51
|
Weber CF, Lake EMR, Haider SP, Mozayan A, Mukherjee P, Scheinost D, Bamford NS, Ment L, Constable T, Payabvash S. Age-dependent white matter microstructural disintegrity in autism spectrum disorder. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:957018. [PMID: 36161157 PMCID: PMC9490315 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.957018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been increasing evidence of White Matter (WM) microstructural disintegrity and connectome disruption in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). We evaluated the effects of age on WM microstructure by examining Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) metrics and connectome Edge Density (ED) in a large dataset of ASD and control patients from different age cohorts. N = 583 subjects from four studies from the National Database of Autism Research were included, representing four different age groups: (1) A Longitudinal MRI Study of Infants at Risk of Autism [infants, median age: 7 (interquartile range 1) months, n = 155], (2) Biomarkers of Autism at 12 months [toddlers, 32 (11)m, n = 102], (3) Multimodal Developmental Neurogenetics of Females with ASD [adolescents, 13.1 (5.3) years, n = 230], (4) Atypical Late Neurodevelopment in Autism [young adults, 19.1 (10.7)y, n = 96]. For each subject, we created Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean- (MD), Radial- (RD), and Axial Diffusivity (AD) maps as well as ED maps. We performed voxel-wise and tract-based analyses to assess the effects of age, ASD diagnosis and sex on DTI metrics and connectome ED. We also optimized, trained, tested, and validated different combinations of machine learning classifiers and dimensionality reduction algorithms for prediction of ASD diagnoses based on tract-based DTI and ED metrics. There is an age-dependent increase in FA and a decline in MD and RD across WM tracts in all four age cohorts, as well as an ED increase in toddlers and adolescents. After correction for age and sex, we found an ASD-related decrease in FA and ED only in adolescents and young adults, but not in infants or toddlers. While DTI abnormalities were mostly limited to the corpus callosum, connectomes showed a more widespread ASD-related decrease in ED. Finally, the best performing machine-leaning classification model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.70 in an independent validation cohort. Our results suggest that ASD-related WM microstructural disintegrity becomes evident in adolescents and young adults-but not in infants and toddlers. The ASD-related decrease in ED demonstrates a more widespread involvement of the connectome than DTI metrics, with the most striking differences being localized in the corpus callosum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara F. Weber
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States,Social Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Lübeck University, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Evelyn M. R. Lake
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Stefan P. Haider
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ali Mozayan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Dustin Scheinost
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Nigel S. Bamford
- Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Laura Ment
- Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Todd Constable
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Seyedmehdi Payabvash
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States,*Correspondence: Seyedmehdi Payabvash,
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Meyers B, Lee VK, Dennis L, Wallace J, Schmithorst V, Votava-Smith JK, Rajagopalan V, Herrup E, Baust T, Tran NN, Hunter J, Licht DJ, Gaynor JW, Andropoulos DB, Panigrahy A, Ceschin R. Harmonization of Multi-Center Diffusion Tensor Tractography in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: Optimizing Post-Processing and Application of ComBat. NEUROIMAGE. REPORTS 2022; 2:100114. [PMID: 36258783 PMCID: PMC9575513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Advanced brain imaging of neonatal macrostructure and microstructure, which has prognosticating importance, is more frequently being incorporated into multi-center trials of neonatal neuroprotection. Multicenter neuroimaging studies, designed to overcome small sample sized clinical cohorts, are essential but lead to increased technical variability. Few harmonization techniques have been developed for neonatal brain microstructural (diffusion tensor) analysis. The work presented here aims to remedy two common problems that exist with the current state of the art approaches: 1) variance in scanner and protocol in data collection can limit the researcher's ability to harmonize data acquired under different conditions or using different clinical populations. 2) The general lack of objective guidelines for dealing with anatomically abnormal anatomy and pathology. Often, subjects are excluded due to subjective criteria, or due to pathology that could be informative to the final analysis, leading to the loss of reproducibility and statistical power. This proves to be a barrier in the analysis of large multi-center studies and is a particularly salient problem given the relative scarcity of neonatal imaging data. We provide an objective, data-driven, and semi-automated neonatal processing pipeline designed to harmonize compartmentalized variant data acquired under different parameters. This is done by first implementing a search space reduction step of extracting the along-tract diffusivity values along each tract of interest, rather than performing whole-brain harmonization. This is followed by a data-driven outlier detection step, with the purpose of removing unwanted noise and outliers from the final harmonization. We then use an empirical Bayes harmonization algorithm performed at the along-tract level, with the output being a lower dimensional space but still spatially informative. After applying our pipeline to this large multi-site dataset of neonates and infants with congenital heart disease (n= 398 subjects recruited across 4 centers, with a total of n=763 MRI pre-operative/post-operative time points), we show that infants with single ventricle cardiac physiology demonstrate greater white matter microstructural alterations compared to infants with bi-ventricular heart disease, supporting what has previously been shown in literature. Our method is an open-source pipeline for delineating white matter tracts in subject space but provides the necessary modular components for performing atlas space analysis. As such, we validate and introduce Diffusion Imaging of Neonates by Group Organization (DINGO), a high-level, semi-automated framework that can facilitate harmonization of subject-space tractography generated from diffusion tensor imaging acquired across varying scanners, institutions, and clinical populations. Datasets acquired using varying protocols or cohorts are compartmentalized into subsets, where a cohort-specific template is generated, allowing for the propagation of the tractography mask set with higher spatial specificity. Taken together, this pipeline can reduce multi-scanner technical variability which can confound important biological variability in relation to neonatal brain microstructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Meyers
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Vincent K. Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Lauren Dennis
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Julia Wallace
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Vanessa Schmithorst
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jodie K. Votava-Smith
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vidya Rajagopalan
- Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elizabeth Herrup
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Tracy Baust
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Nhu N. Tran
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jill Hunter
- Department of Radiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Daniel J. Licht
- Department of Neurology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J. William Gaynor
- Department of Surgery, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Ashok Panigrahy
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Rafael Ceschin
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
The role of medical physicists in clinical trials across Europe. Phys Med 2022; 100:31-38. [PMID: 35717777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The roles and responsibilities of medical physicists (MPs) are growing together with the evolving science and technology. The complexity of today's clinical trials requires the skills and knowledge of MPs for their safe and efficient implementation. However, it is unclear to what extent the skillsets offered by MPs are being exploited in clinical trials across Europe. METHODS The EFOMP Working Group on the role of Medical Physics Experts in Clinical Trials has designed a survey that targeted all 36 current National Member Organisations, receiving a response from 31 countries. The survey included both quantitative and qualitative queries regarding the involvement of MPs in trial design, setup, and coordination, either as trial team members or principal investigators. RESULTS The extent of MPs involvement in clinical trials greatly varies across European countries. The results showed disparities between the roles played by MPs in trial design, conduct or data processing. Similarly, differences among the 31 European countries that responded to the survey were found regarding the existence of national bodies responsible for trials or the available training offered to MPs. The role of principal investigator or co-investigator was reported by 12 countries (39%), a sign of efficient collaboration with medical doctors in designing and implementing clinical studies. CONCLUSION Organisation of specific training courses and guideline development for clinical trial design and conduct would encourage the involvement of a larger number of MPs in all stages of trials across Europe, leading to a better standardisation of clinical practice.
Collapse
|
54
|
Onicas AI, Ware AL, Harris AD, Beauchamp MH, Beaulieu C, Craig W, Doan Q, Freedman SB, Goodyear BG, Zemek R, Yeates KO, Lebel C. Multisite Harmonization of Structural DTI Networks in Children: An A-CAP Study. Front Neurol 2022; 13:850642. [PMID: 35785336 PMCID: PMC9247315 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.850642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The analysis of large, multisite neuroimaging datasets provides a promising means for robust characterization of brain networks that can reduce false positives and improve reproducibility. However, the use of different MRI scanners introduces variability to the data. Managing those sources of variability is increasingly important for the generation of accurate group-level inferences. ComBat is one of the most promising tools for multisite (multiscanner) harmonization of structural neuroimaging data, but no study has examined its application to graph theory metrics derived from the structural brain connectome. The present work evaluates the use of ComBat for multisite harmonization in the context of structural network analysis of diffusion-weighted scans from the Advancing Concussion Assessment in Pediatrics (A-CAP) study. Scans were acquired on six different scanners from 484 children aged 8.00-16.99 years [Mean = 12.37 ± 2.34 years; 289 (59.7%) Male] ~10 days following mild traumatic brain injury (n = 313) or orthopedic injury (n = 171). Whole brain deterministic diffusion tensor tractography was conducted and used to construct a 90 x 90 weighted (average fractional anisotropy) adjacency matrix for each scan. ComBat harmonization was applied separately at one of two different stages during data processing, either on the (i) weighted adjacency matrices (matrix harmonization) or (ii) global network metrics derived using unharmonized weighted adjacency matrices (parameter harmonization). Global network metrics based on unharmonized adjacency matrices and each harmonization approach were derived. Robust scanner effects were found for unharmonized metrics. Some scanner effects remained significant for matrix harmonized metrics, but effect sizes were less robust. Parameter harmonized metrics did not differ by scanner. Intraclass correlations (ICC) indicated good to excellent within-scanner consistency between metrics calculated before and after both harmonization approaches. Age correlated with unharmonized network metrics, but was more strongly correlated with network metrics based on both harmonization approaches. Parameter harmonization successfully controlled for scanner variability while preserving network topology and connectivity weights, indicating that harmonization of global network parameters based on unharmonized adjacency matrices may provide optimal results. The current work supports the use of ComBat for removing multiscanner effects on global network topology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian I. Onicas
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- MoMiLab Research Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, Lucca, Italy
| | - Ashley L. Ware
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ashley D. Harris
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Miriam H. Beauchamp
- Department of Psychology, University of Montreal and CHU Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Christian Beaulieu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - William Craig
- University of Alberta and Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Quynh Doan
- Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephen B. Freedman
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Bradley G. Goodyear
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Roger Zemek
- Department of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Keith Owen Yeates
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Catherine Lebel
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Nan Y, Ser JD, Walsh S, Schönlieb C, Roberts M, Selby I, Howard K, Owen J, Neville J, Guiot J, Ernst B, Pastor A, Alberich-Bayarri A, Menzel MI, Walsh S, Vos W, Flerin N, Charbonnier JP, van Rikxoort E, Chatterjee A, Woodruff H, Lambin P, Cerdá-Alberich L, Martí-Bonmatí L, Herrera F, Yang G. Data harmonisation for information fusion in digital healthcare: A state-of-the-art systematic review, meta-analysis and future research directions. AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON INFORMATION FUSION 2022; 82:99-122. [PMID: 35664012 PMCID: PMC8878813 DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Removing the bias and variance of multicentre data has always been a challenge in large scale digital healthcare studies, which requires the ability to integrate clinical features extracted from data acquired by different scanners and protocols to improve stability and robustness. Previous studies have described various computational approaches to fuse single modality multicentre datasets. However, these surveys rarely focused on evaluation metrics and lacked a checklist for computational data harmonisation studies. In this systematic review, we summarise the computational data harmonisation approaches for multi-modality data in the digital healthcare field, including harmonisation strategies and evaluation metrics based on different theories. In addition, a comprehensive checklist that summarises common practices for data harmonisation studies is proposed to guide researchers to report their research findings more effectively. Last but not least, flowcharts presenting possible ways for methodology and metric selection are proposed and the limitations of different methods have been surveyed for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Nan
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, Northern Ireland UK
| | - Javier Del Ser
- Department of Communications Engineering, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bilbao 48013, Spain
- TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio 48160, Spain
| | - Simon Walsh
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, Northern Ireland UK
| | - Carola Schönlieb
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Northern Ireland UK
| | - Michael Roberts
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Northern Ireland UK
- Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, Northern Ireland UK
| | - Ian Selby
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Northern Ireland UK
| | - Kit Howard
- Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, TX, United States of America
| | - John Owen
- Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, TX, United States of America
| | - Jon Neville
- Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Austin, TX, United States of America
| | - Julien Guiot
- University Hospital of Liège (CHU Liège), Respiratory medicine department, Liège, Belgium
- University of Liege, Department of clinical sciences, Pneumology-Allergology, Liège, Belgium
| | - Benoit Ernst
- University Hospital of Liège (CHU Liège), Respiratory medicine department, Liège, Belgium
- University of Liege, Department of clinical sciences, Pneumology-Allergology, Liège, Belgium
| | | | | | - Marion I. Menzel
- Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
- GE Healthcare GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Sean Walsh
- Radiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liège, Belgium
| | - Wim Vos
- Radiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liège, Belgium
| | - Nina Flerin
- Radiomics (Oncoradiomics SA), Liège, Belgium
| | | | | | - Avishek Chatterjee
- Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry Woodruff
- Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Precision Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leonor Cerdá-Alberich
- Medical Imaging Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- Medical Imaging Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Francisco Herrera
- Department of Computer Sciences and Artificial Intelligence, Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI) University of Granada, Granada, Spain
- Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | - Guang Yang
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, Northern Ireland UK
- Cardiovascular Research Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, Northern Ireland UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, Northern Ireland UK
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Riedel L, van den Heuvel MP, Markett S. Trajectory of rich club properties in structural brain networks. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:4239-4253. [PMID: 35620874 PMCID: PMC9435005 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Many organizational principles of structural brain networks are established before birth and undergo considerable developmental changes afterwards. These include the topologically central hub regions and a densely connected rich club. While several studies have mapped developmental trajectories of brain connectivity and brain network organization across childhood and adolescence, comparatively little is known about subsequent development over the course of the lifespan. Here, we present a cross-sectional analysis of structural brain network development in N = 8066 participants aged 5-80 years. Across all brain regions, structural connectivity strength followed an "inverted-U"-shaped trajectory with vertex in the early 30s. Connectivity strength of hub regions showed a similar trajectory and the identity of hub regions remained stable across all age groups. While connectivity strength declined with advancing age, the organization of hub regions into a rich club did not only remain intact but became more pronounced, presumingly through a selected sparing of relevant connections from age-related connectivity loss. The stability of rich club organization in the face of overall age-related decline is consistent with a "first come, last served" model of neurodevelopment, where the first principles to develop are the last to decline with age. Rich club organization has been shown to be highly beneficial for communicability and higher cognition. A resilient rich club might thus be protective of a functional loss in late adulthood and represent a neural reserve to sustain cognitive functioning in the aging brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Levin Riedel
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martijn P van den Heuvel
- Department of Complex Trait Genetics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Markett
- Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Bell TK, Godfrey KJ, Ware AL, Yeates KO, Harris AD. Harmonization of multi-site MRS data with ComBat. Neuroimage 2022; 257:119330. [PMID: 35618196 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a non-invasive neuroimaging technique used to measure brain chemistry in vivo and has been used to study the healthy brain as well as neuropathology in numerous neurological disorders. The number of multi-site studies using MRS are increasing; however, non-biological variability introduced during data collection across multiple sites, such as differences in scanner vendors and site-specific acquisition implementations for MRS, can obscure detection of biological effects of interest. ComBat is a data harmonization technique that can remove non-biological sources of variance in multisite studies. It has been validated for use with structural and functional MRI metrics but not for MRS metabolites. This study investigated the validity of using ComBat to harmonize MRS metabolites for vendor and site differences. Analyses were performed using data acquired across 20 sites and included edited MRS for GABA+ (N=218) and macromolecule-suppressed GABA data (N=209), as well as standard PRESS data to quantify NAA, creatine, choline, and glutamate (N=190). ComBat harmonization successfully mitigated vendor and site differences for all metabolites of interest. Moreover, significant associations were detected between sex and choline levels and between age and glutamate and GABA+ levels that were not detectable prior to harmonization, confirming the importance of removing site and vendor effects in multi-site data. In conclusion, ComBat harmonization can be successfully applied to MRS data in multi-site MRS studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany K Bell
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB T3B 6A9, Canada.
| | - Kate J Godfrey
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB T3B 6A9, Canada
| | - Ashley L Ware
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB T3B 6A9, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, AB Canada; Department of Neurology, University of Utah, UT, United States
| | - Keith Owen Yeates
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB T3B 6A9, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Ashley D Harris
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive, Calgary, AB T3B 6A9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Treit S, Stolz E, Rickard JN, McCreary CR, Bagshawe M, Frayne R, Lebel C, Emery D, Beaulieu C. Lifespan Volume Trajectories From Non–harmonized T1–Weighted MRI Do Not Differ After Site Correction Based on Traveling Human Phantoms. Front Neurol 2022; 13:826564. [PMID: 35614930 PMCID: PMC9124864 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.826564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Multi–site imaging consortiums strive to increase participant numbers by pooling data across sites, but scanner related differences can bias results. This study combines data from three research MRI centers, including three different scanner models from two vendors, to examine non–harmonized T1–weighted brain imaging protocols in two cohorts. First, 23 human traveling phantoms were scanned twice each at all three sites (six scans per person; 138 scans total) to quantify within–participant variability of brain volumes (total brain, white matter, gray matter, lateral ventricles, thalamus, caudate, putamen and globus pallidus), and to calculate site–specific correction factors for each structure. Sample size calculations were used to determine the number of traveling phantoms needed to achieve effect sizes for observed differences to help guide future studies. Next, cross–sectional lifespan volume trajectories were examined in 856 healthy participants (5—91 years of age) scanned at these sites. Cross–sectional trajectories of volume versus age for each structure were then compared before and after application of traveling phantom based site–specific correction factors, as well as correction using the open–source method ComBat. Although small systematic differences between sites were observed in the traveling phantom analysis, correction for site using either method had little impact on the lifespan trajectories. Only white matter had small but significant differences in the intercept parameter after ComBat correction (but not traveling phantom based correction), while no other fits differed. This suggests that age–related changes over the lifespan outweigh systematic differences between scanners for volumetric analysis. This work will help guide pooling of multisite datasets as well as meta–analyses of data from non–harmonized protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Treit
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- *Correspondence: Sarah Treit
| | - Emily Stolz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Julia N. Rickard
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Cheryl R. McCreary
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Mercedes Bagshawe
- Department of Radiology, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Richard Frayne
- Departments of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Catherine Lebel
- Department of Radiology, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Derek Emery
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Christian Beaulieu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Christian Beaulieu
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Nigri A, Ferraro S, Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Tosetti M, Redolfi A, Forloni G, D'Angelo E, Aquino D, Biagi L, Bosco P, Carne I, De Francesco S, Demichelis G, Gianeri R, Lagana MM, Micotti E, Napolitano A, Palesi F, Pirastru A, Savini G, Alberici E, Amato C, Arrigoni F, Baglio F, Bozzali M, Castellano A, Cavaliere C, Contarino VE, Ferrazzi G, Gaudino S, Marino S, Manzo V, Pavone L, Politi LS, Roccatagliata L, Rognone E, Rossi A, Tonon C, Lodi R, Tagliavini F, Bruzzone MG. Quantitative MRI Harmonization to Maximize Clinical Impact: The RIN-Neuroimaging Network. Front Neurol 2022; 13:855125. [PMID: 35493836 PMCID: PMC9047871 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.855125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies often lack reproducibility, one of the cardinal features of the scientific method. Multisite collaboration initiatives increase sample size and limit methodological flexibility, therefore providing the foundation for increased statistical power and generalizable results. However, multisite collaborative initiatives are inherently limited by hardware, software, and pulse and sequence design heterogeneities of both clinical and preclinical MRI scanners and the lack of benchmark for acquisition protocols, data analysis, and data sharing. We present the overarching vision that yielded to the constitution of RIN-Neuroimaging Network, a national consortium dedicated to identifying disease and subject-specific in-vivo neuroimaging biomarkers of diverse neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions. This ambitious goal needs efforts toward increasing the diagnostic and prognostic power of advanced MRI data. To this aim, 23 Italian Scientific Institutes of Hospitalization and Care (IRCCS), with technological and clinical specialization in the neurological and neuroimaging field, have gathered together. Each IRCCS is equipped with high- or ultra-high field MRI scanners (i.e., ≥3T) for clinical or preclinical research or has established expertise in MRI data analysis and infrastructure. The actions of this Network were defined across several work packages (WP). A clinical work package (WP1) defined the guidelines for a minimum standard clinical qualitative MRI assessment for the main neurological diseases. Two neuroimaging technical work packages (WP2 and WP3, for clinical and preclinical scanners) established Standard Operative Procedures for quality controls on phantoms as well as advanced harmonized quantitative MRI protocols for studying the brain of healthy human participants and wild type mice. Under FAIR principles, a web-based e-infrastructure to store and share data across sites was also implemented (WP4). Finally, the RIN translated all these efforts into a large-scale multimodal data collection in patients and animal models with dementia (i.e., case study). The RIN-Neuroimaging Network can maximize the impact of public investments in research and clinical practice acquiring data across institutes and pathologies with high-quality and highly-consistent acquisition protocols, optimizing the analysis pipeline and data sharing procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Nigri
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Ferraro
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
- MOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Claudia A. M. Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michela Tosetti
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alberto Redolfi
- Laboratory of Neuroinformatics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Forloni
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Egidio D'Angelo
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Domenico Aquino
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Biagi
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Paolo Bosco
- Medical Physics and MR Lab, Fondazione IRCCS Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy
| | - Irene Carne
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia De Francesco
- Laboratory of Neuroinformatics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Greta Demichelis
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben Gianeri
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Edoardo Micotti
- Laboratory of Biology of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Napolitano
- Medical Physics, IRCCS Istituto Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
| | - Fulvia Palesi
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Savini
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Alberici
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carmelo Amato
- Unit of Neuroradiology, Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy
| | - Filippo Arrigoni
- Neuroimaging Unit, Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
| | | | - Marco Bozzali
- Neuroimaging Laboratory, Santa Lucia Foundation, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Valeria Elisa Contarino
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Simona Gaudino
- Istituto di Radiologia, UOC Radiologia e Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Marino
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, Messina, Italy
| | - Vittorio Manzo
- Department of Radiology, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Letterio S. Politi
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Roccatagliata
- Neuroradiologia IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute Università di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Rognone
- Unità di Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Rossi
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute Università di Genova, Genoa, Italy
- UO Neuroradiologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Caterina Tonon
- Functional and Molecular Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Raffaele Lodi
- Functional and Molecular Neuroimaging Unit, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Tagliavini
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Bruzzone
- U.O. Neuroradiologia, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
60
|
C Monte-Rubio G, Segura B, P Strafella A, van Eimeren T, Ibarretxe-Bilbao N, Diez-Cirarda M, Eggers C, Lucas-Jiménez O, Ojeda N, Peña J, Ruppert MC, Sala-Llonch R, Theis H, Uribe C, Junque C. Parameters from site classification to harmonize MRI clinical studies: Application to a multi-site Parkinson's disease dataset. Hum Brain Mapp 2022; 43:3130-3142. [PMID: 35305545 PMCID: PMC9188966 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Multi‐site MRI datasets are crucial for big data research. However, neuroimaging studies must face the batch effect. Here, we propose an approach that uses the predictive probabilities provided by Gaussian processes (GPs) to harmonize clinical‐based studies. A multi‐site dataset of 216 Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and 87 healthy subjects (HS) was used. We performed a site GP classification using MRI data. The outcomes estimated from this classification, redefined like Weighted HARMonization PArameters (WHARMPA), were used as regressors in two different clinical studies: A PD versus HS machine learning classification using GP, and a VBM comparison (FWE‐p < .05, k = 100). Same studies were also conducted using conventional Boolean site covariates, and without information about site belonging. The results from site GP classification provided high scores, balanced accuracy (BAC) was 98.39% for grey matter images. PD versus HS classification performed better when the WHARMPA were used to harmonize (BAC = 78.60%; AUC = 0.90) than when using the Boolean site information (BAC = 56.31%; AUC = 0.71) and without it (BAC = 57.22%; AUC = 0.73). The VBM analysis harmonized using WHARMPA provided larger and more statistically robust clusters in regions previously reported in PD than when the Boolean site covariates or no corrections were added to the model. In conclusion, WHARMPA might encode global site‐effects quantitatively and allow the harmonization of data. This method is user‐friendly and provides a powerful solution, without complex implementations, to clean the analyses by removing variability associated with the differences between sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma C Monte-Rubio
- Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Barbara Segura
- Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED: CB06/05/0018-ISCIII) Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Antonio P Strafella
- Edmond J. Safra Parkinson Disease Program & Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorder Unit, Neurology Division, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thilo van Eimeren
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Naroa Ibarretxe-Bilbao
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Maria Diez-Cirarda
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carsten Eggers
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior - CMBB, Universities Marburg and Gießen, Marburg and Gießen, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany
| | - Olaia Lucas-Jiménez
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Natalia Ojeda
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Javier Peña
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marina C Ruppert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior - CMBB, Universities Marburg and Gießen, Marburg and Gießen, Germany
| | - Roser Sala-Llonch
- Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Department of Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Hendrik Theis
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carme Uribe
- Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Brain Health Imaging Centre, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carme Junque
- Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Medical Psychology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED: CB06/05/0018-ISCIII) Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Koirala N, Kleinman D, Perdue MV, Su X, Villa M, Grigorenko EL, Landi N. Widespread effects of dMRI data quality on diffusion measures in children. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 43:1326-1341. [PMID: 34799957 PMCID: PMC8837592 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) datasets are susceptible to several confounding factors related to data quality, which is especially true in studies involving young children. With the recent trend of large‐scale multicenter studies, it is more critical to be aware of the varied impacts of data quality on measures of interest. Here, we investigated data quality and its effect on different diffusion measures using a multicenter dataset. dMRI data were obtained from 691 participants (5–17 years of age) from six different centers. Six data quality metrics—contrast to noise ratio, outlier slices, and motion (absolute, relative, translation, and rotational)—and four diffusion measures—fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, tract density, and length—were computed for each of 36 major fiber tracts for all participants. The results indicated that four out of six data quality metrics (all except absolute and translation motion) differed significantly between centers. Associations between these data quality metrics and the diffusion measures differed significantly across the tracts and centers. Moreover, these effects remained significant after applying recently proposed harmonization algorithms that purport to remove unwanted between‐site variation in diffusion data. These results demonstrate the widespread impact of dMRI data quality on diffusion measures. These tracts and measures have been routinely associated with individual differences as well as group‐wide differences between neurotypical populations and individuals with neurological or developmental disorders. Accordingly, for analyses of individual differences or group effects (particularly in multisite dataset), we encourage the inclusion of data quality metrics in dMRI analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Meaghan V Perdue
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Connecticut, USA
| | - Xing Su
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Martina Villa
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Connecticut, USA
| | - Elena L Grigorenko
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole Landi
- Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Kurokawa R, Kamiya K, Koike S, Nakaya M, Uematsu A, Tanaka SC, Kamagata K, Okada N, Morita K, Kasai K, Abe O. Cross-scanner reproducibility and harmonization of a diffusion MRI structural brain network: A traveling subject study of multi-b acquisition. Neuroimage 2021; 245:118675. [PMID: 34710585 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Characterization of brain networks by diffusion MRI (dMRI) has rapidly evolved, and there are ongoing movements toward data sharing and multi-center studies. To extract meaningful information from multi-center data, methods to correct for the bias caused by scanner differences, that is, harmonization, are urgently needed. In this work, we report the cross-scanner differences in structural network analyses using data from nine traveling subjects (four males and five females, 21-49 years-old) who underwent scanning using four 3T scanners (public database available from the Brain/MINDS Beyond Human Brain MRI project (http://mriportal.umin.jp/)). The reliability and reproducibility were compared to those of data from another set of four subjects (all males, 29-42 years-old) who underwent scan-rescan (interval, 105-147 days) with the same scanner as well as scan-rescan data from the Human Connectome Project database. The results demonstrated that the reliability of the edge weights and graph theory metrics was lower for data including different scanners, compared to the scan-rescan with the same scanner. Besides, systematic differences between scanners were observed, indicating the risk of bias in comparing networks obtained from different scanners directly. We further demonstrate that it is feasible to reduce inter-scanner variabilities while preserving the inter-subject differences among healthy individuals by modeling the scanner effects at the level of network matrices, when traveling-subject data are available for calibration between scanners. The present data and results are expected to serve as a basis for developing and evaluating novel harmonization methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Kurokawa
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kouhei Kamiya
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shinsuke Koike
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Moto Nakaya
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Akiko Uematsu
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Saori C Tanaka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Naohiro Okada
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kentaro Morita
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Tokyo, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), Tokyo, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Osamu Abe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Intra-scan inter-tissue variability can help harmonize radiomics features in CT. Eur Radiol 2021; 32:783-792. [PMID: 34363133 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08154-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We studied the repeatability and the relative intra-scan variability across acquisition protocols in CT using phantom and unenhanced abdominal series. METHODS We used 17 CT scans from the Credence Cartridge Radiomics Phantom database and 20 unenhanced multi-site non-pathologic abdominal patient series for which we measured spleen and liver tissues. We performed multiple measurements in extracting 9 radiomics features. We defined a "tandem" as the measurement of a given tissue (or material) by a given radiomics. For each tandem, we assessed the proportion of the variability attributable to repetitions, acquisition protocols, material, or patient. We analyzed the distribution of the intra-scan correlation between pairs of tandems and checked the impact of correlation coefficient greater than 0.90 in comparing paired and unpaired differences. RESULTS The repeatability of radiomics features depends on the measured material; 56% of tandems were highly repeatable. Histogram-derived radiomics were generally less repeatable. Nearly 60% of relative radiomics measurements had a correlation coefficient higher than 0.90 allowing paired measurements to improve reliability in detecting the difference between two materials. The analysis of liver and spleen tissues showed that measurement variability was negligible with respect to other variabilities. As for phantom data, we found that gray level zone length matrix (GLZLM)-derived radiomics and gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-derived radiomics were the most correlating features. For these features, relative intra-scan measurements improved the detection of different materials or tissues. CONCLUSIONS We identified radiomics features for which the intra-scan measurements between tissues are linearly correlated. This property represents an opportunity to improve tissue characterization and inter-site harmonization. KEY POINTS • The repeatability of radiomics features on CT depends on the measured material or tissue. • Some tandems of radiomics features/tissues are linearly affected by the variability of acquisition protocols on CT. • Relative intra-scan measurements are an opportunity for improving quantitative imaging on CT.
Collapse
|
64
|
Impact of Preprocessing and Harmonization Methods on the Removal of Scanner Effects in Brain MRI Radiomic Features. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13123000. [PMID: 34203896 PMCID: PMC8232807 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary As a rapid-development research field, radiomics-based analysis has been applied to many clinical problems. However, the reproducibility of the radiomics studies remain challenging especially when data suffers from scanner effects, a kind of non-biological variations introduced by different image acquiring settings. This study aims to investigate how the image preprocessing methods (N4 bias field correction and image resampling) and the harmonization methods (intensity normalization methods working on images and ComBat method working on radiomic features) help to remove the scanner effects and improve the radiomics reproducibility in brain MRI radiomics. Abstract In brain MRI radiomics studies, the non-biological variations introduced by different image acquisition settings, namely scanner effects, affect the reliability and reproducibility of the radiomics results. This paper assesses how the preprocessing methods (including N4 bias field correction and image resampling) and the harmonization methods (either the six intensity normalization methods working on brain MRI images or the ComBat method working on radiomic features) help to remove the scanner effects and improve the radiomic feature reproducibility in brain MRI radiomics. The analyses were based on in vitro datasets (homogeneous and heterogeneous phantom data) and in vivo datasets (brain MRI images collected from healthy volunteers and clinical patients with brain tumors). The results show that the ComBat method is essential and vital to remove scanner effects in brain MRI radiomic studies. Moreover, the intensity normalization methods, while not able to remove scanner effects at the radiomic feature level, still yield more comparable MRI images and improve the robustness of the harmonized features to the choice among ComBat implementations.
Collapse
|
65
|
Richie-Halford A, Yeatman JD, Simon N, Rokem A. Multidimensional analysis and detection of informative features in human brain white matter. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009136. [PMID: 34181648 PMCID: PMC8270416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The white matter contains long-range connections between different brain regions and the organization of these connections holds important implications for brain function in health and disease. Tractometry uses diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) to quantify tissue properties along the trajectories of these connections. Statistical inference from tractometry usually either averages these quantities along the length of each fiber bundle or computes regression models separately for each point along every one of the bundles. These approaches are limited in their sensitivity, in the former case, or in their statistical power, in the latter. We developed a method based on the sparse group lasso (SGL) that takes into account tissue properties along all of the bundles and selects informative features by enforcing both global and bundle-level sparsity. We demonstrate the performance of the method in two settings: i) in a classification setting, patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are accurately distinguished from matched controls. Furthermore, SGL identifies the corticospinal tract as important for this classification, correctly finding the parts of the white matter known to be affected by the disease. ii) In a regression setting, SGL accurately predicts "brain age." In this case, the weights are distributed throughout the white matter indicating that many different regions of the white matter change over the lifespan. Thus, SGL leverages the multivariate relationships between diffusion properties in multiple bundles to make accurate phenotypic predictions while simultaneously discovering the most relevant features of the white matter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Richie-Halford
- eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jason D. Yeatman
- Graduate School of Education and Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Noah Simon
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Ariel Rokem
- eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
Buchanan CR, Muñoz Maniega S, Valdés Hernández MC, Ballerini L, Barclay G, Taylor AM, Russ TC, Tucker-Drob EM, Wardlaw JM, Deary IJ, Bastin ME, Cox SR. Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5 and 3 T: Data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:3905-3921. [PMID: 34008899 PMCID: PMC8288101 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Multi‐scanner MRI studies are reliant on understanding the apparent differences in imaging measures between different scanners. We provide a comprehensive analysis of T1‐weighted and diffusion MRI (dMRI) structural brain measures between a 1.5 T GE Signa Horizon HDx and a 3 T Siemens Magnetom Prisma using 91 community‐dwelling older participants (aged 82 years). Although we found considerable differences in absolute measurements (global tissue volumes were measured as ~6–11% higher and fractional anisotropy [FA] was 33% higher at 3 T than at 1.5 T), between‐scanner consistency was good to excellent for global volumetric and dMRI measures (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range: .612–.993) and fair to good for 68 cortical regions (FreeSurfer) and cortical surface measures (mean ICC: .504–.763). Between‐scanner consistency was fair for dMRI measures of 12 major white matter tracts (mean ICC: .475–.564), and the general factors of these tracts provided excellent consistency (ICC ≥ .769). Whole‐brain structural networks provided good to excellent consistency for global metrics (ICC ≥ .612). Although consistency was poor for individual network connections (mean ICCs: .275−.280), this was driven by a large difference in network sparsity (.599 vs. .334), and consistency was improved when comparing only the connections present in every participant (mean ICCs: .533–.647). Regression‐based k‐fold cross‐validation showed that, particularly for global volumes, between‐scanner differences could be largely eliminated (R2 range .615–.991). We conclude that low granularity measures of brain structure can be reliably matched between the scanners tested, but caution is warranted when combining high granularity information from different scanners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin R Buchanan
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Susana Muñoz Maniega
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Maria C Valdés Hernández
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lucia Ballerini
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gayle Barclay
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Adele M Taylor
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tom C Russ
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Alzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Joanna M Wardlaw
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian J Deary
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark E Bastin
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Simon R Cox
- Lothian Birth Cohorts Group, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Psychology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Turner S, Lazarus R, Marion D, Main KL. Molecular and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury: Principles for Investigation and Integration. J Neurotrauma 2021; 38:1762-1782. [PMID: 33446015 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The last 20 years have seen the advent of new technologies that enhance the diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI). There is recognition that TBI affects the brain beyond initial injury, in some cases inciting a progressive neuropathology that leads to chronic impairments. Medical researchers are now searching for biomarkers to detect and monitor this condition. Perhaps the most promising developments are in the biomolecular and neuroimaging domains. Molecular assays can identify proteins indicative of neuronal injury and/or degeneration. Diffusion imaging now allows sensitive evaluations of the brain's cellular microstructure. As the pace of discovery accelerates, it is important to survey the research landscape and identify promising avenues of investigation. In this review, we discuss the potential of molecular and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) biomarkers in TBI research. Integration of these technologies could advance models of disease prognosis, ultimately improving care. To date, however, few studies have explored relationships between molecular and DTI variables in patients with TBI. Here, we provide a short primer on each technology, review the latest research, and discuss how these biomarkers may be incorporated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Turner
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.,General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Rachel Lazarus
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.,General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Donald Marion
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.,General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Keith L Main
- Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.,General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Koike S, Tanaka SC, Okada T, Aso T, Yamashita A, Yamashita O, Asano M, Maikusa N, Morita K, Okada N, Fukunaga M, Uematsu A, Togo H, Miyazaki A, Murata K, Urushibata Y, Autio J, Ose T, Yoshimoto J, Araki T, Glasser MF, Van Essen DC, Maruyama M, Sadato N, Kawato M, Kasai K, Okamoto Y, Hanakawa T, Hayashi T. Brain/MINDS beyond human brain MRI project: A protocol for multi-level harmonization across brain disorders throughout the lifespan. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 30:102600. [PMID: 33741307 PMCID: PMC8209465 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric and neurological disorders are afflictions of the brain that can affect individuals throughout their lifespan. Many brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have been conducted; however, imaging-based biomarkers are not yet well established for diagnostic and therapeutic use. This article describes an outline of the planned study, the Brain/MINDS Beyond human brain MRI project (BMB-HBM, FY2018 ~ FY2023), which aims to establish clinically-relevant imaging biomarkers with multi-site harmonization by collecting data from healthy traveling subjects (TS) at 13 research sites. Collection of data in psychiatric and neurological disorders across the lifespan is also scheduled at 13 sites, whereas designing measurement procedures, developing and analyzing neuroimaging protocols, and databasing are done at three research sites. A high-quality scanning protocol, Harmonization Protocol (HARP), was established for five high-quality 3 T scanners to obtain multimodal brain images including T1 and T2-weighted, resting-state and task functional and diffusion-weighted MRI. Data are preprocessed and analyzed using approaches developed by the Human Connectome Project. Preliminary results in 30 TS demonstrated cortical thickness, myelin, functional connectivity measures are comparable across 5 scanners, suggesting sensitivity to subject-specific connectome. A total of 75 TS and more than two thousand patients with various psychiatric and neurological disorders are scheduled to participate in the project, allowing a mixed model statistical harmonization. The HARP protocols are publicly available online, and all the imaging, demographic and clinical information, harmonizing database will also be made available by 2024. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first project to implement a prospective, multi-level harmonization protocol with multi-site TS data. It explores intractable brain disorders across the lifespan and may help to identify the disease-specific pathophysiology and imaging biomarkers for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinsuke Koike
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
| | - Saori C Tanaka
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0288, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Okada
- Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Aso
- Laboratory for Brain Connectomics Imaging, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Ayumu Yamashita
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0288, Japan
| | - Okito Yamashita
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0288, Japan
| | - Michiko Asano
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Norihide Maikusa
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan
| | - Kentaro Morita
- Department of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Naohiro Okada
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Masaki Fukunaga
- Division of Cerebral Integration, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
| | - Akiko Uematsu
- Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences (ECS), Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
| | - Hiroki Togo
- Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan
| | - Atsushi Miyazaki
- Tamagawa University Brain Science Institute, 6-1-1 Tamagawagakuen, Machida, Tokyo 194-8610, Japan
| | | | | | - Joonas Autio
- Laboratory for Brain Connectomics Imaging, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ose
- Laboratory for Brain Connectomics Imaging, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan
| | - Junichiro Yoshimoto
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0288, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Araki
- Department of Peripheral Nervous System Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO USA; Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - David C Van Essen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO USA
| | - Megumi Maruyama
- Research Enhancement Strategy Office, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
| | - Norihiro Sadato
- Division of Cerebral Integration, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Kawato
- Brain Information Communication Research Laboratory Group, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institutes International (ATR), Kyoto 619-0288, Japan; Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, RIKEN, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan
| | - Kiyoto Kasai
- University of Tokyo Institute for Diversity & Adaptation of Human Mind (UTIDAHM), Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; University of Tokyo Center for Integrative Science of Human Behavior (CiSHuB), 3-8-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; The International Research Center for Neurointelligence (WPI-IRCN), Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS), University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan; Department of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Okamoto
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Takashi Hanakawa
- Integrative Brain Imaging Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo 187-8551, Japan; Department of Integrated Neuroanatomy and Neuroimaging, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8303, Japan
| | - Takuya Hayashi
- Laboratory for Brain Connectomics Imaging, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Qu Y, Wang P, Liu B, Song C, Wang D, Yang H, Zhang Z, Chen P, Kang X, Du K, Yao H, Zhou B, Han T, Zuo N, Han Y, Lu J, Yu C, Zhang X, Jiang T, Zhou Y, Liu Y. AI4AD: Artificial intelligence analysis for Alzheimer's disease classification based on a multisite DTI database. BRAIN DISORDERS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dscb.2021.100005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
70
|
Horien C, Noble S, Greene AS, Lee K, Barron DS, Gao S, O'Connor D, Salehi M, Dadashkarimi J, Shen X, Lake EMR, Constable RT, Scheinost D. A hitchhiker's guide to working with large, open-source neuroimaging datasets. Nat Hum Behav 2021; 5:185-193. [PMID: 33288916 PMCID: PMC7992920 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-01005-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Large datasets that enable researchers to perform investigations with unprecedented rigor are growing increasingly common in neuroimaging. Due to the simultaneous increasing popularity of open science, these state-of-the-art datasets are more accessible than ever to researchers around the world. While analysis of these samples has pushed the field forward, they pose a new set of challenges that might cause difficulties for novice users. Here we offer practical tips for working with large datasets from the end-user's perspective. We cover all aspects of the data lifecycle: from what to consider when downloading and storing the data to tips on how to become acquainted with a dataset one did not collect and what to share when communicating results. This manuscript serves as a practical guide one can use when working with large neuroimaging datasets, thus dissolving barriers to scientific discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corey Horien
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- MD/PhD program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Stephanie Noble
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Abigail S Greene
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- MD/PhD program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kangjoo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Daniel S Barron
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Siyuan Gao
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David O'Connor
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mehraveh Salehi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Summary Analytics Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Xilin Shen
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Evelyn M R Lake
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - R Todd Constable
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Dustin Scheinost
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Deparment of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
St‐Jean S, Viergever MA, Leemans A. Harmonization of diffusion MRI data sets with adaptive dictionary learning. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:4478-4499. [PMID: 32851729 PMCID: PMC7555079 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging can indirectly infer the microstructure of tissues and provide metrics subject to normal variability in a population. Potentially abnormal values may yield essential information to support analysis of controls and patients cohorts, but subtle confounds could be mistaken for purely biologically driven variations amongst subjects. In this work, we propose a new harmonization algorithm based on adaptive dictionary learning to mitigate the unwanted variability caused by different scanner hardware while preserving the natural biological variability of the data. Our harmonization algorithm does not require paired training data sets, nor spatial registration or matching spatial resolution. Overcomplete dictionaries are learned iteratively from all data sets at the same time with an adaptive regularization criterion, removing variability attributable to the scanners in the process. The obtained mapping is applied directly in the native space of each subject toward a scanner-space. The method is evaluated with a public database which consists of two different protocols acquired on three different scanners. Results show that the effect size of the four studied diffusion metrics is preserved while removing variability attributable to the scanner. Experiments with alterations using a free water compartment, which is not simulated in the training data, shows that the modifications applied to the diffusion weighted images are preserved in the diffusion metrics after harmonization, while still reducing global variability at the same time. The algorithm could help multicenter studies pooling their data by removing scanner specific confounds, and increase statistical power in the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel St‐Jean
- Image Sciences InstituteUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Max A. Viergever
- Image Sciences InstituteUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Alexander Leemans
- Image Sciences InstituteUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Benkert H, Bhatia S, Mirza-Davies A, Tan ZX, Harrison JR. Challenges in diffusion MRI meta-analysis: A discussion of "Genetic influences on white matter and metabolism abnormal change in Alzheimer's disease: Meta-analysis for neuroimaging research on presenilin 1 mutation". Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 199:106279. [PMID: 33091654 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Benkert
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK.
| | - Sanchita Bhatia
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Anastasia Mirza-Davies
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Zhao Xuan Tan
- Cardiff University School of Medicine, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XN, UK
| | - Judith R Harrison
- Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|