Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ESAs to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004. We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE and other databases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review, 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the first update and to November 2011 for the current update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients receiving or not receiving anti-cancer therapy that compared the use of ESAs (plus transfusion if needed).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several review authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. One review author assessed quality assessment and extracted data, a second review author checked for correctness.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review includes a total of 91 trials with 20,102 participants. Use of ESAs significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (risk ratio (RR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68, 70 trials, N = 16,093). On average, participants in the ESAs group received one unit of blood less than the control group (mean difference (MD) -0.98; 95% CI -1.17 to -0.78, 19 trials, N = 4,715). Haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving ESAs (RR 3.93; 95% CI 3.10 to 3.71, 31 trials, N = 6,413). There was suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve Quality of Life (QoL). There was strong evidence that ESAs increase mortality during active study period (hazard ratio (HR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.29, 70 trials, N = 15,935) and some evidence that ESAs decrease overall survival (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11, 78 trials, N = 19,003). The risk ratio for thromboembolic complications was increased in patients receiving ESAs compared to controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.74; 57 trials, N = 15,498). ESAs may also increase the risk for hypertension (fixed-effect model: RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.56; random-effects model: RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.33, 31 trials, N = 7,228) and thrombocytopenia/haemorrhage (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.42; 21 trials, N = 4,507). There was insufficient evidence to support an effect of ESA on tumour response (fixed-effect RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06, 15 trials, N = 5,012).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient's clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.

Current status of pharmacologic therapies in patient blood management

Patient blood management(1,2) incorporates patient-centered, evidence-based medical and surgical approaches to improve patient outcomes by relying on the patient's own (autologous) blood rather than allogeneic blood. Particular attention is paid to preemptive measures such as anemia management. The emphasis on the approaches being "patient-centered" is to distinguish them from previous approaches in transfusion medicine, which have been "product-centered" and focused on blood risks, costs, and inventory concerns rather than on patient outcomes. Patient blood management(3) structures its goals by avoiding blood transfusion(4) with effective use of alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion.(5) These alternatives include autologous blood procurement, preoperative autologous blood donation, acute normovolemic hemodilution, and intra/postoperative red blood cell (RBC) salvage and reinfusion. Reviewed here are the available pharmacologic tools for anemia and blood management: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), iron therapy, hemostatic agents, and potentially, artificial oxygen carriers.

Darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

For years, the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) consisted of red blood cell transfusions. Major disadvantages of transfusions are their temporary effect and limitation to treatment of severe anemia. In an extensive clinical trial program in patients with CIA, darbepoetin alfa (DA) - a long-acting recombinant human erythropoietin - was proven to be very effective in reducing transfusion needs in patients developing CIA. The administration is suitable with most chemotherapy schemes. Caution is needed in patients with a history of thrombo-embolic events, as a slightly higher incidence of these events is noted in patients treated with darbepoetin alfa or erythropoietin substitution agents (ESAs) in general. In recent years, concerns have been raised about a potential negative influence of these agents on survival. In this respect, it is important to make the distinction between studies on the treatment of existing CIA versus treatment with ESAs outside this indication. On the other hand, it has always been assumed that transfusions were a completely safe treatment, but concerns about a potential negative effect on survival have been raised for transfusions as well. The safety concerns with DA and ESAs in general led to a pharmacovigilance program and an adaptation of the guidelines for treatment of CIA, focusing on treatment of moderate CIA but no longer on mild CIA. Now that the most recent safety data of the pharmacovigilance program of ESAs is almost completed, the clinical impact of the shift to the treatment of only moderate anemia is discussed in this review, which provides a critical view on the indications of DA and the benefit-risk assessment, in order to provide good supportive care without harm to the patient.

Overview of supportive care in patients receiving chemotherapy: antiemetics, pain management, anemia, and neutropenia

With advancements in the field of oncology, more and more people are living with cancer. The prevalence of invasive cancer in the United States is estimated to be almost 12 million. The treatment of cancer as well as the malignancy itself can cause an immense number of side effects and other complications. This article explores the fundamentals of supportive care in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation treatment including prevention of nausea and vomiting, pain management, treatment of anemia and neutropenia. Proper supportive care can help improve clinical outcomes, reduce medical costs, and help patients with cancer live longer, happier, and healthier lives. For these reasons, it is important for pharmacists to possess a solid understanding of how to prevent and treat the adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiation treatment.

Hemoglobin level at initiation of darbepoetin alfa: impact on need for transfusion and associated costs in chemotherapy-induced anemia treatment in Europe

PURPOSE

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents can reduce red blood cell transfusion rates in patients developing anemia while receiving chemotherapy. We investigated potential cost savings from reduced transfusion rates in patients starting darbepoetin alfa (DA) at higher versus lower hemoglobin (Hb) levels.

METHODS

Two systematic literature reviews were performed: transfusion outcomes in patients receiving DA stratified by baseline Hb level and costs of transfusion in Europe. Potential cost savings were calculated by multiplying the difference in transfusion rates between Hb levels by the midpoint of transfusion costs.

RESULTS

Despite differences in baseline characteristics, treatment duration and analysis technique, the clinical studies (n = 8) showed that fewer transfusions were required when DA was initiated at higher versus lower Hb levels. The economic studies (n = 9) showed that 1 unit of transfusion ranged from <euro>130 to <euro>537 (2010-adjusted values). Cost savings from initiating DA at higher versus lower Hb levels were <euro>503-2,226 (2 units transfused) and <euro>880-3,895 (3.5 units) per ten patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfusion incidence increases with DA initiation at lower Hb levels. Potential cost savings depend on the number of units transfused and cost items included. DA initiation according to guidelines can reduce transfusions and potentially reduce transfusion-associated costs.

Use of darbepoetin alfa in European clinical practice for the management of chemotherapy-induced anaemia in four tumour types: final data from the CHOICE study

OBJECTIVES

The CHOICE study was a prospective, multicentre, observational study designed to assess levels of adherence in current clinical practice to the European product label and EORTC guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA) with darbepoetin alfa (DA). Here we present data split by tumour types: breast, colorectal, ovarian and lung.

METHODS

Haemoglobin (Hb) levels and red blood cell transfusion requirements were evaluated among patients with solid tumours in 11 European countries. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with a target Hb level of ≥10-≤12 g/dL.

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 1887 patients (mean ± SD 62.4 ± 11.4 years); 1585 (84%) had a current disease stage of ≥3. Common chemotherapy regimens were non-platinum + non-taxane based (n = 696 [37%]) or platinum + non-taxane based (n = 660 [35%]). Breast cancer (n = 575): The mean ± SD Hb level at baseline was 9.9 ± 0.8 g/dL (n = 568). Target Hb level was reached by 187 (55%) patients. Colorectal cancer (n = 310): At baseline the mean ± SD Hb level was 9.8 ± 0.8 g/dL (n = 306). Target Hb level was reached by 107 patients (56%). Ovarian cancer (n = 301): The mean ± SD Hb level at baseline was 9.7 ± 0.8 g/dL (n = 294). Target Hb level was reached by 81 patients (44%). Lung cancer (n = 701): At baseline the mean ± SD Hb level was 9.8 ± 0.9 g/dL (n = 692). Target Hb level was reached by 142 patients (39%).

SAFETY

Five severe or life-threatening adverse drug reactions were seen (three patients with breast cancer, one patient with colorectal cancer and one patient with ovarian cancer).

LIMITATIONS

Potential bias could not be excluded due to the study's observational nature.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the recommendations are adhered to in clinical practice, with the mean starting Hb level <10 g/dL irrespective of tumour type. Furthermore, DA is likely to be effective and well tolerated for the treatment of CIA in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian or lung cancer.

Contrasting effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on breast cancer cell response to cisplatin induced cytotoxicity

Background

Human recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEpo) that is used for the treatment of the chemotherapy-induced anaemia in cancer patients was shown to cause detrimental effects on the course of disease due to increased adverse events inflicting patient’s survival, potentially related to rHuEpo-induced cancer progression. In this study, we elucidate the effect of rHuEpo administration on breast cancer cell proliferation and gene expression after cisplatin (cDDP) induced cytotoxicity.

Materials and methods

Two breast carcinoma models, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, were used differing in oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors and p53 status. Cells were cultured with or without rHuEpo for 24 h or 9 weeks and their growth characteristics after cDDP treatment were assessed together with expression of genes involved in the p53-signaling pathway.

Results

Short-term exposure of breast cancer cells to rHuEpo lowers their proliferation and reduces cDDP cytotoxic potency. In contrast, long-term exposure of MCF-7 cells to rHuEpo increases proliferation and predisposes MCF-7 cells to cDDP cytotoxicity, but has no effect on MDA-MB-231 cells. MDA-MB-231 cells show altered level of ERK phosphorylation, indicating involvement of MAPK signalling pathway. Gene expression analysis of p53-dependent genes and bcl-2 gene family members confirmed differences between long and short-term rHuEpo effects, indicating the most prominent changes in BCL2 and BAD expression.

Conclusions

Proliferation and survival characteristics of MCF-7 cells are reversely modulated by the length of the rHuEpo exposure. On the other hand, MDA-MB-231 cells are almost irresponsive to long-term rHuEpo, supposedly due to the mutated p53 and ER(+)/PR(−) status. The p53 and ER/PR status may predict tumour response on rHuEpo and cDDP treatment.

Effects of erythropoietin receptors and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on disease progression in cancer

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) increase red blood cell (RBC) production in bone marrow by activating the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) on erythrocytic-progenitor cells. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are approved in the United States and Europe for treating anaemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy based on randomised, placebo-controlled trials showing that ESAs reduce RBC transfusions. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-safety issues include thromboembolic events and concerns regarding whether ESAs increase disease progression and/or mortality in cancer patients. Several trials have reported an association between ESA use and increased disease progression and/or mortality, whereas other trials in the same tumour types have not provided similar findings. This review thoroughly examines available evidence regarding whether ESAs affect disease progression. Both clinical-trial data on ESAs and disease progression, and preclinical data on how ESAs could affect tumour growth are summarised. Preclinical topics include (i) whether tumour cells express EpoR and could be directly stimulated to grow by ESA exposure and (ii) whether endothelial cells express EpoR and could be stimulated by ESA exposure to undergo angiogenesis and indirectly promote tumour growth. Although assessment and definition of disease progression vary across studies, the current clinical data suggest that ESAs may have little effect on disease progression in chemotherapy patients, and preclinical data indicate a direct or indirect effect of ESAs on tumour growth is not strongly supported.

Evaluation of clinical use and effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

PURPOSE

To investigate the patterns of use of darbepoetin alfa in Spanish centers, and to evaluate its effectiveness in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia under clinical practice conditions.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study in adult patients with non-myeloid malignancies who initiated chemotherapy and darbepoetin alfa. Data was collected for up to 16 weeks or until treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

A total of 685 patients (72.7% with solid tumors and 27.3% with hematologic malignancies) were included in the study. Median age was 64.7 years (range 18.5-88.9 years), 50.7% were women, 82.4% had ECOG status 0-1 and 80.5% had stage III/IV cancer. At darbepoetin initiation, mean hemoglobin (Hb) was 100 g/L (SD 10), with 11.0% and 23.1% of patients below 90 g/L in solid and hematologic malignancies, respectively. A decrease in transfusion requirements was observed between weeks 5-16 with respect to weeks 0-16 (13.3% [95% CI: 10.7 to 15.9] versus 19.0% [95% CI: 16.0 to 22.0]). Hb levels were significantly increased during the treatment (mean change of 10.4 g/L for solid tumors [p < 0.001], and 16.6 g/L for hematologic malignancies [p < 0.001]). The percentage of patients with baseline Hb level <110 g/L who achieved an Hb level ≥110 g/L during the study was 66.5% (95% CI: 62.5% to 70.5%). Six serious adverse reactions were considered related to darbepoetin alfa (thromboembolic events, 1.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitation of a retrospective design, our results suggest that darbepoetin alfa is a well tolerated treatment that increases hemoglobin levels and reduces the need for transfusion in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Hematologic outcomes and blood utilization in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) pre- and post-national coverage determination (NCD): results from a multicenter chart review

PURPOSE

In July 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) limited coverage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) through a National Coverage Determination (NCD). The primary objective of this study was to compare transfusion rates in patients with CIA with lung, breast, or colorectal cancer before and after the NCD.

METHODS

Adult Medicare patients with CIA treated at 49 community oncology clinics were selected from two time periods based on clinics' NCD implementation date. Chart data were abstracted for 12 weeks post-CIA episode start, defined as hemoglobin (Hb) level <11 g/dL while receiving chemotherapy or within 60 days of the last chemotherapy dose. Multivariate analyses were used to calculate the odds of transfusion and to assess the units of blood transfused, controlling for differences in demographics, clinical history, and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eight hundred pre-NCD and 994 post-NCD patients from 49 sites were selected. Of the patients, 56% used ESAs post-NCD vs. 88% pre-NCD (p < 0.0001). The duration of ESA use decreased in the post-NCD (32.1 days) vs. pre-NCD (48.4 days, p < 0.0001) group. The post-NCD group reported significantly lower Hb levels, higher odds of receiving a transfusion (odds ratio: 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.89, p = 0.0238) and increased blood utilization of 53% (units transfused: OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.15-2.04, p = 0.0034).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased frequency and duration of ESA administration were reported in the post-NCD vs. pre-NCD period. Findings were accompanied by a modest but statistically significant increase in transfusions and a decrease in Hb values.

Transfusion risk in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia when initiating darbepoetin alfa therapy at a baseline hemoglobin level of <9 g/dL versus 9 to <10 g/dL versus ≥ 10 g/dL: an exploratory analysis of a phase 3 trial

Darbepoetin alfa (DA) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) approved for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Safety concerns have prompted changes to the ESA-product information, which now recommends initiating ESAs at hemoglobin (Hb) levels < 10 g/dL (US) or ≤ 10 g/dL (EU). The present exploratory analysis of a DA trial examined how baseline-Hb levels at ESA initiation affect transfusion rates, Hb response, and safety outcomes in CIA patients. Data were retrospectively analyzed from a phase 3 trial of CIA patients randomised to 500 mcg DA every 3 weeks (Q3 W) or to 2.25 mcg/kg DA weekly (QW) for 15 weeks. In the current analysis, data were reanalyzed by baseline-Hb categories of <9 g/dL (n = 126), 9 to <10 g/dL (n = 225), and ≥ 10 g/dL (n = 354). The Q3 W and QW groups were combined. Transfusion rates were highest in the <9 g/dL baseline-Hb group in all time periods examined. The Kaplan-Meier percentage (95% CI) of patients achieving Hb ≥ 10 g/dL was 68% (59, 78) and 88% (82, 92) in the <9 g/dL and 9 to <10 g/dL baseline-Hb groups, respectively. With lower baseline-Hb, incidence of a ≥ 1 g/dL-Hb rise in 14 days progressively decreased. Incidence of venous thromboembolic events was similar in all baseline-Hb groups and similar between patients with or without a ≥ 1 g/dL-Hb rise in 14 days. Overall, transfusion risk increased and Hb response decreased at lower baseline-Hb levels in this exploratory analysis. When following ESA-product information to initiate ESAs at Hb ≤ 10 g/dL, the greatest benefit may be achieved when initiating close to 10 g/dL. Prospective studies are needed to further examine this hypothesis.

The role of erythropoietin and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in tumor progression

Over the past few decades, understanding of the physiologic function of erythropoietin (EPO) has evolved significantly. EPO binds to erythropoietin receptors (EPOR), initiating signaling that stimulates growth, inhibits apoptosis, and induces the differentiation of erythroid progenitors to increase red blood cell mass. EPO has additionally been shown to exert tissue-protective effects on multiple tissues, suggesting a pleiotropic mechanism of action. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) are used clinically for treating cancer-related anemia [chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA)]. Recent clinical trials have reported increased adverse events and/or reduced survival in ESA-treated cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, potentially related to EPO-induced cancer progression. Signaling pathways downstream of EPO/EPOR have been shown to influence numerous cellular functions in both normal and tumor cells, including proliferation, apoptosis, and drug resistance. Some studies have reported effects on proliferation, reduced chemotherapy efficacy, reduction of apoptosis, and resistance to selective therapies on cancer cell lines, whereas others have shown null effects. In addition, newer targeted cancer therapies that are directed toward specific signaling pathways may be antagonized by ESAs. This molecular interplay between anticancer agents and potential survival signals triggered by ESAs may have been underestimated and may contribute toward decreased survival seen in certain trials. As more targeted anticancer therapies become available, these types of interactions may mitigate therapeutic efficacy by allowing tumor cells to acquire drug resistance. Therefore, a more complete understanding of the complex pathways involved will allow for the rational use of ESAs for the safe treatment of CIA in oncology patients.

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemic patients with cancer

Anemia in cancer patients is common and often associated with decreased survival and quality-of-life scores. The introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for the treatment of anemia in patients with solid tumors and nonmyeloid malignancies in the 1990s has proved an important alternative to red blood cell transfusions. ESAs have been consistently shown to increase hemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements in anemic cancer patients whilst also being associated with improvements in quality of life. Several recent studies, however, have raised concerns about the safety of ESAs with regards to an increased number of thrombo-embolic events, decreased on-study survival and possible effects of ESAs on tumor progression. This has led to a reappraisal of the role of ESAs in the treatment of anemic cancer patients. It remains generally accepted that, if used within current guidelines and labeling recommendations, ESAs can still be considered safe in patients receiving chemotherapy once individual risks are balanced against possible benefits.

Current practice of darbepoetin alfa in the management of haemoglobin levels in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy - data from the CHOICE study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate adherence to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and European Summary of Product Characteristic (SmPC) guidance on recommended haemoglobin (Hb) values in routine clinical practice use of darbepoetin alfa (DA) in cancer patients internationally.

METHODS

This multicentre, prospective, observational study assessed DA use in 11 European countries. This interim analysis (IA) included ∼1300 breast, colorectal, ovarian or lung cancer patients receiving DA during any chemotherapy cycle. Hb level and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement data were collected.

RESULTS

Of the 1290 patients (mean [SD] age 62.5 [11.1] years) included in this IA full analysis set, 499 had lung, 387 breast, 192 colorectal and 212 ovarian cancer. Mean baseline Hb levels were <10 g/dL. At week 9, 426 (33%) patients had a Hb level of 10-12 g/dL, 165 (13%) of >12 g/dL, 226 (18%) of <10 g/dL and 473 (37%) had missing Hb values. 54% of the 672 patients still on the study at week 9 with available Hb values had Hb values of 10-12 g/dL. For patients with a baseline Hb of <10 g/dL, the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) percentage of patients with Hb levels ≥10 g/dL from week 1 to end of treatment period (EOTP) was 86%. For these patients, the K-M% of patients with Hb levels >13 g/dL from week 1 to EOTP was 10%. The K-M% of patients requiring RBC transfusions from week 5 to EOTP was 26% for all patients. Seven patients reported treatment-related non-serious adverse drug reactions, four were thromboses.

CONCLUSIONS

This IA suggests most patients were treated according to European SmPC guidance. Hb evolution during the study is consistent with data from clinical trials, implying DA is effective in increasing Hb levels in chemotherapy-induced anaemia patients. Hb levels >13 g/dL were infrequent. Limitations are related to the observational nature of this study.

Addition of darbepoetin alfa to dose-dense chemotherapy: results from a randomized phase II trial in small-cell lung cancer patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide

Darbepoetin alfa, an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), is used in cancer patients as a supportive care for anemia. For small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), several studies have shown that the administration of ESAs does not affect survival but decreases the need for blood transfusions and improves the quality of life (QOL) of patients receiving chemotherapy. The present randomized phase II study assessed the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the administration of darbepoetin alfa to patients with SCLC receiving dose-dense (every 2 weeks) standard chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin plus etoposide, pegfilgrastim prophylactically. Seventy-four chemotherapy-naive patients with limited or extensive SCLC received combination chemotherapy for 6 cycles, and half of the patients additionally received darbepoetin to achieve a target hemoglobin concentration of 12-13 g/dL. The primary study outcome, progression-free survival, showed no difference between the 2 arms of the study. Among the secondary endpoints, objective response was similar in the presence and absence of darbepoetin (best response rates = 75.0% vs. 77.8%). Likewise, 1-year survival rates were not different between the 2 treatment arms (40.1% vs. 45.9%). There were no significant differences in grade 3/4 toxicities. As expected, the need for blood transfusions differed significantly: 19.4% of patients in the darbepoetin arm received transfusions versus 38.9% in the control arm. Analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales at different time points showed that the darbepoetin group's QOL was significantly better for certain readouts and never significantly worse than that of the control group. Thus, the combination of darbepoetin alfa with dose-dense carboplatin plus etoposide was feasible and well tolerated. Addition of darbepoetin alfa to chemotherapy lowered the need for blood transfusions and did not affect measures of survival and objective response.

Patterns of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use for chemotherapy-induced anemia in lung cancer: results of a retrospective Hungarian real-life clinical data analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer carries a relatively high risk of chemotherapy-induced anemia, one of the most frequent hematological complications. Previous data show a lack of optimal anemia correction in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. This paper analyzes real-life data considering the prevalence and severity of chemotherapy-induced anemia, together with the frequency and efficacy of erythropoietin treatment of anemia in Hungarian lung cancer patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data of 482 patients with histological or cytological confirmed lung cancer receiving chemotherapy were collected retrospectively between 1 January and 31 December, 2008. In all, 83 (17%) of them developed chemotherapy-induced moderate to severe anemia (44.6% male, 55.4% female; mean age 70 ± 8.6 years; NSCLC 67.5%, small cell lung cancer 32.5%).

RESULTS

More than 50% of the patients suffering from moderate to severe chemotherapy-induced anemia (hemoglobin below 10 g/dl) did not receive erythropoietin treatment. Chemotherapy had to be postponed due to anemia in 32.26% of the patients receiving erythropoietin supplementation, while this was seen in 41.94% of the group without erythropoietin treatment (p < 0.05). In patients not receiving erythropoietin, the severity of anemia increased, while erythropoietin treated patients maintained acceptable hemoglobin levels after the end of the chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The data draws attention to the fact that nowadays chemotherapy-induced anemia is not treated according to current guidelines in many lung cancer cases in Hungary.

Management of anemia in cancer patients

Cancer-related anemia adversely affects quality of life and is associated with reduced overall survival. The correction of anemia in cancer patients has the potential to improve treatment efficacy and increase survival. A large number of studies demonstrate that treatment of anemia in cancer patients using erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) significantly increases hemoglobin levels, decreases transfusion requirements and improves quality of life, predominantly by reducing fatigue. Some data on the use of ESAs in cancer patients indicate an increased risk of thromboembolic events and a possibly increased risk of mortality. However, there is ample evidence that when ESAs are used within current guidelines, they are valuable and safe drugs for the treatment of anemia in patients receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. There are increasing data from prospective, randomized trials demonstrating better responses to ESAs with the concurrent use of iron. Blood transfusions are also helpful in the management of anemia in cancer patients, especially when there is a need for immediate increases in hemoglobin levels. In this article, we discuss recent aspects relating to treatment modalities for anemia in cancer patients.

Two faces for Janus: recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and cancer mortality

Untreated anemia in cancer patients has severe consequences for many organ systems. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are indicated for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients. Several studies in patients with solid tumors have shown that these agents effectively increase hemoglobin levels, improve the quality of life and reduce the requirement for emergency blood transfusions, regardless of the type of concomitantly administered chemotherapy. The meta-analysis evaluates the impact of ESAs during the active study period on mortality and the overall survival during the longest available follow-up, irrespective of anticancer treatment, with little heterogeneity between trials. A total of 10,441 patients on chemotherapy were enrolled in 38 trials. There was little evidence for a difference between trials of patients administered different anticancer treatments (p for interaction = 0.42). The meta-analysis demonstrated that ESAs increased mortality by 17% during the active study periods and worsened overall survival in patients with cancer. However, 62% of patients evaluated in this analysis started the ESA therapy with basal hemoglobin values over that recommended by ASCO/ASH guidelines. However, the high quality of meta-analysis and the novelty of the information do not represent an obstacle for the continued the use of ESAs within the revised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines and the revised labels.

Erythropoietin contrastingly affects bacterial infection and experimental colitis by inhibiting nuclear factor-κB-inducible immune pathways

Erythropoietin (EPO) is the principal cytokine regulating erythropoiesis through its receptor, EPOR. Interestingly, EPORs are also found on immune cells with incompletely understood functions. Here, we show that EPO inhibits the induction of proinflammatory genes including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase in activated macrophages, which is mechanistically attributable to blockage of nuclear factor (NF)-κB p65 activation by EPO. Accordingly, in systemic Salmonella infection, treatment of mice with EPO results in reduced survival and impaired pathogen clearance because of diminished formation of anti-microbial effector molecules such as TNF-α and NO. However, neutralization of endogenous EPO or genetic ablation of Epor promotes Salmonella elimination. In contrast, in chemically induced colitis, EPO-EPOR interaction decreases the production of NF-κB-inducible immune mediators, thus limiting tissue damage and ameliorating disease severity. These immune-modulatory effects of EPO may be of therapeutic relevance in infectious and inflammatory diseases.

Ten years of meta-analyses on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Since erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) were licensed in 1993, more than 70 randomized controlled trials and more than 20 meta-analyses and systematic reviews on their effectiveness were conducted. Here, we present a systematic review on the meta-analyses of trials evaluating ESAs in cancer patients.

METHODS

We included all published meta-analyses of at least five randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of ESAs versus control in patients with any type of cancer or myelodysplastic syndrome.

RESULTS

We included a total of 23 systematic reviews and meta-analyses (16 literature based and 7 based on individual patient data (IPD)) that assessed several outcomes. All 12 meta-analyses reporting on transfusion risks demonstrated that ESAs significantly reduce the risk of transfusions. Eleven meta-analyses (nine based on published data and two on IPD) evaluated thrombovascular events. An increased risk of thrombovascular events was observed in all but two meta-analyses (relative risks (RRs) ranging from 1.57 to 1.69). However, potential reporting and publication bias as well as detection bias call for a cautious interpretation of these results. Survival and mortality were evaluated in 18 meta-analyses, with the observed effect changing over time. While meta-analyses on studies conducted before 2002 showed beneficial effects of ESAs on survival, contrary results, i.e. worsened survival, was seen in meta-analyses including more recent studies.

DISCUSSION

The results from several meta-analyses show that ESAs in cancer patients reduce the risk for red blood cell transfusions and increase the risk for thrombovascular events and mortality. The effect of ESAs on mortality risk in patients receiving chemotherapy remains unclear. In clinical practice, the benefits and risks of ESAs should be carefully considered and decisions should be made based on each patient's situation and preferences.

Anemia, fatigue and aging

Aging is associated with increased incidence and prevalence of both cancer and anemia. Cancer and aging may conspire in making anemia more frequent and more severe. This article reviews the causes and the consequences of anemia in the older individual. The most common causes include chronic inflammation that is a typical manifestation of aging, iron deficiency that may be due to chronic hemorrhage, malabsorption and Helicobacter pylori infection, cobalamin deficiency from malabsorption and renal insufficiency. Other causes of anemia whose prevalence is not well established include myelodysplasia, copper deficiency, hypothyroidism, and sarcopenia. Anemia is associated with increased risk of mortality, functional dependence, dementia, falls, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. When correcting the anemia of older cancer patients one should remember that the erythropoietic stimulating agents (ESA) may stimulate cancer growth and cause thrombosis. These products may be safe when given exclusively to patients receiving chemotherapy and when the hemoglobin levels are maintained below 12 g/dL.

Phase I/II randomised study of a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (AMG 114) for the treatment of anaemia with concomitant chemotherapy in patients with non-myeloid malignancies

AMG 114 is a novel, hyperglycosylated erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. In preclinical studies, AMG 114 demonstrated increased potency and longer half-life than darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa. This phase I/II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of AMG 114 in patients with non-myeloid malignancies and chemotherapy-induced anaemia. Patients were randomised (1:5) to receive subcutaneous placebo or AMG 114 Q3W for 6 weeks in 3 dose cohorts of 15 μg (cohort A1), 50 μg (cohort A2), or 200 μg (cohort A3). Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The PK profile of AMG 114 was evaluated. Efficacy was assessed by change in haemoglobin from baseline to end of treatment. Forty-eight patients enrolled: 8 received placebo, 40 received AMG 114. No DLTs were observed; adverse events were consistent with underlying malignancies. The PK profile was dose-proportional over the dose range tested; terminal half-life of AMG 114 was approximately 130 h. Mean change (range) in haemoglobin from baseline in AMG 114-treated patients was -0.16 (-1.8 to 1.3), 0.21 (-1.5 to 3.4), and 0.76 (-1.0 to 2.9) g/dl in cohorts A1, A2, and A3, respectively. AMG 114 appeared to be well tolerated, but the study was halted, in part because of modest efficacy.

[Treatment with beta-erythropoietin in lung cancer--effectiveness and quality of life improvement in clinical practice]

Anemia is common among patients with malignant tumors, due to the disease and chemotherapy. Anemia decreases patient's quality of life, and worsens the dose-intensity of chemotherapy. The aim of this retrospective data-analysis was to evaluate quality of life and hemoglobin levels in 19 consecutive lung cancer patients receiving beta-erythropoietin, due to chemotherapy induced anemia. A self developed, patient source data based quality of life questionnaire was used. The mean pre-erythropoietin hemoglobin concentration of the patients was 96.31±6.72 g/L (mean±SD), the post-treatment hemoglobin concentration 111.63±14.05 g/L (p<0.05). During the chemotherapy of the 19 patients with lung cancer, transfusion was given only four times. The mean quality of life total score of the patients increased significantly during erythropoietin treatment that was resulted by the improvements of scores determining dizziness, tachycardia, and fatigue. Main limitations of this real life data analysis are low patient number and the lack of validation in the used questionnaire. In summary, according to our experiences, the use of beta-erythropoietin in patients with lung cancer results improved quality of life and a low rate of transfusions.

Erythropoietin in cancer patients: pros and cons

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anaemia is a frequent complication of cancer. Recently, some concerns have appeared regarding the safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for the treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. The current review will analyse the main arguments in favour of erythropoietin (EPO), as well as those against EPO in chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in cancer-related anaemia. The principal concerns are tumour progression, increased mortality and the risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Recent meta-analyses have come to divergent conclusions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several meta-analyses have reviewed the data regarding VTEs, EPO receptors on tumours and tumour progression as well as mortality.

SUMMARY

As of now, ESAs should only be used within the indications as given in the various guidelines.

Randomized phase 2 dose-finding study of weekly administration of darbepoetin alpha in anemic patients with lung or ovarian cancer receiving multicycle platinum-containing chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This is the first clinical trial for Japanese to evaluate the dose-response and determine the clinically effective dose of darbepoetin alpha by weekly subcutaneously administration in anemic patients with lung cancer or ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were required to have anemia (hemoglobin level of <or=11.0 g/dl). Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive darbepoetin alpha (1.0, 2.25 or 4.5 microg/kg) subcutaneously once a week for up to 12 weeks. The study drug was withheld from patients who had a hemoglobin level >15.0 g/dl (for men) or 14.0 g/dl (for women), and reinstated at 50% of the previous weekly dose when the hemoglobin level decreased to <or=13.0 g/dl. Quality-of-life assessments were conducted using the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-anemia (FACT-an) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Hemoglobin response rate was 31.6%, 55.6% and 70.3% in 1.0, 2.25 and 4.5 microg/kg groups, respectively. The dosages of 2.25 and 4.5 microg/kg thus met the clinically effective dose criterion of at least 50% of patients achieving a hemoglobin response. The FACT-fatigue subscale had a high internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha score. Although no improvement in FACT-fatigue subscale score from baseline to the end of the treatment phase was confirmed for any dose group, there was a correlation between FACT-fatigue subscale score and hemoglobin concentration. Darbepoetin alpha appears to be well tolerated in this setting and no dose-dependent adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Darbepoetin alpha alleviated anemia caused by platinum-based chemotherapy, and the dosage of 2.25 microg/kg was the lowest dose that met the clinically effective dose criteria when administered once weekly.

Parenteral iron therapy in cancer-associated anemia

Anemia is common in cancer patients. Its cause is multifactorial, so a brief workup is always necessary to rule out simple, reversible causes. Anemia of chronic disease/inflammation and chemotherapy-induced anemia are the most common causes. Symptomatic or clinically severe anemia may require treatment with blood transfusion or an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). If ESA therapy is chosen, developing evidence now suggests that, similar to chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis, the addition of intravenous iron can improve the response to ESA because of iron-restricted erythropoiesis, even in the iron-replete patient.

Darbepoetin alfa for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with a baseline hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL versus > or = 10 g/dL: an exploratory analysis from a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that darbepoetin alfa, an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), can reduce transfusions and increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Recent safety concerns, however, have prompted changes to ESA product information. In the European Union and United States, ESA therapy initiation for CIA is now recommended at a Hb level < or = 10 g/dL. The present exploratory analysis examined how ESA initiation at this Hb level may impact patient care.

METHODS

Data from a phase 3 randomized trial were retrospectively reanalyzed. CIA patients with nonmyeloid malignancies were randomized 1:1 to 500 mcg darbepoetin alfa every three weeks (Q3W) or 2.25 mcg/kg darbepoetin alfa weekly (QW) for 15 weeks. A previously published report from this trial showed Q3W dosing was non-inferior to QW dosing for reducing transfusions from week 5 to end-of-the-treatment period (EOTP). In the present analysis, outcomes were reanalyzed by baseline Hb <10 g/dL and > or = 10 g/dL. Endpoints included transfusion rates, Hb outcomes, and safety profiles.

RESULTS

This study reanalyzed 351 and 354 patients who initiated ESA therapy at a baseline Hb of <10 g/dL or > or = 10 g/dL, respectively. From week 5 to EOTP, the estimated Kaplan-Meier transfusion incidence (Q3W vs QW) was lower in the > or = 10 g/dL baseline-Hb group (14% vs 21%) compared with the <10 g/dL baseline-Hb group (36% vs 41%). By week 5, the > or = 10 g/dL baseline-Hb group, but not the <10 g/dL baseline-Hb group, achieved a mean Hb > or = 11 g/dL. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of percentage of patients (Q3W vs QW) who achieved Hb > or = 11 g/dL from week 1 to EOTP was 90% vs 85% in the > or = 10 g/dL baseline-Hb group and 54% vs 57% in the <10 g/dL baseline-Hb group. Both baseline-Hb groups maintained mean Hb levels <12 g/dL and had similar safety profiles, though more patients in the > or = 10 g/dL baseline-Hb group reached the threshold Hb of > or = 13 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory analysis, darbepoetin alfa Q3W and QW raised Hb levels and maintained mean Hb at <12 g/dL in both baseline-Hb groups. The > or = 10 g/dL baseline-Hb group had fewer transfusions and faster anemia correction. Additional studies should prospectively evaluate the relationship between Hb levels at ESA initiation and outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00118638.