A systematic review and critical evaluation of inflammatory cytokine associations in hidradenitis suppurativa

A systematic review and critical evaluation of immunohistochemical associations in hidradenitis suppurativa

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with significant morbidity and impact on quality of life. Our understanding of the pathophysiology is incomplete, impairing efforts to develop novel therapeutic targets. Immunohistochemistry studies have produced conflicting results and no systematic evaluation of study methods and results has been undertaken to date. Methods: This systematic review aimed to collate and describe all reports of immunohistochemical staining in HS. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and conducted in line with the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Potential bias was assessed using the NIH Criteria and antibodies used across various studies were tabulated and compared. Results: A total of 22 articles were identified describing results from 494 HS patients and 168 controls. 87 unique immunohistochemical targets were identified. The overall quality of studies was sub-optimal with staining intensity confounded by active treatment. Conflicting data was identified and able to be reconciled through critical evaluation of the study methodology. Conclusions: Keratinocyte hyperplasia with loss of cytokeratin markers co-localizes with inflammation comprising of dendritic Cells, T-lymphocytes and macrophages, which are known to play central roles in inflammation in HS. Primary follicular occlusion as a pathogenic paradigm and the principal driver of HS is unclear based upon the findings of this review. Inflammation as a primary driver of disease with secondary hyperkeratosis and follicular occlusion is more consistent with the current published data.

A systematic review and critical evaluation of immunohistochemical associations in hidradenitis suppurativa

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with significant morbidity and impact on quality of life. Our understanding of the pathophysiology is incomplete, impairing efforts to develop novel therapeutic targets. Immunohistochemistry studies have produced conflicting results and no systematic evaluation of study methods and results has been undertaken to date. Methods: This systematic review aimed to collate and describe all reports of immunohistochemical staining in HS. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO and conducted in line with the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Potential bias was assessed using the NIH Criteria and antibodies used across various studies were tabulated and compared. Results: A total of 22 articles were identified describing results from 494 HS patients and 168 controls. 87 unique immunohistochemical targets were identified. The overall quality of studies was sub-optimal with staining intensity confounded by active treatment. Conflicting data was identified and able to be reconciled through critical evaluation of the study methodology. Conclusions: Keratinocyte hyperplasia with loss of cytokeratin markers co-localizes with inflammation comprising of dendritic Cells, T-lymphocytes and macrophages, which are known to play central roles in inflammation in HS. Primary follicular occlusion as a pathogenic paradigm and the principal driver of HS is not consistent with the findings of this review. Inflammation as a primary driver of disease with secondary hyperkeratosis and follicular occlusion is more consistent with the current published data.