A phase II study of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, for previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer

The antitumor activity of NK012, an SN-38-incorporating micelle, in combination with bevacizumab against lung cancer xenografts

BACKGROUND

It has been demonstrated that NK012, a novel 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38)-incorporating polymeric micelle, exerts significantly more potent antitumor activity against various human tumor xenografts than irinotecan (CPT-11) (a water-soluble prodrug of SN-38). Combination therapy of anticancer agents with bevacizumab (Bv), an anti-vascualr endothelial growth factor humanized monoclonal antibody, has more potently inhibited tumor growth than either agent alone. In the current study, the authors examined the antitumor effect of NK012 in combination with Bv against human lung cancer.

METHODS

Nude mice bearing lung adenocarcinoma (PC-14 or A549 xenografts) were administered NK012 at SN-38-equivalent doses of 5 mg/kg or 30 mg/kg in combination with or without Bv at 5 mg/kg. CPT-11 at a dose of 66.7 mg/kg was administered with or without Bv at a dose of 5 mg/kg in the same experimental model. To evaluate interaction with Bv, the pharmacokinetics and microvessel density in tumors that were treated on each regimen were analyzed.

RESULT

In vitro, the growth-inhibitory effect of NK012 was 50-fold more potent than that of CPT-11 and was almost equivalent to that of SN-38. In vivo studies revealed that the combination of NK012 plus Bv had significantly greater antitumor activity against human lung cancer xenografts compared with NK012 alone (PC-14, P=.0261; A549, P<.001). The pharmacokinetic profile of NK012 revealed that coadministration of Bv did not interfere with the accumulation of NK012.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, significant antitumor activity was noted with NK012 in combination with Bv against lung cancer cells. The current results warrant the clinical evaluation of NK012 in lung cancer.

A phase II study of cisplatin and irinotecan as induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant thoracic radiotherapy with weekly low-dose irinotecan in unresectable, stage III, non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9706

OBJECTIVE

It is important to identify optimal regimens of cisplatin-based, third-generation chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy for patients with unresectable, Stage III, non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable, Stage III non-small cell lung cancer were treated with the following regimen: cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 29, with irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, and 43 and 30 mg/m(2) on days 57, 64, 71, 78, 85 and 92. Thoracic radiotherapy was started on day 57 at 2 Gy/day (total 60 Gy).

RESULTS

From February 1998 to January 1999, 68 patients were enrolled. Grade 3/4 toxicities during induction chemotherapy primarily included neutropenia (73.5%) and diarrhea (20.6%), while Grade 3/4 toxicities during concomitant thoracic radiotherapy with irinotecan consisted of neutropenia (18.4%), esophagitis (4.1%) and hypoxia (6.5%). There was one treatment-related death due to radiation pneumonitis. The response rate was 64.7% (95% confidence interval, 52.2-75.9%). The median survival time was 16.5 (95% confidence interval, 12.6-19.8) months. The 1- and 2 year survival rates were 65.8% (95% confidence interval, 54.4-77.1%) and 32.9% (95% confidence interval, 21.6-44.1%), respectively. Overall, only 36 (56%) completed both the scheduled chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus irinotecan followed by low-dose irinotecan and concomitant thoracic radiotherapy was feasible according to the prespecified decision criteria in this study for patients with unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. We did not decide to select this regimen for further investigations because approximately half of the patients completed the scheduled treatment.

A phase I, dose-finding study of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is a multitargeted, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumour and antiangiogenic activity. We investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours.

METHODS

Sunitinib was initially administered once daily at 37.5 mg per day on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle, in which irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was given on day 1. In a second cohort, the sunitinib dose was reduced to 25 mg per day. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies.

RESULTS

In the sunitinib 37.5 mg per day cohort, 3 out of 10 evaluable patients had objective responses, but dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia, pneumococcal sepsis, and fatigue were observed. There were no DLTs in the sunitinib 25 mg per day cohort. Paired observations of pharmacokinetic parameter values of sunitinib and irinotecan alone vs the combination did not reveal significant drug-drug interactions. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as sunitinib 25 mg per day (days 1-14) with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) (day 1), but no activity was observed at this dose.

CONCLUSION

Although a higher sunitinib dose of 37.5 mg per day (days 1-14) with irinotecan showed preliminary evidence of antitumour activity, this dose was poorly tolerated. Therefore, this particular combination will not be pursued for further studies.

Streptomycin alleviates irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in rats by a mechanism other than inhibition of β-glucuronidase activity in intestinal lumen

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) is a useful drug for cancer chemotherapy but sometimes induces severe diarrhea clinically. CPT-11 is mainly activated to SN-38 by carboxylesterase (CES) and then detoxified to SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) in the liver. SN-38G is excreted via bile and de-conjugated to SN-38 by β-glucuronidase (β-GLU) in the intestinal content. In order to clarify the alleviative effect of antibiotics on CPT-11-induced diarrhea, we examined whether penicillin G and streptomycin (SM) alleviate CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea using three diarrheal models, i.e., Wistar rats with repeated dosing of CPT-11 (60 mg/kg/day i.v. for 4 consecutive days) and Wistar and Gunn rats with a single dosing of CPT-11 (200 and 20 mg/kg i.v., respectively). Gunn rats have an inherited deficiency of UGT1A and cannot conjugate SN-38 to SN-38G. Therefore, onset of CPT-11-induced diarrhea in Gunn rats is not affected by β-GLU activity. SM alleviated diarrhea in all three diarrheal models. The alleviation of diarrhea by SM in Gunn rats indicated that the effect of SM occurred by a mechanism other than the inhibition of β-GLU activity. SM decreased CPT-11 and/or SN-38 concentrations in intestinal tissues and alleviated epithelial damage from the ileum to colon. SM did not inhibit β-GLU activity in the cecal content. SM also inhibited the intestinal absorption of CPT-11 and decreased CES activity and increased UGT activity in the intestinal epithelium. These findings indicated that SM decreased the exposure of CPT-11 and SN-38 to the intestinal epithelium by inhibiting the absorption of CPT-11 from the intestinal lumen and the change of CES and UGT activities in the intestinal epithelium and alleviated delayed-onset diarrhea.

Clinical features of interstitial lung disease induced by standard chemotherapy (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is rarely reported, but its clinical features remain to be clarified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using a computerized database, we retrospectively identified patients who developed ILD from 734 patients with CRC treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) from April 2005 to December 2008 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East.

RESULTS

Of 734 patients, 11 patients developed ILD (1.5%) and 4 of those patients died (0.54%). Of the 11 patients, 10 showed pulmonary shadows other than lung metastases before chemotherapy. ILD developed during FOLFOX in six patients, at 137 days after completion of FOLFOX in one patient, during oxaliplatin interruption of FOLFOX in one patient and during FOLFIRI in the remaining three patients. FOLFOX had been administered at some point for all ILD patients, with a median of 10 cycles (range 2-17 cycles) and a median dose of administered oxaliplatin of 850 mg/m(2) (range 170-1445 mg/m(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

ILD following FOLFOX or FOLFIRI is an uncommon but life-threatening complication. Care must be taken regarding the onset of ILD, not only during but also after chemotherapy for CRC.

Irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38: review of bioanalytical methods and recent update from clinical pharmacology perspectives

The introduction of irinotecan has revolutionized the applicability of camptothecins as predominant topoisomerase I inhibitor for anti-cancer therapy. The potent anti-tumor activity of irinotecan is due to rapid formation of an in vivo active metabolite, SN-38. Therefore, irinotecan is considered as a pro-drug to generate SN-38. Over the past decade, side-by-side with the clinical advancement of the use of irinotecan in the oncology field, a plethora of bioanalytical methods have been published to quantify irinotecan, SN-38 and other metabolites. Because of the availability of HPLC, LC-MS and LC-MS/MS methods, the pharmacokinetic profiling of irinotecan and its metabolites has been accomplished in multiple species, including cancer patients. The developed assays continue to find use in the optimization of newly designed delivery systems with regard to pharmacokinetics to promote safe and effective use of either irinotecan or SN-38. This review intends to: firstly, provide an exhaustive compilation of the published assays for irinotecan, SN-38 and other metabolite(s) of irinotecan, as applicable; secondly, to enumerate the validation parameters and applicable conclusions; and thirdly, provide some recent perspectives in the clinical pharmacology arena pertaining to efflux transporters, pediatric profiling, role of kidney function in defining toxicity, drug-drug interaction potential of irinotecan, etc.

S-1: a new oral fluoropyrimidine in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

S-1 (also known as TS-1; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Tokyo, Japan) is a new oral fluoropyrimidine formulation that combines tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate in a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. Single-agent S-1 has demonstrated marked activity against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as a broad array of other solid tumors, including gastric, colorectal, breast, cervical, and pancreatic cancers. This comprehensive review summarizes the results of previous clinical studies and describes ongoing clinical trials of S-1 in advanced NSCLC. S-1 combined with platinum compounds, irinotecan, and gemcitabine has produced promising results in terms of feasibility, safety, and effectiveness. Available data have stimulated further research, including phase III trials for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

A phase II study of cisplatin and irinotecan as induction chemotherapy followed by accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy with daily low-dose carboplatin in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9510

OBJECTIVE

It is important to find optimal regimens of cisplatin (CDDP)-based third-generation chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This Phase II study was designed to determine the toxicity and efficacy of two courses of chemotherapy (CDDP 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) followed by accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy/40 fractions in 4 weeks) combined with daily carboplatin (CBDCA) administration. CBDCA was administered at a target area under the plasma level-time curve of 0.4 x (24 h creatinine clearance + 25), according to Calvert's formula.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The patients' median age was 63 years (range 40-74 years) and included 22 males and 4 females. Seven patients were Stage IIIA and 19 were Stage IIIB. Twenty had a performance status (PS) of 1 versus six with a PS of 0. There was one treatment-related death due to sepsis and pneumonia associated with Grade 4 neutropenia and diarrhea during chemotherapy. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and diarrhea were observed in 14 and 5 patients, respectively. Toxicity of the radiotherapy was mild. There were 0 complete response and 13 partial responses, giving a response rate of 50.0%. Median survival time and 2-year survival were 16.4 months and 21.5%, respectively. This study was designed with Simon's two-stage design, and the response rate did not meet the criteria to proceed to the second stage and the study was terminated early.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen might be inactive for patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC.

Long-term disease-free survivor of metastatic large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung treated with amrubicin and irinotecan

Large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a relatively uncommon variant of non-small cell lung cancer. Since the biological characteristics of LCNEC are similar to those of small cell lung cancer, LCNEC is usually treated with chemotherapy regimens used for small cell lung cancer. However, the outcomes are usually dismal. Here, we report a patient with LCNEC (a metastasis to the brain). After whole brain irradiation, he received a combination of amrubicin and irinotecan chemotherapy, and has been relapse-free for two years. This treatment regimen may be beneficial for patients with advanced LCNEC.

Circadian Rhythm of Irinotecan Tolerability in Mice

The toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase-I inhibitor largely used in cancer patients, was investigated as a function of the circadian time of its administration in mice, with mortality, body weight loss, leukopenia, neutropenia, intestinal lesions, and bone marrow cell cycle phase distribution as end points. Four experiments were performed on a total of 773 male mice standardized with 12h light/12h darkness. Irinotecan was administered daily for 4 or 10 consecutive days (D1-4 and D1-10, respectively, in different experiments) at one of six circadian stages expressed in hours after light onset (HALO). The survival curves differed significantly as a function of the dosage and circadian time of drug administration by the D1-10 schedule, with 70% survival at 7 or 11 HALO and 51% at 19 or 23 HALO (p=0.039 from log rank test). CPT-11 administration at 19 or 23 HALO resulted in (1) greatest mean body weight loss at nadir; (2) most severe colic and bone marrow lesions and/or slowest recovery; and (3) deepest neutropenia nadir and/or slowest hematologic recovery. These circadian treatment time-related differences were statistically validated. The bone marrow cell cycle data revealed a four to eight-fold larger G2-M phase arrest following irinotecan administration at 19 or 23 HALO in comparison to the other times of drug administration, apparently representative of the repair of more extensive DNA damage (p < 0.001 from ANOVA) when the medication was given at these circadian times. Overall, CPT-11 was better tolerated by mice treated during the light (animals' rest) span. The results support the administration of CPT-11 to cancer patients in the second half of the night, during sleep, in order to improve drug tolerability.

Preclinical results of camptothecin-polymer conjugate (IT-101) in multiple human lymphoma xenograft models

PURPOSE

Camptothecin (CPT) has potent broad-spectrum antitumor activity by inhibiting type I DNA topoisomerase (DNA topo I). It has not been used clinically because it is water-insoluble and highly toxic. As a result, irinotecan (CPT-11), a water-soluble analogue of CPT, has been developed and used as salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, but with only modest activity. Recently, we have developed a cyclodextrin-based polymer conjugate of 20-(S)-CPT (IT-101). In this study, we evaluated the preclinical antilymphoma efficacy of IT-101 as compared with CPT-11.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We determined an in vitro cytotoxicity of IT-101, CPT-11, and their metabolites against multiple human lymphoma cell lines. In human lymphoma xenografts, the pharmacokinetics, inhibitions of tumor DNA topo I catalytic activity, and antilymphoma activities of these compounds were evaluated.

RESULTS

IT-101 and CPT had very high in vitro cytotoxicity against all lymphoma cell lines tested. As compared with CPT-11 and SN-38, IT-101 and CPT had longer release kinetics and significantly inhibit higher tumor DNA topo I catalytic activities. Furthermore, IT-101 showed significantly prolonged the survival of animals bearing s.c. and disseminated human xenografts when compared with CPT-11 at its maximum tolerated dose in mice.

CONCLUSIONS

The promising present results provide the basis for a phase I clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma.

Irinotecan and oxaliplatin combination as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a prospective phase II trial of IrOx in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically or cytologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), aged > or =18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, at stage IIIB (pleural effusion)/IV or with recurrent disease not suitable for primary surgical treatment, with no palliative chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the chest or immunotherapy or biologic therapy, the presence of measurable disease by RECIST, and who had given signed written informed consent, were eligible. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 65 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients were enrolled in June and August 2007, the median age was 59 years (47-73). In total, 71 cycles were administered with a median of 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-6 cycles) and 18 patients were evaluable for treatment response. An independent review of tumor responses gave an overall response rate of 27.7% (CR: 0, PR: 5/18; 95% CI, 7-48.4%) by intent-to-treat analysis. The median overall survival of all patients was 14 months and the median time-to-progression was 4.2 months (95% CI, 1.959-6.441). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (7% of all cycles) and neutropenia (5.6% of all cycles). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in one patient and one patient died due to sepsis.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that IrOx combination therapy has moderate activity with a tolerable toxicity profile. However, it was not warranted to evaluate further this regimen as first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC using the current dosages and schedule.

Effects of breast cancer resistance protein inhibitors and pharmaceutical excipients on decreasing gastrointestinal toxicity of camptothecin analogs

AIM

To investigate the effect of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) inhibitors and pharmaceutical excipients on reducing the biliary excretion of camptothecins (CPT), ameliorating delayed-type diarrhea and intestinal mucosa damage induced by CPT.

METHODS

The cumulative biliary excretion of irinotecan (CPT-11) and hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) with or without BCRP inhibitors and excipients was investigated in rats. The gastrointestinal toxicity, assessed as the diarrheal score, body weight change and microscopic pathological damage was also determined in rats.

RESULTS

Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) exhibited important effects on the biliary excretion of CPT. Coadministration of BCRP inhibitors such as GF120918 and cyclosporin A reduced the biliary excretion of CPT-11 and HCPT. Pharmaceutical excipients such as Pluronic F68 and PEG 2000 stearate also showed inhibitory effects on BCRP and similarly reduced CPT biliary excretion. The observed gastrointestinal toxicity was ameliorated by coadministration of BCRP inhibitors and excipients compared with injection of CPT-11 and HCPT alone.

CONCLUSION

The use of excipients as inhibitors of BCRP is safe and relatively non-toxic, and may lead to important pharmacotherapeutic benefits by decreasing the gastrointestinal toxicity of CPT.

Is irinotecan plus docetaxel useful as second-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

INTRODUCTION

The ability of doublet therapy in the second-line setting in patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not yet been proven. In this setting, docetaxel (D) has shown efficacy and irinotecan (I) has only recently been introduced. This study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerability of three D + I regimens in platinum pretreated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

From March 2003 to June 2006, 65 patients (age range, 39-71 years; 83% male) with relapsed stage III/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either I 160 mg/m(2) plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm A), I 80 mg/m(2) on days 1,8 plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm B), or I 60 mg/m(2) plus D 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 42 days (arm C), for a maximum of 18 weeks.

RESULTS

Per protocol analysis (47 of 65) overall response rates were 5.6% (A), 6.7% (B), and 7.1% (C). Median times to progression were 3.4, 4.0, and 4.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was 8.9 (A), 8.3 (B), and 9.4 (C) months. G3/4 neutropenia was more frequent in arms A (42%) and B (55%) whereas G3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was similarly prevalent in all arms, although diarrhea occurred in 47% of arm C patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent treatment with D or the multitarget antifolate pemetrexed or erlotinib remain the best choices and investigational studies, following first-line therapy, are required.

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Even with the standard first-line chemotherapy, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurs in most cases. The purpose of this study is to develop a new chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with NSCLC that has relapsed or was refractory to previous chemotherapy. Patients with proven NSCLC refractory or recurrent after previous single-regimen chemotherapy, PS of 0-2, age of 15 years or older, adequate organ functions and measurable lesions were treated with irinotecan at 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin at 25 mg/m(2) with 1000 ml hydration on day 1. This administration, considered as one cycle, was repeated every week without rest unless encountering defined skip and dose-reduction criteria. The treatment was administered for six cycles over a 49-day period, both median values, to 48 patients, with a response rate of 26%, progression free and median survival times of 3 and 11 months, respectively, and a 1-year survival rate of 46%. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, anaemia and nausea, which were manageable. Subset analyses suggested that the response rate was independent of response to the first-line chemotherapy. In conclusion, second-line chemotherapy of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin with minimum hydration seemed effective, with tolerable toxicity, and is potentially useful irrespective of the outcome of previous chemotherapy.

Third-generation chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To estimate the efficacy of third-generation (3G) chemotherapy agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and irinotecan) on response and survival in stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through MEDLINE. Results on tumor response and survival were collected from randomized trials comparing 3G monotherapy versus best supportive care (BSC), 3G monotherapy versus second-generation (2G) platinum-based regimens, and 3G platinum-based regimens versus 2G platinum-based regimens.

RESULTS

Of the 2480 citations screened, 20 randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 19 trials were used in the analyses. The data from two, three-arm trials were used in two different comparisons. Five trials (n = 1029 patients) compared 3G monotherapy with BSC. The summary risk difference (RD) for 1-year survival favored 3G agents by 7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2%, 12%). Four trials (n = 871 patients) compared treatment with 3G monotherapy versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The response RD was -6% (95% CI: -11%, 0%), and the 1-year survival rate RD was 3% (95% CI: -3%, 10%), suggesting that despite a slightly higher response rate for 2G platinum-based regimens relative to 3G monotherapy, there is equivalency in survival. Twelve trials (n = 3995) compared 3G versus 2G platinum-based regimens. The RD for response was 12% (95% CI: 10%, 15%). A RD for 1-year was not calculated, because of heterogeneity among the trials. A subset analysis of 3G versus 2G platinum-based doublets revealed a 1-year survival-rate RD of 6% (95% CI: 2%, 10%), favoring 3G platinum-based regimens without evidence of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

3G agents have been a significant advance in the treatment of NSCLC.

Phase I study of vinorelbine and irinotecan in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Vinorelbine alone and irinotecan alone have been shown to have efficacy against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); each drug has different mechanisms of action. A phase I study using a combination of vinorelbine and irinotecan as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

METHODS

Previously untreated patients (<or=75 years old) with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Based on a 4-week cycle, vinorelbine was given on days 1 and 8, and irinotecan was given on days 1, 8, and 15 intravenously. To prevent an injection site reaction to vinorelbine, the site was treated with topical clobetasol ointment, and the patients were given intravenous dexamethasone prior to vinorelbine treatment. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia lasting >or=4 days or febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, >or=grade 3 non-hematological toxicities, or the need to cancel drug administration on both days 8 and 15.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled. DLT was observed in 1 of 6 patients at level 3 (20 mg/m(2) vinorelbine, 50 mg/m(2 )irinotecan), in 2 of 3 at level 4 (25 mg/m(2), 50 mg/m(2)), and in 2 of 5 at modified level 4 (20, 60 mg/m(2)). Level 4 and modified level 4 were considered to be the MTD; dose level 3 was therefore recommended. DLTs included liver dysfunction, pneumonitis, colitis, and arrhythmia. Injection site reactions were mild. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and easily controlled.

CONCLUSION

Use of 20 mg/m(2) vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 followed by 50 mg/m(2 )irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks warrants a phase II study.

Involvement of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase activity in irinotecan-induced delayed-onset diarrhea in rats

We assessed the involvement of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activity in episodes of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11)-induced delayed-onset diarrhea using a mutant rat strain with an inherited deficiency of UGT1A (Gunn rats). Gunn rats exhibited severe diarrhea after the intravenous administration of CPT-11 at a dose of 20 mg/kg, whereas Wistar rats did not. In the epithelium of the small intestine and cecum in Gunn rats, the shortening of villi, degeneration of crypts, and destruction of the nucleus were observed. The AUC, MRT, and t (1/2) of CPT-11, and the AUC of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) in plasma were, respectively, 1.6-fold, 1.5-fold, 1.7-fold, and 6.5-fold higher, and the cumulative biliary excretion rate of SN-38 was 2.3-fold higher, in Gunn rats than Wistar rats. SN-38 glucuronide excreted via bile in Wistar rats was not de-conjugated in the small intestinal lumen. The SN-38 AUC values in small intestinal tissues were also 5.0 to 5.8-fold higher in Gunn rats than Wistar rats. In conclusion, Gunn rats developed severe delayed-onset diarrhea after i.v. administration of CPT-11 at a much lower dose. Severe intestinal impairments would be induced in Gunn rats through exposure to SN-38 at high levels for a long period mainly via the intestinal lumen and partially via the bloodstream. These results clarified that the deficiency of UGT activity contributed greatly to the induction of the CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea and epithelial impairment in the intestine. In the clinic, great care is needed when using chemotherapy with CPT-11 in patients with poor UGT activity.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of combination chemotherapy using irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the maximum tolerated doses, dose-limiting toxicities, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profiles in the combination of irinotecan and paclitaxel. Eligibility criteria included age 75 years or younger, good performance status, adequate organ function, and unresectable non-small cell or extensive disease of small cell lung cancer. Irinotecan was administered on days 1 and 8 over 90 minutes, and paclitaxel was administered on day 8 over 3 hours after 90 minutes from the end of the irinotecan infusion. Irinotecan and paclitaxel were dose-escalated from 40 and 135 mg/m and repeated every 4 weeks. The authors also administered a higher dosage with preventive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support from day 9. Thirty-one patients were assessed for toxicities and responses. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The dose of irinotecan 60 mg/m and paclitaxel 200 mg/m with preventive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was tolerable and suitable for a phase II trial. Nine of 25 (36%) patients with non-small cell and all six patients with small cell carcinoma achieved partial response. The areas under the concentration versus time curves of irinotecan and its metabolites on day 8 were significantly higher than on day 1. This combination therapy must be planned only after careful consideration of the drug-drug interaction.

Phase I Study of Irinotecan and Gemcitabine in Previously Untreated Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan and gemcitabine are effective against non-small cell lung cancer. We conducted a phase I study of the combined use of irinotecan and gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to determine dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose.

METHODS

Patients were treated with irinotecan followed by gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Gemcitabine dose was fixed at 1000 mg/m2, and irinotecan dose was increased from 60 mg/m2.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients was enrolled. Maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was determined up to level 3 (irinotecan 100 mg/m2). In Japan, the maximum approved weekly dose of irinotecan is 100 mg/m2, so this was the dose that was used. Only very mild hematological and non-hematological toxicities were noted.

CONCLUSION

Use of 100 mg/m2 irinotecan followed by 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks warrants a phase II study.

Green tea polyphenol administration partly ameliorates chemotherapy-induced side effects in the small intestine of mice

The chemotherapeutic agent irinotecan (IT) is highly effective against several types of cancer, although its use is limited due to severe intestinal toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate inflammatory and oxidative stress-related processes contributing to small intestinal mucosa damage and to determine the extent to which green tea polyphenols could ameliorate the detrimental effects induced by IT. In Expt. 1, mice were challenged intraperitoneally with IT or saline on 2 consecutive days. For time kinetic measurements, the IT-treated mice were killed at 3, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after the 2nd dose of IT. Three hours after IT administration, the ileum glutathione concentration dropped significantly. Lipid peroxidation and inflammation, as measured by macrophage inflammatory protein-2 content, myeloperoxidase activity, and nuclear factor-kappaB translocation, were highest between 24 and 48 h after IT treatment. In Expt. 2, green tea polyphenols (1 g/L) were supplied via drinking water for 7 d before and 3 d after treatment with IT. Green tea polyphenols significantly affected the glutathione:glutathione disulfide ratio but not lipid peroxidation, macrophage inflammatory protein-2 levels, myeloperoxidase activity, or nuclear factor-kappaB activation. Our study reveals that IT administration is associated with oxidative stress and inflammation, both occurring simultaneously to IT-induced mucosal damage. The antioxidative defense is affected soon after IT administration. Green tea polyphenols supplied orally protected against oxidation in our experimental model and could be one approach to reducing the risk of IT-induced side effects in the clinical setting.

Phase I Study of Radical Thoracic Radiation, Weekly Irinotecan, and Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan and cisplatin individually are active in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Each is synergistic with radiation. Dosages of 65 mg/m2 of irinotecan and 30 mg/m2 of cisplatin Q weekly times four every 6 weeks yielded a 36% response rate and median survival of 11.6 months in advanced NSCLC (Jagasia et al.; Clinical Cancer Research 7: 68, 2001). A weekly schedule for each agent (versus less frequent doses) limits toxicity and increases the opportunity for radiosensitization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We initiated a phase I study of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin during radical thoracic radiation (TRT). Cisplatin was fixed at 25 mg/m2 Q weekly times seven. Irinotecan was dosed initially at 30 mg/m2 per week for 7 weeks and was increased by 10 mg/m2 per week in three- to six-patient cohorts. TRT was administered in 34 single daily fractions to 63 Gy. Eligibility stipulated locally advanced NSCLC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1; < or = 10% unintended weight loss; and adequate physiologic indices.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were accrued: nine were stage IIIB, five were stage IIIA, and one had isolated mediastinal node recurrence after prior surgery. Median age was 65 years (range, 47-77). Seven patients received irinotecan at a dose of 30 mg/m2 per week; (dose level 1). Seven other patients received irinotecan at a dose of 40 mg/m2 per week; (dose level 2). The one other patient received irinotecan in doses of 50 mg/m2 per week; (dose level 3). Neutropenic fever occurred in one patient each at dose levels 1 and 2. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in three patients at each dose level. Transient grade 3 diarrhea occurred in one patient at dose level 1. Esophagitis of grade 3 or higher occurred in one patient each at dose levels 2 and 3. There was one late grade 3 pneumonitis at dose level 2. Delivered irinotecan dose intensity for dose level 1 was 27 mg/m2 per week; for dose level 2, it was 31.4 mg/m2 per week. Nine of 13 evaluable patients (69%) responded. At median potential follow-up of 5 years, 14 have progressed, and 11 have died. Projected median survival is 28 months; one patient who was treated for mediastinal node recurrence remains free from progression at 6 years.

CONCLUSION

Weekly irinotecan and cisplatin combined with radical TRT (63 Gy) is active and fairly well tolerated in locally advanced NSCLC. In combination with fixed-dose cisplatin (25 mg/m2 per week), the maximum-tolerated dose of irinotecan is 30 mg/m2 per week.

Data acquisition for the histoculture drug response assay in lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Application of the histoculture drug response assay for lung cancer was investigated by using data acquired from lung cancer specimens.

METHODS

From May 1994 through February 2005, histoculture drug response assay data were obtained from 359 lung cancer specimens held in our institute. We examined chemosensitivities of the tissues to cisplatin, doxorubicin, mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, paclitaxel, etoposide, irinotecan, and gemcitabine. Cutoff inhibition rates were determined with each drug for non-small cell lung cancer and were used to calculate predictabilities for chemotherapy responses.

RESULTS

The evaluability of the histoculture drug response assay was high at 97.4%. Good predictability, including true-positive and true-negative rates of 73.2% and 100%, respectively, with an accuracy of 83.0%, was observed.

CONCLUSION

The histoculture drug response assay appears to be applicable to non-small cell lung cancer for the prediction of responses to chemotherapy.

Schedule-dependent cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan in a colon cancer cell line

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to clarify the significance of widely accepted irinotecan (CPT-11)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combinations in colon cancer by investigating their sequential effect.

METHODS

The sequential effect of CPT-11/5-FU in two colon cancer cell lines, LoVo and SW480, was evaluated by WST-8 colorimetric assay. The cell cycle distributions of each drug were analyzed by flow cytometry, and then the chemoresistant mechanisms and expression of a drug transporter (MDR1), the bcl-2 apoptotic pathway, metabolizing enzymes [carboxylesterase (CE), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase], and target enzymes (topoisomerase I, thymidine synthase) associated with sequence-dependent cytotoxicity were examined.

RESULTS

The cytotoxicity of 5-FU (10, 100, 1000 microM) followed by CPT-11 (1 microM) was significantly greater than that of CPT-11 (1 microM) followed by 5-FU (10, 100, 1000 microM) (P < 0.05). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that exposure to 5-FU downregulated both MDR1 and bcl-2 mRNA and simultaneously upregulated CE2 mRNA expression, suggesting enhancement of subsequent CPT-11 cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytotoxic effects of the CPT-11/5-FU combinations were shown to be schedule-dependent in human colon cancer cells. The findings suggest that 5-FU followed by CPT-11 administration might be the optimal sequence for CPT-11/5-FU treatment of advanced colon cancer.

Phase II Study of Etoposide and Cisplatin With Concurrent Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy Followed by Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Patients With Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902

Purpose

We initially conducted a randomized phase II study to compare irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide (IPE) after etoposide and cisplatin (EP) with concurrent twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We amended the protocol to evaluate IP after EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT in a single-arm phase II study because of an unacceptable toxicity in IPE.

Patients and Methods

Previously untreated patients with LD-SCLC were treated intravenously with etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 3 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 with concurrent twice-daily TRT (1.5 Gy per fraction, a total dose of 45 Gy) beginning on day 2 followed by three cycles of irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 4-week cycle.

Results

Of the 51 patients enrolled, 49 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate and complete response rate were 88% and 41%, respectively. The median survival time for all patients was 23 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 49% and 29.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 11.8 months. The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 4, 84%), febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 31%), infection (grade 3 to 4, 33%), electrolytes imbalance (grade 3 to 4, 20%), and diarrhea (grade 3 to 4, 14%).

Conclusion

EP with concurrent twice-daily TRT followed by the consolidation of IP appears to be an active regimen which deserves further phase III testing in patients with LD-SCLC.

Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Four-Arm Cooperative Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of three platinum-based combination regimens against cisplatin plus irinotecan (IP) in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by a non-inferiority design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 602 patients were randomly assigned to one of four regimens: cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks (IP) carboplatin AUC 6.0 min x mg/mL (area under the concentration-time curve) on day 1 plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 3 weeks (TC); cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks (GP); and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 every 3 weeks (NP).

RESULTS

The response rate, median survival time, and 1-year survival rate were 31.0%, 13.9 months, 59.2%, respectively, in IP; 32.4%, 12.3 months, 51.0% in TC; 30.1%, 14.0 months, 59.6% in GP; and 33.1%, 11.4 months, 48.3% in NP. No statistically significant differences were found in response rate or overall survival, but the non-inferiority of none of the experimental regimens could be confirmed. All the four regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The four regimens have similar efficacy and different toxicity profiles, and they can be used to treat advanced NSCLC patients.

Phase II study of 3-week scheduling of irinotecan in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin given every 4 weeks is one of the standard treatments for advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and dose-intensity as a measure of the feasibility of 3-week scheduling of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC in phase II study.

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC were treated intravenously with irinotecan (60 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Of the 28 patients enrolled, 27 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The response rate was 30% (95% confidence interval, 14-50%). The median duration of response was 16 weeks (range, 10-26 weeks). The median survival time for all patients was 52 weeks and the 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 48% and 29%, respectively. The dose-intensity of irinotecan was 34 mg/m2/wk (range, 19-40). The major toxicities observed were neutropenia (grade 3, 30%; 4, 30%), leukopenia (grade 3, 30%), and diarrhea (grade 3, 22%). Other toxicities were generally mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-week scheduling of irinotecan and cisplatin is effective and feasible in advanced NSCLC.

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin combination (GEMOX regimen) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin (GEMOX regimen) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with advanced NSCLC who had disease progression after a cisplatin- and taxane-based front-line regimen were treated with gemcitabine (1500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on day 8) every 3 weeks. The patients' median age was 62 years and the performance status (WHO) was 0 for 11, 1 for 17 and 2 for 4 patients. The treatment was second line for 22 (69%) and >or=third line for 10 (31%) patients.

RESULTS

Partial response was achieved in 5 (16%) patients, stable disease in 8 (25%) and progressive disease in 19 (59%). Two patients with stable disease and one patient with progressive disease while on previous chemotherapy experienced a partial response with GEMOX regimen. The median duration of response was 2.5 months (range, 1-11.5), the median time to tumor progression 3 months (range, 1-18) and the median survival 5.6 months (range, 1-31). Grade III neutropenia occurred in five (16%) patients, grade III thrombocytopenia in two (6%) and grade III anemia in three (9%); moreover, grades II-III asthenia was reported in eight (25%) patients and grades II-III neurotoxicity in three (9%).

CONCLUSION

The GEMOX combination is a relatively active and well tolerated second-line regimen in NSCLC patients pretreated with a taxane- and/or platinum-based chemotherapy.

The synergism between Belotecan and cisplatin in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We wanted to demonstrate the anti-cancer effect and interaction between belotecan and cisplatin on gastric cancer cell line and we evaluated the mechanisms of this synergistic effect in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The growth inhibitory effect of belotocan and cisplatin against several gastric cancer cell lines (SNU-5, SNU-16 and SNU-601) was estimated by tetrazolium dye assay. The effect of a combination treatment was evaluated by the isobologram method. The biochemical mechanisms for the interaction between the drugs were analyzed by measuring the formation of DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) and DNA topo-I activity.

RESULTS

Belotecan showed synergism with cisplatin for growth inhibitory effect on the gastric cancer cell lines SNU-5, and SNU-16, but this was subadditive on the SNU-601 cell line. The formation of DNA ICLs in SNU-16 cells by cisplatin was increased by combination with belotecan, but this was not affected in SNU-601 cells. The topo-I inhibition by belotecan was enhanced at high concentrations of cisplatin in SNU-16, but not in SNU-601 cells.

CONCLUSION

Belotecan and cisplatin show various combination effect against gastric cancer cells. The synergism between cisplatin and belotecan could be the result of one of the following mechanisms: the modulating effect of belotecan on the repair of cisplatin-induced DNA adducts and the enhancing effect of cisplatin on the belotecan-induced topo-I inhibitory effect.

Phase II Study of Combination Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Irinotecan in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated with Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine combined with irinotecan in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients who failed to respond to platinum-containing first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of 30 registered patients were evaluated. There were previous combination treatments of platinum and taxane regimens in 21 out of 27 patients, with 17 patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel and 4 patients treated with cisplatin or carboplatin and docetaxel. A total of 87 cycles was administered and the median number of cycles administered per patient was 3.5 cycles. Objective responses were observed in 5 out of 27 patients (18.5%). No severe hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were observed (grade 3 leukopenia in 3 patients; grade 3 anemia in 3 patients; grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 2 patients; grade 3 diarrhea in 1 patient). The median survival time was 7.7 months and 1-year survival rate was 34.8%.

CONCLUSION

Bi-weekly gemcitabine and irinotecan was well tolerated and had an acceptable response rate and a reasonable median survival time for patients with NSCLC who had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

A phase II study of weekly irinotecan as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma, at least one bidimensionally measurable metastatic lesion, and no prior chemotherapy were selected. Irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m2 was administered intravenously for 90 min on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pharmacokinetics was examined on day 1 of the first cycle of treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 40 enrolled patients were assessable for efficacy and toxicity. A partial response was obtained in 10 patients, giving an overall response rate of 27.0% (95% confidence interval 13.8-44.1%). The median overall survival was 7.3 months with a 1-year survival rate of 29.5%. Although toxicities were generally tolerated, one patient died of disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome induced by neutropenia with watery diarrhea. Pharmacokinetic study showed that patients with biliary drainage seemed to have higher area under the concentration versus time curve for irinotecan and its metabolites compared with patients without biliary drainage.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent irinotecan has significant efficacy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The toxicity with this schedule appears manageable, though it must be monitored carefully.

A phase I–II study of bi-weekly gemcitabine and irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer after prior taxane + platinum-based regimens

PURPOSE

Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of most agents after failure of platinum-based therapy. In the present phase I-II study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of bi-weekly gemcitabine (GEM) + irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with relapsed NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC, WHO-performance status (PS) </= 2, prior taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in a dose-escalated fashion in subgroups of 3-6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered as follows: CPT-11 150 or 180 mg/m(2) followed by GEM 1,200-1,800 mg/m(2), both on days 1 + 15, recycled every 28 days in four dose levels (DLs).

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients entered the phase I and II part of the study (phase I: 12-phase II: 37 + 3 at DL-3), and 40 patients were evaluable for a response in phase II and all for toxicity: median age, 61 years (range 36-74); PS, 1 (0-2); gender, 43 males/6 females-histologies; adenocarcinoma, 25; squamous, 20; large cell, 4. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes, 38; bone, 5; liver, 4; brain, 3; lung nodules, 14; adrenals, 13; other, 3. All patients had prior taxane + platinum-based treatment, and 42 patients had prior docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin/or-carboplatin regimens. DLT was observed at DL-4 and included 2/3 cases with grade 3 diarrhea-1/3 of these with febrile neutropenia. The recommended DL for phase II evaluation was DL3: GEM, 1,500 + CPT-11-180 mg/m(2). Objective responses in phase II were PR, 6/40 [15%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5-31%]; stable disease, 16/40 (40%; 95% CI, 21-53%); and progressive disease, 18/40 (45%; 95% CI, 28.5-62.5%). The median time-to-progression was 4 months (range 1-12) and median survival 7 months (range 1.5-42 +), while 1-year survival was 20%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 18% of patients (6% grade 4) and 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were seen, grade 3 diarrhea in 6% of patients and grade 2 in 15% of patients, while other grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Bi-weekly GEM + CPT-11 is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane + platinum regimens, and represents an effective and convenient combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC particularly after failure of first-line docetaxel + platinum-based regimens.

Irinotecan for children with relapsed solid tumors

Irinotecan is expected to become a new drug for childhood solid tumors. Sixteen children with relapsed solid tumors received irinotecan 180 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days, repeated once after 25 days off. Their original tumors were neuroblastoma in 7, rhabdomyosarcoma in 3, nephroblastoma and undifferentiated sarcoma in 2 each, and primitive neuroectodermal tumor and leiomyosarcoma in 1 each. The average age at trials was 6 years. Partial response was achieved in 5 (31.3%) (neuro-blastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, nephroblastoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma), and decrease in tumor marker in the other 2. Irinotecan appears promising, and could become included in the first-line treatment.

Optimal antidiarrhea treatment for antitumor agent irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11)-induced delayed diarrhea

PURPOSE

An antitumor camptothecin derivative CPT-11 has proven a broad spectrum of solid tumor malignancy, but its severe diarrhea has often limited its more widespread use. We have demonstrated from a rat model that intestinal beta-glucuronidase may play a key role in the development of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea by the deconjugation of the luminal SN-38 glucuronide, and the elimination of the intestinal microflora by antibiotics or dosing of TJ-14, a Kampo medicine that contains beta-glucuronidase inhibitor baicalin, exerted a protective effect. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy of several potential treatments in our rat model to clarify which is the most promising treatment for CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Oral dosing (twice daily from days -1 to 4) of streptomycin 20 mg/kg and penicillin 10 mg/kg (Str/Pen), neomycin 20 mg/kg and bacitracin 10 mg/kg (Neo/Bac), both of which inhibited almost completely the fecal beta-glucuronidase activity, or TJ-14 1,000 mg/kg improved the decrease in body weight and the delayed diarrhea symptoms induced by CPT-11 (60 mg/kg i.v. from days 1 to 4) to a similar extent. The efficacy was less but significant in activated charcoal (1,000 mg/kg p.o. twice daily from days -1 to 4). In a separate experiment using rats bearing breast cancer (Walker 256-TC), TJ-14, Neo/Bac, and charcoal at the same dose regimen improved CPT-11-induced intestinal toxicity without reducing CPT-11's antitumor activity. In contrast, oral dosing (twice a day) of cyclosporin A (50 mg/kg), a P-glycoprotein and cMOAT/MRP2 inhibitor or valproic acid (200 mg/kg), a UDP-glucuronosyltranferase inhibitor, exacerbated the intestinal toxicity without modifying CPT-11's antitumor activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The result clearly demonstrated the ability of Neo/Bac, Str/Pen, and TJ-14, less but significant ability of activated charcoal, to ameliorate CPT-11-induced delayed-onset diarrhea, suggesting the treatments decreasing the exposure of the intestines to the luminal SN-38 are valuable for improvement of CPT-11-induced intestinal toxicity. In contrast, the treatments affecting the biliary excretion of CPT-11 and its metabolites might have undesirable results.

A phase I/II trial of irinotecan-cisplatin combined with an anti-late-diarrhoeal programme to evaluate the safety and antitumour response of this combination therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I/II study in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to increase the therapeutic index of the cisplatin–irinotecan combination by institution of an anti-late-diarrhoeal program (ADP). A total of 77 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled. The cisplatin dose was fixed at 60 mg m⁻² (Day 1). Irinotecan was escalated in 5 mg m⁻² increments, starting from 60 mg m⁻² (Days 1 and 8). ADP consisted of oral sodium bicarbonate, magnesium oxide, basic water, and ursodeoxycholic acid, and was administered orally for 4 days with each dose of irinotecan. In the phase I portion, irinotecan pharmacokinetics was also examined. After the recommended dose of irinotecan with ADP was determined, a phase II study was conducted to evaluate the response. Maximum tolerated dose was reached at an irinotecan dose of 80 mg m⁻² (Grade 4 diarrhoea and neutropenia). Pharmacokinetic studies show that the maximum concentration and the area under the curve of both irinotecan and SN38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) tend to increase in the dose-dependent manner of irinotecan. The phase II portion of the study included 48 patients, who were treated with 75 mg m⁻² of irinotecan. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia in 65%, leucopenia in 33%, and late diarrhoea in 6% of the patients. During this treatment, PS did not change in 65% of patients. At the end of the chemotherapy, PS did not decline in 90% of patients. In the phase II portion, a response occurred in 63% (95% confidential interval (CI), 47–76%) of patients. Median time to progression was 19 weeks (95% CI, 15–22 weeks), and median survival was 52 weeks (95% CI, 39–64 weeks). This regimen of irinotecan and cisplatin with ADP resulted in promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity for patients with advanced NSCLC. This regimen is a candidate for the experimental arm towards future phase III studies.

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan plus capecitabine for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A Phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an irinotecan plus capecitabine combination, a new nonplatinum regimen, in chemonaive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between July 2003 and April 2004, 53 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC were enrolled. All but 5 patients were male, 52 (98%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, 39 (74%) had AJCC Stage IV disease, and the median age was 61 years. Treatment consisted of intravenous irinotecan at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 and oral capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle, given up to 12 cycles.

RESULTS

Of 53 patients enrolled, 22 achieved objective tumor responses (all partial responses) for an overall response rate of 41.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 28.2-54.8%). After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, the median survival was 14.6 months with a 1-year survival rate of 60.1% (95% CI, 46.9-73.4%) and a median progression-free survival of 5.1 months. Treatment was very well tolerated, with only 10% of patients experiencing NCI-CTC Grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The most common toxicities were hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea. In multiple logistic regression analysis for overall response, only the stage predicted for significantly better response (P = 0.04). Squamous cell carcinoma was marginally predictive for better response (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The irinotecan plus capecitabine regimen demonstrated an antitumor activity that is favorably comparable with other commonly used cisplatin-based regimens. Given the mild toxicity profile and favorable survival outcome, this nonplatinum regimen warrants further evaluation in a randomized trial.

Interstitial lung disease in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) refers to a diverse range of pulmonary fibrotic disorders and may be hard to accurately diagnose, as distinguishing it from other pulmonary diseases can be difficult. Estimations of the incidence in populations are confounded by the complexity of the different forms of the disorder. In addition, ILD is a comorbid disease of lung cancer and is seen after most forms of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced lung cancer. Incidences of >or=10% have been reported; however, whatever the true incidence, both chemotherapy and radiotherapy enhance the risk of developing ILD. ILD has also been reported with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including erlotinib (Tarceva, OSI-774) and gefitinib (IRESSA). In a large number of gefitinib-treated patients (n > 185,000) an incidence of approx 1% has been observed (approx 2% in Japan; 0.3% in the rest of the world). Nevertheless, as with other treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, the clinical benefit outweighs the risk of ILD. In this article, we review the data on ILD with EGFR inhibitors and other common lung cancer treatments.

A phase I study of irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor effect of irinotecan in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory malignancies.

PROCEDURE

Twenty-three patients between 1 and 21 years of age, with a solid tumor refractory to standard therapy or for which there was no standard therapy were enrolled. Irinotecan was administered over 90 min weekly 4x, every 6 weeks. The initial dose level was 125 mg/m(2)/day, with subsequent escalations to 160 and 200 mg/m(2)/day. A MTD was defined in heavily-pretreated and less-heavily-pretreated (< or =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, no prior bone marrow transplantation, and no central axis radiation) patients. Pharmacokinetic studies were also performed.

RESULTS

Neutropenia and diarrhea were the DLTs in heavily pretreated patients; the MTD was 125 mg/m(2)/day. Neutropenia was the DLT in less-heavily pretreated; the MTD was 160 mg/m(2)/day. Five patients had stable disease for two to four cycles including one patient each with rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma, and two patients with ependymoma. Irinotecan clearance was greater that that previously reported for children receiving high dose irinotecan.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II dose of irinotecan administered weekly 4x, every 6 weeks in children with solid tumors is 125 mg/m(2)/dose for heavily pretreated patients and 160 mg/m(2)/dose for less heavily pretreated patients.

Phase I study of cisplatin and irinotecan combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan, when combined with cisplatin, is an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This constitutes a rationale for conducting a phase I study of chemoradiotherapy including this combination for locally advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced NSCLC and a performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible. The protocol consisted of escalating doses of irinotecan on days 1 and 15, and daily low-dose cisplatin (6 mg/m(2) daily for a total dose of 120 mg/m(2)) combined with concurrent hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic irradiation (1.5 Gy twice daily for a total dose of 60 Gy).

RESULTS

The maximum tolerable dose was 50 mg/m(2) of irinotecan, and the dose-limiting toxicity was esophagitis. Tumor response was observed in 50% of cases, and the median survival time of the 12 patients enrolled was 10.1 months, including two patients with 5-year disease-free survival. A pharmacokinetics study demonstrated an accumulation of total platinum, but not of free platinum, during the 26-day treatment period.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose for phase II studies was determined.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of edotecarin, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE

Edotecarin (J-107088) is a potent indolocarbazole topoisomerase I inhibitor which is structurally distinct from the camptothecins. This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose for future Phase II studies and the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary antitumor activity of edotecarin in a population of patients with advanced solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Edotecarin was administered as a single dose by IV infusion over 2 h every 21 days (with 1 week permitted for recovery from toxicities, if needed) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Doses ranged from 8 to 15 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed during and after the first administration.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients received 61 cycles of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (infection, febrile neutropenia, constipation, ileus, and prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia) were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients at the 15 mg/m(2) dose, defining the MTD. The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities were anorexia, nausea, malaise, and constipation. Diarrhea was neither frequent nor severe. Neutropenia was the most common hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4 in 21/23 patients during cycle 1). Plasma concentrations of edotecarin rose rapidly following the start of the 2-hour infusion, reaching C (max) values of 103+/-17 ng/ml at the 13 mg/m(2) dose, and decreased steeply after the end of the infusion. Plasma concentrations declined to approximately 1-2 ng/ml at 26 h post start of infusion, the last PK sampling time point. The mean apparent plasma half-life of the drug was 20 h, which should be considered a preliminary estimate until results from studies with a longer duration of plasma sampling are available. A mean of 1.4-3.6% of the dose was recovered as unchanged drug in the urine over 48 h. Unconfirmed tumor regression > or =50% was observed in 2 patients, 1 with metastatic gastric carcinoma and 1 with esophageal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of edotecarin administered IV over 2 h every 21 days was 15 mg/m(2). The recommended dose for Phase II studies with a 3-week schedule (with 1 week permitted for recovery from toxicities, if needed) is 13 mg/m(2). The observed safety profile and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity warrant further investigation of this drug in solid tumors.