The 10-year follow-up data of the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial comparing low-dose and high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide

Treatment of Childhood-onset Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in the 21st Century: A Call to Catch Up With the Evidence

Proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and kidney failure, especially in childhood-onset PLN (cPLN). Therefore, it is important to treat it promptly and aggressively, while being cognizant of the risk-benefit ratio and side effects of therapies.

A glimpse into the future of systemic lupus erythematosus

This viewpoint article on a forecast of clinically meaningful changes in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the next 10 years is based on a review of the current state of the art. The groundwork has been laid by a robust series of classification criteria and treatment recommendations that have all been published since 2019. Building on this strong foundation, SLE management predictably will take significant steps forward. Assessment for lupus arthritis will presumably include musculoskeletal sonography. Large-scale polyomics studies are likely to unravel more of the central immune mechanisms of the disease. Biomarkers predictive of therapeutic success may enter the field; the type I interferon signature, as a companion for use of anifrolumab, an antibody against the common type I interferon receptor, is one serious candidate. Besides anifrolumab for nonrenal SLE and the new calcineurin inhibitor voclosporin in lupus nephritis, both of which are already approved in the United States and likely to become available in the European Union in 2022, several other approaches are in advanced clinical trials. These include advanced B cell depletion, inhibition of costimulation via CD40 and CD40 ligand (CD40L), and Janus kinase 1 (Jak1) and Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2) inhibition. At the same time, essentially all of our conventional therapeutic armamentarium will continue to be used. The ability of patients to have successful SLE pregnancies, which has become much better in the last decades, should further improve, with approaches including tumor necrosis factor blockade and self-monitoring of fetal heart rates. While we hope that the COVID-19 pandemic will soon be controlled, it has highlighted the risk of severe viral infections in SLE, with increased risk tied to certain therapies. Although there are some data that a cure might be achievable, this likely will remain a challenge beyond 10 years from now.

A pharmacoeconomic study comparing the use of mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide as induction therapy in lupus nephritis patients in Egypt

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major and serious complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and is associated with morbidity and mortality. The difference in drug cost between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) inducing regimens becomes a relevant and realistic issue, especially in developing countries. Thus, this study aims to estimate and compare the costs and outcomes of CYC and MMF for better allocation of resources to reduce the burden on the Egyptian healthcare system.

METHODS

A prospective, parallel observational study was conducted at Kasr Al-Aini Hospital between 2018 and 2020. One hundred and twenty-two LN patients were followed up monthly during the study period. Remission and maintenance of renal remission were assessed at 6 and 12 months from the start of therapy. Total direct medical costs associated with both regimens were examined. We applied the cost-minimization analysis method from governmental perspective. Besides, a prospective evaluation of reported changes in health-related quality of life using SF-36 was included in our study.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in treatment response at 6 and 12 months (RR 0.6 [0.26;1.43] and 0.8 [0.27;2.33]), respectively, as well as the incidence of infection episodes between MMF and CYC group (71.4% versus 70.45%, p > 0.05). The average direct medical expenditures per patient in the MMF group were approximately one and half times more than the CYC group (2339.69 $ versus 1329.03 $, p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CYC arm was associated with lower costs than the MMF arm, with equally effective outcomes indicating that CYC is an attractive treatment option.

Low dosage use of cyclophosphamide improves the survival of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of cyclophosphamide (CYC) on organ involvement and SLE patients' overall and cause-specific mortality.

METHODS

Information about CYC prescription was taken from the Jiangsu Lupus database, which was set up to collect medical records from SLE patients since their first admission during 1999-2009 in Jiangsu province, China. Follow-up studies were carried out in 2010 and 2015 to check the survival status of the patients. Cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Kaplan-Meier model was used to assess the effect of CYC on mortality between organ involvement and non-involvement.

RESULTS

There were 221 deaths observed out of 2446 SLE patients. CYC users decreased overall mortality of SLE (8.4%) with adjusted HR (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.56-0.97), as compared to non-users. A decrease in overall mortality of SLE was found in the low dosage (< 600 mg) of CYC users, with adjusted HR (95% CI) of 0.54 (0.36-0.81). The protection of CYC on mortality of SLE was further observed in subgroups, such as female; SLEDAI score ≥ 15 group; and those with neuropsychiatric, renal, and hematological involvements, and low serum C3. In addition, CYC could eliminate the differences in mortality between organ involvement and non-involvement, including renal, neuropsychiatric, cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hematological involvement, but not for mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal involvement.

CONCLUSION

Low dosage use of CYC decreased the risk of overall mortality of SLE. CYC might improve the survival of SLE patients with renal, neuropsychiatric, cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hematological involvements. Key Points • Cyclophosphamide decreases overall mortality of SLE patients. • Decreased mortality is mainly observed from low dosage use of cyclophosphamide. • Cyclophosphamide improves the survival of SLE patients when major systems such as renal, neuropsychiatric, cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, and hematological are involved.

Causes and predictors of mortality from lupus nephritis in Southern Hunan, China

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to explore the causes and predictors of mortality in a cohort of LN with LN in southern Hunan, China.

METHODS

We analyzed 236 patients with biopsy-proven LN during 2010-2018. Demographic data, laboratory data, SLEDAI scores, treatment strategies, and comorbidity were collected. Cox regression analysis was carried out to determine the independent predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

The patients had mean disease duration of 67.9 ± 28.2 months. Class IV LN was the predominant biopsy class within the cohort (38.1%). After 1 year therapy, the majority of patients achieved complete remission (72.9%) and 44 (18.6%) patients achieved partial remission. The 5- and 10-years survival rates for our cohort were 94.4 and 85.2%, respectively. There were 18 deaths (7.6%), of which the main causes were infection (50%) alone and cardiovascular diseases (27.8%). Independent predictors of mortality in our cohort were: platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (PNR) [hazard ratio (HR) 5.910; confidence interval (CI) 1.253-27.875], onset age (HR 1.090; CI 1.035-1.147), and SLEDAI scores (HR 1.258; CI 1.068-1.482).

CONCLUSION

We firstly revealed that PNR might be a promising predictor of mortality and reported the causes and prognostic predictors of mortality in LN from southern Hunan, China.

Treat-to-Target in Lupus Nephritis. What is the Role of the Repeat Kidney Biopsy?

Kidney involvement, termed lupus nephritis (LN), develops in 35-60% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, often early during the disease course. When not treated promptly and efficiently, LN may lead to rapid and severe loss of kidney function, being the reason why it is considered one of the most severe lupus manifestations. Despite improved pharmacotherapy, 5-20% of LN patients develop end-stage kidney disease within ten years from the LN diagnosis. While the principal ground of LN therapy is prevention of renal function worsening, resembling a race against nephron loss, consensual agreement upon outcome measures and clinically meaningful short- and long-term targets of LN therapy have yet to be determined. Literature points to the importance of inclusion of tissue-based approaches in the determination of those targets, and evidence accumulates regarding the importance of per-protocol repeat kidney biopsies in the evaluation of the initial phase of therapy and prediction of long-term renal prognosis. The latter leads to the hypothesis that the information gleaned from repeat biopsies may contribute to optimised therapeutic decision making, and, therefore, increased probability to attain complete renal response in the short term, and a more favourable renal prognosis within a longer prospect. The multinational project ReBioLup was recently designed to serve as a key contributor to form evidence about the role of per-protocol repeat biopsies in a randomised fashion and aspires to unify the global LN community towards improved kidney and patient survival.

Recent Clinical Trials Insights into the Treatment of Primary Membranous Nephropathy

Immunosuppressive therapy is mandatory for primary membranous nephropathy with persistent nephrotic proteinuria or anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibodies, reduced kidney function, or another risk factor for progression. Rituximab has demonstrated efficacy for proteinuria remission compared with renin-angiotensin system blockade or cyclosporine in two well-powered randomized controlled trials. More recently, STARMEN showed that alternating glucocorticoid-cyclophosphamide is superior to sequential tacrolimus-rituximab for proteinuria remission, although it was associated with a higher risk of non-serious adverse events. However, sequential tacrolimus-rituximab involved delayed lower dose rituximab and was the worst-performing rituximab regimen among those tested in randomized clinical trials. The RI-CYCLO pilot study did not demonstrate superiority of glucocorticoid-cyclophosphamide over rituximab and found no difference in adverse events. Overall, STARMEN and RI-CYCLO confirmed the efficacy of glucocorticoid-cyclophosphamide in patients with high-risk membranous nephropathy and the role of rituximab as a valid alternative. However, none of the trials tested an optimized rituximab protocol involving a second rituximab cycle before declaring treatment failure. Calcineurin inhibitors should be considered third-line drugs and sequential use of calcineurin inhibitor rituximab did not add over rituximab-only regimens. We critically review recent randomized controlled trials, propose a research agenda, and call for multinational pragmatic trials that enroll patients at referral centers to address unmet research needs.

The Shifting Landscape of Lupus Nephritis Management: A Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is commonly the first autoimmune disease that comes to mind for most people when rheumatology is mentioned. It remains an enigma that many of us, including patients and healthcare providers, do not fully understand. Although an ancient disease, it still remains difficult to both diagnose and treat. Historically, there has always been a paucity of therapeutic interventions for SLE as a whole. One of the most distressing manifestations for the patient and diagnostic and therapeutically challenging aspects of SLE is lupus nephritis (LN). There has historically been some difficultly in the development of LN drugs that provide significant therapeutic benefits while having an acceptable side-effect profile. This difficulty led to decades in which no drugs were approved for LN. With a better understanding of the pathogenesis of SLE and LN and improvement in trial design, great therapeutic strides have recently been made. The immunosuppressive landscape of LN has changed recently with the approval of two newer agents as well as a number of promising trials in LN. With the increased number of therapeutic agents (both immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive), the clinical question is how and when to use these medications, and, more importantly, which agents to use first. With the increased number of agents, the answers to these questions are becoming more difficult to answer. The purpose of the paper is to review updates in LN diagnosis and management.

From sequential to combination and personalised therapy in lupus nephritis: moving towards a paradigm shift?

The current treatment paradigm in lupus nephritis consists of an initial phase aimed at inducing remission and a subsequent remission maintenance phase. With this so-called sequential treatment approach, complete renal response is achieved in a disappointing proportion of 20-30% of the patients within 6-12 months, and 5-20% develop end-stage kidney disease within 10 years. Treat-to-target approaches are detained owing to uncertainty as to whether the target should be determined based on clinical, histopathological, or immunopathological features. Until reliable non-invasive biomarkers exist, tissue-based evaluation remains the gold standard, necessitating repeat kidney biopsies for treatment evaluation and therapeutic decision-making. In this viewpoint, we discuss the pros and cons of voclosporin and belimumab as add-on agents to standard therapy, the first drugs to be licenced for lupus nephritis after recent successful randomised phase III clinical trials. We also discuss the prospect of obinutuzumab and anifrolumab, also on top of standard immunosuppression, currently tested in phase III trials after initial auspicious signals. Undoubtably, the treatment landscape in lupus nephritis is changing, with combination treatment regimens challenging the sequential concept. Meanwhile, the enrichment of the treatment armamentarium shifts the need from lack of therapies to the challenge of how to select the right treatment for the right patient. This has to be addressed in biomarker surveys along with tissue-level mapping of inflammatory phenotypes, which will ultimately lead to person-centred therapeutic approaches. After many years of trial failures, we may now anticipate a heartening future for patients with lupus nephritis.

Mechanism of Action and Efficacy of Immunosupressors in Lupus Nephritis

Approximately 70% of the patients with systemic lupus erythematosus will have clinical evidence of kidney damage during their evolution. Patients with impaired renal function at onset and those with recurrent flares have a poor prognosis. Understanding the mechanism of action of immunosuppressants is essential for proper prescription. Steroids inhibit the DNA sequence that promotes the release of inflammatory cytokines. Phosphoramide mustard, metabolite of cyclophosphamide, cross-link with the DNA, causing the aggregation of an alkyl group, causing cell death. Mycophenolate inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, prevents de novo synthesis of guanine, inducing cell arrest in S phase. Azathioprine blocks the synthesis of purines and induces apoptosis. Calcineurin inhibitors prevent the dephosphorylation of NFAT and reduce the production of interleukin 2. Antimalarials alter the enzymatic release of lysosomes by increasing intravesicular pH. The mechanism of action of rituximab is related to complement-dependent cytotoxicity and the elimination of anti-CD20-labeled B cells. Progress in the knowledge and management of low doses of steroids may change the current paradigm and reduce the frequency of related adverse events. Mycophenolate seems to be a better choice than cyclophosphamide for induction, it is also preferred over azathioprine as a maintenance immunosuppressive agent, although azathioprine is preferred in women with a desire for conception, those pregnant, or with low resources. For treatment-resistant cases, tacrolimus, rituximab or belimumab may be effective. Ongoing clinical trials with new drugs offer promising results.

Immunosuppression in Rheumatologic and Auto-immune Disease

Many rheumatologic diseases are thought to originate in dysregulation of the immune system; lupus nephritis, for example, involves humoral immunity, while autoinflammatory diseases such as familial Mediterranean fever are caused by defects in innate immunity. Of note, this dysregulation may involve both upregulation of immune system components and aspects of immunodeficiency. Treatment of rheumatologic diseases thus requires a familiarity with a variety of immunosuppressive medications and their effects on immune system function.In many rheumatologic conditions, due to an incompletely elucidated mechanism of disease, immunosuppression is relatively broad in contrast to agents used, for example, in treatment of transplant rejection. Multiple immunosuppressive drugs may also be used in succession or in combination. As such, an understanding of the mechanisms and targets of immunosuppressive drugs is essential to appreciating their utility and potential adverse effects. Because of the overlap between therapies used in rheumatologic as well as other inflammatory disorders, some of these medications are discussed in other disease processes (e.g., Immunosuppression for inflammatory bowel disease) or in greater detail in other chapters of this textbook (corticosteroids, mTOR inhibitors, antiproliferative agents).

Anti-Nuclear Antibody-Negative Lupus Nephritis or Post-Infectious Glomerulonephritis: Diagnostic Dilemma in a Young Male

Proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is histologically characterized by endocapillary hypercellularity and large immune deposits on light microscopy. Immunofluorescence shows almost all immunoglobulins and complement staining. The presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is important for diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Absence of ANA rules out the possibility of SLE according to the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE. We report a young boy with fever, nephrotic-nephritic syndrome and pancytopenia consistent with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Renal biopsy was consistent with LN; however, his initial ANA was negative. In view of pathological features of LN and persistent pancytopenia, high dose steroid therapy was started. Repeat ANA, done during the illness, turned positive. In this report, we describe the relevance of pathological patterns and the uncertainties of ANA positivity in making a diagnosis of SLE.

Voclosporin: a novel calcineurin inhibitor for the management of lupus nephritis

INTRODUCTION

Kidney survival rates in lupus nephritis (LN) remain suboptimal, with 10-20% of patients progressing to end-stage kidney disease by 10-20 years. Recently, the landscape of LN management has changed with the advent of new molecules that have demonstrated safety and efficacy in clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we approach the current state of LN management, the unmet therapeutic needs, and deep dive into voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) that has demonstrated improved efficacy when added to a mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and glucocorticoid regimen, without an increase in adverse events. We focus on the characteristics of this new CNI and the studies that led to its approval by the US FDA.

EXPERT OPINION

Voclosporin adds to therapeutic options for LN. This drug offers potential advantages over other CNIs. The addition of voclosporin to a standard-of-care regimen of MMF/glucocorticoids demonstrated higher and faster response rates. As other regimens, a combination of CNI, MMF, and glucocorticoids must be individualized and is not appropriate for all patients. Some questions remain to be answered for this regimen, such as the length of treatment, the tapering schedule, and its long-term safety and efficacy for preserving kidney function.

The Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology consensus statements on the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is prevalent in Asia and carries a variable prognosis among patients across the Asia-Pacific region, which could relate to access to health care, tolerability of medications, and adherence to therapies. Because many aspects of SLE are unique among patients from this region, the Asia-Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology developed the first set of consensus recommendations on the management of SLE. A core panel of 13 rheumatologists drafted a set of statements through face-to-face meeting and teleconferences. A literature review was done for each statement to grade the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. 29 independent specialists and three patients with SLE were then recruited for a modified Delphi process to establish consensus on the statements through an online voting platform. A total of 34 consensus recommendations were developed. Panellists agreed that patients with SLE should be referred to a specialist for the formulation of a treatment plan through shared decision making between patients and physicians. Remission was agreed to be the goal of therapy, but when it cannot be achieved, a low disease activity state should be aimed for. Patients should be screened for renal disease, and hydroxychloroquine is recommended for all Asian people with SLE. Major organ manifestations of SLE should be treated with induction immunosuppression and subsequently maintenance; options include cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and calcineurin inhibitors, in combination with glucocorticoids. Biologics, combination regimens, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulins should be reserved for cases of refractory or life-threatening disease. Anticoagulation therapy with warfarin is preferred to the direct oral anticoagulants for thromboembolic SLE manifestations associated with a high-risk antiphospholipid antibody profile.

Life prognosis and renal relapse after induction therapy in Japanese patients with proliferative and pure membranous lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare life prognosis and renal relapse after induction therapy in proliferative (PLN) and pure membranous LN (MLN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the cases of 140 of 172 patients with LN who underwent a renal biopsy at our hospital or community hospitals from 1993 to 2016. We determined the complete response (CR) rate at 12 months after the patients had started induction therapy, and we evaluated the predictive factors for CR, life prognosis and renal relapse in PLN and pure MLN. We defined PLN as International Society of Neurology and the Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) Class III or IV and MLN as ISN/RPS Class V.

RESULTS

The renal pathology of 99 (70.7%) patients was classified as PLN, and that of the other 41 (29.3%) patients as MLN. Fifty patients (50.5%) with PLN and 22 patients (53.7%) with MLN achieved a CR at 12 months. A multivariate analysis showed that a lower index of chronicity in PLN and a higher total haemolytic complement (CH50) level in MLN were predictive factors for achieving a CR at 12 months. A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the life prognosis (P = 0.93) and renal relapse (P = 0.52) were not significantly different between PLN and MLN.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive factors for a CR at 12 months post-induction therapy were index of chronicity in PLN and CH50 level in MLN. There were no significant differences in life prognosis or renal relapse between PLN and MLN in the achievement of a CR at 12 months post-induction therapy.

Treatment Update in Systemic Lupus Erythematous

The recent updates on treatment recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematous have provided greater clarity in the way existing anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs are used, in treating disease activity, preventing flares, and reducing irreversible organ damage and toxicity arising from the treatments themselves. Novel therapies will provide more options in the armamentarium for treating this complex disease, but ongoing studies are needed to improve understanding of the optimal treatment algorithm to maintain quality of life and improve survival for patients.

Lupus Cohorts

Large cohorts with diverse ethnic backgrounds and heterogenous clinical features have provided the real-life data about the safety and efficacy of various treatment regimens for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). There are multiple well-established regional, national, and international lupus cohorts that have made significant contributions to the understanding of SLE. Using social media for cohort-based studies can significantly increase the outreach in a short time period for studying rare diseases such as SLE. Lack of strict inclusion criteria allows study of a broad range of patients but selection bias and incomplete data are possible in long-term cohort studies.

Urinary Peptides as Potential Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Lupus Nephritis: Results of the Peptidu-LUP Study

Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). The therapeutic strategy relies on kidney biopsy (KB) results. We tested whether urinary peptidome analysis could non-invasively differentiate active from non-active LN. Design: Urinary samples were collected from 93 patients (55 with active LN and 38 with non-active LN), forming a discovery (n = 42) and an independent validation (n = 51) cohort. Clinical characteristics were collected at inclusion and prospectively for 24 months. The urinary peptidome was analyzed by capillary-electrophoresis coupled to mass-spectrometry, comparing active LN to non-active LN, and assessing chronic lesions and response to therapy. The value of previously validated prognostic (CKD273) and differential diagnostic (LN172) signatures was evaluated. Results: Urinary peptides could not discriminate between active and non-active LN or predict early response to therapy. Tubulo-interstitial fibrosis was correlated to the CKD273. The LN172 score identified 92.5% of samples as LN. Few patients developed new-onset CKD. Conclusions: We validated the CKD273 and LN172 classifiers but did not identify a robust signature that could predict active LN and replace KB. The value of urinary peptidome to predict long-term CKD, or renal flares in SLE, remains to be evaluated.

Comparison of Different Uses of Cyclophosphamide in Lupus Nephritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to compare the relative efficacy and safety of different uses of cyclophosphamide (CYC) in lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE and PubMed for articles from the database till June 2018.

RESULTS

12 randomized controlled trials with 994 participants were included. The meta-analysis indicated that the short-interval lower-dose intravenous CYC regime remarkably reduced 24-hour proteinuria [mean difference (MD) -0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.62 to -0.27; I2 0%], incidence of major infections [odds ratio (OR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.95; I2 42%], gonadal toxicity (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.62; I2 0%), and leukopenia (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.94, I2 0%), while high-dose regime had an obvious lower probability of doubling of serum creatinine (Scr) level (OR 2.43; 95% CI 1.19 to 4.95; I2 0%). However, the difference in the complete and total remission rates between the two regimens was not observed.

CONCLUSION

The result suggested that the short-interval lower-dose CYC regime remarkably reduced 24-hour proteinuria and the incidence of adverse events, while the long-course high-dose regime played a significant role in reducing the rate of doubling Scr level.

The Use of Glucocorticoids in Lupus Nephritis: New Pathways for an Old Drug

Glucocorticoids therapy has greatly improved the outcome of lupus nephritis patients. Since their discovery, their adverse effects have counterbalanced their beneficial anti-inflammatory effects. Glucocorticoids exert their effects through both genomic and non-genomic pathways. Differential activation of these pathways is clinically relevant in terms of benefit and adverse effects. Ongoing aims in lupus nephritis treatment development focus on a better use of glucocorticoids combined with immunosuppressant drugs and biologics. Newer regimens aim to decrease the peak glucocorticoid dose, allow a rapid glucocorticoid tapering, and intend to control disease activity with a lower cumulative glucocorticoid exposure. In this review we discuss the mechanisms, adverse effects and recent strategies to limit glucocorticoid exposure without compromising treatment efficacy.

Management of Lupus Nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. The main goal of the management of LN is to avoid chronic kidney disease (CKD). Current treatment strategies remain unsatisfactory in terms of complete renal response, prevention of relapses, CKD, and progression to end-stage kidney disease. To improve the prognosis of LN, recent data suggest that we should (i) modify our treat-to-target approach by including, in addition to a clinical target, a pathological target and (ii) switch from conventional sequential therapy to combination therapy. Here, we also review the results of recent controlled randomized trials.

Macrophage activation syndrome triggered by active systemic lupus erythematosus : Successful treatment by interleukin-1 inhibition (anakinra)

This article presents a case of fulminant macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) as a rare complication of active systemic lupus erythematosus in a 33-year-old female patient. Initial presentation showed severe lupus disease exacerbation with renal involvement, hemolytic anemia, and neuropsychiatric changes. Early therapy focused on broad immunosuppression (high-dose corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide); however, disease remission could not be achieved. After an additional inflammatory focus and underlying malignancy were excluded, the triplet of pancytopenia, fever, and high ferritin levels indicated MAS, a bone marrow biopsy confirmed secondary hemophagocytic histiocytosis. Treatment with an interleukin‑1 antagonist (anakinra) induced a fast, effective therapeutic success.

Lupus nephritis: clinical presentations and outcomes in the 21st century

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a frequent and severe manifestation of SLE. Along the decades, the epidemiology of LN and its clinical presentation have been changing. However, even though retrospective cohort studies report a decreased mortality rate and an improvement in the disease prognosis, the percentage of patients progressing into end stage renal disease (ESRD) keeps steady despite the improvements in therapeutic strategies. Current in-use medications have been available for decades now, yet over the years, regimens for optimizing their efficacy and minimizing toxicity have been developed. Therapeutic research is now moving towards the direction of precision medicine and several new drugs, targeting selectively different pathogenetic pathways, are currently under evaluation with promising results. In this review, we address the main changes and persistent unmet needs in LN management throughout the past decades, with a focus on prognosis and upcoming treatments.

Evidence of Renal Iron Accumulation in a Male Mouse Model of Lupus

Lupus nephritis represents a common and serious complication of the autoimmune disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Clinical studies suggest that several proteins related to iron metabolism, including transferrin, serve as urinary biomarkers of lupus nephritis. We previously reported that in female NZBWF1 mice, a commonly used mouse model of SLE with a female sex bias, increased urinary transferrin excretion and renal iron accumulation occur around the onset of albuminuria. The current study investigated whether similar findings occur in male mice of a different mouse model of SLE, the MRL/lpr mouse. Two different cohorts were studied: MRL/lpr mice at an early, pre-albuminuric age (8 weeks), and after developing albuminuria (>100 mg/dL, confirmed by ELISA); age-matched MRL/MpJ control strain mice served for comparison. Urinary transferrin excretion was dramatically increased in the older, albuminuric MRL/lpr mice compared to the age-matched MRL/MpJ (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between strains at 8 weeks of age. Similarly, there were no significant differences between strains in renal cortical or outer medullary non-heme iron concentrations at 8 weeks. In the older, albuminuric MRL/lpr mice, renal cortical and outer medullary non-heme iron concentrations were significantly increased compared with age-matched MRL/MpJ mice, as was the expression of the iron storage protein ferritin (P < 0.01). Together, these data show that increased urinary transferrin excretion and renal tissue iron accumulation also occurs in albuminuric male MRL/lpr mice, suggesting that renal iron accumulation may be a feature of multiple mouse models of SLE.

Comparison of complete renal response and mortality in early- and late-onset lupus nephritis: a multicenter retrospective study of a Japanese cohort

Background

Most patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) progress to lupus nephritis (LN) within 5 years of their SLE diagnosis, although it is not uncommon for LN to develop at later time points. Here we evaluated the clinical features of early- and late-onset LN.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 184 of the 201 patients who underwent a renal biopsy at Nagasaki University Hospital and associated community hospitals between 1990 and 2016 and were diagnosed as having LN. Early onset was defined as the development of LN within the first 5 years after the patient’s SLE diagnosis, and late onset was defined as LN development > 5 years post-diagnosis. We analyzed the complete renal response (CR) at 6 and 12 months after induction therapy, the classification of renal pathology, and the mortality of the early- and late-onset LN groups.

Results

The mean follow-up duration after the renal biopsy was 123 ± 85 months. There were 113 (61.4%) early-onset patients and 71 (38.6%) late-onset patients. A multivariate analysis revealed that the following factors were predictive of CR: at 6 months: female sex (odds ratio [OR] 3.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31–11.77, p = 0.010), proteinuria (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71–0.97, p = 0.009), index of activity (0–24) (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.99, p = 0.030), and early-onset LN (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.15–4.98, p = 0.018); at 12 months: female sex (OR 3.60, 95% CI 1.32–9.83, p = 0.013), mixed LN (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04–0.80, p = 0.024), index of activity (0–24) (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68–0.94, p = 0.007), and early-onset LN (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.05–4.23, p = 0.035). In a Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray regression model, the early-onset LN group had a significantly better mortality rate than the late-onset LN group (p = 0.038 and p = 0.043, respectively).

Conclusions

In our cohort, early-onset LN was a better predictor of CR at 6 and 12 months than late-onset LN. Our results suggest that early-onset LN patients had lower mortality than late-onset LN patients.

Long-term outcomes of lupus nephritis treated with regimens based on cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil

INTRODUCTION

Lupus nephritis (LN) has a considerable impact on the morbidity and mortality of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Long-term comparative outcome data from the Indian subcontinent on treatment regimens with cyclophosphamide (CYP) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are sparse. We assessed renal and patient survival for these patients in terms of the types of induction - CYP or MMF - and the two maintenance therapies - MMF or azathioprine (AZA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed outcomes of 100 LN patients, 67 treated with CYP (26 class III, 25 class IV, 6 class III + V and 10 class IV + V; 40 Euro lupus regimen and 27 National Institutes of Health regimen) and 33 treated with a MMF-based regimen with steroids between July 2008 and June 2018. Data regarding demographic, clinical and histopathological features and the treatment given to all patients were extracted. Outcomes between the two regimens CYP and MMF were compared in terms of remission, dialysis and patient survival.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics were similar in both groups, except that the activity index was higher in CYP patients (6.13 ± 4.48 vs. 4.61 ± 2.80). However, the chronicity index was similar. The overall remission rate was 70% at the end of induction. The rates of complete remission, partial remission and non-responders in the CYP group were 46.2%, 23.9% and 29.9%, respectively. However, in the MMF group, the corresponding rates were 57.6%, 12.1% and 30.3%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates in the CYP group were 89.5%, 86.2%, 86.2%, 83.8%, 83.8% and 83.8%, respectively. In the MMF induction group, the corresponding rates were 93.9%, 93.9%, 89%, 89%, 89% and 89%, respectively. At the end of the study, rates of end-stage renal disease in the MMF group and CYP group were 7.5% and 12.1%, respectively. The death-censored and non-censored renal survival rates were also similar in the long term. With regard to maintenance therapy, 3/56 (5.3%) in the MMF group and 7/34 (20.5%) in the AZA group experienced doubling of serum creatinine (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes in terms of patient and renal survival of LN patients treated with CYP and MMF induction are similar. Doubling of serum creatinine occurred more with AZA-based maintenance therapy than with MMF-based maintenance therapy. Most deaths occurred during induction, and sepsis was the most common cause of death.

An Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Lupus Nephritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Update on the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of lupus nephritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent criteria enable the earlier classification of lupus nephritis based on kidney biopsy and compatible serology. Treatment of active nephritis includes low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate, followed by maintenance immunosuppression. Recent trials have suggested superiority of regimens combining mycophenolate with either calcineurin inhibitor or belimumab, although their long-term benefit/risk ratio has not been determined. Encouraging results with novel anti-CD20 antibodies confirm the effectiveness of B cell depletion. Achievement of low-grade proteinuria (< 700-800 mg/24 h) at 12-month post-induction is linked to favorable long-term outcomes and could be considered in a treat-to-target strategy. Also, repeat kidney biopsy can guide the duration of maintenance immunosuppression. Lupus nephritis has increased cardiovascular disease burden necessitating risk-reduction strategies. An expanding spectrum of therapies coupled with ongoing basic/translational research can lead to individualized medical care and improved outcomes in lupus nephritis.

Targeting glycosphingolipid metabolism as a potential therapeutic approach for treating disease in female MRL/lpr lupus mice

Glycosphingolipids (GSLs) hexosylceramides and lactosylceramides are elevated in lupus mice and human patients with nephritis. Whereas other renal diseases characterized by increased GSL levels are thought to be a result of upregulated GSL synthesis, our results suggest elevated hexosylceramides and lactosylceramides in lupus nephritis is a result of increased catabolism of ganglioside GM3 due to significantly increased neuraminidase (NEU) activity. Thus, we hypothesized GM3 would be decreased in lupus nephritis kidneys and blocking NEU activity would reduce GSLs and improve disease in lupus mice. Female MRL/lpr lupus mice were treated with water or the NEU inhibitor oseltamivir phosphate at the onset of proteinuria to block GSL catabolism. Age-matched (non-nephritic) female MRL/MpJ lupus mice served as controls. Renal GM3 levels were significantly higher in the nephritic MRL/lpr water-treated mice compared to non-nephritic MRL/MpJ mice, despite significantly increased renal NEU activity. Blocking GSL catabolism increased, rather than decreased, renal and urine GSL levels and disease was not significantly impacted. A pilot study treating MRL/lpr females with GlcCer synthase inhibitor Genz-667161 to block GSL synthesis resulted in a strong significant negative correlation between Genz-667161 dose and renal GSL hexosylceramide and GM3 levels. Splenomegaly was negatively correlated and serum IgG levels were marginally correlated with increasing Genz-667161 dose. These results suggest accumulation of renal GM3 may be due to dysregulation of one or more of the GSL ganglioside pathways and inhibiting GSL synthesis, but not catabolism, may be a therapeutic approach for treating lupus nephritis.

The Evolving Role of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Treating Lupus Nephritis

The overall kidney survival among lupus nephritis patients has improved with currently used induction immunosuppression regimens of corticosteroids and either cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil; however, there still remains a significant number of lupus nephritis patients who do not achieve remission with these regimens. Investigators have looked at other immunosuppressive regimens for lupus nephritis, and there has been interest in the use of calcineurin inhibitors in this regard. Calcineurin inhibitors are potentially an attractive option because of their established ability to inhibit T cell function, attenuate proteinuria through non-immunologic means, and their safety in pregnancy and lactation. In this review, we discuss the findings and limitations of selected trials that evaluated the use of calcineurin inhibitors in the treatment of lupus nephritis, either with corticosteroids alone or as a component of multitarget therapy when combined with mycophenolate mofetil. There may be a role for calcineurin inhibitors among patients with heavy proteinuria, as well as younger patients with refractory lupus nephritis. The multitarget therapy trials reveal higher rates of remission compared with mycophenolate mofetil alone and cyclophosphamide; however, some trials highlight the possibility of more infectious adverse events. We discuss the need for further study of calcineurin inhibitors in more diverse patient populations and the need for trials with longer follow-up with "hard" endpoints beyond proteinuria reduction, such as worsening CKD or repeat protocol biopsies, given the calcineurin inhibitors ability to reduce proteinuria non-immunologically and thus increased rate of relapse when the drug is tapered. While there may indeed be a space for calcineurin inhibitors to help increase remission rates in lupus nephritis patients, more work is needed to help address the questions the studies available to date have yet to answer.

Prediction of prognosis and renal outcome in lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe manifestation of SLE, characterised by subendothelial and/or subepithelial immune complex depositions in the afflicted kidney, resulting in extensive injury and nephron loss during the acute phase and eventually chronic irreversible damage and renal function impairment if not treated effectively. The therapeutic management of LN has improved during the last decades, but the imperative need for consensual outcome measures remains. In order to design trials with success potentiality, it is important to define clinically important short-term and long-term targets of therapeutic and non-therapeutic intervention. While it is known that early response to treatment is coupled with favourable renal outcomes, early predictors of renal function impairment are lacking. The information gleaned from kidney biopsies may provide important insights in this direction. Alas, baseline clinical and histopathological information has not been shown to be informative. By contrast, accumulating evidence of pronounced discrepancies between clinical and histopathological outcomes after the initial phase of immunosuppression has prompted investigations of the potential usefulness of per-protocol repeat kidney biopsies as an integral part of treatment evaluation, including patients showing adequate clinical response. This approach appears to have merit. Hopefully, clinical, molecular or genetic markers that reliably reflect kidney histopathology and portend the long-term prognosis will be identified. Novel non-invasive imaging methods and employment of the evolving artificial intelligence in pattern recognition may also be helpful towards these goals. The molecular and cellular characterisation of SLE and LN will hopefully result in novel therapeutic modalities, maybe new taxonomy perspectives, and ultimately personalised management.

Lupus nephritis

Lupus nephritis (LN) is a form of glomerulonephritis that constitutes one of the most severe organ manifestations of the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Most patients with SLE who develop LN do so within 5 years of an SLE diagnosis and, in many cases, LN is the presenting manifestation resulting in the diagnosis of SLE. Understanding of the genetic and pathogenetic basis of LN has improved substantially over the past few decades. Treatment of LN usually involves immunosuppressive therapy, typically with mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide and with glucocorticoids, although these treatments are not uniformly effective. Despite increased knowledge of disease pathogenesis and improved treatment options, LN remains a substantial cause of morbidity and death among patients with SLE. Within 10 years of an initial SLE diagnosis, 5-20% of patients with LN develop end-stage kidney disease, and the multiple comorbidities associated with immunosuppressive treatment, including infections, osteoporosis and cardiovascular and reproductive effects, remain a concern. Clearly, early and accurate diagnosis of LN and prompt initiation of therapy are of vital importance to improve outcomes in patients with SLE.

Initial renal histology and early response predict outcomes of Brazilian lupus nephritis patients

Objective

We analyzed baseline and follow-up characteristics related to poorer renal outcomes in a Brazilian cohort of admixture race patients with lupus nephritis.

Methods

Overall, 280 outpatients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and previous kidney biopsy of lupus nephritis were recruited from August 2015 to December 2018 and had baseline laboratory and histologic data retrospectively analyzed; patients were then followed-up and data were recorded. The main outcome measure was the estimated glomerular filtration rate at last follow-up. Secondary analyses assessed the impact of initial kidney histology and treatment in long-term kidney survival.

Results

Median duration of lupus nephritis was 60 months (interquartile range: 27–120); 40 (14.3%) patients presented progressive chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 and ≥10 ml/min/1.73 m2) or end-stage kidney disease at last visit. Adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that class IV lupus nephritis (odds ratio 14.91; 95% confidence interval 1.77–125.99; p = 0.01) and interstitial fibrosis ≥25% at initial biopsy (odds ratio 5.87; 95% confidence interval 1.32–26.16; p = 0.02), lack of complete or partial response at 12 months (odds ratio 16.3; 95% confidence interval 3.74–71.43; p < 0.001), and a second renal flare (odds ratio 4.49; 95% confidence interval 1.10–18.44; p = 0.04) were predictors of progressive chronic kidney disease. In a Kaplan-Meier survival curve we found that class IV lupus nephritis and interstitial fibrosis ≥25% were significantly associated with end-stage kidney disease throughout follow-up (hazard ratio 2.96; 95% confidence interval 1.3–7.0; p = 0.036 and hazard ratio 4.96; 95% confidence interval 1.9–12.9; p < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

In this large cohort of admixture race patients, class IV lupus nephritis and chronic interstitial damage at initial renal biopsy together with non-response after 1 year of therapy and relapse were associated with worse long-term renal outcomes.

Modulatory Effect of the Euro-Lupus Low-Dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide Regimen on Circulating Immune Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Euro-Lupus regimen of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CFA) is commonly used to treat severe organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), particularly lupus nephritis (LN). There are no data on the distributions and dynamics of immune cell populations in patients with various treatment outcomes. The circulating immune cells of 11 female SLE patients were assessed before and after Euro-Lupus regimen (cumulative dose of 3000 mg CFA) by flow cytometry together with those of 16 healthy women. A subanalysis was performed in LN patients who achieved complete remission (CR; n = 3), partial remission (PR; n = 4), and no response (NR; n = 2). In SLE, the Euro-Lupus regimen decreased the percentage and absolute count of B cells; increased the percentage of CD8⁺ T cells, T regulatory cells, neutrophils, and monocyte subsets; and activated T and NK cells compared to healthy controls (P < 0.050). Patients with LN achieving CR had significantly lower proportions of CD27⁺ B memory cells compared to poor responders (PR/NR, P = 0.035). The post-treatment percentages and absolute numbers of B cells, T cells, NK cells, monocytes, and neutrophils showed high inter-individual variability with no association with treatment outcome. Our pilot study revealed the dynamics of changes in immune cell populations in SLE patients during a Euro-Lupus regimen, mainly the lowering of B cells. In LN patients who achieved CR, a lower proportion of CD27⁺ B memory cells was evident compared to poor responders (PR/NR). Further studies on usefulness of monitoring immune cells for treatment response prediction on larger cohorts are needed.

[Lupus nephritis]

Lupus nephritis (LN) is the most frequent and one of the most severe organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. The central pathogenetic mechanism is characterized by the loss of immune tolerance against autoantigens of the cell nucleus, which can lead to renal inflammation via the formation of nuclear autoantibodies. The clinical manifestations of LN encompass nephritic syndrome with the special form of rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis, nephrotic syndrome and thrombotic microangiopathy. The diagnostic procedures consist of renal function and urine analysis as well as the determination of serum autoantibody profiles and complement components. An early renal biopsy enables a differentiation between the prognostically different forms of LN. In addition to supportive measures, a differentiated immunosuppressive treatment is the main approach for prognostically unfavorable forms. Important components are corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil for induction treatment. Currently investigated treatment principles include next generation calcineurin inhibitors and anti-B cell treatment.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and melioidosis

We reported a case of a young female patient presented with sepsis and diagnosed with melioidosis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) within the same admission. She presented with 1-week history of productive cough, progressive dyspnoea together with prolonged fever, arthralgia, rashes and oral ulcers. She had septicemic shock, respiratory failure requiring intubation and ventilation in intensive care unit and subsequently developed acute renal failure requiring haemodialysis. Antibiotics and immunosuppressive treatment including low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide were commenced. She had a remarkable recovery and was discharged after 6 weeks. There was no evidence of active SLE or relapse of melioidosis during clinic follow-ups.

Novel paradigms in systemic lupus erythematosus

The heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), long recognised by clinicians, is now challenging the entire lupus community, from geneticists to clinical investigators. Although the outlook for patients with SLE has greatly improved, many unmet needs remain, chief of which is the development of safer and more efficacious therapies. To develop innovative therapies, a far better understanding of SLE pathogenesis as it relates to the array of clinical phenotypes is needed. Additionally, to efficiently achieve these goals, the lupus community needs to refine existing clinical research tools and better adapt them to overcome the obstacles created by the heterogeneity of manifestations. Here, we review progress towards the ultimate goal of safely reducing disease activity and preventing damage accrual and death. We discuss the new classification criteria from the European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology, novel definitions of remission and low lupus disease activity, and new proposals for the histological classification of lupus nephritis. Recommendations for the treatment of SLE and novel approaches to drug development hold much promise to further enhance SLE outcomes.

2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007-12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion.

[Lupus nephritis]

Systemic lupus erythematosus is the most characteristic of auto-immune disorders that can lead to tissue damage in many organs, including kidney. Lupus nephritis occurs in 10 to 40% of lupus patients. Its clinical hallmark is the appearance of a proteinuria as soon as a 0.5 g/g or 0.5 g/d threshold, which calls for a renal histological evaluation in order to determine the lupus nephritis severity and the need for specific therapy. More than half of renal biopsies lead to the diagnosis of active lupus nephritis-class III or class IV A according to the ISN/RPS classification-that are the most severe in regards to renal prognosis and mortality. Their treatment aims to their clinical remission and to the prevention of relapse with minimal adverse effects for eventually the preservation of renal function, the prevention of other irreversible damage, and the reduction of risk of death. The remission is obtained through induction therapies of which the association of high dose steroids and cyclophosphamide is the most experienced. When this association must be challenged by the prevention of side-effect, in particular infertility, mycophenolate can be given instead of cyclophosphamide. Maintenance therapy, for the prevention of relapse, consists in mycophenolate or in azathioprine, mycophenolate being the most efficient however associated with a high risk of teratogenicity. Withdrawal of maintenance therapy is possible after two to three years in absence of high risk factors of relapse of lupus nephritis, however a reliable assessment of the risk of relapse is still lacking. Only pure membranous lupus nephritis (pure class V) associated with high level proteinuria requires specific therapies that usually associates steroids and an immunosuppressive drug. However, their choice hierarchy and even the use of less immunosuppressive strategies remain to be determined in terms of benefice over risk ratios. In spite of its trigger effect on lupus activity, pregnancy can be safe and successful if scheduled in the lowest risk periods with close multidisciplinary monitoring before, during and after. When necessary, renal replacement therapy does not require specific adaptation, renal transplantation is the best option when possible, as early as possible.