Validity of the AM-PAC "6-Clicks" inpatient daily activity and basic mobility short forms

Determinants of acute care discharge in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with COPD basic mobility scores on the AM-PAC "6-clicks" measure completed at discharge had the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting discharge to home and need for rehab services.

Prognosis of Individual-Level Mobility and Daily Activities Recovery From Acute Care to Community, Part 2: A Proof-of-Concept Single Group Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate a proof-of-concept for prognostic models of post-stroke recovery on activity level outcomes.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort with repeated measures from acute care, inpatient rehabilitation, and post-discharge follow-up to 6 months post-stroke.

SETTING

Enrollment from a single Midwest USA inpatient rehabilitation facility with community follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

One-hundred fifteen persons recovering from stroke admitted to an acute rehabilitation facility (N=115).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Basic Mobility and Daily Activities domains administered as 6 Clicks and patient-reported short forms.

RESULTS

The final Basic Mobility model defined a group-averaged trajectory rising from a baseline (pseudo-intercept) T score of 35.5 (P<.001) to a plateau (asymptote) T score of 56.4 points (P<.001) at a negative exponential rate of -1.49 (P<.001). Individual baseline scores varied by age, acute care tissue plasminogen activator, and acute care length of stay. Individual plateau scores varied by walking speed, acute care tissue plasminogen activator, and lower extremity Motricity Index scores. The final Daily Activities model defined a group-averaged trajectory rising from a baseline T score of 24.5 (P<.001) to a plateau T score of 41.3 points (P<.001) at a negative exponential rate of -1.75 (P<.001). Individual baseline scores varied by acute care length of stay, and plateau scores varied by self-care, upper extremity Motricity Index, and Berg Balance Scale scores.

CONCLUSIONS

As a proof-of-concept, individual activity-level recovery can be predicted as patient-level trajectories generated from electronic medical record data, but models require attention to completeness and accuracy of data elements collected on a fully representative patient sample.

Activity Measure for Post-acute Care Mobility Scoring System: Comparison of Nursing and Physical Therapy Evaluation for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients

BACKGROUND

Optimizing resource utilization after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has become increasingly vital. The Activity Measure for Post-acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-clicks" scoring system is a validated, physical therapist (PT)-administered metric of patient basic mobility and predicts discharge disposition. This study aimed to determine whether the use of AM-PAC scoring by nurses in the postoperative period could (1) substitute for AM-PAC scoring by therapists and (2) predict 90-day outcomes in TJA patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all primary TJAs conducted by two surgeons at a single institution from 2019 to 2021. Patients underwent postoperative AM-PAC evaluation by nursing and physical therapy within 24 hours of surgery, and specific timing of nursing and PT scores was determined. Inter-rater reliability between therapy and nursing scores was analyzed. Multiple regression was used to determine the association between AM-PAC scores and readmissions, complications, length of stay, and nonhome discharge.

RESULTS

In total, 1,119 patients were included. Agreement testing between therapy and nursing scores was weak for all six AM-PAC components, with a Spearman correlation of 0.437. Nursing scores were typically conducted earlier than therapist scores (204.0 ± 249.9 minutes versus 523.5 ± 449.4 minutes; P < 0.001). Therapy and nursing scores were not notable predictors for 90-day complications or readmissions. However, higher therapy and nursing scores were predictors of less than 2-day hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.63, P < 0.001; OR 0.88, P < 0.001) and fewer nonhome discharges (OR 0.62, P < 0.001; OR 0.84, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although nursing-driven mobility assessments could potentially improve efficiency of patient discharge and control costs, nursing AM-PAC scoring did not serve as an appropriate substitute for PT scoring in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty at our institution.

Preoperative characteristics are associated with increased likelihood of low early postoperative mobility after adult spinal deformity surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Low early postoperative mobility (LEPOM) has been shown to be associated with increased length of hospital stay, complication rates, and likelihood of nonhome discharge. However, few studies have examined preoperative characteristics associated with LEPOM in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

PURPOSE

To investigate which preoperative patient characteristics may be associated with LEPOM after ASD surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Included were 86 ASD patients with fusion of ≥5 levels for whom immediate-postoperative AM-PAC Basic Mobility Inpatient Short Form (6-Clicks) scores had been obtained.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of this study was the likelihood of LEPOM, defined as an AM-PAC score ≤15, which is associated with inability to stand for more than 1 minute.

METHODS

Significant cutoffs for preoperative characteristics associated with LEPOM were determined via threshold linear regression. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the impact of preoperative characteristics on the likelihood of LEPOM.

RESULTS

LEPOM was recorded in 38 patients (44.2%). Threshold regression identified the following cutoffs to be associated with LEPOM: preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores of ≥68 for Pain, <28.3 for Physical Function, and ≥63.4 for Anxiety; preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) score of ≥60; and body mass index (BMI) of ≥35.2. On multivariate analysis, preoperative PROMIS scores of ≥68 for Pain (odds ratio [OR] 5.3, confidence interval [CI] 1.2-22.8, p=.03), <28.3 for Physical Function (OR 10.1, CI 1.8-58.2, p=.01), and ≥63.4 for Anxiety (OR 4.7, CI 1.1-20.8, p=.04); preoperative ODI score ≥60 (OR 38.8, CI 4.0-373.6, p=.002); BMI ≥35.2 (OR 14.2, CI 1.3-160.0, p=.03), and male sex (OR 5.4, CI 1.2-23.7, p=.03) were associated with increased odds of LEPOM.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PROMIS Pain, Physical Function, and Anxiety scores; ODI score; BMI; and male sex were associated with LEPOM. Several of these characteristics are modifiable risk factors and thus may be candidates for optimization before surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Total knee arthroplasty is associated with greater immediate post-surgical pain and opioid use than total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

As greater emphasis is being placed on opioid reduction strategies and implementation of multimodal analgesia, we sought to determine whether immediate post-surgical opioid consumption was different between THA and TKA.

METHODS

A single-institution total joint arthroplasty database was used to identify patients who underwent elective THA and TKA from 2016 to July 2019. Baseline demographic data, operative time (defined by incision time), and American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) class were collected. Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were calculated and derived from prospectively documented nursing opioid administration events, while visual analog scale (VAS) scores represented pain levels, both of which were collected as part of our institution's standard protocols. Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AMPAC) was used to determine physical therapy progress.

RESULTS

A total of 11,693 cases were identified: 5,909 THA (50.53%) and 5784 (49.47%) TKA. THA patients tended to be slightly younger (63.38 years, SD 11.61 years, vs 65.72 years, SD 9.56 years; p < 0.01) and have lower BMIs (28.92 kg/m² vs 32.52 kg/m²; p < 0.01). THA patients had lower ASA scores in comparison to TKA patients (p < 0.01). Aggregate opioid consumption (93.76 MME vs 147.55 MME; p < 0.01) along with first 24-h and 48-h usage was significantly less for THA as compared to TKA. Similarly, mean pain scores (4.15 vs 5.08; p < 0.01) were lower for THA, while AMPAC mobilization scores were higher (20.88 vs 19.29; p < 0.01) when compared to TKA.

CONCLUSION

THA patients reported lower pain scores and were found to require less opioid medication in the immediate post-surgical period than TKA patients.

Clinical Properties of the 6-Clicks and Functional Status Score for the ICU in a Hospital in the United Arab Emirates

OBJECTIVE

To determine measurement properties of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Inpatient Mobility Short Form (6-clicks) and Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit (FSS-ICU).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of scores from a cohort of patients over 24 months. Outcome measures were administered to patients referred to physical therapy on admission and discharge.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital in the United Arab Emirates.

PARTICIPANTS

2793 adults referred to physical therapy; 62% were male, with a median age of 58 (interquartile range=44-70) and the median length of stay was 14 days (interquartile range=8-28).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Instruments' clinical measurement properties: (1) responsiveness as per mean change and effect size; (2) floor and ceiling effects; and (3) minimal important difference. Results were analyzed for the whole group as well as 3 subgroups: patients with stroke as primary diagnosis (n = 644), discharged from heart and vascular floors (n = 642), and discharged from medical floors (n = 554).

RESULTS

The mean change and effect size (Cohen's d) for the 6-clicks were +8.3 (±8.6) and 0.97, and for the FSS-ICU they were +6.8 (±7.8) and 0.87, respectively. 6-Clicks had a floor effect on admission among patients with stroke (16.9%) and patients discharged from medical floors (19.3%), as well as a ceiling effect on discharge (25.5% in the whole group). The FSS-ICU had a ceiling effect on discharge (23.2% in whole group). The estimated minimal important difference for the 6-clicks was 4.3, and for the FSS-ICU it was 3.9.

CONCLUSION

Both instruments demonstrate good responsiveness in adults hospitalized in the United Arab Emirates. The FSS-ICU exhibited several advantages in performance that suggest greater clinical utility than the 6-clicks. Minimal important differences were generated, which has not been previously reported for the 6-clicks.

Is the Activity Measure for Postacute Care "6-Clicks" Tool Associated With Discharge Destination Postacute Stroke?

Objective

To investigate the association of poststroke physical function, measured within 24 hours prior to discharge from the acute care hospital using Activity Measure for Postacute Care (AM-PAC) Inpatient "6-Clicks" scores and discharge destination (home vs facility and inpatient rehabilitation facility [IRF] vs skilled nursing facility [SNF]).

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.

Setting

Acute care, University Hospital.

Participants

Individuals post acute ischemic stroke, N=721, 51.3% male, mean age 63.6±16.4 years.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

AM-PAC "6-Clicks" 3 domains: basic mobility, daily activity, and applied cognition.

Results

AM-PAC basic mobility and daily activity were significant predictors of discharge. Those in the home discharge group had AM-PAC basic mobility mean t scale score of 48.5 compared with a score of 34.8 for individuals sent to a facility and daily activity score of 47.2 compared with 32.7 for individuals sent to a facility. The AM-PAC variables accounted for an additional 24% of the variance in the discharge destination, with basic mobility and daily activity accounting for most of the variance.The AM-PAC scores were not statistically different and were not able to discriminate between placement in an IRF vs SNF. The mean basic mobility t scale score for individuals going to an IRF was 34.9 compared with 34.6 for those going to an SNF. The daily activity score for IRF was 32.8 compared with 32.6 for SNF. The AM-PAC accounted for no additional variance in discharge destination to an IRF or SNF.

Conclusions

The AM-PAC Inpatient "6-Clicks" 3 domains are able to distinguish individuals with stroke being discharged to home from postacute care (PAC) but not for differentiating between PAC facilities (IRF vs SNF) in this cohort of individuals post stroke.

Palliative Rehabilitation in Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation: Prognostic Factors and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognosis has a vital role for patients with cancer undergoing palliative rehabilitation in acute inpatient rehabilitation. This study aimed to identify the proportion of patients who survived <2 months after discharge and the associated prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective study of 163 consecutive patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation from September 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018 at a cancer center. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and putative prognostic factors, including Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) functional scores, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 163 patients, 27 (17%; 95% CI, 11-23) died within 60 days of discharge. These patients were more likely to be male (OR = 2.83; 95% CI, 1.16-6.92; P = .017); have longer hospital stays (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1-1.04; P = .015); receive ≥ weekly packed red blood cell (OR = 5.31; 95% CI, 1.86-15.1; P = .003) or platelet (OR = 4.57; 95% CI, 1.44-14.5; P = .014) transfusions; have lower AM-PAC daily activity scores upon discharge (OR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97; P = .006); and have lower AM-PAC basic mobility scores upon admission (OR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98; P = .018) and discharge (OR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94; P = <.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the male sex (OR = 2.71; 95% CI, 1.03-7.15; P = .037) was independently associated with ≤2 months survival, whereas AM-PAC basic mobility score at admission of >33 (OR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.07-0.79; P = .022) was less likely.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 6 patients who completed acute inpatient rehabilitation died within 2 months of discharge, had poorer baseline functional status, and were less likely to regain function than those who lived longer.

Physical dependence and urinary catheters both strongly relate to physical inactivity in adults during hospital stay: a cross-sectional, observational study

PURPOSE

To determine which factors are associated with physical inactivity in hospitalized adults of all ages.

METHODS

A cross-sectional sample of 114 adults admitted to a gastrointestinal surgery, internal medicine or cardiology hospital ward (median age 60, length of stay 13 days) were observed during one random day from 8 am to 8 pm using wireless accelerometers and behavioral mapping protocols. Factors (e.g., comorbidities, self-efficacy, independence in mobility, functional restraints) were collected from medical records, surveys, and observations.

RESULTS

Patients were physically active for median(IQR) 26 (13-52.3) min and were observed to lie in bed for 67.3%, sit for 25.2%, stand for 2.5%, and walk for 5.0% of the time. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that physical inactivity was 159.87% (CI = 89.84; 255.73) higher in patients dependent in basic mobility, and 58.88% (CI = 10.08; 129.33) higher in patients with a urinary catheter (adjusted R² = 0.52). The fit of our multivariable regression analysis did not improve after adding hospital ward to the analysis (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Independence in mobility and urine catheter presence are two important factors associated with physical inactivity in hospitalized adults of all ages, and these associations do not differ between hospital wards. Routine assessments of both factors may therefore help to identify physically inactive patients throughout the hospital.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealthcare professionals should be aware that physical inactivity during hospital stay may result into functional decline.Regardless of which hospital ward patients are admitted to, once patients require assistance in basic mobility or have a urinary catheter they are at risk of physical inactivity during hospital stay.Implementing routine assessments on the independence of basic mobility and urine catheter presence may therefore assist healthcare professionals in identifying physically inactive patients before they experience functional decline.

AM-PAC mobility scores predict non-home discharge following adult spinal deformity surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery requires an extended recovery period and often non-routine discharge. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility Inpatient Short Form (6-Clicks) is a prediction tool, validated for other orthopedic procedures, to assess a patient's ability to mobilize after surgery.

PURPOSE

To assess the thresholds of AM-PAC scores that determine non-home discharge disposition in patients who have undergone ASD surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety consecutive ASD patients with ≥5 levels fused who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2018, with postoperative AM-PAC scores measured before discharge, were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Non-home discharge disposition METHODS: Patients with routine home discharge were compared to those with non-home discharge. Bivariate analysis was first conducted to compare these groups by preoperative demographics, comorbidities, radiographic alignment, surgical characteristics, HRQOLs, and AM-PAC measurements. Threshold linear regression with Bayesian information criteria was utilized to identify the optimal cutoffs for AM-PAC scores associated with increased likelihood of non-home discharge. Finally, multivariable analysis controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, levels fused, perioperative complication, and home support was conducted to assess each threshold.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (40%) of 90 patients analyzed had non-home discharge. On bivariate analysis, first AM-PAC score (13.5 vs. 17), last AM-PAC score (17 vs. 20), and AM-PAC change per day (+.387 vs. +1) were all significantly associated with non-home discharge. Threshold regression identified that cutoffs of ≤15 for first AM-PAC score, <17 for last AM-PAC score, and <+0.625 for daily AM-PAC change were associated with non-home discharge. On multivariable analysis, first AM-PAC score ≤15 (odds ratio [OR] 11.28; confidence interval [CI] 2.96-42.99; p<.001), last AM-PAC score <17 (OR 33.57; CI 5.85-192.82; p<.001), and AM-PAC change per day <+0.625 (OR 6.24; CI 2.01-19.43; p<.001) were all associated with increased odds of non-home discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

First AM-PAC score of 15 or less can help predict non-home discharge. A goal of daily AM-PAC increases of 0.625 points toward a final AM-PAC score of 17 can aid in achieving home discharge. The early AM-PAC mobility threshold of ≤15 may help prepare for non-home discharge, while AM-PAC daily changes per day <0.625 and final AM-PAC <17 may provide goals for mobility improvement during the early postoperative period in order to prevent non-home discharge.

Early prediction of patient discharge disposition in acute neurological care using machine learning

BACKGROUND

Acute neurological complications are some of the leading causes of death and disability in the U.S. The medical professionals that treat patients in this setting are tasked with deciding where (e.g., home or facility), how, and when to discharge these patients. It is important to be able to predict potential patient discharge outcomes as early as possible during the patient's hospital stay and to know what factors influence the development of discharge planning. This study carried out two parallel experiments: A multi-class outcome (patient discharge targets of 'home', 'nursing facility', 'rehab', 'death') and binary class outcome ('home' vs. 'non-home'). The goal of this study is to develop early predictive models for each experiment exploring which patient characteristics and clinical variables significantly influence discharge planning of patients based on the data that are available only within 24 h of their hospital admission.  METHOD: Our methodology centers around building and training five different machine learning models followed by testing and tuning those models to find the best-suited predictor for each experiment with a dataset of 5,245 adult patients with neurological conditions taken from the eICU-CRD database.

RESULTS

The results of this study show XGBoost to be the most effective model for predicting between four common discharge outcomes of 'home', 'nursing facility', 'rehab', and 'death', with 71% average c-statistic. The XGBoost model was also the best-performer in the binary outcome experiment with a c-statistic of 76%. This article also explores the accuracy, reliability, and interpretability of the best performing models in each experiment by identifying and analyzing the features that are most impactful to the predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

The acceptable accuracy and interpretability of the predictive models based on early admission data suggests that the models can be used in a suggestive context to help guide healthcare providers in efforts of planning effective and equitable discharge recommendations.

Is there a difference in mobility and inpatient physical therapy need after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty? A decade-by-decade analysis from 60 to 99 years

INTRODUCTION

Extended inpatient rehabilitation (PT) after total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a significant impact on total care costs. As patients age, extended PT might be required following THA and TKA. This study examined the relationship between patient age, functional mobility, inpatient PT need, and discharge disposition in THA and TKA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients aged 60 + undergoing primary THA or TKA between 2018 and 2020 at an orthopedic hospital. Comparing by age-decade, 7374 (3600 THA, 3774 TKA) sexagenarians, 5350 (2367 THA, 2983 TKA) septuagenarians, 1356 (652 THA, 704 TKA) octogenarians, and 78 (52 THA, 26 TKA) nonagenarians were analyzed. We compared the number of PT sessions needed for discharge clearance and the postoperative functional mobility using the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) tool. Statistical analyses included ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey's HSD for continuous data and Chi-squared test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

The number of PT sessions required for discharge clearance increased with age after THA (3.3 ± 1.9 sessions vs 3.8 ± 2.1 vs 5.0 ± 2.7 vs 6.2 ± 3.0; p < 0.01) and TKA (4.0 ± 2.1 vs 4.7 ± 3.1 vs 5.2 ± 2.8 vs 5.0 ± 1.6; p < 0.01). The functional mobility improvement as measured by AM-PAC was significantly lower for nonagenarians after THA (4.9 ± 2.8 vs 5.1 ± 2.8 vs 4.6 ± 3.3 vs 3.3 ± 3.9; p < 0.01) and TKA (5.0 ± 2.9 vs 4.7 ± 3.2 vs 3.9 ± 3.4 vs 3.2 ± 2.6; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients in their eighth and ninth decade had less improvement in functional mobility during in-hospital rehabilitation and utilized more PT services. However, clinical results in the elderly are still satisfying and the data may be helpful for resource utilization planning and risk-adjustment in value-based payment models.

The Predictive Validity of Functional Outcome Measures With Discharge Destination for Hospitalized Medical Patients

Objective

To investigate the predictive validity for discharge to home or facility of 4 functional mobility outcome measures.

Design

Retrospective, observational study.

Setting

Urban, academic hospital in the United States.

Participants

Adult patients (N=3999) admitted to medical units between June 1, 2019, and February 29, 2020, with 2 or more recorded scores on each of 4 tools: Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) 6-Clicks Basic Mobility and Daily Activity, Henry Ford Mobility Level, and The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Mobility scores and discharge destination.

Results

For the 3999 subjects, 51.4% went home at discharge and had higher mean scores on each measure than those not returning home. Both early (I) and later (II) time point for each measure had positive predictability for discharge home. AM-PAC 6-Clicks had the highest confidence intervals for early and later recorded scores. The c-statistic value for Basic Mobility I (cut point=16) was 0.74 and for II (cut point=18) was, 0.79. The value for Daily Activity I (cut point=18) was 0.75 and for Daily Activity II (cut point=18) was 0.80). The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility and Henry Ford Mobility Level measures were less discriminative at initial score (c-statistic 0.704 and 0.665, respectively) and final score (c-statistic 0.74 and 0.75, respectively).

Conclusions

Functional outcome measures have good predictive validity for discharge destination. The AM-PAC Basic mobility score appears to have a slightly higher confidence interval than the other tools in this study design.

Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care “6-Clicks” Basic Mobility Scores Predict Discharge Destination After Acute Care Hospitalization in Select Patient Groups: A Retrospective, Observational Study

•

A standardized Basic Mobility score of 42.9 predicts home vs institution discharge.

•

Orthopedic diagnoses may have a cutoff score of 41.5 to predict home discharge.

•

Cutoff scores vary by diagnostic group and discharge destination.

•

Cutoff scores vary by time of assessment relative to admission for some diagnoses.

Objectives

To establish cutoff scores for the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care “6-Clicks” standardized Basic Mobility scores (sBMSs) for predicting discharge destination after acute care hospitalization for diagnostic subgroups within an acute care population and to evaluate the need for a second score to improve predictive ability.

Design

Retrospective, observational design.

Setting

Major medical center in metropolitan area.

Participants

Electronic medical records of 1696 adult patients (>18 years) admitted to acute care from January to October 2018. Records were stratified by orthopedic, cardiac, pulmonary, stroke, and other neurological diagnoses (N=1696). Interventions: None

Main Outcome Measure

Physical therapists scored patients’ sBMSs after referral for physical therapy and prior to discharge. Receiver operating characteristic curves delineated sBMS cutoff scores distinguishing various pairings of home, home with services, inpatient rehabilitation, or skilled nursing facility discharges. First and second sBMSs were compared with percentage change of the area under the curve and inferential statistics.

Results

Home vs institution cutoff score was 42.88 for combined sample, pulmonary and neurological cases. The cutoff score for orthopedic diagnoses score was 41.46. Cardiac and stroke model quality invalidated cutoff scores. Home without services vs skilled nursing discharges and home with services vs skilled nursing discharges were predicted with varying cutoff scores per diagnosis. sBMS cutoff scores collected closer to discharge were either the same or higher than first cutoffs, with varying effects on predictive ability.

Conclusions

sBMSs can help decide institution vs home discharge and finer distinctions among discharge settings for some diagnostic groups. A single sBMS may provide sufficient assistance with discharge destination decisions but timing of scoring and diagnostic group may influence cutoff score selection.

Physiotherapists' and Physiotherapy Assistants' Perspectives on Using Three Physical Function Measures in the Intensive Care Unit: A Mixed-Methods Study

Purpose: We sought to understand physiotherapists' and physiotherapist assistants' perspectives on using three physical function measures in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting: the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Inpatient Mobility Short Form, the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility scale, and the Functional Status Score for the Intensive Care Unit. Method: A six-item questionnaire was developed and administered to physiotherapists and physiotherapist assistants working in adult ICUs at one U.S. teaching hospital. A single semi-structured focus group was conducted with seven physiotherapists, recruited using purposive sampling to include participants with a range of clinical experience. Results: Of 22 potential participants, 18 physiotherapists and 2 physiotherapist assistants completed the questionnaire. Seven physiotherapists participated in the focus group. The questionnaire found favourable perspectives on the use of the three physical function measures in clinical practice, and the focus group identified five themes related to clinicians' experience with using them: (1) ease of scoring, (2) usefulness in inter-professional communication, (3) general ease of use, (4) responsiveness to change in physical function, and (5) generalizability across patients. Conclusions: The most frequently discussed themes in this study were ease of scoring and usefulness in inter-professional communication, highlighting their importance in designing and selecting physical function measures for clinical use in the ICU setting.

Utility of the AM-PAC "6 Clicks" Basic Mobility and Daily Activity Short Forms to Determine Discharge Destination in an Acute Stroke Population

IMPORTANCE

The American Heart Association and American Stroke Association recommend early identification of level of rehabilitative care as a priority after stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6 Clicks" Daily Activity and Basic Mobility forms to determine the next level of rehabilitation after hospitalization for adults with stroke.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort design using medical records from 2015 to 2016.

SETTING

Major urban hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients admitted to the stroke service, with a confirmed stroke, who were seen by a physical or occupational therapist; who had a 6 Clicks Basic Mobility or Daily Activity score at initial evaluation; and who were discharged to home, an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), or a subacute skilled nursing facility (SNF).

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Length of stay and discharge destination.

RESULTS

Seven hundred four participants (M age = 68.28 yr; 51.21% female) were included. Analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic curves were performed. Daily Activity scores were highest for home discharge, lower for IRF discharge, and lowest for SNF discharge; Basic Mobility showed a similar pattern. Cutoff values distinguishing home from further inpatient rehabilitation were 44.50 for Basic Mobility and 39.40 for Daily Activity scores (area under the curve [AUC] = .82 for both forms), with scores of 34.59 (AUC = 0.64) and 31.32 (AUC = 0.67) separating IRF from SNF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Therapists should incorporate 6 Clicks scores into their discharge planning. What This Article Adds: This research demonstrates the utility of an outcome measure in the acute care setting that assists in planning discharge destination for patients with stroke.

Development and internal validation of a prediction model to identify older adults at risk of low physical activity levels during hospitalisation: a prospective cohort study

Background

Inactive behaviour is common in older adults during hospitalisation and associated with poor health outcomes. If patients at high risk of spending little time standing/walking could be identified early after admission, they could be given interventions aimed at increasing their time spent standing/walking. This study aims to identify older adults at high risk of low physical activity (PA) levels during hospitalisation.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of 165 older adults (≥ 70 years) admitted to the department of Internal Medicine of Maastricht University Medical Centre for acute medical illness. Two prediction models were developed to predict the probability of low PA levels during hospitalisation. Time spent standing/walking per day was measured with an accelerometer until discharge (≤ 12 days). The average time standing/walking per day between inclusion and discharge was dichotomized into low/high PA levels by dividing the cohort at the median (50.0%) in model 1, and lowest tertile (33.3%) in model 2. Potential predictors—Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC), age, sex, walking aid use, and disabilities in activities of daily living—were selected based on literature and analysed using logistic regression analysis. Models were internally validated using bootstrapping. Model performance was quantified using measures of discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)) and calibration (Hosmer and Lemeshow (H–L) goodness-of-fit test and calibration plots).

Results

Model 1 predicts a probability of spending ≤ 64.4 min standing/walking and holds the predictors SPPB, AM-PAC and sex. Model 2 predicts a probability of spending ≤ 47.2 min standing/walking and holds the predictors SPPB, AM-PAC, age and walking aid use. AUCs of models 1 and 2 were .80 (95% confidence interval (CI) = .73—.87) and .86 (95%CI = .79—.92), respectively, indicating good discriminative ability. Both models demonstrate near perfect calibration of the predicted probabilities and good overall performance, with model 2 performing slightly better.

Conclusions

The developed and internally validated prediction models may enable clinicians to identify older adults at high risk of low PA levels during hospitalisation. External validation and determining the clinical impact are needed before applying the models in clinical practise.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03146-9.

Patient Versus Clinician Proxy Reliability of the AM-PAC "6-Clicks" Basic Mobility and Daily Activity Short Forms

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" mobility and activity short forms between patients and therapist proxies. As a secondary aim, reliability was examined when patients completed their self-report before versus after the therapist evaluation.

METHODS

Patients being seen for an initial physical therapist (N = 70) or occupational therapist (N = 71) evaluation in the acute care hospital completed the "6-Clicks" mobility short form (if a physical therapist evaluation) or activity short form (if an occupational therapist evaluation). Whether patients completed their self-assessment before or after the evaluation was randomized. Patient- and therapist-rated "6-Clicks" raw scores were converted to AM-PAC T-scores for comparison. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, and agreement was assessed with weighted kappa values.

RESULTS

The ICCs for the "6-Clicks" mobility and daily activity short forms were 0.57 (95% CI = 0.42-0.69) and 0.45 (95% CI = 0.28-0.59), respectively. For both short forms, reliability was higher when the patient completed the self-assessment after versus before the therapist evaluation (ICC = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47-0.80 vs ICC = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26-0.67 for the mobility short form; and ICC = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.29-0.70 vs ICC = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.06-0.56 for the activity short form).

CONCLUSION

Reliability of the "6-Clicks" total scores was moderate for both the mobility and activity short forms, though higher for the mobility short form and when patients' self-report occurred after the therapist evaluation.

IMPACT

Reliability of the AM-PAC "6-Clicks" short forms is moderate when comparing scores from patients with those of therapists responding as proxies. The short forms are useful for measuring participants' function in the acute care hospital; however, it is critical to recognize limitations in reliability between clinician- and patient-reported AM-PAC scores when evaluating longitudinal change and recovery.

Association of Physical Therapy Treatment Frequency in the Acute Care Hospital With Improving Functional Status and Discharging Home

BACKGROUND

Physical therapists (PTs) are consulted to address functional deficits during hospitalization, but the effect of PT visit frequency on patients' outcomes is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine whether PT visit frequency is independently associated with functional improvement, discharge home, and both outcomes combined.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Patients discharged from hospitals in 1 health system between 2017 and 2020, stratified by diagnostic subgroup: cardiothoracic and vascular, general medical/surgical, neurological, oncology, and orthopedic.

MEASURES

PT visit frequency was categorized as ≤2, >2-4, >4-7, >7 visits/week. Functional improvement was defined as ≥5-point improvement in Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care mobility score. Other outcomes were discharge home and both outcomes combined.

RESULTS

There were 243,779 patients included. Proportions within frequency categories ranged from 11.0% (>7 visits/wk) to 40.5% (≤2 visits/wk) and varied by subgroup. In the full sample, 36% of patients improved function, 64% were discharged home, and 27% achieved both outcomes. In adjusted analyses, relative to ≤2 visits/week, the adjusted relative risk (aRR) for functional improvement increased incrementally with higher frequency (aRR=1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.26 for >2-4 visits to aRR=1.78, 95% confidence interval: 1.55-2.03 for >7 visits). For all patients and within subgroups, the higher frequency was also associated with a greater likelihood of discharging home and achieving both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

More frequent PT visits during hospitalization may facilitate functional improvement and discharge home. Most patients, however, receive infrequent visits. Further research is needed to determine the optimal delivery of PT services to meet individual patient needs.

Continuous interscalene versus phrenic nerve-sparing high-thoracic erector spinae plane block for total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The high-thoracic erector spinae plane block (HT-ESPB) has been reported as an effective analgesic modality for the shoulder region without phrenic nerve palsy. The goal of this study was to compare the HT-ESPB as a phrenic nerve-sparing alternative to an interscalene block for total shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

Thirty patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty at Stanford Health Care (Palo Alto, CA, USA) were enrolled in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. We randomized 28 patients to receive either an interscalene or HT-ESPB perineural catheter preoperatively; 26 patients were included in the final analysis. The study was powered for the primary outcome of incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Other outcome measures included incentive spirometry volume, brachial plexus motor and sensory exams, adverse events, pain scores, and opioid consumption.

RESULTS

The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in the HT-ESPB catheter group was significantly lower than in the interscalene catheter group (0/12, 0% vs 14/14, 100%; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in pain scores and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents) between the interscalene and HT-ESPB groups through postoperative day (POD) 2. Nevertheless, the mean (standard deviation) point estimates for opioid consumption for the HT-ESPB group were higher than for the interscalene group in the PACU (HT-ESPB: 24.8 [26.7] mg; interscalene: 10.7 [21.7] mg) and for POD 0 (HT-ESPB: 20.5 [25.0] mg; interscalene: 6.7 [12.0] mg). In addition, cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was significantly higher at POD 0 (PACU through POD 0) in the HT-ESPB group (45.3 [39.9] mg) than in the interscalene group (16.6 [21.9] mg; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that continuous HT-ESPB can be a phrenic nerve-sparing alternative to continuous interscalene brachial plexus blockade, although the latter provided superior opioid-sparing in the immediate postoperative period. This was a small sample size study, and further investigations powered to detect differences in analgesic and quality of recovery score endpoints are needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT03807505); registered 17 January 2019.

Key Data Elements for Longitudinal Tracking of Physical Function: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study

OBJECTIVE

Physical function is associated with important outcomes, yet there is often a lack of continuity in routine assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine data elements and instruments for longitudinal measurement of physical function in routine care among patients transitioning from acute care hospital setting to home with home health care.

METHODS

A 4-round modified Delphi process was conducted with 13 participants with expertise in physical therapy, health care administration, health services research, physiatry/medicine, and health informatics. Three anonymous rounds identified important and feasible data elements. A fourth in-person round finalized the recommended list of individual data elements. Next, 2 focus groups independently provided additional perspectives from other stakeholders.

RESULTS

Response rates were 100% for online rounds 1, 3, and 4 and 92% for round 2. In round 1, 9 domains were identified: physical function, participation, adverse events, behavioral/emotional health, social support, cognition, complexity of illness/disease burden, health care utilization, and demographics. Following the fourth round, 27 individual data elements were recommended. Of these, 20 (74%) are "administrative" and available from most hospital electronic medical records. Additional focus groups confirmed these selections and provided input on standardizing collection methods. A website has been developed to share these results and invite other health care systems to participate in future data sharing of these identified data elements.

CONCLUSION

A modified Delphi consensus process was used to identify critical data elements to track changes in patient physical function in routine care as they transition from acute hospital to home with home health.

IMPACT

Expert consensus on comprehensive and feasible measurement of physical function in routine care provides health care professionals and institutions with guidance in establishing discrete medical records data that can improve patient care, discharge decisions, and future research.

New complementary perspectives for inpatient physical function assessment: matched clinician-report and patient-report short form measures from the PROMIS adult physical function item bank

Purpose

To develop two item content-matched, precise, score-level targeted inpatient physical function (PF) short form (SF) measures: one clinician-reported, one patient-reported. Items were derived from PROMIS PF bank content; scores are reported on the PROMIS PF T-score metric.

Methods

The PROMIS PF item bank was reviewed for content measuring lower-level PF status (T-scores 10–50) with high item set score-level reliability (≥ 0.90). Selected patient-reported (PR) items were also edited to function as clinician-reported (CR) items. Items were reviewed by clinicians and field tested; responses were assessed for meeting PROMIS measure development standards. New CR and PR items were calibrated using patient responses to the original PROMIS PF items as anchoring data. SFs were constructed, based on content and precision.

Results

Nine PROMIS PF items were candidates for CR and PR inpatient PF assessment; three new items were written to extend content coverage. An inpatient sample (N = 515; 55.1% female; mean age = 66.2 years) completed 12 PR items and was assessed by physical therapists (using 12 CR items). Analyses indicated item sets met expected measure development standards. Twelve new CR and three new PR items were linked to the PROMIS PF metric (raw score r = 0.73 and 0.90, respectively). A 5-item CR SF measure was constructed; score-level reliabilities were ≥ 0.90 for T-scores 13–45. A 5-item PR SF measure was assembled, mirroring CR SF content.

Conclusions

Two item content-matched SFs have been developed for clinician and patient reporting and are an effective, efficient means of assessing inpatient PF and offer complementary perspectives.

CONNECT: A pragmatic clinical trial testing a remotely provided linkage to service coordination after hospitalization for TBI

OBJECTIVE

To test whether a complex behavioral intervention delivered remotely to connect individuals to clinical resources after hospitalization for TBI improved their quality of life.

DESIGN/METHODS

Community-based randomized pragmatic clinical trial. Main measures TBI-QOL, Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC), Clinical Satisfaction and Competency Rating Scale.

RESULTS

332 individuals ≥18 years-old hospitalized for TBI in four upper Midwest states were randomized to Remote (n = 166) and Usual Care (n = 166) groups. The groups were equivalent and representative of their state population's racial and ethnic composition, age, and proportion living in rural communities. There were no significant differences within or between experimental groups over the study period in TBI-QOL t-scores. There was a significant improvement in AM-PAC Daily Activities within the Remote group and a significant between-group improvement in clinical satisfaction for the Remote group.

CONCLUSION

Enrolling a representative, regional community-based sample of individuals with TBI can be successful, and delivering a customized complex behavioral intervention remotely is feasible. The overall lack of intervention effectiveness was likely due to enrolling individuals without pre-identified clinical needs, initiating intervention after the immediate post-acute phase when needs are often highest, inability to provide direct clinical care remotely, and potential lack of outcome measure responsiveness in our sample.

PLAN and AM-PAC "6-Clicks" Scores to Predict Discharge Disposition After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Determination of the appropriate post-discharge disposition after total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty is a challenging multidisciplinary decision. Algorithms used to guide this decision have been administered both preoperatively and postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to simultaneously evaluate the predictive ability of 2 such tools-the preoperatively administered Predicting Location after Arthroplasty Nomogram (PLAN) and the postoperatively administered Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" basic mobility tools-in accurately determining discharge disposition after elective THA and TKA.

METHODS

The study included 11,672 patients who underwent THA (n = 4,923) or TKA (n = 6,749) at a single large hospital system from December 2016 through March 2020. PLAN and "6-Clicks" basic mobility scores were recorded for all patients. Regression models and receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the tools' prediction concordance with the actual discharge disposition (home compared with a facility).

RESULTS

PLAN scores had a concordance index of 0.723 for the THA cohort and 0.738 for the TKA cohort. The first "6-Clicks" mobility score (recorded within the first 48 hours postoperatively) had a concordance index of 0.813 for the THA cohort and 0.790 for the TKA cohort. When PLAN and first "6-Clicks" mobility scores were used together, a concordance index of 0.836 was observed for the THA cohort and 0.836 for the TKA cohort. When the PLAN and "6-Clicks" agreed on home discharge, higher rates of discharge to home (98.0% for THA and 97.7% for TKA) and lower readmission rates (5.1% for THA and 7.0% for TKA) were observed, compared with when the tools disagreed.

CONCLUSIONS

PLAN and "6-Clicks" basic mobility scores were good-to-excellent predictors of discharge disposition after primary total joint arthroplasty, suggesting that both preoperative and postoperative variables influence discharge disposition. We recommend that preoperative variables be collected and used to generate a tentative plan for discharge, and the final decision on discharge disposition be augmented by early postoperative evaluation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The determination of post-discharge needs after THA and TKA remains a complex clinical decision. This study shows how simultaneously exploring the predictive ability of preoperative and postoperative assessment tools on discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty may be a useful aid in a value-driven health-care model.

Pain and Analgesia in Children with Cancer after Hemipelvectomy: A Retrospective Analysis

A paucity of data exists centering on the pain experience of children following hemipelvectomy performed for primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas. In this study, we aimed to describe the incidence, severity, and evolution of perioperative pain and function in pediatric oncology patients undergoing hemipelvectomy, and, additionally, we sought to detail the analgesic regimens used for these patients perioperatively. A retrospective chart review was conducted, studying cancer patients, aged 21 years and under, who underwent hemipelvectomy at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) from 2018 to 2021. Primary outcomes included the evolution of pain throughout the perioperative course, as well as the route, type, dose, and duration of analgesic regimens. Eight patients were included in the analysis. The mean age at operation was 13 ± 2.93 years. All patients received opioids and acetaminophen. The mean pain scores were highest on post-operative day (POD)0, POD5, and POD 30. The mean opioid use was highest on POD5. A total of 75% of patients were noted to be ambulating after hemipelvectomy. The mean time to ambulation was 5.33 ± 2.94 days. The combination of acetaminophen with opioids, as well as adjunctive regional analgesia, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentin, and/or ketamine in select patients, appeared to be an effective analgesic regimen, and functional outcomes were excellent in 75% of patients.

Planning for Safe Hospital Discharge by Identifying Patients Likely to Fall After Discharge

OBJECTIVE

Acute care physical therapists recommend discharge locations and services in part to help prevent falls during post-discharge recovery. Therapists may use standardized tests to inform their recommendation decisions, but evidence linking test scores with fall risk after discharge is lacking. The primary purpose of this study was to explore the associations between Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) and Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Inpatient Mobility Short Form (AM-PAC IMSF) scores and falls in the first 30 days after hospital discharge. Anticipating that agreement between therapist recommendations and discharge locations and services (discharge agreement), age, and sex could impact those associations, these factors were included in this investigation.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study, 258 hospitalized patients consented to medical record data extraction and answered a phone survey 30 days after discharge to report whether they had experienced a fall since leaving the hospital. POMA and AM-PAC IMSF tests were administered for every patient. Participants' age, sex, diagnosis, last POMA score, last AM-PAC IMSF score, physical therapist discharge recommendations, actual discharge location and services, discharge date, and phone number were collected from their medical records.

RESULTS

When analyzed alone, higher POMA scores were associated with lower odds of falling, but the association was not significant after adjustment for other factors. Neither AM-PAC IMSF scores, age, nor sex were associated with falls. Discharge agreement, however, was associated with 59% lower odds of falling after adjustment for other factors.

CONCLUSION

Participants, who were discharged to the location with the services recommended by their physical therapist, were less likely to fall. Tinetti POMA and AM-PAC IMSF scores did not discriminate well participants who would fall.

IMPACT

Findings in this study inform those involved in discharge planning on the value of implementing physical therapist recommendations in reducing fall risk after hospital discharge.

LAY SUMMARY

If physical therapist discharge recommendations are implemented, patients are less likely to fall during the month after hospital discharge. Balance and mobility test scores may provide therapists valuable information, but they are limited in their ability to identify who will fall after discharge.

The role of the lower extremity functional scale in predicting surgical outcomes for total joint arthroplasty patients

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) scores with postoperative functional outcomes for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients and to investigate the utility of this tool to create an individualized plan of care perioperatively.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary TJA at a single institution from 2016 to 2019 was retrospectively reviewed by a univariate analysis in terms of patient characteristics and outcomes across LEFS quartiles. Multivariate regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between the LEFS quartile and outcomes after controlling for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 1389 patients were included. All patients had a documented LEFS pre- and postoperatively with the last value documented at least 60 days to a maximum of 1 year after surgery. The following cutoffs for LEFS quartiles were observed: quartile 1 preoperative LEFS ≤27, quartile 2 ranges from 28 to 35, quartile 3 ranges from 36 to 43, and quartile 4 ≥ 44. Patients with a higher comorbidity burden and ASA score were more likely to have a lower LEFS. Higher levels of preoperative function were significantly associated with shorter LOS and higher rates of same day discharge, independent ambulation, mobility and activity scores, and rates of discharge home.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that LEFS is a useful tool for aiding clinical resource allocation decisions, and incorporation of the measure into existing predictive models may improve their accuracy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-021-00106-3.

Perceived Factors of Influence on the Implementation of a Multidimensional Project to Improve Patients' Movement Behavior During Hospitalization: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore perceived factors of influence on the implementation of Hospital in Motion, a multidimensional and multidisciplinary implementation project to improve inpatients' movement behavior.

METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted on 4 wards. Per ward, a tailored action plan was implemented consisting of multiple tools and interventions to stimulate the integration of inpatient physical activity in usual care processes. After implementation, semi-structured interviews were performed with health care professionals and patients to explore perceived factors of influence on the implementation of the Hospital in Motion project. A content analysis was performed using the framework of the Medical Research Council for complex interventions as guidance for the identification of categories and themes.

RESULTS

In total, 16 interviews were conducted with health care professionals and 12 with patients. The results were categorized into the 3 key components of the Medical Research Council framework: implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context. An important factor of influence within the theme "implementation" was the iterative and multidisciplinary approach. Within the theme "mechanisms of impact," continuous attention and the interaction of multiple interventions, tailored to the target group and targeting multiple dimensions (individual, inter-professional, community and society), were perceived as important. Within the theme "context," the intrinsic motivation and inter-professional, community and societal culture towards physical activity was perceived to be of influence.

CONCLUSION

Impact can be achieved and maintained by creating continuous attention to inpatient physical activity and by the interaction between different interventions and dimensions during implementation. To maintain enough focus, the amount of activities at one time should be limited.

IMPACT

To improve inpatients' movement behavior, implementation project teams should be multidisciplinary and should implement a small set of tailored interventions that target multiple dimensions. Intermediate evaluation of the implementation process, strategies, and interventions is recommended.

Mobility status and acute care physical therapy utilization: The Moderating roles of age, significant others, and insurance type

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a direct measure of need for PT, mobility status, was associated with acute care PT utilization and whether this relationship differs across sociodemographic factors and insurance type.

DESIGN

In a secondary analysis of electronic health records data, we estimated logistic regression models to determine whether mobility status was associated with acute care PT utilization. Interactions between mobility and both sociodemographic factors (sex; age; significant other; minority status) and insurance type were included to investigate whether the relationship between mobility and PT utilization varied across patient characteristics.

SETTING

Five regional hospitals from one health system.

PARTICIPANTS

60,459 adults admitted between 2014 and 2018 who received a PT evaluation.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Received acute care PT; Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" measure of mobility.

RESULTS

Half of patients who received a PT evaluation received subsequent treatment. Patients with mobility limitations were more likely to receive PT. Interaction terms indicated that among patients with mobility limitations, those who 1) were younger; 2) had significant others; and 3) had private insurance (vs. public) were more likely to receive PT. Among patients with greater mobility status, older patients and those without a significant other were more likely to receive PT.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between acute care PT need and utilization differed across sociodemographic factors and insurance type. We offer potential explanations for these findings to guide studies targeting equitable distribution of beneficial PT services.

Activities of Daily Living Performance and Acute Care Occupational Therapy Utilization: Moderating Factors

IMPORTANCE

Hospitalized patients who have difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADLs) benefit from occupational therapy services; however, disparities in access to such services are understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether need (i.e., limited ADL performance) predicts acute care occupational therapy utilization and whether this relationship differs across sociodemographic factors and insurance type.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of electronic health records data. Logistic regression models were specified to determine whether ADL performance predicted use of occupational therapy treatment. Interactions were included to investigate whether the relationship between ADL performance and occupational therapy utilization varied across sociodemographic factors (e.g., age) and insurance type.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 56,022 adults admitted to five regional hospitals between 2014 and 2018 who received an occupational therapy evaluation.

INTERVENTION

None. Outcomes and Measures: Occupational therapy service utilization, Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" measure of daily activity.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of the patients evaluated for occupational therapy received treatment. Patients with lower ADL performance were more likely to receive occupational therapy treatment; however, interaction terms indicated that, among patients with low ADL performance, those who were younger, were White and non-Hispanic, had significant others, and had private insurance (vs. public) were more likely to receive treatment. These differences were smaller among patients with greater ADL performance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Greater need was positively associated with receiving occupational therapy services, but this relationship was moderated by age, minoritized status, significant other status, and insurance type. The findings provide direction for exploring determinants of disparities in occupational therapy utilization. What This Article Adds: Acute care occupational therapy utilization is driven partly by patient need, but potential disparities in access to beneficial services may exist across sociodemographic characteristics and insurance type. Identifying potential determinants of disparities in acute care occupational therapy utilization is the first step in developing strategies to reduce barriers for those in need.

Functional outcomes of cancer patients in an acute inpatient setting at King Fahad Medical City

[Purpose] Cancer survivors have functional impairments that adversely affect patients’ quality of life (QoL). Acute rehabilitation helps to reduce disability and improves QoL in cancer survivors. This study investigated the potential improvement in mobility levels and QoL of cancer patients during acute inpatient physical therapy (PT) from admission to discharge. [Participants and Methods] This was a cross-sectional study conducted at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh. Acute inpatient cancer survivors (n=99) were assessed at their admission and discharge. The primary outcome measure was the AM-PAC “6-Clicks” Basic Mobility, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7) and the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). [Results] Overall, 82.8% of cancer patients were discharged home. There were significant improvements in all the three outcome measures for all the patients from admission to discharge. Patients who were discharged home exhibited significantly better improvement in all the scales. Factors that predicted discharge mobility and quality of life were discharge destination, number of PT sessions, and baseline admission scores. [Conclusion] The study found that acute inpatient cancer rehabilitation helps to improve mobility and QoL. Rehabilitation programs available in Saudi Arabia are limited, and it is important to integrate the cancer rehabilitation model into the oncology services.

Lower AM-PAC 6-Clicks Basic Mobility Score Predicts Discharge to a Postacute Care Facility Among Patients in Cardiac Intensive Care Units

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the ability of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" Basic Mobility Short Form to predict patient discharge destination (home vs postacute care [PAC] facility) from the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU), including patients from the cardiothoracic surgical ICU and coronary care unit.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic medical records of patients in cardiac ICU (n = 359) in an academic teaching hospital in the southeastern region of United States from September 1, 2017, through August 31, 2018.

RESULTS

The median interquartile range age of the sample was 68 years (75-60), 55% were men, the median interquartile range 6-Clicks score was 16 (20-12) at the physical therapist evaluation, and 79% of the patients were discharged to home. Higher score on 6-Clicks indicates improved function. A prediction model was constructed based on a machine learning approach using a classification tree. The classification tree was constructed and evaluated by dividing the sample into a train-test split using the Leave-One-Out cross-validation approach. The classification tree split the data into 4 distinct groups along with their predicted outcomes. Patients with a 6-Clicks score >15.5 and a score between 11.5 and 15.5 with primary insurance other than Medicare were discharged to home. Patients with a 6-Clicks score between 11.5 and 15.5 with Medicare insurance and those with a score ≤11.5 were discharged to a PAC facility.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lower 6-Clicks scores were more likely to be discharged to a PAC facility. Patients without Medicare insurance had to be significantly lower functioning, as indicated by lower 6-Clicks scores for PAC facility placement than those with Medicare insurance.

IMPACT

The ability of 6-Clicks along with primary insurance to determine discharge destination allows for early discharge planning from cardiac ICUs.

Improving patient selection for use of consumer grade physical activity monitors in the hospital

BACKGROUND

Bedrest is toxic for inpatients and consumer grade physical activity monitors offer an economical solution to monitor patient ambulation. But these devices may not be accurate in debilitated hospitalized patients who frequently ambulate very slowly.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether measures of physical capacity can help identify inpatients for whom wearable physical activity monitors may accurately measure step count.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of 54 adult inpatients with acute neurological diagnoses. Patients were assessed using 2 physical capacity assessments (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Inpatient Mobility Short Form [AM-PAC IMSF] and Katz Activities of Daily Living [ADL] scale). They also completed a 2-minute walk test (2MWT) wearing a consumer grade physical activity monitor.

RESULTS

The wearable activity monitor recorded steps (initiated) in 33 (61%) of the inpatients, and for 94% of inpatients with gait speeds >0.43 m/s. Physical capacity assessments correlated well with gait speed, AM-PAC IMSF r = 0.7, and Katz ADL r = 0.6, p < 0.05. When the physical activity monitor initiated, the mean absolute percent error (SD) comparing device calculated steps to observed steps, was 10% (13). AM-PAC IMSF (T-score >45) and Katz ADL (>5) cutoff scores identified inpatients for whom physical activity monitors initiated with a sensitivity of 94 and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical capacity assessments, such as AM-PAC, and Katz ADL, may be a useful and feasible screening strategy to help identify inpatients where wearable physical activity monitors can measure their mobility.

Activities of Daily Living Performance and Acute Care Occupational Therapy Utilization: Moderating Factors

IMPORTANCE

Hospitalized patients who have difficulty performing activities of daily living (ADLs) benefit from occupational therapy services; however, disparities in access to such services are understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether need (i.e., limited ADL performance) predicts acute care occupational therapy utilization and whether this relationship differs across sociodemographic factors and insurance type.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of electronic health records data. Logistic regression models were specified to determine whether ADL performance predicted use of occupational therapy treatment. Interactions were included to investigate whether the relationship between ADL performance and occupational therapy utilization varied across sociodemographic factors (e.g., age) and insurance type.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 56,022 adults admitted to five regional hospitals between 2014 and 2018 who received an occupational therapy evaluation.

INTERVENTION

None. Outcomes and Measures: Occupational therapy service utilization, Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" measure of daily activity.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of the patients evaluated for occupational therapy received treatment. Patients with lower ADL performance were more likely to receive occupational therapy treatment; however, interaction terms indicated that, among patients with low ADL performance, those who were younger, were White and non-Hispanic, had significant others, and had private insurance (vs. public) were more likely to receive treatment. These differences were smaller among patients with greater ADL performance.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Greater need was positively associated with receiving occupational therapy services, but this relationship was moderated by age, minoritized status, significant other status, and insurance type. The findings provide direction for exploring determinants of disparities in occupational therapy utilization. What This Article Adds: Acute care occupational therapy utilization is driven partly by patient need, but potential disparities in access to beneficial services may exist across sociodemographic characteristics and insurance type. Identifying potential determinants of disparities in acute care occupational therapy utilization is the first step in developing strategies to reduce barriers for those in need.

Predicting Community Discharge for Occupational Therapy Recipients in the Neurological Critical Care Unit

IMPORTANCE

Occupational therapy in the neurological critical care unit (NCCU) may enable safe community discharge by restoring functional ability. However, the influence of patient characteristics and NCCU occupational therapy on discharge disposition is largely unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine how patient factors and receipt of occupational therapy predict discharge disposition for NCCU patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of electronic health records data from adults admitted to the NCCU between May 2013 and September 30, 2015.

SETTING

NCCU in a large urban academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults age 18 yr or older (N = 1,134) admitted to the NCCU. Outcomes and Measures: Using logistic regression with discharge disposition as the dependent variable, we entered sex, age, length of stay (LOS), baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and receipt of occupational therapy services as predictor variables.

RESULTS

Of NCCU patients, 39% received occupational therapy. Younger age, shorter LOS, lower comorbidity burden, and not receiving occupational therapy services increased the likelihood of discharge to the community. Men who received occupational therapy were less likely to be discharged to the community than men who did not receive occupational therapy. As age increased, differences in the probability of community discharge decreased between recipients and nonrecipients of occupational therapy services.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our results suggest that patients receiving occupational therapy services in the NCCU may have a lower likelihood of community discharge. However, these findings may result from therapist's consideration of the safest discharge location to ensure the greatest balance between independence and support. What This Article Adds: This study's findings suggest that receipt of occupational therapy in the NCCU is associated with higher likelihood for noncommunity discharge (i.e., to inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing, or long-term care). However, activity limitations and comorbidity burden may be greater for recipients of occupational therapy, and these NCCU patients are presumably less prepared for community discharge.

Implementation of a Framework for Telerehabilitation in Clinical Care Across the Continuum During COVID-19 and Beyond

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled an unprecedented global implementation of telemedicine and telerehabilitation as well as its integration into the healthcare system. Here, we describe the clinical implementation of the A3E framework for the deployment of telerehabilitation in the inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation continuum by addressing accessibility, adaptability, accountability, and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. By using an organized, coordinated, and stratified approach, we increased our telerehabilitation practice from 0 to more than 39,000 visits since the pandemic began. Learning from both the successes and challenges can help address the need to increase access to rehabilitation services even beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Change in Activity Performance Mediates the Relationship between Occupational Therapy Utilization and Discharge Disposition among Adults with Traumatic Brain Injuries

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 435 adults with TBI who received occupational therapy services in an acute care trauma center hospital. Outcome measures were (1) occupational therapy utilization based on billed minutes of occupational therapy evaluation and treatment (low vs. high); (2) Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-Clicks" to assess activities of daily living level of assistance; and (3) Discharge disposition (community vs. institution). Community discharge included home and supported living facilities. Institutional discharge involved long term care, rehabilitation facility, short term hospital, and skilled nursing facility. Results indicated that change in ADL performance, between admission and discharge, partially mediated the relationship between occupational therapy utilization and community discharge (OR= 0.80, p = .003). High occupational therapy utilization (vs. low) was associated with greater change in ADL performance (β = 0.39, p < .001). Greater change in ADL performance was associated with lower odds of community discharge (OR= 0.96, p <.001). Independent of change in ADL performance, higher occupational therapy utilization was associated with significantly lower odds for community discharge (OR = 0.57, p = 0.023). In conclusion, patients who received more occupational therapy were less likely to be community discharged, as mediated by change in ADL performance. This result can provide direction for future research exploring acute care occupational therapy utilization and discharge disposition.

Correlation and Crosswalks between Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes and PROMIS Physical Function among Medically Ill Patients

OBJECTIVES

To develop scoring crosswalks between a new multi-domain patient-reported outcome measure, the Functional Assessment in Acute Care (FAMCAT) with a PROMIS measure of physical function and examine correlations with existing legacy instruments.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, single-group design study Setting: Large Midwestern academic teaching hospital Participants: A sample of 1,885 patients (53% men, average age 62 (SD 16)) hospitalized on the general medical services between May 2016 - June 2017.

INTERVENTION

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scores from the FAMCAT administered via computerized adaptive testing were compared to scores on the 8-item PROMIS Physical Function short form.

RESULTS

Correlations with the FAMCAT and the PROMIS PF were strong for initial scores (MCAT_Mobilty r=0.78, p<.0001; MCAT_DailyAct r=0.81, p<.0001). The Applied Cognition scale did not demonstrate adequate correlations, thus was not a candidate for crosswalk scores. While the MCAT_Mobility scale could be initially linked, subsequent analysis did not support a valid crosswalk. Linking criteria were applied with the Daily Activity scale to developing a final concordance table.

CONCLUSIONS

The FAMCAT Daily Activity scale yielded robust correlations to develop crosswalk scores with the PROMIS PF. The resulting crosswalk conversion metric may be useful to compare outcomes across these constructs for assessing functional abilities among patients on general medical services. The Applied Cognition and Basic Mobility scales did not meet criteria; therefore, alternate legacy instruments are needed to develop additional crosswalks.

Functional recovery following hospitalisation of patients diagnosed with COVID-19: a protocol for a longitudinal cohort study

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is an international public health crisis with more than 132 million infections worldwide. Beyond acute infection, emerging data indicate patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may experience persistent sequelae similar to survivors of sepsis or acute respiratory syndromes, including mobility limitations and fatigue. However, there is limited evidence on the trajectory of functional recovery in those hospitalised with COVID-19. The primary aim of the Coronavirus Registry Functional Recovery (COREG-FR) study is to understand the trajectory of functional recovery among individuals hospitalised for COVID-19 over the medium (up to 6 months) and longer term (6-12 months) that will guide clinical care and optimal management of serious COVID-19 illness and recovery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

COREG-FR is a multicentre longitudinal cohort study. We will enrol a minimum of 211 adults age 18 years and older with COVID-19 from five hospitals. Participants will be followed from admission to hospital as an inpatient, to hospital discharge, and at 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and up to 12-month post-hospital discharge. We will conduct telephone interviews at ward admission and discharge, and telephone interviews plus in-person assessments of physical function and lung function at all remaining follow-ups. Our primary outcome is the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care mobility scale measured at all time points. We will conduct linear mixed effects regression analyses to explore determinants of functional outcomes after COVID-19 illness. Subgroup analyses based on age (≤65 vs >65 years), frailty status (Clinical Frailty Scale score ≤4 vs >5) and variants of concern will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

COREG-FR has been approved by Research Ethics Boards at participating sites. We will disseminate this work through peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentations at national and international meetings and through the established COREG website (www.coregontario.ca). COREG-FR is designed as a data platform for future studies evaluating COVID-19 recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04602260; Pre-results.

A View of the Development of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures, their Clinical Integration, Electronification, and Potential Impact on Rehabilitation Service Delivery

Recognition of the importance of a patient's perception of their status and experience has become central to medical care and its evaluation. This recognition has led to a growing reliance on the use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Nevertheless, while awareness of PROMs and acceptance of their utility has increased markedly, few of us have a good insight into their development; their utility relative to clinician-rated and performance measures such as the FIM and 6-Minute Walk Test or how their "electronification" and incorporation into electronic health records (EHRs) may improve the individualization, value, and quality of medical care. In all, the goal of this commentary is to provide some insight into historical factors and technology developments that we believe have shaped modern clinical PROMs as they relate to medicine in general and to rehabilitation in particular. In addition, we speculate that while the growth of PROM use may have been triggered by an increased emphasis on the centrality of the patient in their care, future uptake will be shaped by their embedding in EHRs and use to improve clinical decision support though their integration with other sources of clinical and sociodemographic data.

Description and Functional Outcomes of a Novel Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Program for Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to describe an interdisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation program for patients recovering from COVID-19 and to evaluate functional outcomes.

DESIGN

This is an analysis of retrospective data captured from the electronic health record of COVID-19 patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit (N = 106). Rehabilitation approaches are described narratively. Functional gain was evaluated using the Activity Measure for Postacute Care 6 Clicks, basic mobility and daily activities.

RESULTS

Interdisciplinary approaches were implemented to address the medical, physical, communication, cognitive, and psychosocial needs of COVID-19 patients. COVID-19 patients exhibited significant improvements in basic mobility (Activity Measure for Postacute Care for basic mobility, P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.35) and daily activities (Activity Measure for Postacute Care for daily activities, P < 0.001, Cohen d = 1.06) from admission to discharge. There was an increase in ambulatory distance as well as the percentage of the patients who were able to breathe on room air. At discharge, fewer patients required supplemental oxygen on exertion. Eighty percent of the patients were discharged home after an average length of stay of 17 days. Greater functional improvement was associated with younger age, longer intubation duration, and participation in psychotherapy, but not a history of delirium during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Early rehabilitation is associated with improved mobility and independence in activities of daily living after COVID-19.

Frequency and profile of objective cognitive deficits in hospitalized patients recovering from COVID-19

Early reports and case series suggest cognitive deficits occurs in some patients with COVID-19. We evaluated the frequency, severity, and profile of cognitive dysfunction in patients recovering from prolonged COVID-19 hospitalization who required acute inpatient rehabilitation prior to discharge. We analyzed cross-sectional scores from the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET) in a cohort of N = 57 COVID-19 patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation, calculating the frequency of impairment based on neuropsychologist diagnosis and by age-normed BMET subtests. In total, 43 patients (75%) were male, 35 (61%) were non-white, and mean age was 64.5 (SD = 13.9) years. In total, 48 (84%) were previously living at home independently. Two patients had documented preexisting cognitive dysfunction; none had known dementia. Patients were evaluated at a mean of 43.2 (SD = 19.2) days after initial admission. In total, 50 patients (88%) had documented hypoxemic respiratory failure and 44 (77%) required intubation.  Forty-six patients (81%) had cognitive impairment, ranging from mild to severe. Deficits were common in working memory (26/47 [55%] of patients), set-shifting (21/44 [47%]), divided attention (18/39 [46%]), and processing speed (14/35 [40%]). Executive dysfunction was not significantly associated with intubation length or the time from extubation to assessment, psychiatric diagnosis, or preexisting cardiovascular/metabolic disease. Attention and executive functions are frequently impaired in COVID-19 patients who require acute rehabilitation prior to discharge. Though interpretation is limited by lack of a comparator group, these results provide an early benchmark for identifying and characterizing cognitive difficulties after COVID-19. Given the frequency and pattern of impairment, easy-to-disseminate interventions that target attention and executive dysfunctions may be beneficial to this population.