Giant Cell Arteritis with or without Aortitis at Diagnosis. A Retrospective Study of 22 Patients with Longterm Followup

Giant-Cell Arteritis: Do We Treat Patients with Large-Vessel Involvement Differently?

PURPOSE

We aimed to describe the initial treatment that was used in a common hospital-based practice in patients with giant-cell arteritis with and without large-vessel involvement at diagnosis as well as the outcomes in both groups.

METHODS

This retrospective multi-center cohort included patients with giant-cell arteritis diagnosed between 2005 and 2015, all of whom had fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) performed at giant-cell arteritis diagnosis and were followed up for ≥12 months. We compared the features, treatment, and outcomes of patients with large-vessel involvement demonstrated on FDG-PET/CT with those of patients with a negative PET/CT.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (50 women, median age: 71 [53-87] years) were included, 40 of whom had large-vessel involvement demonstrated on FDG-PET/CT and 40 who did not. After a median 56-month follow-up time, 42 (53%) patients had discontinued glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Patients with and without large-vessel involvement were indistinguishable in the initial median dose of prednisone (0.74 mg/kg vs 0.75 mg/kg, P = .56), overall GC duration (P = .77), GC discontinuation rate (P = .65), relapse rate (P = .50), frequency of GC-dependent disease requiring GC-sparing treatments (P = .62), and fatality rate (P = .06).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of tertiary hospital recruitment, large-vessel involvement at giant-cell arteritis diagnosis using a PET/CT study had no influence on the choice of initial GC dose and had no impact on outcomes. Prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Giant-cell arteritis: concordance study between aortic CT angiography and FDG-PET/CT in detection of large-vessel involvement

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to assess the concordance of aortic CT angiography (CTA) and FDG-PET/CT in the detection of large-vessel involvement at diagnosis in patients with giant-cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

We created a multicenter cohort of patients with GCA diagnosed between 2010 and 2015, and who underwent both FDG-PET/CT and aortic CTA before or in the first ten days following treatment introduction. Eight vascular segments were studied on each procedure. We calculated concordance between both imaging techniques in a per-patient and a per-segment analysis, using Cohen's kappa concordance index.

RESULTS

We included 28 patients (21/7 women/men, median age 67 [56-82]). Nineteen patients had large-vessel involvement on PET/CT and 18 of these patients also presented positive findings on CTA. In a per-segment analysis, a median of 5 [1-7] and 3 [1-6] vascular territories were involved on positive PET/CT and CTA, respectively (p = 0.03). In qualitative analysis, i.e., positivity of the procedure suggesting a large-vessel involvement, the concordance rate between both procedures was 0.85 [0.64-1]. In quantitative analysis, i.e., per-segment analysis in both procedures, the global concordance rate was 0.64 [0.54-0.75]. Using FDG-PET/CT as a reference, CTA showed excellent sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%) in a per-patient analysis. In a per-segment analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 97.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CTA and FDG-PET/CT were both able to detect large-vessel involvement in GCA with comparable results in a per-patient analysis. However, PET/CT showed higher performance in a per-segment analysis, especially in the detection of inflammation of the aorta's branches.

Clinically isolated aortitis: pitfalls, progress, and possibilities

Non-infectious aortitis may be caused by several distinct systemic rheumatologic diseases. In some patients, aortitis is identified either pathologically or radiologically in the absence of clinical evidence of a systemic vasculitis. By consensus nomenclature, such cases are referred to as clinically isolated aortitis (CIA). Some systemic disorders may initially present as CIA including giant cell arteritis (GCA), IgG4-related disease, infectious aortitis, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis. CIA most commonly occurs in women of European descent over the age of 50 and, thus, mirrors the gender, age, and geographic distribution of GCA. CIA most often demonstrates a granulomatous/giant cell pattern of inflammation (GPI), and CIA-GPI is pathologically indistinguishable from aortitis due to GCA. In many cases, CIA may be a manifestation of extracranial GCA. CIA is being identified both pathologically in resected aortic tissue and radiologically by computed tomography scanning, magnetic resonance imaging, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. However, there appears to be significant differences between pathologically defined CIA and radiologically defined CIA. Multiple studies have shown that patients with CIA are at increased risk for subsequent aortic events (new aneurysms or dissections) and thus it is recommended to monitor these patients with periodic aortic imaging. While the data is currently limited, there is increasing evidence that at least some patients with CIA may benefit from immunosuppressive therapy.

Giant-cell arteritis without cranial manifestations: Working diagnosis of a distinct disease pattern

Diagnosis of giant-cell arteritis (GCA) is challenging in the absence of cardinal cranial symptoms/signs. We aimed to describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic process, and disease course of GCA patients without cranial symptoms, and to compare them to those of patients with typical cranial presentation. In this retrospective multicenter study, we enrolled patients with GCA who satisfied at least 3 of the 5 American College of Rheumatology criteria for GCA, or 2 criteria associated with contributory vascular biopsy other than temporal artery biopsy or with demonstration of large-vessel involvement; underwent iconographic evaluation of large arterial vessels (aortic CT scan or a positron emission tomography with F-fluorodeoxyglucose combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) scan or cardiac echography combined with a large-vessel Doppler) at diagnosis. We divided the cohort into 2 groups, distinguishing between patients without cranial symptoms/signs (i.e., headaches, clinical temporal artery anomaly, jaw claudication, ophthalmologic symptoms) and those with cranial symptoms/signs. In the entire cohort of 143 patients, all of whom underwent vascular biopsy and vascular imaging, we detected 31 (22%) patients with no cranial symptoms/signs. In the latter, diagnosis was biopsy proven in an arterial sample in 23 cases (74% of patients, on a temporal site in 20 cases and on an extratemporal site in 3). One-third of these 31 patients displayed extracranial symptoms/signs whereas the remaining two-thirds presented only with constitutional symptoms and/or inflammatory laboratory test results. Compared to the 112 patients with cardinal cranial clinical symptoms/signs, patients without cranial manifestations displayed lower levels of inflammatory laboratory parameters (C-reactive level: 68 [9-250] mg/L vs 120 [3-120] mg/L; P < 0.01), highest rate of aorta and aortic branch involvement identified (19/31 (61%) vs 42/112 (38%); P = 0.02) and also a lower rate of disease relapse (12/31 (39%) vs 67/112 (60%); P = 0.04). Our results suggest that patients without cranial symptoms/signs are prone to lower inflammatory laboratory parameters, fewer relapses, and more large-vessel involvement than those displaying cardinal cranial manifestations. Further studies are therefore required in order to determine whether these 2 subgroups of patients have a different prognosis, and therefore warrant different therapeutic and monitoring regimens.

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and the risk of subsequent aortic complications in giant-cell arteritis: A multicenter cohort of 130 patients

Previous studies reported a 2- to 17-fold higher risk of aortic complications (dilation or dissection) in patients with giant-cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to determine whether or not GCA patients with large-vessel involvement demonstrated by positron emission tomography with F-fluorodeoxyglucose combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) have a higher risk of aortic complications. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study between 1995 and 2014. Patients were included if they fulfilled at least 3 American College of Rheumatology criteria for GCA, or 2 criteria associated with extratemporal biopsy-proven giant-cell vasculitis; they underwent at least 1 FDG-PET/CT scan at diagnosis or during follow-up; and the morphology of the aorta was assessed by medical imaging at diagnosis. Patients with an aortic complication at the time of diagnosis were excluded. Of the 130 patients included [85 women (65%), median age 70 (50-86)], GCA was biopsy proven in 77 (59%). FDG-PET/CT was performed at diagnosis in 63 (48%) patients and during the follow-up period in the 67 (52%) remaining patients. FDG-PET/CT was positive in 38/63 (60%) patients at diagnosis and in 31/67 (46%) patients when performed during follow-up (P = NS). One hundred four patients (80%) underwent at least 1 morphological assessment of the aorta during follow-up. Nine (9%) patients developed aortic complications (dilation in all and dissection in 1) at a median time of 33 (6-129) months after diagnosis. All of them displayed large-vessel inflammation on previous FDG-PET/CT. A positive FDG-PET/CT was significantly associated with a higher risk of aortic complications (P = 0.004).In our study, a positive FDG-PET/CT was associated with an increased risk of aortic complications at 5 years.

Imaging in Giant Cell Arteritis

Much progress has been made in the use of imaging as a diagnostic tool in giant cell arteritis (GCA), which assists in the management of patients where the initial diagnosis is unclear. This includes patients with atypical cranial symptoms, or with predominantly systemic, constitutional or limb symptoms. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are capable of visualising both the cranial and extracranial large vessel circulation, with vessel wall thickening and stenotic lesions being visualised. Computed tomographic angiography is helpful in visualising the aorta for aneurysm complicating GCA but can also detect vessel wall thickening in established large vessel vasculitis. PET-CT is a very sensitive test for early vascular inflammation in extracranial large vessel vasculitis, before aneurysmal or stenotic lesions have developed, of use in the patient with unexplained constitutional symptoms. The place of imaging in the follow-up of GCA is being investigated, and repeated imaging may be useful in select cases. Generally, vascular abnormalities become less defined once glucocorticoid treatment has been started, and therefore, imaging studies must be conducted early as part of a GCA fast-track assessment.

Comparison of idiopathic (isolated) aortitis and giant cell arteritis-related aortitis. A French retrospective multicenter study of 117 patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare clinical/imaging findings and outcome in patients with idiopathic (isolated aortitis, IA) and with giant cell arteritis (GCA)-related aortitis.

METHODS

Patients from 11 French internal medicine departments were retrospectively included. Aortitis was defined by aortic wall thickening >2mm and/or an aortic aneurysm on CT-scan, associated to inflammatory syndrome. Patients with GCA had at least 3 ACR criteria. Aortic events (aneurysm, dissection, aortic surgeries) were reported, and free of aortic events-survival were compared.

RESULTS

Among 191 patients with non-infectious aortitis, 73 with GCA and 44 with IA were included. Patients with IA were younger (65 vs 70 years, p=0.003) and comprised more past/current smokers (43 vs 15%, p=0.0007). Aortic aneurisms were more frequent (38% vs 20%, p=0.03), and aortic wall thickening was more pronounced in IA. During follow-up (median=34 months), subsequent development of aortic aneurysm was significantly lower in GCA when compared to IA (p=0.009). GCA patients required significantly less aortic surgery during follow-up than IA patients (p=0.02). Mean age, sex ratio, inflammatory parameters, and free of aortic aneurism survival were equivalent in patients with IA ≥ 60 years when compared to patients with GCA-related aortitis.

CONCLUSIONS

IA is more severe than aortitis related to GCA, with higher proportions of aortic aneurism at diagnosis and during follow-up. IA is a heterogeneous disease and its prognosis is worse in younger patients <60 years. Most patients with IA ≥ 60 years share many features with GCA-related aortitis.

[Therapeutic endovascular procedures in aortitis]

Aortitis is an inflammation of the aortic wall with an infectious or non-infectious origin, which often progresses to vascular complications. The open surgical approach is a high-risk procedure for these pathologies. Endovascular interventions have improved the prognosis of patients with aortitis complications. This manuscript describes the pathophysiology responsible for vascular complications and the role of endovascular approach for their treatment.

Abdominal aortitis on PET CT: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Aortitis often occurs in patients with systemic vasculitis.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We reported a 73 year old man with giant cell arteritis who was presented with abdominal pain and weight loss.

DISCUSSION

Aortitis was diagnosed on PET-CT scan performed because initial investigations raised the possibility of pancreatic pathology.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the utility of PET-CT in the diagnosis of abdominal aortitis and the need to consider aortitis as a differential in patients with abdominal pain with a history of vasculitis.

Impact of cranial and axillary/subclavian artery involvement by color duplex sonography on response to treatment in giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

Color duplex sonography (CDS) today is broadly used in the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected cranial or extracranial giant cell arteritis (GCA). This study aimed to determine the prognostic impact of the disease pattern assessed by CDS on the treatment response in GCA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal follow-up study of 43 patients who were diagnosed with GCA at our institution between 2002 and 2010. All patients underwent CDS of the temporal and subclavian/axillary arteries at baseline and were observed for at least 6 months. Vasculitis was sonographically characterized by a circumferential, hypoechogenic wall thickening. According to the CDS findings, patients were categorized into patients with involvement of the subclavian/axillary arteries only (group A1, n = 17), patients with involvement of both the subclavian/axillary arteries and the temporal arteries (group A2, n = 9), and patients with isolated cranial GCA (group B, n = 17). Data on recurrences, corticosteroid doses, and steroid-sparing agents were extracted from the medical records. Treatment response over time was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 25.4 months and did not differ between groups (P = .4). Patients in group A1 were significantly younger than patients in groups A2 and B (P < .01). The interval between symptom onset and diagnosis was significantly longer in groups A1 and A2 compared with group B (P < .01). The number of recurrences per month was significantly higher in group A2 compared with group A1 and group B (A1, 0.07; A2, 0.13; B, 0.03; P < .01). Whereas there were no significant differences in the mean time until a daily prednisolone dose <10 mg was reached, patients in group A2 more frequently required steroid-sparing agents (A1, 24%; A2, 56%; B, 24%; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive vascular involvement of both the temporal and subclavian/axillary arteries, as depicted by CDS, may be associated with a poor treatment response in GCA.

Clinical Features and Radiological Findings in Large Vessel Vasculitis: Are Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis 2 Different Diseases or a Single Entity?

Objective.

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) are 2 major variants of large vessel vasculitis (LVV). The frequent involvement of large vessels in GCA has raised the possibility that TAK and GCA should be regarded as 1 disease. By detailed phenotyping of a single-center cohort, we aimed to define the differences between TAK and GCA.

Methods.

Forty-five patients (23 TAK, 22 GCA) were identified. Baseline characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory data, enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, treatments, and clinical courses were retrospectively assessed with descriptive statistics. In addition, latent class analysis of the 45 patients was performed to explore phenotypic differences.

Results.

Patients with GCA had more frequent headache (p < 0.01), higher C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.01), and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rates (p = 0.03) than did patients with TAK at diagnosis. With the exception of subdiaphragmatic lesions, the distributions of vessel lesions were not different between TAK and GCA. However, focusing on subclavian and carotid arteries, long tapered-type stenotic lesions were more frequent in GCA than in TAK (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients without relapse was higher in GCA (60%) than in TAK (22%, p = 0.01). Latent class analysis also divided patients with LVV into 2 separate groups consistent with TAK and GCA.

Conclusion.

The differences observed in clinical symptoms, inflammatory markers, radiological findings, and clinical courses suggested that TAK and GCA were 2 different diseases. Latent class analysis supported these results. The shape of stenotic lesions in the subclavian and carotid arteries is a useful discriminator between TAK and GCA.

Coronary artery disease in giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between giant cell arteritis (GCA) and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that reported relative risks, hazard ratios, or standardized incidence ratios with 95% confidence interval comparing CAD risk in patients with GCA versus non-GCA controls. Pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance of DerSimonian and Laird.

RESULT

Six studies with 10,868 patients with GCA and 245,323 controls were identified and included in our data analysis. The pooled risk ratio of CAD in patients with GCA was 1.51 and did not achieve statistical significance (95% CI: 0.88-2.61). The statistical heterogeneity was high with an I(2) of 97%.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to other chronic systemic inflammatory disorders, our meta-analysis did not show any statistically significant increased risk of CAD among patients with GCA.

Mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether GCA is associated with increased mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study including all individuals who between 1993 and 2011 were registered in the Danish National Hospital Register and the Danish Pathology Register with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of GCA (n = 1787). Through the Danish Civil Registration System we identified a comparison cohort of 33 953 persons from the background population, individually matched on age and sex. Data on causes of death were obtained from the Danish Registry of Causes of Death. We used Poisson regression to determine mortality rate ratios as estimates of relative risk of death and specific causes of death.

RESULTS

Compared with the general population, the relative risk (RR) of death in patients diagnosed with GCA was 1.17 (95% CI 1.01, 1.36) and 1.22 (95% CI 1.05, 1.41) 0-2 years and >10 years after diagnosis, respectively, whereas we observed no increased mortality during the follow-up period of 2-10 years [RR 0.96 (95% CI 0.88, 1.05)]. The increased mortality during the first 2 years of follow-up was mainly due to diseases of the circulatory system, including aortic aneurisms.

CONCLUSION

GCA is associated with slightly increased early and late mortality.

Prospective long term follow-up of a cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis screened for aortic structural damage (aneurysm or dilatation)

BACKGROUND

Aortic structural damage (ASD) may complicate the course of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). However the frequency and outcome of ASD has not been assessed in long term prospective studies.

METHODS

In a previous screening of 54 biopsy proven GCA patients, significant ASD was detected in 12 (22.2%) after a median follow-up of 5.4 years. These patients were periodically evaluated (every 4 years) over a median of 10.3 years (range 4-16.6 years) in order to investigate the development of new ASD and the outcome of previously detected abnormalities.

RESULTS

18 of the 54 patients abandoned the study due to death or other reasons. The remaining 36 patients were subjected to a second screening and 14 to a third screening. 12 (33.3%) of the 36 patients re-screened and 16 (29.6%) of the initial cohort developed ASD, all but one in the thoracic aorta. Aortic diameters at the ascending and descending aorta significantly increased over time. One patient (1.9% of the initial cohort) died from aortic dissection. Surgery was advised in eight (50%) patients with ASD but could only be performed in three patients (37.7%). The development of ASD was not associated with persistence of detectable disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ASD is maximal within the first 5 years after diagnosis but continues developing over time, affecting up to 33.3% of individuals after long term follow-up. Once ASD occurs, dilatation increases over time, underlining the need for periodic evaluation. Surgical repair is feasible in about one-third of candidates.

Nonarteriosclerotic vascular disease

Thromboangiitis obliterans, or Buerger disease, is a chronic nonatherosclerotic endarteritis manifesting as inflammation and thrombosis of distal extremity small and medium-sized arteries resulting in relapsing episodes of distal extremity ischemia. Takayasu arteritis is a rare syndrome characterized by inflammation of the aortic arch, pulmonary, coronary, and cerebral vessels, presenting with cerebrovascular symptoms, myocardial ischemia, or upper extremity claudication in young, often female, patients. Kawasaki disease is a small- and medium-vessel acute systemic vasculitis of young children, with morbidity and mortality stemming from coronary artery aneurysms. Microscopic polyangiitis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, and Wegener granulomatosis are systemic small-vessel vasculitides, affecting arterioles, capillary beds and venules, and each presenting with variable effects on the pulmonary, renal and gastrointestinal systems.

Should I send my patient with previous giant cell arteritis for imaging of the thoracic aorta? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature in order to estimate how many previously unknown thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and thoracic aortic dilatations (TADs) might be detected by systematic, cross-sectional aortic imaging of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Studies potentially relevant to TAA/TAD were evaluated by two authors independently for relevance, bias and heterogeneity. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate pooled prevalence.

RESULTS

Two analyses of routinely collected administrative data suggested a threefold risk of TAA/dissection in GCA compared with controls. In GCA cohorts without systematic imaging, 2-8% had TAA. In the two best-reported studies, aneurysm dissection/rupture occurred in 1% and 6% of GCA cases. Aortic imaging studies had a variety of TAA/TAD definitions, imaging methods and time points. There were limited data on age-matched controls. Three studies suggested that male sex may be a risk factor for TAA/TAD in GCA. On average, five to ten patients with GCA would need aortic imaging to detect one previously unknown TAA/TAD.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support an association between GCA and TAA/TAD compared with age-matched controls, but the true relative risk, and the time course of that risk, remains unclear. It is also unclear whether chest radiography is a sufficiently sensitive screening tool. Clinicians should retain a high index of suspicion for aortic pathology in patients with GCA. Before ordering imaging, clinicians should consider whether, and how, detecting aortic pathology would affect a patient's management.