Campath-1H and fludarabine in combination are highly active in refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Antibody therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The introduction of the monoclonal antibodies rituximab (anti-CD20) and alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) has revolutionized the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Both antibodies were first studied as single agents in relapsed CLL, but rituximab is increasingly used in combination chemoimmunotherapy regimens in previously untreated patients. Phase II studies demonstrated that the addition of rituximab to fludarabine-based chemotherapy improves complete response (CR) rates and prolongs progression-free survival (PFS), but a long-term survival benefit has not been shown. Alemtuzumab is less commonly used, due to the greater likelihood of infusion toxicity, as well as hematologic and immune toxicities. Subcutaneous (SC) administration significantly reduces infusion toxicity, but hematologic and infectious complications, most notably cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, still occur with SC dosing. Alemtuzumab's unique clinical properties include its clinical activity in relapsed CLL patients with del(17p13) and its ability to eradicate minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow. Its use as consolidation therapy to eradicate MRD after nucleoside analog therapy is under active study. Several investigational monoclonal antibodies are in preclinical or clinical studies, most notably lumiliximab (anti-CD23) and ofatumumab (HuMax CD20), and are briefly discussed in this review.

Alemtuzumab in the treatment of fludarabine refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

The introduction of immunotherapeutic agents has provided renewed hope for Chronic lymphocytic leukemia fludarabine-refractory patients. Several clinical trials have shown that alemtuzumab is a more effective option compared to combination chemotherapy for treatment of patients who have relapsed or who are refractory to fludarabine, including those with poor prognostic factors. Although there are significant potential toxicities associated with alemtuzumab, such as infusional reactions and the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation, most are manageable. Pre-treatment anti-pyretics and anti-histamines are recommended to prevent or mitigate the acute infusional reactions associated with intravenous infusion. Recent use of alemtuzumab via the subcutaneous route has been shown to be well tolerated and has yielded similar response rates to the infusional method of administration. Prophylaxis with thrimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) as well as valacyclovir or a similar anti-viral can prevent many of the opportunistic infections seen in early trials. Reactivation of CMV infection can be effectively managed with monitoring and early treatment. Chemo-immunotherapy combination with alemtuzumab has been tested and demonstrated unprecedented clinical results in relapsed and refractory patients. The use of this agent earlier in the algorithm of patients with these characteristics should be considered. Future areas of research will include the use of alemtuzumab in combination with other monoclonal antibodies and other targeted therapies.

Alemtuzumab compared with chlorambucil as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

PURPOSE

We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous alemtuzumab compared with chlorambucil in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received alemtuzumab (30 mg three times per week, for up to 12 weeks) or chlorambucil (40 mg/m(2) every 28 days, for up to 12 months). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), time to alternative therapy, safety, and overall survival.

RESULTS

We randomly assigned 297 patients, 149 to alemtuzumab and 148 to chlorambucil. Alemtuzumab had superior PFS, with a 42% reduction in risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58; P = .0001), and a median time to alternative treatment of 23.3 versus 14.7 months for chlorambucil (HR = 0.54; P = .0001). The ORR was 83% with alemtuzumab (24% CR) versus 55% with chlorambucil (2% CR); differences in ORR and CR were highly statistically significant (P < .0001). Elimination of minimal residual disease occurred in 11 of 36 complete responders to alemtuzumab versus none to chlorambucil. Adverse events profiles were similar, except for more infusion-related and cytomegalovirus (CMV) events with alemtuzumab and more nausea and vomiting with chlorambucil. CMV events had no apparent impact on efficacy.

CONCLUSION

As first-line treatment for patients with CLL, alemtuzumab demonstrated significantly improved PFS, time to alternative treatment, ORR and CR, and minimal residual disease-negative remissions compared with chlorambucil, with predictable and manageable toxicity.

Chemoimmunotherapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

The past two decades have seen a major paradigm shift in the therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), with the treatment goal shifting from symptom palliation to the attainment of maximal disease control using the most effective frontline regimens available, thus prolonging survival and possibly leading to cure. The most potent therapeutic regimens developed to date include the chemoimmunotherapy combinations incorporating purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies. We review the evolution of modern chemoimmunotherapy for CLL, and discuss current research directions for further refining the potency of these regimens.

Emerging therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

The presentation, clinical course and prognosis for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is diverse and strategies for therapy reflect this variability. Staging of the disease has assisted in deciding treatment options and more recently the cytogenetic, molecular and surrogate markers of the immunoglobulin heavy chain mutational status, CD38 and ZAP-70, have assisted in further risk stratification. Chemotherapy has been the mainstay of interventional therapy when required and the two most important classes of agents in the treatment of CLL are nucleoside analogues and alkylating agents. Combining these two groups of agents has significantly improved prognosis in this disease. More recently a number of novel agents have been applied to patients with CLL to determine if they represent better therapy. However, allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers perhaps the only realistic chance of a cure in this disease. Clinical trials are still needed to determine the timing and role of this promising treatment modality in the treatment of CLL and, where possible, combined with the emerging awareness of the disease biology, related biological markers and prognostic indicators.

Recent progress in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a clonal disease characterized by proliferation and accumulation of small CD5-positive B cells. More than 50% of patients are asymptomatic at diagnosis and usually require no treatment. However, treatment is needed in the advanced and progressive disease. Chlorambucil with or without steroids has been the drug of choice for many years in previously untreated patients with CLL. The purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs), fludarabine (FA), cladribine (2-CdA-chlorodeoxyadenosine) and pentostatin (DCF, 2'-deoxycoformycin) also have been introduced for treatment of CLL. Significantly higher overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) and longer progression free survival (PFS) in patients with CLL treated with FA or 2-CdA have been confirmed in randomized, multicenter trials and more recently in meta-analysis. However, the median survival time did not differ between patients treated with PNA and alkylating agents. Combination therapies with PNAs and cyclophosphamide and especially with cyclophosphamide and rituximab are more active than monotherapy in terms of OR, CR and PFS. Several reports have shown significant activity of alemtuzumab in previously untreated and pretreated patients even when refractory to FA. Alemtuzumab also can be used in CLL as a preparative regimen before stem cell transplantation (SCT) and to eliminate minimal residual disease (MRD). Recently, several new agents have shown promise in treating CLL, including new monoclonal antibodies, agents targeting bcl-2 family of proteins, antisense oligonucleotides and other agents. Moreover, autologous and allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantations are increasingly considered for treatment of patients with CLL. In this review current therapeutic strategies in CLL are presented.

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets the human CD52 antigen. CD52 is expressed by a variety of lymphoid neoplasms and most human mononuclear cell subsets. In 2001, alemtuzumab was approved for marketing in the United States and Europe for use in patients with fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In heavily pretreated patients with CLL, the overall response rate (ORR) is approximately 35%, and in previously untreated patients the ORR is greater than 80%, with a recent randomized study suggesting it is superior to alkylator-based therapy. Importantly, alemtuzumab is effective in patients with high-risk del(17p13.1) and del(11q22.3) CLL. Alemtuzumab combination studies with fludarabine and/or monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab have demonstrated promising results. Alemtuzumab is also being studied in CLL patients as consolidation therapy for treatment of minimal residual disease, in preparation for stem cell transplantation and to prevent acute and chronic graft versus host disease. Alemtuzumab is frequently associated with acute 'first-dose' reactions when administered intravenously, but is much better tolerated when administered subcutaneously without loss of therapeutic efficacy. Additional potential adverse events associated with alemtuzumab administration include myelosuppression as well as profound cellular immune dysfunction with the associated risk of viral reactivation and other opportunistic infections. Additional studies detailing the mechanism of action of alemtuzumab as well as new strategies for prevention of opportunistic infections will aid in the future therapeutic development of this agent.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia in the western world and is due to the accumulation of mature B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and secondary lymphoid organs. The leukemic cells show a distinct phenotype, which is essential to reach the correct diagnosis. Despite the phenotypic homogeneity, the clinical outcome may be significantly different. Some patients have an indolent leukemia, with long survival while others experience an aggressive disease, with early and frequent need of treatment. At present, no chemotherapeutic regimens can be considered curative and all patients will die with (or because of) their disease. In recent years, research on CLL has led to important discoveries that help defining patients' prognosis at the moment of diagnosis. These prognostic factors, which are derived from the biological features of the leukemic lymphocytes, are now rapidly moved into the clinical arena. They are used to stratify patients in selected clinical trials to assess the value of early and more modern treatments, which are becoming available to hematologists.

International standardized approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

The eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) predicts for improved outcome. However, the wide variety of MRD techniques makes it difficult to interpret and compare different clinical trials. Our aim was to develop a standardized flow cytometric CLL-MRD assay and compare it to real-time quantitative allele-specific oligonucleotide (RQ-ASO) Immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IgH) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Analysis of 728 paired blood and marrow samples demonstrated high concordance (87%) for patients off-therapy. Blood analysis was equally or more sensitive than marrow in 92% of samples but marrow analysis was necessary to detect MRD within 3 months of alemtuzumab therapy. Assessment of 50 CLL-specific antibody combinations identified three (CD5/CD19 with CD20/CD38, CD81/CD22 and CD79b/CD43) with low inter-laboratory variation and false-detection rates. Experienced operators demonstrated an accuracy of 95.7% (specificity 98.8%, sensitivity 91.1%) in 141 samples with 0.01-0.1% CLL. There was close correlation and 95% concordance with RQ-ASO IgH-PCR for detection of CLL above 0.01%. The proposed flow cytometry approach is applicable to all sample types and therapeutic regimes, and sufficiently rapid and sensitive to guide therapy to an MRD-negativity in real time. These techniques may be used as a tool for assessing response and comparing the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches.

Alemtuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for CD52, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored, lymphocyte-surface glycoprotein. Administration of alemtuzumab to patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia depletes normal and neoplastic lymphocytes from the blood, spleen and marrow, but appears to be less effective in resolving lymphadenopathy. Owing to its activity in clearing leukemia cells of patients who are refractory to purine analogs, such as fludarabine, alemtuzumab became the first and only monoclonal antibody approved by the US FDA and other regulatory authorities for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Here we review the results of clinical studies evaluating the activity and safety of alemtuzumab when used alone or in combination with other antileukemia agents for the treatment of this disease.

Routine clinical use of alemtuzumab in patients with heavily pretreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a nation-wide retrospective study in Austria

BACKGROUND

In previous studies, alemtuzumab demonstrated considerable activity in patients with previously treated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including fludarabine-refractory disease. In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the benefit of alemtuzumab monotherapy in unselected patients with advanced, previously treated CLL who received treatment in the routine clinical setting.

METHODS

Data were collected from 115 consecutive patients who received alemtuzumab therapy at 25 participating centers in Austria. Patients received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-11 prior lines of therapy), and 59% had fludarabine-refractory disease. Alemtuzumab was administered intravenously or subcutaneously with a planned schedule of 30 mg 3 times per week for up to 12 weeks. Patients received valacyclovir and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for antiinfective prophylaxis.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 23%, with complete responses achieved in 5% of patients. Stable disease (SD) was achieved in 36% of patients. After a median follow-up of 17.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 20.2 months for all patients. A multivariate Cox regression analysis that included pretreatment baseline characteristics, response to therapy, and cumulative dose of alemtuzumab indicated that bulky lymphadenopathy, the administration of > r =3 previous therapies, and lack of response to alemtuzumab remained significant independent risk factors for inferior OS. The median OS had not been reached for responding patients. The median OS was 29.5 months for patients with SD and 10.8 months for patients with progressive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad use of alemtuzumab in the routine clinical practice setting is feasible and active in unselected patients with pretreated CLL, and the current results confirmed the activity and safety of this agent, as reported in previously published clinical studies.

Role of fludarabine in hematological malignancies

Fludarabine is a prodrug that is converted to the free nucleoside 9-beta-D-arabinosyl-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A), which enters cells and accumulates mainly as the 5'-triphosphate, F-ara-ATP. F-ara-ATP has multiple mechanisms of action, which are mostly directed toward DNA. Collectively, these actions affect DNA synthesis, which is the major mechanism of F-ara-A-induced cytotoxicity. Secondarily, incorporation into RNA and inhibition of transcription has been shown in cell lines. As a single agent, fludarabine has been effective for indolent leukemia. Biochemical modulation strategies resulted in enhanced accumulation of cytarabine triphosphate and led to the use of fludarabine for the treatment of acute leukemia. The combination of fludarabine with DNA-damaging agents to inhibit DNA repair processes has been highly effective for indolent leukemia and lymphomas. Other strategies have incorporated fludarabine into preparative regimens for nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation.

Monoclonal antibody combinations in CLL: evolving strategies

Monoclonal antibodies have led to a profound shift in the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Alemtuzumab and rituximab remain the most active antibodies, and their single-agent activity has been established in previously untreated and relapsed patients with CLL. Higher response rates and a better quality of response through eradication of minimal residual disease have been reported with monoclonal antibody combinations. Chemoimmunotherapy regimens are being actively explored in frontline CLL therapy, and numerous combination regimens have been investigated in relapse. New and more effective therapies are shifting the focus from palliation to treatment algorithms with curative attempt. Challenges for monoclonal antibody combinations in the future include: (1) defining appropriate patient populations for combination therapies; (2) assessing the impact of pretreatment biologic prognostic factors; (3) enhancing eradication of minimal residual disease; and (4) reassessing response criteria in CLL.

Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: is it ready for primetime?

New therapeutic modalities have substantially improved response rates and outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), yet the mindset remains that palliation is the only goal of therapy because the disease is considered incurable. Ultimately, all patients relapse despite achieving an initial response, as minimal residual disease (MRD) persisting after therapy eventually evolves into morphological and clinical recurrence. The emergence of immune-based combination therapies capable of inducing molecular remissions, the availability of highly sensitive assays that detect MRD, and emerging data showing a longer duration of response or longer survival in patients with no detectable disease, suggest that eradicating MRD may be a reasonable option for some patients. Moreover, novel biological prognostic markers have divided CLL into favourable and unfavourable subtypes, arguing in favour of defining different goals of therapy for different patients. Clinicians are increasingly challenged with the task of how best to incorporate MRD assessment into clinical practice, especially in an era when these novel prognostic factors exist. This review summarises the current understanding of MRD from a clinical standpoint, suggests that MRD eradication maybe a reasonable option for some patients, and argues in favour of designing large randomised studies to determine whether MRD-negative remission improves outcome.

Fludarabine in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common leukaemia in the Western world. Historically, CLL patients have received prednisone- or chlorambucil-containing regimens, resulting in modest responses and a slim chance of long-term survival. The addition of purine nucleoside analogues, specifically fludarabine, to the armamentarium has significantly improved efficacy in treatment-naive or heavily pretreated CLL patients. Since the 1980s, fludarabine monotherapy has demonstrated an improvement in response over historical chemotherapeutic agents. Single-agent fludarabine therapy has expanded into a combination regimen containing cyclophosphamide and has further evolved to incorporate monoclonal antibodies. A review of the fludarabine literature shows that these advancements in fludarabine-containing therapy have enhanced the overall patient response with a potential increase in survival time, thus representing progress towards a superior treatment for CLL.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: diagnosis and treatment

Traditionally, the goal of therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been palliative, with first-line therapy using alkylating agents and/or involved field radiotherapy (depending on the stage of disease and sites of involvement) because of the older age of affected patients and the low rate of complete remissions (CRs) with no improvement in overall survival despite treatment. With increasing knowledge about the biology, molecular genetics, and prognostic factors of the disease, the philosophy of care for patients with CLL has evolved from palliation to aiming for a potential cure, especially in younger patients. Furthermore, multiple treatment options have emerged, including purine analogues, monoclonal antibodies, and potentially stem cell transplantation. These have been associated with higher frequencies of CRs and longer durations of responses compared to conventional chemotherapy. In addition, a subset of patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy can achieve durable CRs and molecular remissions. This may translate into improved disease-free survival and potentially a "cure." Because of the heterogeneous nature of CLL, new prognostic markers are currently being incorporated into clinical trials to determine their role in routine clinical practice. This review summarizes current therapeutic regimens that are being evaluated in patients with CLL and management of disease-related complications.

Alemtuzumab as consolidation after a response to fludarabine is effective in purging residual disease in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

PURPOSE

Treatment with alemtuzumab has resulted in negative responses for minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a prior analysis we demonstrated that it is possible to achieved MRD negativity, as assessed by polyclonality of immunoglobulin heavy chain after consolidation with alemtuzumab. This phase II study evaluated 34 patients with CLL who received alemtuzumab consolidation in an effort to improve the quality of their response to fludarabine-based induction. Subsequent peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) collection and transplantation, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics also were assessed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients younger than 65 years who had a clinical response to fludarabine-based induction therapy received alemtuzumab 10 mg subcutaneously three times per week for 6 weeks. PBSCs were collected after mobilization with cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Blood samples for pharmacokinetics study were taken between days 1 and 31.

RESULTS

The complete response rate improved from 35% after fludarabine induction to 79.4% after alemtuzumab consolidation, including 19 patients (56%) who achieved MRD negativity. The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions and fever. Cytomegalovirus reactivation occurred in 18 patients, all of whom were successfully treated with oral ganciclovir. PBSC collection was successful in 24 (92%) of 26 patients, and 18 patients underwent autologous PBSC transplantation. Alemtuzumab plasma concentrations increased gradually during the first 2 weeks and accumulated more rapidly thereafter.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneously administered alemtuzumab was effective, safe, and well tolerated as consolidation therapy in patients with CLL who responded to fludarabine induction therapy. Subsequent PBSCT was feasible thereafter.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for B-Cell Malignancies

For decades, chemotherapy was the only available approach for patients with advanced lymphoid malignancies. Treatment paradigms were dramatically altered by the availability of novel and active targeted agents, particularly the monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab and rituximab. These agents are now playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies. Alemtuzumab is being used earlier in the course of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in patients with a more intact immune system, when it is likely to have its greatest activity. The immunosuppressive properties of monoclonal antibodies are also being explored in the stem cell transplant setting, including in vivo purging and, with alemtuzumab, for the management of graft-versus-host disease. Rituximab has become ubiquitous in the treatment of most B-cell malignancies. Further research with this antibody is focused on optimizing its use and determining its role in each of the relevant disease states. In addition, newer antibodies are in development for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other B-cell malignancies. New treatment regimens, including combinations of monoclonal antibodies, could enhance complete response rates and prolong progression-free survival, perhaps eventually improving our ability to cure patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Advances in the treatment for haematological malignancies

Despite the progress made in the last decade in the treatment of haematological malignancies, most of the patients still have a dismal prognosis. However, the improved knowledge of tumour biology opened the possibility to develop new 'intelligent' therapeutic strategies, the so-named targeted therapies. These approaches aim to selectively kill cancer cells by basing this selectivity on both the expression of a specific molecule on their surface or the activation of particular molecular pathways secondary to malignant transformation. In this article, the authors review the main targeted therapies available in haematology, such as monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase, farnesyltransferase, as well as proteasome inhibitors, antiangiogenesis compounds and antisense oligonuceotides. Finally, the authors focus on the application of imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukaemia as the paradigm of molecular treatment. Although these novel therapies are beginning to fulfil their promise, continued research efforts are needed to determine the optimal role of these strategies in haemato-oncology.

Monoclonal antibody therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Cure of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has been an elusive goal. The recent availability of active monoclonal antibodies has rekindled enthusiasm for new and innovative therapeutic approaches. Alemtuzumab, induces responses in about a third of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL following therapy with fludarabine and an alkylating agent. Whereas, rituximab has limited activity in previously treated patients, response rates of 50-70% have been reported in those without prior therapy. Recent data on combinations with rituximab and chemotherapy have shown promise for improving patient outcome. Newer antibodies in development include the primatized monoclonal antibody lumiliximab (IDEC-152), directed against CD23. Other biological approaches include the use of antisense oligonucleotides, proapoptic small molecules, and vaccines directed against the malignant B cells. The rational development of combinations of these promising approaches may eliminate the need for chemotherapy, leading to safer and more effective approaches for patients with CLL.

Current and Investigational Therapies for Patients with CLL

Clinical and laboratory investigations are driving the rapid change in treatments for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Randomized trials have demonstrated superior activity for fludarabine combined with cyclophosphamide versus single-agent fludarabine or chlorambucil as initial treatment. Chemoimmunotherapy holds promise for further improvement and is being tested in randomized trials. New combinations and agents are being identified and tested. Eliminating minimal residual disease is a therapeutic endpoint that may prove to prolong survival and is also under investigation in prospective clinical trials. Work continues toward improving survival and potentially curing patients of this disease.

Development of Antibodies and Chimeric Molecules for Cancer Immunotherapy

Monoclonal antibodies are among the most rapidly expanding class of therapeutics for cancer treatment. Monoclonal antibodies targeting non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Her-2/neu highly expressing metastatic breast cancer, colorectal cancer, acute myelogenous leukemia, and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have received FDA approval. Promising new targets for antibody therapy include cellular growth factor receptors, mediators of tumor-driven neo-angiogenesis, as well as host negative immunoregulatory checkpoints that impede an effective immune response to neoplasia. Antibody efficacy has been increased by genetic engineering to humanize the antibodies and to increase their effector functions including antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Furthermore, antibodies have been armed with cytokines, chemotherapeutic agents, toxins, and radionuclides to augment their efficacy as tumor cytotoxic agents. As a consequence of these advances, 30 years after their first development, monoclonal antibodies have become an important standard approach for the therapy of neoplasia with 19 therapeutic monoclonal antibodies now approved by the FDA including 8 for the treatment of cancer.

Organisation of neoplastic haematopathology services: a UK perspective

The diagnosis of haematological malignancies has begun to emerge as a distinct pathological discipline in the United Kingdom. This has been driven by the recommendation of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence that diagnosis of leukaemia and lymphoma should take place in a specialist laboratory and in most cases this should be organised on a regional basis. The reason for this guidance was the perception that there was a considerable level of diagnostic inaccuracy and that this could be improved by better integration of the currently available technologies. This is one of a number of major changes in the way that services to patients are being delivered, all of which are centred on the development of multidisciplinary teams responsible for the provision of local services. The introduction of the WHO classification of haematological malignancy provides a structure for the development of integrated haemtopathology laboratories, with its emphasis on definition of disease entities based on clinical, morphological, phenotypical and molecular features. This means that these diagnostic modalities can be used systematically and in parallel to provide effective cross validation of a diagnosis. One of the challenges raised by this approach is the selection of the most informative panels of investigations both at presentation and subsequent follow up from the wide range of options that are now available. The introduction of specialist haematopathology services in the United Kingdom has highlighted a number of scientific and organisational issues that in time may have a wider impact on diagnostic laboratories in general. These include the relationship between size and cost effectiveness and the future role of clinical scientists and medically trained pathologists. Integrated laboratories of the type being developed challenge the prevailing model for delivery of pathological services in the United Kingdom, which is based around the traditional pathology disciplines. These speciality boundaries will become less relevant as long established diagnostic techniques are replaced by the new generation of diagnostic technologies and it is important to establish frameworks of service delivery that can deploy these developments for the benefit of patients.

New developments in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The remarkable progress witnessed over the past few years in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia has profoundly changed the clinical approach to this disease. This review focuses on the most recent advances in the diagnostic and prognostic examination of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, with particular emphasis on their implications in clinical management, taking into account the broadening of the therapeutic possibilities available today.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through the biologic improvements achieved during the past few years it is now possible to effectively stratify chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients prognostically at presentation on the basis of several laboratory parameters. Furthermore, the availability of purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies and the extension of autografting and allografting procedures have allowed the achievement of higher response rates, including molecular remissions. With the aim of investigating whether early and aggressive treatment intervention may improve the survival of patients with a poor prognosis, new therapeutic trials have been specifically designed.

SUMMARY

A complete biologic and clinical examination now allows the establishment of a correct diagnostic characterization of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and to identify patients with early disease with a different prognostic likelihood. Multicenter prospective trials, in which the enrolled patients are stratified and treated according to their prognostic risk, will determine the best treatment for the different categories of patients. It is likely that in the near future each chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient can be offered a targeted treatment algorithm based on the clinical and biologic characteristics at presentation.

Novel immune-based treatment strategies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Immune-based treatments represent a new group of therapeutic strategies for patients with cancer, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), that employ immune effector mechanisms. Among these strategies is passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibody, alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Active immunotherapy strategies currently under development include vaccines, administration of expanded and activated T cells, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. These immune-based strategies represent new treatments with potentially complementary mechanisms of action to standard therapies and signify major advances in treatments for patients with CLL.

The evolving role of Alemtuzumab in management of patients with CLL

New insights into prognostic markers and the pathophysiology of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are beginning to change the concept of CLL treatment. Alemtuzumab has evolved as a potent and effective therapeutic option for patients with CLL. Specifically, alemtuzumab has demonstrated substantial efficacy in fludarabine-refractory patients and has shown impressive responses when administered subcutaneously in first-line therapy. A group of experts gathered to discuss new data related to the use of alemtuzumab in CLL and to assess its place in the rapidly changing approach to treating patients with this disease. The main goals of this program were to update the management guidelines that were previously developed for alemtuzumab-treated patients and to provide community oncologists with guidance on the most effective way to integrate alemtuzumab into a CLL treatment plan.

How I treat refractory CLL

Therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has greatly changed over the past few years. After years of stagnation, with treatment revolving around the use of rather ineffective drugs such as alkylators, many patients are now being treated with more effective agents such as purine analogs either alone or combined with other drugs and/or monoclonal antibodies. Treatment of patients refractory to these treatments is particularly challenging and should be decided only upon a careful evaluation of the disease, patient characteristics, and prognostic factors. Refractory disease should be clearly separated from relapsing disease. The only curative therapy for patients with CLL, including those with refractory disease, is allogeneic stem cell transplantation. However, the use of allogeneic transplantation is limited because of the advanced age of most patients and the high transplant-related mortality (TRM). Transplants with nonmyeloablative regimens may reduce TRM and allow more patients to receive transplants more safely. For patients in whom an allogeneic transplantation is not feasible or in whom it is deemed inappropriate, participation in phase 2 trials should be encouraged. Finally, to investigate mechanisms to overcome resistance to therapy in CLL and to identify patients that might gain benefit from early, intensive therapies (eg, based on biologic markers) constitute a challenge that needs active investigation.

Fludarabine in Combination With Alemtuzumab Is Effective and Feasible in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of a Phase II Trial

Purpose

To determine the efficacy and safety of a newly developed concomitant administration of fludarabine and alemtuzumab (FluCam) in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL).

Patients and Methods

A total of 36 patients were treated in this phase II study (median age, 61.47 years; mean number of prior chemotherapies, 2.6; Binet stage C, n = 28). After an initial dose escalation of alemtuzumab over 3 days, alemtuzumab 30 mg and fludarabine 30 mg/m2 were administered on 3 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated after 28 days for up to six cycles. Restaging (following National Cancer Institute criteria) was carried out after cycles 2 and 4 and 1 month after the end of treatment.

Results

The overall response rate was 83% (11 complete responses, 19 partial responses, one stable disease, and five progressive diseases). Two patients with progressive disease developed fungal pneumonias, and one patient died as a result of Escherichia coli sepsis. Two subclinical cytomegalovirus reactivations occurred.

Conclusion

The new FluCam regimen is effective and feasible in patients with relapsed and refractory B-CLL.

The Emerging Role of Alemtuzumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Targeted therapy for malignant hematologic disorders has become a realistic goal with the identification of novel antibodies that are designed to act against highly expressed antigens on malignant clones. CD52 is abundantly expressed on malignant lymphocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD52 and induces cell death by several mechanisms that are still under investigation. The initial positive results of many clinical studies that explored the activity of alemtuzumab in relapsed and/or refractory CLL have provoked many oncologists to incorporate this agent into the treatment paradigm of this disease. Prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of therapy or until patients are no longer immunocompromised are recommended. This review summarizes the clinical experience with alemtuzumab that eventually led to its approval. Recent novel prognostic factors and trends in CLL therapy are also reviewed.

Alemtuzumab induces enhanced apoptosis in vitro in B-cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity

Alemtuzumab, a monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody has been shown to be highly effective in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, even in fludarabine-refractory disease. The mechanism of action is currently unknown, but may rely on complement-mediated cell lysis and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The aim of this study was to assess the proapoptotic activity of alemtuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and to describe pathways potentially underlying this effect. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 21 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients were treated in vitro in the absence of complement with fludarabine alone, alemtuzumab alone, or with the additional presence of a cross-linking anti-Fc-antibody. Apoptosis was quantified after 24 h by flow cytometry analysis. Expression of several pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins was determined at different time points. Apoptosis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells treated with alemtuzumab alone was significantly enhanced compared to untreated cells suggesting a minor potentially cytotoxic mechanism by direct signaling independent from antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. The presence of a cross-linking anti-Fc-antibody induced the formation of cell clusters and enhanced apoptosis significantly suggesting a potential role of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in alemtuzumab induced apoptosis. Alemtuzumab activated a CD52-dependent signaling pathway which induced a significant increase in caspase 3 and 8 expression. Alemtuzumab significantly enhances apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro, especially in combination with a cross-linking anti-Fc-antibody, this effect being mediated by a caspase-dependent pathway.

Proapoptotic activity of alemtuzumab alone and in combination with rituximab or purine nucleoside analogues in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells

Proapoptotic activity of anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, alemtuzumab (ALT) as well as ALT-affected apoptosis-regulatory mechanisms were assessed in tumor cells from 36 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Cells were treated in vitro for 24-48 h with ALT alone or in combination with rituximab (RTX), or purine nucleoside analogues (PNA), fludarabine and cladribine. Moreover, eight ALT-treated patients were examined in vivo. In 22/36 patients with the pre-treatment overexpression of Bax, Bak and Bid proteins, ALT induced a distinct (more than 50% from the baseline) increase in the incidence of apoptosis after 24 h of in vitro treatment. ALT-attributed CLL cell apoptosis was also detected after 24 h from in vivo ALT administration, with significantly downregulated Bcl-2 (P = 0.012) and Mcl-1 (P = 0.031). ALT combined with PNA or RTX exerted significantly higher proapoptotic effect in vitro than single agents, downregulating FLIP and Bcl-2 (ALT + PNA) or significantly increasing Bax expression (ALT + RTX; P = 0.007). In conclusion, the evidence of apoptotic CLL cells death in response to ALT, with deregulation of intrinsic apoptotic pathway, is presented. ALT and PNA or RTX trigger complementary changes in expression of proteins regulating cell propensity to undergo apoptosis, what provides molecular rationale for combining ALT with those agents.

Therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia with purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a clonal hematopoietic disorder characterized by proliferation and accumulation of small lymphocytes. It is the most common form of leukemia in North America and Europe. The management of CLL is determined by the stage and activity of the disease. Several randomized studies indicate that cytotoxic therapy based on alkylating agents in the indolent phase of disease, does not prolong the survival time of CLL patients. Chlorambucil, with or without steroids, has been for many years the drug of choice in previously untreated patients with this leukemia. Alternative treatment approaches, including new purine nucleoside analogs (PNA), such as fludarabine and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine) have also shown activity in CLL. The randomized studies have indicated a higher overall response, complete remission rates and longer response duration in patients treated initially with PNA than with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide based combination regimens. These agents alone or in combinations, seem to be the treatment of choice for patients failing standard therapies. The monoclonal antibodies directed against CD52 antigen (alemtuzumab, Campath-1H) and CD20 antigen (rituximab) demonstrate also significant activity in CLL patients. These agents have significant single-agent activity, distinct mechanism of action and generally, favorable toxicity profiles. Both antibodies achieved the most promising results in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. More recently the effect of alemtuzumab in previously untreated patients has been also investigated and results are very encouraging. A multicenter prospective randomized study comparing alemtuzumab and chlorambucil as first line therapies are ongoing and preliminary results show acceptable toxicity profile of monoclonal antibody.

Remission induction using alemtuzumab can permit chemotherapy-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients to undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation depends upon the disease status before transplantation. Patients with refractory disease are at high risk for relapse. To improve the curative potential of the transplant procedure, we treated 3 chemotherapy-refractory CLL patients with alemtuzumab before allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Prior to therapy, all patients suffered from B-symptoms, and had massive adenopathy, splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and anemia; two patients had hepatomegaly. Alemtuzumab greatly reduced tumor mass in blood and bone marrow, B-symptoms resolved, and organomegaly improved. Two patients became blood product independent. All patients proceeded to transplantation after conditioning with TBI 2 Gy (n=1) or Treosulfan (n=2) in combination with Fludarabine either from an HLA-matched sibling (n=2) or from an HLA-matched unrelated donor (n=1). All patients engrafted, and are alive and well. Two patients reached complete remission (CR); one patient attained stable partial remission (PR). These heavily pre-treated refractory patients gained substantial clinical benefit from alemtuzumab, and received successful allografts.

Overview of monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy: present and promise

After 30 years of development, therapy with monoclonal antibodies has started to realize its promise. Clinical use is most widespread in the field of oncology, where half of the agents approved for routine clinical use are employed and a large number of molecules are currently undergoing clinical trials. In the past 2 years alone, three new compounds-the radiolabeled antibody (131)I-tositumomab and two antibodies targeting growth factor receptors (bevacizumab and cetuximab)-have received FDA approval for indications in oncology. This review summarizes the development of this exciting treatment modality over the last three decades, examines the outcome of treatment with these new antibodies and others available for routine clinical use (i.e. rituximab, trastuzumab, alemtuzumab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan) in standard indications and in experimental settings, and gives a brief outlook on possible future developments.

Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Traditional therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has consisted of alkylating agents, purine analogs, or a combination of these drugs. These agents are effective at producing remissions but are not curative.Thus, new drugs are still needed to improve the outcome of patients with CLL. The introduction of monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab and alemtuzumab, provides a novel therapeutic modality.Rituximab is an active agent in CLL. Standard doses of rituximab result in higher response rates in previously untreated than in relapsed patients but low complete response (CR) rates. Rituximab is most effective in combination with chemotherapy, especially fludarabine-based regimens in the first-line and salvage setting. Rituximab is also useful in the treatment of complications of CLL, such as pure red cell aplasia, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Alemtuzumab has impressive activity in patients with refractory CLL and may play an important role in the consolidation treatment of CLL. Alemtuzumab is most efficacious at clearing disease in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. Bulky lymphadenopathy is less sensitive to therapy. Because of the significant lymphopenia associated with alemtuzumab, antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis should always be used.

Eradication of minimal residual disease in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia after alemtuzumab therapy is associated with prolonged survival

PURPOSE

To test whether eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by alemtuzumab is associated with a prolongation of treatment-free and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-one previously treated patients with CLL (74 men and 17 women; median age, 58 years [range, 32 to 75 years]; 44 were refractory to purine analogs) received a median of 9 weeks of alemtuzumab treatment between 1996 and 2003. Regular bone marrow assessments by MRD flow cytometry were performed with the aim of eradicating detectable MRD (< 1 CLL cell in 10(5) normal cells).

RESULTS

Responses according to National Cancer Institute-sponsored working group response criteria were complete remission (CR) in 32 patients (36%), partial remission (PR) in 17 patients (19%), and no response (NR) in 42 patients (46%). Twenty-two (50%) of 44 purine analog-refractory patients responded to alemtuzumab. Detectable CLL was eradicated from the blood and marrow in 18 patients (20%). Median survival was significantly longer in MRD-negative patients compared with those achieving an MRD-positive CR, PR, or NR. Patients achieving an MRD-negative CR had a longer treatment-free survival than patients with MRD-positive CRs, PR, or NR: MRD-negative CRs, not reached; MRD-positive CRs, 20 months; PRs, 13 months; NR, 6 months (P < .0001). Overall survival for the 18 patients with MRD-negative remissions was 84% at 60 months. Eight (47%) of the MRD-negative patients converted to MRD positivity at a median of 28 months.

CONCLUSION

MRD-negative remission in CLL is achievable with alemtuzumab, leading to an improved overall and treatment-free survival.

An update on the management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Despite the lack of long-term survival data, the impressive results obtained with fludarabine- and rituximab-based therapies have altered the philosophy of the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Therapy with chemoimmunotherapy appears to give higher responses with more patients achieving complete remission and some molecular remission. This may potentially translate into improved disease-free survival, and potentially a 'cure'. Treatment options for patients who develop resistance to fludarabine continue to be limited. This review summarises current chemo-, immuno-, and chemoimmunotherapeutic regimens that are being currently evaluated in patients with CLL.

Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Alemtuzumab is a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody (MAb) that recognizes the CD52 antigen, expressed on normal and neoplastic lymphocytes, monocytes, and natural killer cells. In 2001, alemtuzumab was approved in the US and Europe to treat B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) that had been treated previously with alkylating agents and was refractory to fludarabine. In heavily pretreated patients this MAb is able to produce response rates of about 40%, and in symptomatic, previously untreated patients response rates of more than 80% can be achieved. Alemtuzumab can also be used in patients with CLL as a preparative regimen for stem cell transplantation (SCT) and to prevent graft versus host disease. Moreover its in vivo use before or after SCT may also potentially result in depletion of residual leukemia cells, especially in the autologous setting. Adverse events associated with alemtuzumab include acute first-dose reaction, hematologic toxicity, and infectious complications. Usually they are predictable, manageable, and acceptable in the context of CLL. However, in a significant percentage of patients, cytomegalovirus reactivation occurs during alemtuzumab therapy, and routine weekly monitoring with the polymerase chain reaction methodology is indicated. Moreover, antiviral and antibacterial prophylaxis is mandatory.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): First-Line Treatment

For the past ten years, there has been a dynamic development of new therapeutic compounds and prognostic parameters for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Hematologists and oncologists are challenged to use these new possibilities for an optimized, risk- and fitness-adapted treatment strategy, with the goal of achieving long-term remissions and preserving a good quality of life. This review is intended to summarize the current knowledge on first-line treatment of CLL.

Stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Early results of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) suggested a significant proportion of patients remained disease-free for years, raising the possibility of cure. More recent studies have shown no evidence of a plateau in the survival curves indicating that, at best, ASCT may only prolong disease-free survival. Problems remain over progenitor cell mobilization and one study has raised anxieties about post-transplant myelodysplasia. The impact of ASCT in CLL will only be properly ascertained in a randomized clinical trial and this in underway in Europe. Initial results of conventional allogeneic transplantation (allo-SCT) were very disappointing, with an unacceptably high mortality, but did show that cure was possible in some patients. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning has limited the early transplant-related mortality but it remains too early to determine what proportion of patients will be cured. In view of these uncertainties, is important that reduced intensity allo-SCT for CLL is conducted in the context of a clinical trial. Finally, CLL is very heterogeneous condition and great deal more is becoming understood about the prognostic factors. These will become important in allowing patients and their physicians a choice in balancing the risks of various treatment options.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): First-Line Treatment

For the past ten years, there has been a dynamic development of new therapeutic compounds and prognostic parameters for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Hematologists and oncologists are challenged to use these new possibilities for an optimized, risk- and fitness-adapted treatment strategy, with the goal of achieving long-term remissions and preserving a good quality of life. This review is intended to summarize the current knowledge on first-line treatment of CLL.

Therapy of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia with Purine Nucleoside Analogues

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a neoplastic disease of unknown aetiology characterised by an absolute lymphocytosis in peripheral blood and bone marrow. The disease is diagnosed most commonly in the elderly with the median age at diagnosis being about 65 years. The purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) fludarabine, cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) and pentostatin (2'-deoxycoformycin) are highly active in CLL, both in previously treated and in refractory or relapsed patients. These three agents share similar chemical structures and mechanisms of action such as induction of apoptosis. However, they also exhibit significant differences, especially in their interactions with enzymes involved in adenosine and deoxyadenosine metabolism. Recent randomised studies suggest that fludarabine and cladribine have similar activity in CLL. However, clinical observations indicate the existence of cross-resistance between fludarabine and cladribine. Patients who received PNAs as their initial therapy and achieved long-lasting response can be successfully retreated with the same agent. PNAs administered in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents and/or monoclonal antibodies may produce higher response rates, including complete response (CR) or molecular CR, compared with PNAs alone or other treatment regimens. Management decisions are more difficult in elderly patients because of the apparent increase in toxicity of PNAs in this population. In elderly patients, we recommend chlorambucil as the first-line treatment, with PNAs in lower doses in refractory or relapsed patients. Myelosuppression and infections, including opportunistic varieties, are the most frequent adverse effects in patients with CLL treated with PNAs. Therefore, some investigators recommend routine antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis during and after PNA treatment. This review presents current results and treatment strategies with the use of PNAs in CLL, especially in elderly patients.