Adenovirus E1A proteins interact with the cellular YY1 transcription factor

Viral transactivating proteins

Many viruses utilize the cellular transcription apparatus to express their genomes, and they encode transcriptional regulatory proteins that modulate the process. Here we review the current understanding of three viral regulatory proteins. The adenovirus E1A protein acts within the nucleus to regulate transcription through its ability to bind to other proteins. The herpes simplex type 1 virus VP16 protein acts within the nucleus to control transcription by binding to DNA in conjunction with cellular proteins. The human T-cell leukemia virus Tax protein influences transcription through interactions with cellular proteins in the nucleus as well as the cytoplasm.

Transforming region of 243R E1A contains two overlapping but distinct transactivation domains

Conserved regions 1 and 2 as well as the amino terminus of E1A are required for the transforming activity of the E1A oncoprotein. We show here that the amino terminus of 243R E1A has transactivation activity when brought to a promoter in yeast. Recruitment to a specific promoter is essential. Mutagenesis studies correlated the transactivation function with the extreme amino terminus and the conserved region 1 of E1A. Cotransfection assays in rodent cells confirmed that two overlapping but distinguishable domains, amino acids 1-65 and 37-80, can transactivate independently when targeted to a promoter. We also observed that when recruited to the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) promoter, the amino-terminal region was sufficient to transactivate the PCNA promoter. On the other hand, deletion of the amino terminus of E1A resulted in failure to induce PCNA expression. Fusion of VP16 with the amino-terminal-deleted E1A mutant was able to restore the ability to induce the PCNA promoter. We further show that the amino-terminal region also is required for 243R E1A to repress the transactivation mediated by a universal transactivator DBD.VP16 and DBD.E1A. This repression could be specifically relieved by overexpression of TBP but not TFIIB. In addition, we show that the amino terminus of E1A is involved in in vitro interaction with the TATA binding protein (TBP). Thus the amino-terminal transforming region of E1A may regulate cellular gene expression in species that are distant in evolution via a common mechanism, functionally targeting TBP.

A functional YY1 binding site is necessary and sufficient to activate Surf-1 promoter activity in response to serum growth factors

The human Surf-1 and Surf-2 housekeeping genes are divergently transcribed and share a bi-directional, TATA-less promoter. Housekeeping promoters typically contain complex arrays of transcription factor binding sites and several studies have suggested that many of these sites might be functionally redundant. The Surf-1/Surf-2 promoter region contains four factor binding sites; members of the ETS family of transcription factors bind to two of these sites whilst YY1 binds to a third site immediately downstream of the major Surf-1 transcription start point. Here we show that Sp1 binds to the fourth transcription factor binding site. Although YY1 and Sp1 have previously been shown to interact both in vitro and in vivo, these proteins function independently at the Surf-1/Surf-2 promoter. The binding of Sp1 alone is sufficient to bring about full promoter activity in the Surf-2 direction. In contrast, both Sp1 and ETS proteins are required to bring about full promoter activity in the Surf-1 direction. The YY1 binding site is not required for basal transcription in either direction. The YY1 binding site is, however, both necessary and sufficient to confer growth factor inducibility on transcription in the Surf-1 direction. Our data suggest that functionally redundant transcription factor binding sites might not be a general feature of housekeeping promoters.

Multiple mechanisms of transcriptional repression by YY1

The four C-terminal GLI-Krüppel type zinc fingers of YY1 have been identified as a transcriptional repression domain. Previous reports have proposed DNA-bending and activator-quenching mechanisms for this zinc finger-mediated repression. In addition, previous work indicated that p300 and CBP might be involved in YY1-mediated repression. We have analyzed these possible models for the zinc finger-mediated repression. The role of each zinc finger in the repression and DNA-binding functions was determined by using a structure-and-function approach. We show that zinc finger 2 of YY1 plays a central role in both DNA binding and transcriptional repression. However, a survey of a panel of YY1 mutants indicates that these two functions can be separated, which argues against the DNA-bending model for repression. We show that the physical interaction between YY1 and p300, a coactivator for CREB, is not sufficient for repression of CREB-mediated transcription. Our studies indicate that YY1 functions as an activator-specific repressor. Repression of CTF-1-directed transcription may be accomplished through direct physical interaction between YY1 and this activator. In contrast, physical interaction is not necessary for YY1 to repress Sp1- and CREB-mediated transcription. Rather, the repression likely reflects an ability of YY1 to interfere with communication between these activators and their targets within the general transcription machinery. Taken together, our results suggest that YY1 employs multiple mechanisms to achieve activator-specific repression.

Role for highly regulated rep gene expression in adeno-associated virus vector production

Recent success achieving long-term in vivo gene transfer without a significant immune response by using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors (X. Xiao, J. Li, and R. J. Samulski, J. Virol. 70:8098-8108, 1996) has encouraged further development of this vector for human gene therapy. Currently, studies focus on the generation of high-titer vectors by using the two-plasmid helper-vector system in adenovirus (Ad)-infected cells. To examine the effects of the AAV replication (rep) genes on recombinant AAV (rAAV) vector production, we have constructed a series of AAV helper plasmids that contain strong heterologous promoters in place of the endogenous p5 promoter. Although high-level rep gene expression was achieved, rAAV DNA failed to replicate in the absence of Ad infection. Moreover, unregulated overexpression of Rep78/68 led to substantially lower rAAV yields in the presence of Ad (10(4-5) versus 10(7-8)). In contrast, under similar conditions, reduced Rep78/68 expression resulted in much higher rAAV yields (10(9)). Molecular characterization showed that overexpression of the rep gene decreased rAAV DNA replication and severely inhibited capsid (cap) gene expression. Interestingly, a reduced rep level enhanced cap gene expression and supported normal rAAV DNA replication. These studies suggest a critical role for regulated rep gene expression in rAAV production and have facilitated the development of a new AAV helper plasmid that increases vector production eightfold over currently used constructs.

The cellular YY1 transcription factor binds a cis-acting, negatively regulating element in the Epstein-Barr virus BRLF1 promoter

Disruption of Epstein-Barr virus latency is induced by expression of either the BZLF1 (in B cells and epithelial cells) or BRLF1 (in epithelial cells only) immediate-early protein. Regulation of BZLF1 and BRLF1 transcription may therefore modulate the stringency of viral latency. The cellular transcription factor YY1 negatively regulates BZLF1 transcription. Here we show that the BRLF1 promoter (Rp) sequences from -206 to -227 (relative to the mRNA start site) and from -7 to +6 are directly bound by YY1. Mutation of the upstream YY1 binding site increases constitutive Rp activity in epithelial cells and B cells, while mutation of the downstream YY1 binding site does not significantly affect Rp activity. Negative regulation of BZLF1 and BRLF1 transcription by YY1 may act to maintain viral latency.

The cellular transcription factor SP1 and an unknown cellular protein are required to mediate Rep protein activation of the adeno-associated virus p19 promoter

Control of adeno-associated virus (AAV) transcription from the three AAV promoters (p5, p19, and p40) requires the adenovirus E1a protein and the AAV nonstructural (Rep) proteins. The Rep proteins have been shown to repress the AAV p5 promoter yet facilitate activation of the p19 and p40 promoters during a productive infection. To elucidate the mechanism of promoter regulation by the AAV Rep proteins, the cellular factors involved in mediating Rep activation of the p19 promoter were characterized. A series of protein-DNA binding experiments using extracts derived from uninfected HeLa cells was performed to identify cellular factors that bind to the p19 promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays, DNase I protection analyses, and UV cross-linking experiments demonstrated specific interactions with the cellular factor SP1 (or an SP1-like protein) at positions -50 and -130 relative to the start of p19 transcription. Additionally, an unknown cellular protein (cellular AAV activating protein [cAAP]) with an approximate molecular mass of 34 kDa was found to interact with a CArG-like element at position -140. Mutational analysis of the p19 promoter suggested that the SP1 site at -50 and the cAAP site at -140 were necessary to mediate Rep activation of p19. Antibody precipitation experiments demonstrated that Rep-SP1 protein complexes can exist in vivo. Although Rep was demonstrated to interact with p19 DNA directly, the affinity of Rep binding was much lower than that seen for the Rep binding elements within the terminal repeat and the p5 promoter. Furthermore, the interaction of purified Rep68 with the p19 promoter in vitro was negligible unless purified SP1 was also added to the reaction. Thus, the ability of Rep to transactivate the p19 promoter is likely to involve SP1-Rep protein contacts that facilitate Rep interaction with p19 DNA.

Separate domains of MBP-1 involved in c-myc promoter binding and growth suppressive activity

We previously demonstrated that exogenous expression of MBP-1 induces rapid cell death in murine fibroblasts, and alters loss of anchorage-independent growth and tumorigenicity in human breast carcinoma cells. Here, we investigated the functional role of two different domains of MBP-1. A DNA-protein interaction study suggested that the amino-terminal half (amino acids 1-178) of MBP-1 possesses the c-myc P2 promoter binding activity. The same domain of MBP-1 also showed transcriptional repressor activity on c-myc promoter by in vitro transient expression assay. On the other hand, the carboxy terminal half (amino acids 190-335) of MBP-1 induced cell death in murine fibroblasts similar to full length MBP-1. Furthermore, exogenous protein expression from the carboxy terminal half of MBP-1 in human breast carcinoma (MCF-7) cells showed suppression of colony formation and loss of anchorage-independent growth. Results from this study suggest that MBP-1 exerts its biological effect through different functional domains.

Regulation of murine cytochrome oxidase Vb gene expression in different tissues and during myogenesis. Role of a YY-1 factor-binding negative enhancer

The mouse cytochrome oxidase (COX) Vb promoter contains three sequence motifs with partial or full consensus for YY-1 and GTG factor binding and a CArG box, located between positions -480 and -390. Individually, all three motifs stimulated transcription of the TKCAT promoter, and bound distinctly different proteins from the liver and differentiated C2C12 nuclear extracts. Collectively, these motifs, together with the downstream flanking sequence, -378 to -320, suppressed the transcription activity of heterologous promoters, thymidine kinase-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (TKCAT) and COXIV/CAT. The transcription activities of both TKCAT and COXIV/CAT constructs were induced 3-4-fold during induced myogenesis of C2C12 cells. The downstream CArG-like motif binds transcription factor YY-1, while the upstream YY-1-like motif binds to a yet unidentified factor. Co-expression with intact YY-1, but not that lacking the DNA binding domain suppressed the transcriptional activity. Mutations targeted to the CArG-like motif abolished the suppressive effect of the negative enhancer and the inducibility of the promoter during myogenic differentiation. Our results suggest that the activity of the negative enhancer may determine the level of expression of the COX Vb gene in different tissues.

The adeno-associated virus (AAV) Rep protein acts as both a repressor and an activator to regulate AAV transcription during a productive infection

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) uses three promoters, p5, p19, and p40, to regulate viral gene expression. The p5 and p19 promoters direct the synthesis of the viral regulatory proteins, Rep78 and -68 and Rep52 and -40, respectively. The p5 Rep proteins bind a linear 22-bp sequence, the Rep binding element (RBE), that is within both the terminal repeat (TR) and the p5 promoter. In the absence of helper virus, all four Rep proteins have been shown to reduce transcription from the viral p5 and p19 promoters. In this report, we focus on the roles of these proteins and the RBEs in controlling transcription during a productive infection, that is, in the presence of adenovirus. We find that in the presence of adenovirus, the p5 RBE represses p5 transcription while the RBE in the TR activates p5. However, both the TR RBE and the p5 RBE transactivate the p19 and p40 promoters. The fact that the p5 RBE-Rep complex can transactivate p19 and p40 while repressing p5 suggests that Rep78/68 is both a repressor and a transactivator. Rep repression of p5 is specific for the p5 RBE, as other p5 promoter elements do not support this activity. We also demonstrate that in the presence of adenovirus, the p19 Rep proteins, which do not bind to the RBE, can eliminate repression of the p5 promoter by Rep78 and Rep68. This may occur by the association of Rep52 with Rep78 or Rep68 to produce a Rep78/68-Rep52 protein complex which can be detected in vivo by immunoprecipitation. Finally, two Rep mutants that were deficient in RBE binding and transactivation but positive for p5 repression were identified. These mutants may define interaction domains involved in making contacts with other proteins that facilitate repression. These observations suggest a mechanism for controlling the p5 and p19 mRNA levels during a productive AAV infection.

Role of p300-family proteins in E1A oncogene induction of cytolytic susceptibility and tumor cell rejection

The mechanism by which the adenoviral (Ad) E1A oncogene induces cellular susceptibility to lysis by killer lymphocytes involves interactions between its first exon and different second-exon accessory regions. Mutational analysis showed that two first-exon regions--one in the N terminus and one in the conserved region 1 (CR1) domain--are necessary for this activity. E1A complex formation with cellular p300 protein through these first-exon-encoded regions correlated with induction of the cytolytic susceptible phenotype but was only effective in the context of E1A second-exon expression. An E1A first-exon deletion that prevented p300 binding eliminated both oncoprotein-induced cytolytic susceptibility and rejection of transfected sarcoma cells by immunocompetent animals. These results suggest that the E1A oncogene induces cytolytic susceptibility and tumor rejection by interactions with cellular proteins of the p300 family that affect transcription of genes involved in the cellular response to injury inflicted by host killer cells.

Transcriptional repression by YY1 is mediated by interaction with a mammalian homolog of the yeast global regulator RPD3

YY1 is a mammalian zinc-finger transcription factor with unusual structural and functional features. It has been implicated as a positive and a negative regulatory factor that binds to the CCATNTT consensus DNA element located in promoters of many cellular and viral genes. A mammalian cDNA that encodes a YY1-binding protein and possesses sequence homology with the yeast transcriptional factor RPD3 has been identified. A Gal4 DNA binding domain-mammalian RPD3 fusion protein strongly represses transcription from a promoter containing Gal4 binding sites. Association between YY1 and mammalian RPD3 requires a glycine-rich region on YY1. Mutations in this region abolish the interaction with mammalian RPD3 and eliminate transcriptional repression by YY1. These data suggest that YY1 negatively regulates transcription by tethering RPD3 to DNA as a cofactor and that this transcriptional mechanism is highly conserved from yeast to human.

A novel C/EBP beta-YY1 complex controls the cell-type-specific activity of the human papillomavirus type 18 upstream regulatory region

The human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV-18) upstream regulatory region (URR) controls viral gene transcription in a cell-type-specific manner. The HPV-18 URR is active in HeLa cells but inactive in HepG2 cells. The activating activity of YY1 in HeLa cells is dependent on its functional interactions with the switch region which is critical for the HPV-18 URR activity in HeLa cells. Here, we show that a protein complex composed of C/EBP beta and YY1 binds the switch region which is detected only in HeLa cells, not in HepG2 cells. Transfection of C/EBP beta into HepG2 cells restored the formation of the C/EBP beta-YY1-switch region complex, accompanied by increased transcription directed by the HPV-18 URR. Mutations in the switch region that abolished the complex formation also abrogated C/EBP beta-induced transcriptional activation. This provides a strong correlation between the binding of the C/EBP beta-YY1 complex to the switch region and cell-type-specific URR activity. Taken together, we have identified a novel C/EBP beta-YY1 complex that binds the switch region and contributes to cell-type-specific HPV-18 URR activity.

Adenovirus E1A specifically blocks SWI/SNF-dependent transcriptional activation

Expression of the adenovirus E1A243 oncoprotein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces a slow-growth phenotype with accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This effect is due to the N-terminal and CR1 domains of E1A243, which in rodent cells are involved in triggering cellular transformation and also in binding to the cellular transcriptional coactivator p300. A genetic screen was undertaken to identify genes required for the function of E1A243 in S. cerevisiae. This screen identified SNF12, a gene encoding the 73-kDa subunit of the SWI/SNF transcriptional regulatory complex. Mutation of genes encoding known members of the SWI/SNF complex also led to loss of E1A function, suggesting that the SWI/SNF complex is a target of E1A243. Moreover, expression of E1A in wild-type cells specifically blocked transcriptional activation of the INO1 and SUC2 genes, whose activation pathways are distinct but have a common requirement for the SWI/SNF complex. These data demonstrate a specific functional interaction between E1A and the SWI/SNF complex and suggest that a similar interaction takes place in rodent and human cells.

YY1 and NF1 both activate the human p53 promoter by alternatively binding to a composite element, and YY1 and E1A cooperate to amplify p53 promoter activity

A novel transcription factor binding element in the human p53 gene promoter has been characterized. It lies about 100 bp upstream of the major reported start site for human p53 gene transcription. On the basis of DNase I footprinting studies, electromobility shift assay patterns, sequence specificity of binding, the binding pattern of purified transcription factors, effects of specific antibodies, and methylation interference analysis we have identified the site as a composite element which can bind both YY1 and NF1 in an independent and mutually exclusive manner. The site is conserved in the human, rat, and mouse p53 promoters. The occupancy of the site varies in a tissue-specific manner. It binds principally YY1 in nuclear extracts of rat testis and spleen and NF1 in extracts of liver and prostate. This may facilitate tissue-specific control of p53 gene expression. When HeLa cells were transiently transfected with human p53 promoter-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter constructs, a mutation in this composite element which disabled YY1 and NF1 binding caused a mean 64% reduction in basal p53 promoter activity. From mutations which selectively impaired YY1 or NF1 binding and the overexpression of YY1 or NF1 in HeLa cells we concluded that both YY1 and NF1 function as activators when bound to this site. In transient cotransfections E1A could induce the activity of the p53 promoter to a high level; 12S E1A was threefold as efficient as 13S E1A in this activity, and YY1 bound to the composite element was shown to mediate 55% of this induction. Overexpressed YY1 was shown to be able to synergistically activate the p53 promoter with E1A when not specifically bound to DNA. Deletion of an N-terminal domain of E1A, known to be required for direct E1A-YY1 interaction and E1A effects mediated through transcriptional activator p300, blocked the E1A induction of p53 promoter activity.

YY1 represses human papillomavirus type 16 transcription by quenching AP-1 activity

YY1 is a multifunctional transcription factor that has been shown to regulate the expression of a number of cellular and viral genes, including the human papillomavirus (HPV) oncogenes E6 and E7. In this study, we have analyzed the YY1-mediated repression of the HPV type 16 (HPV-16) E6-E7 promoter. A systematic analysis to identify YY1 sites present in the HPV-16 long control region showed that of 30 potential YY1 binding motifs, 24 bound purified recombinant YY1 protein, but only 10 of these were able to bind YY1 when nuclear extracts of HeLa cells were used. Of these, only a cluster of five sites, located in the vicinity of an AP-1 motif, were found to be responsible for repressing the HPV-16 P97 promoter. All five sites were required for repression, the mutation of any one site giving rise to a four- to sixfold increase in transcriptional activity. The target for YY1-mediated repression was identified as being a highly conserved AP-1 site, and we propose that AP-1 may represent a common target for YY1 repression. We also provide data demonstrating that YY1 can bind the transcriptional coactivator CREB-binding protein and propose a potentially novel mechanism by which YY1 represses AP-1 activity as a result of this YY1-CREB-binding protein interaction.

CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor coactivator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription

Steroid receptors are ligand-regulated transcription factors that require coactivators for efficient activation of target gene expression. The binding protein of cAMP response element binding protein (CBP) appears to be a promiscuous coactivator for an increasing number of transcription factors and the ability of CBP to modulate estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-dependent transcription was therefore examined. Ectopic expression of CBP or the related coactivator, p300, enhanced ER transcriptional activity by up to 10-fold in a receptor- and DNA-dependent manner. Consistent with this, the 12S E1A adenoviral protein, which binds to and inactivates CBP, inhibited ER transcriptional activity, and exogenous CBP was able to partially overcome this effect. Furthermore, CBP was able to partially reverse the ability of active ER to squelch PR-dependent transcription, indicating that CBP is a common coactivator for both receptors and that CBP is limiting within these cells. To date, the only other coactivator able to significantly stimulate receptor-dependent transcription is steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1). Coexpression of CBP and SRC-1 stimulated ER and PR transcriptional activity in a synergistic manner and indicated that these two coactivators are not functional homologues. Taken together, these data suggest that both CBP and SRC-1 may function in a common pathway to efficiently activate target gene expression.

An enhancer of recombination in polyomavirus DNA

Previous work from this laboratory has indicated that intramolecular homologous recombination of polyomavirus (Py) DNA is dependent upon promoter structure or function. In this report, we demonstrate that Py DNA contains not two but three binding sites for transcription factor YY1, all located on the late side of viral origin of replication (ori) and the third well within the VP1 coding sequence. This third site (Y3), which may or may not play a role in transcription regulation, is immediately adjacent to a previously described recombination hot spot (S1/S2). We found that Py replicons carrying an altered Y3 site recombined in a manner suggesting partial inactivation of the S1/S hot spot. Point mutations precluding the binding of YY1 to Y3 in vitro depressed hot spot activity in vivo; however, of the two reciprocal products reflecting recombination at this spot, only that carrying the mutated Y3 site arose at a reduced rate. These results are interpreted in light of a model assuming that recombination occurs within a transcriptionally active viral chromatin tethered to the nuclear matrix by YY1.

An N-terminal deletion mutant of simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen oligomerizes incorrectly on SV40 DNA but retains the ability to bind to DNA polymerase alpha and replicate SV40 DNA in vitro

A peptide encompassing the N-terminal 82 amino acids of simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen was previously shown to bind to the large subunit of DNA polymerase alpha-primase (I. Dornreiter, A. Höss, A. K. Arthur, and E. Fanning, EMBO J. 9:3329-3336, 1990). We report here that a mutant T antigen, T83-708, lacking residues 2 to 82 retained the ability to bind to DNA polymerase alpha-primase, implying that it carries a second binding site for DNA polymerase alpha-primase. The mutant protein also retained ATPase, helicase, and SV40 origin DNA-binding activity. However, its SV40 DNA replication activity in vitro was reduced compared with that of wild-type protein. The reduction in replication activity was accompanied by a lower DNA-binding affinity to SV40 origin sequences and aberrant oligomerization on viral origin DNA. Thus, the first 82 residues of SV40 T antigen are not strictly required for its interaction with DNA polymerase alpha-primase or for DNA replication function but may play a role in correct hexamer assembly and efficient DNA binding at the origin.

CD30 contains two binding sites with different specificities for members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family of signal transducing proteins

CD30 is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family of proteins. CD30 can regulate proliferation of lymphocytes and may also play an important role in human immunodeficiency virus replication. However, little is known about CD30 signal transduction. We performed a yeast two-hybrid library screen with the cytoplasmic domain of CD30 and isolated multiple independent cDNAs encoding human tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) 1, TRAF2, and CRAF1 (TRAF3). The ability of TRAF1, TRAF2, and CRAF1 to associate with CD30 was confirmed using an in vitro coprecipitation assay, further demonstrating that the interaction was specific and direct. The TRAF-binding domain of CD30 was mapped to the COOH-terminal 36 amino acid residues, which contained two independent binding sites. CRAF1 bound only a single site, which contained the sequence PEQET, whereas TRAF1 and TRAF2 were capable of binding to either the PEQET site or an additional downstream domain. These data indicate that the TRAF protein binding pattern of CD30 differs from other TNF receptor family members and suggest that signaling specificity through TNF receptor family proteins may be achieved through differences in their abilities to bind TRAF proteins.

Purification and characterization of a DNA polymerase beta promoter initiator element-binding transcription factor from bovine testis

A low-abundance DNA-binding protein for the DNA polymerase beta (beta-pol) promoter initiator element was purified from bovine testis. The transcriptional initiator element (Inr) of the mammalian beta-pol promoters characterized is highly conserved, and the bovine beta-pol promoter Inr has the sequence -11CAGAGGCGGCCATTGTT+6. The purified initiator element-binding protein (Inr-BP) binds with high affinity to an oligonucleotide corresponding to the beta-pol promoter Inr (Kd = 5 pM), and increasing ionic strength decreases stability of the protein-DNA complex. Mutational analysis of the Inr shows that the purified Inr-BP binds with sequence specificity to the sequence CCAT at -2 to +2 of the Inr, but that seven residues on the 5' side and three residues on the 3' side of the CCAT sequence are required also. Using an in vitro transcription assay with HeLa cell nuclear extract, we find that the endogenous Inr-BP is required for transcriptional activity of the beta-pol promoter; addition of purified Inr-BP restores activity to the nuclear extract depleted in Inr-BP by affinity chromatography. These results, based upon the sequence specificity for DNA binding, indicate that Inr-BP is a YY1-like protein and suggest that it is a required transcription factor in beta-pol gene expression.

Characterization of functional domains within the multifunctional transcription factor, YY1

YY1 is a multifunctional transcription factor capable of either activation or repression of transcription. Using a series of mutant proteins, we have characterized domains responsible for activation or repression. We found that the YY1 transcriptional activation domain lies near the amino terminus and requires amino acids 16-29 and 80-100 for maximal activity. The region between residues 16 and 29 has the potential to form an acidic amphipathic helix, whereas residues between 80 and 100 are rich in proline and glutamine. The YY1 repression domain lies near the carboxyl terminus and is embedded within the YY1 zinc finger region necessary for binding to DNA. Deletion of YY1 amino acids, which include zinc fingers 3 and 4, abolishes repression. However, site-directed mutagenesis, progressive deletion, and internal deletion mutant analyses indicate that the normal structures of zinc fingers 3 and 4 are not required for repression.

Adenovirus E1A243 disrupts the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex at the mouse c-fos promoter

The adenovirus E1A243 protein can activate transcription of the mouse c-fos gene in a manner that depends on treatment of cells with inducers or analogs of cyclic AMP (cAMP). Activation requires conserved region 1 and the N-terminal domain of E1A243 and is mediated by a 22-bp E1A response element containing a cAMP response element (CRE) at -67 and a binding site for transcription factor YY1 at -54. In the absence of E1A243, YY1 represses CRE-dependent transcription of c-fos by physically interacting with ATF/CREB proteins bound to the -67 CRE. Here we present evidence that expression of E1A243 leads to relief of YY1-mediated repression by a disruption of the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex. Addition of E1A243 to in vitro binding assays prevented binding of ATF-2 to glutathione S-transferase-YY1. Similarly, expression of E1A243 in HeLa cells prevented the association of a YY1-VP16 fusion protein with endogenous ATF/CREB proteins bound to the -67 CRE of a transfected c-fosCAT reporter plasmid. In each case, the N-terminal domain of E1A243, which mediates a direct interaction with YY1, was responsible for disruption of the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex. On the basis of these and previously published results, we present a model for the synergistic transcriptional activation of the c-fos gene by E1A243 and cAMP.

DNA binding sites for the transcriptional activator/repressor YY1

YY1 is ubiquitously expressed zinc finger DNA binding protein. It can act as a transcriptional repressor or activator and, when binding at the initiator element, as a component of the basal transcription complex. Binding sites for YY1 have been reported in a wide variety of promoters and they exhibit substantial diversity in their sequence. To better understand how YY1 interacts with DNA and to be able to predict the presence of YY1 sites in a more comprehensive fashion, we have selected YY1 binding sites from a random pool of oligonucleotides. The sites display considerable heterogeneity, but contain a conserved 5'-CAT-3' core flanked by variable regions, generating the consensus 5'-(C/g/a)(G/t)(C/t/a)CATN(T/a)(T/g/c)-3', where the upper case letters represent the preferred base. This high degree of flexibility in DNA recognition can be predicted by modeling the interaction of the four YY1 zinc fingers with DNA and a detailed model for this interaction is presented and discussed.

Transcription factor TFIID is a direct functional target of the adenovirus E1A transcription-repression domain

The 243-amino acid adenovirus E1A oncoprotein both positively and negatively modulates the expression of cellular genes involved in the regulation of cell growth. The E1A transcription repression function appears to be linked with its ability to induce cellular DNA synthesis, cell proliferation, and cell transformation, as well as to inhibit cell differentiation. The mechanism by which E1A represses the transcription of various promoters has proven enigmatic. Here we provide several lines of evidence that the "TATA-box" binding protein (TBP) component of transcription factor TFIID is a cellular target of the E1A repression function encoded within the E1A N-terminal 80 amino acids. (i) The E1A N-terminal 80 amino acids [E1A-(1-80)protein] efficiently represses basal transcription from TATA-containing core promoters in vitro. (ii) TBP reverses completely E1A repression in vitro. (iii) TBP restores transcriptional activity to E1A-(1-80) protein affinity-depleted nuclear extracts. (iv) The N-terminal repression domain of E1A interacts directly and specifically with TBP in vitro. These results may help explain how E1A represses a set of genes that lack common upstream promoter elements.

Transcriptional repression by human adenovirus E1A N terminus/conserved domain 1 polypeptides in vivo and in vitro in the absence of protein synthesis

The human adenovirus E1A 243R protein (243 residues) transcriptionally represses a set of cellular genes that regulate cellular growth and differentiation. We describe two lines of evidence that E1A repression does not require cellular protein synthesis but instead involves direct interaction with a cellular protein(s). First, E1A 243R protein represses an E1A-repressible promoter in the presence of inhibitors of protein synthesis, as shown by cell microinjection-in situ hybridization. Second, E1A 243R protein strongly represses transcription in vitro from promoters of the E1A-repressible genes, human collagenase, and rat insulin type II. Repression in vitro is promoter-specific, and an E1A polypeptide containing only the N-terminal 80 residues is sufficient for strong repression both in vivo and in vitro. By use of a series of E1A 1-80 deletion proteins, the E1A repression function was found to require two E1A sequence elements, one within the nonconserved E1A N terminus, and the second within a portion of conserved region 1 (40-80). These domains have been reported to possess binding sites for several cellular transcription regulators, including p300, Dr1, YY1, and the TBP subunit of TFIID. The in vitro transcription-repression system described here provides a powerful tool for the further analysis of molecular mechanism and the possible role of these cellular factors.

Transcriptional repression of the c-fos gene by YY1 is mediated by a direct interaction with ATF/CREB

Transcriptional activation of the mouse c-fos gene by the adenovirus 243-amino-acid E1A protein requires a binding site for transcription factor YY1 located at -54 of the c-fos promoter. YY1 normally represses transcription of c-fos, and this repression depends on the presence of a cyclic AMP (cAMP) response element located immediately upstream of the -54 YY1 DNA-binding site. This finding suggested that the mechanism of transcriptional repression by YY1 might involve a direct interaction with members of the ATF/CREB family of transcription factors. In vitro and in vivo binding assays were used to demonstrate that YY1 can interact with ATF/CREB proteins, including CREB, ATF-2, ATFa1, ATFa2, and ATFa3. Structure-function analyses of YY1 and ATFa2 revealed that the C-terminal zinc finger domain of YY1 is necessary and sufficient for binding to ATFa2 and that the basic-leucine zipper region of ATFa2 is necessary and sufficient for binding to YY1. Overexpression of YY1 in HeLa cells resulted in repression of a mutant c-fos chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter that lacked binding sites for YY1, suggesting that repression can be triggered through protein-protein interactions with ATF/CREB family members. Consistent with this finding, repression was relieved upon removal of the upstream cAMP response element. These data support a model in which YY1 binds simultaneously to its own DNA-binding site in the c-fos promoter and also to adjacent DNA-bound ATF/CREB proteins in order to effect repression. They further suggest that the ATF/CREB-YY1 complex serves as a target for the adenovirus 243-amino-acid E1A protein.

Cyclophilin A and FKBP12 interact with YY1 and alter its transcriptional activity

YY1 is a zinc finger transcription factor with unusual structural and functional features. In a yeast two-hybrid screen, two cellular proteins, cyclophilin A (CyPA) and FK506-binding protein 12 (FKBP12), interacted with YY1. These interactions are specific and also occur in mammalian cells. Cyclosporin A and FK506 efficiently disrupt the YY1-CyPA and YY1-FKBP12 interactions. Overexpression of human CyPA and FKBP12 have different effects on YY1-regulated transcription with these effects being promoter-dependent. These results suggest that immunophilins may be mediators in the functional role of YY1.

Identification of a novel E1A response element in the mouse c-fos promoter

Transcriptional activation of the c-fos gene in mouse S49 cells by the adenovirus 243-amino-acid E1A protein depends on domains of E1A that are also required for transformation and that bind the cellular protein p300. Activation additionally depends on stimulation of endogenous cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase by analogs or inducers of cAMP. Transient transfection assays were used to analyze the c-fos promoter for sequences that confer responsiveness to E1A. Linker substitution and point mutants revealed that transcriptional activation by E1A depended on a cAMP response element (CRE) located at -67 relative to the start site of transcription and a neighboring binding site for transcription factor YY1 located at -54. A 22-bp sequence containing the -67 CRE and the -54 YY1 site was sufficient to confer responsiveness to a minimal E1B promoter and was termed the c-fos E1A response element (ERE). Function of the c-fos ERE depended on both the CRE and the YY1 site, since mutation of either site resulted in a loss of responsiveness to E1A. These results imply a specific functional interaction between CRE-binding proteins, transcription factor YY1, and E1A in the regulation of the c-fos gene.