Preliminary studies of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate: capecitabine

Optimal delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy for colon cancer

Colon cancer is treated adjuvantly with 5-flourouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin, most commonly as part of the FOLFOX regimen, which has less toxicity than the older regimen FLOX (bolus 5-FU and oxaliplatin) that has fallen out of favor. For patients who cannot tolerate oxaliplatin, 5-FU can be given as a single agent. Patients with metastatic disease may be treated with a number of regimens, including FOLFOX and FOLFIRI; however, the environment is a not a monotonous vanilla and chocolate FOLFOX and FOLFIRI. Cytotoxic agents, sequentially or in combination, are frequently combined with biologic agents to improve response in metastatic disease. Clinical investigators have focused considerable attention on how best to apply all the agents active in metastatic colon cancer, a practice in evolution. In this article, we highlight important, informative research regarding cytotoxic chemotherapy for colon cancer. We also recognize the contribution made by skilled surgeons, interventional radiologists, and radiation oncologists who will push the envelope and as well, the pharmacogenomic and molecular markers that help us to understand mechanisms of disease, predict toxicity, and refine our therapy.

Capecitabine for locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer: A review

Capecitabine (Xeloda^®) is an oral fluoropyrimidine which is produced as a pro-drug of fluorouracil, and shows improved tolerability and intratumor drug concentrations following its tumor-specific conversion to the active drug. We have searched the Pubmed and Cochrane databases from 1980 to 2009 with the purpose of reviewing all available information on Capecitabine, focusing on its clinical effectiveness against colorectal cancer. Special attention has been paid to trials that compared Capecitabine with standard folinic acid (leucovorin, LV)-modulated intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus regimens in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover the efficacy of Capecitabine on metastatic colorectal cancer, either alone or in various combinations with other active drugs such as Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin was also assessed. Finally, neoadjuvant therapy consisting of Capecitabine plus radiation therapy, for locally advanced rectal cancer was analysed. This combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has a special role in tumor down staging and in sphincter preservation for lower rectal tumors. Comparative trials have shown that Capecitabine is at least equivalent to the standard LV-5-FU combination in relation to progression-free and overall survival whilst showing a better tolerability profile with a much lower incidence of stomatitis. It is now known that Capecitabine can be combined with other active drugs such as Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin. The combination of Oxaliplatin with Capecitabine represents a new standard of care for metastatic colorectal cancer. Combinating the Capecitabine-Oxaliplatin regimen with promising new biological drugs such as Bevacizumab seems to give a realistic prospect of further improvement in time to progression of metastatic disease. Moreover, preoperative chemo-radiation using oral capecitabine is better tolerated than bolus 5-FU and is more effective in the promotion of both down-staging and sphincter preservation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Finally, the outcomes of recently published trials suggest that capecitabine seems to be more cost effective than other standard treatments for the management of patients with colorectal cancer.

The frequency and severity of capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridaemia in routine clinical practice: a prospective study

Background:

Capecitabine is known to rarely cause raised serum triglycerides (TG). In our centre, several patients receiving capecitabine developed raised TG levels corresponding to the ‘very high risk’ category for potentially serious acute pancreatitis.

Methods:

A fasting blood lipid screening protocol was introduced into clinical practice for patients receiving capecitabine. Patients with TGs >5 mmol l⁻¹ were treated and followed up. An 18-month prospective audit was performed to establish the incidence and severity of capecitabine-induced hypertriglyceridaemia (CIHT).

Results:

A total of 304 patients received capecitabine for colorectal cancer between January 2008 and June 2009. Of these, 212 patients (70%) were screened and 8 (3.7%) developed clinically significant hypertriglyceridaemia requiring lipid-lowering therapy. Two of the eight patients had diabetes and one had pre-existing dyslipidaemia. One suffered cerebral infarction during chemotherapy. There were no cases of acute pancreatitis. Follow-up showed that serum TGs safely and rapidly returned to normal with appropriate treatment without discontinuation of capecitabine.

Conclusions:

This is the first prospective study evaluating CIHT. These results suggest that it should be classed as a ‘common’ undesired effect of capecitabine. Despite this, the incidence does not justify routine screening in all patients. Targeted screening in those with diabetes or pre-existing hyperlipidaemia is recommended, together with adoption of a clear management policy.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression in metastatic sites is predictive for response in patients with colorectal cancer treated with continuous oral capecitabine and biweekly oxaliplatin

The primary objective of this study was to determine the activity and safety profile of biweekly oxaliplatin combined with continuous oral capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. A secondary endpoint was to investigate the correlation between thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) expression in metastatic tissues and tumor response. Forty-one patients received oral capecitabine 1331 mg/m every day combined with intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m every 2 weeks. The overall response rate was 58.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.3-73.6%], the median progression-free survival 9.4 months (95% CI: 7.7-11.2 months) and the median survival 22.3 months (95% CI: 16.1-27.5 months). There were no grade 4 toxicities, and grade 3 toxicity was also uncommon. High TP expression in metastatic tissue was significantly associated with response to treatment (P=0.019), and also with a trend towards a better median progression-free survival and overall survival compared with patients expressing low TP (P=0.056; P=0.073). This study suggests that biweekly oxaliplatin and continuous oral capecitabine is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover, these findings add to a growing body of evidence that patients with high levels of intratumoral TP expression are the ideal candidates for capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

Intravenous versus oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine as second-line treatment in advanced breast cancer patients. A retrospective comparison of two consecutive phase II studies

Vinorelbine (i.v.) plus capecitabine (oral) combination therapy is active in anthracycline/taxane pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Availability of oral vinorelbine provides this combination in an all-oral formulation. Two consecutive phase II trials differing only in vinorelbine administration routes evaluated their respective activities and tolerabilities in this population. In the i.v. group (n = 38) disease control was 61% (37% PR, 24% SD), median TTP 6.8 months and median survival 11.3 months. In the oral group (n = 38) disease control was 77% (5.4% CR, 34% PR, 38% SD), median TTP 7 months and median survival 10 months. G3-G4 neutropenia was more common in the oral group (p < 0.05); G2-G3 anaemia [5] and G3 thrombocytopenia [1] were observed only in the oral group. Although the comparison between the two regimens was not randomized, the results observed in these two consecutive phase II studies may suggest that oral and iv vinorelbine, in combination with capecitabine, can achieve similar responses in patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthra-taxane combinations.

An epigenetic mechanism for capecitabine resistance in mesothelioma

Mesothelioma is an uncommon malignancy whose global incidence continues to rise. The therapeutic standard for advanced disease is intravenous pemetrexed and cisplatin. The anti-folate capecitabine is significantly less effective than pemetrexed. The balance between thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is critical to the efficacy of capecitabine. DNA from mesothelioma cell lines was bisulfite treated and examined by MS-PCR, RNA was obtained for real-time PCR analysis, and protein lysates were obtained for Western immunoblot analysis. Cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay, comparing 5-aza-CdR pretreated or untreated cells with 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (DFUR), 5-FU, and pemetrexed. Finally bisulfite sequencing of the extracellular growth factor-1 (ECGF-1) gene was performed on 4 mesothelioma samples and pericardial tissue. One of the four cell lines tested (H290) was methylated for ECGF-1. This corresponded to a lack of TP expression by real-time PCR and Western immunoblot. Treatment with 1muM 5-aza-CdR increased TP mRNA and protein expression in H290. DFUR, the substrate for TP, showed increased cytotoxicity when delivered after 5-aza-CdR exposure in the methylated cell line. There was no difference in any of the unmethylated cell lines when cells were exposed to 5-FU or pemetrexed with or without 5-aza-CdR. Patient tumor samples revealed an increased number of methylated CpG sites in ECGF-1 compared to normal pericardium. Methylation of ECGF-1, leads to transcriptional silencing of TP and may explain the lack of any effect of capecitabine, especially when compared to pemetrexed.

Chemotherapy with low-dose capecitabine as palliative treatment in a patient with metastatic breast cancer: a case report

Chemotherapeutic agents are rarely used for symptom management in patients under palliative care setting. This is because chemotherapeutic agents not only have limited efficacy in palliative treatment but are also known to exert severe adverse effects. We describe our experience with a patient with metastatic breast cancer who was successfully treated with low-dose capecitabine, without the development of any severe toxicities and with significant improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL).

The patient, a 43-year-old female, had breast cancer with liver, bone, and cutaneous metastases. She visited our clinic after a year-long hiatus during which she underwent alternative therapy. She presented with ulcerated lesions on the anterior chest and dyspnea due to malignant pleural effusion. After treatment for the latter, we administered capecitabine (600 mg/day) in accordance with the wishes of the patient and her attendants. The ulcerated lesions on the anterior chest, dyspnea, ADL and QOL improved significantly, without the development of any serious adverse effects. The findings of this case indicate that chemotherapy in the form of low-dose capecitabine monotherapy may be considered in patients under palliative care setting.

Capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity: when to suspect? How to manage? A case report

We present a case of capecitabine-induced cardiac toxicity manifested by chest pain, ST-segment elevation and ventricular tachycardia. Symptoms and ECG alterations were completely reversible after withdrawal of the drug. Coronary angiography demonstrated the absence of epicardial coronary spasm. We suggest cardiac monitoring with ECG Holter and effort ECG during the first days of drug administration. Prompt evaluation of chest pain in this setting is of paramount importance.

Pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy of capecitabine: focus on breast and colorectal cancer

Capecitabine (N -pentyloxycarbonyl-5-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine), an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, has provided compelling efficacy data for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and stage III or IV colorectal cancer, both as monotherapy and in combination regimens. The preferential conversion of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil in neoplastic tissues renders this fluoropyrimidine particularly appealing for clinical use. The enzyme thymidine phosphorylase, which mediates the final step of the capecitabine activation pathway, is expressed in higher concentration in neoplastic than in healthy tissues. This makes capecitabine more tumor specific than other chemotherapeutic agents. Accordingly, capecitabine is generally well tolerated. In particular, the incidence of myelosuppression and alopecia is low, and the most common side effects, hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea, are usually manageable. Given its good toxicity profile, capecitabine was assessed in combination with several chemotherapeutic or biologic agents. In addition, the observation that thymidine phosphorylase is upregulated after treatment with other anticancer drugs, namely taxanes, provided a rationale for the prominent antitumor activity recently observed for the combination of capecitabine with these agents. This review provides an evidence-based update of clinical trials investigating the role of capecitabine in the treatment of breast and colorectal cancer, with special emphasis on pharmacological and safety issues that form the basis of currently used schedules.

A multicenter phase II study of the combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

The triple drug combination consisting of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOXIRI) has demonstrated higher activity and efficacy compared to the doublet FOLFIRI. 5-Fluorouracil could be substituted in FOLFOXIRI regimen by capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine with similar efficacy. Recently, a dose-finding trial has demonstrated the feasibility of the combination of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) and established their recommended doses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of XELOXIRI. A total of 36 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan 165 mg m⁻² and oxaliplatin 85 mg m⁻² on day 1 plus capecitabine 2000 mg m⁻² per day orally in two doses from day 1 to day 7, every 2 weeks. Grade 3–4 toxicities were infrequent, expect for neutropenia and diarrhoea, which were each observed in 30% of patients. Two complete and twenty-two partial responses were obtained, corresponding to an overall response rate of 67% (95% CI 51.4–82%). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months, the median progression-free and overall survival were 10.1 and 17.9 months, respectively.

The substitution of 5-fluorouracil with capecitabine, in combination with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, is feasible and does not impair the activity of the regimen. However, the XELOXIRI combination is associated with a high incidence of diarrhoea and, therefore, should be considered as a not preferable alternative to FOLFOXIRI.

Targeting cancers in the gastrointestinal tract: role of capecitabine

Capecitabine is currently the only novel, orally home-administered fluorouracil prodrug. It offers patients more freedom from hospital visits and less inconvenience and complications associated with infusion devices. The drug has been extensively studied in large clinical trials in many solid tumors, including breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and many others. Furthermore, the drug compares favorably with fluorouracil in patients with such cancers, with a safe toxicity profile, consisting mainly of gastrointestinal and dermatologic adverse effects. Whereas gastrointestinal events and hand-foot syndrome occur often with capecitabine, the tolerability profile is comparatively favorable. Prompt recognition of severe adverse effects is the key to successful management of capecitabine. Ongoing and future clinical trials will continue to examine, and likely expand, the role of capecitabine as a single agent and/or in combination with other anticancer agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal as well as other solid tumors, both in the advanced palliative and adjuvant settings. The author summarizes the current data on the role of capecitabine in the management of gastrointestinal cancers.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and capecitabine

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination of weekly oxaliplatin x 4, weekly irinotecan x 4 and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle in patients with solid tumors; to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of these agents in this combination; to observe patients for clinical anti-tumor response.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with metastatic solid tumors received oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, irinotecan beginning at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, and capecitabine Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle, initially at 1,000 mg twice daily (bid).

RESULTS

The MTD was oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) weekly x 4, irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) weekly x 4 and capecitabine 450 mg bid Monday through Friday for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle. One of six patients at this dose level developed DLT of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Among patients treated with a constant capecitabine dose of 450 mg bid, there was a higher mean AUC of 5-FU in women than in men (mean +/- SD: 892 +/- 287 nM h vs. 537 +/- 182 nM h; Mann-Whitney two-tailed, P = 0.02). There was one complete response in a patient with gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

The novel schedule of weekly oxaliplatin, weekly irinotecan, and capecitabine Monday through Friday, all administered for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle, evaluated in this phase I trial is well-tolerated and demonstrated activity in a patient with gastric cancer.

A phase I study of EKB-569 in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterize the principal toxicities, and assess the pharmacokinetics of EKB-569, an oral selective irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were treated with EKB-569 daily for 21 days and capecitabine twice daily for 14 days of a 21-day cycle. The dose levels of EKB-569 (mg/day) and capecitabine (mg/m(2) twice daily) assessed were 25/750, 50/750, 50/1,000 and 75/1,000. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTD to better study toxicity and efficacy. Samples of plasma were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the agents. Treatment efficacy was assessed every other cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients, the majority of whom had prior chemotherapy, received a total of 163 cycles of treatment. Twenty patients were treated at the MTD, 50 mg EKB-569, daily and 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice daily. Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and rash. No patients had complete or partial responses but 48% had stable disease. The conversion of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil was higher for the combination of EKB-569 and capecitabine (321+/-151 ng*h/mL) than for capecitabine alone (176+/-62 ng*hours/mL; P=0.0037).

CONCLUSION

In advanced colorectal cancer, 50 mg EKB-569 daily can be safely combined with 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice a day. A statistically significant increase in plasma levels of 5-fluorouracil for the combination of EKB-569 and capecitabine may be due to the single-dose versus multiple-dose exposure difference, variability in exposure or a potential drug interaction.

A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination of pertuzumab (rhuMab 2C4) and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To study the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended dose of the combination of pertuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody HER2-dimerization inhibitor, and capecitabine in patients with advanced malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients that had progressed to standard treatment were treated with pertuzumab at a fixed dose of 1,050 mg given i.v. on day 1 plus capecitabine at doses of 825-1,000-1,250 mg/m(2), twice daily orally on days 1 to 14 of each 21-day treatment cycle, in three sequential cohorts. The pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and pertuzumab were studied. Patients received a single dose of capecitabine in a pretreatment phase (day -7) followed by serum sampling for capecitabine and its metabolites.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were accrued and 18 were assessable. The combination of capecitabine and pertuzumab was well tolerated at all dose levels and no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most frequent adverse event was asthenia, which was grade 3 in two patients. One asymptomatic pulmonary embolism occurred. No other grade 3 or 4 adverse events or cardiac or left ventricular ejection fraction events were reported. There was no apparent change in the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites when combined with pertuzumab. The pharmacokinetics of pertuzumab was apparently not modified when administered with capecitabine. Disease stabilization was observed in 11 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pertuzumab and capecitabine were well tolerated at all dose levels. Escalation beyond the highest dose level tested was not planned, as this included the recommended doses of monotherapy for both drugs. In conclusion, this combination is ready for phase II testing.

Capecitabine: an overview of the side effects and their management

Xeloda (capecitabine), a thymidine phosphorylase activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is currently the only universally approved orally administered 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug. It belongs to a newer generation of orally administered fluoropyrimidines. It has been developed because of the clinical need for efficient, tolerable and convenient agents, which do not require continuous infusion. Capecitabine is not a cytotoxic drug in itself, but via a three-step enzymatic cascade, it is converted to 5-FU mainly within human cancer cells. While the drug compares favorably with 5-FU in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer and pretreated breast cancer, it also has an improved toxicity profile, mainly of gastrointestinal and dermatologic effects with a significantly lower incidence of grade 3/4 myelotoxicity compared with infusional 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Capecitabine's selective activation within the tumor allows for less systemic toxicity events. A gradient of fluoropyrimidine toxicity is observed: high in the US and low in East Asia. In addition, there is a discrepancy in tolerance of dose among patients treated in the US vs. Europe. Although patients can take the drug orally in the convenience of their own home, the key to successful management of capecitabine is the clinician's awareness of its severe, but low in incidence, adverse effects, and the patients' education, emphasizing compliance with the treatment plan, prevention and timely recognition of its toxicities.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Capecitabine is an orally bioavailable prodrug that is converted to 5-fluorouracil through several enzymatic steps, the last of which is mediated by thymidine phosphorylase (TP). TP has been reported to be expressed at higher levels in cancer tissue compared with normal counterpart. The present study aimed at evaluating the potential relationship between TP expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for TP and other biological markers was carried out on paraffin-embedded cancer tissues of 61 patients with BC treated with at least three cycles of capecitabine as single agent for metastatic disease. All patients had received capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. days 1-14 every 21 days. The following variables were analyzed as potential determinants of benefit from capecitabine: TP expression, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, MIB-1 expression, performance status at the beginning of capecitabine treatment, stage at diagnosis, grade, presence of visceral metastases at the beginning of capecitabine treatment, and previous chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, median time to progression (TTP) was 6.5 months (range 1.4-33). On multivariate analysis, ER status [hazard ratio (HR) for progression = 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.15-0.64; P = 0.002], presence of visceral metastases at the beginning of capecitabine treatment (HR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.21-4.39; P = 0.01), and capecitabine as first- or second-line treatment (HR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.21-4.32; P = 0.01) independently predicted TTP. TP was highly expressed in 34 of 61 cases (55.7%). In the subgroup of patients with TP-expressing tumor, TTP was significantly longer in patients who received anthracyclines and taxanes before capecitabine (median TTP 7.5 versus 3.3 months, P = 0.01, log-rank test). Similarly, patients with a TP-positive tumor showed a longer TTP if they received taxanes before capecitabine than patients with TP-positive tumor who did not receive this treatment (7.3 versus 3.4 months, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide further evidence that TP expression in BC could represent a biomarker of sensitivity to capecitabine treatment. Prospective studies with translational approach are desirable to confirm the predictive and prognostic role of TP.

Efficacy of the oral fluorouracil pro-drug capecitabine in cancer treatment: a review

Capecitabine (Xeloda) was developed as a pro-drug of fluorouracil (FU), with the aim of improving tolerability and intratumor drug concentrations through its tumorspecific conversion to the active drug. The purpose of this paper is to review the available information on capecitabine, focusing on its clinical effectiveness against various carcinomas. Identification of all eligible English trails was made by searching the PubMed and Cochrane databases from 1980 to 2007. Search terms included capecitabine, Xeloda and cancer treatment. Nowadays, FDA has approved the use of capecitabine as a first line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer when single-agent fluoropyrimidine is preferred. The drug is also approved for use as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer patients who are resistant to both anthracycline and paclitaxel-based regimens or when further anthracycline treatment is contraindicated. It is also approved in combination with docetaxel after failure of prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In patients with prostate, pancreatic, renal cell and ovarian carcinomas, capecitabine as a single-agent or in combination with other drugs has also shown benefits. Improved tolerability and comparable efficacy, compared with the intravenous FU/LV combination, in addition to its oral administration, make capecitabine an attractive option for the treatment of several types of carcinomas.

Severe sequence-specific toxicity when capecitabine is given after Fluorouracil and leucovorin

PURPOSE

Options for single-agent fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy after bowel cancer resection include intravenous fluorouracil with leucovorin (FU/LV) or oral capecitabine. These treatments have similar efficacy but differ in convenience and toxicity. We therefore wished to compare their overall acceptability to patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients scheduled for adjuvant single-agent fluoropyrimidine therapy were randomly assigned to receive once-weekly FU/LV (425 mg/m(2) FU, 45 mg LV) for 6 weeks, followed by two 3-week cycles of capecitabine (1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1 through 14), or the same treatments but in reverse order. After 12 weeks, the patients were asked which treatment they preferred, and received the preferred treatment for an additional 12 weeks. The primary end point was patient preference.

RESULTS

After 40 of the planned 74 patients had been randomly assigned, real-time adverse event monitoring led to early trial closure because of excess sequence-specific toxicity. Eleven of 14 patients (79%) receiving capecitabine as their second treatment experienced grade >/= 3 toxicity. This compared with five of 18 patients (28%) receiving capecitabine as the first treatment, and no patients receiving FU/LV as the first treatment (zero of 16) or the second treatment (zero of 12). Similar imbalances were seen in the proportion of patients requiring interruption of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In chemotherapy-naïve patients, capecitabine produced more toxicity than FU/LV, but at levels in line with previously reported data. However, treatment with capecitabine after FU/LV caused markedly increased toxicity, indicating a sequence-specific interaction. The mechanism has not been determined, but interaction with intracellularly retained folate after FU/LV therapy is a possibility. Oncologists need to be aware of this risk if considering crossing patients over from FU/LV to capecitabine-based regimens.

Capecitabine in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Although the role of systemic chemotherapy has been established for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, the prognosis of these patients remains poor, with a median overall survival of less than 1 year. Based on the results of several randomized Phase III trials, 5-fluorouracil continuous infusion plus cisplatin, with or without epirubicin, has become the global reference regimen for this patient population. However, treatment with fluorouracil infusion requires either frequent hospitalizations or the use of a central venous access device, harboring potential complications. Capecitabine, a tumor-activating oral prodrug of fluorouracil, may be more advantageous in terms of patient convenience, safety and efficacy. Two recent randomized Phase III trials have shown that capecitabine could replace infusional fluorouracil in cisplatin-based regimens. Furthermore, Phase II trials have shown that many other capecitabine-based doublet or triplet chemotherapy regimens incorporating newer cytotoxic agents are active and well tolerated. Many promising biological agents are now being tested in Phase III trials, incorporating capecitabine combinations as control arms, in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Drug metabolism by tumours: its nature, relevance and therapeutic implications

Drug-metabolising enzymes (DMEs) are present in tumours and are capable of biotransforming a variety of antineoplastics. Tumoural drug metabolism is both a potential mechanism of resistance and a means of achieving optimal therapy. This review addresses the classes of DMEs, their cytotoxic substrates and distribution in specific malignancies. The limitations of preclinical and clinical studies are highlighted. Their role in predicting therapeutic response, the activation of prodrugs and the potential for their modulation for gain is also addressed. The contribution of tumoural DMEs to cancer therapy can only be ascertained through large prospective studies and supported by new technologies. Only then can efforts be concentrated in the design of better prodrugs or combination therapy to optimise individual therapy.

Oral vinorelbine plus capecitabine (oral vincap) combination in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). A phase II study of the GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale)

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine i.v. and capecitabine are two of the most effective single agents in previously treated advanced breast cancer (ABC). A number of studies have been reported with the combination of these agents. Actually, the availability of oral formulation for vinorelbine allows a full oral combination of the two agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of this novel combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight advanced breast cancer patients refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes were included in this study. Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) (days 1 + 8), and capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2) (days 2-7 and 9-16) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 228 courses were given with a mean of three cycles/patient (range 1-12). Five patients (13.1%) had no toxicity at all. Hematologic side-effects were: neutropenia grade 2-3 in seven patients (18.9%) and grade 4 in one patient (2.7%), anemia grade 1 in 11 patients (29.7%), grade 2-3 in five patients (13.5%), thrombocytopenia grade 1 in six patients (16.2%) and grade 3 in one patient (2.7%). Non-hematologic side-effects were: fatigue grade 1 in five patients (13.5%), hand-foot syndrome grade 1 in two patients (5.4%) and grade 2 in two patients (5.4%), nausea/vomiting grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), grade 2 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 3 in one patient (2.7%), constipation grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), peripheral neurotoxicity grade 1 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 2 in one patient (2.7%), gastric pain grade 1 in two patients (5.4%), stomatitis grade 1 in three patients (8.1%) and grade 2 in one patient (2.7%). Out of 38 patients assessable, we observed two (5.4%) CR, 13 (34 %) PR, 14 (37.8%) SD and nine (26.3%) PD. The median time to progression was 4.5 months (range 1-18 months), the median response duration was 7 months (range 2-18 months) and the median survival duration was 10 months (range 2-26+).

CONCLUSIONS

The oral vincap should be considered as an alternative to single agent capecitabine or vinorelbine in ABC refractory to antra-taxane combination.

Continuous oral capecitabine at fixed dose in patients older than 75 years with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer: a study of the Multidisciplinary Oncology Group on Gastrointestinal Tumors

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety profile of continuous oral capecitabine at fixed dose in patients older than 75 years, having metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer. Capecitabine was administered at a fixed dose of 2000 mg daily without interruptions. Thirty-four patients were considered evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. The median age was 81 years (range 76-85). The median duration of treatment was 113 days (range 24-238 days). No grade 4 toxicity was observed. One patient had grade 3 nausea and vomiting, and one had grade 3 diarrhea. Partial responses were observed in six patients with colorectal cancer, and in one patient with gastric cancer. This study suggests that continuous oral capecitabine at a fixed daily dose of 2000 mg is well tolerated, and that it allows for the simplification and ease of dosing in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer.

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We evaluated capecitabine (an oral fluoropyrimidine) and oxaliplatin (a platinum compound) as alternatives to infused fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, for untreated advanced esophagogastric cancer.

METHODS

In a two-by-two design, we randomly assigned 1002 patients to receive triplet therapy with epirubicin and cisplatin plus either fluorouracil (ECF) or capecitabine (ECX) or triplet therapy with epirubicin and oxaliplatin plus either fluorouracil (EOF) or capecitabine (EOX). The primary end point was noninferiority in overall survival for the triplet therapies containing capecitabine as compared with fluorouracil and for those containing oxaliplatin as compared with cisplatin.

RESULTS

For the capecitabine-fluorouracil comparison, the hazard ratio for death in the capecitabine group was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.99); for the oxaliplatin-cisplatin comparison, the hazard ratio for the oxaliplatin group was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.10). The upper limit of the confidence intervals for both hazard ratios excluded the predefined noninferiority margin of 1.23. Median survival times in the ECF, ECX, EOF, and EOX groups were 9.9 months, 9.9 months, 9.3 months, and 11.2 months, respectively; survival rates at 1 year were 37.7%, 40.8%, 40.4%, and 46.8%, respectively. In the secondary analysis, overall survival was longer with EOX than with ECF, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.80 in the EOX group (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.97; P=0.02). Progression-free survival and response rates did not differ significantly among the regimens. Toxic effects of capecitabine and fluorouracil were similar. As compared with cisplatin, oxaliplatin was associated with lower incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, alopecia, renal toxicity, and thromboembolism but with slightly higher incidences of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin, respectively, in patients with previously untreated esophagogastric cancer. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51678883 [controlled-trials.com].).

Capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer

Since the routine introduction of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in the early 1990 s, median survival for gastric cancer has improved from 3 months, with best supportive care alone, to > 11 months in recently reported Phase III trials of triplet chemotherapy. Capecitabine is an orally-active fluoropyrimidine, which is selectively metabolised to fluorouracil in tumour cells. The combinations of platinum compounds and capecitabine have been evaluated in two recent, large, Phase III trials demonstrating non-inferiority in efficacy compared with platinum plus continuous infusion fluorouracil. In view of the convenience and flexibility of patients in adjusting dosage when encountering toxicities, capecitabine is replacing continuous infusion fluorouracil as the backbone of combination chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients. Future trials evaluating biologicals are now incorporating capecitabine combinations as control arms in both advanced disease and peri-operative settings in gastric cancer.

A phase II study of preoperative capecitabine and radiation therapy in patients with rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative capecitabine and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum stage >or=T3 or >or=N1 were treated with capecitabine 1330 mg/m per day in 2 divided doses days 1 to 42 and 50.4 Gy of RT in 28 1.8-Gy fractions. Patients with metastatic disease were eligible provided that operative intervention on primary site was anticipated. Surgery resection occurred 4 to 6 weeks after completion of preoperative therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty eligible patients were enrolled at two institutions. Median age and performance status were 62 years and 90%, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (93%) completed combined modality therapy and 27 underwent resection, including 17 abdominal-perineal and 9 low anterior resections. Three of 27 (11%) had pathologic complete response (pCR) with an additional 7 (26%) having minimal residual disease. Two patients who were felt to require abdominal perineal resection prior to combined modality therapy (CMT) were able to have sphincter-sparing surgery. No patients had progression during CMT which precluded surgical resection. Treatment was well tolerated with >or=grade 3 toxicities limited to diarrhea (5 patients), hand-foot syndrome (1 patient), dermatitis (1 patient). Twenty-four patients are living, 18 with no evidence of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of preoperative capecitabine and RT in patients with LARC has significant antitumor activity, efficacy, and a low toxicity profile.

Medullary thyroid cancer treated by capecitabine

Medullary thyroid carcinoma with distant metastases is generally incurable, with 20% overall survival at 10 years. The treatment goal is palliative. Chemotherapy has a limited role, with low response rates and high toxicities with the different regimens. Here, we report the case of 64-year-old man with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma in progression after primary treatment with cisplatin-doxorubicin. The patient received capecitabine 2000 mg/m total per day x 14 days followed by 1-week rest. He received 41 cycles, and presented prolonged and objective tumor response (30 months), without any toxicity.

Quantitative 19F MR spectroscopy at 3 T to detect heterogeneous capecitabine metabolism in human liver

Chemotherapy in non-responding cancer patients leads to unnecessary toxicity. A marker is therefore required that can predict the sensitivity of a specific tumour to chemotherapy, which would enable individualisation of therapy. 19F MR spectroscopy (19F MRS) can be used to monitor the metabolism of fluorinated drugs. The aim of this study was to develop a method for quantified localised detection of fluorinated compounds in human liver. For this purpose, sensitivity-optimised localised 19F MRS methods at 3 T were used to detect MR signals from capecitabine, 5'DFUR, 5'DFCR and FBAL after oral intake of capecitabine. As the radio-frequency (rf) coil is made tuneable to 19F and 1H, the same localisation method is applied to obtain 1H MR signals of water and of the 19F metabolites. In addition, T1 measurements have been performed to correct for measurement-induced saturation effects. Finally, absolute tissue concentrations of capecitabine metabolites were obtained in vivo, which revealed a substantial spatial heterogeneity of these metabolites in human liver after chemotherapy.

Capecitabine in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil. It is being increasingly used in the treatment of colorectal cancer in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. This review aims to explore the data in relation to the pharmacology and mode of action of capecitabine, followed by an in-depth review of the available clinical evidence for the use of capecitabine as a single agent, or in combination therapy, in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The pharmacoeconomic and medical resource use implications are also investigated. The future role of capecitabine in the treatment of colorectal cancer and the questions that remain to be answered with regard to its optimal use are considered.

Hand-foot syndrome with scleroderma-like change induced by the oral capecitabine: a case report

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a well-known adverse event associated with capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). HFS manifests as acral erythema, with swelling and dysesthesia of the palms and plantar aspects of the feet, which in the absence of dosage reduction or drug cessation, progresses to moist desquamation and ulceration, resulting in serious infections and loss of function. We report a case of HFS, with scleroderma-like changes, apparently induced by capecitabine. In our case, capecitabine, given in the recommended dosage was observed to lead to hyperpigmentation of the palms and soles, followed by a distinct keratoderma-like thickening unfamiliar to usual cases of HFS. This case may provide important clues for revising the definition of HFS, and allow the formation of effective preventive strategies for this side effect of chemotherapy.

A phase II study of biweekly dose-intensified oral capecitabine plus irinotecan (bXELIRI) for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Capecitabine, a prodrug of 5-FU, has been reported to generate maximal tumour activity at tumour sites and/or to improve drug tolerability as compared with 5-FU infusion, and it has also been demonstrated to act synergistically with irinotecan against some solid cancers. A previous study concluded that dose-intensified biweekly capecitabine seems to be more effective at increasing both response rate and progression-free survival time than conventional dose and schedule of capecitabine in colon cancer. We conducted this study to ascertain the efficacy and toxicity of dose-intensified biweekly capecitabine and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients. Patients were treated with irinotecan 130 mg m(-2) intravenously for 90 min on days 1 and 15. Capecitabine at 3500 mg m(-2) day(-1), divided into two sessions per day, was administered for seven consecutive days from days 1 and 15, and followed by a 7-day drug-free period, respectively. Fifty-five eligible patients were enrolled in this study from November 2003 to April 2006. There were 22 women and 33 men: median patient age was 54 years (range: 27-81). A total of 200 treatment cycles were administered at a median number of four per patient (range: 1-9). Intent-to-treatment analysis showed that one patient achieved complete response (1.8%), 23 partial response (41.8%), 15 stable disease (27.3%), 10 progressive disease (18.2%) and 6 were non-evaluable (10.9%). The overall response rate was 43.6% (95% confidence interval: 30.2-56.9). The common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 12 (21.8%), nausea/vomiting in 3 (5.4%) and diarrhea in 4 (7.2%) patients. Median time to progression was 5 months (range: 0.5-11 months), median survival duration was 11 months (range: 0.5-45 months) and median response duration was 6 months (range: 0.5-9 months). Biweekly dose-intensified capecitabine and irinotecan combination chemotherapy was active for the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancers with a tolerable safety profile.

A case of capecitabine-induced coronary microspasm in a patient with rectal cancer

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most frequently used chemotherapy agent concomitant with radiotherapy in the management of patients with rectal cancer. Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that mimics the pharmaconkinetics of infusional 5-FU. This new drug is replacing 5-FU as a part of the combined-modality treatment of a number of gastrointestinal cancers. While cardiac events associated with the use of 5-FU are a well known side effect, capecitabine-induced cardiotoxicity has been only rarely reported. Here, we reviewed the case of a patient with rectal cancer who had a capecitabine-induced coronary vasospasm. The most prominent mutation of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene was also analyzed.

Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy

Advances in analytical methods, imaging techniques and an increased understanding of the influence of pharmacogenetic factors have added to our knowledge of the pharmacology of many chemotherapeutic agents. Extending the use of these approaches to pharmacodynamic end-points, together with the application of population-based modelling techniques, offers the potential to develop truly individualized therapy in the future.

Weekday on-weekend off oral capecitabine: a phase I study of a continuous schedule better simulating protracted fluoropyrimidine therapy

BACKGROUND

Although protracted intravenous 5-fluorouracil is superior to bolus regimens in terms of tumour exposure to the drug during DNA synthesis as well as activity and safety, the oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine is administered intermittently. In this phase I study, we investigated an alternative, dose-intense continuous regimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Oral capecitabine was administered twice daily continuously with weekend breaks, in patients with advanced solid tumours refractory to standard therapy. Dose escalation proceeded from 1,331 to 2,510 mg/m(2) daily. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of any grade-3 or 4 adverse event except for alopecia and skin toxicity resolving within 7 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-five heavily pretreated patients participated in the study. No DLT occurred in the first four cohorts. Two out of four patients developed grade III diarrhoea in the fourth week of capecitabine at 2,510 mg/m(2) (DLT). The most common toxic episodes during all cycles of treatment were grade 1-2 fatigue, skin erythema, abdominal cramps, nausea, constipation and neutropenia. Disease regression was seen in three and stabilisation with clinical benefit in ten patients (clinical benefit response 54%). Pharmacokinetic studies of capecitabine and metabolites in four patients at 2,250 mg/m(2 )daily showed rapid absorption, short plasma half-lives with the exception of FBAL and absence of accumulation or conversion saturation during the course of therapy. At this dose, administered dose intensity in eight patients was 99.3% of the planned one.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekday on-weekend off capecitabine maximizes cytotoxic impact on tumour cells during S-phase by safely simulating protracted fluoropyrimidine therapy at a recommended dose (2,250 mg/m(2)) close to that of the intermittent schedule and clearly higher than the continuous one of 1,331 mg/m(2).

Phase II study of capecitabine single-agent therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Fluoropyrimidines are known to have modest activity in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug that is converted to fluorouracil and is of potential use in the treatment of this disease. We conducted a Phase II clinical trial of capecitabine administered as a single agent to patients with metastatic RCC. The treatment consisted of 1250 mg/m(2) capecitabine orally, twice daily (2500 mg/m(2) per day) days 1-14, repeated every 21 days. There were 15 patients, including 13 men and 2 women, who underwent a total of 67 cycles (median 3.5; range 1-15). Nine patients had undergone prior systemic therapy consisting of interferon-alpha in 3, interleukin-2 in 1, interferon-alpha plus interleukin-2 in 4, and investigational therapy with bryostatin-1 in 1. There were 14 patients assessable for response (one withdrew), and no responses were seen. Median time to progression was 9 weeks (range 1-45). There were 3 patients (21%) who had stable disease for 18, 39, and 45 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was mild. Three patients had grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity, and 3 required dose reductions. There were 2 early deaths, including 1 patient with pulmonary edema and 1 with hypotension. The study was terminated because there were no responses in the first 14 assessable patients, indicating that the response rate was likely to be less than 20%. We conclude that single-agent capecitabine has minimal activity for the treatment of metastatic RCC.

Capecitabine for the oral treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Women with metastatic breast cancer require tailored chemotherapy that improves outcomes without compromising quality of life. Capecitabine, a pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil, is an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is sequentially activated in a three-step process. This results in the preferential production of 5-fluorouracil in tumors rather than in normal surrounding tissue, improving the tolerability and efficacy of 5-fluorouracil. In combination with docetaxel, capecitabine is the first agent that has shown superior activity to single-agent docetaxel, and it is a particularly appropriate option for younger, fitter patients with rapidly progressing disease and/or visceral metastases. However, for older patients and those with comorbidities and/or after progression to taxanes, single-agent capecitabine may be the best option. Its role in earlier disease stages (adjuvant therapy) is being investigated.

Phase II clinical trial of capecitabine in the treatment of advanced, persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with translational research: a gynecologic oncology group study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anti-tumor activity and adverse events of capecitabine in advanced, persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, and to explore biomarkers with the potential to predict capecitabine response and toxicity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible, consenting patients were treated with a starting dose of 2500 mg/m(2)/day or 1800 mg/m(2)/day (divided into two doses given every 12 h) for 14 days of each 21-day cycle. Prior chemotherapy was allowed only in the context of radiation "sensitization". Genotyping in the 5' and 3' ends of thymidylate synthase (TS) was performed in DNA from pretreatment blood. Relative gene expression of TS, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) was quantified in RNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor.

RESULTS

All patients had prior radiotherapy and 22 received a radiation sensitizer. A partial response was observed in 4 of 26 (15%) evaluable patients. An additional 35% of patients achieved stable disease while 42% experienced increasing disease. The most common serious non-hematological toxicities were gastrointestinal and dermatologic. Exploratory analyses suggested that: a germline polymorphism in the 3' or the 5' end of TS was not associated with TS gene expression, relative tumor expression of TS, DPD and TP were not correlated, and relative tumor expression of TP may predict severe anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the modest response rate, this trial was closed without a second stage of accrual; single agent capecitabine was not selected for further study in advanced persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix previously treated with radiation or chemoradiation.

Capecitabine in carcinoma of the pancreas

Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, which is converted to 5-fluorouracil by three sequential enzymatic reactions. The final requisite enzyme, thymidine phosphorylase, is present at consistently higher levels in tumours compared with normal tissues, thereby suggesting that 5-fluorouracil that is delivered in this way may benefit from an element of tumour targeting and thus enhanced selectivity and better tolerability. Capecitabine has been shown to have single-agent activity in advanced carcinoma of the pancreas and to improve response rates and survival when administered in combination with gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone. This paper reviews the pharmacology and clinical data that are relevant to the use of capecitabine in pancreatic cancer.

Phase II study of a 4-week capecitabine regimen in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. An open-label multicenter phase II study was conducted for previously untreated patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Oral capecitabine 828 mg/m2 twice daily was given on days 1-21 every 4 weeks. Baseline characteristics of 60 enrolled patients were: male/female 49/11, median age 64 years (range 28-74), good performance status (ECOG 0-1) in 98% of patients and 27 patients had prior gastrectomy (45%). A median of 4 treatment cycles were administered (range 1-37). Five patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis because they did not meet eligibility criteria. The overall response rate (RR) in the evaluable patient population (n=55) was 26% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 15-39%] and a further 29% of patients had stable disease. The overall RR in the intent-to-treat population (n=60) was 23% (95% CI 13-36.0%). Median time to progression in the evaluable patient population was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.8-6.1) and overall survival time in the intent-to-treat population was 10.0 months (95% CI 6.4-13.6). The most frequent grade 3/4 drug-related adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (13%), but this was readily managed by treatment interruption and dose reduction. No patients developed grade 3/4 drug-related diarrhea, vomiting, leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. We conclude that this 4-week regimen of capecitabine showed promising activity and was well tolerated as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted.

Dermatologic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents

Due to its high metabolic rate, skin represents one of the major target organs of chemotherapy-associated toxicity. Reactions range from common, nonspecific exanthematous eruptions to rare but distinctive cutaneous lesions that may not become apparent until a drug transitions from clinical trials to widespread oncologic use. The challenge of the physician is to recognize reaction patterns that reflect a drug reaction, identify a likely causative drug, and determine whether the reaction is a dose-limiting toxicity. This review will focus on the cutaneous side effects of the newer classes of chemotherapy drugs, including targeted monoclonal antibody therapy and small molecule inhibitors.

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of an all-oral combination regimen of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose, recommended doses (RDs), safety and efficacy of oral vinorelbine when combined with capecitabine in an all-oral chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with pharmacokinetic blood sampling to investigate potential drug-drug interactions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with MBC received as first- or second-line chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine at a dose of 60 or 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (and 15) with escalating doses of capecitabine from 1650 to 2500 mg/m2/day days 1-14 every 3 or 4 weeks. Three schedules were tested: day 1, day 8 and weekly regimens of oral vinorelbine with a 14-day course of capecitabine every 3 weeks; and a days 1 and 8 regimen of oral vinorelbine with a 14-day course of capecitabine every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

With oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m2, the RDs were established as oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 2250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2/week plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14. With oral vinorelbine at 80 mg/m2, the RD was oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity of the combination; it was reported in 40 patients (90.9%), with grade 3 in 14 patients (31.8%) and 6.2% of cycles, and grade 4 in 12 patients (27.3%) and 4.3% of cycles. Complications were rare with only three patients experiencing febrile neutropenia (one episode each). The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was gastrointestinal; however, the incidence of grade 3 was low, with no episode of grade 4. Hand-foot syndrome was reported in 14 patients (31.8%) and 22.6% of cycles, with grade 2 in two patients (4.5%) and 1.2% of cycles (two episodes each). No episode of grade 3 was observed. Objective responses were reported in 18 patients (three complete responses and 15 partial responses), yielding a response rate of 40.9% in the intention-to-treat population according to the investigator assessment. Results from the pharmacokinetic study demonstrated the absence of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions when both drugs were co-administered.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine is safe and easy to administer in an outpatient setting. This all-oral combination chemotherapy may offer a good alternative to the intravenous route for patients with MBC. Based on these promising results, a phase II study has started using oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2/week with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14 every 3 weeks as first-line chemotherapy in patients with MBC.

Capecitabine combined with gemcitabine (CapGem) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract carcinoma is an aggressive cancer, with median survival rarely exceeding 6 months. There is currently no established palliative standard of care. A Phase II trial was conducted to study a combination of oral capecitabine and gemcitabine (CapGem) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced and/or metastatic biliary carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable or metastatic intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma were enrolled. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable adenocarcinoma and had not received prior therapy with capecitabine or gemcitabine. Treatment consisted of intravenous (i.v.) gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8) plus oral capecitabine (650 mg/m(2) twice daily on Days 1-14) every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Tumor response, survival, and safety were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were evaluable. Primary tumor sites were: intrahepatic (n = 14) and extrahepatic biliary duct (n = 16); gallbladder (n = 7); and ampulla (n = 7). Fourteen (32%) patients had a partial response and 15 (34%) patients had stable disease. Median time to disease progression and overall survival were 6.0 (range, 3.8-8.1) and 14 (range, 11.4-16.6) months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 58%. No Grade 4 adverse events were seen. Transient Grade 3 neutropenia/thrombocytopenia and manageable (almost invariably Grade 2) nausea, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome were the most common adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

CapGem is an active and well tolerated first-line combination chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced/metastatic biliary tract carcinoma that offers a convenient home-based therapy.

A pilot phase II study of capecitabine in advanced or recurrent breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A pilot phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Japanese intermittent regimen of capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 23 patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen received oral 828 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period. The response to capecitabine was evaluated in 22 patients (one patient ineligible).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4-67.8%), including 1 complete response (4.5%) and 9 patients with partial response (40.9%). A further 7 patients (31.8%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 7.2 months (range, 3.0-15.8 months) and the median time to progression was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.1 months). Treatment-related adverse events >or= grade 3 were observed in 7 patients (30.1%).

CONCLUSION

Intermittent capecitabine therapy (828 mg/m(2) twice daily for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week rest period) was shown to be effective and well tolerated as second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent breast cancer. The Japanese regimen is worthy of further study in larger numbers of patients in phase II / III clinical trials.