DALBACEN cohort: dalbavancin as consolidation therapy in patients with endocarditis and/or bloodstream infection produced by gram-positive cocci

Multiple-Dose Dalbavancin Regimens as the Predominant Treatment of Deep-Seated or Endovascular Infections: A Scoping Review

Off-label use of dalbavancin for deep-seated and endovascular infections has been increasing. We performed a scoping review to evaluate the evidence for use of multiple-dose dalbavancin regimens as the predominant therapy for these indications. Predominant therapy was defined as use of dalbavancin without other concurrent antibiotics for more than half of the total treatment duration. Fifteen publications were identified; 2 were small, open-label randomized controlled trials and the remainder were retrospective observational studies or case reports. A total of 144 cases from these publications met eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. Types of infections included osteoarticular infections, catheter-related or complicated bloodstream infections, and infective endocarditis. Overall, the evidence for use of multiple-dose regimens of dalbavancin for deep-seated and endovascular infections is limited by a paucity of data from controlled trials, heterogeneity of dosing regimens, and a lack of standardized clinical outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of Dalbavancin versus Other Antimicrobial Options for Gram-Positive Cocci Infections: Effectiveness, Hospital Stay and Mortality

Dalbavancin is a new antibiotic that is effective against Gram-positive microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococci, and offers the possibility of administering intravenous therapy once weekly in an ambulatory setting. We conducted a multicenter observational case-control study, comparing all patients who received dalbavancin (cases) with hospitalized patients who were treated instead with daptomycin, linezolid or vancomycin (controls), based on clinical diagnosis, main microorganism involved, and age. The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay after starting the study antimicrobial. Secondary outcomes were 7-day and 30-day efficacy, 30-day mortality, 90-day recurrence, 90-day and 6-month hospitalization, presence of adverse events and healthcare-associated infections; 161 patients (44 cases and 117 controls) were included. Bivariate analysis showed that dalbavancin reduced the total length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), with fewer 90-day recurrences (p = 0.005), 6-month hospitalizations related to the same infection (p = 0.004) and non-related hospitalizations (p = 0.035). Multivariate analyses showed that length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients treated with dalbavancin (−12.05 days 95% CI [−17.00, −7.11], p < 0.001), and 30-day efficacy was higher in the dalbavancin group (OR 2.62 95% CI [1.07, 6.37], p = 0.034). Although sample size of the study may be a limitation, we can conclude that Dalbavancin is a useful antimicrobial drug against Gram-positive infections, including multidrug-resistant pathogens, and allows for a remarkable reduction in length of hospital stay with greater 30-day efficacy.

Biofilm-Related Infections in Gram-Positive Bacteria and the Potential Role of the Long-Acting Agent Dalbavancin

Infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria are a major public health problem due to their increasing resistance to antibiotics. Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species' resistance and pathogenicity are enhanced by their ability to form biofilm. The biofilm lifestyle represents a significant obstacle to treatment because bacterial cells become highly tolerant to a wide range of antimicrobial compounds normally effective against their planktonic forms. Thus, novel therapeutic strategies targeting biofilms are urgently needed. The lipoglycopeptide dalbavancin is a long-acting agent for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections caused by a broad range of Gram-positive pathogens. Recent studies have shown promising activity of dalbavancin against Gram-positive biofilms, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE), and vancomycin-susceptible enterococci. This review outlines the mechanisms regulating biofilm development in Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species and the clinical impact of biofilm-related infections. In addition, it discusses the clinical implications and potential therapeutic perspectives of the long-acting drug dalbavancin against biofilm-forming Gram-positive pathogens.

Role or oritavancin and dalbavancin in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and other potential indications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the currently available evidence about the use oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and for other potential indications.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we briefly summarize the available data on efficacy (from randomized controlled trials) and on effectiveness and cure rates (from observational studies) pertaining to the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin either for ABSSSI or for other indications.

SUMMARY

Oritavancin and dalbavancin are valid options for outpatient therapy and early discharge in patients with ABSSSI, especially when adherence to oral therapy cannot be guaranteed or no oral choices are available. Furthermore, it is worth noting that a non-negligible portion (sometimes the majority) of oritavancin and dalbavancin use in available real-life experiences is for indications other than ABSSSI, especially for Gram-positive osteomyelitis and endocarditis. The number of studies on the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides for these currently off-label indications is rapidly increasing and will help to further optimize the use of these peculiar antibiotics in the forthcoming future.

Use of dalbavancin in infective endocarditis: a case series

Background

Infective endocarditis, typically caused by Gram-positive organisms such as viridans group streptococci and Staphylococcus aureus, is associated with high mortality and morbidity and requires aggressive, prolonged antimicrobial treatment and sometimes surgery. Dalbavancin, a lipoglycopeptide active against Gram-positive pathogens, has a long half-life, which allows IV treatment as one dose or two doses with a prolonged interval, offering personalized treatment for complex psychosocial situations or facilitating early discharge. In the absence of randomized controlled trials in infective endocarditis, current evidence derives from real-world case series involving off-licence use. The Austrian Society for Infectious Disease and Tropical Medicine includes dalbavancin as an option for infective endocarditis.

Objectives

This retrospective case series reports use of dalbavancin in a small cohort of patients with infective endocarditis treated at Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Blackpool Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, UK.

Results

The pharmacy database included 11 patients in whom dalbavancin was used to address either complex psychosocial circumstances or the need for early discharge. The endocarditis multidisciplinary team selected dalbavancin from available treatment options. Structures affected by infective endocarditis included aortic, mitral and tricuspid valves; aortic composite grafts; implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads; and prosthetic aortic valves. Eight patients underwent surgery; three were managed conservatively with antibiotics. Dalbavancin was curative in all but one patient, whose signs and symptoms of infection improved. No patients developed adverse reactions.

Conclusions

Dalbavancin is an alternative treatment option at hospital discharge when conventional antibiotics may not be suitable due to complex psychosocial issues or early discharge is required.

Real-World Use of Dalbavancin in the Era of Empowerment of Outpatient Antimicrobial Treatment: A Careful Appraisal Beyond Approved Indications Focusing on Unmet Clinical Needs

Dalbavancin is a novel, long-acting lipoglycopeptide characterized by a long elimination half-life coupled with excellent in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-positives. Although it is currently approved only for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, an ever-growing amount of evidence supports the efficacy of dalbavancin as a long-term therapy in osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, endocarditis, and bloodstream infections. This article provides a critical reappraisal of real-world use of dalbavancin for off-label indications. A search strategy using specific keywords (dalbavancin, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, long-term suppressive therapy, bloodstream infection, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile) until April 2021 was performed on the PubMed-MEDLINE database. As for other novel antibiotics, a conundrum between approved indications and potential innovative therapeutic uses has emerged for dalbavancin as well. The promising efficacy in challenging scenarios (i.e., osteomyelitis, endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections), coupled with the unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, makes dalbavancin a valuable alternative to daily in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial regimens in the treatment of long-term Gram-positive infections. This makes dalbavancin valuable in the current COVID-19 scenario, in which hospitalization and territorial medicine empowerment are unavoidable.

Antibiotic Approvals in the Last Decade: Are We Keeping Up With Resistance?

OBJECTIVE

To review the spectrum of activity, efficacy, safety, and role in therapy of all antibiotics and related biologics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the last decade.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end May 2021) with the search terms' name of the antibiotic or the biologic. Data were also obtained from the prescribing information, FDA, and ClinicalTrials.gov websites.

STUDY SELECTION

All relevant English-language, late phase clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of the identified drugs were included. Review articles and references of retrieved articles were evaluated for relevant data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Antibiotic resistance is a public health crisis, and antibiotic development is imperative to outpace the ability of bacteria to develop resistance. Only 17 new systemic antibiotics and 1 related biologic have been approved by the FDA since 2010. Among these drugs, 14 were approved for common bacterial infections, 1 was approved for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), 1 was licensed to prevent CDI recurrence, and 2 were approved for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Very few antibiotics are in clinical development.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

The arrival of these new antibiotics was welcomed with great enthusiasm, particularly when they met previously unmet medical needs. Unfortunately, the majority of them represent modifications to existing chemical structures rather than new drug classes. Despite the availability of these antibiotics, managing patients with deep-seated infections and those with extensively resistant gram-negative organisms remains challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of new antibiotics and their indications are not keeping up with resistance and the needs of the patients.

Dalbavancin for the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Narrative Review

Dalbavancin (DAL) is a lipoglycopeptide with bactericidal activity against a very wide range of Gram-positive microorganisms. It also has unique pharmacokinetic properties, namely a prolonged half-life (around 181 h), which allows a convenient weekly dosing regimen, and good diffusion in bone tissue. These features have led to off-label use of dalbavancin in the setting of bone and joint infection, including prosthetic joint infections (PJI). In this narrative review, we go over the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of DAL, along with published in vitro and in vivo experimental models evaluating its activity against biofilm-embedded bacteria. We also examine published experience of osteoarticular infection with special attention to DAL and PJI.

Long-term antibiotic therapy in patients with surgery-indicated not undergoing surgery infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

To date, there is little information regarding management of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) that did not undergo an indicated surgery. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate prognosis of these patients treated with a long-term antibiotic treatment strategy, including oral long term suppressive antibiotic treatment in five referral centres with a multidisciplinary endocarditis team.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study retrieved individual patient-level data from five referral centres in Spain. Among a total of 1797, 32 consecutive patients with IE were examined (median age 72 years; 78% males) who had not undergone an indicated surgery, but received long-term antibiotic treatment (LTAT) and were followed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team, between 2011 and 2019. Primary outcomes were infection relapse and mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 32 patients, 21 had IE associated with prostheses. Of the latter, 8 had an ascending aorta prosthetic graft. In 24 patients, a switch to long-term oral suppressive antibiotic treatment (LOSAT) was considered. The median duration of LOSAT was 277 days. Four patients experienced a relapse during follow-up. One patient died within 60 days, and 12 patients died between 60 days and 3 years. However, only 4 deaths were related to IE.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study results suggest that a LTAT strategy, including LOSAT, might be considered for patients with IE that cannot undergo an indicated surgery. After hospitalization, they should be followed by a multidisciplinary endocarditis team.

New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis

Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency: ceftaroline, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and omadacycline. This narrative review aims to provide an overview on these antibiotics with a special focus on their use in infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections. Although some of these approved antibiotics are promising, they should not be used as first- or second-line therapy, awaiting more clinical data.

The role of dalbavancin for Gram positive infections in the COVID-19 era: state of the art and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically challenged the national health systems worldwide in the last months. Dalbavancin is a novel antibiotic with a long plasmatic half-life and simplified weekly administration regimens, thus representing a promising option for the outpatient treatment of Gram-positive infections and the early discharge of hospitalized patients. Dalbavancin is approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Many preliminary data seem to support its use in other indications, such as osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, and infective endocarditis.

AREAS COVERED

A search in the literature using validated keywords (dalbavancin, Gram-positive infections, Gram-positive cocci, ABSSSI, intravenous treatment, and long-acting antibiotics) was conducted on biomedical bibliographic databases (PubMed and Embase) from 2004 to 30 September 2020. Results were analyzed during two consensus conferences with the aim to review the current evidence on dalbavancin in Gram-positive infections, mainly ABSSSI, osteomyelitis, and infective endocarditis, highlight the main limitations of available studies and suggest possible advantages of the molecule.

EXPERT OPINION

The board identifies some specific subgroups of patients with ABSSSIs who could mostly benefit from a treatment with dalbavancin and agrees that the design of homogenous and robust studies would allow a broader use of dalbavancin even in other clinical settings.

Current Challenges in the Management of Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is a relatively rare, but deadly cause of sepsis, with an overall mortality ranging from 20 to 25% in most series. Although the classic clinical classification into syndromes of acute or subacute endocarditis have not completely lost their usefulness, current clinical forms have changed according to the profound epidemiological changes observed in developed countries. In this review, we aim to address the changing epidemiology of endocarditis, several recent advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology of endocarditis and endocarditis-triggered sepsis, new useful diagnostic tools as well as current concepts in the medical and surgical management of this disease. Given its complexity, the management of infective endocarditis requires the close collaboration of multidisciplinary endocarditis teams that must decide on the diagnostic approach; the appropriate initial treatment in the critical phase; the detection of patients needing surgery and the timing of this intervention; and finally the accurate selection of patients for out-of-hospital treatment, either at home hospitalization or with oral antibiotic treatment.

Comparison of dalbavancin to standard-of-care for outpatient treatment of invasive Gram-positive infections

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin compared to standard-of-care (SOC) or vancomycin and daptomycin in invasive infections due to suspected or confirmed Gram-positive organisms.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of adults who received dalbavancin or SOC on discharge or as an outpatient from 12/2016 to 11/2019. Indications were osteoarticular infection (OAI), infective endocarditis (IE), or other bloodstream infection (BSI). Primary endpoint was 90-day infection-related readmission (IRR); secondary endpoints included time-to-IRR, frequency of adverse drug events (ADEs), and all-cause readmission and mortality.

RESULTS

215 patients were included: 70 (33%) receiving dalbavancin, and 145 (67%) receiving SOC. Indications were OAI (47%), IE (27%), and other BSI (26%). OAI was more common in patients on dalbavancin compared with those receiving SOC (70% vs. 37%, P<0.001). Dalbavancin patients had shorter median (interquartile range [IQR]) length of stay (LOS) prior to drug initiation compared with those receiving SOC (10 [7-17] vs. 13 [9-19], P=0.021). IRR incidence was 17% for dalbavancin patients and 28% for SOC patients. Dalbavancin use was independently associated with lower IRR (adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 0.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.31). There was longer median (IQR) time-to-IRR in the dalbavancin group (43 [30-87] vs. 23 [11-63] days, P=0.039), but no differences in all-cause readmission or mortality. Treatment-related ADE incidence was 3% and 14% for the dalbavancin and SOC groups, respectively (P=0.013). Infusion reactions (1/2) and catheter-related complications (1/2) were the most common dalbavancin ADEs; catheter-related complications (14/21), nephrotoxicity (3/21), rhabdomyolysis (2/21), and rash (2/21) were the most common SOC ADEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin use was associated with lower 90-day IRR, a shorter hospital LOS prior to therapy, and longer time-to-IRR compared with SOC.

Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis and Outpatient Treatment: A Systematic Review of Current Alternatives

The selection of the best alternative for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (IE) continuation treatment in the outpatient setting is still challenging. Three databases were searched, reporting antibiotic therapies against E. faecalis IE in or suitable for the outpatient setting. Articles the results of which were identified by species and treatment regimen were included. The quality of the studies was assessed accordingly with the study design. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively. In total, 18 studies were included. The treatment regimens reported were classified regarding the main antibiotic used as regimen, based on Aminoglycosides, dual β-lactam, teicoplanin, daptomycin or dalbavancin or oral therapy. The regimens based on aminoglycosides and dual β-lactam combinations are the treatment alternatives which gather more evidence regarding their efficacy. Dual β-lactam is the preferred option for high level aminoglycoside resistance strains, and for to its reduced nephrotoxicity, while its adaptation to the outpatient setting has been poorly documented. Less evidence supports the remaining alternatives, but many of them have been successfully adapted to outpatient care. Teicoplanin and dalbavancin as well as oral therapy seem promising. Our work provides an extensive examination of the potential alternatives to E. faecalis IE useful for outpatient care. However, the insufficient evidence hampers the attempt to give a general recommendation.

Dalbavancin as long-term suppressive therapy for patients with Gram-positive bacteremia due to an intravascular source-a series of four cases

We present four cases with Gram-positive bacteremia (pathogens: MRSA n = 1, Enterococcus spp. n = 3) due to an intravascular source (left ventricular assist device: n = 2, transfemoral aortic valve implantation n = 1, prosthetic aortic valve: n = 1) where no curative treatment was available. These patients received indefinite, chronic suppressive (palliative) therapy with dalbavancin (500 mg weekly or 1000 mg biweekly regimens). Outcomes and clinical characteristics are described; treatment was effective in suppression of bacteremia in all patients over several months (range: 1 to more than 12 months), we observed no relevant side effects.

Infective Endocarditis in Persons Who Use Drugs: Epidemiology, Current Management, and Emerging Treatments

Infective endocarditis associated with injection drug use (IDU-IE) is markedly increasing in the United States and Canada. Long-term outcomes are dismal and stem from insufficient substance use disorder treatment. In this review, we summarize the principles of antimicrobial and surgical management for infective endocarditis associated with injection drug use. We discuss approaches to opioid use disorder care and harm reduction in the inpatient setting and review opportunities to address preventable infections among persons injecting drugs. We highlight barriers to implementing optimal treatment and consider novel approaches that may reshape infective endocarditis associated with injection drug use treatment in coming years.

Efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and other infections in a real-life setting: data from an Italian observational multicentric study (DALBITA study)

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of dalbavancin in ABSSSI and 'other sites' infections' (OTA).

METHODS

Observational study involving 11 Italian hospitals including patients that received ≥1 dose of dalbavancin in 2016-2019. The outcome was end-of-treatment efficacy and safety in ABSSSI and OTA in a real-life setting.

RESULTS

206 patients enrolled (males 50%, median age 62 [IQR 50-76] years), 60.2% ABSSSI, 39.8% OTA. 69.7% ABSSSI vs 90.7% OTA (p = 0.003) and 46.3% ABSSSI vs 37.2% OTA (p = 0.786) received previous and concomitant antibiotics, respectively. 82.5% reached clinical cure . Eleven (5.4%) patients had non-serious adverse events (AE). OTA patients showed longer hospitalization (13.5 days, 5.5-22 vs 3, 0-11.7; p<0.0001) and received longer previous (18 days, 9-30 vs 11, 7-19; p = 0.007)/concomitant antibiotic treatments (21 days, 14-52 vs 11, 8-14; p < 0.0001), compared to ABSSSI. ABSSSI and OTA showed similar efficacy (85.5% vs 75%, p = 0.459) and safety (no AE: 81.5% vs 64.3%, p = 0.258); efficacy was independent of previous/concomitant therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin demonstrated a success rate of >80%, with similar efficacy/safety in ABSSSI and off-label indications. The preferential use of dalbavancin as second-line or combination therapy would seem to suggest the need for in-depth studies focused on its off-label use.

Current trends in the real-life use of dalbavancin: report of a study panel

Dalbavancin is a novel lipoglycopeptide antibiotic with a chemical structure similar to teicoplanin. Dalbavancin has been approved and marketed since 2014 in the USA and 2015 in the European Union for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive cocci. ABSSSIs include infectious syndromes such as erysipelas, cellulitis, major cutaneous abscesses that require incision and drainage, and both surgical and traumatic wound infections. In current clinical practice, dalbavancin is also used for cardiac implantable electronic device-related soft tissue infection and other prosthetic infections, and therefore when the presence of biofilm is a concern. In this review, we aimed to highlight our experience with the use of dalbavancin for some of the most hard-to-treat Gram-positive infections, as well as a promising strategy in terms of pharmacoeconomic effectiveness. We describe our current real-life clinical practice with the use of dalbavancin, depicting a few representative clinical cases in order to share our own practice in the hospital setting.

Dalbavancin and telavancin in the treatment of infective endocarditis: a literature review

Glycopeptides have an established role in the management of infective endocarditis, and feature in current treatment guidelines. Newer lipoglycopeptide agents (dalbavancin, telavancin and oritavancin), which are analogues of glycopeptides with structural modifications giving rise to added novel mechanisms of antimicrobial activity, are approved for the treatment of Gram-positive skin and skin structure infections, and also for nosocomial pneumonia (only telavancin has approval for the latter indication). Recent evidence has also emerged to support their use in the treatment of bone and joint infections. This article reviews the current literature on dalbavancin and telavancin in the treatment of infective endocarditis, a condition for which the role of these agents is yet to be established.

Treatment of osteoarticular, cardiovascular, intravascular-catheter-related and other complicated infections with dalbavancin and oritavancin: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin for complicated Gram-positive infections as an alternative to in-hospital intravenous or outpatient antimicrobial therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGPs) in patients with osteoarticular, cardiovascular, intravascular-catheter-related and other complicated infections.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using 'dalbavancin' and 'oritavancin' as search terms. For inclusion in this review, studies had to include at least one human subject treated for an indication other than acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. The primary outcome for this review was clinical success as defined by each individual study, and patients were stratified by type of infection.

RESULTS

In total, 38 studies (18 randomized controlled trials/case series and 20 case reports) met the inclusion criteria. The most common off-label indication for oritavancin and dalbavancin was osteoarticular infection, with a median success rate of 73% [interquartile range (IQR) 58-85%] among the 14 studies with more than one patient. The success rate for endocarditis and cardiac-device-related infections was 68% (IQR 56-86%) among nine studies, and the success rate for catheter-related bloodstream infection was 75% (IQR 59-90%) among seven studies. Among the 16 studies of almost 700 patients receiving laLGPs, there were 98 reports of adverse events, resulting in 13% of treated patients reporting an event.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that laLGPs are safe and efficacious for osteoarticular, cardiovascular, intravascular-catheter-related and other complicated infections. Further research is needed to confirm these results.

Advantages of Outpatient Treatment with Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: A Review

Treatment of serious gram-positive infections presents multiple challenges. Treatment often results in prolonged hospitalization for administration of intravenous antimicrobials and presents an inefficient use of hospital resources. Prolonged hospitalization is typically also unfavorable to patient preferences and potentially subjects patients to additional health care-associated complications. Current strategies of transition to outpatient settings-outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and use of oral antibiotics-often do not adequately serve vulnerable populations for whom there is often no alternative to inpatient therapy. Specifically, people who use drugs, those who cannot reliably adhere to unsupervised treatment (poor mental or physical health), people with complicating life circumstances (e.g., homelessness, incarceration, rural location), and those with inadequate health insurance remain hospitalized for weeks longer than persons without such conditions. We suspected that long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGP), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, may be useful in patient transitions to outpatient settings. Thus, we conducted a search of the peer-reviewed literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Based on accumulating literature, it appears that laLGPs offer a reliable alternative therapeutic strategy that addresses many of the personal and systemic barriers to the traditional transitioning approaches. Current evidence also suggests that these agents may be cost-effective from patient, payer, and hospital perspectives. Barriers to broader use of laLGPs include, among others, a relative lack of prospective data regarding efficacy in serious infections, a narrow United States Food and Drug Administration-approved indication restricted to only acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and lack of reimbursement infrastructure for inpatient settings.

Therapy of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Evidences and challenges

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is still a daily challenge for clinicians. Despite all efforts, the associated mortality and morbidity has not significantly improved in the last 20 years. The available evidence suggests that adherence to some quality-of-care indicators with regard to clinical management is important in improving the outcome of patients, but it is lower than desired in many hospitals; as such, management of patients with SAB by infectious diseases specialists has been demonstrated to contribute in the reduction of the mortality rate of these patients. In this article, the most relevant clinical studies published over the last few years evaluating the efficacy and safety of alternative drugs for the treatment of SAB are reviewed. However, classic drugs are still used in a high proportion of patients because the promising results obtained from in vivo and in vivo studies with these alternative drugs have not translated as frequently as expected into evident superiority in clinical studies. Nevertheless, some data suggest that certain alternatives may offer advantages in specific situations. Overall, an individualised and expert approach is needed in order to decide the best treatment according to the source, severity, complications, patients' features and microbiological data.