Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review

Questions have been raised about the effects of progestogen-only contraceptive use on bone health, particularly among young women who have not yet reached peak bone mass and perimenopausal women who may be starting to lose bone mass. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the association between progestogen-only contraceptive use and fracture risk or bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 39 articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE, published through July 2005. One study reported that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users were more likely to experience stress fractures than nonusers; this association was not statistically significant after controlling for baseline bone density. In cross-sectional studies, the mean BMD in DMPA users was usually below that of nonusers, but within 1 SD. In longitudinal studies, BMD generally decreased more over time among DMPA users than among nonusers, but women gained BMD upon discontinuation of DMPA. Limited evidence suggested that use of progestogen-only contraceptives other than DMPA did not affect BMD.

Non-oral reversible contraceptive methods

There are many contraceptives in the world market today. Knowledge of the vast spectrum of contraceptive methods is essential to the everyday practice of healthcare personnel. Such knowledge translates to improved care and access for women so they can obtain and utilize the appropriate contraception for their individual needs. This is a review of non-oral and nonsurgical contraceptive methods.

A cross-sectional study of the forearm bone density of long-term users of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

BACKGROUND

There are concerns about the effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density (BMD), but there is currently no information available on the effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on BMD. The objective of this study was to compare the BMD of LNG-IUS users with that of controls using the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study paired 53 women, aged 25-51 years, who had been using the LNG-IUS for 7 years, with 53 IUD users, according to age (+/-1 year) and body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) (+/-1). BMD was evaluated at the midshaft of the ulna and the distal radius of the nondominant forearm using double X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Mean age of women was 34 years. BMI was slightly over 25 in both groups. Estradiol was normal. Mean BMD was 0.469 +/- 0.008 and 0.467 +/- 0.009 and 0.409 +/- 0.009 and 0.411 +/- 0.009 at the midshaft of the ulna and distal radius in LNG-IUS and IUD users, respectively, without significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Women aged 25-51 years, using the LNG-IUS for 7 years, had a mean BMD similar to that of the control group of TCu380A IUD users.

A prospective study of the forearm bone density of users of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) before insertion and at 18 months of use of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

METHODS

One hundred and eleven women, 19-43 years of age, were randomly allocated to two groups: 56 to etonorgestrel and 55 to levonorgestrel. BMD was evaluated at the midshaft of the ulna and at the distal radius of the non-dominant forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before insertion and at 18 months of use.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline demographic or anthropometric characteristics, or in BMD of users of either model of implant. BMD was significantly lower at 18 months of use at the midshaft of the ulna in both groups of users. However, no difference was found at the distal radius. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variables associated with BMD at 18 months of use in both implant groups were baseline BMD, body mass index (BMI) and difference in BMI (0 versus 18 months of use).

CONCLUSIONS

Women of 19-43 years of age using either one of the implants showed lower BMD at 18 months of use at the midshaft of the ulna, however, without a difference at the distal radius.

Effects of oral contraceptives on bone mineral density

Osteoporosis is a major health problem that leads to a high incidence of spine, radial, and hip fractures. It is now well recognized that a chronically hypoestrogenic state increases bone turnover that, in turn, causes a critical decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), an important determinant of fracture risk. During the premenopausal period, hypogonadism can have deleterious effects on skeletal health by reducing peak bone mass or inducing precocious bone loss. In young women, hypothalamic amenorrhea, caused by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulsatility dysregulation, is often associated with bone loss. Although the relationship between hypothalamic amenorrhea and bone density is not completely understood, the most plausible intervention for this disorder at the moment seems to be the use of hormone replacement. Oral contraceptives are associated with an improvement in BMD if assumed upon the onset of anovulatory cycles and, therefore, estrogen deficiency, but confer no benefit in healthy women with normal ovarian function. In perimenopausal oligomenorrheic women, the use of oral contraceptives seems to have bone-sparing effects. In conclusion, the protective role of oral contraceptives on bone density is biologically plausible, since this treatment represents a replacement therapy with continuous exposure to exogenous estrogens.

Effect of Norplant contraceptive on the bones of Nigerian women as assessed by quantitative ultrasound and serum markers of bone turnover

Levonorgestrel is a commonly used progestin-only contraceptive that is available as subdermal (Norplant) and intrauterine implants. Other progestin-only contraceptives such as injectable medroxyprogeterone acetate have been shown to decrease bone mineral density in long-term users. We used calcaneal ultrasound to compare the bone quality of Nigerian women between 25 and 50 years of age who had Norplant implants for 1-4 years to that of women who were not using any form of hormonal contraceptive. The mean stiffness index of women who had Norplant implants for as long as 4 years was not significantly different from that of controls. However, serum markers of bone turnover were significantly decreased in women with Norplant implants compared to age-matched controls. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase was significantly decreased in subjects with Norplant implants for 1 year (13.7+/-6.0 vs. 23.0 U/L for controls, p = .001) and serum NTx was significantly decreased in subjects with implants for 3 years (10.6+/-4.9 vs. 17.6+/-7.7 bone collagen equivalents per liter for controls, p < .001). We conclude that although levonorgestrel contraceptive decreased overall bone turnover, it had no deleterious effect on the bone quality of women using Norplant implants for up to 4 years.

Gynecological health of females with congenital heart disease

Because of major advances in diagnostic and surgical methods, females with congenital heart disease (CHD) now survive into and beyond their reproductive years. Management of pregnancy in this patient population is well described, but gynecologic management such as menstruation, contraception and menopause have received scanty attention. Accordingly, the gynecologic health issues confronting these patients are described. Menstrual patterns in acyanotic females with CHD are similar to the general population, but cyanotic females have menstrual irregularities including amenorrhea, which implies anovulation and an increased risk of uterine carcinoma. Anticoagulants predispose to heavy vaginal bleeding and corpus luteum rupture. Contraceptives must be selected according to individual patient profiles. Hormone replacement therapy is warranted for relief of menopausal symptoms as in the general population and should be relatively safe because estrogen dose is low.

Bone mineral density in women aged 40–49 years using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enanthate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception

Most studies show that depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has a negative effect on bone mass. There are conflicting reports with respect to recovery of bone mass with long-term use of DMPA. No information is available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass, and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) in older women (40-49 years) in relation to use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs for at least 12 months preceding recruitment into the study. One-hundred twenty-seven users of DMPA, 102 NET-EN users and 106 COC users were compared to 161 nonuser controls. Bone mineral density was measured at the distal radius and midshaft of the ulna using dual X-ray absorptiometry. There was no significant difference in BMD between the four contraceptive user groups (p=.26) with and without adjustment for age. Although a small decrease in BMD was noted in the age range of 40-49 years, this was not statistically significant (p=.7). The BMD was found to be significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p<or=.0001) at both measurement sites, with an increase of one unit of BMI translating to an increase of 0.0044 g/cm2 in radius BMD. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level >or=25.8 mIU/mL was associated with a decrease of 0.017 g/cm2 in radius BMD relative to women with FSH <25.8 mIU/mL. Significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD was observed (p=.006). This study found no evidence that long-term use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs affects BMD in this population.

Bone mineral density changes over two years in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users to women using no hormonal contraception, and evaluate user characteristics associated with that BMD change.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Women, aged 18 to 35, choosing DMPA for contraception (n = 178) and women using no hormonal contraception (n = 145).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hip and spine BMD measured, at three-month intervals for 24 months, by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULT(S)

Mean hip BMD declined 2.8% (SE = 0.034) 12 months following DMPA initiation and 5.8% (SE = 0.096) after 24 months. Mean spine (L1-L3) BMD declined 3.5% (SE = 0.022) and 5.7% (SE = 0.034), respectively, after one and two years of DMPA use. Mean hip and spine BMD of control participants changed less than 0.9% over the same period. Among DMPA users, body mass index (BMI) change was inversely associated with BMD change at the hip, but not at the spine. Calcium intake, physical activity, and smoking did not influence BMD change in either group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hip and spine BMD declined after one DMPA injection and this decline continued with each subsequent injection for 24 months. With the exception of increasing BMI among DMPA users, no user characteristics offered protection against DMPA-related BMD loss.

Double-blinded randomized controlled trial of estrogen supplementation in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of estrogen supplementation on bone mineral density in adolescent girls who received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred twenty-three adolescents who began receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections every 12 weeks were assigned randomly to receive monthly injections of estradiol cypionate or placebo. The main outcome was bone mineral density that was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for 12 (n = 69) to 24 (n = 36) months. Participants, technicians, and physicians were blinded to estrogen treatment.

RESULTS

Over the 24-month period, the percentage of change from baseline bone mineral density at the lumbar spine was 2.8% in the estradiol cypionate group versus -1.8% in the placebo group ( P <.001). At the femoral neck, the percentage of change from baseline bone mineral density was 4.7% in the estradiol cypionate group versus -5.1% in the placebo group ( P <.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that estrogen supplementation is protective of bone in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections.

Contraception for the adolescent and young adult with congenital heart disease

Increasing numbers of females born with congenital heart disease are reaching childbearing age. Practitioners involved in the management of the adolescents or adults must be aware not only of the risks of pregnancy associated with varying types of CHD but with other issues involving the reproductive cycle to provide appropriate care, counseling, and education.

Bone biochemical markers in adolescent girls using either depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or an oral contraceptive

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between biochemical markers of bone metabolism and hormonal contraception in adolescents.

DESIGN

A prospective, observational design.

SETTING

The study was conducted in four adolescent health clinics in a large metropolitan area.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population comprised healthy, postmenarcheal adolescent girls aged 12-18 initiating either medroxyprogesterone acetate (n=53) or an oral contraceptive (OC) containing 20 mug ethinyl estradiol/100 mug levonorgestrel (n=165) and those using no hormonal contraception (n=152).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), and bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 month follow-up, serum BSAP levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the control group (40.4 U/L +/- 1.03 SE), than in the DMPA group (35.2 U/L +/- 1.05 SE) and the OC group (35.5 U/L +/- 1.03 SE). There was a trend in urinary DPD levels to be higher (P=0.08) in the control group (9.9 nmol/mmol Cr +/- 1.03 SE) than in the DMPA group (9.1 +/- 1.05 SE) and the OC group (8.9 +/- 1.03 SE). No relationship was found between the biochemical markers and BMD at the lumbar spine or the femoral neck.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 12 months, there was evidence of increased bone formation and resorption in the control group when compared to that in the DMPA and OC groups. This finding may indicate a suppression of bone metabolism in girls using DMPA or an OC containing 20 mug ethinyl estradiol/100 mug levonorgestrel.

Bone mineral density in lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Estrogen deficiency and pulmonary diseases are associated with bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a disorder affecting women that is characterized by cystic lung lesions, is frequently treated with antiestrogen therapy, i.e., progesterone and/or oophorectomy. Therefore, we evaluated BMD yearly in 211 LAM patients to determine the prevalence of BMD abnormalities, whether antiestrogen therapy decreased BMD, and if treatment with bisphosphonates prevented bone loss. Abnormal BMD was found in 70% of the patients and correlated with severity of lung disease and age. Greater severity of lung disease, menopause, and oophorectomy were associated with greater decline in BMD. After adjusting for differences in initial lung function and BMD, we found similar rates of BMD decline in progesterone-treated (n = 122) and untreated patients (n = 89). After similar adjustments, we found that bisphosphonate-treated patients (n = 98) had lower rates of decline in lumbar spine BMD (-0.004 +/- 0.003 vs. -0.015 +/- 0.003 gm/cm(2), p = 0.036) and T-scores (-0.050 +/- 0.041 vs. -0.191 +/- 0.041, p < 0.001) than untreated patients (n = 113). We conclude that abnormal BMD was frequent in LAM. Progesterone therapy was not associated with changes in BMD; bisphosphonate therapy was associated with lower rates of bone loss. We recommend systematic evaluation of BMD and early treatment with bisphosphonates for patients with LAM.

Effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density after 24 months of use

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effect of 24 months of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use on bone mineral density compared with oral contraception (pills) and nonhormonal contraception.

METHODS

Women aged 18-33 years self-selected oral contraception, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, or nonhormonal contraception (controls). Those selecting pills were randomized to formulations containing either 35 microg ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone or 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel. Controls were frequency matched on age and race/ethnicity to hormonal contraception users. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) was performed at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Percent change in bone mineral density was analyzed by using analysis of covariance, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, weight-bearing exercise, calcium intake, smoking status, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Of the 191 women making up the final sample, 86 used pills, 47 used depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, and 58 used nonhormonal contraception. Women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for 24 months experienced, on average, a 5.7% loss in bone mineral density, with a 3.2% loss occurring between months 12 and 24. On average, users of desogestrel pills experienced a 2.6% loss in bone mineral density after 24 months. Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons demonstrated that bone mineral density changes from baseline to 24 months among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate users differed significantly from changes experienced by either of the pill groups or the control group. Changes in bone mineral density among users of either pill did not significantly differ from each other or from controls.

CONCLUSION

Loss of bone mineral density associated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use appears to be linear during the first 2 years of use. Shifts in bone mineral density among pill users were not significant when compared with controls.

Benefits and risks of pharmacological agents used for the treatment of menorrhagia

Menorrhagia affects the lives of many women. The assessment of menstrual flow is highly subjective and gauging the severity of the condition by objective assessment of menstrual blood loss is impractical. In treating menorrhagia, the primary aim should be to improve quality of life. Women are willing to undergo quite invasive treatment in order to achieve this. Drug therapy is the initial treatment of choice and the only option for those who wish to preserve their reproductive function. Despite the availability of a number of drugs, there is a general lack of an evidence-based approach, marked variation in practice and continuing uncertainty regarding the most appropriate therapy. Adverse effects and problems with compliance also undermine the success of medical treatment. This article reviews the available literature to compare the efficacy and tolerability of different medical treatments for menorrhagia. Tranexamic acid and mefenamic acid are among the most effective first-line drugs used to treat menorrhagia. Despite being used extensively in the past, oral luteal phase norethisterone is probably one of the least effective agents. Women requiring contraception have a choice of the combined oral contraceptive pill, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) or long-acting progestogens. Danazol, gestrinone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues are all effective in terms of reducing menstrual blood loss but adverse effects and costs limit their long-term use. They have a role as second-line drugs for a short period of time in women awaiting surgery. While current evidence suggests that the LNG-IUS is an effective treatment, further evaluation, including long-term follow up, is awaited. Meanwhile, the quest continues for the ideal form of medical treatment for menorrhagia--one that is effective, affordable and acceptable.

The association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and bone mineral density in adolescent women

Although adolescent women are actively acquiring bone, there has been little study of the possible effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception use on bone density in adolescents. We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the association between DMPA use and bone mineral density in adolescent women, ages 14-18 years. Of 174 study participants, 81 were DMPA users (range, 1-13 injections, median = 3) and 93 were not. Mean bone density at all anatomic sites (hip, spine and whole body) was lower for DMPA users than nonusers, but differences were not statistically significant (e.g., hip, 0.940 vs. 0.970 g/cm2, p = 0.10; spine, 0.970 vs. 0.992 g/cm2, p = 0.19). Duration of DMPA use showed a trend toward lower spine bone density (p-value for trend = 0.06). This study did not find a strong association between DMPA use and bone density. Further prospective evaluation of bone density changes with DMPA use and after DMPA discontinuation are needed in this age group.

Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Women Using Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

PURPOSE

To present current data on bone mineral density (BMD) in adolescent women using the long-acting contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and also to discuss the importance of developing maximal bone mass during adolescence to offset bone demineralization later in life.

DATA SOURCES

Research-based articles in the medical literature, review articles, and recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoporosis is a preventable disease that affects millions of Americans, particularly older women. Factors influencing the attainment and maintenance of peak bone mass during childhood and adolescence affect the future risk of fractures. Although longitudinal studies conducted on adolescent women using DMPA are very limited, findings suggest that adolescents are losing bone density during a time of expected bone accretion.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Clinicians must consider all the risks and benefits when prescribing contraceptives to adolescents. By themselves, the findings related to BMD and DMPA use by adolescents are not sufficient to limit the use of DMPA as a contraceptive method. However, clinicians must take into account the addition of other modifying factors associated with BMD that may contribute to overall bone loss in adolescent females. More prospective data on the long-term use of DMPA by adolescents are needed to determine DMPA's effect on bone loss and to determine if bone loss is transient in adolescents.

Effects of oral contraceptives on circulating osteoprotegerin and soluble RANK ligand serum levels in healthy young women

OBJECTIVE

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) represents a secreted cytokine which regulates bone mass by blocking receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL), the principal regulator of osteoclast function. In vitro, OPG production is upregulated by oestrogens in osteoblastic lineage cells, a mechanism that has been discussed as a protective paracrine mechanism of oestrogens on the skeleton. To define the effects of oestrogens on the RANKL/OPG system in vivo, we evaluated OPG and both free and total soluble RANKL (sRANKL) serum levels in healthy young women with or without oral contraceptives.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Serum levels of OPG and sRANKL were prospectively assessed in a cohort of healthy young women with (n = 30) or without (n = 25) combined oestrogen-progestin-based oral contraceptives.

MEASUREMENTS

OPG, total and free sRANKL serum levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).

RESULTS

In women using oral contraceptives, OPG serum levels were significantly higher (2.71 +/- 1.42 pmol/l) compared to nonusers (1.35 +/- 1.02 pmol/l; P = 0.0003), whereas free (P = 0.55) and total (P = 0.24) sRANKL serum levels did not differ between both groups. This resulted in an increased OPG/free sRANKL ratio (P = 0.02) in women on oral contraceptives. During the ovarian cycle, OPG (P = 0.22) and free sRANKL (P = 0.99) serum levels remained unchanged in women without oral contraceptives (n = 19), while total sRANKL levels were higher in the follicular than in the luteal phase (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Intake of oral contraceptives is associated with increased OPG serum levels, but not sRANKL levels, resulting in a higher OPG/sRANKL ratio. This may contribute to the positive effects of oral contraceptives on the skeleton.

Controversies in adolescent hormonal contraception

Unintended pregnancy and abortion rates among US adolescents remain high although hormonal contraception is safe and effective in this population. Controversies affecting the provision of hormonal contraception for adolescents include the side effects of oral contraceptives, the possibility that progestin-only injectables lead to decreased bone health, and debate as to whether emergency contraception should be available to teens without a prescription. Each of these issues is addressed with a review of relevant literature.

A 2-year prospective study on the effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mass-response to estrogen and calcium therapy in individual users

The primary aim of this prospective 2-year follow-up study was to investigate the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the maintenance of bone mass in women aged 30-45 years. The effects of estrogen or calcium substitution during the second year of follow-up was investigated in seven DMPA users with a high annual bone loss during the first year. The bone mass of 35 users of DMPA and 10 women without hormonal contraception was investigated using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The baseline cortical and trabecular bone mass (TBM) and the annual change was not different in DMPA users and controls. Over 24 months we measured an increase in TBM of 0.6% and a decrease in cortical bone mass of 0.1% in exposed women. Some but not all of the DMPA users with a bone loss during the first year could be successfully treated with estradiol or calcium. In conclusion, we did not observe an accelerated bone loss in DMPA users aged 30-45 years.

A randomized controlled trial of estrogen replacement therapy in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

Long-term use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera) is associated with a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD), particularly in the lumbar spine. The cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is not known, but the relative estrogen deficiency induced by DMPA use could be responsible. We have undertaken a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of oral estrogen replacement therapy in 38 premenopausal women (mean age 37) with a minimum 2 yr DMPA use who had a below average baseline lumbar spine BMD (T score < or = 0). Nineteen women were allocated to receive conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/d orally) and 19 to receive a matching placebo. All continued with regular DMPA injections throughout the study. Areal bone density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body sites every 6 months for 2 yr; the main outcome measure being the change in areal BMD at the lumbar spine. At baseline, the two groups were well matched for demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical variables, and for BMD. Twenty-seven subjects completed at least 18 months in the study, and 26 the full 2 yr, with similar numbers dropping out from each group (mainly for personal reasons). In the estrogen-treated group, mean lumbar spine BMD increased 1%, whereas in the placebo group it fell 2.6%, over 2 yr. The between group differences were 2.0% at 12 months (P = 0.058), 3.2% at 18 months (P < 0.01), and 3.5% at 24 months (P < 0.002). Differences of lesser statistical magnitude were seen at the femoral neck (between group differences at 2 yr: 2.7%, P = 0.24), Ward's triangle (5.0%, P = 0.055), greater trochanter (3.6%, P = 0.056), total body (1.3%, P = 0.046), legs (1.3%, P = 0.065), and trunk (2.0%, P = 0.029). There were no major adverse events. These data support the view that the likely cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is estrogen deficiency and demonstrate that it can be arrested by estrogen replacement therapy.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density

BACKGROUND

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) are generally well tolerated, and are effective in relieving the symptoms of endometriosis (Prentice 2003). Unfortunately the low oestrogen state that they induce is associated with adverse effects including an acceleration in bone mineral density (BMD) loss.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHas) on the bone mineral density of women with endometriosis, compared to placebo, no treatment, or other treatments for endometriosis, including GnRHas with add-back therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's specialised register of controlled trials (23rd October 2002) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2002). We also carried out electronic searches of MEDLINE (1966 - March Week 2 2003) and EMBASE (1980 - March Week 2 2003). We also searched the reference lists of articles and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective, randomised controlled studies of the use of GnRHas for the treatment of women with endometriosis were considered, where bone density measurements were an end point. The control arm of the studies was either placebo, no treatment, another medical therapy for endometriosis, or GnRHas with add-back therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers (JF and MS) independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty studies involving 2,391 women were included, however only 15, involving 910 women, could be included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that danazol and progesterone + oestrogen add-back are protective of BMD at the lumbar spine both during treatment and for up to six and twelve months after treatment, respectively. Between the groups receiving GnRHa and the groups receiving danazol/gestrinone, there was a significant difference in percentage change of BMD after six months of treatment, the GnRH analogue producing a reduction in BMD from baseline and danazol producing an increase in BMD (SMD -3.43, 95 % CI -3.91 to -2.95). Progesterone only add-back is not protective; after six months of treatment absolute value BMD measurements of the lumbar spine did not differ significantly from the group receiving GnRH analogues (SMD 0.15, 95 % CI -0.21 to 0.52). In the comparison of GnRHa versus GnRHa + HRT add-back, that is oestrogen + progesterone or oestrogen only, there was a significantly bigger BMD loss in the GnRHa only group (SMD -0.49, 95 % CI -0.77 to -0.21). These numbers reflect the absolute value measurements at the lumbar spine after six months of treatment. Due to the small number of studies in the comparison we are unable to conclude whether calcium-regulating agents are protective. No difference was found between low and high dose add-back regimes but again only one study was identified for this comparison. Only one study comparing GnRH analogues with placebo was identified, but the study gave no data. No studies comparing GnRH with the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) or progestagens were identified.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Both danazol and progesterone + oestrogen add-back have been shown to be protective of BMD, while on treatment and up to six and 12 months later, respectively. However, by 24 months of follow-up there was no difference in BMD in those women who had HRT add-back. Studies of danazol versus GnRHa did not report long-term follow-up. The significant side effects associated with danazol limit its use.

Long-Term Use of Contraceptive Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Young Women Impairs Arterial Endothelial Function Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Background— Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) inhibits proliferation of ovarian follicles, resulting in anovulation and a decrease in circulating estrogen; the latter action is potentially disadvantageous to cardiovascular health. We therefore investigated the vascular effects of long-term contraceptive DMPA in young women.

Methods and Results— Endothelium-dependent (hyperemia-induced flow-mediated dilatation [FMD]) and -independent (glyceryl trinitrate [GTN]) changes in brachial artery area were measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 13 amenorrheic DMPA users (>1 year use; mean age 29±4 years) and in 10 controls (mean age 30±4 years, P =0.25) with regular menstrual cycles after validation of the technique. FMD and GTN responses were measured just before repeat MPA injection and 48 hours later (n=12) in DMPA users and during menstruation and midcycle (n=9) in controls. Serum-estradiol levels (S-estradiol) were measured at both visits. FMD was reduced in DMPA users compared with controls during menstruation (1.1% versus 8.0%, respectively P <0.01) without differences in GTN responses. S-estradiol levels in DMPA users were significantly lower than in controls during menstruation (58 versus 96 pmol/L, P <0.01). High levels of circulating MPA 48 hours after injection were not linked to an additional impairment in FMD (2.0% versus 3.1%, P =0.23). Estradiol levels were significantly correlated to FMD ( r =0.43, P <0.01).

Conclusions— Endothelium-dependent arterial function measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance is impaired in chronic users of DMPA, and hypoestrogenism may be the mechanism of action. DMPA might adversely affect cardiovascular health, and in particular its use in women with cardiovascular disease should be additionally evaluated.

Injectable hormone contraception and bone density: results from a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception may decrease bone density and increase the risk for osteoporosis in later life. Prospective data are scarce, especially of the effects of DMPA discontinuation on bone.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1999, we conducted a population-based prospective cohort study among women enrollees of a Washington State health maintenance organization. We enrolled 457 nonpregnant women, ages 18-39 years (183 DMPA users and 274 non-users). Bone density was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry every 6 months for 3 years.

RESULTS

Bone density decreased notably among DMPA-exposed women at the spine (adjusted mean bone density was -0.0053 gm/cm for DMPA users compared with +0.0023 gm/cm for non-users for each 6-month interval) and total hip (-0.0060 compared with -0.0002 gm/cm ). This represents an annualized mean rate of change at the spine of -0.87% compared with +0.40% and, at the hip, -1.12% compared with -0.05%. Discontinuers of this method (N = 110) showed sizable increases in bone density over comparison women (for each 6-month interval, adjusted mean spine bone density was +0.0067 gm/cm compared with +0.0023 gm/cm, respectively; adjusted mean hip bone density was +0.0035 compared with -0.0002 gm/cm ). Estimated annualized mean rates of change were +1.41% compared with +0.40% [corrected] at the spine and +1.03% [corrected] compared with -0.05% at the hip. After 30 months, mean bone density for discontinuers was similar to that of non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, DMPA use was strongly associated with bone density loss. Substantial postdiscontinuation recovery of bone provides evidence that the effects may be largely reversible.

Bone mineral density at various anatomic bone sites in women receiving combined oral contraceptives and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

The association between users of combined oral contraceptives and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) for contraception and bone mineral density (BMD) has been controversial because of variations among studies. Like other studies, this cross-sectional study compares BMD in users of combined oral contraceptives and DMPA with that in nonusers. Unlike previous studies, we defined long-term use as >2 years, and we measured more bone sites than previous studies including lumbar spines, femurs, and forearms. The study group consisted of 59 women aged 30 years to 34 years who had been using combined oral contraceptives for 57.36 +/- 27.02 months with a minimum period of 24 months, 34 women of the same age who had been using DMPA as contraceptive for 55.76 +/- 35.31 months, and 62 women of the same age who had not used any steroid hormonal contraceptives for more than 6 months. BMD was measured by dual energy photon absorptiometer at lumbar spine 2-4, neck of femur, Ward's triangle of femur, greater trochanter of femur, ultradistal radius, and distal ulnar, respectively. Age, body mass index, and lifestyles of both groups were matched with nonusers. Mean BMD at lumbar spine (L2-4) in the DMPA users was significantly lower than in the controls (1.031 +/- 0.090 vs. 1.096 +/- 0.116, p = 0.007). There were no significant differences in BMD values at bone sites other than lumbar spine between DMPA users and the controls. There were no significant differences in BMD values at all bone sites between combined oral contraceptives users and the controls. We conclude that combined oral contraceptives are not associated with changes in values of BMD, while DMPA is associated with decreased BMD only at lumbar spine. We comment that steroid hormonal contraceptives are safe to use for long-term contraception regarding bone mass effects.

Menopausal bone loss in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of early postmenopausal bone loss in women who had used depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception through to menopause.

STUDY DESIGN

Bone mineral density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck was assessed prospectively over 3 years in 15 women who reached a natural menopause and who did not undergo hormone replacement therapy and in 16 long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate who discontinued depot medroxyprogesterone acetate only on reaching menopause. Of the latter, 5 women subsequently underwent hormone replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Early menopausal bone loss was rapid in the control group (6% from both sites over 3 years), but the users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (who did not take hormone replacement therapy) showed little change in bone mineral density. Between-group differences were statistically significant at years 2 and 3 at both sites (P <.03-<.002). In the users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate who underwent hormone replacement therapy, bone mineral density increased significantly (P <.03) at the lumbar spine and was stable at the femoral neck.

CONCLUSION

Women who use depot medroxyprogesterone acetate through to menopause have attenuated rates of bone loss from the lumbar spine and femoral neck, presumably because they have already lost the estrogen-sensitive component of bone.

Depot medroxyprogesterone and bone mineral density

OBJECTIVE

To investigate depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA)-associated bone loss in a general practice setting.

DESIGN

Forty-eight patients from a single practice who had used DMPA for contraception for more than 2 years. All patients had a serum oestradiol and if the serum level was <52 pmol/l or >52 pmol/l with menopausal symptoms, bone mineral densitometry (BMD) measurements were made at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Thirty-two patients had bone densitometry, of whom 27 had a serum oestradiol <52 pmol/l and five >52 pmol/l associated with menopausal symptoms. Of the remaining 16 patients, nine patients had a serum oestradiol <52 pmol/l but did not have a BMD as they moved away (five women) or switched to another contraceptive (four women).

RESULTS

BMD results showed a significantly reduced bone mass at both sites with mean Z score LS -0.84 (95% CI -1.17 to -0.52) and FN -0.32 (95% CI -0.62 to -0.02). Eighteen women (56% of 32 women) had either osteopenia (15 cases) (T score < -1.0) or osteoporosis (three cases) (T score < -2.5) at the LS. There were trends to an association of a family history of height loss or tobacco smoking (current or past) for LS and FN Z scores that did not quite achieve significance. There was also a trend to lower body weight in those with a possible family history of osteoporosis or who were smokers and an inverse correlation of weight with BMD at the FN (p < 0.05) and a non-significant inverse correlation at the LS.

CONCLUSION

The present results demonstrate that a low bone mass should be considered in patients with prolonged DMPA usage especially if they have risk factors for osteoporosis.

Overview of the relationship between use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the available epidemiological evidence regarding the relationship between the use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Overview of the published epidemiological literature.

RESULTS

Overall, 17 studies of the use of progestogen-only contraceptives and bone mineral density were identified, involving 1529 women exposed to progestogen-only contraceptives and 2086 controls. Sixty-eight percent of the data relate to the effects of use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Average bone mineral density was reduced in current users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate compared with non-users, although density in users was within one standard deviation of the mean in non-users. There was significant heterogeneity between the results of different studies (P < 0.0001). The reduction in bone mineral density appeared to be greater at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and ultradistal forearm than at the midshaft of the ulna. Studies involving women with a longer average duration of use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate displayed greater reductions in bone mineral density compared with studies of women with shorter durations of use. Based on limited data, no difference in bone mineral density was observed between former and never users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. Results regarding the effect of levonorgestrel implants were conflicting. Studies of progestogen-only oral contraceptives and the progesterone vaginal ring were small and restricted to lactating women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women currently using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate have a lower average bone mineral density than non-users. The magnitude of this effect is uncertain but appears to be greater with longer durations of use.

Forearm bone density in long-term users of oral combined contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare the bone mineral density of users of combined oral contraceptives (OC) or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (depot-MPA) with women who have never used a hormonal contraceptive method.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary-care hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 189 women, aged 30 to 34 years old, were allocated to three groups: 63 who had used OC for at least 2 years; 63 who had used depot-MPA for at least 2 years; and 63 control women who had never used hormonal contraceptives.

INTERVENTION(S)

Each woman's bone mineral density (BMD) was evaluated at the distal and ultradistal section of the radius of the nondominant forearm by the use of single x-ray absorptiometry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We obtained BMD measurements for each participant.

RESULT(S)

Independent of the period of use and the section of the forearm studied, we found no difference in BMD for OC or depot-MPA users when compared to women who had never used hormonal contraceptive methods. In addition, BMD was similar between OC users and depot-MPA users. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variables associated with BMD were weight, number of pregnancies, and the woman's occupation.

CONCLUSION(S)

Women aged 30 to 34 years who have used OC or depot-MPA have similar BMD as control women. These findings suggest that the use of OC or depot-MPA does not affect the BMD of women in this age group.

Magnitude and variability of sequential estradiol and progesterone concentrations in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

OBJECTIVE

To describe the magnitude and variability of sequential serum estradiol and progesterone concentrations throughout one depot medroxyprogesterone (DMPA) injection interval.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Family planning and women's health clinics.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-one women, ages 19 to 46, using DMPA for contraception.

INTERVENTION(S)

Serum for estrogen and progesterone was collected weekly throughout one DMPA injection interval.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Serum estradiol and progesterone concentrations; estradiol patterns produced from data plotted across the entire DMPA injection interval.

RESULT(S)

The average daily estradiol concentrations ranged from 7.9 to 69.1 pg/mL, with a mean of 18.9 +/- 12.9 and a median of 15.4 pg/mL. Average daily progesterone concentrations ranged from 0.14 to 1.1 ng/mL, with a mean of 0.40 +/- 0.19 ng/mL and a median of 0.36 ng/mL. Two general patterns of estradiol concentrations were identified. One pattern, observed in approximately one third of the participants, reflected estradiol concentrations that were extremely low (mean, 12.7 +/- 3.6 pg/mL; median, 13.4 pg/mL) and consistently flat across the DMPA injection interval. The second pattern, seen in the remaining participants, reflected estradiol concentrations that were higher (mean, 22.2 +/- 14.9 pg/mL; median, 17.3 pg/mL) and quite variable.

CONCLUSION(S)

This study demonstrated that estradiol concentrations were lower than the 40 to 50 pg/mL reported in most studies and, for the majority of women, varied substantially across the DMPA injection interval.

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a rare disorder of unknown cause that occurs almost exclusively in women of childbearing years, is characterized microscopically by abnormal smooth muscle proliferation in the lung, lymphatics, and mediastinal, abdominal and lower cervical lymph nodes. LAM is associated with progressive dyspnea, recurrent pneumothoraces, chylous effusions, abdominal tumors (angiomyolipoma), and chylous ascites. Because of the predilection of this disease for young women, therapies to date have mainly involved hormonal manipulation. Although the efficacy of these therapies has not been established, the clinical course is more favorable in recent studies compared with earlier reports.

Bone loss in adolescents using Depo-Provera

ISSUES AND PURPOSE

Contraceptive methods that decrease bone density in a population already deficient in calcium are a rising concern in women's health.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of Depo-Provera (DMPA) significantly decreases bone mass density (BMD) in normal adolescents up to the age of 21. DMPA is often used in adolescents with disabilities who may already be at high risk for osteoporosis. The effects are likely to be similar to that in able-bodied adolescents, but research is limited.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Through early identification of risk factors in able-bodied and disabled adolescents, primary care providers considering the use of DMPA in adolescents can optimize BMD by providing adequate nutritional assessment, counseling on nutritional sources of calcium, calcium supplementation, guidance on exercise, and alcohol and smoking prevention or cessation.

Contraception

The supremacy of combined oral contraceptives (OCs) is being challenged. For too long combined OCs have been seen as synonymous with contraception, helping to maintain ignorance of alternative methods. Further, the efficacy of these OCs and condoms is often compromised by incorrect or inconsistent use. We particularly welcome developments in male systemic methods, that allow men to share not only in conception but also in contraception, and methods that are completely forgettable once instituted, especially if usable by adolescents.

Implantable contraception

Although levonorgestrel contraceptive implants have been available for over 15 years, innovations have only recently led to a wider choice. These new implants offer easier insertion and removal and other advantages depending on the type of progestin. Implants prevent pregnancy by several mechanisms, including inhibition of ovulation and luteal function and alteration of cervical mucus and the endometrium. The high efficacy and ease of maintenance make implants an ideal contraceptive for many women, including adolescents, a population that uses implants infrequently but reports high satisfaction. Implants are appropriate for women who are breastfeeding, who have contraindications to estrogen, or who have diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, sickle cell anemia, or an HIV infection because implants have few metabolic or hematologic effects. Long-term use has not been associated with a decrease in BMD and generally leads to increased blood levels and iron stores. Women who wish to space their pregnancies appreciate the nearly immediate onset of action with insertion and the rapid termination of all effects with removal. All types of implants lead to menstrual changes and other side effects in some women. Adverse effects that occur in implant users more than the general population include headaches and acne. Women must be thoroughly counseled regarding the potential for menstrual alteration, side effects, and sexually transmitted infections if they do not use condoms. Despite their initial high cost, implants are a cost-effective method over several years, even when discontinued before the life of the implant.

Injectable contraception. New and existing options

DMPA and MPA/E2C contraception offer women safe, effective, convenient, and reversible birth control choices. The use of DMPA, a 3-month injectable, is characteristically associated with amenorrhea. Lactating women and women in whom contraceptive doses of estrogen are contraindicated can use this progestin-only birth control method. Return of fertility can be delayed in women discontinuing DMPA to become pregnant. In some cases, the use of DMPA also confers important noncontraceptive and therapeutic benefits. A monthly estrogen/progestin injectable contraceptive, MPA/E2C should appeal to women who are concerned about daily pill taking, who prefer regular cycles to amenorrhea, and who find monthly injections acceptable and accessible. As is true for oral contraceptives, MPA/E2C represents an appropriate choice for women who prefer a rapidly reversible contraceptive. Currently, the proposed contraindications for MPA/E2C parallel those for combined oral contraceptives. As MPA/E2C contraception becomes available for American women, clinicians will learn how to best include this new method among the array of contraceptive choices. By individualizing contraceptive selection, counseling, and management approaches based on the relevant behavioral and medical considerations reviewed herein, clinicians can maximize their patients' success with injectable contraceptives. The more innovative that clinicians, family planning agencies, and insurers are in facilitating access to care (including reinjections), the more women will be able to avail themselves of safe, effective, and reversible methods of contraception. In addition to the physician's office or health clinic, other sites at which women might receive contraceptive injections include employee health clinics, college health clinics, or perhaps the pharmacy where the prescription is filled. Self-administration may become an appropriate option for some users of injectable contraception.

Adolescents: at increased risk for osteoporosis?

Perhaps the most important factor in the primary prevention of osteoporosis is the attainment of an optimal peak bone during adolescence. In addition to endogenous factors, such as genetic and ethnic background, environmental factors such as dietary habits, physical activity, and sex hormone therapy, influence the accretion of bone mass during this critical period of skeletal growth. First, calcium dietary intake in adolescents is generally well less than the current recommended RDA of 1200 mg/day. Multiple studies of children and adolescents have demonstrated increases in bone mass with dietary calcium supplementation. Second, regarding physical activity, the overall impression is that a moderate amount of particularly weight-bearing exercise has a positive impact on bone. There appears, however, to be a threshold of intensity of physical activity over which a negative impact on bone occurs, particularly when the exercise is of an anaerobic nature or occurring in very thin, amenorrheic participants. Third, previous research suggests that the various forms of hormonal contraception exert differing effects on bone mass in adolescents, with levonorgestrel implants and combined oral contraceptives may be associated with a more positive effect on bone mass compared with that observed with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate. From a clinical perspective, approaches to optimizing peak bone mass in adolescents would include increasing calcium intake, whether in the form of dairy products, fortified foods, or supplements as well as encouraging participation at a moderate level, in weight-bearing exercise. Last, in adolescents with extensive risk factors and predicted long duration of use, subdermal implants or combined oral contraceptives may be the optimal hormonal methods of birth control.

Further evaluation on long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and bone mineral density: a longitudinal cohort study

Cross-sectional studies on the effects of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on bone mineral density (BMD) have been controversial. The present longitudinal cohort study on 59 Chinese women over a period of 3 years has shown that their annual rate of bone loss at 3 sites (0.44% in lumbar spine, 0.40% in neck of femur, 1.05% in Ward's triangle) was substantially less than the projected values (1.1% in lumbar spine, 2.3% in neck of femur, 3.5% in Ward's triangle) in a cross-sectional study that had demonstrated a significant reduction in BMD in DMPA users than the non-user population. The trochanter BMD measurement did not show the projected annual bone loss of 2.4%. The rate of bone loss is probably non-linear, with a rapid loss in the first 5 years and a leveling off afterwards. The duration of DMPA use was not significantly correlated with the rate of bone loss. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that age and body mass index were significant variables in modeling the rate of bone loss in the lumbar spine and neck of femur, but not in the trochanter and Ward's triangle areas. The Z scores also suggested a retardation in bone loss with time and potentially due to the effect of progesterone in decreasing bone turnover that is similar to the situation in postmenopausal women. The present data provide another aspect of reassurance to the long-term use of DMPA.

A prospective study on the effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on trabecular and cortical bone after attainment of peak bone mass

OBJECTIVE

To study the annual change of bone mass in women aged 30-45 years being treated with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) in order to evaluate whether the bone mass depends on the duration of DMPA use or the oestradiol level.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study over an interval of 12 months.

SETTING

A family planning centre of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six current users of DMPA.

INTERVENTIONS

Injection of 150 mg DMPA every 12 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Bone mass was measured at the distal radius by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (reproducibility 0.3%).

RESULTS

Mean annual changes (SD) in trabecular and cortical bone mass were 0.06 (1.6%) [P = 0.8] and -0.26% (0.6) [P < 0.04]. The decrease in cortical bone mass was not significant because the changes were within the precision error of the method used for the measurements. Duration of DMPA use and oestradiol levels were not associated to the bone parameters.

CONCLUSION

We did not find a negative impact of DMPA on the bone mass of premenopausal women aged 30-45 years.