Modulation of irinotecan metabolism by ketoconazole

Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile

Camptothecins represent an established class of effective agents that selectively target topoisomerase I by trapping the catalytic intermediate of the topoisomerase I-DNA reaction, the cleavage complex. The water-soluble salt camptothecin-sodium - introduced in early trials in the 1960s - was highly toxic in animals, whereas the semisynthetic derivatives irinotecan and topotecan did not cause haemorrhagic cystitis because of their higher physicochemical stability and solubility at lower pH values. Myelosuppression, neutropenia and, to a lesser extent, thrombocytopenia are dose-limiting toxic effects of topotecan. In contrast to the structurally-related topotecan, irinotecan is a prodrug which has to be converted to SN-38, its active form. SN-38 is inactivated by conjugation, thus patients with Gilbert's syndrome and other forms of genetic glucuronidation deficiency are at an increased risk of irinotecan-induced adverse effects, such as neutropenia and diarrhoea. The cytotoxic mechanism of podophyllotoxin is the inhibition of topoisomerase II. Common adverse effects of etoposide include dose-limiting myelosuppression. Hypersensitivity reactions are more common with etoposide and teniposide than with etoposide phosphate because the formulations of the former contain sensitising solubilisers. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occur in 65% and 80%, respectively, of patients after administration of conventional doses of teniposide. Anorexia, vomiting and diarrhoea are generally of mild severity after administration of conventional doses of topoisomerase II inhibitors. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies have revealed substantial interindividual variabilities regarding the area under the concentration-time curve values and steady-state concentrations for all drugs reviewed in this article. Irinotecan, etoposide and teniposide are degraded via complex metabolic pathways. In contrast, topotecan primarily undergoes renal excretion. Regarding etoposide and teniposide, the extent of catechol formation over time during drug metabolism may be associated with a higher risk for secondary malignancies.

Irinotecan-induced diarrhea: functional significance of the polymorphic ABCC2 transporter protein

Interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of the anticancer agent irinotecan is high. Life-threatening diarrhea is observed in up to 25% of patients receiving irinotecan and has been related with irinotecan pharmacokinetics and UGT1A1 genotype status. Here, we explore the association of ABCC2 (MRP2) polymorphisms and haplotypes with irinotecan disposition and diarrhea. A cohort of 167 Caucasian cancer patients who were previously assessed for irinotecan pharmacokinetics (90-min infusion given every 21 days), toxicity, and UGT1A1*28 genotype were genotyped for polymorphisms in ABCC2 using Pyrosequencing. Fifteen ABCC2 haplotypes were identified in the studied patients. The haplotype ABCC2*2 was associated with lower irinotecan clearance (28.3 versus 31.6 l/h; P=0.020). In patients who did not carry a UGT1A1*28 allele, a significant reduction of severe diarrhea was noted in patients with the ABCC2*2 haplotype (10 versus 44%; odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.61; P=0.005). This effect was not observed in patients with at least one UGT1A1*28 allele (32 versus 20%; odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-7.05; P=0.354). This study suggests that the presence of the ABCC2*2 haplotype is associated with less irinotecan-related diarrhea, maybe as a consequence of reduced hepatobiliary secretion of irinotecan. As the association was seen in patients not genetically predisposed at risk for diarrhea due to UGT1A1*28, confirmatory studies of the relationships of ABCC2 genotypes and irinotecan disposition and toxicity are warranted.

Effects of green tea compounds on irinotecan metabolism

The effects of green tea compounds on the metabolism of irinotecan have never been investigated. We aimed to study whether catechins [(-)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), (-)-epicatechin gallate (ECG), (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC), (-)-epicatechin] affect the inactivation metabolism of irinotecan into 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(1-piperidino)-1-amino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (NPC) (by CYP3A4) and 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) into 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin glucuronide (SN-38G) (by UGT1A1). Human liver microsomes, hepatocytes and Hep G2 cells were incubated with catechins and treated with irinotecan and/or SN-38. NPC and SN-38G formation was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. UGT1A1 mRNA levels were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction. In human liver microsomes, a concentration-dependent decrease in the formation of NPC and SN-38G was observed. In human hepatocytes, a significant increase in SN-38G production was observed in 33% (EGCG), 44% (ECG), and 44% (EGC) of the hepatocyte preparations. Phenobarbital increased the formation of SN-38G in 100% of the same hepatocyte preparations. In Hep G2 cells, no increase in SN-38G formation was observed. With the exception of ECG in one liver, catechins did not increase UGT1A1 mRNA levels. NPC production was also significantly increased in 40% of the hepatocyte preparations for each catechin. However, the production of 6beta-hydroxytestosterone remained unaffected in other hepatocyte preparations. At pharmacologically relevant concentrations, catechins are unlikely to inhibit the formation of irinotecan inactive metabolites when administered concomitantly. The induction effect of catechins on UGT1A1 seems to be modest and highly variable. Catechins do not induce CYP3A4 activity. The effect of acute and prolonged use of green tea on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in patients remains to be evaluated.

Drug interactions in cancer therapy

Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents. Interactions with other medications can cause small changes in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a chemotherapy agent that could significantly alter its efficacy or toxicity. Improvements in in vitro methods and early clinical testing have made the prediction of potentially clinically significant drug interactions possible. We outline the types of drug interaction that occur in oncology, the mechanisms that underlie these interactions and describe select examples.

Irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Out of every 17-18 individuals in the US, one develops colorectal cancer (CRC) in their lifetime. Of individuals diagnosed with CRC, > 50% present or develop metastatic disease, which, if untreated, is associated with 6-9 months median survival. Although surgical resection is the primary treatment modality for CRC, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic or unresectable disease. For nearly three decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the chemotherapy of choice for treatment of CRC. However, the response rates to single 5-FU therapy have been suboptimal with an objective tumour response of 10-20%. Attempts have been made to improve the efficacy of 5-FU by either schedule alteration (protracted infusion versus intravenous push) or biochemical modulation with leucovorin (LV). Continuous infusion induced more tumour regression and prolonged the time-to-disease progression with some significant impact on survival (11.3 versus 12.1 months; p < 0.04). 5-FU/LV resulted in a significant increase in overall response rates and in the prolongation of disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting, although severe toxicities represent a major clinical problem. The last 10 years have seen the addition of several new agents such as irinotecan, oxaliplatin, raltitrexed, bevacizumab and cetuximab. The prognosis has significantly improved with the addition of these agents, with median survivals now > 20 months. This review paper focuses on irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed when used alone and in combination.

Role of pharmacogenetics in irinotecan therapy

In the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, irinotecan has become one of the most important drugs, despite its sometimes unpredictable adverse effects. To understand why some patients experience severe adverse effects (diarrhea and neutropenia), while others do not, the metabolic pathways of this drug have to be unraveled in detail. Individual variation in expression of several phase I and phase II metabolizing enzymes and ABC-transporters involved in irinotecan metabolism and excretion, at least partly explains the observed pharmacokinetic interpatient variability. Although the difference in expression-level of these proteins to a certain amount is explained by physiologic and environmental factors, the presence of specific genetic determinants also does influence their expression and function. In this review, the role of genetic polymorphisms in the main enzyme-systems (carboxylesterase, cytochrome P450 3A, and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase) and ABC-transporters (ABCB1, ABCC2, and ABCG2) involved in irinotecan metabolism, are discussed. Since at this moment the field of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics is rapidly expanding and simultaneously more rapid and cost-effective screening methods are emerging, a wealth of future data is expected to enrich our knowledge of the genetic basis of irinotecan metabolism. Eventually, this may help to truly individualize the dosing of this (and other) anti-cancer agent(s), using a personal genetic profile of the most relevant enzymes for every patient.

Irinotecan in the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a review of patient safety considerations

A water soluble derivative of camptothecin, irinotecan (CPT-11) is effective against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), as well as non-SCLC and gastrointestinal cancers. This extended review of recently concluded and ongoing studies focuses on irinotecan in the treatment of limited (LD) and extensive (ED) SCLC specifically considering the safety of patients. Irinotecan-induced diarrhoea is pervasive, and can be severe and life-threatening especially in combination with neutropenia. It can have a significant impact on patient quality of life, negatively influencing compliance with therapy and dose-intensity. For LD SCLC, irinotecan can be administered with radiotherapy concurrently or sequentially. In a Phase III study for ED SCLC comparing etoposide and cisplatin (EP) and irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) regimens, severe myelosuppression was more frequent in the EP arm than in the IP arm, and conversely severe or life-threatening diarrhoea was more frequent in the IP arm than in the EP arm. IP resulted in significantly higher response rates and overall survival in Japan, and confirmatory Phase III studies are ongoing. Irinotecan should not be administered to patients with any degree of ongoing diarrhoea above their baseline. Irinotecan can be administered with relative safety for patients with SCLC only through careful patient monitoring, especially regarding diarrhoea and myelosuppression.

Development, validation and utility of an in vitro technique for assessment of potential clinical drug-drug interactions involving P-glycoprotein

Regulatory interest is increasing for drug transporters generally and P-glycoprotein (Pgp) in particular, primarily in the area of drug-drug interactions. To aid in both identifying and discharging the potential liabilities associated with drug-transporter interactions, the pharmaceutical industry has a growing requirement for routine and robust non-clinical assays. An assay was designed, optimised and validated to determine the in vitro inhibitory potency of new chemical entities (NCEs) towards human Pgp-mediated transport. [3H]-Digoxin was established as a suitable probe substrate by investigating its characteristics in the in vitro system (MDCKII-MDR1 cells grown in 24-multiwell inserts). The inhibitory potencies (apparent IC50) of known Pgp inhibitors astemizole, GF120918, ketoconazole, itraconazole, quinidine, verapamil and quinine were determined over at least a 1000-fold concentration range. Validation was carried out using manual and automatic techniques. [3H]-Digoxin was found to be stable and have good mass balance in the system. In contrast to [A-->B] transport, [3H]-digoxin [B-->A] transport rates were readily measured with good reproducibility. There was no evidence of saturation of transport up to 10 microM digoxin and 30 nM digoxin was selected for routine assay use, reflecting clinical therapeutic concentrations. IC50 values ranged over approximately 100-fold with excellent reproducibility. Results from manual and automated versions were in close agreement. This method is suitable for routine use to assess the in vitro inhibitory potency of NCEs on Pgp-mediated digoxin transport. Comparison of IC50 values against clinical interaction profiles for the probe inhibitors indicated the in vitro assay is predictive of clinical digoxin-drug interactions mediated via Pgp.

Genotyping and phenotyping cytochrome P450: Perspectives for cancer treatment

As most anticancer agents display a narrow therapeutic window, patients may be susceptible to (extreme) toxicities or a lowered therapeutic outcome if not dosed adequately. Therefore, it is important to study factors which affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs. Among these, the contribution of genetic variation in drug metabolizing enzymes on the metabolism of anticancer agents has gathered interest, as it may potentially explain a substantial amount of interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics and drug response. Cytochrome P450, an oxidative enzyme-system involved in the breakdown of many drugs, is currently studied for correlations between genetic polymorphisms and anticancer drug metabolism. Also, alternative ways to predict the expression of cytochrome P450 have been developed (phenotyping measures) which may have additional value in creating a lowered interpatient variability, to minimize side-effects and maximize therapeutic efficacy.

Effect of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan

PURPOSE

Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) is one of the most commonly used herbal therapies, and its principal constituent silybin significantly inhibits cytochrome P450 isoform 3A4 (CYP3A4) and UDP glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1) in vitro. Here, we investigated whether milk thistle affects the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan, a substrate for CYP3A4 and UGT1A1, in humans.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Six cancer patients were treated with irinotecan (dose, 125 mg/m(2)) given as a 90-minute infusion once every week. Four days before the second dose, patients received 200 mg milk thistle, thrice a day, for 14 consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic studies of irinotecan and its metabolites 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), 7-ethyl-10-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-pyran-2-carboxylic acid]-camptothecin (SN-38-glucuronide), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin were done during the first three irinotecan administrations.

RESULTS

Short-term (4 days) or more prolonged intake of milk thistle (12 days) had no significant effect on irinotecan clearance (mean, 31.2 versus 25.4 versus 25.6 L/h; P = 0.16). The area under the curve ratio of SN-38 and irinotecan was slightly decreased by milk thistle (2.58% versus 2.23% versus 2.17%; P = 0.047), whereas the relative extent of glucuronidation of SN-38 was similar (10.8 versus 13.5 versus 13.1; P = 0.64). Likewise, the area under the curve ratio of 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin and irinotecan was unaffected by milk thistle (0.332 versus 0.285 versus 0.337; P = 0.53). The maximum plasma concentrations of silybin ranged between 0.0249 and 0.257 micromol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Silybin concentrations after intake of milk thistle are too low to significantly affect the function of CYP3A4 and UGT1A1 in vivo, indicating that milk thistle is unlikely to alter the disposition of anticancer drugs metabolized by these enzymes.

Modulation of cytochrome P450 activity: implications for cancer therapy

Although metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes is known to play a major part in the biotransformation of anticancer agents in vivo, few clinical studies have investigated activity of cytochrome P450s and therapeutic outcome in people with cancer. Variability between individuals in the pharmacokinetics of cancer chemotherapy has important consequences in terms of therapeutic efficacy and safety. We discuss here the effect of drug metabolism mediated by cytochrome P450 on therapeutic outcome. As examples, the biotransformation pathways of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, tamoxifen, docetaxel, paclitaxel, and irinotecan are discussed. Since most anticancer agents are transformed by enzymes, better knowledge of their metabolic pathways could help improve treatment outcome and safety. Furthermore, a more complete understanding of the metabolism of anticancer agents through phenotyping and genotyping approaches will facilitate the prediction of interactions between drugs. More clinical evidence is needed on the metabolic transformation and drug interactions with these agents to improve cancer therapeutics.

Cancer treatment and pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P450 enzymes

For the treatment of cancer, the window between drug toxicity and suboptimal therapy is often narrow. Interindividual variation in drug metabolism therefore complicates therapy. Genetic polymorphisms in phase I and phase II enzymes may explain part of the observed interindividual variation in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. The cytochrome P450 superfamily is involved in many drug metabolizing reactions. Information on variant alleles for the different isoenzymes of this family, encoding proteins with decreased enzymatic activity, is rapidly growing. The ultimate goal of ongoing research on these enzymes would be to enable pharmacogenetic screening prior to anticancer therapy. At this moment, potential clinically relevant application of CYP450 pharmacogenetics for anticancer therapy may be found for CYP1A2 and flutamide, CYP2A6 and tegafur, CYP2B6 and cyclophosphamide, CYP2C8 and paclitaxel, CYP2D6 and tamoxifen, and CYP3A5. For this latter enzyme, the drugs of interest still need to be identified.

Effects of Ketoconazole on Glucuronidation by UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Enzymes

PURPOSE

Ketoconazole has been shown to inhibit the glucuronidation of the UGT2B7 substrates zidovudine and lorazepam. Its effect on UGT1A substrates is unclear. A recent study found that coadministration of irinotecan and ketoconazole led to a significant increase in the formation of SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecine), an UGT1A substrate. This study investigates whether ketoconazole contributes to the increase in SN-38 formation by inhibiting SN-38 glucuronidation.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

SN-38 glucuronidation activities were determined by measuring the rate of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G) formation using pooled human liver microsomes and cDNA-expressed UGT1A isoforms (1A1, 1A7 and 1A9) in the presence of ketoconazole. Indinavir, a known UGT1A1 inhibitor, was used as a positive control. SN-38G formation was measured by high-performance liquid chromatograph.

RESULTS

Ketoconazole competitively inhibited SN-38 glucuronidation. Among the UGT1A isoforms screened, ketoconazole showed the highest inhibitory effect on UGT1A1 and UGT1A9. The K(i) values were 3.3 +/- 0.8 micromol/L for UGT1A1 and 31.9 +/- 3.3 micromol/L for UGT1A9.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that ketoconazole is a potent UGT1A1 inhibitor, which seems the basis for increased exposure to SN-38 when coadministered with irinotecan.

RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE FIVE MAJOR HUMAN CYTOCHROMES P450, 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, AND 3A4, TO THE HEPATIC METABOLISM OF THE PROTEASOME INHIBITOR BORTEZOMIB

VELCADE (bortezomib, PS-341), reversibly inhibits the 20S proteasome and exhibits cytotoxic and antitumor activities. Pretreatment of cancer cells with bortezomib increases the chemosensitivity of these cells, suggesting that bortezomib may be used in combination chemotherapy. The relative contributions of the five major human cytochromes P450 (P450s), 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4 (the focus of the present study), to the metabolism of bortezomib are an important aspect of potential drug interactions. Relative activity factor (RAF), chemical inhibition, and immunoinhibition using monoclonal antibodies were three approaches employed to determine the relative contributions of the major human P450s to the net hepatic metabolism of bortezomib. RAFs for the P450 isoform-selective substrates were determined; the ratio of the rate of metabolism of bortezomib with cDNA-expressed P450s versus rate of metabolism with human liver microsomes was normalized with respect to the RAF for each P450 isoform to determine the percentage contributions of the P450s to the net hepatic metabolism of bortezomib. CYP3A4 followed by CYP2C19 were determined to be the major contributors to the metabolism of bortezomib. Chemical inhibition and immunoinhibition confirmed that CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 were the major P450s responsible for the hepatic metabolism of bortezomib. The studies were conducted with 2 muM bortezomib, and the disappearance of bortezomib, rather than appearance of a specific metabolite, was quantified to determine the contributions of the P450s to the overall hepatic metabolism of bortezomib in humans.

Classification and occurrence of clinically significant drug interactions with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions with cytotoxic drugs may significantly influence the efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify drug interactions with irinotecan and oxaliplatin reported in the literature, to assess their clinical significance, and to examine the occurrence of these interactions in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin or both.

METHODS

To obtain data on drug-drug interactions with irinotecan and oxaliplatin, a literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted using the search terms irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and interactions (English-language studies only published between 1980 and August 2004). The interactions found were subsequently classified for documentation evidence and severity of clinical effect, according to a 5-level classification system of a standard reference text, by a study panel of medical oncologists and clinical pharmacists. Comedication of patients who were treated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin, or both, was then examined to determine the occurrence of clinically significant interactions.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients (50 women, 48 men;mean age, 60 years) were included in the study. Seventeen interactions with irinotecan were found in the literature, and 11 were classified as clinically significant. Only 1 nonspecific, clinically significant interaction was identified for oxaliplatin. Irinotecan-treated patients received a mean of 8 different comedications and oxaliplatin-treated patients received a mean of 6. Apart from antiemetic and antidiarrheal drugs that were prescribed for treatment-related toxicities, only 1 patient appeared to be exposed to a possible clinically significant interaction (between irinotecan and phenytoin).

CONCLUSIONS

Eleven of the 17 interactions with irinotecan that were found in the literature were classified as clinically significant versus 1 clinically significant interaction with oxaliplatin. The occurrence of these interactions in the study patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was low. For medication surveillance purposes, however, the significant interactions should be considered in clinical practice.

Pharmacogenetics and Pediatric Cancer

The great advances in therapeutic success for childhood cancers have provided the impetus for strategies to avoid serious systemic toxicities from chemotherapy. This review describes the impact of genetic mutations in drug metabolism pathways on the toxicity of anticancer agents. Although many polymorphisms have been related to toxicity in adults, these associations are less well defined in children. The role of genetic polymorphisms in MTHFR, TYMS, TPMT, and UGT1A1 in influencing drug toxicity is reviewed. Better understanding of the pharmacogenetic determinants of drug metabolism or pharmacologic cofactors may allow for prospective identification of potential patients who are at increased risk for toxicity, allowing for dose optimization and resulting in a decrease in toxic risk while maximizing efficacy.

Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer

Over the past decade, metastatic colorectal cancer has evolved from a relatively resistant disease to one that is sensitive to a variety of chemotherapeutic drugs and combinations of drugs. During the same period, the median survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer increased from approximately 14 months to almost 20 months. First-line chemotherapy prolongs survival and delays the appearance of symptoms and should be considered in patients who are still asymptomatic. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and adequate performance status should be treated with a combination of fluorouracil (5-FU) and either oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Bevacizumab, the monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor, has been shown to prolong survival with acceptable toxicity and may be added when available. When the disease recurs, second-line chemotherapy may also prolong survival in appropriately selected patients. Typically, treatment includes 5-FU and one of the drugs not used in the first-line therapy (oxaliplatin or irinotecan). Several oral prodrugs of 5-FU are currently available. Capecitabine, approved in the United States, may be safely substituted for 5-FU in the majority of settings and combinations. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor and is approved both as a single agent and in combination with irinotecan for patients with recurrent disease. This treatment may represent a second-line or third-line option in selected patients. Treatment of patients with isolated liver metastases may also include surgical or other ablative procedures. In carefully selected patients, these modalities add to the efficacy of chemotherapy and may be used with potentially curative intent. However, for the vast majority of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treatment is palliative.

Unfavourable expression of pharmacologic markers in mucinous colorectal cancer

Patients with mucinous colorectal cancer generally have worse prognoses than those with the nonmucinous variety. The reason for this disparity is unclear, but may result from a differential response to adjuvant chemotherapy. We examined known molecular markers for response to common chemotherapy in these two histological subtypes. In all, 21 patients with mucinous and 30 with nonmucinous Dukes C colorectal cancer were reviewed for demographic data and outcome. Total RNA from the tumours and adjacent normal mucosa was isolated and reverse transcribed. Quantitative expression levels of drug pathway genes were determined using TaqMan RT–PCR (5-fluorouracil (5-FU): TYMS, DPYD, ECGF1; oxaliplatin: GSTP1 (glutathione S-transferase pi), ERCC1 and 2; irinotecan: ABCB1, ABCG2, CYP3A4, UGT1A1, CES2, TOP1). Mucinous tumours significantly overexpressed both TYMS and GSTP1 relative to nonmucinous tumours and patient-matched normal mucosa. No significant differences in expression of the remaining markers were found. Mean follow-up was 20 months; 17 patients had recurrent disease. Among patients receiving 5-FU, those with mucinous tumours experienced shorter disease-free survival (DFS) than those with nonmucinous tumours (median DFS 13.8 vs 46.5 months, P=0.053). Mucinous colorectal cancer overexpresses markers of resistance to 5-FU and oxaliplatin. Likewise, DFS may be decreased in patients with mucinous tumours who receive 5-FU. The presence of mucin should be carefully evaluated in developmental trials of new agents for treating colorectal cancer.

Novel chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme

During the last few decades, the discovery of novel targets for therapeutic intervention led to the development of chemotherapeutic agents that specifically interfere with altered cellular functions of tumour cells. Genetic alterations in glioblastoma affect cell proliferation and cell cycle control, as well as invasive and metastatic growth. Therefore, innovative therapeutic strategies have been based on drugs targeting cellular proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, metastasis and differentiation of tumour cells. Furthermore, disruption of cell-death pathways also contributes to the pathogenesis of glioblastoma and may result in resistance to chemotherapy and radiation. Therefore, additional treatment strategies that target intracellular survival and/or apoptotic pathways are under current laboratory investigation. The progress in the understanding of glioblastoma tumour biology and the refined diagnosis of individual patients together with the exploration of targeted drugs may allow a risk-adapted, individualised therapeutic strategy and will hopefully improve prognosis of glioblastoma patients in the future.

Mechanisms of resistance to anticancer drugs: the role of the polymorphic ABC transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) genes play a role in the resistance of malignant cells to anticancer agents. The ABC gene products, including ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) and ABCG2 (breast cancer-resistance protein [BCRP], mitoxantrone-resistance protein [MXR], or ABC transporter in placenta [ABCP]), are also known to influence oral absorption and disposition of a wide variety of drugs. As a result, the expression levels of these proteins in humans have important consequences for an individual’s susceptibility to certain drug-induced side effects, interactions, and treatment efficacy. Naturally occurring variants in ABC transporter genes have been identified that might affect the function and expression of the protein. This review focuses on recent advances in the pharmacogenetics of the ABC transporters ABCB1 and ABCG2, and discusses potential implications of genetic variants for the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

Interactions Between Antiretrovirals and Antineoplastic Drug Therapy

Despite the established impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality, malignancy remains an important cause of death. Patients who receive the combination of cancer chemotherapy and HAART may achieve better response rates and higher rates of survival than patients who receive antineoplastic therapy alone. However, the likelihood of drug interactions with combined therapy is high, since protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are substrates and potent inhibitors or inducers of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Since many antineoplastic drugs are also metabolised by the CYP system, coadministration with HAART could result in either drug accumulation and possible toxicity, or decreased efficacy of one or both classes of drugs. Although formal, prospective pharmacokinetic interaction studies are not available in most instances, it is possible to infer the nature of drug interactions based on the metabolic fates of these agents. Paclitaxel and docetaxel are both metabolised by the CYP system, although differences exist in the nature of the isoenzymes involved. Case reports describing adverse consequences of concomitant taxane-antiretroviral therapy exist. Although other confounding factors may have been present, these cases serve as reminders of the vigilant monitoring necessary when taxanes and HAART are coadministered. Similarly, vinca alkaloids are substrates of CYP3A4 and are, thus, vulnerable to PI- or NNRTI-mediated changes in their pharmacokinetics. Interactions with the alkylating agents cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are complicated as a result of the involvement of the CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 isoenzymes in both the metabolic activation of these drugs and the generation of potentially neurotoxic metabolites. Existing data regarding the metabolic fate of the anthracyclines doxorubicin and daunorubicin suggest that clinically detrimental interactions would not be expected with coadministered HAART. Commonly used endocrine therapies are largely substrates of the CYP system and may, therefore, be amenable to modulation by concomitant HAART. In addition, tamoxifen itself has been associated with reduced concentrations of both anastrozole and letrozole, raising the concern that similar inducing properties may adversely affect the outcome of PI- or NNRTI-based therapy. Similarly, dexamethasone is both a substrate and concentration-dependent inducer of CYP3A4; enhanced corticosteroid pharmacodynamics may result with CYP3A4 inhibitors, while the efficacy of concomitant HAART may be compromised with prolonged dexamethasone coadministration. Since PIs and NNRTIs may also induce or inhibit the expression of P-glycoprotein, the potential for additional interactions to arise via modulation of this transporter also exists. Further research delineating the combined safety and pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals and antineoplastic therapy is necessary.

Prediction of irinotecan pharmacokinetics by use of cytochrome P450 3A4 phenotyping probes

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has been approved for use as a first- and second-line treatment for colorectal cancer. The response to irinotecan is variable, possibly because of interindividual variation in the expression of the enzymes that metabolize irinotecan, including cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1). We prospectively explored the relationships between CYP3A phenotype, as assessed by erythromycin metabolism and midazolam clearance, and the metabolism of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38.

METHODS

Of the 30 white cancer patients, 27 received at least two treatments with irinotecan administered as one 90-minute infusion (dose, 600 mg) with 3 weeks between treatments, and three received only one treatment. Before the first and second treatments, patients underwent an erythromycin breath test and a midazolam clearance test as phenotyping probes for CYP3A4. Erythromycin metabolism was assessed as the area under the curve for the flux of radioactivity in exhaled CO2 within 40 minutes after administration of [N-methyl-14C]erythromycin. Midazolam and irinotecan were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Genomic DNA was isolated from blood and screened for genetic variants in CYP3A4 and UGT1A1. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

CYP3A4 activity varied sevenfold (range = 0.223%-1.53% of dose) among patients, whereas midazolam clearance varied fourfold (range = 262-1012 mL/min), although intraindividual variation was small. Erythromycin metabolism was not statistically significantly associated with irinotecan clearance (P = .090), whereas midazolam clearance was highly correlated with irinotecan clearance (r = .745, P<.001). In addition, the presence of a UGT1A1 variant with a (TA)7 repeat in the promoter (UGT1A1*28) was associated with increased exposure to SN-38 (435 ng x h/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 339 to 531 ng x h/mL in patients who are homozygous for wild-type UGT1A1; 631 ng x h/mL, 95% CI = 499 to 762 ng . h/mL in heterozygous patients; and 1343 ng x h/mL, 95% CI = 0 to 4181 ng x h/mL in patients who are homozygous for UGT1A1*28) (P = .006).

CONCLUSION

CYP3A4 phenotype, as assessed by midazolam clearance, is statistically significantly associated with irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Evaluation of midazolam clearance combined with UGT1A1*28 genotyping may assist with optimization of irinotecan chemotherapy.

Effect of fractionated ifosfamide on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma

The combination of irinotecan (daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks) and ifosfamide (daily on days 1 through 3) was investigated in children with osteosarcoma. Irinotecan pharmacokinetic investigations were performed before ifosfamide (day 1), after 3 days of ifosfamide (day 3), and 9 days after the end of ifosfamide (day 12). On day 3, the concentrations of irinotecan's active metabolite, SN-38, were below the limit of quantitation in two patients and were decreased in a third patient. The SN-38 area under the concentration-time curve remained below the day 1 value in two patients on day 12. The reduced area under the curve to the active metabolite SN-38 during ifosfamide therapy predicts a compromised efficacy of irinotecan in this combination.

Drug interactions in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipient: what every transplanter needs to know

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions among hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients can result in either increases in serum concentrations of medications, which may lead to enhanced toxicity; or reduced serum concentrations, which can lead to treatment failure and the emergence of post transplant complications. The use of drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index, such as cyclosporine/tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitors), increases the significance of these interactions when they occur. This report will review the clinical data evaluating the drug interactions of relevance to HSCT clinical practice, focusing on the pharmacokinetic interactions, and provides recommendations for managing these interactions to avoid both toxicity and treatment failure.

ABCG2 pharmacogenetics: ethnic differences in allele frequency and assessment of influence on irinotecan disposition

PURPOSE

The ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein) is an efflux protein that plays a role in host detoxification of various xenobiotic substrates, including the irinotecan metabolite 7- ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). The ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism has been associated with reduced protein expression and altered function in vitro. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ethnic distribution and potential functional consequence of the ABCG2 421C>A genotype in cancer patients treated with irinotecan.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ABCG2 genotyping was performed using Pyrosequencing on DNA from 88 American Caucasians, 94 African Americans, 938 Africans, and 95 Han Chinese, as well as in 84 European Caucasian patients treated with irinotecan undergoing additional blood sampling for pharmacokinetic studies.

RESULTS

Significant differences in allele frequencies were observed between the given world populations (P < 0.001), the variant allele being most common in the Han Chinese population with a frequency as high as 34%. The mean area under the curve of irinotecan and SN-38 were 19,851 and 639 ng x hour/mL, respectively. The frequency of the variant allele (10.7%) was in line with results in American Caucasians. No significant changes in irinotecan pharmacokinetics were observed in relation to the ABCG2 421C>A genotype, although one of two homozygous variant allele carriers showed extensive accumulation of SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABCG2 421C>A polymorphism appears to play a limited role in the disposition of irinotecan in European Caucasians. It is likely that the contribution of this genetic variant is obscured by a functional role of other polymorphic proteins.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Intravenous to Oral Administration

This article reviews the current status of the topoisomerase I (top I) inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. We focus on oral drug administration, the mode of administration that is generally preferred by patients with cancer. However, the great majority of the studies have been performed with intravenous (I.V.) administration. The most extensively investigated GI malignancy in phase I/II studies is colorectal cancer (CRC), for which I.V. irinotecan is currently approved in the United States and Europe. We discuss the activity and efficacy of irinotecan as a single agent in CRC and in combination regimens. Also, results obtained with monotherapy and in combination treatment in other GI malignancies such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer are discussed. Few phase I studies have been performed with oral irinotecan and its clinical activity has not yet been fully determined. Several top I inhibitors are discussed, including topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, rubitecan, exatecan, and lurtotecan. None of these agents, given orally or intravenously, have shown activity in CRC similar to that of I.V. irinotecan. However, several agents show promising results in other GI malignancies, eg, rubitecan and exatecan in pancreatic cancer. A complicating factor in the oral administration of the top I inhibitors is the often encountered low and variable oral bioavailability. This can partly be explained by the high affinity for the drug efflux pumps BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein, which are highly expressed in the epithelial apical membrane of the GI tract. A novel approach to improve the oral bioavailability of the top I inhibitors by temporary blockade of the drug transporter BCRP is described.

Implications of cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms on the toxicity of antitumor agents

In the treatment of cancer, a narrow therapeutic window generally exists between toxicity and suboptimal therapy. In addition, interindividual variation in drug metabolism seriously complicates therapy. Genetic polymorphisms in phase 1 and phase 2 enzymes are present in the population and may explain part of the observed interindividual variation in drug pharmacokinetics. For the cytochrome P450 superfamily, information on variant alleles encoding enzymes with decreased activity is rapidly on the increase. The potential of applying pharmacogenetic screening before therapy in the treatment of cancer seems to be greatest for CYP2B6 (cyclophosphamide treatment), CYP2C8 (paclitaxel therapy), and CYP3A5; however, the drugs of interest still need to be identified for this latter enzyme.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan in combination with R115777, a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor

The aims of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan given with oral R115777 (tipifarnib), a farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor. Patients were treated with escalating doses of irinotecan with interval-modulated dosing of R115777 (continuously or on days 1–14, and repeated every 21 days). In total, 35 patients were entered onto the trial for a median duration of treatment of 43 days (range, 5–224 days). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities; other side effects were mostly mild. The MTD was established at R115777 300 mg b.i.d. for 14 consecutive days with irinotecan 350 mg m⁻² given every 3 weeks starting on day 1. Three patients had a partial response and 14 had stable disease. In the continuous schedule, the area under the curves of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38 were 20.0% (P=0.004) and 38.0% (P<0.001) increased by R115777, respectively. Intermittent dosing of R115777 at a dose of 300 mg b.i.d. for 14 days every 3 weeks is the recommended dose of R115777 in combination with the recommended single-agent irinotecan dose of 350 mg m⁻².

Pharmacological factors influencing anticancer drug selection in the elderly

Persons over the age of 65 years are the fastest growing segment of the US population. In the next 30 years this segment will represent more than 20% of the population. Fifty percent of all cancers occur in this age group and therefore the total cancer burden is expected to rise. Data are becoming available that will better guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population. Studies are presented discussing pharmacokinetic data on a number of chemotherapeutic agents with an emphasis on those that have entered clinical practice over the past few years. Many of these agents seem to have a beneficial therapeutic index, particularly in regard to older patients. Aging can affect the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy in a number of ways. Absorption is only modified minimally by age. The greater concern with the use of oral drugs is patient compliance. Volume of distribution is affected by changes in body composition, anaemia and decreased plasma albumin concentration. There are many drugs in which renal excretion plays an important role. Decline in glomerular filtration is a consistent phenomenon with aging. Drug metabolism is primarily affected by changes in the P450 system and coadministration of drugs which also interact with this important enzyme system. The selection of chemotherapy in the elderly is frequently determined by degree of comorbidity and the patients' functional status. These factors are critical and can often determine response and toxicity. This article discusses the changes that occur with antimetabolites, camptothecins, anthracyclines, taxanes, platinum compounds, epipodophyllotoxins and vinca alkaloids. There has also been an increasing trend toward the use of oral chemotherapy. Factors that must be considered in selecting chemotherapeutic agents include limitations of saturability of absorption, patient compliance and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes that occur in older patients. Interpatient variability and age-related changes in drug metabolism are discussed. Careful attention to the physiological changes with age and dose adjustments necessary for end-organ dysfunction (renal, hepatic) are needed to ensure the safe administration of chemotherapy. In this article specific diseases are discussed (breast, colon, ovarian and non-small lung cancers) with recommendations for drug selection in adjuvant chemotherapy and the treatment of metastatic disease. Future studies will need to incorporate these various factors to properly evaluate chemotherapy in older patients. Research and educational initiatives targeted to this population will need to be a priority.

Pharmacogenomics of ABC transporters and its role in cancer chemotherapy

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) genes play a role in the resistance of malignant cells to anticancer agents. The ABC gene products, including ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein), ABCC1 (MRP1), ABCC2 (MRP2, cMOAT), and ABCG2 (BCRP, MXR, ABCP) are also known to influence oral absorption and disposition of a wide variety of drugs. As a result, the expression levels of these proteins in humans have important consequences for an individual's susceptibility to certain drug-induced side effects, interactions, and treatment efficacy. Naturally occurring variants in ABC transporter genes have been identified that might affect the function and expression of the protein. This review focuses on recent advances in the pharmacogenomics of ABC transporters, and discusses potential implications of genetic variants for the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous irinotecan plus oral ciclosporin in patients with fuorouracil-refractory metastatic colon cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and toxicity profile of escalating doses of intravenous irinotecan, in combination with a fixed dose of oral ciclosporin (Cs) and to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan and its metabolites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with fluorouracil-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer received escalating doses of intravenous irinotecan from 40 to 125 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks in combination with a fixed dose of oral Cs (5 mg/kg bid for 3 days). Pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma irinotecan and its metabolites SN38 and SN38G was performed during paired cycles with and without Cs.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were treated. Dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia was seen at an irinotecan dose of 125 mg/m(2). There was no grade 4 diarrhea, and only one patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea. Toxicities caused by Cs were generally mild. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that irinotecan clearance was reduced from 13.4 to 5.8 L/h/m(2) and area under the curve (AUC)(0-tn) was increased 2.2-fold by the coadministration of Cs. Similar significant increases in AUC(0-24h) were seen for both SN38 and SN38G (2.2-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively) in the presence of Cs. Antitumor activity was seen at every irinotecan dose level.

CONCLUSION

The maximum tolerated irinotecan dose and recommended dose for phase II studies is 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting diarrhea was not seen during this study, supporting the hypothesis that pharmacokinetic modulation of irinotecan by Cs may improve its therapeutic index. Further studies using this combination are warranted.

Improvement of oral drug treatment by temporary inhibition of drug transporters and/or cytochrome P450 in the gastrointestinal tract and liver: an overview

The oral bioavailability of many cytotoxic drugs is low and/or highly variable. This can be caused by high affinity for drug transporters and activity of metabolic enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract and liver. In this review, we will describe the main involved drug transporters and metabolic enzymes and discuss novel methods to improve oral treatment of affected substrate drugs. Results of preclinical and clinical phase I and II studies will be discussed in which affected substrate drugs, such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, and topotecan, are given orally in combination with an inhibitor of drug transport or drug metabolism. Future randomized studies will, hopefully, confirm that this strategy for oral treatment is at least as equally effective and safe as standard intravenous administration of these drugs.

Irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: the clinical relevance of prolonged exposure to SN-38

We have shown previously that the terminal disposition half-life of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, is much longer than earlier thought. Currently, it is not known whether this prolonged exposure has any relevance toward SN-38-induced toxicity. Here, we found that SN-38 concentrations present in human plasma for up to 3 weeks after a single irinotecan infusion induce significant cytotoxicity in vitro. Using pharmacokinetic data from 26 patients, with sampling up to 500 h, relationships were evaluated between systemic exposure (AUC) to SN-38 and the per cent decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at nadir, or by taking the entire time course of ANC into account (AOC). The time course of SN-38 concentrations (AUC(500 h)) was significantly related to this AOC (P<0.001). Based on these findings, a new limited-sampling model was developed for SN-38 AUC(500 h) using only two timed samples: AUC(500 h)=(6.588 x C(2.5 h))+(146.4 x C(49.5 h))+15.53, where C(2.5 h) and C(49.5 h) are plasma concentrations at 2.5 and 49.5 h after start of infusion, respectively. The use of this limited-sampling model may open up historic databases to retrospectively obtain information about SN-38-induced toxicity in patients treated with irinotecan.