Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions Arising from CYP3A induction Using a Physiologically Based Dynamic Model

Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, we predicted the magnitude of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) for studies with rifampicin and seven CYP3A4 probe substrates administered i.v. (10 studies) or orally (19 studies). The results showed a tendency to underpredict the DDI magnitude when the victim drug was administered orally. Possible sources of inaccuracy were investigated systematically to determine the most appropriate model refinement. When the maximal fold induction (Ind_max) for rifampicin was increased (from 8 to 16) in both the liver and the gut, or when the Ind_max was increased in the gut but not in liver, there was a decrease in bias and increased precision compared with the base model (Ind_max = 8) [geometric mean fold error (GMFE) 2.12 vs. 1.48 and 1.77, respectively]. Induction parameters (mRNA and activity), determined for rifampicin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital in hepatocytes from four donors, were then used to evaluate use of the refined rifampicin model for calibration. Calibration of mRNA and activity data for other inducers using the refined rifampicin model led to more accurate DDI predictions compared with the initial model (activity GMFE 1.49 vs. 1.68; mRNA GMFE 1.35 vs. 1.46), suggesting that robust in vivo reference values can be used to overcome interdonor and laboratory-to-laboratory variability. Use of uncalibrated data also performed well (GMFE 1.39 and 1.44 for activity and mRNA). As a result of experimental variability (i.e., in donors and protocols), it is prudent to fully characterize in vitro induction with prototypical inducers to give an understanding of how that particular system extrapolates to the in vivo situation when using an uncalibrated approach.

Diagnosis and treatment of bacteremia and endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus. A clinical guideline from the Spanish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (SEIMC)

Both bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. The prognosis may darken not infrequently, especially in the presence of intracardiac devices or methicillin-resistance. Indeed, the optimization of the antimicrobial therapy is a key step in the outcome of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates has led to the research of novel therapeutic schemes. Specifically, the interest raised in recent years on the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been also extended to infections caused by susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. Recent clinical and experimental research has focused in the activity of new combinations of antimicrobials, their indication and role still being debatable. Also, the impact of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment has acquired relevance in recent years. Finally, it is noteworthy the impact of the implementation of a systematic bundle of measures for improving the outcome. The aim of this clinical guideline is to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment and prognosis of bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by S. aureus, in accordance to the latest evidence published.

Clinical experience with linezolid for the treatment of orthopaedic implant infections

Gram-positive cocci are commonly isolated in orthopaedic implant infections and their resistance to β-lactams and fluoroquinolones is increasing. The high oral bioavailability of linezolid makes it an attractive oral alternative to glycopeptides and its use has increased in the last decade. To evaluate experience with linezolid in orthopaedic implant infections a systematic review of the literature available in English was undertaken. Only those articles describing series of ≥10 patients with acute or chronic orthopaedic implant infections treated with linezolid and with a clear definition of diagnosis and outcome were selected. A total of 293 patients (79.9% had prosthetic joint infections) were analysed in the 10 articles included. The overall remission rate with at least 3 months of follow-up was 79.9%, depending on whether the implant was removed or not (94% versus 69.9%). The addition of rifampicin was described in only two articles and no significant difference was observed. Adverse events were frequent during prolonged administration of linezolid (34.3%), requiring treatment discontinuation in 12.8%. The most common event was anaemia (13.4%) followed by gastrointestinal symptoms (11.1%). In conclusion, linezolid seems a good oral treatment alternative for orthopaedic implant infections due to Gram-positive cocci resistant to β-lactams and fluoroquinolones. However, close monitoring of adverse events is required.

The association between risk factors and time of onset for thrombocytopenia in Japanese patients receiving linezolid therapy: a retrospective analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Linezolid (LZD) is an oxazolidinone antibiotic that is active against Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The major adverse effect related to its use in humans is reversible myelosuppression, which mostly manifests as thrombocytopenia. This retrospective study was conducted to identify risk factors that might contribute towards the development of thrombocytopenia due to intravenous administration of LZD.

METHOD

Patients who were administered LZD between January 2008 and March 2013 were included. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a decrease in platelet count of ≥10 × 10(4) cell/μL from baseline or of ≥30%.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included in this study. These patients were divided into two groups: 22 patients (46·8%) were assigned to a non-thrombocytopenia group and 25 patients (53·2%) to a thrombocytopenia group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant intergroup differences in duration of LZD treatment [odds ratio (OR) = 1·278; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·068-1·529; P = 0·007] and white blood cell (WBC) count (>12000 cells/μL; OR = 10·399; 95% CI = 1·667-64·882; P = 0·012).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggests that duration of LZD treatment and WBC count (>12000 cells/μL) are risk factors associated with thrombocytopenia resulting from LZD administration.

A Retrospective Review of the Clinical Experience of Linezolid with or Without Rifampicin in Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Implant Retention

Introduction

Debridement and prosthesis retention, combined with a prolonged antibiotic regimen including rifampicin, is an accepted therapeutic approach when the duration of symptoms is less than 4 weeks and there are no radiological signs of loosening. The outcome of patients managed with this strategy has been previously assessed in several articles with success rates of 60–90%. This study aims to review the clinical experience with linezolid in 3 different hospitals from Spain and France in patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) managed with debridement, retention of the implant and treated with linezolid with or without rifampicin.

Methods

Patients with an acute PJI who underwent open debridement with implant retention treated with linezolid for more than 7 days in 3 hospitals from Barcelona, Tours and Lille between 2005 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant information about demographics, co-morbidity, type of implant, surgical treatment, microorganism isolated, antimicrobial therapy, adverse events (AEs) and outcomes were recorded from patients.

Results

A total of 39 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age (SD) was 70.5 (8.8) years and 9 patients had diabetes mellitus (23%). There were 25 (64%) knee prostheses, 13 (33%) hips and 1 shoulder (3%). The median interquartile range (IQR) days from arthroplasty to infection diagnosis was 17 (19–48) and 33 (85%) cases were diagnosed within the first 60 days. The median (IQR) duration of antibiotic treatment was 70.5 (34–96) days and the median (IQR) number of days on linezolid treatment was 44.5 (30–81). AEs were observed in 15 patients (38%), with gastrointestinal complaints in 8 cases and anemia in 5 being the most frequent. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.5 (1.8–3.6) years, there were 11 failures (28%) (8 relapses and 3 new infections). The failure rate was higher in the rifampicin group (36% vs. 18%) mainly due to a higher relapse rate (27% vs. 12%) although differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Management of acute PJIs with debridement and retention of the implant linezolid, with or without rifampicin, is associated with a high remission rate and it is an alternative treatment for infections due to fluoroquinolone and/or rifampicin-resistant staphylococci.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40121-014-0032-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Treatment options for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: Where are we now?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to be a substantial global problem with significant associated morbidity and mortality. This review summarises the discussions that took place at the 4th MRSA Consensus Conference in relation to the current treatment options for serious MRSA infections and how to optimise whichever therapy is embarked upon. It highlights the many challenges faced by both the laboratory and clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of MRSA infections.

Comparative study of the effects of antituberculosis drugs and antiretroviral drugs on cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein

Predicting drug-drug interactions (DDIs) related to cytochrome P450 (CYP), such as CYP3A4 and one of the major drug transporters, P-glycoprotein (P-gp), is crucial in the development of future chemotherapeutic regimens to treat tuberculosis (TB) and TB/AIDS coinfection cases. We evaluated the effects of 30 anti-TB drugs, novel candidates, macrolides, and representative antiretroviral drugs on human CYP3A4 activity using a commercially available screening kit for CYP3A4 inhibitors and a human hepatocyte, HepaRG. Moreover, in order to estimate the interactions of these drugs with human P-gp, screening for substrates was performed. For some substrates, P-gp inhibition tests were carried out using P-gp-expressing MDCK cells. As a result, almost all the compounds showed the expected effects on human CYP3A4 both in the in vitro screening and in HepaRG cells. Importantly, the unproven mechanisms of DDIs caused by WHO group 5 drugs, thioamides, and p-aminosalicylic acid were elucidated. Intriguingly, clofazimine (CFZ) exhibited weak inductive effects on CYP3A4 at >0.25 μM in HepaRG cells, while an inhibitory effect was observed at 1.69 μM in the in vitro screening, suggesting that CFZ autoinduces CYP3A4 in the human liver. Our method, based on one of the pharmacokinetics parameters in humans, provides more practical information associated with not only DDIs but also with drug metabolism.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in cerebrospinal fluid

In the past 20 years, an increased discrepancy between new available antibacterials and the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains has been observed. This condition concerns physicians involved in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections, for which clinical and microbiological success depends on the rapid achievement of bactericidal concentrations. In order to accomplish this aim, the choice of drugs is based on their disposition toward the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which is influenced by the physicochemical characteristics of antibacterials. A reduced distribution into CSF has been documented for beta-lactams, especially cephalosporins and carbapenems, on the basis of their hydrophilic nature. However, they represent a cornerstone of the majority of combined therapeutic schemes for their ability to achieve bactericidal concentrations, especially in the presence of inflamed meninges. The good tolerability of beta-lactams makes possible high daily dose intensities, which may be associated with increased probability of cure. Furthermore, the adoption of continuous infusion seems to be a fruitful option. Fluoroquinolones, namely moxifloxacin, and antituberculosis drugs, together with the agents such as linezolid, reach the highest CSF/plasma concentration ratio, which is greater than 0.8, and for most of these drugs it is near 1. For all drugs that are currently used for the treatment of CNS infections, the evaluation of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, on the basis of dosing regimens and their time-dependent or concentration-dependent pattern of bacterial killing, remains an important aspect of clinical investigation and medical practice.

Predicting drug-drug interactions: application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models under a systems biology approach

The development of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), a 'bottom-up' approach, to predict pharmacokinetic parameters and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) has accelerated mainly due to an increase in the understanding of the multiple mechanisms involved in these interactions and the availability of appropriate in vitro systems that act as surrogates for delineating various elements of the interactions relevant to absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination. Recent advances in the knowledge of the population variables required for IVIVE (demographic, anatomical, genetic and physiological parameters) have also contributed to the appreciation of the sources of variability and wider use of this approach for different scenarios within the pharmaceutical industry. Initially, the authors present an overview of the integration of IVIVE into 'static' and 'dynamic' models for the quantitative prediction of DDIs. The main purpose of this review is to discuss the application of IVIVE in conjunction with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling under a systems biology approach to characterize the potential DDIs in individual patients, including those who cannot be investigated in formal clinical trials for ethical reasons. In addition, we address the issues related to the prediction of complex DDIs involving the inhibition of cytochrome P- and transporter-mediated activities through multiple drugs.

Current pharmacotherapy options for osteomyelitis: convergences, divergences and lessons to be drawn

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic therapy of osteomyelitis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach including surgeons and infectious diseases specialists. However, it suffers from a lack of high-quality clinical studies indicating the superiority of one type of therapy over another. Knowing the antibiotics and their main characteristics is important to guide the choice of treatment for patients with osteomyelitis.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of the present article is to review the systemic curative antibiotic therapy of osteomyelitis in adults with a focus on new agents. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis will be briefly discussed separately. A literature search of the PubMed database using the term 'osteomyelitis' alone and in combination with 'hematogenous', 'vertebral', 'biofilm', 'diabetic foot', 'trauma', 'antibiotic' 'daptomycin', 'telavancin', 'tigecycline', 'linezolid', 'ertapenem', 'ceftobiprole' and 'ceftaroline' was carried out.

EXPERT OPINION

Antibiotic treatment of acute and chronic osteomyelitis should be considered as two distinct entities with regard to the choice of the most appropriate antibiotics and the need for surgery. Among the most recently available antibiotics, ertapenem and daptomycin are promising agents for the treatment of osteomyelitis due to resistant bacteria.

Update on rifampin, rifabutin, and rifapentine drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Rifampin is a potent inducer of both cytochrome P-450 oxidative enzymes and the P-glycoprotein transport system. Among numerous well documented, clinically significant interactions, examples include warfarin, oral contraceptives, itraconazole, digoxin, verapamil, simvastatin, and human immunodeficiency virus-related protease inhibitors. Rifabutin reduces serum concentrations of antiretroviral agents, but less so than rifampin. Rifapentine is also an inducer of drug metabolism.

METHODS

A literature search of English language journals from 2008 to March 2012 was completed using several databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Search terms included rifampin, rifabutin, rifapentine AND drug interactions.

FINDINGS

Examples of clinically relevant interactions with rifampin demonstrated by recent reports include posaconazole, voriconazole, oxycodone, risperidone, mirodenafil, and ebastine.

CONCLUSIONS

To avoid a reduced therapeutic response, therapeutic failure, or toxic reactions when rifampin, rifabutin, or rifapentine are added to or discontinued from medication regimens, clinicians need to be aware of these interactions. Recent studies have indicated that other transporter systems play a role in these drug interactions. As reports of rifampin drug interactions continue to grow, this review is a reminder to clinicians to be vigilant.

Decreased serum linezolid concentrations in two patients receiving linezolid and rifampicin due to bone infections

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus is a common cause of orthopaedic implant infections. In such cases, rifampicin is the antibiotic of choice, but it should not be administered alone to avoid the selection of resistant mutants. Linezolid has activity against resistant staphylococci and a high oral bioavailability; therefore, it could be a good option for combining with rifampicin. We describe 2 patients admitted to our hospital due to orthopaedic implant infections, who received combination therapy with linezolid and rifampicin. In both cases, the trough serum concentration of linezolid during rifampicin treatment was below the minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of organisms (MIC(90)) for staphylococci, but increased after rifampicin withdrawal. This finding suggests an interaction between rifampicin and linezolid, and a possible explanation is discussed.

Linezolid plus rifampin as a salvage therapy in prosthetic joint infections treated without removing the implant

The aim of this study is to describe our experience with linezolid plus rifampin as a salvage therapy in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) when other antibiotic regimens failed or were not tolerated. A total of 161 patients with a documented prosthetic joint infection were diagnosed with a PJI and prospectively followed up from January 2000 to April 2007. Clinical characteristics, inflammatory markers, microbiological and radiological data, and antibiotic treatment were recorded. After a 2-year follow-up, patients were classified as cured when the prosthesis was not removed, symptoms of infection disappeared, and inflammatory parameters were within the normal range. Any other outcome was considered a failure. The mean age of the entire cohort (n = 161) was 67 years. Ninety-five episodes were on a knee prosthesis (59%), and 66 were on a hip prosthesis (41%). A total of 49 patients received linezolid plus rifampin: 45 due to failure of the previous antibiotic regimen and 4 due to an adverse event associated with the prior antibiotics. In no case was the implant removed. The mean (standard deviation) duration of treatment was 80.2 (29.7) days. The success rate after 24 months of follow-up was 69.4% (34/49 patients). Three patients developed thrombocytopenia and 3 developed anemia; however, it was not necessary to stop linezolid. Linezolid plus rifampin is an alternative salvage therapy when the implant is not removed.

Future challenges and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with emphasis on MRSA

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is an urgent medical problem due to its growing frequency and its poor associated outcome. As healthcare delivery increasingly involves invasive procedures and implantable devices, the number of patients at risk for SAB and its complications is likely to grow. Compounding this problem is the growing prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and the dwindling efficacy of vancomycin, long the treatment of choice for this pathogen. Despite the recent availability of several new antibiotics for S. aureus, new strategies for treatment and prevention are required for this serious, common cause of human infection.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics in drug development and regulatory science

The application of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is coming of age in drug development and regulation, reflecting significant advances over the past 10 years in the predictability of key pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from human in vitro data and in the availability of dedicated software platforms and associated databases. Specific advances and contemporary challenges with respect to predicting the processes of drug clearance, distribution, and absorption are reviewed, together with the ability to anticipate the quantitative extent of PK-based drug-drug interactions and the impact of age, genetics, disease, and formulation. The value of this capability in selecting and designing appropriate clinical studies, its implications for resource-sparing techniques, and a more holistic view of the application of PK across the preclinical/clinical divide are considered. Finally, some attention is given to the positioning of PBPK within the drug development and approval paradigm and its future application in truly personalized medicine.

A quantitative framework and strategies for management and evaluation of metabolic drug-drug interactions in oncology drug development: new molecular entities as object drugs

This article outlines general strategies for the management and evaluation of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) resulting from perturbation of clearance of investigational anticancer drug candidates by concomitantly administered agents in a drug development setting, with a focus on drug candidates that cannot be evaluated in first-in-human studies in healthy subjects. A risk level classification is proposed, based on quantitative integration of knowledge derived from preclinical drug-metabolism studies evaluating the projected percentage contribution [f(i)(%)] of individual molecular determinants (e.g. cytochrome P450 isoenzymes) to the overall human clearance of the investigational agent. The following classification is proposed with respect to susceptibility to DDIs with metabolic inhibitors: a projected maximum DDI expected to result in a ≤1.33-fold increase in exposure, representing a low level of risk; a projected maximum DDI expected to result in a >1.33-fold but <2-fold increase in exposure, representing a moderate level of risk; and a projected maximum DDI expected to result in a ≥2-fold increase in exposure, representing a potentially high level of risk. For DDIs with metabolic inducers, the following operational classification is proposed, based on the sum of the percentage contributions of enzymes that are inducible via a common mechanism to the overall clearance of the investigational drug: <<25%, representing a low level of risk; <50%, representing a moderate level of risk; and ≥50%, representing a potentially high level of risk. To ensure patient safety and to minimize bias in determination of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), it is recommended that strong and moderate inhibitors and inducers of the major contributing enzyme are excluded in phase I dose-escalation studies of high-risk compounds, whereas exclusion of strong inhibitors and inducers of the contributing enzyme(s) is recommended as being sufficient for moderate-risk compounds. For drugs that will be investigated in diseases such as glioblastoma, where there may be relatively frequent use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic agents (EIAEDs), a separate dose-escalation study in this subpopulation is recommended to define the RP2D. For compounds in the high-risk category, if genetic deficiencies in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzyme are known, it is recommended that poor metabolizers be studied separately to define the RP2D for this subpopulation. Whereas concomitant medication exclusion criteria that are utilized in the phase I dose-escalation studies will probably also need to be maintained for high-risk compounds in phase II studies unless the results of a clinical DDI study indicate the absence of a clinically relevant interaction, these exclusion criteria can potentially be relaxed beyond phase I for moderate-risk compounds, if supported by the nature of clinical toxicities and the understanding of the therapeutic index in phase I. Adequately designed clinical DDI studies will not only inform potential relaxation of concomitant medication exclusion criteria in later-phase studies but, importantly, will also inform the development of pharmacokinetically derived dose-modification guidelines for use in clinical practice when coupled with adequate safety monitoring, as illustrated in the prescribing guidance for many recently approved oncology therapeutics.