51
|
Montagna G, Lee MK, Sevilimedu V, Barrio AV, Morrow M. Is Nodal Clipping Beneficial for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6133-6139. [PMID: 35902495 PMCID: PMC10109537 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12240-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In cN1 patients rendered cN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is < 10% when ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are removed. The added value of nodal clipping in this scenario is unknown. Here we determine how often the clipped node is a sentinel node when ≥ 3 SLNs are retrieved. METHODS We identified cT1-3N1 patients treated between 02/2018 and 10/2021 with a clipped lymph node at presentation. SLNB was performed with a standardized approach of dual-tracer mapping and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs. Clipped nodes were not localized; SLNs were X-rayed intraoperatively to determine clip location. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed for any residual disease or retrieval of < 3 SLNs. RESULTS Of 269 patients, 251 (93%) had ≥ 3 SLNs. Median age was 51 years; the majority (92%) had ductal histology; 46% were HR+/HER2-. The median number of SLNs removed was 4 (IQR 3,5). The clipped node was an SLN in 88% (220/251) of cases. Of the 31 where the clipped node was not, 13 had a positive SLN mandating ALND, and the clip was identified in the ALND specimen. In the remaining 18, where ≥ 3 negative SLNs were retrieved and an ALND was not performed, the clip was not retrieved, with no axillary failures in this group (median follow-up: 55 months). CONCLUSION When the SLNB procedure is optimized with dual tracer and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs, the clipped node is an SLN in the majority of cases, suggesting that failure to retrieve the clipped node should not be an indication for ALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Minna K Lee
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea V Barrio
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, Thill M, Kühn T, Ditsch N, Heil J, Wöckel A, Fallenberg E, Friedrich M, Kümmel S, Müller V, Janni W, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fasching P, Fehm T, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Gerber B. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1031-1043. [PMID: 36186147 PMCID: PMC9525149 DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-6231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee on the surgical therapy of breast cancer were last updated in March 2022 (www.ago-online.de). Since surgical therapy is one of several partial steps in the treatment of breast cancer, extensive diagnostic and oncological expertise of a breast surgeon and good interdisciplinary cooperation with diagnostic radiologists is of great importance. The most important changes concern localization techniques, resection margins, axillary management in the neoadjuvant setting and the evaluation of the meshes in reconstructive surgery. Based on meta-analyses of randomized studies, the level of recommendation of an intraoperative breast ultrasound for the localization of non-palpable lesions was elevated to "++". Thus, the technique is considered to be equivalent to wire localization, provided that it is a lesion which can be well represented by sonography, the surgeon has extensive experience in breast ultrasound and has access to a suitable ultrasound device during the operation. In invasive breast cancer, the aim is to reach negative resection margins ("no tumor on ink"), regardless of whether an extensive intraductal component is present or not. Oncoplastic operations can also replace a mastectomy in selected cases due to the large number of existing techniques, and are equivalent to segmental resection in terms of oncological safety at comparable rates of complications. Sentinel node excision is recommended for patients with cN0 status receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after completion of chemotherapy. Minimally invasive biopsy is recommended for initially suspect lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with initially 1 - 3 suspicious lymph nodes and a good response (ycN0) can receive the targeted axillary dissection and the axillary dissection as equivalent options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany,Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Maggie Banys-Paluchowski Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und GeburtshilfeUniversitätsklinikum
Schleswig-Holstein Campus LübeckRatzeburger Allee 16023538
LübeckGermany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Peter Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Schweiz
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Neu-Isenburg, Germany,Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane & Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus
GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - H. Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Hartmann S, Kühn T, Hauptmann M, Stickeler E, Thill M, Lux MP, Fröhlich S, Ruf F, Loibl S, Blohmer JU, Kolberg HC, Thiemann E, Weigel M, Solbach C, Kaltenecker G, Paluchowski P, Schrauder MG, Paepke S, Watermann D, Hahn M, Hufnagel M, Lefarth J, Untch M, Banys-Paluchowski M. Axillary Staging after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Initially Node-Positive Breast Carcinoma in Germany: Initial Data from the AXSANA study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:932-940. [PMID: 36110892 PMCID: PMC9470287 DOI: 10.1055/a-1889-7883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To date, the optimal axillary staging procedure for initially node-positive breast carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been unclear. The aim of the AXSANA study is to prospectively compare different surgical staging techniques with respect to the oncological outcome and quality of life for the patients. Little is known about current clinical practice in Germany. Material and Methods In this paper we analyzed data from patients enrolled in the AXSANA study at German study sites from June 2020 to March 2022. Results During the period under investigation, 1135 patients were recruited at 143 study sites. More than three suspicious lymph nodes were initially found in 22% of patients. The target lymph node (TLN) was marked in 64% of cases. This was done with clips/coils in 83% of patients, with magnetic seeds or carbon suspension in 8% each, and with a radar marker in 1% of patients. After NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD) or axillary lymphadenectomy (ALND) were each planned in 48% of patients, and sentinel lymph node biopsy alone (SLNB) in 2%. Clinically, the nodal status after NACT was found to be unremarkable in 65% of cases. Histological lymph node status was correctly assessed by palpation in 65% of patients and by sonography in 69% of patients. Conclusion At the German AXSANA study sites, TAD and ALND are currently used as the most common surgical staging procedures after NACT in initially node-positive breast cancer patients. The TLN is marked with various markers prior to NACT. Given the inadequate accuracy of clinical assessment of axillary lymph node status after NACT, it should be questioned whether axillary dissection after NACT should be performed based on clinical assessment of nodal status alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffi Hartmann
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany,Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse Prof. Dr. med. Thorsten Kühn Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und GeburtshilfeKlinikum
EsslingenHirschlandstraße 9773730 Esslingen
a. N.Germany
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGAPLESION MARKUS KRANKENHAUS, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Sarah Fröhlich
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Franziska Ruf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany,Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Weigel
- Brustzentrum Schweinfurt-Mainfranken, Leopoldina-Krankenhaus, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universität Frankfurt, Brustzentrum, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Stefan Paepke
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Dirk Watermann
- Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus, Brustzentrum Südbaden, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Jutta Lefarth
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Memmingen, Memmingen, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
54
|
Accuracy and Limitations of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Nodes. Breast J 2022; 2022:1507881. [PMID: 36051467 PMCID: PMC9411000 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1507881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Axillary surgical management in patients with node-positive breast cancer at the time of diagnosis converted to negative nodes through neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains unclear. Removal of more than two sentinel nodes (SLNs) in these patients may decrease the false negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs). We aim to analyse the detection rate (DR) and the FNR of SLNB assessment according to the number of SLNs removed. Methods A retrospective study was performed from October 2012 to December 2018. Patients with invasive breast cancer who had a clinically node-positive disease at diagnosis and with a complete axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients included underwent SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NAC. The SLN was considered positive if any residual disease was detected. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the clinicopathologic features and the results of SLNB and ALND. The DR of SLNB was defined as the number of patients with successful identification of SLN. Presence of residual disease in ALND and negative SLN was considered false negative. Results A total of 368 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent surgery after complete NAC were studied. Of them, 85 patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 50.8 years. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients, with an average of 10 lymph nodes removed. The DR of SLNB was 92.9%, and the FNR was 19.1. The median number of SLNs removed was 3, and at least, three SLNs were obtained in 42 patients (53.2%). When at least three sentinel nodes were removed, the FNR decreased to 8.7%. Conclusions In this cohort, the SLN assessment was associated with an adequate DR and a high FNR. Removing three or more SLNs decreased the FNR from 19.1% to 8.7%. Complementary approaches may be considered for axillary lymph node staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study was approved by our institution's ethics committee (Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCEI:20/0048).
Collapse
|
55
|
Maggie BP, Peter P, Natalia K. Twinkle artifact in sonographic breast clip visualization. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 307:2021-2022. [PMID: 35829766 PMCID: PMC10147737 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06659-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The 'twinkle' or 'twinkling' artifact represents a phenomenon observed using color Doppler ultrasound that leads to a rapid alternation of color in and immediately behind an echogenic and highly reflective object. It occurs during sonographic examination of kidney stones, and has been also described in clips used for marking breast and axillary lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Banys-Paluchowski Maggie
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Paluchowski Peter
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Regio Klinikum Pinneberg, Pinneberg, Germany
| | - Krawczyk Natalia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Gasparri ML, de Boniface J, Poortmans P, Gentilini OD, Kaidar-Person O, Banys-Paluchowski M, Di Micco R, Niinikoski L, Murawa D, Bonci EA, Pasca A, Rubio IT, Karadeniz Cakmak G, Kontos M, Kühn T. Axillary surgery after neoadjuvant therapy in initially node-positive breast cancer: international EUBREAST survey. Br J Surg 2022; 109:857-863. [PMID: 35766257 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on axillary management after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer. To investigate current clinical practice, an international survey was conducted among breast surgeons and radiation oncologists. The aim of the first part of the survey was to provide a snapshot of international discrepancies regarding axillary surgery in this context. METHODS The European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST) developed a web-based survey containing 39 questions describing clinical scenarios in the setting of axillary management in patients with cN1 disease converting to ycN0 after NAT. The survey was then distributed to breast surgeons and radiation oncologists via 14 breast cancer societies between April and October 2021. RESULTS Responses from 349 physicians in 45 countries were recorded. The most common post-NAT axillary surgery in patients with cN1 disease converting to ycN0 was targeted axillary dissection (54.2 per cent), followed by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone (20.9 per cent), level 1-2 axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (18.4 per cent), level 1-3 ALND (4 per cent), and targeted lymph node biopsy (2.5 per cent). For SLNB alone, dual tracers were most commonly used (62.3 per cent). Management varied widely in patients with ambiguous axillary status before initiation of treatment or a residual metastatic burden in the axilla after NAT. In patients with ycN+ tumours, ALND was the preferred surgical approach for 66.8 per cent of respondents. CONCLUSION These results highlight the wide heterogeneity in surgical approaches to the axilla after NAT. To standardize the guidelines, further data from clinical research are urgently needed, which underlines the importance of the ongoing AXSANA (EUBREAST-3) study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, CH.,Faculty of Biomedicine, University of the Italian Switzerland (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Oncology Institute, Sheba Hospital Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Surgery Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Niinikoski
- Breast Surgery Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - David Murawa
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
| | - Eduard Alexandru Bonci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Oncological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Andrei Pasca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Department of Oncological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak
- Zonguldak BEUN The School of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Breast and Endocrine Unit, Kozlu/Zonguldak, Turkey
| | - Michalis Kontos
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Porpiglia M, Borella F, Chieppa P, Brino C, Ala A, Marra V, Castellano I, Benedetto C. Carbon tattooing of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective analysis. TUMORI JOURNAL 2022:3008916221107712. [PMID: 35751383 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221107712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of tattooing suspicious axillary lymph nodes with carbon suspension at the time of breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and the intraoperative correspondence between tattooed lymph node (TLN) and sentinel lymph node (SLN) in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS In this retrospective study, we analyzed consecutive BC patients who underwent NACT, between April 2019 and May 2021, at the Breast Unit of Sant'Anna Hospital in Turin, Italy. Before NACT, all suspicious biopsied lymph nodes were marked with carbon suspension. All SLNs, TLNs, and axillary nodal dissection specimens were sent for histopathological examination. RESULTS The study group included a total of 49 patients with BC. The overall identification rate of TLNs was 83.7% (41/49; 95%, confidence interval - CI 0.70-0.92). In patients who underwent target axillary dissection (TAD) the carbon tattooing had an intraoperative identification rate of 84.4% (27/32; 95% CI 0.67-0.95) while, in the case of axillary lymph node dissection, TLNs were detected in 82.3% (14/17; 95% CI 0.56-0.96) of patients. The correlation between TLN and SLN was 71.8% (23/32). CONCLUSIONS These results confirmed that tattooing axillary lymph nodes has an acceptable identification rate. We also confirmed that this procedure, in addition to SLN biopsy, improves the accuracy of surgical axillary staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Porpiglia
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy.,Breast Unit, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Fulvio Borella
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy.,Breast Unit, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Chieppa
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Carola Brino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Ada Ala
- Department of Surgery, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Marra
- Department of Radiology, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Isabella Castellano
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, S. Anna Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Mátrai Z, Kelemen P, Kósa C, Maráz R, Paszt A, Pavlovics G, Sávolt Á, Simonka Z, Tóth D, Kásler M, Kaprin A, Krivorotko P, Vicko F, Pluta P, Kolacinska-Wow A, Murawa D, Jankau J, Ciesla S, Dyttert D, Sabol M, Zhygulin A, Avetisyan A, Bessonov A, Lázár G. Modern Breast Cancer Surgery 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610377. [PMID: 35783360 PMCID: PMC9240205 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified on the basis of the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, they address some specific issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, and some remarks about the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Mátrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Kelemen
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Kósa
- Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Róbert Maráz
- Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Attila Paszt
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Ákos Sávolt
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Simonka
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Dezső Tóth
- Department of Surgery, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Miklós Kásler
- Minister of Human Capacities, Government of Hungary, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andrey Kaprin
- National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Petr Krivorotko
- N.N.Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Ferenc Vicko
- Medical Faculty Novi Sad, Oncology Institute of Vojvodina Sremska Kamenica, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Piotr Pluta
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Breast Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital–Research Institute in Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Kolacinska-Wow
- Department of Head and Neck Cancer Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Center, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dawid Murawa
- Clinic of Surgical Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- General and Oncological Surgery Clinic, Karol Marcinkowski University Hospital, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Jerzy Jankau
- Plastic Surgery Department, Medical University of Gdańsk/University Hospitals, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Slawomir Ciesla
- General and Oncological Surgery Clinic, Karol Marcinkowski University Hospital, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Daniel Dyttert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Martin Sabol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Medical Faculty, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | | | | | - Alexander Bessonov
- Breast Cancer Department of the LOKOD, N.N.Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - György Lázár
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, SZTE ÁOK, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
de Boniface J, Frisell J, Kühn T, Wiklander-Bråkenhielm I, Dembrower K, Nyman P, Zouzos A, Gerber B, Reimer T, Hartmann S. False-negative rate in the extended prospective TATTOO trial evaluating targeted axillary dissection by carbon tattooing in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 193:589-595. [PMID: 35451733 PMCID: PMC9114094 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06588-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In clinically node-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), nodal metastases can be initially marked and then removed during surgical axillary staging. Marking methods vary significantly in terms of feasibility and cost. The purpose of the extended TATTOO trial was to report on the false-negative rate (FNR) of the low-cost method carbon tattooing. METHODS The international prospective single-arm TATTOO trial included clinically node-positive breast cancer patients planned for NST from November 2017 to January 2021. For the present analysis, patients who received both the targeted procedure with or without an additional sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and a completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were selected. Primary endpoint was the FNR. RESULTS Out of 172 included patients, 149 had undergone a completion ALND. The detection rate for the tattooed node was 94.6% (141 out of 149). SLN biopsy was attempted in 132 out of 149 patients with a detection rate of 91.7% (121 out of 132). SLN and tattooed node were identical in 58 out of 121 individuals (47.9%). The combined procedure, i.e. targeted axillary dissection (TAD) was successful in 147 of 149 cases (98.7%). Four out of 65 patients with a clinically node-negative status after NST had a negative TAD but metastases on ALND, corresponding to a FNR of 6.2%. All false-negative TAD procedures were performed in the first 2 years of the trial (2018-2019, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION Carbon tattooing is a feasible marking method for TAD with a high detection rate and an acceptably low FNR. The TATTOO trial was preregistered as prospective trial before initiation at the University of Rostock, Germany (DRKS00013169).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Mariebergsporten 2, 11219, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Jan Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Breast, Endocrine and Sarcoma Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | | | - Karin Dembrower
- Department of Radiology, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Nyman
- Department of Surgery, Skaraborg Hospital, Lidköping, Sweden
| | - Athanasios Zouzos
- Department of Mammography, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Steffi Hartmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Song YX, Xu Z, Liang MX, Liu Z, Hou JC, Chen X, Xu D, Fei YJ, Tang JH. Diagnostic accuracy of de-escalated surgical procedure in axilla for node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4085-4103. [PMID: 35502768 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More initial clinical node-positive breast cancer patients achieve axillary pathological complete response (ax-pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). Restaging axillary status and performing de-escalated surgical procedures to replace routine axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) is urgently needed. Targeted axillary lymph node biopsy (TLNB) is a novel de-escalated surgical strategy marking metastatic axillary nodes before NST and targeted dissection and biopsy intraoperatively to tailor individual axillary management. METHODS This study provided a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the feasibility and diagnosis accuracy of TLNB. Prospective and retrospective clinical trials on TLNB were searched from Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. Identification rate (IFR), false-negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV), and rate of ax-pCR were the outcomes of this meta-analysis. RESULTS One thousand nine hundred and twenty patients attempted TLNB, with an overall IFR of 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90.1%-96.2%). IFR of three nodal marking methods, namely iodine seeds, clips, and carbon dye, was 95.6% (95% CI 91.2%-98.7%), 91.7% (95% CI 87.3%-95.4%), and 97.1% (95% CI 89.1%-100.0%), respectively. Of them, 847 patients received ALND, with an overall FNR of 5.5% (95% CI 3.3%-8.0%), and NPV ranged from 90.1% to 96.1%. Regression analysis showed that the overlap of targeted and sentinel biopsied nodes might associate with IFRs and FNRs. CONCLUSION TLNB is a novel, less invasive surgical approach to distinguish initial node-positive breast cancer that achieves negative axillary conversion after NST. It yields an excellent IFR with a low FNR and a high NPV. A combination of preoperative imaging, intraoperative TLNB with SLNB, and postoperative nodal radiotherapy might affect the future treatment paradigm of primary breast cancer with nodal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Xin Song
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ming-Xing Liang
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhen Liu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun-Chen Hou
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiu Chen
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Di Xu
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yin-Jiao Fei
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jin-Hai Tang
- The Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Kaidar-Person O, Weber WP, Kühn T, Poortmans P. The forgotten node: Axillary surgery mandates expertise. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1922-1924. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
62
|
Valdés Olmos R, Vidal-Sicart S, Fuertes Cabero S, Goñi Gironés E, Paredes P. Aportación de la medicina nuclear intervencionista a la cirugía de precisión molecularmente dirigida. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
63
|
Minella C, Villasco A, D’Alonzo M, Cellini L, Accomasso F, Actis S, Biglia N. Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Clip-Based Technique to Improve Surgical Outcomes, a Single-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2229. [PMID: 35565357 PMCID: PMC9103394 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to describe the surgical management of breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with attention to the impact on surgical outcomes of a clip-based marking technique. METHODS Patients who underwent NACT at the Breast Unit of the A. O Ordine Mauriziano of Turin from January 2018 and had a surgical intervention by January 2022 were included. Data on the feasibility of clip insertion, after-treatment visibility, and successful removal during surgery were collected prospectively. Surgical outcomes in terms of breast-conserving surgery and axillary dissection reduction were described. RESULTS In 51 patients who had surgery after NACT, 55 clips were placed (34 breast and 21 axillary clips). Ultrasound visibility of the clips was optimal (91%) as well as preoperative localization and retrieval within the surgical specimen. Moreover, the use of the clip positively affected surgical outcomes. In our study, clip insertion allowed to avoid mastectomy and axillary dissection in patients with a complete radiological response. CONCLUSIONS In our findings, the use of breast and/or lymph node clips has proved to be a simple and effective method to improve surgical conservative management of breast cancer patients after NACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carola Minella
- Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy; (C.M.); (A.V.); (M.D.); (F.A.); (S.A.)
| | - Andrea Villasco
- Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy; (C.M.); (A.V.); (M.D.); (F.A.); (S.A.)
| | - Marta D’Alonzo
- Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy; (C.M.); (A.V.); (M.D.); (F.A.); (S.A.)
| | - Lisa Cellini
- Radiology Department, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, 10128 Turin, Italy;
| | - Francesca Accomasso
- Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy; (C.M.); (A.V.); (M.D.); (F.A.); (S.A.)
| | - Silvia Actis
- Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy; (C.M.); (A.V.); (M.D.); (F.A.); (S.A.)
| | - Nicoletta Biglia
- Academic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy; (C.M.); (A.V.); (M.D.); (F.A.); (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Valdés Olmos R, Vidal-Sicart S, Fuertes Cabero S, Goñi Gironés E, Paredes P. Interventional nuclear medicine's contribution to molecularly targeted precision surgery. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:179-187. [PMID: 35484078 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The surgical approach to different pathologies, not only oncological, has evolved. As Veronesi's group has coined very graphically, we are moving from "maximum tolerable treatments to minimum effective treatments" and this journey cannot be carried out in any other way than through a multidisciplinary and multimodality approach. Multidisciplinary, because collaboration between surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, nuclear physicians, pathologists, and all those involved in patient follow-up is necessary, and multimodality, because we must move towards precision surgery tailored to each patient in which, on the part of Nuclear Medicine, hybrid imaging (SPECT/CT and PET/CT), bimodal tracers, the use of new allies such as ultrasound or our own adaptation to robotic surgery have a great deal to say. A wide range of possibilities is built on the solid foundation of preoperative scintigraphy, which makes it possible to identify the target tissues and whose knowledge prior to surgery allows the necessary surgical approach to be considered for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Valdés Olmos
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory and Nuclear Medicine Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - S Vidal-Sicart
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Imatge Mèdica Intercentres S. L. (IMI), Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Fuertes Cabero
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Goñi Gironés
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - P Paredes
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Pinto CS, Peleteiro B, Pinto CA, Osório F, Costa S, Magalhães A, Mora H, Amaral J, Gonçalves D, Fougo JL. Initial experience with targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer 2022; 29:709-719. [PMID: 35304711 PMCID: PMC8933233 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01349-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) combines sentinel node biopsy (SNB) with the removal of the previously marked metastatic node. TAD is a promising concept for axillary restaging in node-positive breast cancer patients with pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We aimed to evaluate TAD feasibility in this context. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in biopsy-confirmed cN1 patients. The removal of the clipped node (CN) was guided by intraoperative ultrasound. SNB used indocyanine green and patent blue V dye. If the CN or sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) had any metastatic foci, or the TAD procedure was unsuccessful, the patient underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Results Thirty-seven patients were included. TAD and SNB identification rates were 97.3%. Every retrieved CN was also a SLN. At the individual level, SNB identification rate was 89.2% with indocyanine green and 85.5% with patent blue V dye. The CN identification rate was 81.1%, being higher when the CN was localized on the intraoperative ultrasound (84.4% vs 60.0%). Nodal pCR was achieved by 54.1% of our patients and was more frequent in HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors (p = 0.039). Nineteen patients were spared from ALND. Conclusion TAD with intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision of the CN and SNB with indocyanine green and patent blue V dye is a feasible concept to identify patients without axillary residual disease after NAT, that can be spared from ALND, although the need for marking the biopsied node should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
| | - B Peleteiro
- EPIUnit-Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-598, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-598, Porto, Portugal
| | - C A Pinto
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - F Osório
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - S Costa
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - A Magalhães
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - H Mora
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - J Amaral
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - D Gonçalves
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| | - J L Fougo
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
- Centro de Mama, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
66
|
A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide versus Radioisotope Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022. [PMID: 35158944 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030676.pmid:35158944;pmcid:pmc8833727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The standard method for nodal staging in breast cancer (BC) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with a radioisotope (RI) injection. However, SLNB after NAC results in high false-negative rates (FNR), and the RI method is restricted by nuclear medicine unit dependency. These limitations resulted in the development of the superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) method, reducing FNR and presenting a comparable detection rate. This bi-institutional cohort comparison study aimed to assess the efficacy of SPIO and radioisotope SNLB in BC patients after NAC using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. The study group comprised 508 patients who underwent SLNB after NAC for ycT1-4N0M0 BC between 2013 and 2021 in two high volume centers. Data were retrieved from prospectively conducted databases. In the SPIO group, the median of retrieved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) was significantly higher than in the RI group (3 vs. 2; p < 0.0001). The SPIO method was associated with a significantly higher chance of retrieving at least three lymph nodes when compared to the RI method (71% vs. 11.3%; p < 0.0001). None of the analyzed demographic and clinical variables had a statistically significant influence on the efficacy of SLNs retrieval in the RI group, while in the SPIO group, patients with ≥three harvested SLNs had lower weight and decreased BMI. Based on this PSM analysis, SPIO-guided SLNB allowed the efficient retrieval and detection of SLNs in BC patients after NAC compared to RI.
Collapse
|
67
|
A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide versus Radioisotope Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030676. [PMID: 35158944 PMCID: PMC8833727 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary This Propensity Score Matched Analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and radioisotope sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) in breast cancer (BC) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). One hundred and twenty-four patients were eligible for final analysis. In the SPIO group, the median of retrieved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) was significantly higher than in the RI group. The SPIO method was associated with a significantly higher chance of retrieving at least three SLNs when compared to the RI method. SPIO-guided SLNB allows efficient retrieval and detection of SLNs in BC patients after NAC when compared to RI. Abstract The standard method for nodal staging in breast cancer (BC) patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with a radioisotope (RI) injection. However, SLNB after NAC results in high false-negative rates (FNR), and the RI method is restricted by nuclear medicine unit dependency. These limitations resulted in the development of the superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) method, reducing FNR and presenting a comparable detection rate. This bi-institutional cohort comparison study aimed to assess the efficacy of SPIO and radioisotope SNLB in BC patients after NAC using Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. The study group comprised 508 patients who underwent SLNB after NAC for ycT1-4N0M0 BC between 2013 and 2021 in two high volume centers. Data were retrieved from prospectively conducted databases. In the SPIO group, the median of retrieved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) was significantly higher than in the RI group (3 vs. 2; p < 0.0001). The SPIO method was associated with a significantly higher chance of retrieving at least three lymph nodes when compared to the RI method (71% vs. 11.3%; p < 0.0001). None of the analyzed demographic and clinical variables had a statistically significant influence on the efficacy of SLNs retrieval in the RI group, while in the SPIO group, patients with ≥three harvested SLNs had lower weight and decreased BMI. Based on this PSM analysis, SPIO-guided SLNB allowed the efficient retrieval and detection of SLNs in BC patients after NAC compared to RI.
Collapse
|
68
|
Gerber B, Schneeweiss A, Möbus V, Golatta M, Tesch H, Krug D, Hanusch C, Denkert C, Lübbe K, Heil J, Huober J, Ataseven B, Klare P, Hahn M, Untch M, Kast K, Jackisch C, Thomalla J, Seither F, Blohmer JU, Rhiem K, Fasching PA, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Kühn T. Pathological Response in the Breast and Axillary Lymph Nodes after Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment in Patients with Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer Correlates with Disease Free Survival: An Exploratory Analysis of the GeparOcto Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030521. [PMID: 35158789 PMCID: PMC8833390 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The extent of axillary surgery has been reduced in recent years to minimize side effects. However, a negative impact of reduced surgery on outcome must be avoided. We investigated for whom the extent of surgery can be safely reduced by examining early-stage breast cancer patients converting from lymph node (LN)-positive to LN-negative disease after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST). Of 242 initially LN-positive patients treated within the GeparOcto trial, 54.5% were classified as LN-negative after NAST, 31.8% as LN-positive, and for 13.6% data were missing. Overall, 92.1% of patients underwent complete axillary LN dissection, with 6.6% undergoing sentinel LN dissection only. At surgery, 55.4% of patients had no signs of cancer in the LN, 45.0% had no signs of cancer in the breast (of those 8.3% had involved LN), and 41.3% had no signs of cancer at all. Patients with involved LN still had a bad prognosis. Conversion from LN-positive to LN-negative after NAST is of highest prognostic value. Surgical axillary staging after NAST is essential in these patients to offer tailored treatment. Abstract Background: The conversion of initially histologically confirmed axillary lymph node-positive (pN+) to ypN0 after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients and may influence surgical de-escalation strategies. We aimed to determine pCR rates in lymph nodes (pCR-LN), the breast (pCR-B), and both (tpCR) in women who present with pN+ BC, to assess predictors for response and the impact of pCR-LN, pCR-B, and tpCR on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Methods: Retrospective, exploratory analysis of 242 patients with pN+ at diagnosis from the multicentric, randomized GeparOcto trial. Results: Of 242 patients with initially pN+ disease, 134 (55.4%) had a pCR-LN, and 109 (45.0%) a pCR-B. Of the 109 pCR-B patients, 9 (8.3%) patients had involved LN, and 100 (41.3%) patients had tpCR. Those with involved LN still had a bad prognosis. As expected, pCR-B and intrinsic subtypes (TNBC and HER2+) were identified as independent predictors of pCR-LN. pCR-LN (ypN0; hazard ratio 0.42; 95%, CI 0.23–0.75; p = 0.0028 for iDFS) was the strongest independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: In initially pN+ patients undergoing NAST, the conversion to ypN0 is of high prognostic value. Surgical axillary staging after NAST is still essential in these patients to offer tailored treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Südring 81, 18059 Rostock, Germany;
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Volker Möbus
- Medical Clinic II, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice, Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Im Prüfling 17-19, 60389 Frankfurt, Germany;
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Claus Hanusch
- Department of Senology, Rotkreuz-Klinikum, Rotkreuzplatz 8, 80634 Munich, Germany;
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany;
| | - Kristina Lübbe
- Breast Center, Diakovere Henriettenstift, Schwemannstraße 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.G.); (J.H.)
| | - Jens Huober
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany;
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Peter Klare
- Oncologic Medical Care Center Krebsheilkunde, Möllendorffstraße 52, 10367 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department for Women’s Health, University of Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany;
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Karin Kast
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Starkenburgring 66, 63069 Offenbach, Germany;
| | - Jörg Thomalla
- Praxisklinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie Koblenz, Neversstraße 5, 56068 Koblenz, Germany;
| | - Fenja Seither
- German Breast Group, Martin Behaim Strasse 12, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany; (F.S.); (V.N.)
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center Charité, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Erlangen, Universitätsstraße 21/23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Valentina Nekljudova
- German Breast Group, Martin Behaim Strasse 12, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany; (F.S.); (V.N.)
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Martin Behaim Strasse 12, 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany; (F.S.); (V.N.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-610-2748-0411; Fax: +49-610-2748-0111
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology, Klinikum Esslingen, Hirschlandstraße 97, 73730 Esslingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Zachariah NN, Basu A, Gautam N, Ramamoorthi G, Kodumudi KN, Kumar NB, Loftus L, Czerniecki BJ. Intercepting Premalignant, Preinvasive Breast Lesions Through Vaccination. Front Immunol 2021; 12:786286. [PMID: 34899753 PMCID: PMC8652247 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) prevention remains the ultimate cost-effective method to reduce the global burden of invasive breast cancer (IBC). To date, surgery and chemoprevention remain the main risk-reducing modalities for those with hereditary cancer syndromes, as well as high-risk non-hereditary breast lesions such as ADH, ALH, or LCIS. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a preinvasive malignant lesion of the breast that closely mirrors IBC and, if left untreated, develops into IBC in up to 50% of lesions. Certain high-risk patients with DCIS may have a 25% risk of developing recurrent DCIS or IBC, even after surgical resection. The development of breast cancer elicits a strong immune response, which brings to prominence the numerous advantages associated with immune-based cancer prevention over drug-based chemoprevention, supported by the success of dendritic cell vaccines targeting HER2-expressing BC. Vaccination against BC to prevent or interrupt the process of BC development remains elusive but is a viable option. Vaccination to intercept preinvasive or premalignant breast conditions may be possible by interrupting the expression pattern of various oncodrivers. Growth factors may also function as potential immune targets to prevent breast cancer progression. Furthermore, neoantigens also serve as effective targets for interception by virtue of strong immunogenicity. It is noteworthy that the immune response also needs to be strong enough to result in target lesion elimination to avoid immunoediting as it may occur in IBC arising from DCIS. Overall, if the issue of vaccine targets can be solved by interrupting premalignant lesions, there is a potential to prevent the development of IBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amrita Basu
- Clinical Science Division, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Namrata Gautam
- Clinical Science Division, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Ganesan Ramamoorthi
- Clinical Science Division, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Krithika N Kodumudi
- Clinical Science Division, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Nagi B Kumar
- Clinical Science Division, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Loretta Loftus
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Surgery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Corsi F, Albasini S, Sorrentino L, Armatura G, Carolla C, Chiappa C, Combi F, Curcio A, Della Valle A, Ferrari G, Gasparri ML, Gentilini O, Ghilli M, Listorti C, Mancini S, Marinello P, Meani F, Mele S, Pertusati A, Roncella M, Rovera F, Sgarella A, Tazzioli G, Tognali D, Folli S. Development of a novel nomogram-based online tool to predict axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN+ breast cancer: A multicentre study on 1,950 patients. Breast 2021; 60:131-137. [PMID: 34624755 PMCID: PMC8503563 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) patients who convert from cN + to ycN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is still debated. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a preoperative predictive nomogram to select those patients with a low risk of residual axillary disease after NAC, in whom axillary surgery could be minimized. PATIENTS AND METHODS 1950 clinically node-positive BC patients from 11 Breast Units, treated by NAC and subsequent surgery, were included from 2005 to 2020. Patients were divided in two groups: those who achieved nodal pCR vs. those with residual nodal disease after NAC. The cohort was divided into training and validation set with a geographic separation criterion. The outcome was to identify independent predictors of axillary pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS Independent predictive factors associated to nodal pCR were axillary clinical complete response (cCR) after NAC (OR 3.11, p < 0.0001), ER-/HER2+ (OR 3.26, p < 0.0001) or ER+/HER2+ (OR 2.26, p = 0.0002) or ER-/HER2- (OR 1.89, p = 0.009) BC, breast cCR (OR 2.48, p < 0.0001), Ki67 > 14% (OR 0.52, p = 0.0005), and tumor grading G2 (OR 0.35, p = 0.002) or G3 (OR 0.29, p = 0.0003). The nomogram showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 73% (AUC 0.77, 95%CI 0.75-0.80). After external validation the accuracy of the nomogram was confirmed. CONCLUSION The accuracy makes this freely-available, nomogram-based online tool useful to predict nodal pCR after NAC, translating the concept of tailored axillary surgery also in this setting of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Corsi
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", Università di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sara Albasini
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgery, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Luca Sorrentino
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", Università di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Armatura
- Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Italy
| | - Claudia Carolla
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Combi
- Breast Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Modena, Italy
| | - Annalisa Curcio
- Chirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Angelica Della Valle
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Ferrari
- Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Oreste Gentilini
- Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Matteo Ghilli
- Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Listorti
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Mancini
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy
| | - Peter Marinello
- Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano, Azienda Sanitaria dell'Alto Adige, Italy
| | - Francesco Meani
- Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Simone Mele
- Breast Surgery Unit, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola 2, 42122, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Anna Pertusati
- General Surgery I, Department of Surgery, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Adele Sgarella
- Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy; Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Tazzioli
- Breast Unit Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Modena, Italy
| | - Daniela Tognali
- Chirurgia Senologica, Ospedale Morgagni Pierantoni, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Secondo Folli
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson ALV. Eradication of Potential In-Transit Metastasis in Breast-Conserving Surgery-Reply. JAMA Surg 2021; 157:174-175. [PMID: 34705036 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jana de Boniface
- Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Robert Szulkin
- SDS Life Science, Danderyd, Sweden.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Pachulowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:1112-1120. [PMID: 34629490 PMCID: PMC8494519 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives
during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+
CNB
stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this yearʼs AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Pachulowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Cao S, Liu X, Cui J, Liu X, Zhong J, Yang Z, Sun D, Wei W. Feasibility and reliability of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with positive axillary nodes at initial diagnosis: An up-to date meta-analysis of 3,578 patients. Breast 2021; 59:256-269. [PMID: 34325383 PMCID: PMC8334738 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly adopted in the therapy of breast cancer (BC) patients with positive axillary nodes (cN+), but the reliability and feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) following NACT are still controversial. The objective of the present study is to conduct an updated meta-analysis on this issue. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science to identify papers published from January 1, 2000 to October 22, 2020 to research SLNB after NACT in BC patients. Studies that met the quality standard were enrolled for this meta-analysis. Results A total of 3578 participants from 27 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate of the identification rate (IR) for SLNB was 91 %, and the false negative rate (FNR) was 15 %. The pooled negative prediction value (NPV), accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 82 %, 89 %, 97 %, and 85 %, respectively. In subgroup analysis, the application of dual mapping could clearly decrease the FNR. The FNR was significantly high in the luminal types, and it declined as more sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were removed. Conclusion SLNB following NACT is now technically feasible for BC with cN+. However, it must be emphasized that the FNR is unacceptable high. We performed a meta-analysis to provide a consensus regarding the application of SLNB post-NACT in cN + patients. One comprehensive database search yielded 27 studies (3578 patients). The pooled estimate of IR for SLNB was 91 %, and FNR was 15 %. The application of dual mapping could clearly decrease the FNR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyang Cao
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xia Liu
- Department of Ultrasonography, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Junwei Cui
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoling Liu
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jieyu Zhong
- Department of Ultrasonography, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zijian Yang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Desheng Sun
- Department of Ultrasonography, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide for Identifying Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10143149. [PMID: 34300315 PMCID: PMC8305632 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a well-established procedure for staging clinically node-negative early breast cancer (BC). Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) demonstrated efficacy for nodal identification using a magnetic probe after local retroaeroal interstitial injection. Its benefits lie in its flexibility, which is an essential property in the global setting, where access to the isotope is difficult. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the SPIO for SLNB in BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Seventy-four female patients were included. The median time of lymph node retrieval was 20 min. The median number of resected sentinel nodes (SNs) was 4. SN was detected in all patients. No serious adverse event was observed. SPIO in identifying SN in BC patients after NAC is feasible and oncologically safe.
Collapse
|
75
|
Kurylcio A, Pelc Z, Skórzewska M, Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Mlak R, Gęca K, Sędłak K, Kurylcio P, Małecka-Massalska T, Polkowski W. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide for Identifying Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2021. [PMID: 34300315 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10143149.pmid:34300315;pmcid:pmc8305632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a well-established procedure for staging clinically node-negative early breast cancer (BC). Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) demonstrated efficacy for nodal identification using a magnetic probe after local retroaeroal interstitial injection. Its benefits lie in its flexibility, which is an essential property in the global setting, where access to the isotope is difficult. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the SPIO for SLNB in BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Seventy-four female patients were included. The median time of lymph node retrieval was 20 min. The median number of resected sentinel nodes (SNs) was 4. SN was detected in all patients. No serious adverse event was observed. SPIO in identifying SN in BC patients after NAC is feasible and oncologically safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Kurylcio
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Zuzanna Pelc
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Magdalena Skórzewska
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Radosław Mlak
- Department of Human Physiology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Gęca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Sędłak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Piotr Kurylcio
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Teresa Małecka-Massalska
- Department of Human Physiology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| | - Wojciech Polkowski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 13 St., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Fehm TN, Stickeler E, Fasching PA, Janni W, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kolberg HC, Lüftner D, Müller V, Schütz F, Thomssen C, Belleville E, Behrens A, Bader S, Untch M, Welslau M, Würstlein R, Thill M, Krug D, Hartkopf AD. Update Breast Cancer 2021 Part 3 - Current Developments in the Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Review and Assessment of Specialised Treatment Scenarios by an International Expert Panel. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:654-665. [PMID: 34168379 PMCID: PMC8216783 DOI: 10.1055/a-1487-7642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The continuous availability of findings from new studies repeatedly results in updated treatment recommendations and guidelines. In the case of breast carcinoma in particular, several studies have been published in the last few years that have transformed how early and advanced breast carcinoma is being treated. However, this by no means means implies that there is agreement among all experts on specific issues. It is precisely the diversity of interpretation of guidelines and study findings that reflects the constantly changing available data and its complexity, as well as the availability of new drugs. In recent years, new substances such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib and capecitabine have become available to treat patients with early stages of breast carcinoma. Furthermore, the first results on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for adjuvant treatment have now been published. Last but not least, the use of multigene tests to avoid the necessity of chemotherapy in certain
patients is still under discussion. This review summarises the state of the data and publishes the results of the survey completed by experts at the 2021 St. Gallen Breast Cancer Conference on early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,palleos healthcare, Wiesbaden, Germany.,Phaon Scientific, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Annika Behrens
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Simon Bader
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Genecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Hartmann S, Stachs A, Schultek G, Gerber B, Reimer T. The Clinical Relevance of Target Lymph Node Biopsy after Primary Systemic Therapy in Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112620. [PMID: 34073547 PMCID: PMC8198475 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Currently, the optimal axillary surgical approach for breast cancer patients with initial node-positive disease and conversion to clinically node-negative status after primary systemic therapy is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of removing the initially most suspicious, labeled axillary lymph node in addition to the sentinel lymph node. Metastatic target lymph nodes were found in five out of 63 patients (7.9%), while the sentinel lymph node was either tumor-free or not detected. The removal of the target lymph node influenced the adjuvant systemic therapy in only one case (1.6%). However, complete axillary dissection was indicated in all five cases. Furthermore, with fewer than three sentinel lymph nodes removed, the target lymph node reduced the false-negative rate to less than 10%. We therefore conclude that although the target lymph node has a minor impact on adjuvant systemic therapy, it is relevant for surgical axillary management. Abstract Purpose: To assess the impact of the removal of the target lymph node (TLN) on therapy after the completion of primary systemic therapy (PST) in initially node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods: Pooled data analysis of participants of the prospective CLIP- and TATTOO-study at the University of Rostock was performed. Results: A total of 75 patients were included; 63 of them (84.0%) converted to clinically node-negative after PST. Both TLN and sentinel lymph node (SLN) were identified in 41 patients (51.2%). In five out of 63 patients (7.9%), the TLN was metastatic after PST and the SLN was either tumor-free or not detected. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was conducted in all five patients. In one patient, systemic therapy recommendation was influenced by the TLN; adjuvant radiotherapy was influenced by the TLN in zero patients. For patients with fewer than three removed SLNs, the FNR was 28.6% for the SLN biopsy alone and 7.1% for targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Conclusions: Removal of the TLN in addition to the SLN after PST has only minimal impact on the type of adjuvant systemic therapy and radiotherapy. However, the extent of axillary surgery was relevantly affected and FNR was improved by TAD.
Collapse
|