The antithrombotic profile of aspirin. Aspirin resistance, or simply failure?

Residual platelet reactivity: predicting short- and long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization

Adequate platelet inhibition is mandatory in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in order to prevent recurrent thrombotic events. Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridine (e.g., clopidogrel) is the treatment of choice in this setting, providing clear clinical benefit in most of the patients. However, a wide interindividual variability exists in the response to antiplatelet drugs and several factors may contribute to determine fluctuation in platelet reactivity, even within the individual patient. Several methodologies and devices have been developed to monitor individual response to antiplatelet treatment, assessing different pathways of platelet activation and aggregation. Studies performed with the use of these methodologies have clearly demonstrated that patients with high post-treatment residual platelet reactivity present a higher risk of ischemic events both at short (during or soon after percutaneous coronary intervention) and long term. In these patients, more aggressive antithrombotic strategies, based on the results of platelet function tests, may be beneficial in order to reduce ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Resistance to low-dose aspirin therapy among patients with acute coronary syndrome in relation to associated risk factors

BACKGROUND

A substantial proportion of patients have recurrence of vascular events despite daily intake of low-dose aspirin therapy. Therefore, different patients may require different aspirin dosages to achieve complete inhibition of platelet function.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to measure the response to low-dose aspirin therapy (150 mg/day) among patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and to find out whether titrating aspirin dosage to 300 mg/day, would provide a better therapeutic response in the resistant cases. Moreover, we also aimed to study any association between aspirin non-responsiveness and atherothrombotic risk factors.

METHODS

The antiplatelet effect of 150 mg/day aspirin was studied prospectively in 50 consecutive patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Platelet aggregation was measured using optical platelet aggregometry and serum thromboxane B(2) level. Aspirin resistance was defined as collagen (1 μg/mL) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (5 μmol/L)-induced platelet aggregation of ≥ 40% when compared with control values. Twenty healthy age- and sex-matched individuals were taken as a control group. All patients were subjected to complete medical history (risk factors, medications), thorough clinical examination, ECG, coronary angiography and laboratory investigations including: complete haemogram, coagulation, kidney, liver and lipid profiles, fasting blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1C) ).

RESULTS

Eleven of 50 patients (22%) were found to be aspirin resistant. A highly significant difference was found between the mean values of ADP, collagen-induced platelet aggregation percentage and thromboxane B(2) level after aspirin 150 mg/day when compared with the corresponding mean values after aspirin 300 mg/day among the resistant patients (66 ± 7.01%, 62 ± 4.34% and 620 ± 64.58 pg/mL, respectively, vs. 26.87 ± 2.85%, 16.5 ± 3.8% and 77 ± 11.3 pg/mL) indicating enhanced response to aspirin after escalating the dose. The presence of atherothrombotic risk factors (hypertension, smoking, family history of ischaemic heart disease and previous MI) were not statistically different between aspirin-resistant and aspirin-sensitive patients. However, there was a highly significant difference between the aspirin sensitive and the resistant patients regarding the other risk factors (diabetes mellitus and dyslipidaemia) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

There is inter-individual variability in response to the antiplatelet effect of standard doses of aspirin (150, 300 mg/day). The response to aspirin 300 mg/day is enhanced in resistant patients when compared to 150 mg/day. There was a significant association between aspirin resistance and atherothrombotic risk factors (diabetes, hyperlipidaemia and obesity).

Perioperative Microemboli and Platelet Aggregation in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy

In carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients, platelet aggregation is increased despite heparinization. We investigated whether this phenomenon correlates with the occurrence of perioperative microemboli. Of 27 CEA patients, 18 (67%) used aspirin and 9 also used clopidogrel. Blood was collected at multiple time points before, during, and after CEA. Platelet aggregation and P-selectin expression were determined. Transcranial Doppler monitoring was used to measure microemboli. Platelet aggregation showed a significant increase 5 minutes postheparinization compared with preheparinization (19.7 ± 2.8% vs 8.9 ± 0.9% in the aspirin group and 22.5 ± 4.4% vs 8.7 ± 1.2% in the clopidogrel group; p < .01 and p < .05, respectively). P-selectin expression showed a tendency to increase postheparinization in both groups ( p = .07 and p = .09, respectively). The number of microemboli ranged from 0 to 50. Clopidogrel patients displayed fewer microemboli than aspirin patients (4.1 ± 2.3 vs 17.6 ± 18.2; p < .01). Patients with a high number of microemboli displayed had a tendency toward higher baseline platelet aggregation than patients with a low number of microemboli ( p = .08). In conclusion, platelet aggregation is transiently increased during CEA despite the administration of antiplatelet agents. Clopidogrel is associated with a decreased number of perioperative microemboli. The exact relationships between these findings, postoperative microemboli formation, and the risk for thromboembolic complications after CEA remain to be determined.

Aspirin resistance is more common in lacunar strokes than embolic strokes and is related to stroke severity

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between aspirin resistance, ischaemic stroke subtype, stroke severity, and inflammatory cytokines. Aspirin resistance was assessed by thrombelastography in 45 people with ischaemic stroke and 25 controls. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 was measured. Stroke severity was assessed using the modified Rankin scale and National Institute of Health Stroke Score within 72 h of stroke. Aspirin resistance was more common in the stroke than the control group (67% versus 40%, P=0.028), and within the stroke group the aspirin-resistant group had a higher Rankin score (4.0 versus 2.0, P=0.013). Aspirin resistance was greater in lacunar than embolic strokes (platelet activation 79% versus 59%, P=0.020). The stroke aspirin-resistant group had higher levels of IL-6 than the stroke aspirin-sensitive group (2.4+/-1 versus 1.8+/-0.9 ng/mL, P=0.037). Using multivariate analysis, we examined the interrelationships between aspirin resistance, IL-6, and stroke severity. These analyses showed that IL-6 was independently associated with stroke severity as the outcome (B=3.738, P=0.036), and aspirin resistance was independently associated with IL-6 (B=0.765, P=0.005) as the outcome. In conclusion, aspirin resistance is related to stroke severity and aspirin resistance is more common in lacunar strokes than embolic strokes.

Prevalence of platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin in patients treated for secondary stroke prophylaxis and in patients with recurrent ischemic events

To determine the prevalence of platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin treatment for secondary stroke prophylaxis, the authors studied consecutive patients during a 29-month period. Information regarding their ischemic events, risk factors, and medications was collected. Platelet aggregation in response to collagen and arachidonic acid was used to determine platelet responsiveness to aspirin. A total of 653 patients were evaluated. Of these, 129 patients (20%) were determined to be nonresponsive to aspirin based on continued platelet aggregation in response to collagen, arachidonic acid, or both. A total of 87 (13%) of the 653 patients were clinical aspirin failures (ie, presented with new focal cerebral ischemic symptoms while taking aspirin). Of the patients with new cerebral ischemic symptoms, 57 (66%) were determined to be platelet nonresponsive to aspirin. The odds ratio for platelet nonresponsiveness to aspirin in patients who suffered a recurrent ischemic event while taking aspirin was 14.25 (95% confidence interval: 8.5-23.7; P < .5). Continued platelet aggregation despite aspirin treatment occurred in 20% of ambulatory patients treated for secondary stroke prophylaxis. The prevalence of nonresponsiveness to aspirin was statistically higher in those patients who suffered recurrent cerebral ischemia while taking aspirin (P < .5) compared with patients who remained without new ischemic symptoms.

Real-time monitoring of adhesion and aggregation of platelets using thickness shear mode (TSM) sensor

Hemostasis is required to maintain vascular system integrity, but thrombosis, formation of a clot in a blood vessel, is one of the largest causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Novel clinical and research tools for characterizing the hemostatic system are of continued interest, and the object of this research is to test the hypothesis that clinically relevant platelet function can be monitored using an electromechanical sensor. A piezoelectric thickness shear mode (TSM) biosensor coated with collagen-I fibers to promote platelet activation and adhesion was developed and tested for sensitivity to detect these primary events. Magnitude and frequency response of the sensor were monitored under static conditions at 37 degrees C, using platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and PRP with adenosine diphosphate (ADP), a clinical aggregation inhibitor (abciximab), or a collagen binding inhibitor. Sensors loaded with PRP exhibited a 3-stage response; no significant change in response for the first 20 min (Stage-1), followed by a larger drop in response (Stage-2) and subsequently, response gradually increased (Stage-3). Exogenous ADP stimulated an immediate Stage-2 response, while abciximab delayed and reduced the magnitude change of Stage-2. In the presence of collagen inhibitor, Stage-2 response was similar to that of control but was delayed by an additional 20 min. The obtained results, supported by epifluorescence and complementary SEM studies, demonstrated the selective sensitivity of TSM electromechanical biosensors to monitor platelet function and inhibition, particularly aggregation.

Frequency of genetic polymorphisms of COX1, GPIIIa and P2Y1 in a Chinese population and association with attenuated response to aspirin

Background: Aspirin is a frequently prescribed drug for primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. However, aspirin resistance may affect up to 45% of the population. Little is known on the role of genetic factors that contribute to resistance or augmented response to aspirin in different human populations. Methods: In a large sample of nonsmoker, medication-free healthy volunteers from mainland China (n = 323; age: 22.1 ± 2.0 years) (mean ± standard deviation), we determined the frequency of polymorphisms in cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1) (A-842G and C50T), glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa) (PLA1/A2) and purinergic receptor P2Y (P2Y1) (C893T and A1622G) genes. These candidate genes were chosen on the basis of their impact on platelet physiology and aspirin mode of action. A four panel P2Y1 genotype-stratified sample of healthy volunteers (n = 24 in total), identified from the large study sample above, prospectively received a 100 mg daily oral dose of aspirin for 7 days. We measured changes in platelet aggregation before and after aspirin treatment. As a comparison reference group, 6 out of 24 subjects in the prospective aspirin trial had the P2Y1 CT893/AG1622 genotype that displays a low frequency (<7%) in the Chinese population. Results: COX1 A-842G, C50T and GPIIIa PLA1/A2 genetic polymorphisms were not observed in our sample from mainland China. Allele frequencies of P2Y1 893T and 1622G were 3.5 and 30.6%, respectively. The heterozygosity for the P2Y1 A1622G polymorphism observed in the present study was different to Caucasians; Chinese displayed a higher allele frequency for the 1622G allele. After aspirin treatment, the net decrease in arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was significantly larger in the P2Y1 CT893/AG1622 genotype panel (83.4 ± 3.7%, net reduction by aspirin expressed as percentage of baseline) compared with CC893/GG1622 (68.2 ± 13.5%), CC893/AG1622 (68.9  ± 9.6%) and CC893/AA1622 (65.1 ± 9.1%) genotypic groups (p = 0.012, 0.025 and 0.004, respectively; statistical power = 77%). There was no significant difference in antiplatelet effect of aspirin among the CC893/GG1622, CC893/AG1622 and CC893/AA1622 genotypes (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The COX1 A-842G, C50T and GPIIIa PLA1/A2 polymorphisms are rare in Chinese. In contrast to previous studies in Caucasian populations, these candidate functional polymorphisms are unlikely to be significant contributors to aspirin pharmacodynamics in Chinese persons. Importantly, the presence of the P2Y1 893CC genotype appears to confer an attenuated antiplatelet effect during aspirin treatment in healthy Chinese volunteers. These data collectively underscore the importance of population-to-population variability in clinical pharmacogenetics research and provide a basis for further long-term studies of aspirin response and P2Y1 genetic variation in patients with cardiovascular risk.

Therapeutic effects of nitric oxide-aspirin hybrid drugs

This review examines the therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action of drugs known as nitric oxide (NO)-aspirins. Drugs of this class have an NO-releasing moiety joined by ester linkage to the aspirin molecule. NO-aspirins have the capability to release NO in addition to retaining the cyclooxygenase-inhibitory action of aspirin. The protective nature of NO led to the development of NO-aspirins in the hope that they might avoid the gastric side effects associated with aspirin. However, it has become apparent that the drug-derived NO instills potential for a wide range of added beneficial effects over the parent compound. In this review, the authors focus on the analgesic, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular and chemopreventative actions of compounds of this emerging drug class.

Aspirin failure course during exercise and its connection with soluble CD40L

INTRODUCTION

The aspirin failure (resistance) is a still discussed and highly studied problem. This phenomenon is observed in rest, but could be precipitated by an exercise. The aspirin resistance was also linked with the inflammatory process which is a key event for the atherosclerosis development. Platelets seem to play an important role also in that setting, probably by the CD40-CD40L axis. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of the aspirin failure induced by the exercise and the role of sCD40L in that regard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 40 patients with established coronary artery disease. The control group consisted of 10 patients without coronary artery disease matched for age. All patients and controls were on 75 mg of aspirin for at least 30 days and had treadmill testing and blood collected for measurement of sCD40L and optical platelet aggregation with ADP, collagen and arachidonic acid. Aspirin resistance was defined as a maximal aggregation with ADP and collagen exceeding 70%.

RESULTS

There were 15 aspirin-resistant patients in the studied group (37%). There were significantly higher concentration of sCD40L (ng/ml) in aspirin-resistant patients in comparison with aspirin-sensitive ones before testing (7,9 +/- 2,5 vs. 5,1 +/- 3,5, p < 0,05) and on the top of it (8,1 +/- 2,9 vs. 4,5 +/- 3,9, p < 0,05). There were 3 persons who become resistant on the top of the exercise which was connected with the significant increase of sCD40L concentration in that group (from 7,6 +/- 1,9 before exercise to 10,1 +/- 2,9 on the top of the exercise, p < 0,05). There was also a positive correlation between the sCD40L level before and on the top of the exercise in an aspirin-resistant group (r = 0,48 for both, p < 0,05). Patients who were aspirin-resistant at rest had also significant elevation of platelet aggregation on the top of the exercise (ADP (%) from 90,5 +/- 8,6 to 95,0 +/- 6,5, p < 0,05 and collagen (%) from 87,8 +/- 8,7 to 92,1 +/- 8,0, p < 0,05).

CONCLUSIONS

1. Aspirin resistance phenomenon is present in about 37% patients on 75 mg aspirin daily.2. Aspirin-resistant patients have higher platelet aggregation during the exercise.3. Moderate physical exercise provokes 12% increase in the aspirin resistance phenomenon occurrence.4. Aspirin resistance is connected with higher sCD40L level at rest and exercise provoked aspirin resistance is connected with the sCD40L concentration increase.

Resveratrol inhibits aggregation of platelets from high-risk cardiac patients with aspirin resistance

Up to 20% of serious vascular events in high-risk vascular patients is attributable to a failure of aspirin (ASA) to suppress platelet aggregation. Resveratrol is a cardioprotective phytoestrogen that can inhibit platelet aggregation in animal models. We hypothesized that resveratrol can also inhibit aggregation of platelets from ASA-resistant (ASA-R) patients. Thus, platelet-rich plasma was isolated from ASA-sensitive (ASA-S) and ASA-R patients (aspirin resistance was defined as higher-than-expected aggregation to collagen and epinephrine [>/=40%] after oral treatment with 100 mg/d ASA). Aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (ADP; 5 and 10 mumol/L), collagen (2 mug/mL), and epinephrine (10 mumol/L) in the absence and presence of resveratrol (10 mol/L) was measured by optical aggregometry. Maximal aggregation to 5 mumol/L ADP was only slightly affected by resveratrol. Similar results were obtained using 10 mumol/L ADP. Maximal aggregation of ASA-R platelets to collagen was significantly decreased by resveratrol, whereas resveratrol had only marginal effects in ASA-S platelets. Similar results were obtained with epinephrine as well. Collectively, resveratrol effectively inhibited collagen- and epinephrine-induced aggregation of platelets from ASA-R patients, which may contribute to its cardioprotective effects in high-risk cardiac patients.

Aspirin resistance or variable response or both?

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that aspirin is effective in secondary prevention and in high-risk primary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events. However, a constellation of clinical and laboratory evidence exists that demonstrates diminished or absent response to aspirin in some patients. This has led to the concept of "aspirin resistance," which is a poorly defined, somewhat misleading term. The mechanism for aspirin resistance has not been fully established, but it is almost certainly due to a combination of clinical, biological, and genetic properties affecting platelet function. There are no criteria for distinguishing true resistance from treatment failure, and there is no consensus on whether the definition of aspirin resistance should be based on clinical outcomes, laboratory evidence, or both. Studies in large populations are needed to define antiplatelet resistance using consistent and reproducible assays and correlate the measurements with clinical outcomes. One such prospective randomized trial is completed, and 2 others are under way: the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial compared clopidogrel and aspirin with placebo and aspirin for high-risk primary or secondary prevention, and the Aspirin Nonresponsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial (ASCET) is evaluating whether switching to clopidogrel will be superior to continued aspirin therapy in improving clinical outcomes in aspirin-resistant patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The Research Evaluation to Study Individuals Who Show Thromboxane or P2Y(12) Receptor Resistance (RESISTOR) trial is investigating whether modifying antiplatelet regimens could prevent myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.

Relation between atherosclerosis risk factors and aspirin resistance in a primary prevention population

Resistance to inhibition of platelet function by aspirin may contribute to future myocardial infarction and stroke. Adverse cardiovascular outcomes have been associated with aspirin resistance on several different platelet function assays, including the level of urinary 11-dehydro thromboxane B2 (Tx-M), platelet aggregation to arachidonic acid and adenosine diphosphate, and closure time on the platelet function analyzer-100. We examined the concordance of these aspirin-resistance assays and their relation to cardiovascular risk factors in a primary prevention population. Asymptomatic patients (n = 1,311) at increased risk for coronary heart disease were evaluated before and after 2 weeks of aspirin (81 mg/day). Aspirin resistance was defined according to published criteria for these 3 assays of platelet function. Subjects were characterized for the presence of atherosclerosis risk factors. Agreement among the 3 assays was poor. Only 5 patients met aggregation criteria for aspirin resistance. Attenuated suppression of urinary Tx-M by aspirin was associated with a greater atherosclerotic risk profile and Framingham risk score in multivariable regression analysis. Aspirin resistance by platelet function analyzer-100 was associated only with increased von Willebrand factor levels and not with atherosclerotic risk profile. In conclusion, in a primary prevention population, different published criteria for aspirin resistance classify distinct groups of patients as aspirin resistant with very little overlap. Higher Tx-M, which reflects decreased suppression of thromboxane production in vivo, is the only criterion associated with atherosclerosis risk factors, suggesting that this measurement may represent the most relevant approach for identifying asymptomatic subjects whose aspirin treatment will "fail."

Recombinant factor VIIa reverses the inhibitory effect of aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel on in vitro thrombin generation

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet drugs constitute the therapy of choice for acute coronary syndromes, but bleeding can be a side-effect requiring treatment. Restoration of normal platelet activity is also mandatory before urgent surgery. This study investigated: (a) whether a regimen of aspirin or clopidogrel plus aspirin significantly inhibited platelet thrombin generation (TG); and (b) the reversal of this inhibition by recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa).

METHODS AND RESULTS

TG was evaluated by the lag time, time to peak, peak of TG, and area under the curve after 35 min of assay (AUC(0 --> 35 min)). These measures were examined by the calibrated automated thrombography method in 22 healthy volunteers, 22 volunteers after a 100 mg day(-1) aspirin intake (200 mg first day) for 5-7 days, and 22 healthy volunteers after aspirin 100 mg day(-1) (200 mg first day) plus clopidogrel 75 mg day(-1) (300 mg first day) for 4-7 days. The TG parameters were measured under basal conditions and after platelet stimulation by sodium arachidonate (AA), adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), collagen and rFVIIa in normal non-aspirinated as well as in vivo aspirinated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or aspirin plus clopidogrel PRP. Lag time was shorter (P < 0.05), and peak of TG and AUC(0 --> 35 min) were significantly greater (P < 0.01 for both), in PRP activated with ADP, collagen, AA or FVIIa than in non-activated PRP from normal subjects. Both non-activated PRP and activated PRP prepared from platelets obtained from volunteers after aspirin intake showed significant prolongation of the time parameters but there was less effect on peak of TG and AUC(0 --> 35 min). For most parameters, aspirin plus clopidogrel administration showed to be more effective compared with the effect obtained by aspirin alone. When rFVIIa was added to ASA-PRP or ASA + Clop PRP, lag time (P < 0.001 for all) and time to peak (P < 0.001-0.017) were significantly shortened, indicating that rFVIIa reverses the inhibitory effect of these anti-aggregating agents.

CONCLUSION

Platelets activated by AA, ADP, collagen or FVIIa triggered TG. This effect was inhibited by aspirin plus clopidogrel, suggesting an additional benefit of this drug combination for preventing thrombosis. rFVIIa reverses the inhibitory effect of aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel, and could be useful for bleeding complications or when acute surgery is needed during treatment with these antiplatelet drugs.

Reduced Blood Platelet Sensitivity to Aspirin in Coronary Artery Disease: Are Dyslipidaemia and Inflammatory States Possible Factors Predisposing to Sub-optimal Platelet Response to Aspirin?

The study was designed to assess blood platelet sensitivity to acetylsalicylic acid and its associations with dyslipidaemia and inflammation in coronary artery disease patients. Platelet non-responsiveness to aspirin is associated with an increased risk of serious cardiovascular events. Several environmental and hereditary factors are reportedly involved in sub-optimal acetylsalicylic acid response. Forty-five coronary artery disease patients and 45 non-coronary artery disease controls received acetylsalicylic acid at a daily dose of 75-150 mg. Controls were examined twice: on the day of entering the study and 10 days later. Urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 was assessed as the marker of platelet thromboxane generation. Aggregation was studied in platelet-rich plasma using turbidimetric aggregometry with collagen and arachidonic acid. Fifty to seventy percent of coronary artery disease patients showed an extent of collagen-induced aggregation above the upper quartile of the reference range compared with 8-15% in controls (P<0.003). For arachidonic acid-activated aggregation these proportions were 45-50% in coronary artery disease versus 7% in controls (P<0.007). In coronary artery disease patients, the acetylsalicylic acid-mediated platelet inhibition positively correlated with increased triglycerides (in arachidonic acid-stimulated platelets, r=0.30, P=0.0018), total cholesterol (r=0.33, P<0.0001 in coll and arachidonic acid-activated platelets) and elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (r=0.27, P=0.0024). In coronary artery disease patients urine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 concentrations were significantly increased compared to controls after 10 day acetylsalicylic acid intake (563; 313-728 pg/mg creatinine versus 321; 246-488 pg/mg creatinine, P=0.04). The incidence of suboptimal acetylsalicylic acid response incidence was more common in patients with coronary artery disease. Acetylsalicylic acid inhibition of blood platelet reactivity and thromboxane generation was less effective in these patients. Dyslipidaemia and chronic inflammatory states may promote suboptimal acetylsalicylic acid response in coronary artery disease patients.

Aspirin Resistance: A Review Of Diagnostic Methodology, Mechanisms, and Clinical Utility

Ingestion of a daily aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease decreases the rate of occlusive atherosclerotic events by about 25 percent. Some patients whose platelets are minimally inhibited by aspirin are categorized as aspirin resistant. Three reports document an increased risk for future vascular events in aspirin resistant patients. Aspirin's platelet inhibitory effect is measured using a variety of techniques. The demarcation between minimal and expected aspirin inhibition of platelets is arbitrarily determined by each investigator which leads to confusion in translating these reports to patient care. The focus of this report is the relative merits of the different techniques and their utility for defining patients with minimal aspirin induced platelet inhibition. The clinically useful mechanisms underlying decreased aspirin induced platelet inhibition include failure of a patient to take their daily aspirin, poor compliance, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) interference with aspirin's ability to get to its binding site on the cyclooxygenase enzyme-1 (COX-1)]. Compliance is best assessed by comparing the results obtained with arachidonic acid (AA) stimulated light aggregation at two time points. The first time point is while the patient is supposedly taking their usual daily aspirin and the second time point is 2 hours after the patient is observed to ingest 325 mg of aspirin. After observed ingestion of aspirin, those patients with minimal aspirin inhibition of platelets are best detected using light aggregation stimulated by a new platelet agonist platelet prostaglandin agonist (PPA). In order for the results of a particular technique to be clinically meaningful it must be shown that those patients with minimal aspirin inhibition of platelets have an increased risk for a future vascular event that is independent from known major cardiovascular risk factors.

A comparison of reported gastrointestinal and thromboembolic events between rofecoxib and celecoxib using observational data

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rofecoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, was a widely marketed drug that was used for relief of pain and inflammation in arthritic conditions. It was withdrawn from the market worldwide in September 2004 because of an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Celecoxib, which belongs to the same class of drugs, is now under scrutiny for the risk of similar events. The objective of our study was to compare the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) [symptomatic and complicated upper GI] events and thromboembolic (cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral venous) events reported for patients prescribed rofecoxib or celecoxib in primary care.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of selected events was conducted using data collected from previously conducted prescription-event monitoring (PEM) studies for rofecoxib and celecoxib. PEM is an observational cohort technique. Exposure data were derived from dispensed prescriptions for rofecoxib (July-November 1999) and celecoxib (May-December 2000) that were written by primary care general practitioners in England. Outcome data were clinical events and information on potential risk factors reported on simple questionnaires (posted to prescribers approximately 9 months after the date of the first prescription). Incidence rates of the first event during treatment within each thromboembolic and GI group were calculated during the 270 days after the patient started receiving either of the drugs; crude and adjusted rate ratios (RR) were calculated for rofecoxib compared with celecoxib using Poisson regression modelling.

RESULTS

The rofecoxib and celecoxib PEM cohorts contained 15 268 and 17 458 patients, respectively. For the GI event groups, the adjusted RRs for rofecoxib compared with celecoxib were: 1.21 (95% CI 1.09, 1.36) for symptomatic upper GI events and 1.60 (95% CI 0.95, 2.70) for complicated upper GI conditions. For the thromboembolic event groups, the adjusted RRs were: 1.04 (95% CI 0.50, 2.17) for cardiovascular thromboembolic events; 1.43 (95% CI 0.86, 2.38) for cerebrovascular thromboembolic events; and 0.36 (95% CI 0.01, 1.34) for peripheral venous thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was a retrospective comparison of PEM studies conducted for rofecoxib and celecoxib. For symptomatic upper GI events, a 21% increase in the relative rate was found for rofecoxib users compared with celecoxib users after adjusting for identified risk factors. For complicated upper GI events, no statistically significant difference in the incidence was observed between rofecoxib and celecoxib users after adjusting for identified risk factors. For the three thromboembolic event groups, no evidence of a statistically significant difference between rofecoxib and celecoxib users was found after adjusting for identified risk factors. This study contributes to the understanding of the association between COX-2 inhibitors and thromboembolic events. However, it should be borne in mind that we had information on only a limited number of confounding variables for thromboembolic events. Further research is required to fully understand the risks and benefits of using celecoxib and other COX-2 inhibitors. Meanwhile, doctors should be cautious when prescribing these products, particularly to patients with risk factors for developing thromboembolic events.

Resistance to Aspirin in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Is Transient

The aim of the present study was to assess the responsiveness of blood platelets to aspirin in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Aspirin was administered following CABG in 24 operated patients (aged 63.2 +/- 6.3 years). Platelet function was monitored on the 10th postoperative day (A) and 1 month after CABG (B) with the use of whole-blood aggregometry (WBEA) and PFA-100 closure time (PFA-100 CTCEPI). Normal platelet response to aspirin was defined by 3 criteria: the complete inhibition of WBEA induced by arachidonic acid (0.5 mmol/L), partial inhibition of collagen (1 microg/mL)-induced aggregation (WBEA < 14 Omega), and prolongation of PFA-100 CTCEPI (>150 seconds) ("good responders"). Depending on whether 0, 1, 2, or 3 of these 3 criteria were fulfilled, patients were classified as "nonresponders," "weak responders," "incomplete responders," or "good responders," respectively. On the 10th postoperative day, there were 3 good responders, 6 incomplete responders, 11 weak responders, and 4 nonresponders among 24 patients. In contrast, 1 month after CABG within the same group of 24 patients there were 18 good responders, 5 incomplete responders, and 1 weak responder. Using a new methodology to assess impaired platelet responsiveness to aspirin ex vivo, we describe here the transient nature of "aspirin resistance" following CABG. These results indicate the necessity for the prolonged monitoring of the antiplatelet effectiveness of aspirin in the postoperative period after CABG.

Resistance to aspirin is increased by ST-elevation myocardial infarction and correlates with adenosine diphosphate levels

Background

To be fully activated platelets are dependent on two positive feedback loops; the formation of thromboxane A₂ by cyclooxygenase in the platelets and the release of ADP. We wanted to evaluate the effect of aspirin on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes and we hypothesized that increased levels of ADP in patients with acute coronary syndromes could contribute to aspirin resistance.

Methods

Platelet activity in 135 patients admitted for chest pain was assessed with PFA-100. An epinephrine-collagen cartridge (EPI-COLL) was used for the detection of aspirin resistance together with an ADP-collagen cartridge (ADP-COLL). ADP was measured with hplc from antecubital vein samples. Three subgroups were compared: chest pain with no sign of cardiac disease (NCD), NonST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and STEMI.

Results

Platelet activation was increased for the STEMI group compared NCD. Aspirin resistance defined as <193 sec in EPI-COLL was 9.7 % in NCD, and increased to 26.0 % (n.s.) in NSTEMI and 83.3 % (p < 0.001) in STEMI. Chronic aspirin treatment significantly reduced platelet aggregation in NCD and NSTEMI, but it had no effect in STEMI. Plasma levels of ADP were markedly increased in STEMI (905 ± 721 nmol/l, p < 0.01), but not in NSTEMI (317 ± 245), compared to NCD (334 ± 271, mean ± SD). ADP levels correlated with increased platelet activity measured with ADP-COLL (r = -0.30, p < 0.05). Aspirin resistant patients (EPI-COLL < 193 sec) had higher ADP levels compared to aspirin responders (734 ± 807 vs. 282 ± 187 nmol/l, mean ± SD, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Platelets are activated and aspirin resistance is more frequent in STEMI, probably due to a general activation of platelets. ADP levels are increased in STEMI and correlates with platelet activation. Increased levels of ADP could be one reason for increased platelet activity and aspirin resistance.

What every emergency nurse needs to know about aspirin

As the most commonly recommended medication in the world, aspirin is a medication with which emergency nurses are intimately familiar. Although this medication has been used for more than a century, health-care researchers are discovering new information about the utility of aspirin every year. Within this paper, we provide a review of recent findings related to the use of aspirin in the Emergency Department. In particular, we focus on understanding the pharmacokinetics of the medication as several drugs introduced in the past decade, interact with aspirin and create side effects harmful to patients. As well, we highlight current research around optimal dosage and other issues related to aspirin administration. This review is timely as several issues have arisen in the literature, in relation to the effectiveness of aspirin as an anti-platelet agent.

Anti-platelet effect of aspirin is substantially reduced after administration of heparin during carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Aspirin therapy is usually continued throughout the perioperative period to reduce the risk for thromboembolic stroke and myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Aspirin irreversibly binds cyclooxygenase-1, thereby reducing platelet aggregation for the lifetime of each platelet. However, recent research from this unit has shown that aggregation in response to arachidonic acid increases significantly, but transiently, during CEA, which suggests that the anti-platelet effect of aspirin is temporarily reversed. The purpose of the current study was to determine when this phenomenon occurs and to identify the possible mechanisms involved.

METHODS

Platelet aggregation was measured in platelet-rich plasma from 41 patients undergoing CEA who were stabilized with 150 mg of aspirin daily. Blood was taken at 8 time points: before anesthesia, after anesthesia, before heparinization, 3 minutes after heparinization, 3 minutes after shunt insertion, 10 minutes after flow restoration, 4 hours postoperatively, and 24 hours postoperatively. Platelet aggregation was also measured at similar times in a group of 18 patients undergoing peripheral angioplasty without general anesthesia.

RESULTS

All patient platelets were effectively inhibited by aspirin at the start of the operation. There was a significant intraoperative increase in platelet response to arachidonic acid in both groups of patients, which occurred within 3 minutes of administration of unfractionated heparin. In the CEA group this resulted in a greater than 10-fold increase in mean aggregation, to 5 mmol/L of arachidonic acid (5 mmol/L), rising from 3.9% +/- 2.2% preoperatively to 45.1% +/- 29.3% after administration of heparin ( P <.0001). This increased aggregation persisted into the early postoperative period, but by 24 hours post operation aggregation had returned to near preoperative values. Aggregation in response to other platelet agonists (adenosine diphosphate, thrombin receptor agonist peptide) showed only a small increase at the same time, which could be accounted for by a parallel increase in the level of spontaneous aggregation.

CONCLUSION

Administration of heparin significantly increases platelet aggregation in response to arachidonic acid, despite adequate inhibition by aspirin administered preoperatively. This apparent reversal in anti-platelet activity persisted into the immediate early postoperative period, and could explain why a small proportion of patients are at increased risk for acute cardiovascular events after major vascular surgery, despite aspirin therapy.