Systematic literature review of health-related quality of life in locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Has it yet become state-of-the-art?

Lung cancer and its treatment have an important impact on the patients' health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). A systematic literature review of prospective clinical studies published since 2005 and measuring HRQoL in patients with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA- NSCLC) was performed. Besides reviewing the HRQoL impact of LA-NSCLC treatment, it critically examined the frequency, methodology and quality of HRQoL data collection and analysis in LA-NSCLC clinical studies. Out of 814 potentially eligible publications, only 27 (representing 19 individual studies) met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies documented an impact on HRQoL. Large variability in use of HRQoL instruments, statistical analysis and methodological quality was observed. Reporting of HRQoL data lacks standardization, but recent initiatives establishing recommendations to standardize the analysis and reporting of HRQoL in cancer trials are expected to address these issues. Overall, more research is needed to evaluate the treatment impact on HRQoL in both clinical trials and daily care.

Patterns of care for non-small cell lung cancer patients in Belgium: A population-based study

Guidelines recommend surgery for Stage I-II, chemoradiation for Stage III and systemic therapy for Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, patient related factors and patient preferences influence treatment decisions. We investigated patterns of care for Belgian NSCLC patients in 2010-2011, based on population-based data from the Belgian Cancer Registry and administrative databases. The relationship between patient characteristics, institutional diagnostic volume, type of treatment and survival was investigated. Overall, 20.8% of patients received no oncological treatment. 59% and 22.1% of Stage I-II patients received primary surgery or (chemo)radiation respectively. 34% of Stage III patients received chemoradiation and 17% of Stage IIIA patients had surgery. 70% of Stage IV patients received chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Moderate variability between centres was observed. For Stage IV, systemic therapy was less frequently used in higher volume centres and 1-year survival was lower in centres that had ≥ 50 new patients yearly. Although not all NSCLC patients received treatment as ideally recommended by guidelines, these results do not necessarily represent poor quality of care as patient characteristics and preferences need to be taken into account. Treatment options targeted towards patients with co-morbidity or unfit patients is warranted to improve outcomes of all NSCLC patients.

Identifying the Optimal Radiation Dose in Locally Advanced Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy Without Concurrent Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The optimal radiation dose for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not known for patients who receive sequential chemoradiation (CRT) or definitive radiotherapy (RT) only. Our objective was to determine whether a benefit exists for radiation dose escalation for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients included in our retrospective analysis had undergone RT for NSCLC from 2004 to 2013, had not undergone surgery, and received a dose ≥ 50.0 Gy. Patients who received concurrent CRT were excluded from the analysis, leaving 336 patients for analysis. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), local failure (LF), and distant failure (DF).

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, Karnofsky performance status, gross tumor volume, and treatment modality, patients treated with a radiation dose > 66 Gy had significantly improved OS compared with those treated with < 60 Gy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.87; P = .008). After adjusting for smoking history and radiologic tumor size, patients treated with a radiation dose > 66 Gy had a significantly decreased risk of LF compared with those treated with < 60 Gy (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.91; P = .02). The radiation dose was not an independent prognostic factor of DF on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

When controlling for tumor volume and/or dimensions and other independent prognostic factors, patients with locally advanced NSCLC who were not candidates for concurrent CRT benefited from a radiation dose > 66 Gy versus < 60 Gy with improved OS and reduced LF. An increased radiation dose did not appear to affect the incidence of DF.

Multidisciplinary team approach for the management of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: searching the evidence to guide the decision

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is composed of heterogeneous subgroups that require a multidisciplinary team approach in order to ensure optimal therapy for each patient. Since 2010, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network has recommended chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for bulky mediastinal disease and surgical combination for those patients with single-station N2 involvement who respond to neoadjuvant therapy. According to lung cancer tumor boards, thoracic surgeons make a decision on the resectability of the tumor, if it is determined to be unresectable, concurrent CRT (CCRT) is considered the next choice. However, the survival benefit of CCRT over sequential CRT or radiotherapy alone carries the risk of additional toxicity. Considering severe adverse events that may lead to death, fit patients who are able to tolerate CCRT must be identified by multidisciplinary tumor board. Decelerated approaches, such as sequential CRT or high-dose radiation alone may be a valuable alternative for patients who are not eligible for CCRT. As a new treatment strategy, investigators are interested in the application of the innovative radiation techniques, trimodality therapy combining surgery after high-dose definitive CCRT, and the combination of radiation with targeted or immunotherapy agents. The updated results and on-going studies are thoroughly reviewed in this article.

Radical hypo-fractionated radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy in lung cancer : A retrospective study of elderly patients with stage III disease

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyse the feasibility and acute toxicity of radical hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (RT) for elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective evaluation of treatment with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of elderly patients affected by stage III inoperable NSCLC. The dose prescription was 56 Gy in 20 fractions, 55 Gy in 22 fractions, or 50 Gy in 20 fractions. Target volume included only the primary lesion and the infiltrated lymph nodes. The primary end point was acute and late toxicity, while secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In all, 41 patients were included in this analysis. The mean age of the patients was 78.6 years, and 22 patients had staged IIIA while 19 patients had stage IIIB disease. All but one patient had pathological nodal involvement; 15 patients received chemotherapy before RT. Acute grade 1-2 toxicity was recorded in 25 (61%) patients. Late toxicity was recorded in 13 (32%) patients. No cases of G3 or G4 toxicity were recorded. Complete response was obtained in two (5%) patients, 26 (63%) showed a partial response, and two (5%) experience disease progression. At a mean follow-up of 9.9 months (range, 1.1-25.4), 17 patients had died from disease progression, one died from other causes, and 23 were alive. Median OS was 13.7 ± 1.5 months (95% CI: 10.7-16.7), OS at 12 and 18 months was 51.3 ± 9.5% and 35.1 ± 10.1%, respectively. Median PFS was 13.7 ± 2.3 months (95% CI: 9.1-18.2), and PFS at 12 and 18 months was 50.1 ± 9.9% and 38.9 ± 10.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radical hypo-fractionated VMAT is a promising treatment for locally advanced NSCLC in the elderly. The use of hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for lung cancer in older patients can be considered a valuable approach, particularly for patients with poor performance status or refusing other treatment approaches.

The Challenges Faced in Developing Novel Drug Radiation Combinations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in the UK. Outcomes for patients with this disease remain poor and new strategies to treat this disease require investigation. One potential option is to combine novel agents with radiotherapy in clinical studies. Here we discuss some of the important issues to consider when combining novel agents with radiotherapy, together with potential solutions as discussed at a recent Clinical Translational Radiotherapy Group (CTRad) workshop.

Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the elderly: Patient characteristics predictive for tolerance and survival of chemoradiation in daily clinical practice

BACKGROUND

In unselected elderly with stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), evidence is scarce regarding motives and effects of treatment modalities.

METHODS

Hospital-based multicenter retrospective study including unresectable stage III NSCLC patients aged ⩾70 and diagnosed between 2009 and 2013 (N=216). Treatment motives and tolerance (no unplanned hospitalizations and completion of treatment), and survival were derived from medical records and the Netherlands Cancer Registry.

RESULTS

Patients received concurrent chemoradiation (cCHRT, 33%), sequential chemoradiation (sCHRT, 24%), radical radiotherapy (RT, 16%) or no curative treatment (27%). Comorbidity, performance status (58%) and patient refusal (15%) were the most common motives for omitting cCHRT. Treatment tolerance for cCHRT and sCHRT was worse in case of severe comorbidity (OR 6.2 (95%CI 1.6-24) and OR 6.4 (95%CI 1.8-22), respectively). One-year survival was 57%, 50%, 49% and 26% for cCHRT, sCHRT, RT and no curative treatment, respectively. Compared to cCHRT, survival was worse for no curative treatment (P=0.000), but not significantly worse for sCHRT and RT (P=0.38).

CONCLUSION

Although relatively fit elderly were assigned to cCHRT, treatment tolerance was worse, especially for those with severe comorbidity. Survival seemed not significantly better as compared to sCHRT or RT. Prospective studies in this vital and understudied area are needed.

Radical Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: When Should Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Not Be Used?

Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy confers a significant, but small, benefit for overall survival compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy. The improvement of about 4% with a hazard ratio of 0.85 has only been proven for fit patients with a good organ function. From non-randomised trials, there are no indications that concurrent chemoradiotherapy is clearly superior to the sequential approach in other patients. Moreover, radiotherapy alone can lead to 5 year survival rates of 20%. As the differences in long-term survival between the treatment options are small, even fit patients should be offered, via a shared decision process, the choice between concurrent and non-concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In less fit patients, sequential chemoradiotherapy offers a chance for long-term survival and cure with less toxicity than the concurrent approach.

Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is efficient in biodosimetry during radiotherapy of lung cancer

The aim of the present study was to determine if the serum levels of early markers of inflammation, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) were correlated with the radiation dose received by the pulmonary and mediastinal structures of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This pilot study included 26 patients with NSCLC who received total radiation doses ranging from 54 to 74 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction). Cytokines were measured at baseline by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay, and following administration of total doses of 20 and 40 Gy. A control group of 26 participants was sampled for comparisons with patient baseline cytokine levels. Only data from the 40-Gy cytokine blood levels of patients with NSCLC were identified to be correlated with histograms of the parameters of each patient's radiotherapy protocol. The IL-6, TNF-α and CRP median baseline levels of the patients with NSCLC were significantly higher than those of the controls (all P≤0.01). No differences were observed between the LBP levels of the patients and controls [median, 36.34 (25-75%; 31.35-39.27) vs. 36.92 (30.20-44.05) µg/ml, respectively; P=0.42]. No significant differences in the levels of the four cytokines between baseline, and at 20 and 40 Gy were observed [IL-6 (P=0.19); TNF-α (P=0.68); CRP (P=0.44) and LBP (P=0.29)]. LBP was significantly and positively correlated with the mean radiation dose to the lung (r=0.409; P=0.038), and showed a positive correlation with the percentage of lung volume exposed to at least 20 Gy of the planned radiation dose (r=0.3536; P=0.0764). CRP levels were positively correlated with the mean radiation dose to the esophagus (r=0.404; P=0.041); however, IL-6, TNF-α and CRP were not significantly associated with other lung dosimetry parameters. Thus, LBP levels were correlated with radiation exposure of pulmonary tissues, and LBP may be a marker that warrants further investigation on radiotoxicity in NSCLC patients.

Randomized phase III PITCAP trial and meta-analysis of induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation with or without concurrent taxane-based chemotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Chemo-radiotherapy is standard of care in the treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC. We aimed at assessing whether the addition of concurrent taxane-chemotherapy to thoracic irradiation following chemotherapy was able to improve treatment outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In PITCAP trial, patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were randomized to receive 2 cycles of platinum-paclitaxel followed by 60-61.2Gy thoracic irradiation (control arm) or by same radiotherapy with concomitant weekly paclitaxel (experimental arm). A literature-based meta-analysis including all studies with same design was also performed.

RESULTS

At the time of the second interim analysis, when 151 patients were randomized, accrual was terminated. With a median follow-up of 6.1 years, median survival was 13.2 vs 15.1 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 19.5 vs 21.2% in the control and experimental arm, respectively (HR: 0.97; 95% CI 0.69-1.36; p=0.845). Treatment toxicity was manageable in both arms. The meta-analysis of 5 trials (n=866) confirmed the lack of a meaningful effect on 1-year overall survival of a taxane added concurrently to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support a meaningful survival benefit with the addition of single agent taxane given concurrently to radiotherapy after platinum-based induction in locally advanced NSCLC.

Overcoming toxicity-challenges in chemoradiation for non-small cell lung cancer

Concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the treatment of choice for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a modest survival benefit over sequential chemoradiation or radiotherapy (SCRT) alone. However, this benefit is at the cost of increasing acute toxicity such as esophagitis. Previous analysis revealed several predictive parameters in dose-volume and patient characteristics which helped us to identify those patients at risk for severe esophagus toxicity. As a result, supportive care interventions including individualized patient information, dietary guidance, adequate medication, hydration and tubefeeding could be initiated. This paper discusses the challenges in overcoming chemoradiation induced acute esophageal toxicity (AET).

[Non-small cell lung cancer irradiation in elderly]

People over the age of 65 are often excluded from participation in oncological clinical trials. However, more than half of patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer are older than 65 years. Any therapeutic strategy must be discussed in multidisciplinary meetings after adapted geriatric assessment. Patients who benefit from the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of Balducci and Extermann are those whose G8 screening tool score is less than or equal to 14. Age itself does not contraindicate a curative therapeutic approach. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for early stages in elderly patients who are medically inoperable or who refuse surgery, because it significantly increases overall survival. Mostly sequential (rarely concomitant) chemoradiotherapy can be proposed to elderly patients with locally advanced stages in good general state of health. For the others, an exclusive palliative radiotherapy, a single or dual agent of chemotherapy, a targeted drug or best supportive care only may be discussed.

Protocol for the isotoxic intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

The majority of stage III patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are unsuitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the non-surgical gold standard of care. As the alternative treatment options of sequential chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone are associated with high local failure rates, various intensification strategies have been employed. There is evidence to suggest that altered fractionation using hyperfractionation, acceleration, dose escalation, and individualisation may be of benefit. The MAASTRO group have pioneered the concept of 'isotoxic' radiotherapy allowing for individualised dose escalation using hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy based on predefined normal tissue constraints. This study aims to evaluate whether delivering isotoxic radiotherapy using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is achievable.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Isotoxic IMRT is a multicentre feasibility study. From June 2014, a total of 35 patients from 7 UK centres, with a proven histological or cytological diagnosis of inoperable NSCLC, unsuitable for concurrent chemoradiotherapy will be recruited. A minimum of 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy is mandated before starting isotoxic radiotherapy. The dose of radiation will be increased until one or more of the organs at risk tolerance or the maximum dose of 79.2 Gy is reached. The primary end point is feasibility, with accrual rates, local control and overall survival our secondary end points. Patients will be followed up for 5 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has received ethical approval (REC reference: 13/NW/0480) from the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) Committee North West-Greater Manchester South. The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented internationally.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01836692; Pre-results.

How many new cancer patients in Europe will require radiotherapy by 2025? An ESTRO-HERO analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this HERO study was to assess the number of new cancer patients that will require at least one course of radiotherapy by 2025.

METHODS

European cancer incidence data by tumor site and country for 2012 and 2025 was extracted from the GLOBOCAN database. The projection of the number of new cases took into account demographic factors (age and size of the population). Population based stages at diagnosis were taken from four European countries. Incidence and stage data were introduced in the Australian Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CCORE) model.

RESULTS

Among the different tumor sites, the highest expected relative increase by 2025 in treatment courses was prostate cancer (24%) while lymphoma (13%), head and neck (12%) and breast cancer (10%) were below the average. Based on the projected cancer distributions in 2025, a 16% expected increase in the number of radiotherapy treatment courses was estimated. This increase varied across European countries from less than 5% to more than 30%.

CONCLUSION

With the already existing disparity in radiotherapy resources in mind, the data provided here should act as a leverage point to raise awareness among European health policy makers of the need for investment in radiotherapy.

Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy - Escalated dose (CHART-ED): A phase I study

INTRODUCTION

Patients who present with locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be suitable for radical radiotherapy. A randomised trial of 563 patients compared CHART and conventional radical radiotherapy (60 Gy/30f) given over 6 weeks and suggested that CHART resulted in a 9% improvement in 2-year survival (Saunders et al., 1999). RT dose escalation for both conventional and CHARTWEL (CHART-WeekEndLess) - fractionation schedules is feasible with modern 3-dimensional CT-based planning techniques and we initiated a phase I CHART dose escalation study in 2009.

METHODS

Patients with WHO performance status 0-2 histologically confirmed, inoperable, stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer were recruited into an open phase I dose escalation trial. Three cohorts of six patients were recruited sequentially. Total dose was escalated from standard CHART radiotherapy of 54 Gy/36f/12 days to 57.6G y (2 × 1.8 Gy fractions on day 15, Group 1), 61.2 Gy (4 × 1.8 Gy fractions on days 15-16, Group 2) and 64.8 Gy (6 × 1.8 Gy fractions on days 15-17, Group 3).

RESULTS

Between April 2010 and May 2012, 18 patients were enrolled from 5 UK centres and received escalated dose radiotherapy. 14 were male, 16 squamous cell histology and 12 were stage IIIA or IIIB. The median age was 70 years and baseline characteristics were similar across the three dose cohorts. One patient did not start escalated radiotherapy but all remaining patients completed their planned radiotherapy schedules. Of these 9 patients have died to date with a median survival of 2 years across the three cohorts. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (fatigue, dysphagia, nausea and anorexia - classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0) were reported in 6 patients but the pre-specified dose limiting toxicities (grade 4 early oesophagitis; grade 3 cardiac, spinal cord and pneumonitis) were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

CHART remains a radiotherapy schedule in routine use across the UK and in this dose escalation study no dose limiting toxicities were observed. We feel the dose of 64.8 Gy/42f/17 days should be taken forward into further clinical trials. The sample size used in this study was small so we plan a randomised phase II study that includes other radiotherapy schedules to confirm safety and select an accelerated sequential chemo-radiotherapy schedule to take into phase III studies.

Molecular targeted therapy to improve radiotherapeutic outcomes for non-small cell lung carcinoma

Effective treatments for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain elusive. The use of concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (RT) has improved outcomes, but a significant proportion of NSCLC patients are too frail to be able to tolerate an intense course of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The development of targeted therapies ignited new hope in enhancing radiotherapeutic outcomes. The use of targeted therapies against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has offered slight but significant benefits in concurrent use with RT for certain patients in certain situations. However, despite theoretical promise, the use of anti-angiogenics, such as bevacizumab and endostatin, has not proven clinically safe or useful in combination with RT. However, many new targeted agents against new targets are being experimented for combined use with RT. It is hoped that these agents may provide a significant breakthrough in the radiotherapeutic management of NSCLC. The current review provides a brief discussion about the targets, the targeted therapies, the rationale for the use of targeted therapies in combination with RT, and a brief review of the existing data on the subject.

What is changing in radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients? A review

Radiotherapy treatment continues to have a relevant impact in the treatment of nonsmall cell cancer (NSCLC). Use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy is considered the gold standard in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC but clinical outcomes are not satisfactory. Introduction of new radiotherapy technology and chemotherapy regimens are under investigation in this setting with the goal to improve unsatisfactory results. We report how radiotherapy is changing in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

125I Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer After Progression of Concurrent Radiochemotherapy

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of computed tomography (CT)-guided I seed implantation for locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after progression of concurrent radiochemotherapy (CCRT).We reviewed 78 locally advanced NSCLC patients who had each one cycle of first-line CCRT but had progressive disease identified from January 2006 to February 2015 at our institution. A total of 37 patients with 44 lesions received CT-guided percutaneous I seed implantation and second-line chemotherapy (group A), while 41 with 41 lesions received second-line chemotherapy (group B).Patients in group A and B received a total of 37 and 41 first cycle of CCRT treatment. The median follow-up was 19 (range 3-36) months. After the second treatment, the total response rate (RR) in tumor response accounted for 63.6% in group A, which was significantly higher than that of group B (41.5%) (P = 0.033). The median progression-free survival time (PFST) was 8.00 ± 1.09 months and 5.00 ± 0.64 months in groups A and B (P = 0.011). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for group A were 56.8%, 16.2%, and 2.7%, respectively. For group B, OS rates were 36.6%, 9.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. The median OS time was 14.00 ± 1.82 months and 10.00 ± 1.37 months for groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.059). Similar toxicity reactions were found in both groups. Tumor-related clinical symptoms were significantly reduced and the patients' quality of life was obviously improved.CT-guided I seed implantation proved to be potentially beneficial in treating localized advanced NSCLC; it achieved good local control rates and relieved clinical symptoms without increasing side effects.

A Phase 2 Trial of Concurrent Chemotherapy and Proton Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results and Reflections Following Early Closure of a Single-Institution Study

PURPOSE

Proton therapy has been shown to reduce radiation dose to organs at risk (OAR) and could be used to safely escalate the radiation dose. We analyzed outcomes in a group of phase 2 study patients treated with dose-escalated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage 3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2009 through 2013, LU02, a phase 2 trial of proton therapy delivering 74 to 80 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction with concurrent chemotherapy for stage 3 NSCLC, was opened to accrual at our institution. Due to slow accrual and competing trials, the study was closed after just 14 patients (stage IIIA, 9 patients; stage IIIB, 5 patients) were accrued over 4 years. During that same time period, 55 additional stage III patients were treated with high-dose proton therapy, including 7 in multi-institutional proton clinical trials, 4 not enrolled due to physician preference, and 44 who were ineligible based on strict entry criteria. An unknown number of patients were ineligible for enrollment due to insurance coverage issues and thus were treated with photon radiation. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 52 months.

RESULTS

Two-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 57% and 25%, respectively. Median lengths of overall survival and progression-free survival were 33 months and 14 months, respectively. There were no acute grade 3 toxicities related to proton therapy. Late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary toxicity each occurred in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-escalated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging results among a small cohort of patients. Unfortunately, single-institution proton studies may be difficult to accrue and consideration for pragmatic and/or multicenter trial design should be considered when developing future proton clinical trials.

2nd ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer: locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

To complement the existing treatment guidelines for all tumour types, ESMO organises consensus conferences to focus on specific issues in each type of tumour. The 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer was held on 11-12 May 2013 in Lugano. A total of 35 experts met to address several questions on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in each of four areas: pathology and molecular biomarkers, first-line/second and further lines of treatment in advanced disease, early-stage disease and locally advanced disease. For each question, recommendations were made including reference to the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. This consensus paper focuses on locally advanced disease.

Discovery and Validation of Predictive Biomarkers of Survival for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Radiotherapy: Two Proteins With Predictive Value

Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related death world-wide. Radiotherapy alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently there is no predictive marker with clinical utility to guide treatment decisions in NSCLC patients undergoing radiotherapy. Identification of such markers would allow treatment options to be considered for more effective therapy. To enable the identification of appropriate protein biomarkers, plasma samples were collected from patients with non-small cell lung cancer before and during radiotherapy for longitudinal comparison following a protocol that carries sufficient power for effective discovery proteomics. Plasma samples from patients pre- and during radiotherapy who had survived > 18 mo were compared to the same time points from patients who survived < 14 mo using an 8 channel isobaric tagging tandem mass spectrometry discovery proteomics platform. Over 650 proteins were detected and relatively quantified. Proteins which showed a change during radiotherapy were selected for validation using an orthogonal antibody-based approach. Two of these proteins were verified in a separate patient cohort: values of CRP and LRG1 combined gave a highly significant indication of extended survival post one week of radiotherapy treatment.

Induction chemotherapy with cetuximab, vinorelbine-cisplatin followed by thoracic radiotherapy and concurrent cetuximab, vinorelbine-cisplatin in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The modest benefits from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) warrant a more effective treatment regimen. We herein report mature data of a phase I/II study testing the addition of cetuximab to induction vinorelbine/cisplatin (NP) followed by concurrent cetuximab NP and thoracic radiation in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were treated with weekly cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2, day 1, week 1; maintenance dose 250 mg/m2 from week 2 to the end of CCRT) and induction vinorelbine (25 mg/m2, days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2, day 1) every 3 weeks for 2 cycles from week 2. Concomitant thoracic radiation (60-66 Gy/2 Gy) and two cycles of NP (vinorelbine 12.5 mg/m2, days 1 and 8; cisplatin 25mg/m2, days 1 to 3, every 3 weeks) were started from week 7. The primary endpoints were toxicities; the secondary endpoints encompassed response rate and survival.

RESULTS

In total, 27 patients were enrolled, and 24 completed the full regimen. No treatment-related death occurred. Severe (CTCAE Grade 3 or high) adverse events were experienced by 81% patients (22/27), mostly haematologic. Severe non-haematologic toxicities including nausea/vomiting, intestinal obstruction, pulmonary infection and esophagitis, each of which was detected in <7% of patients. With a median follow-up of 26.7 months, the median survival was 26.7 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 88.9% and 51.9%, respectively. Six patients remained progression-free to date, and the median progression-free survival was 13.5 months. The overall response rate was 63% and 77.8% after the induction and CCRT phases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Weekly cetuximab with induction vinorelbine/cisplatin followed by concurrent cetuximab vinorelbine/cisplatin thoracic radiation is feasible with a manageable toxicity profile and clinically active.

Concurrent systemic therapy with radiotherapy for the treatment of poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), despite the increasing number of these patients in current clinical practice. In terms of survival, the combination of concurrent systemic therapy with standard radiotherapy might be advantageous over radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this review is to ascertain the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the combination of concurrent systemic therapy and standard radiotherapy in these patients.

METHODS

A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed and Science Direct for relevant publications; data reported at major conferences in abstract form were also included.

RESULTS

In unresectable stage III NSCLC, advanced age, poor performance status, weight loss and comorbidities are factors that influence treatment options and disease outcomes in clinical practice. Prospective studies including poor-risk patients have been reviewed. Trials specifically recruiting poor-risk patients have been separated into those using chemotherapy and those using targeted agents with or without chemotherapy. Only two phase III studies specifically including poor-risk patients have been published. Some recent studies suggested that tolerable radio-sensitizing therapy combined with radiotherapy can provide longer survival outcomes than those reported earlier with chemo-radiotherapy or with radiotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an unmet need to develop well-designed clinical trials with tolerable combinations of systemic therapy and radiotherapy specifically tailored to this lung cancer population. Such trials should incorporate careful comorbidity measurement and, in older adults, a validated geriatric assessment.

A phase I study of concurrent individualized, isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy and cisplatin-vinorelbine-cetuximab in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In this open-label phase I study, the maximum-tolerated dose of cetuximab with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT) in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer together with individualized, isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy (RT) was investigated.

METHODS

Patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, World Health Organization performance status 0-1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second more than 50%, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity more than 50%, weight loss less than 10%, and no severe comorbidity were enrolled. Patients without progression after one to two cycles of gemcitabine-carboplatin were included and treated with cetuximab 400 mg/kg d7 and 250 mg/kg weekly together with RT and cisplatin (50 mg/m d1, 8; 40 mg/m d22)-vinorelbine for 5 weeks. Vinorelbine was escalated in three steps; (1) 10 mg/m d1, 8 and 8 mg/m d22, 29; (2) 20 mg/m d1, 8 and 8 mg/m d22, 29; (3) 20 mg/m d1, 8; 15 mg/m d22, 29. An individualized prescribed RT dose based on normal tissue dose constraints was applied (e.g., mean lung dose 19 Gy). The primary endpoint was the maximum-tolerated dose 3 months after the end of C-CRT; secondary endpoints were toxicity and metabolic response as assessed by positron emission tomography.

RESULTS

Between September 2007 and October 2010, 25 patients (12 men, 13 women, mean age 59 years) were included. The mean RT dose was 62 ± 6.6 Gy. The vinorelbine dose could be escalated to dose level 3. Twelve of 25 patients experienced greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity (esophagitis 3, rash 1, diarrhea 1, cough 1, dyspnea 1, vomiting 1, and pulmonary embolism 1). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. One patient with a complete pathological response in dose level 3 developed a fatal hemoptysis 4 months after RT. Metabolic remissions were observed in 19 of 22 patients.

CONCLUSION

C-CRT with cetuximab and cisplatin-vinorelbine is safe to deliver at full dose. The recommended phase II dose is therefore cetuximab 400 mg/m d7 and 250 mg/m weekly, cisplatin 50 mg/m d1, 8; 40 mg/m d22 and vinorelbine 20 mg/m d1, 8; 15 mg/m d22, 29 for 5 weeks together with RT.

International patterns of radiotherapy practice for non-small cell lung cancer

Radiotherapy is an important treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are models of radiotherapy utilization that estimate the proportion of patients with NSCLC who have an evidence-based indication for radiotherapy. These estimates range from 46%-68% for radiotherapy utilization at diagnosis and 64%-75% overall. However, actual radiotherapy utilization throughout much of the world is lower than this, ranging from 28%-53%, with the largest differences between actual and estimated radiotherapy utilization seen in stage III NSCLC. Some of this discrepancy is attributable to the assumptions in the models that are based on broad factors such as stage and performance status. Characteristics of the population with underlying lung cancer that often has comorbidities or compromised respiratory function also influence the ability to deliver radiotherapy safely. Sociodemographic factors such as race and income have been found to affect access to radiotherapy in certain jurisdictions. The type of clinician or medical setting the patient presents to initially can also influence radiotherapy use in NSCLC. Potential solutions to improve appropriate radiotherapy utilization for NSCLC include restructuring models of care to ensure that all patients with lung cancer are managed within a multidisciplinary team including a radiation oncologist.

How Do Elderly Poor Prognosis Patients Tolerate Palliative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Stage III? A Subset Analysis From a Clinical Phase III Trial

BACKGROUND

In a phase III trial of patients with unresectable, locally advanced, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a poor prognosis, palliative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) provided a significantly better outcome than chemotherapy alone, except among performance status (PS) 2 patients. In the present subgroup analysis, we evaluated the effect on patients aged ≥ 70 years (42% of all included) compared with patients aged < 70 years enrolled in the trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received 4 courses of intravenous carboplatin and oral vinorelbine. The experimental arm also received radiotherapy (42 Gy in 15 fractions). The included patients were required to have large tumors (> 8 cm), weight loss (> 10% within the previous 6 months) and/or PS 2.

RESULTS

The overall survival was increased among the CRT patients in both age groups, but the difference was significant only in patients aged < 70 years (median survival, 14.8 vs. 9.7 months; P = .001; age ≥ 70 years, median survival, 10.2 vs. 9.1 months; P = .09). Patients aged ≥ 70 years experienced better preserved health-related quality of life (QOL) and significantly less hematologic toxicity. The 2- and 3-year survival was significantly increased in both age groups receiving CRT.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years with unresectable, stage III, locally advanced, NSLCL and a poor prognosis can tolerate CRT with the doses adjusted to age and palliative intent. These results indicate that CRT can provide both survival and QOL benefits in elderly patients, except for those with PS 2 or worse. The male predominance in the ≥ 70-year-age group and the reduced chemotherapy intensity for the patients aged > 75 years might explain the lack of significant survival improvement among those patients aged ≥ 70 years.

[Forty years of progress in the therapeutic management of lung cancer]

This article reviews and describes the progress made in the therapeutic management of patients suffering from a lung cancer, outlining the major improvements made and suggesting some perspectives for the future.

Prospective, randomized, controlled, and open study in primarily inoperable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients given sequential radiochemotherapy with or without epoetin alfa

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Induction chemotherapy is associated with anemia in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing radiotherapy. This randomized, open-label study compared the effect of sequential radiochemotherapy (RCHT) versus RCHT + epoetin alfa (RCHT + EPO), with respect to 2-year overall survival (OS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients ⩾18 years received sequential RCHT; one arm also received EPO (chemotherapy day 1, when Hb<12 g/dL). Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, and Cox-regression methods were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 385 patients randomized (RCHT + EPO: n = 195; RCHT: n = 190), 78 (RCTH + EPO: 46 [23.6%]; RCHT: 32 [16.8%]) were anemic at baseline. Two-year OS was higher in RCHT + EPO-treated versus RCHT-treated (28.5% [95% CI: 22.2-35.1%] versus 20.6% [95% CI: 15.1-26.8%] [p = 0.2278]), and requirement for RBC transfusion was lower (24/195 [12.3%] versus 61/190 [32.1%]). In anemic (baseline) patients (post hoc analysis), median survival was shorter in RCTH-treated (212 days) versus RCHT + EPO-treated (343 days) (Hazard ratio = 1.62 [95% CI: 0.99-2.63], p = 0.0525). Adverse events were documented in 72.7% (RCHT + EPO: 75.0%; RCHT: 70.5%) patients, and thrombovascular events (TVEs) in 45 patients (RCHT + EPO: 16.7%; RCHT: 7.9%; p = 0.0099).

CONCLUSIONS

A statistically non-significant trend for 2-year OS was observed in a sub-group of EPO-treated NSCLC-patients with baseline anemia, although this trend was not maintained in the overall population with inoperable NSCLC.

Older patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: long-term survival after concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Considering the various comorbidities associated with aging, the feasibility and usefulness of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in older patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a controversial issue. Here, we compared the feasibility of CRT and the effects of various comorbidities on the prognosis of a minimally selected population of inoperable NSCLC patients aged 60-77 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 161 patients with inoperable NSCLC who received CRT with a target radiation dose greater than  60 Gy and platinum-based chemotherapy from 1998 to 2007. The total population included 69 patients aged 60-69 years and 53 aged 70-77 years. These two age cohorts were included in the study with a follow-up of a median 14.5 months.

RESULTS

The two groups showed no differences in long-term survival, as reflected by the 5-year survival rates of 13.0 ± 4.1 % (60- to 69-year-olds) and 14.4 ± 4.9 % (70- to 77-year-olds). During the treatment phase, the groups were comparable in terms of toxicity and the feasibility of chemotherapy. Compared to patients in their 60s, the septuagenarians had more pulmonary comorbidities (p = 0.02), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04), cardiac comorbidities (p = 0.08), and previous cancer disease (p = 0.08) that exerted a negative effect on survival. In patients without comorbidities, there were no differences between the age groups.

CONCLUSION

Age is not a contraindication for concurrent CRT per se, because elderly patients do not have a worse long-term prognosis than younger seniors. However, "elderly patients" (≥ 70-77 years) have more concomitant diseases associated with shorter survival than "moderately aged patients" (≥ 60-69 years).

Hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Radical radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to the fact that many patients are medically or surgically inoperable. Advances in technology and radiotherapy delivery allow targeted treatment of the disease, whilst minimizing the dose to organs at risk. This in turn creates an opportunity for dose escalation and the prospect of tailoring radiotherapy treatment to each patient. This is especially important in patients deemed unsuitable for chemotherapy or surgery, where there is a need to increase the therapeutic gain from radical radiotherapy alone. Recent research into fractionation schedules, with hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy regimes has been promising. How to combine these new fractionated schedules with dose escalation and chemotherapy remains open to debate and there is local, national and international variation in management with a lack of overall consensus. An overview of the current literature on hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy in NSCLC is provided.

Combining targeted agents and hypo- and hyper-fractionated radiotherapy in NSCLC

Radical radiotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) either as single modality treatment for poor performance status patients or with sequential or concomitant chemotherapy for good performance status patients. Advances in understanding of tumour molecular biology, targeted drug development and experiences of novel agents in the advanced disease setting have brought targeted agents into the NSCLC clinic. In parallel experience using modified accelerated fractionation schedules in locally advanced disease have demonstrated improved outcomes compared to conventional fractionation in the single modality and sequential chemo-radiotherapy settings. Early studies of targeted agents combined with (chemo-) radiotherapy in locally advanced disease in different clinical settings are discussed below and important areas for future studies are high-lighted.

Early body weight loss during concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation-esophagitis and weight loss are frequently observed toxicities in patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CT-RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and might be related. The purpose was to investigate whether weight loss already starts early after initiation of CT-RT and precedes radiation-esophagitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective cohort, weight and esophagitis grade ≥2 were assessed during the first weeks of (CT-)RT in patients treated with concurrent (n = 102) or sequential (n = 92) therapy. In a prospective validation study, data on body weight, esophagitis grade ≥2, nutritional intake and muscle strength were obtained before, during and following CT-RT.

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort, early weight loss was observed in concurrently treated patients (p = 0.002), independent of esophagitis ≥ grade 2. Early weight loss was also observed in the prospective cohort (p = 0.003) and was not accompanied by decreases in nutritional intake. In addition lower limb muscle strength rapidly declined (p = 0.042). In the later weeks of treatment, further body weight loss occurred (p < 0.001) despite increased nutritional supplementation and body weight was only partly recovered after 4 weeks post CT-RT (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Weight loss during concurrent CT-RT for NSCLC starts early and prior to onset of esophagitis, requiring timely and intense nutritional rehabilitation.

Weekly administration of paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation in previously untreated elderly patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A case series of 20 patients

Elderly patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials that evaluate chemoradiotherapy, due to their poor functional status, coexisting illnesses and limited life expectancy. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group 0301 trial (JCOG0301) was the first study to demonstrate that thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with daily low-dose carboplatin may improve the outcome of elderly patients with stage III NSCLC. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of chemoradiotherapy, including platinum doublets, have not been clearly determined in this patient population. We retrospectively assessed the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and concurrent TRT in patients aged ≥75 years with previously untreated locally advanced NSCLC. Between February, 2004 and July, 2013, we collected the data of 20 patients treated with weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin for 6 weeks and concurrent TRT. The objective response rate was 90%, the disease control rate was 95%, the median progression-free survival was 8.63 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.7-16.7] and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.1 months (95% CI: 10.7-41.6). There were no grade 4 hematological or non-hematological toxicities and no reported treatment-related deaths. Therefore, platinum doublet therapy in combination with TRT did not provide a clinically significant survival benefit in our population of elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. However, the present study demonstrated the good feasibility and safety of this regimen. Further prospective clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platinum doublet with TRT in elderly patients.

Challenges in optimizing chemoradiation in locally advanced non small-cell lung cancers in India

Data supporting use of concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced lung cancers comes from clinical trials from developed countries. Applicability and outcomes of such schedules in developing countries is not widely reported. There are various challenges in delivering chemoradiation in locally advanced non small cell lung cancer in developing countries which is highlighted by an audit of patients treated with chemoradiation in our center. This article deals with the challenges in the context of a developing country. We conclude that sequential chemoradiotherapy is better tolerated than concurrent chemoradiation in Indian patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Patients with stage IIIa, normal weight or overweight, and adequate baseline pulmonary function should be offered concurrent chemoradiation.

Long-term survival of stage T4N0-1 and single station IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients treated with definitive chemo-radiotherapy using individualised isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy (INDAR)

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage T4N0-1 or single nodal station IIIA-N2 are two stage III sub-groups for which the outcome of non-surgical therapy is not well known. We investigated the results of individualised isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy (INDAR) and chemotherapy in this setting.

METHODS

Analysis of NSCLC patients included in 2 prospective trials (NCT00573040 and NCT00572325) stage T4N0-1 or IIIA-N2 with 1 pathologic nodal station, treated with chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) using INDAR with concurrent or sequential platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was updated and calculated from date of diagnosis (Kaplan-Meier). Toxicity was scored following CTCAEv3.0. To allow comparison with other articles the subgroups were also analysed separately for toxicity, progression free and overall survival.

RESULTS

83 patients (42 T4N0-1 and 41 IIIA-N2) were identified: the median radiotherapy dose was 65Gy. Thirty-seven percent of patients received sequential CRT and 63% received concurrent CRT. At a median follow-up of 48 months the median OS for T4N0-1 patients was 34 months with 55% 2-year survival and 25% 5-year survival. For stage IIIA-N2 at a median follow-up of 50 months the median OS was 26 months with 2- and 5-year survival rates of 53% and 24%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chemo-radiation using INDAR yields promising survival results in patients with single-station stage IIIA-N2 or T4N0-1 NSCLC.

New radiotherapy approaches in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Radiotherapy plays a major role in the treatment of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly since most patients are not suitable for surgery due to the extent of their disease, advanced age and multiple co-morbidities. Despite advances in local and systemic therapies local control and survival remain poor and there is a sense that a therapeutic plateau has been reached with conventional approaches. Strategies for the intensification of radiotherapy such as dose escalation have shown encouraging results in phase I-II trials, but the outcome of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0617 trial was surprisingly disappointing. Hyperfractionated and/or accelerated fractionating schedules have demonstrated superior survival compared to conventional fractionation at the expense of greater oesophageal toxicity. Modern radiotherapy techniques such as the integration of 4-dimensional computed tomography for planning, intensity modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy have substantially enhanced the accuracy of the radiotherapy delivery through improved target conformality and incorporation of tumour respiratory motion. A number of studies are evaluating personalised radiation treatment including the concept of isotoxic radiotherapy and the boosting of the primary tumour based on functional imaging. Proton beam therapy is currently under investigation in locally advanced NSCLC. These approaches, either alone or in combination could potentially allow for further dose escalation and improvement of the therapeutic ratio and survival for patients with NSCLC.

How can we optimise concurrent chemoradiotherapy for inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer?

Latest evidence sets a clear mandate for concurrent chemoradiotherapy as the current standard of care for inoperable stage III non small cell lung cancer patients with good performance status and minimal co-morbidities. However, a survival plateau has been reached, with disappointing results from dose escalation studies using conventional fractionation and studies investigating the addition of systemic doses of chemotherapy delivered before or after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A review was carried out to address three questions considered fundamental to improving outcome in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: (1) Can radiotherapy regimens be optimised using advanced radiotherapy techniques to improve local control rate and overall survival? (2) Can systemic therapy regimens be optimised to reduce the risk of distant metastases? (3) Should concurrent chemoradiotherapy be considered standard of care for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly? It is clear that further improvement in outcome for these patients will be determined by better local control and by reducing the risk of distant recurrence. Given the technological advances in radiotherapy planning and delivery in recent years plus the abundance of novel targeted therapies exploiting critical oncogenic pathways, further advances in combined drug-radiation treatment for lung cancer seem highly possible.

Accelerated hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for non small cell lung cancer: results from 4 UK centres

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A variety of radiotherapy fractionations are used as potentially curative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer. In the UK, 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks (55/20) is the most commonly used fractionation schedule, though it has not been validated in randomized phase III trials. This audit pooled together existing data from 4 UK centres to produce the largest published series for this schedule.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

4 UK centres contributed data (Cambridge, Cardiff, Glasgow and Sheffield). Case notes and radiotherapy records of radically treated patients between 1999 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Basic patient demographics, tumour characteristics, radiotherapy and survival data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

609 patients were identified of whom 98% received the prescribed dose of 55/20. The median age was 71.3 years, 62% were male. 90% had histologically confirmed NSCLC, 49% had stage I disease. 27% had received chemotherapy (concurrent or sequential) with their radiotherapy. The median overall survival from time of diagnosis was 24.0 months and 2 year overall survival was 50%.

CONCLUSION

These data show respectable results for patients treated with accelerated hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for NSCLC with outcomes comparable to those reported for similar schedules and represent the largest published series to date for 55/20 regime.

Prediction of acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent low-dose Cisplatin

BACKGROUND

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is increasingly used with concurrent chemotherapy but toxicity data are not well investigated. We correlated clinical and dosimetric parameters with acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with IMRT and concurrent low-dose cisplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed age, PS, comorbidities, gross tumor volume, and the volume of the esophagus irradiated with 50 Gy (V50oes) in relation with acute toxicity. The mean lung dose (MLD) and pulmonary toxicity was described. Treatment consisted of 24 × 2, 75 Gy, and daily cisplatin 6 mg/m². Patients with an MLD ≥ 20 Gy or a PS > 2 were excluded from CCRT. Toxicity was prospectively scored using the Common Toxicity Criteria for adverse events version 3.0. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was applied for scoring comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regressions for toxicity and survival estimates (Kaplan-Meier) were used for evaluation.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2011, 188 patients received standard CCRT. In 35% of the patients, acute toxicity grade ≥ 3 was reported. Grade 5 toxicity was scored in 1% of the patients. V50oes (odds ratio [OR], 1.33 per 10% increase; P = .01) and PS ≥ 2 (OR, 3.45; P = .07) were significantly correlated with acute toxicity ≥ grade 3. No differences in toxicity were observed between age groups (< 70 and ≥ 70; P = .26), and those with a CCI score < 5 and ≥ 5, and acute severe toxicity (P = .36). Grade ≥ 3 pulmonary toxicity was seen in 7%. The 1- and 2-year overall survival in stage III disease were 78% and 52%, respectively. Patients with a poor PS or a high CCI score had similar survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent low-dose cisplatin using IMRT is effective in a large cohort of consecutive patients with NSCLC and life threatening toxicity is rare (1%). PS ≥ 2 and V50oes are correlated with acute toxicity grade ≥ 3.