1201
|
Yadav DK, Bai X, Yadav RK, Singh A, Li G, Ma T, Chen W, Liang T. Liquid biopsy in pancreatic cancer: the beginning of a new era. Oncotarget 2018; 9:26900-26933. [PMID: 29928492 PMCID: PMC6003564 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
With dismal survival rate pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive and devastating malignancy. Predominantly, due to the absence of a dependable methodology for early identification and limited therapeutic options for advanced disease. However, it takes over 17 years to develop pancreatic cancer from initiation of mutation to metastatic cancer; therefore, if diagnosed early; it may increase overall survival dramatically, thus, providing a window of opportunity for early detection. Recently, genomic expression analysis defined 4 subtypes of pancreatic cancer based on mutated genes. Hence, we need simple and standard, minimally invasive test that can monitor those altered genes or their associated pathways in time for the success of precision medicine, and liquid biopsy seems to be one answer to all these questions. Again, liquid biopsy has an ability to pair with genomic tests. Additionally, liquid biopsy based development of circulating tumor cells derived xenografts, 3D organoids system, real-time monitoring of genetic mutations by circulating tumor DNA and exosome as the targeted drug delivery vehicle holds lots of potential for the treatment and cure of pancreatic cancer. At present, diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is frantically done on the premise of CA19-9 and radiological features only, which doesn't give a picture of genetic mutations and epigenetic alteration involved. In this manner, the current diagnostic paradigm for pancreatic cancer diagnosis experiences low diagnostic accuracy. This review article discusses the current state of liquid biopsy in pancreatic cancer as diagnostic and therapeutic tools and future perspectives of research in the light of circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA and exosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipesh Kumar Yadav
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Xueli Bai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Rajesh Kumar Yadav
- Department of Pharmacology, Gandaki Medical College, Tribhuwan University, Institute of Medicine, Pokhara 33700, Nepal
| | - Alina Singh
- Department of Surgery, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Science, Kanti Path, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal
| | - Guogang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Tao Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
| |
Collapse
|
1202
|
Affiliation(s)
- F Fece de la Cruz
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - R B Corcoran
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
1203
|
Kodahl AR, Ehmsen S, Pallisgaard N, Jylling AMB, Jensen JD, Lænkholm A, Knoop AS, Ditzel HJ. Correlation between circulating cell-free PIK3CA tumor DNA levels and treatment response in patients with PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. Mol Oncol 2018; 12:925-935. [PMID: 29689598 PMCID: PMC5983134 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsies focusing on the analysis of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have important clinical implications for personalized medicine, including early detection of cancer, therapeutic guidance, and monitoring of recurrence. Mutations in the oncogene, PIK3CA, are frequently observed in breast cancer and have been suggested as a predictive biomarker for PI3K-selective inhibitor treatment. In this study, we analyzed the presence of PIK3CA mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, metastatic tissue and corresponding ctDNA from serum of patients with advanced breast cancer using a highly sensitive, optimized droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay. We found 83% of patients with PIK3CA mutation in the metastatic tumor tissue also had detectable PIK3CA mutations in serum ctDNA. Patients lacking the PIK3CA mutation in corresponding serum ctDNA all had nonvisceral metastatic disease. Four patients with detectable PIK3CA-mutated ctDNA were followed with an additional serum sample during oncological treatment. In all cases, changes in PIK3CA ctDNA level correlated with treatment response. Our results showed high concordance between detection of PIK3CA mutations in tumor tissue and in corresponding serum ctDNA and suggest that serum samples from patients with advanced breast cancer and ddPCR may be used for PIK3CA mutation status assessment to complement imaging techniques as an early marker of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sidse Ehmsen
- Department of Cancer and InflammationInstitute of Molecular MedicineUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Ann S. Knoop
- Department of OncologyRigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Henrik J. Ditzel
- Department of OncologyOdense University HospitalDenmark
- Department of Cancer and InflammationInstitute of Molecular MedicineUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
- Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare)Odense University HospitalDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
1204
|
Davis AA, McKee AE, Kibbe WA, Villaflor VM. Complexity of Delivering Precision Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2018; 38:998-1007. [PMID: 30231318 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_200279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine has emerged as a tool to match patients with the appropriate treatment based on the precise molecular features of an individual patient's tumor. Although examples of targeted therapies exist resulting in dramatic improvements in patient outcomes, comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors has also demonstrated the incredible complexity of molecular alterations in tissue and blood. These sequencing methods provide opportunities to study the landscape of tumors at baseline and serially in response to treatment. These tools also serve as important biomarkers to detect resistance to treatment and determine higher likelihood of responding to particular treatments, such as immune checkpoint blockade. Federally funded and publicly available data repositories have emerged as mechanisms for data sharing. In addition, novel clinical trials are emerging to develop new ways of incorporating molecular matched therapy into clinical trials. Various challenges to delivery of precision oncology include understanding the complexity of advanced tumors based on evolving "omics" and treatment resistance. For physicians, determining when and how to incorporate genetic and molecular tools into clinic in a cost-effective manner is critical. Finally, we discuss the importance of well-designed prospective clinical trials, biomarkers such as liquid biopsies, the use of multidisciplinary tumor boards, and data sharing as evidence-based medicine tools to optimally study and deliver precision oncology to our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Davis
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Amy E McKee
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Warren A Kibbe
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Victoria M Villaflor
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
1205
|
Zedan AH, Hansen TF, Assenholt J, Pleckaitis M, Madsen JS, Osther PJS. microRNA expression in tumour tissue and plasma in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Tumour Biol 2018; 40:1010428318775864. [PMID: 29775158 DOI: 10.1177/1010428318775864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the western world. Clinical practice is continuously challenged by the pitfalls of the available diagnostic tools. microRNAs may represent promising biomarkers in many types of human cancers, including prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate microRNA expression in tumour tissue and matched plasma in a cohort of patients with primary metastatic prostate cancer. The relative expression of 12 microRNAs was assessed in diagnostic needle biopsies from the prostate and matched plasma samples in two prospective cohorts (screening cohorts) comprising 21 patients with metastatic prostate cancer and 25 control patients. An independent validation cohort of plasma samples was collected prospectively from 149 newly diagnosed patients with local/locally advanced prostate cancer. Analyses were performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction. miRNA-93 showed a significant negative correlation between expression in tumour tissue and plasma in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Furthermore, the plasma level of miRNA-93 significantly decreased after treatment in patients with local/locally advanced prostate cancer compared to baseline plasma level. The expression of six microRNAs (let-7b, miRNA-34a, -125b, -143, -145 and -221) was downregulated, and three microRNAs (miRNA-21, -25 and miRNA-93) were upregulated in tumour tissue compared to benign prostate tissue. In plasma, six microRNAs were upregulated (miRNA-21, -125b, -126, -141, -143 and -375), while let-7b was downregulated in patients with metastatic prostate cancer compared to the control cohort. In the metastatic prostate cancer cohort, the expression of four microRNAs (miRNA-125b, -126, -143 and -221), and miRNA-141 in tissue was associated with Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen, respectively. The expression of miRNA-93 in tumour tissue was correlated with matched plasma levels and showed a significant decrease in plasma level after intervention in local prostate cancer. Differential expression between tumour and benign prostate was detected for several microRNAs in both tissue and plasma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Hussein Zedan
- 1 Urological Research Center, Department of Urology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.,2 Oncological Department, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.,3 Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Torben Frøstrup Hansen
- 2 Oncological Department, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.,3 Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jannie Assenholt
- 4 Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | - Jonna Skov Madsen
- 3 Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,4 Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- 1 Urological Research Center, Department of Urology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.,3 Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
1206
|
Fang H, Xie N, Ou M, Huang J, Li W, Wang Q, Liu J, Yang X, Wang K. Detection of Nucleic Acids in Complex Samples via Magnetic Microbead-Assisted Catalyzed Hairpin Assembly and “DD–A” FRET. Anal Chem 2018; 90:7164-7170. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hongmei Fang
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Nuli Xie
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Min Ou
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Jin Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Wenshan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Qing Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Jianbo Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Xiaohai Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| | - Kemin Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Bio-Nanotechnology and Molecular Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
| |
Collapse
|
1207
|
Human cancer cells suppress behaviors of endothelial progenitor cells through miR-21 targeting IL6R. Microvasc Res 2018; 120:21-28. [PMID: 29777792 DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a severe clinical process and has a high rate of fatality. Cancer patients have a high incidence rate of venous thrombosis complication and increase the mortality of cancer patients for 2-8 times. The mechanisms involved in human cancers and venous thrombosis remains unclear. In this study, we determined miR-21 expressed higher in human breast cancer, colon cancer and hepatocellular cancer tissues compared with normal tissues and expressed higher in exosomes of breast cancer and hepatocellular cancer cell lines compared with normal cells. MiR-21 dramatically suppressed proliferation, migration and invasion of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), which performed promoting role in thrombus repairment and resolution. High levels of miR-21 in exosomes of human cancers dramatically inhibited behaviors of EPCs, and depletion of miR-21 abrogated the decreased proliferation, migration and invasion of EPCs induced by human cancer cells. Moreover, IL6R (interleukin 6 receptor) was identified to be a direct target of miR-21 and promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion of EPCs. Therefore, the miR-21-IL6R pathway contributed to behaviors of EPCs and consequently mediated the vein thrombosis in patients with cancer. MiR-21-IL6R pathway based therapeutic methods would be beneficial to decrease the complicated venous thrombosis in cancer patients and promote thrombus resolution.
Collapse
|
1208
|
Castro-Giner F, Gkountela S, Donato C, Alborelli I, Quagliata L, Ng CKY, Piscuoglio S, Aceto N. Cancer Diagnosis Using a Liquid Biopsy: Challenges and Expectations. Diagnostics (Basel) 2018; 8:diagnostics8020031. [PMID: 29747380 PMCID: PMC6023445 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics8020031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The field of cancer diagnostics has recently been impacted by new and exciting developments in the area of liquid biopsy. A liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive alternative to surgical biopsies of solid tissues, typically achieved through the withdrawal of a blood sample or other body fluids, allowing the interrogation of tumor-derived material including circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fragments that are present at a given time point. In this short review, we discuss a few studies that summarize the state-of-the-art in the liquid biopsy field from a diagnostic perspective, and speculate on current challenges and expectations of implementing liquid biopsy testing for cancer diagnosis and monitoring in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesc Castro-Giner
- Cancer Metastasis Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
- Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Sofia Gkountela
- Cancer Metastasis Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Cinzia Donato
- Cancer Metastasis Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Ilaria Alborelli
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Luca Quagliata
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Charlotte K Y Ng
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
- Hepatology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | - Nicola Aceto
- Cancer Metastasis Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
1209
|
A Comparative Study for Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma Cell-Free DNA in Korean Clinical Diagnostic Laboratories. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:7392419. [PMID: 29854785 PMCID: PMC5964486 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7392419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Liquid biopsies to genotype the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for targeted therapy have been implemented in clinical decision-making in the field of lung cancer, but harmonization of detection methods is still scarce among clinical laboratories. We performed a pilot external quality assurance (EQA) scheme to harmonize circulating tumor DNA testing among laboratories. For EQA, we created materials containing different levels of spiked cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in normal plasma. The limit of detection (LOD) of the cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Molecular Systems) was also evaluated. From November 2016 to June 2017, seven clinical diagnostic laboratories participated in the EQA program. The majority (98.94%) of results obtained using the cobas assay and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were acceptable. Quantitative results from the cobas assay were positively correlated with allele frequencies derived from digital droplet PCR measurements and showed good reproducibility among laboratories. The LOD of the cobas assay was 5~27 copies/mL for p.E746_A750del (exon 19 deletion), 35~70 copies/mL for p.L858R, 18~36 copies/mL for p.T790M, and 15~31 copies/mL for p.A767_V769dup (exon 20 insertion). Deep sequencing of materials (>100,000X depth of coverage) resulted in detection of low-level targets present at frequencies of 0.06~0.13%. Our results indicate that the cobas assay is a reliable and rapid method for detecting EGFR mutations in plasma cfDNA. Careful interpretation is particularly important for p.T790M detection in the setting of relapse. Individual laboratories should optimize NGS performance to maximize clinical utility.
Collapse
|
1210
|
Comparison of genetic profiles among primary lung tumor, metastatic lymph nodes and circulating tumor DNA in treatment-naïve advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 2018; 121:54-60. [PMID: 29858028 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Genetic profiles of primary and metastatic lung tumor have been investigated by previous studies. However, whether they can be replaced by each other to guide treatment remains controversial. Moreover, it is unclear that whether genetic profiles of plasma can reflect genetic divergence between primary and metastatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective study, we collected 35 pairs of matched primary tumor tissue, metastatic lymph nodes and plasma from treatment-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and applied to capture-based sequencing using a panel consisting 56 NSCLC-related genes to interrogate the heterogeneity and similarity among the 3 sites. RESULTS We observed 62.0% (67/108) by-variant concordance rate among primary tumor, metastatic lymph nodes and plasma as well as 76.4% (81/106) by-variant concordance rate between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes. When the analysis restricted to driver genes, we achieved 60.9% (28/46) and 77.3% (34/44) concordance, respectively. Furthermore, there is no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) of 17 patients who used matched targeted therapy between patients having 100% concordance rate between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes and patients having partially matched mutational profiles. CONCLUSION Collectively, our study revealed a similar genetic profile shared between primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes. The limited discordance observed can be partially reflected by plasma. Sequencing results obtained from either site can be utilized for providing treatment guidance.
Collapse
|
1211
|
Li D, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Chen M. Mesoporous Nanofibers Mediated Targeted Anti-cancer Drug Delivery. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1557/adv.2018.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
1212
|
Exosomes: Definition, Role in Tumor Development and Clinical Implications. CANCER MICROENVIRONMENT 2018; 11:13-21. [PMID: 29721824 DOI: 10.1007/s12307-018-0211-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Exosomes are microvesicles released by cells in both physiological and pathological situations. They are surrounded by a lipid bilayer with proteins derived from the origin cell, and contain a variety of molecules, such as nucleic acids. They represent an emerging mechanism of intercellular communication, and they play an important role in the pathogenesis of cancer, stimulating proliferation and aggressiveness of cancer cells, inducing a microenvironment favorable to tumor development and controlling immune responses. Because of the growing understanding of the potential implications of extracellular vesicles in the development of malignancies, research on exosomes, and its role as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool, constitutes nowadays a very exciting and promising field.
Collapse
|
1213
|
Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Marsoni S, Hurwitz HI, McCall SJ, Penault-Llorca F, Srock S, Bardelli A, Trusolino L. Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene in colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:1108-1119. [PMID: 29659677 PMCID: PMC5961091 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an oncogenic driver, and a well-established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancers. Using functional and genomic analyses of patient-derived xenografts, we previously showed that a subset (approximately 5%) of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors is driven by amplification or mutation of HER2. This paper reviews the role of HER2 amplification as an oncogenic driver, a prognostic and predictive biomarker, and a clinically actionable target in CRC, considering the specifics of HER2 testing in this tumor type. While the role of HER2 as a biomarker for prognosis in CRC remains uncertain, its relevance as a therapeutic target has been established. Indeed, independent studies documented substantial clinical benefit in patients treated with biomarker-driven HER2-targeted therapies, with an impact on response rates and duration of response that compared favorably with immunotherapy and other examples of precision oncology. HER2-targeted therapeutic strategies have the potential to change the treatment paradigm for a clinically relevant subgroup of metastatic CRC patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
- Biomarkers, Tumor/antagonists & inhibitors
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Biopsy
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
- Clinical Trials as Topic
- Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics
- Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality
- Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology
- Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy
- Disease-Free Survival
- Gene Amplification
- Genetic Testing
- Humans
- Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods
- Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
- Precision Medicine/methods
- Prognosis
- Progression-Free Survival
- Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors
- Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Siena
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan.
| | - A Sartore-Bianchi
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan
| | - S Marsoni
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan; Precision Oncology, IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - H I Hurwitz
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - S J McCall
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Jean-Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre, UMR INSERM 1240, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - S Srock
- Global Product Development Medical Affairs, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - A Bardelli
- Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin; Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - L Trusolino
- Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin; Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1214
|
Kim CJ, Park J, Sunkara V, Kim TH, Lee Y, Lee K, Kim MH, Cho YK. Fully automated, on-site isolation of cfDNA from whole blood for cancer therapy monitoring. LAB ON A CHIP 2018; 18:1320-1329. [PMID: 29658031 DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00165k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The potential utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in patient blood for cancer diagnostics and real-time monitoring of disease progression is highly recognized. However, the lack of automated and efficient methods for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolation from peripheral blood has remained a challenge for broader acceptance of liquid biopsy in general clinical settings. Here, we demonstrate a lab-on-a-disc system equipped with newly developed, electromagnetically actuated, and reversible diaphragm valves that allows fully automated and rapid (<30 min) isolation of cfDNA from whole blood (>3 ml) to achieve high detection sensitivity by minimizing the degradation of fragile ctDNA as well as contamination of wild-type DNA from abundant blood cells. As a proof of concept study, we used the lab-on-a-disc to isolate cfDNA from patients with non-small cell lung cancer and successfully detected epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations (L858R, T790M) during targeted drug therapy. The proposed lab-on-a-disc enables a fully automated, rapid, and point-of-care cfDNA enrichment starting from whole blood to facilitate the wide use of liquid biopsy in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Ju Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
1215
|
Mariani S, Bertero L, Coppola V, Saracco G, Arezzo A, Francia Di Celle P, Metovic J, Marchiò C, Cassoni P. Awareness of mutational artefacts in suboptimal DNA samples: possible risk for therapeutic choices. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18:467-475. [PMID: 29676606 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2018.1468254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technical biases due to PCR artefacts could represent an insidious obstacle for mutational analysis and precision medicine. METHODS The authors report a retrospective analysis by fast COLD-PCR and sequencing of 31 suboptimal tumor DNA samples obtained from FFPE tissues and liquid biopsies. RESULTS In FFPE tumor tissues and plasma liquid biopsies of patients with lung and colorectal adenocarcinoma, we observed a significant rate of artefactual KRAS mutations, unveiled by repeated analysis following UDG pretreatment as well as by simple repetition without UDG pretreatment step, thus suggesting a DNA damage different from cytosine deamination. UDG pretreatment was not only unnecessary to contrast artefacts occurrence, but also hampered the efficiency of mutational screening, reducing the analytical sensitivity. Taken individually or considered together, the reduced DNA input per reaction and UDG pretreatment limited the detection of 'real' mutated alleles, decreasing PCR sensitivity enough to hamper distinction between artefactual and true subclonal mutations of KRAS. CONCLUSIONS Careful validation of analytical sensitivities should always be carried out through standard controls, and strategies other than UDG pretreatment need to be identified to avoid both amplification of artefactual mutations and failure to identify real subclonal mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Mariani
- a Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- a Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | - Vittoria Coppola
- a Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | - Giorgio Saracco
- b Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Gastroenterology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- c Department of Surgical Sciences , University of Turin and Surgical Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | | | - Jasna Metovic
- a Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | - Caterina Marchiò
- a Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- a Department of Medical Sciences , University of Turin and Pathology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital , Torino , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1216
|
Kodahl AR, Ehmsen S, Pallisgaard N, Jylling AMB, Jensen JD, Laenkholm AV, Knoop AS, Ditzel HJ. Correlation between circulating cell-free PIK3CA tumor DNA levels and treatment response in patients with PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. Mol Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29689598 DOI: 10.1002/1878‐0261.12305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsies focusing on the analysis of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may have important clinical implications for personalized medicine, including early detection of cancer, therapeutic guidance, and monitoring of recurrence. Mutations in the oncogene, PIK3CA, are frequently observed in breast cancer and have been suggested as a predictive biomarker for PI3K-selective inhibitor treatment. In this study, we analyzed the presence of PIK3CA mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, metastatic tissue and corresponding ctDNA from serum of patients with advanced breast cancer using a highly sensitive, optimized droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay. We found 83% of patients with PIK3CA mutation in the metastatic tumor tissue also had detectable PIK3CA mutations in serum ctDNA. Patients lacking the PIK3CA mutation in corresponding serum ctDNA all had nonvisceral metastatic disease. Four patients with detectable PIK3CA-mutated ctDNA were followed with an additional serum sample during oncological treatment. In all cases, changes in PIK3CA ctDNA level correlated with treatment response. Our results showed high concordance between detection of PIK3CA mutations in tumor tissue and in corresponding serum ctDNA and suggest that serum samples from patients with advanced breast cancer and ddPCR may be used for PIK3CA mutation status assessment to complement imaging techniques as an early marker of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sidse Ehmsen
- Department of Cancer and Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | - Ann S Knoop
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik J Ditzel
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.,Department of Cancer and Inflammation, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
1217
|
Implementing liquid biopsies into clinical decision making for cancer immunotherapy. Oncotarget 2018; 8:48507-48520. [PMID: 28501851 PMCID: PMC5564665 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
During the last decade, novel immunotherapeutic strategies, in particular antibodies directed against immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the treatment of different malignancies leading to an improved survival of patients. Identification of immune-related biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring of immune responses and selection of patients for specific cancer immunotherapies is urgently required and therefore areas of intensive research. Easily accessible samples in particular liquid biopsies (body fluids), such as blood, saliva or urine, are preferred for serial tumor biopsies. Although monitoring of immune and tumor responses prior, during and post immunotherapy has led to significant advances of patients’ outcome, valid and stable prognostic biomarkers are still missing. This might be due to the limited capacity of the technologies employed, reproducibility of results as well as assay stability and validation of results. Therefore solid approaches to assess immune regulation and modulation as well as to follow up the nature of the tumor in liquid biopsies are urgently required to discover valuable and relevant biomarkers including sample preparation, timing of the collection and the type of liquid samples. This article summarizes our knowledge of the well-known liquid material in a new context as liquid biopsy and focuses on collection and assay requirements for the analysis and the technical developments that allow the implementation of different high-throughput assays to detect alterations at the genetic and immunologic level, which could be used for monitoring treatment efficiency, acquired therapy resistance mechanisms and the prognostic value of the liquid biopsies.
Collapse
|
1218
|
Gorgannezhad L, Umer M, Islam MN, Nguyen NT, Shiddiky MJA. Circulating tumor DNA and liquid biopsy: opportunities, challenges, and recent advances in detection technologies. LAB ON A CHIP 2018; 18:1174-1196. [PMID: 29569666 DOI: 10.1039/c8lc00100f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 195] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to short fragments of acellular nucleic acids detectable in almost all body fluids, including blood, and is involved in various physiological and pathological phenomena such as immunity, coagulation, aging, and cancer. In cancer patients, a fraction of hematogenous cfDNA originates from tumors, termed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and may carry the same mutations and genetic alterations as those of a primary tumor. Thus, ctDNA potentially provides an opportunity for noninvasive assessment of cancer. Recent advances in ctDNA analysis methods will potentially lead to the development of a liquid biopsy tool for the diagnosis, prognosis, therapy response monitoring, and tracking the rise of new mutant sub-clones in cancer patients. Over the past few decades, cancer-specific mutations in ctDNA have been detected using a variety of untargeted methods such as digital karyotyping, personalized analysis of rearranged ends (PARE), whole-genome sequencing of ctDNA, and targeted approaches such as conventional and digital PCR-based methods and deep sequencing-based technologies. More recently, several chip-based electrochemical sensors have been developed for the analysis of ctDNA in patient samples. This paper aims to comprehensively review the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive potential of ctDNA as a minimally invasive liquid biopsy for cancer patients. We also present an overview of current advances in the analytical sensitivity and accuracy of ctDNA analysis methods as well as biological and technical challenges, which need to be resolved for the integration of ctDNA analysis into routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Gorgannezhad
- School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia. and Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Muhammad Umer
- Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Md Nazmul Islam
- School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia. and Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Nam-Trung Nguyen
- Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia
| | - Muhammad J A Shiddiky
- School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia. and Queensland Micro- and Nanotechnology Centre, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, QLD 4111, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
1219
|
Affiliation(s)
- Thale Kristin Olsen
- Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| | - Ninib Baryawno
- Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
1220
|
Dhondt B, Van Deun J, Vermaerke S, de Marco A, Lumen N, De Wever O, Hendrix A. Urinary extracellular vesicle biomarkers in urological cancers: From discovery towards clinical implementation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2018; 99:236-256. [PMID: 29654900 DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Urine contains cellular elements, biochemicals, and proteins derived from glomerular filtration of plasma, renal tubule excretion, and urogenital tract secretions that reflect an individual's metabolic and pathophysiologic state. Despite intensive research into the discovery of urinary biomarkers to facilitate early diagnosis, accurate prognosis and prediction of therapy response in urological cancers, none of these markers has reached widespread use. Their implementation into daily clinical practice is hampered by a substantial degree of heterogeneity in performance characteristics and uncertainty about reliability, clinical utility and cost-effectiveness, in addition to several technical limitations. Extracellular vesicles (EV) have raised interest as a potential source of biomarker discovery because of their role in intercellular communication and the resemblance of their molecular content to that of the releasing cells. We review currently used urinary biomarkers in the clinic and attempts that have been made to identify EV-derived biomarkers for urological cancers. In addition, we discuss technical and methodological considerations towards their clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bert Dhondt
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jan Van Deun
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Silke Vermaerke
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ario de Marco
- Laboratory for Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Nova Gorica, Vipava, Slovenia
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Wever
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An Hendrix
- Laboratory of Experimental Cancer Research, Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
1221
|
Abstract
A tissue biopsy is the "golden standard" for molecular profiling that is essential in decision-making regarding treatment for malignant tumors, including primary lung cancer. However, tumor biopsies are associated with several limitations, including invasiveness and difficulty in achieving access. Liquid biopsies have several potential advantages over tissue biopsies, and recent advances in molecular technologies have enabled liquid biopsies to be introduced into daily clinical practice. Cell-free blood-based liquid biopsies to detect mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in the plasma have been approved and may be useful in selecting patients for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors of EGFR. We herein describe blood-based liquid biopsies and review the current status and future perspectives of plasma genotyping in primary lung cancer.
Collapse
|
1222
|
Lüke F, Blazquez R, Yamaci RF, Lu X, Pregler B, Hannus S, Menhart K, Hellwig D, Wester HJ, Kropf S, Heudobler D, Grosse J, Moosbauer J, Hutterer M, Hau P, Riemenschneider MJ, Bayerlová M, Bleckmann A, Polzer B, Beißbarth T, Klein CA, Pukrop T. Isolated metastasis of an EGFR-L858R-mutated NSCLC of the meninges: the potential impact of CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in EGFR mut NSCLC in diagnosis, follow-up and treatment. Oncotarget 2018; 9:18844-18857. [PMID: 29721166 PMCID: PMC5922360 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain and leptomeningeal metastasis (LMM) of non-small cell lung cancer is still associated with poor prognosis. Moreover, the current diagnostic standard for LMM often yields false negative results and the scientific progress in this field is still unsatisfying. We present a case of a 71-year old patient with an isolated LMM. While standard diagnostics could only diagnose a cancer of unknown primary, the use of [68Ga]-Pentixafor-PET/CT (CXCR4-PET/CT, a radiotracer targeting CXCR4) and a liquid biopsy of the cerebrospinal fluid revealed the primary NSCLC. The detection of L858R-EGFR, a common driver mutation in NSCLC, enabled us to treat the patient with Afatinib and monitor treatment using [68Ga]-Pentixafor PET/CT. To estimate the impact of CXCR4 signaling and its ligands in NSCLC brain metastasis we looked at their expression and correlation with EGFR mutations in a primary and brain metastasis data set and investigated the previously described binding of extracellular ubiquitin to CXCR4. In conclusion, we describe a novel approach to improve diagnostics towards LMM and underline the impact of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in brain metastasis in a subset of NSCLC patients. We cannot confirm a correlation of CXCR4 expression with EGFR mutations or the binding of extracellular ubiquitin as previously reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Lüke
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Raquel Blazquez
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Rezan Fahrioglu Yamaci
- Chair of Experimental Medicine and Therapy Research, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Xin Lu
- Chair of Experimental Medicine and Therapy Research, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Pregler
- Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Karin Menhart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Hellwig
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Heudobler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jirka Grosse
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jutta Moosbauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Hutterer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Wilhelm Sander-Neurooncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology 1, NeuroMed Campus, Kepler University Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Peter Hau
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Wilhelm Sander-Neurooncology Unit, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Michaela Bayerlová
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Statistics, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Annalen Bleckmann
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Statistics, Göttingen, Germany.,University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Polzer
- Division Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tim Beißbarth
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Statistics, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Christoph A Klein
- Chair of Experimental Medicine and Therapy Research, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Division Personalized Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Pukrop
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
1223
|
Mansilla C, Soria E, Ramírez N. The identification and isolation of CTCs: A biological Rubik's cube. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 126:129-134. [PMID: 29759554 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy represents an alternative to conventional biopsies for the evaluation of tumors mainly due to its easy sampling. One of the main applications is the enumeration of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) to evaluate tumor progression or response to treatment. The analysis of the functional characteristics of CTCs could give us much more information about their role in order to establish a more personalized treatment for the patients. The major issue that has to be solved is the isolation of the CTC population. Multiple protocols have been developed, however none of them has demonstrated to be the definitive one. In fact, a combination of these techniques has often been performed in order to obtain a purer and viable population of CTCs. In this review we have summarized for the first time the different combinatorial approaches used in the last years to optimize the isolation of CTCs and their limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Mansilla
- Oncohematology Research Group, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Elena Soria
- Oncohematology Research Group, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Natalia Ramírez
- Oncohematology Research Group, Navarrabiomed, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, 31008 Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
1224
|
Santarpia M, Liguori A, D'Aveni A, Karachaliou N, Gonzalez-Cao M, Daffinà MG, Lazzari C, Altavilla G, Rosell R. Liquid biopsy for lung cancer early detection. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S882-S897. [PMID: 29780635 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.81] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have markedly improved the therapeutic management of advanced lung cancer. However, it still remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with disease stage at diagnosis representing the main prognostic factor. Detection of lung cancer at an earlier stage of disease, potentially susceptible of curative resection, can be critical to improve patients survival. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk patients has been demonstrated to reduce mortality from lung cancer, but can be also associated with high false-positive rate, thus often resulting in unnecessary interventions for patients. Novel sensitive and specific biomarkers for identification of high-risk subjects and early detection that can be used alternatively and/or complement current routine diagnostic procedures are needed. Liquid biopsy has recently demonstrated its clinical usefulness in advanced NSCLC as a surrogate of tissue biopsy for noninvasive assessment of specific genomic alterations, thereby providing prognostic and predictive information. Different biosources from liquid biopsy, including cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes and tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), have also been widely investigated for their potential role in lung cancer diagnosis. This review will provide an overview on the circulating biomarkers being evaluated for lung cancer detection, mainly focusing on results from most recent studies, the techniques developed to perform their assessment in blood and other biologic fluids and challenges in their clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariacarmela Santarpia
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alessia Liguori
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro D'Aveni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Niki Karachaliou
- Institute of Oncology Rosell (IOR), University Hospital Sagrat Cor, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Gonzalez-Cao
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Oncology Rosell (IOR), Quirón-Dexeus University Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Grazia Daffinà
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Chiara Lazzari
- Department of Oncology, Division of Experimental Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Altavilla
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Rafael Rosell
- Cancer Biology and Precision Medicine Program, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain.,Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
1225
|
Rosolen DCB, Faria DK, Faria CS, Antonangelo L. Performance of the UroVysion ® FISH assay for the diagnosis of malignant effusions using two cutoff strategies. Cancer Med 2018; 7:1967-1977. [PMID: 29577646 PMCID: PMC5943432 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The cytological examination of cavity fluids has limited sensitivity in the diagnosis of malignancy. Aneuploidy, which is commonly observed in neoplastic cells, could potentially be used as an ancillary diagnostic tool. To evaluate the detection of aneuploid cells in cavitary effusion samples using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay UroVysion® with some adaptations and two different cutoff strategies. Seventy samples of pleural or peritoneal fluid with positive (n = 40), negative (n = 15), or suspicious (n = 15) oncotic cytology were subjected to FISH assay with the multitarget UroVysion® kit, which is composed of probes that hybridize to the centromeric region of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and to the locus 9p21. FISH performance was evaluated using two different cutoffs: (1) the manufacturer's cutoff (M‐FISH) and 2) a proposed cutoff (P‐FISH). Using M‐FISH, the diagnostic sensitivity was 57.1%, specificity 87.5%, and accuracy 60.0%; with P‐FISH, the sensitivity was 87.3%, specificity 71.4%, and accuracy 85.7%. When combined with cytology, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.0%, 83.3%, and 87.8%, respectively. Malignant cells presented a predominance of chromosomal gains. The UroVysion® test using the P‐FISH cutoff was effective in demonstrating aneuploid cells in all malignant effusions, confirming the diagnosis of malignancy even in cases with suspicious cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Débora C B Rosolen
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel K Faria
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Caroline S Faria
- Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Leila Antonangelo
- Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.,Faculdade de Medicina, Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM03), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
1226
|
Rodda AE, Parker BJ, Spencer A, Corrie SR. Extending Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis to Ultralow Abundance Mutations: Techniques and Challenges. ACS Sens 2018; 3:540-560. [PMID: 29441780 DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Liquid biopsies that analyze circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) hold great promise in the guidance of clinical treatment for various cancers. However, the innate characteristics of ctDNA make it a difficult target: ctDNA is highly fragmented, and found at very low concentrations, both in absolute terms and relative to wildtype species. Clinically relevant target sequences often differ from the wildtype species by a single DNA base pair. These characteristics make analyzing mutant ctDNA a uniquely difficult process. Despite this, techniques have recently emerged for analyzing ctDNA, and have been used in pilot studies that showed promising results. These techniques each have various drawbacks, either in their analytical capabilities or in practical considerations, which restrict their application to many clinical situations. Many of the most promising potential applications of ctDNA require assay characteristics that are not currently available, and new techniques with these properties could have benefits in companion diagnostics, monitoring response to treatment and early detection. Here we review the current state of the art in ctDNA detection, with critical comparison of the analytical techniques themselves. We also examine the improvements required to expand ctDNA diagnostics to more advanced applications and discuss the most likely pathways for these improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Andrew Spencer
- Myeloma Research Group, Australian Center for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
- Malignant Haematology & Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
1227
|
Uchôa Guimarães CT, Ferreira Martins NN, Cristina da Silva Oliveira K, Almeida CM, Pinheiro TM, Gigek CO, Roberto de Araújo Cavallero S, Assumpção PP, Cardoso Smith MA, Burbano RR, Calcagno DQ. Liquid biopsy provides new insights into gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:15144-15156. [PMID: 29599934 PMCID: PMC5871105 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsies have great promise for precision medicine as they provide information about primary and metastatic tumors via a minimally invasive method. In gastric cancer patients, a large number of blood-based biomarkers have been reported for their potential role in clinical practice for screening, early diagnosis, prognostic evaluation, recurrence monitoring and therapeutic efficiency follow-up. This current review focuses on blood liquid biopsies' role and their clinical implications in gastric cancer patients, with an emphasis on circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). We also provide a brief discussion of the potential and limitations of liquid biopsies use and their future use in the routine clinical care of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camila Tavares Uchôa Guimarães
- Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
| | | | | | - Caroline Martins Almeida
- Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
| | | | - Carolina Oliveira Gigek
- Disciplina de Genética, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Disciplina de Gastroenterologia Cirurgica, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Rommel Rodríguez Burbano
- Núcleo de Pesquisas em Oncologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
- Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Hospital Ophir Loyola, Belém, PA, Brazil
| | - Danielle Queiroz Calcagno
- Residência Multiprofissional em Oncologia, Hospital Universitário João de Barros Barreto, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
- Núcleo de Pesquisas em Oncologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
1228
|
Zhao H, Chen KZ, Hui BG, Zhang K, Yang F, Wang J. Role of circulating tumor DNA in the management of early-stage lung cancer. Thorac Cancer 2018. [PMID: 29528556 PMCID: PMC5928385 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and the predominant cause of cancer‐related death in the world. The low accuracy of early detection techniques and high risk of relapse greatly contribute to poor prognosis. An accurate clinical tool that can assist in diagnosis and surveillance is urgently needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is free DNA shed from tumor cells and isolated from peripheral blood. The genomic profiles of ctDNA have been shown to closely match those of the corresponding tumors. With the development of approaches with high sensitivity and specificity, ctDNA plays a vital role in the management of lung cancer as a result of its reproducible, non‐invasive, and easy‐to‐obtain characteristics. However, most previous studies have focused on advanced lung cancer. Few studies have investigated ctDNA in the early stages of the disease. In this review, we focus on ctDNA obtained from patients in the early stage of lung cancer, provide a summary of the related literature to date, and describe the main approaches to ctDNA and the clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ke-Zhong Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ben-Gang Hui
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
1229
|
Stewart CM, Kothari PD, Mouliere F, Mair R, Somnay S, Benayed R, Zehir A, Weigelt B, Dawson SJ, Arcila ME, Berger MF, Tsui DW. The value of cell-free DNA for molecular pathology. J Pathol 2018; 244:616-627. [PMID: 29380875 DOI: 10.1002/path.5048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decade, advances in molecular biology and genomics techniques have revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The technological advances in tissue profiling have also been applied to the study of cell-free nucleic acids, an area of increasing interest for molecular pathology. Cell-free nucleic acids are released from tumour cells into the surrounding body fluids and can be assayed non-invasively. The repertoire of genomic alterations in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is reflective of both primary tumours and distant metastatic sites, and ctDNA can be sampled multiple times, thereby overcoming the limitations of the analysis of single biopsies. Furthermore, ctDNA can be sampled regularly to monitor response to treatment, to define the evolution of the tumour genome, and to assess the acquisition of resistance and minimal residual disease. Recently, clinical ctDNA assays have been approved for guidance of therapy, which is an exciting first step in translating cell-free nucleic acid research tests into clinical use for oncology. In this review, we discuss the advantages of cell-free nucleic acids as analytes in different body fluids, including blood plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, and their clinical applications in solid tumours and haematological malignancies. We will also discuss practical considerations for clinical deployment, such as preanalytical factors and regulatory requirements. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin M Stewart
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Prachi D Kothari
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Research UK Major Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
| | - Richard Mair
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Research UK Major Centre - Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Saira Somnay
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryma Benayed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmet Zehir
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Britta Weigelt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah-Jane Dawson
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria E Arcila
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael F Berger
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dana Wy Tsui
- Marie-José and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1230
|
Liu C, Yang Y, Wu Y. Recent Advances in Exosomal Protein Detection Via Liquid Biopsy Biosensors for Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Prognosis. AAPS JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1208/s12248-018-0201-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
1231
|
Pellerino A, Bertero L, Rudà R, Soffietti R. Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumors: from diagnosis to personalized treatments. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2018. [PMID: 29535794 PMCID: PMC5844521 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418759618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a devastating complication of solid tumors with poor outcome. Some randomized clinical trials have been conducted with heterogeneous inclusion criteria, diagnostic parameters, response evaluation and primary endpoints. Recently, the Leptomeningeal Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (LANO) Group and the European Society for Medical Oncology/European Association for Neuro-Oncology have proposed some recommendations in order to provide diagnostic criteria and response evaluation scores for NM. The aim of these guidelines is to integrate the neurological examination with magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid findings as well as to provide a framework for use in clinical trials. However, this composite assessment needs further validation. Since intrathecal therapy represents a treatment with limited efficacy in NM, many studies have been conducted on systemic therapies, including target therapies, with some encouraging results in terms of disease control. In this review, we have analyzed the clinical aspects and the most recent diagnostic tools and therapeutic options in NM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Via Cherasco 15, Turin, 10126 Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1232
|
Abstract
Head and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. It remains one of the leading causes of death, and its early detection is crucial. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising tool for detecting and monitoring the disease status of patients with early and advanced cancers. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and exosomal miRNAs have received enormous attention because of their apparent clinical implications. Analyses of these circulating biomarkers have paved the way for novel therapeutic approaches and precision medicine. A growing number of reports have implicated the use of circulating biomarkers for detection, treatment planning, response monitoring, and prognosis assessment. Although these new biomarkers can provide a wide range of possible clinical applications, no validated circulating biomarkers have yet been integrated into clinical practice for head and neck cancer. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of circulating biomarkers in this field, focusing on their feasibility, limitations, and key areas of clinical applications. We also highlight recent advances in salivary diagnostics and their potential application in head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Nonaka
- 1 Center for Oral/Head and Neck Oncology Research, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,2 Division of Oral Biology and Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - D T W Wong
- 1 Center for Oral/Head and Neck Oncology Research, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,2 Division of Oral Biology and Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1233
|
Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C, Diehn M, Hurley P, Lazar AJ, Lindeman N, Lockwood CM, Rai AJ, Schilsky RL, Tsimberidou AM, Vasalos P, Billman BL, Oliver TK, Bruinooge SS, Hayes DF, Turner NC. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:1242-1253. [PMID: 29504834 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0901-sa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE.— Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. METHODS.— An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including preanalytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. RESULTS.— The literature search identified 1338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. CONCLUSIONS.— The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens, and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity or clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, reevaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Merker
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey R Oxnard
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Compton
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Hurley
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Lindeman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Rai
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard L Schilsky
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Vasalos
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke L Billman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas K Oliver
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suanna S Bruinooge
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; hristina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1234
|
Merker JD, Oxnard GR, Compton C, Diehn M, Hurley P, Lazar AJ, Lindeman N, Lockwood CM, Rai AJ, Schilsky RL, Tsimberidou AM, Vasalos P, Billman BL, Oliver TK, Bruinooge SS, Hayes DF, Turner NC. Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Patients With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Joint Review. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:1631-1641. [PMID: 29504847 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.76.8671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 604] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Clinical use of analytical tests to assess genomic variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasing. This joint review from ASCO and the College of American Pathologists summarizes current information about clinical ctDNA assays and provides a framework for future research. Methods An Expert Panel conducted a literature review on the use of ctDNA assays for solid tumors, including pre-analytical variables, analytical validity, interpretation and reporting, and clinical validity and utility. Results The literature search identified 1,338 references. Of those, 390, plus 31 references supplied by the Expert Panel, were selected for full-text review. There were 77 articles selected for inclusion. Conclusion The evidence indicates that testing for ctDNA is optimally performed on plasma collected in cell stabilization or EDTA tubes, with EDTA tubes processed within 6 hours of collection. Some ctDNA assays have demonstrated clinical validity and utility with certain types of advanced cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence of clinical validity and utility for the majority of ctDNA assays in advanced cancer. Evidence shows discordance between the results of ctDNA assays and genotyping tumor specimens and supports tumor tissue genotyping to confirm undetected results from ctDNA tests. There is no evidence of clinical utility and little evidence of clinical validity of ctDNA assays in early-stage cancer, treatment monitoring, or residual disease detection. There is no evidence of clinical validity and clinical utility to suggest that ctDNA assays are useful for cancer screening, outside of a clinical trial. Given the rapid pace of research, re-evaluation of the literature will shortly be required, along with the development of tools and guidance for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason D Merker
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geoffrey R Oxnard
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carolyn Compton
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Hurley
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neal Lindeman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christina M Lockwood
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alex J Rai
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard L Schilsky
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patricia Vasalos
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brooke L Billman
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas K Oliver
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suanna S Bruinooge
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Jason D. Merker and Maximilian Diehn, Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA; Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School; Neal Lindeman, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Carolyn Compton, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Patricia Hurley, Richard L. Schilsky, Thomas K. Oliver, and Suanna S. Bruinooge, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Alexander J. Lazar and Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Christina M. Lockwood, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Alex J. Rai, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Patricia Vasalos and Brooke L. Billman, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL; Daniel F. Hayes, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; and Nicholas C. Turner, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
1235
|
Kumar M, Choudhury Y, Ghosh SK, Mondal R. Application and optimization of minimally invasive cell-free DNA techniques in oncogenomics. Tumour Biol 2018; 40:1010428318760342. [PMID: 29484962 DOI: 10.1177/1010428318760342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The conventional method of measuring biomarkers in malignant tissue samples has already given subversive growth in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy selection. However, the regression and heterogeneity associated with tumor tissue biopsy have urged for the development of an alternative approach. Considering the limitations, cell-free DNA has emerged as a surrogate alternative, facilitating preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.0001) treatment response in rectal cancer and detection of biomarker in lung cancer. This potential of cell-free DNA in several other cancers has yet to be explored based on clinical relevance by optimizing the preanalytical factors. This review has highlighted the crucial parameters from blood collection to cell-free DNA analysis that has a significant impact on the accuracy and reliability of clinical data. The quantity of cell-free DNA is also a limiting factor. Therefore, a proper preanalytical factor for blood collection, its stability, centrifugation speed, and plasma storage condition are to be optimized for developing cancer-specific biomarkers useful for clinical purpose. Liquid biopsy-based origin of cell-free DNA has revolutionized the area of cancer research. Lack of preanalytical and analytical procedures may be considered for identification of novel biomarkers through next-generation sequencing of tumor-originated cell-free DNA in contradiction to tissue biopsy for cancer-specific biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Kumar
- 1 Department of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar, India
| | | | - Sankar Kumar Ghosh
- 1 Department of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar, India.,2 University of Kalyani, Kalyani, India
| | - Rosy Mondal
- 3 Life Sciences Division, Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology, Guwahati, India
| |
Collapse
|
1236
|
Wu T, Chen W, Yang Z, Tan H, Wang J, Xiao X, Li M, Zhao M. DNA terminal structure-mediated enzymatic reaction for ultra-sensitive discrimination of single nucleotide variations in circulating cell-free DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:e24. [PMID: 29190359 PMCID: PMC5829738 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx1218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensitive detection of the single nucleotide variants in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may provide great opportunity for minimally invasive diagnosis and prognosis of cancer and other related diseases. Here, we demonstrate a facile new strategy for quantitative measurement of cfDNA mutations at low abundance in the cancer patients' plasma samples. The method takes advantage of a novel property of lambda exonuclease which effectively digests a 5'-fluorophore modified dsDNA with a 2-nt overhang structure and sensitively responds to the presence of mismatched base pairs in the duplex. It achieves a limit of detection as low as 0.02% (percentage of the mutant type) for BRAFV600E mutation, NRASQ61R mutation and three types of EGFR mutations (G719S, T790M and L858R). The method enabled identification of BRAFV600E and EGFRL858R mutations in the plasma of different cancer patients within only 3.5 h. Moreover, the terminal structure-dependent reaction greatly simplifies the probe design and reduces the cost, and the assay only requires a regular real-time PCR machine. This new method may serve as a practical tool for quantitative measurement of low-abundance mutations in clinical samples for providing genetic mutation information with prognostic or therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongbo Wu
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Ziyu Yang
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Haocheng Tan
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Xianjin Xiao
- Family Planning Research Institute/Center of Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Mengyuan Li
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Meiping Zhao
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences and MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| |
Collapse
|
1237
|
Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer: Clinical Applications of Circulating Biomarkers (CTCs and ctDNA). MICROMACHINES 2018; 9:mi9030100. [PMID: 30424034 PMCID: PMC6187707 DOI: 10.3390/mi9030100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for the majority of cases. Recent advances in the understanding of the biology of tumors and in highly sensitive detection technologies for molecular analysis offer targeted therapies, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, our understanding of an individual patient’s lung cancer is often limited by tumor accessibility because of the high risk and invasive nature of current tissue biopsy procedures. “Liquid biopsy”, the analysis of circulating biomarkers from peripheral blood, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), offers a new source of cancer-derived materials that may reflect the status of the disease better and thereby contribute to more personalized treatment. In this review, we examined the clinical significance and uniqueness of CTCs and ctDNA from NSCLC patients, isolation and detection methods developed to analyze each type of circulating biomarker, and examples of clinical studies of potential applications for early diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring, and prediction of resistance to therapy. We also discuss challenges that remain to be addressed before such tools are implemented for routine use in clinical settings.
Collapse
|
1238
|
Coleman N, Ameratunga M, Lopez J. Development of Molecularly Targeted Agents and Immunotherapies in Glioblastoma: A Personalized Approach. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2018; 12:1179554918759079. [PMID: 29511362 PMCID: PMC5833160 DOI: 10.1177/1179554918759079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, precision cancer medicine has driven major advances in the management of advanced solid tumours with the identification and targeting of putative driver aberrations transforming the clinical outcomes across multiple cancer types. Despite pivotal advances in the characterization of genomic landscape of glioblastoma, targeted agents have shown minimal efficacy in clinical trials to date, and patient survival remains poor. Immunotherapy strategies similarly have had limited success. Multiple deficiencies still exist in our knowledge of this complex disease, and further research is urgently required to overcome these critical issues. This review traces the path undertaken by the different therapeutics assessed in glioblastoma and the impact of precision medicine in this disease. We highlight challenges for precision medicine in glioblastoma, focusing on the issues of tumour heterogeneity, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic optimization and outline the modern hypothesis-testing strategies being undertaken to address these key challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh Coleman
- Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Juanita Lopez
- Drug Development Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
1239
|
Ramroop JR, Stein MN, Drake JM. Impact of Phosphoproteomics in the Era of Precision Medicine for Prostate Cancer. Front Oncol 2018; 8:28. [PMID: 29503809 PMCID: PMC5820335 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in the United States. While androgen deprivation therapy results in tumor responses initially, there is relapse and progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Currently, all prostate cancer patients receive essentially the same treatment, and there is a need for clinically applicable technologies to provide predictive biomarkers toward personalized therapies. Genomic analyses of tumors are used for clinical applications, but with a paucity of obvious driver mutations in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, other applications, such as phosphoproteomics, may complement this approach. Immunohistochemistry and reverse phase protein arrays are limited by the availability of reliable antibodies and evaluates a preselected number of targets. Mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics has been used to profile tumors consisting of thousands of phosphopeptides from individual patients after surgical resection or at autopsy. However, this approach is time consuming, and while a large number of candidate phosphopeptides are obtained for evaluation, limitations are reduced reproducibility, sensitivity, and precision. Targeted mass spectrometry can help eliminate these limitations and is more cost effective and less time consuming making it a practical platform for future clinical testing. In this review, we discuss the use of phosphoproteomics in prostate cancer and other clinical cancer tissues for target identification, hypothesis testing, and possible patient stratification. We highlight the majority of studies that have used phosphoproteomics in prostate cancer tissues and cell lines and propose ways forward to apply this approach in basic and clinical research. Overall, the implementation of phosphoproteomics via targeted mass spectrometry has tremendous potential to aid in the development of more rational, personalized therapies that will result in increased survival and quality of life enhancement in patients suffering from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnny R. Ramroop
- Cancer Metabolism and Growth Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Mark N. Stein
- Developmental Therapeutics/Phase I Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Justin M. Drake
- Cancer Metabolism and Growth Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- Department of Pharmacology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
1240
|
Silva PJ, Schaibley VM, Ramos KS. Academic medical centers as innovation ecosystems to address population -omics challenges in precision medicine. J Transl Med 2018; 16:28. [PMID: 29448963 PMCID: PMC5815198 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1401-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
While the promise of the Human Genome Project provided significant insights into the structure of the human genome, the complexities of disease at the individual level have made it difficult to utilize -omic information in clinical decision making. Some of the existing constraints have been minimized by technological advancements that have reduced the cost of sequencing to a rate far in excess of Moore's Law (a halving in cost per unit output every 18 months). The reduction in sequencing costs has made it economically feasible to create large data commons capturing the diversity of disease across populations. Until recently, these data have primarily been consumed in clinical research, but now increasingly being considered in clinical decision- making. Such advances are disrupting common diagnostic business models around which academic medical centers (AMCs) and molecular diagnostic companies have collaborated over the last decade. Proprietary biomarkers and patents on proprietary diagnostic content are no longer driving biomarker collaborations between industry and AMCs. Increasingly the scope of the data commons and biorepositories that AMCs can assemble through a nexus of academic and pharma collaborations is driving a virtuous cycle of precision medicine capabilities that make an AMC relevant and highly competitive. A rebalancing of proprietary strategies and open innovation strategies is warranted to enable institutional precision medicine asset portfolios. The scope of the AMC's clinical trial and research collaboration portfolios with industry are increasingly dependent on the currency of data, and less on patents. Intrapeneurial support of internal service offerings, clinical trials and clinical laboratory services for example, will be important new points of emphasis at the academic-industry interface. Streamlining these new models of industry collaboration for AMCs are a new area for technology transfer offices to offer partnerships and to add value beyond the traditional intellectual property offering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick J. Silva
- Office of the Senior Vice President Health Sciences, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Drachman Hall, Room B207, 1295 North Martin Avenue, P.O. Box 210202, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202 USA
| | - Valerie M. Schaibley
- Center for Applied Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Arizona, 1295 North Martin Avenue, Drachman Hall, Room B207, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202 USA
| | - Kenneth S. Ramos
- Office of the Senior Vice President Health Sciences, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Drachman Hall, Room B207, 1295 North Martin Avenue, P.O. Box 210202, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202 USA
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, 550 E. Van Buren Street, Phoenix, 85004 USA
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, 1295 North Martin Avenue, Drachman Hall, Room B207, P.O. Box 210202, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202 USA
- Center for Applied Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University of Arizona, 1295 North Martin Avenue, Drachman Hall, Room B207, Tucson, AZ 85721-0202 USA
| |
Collapse
|
1241
|
Huang D, Leslie KA, Guest D, Yeshcheulova O, Roy IJ, Piva M, Moriceau G, Zangle TA, Lo RS, Teitell MA, Reed J. High-Speed Live-Cell Interferometry: A New Method for Quantifying Tumor Drug Resistance and Heterogeneity. Anal Chem 2018; 90:3299-3306. [PMID: 29381859 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We report the development of high-speed live-cell interferometry (HSLCI), a new multisample, multidrug testing platform for directly measuring tumor therapy response via real-time optical cell biomass measurements. As a proof of concept, we show that HSLCI rapidly profiles changes in biomass in BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi)-sensitive parental melanoma cell lines and in their isogenic BRAFi-resistant sublines. We show reproducible results from two different HSLCI platforms at two institutions that generate biomass kinetic signatures capable of discriminating between BRAFi-sensitive and -resistant melanoma cells within 24 h. Like other quantitative phase imaging (QPI) modalities, HSLCI is well-suited to noninvasive measurements of single cells and cell clusters, requiring no fluorescence or dye labeling. HSLCI is substantially faster and more sensitive than field-standard growth inhibition assays, and in terms of the number of cells measured simultaneously, the number of drugs tested in parallel, and temporal measurement range, it exceeds the state of the art by more than 10-fold. The accuracy and speed of HSLCI in profiling tumor cell heterogeneity and therapy resistance are promising features of potential tools to guide patient therapeutic selections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin A Leslie
- Department of Physics , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia 23284 , United States
| | - Daniel Guest
- Department of Physics , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia 23284 , United States
| | - Olga Yeshcheulova
- Department of Physics , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia 23284 , United States
| | | | | | | | - Thomas A Zangle
- Department of Chemical Engineering , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , Utah 84112 , United States
| | | | | | - Jason Reed
- Department of Physics , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia 23284 , United States.,Massey Cancer Center , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia 23298 , United States
| |
Collapse
|
1242
|
Poudineh M, Sargent EH, Pantel K, Kelley SO. Profiling circulating tumour cells and other biomarkers of invasive cancers. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2:72-84. [DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0190-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
1243
|
Review: Microfluidics technologies for blood-based cancer liquid biopsies. Anal Chim Acta 2018; 1012:10-29. [PMID: 29475470 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.12.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Revised: 12/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Blood-based liquid biopsies provide a minimally invasive alternative to identify cellular and molecular signatures that can be used as biomarkers to detect early-stage cancer, predict disease progression, longitudinally monitor response to chemotherapeutic drugs, and provide personalized treatment options. Specific targets in blood that can be used for detailed molecular analysis to develop highly specific and sensitive biomarkers include circulating tumor cells (CTCs), exosomes shed from tumor cells, cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA), and circulating RNA. Given the low abundance of CTCs and other tumor-derived products in blood, clinical evaluation of liquid biopsies is extremely challenging. Microfluidics technologies for cellular and molecular separations have great potential to either outperform conventional methods or enable completely new approaches for efficient separation of targets from complex samples like blood. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of blood-based targets that can be used for analysis of cancer, review microfluidic technologies that are currently used for isolation of CTCs, tumor derived exosomes, cfDNA, and circulating RNA, and provide a detailed discussion regarding potential opportunities for microfluidics-based approaches in cancer diagnostics.
Collapse
|
1244
|
Johann DJ, Steliga M, Shin IJ, Yoon D, Arnaoutakis K, Hutchins L, Liu M, Liem J, Walker K, Pereira A, Yang M, Jeffus SK, Peterson E, Xu J. Liquid biopsy and its role in an advanced clinical trial for lung cancer. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018; 243:262-271. [PMID: 29405770 PMCID: PMC5813874 DOI: 10.1177/1535370217750087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy methodologies, for the purpose of plasma genotyping of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of solid tumors, are a new class of novel molecular assays. Such assays are rapidly entering the clinical sphere of research-based monitoring in translational oncology, especially for thoracic malignancies. Potential applications for these blood-based cfDNA assays include: (i) initial diagnosis, (ii) response to therapy and follow-up, (iii) tumor evolution, and (iv) minimal residual disease evaluation. Precision medicine will benefit from cutting-edge molecular diagnostics, especially regarding treatment decisions in the adjuvant setting, where avoiding over-treatment and unnecessary toxicity are paramount. The use of innovative genetic analysis techniques on individual patient tumor samples is being pursued in several advanced clinical trials. Rather than using a categorical treatment plan, the next critical step of therapeutic decision making is providing the "right" cancer therapy for an individual patient, including correct dose and timeframe based on the molecular analysis of the tumor in question. Per the 21st Century Cures Act, innovative clinical trials are integral for biomarker and drug development. This will include advanced clinical trials utilizing: (i) innovative assays, (ii) molecular profiling with cutting-edge bioinformatics, and (iii) clinically relevant animal or tissue models. In this paper, a mini-review addresses state-of-the-art liquid biopsy approaches. Additionally, an on-going advanced clinical trial for lung cancer with novelty through synergizing liquid biopsies, co-clinical trials, and advanced bioinformatics is also presented. Impact statement Liquid biopsy technology is providing a new source for cancer biomarkers, and adds new dimensions in advanced clinical trials. Utilizing a non-invasive routine blood draw, the liquid biopsy provides abilities to address perplexing issues of tumor tissue heterogeneity by identifying mutations in both primary and metastatic lesions. Regarding the assessment of response to cancer therapy, the liquid biopsy is not ready to replace medical imaging, but adds critical new information; for instance, through a temporal assessment of quantitative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay results, and importantly, the ability to monitor for signs of resistance, via emerging clones. Adjuvant therapy may soon be considered based on a quantitative cfDNA assay. As sensitivity and specificity of the technology continue to progress, cancer screening and prevention will improve and save countless lives by finding the cancer early, so that a routine surgery may be all that is required for a definitive cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald J Johann
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Mathew Steliga
- Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Ik Jae Shin
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Donghoon Yoon
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Konstantinos Arnaoutakis
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Laura Hutchins
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Meeiyueh Liu
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Jason Liem
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Karl Walker
- Computer Science, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR 71601, USA
| | - Andy Pereira
- Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
| | - Mary Yang
- Bioinformatics, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR 72204, USA
| | - Susanne K Jeffus
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Erich Peterson
- Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Joshua Xu
- Bioinformatics, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR 72709, USA
| |
Collapse
|
1245
|
Lalli E, Luconi M. The next step: mechanisms driving adrenocortical carcinoma metastasis. Endocr Relat Cancer 2018; 25:R31-R48. [PMID: 29142005 DOI: 10.1530/erc-17-0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Endocrine tumors have the peculiarity to become clinically evident not only due to symptoms related to space occupation by the growing lesion, similarly to most other tumors, but also, and most often, because of their specific hormonal secretion, which significantly contributes to their pathological burden. Malignant endocrine tumors, in addition, have the ability to produce distant metastases. Here, we critically review the current knowledge about mechanisms and biomarkers characterizing the metastatic process in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), a rare endocrine malignancy with a high risk of relapse and metastatization even when the primary tumor is diagnosed and surgically removed at an early stage. We highlight perspectives of future research in the domain and possible new therapeutic avenues based on targeting factors having an important role in the metastatic process of ACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enzo Lalli
- Université Côte d'AzurValbonne, France
- CNRS UMR7275Valbonne, France
- NEOGENEX CNRS International Associated LaboratoryValbonne, France
- Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et CellulaireValbonne, France
| | - Michaela Luconi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio'University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1246
|
Size-based separation methods of circulating tumor cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018; 125:3-20. [PMID: 29326054 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) originate from the primary tumor mass and enter into the peripheral bloodstream. Compared to other "liquid biopsy" portfolios such as exosome, circulating tumor DNA/RNA (ctDNA/RNA), CTCs have incomparable advantages in analyses of transcriptomics, proteomics, and signal colocalization. Hence, CTCs hold the key to understanding the biology of metastasis and play a vital role in cancer diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and prognosis. Size-based enrichment features are prominent in CTC isolation. It is a label-free, simple and fast method. Enriched CTCs remain unmodified and viable for a wide range of subsequent analyses. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the differences of size and deformability between CTCs and blood cells, which would facilitate the development of technologies of size-based CTC isolation. Then we review representative size-/deformability-based technologies available for CTC isolation and highlight the recent achievements in molecular analysis of isolated CTCs. To wrap up, we discuss the substantial challenges facing the field, and elaborate on prospects.
Collapse
|
1247
|
Fan Q, Yang L, Zhang X, Peng X, Wei S, Su D, Zhai Z, Hua X, Li H. The emerging role of exosome-derived non-coding RNAs in cancer biology. Cancer Lett 2018; 414:107-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
1248
|
Wu CP, Wu P, Zhao HF, Liu WL, Li WP. Clinical Applications of and Challenges in Single-Cell Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells. DNA Cell Biol 2018; 37:78-89. [PMID: 29265876 DOI: 10.1089/dna.2017.3981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-peng Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Clinical Medicine College of Anhui Medical University, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Peng Wu
- The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Luohu Hospital Group Department of Urology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hua-fu Zhao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Neurosurgery/Neuro-oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wen-lan Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wei-ping Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
1249
|
Rospo G, Corti G, Crisafulli G, Novara L, Bardelli A. Tracking colorectal cancer evolution in time and space. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:1163-1165. [PMID: 28383707 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Rospo
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo (TO)
| | - G Corti
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo (TO)
| | - G Crisafulli
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo (TO).,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| | - L Novara
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo (TO)
| | - A Bardelli
- Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Candiolo (TO).,Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Candiolo (TO), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
1250
|
Nordgård O, Tjensvoll K, Gilje B, Søreide K. Circulating tumour cells and DNA as liquid biopsies in gastrointestinal cancer. Br J Surg 2018; 105:e110-e120. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Blood is the most extensively studied body fluid and, because it contains circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour-derived cell-free DNA (ctDNA), it may represent a liquid biopsy for cancer. Methods for enrichment and detection of CTCs and ctDNA, their clinical applications and future opportunities in gastrointestinal cancers were the focus of this review.
Methods
The PubMed database was searched for literature up to 24 June 2017, with a focus on the past 10 years. Identified articles were further scrutinized for relevant references. Articles were those in English relating to colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer.
Results
Both CTCs and ctDNA are in low abundance compared with other cellular components of blood, but effective enrichment and highly sensitive techniques are available for their detection. Potential clinical applications of these liquid biopsies include screening, prognostic stratification, therapy administration, monitoring of treatment effect or resistance, and surveillance. Liquid biopsies provide opportunities to reduce the need for invasive tissue sampling, especially in the context of intratumoral heterogeneity and the need for tumour genotyping.
Conclusion
Liquid biopsies have applications in gastrointestinal cancers to improve clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Nordgård
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - K Tjensvoll
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - B Gilje
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - K Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|