Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

QuantiFERON-CMV as a Predictor of CMV Events During Preemptive Therapy in CMV-seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation is costly and burdensome.

METHODS

Given its promising utility in risk stratification, we evaluated the use of QuantiFERON-CMV (QFCMV) and additional clinical variables in this prospective cohort study to predict the first clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMV, ranging from asymptomatic viremia requiring treatment to CMV disease) in the first posttransplant year. A cost-effectiveness analysis for guided prevention was done.

RESULTS

One hundred adult kidney transplant recipients, CMV IgG + , were given basiliximab induction and maintained on steroid/mycophenolate/tacrolimus with weekly CMV monitoring. Thirty-nine patients developed CS-CMV infection (viral syndrome, n = 1; end-organ disease, n = 9; and asymptomatic viremia, n = 29). A nonreactive or indeterminate QFCMV result using the standard threshold around day 30 (but not before transplant) was associated with CS-CMV rates of 50% and 75%, respectively. A higher QFCMV threshold for reactivity (>1.0 IU interferon-γ/mL) outperformed the manufacturer's standard (>0.2 IU interferon-γ/mL) in predicting protection but still allowed a 16% incidence of CS-CMV. The combination of recipient age and type of donor, along with posttransplant QFCMV resulted in a prediction model that increased the negative predictive value from 84% (QFCMV alone) to 93%. QFCMV-guided preemptive therapy was of lower cost than preemptive therapy alone ( P  < 0.001, probabilistic sensitivity analysis) and was cost-effective (incremental net monetary benefit of 210 USD) assuming willingness-to-pay of 2000 USD to avoid 1 CMV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided CMV prevention by the prediction model with QFCMV is cost-effective and would spare from CMV surveillance in 42% of patients with low risk for CS-CMV.

What's New: Updates on Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.

Evaluation of an automated real-time transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay for detection and quantification of cytomegalovirus DNA in different clinical specimens

BACKGROUND

Reliable and fast detection and quantification of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in various diagnostic specimens is essential for care of immunocompromised or congenitally infected individuals.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Panther Aptima® CMV (Hologic) quantitative real-time transcription mediated amplification (TMA) assay.

STUDY DESIGN

Performance of the TMA assay run on the Hologic Panther Fusion was analysed for 32 proficiency testing samples and 21 quantitative reproducibility panel samples; additionally, we compared results of TMA assay and routine quantitative real-time PCR assays ("PCR-A"= Biomérieux CMV R-gene® or "PCR-B"= Laboratory-developed CMV-PCR) in 518 diagnostic specimens (254 plasma, 120 EDTA whole blood, 43 urine, 45 amniotic fluid and 56 breast milk) at two university hospital laboratories.

RESULTS

All proficiency panel samples were correctly identified and quantified by the TMA assay; replicate testing of the reproducibility panel samples showed good reproducibility within and between the two laboratories. Sensitivity in plasma and WB was higher for the TMA assay detecting low-level CMV-DNAemia in samples tested negative by routine PCR. Quantitative CMV-DNAemia values correlated well between TMA and real-time PCR. Similarly, urine, AF and BM specimens showed a high rate of concordant results (91%, 98% and 98%, respectively) among TMA and PCR with good correlation of quantitative values.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the Aptima® CMV TMA assay for viral blood load testing compared well to established real-time PCRs. In addition, it can be useful for diagnostics in urine, amniotic fluid and breast milk specimens.

Qualitative evaluation of connective tissue disease with cytomegalovirus infection: A meta-analysis of case reports

BACKGROUND

The primary therapies for connective tissue disease include glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. However, their prolonged usage can precipitate opportunistic infections, such as cytomegalovirus infection. When managing connective tissue disease complicated by cytomegalovirus infection, judicious selection of treatment modalities is crucial. This involves assessing the necessity for antiviral therapy and contemplating the reduction or cessation of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants.

OBJECTIVE

This investigation sought to methodically review existing literature regarding treating connective tissue disease patients with cytomegalovirus infection.

METHODS

On July 5, 2023, an exhaustive literature search was conducted. Data analysis utilized the Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way analysis of variance, supplemented by Bonferroni post hoc testing.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis incorporated 88 studies encompassing 146 connective tissue disease patients with CMV infections. The results indicated that patients with connective tissue disease and cytomegalovirus disease benefitted more from antiviral therapy than those not receiving such treatment (P = 0.003, P < 0.005). Furthermore, the strategic reduction of glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants was beneficial (P = 0.037, P < 0.05). Poor clinical outcomes with glucocorticoid-immunosuppressant combination therapy compared to other treatment modalities. The findings also suggested that CMV infection patients fare better without Cyclosporine A than using it (P = 0.041, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Antiviral therapy is a viable treatment option in cases of connective tissue disease co-occurring with cytomegalovirus disease. Additionally, when connective tissue disease is stable, there is potential merit in reducing glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants, especially avoiding the combination of these drugs. For all cytomegalovirus infection patients, Cyclosporine A may be avoided wherever possible for selecting immunosuppressive agents if its use is not deemed essential in the treatment regimen.

Anti-Donor T-Cell Responses Are Not Necessarily Attenuated During Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), the most common opportunistic infection of kidney transplantation (KT), is preventable by prophylactic and preemptive antiviral drugs in CMV-immunoglobulin (Ig)G-positive donors. Our preemptive therapy optimized immunosuppressive doses based on mixed lymphocyte response (MLR) results, regardless of preoperative CMV-IgG serostatus pairing. This study used the MLR to compare the anti-donor T-cell responses between CMV antigenemia-positive and -negative cases.

METHODS

One hundred patients underwent KT using a cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive regimen at Hiroshima University Hospital. CMV antigenemia-positive cells were defined as 4/50,000 CMVpp65-positive cells. T-cell responses to allo-antigens were measured using MLR assays to evaluate patients' anti-donor immune reactivity. After analyzing the proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets, the stimulation indices of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were quantified. The study used no prisoners, and the participants were neither coerced nor paid. The manuscript was created in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients tested positive for CMV antigenemia within 3 months after KT. No significant differences were found between the CMV antigenemia-positive and -negative groups in the stimulation indices for CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to anti-donor stimulation. However, T-cell responses to third-party stimuli during the postoperative month 1 were significantly less in the CMV antigenemia-positive than -negative group.

CONCLUSION

Anti-donor T-cell responses are not necessarily attenuated during CMV infection in KT recipients. In CMV-infected KT recipients, caution should be exercised against inadvertent dose reduction of immunosuppressants.

Advances in pharmacotherapies for cytomegalovirus infection: what is the current state of play?

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a serious opportunistic infection in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Traditional anti-CMV drugs are limited by toxicities and the development of resistance. Letermovir and maribavir are newly approved antivirals for the prevention and treatment of CMV.

AREAS COVERED

Prior reviews have discussed use of letermovir for prevention of CMV after HCT and maribavir for resistant or refractory (R/R) CMV post HCT or SOT. Subsequent data have expanded their use including letermovir for primary CMV prophylaxis in high-risk renal transplant recipients and new recommendations for extending prophylaxis through day + 200 in certain HCT patients. Data on the use of maribavir for first asymptomatic CMV infection post-HCT has also been published. This review compares the pharmacology of anti-CMV agents and discusses the updated literature of these new drugs in the prevention and treatment of CMV.

EXPERT OPINION

Letermovir and maribavir are much needed tools that spare toxicities of ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. High cost is a challenge preventing their integration into clinical practice in resource-limited countries. Transplant centers need to exercise restraint in overuse to avoid resistance, particularly in the setting of high viral loads.

Cytomegalovirus Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation: An Update on Current Approaches

OBJECTIVE

The article reviews the safety and efficacy of treatments for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

A literature review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Clinicaltrials.gov from database inception through January 2024, using terms CMV, therapy, and solid organ transplantation.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical trials, meta-analyses, cohort studies, case reports, and guidelines were included. Letters to the editor, reviews, and commentaries were excluded.

DATA SYNTHESIS

After abstract screening and full-text review of 728 citations for eligibility, 53 were included. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir are drugs of choice for CMV management and, until recently, the availability of alternative options has been restricted due to toxicity. For instance, foscarnet and cidofovir serve as second-line agents due to potential bone marrow and renal toxicity. In patients with refractory or resistant CMV, maribavir, a novel oral agent, has proven efficacy and a lower adverse effect profile. However, in refractory or resistant CMV, foscarnet and cidofovir are preferred in invasive disease (CMV gastritis, CMV retinitis, and CMV encephalitis), high viral loads, and inability to tolerate oral preparations.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Consensus guidelines have not been revised since approval of novel antivirals in solid organ transplantation. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir remain drugs of choice for initial CMV therapy. Foscarnet, cidofovir, and maribavir are treatments for refractory or resistant-CMV.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of CMV antiviral treatment should be determined by patient-specific factors, including severity of illness, resistant or refractory disease, dose-limiting adverse effects, and the preferred route of administration.

Management strategies for common viral infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Viral infections have been considered as a major cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation in pediatric cohort. Children are at high risk of acquiring virus-related complications due to immunological immaturity and the enhanced alloreactivity risk that led to maintenance of high immunosuppressive regimes. Hence, prevention, early detection, and prompt treatment of such infe ctions are of paramount importance. Among all viral infections, herpes viruses (herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus), hepatitis B and C viruses, BK polyomavirus, and respiratory viruses (respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, influenza virus and adenovirus) are common in kidney transplant recipients. These viruses can cause systemic disease or allograft dysfunction affecting the clinical outcome. Recent advances in tech nology and antiviral therapy have improved management strategies in screening, monitoring, adoption of prophylactic or preemptive therapy and precise trea tment in the immunocompromised host, with significant impact on the outcome. This review discusses the etiology, screening and monitoring, diagnosis, pre vention, and treatment of common viral infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients.

Optimization of Ganciclovir and Valganciclovir Starting Dose in Children by Machine Learning

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (VGCV) show large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, particularly in children. The objectives of this study were (1) to develop machine learning (ML) algorithms trained on simulated pharmacokinetics profiles obtained by Monte Carlo simulations to estimate the best ganciclovir or valganciclovir starting dose in children and (2) to compare its performances on real-world profiles to previously published equation derived from literature population pharmacokinetic (POPPK) models achieving about 20% of profiles within the target.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of four literature POPPK models in addition to the World Health Organization (WHO) growth curve for children were used in the mrgsolve R package to simulate 10,800 pharmacokinetic profiles. ML algorithms were developed and benchmarked to predict the probability to reach the steady-state, area-under-the-curve target (AUC0-24 within 40-60 mg × h/L) based on demographic characteristics only. The best ML algorithm was then used to calculate the starting dose maximizing the target attainment. Performances were evaluated for ML and literature formula in a test set and in an external set of 32 and 31 actual patients (GCV and VGCV, respectively).

RESULTS

A combination of Xgboost, neural network, and random forest algorithms yielded the best performances and highest target attainment in the test set (36.8% for GCV and 35.3% for the VGCV). In actual patients, the best GCV ML starting dose yielded the highest target attainment rate (25.8%) and performed equally for VGCV with the Franck model formula (35.3% for both).

CONCLUSION

The ML algorithms exhibit good performances in comparison with previously validated models and should be evaluated prospectively.

Comparative Analysis of Cytomegalovirus Gastrointestinal Disease in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Patients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) gastrointestinal (GI) diseases impact both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals, yet comprehensive studies highlighting the differences between these groups are lacking.

METHODS

In this retrospective study (January 2000 to July 2022) of 401 patients with confirmed CMV GI diseases, we categorized them based on immunological status and compared manifestations, treatments, outcomes, and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The immunocompromised patients (n = 193) showed older age, severe illnesses, and higher comorbidity rates. GI bleeding, the predominant manifestation, occurred more in the immunocompetent group (92.6% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.009). Despite longer antiviral therapy, the immunocompromised patients had higher in-hospital (32.2% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.034) and overall mortality rates (91.1% vs. 43.4%, p < 0.001). The independent factors influencing in-hospital mortality in the immunocompromised patients included GI bleeding (OR 5.782, 95% CI 1.257-26.599, p = 0.024) and antiviral therapy ≥ 14 days (OR 0.232, 95% CI 0.059-0.911, p = 0.036). In the immunocompetent patients, age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.006-1.159, p = 0.032), GI bleeding (OR 10.036, 95% CI 1.183-85.133, p = 0.035), and time to diagnosis (OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.004-1.055, p = 0.021) were significant prognostic factors, with the age and diagnosis time cut-offs for survival being 70 years and 31.5 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GI bleeding is the most common manifestation and prognostic factor in both groups. Early diagnosis and effective antiviral therapy can significantly reduce in-hospital mortality.

Case report: CMV retinitis following local and systemic immunosuppression

We report the case of a 71-year-old man who presented 2 years following renal transplantation with diffuse, unilateral cytomegalovirus retinitis five weeks after receiving an intravitreal dexamethasone implant device for the management of central retinal vein occlusion. Examination of the left eye showed diffuse retinal hemorrhages, attenuated and tortuous retinal vessels, and superior retinal whitening. The patient was successfully treated with serial intravitreal foscarnet injections and oral valganciclovir with disease regression observed by 12 weeks after presentation. The patient's visual acuity and examination remained stable at 9-months follow-up.

Resource Use and Financial Impact of Oral Step-Down Therapy for Resistant Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are common opportunistic infections in solid organ transplants (SOT) with increased health care resource USE and costs. Costs are further increased with ganciclovir-resistance (GR). This study aimed to evaluate the real-world impact of conversion to oral step-down therapy on duration of foscarnet and hospital length of stay (LOS) for treatment of GR-CMV infections in SOT.

METHODS

This study included adult recipients of kidney or lung transplants who received foscarnet for genotypically documented GR-CMV while admitted at the University of Wisconsin Hospital from October 1, 2015, to January 31, 2022. Patients in the oral step-down group were converted from standard of care (SOC; foscarnet) to maribavir or letermovir; patients in the historical control group were treated with SOC.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria: 5 in the intervention group and 21 in the SOC group. The median viral load at foscarnet initiation was 11,435 IU/mL. Patients who received oral step-down conversion had shorter mean foscarnet duration than those who received SOC (7 ± 4 vs 37 ± 25 days, P = .017). Mean hospital LOS in the oral step-down group (16 ± 3 days) was shorter than the SOC group (33 ± 21 days; P < .001). In the SOC group, 9 patients lost their graft, and 9 patients died; 2 deaths were attributed to CMV. There were 2 deaths in the oral step-down group, neither of which was attributed to CMV.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In this real-world case series of patients receiving treatment for GR-CMV infection, oral step-down conversion decreased foscarnet therapy duration and hospital LOS. Future studies are needed to evaluate better the effect of oral step-down in treating GR-CMV infection on treatment duration and cost-savings.

Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Guidelines by the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and the Korean Society for Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important opportunistic viral pathogen in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The Korean guideline for the prevention of CMV infection in SOT recipients was developed jointly by the Korean Society for Infectious Diseases and the Korean Society of Transplantation. CMV serostatus of both donors and recipients should be screened before transplantation to best assess the risk of CMV infection after SOT. Seronegative recipients receiving organs from seropositive donors face the highest risk, followed by seropositive recipients. Either antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy can be used to prevent CMV infection. While both strategies have been demonstrated to prevent CMV infection post-transplant, each has its own advantages and disadvantages. CMV serostatus, transplant organ, other risk factors, and practical issues should be considered for the selection of preventive measures. There is no universal viral load threshold to guide treatment in preemptive therapy. Each institution should define and validate its own threshold. Valganciclovir is the favored agent for both prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. The evaluation of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity and the monitoring of viral load kinetics are gaining interest, but there was insufficient evidence to issue recommendations. Specific considerations on pediatric transplant recipients are included.

Crystal structure of the tegument protein UL82 (pp71) from human cytomegalovirus

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is an opportunistic pathogen that infects a majority of the world population. It may cause severe disease in immunocompromised people and lead to pregnancy loss or grave disabilities of the fetus upon congenital infection. For effective replication and lifelong persistence in its host, HCMV relies on diverse functions of its tegument protein UL82, also known as pp71. Up to now, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying the multiple functions of this crucial viral protein. Here, we describe the X-ray structure of full-length UL82 to a resolution of 2.7 Å. A single polypeptide chain of 559 amino acids mainly folds into three ß-barrels. We show that UL82 forms a dimer in the crystal as well as in solution. We identify point mutations that disturb the dimerization interface and show that the mutant protein is monomeric in solution and upon expression in human cells. On the basis of the three-dimensional structure, we identify structural homologs of UL82 from other herpesviruses and analyze whether their functions are preserved in UL82. We demonstrate that UL82, despite its structural homology to viral deoxyuridinetriphosphatases (dUTPases), does not possess dUTPase activity. Prompted by the structural homology of UL82 to the ORF10 protein of murine herpesvirus 68 (MHV68), which is known to interact with the RNA export factor ribonucleic acid export 1 (Rae1), we performed coimmunoprecipitations and demonstrated that UL82 indeed interacts with Rae1. This suggests that HCMV UL82 may play a role in mRNA export from the nucleus similar to ORF10 encoded by the gammaherpesviruses MHV68.

Opportunistic Infections Post-Lung Transplantation: Viral, Fungal, and Mycobacterial

Opportunistic infections are a leading cause of lung transplant recipient morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for infection include continuous exposure of the lung allograft to the external environment, high levels of immunosuppression, impaired mucociliary clearance and decreased cough reflex, and impact of the native lung microbiome in single lung transplant recipients. Infection risk is mitigated through careful pretransplant screening of recipients and donors, implementation of antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies, and routine surveillance posttransplant. This review describes common viral, fungal, and mycobacterial infectious after lung transplant and provides recommendations on prevention and treatment.

Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with impaired myocardial flow reserve after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) limits long-term survival after heart transplantation (HT). This study evaluates the relationship between clinically significant cytomegalovirus infection (CS-CMVi) and CAV using cardiac positron emission tomography (PET).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated HT patients from 2005 to 2019 who underwent cardiac PET for CAV evaluation. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between CS-CMVi and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between CS-CMV, MFR, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-two (31.1%) of 103 HT patients developed CS-CMVi at a median 9 months after HT. Patients with CS-CMVi had a significantly lower MFR at year 1 and 3, driven by reduction in stress myocardial blood flow. Patients with CS-CMVi had a faster rate of decline in MFR compared to those without infection (-0.10 vs -0.06 per year, p < 0.001). CS-CMVi was an independent predictor of abnormal MFR (<2.0) (odds ratio: 3.8, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.4-10.7, p = 0.001) and a lower MFR (β = -0.39, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.16, p = 0.001) at year 3. In adjusted survival analyses, both abnormal MFR (log-rank p < 0.001; hazard ratio [HR]: 5.7, 95% CI: 4.2-7.2) and CS-CMVi (log-rank p = 0.028; HR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.8-4.8) were significant predictors of the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, retransplantation, heart failure hospitalization, and acute coronary syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

CS-CMVi is an independent predictor of reduced MFR following HT. These findings suggest that CMV infection is an important risk factor in the development and progression of CAV.

Evaluation of valganciclovir's neutropenia risk in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients utilizing two dosing regimens

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir is approved for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatrics using the Pescovitz algorithm. There are reports of valganciclovir overdoses in children with low body surface area and overestimated creatinine clearance utilizing this algorithm. This study compared the incidence of neutropenia and cytomegalovirus infection between the Pescovitz and weight-based dosing algorithms.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective chart review from January 2010 to September 2018 was performed on pediatric heart, liver, and kidney transplant recipients, who received valganciclovir. Data were collected from the initiation of valganciclovir prophylaxis to 30 days after discontinuation. The primary objective was the incidence of neutropenia in patients receiving valganciclovir dosed by the Pescovitz versus weight-based dosing algorithms.

RESULTS

This study included 187 pediatric transplant recipients who received valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz (62 recipients) or weight-based dosing algorithms (125 recipients). The incidence of neutropenia was higher in the Pescovitz (69.4%) compared to the weight-based dosing group (53.6%; p = .04) including moderate and severe neutropenia. Cytomegalovirus viremia was not significantly different between the two groups and occurred in 4.8% of the Pescovitz group compared to 2.4% of the weight-based group (p = .4).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of neutropenia was greater in recipients receiving valganciclovir dosed via the Pescovitz algorithm compared to the weight-based dosing. There were no significant differences in regard to cytomegalovirus viremia or disease between the two groups.

Current and Emerging Antiviral Agents in the Prevention and Treatment of Cytomegalovirus in Pediatric Transplant Recipients

Despite current prophylaxis regimens, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is common in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT) and remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Newer antiviral medications are reshaping the landscape for prevention and treatment of CMV DNAemia, infection, and disease. Letermovir is approved for CMV prevention in adult HCT patients and is attractive due to the absence of marrow suppression seen with ganciclovir/valganciclovir. Letermovir should not be routinely used for CMV treatment due to its low threshold for resistance. Maribavir is approved for the treatment of refractory or resistant CMV disease in HCT and SOT recipients ≥12 years of age, though it has no current role in CMV prevention. More research is needed to fully elucidate the roles, efficacy, and safety of these newer agents in prevention and treatment of CMV in pediatric transplant recipients.

Pre-Transplantation Strategies for Infectious Disease Mitigation and Prevention

Pediatric Infectious Disease (ID) clinicians play a critical role in helping prevent and mitigate infectious risks in children peri- and post-transplantation. Prevention starts during the pre-transplant evaluation and persists throughout the solid organ transplant and hematopoietic cell transplant continuum. The pre-transplant evaluation is an opportunity to screen for latent infections, plan preventative strategies, optimize immunizations, and discuss risk mitigation practices. An ideal pre-transplant evaluation establishes a relationship with the family that further promotes post-transplant infectious risk reduction. This manuscript builds on shared pediatric ID prevention strategies, introduces updated ID testing recommendations for transplant donors/candidates, highlights emerging data, and identifies ongoing knowledge gaps that are potential areas of research.

Immune Monitoring-Guided Versus Fixed Duration of Antiviral Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The use of assays detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cell-mediated immunity may individualize the duration of antiviral prophylaxis after transplantation.

METHODS

In this randomized trial, kidney and liver transplant recipients from 6 centers in Switzerland were enrolled if they were CMV-seronegative with seropositive donors or CMV-seropositive receiving antithymocyte globulins. Patients were randomized to a duration of antiviral prophylaxis based on immune monitoring (intervention) or a fixed duration (control). Patients in the control group were planned to receive 180 days (CMV-seronegative) or 90 days (CMV-seropositive) of valganciclovir. Patients were assessed monthly with a CMV ELISpot assay (T-Track CMV); prophylaxis in the intervention group was stopped if the assay was positive. The co-primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with clinically significant CMV infection and reduction in days of prophylaxis. Between-group differences were adjusted for CMV serostatus.

RESULTS

Overall, 193 patients were randomized (92 in the immune-monitoring group and 101 in the control group), of whom 185 had evaluation of the primary outcome (87 and 98 patients). CMV infection occurred in 26 of 87 (adjusted percentage, 30.9%) in the immune-monitoring group and in 32 of 98 (adjusted percentage, 31.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, -0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.0% to 12.7%; P = .064). The duration of prophylaxis was shorter in the immune-monitoring group (adjusted difference, -26.0 days; 95%, CI, -41.1 to -10.8 days; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Immune monitoring resulted in a significant reduction of antiviral prophylaxis, but we were unable to establish noninferiority of this approach on the co-primary outcome of CMV infection.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02538172.

Viral meningoencephalitis in pediatric solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach

Neurologic complications, both infectious and non-infectious, are frequent among hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Up to 46% of HCT and 50% of SOT recipients experience a neurological complication, including cerebrovascular accidents, drug toxicities, as well as infections. Defects in innate, adaptive, and humoral immune function among transplant recipients predispose to opportunistic infections, including central nervous system (CNS) disease. CNS infections remain uncommon overall amongst HCT and SOT recipients, compromising approximately 1% of total cases among adult patients. Given the relatively lower number of pediatric transplant recipients, the incidence of CNS disease amongst in this population remains unknown. Although infections comprise a small percentage of the neurological complications that occur post-transplant, the associated morbidity and mortality in an immunosuppressed state makes it imperative to promptly evaluate and aggressively treat a pediatric transplant patient with suspicion for viral meningoencephalitis. This manuscript guides the reader through a broad infectious and non-infectious diagnostic differential in a transplant recipient presenting with altered mentation and fever and thereafter, elaborates on diagnostics and management of viral meningoencephalitis. Hypothetical SOT and HCT patient cases have also been constructed to illustrate the diagnostic and management process in select viral etiologies. Given the unique risk for various opportunistic viral infections resulting in CNS disease among transplant recipients, the manuscript will provide a contemporary review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of viral meningoencephalitis in these patients.

Detrimental impact of immunosuppressive burden on clinical course in patients with Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infection and reactivation remain a relevant complication after liver transplantation (LT). The recipient and donor serum CMV-IgG-status has been established for risk stratification when choosing various pharmaceutical regimens for CMV-prophylaxis in the last two decades. However, factors influencing course of CMV-infection in LT remain largely unknown. In this study, the impact of immunosuppressive regimen was examined in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

All patients that underwent primary LT between 2006 and 2018 at the Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, were included. Clinical course as well as histological and laboratory findings of patients were analyzed our prospectively maintained database. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis for impact of variables on CMV-occurrence was conducted, and survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 867 patients were included in the final analysis. CMV-infection was diagnosed in 325 (37.5%) patients after transplantation. Significantly improved overall survival was observed in these patients (Log rank = 0.03). As shown by correlation and regression tree classification and regression tree analysis, the recipient/donor CMV-IgG-status with either positivity had the largest influence on CMV-occurrence. Analysis of immunosuppressive burden did not reveal statistical impact on CMV-infection, but statistically significant inverse correlation of cumulative tacrolimus trough levels and survival was found (Log rank < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings (p = .02).

DISCUSSION

CMV-infection remains of clinical importance after LT. Undergone CMV-infection of either recipient or donor requires prophylactic treatment. Additionally, we found a highly significant, dosage-dependent impact of immunosuppression (IS) on long-term outcomes for these patients, underlying the importance of minimization of IS in liver transplant recipients.

International pediatric transplant association (IPTA) guidance on developing and/or expanding pediatric solid organ transplantation programs in low- and middle-income countries

Pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a preferred treatment for medically suitable children with end-stage organ failure. Still, many of them have no access to transplantation owing to socioeconomic constraints or lack of transplant facilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Establishing pediatric SOT programs in LMIC offers children the opportunities to receive transplant care in more familiar home environments as well as help curtail transplant tourism and improve transplant outcomes as pediatric transplantation would be performed ethically and legally. The International Pediatric Transplant Association (IPTA) is a professional organization aiming to promote safe, ethical, and high-quality pediatric transplantation worldwide. This society paper describes major obstacles to pediatric SOT in LMIC and provides guidance on developing and/or expanding pediatric SOT programs in such countries. We also summarize available resources from the IPTA Outreach Program to help establish and support pediatric SOT programs in LMIC.

Impact of an ultrasensitive Cytomegalovirus quantitative nucleic acid test on Cytomegalovirus detection and therapy in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has broad implications for morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Routine surveillance for CMV replication with PCR-based quantitative nucleic acid testing (qNAT) assays is standard practice in most transplant centers, but the impact of assay sensitivity on antiviral decision-making and virologic outcomes has not been studied. We investigated the effects of an ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assay on multiple clinical outcomes, including time to detection and duration of CMV DNAemia.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center cohort study contrasting RTRs monitored with a qNAT with a higher lower limit of quantification (LLOQ >300 IU/mL) with those monitored with a more sensitive qNAT (LLOQ >35 IU/mL). Patients were stratified by donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV serostatus (D+/R-: high risk; any R+: moderate risk). CMV viral load monitoring was performed monthly post transplantation, with the primary outcomes being time to CMV DNAemia and its duration.

RESULTS

Total 1382 patients were analyzed from 2014 to 2016 and 2019 to 2021. Moderate-risk RTRs monitored with the more sensitive assay experienced a greater hazard for the development of a first episode of CMV DNAemia (aHR: 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55-2.46) and an average of 24 (95% CI: 16.40-31.98) additional days of DNAemia. There was no difference in CMV end-organ disease or 1-year all-cause mortality between moderate-risk RTRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The more sensitive assay was associated with earlier detection and extended durations of CMV DNAemia in moderate-risk RTRs, without altering clinical outcomes. These findings inform optimal use of these assays and antiviral stewardship in RTRs.

KEY SUMMARY

The use of ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assays in moderate-risk CMV renal transplant recipients is associated with earlier detection and longer durations of CMV DNAemia without impacting CMV end-organ disease or 1-year mortality.

Infections in the first year after heart transplantation in a Latin American country

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation is the therapy of choice in patients with advanced heart failure refractory to other medical or surgical management. However, heart transplants are associated with complications that increase posttransplant morbidity and mortality. Infections are one of the most important complications after this procedure. Therefore, infections in the first year after heart transplantation were evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of infections after heart transplants was conducted in a teaching hospital in Colombia between 2011 and 2019. Patients registered in the institutional heart transplant database (RETRAC) were included in the study. Microbiological isolates and infectious serological data were matched with the identities of heart transplant recipients and data from clinical records of individuals registered in the RETRAC were analyzed. The cumulative incidences of events according to the type of microorganism isolated were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Median age was 49 years (37.4-56.3), and 26.58% of patients were women. Eighty-seven infections were documented, of which 55.17% (48) were bacterial, 22.99% (20) were viral, and 12.64% (11) were fungal. Bacterial infections predominated in the first month. In the first year, infections caused 38.96% of hospital admissions and were the second cause of death after heart transplants (25.0%).

CONCLUSION

Posttransplant infections in the first year of follow-up were frequent. Bacterial infections predominated in the early posttransplant period. Infections, mainly bacterial, were the second most common cause of death and the most common cause of hospitalization in the first year after heart transplantation.

Effect of cytomegalovirus infection on post-transplant hospitalization days among children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A marginal structural model approach

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) commonly reactivates after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), potentially leading to CMV disease and significant morbidity and mortality. To reduce morbidity and mortality, many centers conduct weekly CMV blood polymerase chain reaction (PCR) surveillance testing with subsequent initiation of antiviral therapy upon CMV DNAemia detection. However, the impact of CMV DNAemia on subsequent hospitalization risk has not been assessed using models accounting for the time-varying nature of the exposure, outcome, and confounders.

METHODS

All allogeneic HCTs at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from January 2004-April 2017 were considered for inclusion. Patients were monitored with CMV surveillance via PCR testing for up to 105 days after HCT receipt. We estimated the association between CMV DNAemia and rate of hospitalization using marginal structural models (MSM).

RESULTS

There were 343 allogeneic HCT episodes in 330 with CMV surveillance; median age was 9.0 (range: 0.1-26.2) and 46.5% were female. And 24.1% of HCT patients had at least one positive CMV blood PCR during the follow-up period. Median time to CMV DNAemia detection was 19 days (range: 4-97). The MSM estimated the incidence rate ratios for an association of CMV DNAemia with hospitalization to be 1.24, (95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV DNAemia was associated with an increased hospitalization in the post-HCT period. The MSM accounted for time-varying nature of the outcome, exposure and confounders. The findings support prevention of CMV DNAemia in this population. We recommend further investigation into the effectiveness and safety of prophylaxis versus pre-emptive CMV prevention approaches.

Risk of cytomegalovirus infection and subsequent allograft failure after pancreas transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of infection after transplantation, but few studies have evaluated its epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes among pancreas transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020, at 3 sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary outcome was clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi), defined as CMV disease or infection requiring antiviral therapy. The secondary outcome was pancreas allograft failure. Among 471 pancreas transplant recipients, 117 (24.8%) developed csCMVi after a median of 226 (interquartile range 154-289) days. CMV donor (D)+/R- patients had a significantly higher incidence of csCMVi (hazard ratio [HR] 4.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-7.64; P < .001). In adjusted analysis, a lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was associated with a greater risk of csCMVi among seropositive recipients (HR 1.39 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 1.13-1.73; P = .002) but not among D+/R- patients (HR 1.04 per 50% decrease, 95% CI 0.89-1.23; P = .595). csCMVi, lower ALC, and acute rejection (P < .001) were independently associated with pancreas allograft failure. In conclusion, CMV D+/R- was associated with csCMVi in pancreas recipients, although ALC was associated with csCMVi only among seropositive patients. The development of csCMVi in pancreas recipients was associated with poor pancreas allograft outcomes.

Viral load kinetics and the clinical consequences of cytomegalovirus in kidney transplantation

Background

Despite advances in clinical management, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a serious complication and an important cause of morbidity and mortality following kidney transplantation. Here, we explore the importance of viral load kinetics as predictors of risk and potential guides to therapy to reduce transplant failure in a large longitudinal Genome Canada Transplant Consortium (GCTC) kidney transplant cohort.

Methods

We examined the relationship between CMV infection rates and clinical characteristics, CMV viral load kinetics, and graft and patient outcomes in 2510 sequential kidney transplant recipients in the British Columbia Transplant Program. Transplants were performed between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018, were managed according to a standard protocol, and were followed until December 31, 2019, representing over 3.4 million days of care.

Results

Longitudinal CMV testing was performed in 2464 patients, of whom 434 (17.6%) developed a first episode of CMV viremia at a median of 120 (range: 9-3906) days post-transplant. Of these patients, 93 (21.4%) had CMV viremia only and 341 (78.6%) had CMV viremia with clinical complications, of whom 21 (4.8%) had resulting hospitalization. A total of 279 (11.3%) patients died and 177 (7.2%) patients lost their graft during the 12 years of follow-up. Patients with CMV infection were at significantly greater risk of graft loss (p=0.0041) and death (p=0.0056) than those without. Peak viral load ranged from 2.9 to 7.0 (median: 3.5) log10 IU/mL, the duration of viremia from 2 to 100 (15) days, and the viral load area under the curve from 9.4 to 579.8 (59.7) log10 IU/mL × days. All three parameters were closely inter-related and were significantly increased in patients with more severe clinical disease or with graft loss (p=0.001). Duration of the first CMV viremic episode greater than 15 days or a peak viral load ≥4.0 log10 IU/mL offered simple predictors of clinical risk with a 3-fold risk of transplant failure.

Conclusion

Viral load kinetics are closely related to CMV severity and to graft loss following kidney transplantation and provide a simple index of risk which may be valuable in guiding trials and treatment to prevent transplant failure.

Diagnosis of Human Cytomegalovirus Drug Resistance Mutations in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients-A Review

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection may be asymptomatic in healthy individuals but can cause severe complications in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. Breakthrough and drug-resistant HCMV infections in such patients are major concerns. Clinicians are first challenged to accurately diagnose HCMV infection and then to identify the most effective antiviral drug and determine when to initiate therapy, alter drug dosage, or switch medication. This review critically examines HCMV diagnostics approaches, particularly for immunocompromised patients, and the development of genotypic techniques to rapidly diagnose drug resistance mutations. The current standard method to identify prevalent and well-known resistance mutations involves polymerase chain reaction amplification of UL97, UL54, and UL56 gene regions, followed by Sanger sequencing. This method can confirm clinical suspicion of drug resistance as well as determine the level of drug resistance and range of cross-resistance with other drugs. Despite the effectiveness of this approach, there remains an urgent need for more rapid and point-of-care HCMV diagnosis, allowing for timely lifesaving intervention.

Bring it on again: antimicrobial stewardship in transplant infectious diseases: updates and new challenges

Advancement in solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplant continues to improve the health outcomes of patients and widens the number of eligible patients who can benefit from the medical progress. Preserving the effectiveness of antimicrobials remains crucial, as otherwise transplant surgeries would be unsafe due to surgical site infections, and the risk of sepsis with neutropenia would preclude stem cell transplant. In this review, we provide updates on three previously discussed stewardship challenges: febrile neutropenia, Clostridioides difficile infection, and asymptomatic bacteriuria. We also offer insight into four new stewardship challenges: the applicability of the "shorter is better" paradigm shift to antimicrobial duration; antibiotic allergy delabeling and desensitization; colonization with multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms; and management of cytomegalovirus infections. Specifically, data are accumulating for "shorter is better" and antibiotic allergy delabeling in transplant patients, following successes in the general population. Unique to transplant patients are the impact of multidrug-resistant organism colonization on clinical decision-making of antibiotic prophylaxis in transplant procedure and the need for antiviral stewardship in cytomegalovirus. We highlighted the expansion of antimicrobial stewardship interventions as potential solutions for these challenges, as well as gaps in knowledge and opportunities for further research.

Patient years lost due to cytomegalovirus serostatus mismatching in the scientific registry of transplant recipients

Background

The cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatch rate in deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients in the US remains above 40%. Since CMV mismatching is common in DDKT recipients, the cumulative effects may be significant in the context of overall patient and graft survival. Our primary objective was to describe the short- and long-term risks associated with high-risk CMV donor positive/recipient negative (D+/R-) mismatching among DDKT recipients with the explicit goal of deriving a mathematical mismatching penalty.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, secondary analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database using donor-matched DDKT recipient pairs (N=105,608) transplanted between 2011-2022. All-cause mortality and graft failure hazard ratios were calculated from one year to ten years post-DDKT. All-cause graft failure included death events. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimation at 10 years post-DDKT and extrapolated to 20 years to provide the average graft days lost (aGDL) and average patient days lost (aPDL) due to CMV D+/R- serostatus mismatching. We also performed an age-based stratification analysis to compare the relative risk of CMV D+ mismatching by age.

Results

Among 31,518 CMV D+/R- recipients, at 1 year post-DDKT, the relative risk of death increased by 29% (p<0.001), and graft failure increased by 17% (p<0.001) as compared to matched CMV D+/R+ group (N=31,518). Age stratification demonstrated a significant increase in the risk associated with CMV mismatching in patients 40 years of age and greater. The aGDL per patient due to mismatching was 125 days and the aPDL per patient was 100 days.

Conclusion

The risks of CMV D+/R- mismatching are seen both at 1 year post-DDKT period and accumulated throughout the lifespan of the patient, with the average CMV D+/R- recipient losing more than three months of post-DDKT survival time. CMV D+/R- mismatching poses a more significant risk and a greater health burden than previously reported, thus obviating the need for better preventive strategies including CMV serodirected organ allocation to prolong lifespans and graft survival in high-risk patients.

Utility of the Interferon-Gamma Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Spot Assay to Predict Risk of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Non-specific interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISpot) responses after solid organ transplant (SOT) and their relationship with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation have hardly been investigated. Adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients underwent measurement of IFN-γ-producing T cells using the ELISpot assay before and 1 month after transplantation. Data for CMV infection episodes were collected. Risk factors for post-transplant CMV infection, based on IFN-γ responses, were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model. A total of 93 KT recipients were enrolled in the study and 84 evaluable participants remained at 1 month post KT. Thirty-three (39%) recipients developed subsequent CMV infection within 6 months post-transplant. At 1-month post-transplant, IFN-γ-producing T cells with <250 spot-forming units (SFUs)/2.5 × 105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were significantly associated with CMV infection (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-7.1, p = 0.007). On multivariable analysis, posttransplant IFN-γ-producing T cells with <250 SFUs/2.5 × 105 PBMCs remained independently associated with CMV infection (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.8, p = 0.019). Conclusions: KT recipients with low IFN-γ-producing T cells measured by the ELISpot assay are more likely to develop CMV infection after transplantation. Therefore, measurement of nonspecific cell-mediated immunity ELISpot responses could potentially stratify recipients at risk of CMV infection (Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210216004).

Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic administration of valganciclovir (VG) is an accepted method for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation (KTx). The standard dosage of oral VG is 900 mg/day, adjusted to renal function. There is growing evidence that low-dose 450 mg/day VG might be safe and effective. We compared low-dose vs standard-dose prophylaxis after KTx in a single-center follow-up study.

METHODS

Data from 603 renal transplantations at a single center were retrospectively analyzed (2011-2014, 12-month follow-up). Recipients with donor IgG positive-recipient IgG positive (D+/R+), (D+/R-), and (D-/R+) CMV serostatus were routinely treated with 450 mg/day VG for 3 months. Based on the same prophylactic dose, patients could be categorized into two groups according to their postoperative renal function: those receiving standard-dose VG due to a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (average eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and those receiving low-dose VG due to higher eGFR (average eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m2).

RESULTS

Estimated glomerular filtration rate-based VG serum alterations significantly affected the risk of CMV infection with a higher incidence in higher VG levels (standard-dose: 357 patients, CMV: 33 cases (9.2 %); low-dose: 246 patients, CMV: 10 cases (4.1%). The occurrence of known risk factors: serologic risk distribution and rate of induction therapy were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Treatment of an acute rejection episode influenced the infection rate significantly in the standard-dose group. As a side effect of prophylaxis, leucopenia (<3G/L) was 2.46 times higher in standard-dose vs low-dose group.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose VG administration is safe and non-inferior to the standard dose in the prophylaxis of CMV infection after KTx.

Heart Transplantation-Postoperative Considerations

Heart transplantation (HT) remains the best treatment of patients with severe heart failure who are deemed to be transplant candidates. The authors discuss postoperative management of the HT recipient by system, emphasizing areas where care might differ from other cardiac surgery patients. Working together, critical care physicians, heart transplant surgeons and cardiologists, advanced practice providers, pharmacists, transplant coordinators, nursing staff, physical therapists, occupational therapists, rehabilitation specialists, nutritionists, health psychologists, social workers, and the patient and their loved ones partner to increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.

Human cytomegalovirus-related gastrointestinal disease after kidney transplantation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Human-cytomegalovirus (hCMV) infection involving the gastrointestinal tract represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant (KT) recipients (KTRs). Signs and symptoms of the disease are extremely variable. Prompt anti-viral therapy administration and immunosuppression modification are key factors for optimizing management. However, complex work-up strategies are generally required to confirm the preliminary diagnosis. Unfortunately, solid evidence and guidelines on this specific topic are not available. We consequently aimed to summarize current knowledge on post-KT hCMV-related gastrointestinal disease (hCMV-GID).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023399363) about hCMV-GID in KTRs.

RESULTS

Our systematic review includes 52 case-reports and ten case-series, published between 1985 and 2022, collectively reporting 311 cases. The most frequently reported signs and symptoms of hCMV-GID were abdominal pain, diarrhea, epigastric pain, vomiting, fever, and GI bleeding. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were the primary diagnostic techniques. In most cases, the preliminary diagnosis was confirmed by histology. Information on anti-viral prophylaxis were extremely limited as much as data on induction or maintenance immunosuppression. Treatment included ganciclovir and/or valganciclovir administration. Immunosuppression modification mainly consisted of mycophenolate mofetil or calcineurin inhibitor minimization and withdrawal. In total, 21 deaths were recorded. Renal allograft-related outcomes were described for 26 patients only. Specifically, reported events were acute kidney injury (n = 17), transplant failure (n = 5), allograft rejection (n = 4), and irreversible allograft dysfunction (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of local and national registries is strongly recommended to improve our understanding of hCMV-GID. Future clinical guidelines should consider the implementation of dedicated diagnostic and treatment strategies.

Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing assay with open-access analysis software for detecting resistance-associated mutations in CMV

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) resistance testing by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for the simultaneous analysis of multiple genes. We developed and validated an amplicon-based Ion Torrent NGS assay to detect CMV resistance mutations in UL27, UL54, UL56, and UL97 and compared the results to standard Sanger sequencing. NGS primers were designed to generate 83 overlapping amplicons of four CMV genes (~10 kb encompassing 138 mutation sites). An open-access software plugin was developed to perform read alignment, call variants, and interpret drug resistance. Plasmids were tested to determine NGS error rate and minor variant limit of detection. NGS limit of detection was determined using the CMV WHO International Standard and quantified clinical specimens. Reproducibility was also assessed. After establishing quality control metrics, 185 patient specimens previously tested using Sanger were reanalyzed by NGS. The NGS assay had a low error rate (<0.05%) and high accuracy (95%) for detecting CMV-associated resistance mutations present at ≥5% in contrived mixed populations. Mutation sites were reproducibly sequenced with 40× coverage when plasma viral loads were ≥2.6 log IU/mL. NGS detected the same resistance-associated mutations identified by Sanger in 68/69 (98.6%) specimens. In 16 specimens, NGS detected 18 resistance mutations that Sanger failed to detect; 14 were low-frequency variants (<20%), and six would have changed the drug resistance interpretation. The NGS assay showed excellent agreement with Sanger and generated high-quality sequence from low viral load specimens. Additionally, the higher resolution and analytic sensitivity of NGS potentially enables earlier detection of antiviral resistance.

How we treat diarrhea in pediatric transplant patients: a brief review

Diarrhea is a common problem faced by both hematopoietic and solid organ transplant recipients. The differential diagnosis is wide, ranging from infectious to non-infectious causes and from benign to emergent illness. Here we present two patients with diarrhea and discuss our approaches to the diagnostic evaluation and management of transplant recipients with diarrhea. We also include a review of the literature and discuss areas in need of further study.

Beginners guide to protocol writing in transplant infectious diseases

Creating protocols surrounding the guidance of the prevention and treatment of infections in transplantation is an integral part of being a transplant infectious disease physician. This piece outlines the key components for success in developing a protocol, with an example protocol and protocol template available for readers. Collaborating effectively within the multi-disciplinary team to develop, implement, and assess the efficacy of a protocol is a skill that enhances the relationship with our transplantation colleagues and improves patient outcomes by standardizing the care delivered.

Viral specific T cell therapy in kidney transplant recipients - A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Viral infections such as adenovirus (ADV), BK virus (BKV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) after kidney transplantation negatively impact outcomes in transplant recipients despite advancements in screening and antiviral therapy. We describe our experience of using the virus-specific T cell therapy (VSTs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at our transplant center.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single center review of KTR with ADV, BKV and CMV infections between June 2021 and December 2022. These patients received third party VSTs as part of the management of infections. The immunosuppression, details of infection and outcome data were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Two cases of ADV infection resolved after one infusion of VSTs. The response rate of BKV and CMV infection was not as robust with close to 50% reduction in median viral load after VSTs. Out of 23 patients, two patients developed chronic allograft nephropathy from membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and acute rejection.

CONCLUSION

Patients that are resistant to antivirals or who have worsening viremia despite conventional management may benefit from VSTs therapy to treat underlying viral infection. Additional studies are needed to ascertain efficacy and short- and long-term risks secondary to VSTs.

Refractory Cytomegalovirus Colitis Followed by De Novo Inflammatory Bowel Disease Post-Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are both immune-mediated complications that affect orthotopic liver transplantation patients. In this report, we present a 60-year-old man who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis with serologies notable for CMV-seropositive donor and seronegative recipient. His post-transplant course was initially complicated by probable refractory CMV colitis. However, his gastrointestinal symptoms persisted, eventually leading to a diagnosis of post-transplant de novo IBD. The discussion highlights theories regarding the association between CMV and IBD, a topic that has been widely debated for decades.

Clinical utility of a cytomegalovirus-specific T cell assay in assessing the risk of post-prophylaxis cytomegalovirus infection and post-treatment relapse

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes significant morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Measuring cell-mediated immunity (CMI) may inform the risk of CMV infection after antiviral prophylaxis and predict relapse after CMV treatment.

METHODS

We serially assessed CMV CMI using the QuantiFERON-CMV assay (QF-CMV; Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in two cohorts of SOTRs: during valganciclovir prophylaxis and during treatment of CMV viremia. Results of CMI were correlated with post-prophylaxis CMV infection and post-treatment relapse, respectively.

RESULTS

Only one (4.2%) of 24 CMV D+/R- patients demonstrated positive QF-CMV by the end of valganciclovir prophylaxis. Four (16.6%) patients developed post-prophylaxis CMV infection; all four had undetectable QF-CMV at end of prophylaxis. Among 20 patients treated for CMV infection, 18 (90%) developed QF-CMV levels >.2 IU/mL by end of antiviral treatment and none developed CMV relapse. In contrast, the single patient who relapsed after completing treatment had a CMV CMI <.2 IU/ml (p = .0036).

CONCLUSION

Since CMV D+/R- SOTRs are unlikely to develop adequate CMV CMI while receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis, the utility of CMV CMI monitoring for risk stratification during time of prophylaxis had limited value. Conversely, CMV CMI testing may be a useful marker of the risk of CMV relapse after antiviral treatment.

A new direction for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis among transplant recipients: Benefits and nonviral outcomes of letermovir use as primary CMV prophylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Letermovir has changed the game of primary prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and more recently, solid organ transplant recipients. This is largely due to letermovir's similar efficacy in protecting against CMV reactivation and disease, along with its superior safety profile, notably reduced myelotoxicity, and lack of renal dose adjustment compared to standard agents like valganciclovir. This review will describe the potential benefits and clinical considerations of letermovir as prophylaxis among transplant recipients, with a focus on recent evidence describing nonviral outcomes of CMV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence has demonstrated improved safety (e.g., less myelosuppression) and tolerability with no difference in rates of CMV infection or disease in kidney transplant recipients given letermovir compared to valganciclovir. Real-world studies and meta-analyses in HSCT populations have explored various nonviral outcomes with letermovir use. Letermovir prophylaxis was associated with reduced mortality, lower rates of graft versus host disease, delayed CMV immune reconstitution, improved tolerability with extended durations, and decreased healthcare utilization.

SUMMARY

Letermovir is an effective antiviral agent for CMV prevention and has demonstrated enhanced safety, which may allow for extended durations of primary prophylaxis among transplant recipients along with other improved clinical outcomes by mitigating the indirect effects of CMV.

Real world experience with conversion from valganciclovir to letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis: Letermovir reverses leukopenia and avoids mycophenolate dose reduction

PURPOSE

Valganciclovir (VGC) is the gold-standard for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis (PPX) after solid organ transplant (SOT). Letermovir (LTV) was recently approved in high-risk kidney transplant and has reduced myelosuppressive toxicity. Conversion from VGC to LTV may be pursued in the setting of leukopenia. It is unknown if this strategy is effective.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving abdominal SOT were included if converted from VGC to LTV between January 1, 2018 and January 31, 2023. Primary objective was to describe the impact of LTV conversion as measured by WBC recovery, mycophenolate modification, and use of GCSF, and prophylaxis efficacy assessed by course completion and breakthrough DNAemia. Secondary objective was to evaluate rates of post-prophylaxis CMV.

RESULTS

Seventy five SOT recipients met inclusion criteria. Mean change in WBC in response to LTV conversion by day 14 was +2.02 ± 2.52 k/uL. 75%(56/75) of the population did not require mycophenolate adjustment or had their dose increased after conversion. GCSF was required in 38.7%(29/75) prior to conversion; only 21.3%(16/75) of patients required GCSF after conversion. Early termination was uncommon, 14.7%(11/75) stopped due to lack of ongoing insurance approval, only one patient stopped due to adverse effects (1.3%). One patient had clinically significant breakthrough (1.3%) that was successfully managed with VGC. Incidence of post prophylaxis CMV was 40%.

CONCLUSION

Withholding of VGC with LTV conversion may improve leukopenia without need for additional supportive measures. Most importantly, this strategy avoided additional mycophenolate modifications. In our study, LTV was associated with low rates of breakthrough. Post-prophylaxis CMV was similar to VGC prophylaxis.

Evidence supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes current knowledge of ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (ValGCV) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, highlighting the likely contribution from host genetic factors to interpatient variability. The evidence and challenges surrounding optimization of drug dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are examined, with recommendations made.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pharmacokinetic studies of current dosing guidelines have shown high interindividual and intraindividual variability of GCV concentrations. This is sometimes associated with a slow decline in cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load in some transplant recipients. A high incidence of GCV-associated myelosuppression has limited the use of this drug in the transplant setting. Patient groups identified to benefit from GCV TDM include pediatric patients, cystic fibrosis with lung transplantation, obese with kidney transplantation, and patients with fluctuating renal function or on hemodialysis. The emergence of refractory resistant CMV, particularly in immune compromised patients, highlights the importance of appropriate dosing of these antivirals. Host genetic factors need to be considered where recently, two host genes were shown to account for interpatient variation during ganciclovir therapy. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring has been shown to improve target antiviral-level attainment. The use of TDM may guide concentration-based dose adjustment, potentially improving virological and clinical outcomes. However, evidence supporting the use of TDM in clinical practice remains limited and further study is needed in the transplant cohort.

SUMMARY

Further studies examining novel biomarkers are needed to guide target concentrations in prophylaxis and treatment. The use of TDM in transplant recipients is likely to improve the clinical efficacy of current antivirals and optimize outcomes in transplant recipients.

Assessment of mimicking by EBV-CMV immunoglobulin M of anti-HLA antibodies

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to show the cross-reactivity that may occur between immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibodies that form against Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and/or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and human leukocyte antigens (HLA).

METHODS

Complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) cross-reactivity between serum samples of 57 patients with IgM positive CMV and/or EBV infections and T and B cells from 15 healthy donors were evaluated. Dithiothreitol was used to distinguish cross-reactivity caused by IgM antibodies from IgG.

RESULTS

The cross-reactivity ratio between pathogenic IgM antibodies with T cell of the 12th donor, and B cell of the 3rd, 4th, and 8th donors was significantly higher (p = 0.011, <0.001, <0.001 and 0.013, respectively). The ratio of B cell CDC cross-reactivity of all donors (26.4%) was higher than the ratio of T cell CDC cross-reactivity (5.2%) (p < 0.001). The ratio of T cell CDC cross-reactivity of sera containing both anti-CMV IgM and anti-EBV IgM antibodies was significantly higher than those of sera containing only anti-CMV IgM or only anti-EBV IgM antibodies (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference between B cell CDC cross-reactivity rates according to the presence of anti-CMV and/or anti-EBV IgM antibodies.

CONCLUSION

Cross-reactivity may occur between anti-CMV and anti-EBV IgM antibodies with HLA molecules. Thus, in graft recipients, pathogenic IgMs can also act as de novo anti-HLA antibodies and aggravate the rejection process.

Updates in Cytomegalovirus Prevention and Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation

The authors summarize recent updates in the prevention and management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a focus on CMV seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors (CMV D+/R-) who are at highest risk of CMV infection and disease. They discuss advantages of preemptive therapy for CMV disease prevention in CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients, letermovir for CMV prophylaxis, and updates in the development of monoclonal antibodies and vaccines as immune-based preventative strategies. They review the roles of maribavir and virus-specific T cells for management of resistant or refractory CMV infection in SOT recipients.

Genomic Markers Associated with Cytomegalovirus DNAemia in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major pathogen after solid organ transplantation, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Transplantation from a CMV-seropositive donor to a CMV-seronegative recipient (D+/R-) is associated with high risk of CMV disease. However, that risk is not uniform, suggesting a role for host factors in immune control of CMV. To identify host genetic factors that control CMV DNAemia post transplantation, we performed a whole-exome association study in two cohorts of D+/R- kidney transplant recipients. Quantitative CMV DNA was measured for at least one year following transplantation. Several CMV-protective single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the first cohort (72 patients) but were not reproducible in the second cohort (126 patients). A meta-analysis of both cohorts revealed several SNPs that were significantly associated with protection from CMV DNAemia. The copy number variation of several genes was significantly different between recipients with and without CMV DNAemia. Amongst patients with CMV DNAemia in the second cohort, several variants of interest (p < 5 × 10-5), the most common of which was NLRC5, were associated with peak viral load. We provide new predictive genetic markers for protection of CMV DNAemia. These markers should be validated in larger cohorts.

Cytomegalovirus-Specific T Cells in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major opportunistic infection after liver transplantation (LT) that necessitates monitoring. Because of the lack of studies in children, we aimed to investigate CMV-specific T cell immune reconstitution among pediatric LT recipients. The recipients were monitored for CMV infection and CMV-specific T cells from the start of immunosuppressive therapy until 48 weeks after LT. Clinically significant CMV viremia (csCMV) requiring preemptive therapy was defined as a CMV load of >2000 IU/mL. Peripheral blood CMV-specific T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry based on IFNγ secretion upon stimulation with CMV antigens including immediate early protein 1 (IE1) Ag, phosphoprotein 65 (pp65) Ag, and whole CMV lysate (wCMV). Of the 41 patients who underwent LT, 20 (48.8%) had csCMV. Most (17/20 patients) were asymptomatic and characterized as experiencing CMV reactivation. The onset of csCMV occurred approximately 7 weeks after LT (interquartile range: 4-12.9); csCMV rarely recurred after preemptive therapy. Lower pp65-specific CD8+ T cell response was associated with the occurrence of csCMV (p = 0.01) and correlated with increased viral load at the time of csCMV diagnosis (ρ = -0.553, p = 0.02). Moreover, those with csCMV had lower percentages of IE1-specific CD4+ and wCMV-reactive CD4+ T cells at 12 weeks after LT (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). Despite intense immunosuppressive therapy, CMV-specific T cell immune reconstitution occurred in pediatric patients post-LT, which could confer protection against CMV reactivation.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.

Associations between invasive aspergillosis and cytomegalovirus in lung transplant recipients: a nationwide cohort study

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and invasive aspergillosis (IA) cause morbidity among lung transplant recipients (LTXr). Early diagnosis and treatment could improve outcomes. We examined rates of CMV after IA and vice versa to assess whether screening for one infection is warranted after detecting the other. All Danish LTXr, 2010-2019, were followed for IA and CMV for 2 years after transplantation. IA was defined using ISHLT criteria. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRR) were estimated by Poisson regression adjusted for time after transplantation. We included 295 LTXr, among whom CMV and IA were diagnosed in 128 (43%) and 48 (16%). The risk of CMV was high the first 3 months after IA, IR 98/100 person-years of follow-up (95% CI 47-206). The risk of IA was significantly increased in the first 3 months after CMV, aIRR 2.91 (95% CI 1.32-6.44). Numbers needed to screen to diagnose one case of CMV after IA, and one case of IA after CMV was approximately seven and eight, respectively. Systematic screening for CMV following diagnosis of IA, and vice versa, may improve timeliness of diagnosis and outcomes for LTXr.