Pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine and its metabolite N-2-glucuronide: Influence of polymorphism of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and drug transporters

Clinically Relevant Effect of UGT1A4*3 on Lamotrigine Serum Concentration Is Restricted to Postmenopausal Women-A Study Matching Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Genotype Data From 534 Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the impact of the UGT1A4*3 variant allele on lamotrigine (LTG) exposure. As no studies have controlled for nongenetic factors, the aim of this study was to compare serum concentrations of LTG in carriers versus noncarriers of UGT1A4*3 adjusting for differences in age, sex, and valproic acid (VPA) comedication.

METHODS

Matched data on serum concentration of LTG and UGT1A4 genotype patients with known information about VPA comedication were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. Linear mixed-model analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the UGT1A4*3 variant on dose-adjusted serum concentrations (C/D ratio) of LTG. Subanalyses were performed to assess the impact of UGT1A4*3 in relation to age, sex, and VPA comedication.

RESULTS

In total, 534 patients (1735 LTG serum concentrations) were included. In the study population, UGT1A4*3 carriers (n = 87; 16.3%) were estimated to have a 13% lower LTG C/D ratio compared with noncarriers (P = 0.01). Subanalyses showed that the quantitative impact of UGT1A4*3 was greatest in postmenopausal women (>50 years) without VPA comedication. In these patients (n = 99), UGT1A4*3 carriers displayed a 40% lower LTG C/D ratio than noncarriers (P = 0.001). The UGT1A4*3 variant had no significant effect on LTG C/D ratio in the other subpopulations (P > 0.1). Regardless of patient subgroup, the concomitant use of VPA was the strongest determinant of LTG exposure by increasing the C/D ratio 2.5-fold (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that UGT1A4*3 generally has a modest impact on LTG exposure, but it could lead to clinically relevant lowering in LTG serum concentration among postmenopausal women. The clinical impact of UGT1A4*3 in these patients needs to be assessed in relation to comedication with VPA, which is associated with a substantial increase in serum concentration of LTG.

Relationship Between UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 Polymorphisms and the Steady-State Plasma Concentrations of Lamotrigine in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depressive Disorder Receiving Lamotrigine as Augmentation Therapy

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, the authors had shown that in treatment-resistant depressive disorder, an early therapeutic response to lamotrigine augmentation therapy is dependent on its plasma concentrations. Lamotrigine is mainly metabolized by UGT1A4 and UGT2B7, and polymorphisms of said UGTs that affect enzyme activities have been reported. This study investigated the effect of these polymorphisms on the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of lamotrigine in patients with treatment-resistant depressive disorder receiving lamotrigine as augmentation therapy.

METHODS

The subjects were 103 depressed patients who had already shown insufficient response to at least 3 psychotropics including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics. The diagnoses were major depressive disorder (n = 46), bipolar II disorder (n = 44), and bipolar I disorder (n = 13). They received augmentation therapy with lamotrigine for 8 weeks. The final doses of lamotrigine were 100 mg/d for 67 subjects who were not taking valproate and 75 mg/d for 36 subjects taking valproate, respectively. Blood sampling was performed at the 8th week. Plasma concentrations of lamotrigine were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The genotypes of UGT1A4 142T>G, UGT2B7 -161C>T, and UGT2B7 372A>G were identified by polymerase chain reaction analyses.

RESULTS

There were no significant relationships between these polymorphisms and the Css of lamotrigine in the subjects regardless of valproate comedication.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that these genetic polymorphisms do not affect the Css of lamotrigine in patients with treatment-resistant depressive disorder receiving lamotrigine as augmentation therapy.

The influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs on lamotrigine serum concentrations in Northwest Chinese Han population with epilepsy

Objective

The aims of this study were to identify the influencing factors such as gender, age, dose and combinations of other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), especially in triple combinations on the pharmacokinetic of Lamotrigine (LTG) in epilepsy patients of Northwest Chinese Han population.

Methods

Data of the LTG concentration and clinical information were analyzed retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Clinical Pharmacy Laboratory of Xi’an Central Hospital between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2018. The independent-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA analysis and Bonferroni and Tamhane T3 post-hoc test, the stepwise multivariate regression analysis were adopted by IBM SPSS, version 22.0.

Results

226 serum samples met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The mean LTG serum concentration was 5.48±3.83 μg/mL. There were no gender differences (P = 0.64), and there were no significant effects by age on LTG serum concentration after age stratification (3–14 years old, 14-45 years old, 45–59 years old) (P = 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the daily LTG dose and co-administration of other AEDs significantly affected LTG serum concentrations. Combination with enzyme-inducer AEDs, the mean steady-state LTG concentration could be decreased by 30.73% compared with LTG monotherapy. Among enzyme-inducer AEDs, particularly strong inducer Carbamazepine (CBZ) could decrease the mean LTG concentration by 53.65%, but weak inducer AEDs such as Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and Topiramate (TPM) had no effect, Valproic acid (VPA) could increase the mean LTG concentration by 93.95%, and the inducer only partially compensated for the inhibitory effect of VPA in triple combination.

Conclusions

There were no significant gender and age effects, but the LTG daily dose and co-administration of other AEDs significantly affected LTG serum concentration. Combination with enzyme-inducer AEDs, especially CBZ could significantly decrease LTG serum concentrations, VPA could significantly increase LTG serum concentrations, and the inducer only partially compensated for the inhibitory effect of VPA in triple combination. In the clinical setting, these findings can help to estimate LTG concentrations and adjust dosage and evaluate adverse drug reactions.

Meta-analysis of the Influence of UGT Genetic Polymorphisms on Lamotrigine Concentration

Uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are involved in the metabolism of lamotrigine, but whether the UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 genetic polymorphisms affect lamotrigine concentration remains controversial. Thus, the objective of this meta-analysis was to analyse the influence of UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 genetic polymorphisms on lamotrigine concentration. Through searching, screening, selection, data extraction and quantitative analyses, the influence of UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 genetic polymorphisms on lamotrigine concentration-to-dose ratio (CDR) was assessed by meta-analysis of nine studies. Neither UGT1A4 70C>A nor 142T>G significantly affected lamotrigine CDR values (standardized difference in means [SDM] = 0.433, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.380-1.302; SDM = -0.458, 95% CI = -1.141-0.224, respectively). Only the UGT2B7 -161C>T homozygous variant had significantly higher CDR values than the wild-type (WT) and heterozygous variant (SDM = 0.634, 95% CI = 0.056-1.222). In conclusion, CDR of lamotrigine was significantly higher for the UGT2B7 -161C>T homozygous variant than for the WT and heterozygous variant. Thus, UGT2B7 -161C>T homozygous variant needs to receive reduced dose.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetics following oral and stable-labeled intravenous administration in young and elderly adult epilepsy patients: Effect of age

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate the effect of age on pharmacokinetic parameters of lamotrigine (LTG) and estimate parameter variability.

METHODS

Patients (>18 years old) who were already on a steady-state dose of LTG therapy with no interacting comedications were enrolled. Patients with significant cardiac disease, severe kidney dysfunction, or moderate-to-severe liver dysfunction were excluded. Fifty milligrams of a stable-labeled intravenous LTG formulation (SL-LTG) replaced 50 mg of a patient's normal daily oral LTG dose. Thirteen blood samples were collected in each person over 96 hours. SL-LTG and unlabeled LTG concentrations were measured simultaneously by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM version 7.3).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients representing 16 young (18-48 years old) and 12 elderly (63-87 years old) patients were included, yielding 382 unlabeled and 351 SL-LTG concentrations. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination adequately described the plasma concentration-time data. Bioavailability of oral LTG was approximately 74% and did not differ by age. LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly than in young patients (1.80 L/h for a 70-kg patient).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although LTG bioavailability was not affected by age, LTG clearance was 27.2% lower in elderly versus young patients of comparable body weight, possibly indicating lower dosages being needed in this population.

Interaction between ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism and valproate in their effects on steady-state disposition of lamotrigine in adults with epilepsy

AIMS

To investigate the impact of glucuronidation enzyme (UGT1A4*3 142T>G, UGT1A4*2 70C>A, UGT2B7 -161C>T) and transporter (MDR1/ABCB1 1236C>T, ABCG2 421C>A) polymorphisms on steady-state disposition of lamotrigine and on the lamotrigine-valproate interaction.

METHODS

Adults with epilepsy on lamotrigine monotherapy (n = 131) or lamotrigine + valproate treatment (n = 74) were genotyped and steady-state lamotrigine and valproate morning troughs were determined as a part of routine therapeutic drug monitoring.

RESULTS

No effect of UGT and MDR1/ABCB1 polymorphisms was observed. In the entire cohort, ABCG2 421A allele had no effect however an interaction between the variant allele and valproate was observed: (i) in lamotrigine-only patients, variant allele (vs. wild type homozygosity) was independently (adjustments: age, sex, body mass index, lamotrigine dose, other polymorphisms) associated with mildly lower lamotrigine troughs [geometric means ratio (GMR) = 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.98], whereas in lamotrigine + valproate patients it was associated with higher troughs (GMR = 1.72, 95%CI 1.14-2.62); (ii) valproate cotreatment was overall associated with markedly higher troughs vs. lamotrigine monotherapy (GMR = 3.49, 95%CI 2.73-4.44), but more so in variant allele carriers (GMR = 5.24, 95%CI 3.38-8.15) than in wild type homozygotes (GMR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.89-2.83); (iii) variant allele effects in two treatment subsets and valproate effects in two genotype subsets differed by 2.36-fold (95%CI 1.39-3.67); (iv) increase in lamotrigine troughs associated with increasing valproate troughs was greater in variant allele carriers than in wild type homozygotes, i.e. variant allele effect increased with increasing valproate troughs.

CONCLUSION

This study is first to indicate a potentially relevant interaction between ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism and valproate in their effects on lamotrigine disposition.

Time course of reversal of valproate-mediated inhibition of lamotrigine

PURPOSE

Conversion to lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy from sodium valproate (VPA) is complicated by the robust pharmacokinetic interaction between the two AEDs. This study examined changes in LTG serum concentrations immediately following VPA discontinuation.

METHODS

Ten healthy female and male adult subjects were initiated on LTG (Lamictal) 10 mg orally every morning for 30 days and VPA (Depakote ER) 500 mg orally every morning for 14 days. Morning trough (pre-dose) venous blood samples were obtained for determination of LTG and VPA concentrations on study days 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30. Following the collection of the blood sample on day 15, VPA was discontinued.

RESULTS

Despite stable LTG dosage serum concentrations on study day 20, 22, 24, 26, and 28, all were significantly lower compared to baseline (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic interaction between LTG and VPA is reversible, and that de-inhibition appears to follow a predictable time course. Complete offset, or reversal of this interaction takes place 10-14 days after VPA discontinuation. Our data also confirms the observation that LTG oral clearance may be inhibited by very low concentrations of VPA. These data support the conversion algorithm suggested by the manufacturer, and provide guidance to the clinician. These data provide clinically useful information in developing a dosing algorithm for converting patients to LTG monotherapy.

[The clinical significance of the lamotrigine pharmacokinetic variability]

AIM

To estimate pharmacokinetic variability of lamotrigine (LTG) and its clinical significance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred patients, including 74 women, aged from 18 to 77 years (38.23±14.37 years), with focal epilepsy were examined. Monotherapy with LTG was administered to 54 patients, duotherapy to 46 patients (LTG and valproic acid combination to 27 patients, LTG and liver enzymes inducers to 19 patients). Patients underwent procedures of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Minimal (Css_min) and maximal (Css_max) steady-state LTG plasma concentrations, and concentration-to-weight ratio (CDR) were calculated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In patients who used LTG in monotherapy, LTG Css_min was 5.6±4.65 mg/l, Css_max 7.59±5.54 mg/l. In the group that received LTG in combination with valproate, LTG Сss_min was 7.8 [5.4; 11.8] mg / l and Css_max 11.4 [7.3; 15.3] mg/l. In the group that received LTG in combination with drug-inducers of glucuronidation, Css_min was 2.5 [1.99; 4.32] mg/l, Css_max 4.73 [2.91; 6.70] mg/l. Statistically significant differences in CDR parameter between groups with LTG monotherapy and duotherapy, both with inducer and with inhibitors, as well as between groups of duotherapy with inductors and with inhibitors were obtained. The results of the study indicate a pronounced pharmacokinetic variability of the LTG. Conducting TDM allows the establishment of individual therapeutic concentrations of LTG in blood plasma and setting a correction vector for antiepileptic therapy.

Specific OCT1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms are associated with Lamotrigine concentrations in Chinese patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE

The pharmacokinetics of Lamotrigine (LTG) varies widely among patients with epilepsy. In this study, we are aiming to investigate the effects of OCT1, ABCG2, ABCC2 and HNF4α genetic polymorphisms on plasma LTG concentrations and therapeutic efficacy in Chinese patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 112 Han Chinese patients with epilepsy who were receiving LTG monotherapy. Blood samples were taken and LTG levels were measured. The polymorphisms of OCT1 rs2282143, rs628031, ABCG2 rs2231142, rs2231137, ABCC2 rs2273697 and HNF4α rs2071197, rs3212183 were determined. The therapeutic efficacy of LTG at the 1-year time-point was assessed. Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0.

RESULTS

There were significant associations between OCT1 rs628031, ABCG2 rs2231142 polymorphisms and normalized LTG concentrations in patients with epilepsy (P<0.05). On the other hand, polymorphisms of OCT1 rs2282143, ABCG2 rs2231137, ABCC2 rs2273697 and HNF4α rs2071197, rs3212183 exhibited no correlation with LTG concentrations. Additionally, no significant association existed between all the studied genotypes and LTG treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that the polymorphisms of OCT1 rs628031 and ABCG2 rs2231142 may affect LTG metabolism in Chinese patients with epilepsy. However, future studies are necessary to be investigated in a larger cohort of epileptic patients.

Pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine and its metabolite N-2-glucuronide: Influence of polymorphism of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and drug transporters

AIMS

This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for quantitative evaluation of the influence of genetic variants in metabolic enzymes and transporters on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics while taking into account the influence of various clinical, biochemical and demographic factors.

METHODS

We included 100 patients with epilepsy on stable dosing with lamotrigine as mono or adjunctive therapy. Lamotrigine and lamotrigine N-2-glucuronide concentrations were determined in up to two plasma samples per patient. Patients were genotyped for UGT1A4, UGT2B7, ABCB1 and SLC22A1. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-linear mixed effects modelling. Prior knowledge from previous pharmacokinetic studies was incorporated to stabilize the modelling process. A parent-metabolite model was developed to get a more detailed view on the covariate effects on lamotrigine metabolism.

RESULTS

With a base model absorption rate (interindividual variability) was estimated at 1.96 h(-1) (72.8%), oral clearance at 2.32 l h(-1) (41.4%) and distribution volume at 77.6 l (30.2%). Lamotrigine clearance was associated with genetic factors, patient's weight, renal function, smoking and co-treatment with enzyme inducing or inhibiting drugs. In patients with UGT2B7-161TT genotype clearance was lower compared with GT and GG genotypes. Clearance was particularly high in patients with UGT2B7 372 GG genotype (compared with AA genotype it was 117%; 95% CI 44.8, 247% higher).

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in lamotrigine pharmacokinetics is large and quantification of its sources may lead to more precise individual treatment. Genotyping for UGT2B7 may be useful in various clinical settings.