101
|
Chemoradiotherapy for fistula-related perianal squamous cell carcinoma with Crohn's disease. Int Cancer Conf J 2021; 10:305-311. [PMID: 34567943 DOI: 10.1007/s13691-021-00497-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The reports of chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma with Crohn's disease are few. Severe toxicity related to radiotherapy is concerned in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We report a case of chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced fistula-related perianal squamous cell carcinoma in a patient with long-standing Crohn's disease which was controlled by a maintenance therapy. The patient completed standard chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy without severe toxicity, and achieved complete remission. Standard chemoradiotherapy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy may be feasible and effective treatment for this population when Crohn's disease is controlled.
Collapse
|
102
|
Nilsson MP, Gunnlaugsson A, Johnsson A, Scherman J. Dosimetric and Clinical Predictors for Acute and Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity Following Chemoradiotherapy of Locally Advanced Anal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:e35-e44. [PMID: 34598844 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To analyse dosimetric and clinical predictors for acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity following chemoradiotherapy of anal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients with locally advanced (T2 ≥4 cm - T4 or N+) anal cancer were selected from an institutional database (n = 114). All received intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Gastrointestinal toxicity was retrospectively graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and bowel cavity, small bowel and large bowel were contoured. Dosimetric and clinical variables were tested for associations with acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity and late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity using the Mann-Whitney test, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and logistic regression. RESULTS The median follow-up was 40 months. Acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 51 (44.7%) of the patients; late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 36 of the patients (39.6% of 91 patients with >1 year recurrence-free follow-up). Bowel cavity V30Gy was the best dosimetric predictor for acute gastrointestinal toxicity (AUC 0.633; P = 0.02). Large bowel V20Gy was the best dosimetric predictor for late gastrointestinal toxicity (AUC 0.698; P = 0.001) but showed no association with acute gastrointestinal toxicity. In multivariate logistic regression, increasing age was significantly associated with acute gastrointestinal toxicity; smoking and large bowel V20Gy were significantly associated with late gastrointestinal toxicity. Patients who experienced acute grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity were not at an increased risk of late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal toxicity (odds ratio 1.3; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS Factors of importance for acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity were not the same. Bowel cavity V30Gy is a good metric to use for the prediction of acute gastrointestinal toxicity, but the results of our study indicate that individual large and small bowel loops need to be contoured for better prediction of late gastrointestinal toxicity. The role of the large bowel as an important organ at risk for late gastrointestinal toxicity merits further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
| | - A Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Das A, Arunsingh M, Bhattacharyya T, Prasath SS, Balakrishnan A, Mallick I. Intensity modulated radiotherapy in anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: Implementation and outcomes. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 17:975-981. [PMID: 34528551 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_212_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Objective Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard curative treatment option for nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce doses delivered to bowel and skin and reduce toxicities associated with conventional fields. Here, we present our institutional data on dosimetry, toxicity, and clinical outcomes with IMRT for anal cancer. Materials and Methods We analyzed 23 patients of anal SCC treated with curative-intent CCRT/radiation therapy alone, utilizing IMRT, between August 2011 and December 2016. The standard prescription dose was 54 Gy/27Fr/5.5 weeks, delivered in two phases, and concurrent chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. Acute and late toxicities and dosimetric data were compiled and analyzed. Results The median age was 65 years. Fourteen (60.7%) patients had Stage IIIC disease. Eighteen patients received concurrent chemotherapy. No patient had any treatment breaks. Grade 3 acute perianal dermatitis was recorded in 11 (47.8%) patients. Proctitis, diarrhea, and cystitis were limited to Grade 1 in 73.9%, 47.8%, and 8.6% patients, respectively. The only late Grade 2+ toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities in 4 (17.4%) patients. Twenty (87%) patients had complete response at 6 months. The 3-year local control, nodal control, and distant metastases-free survival were 85.9%, 86.6%, 84.7%, respectively, with 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival of 63.4% and 81%, respectively. Conclusion In this report on IMRT in anal cancer from India, treatment was well tolerated with lower acute toxicity than reported in other prospective studies. Long-term results are at par with other published studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avipsa Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Moses Arunsingh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Tapesh Bhattacharyya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - S Sriram Prasath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Arun Balakrishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Indranil Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, Franco P, Johnsson A, Segelov E, Deutsch E, Rao S, Spindler KLG, Arnold D. Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:279-287. [PMID: 34645589 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, AOU ''Maggiore della Carità,'' Novara, Italy
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Segelov
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia and Department of Oncology, Monash Health Clayton, Australia
| | | | - Sheela Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Joo JH, Park JH, Yoon SM, Kim JC, Yu CS, Kim TW, Kim JH. Long-term oncologic and complication outcomes in anal cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 16:S194-S200. [PMID: 33380677 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_34_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Aim The aim of the study is to analyze prognostic factors for tumor control, survival, and late toxicity in patients with anal cancer treated with chemoradiation. Materials and Methods Anal cancer patients treated between 1996 and 2010 were analyzed. Patients received radiotherapy and concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-C. Results Data from 70 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 88% and 84%, respectively. Female gender and total radiation dose (≥54 Gy) were significantly associated with better local control. For survival, female gender, patient age, and tumor size were significant prognostic factors. The most common late toxicity was lymphedema. Possible prognosticators were examined, and only radiation dose to the inguinal area was significant. Conclusion Despite moderately high radiation doses, local recurrence, and late complications were problems in treating anal cancer. In the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era, consensus on accurate target volume based on the pattern of failure analysis is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyeon Joo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jin-Hong Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Cheon Kim
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Sik Yu
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Won Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Rao S, Guren MG, Khan K, Brown G, Renehan AG, Steigen SE, Deutsch E, Martinelli E, Arnold D. Anal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1087-1100. [PMID: 34175386 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Rao
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Khan
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK; Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Brown
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A G Renehan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S E Steigen
- University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - E Deutsch
- INSERM 1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - E Martinelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - D Arnold
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, Palliative Care Medicine and Rheumatology, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Nilsson MP, Johnsson A, Scherman J. Sarcopenia and dosimetric parameters in relation to treatment-related leukopenia and survival in anal cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:152. [PMID: 34399812 PMCID: PMC8365937 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01876-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment-related white blood cell (WBC) toxicity has been associated with an inferior prognosis in different malignancies, including anal cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate predictors of WBC grade ≥ 3 (G3+) toxicity during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) of anal cancer. Methods Consecutive patients with locally advanced (T2 ≥ 4 cm—T4 or N+) anal cancer scheduled for two cycles of concomitant 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C chemotherapy were selected from an institutional database (n = 106). All received intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; mean dose primary tumor 59.5 Gy; mean dose elective lymph nodes 45.1 Gy). Clinical data were extracted from medical records. The highest-grade WBC toxicity was recorded according to CTCAE version 5.0. Pelvic bone marrow (PBM) was retrospectively contoured and dose-volume histograms were generated. The planning CT was used to measure sarcopenia. Dosimetric, anthropometric, and clinical variables were tested for associations with WBC G3+ toxicity using the Mann–Whitney test and logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess predictors for overall survival (OS) and anal cancer specific survival (ACSS). Results WBC G3+ was seen in 50.9% of the patients, and 38.7% were sarcopenic. None of the dosimetric parameters showed an association with WBC G3+ toxicity. The most significant predictor of WBC G3+ toxicity was sarcopenia (adjusted OR 4.0; P = 0.002). Sarcopenia was also associated with an inferior OS (adjusted HR 3.9; P = 0.01), but not ACSS (P = 0.07). Sensitivity analysis did not suggest that the inferior prognosis for sarcopenic patients was a consequence of reduced doses of chemotherapy or a prolonged radiation treatment time. Patients who experienced WBC G3+ toxicity had an inferior OS and ACSS, even after adjustment for sarcopenia. Conclusions Sarcopenia was associated with increased risks of both WBC G3+ toxicity and death following CRT for locally advanced anal cancer. In this study, radiation dose to PBM was not associated with WBC G3+ toxicity. However, PBM was not used as an organ at risk for radiotherapy planning purposes and doses to PBM were high, which may have obscured any dose–response relationships. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01876-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin P Nilsson
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Anders Johnsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23, 221 85, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Scherman
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
110
|
Yoder AK, Lakomy DS, Dong Y, Raychaudhury S, Royse K, Hartman C, Richardson P, White DL, Kramer JR, Lin LL, Chiao E. The association between protease inhibitors and anal cancer outcomes in veterans living with HIV treated with definitive chemoradiation: a retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:776. [PMID: 34225709 PMCID: PMC8256603 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08514-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of anal squamous cell carcinoma has been increasing, particularly in people living with HIV (PLWH). There is concern that radiosensitizing drugs, such as protease inhibitors, commonly used in the management of HIV, may increase toxicities in patients undergoing chemoradiation. This study examines treatment outcomes and toxicities in PLWH managed with and without protease inhibitors who are receiving chemoradiation for anal cancer. METHODS Patient demographic, HIV management, and cancer treatment information were extracted from multiple Veterans Affairs databases. Patients were also manually chart reviewed. Among PLWH undergoing chemoradiation for anal carcinoma, therapy outcomes and toxicities were compared between those treated with and without protease inhibitors at time of cancer treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square, Cox regression analysis, and logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 219 PLWH taking anti-retroviral therapy undergoing chemoradiation for anal cancer were identified and included in the final analysis. The use of protease inhibitors was not associated with any survival outcome including colostomy-free survival, progression-free survival, or overall survival (all adjusted hazard ratio p-values> 0.05). Regarding toxicity, protease inhibitor use was not associated with an increased odds of hospitalizations or non-hematologic toxicities; however, protease inhibitor use was associated with increased hospitalizations for hematologic toxicities, including febrile neutropenia (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The use of protease inhibitors during chemoradiation for anal carcinoma was not associated with any clinical outcome or increase in non-hematologic toxicity. Their use was associated with increased hospitalizations for hematologic toxicities. Further prospective research is needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protease inhibitors for patients undergoing chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison K Yoder
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern School of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Lakomy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Yongquan Dong
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suchismita Raychaudhury
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn Royse
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
| | - Christine Hartman
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter Richardson
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Donna L White
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer R Kramer
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lilie L Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth Chiao
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1155 Pressler St. Unit, Houston, 1340, USA.
- Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Saif MW, Hamal R, Siddiqui N, Maloney A, Smith M. Alternative chemoradiotherapy in anal carcinoma patients with mutations in thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genes. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211024464. [PMID: 34276810 PMCID: PMC8255561 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211024464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) with radiotherapy (RT) remain an established treatment for patients with anal cancer (AC). Genetic mutations in two major metabolizing enzymes for 5-FU; dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD and thymidylate synthetase (TYMS), have been associated with clinical response and toxicity. However, their place in the treatment of AC remains undetermined. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 21 patients with AC, including T2-4, N0-1, M0 or T1-4, N2-3, and M0 treated between 2012 and 2018. All patients were treated with 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2/day via continuous intravenous (IV) infusion 1-4 and 29-32, MMC 10 mg/m2 IV bolus days 1 and 29 plus RT. Patients who developed ⩾3 grade toxicities were tested for the DPYD and TYMS genes. Treatment was either modified with reduced doses or changed to MMC 10 mg/m2 day 1 and 29 with cisplatin 25 mg/m2/week plus RT. Toxicities and responses were collected. RESULTS Six out of 21 patients who developed ⩾3 grade toxicities including pancytopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, nausea, rash, and nephritis were found to have genetic mutations: TYMS 2RG/3RC (n = 2), 3RG/3RC (n = 1), 2R/2R (n = 2), TYMS 3'UTR del/Ins (n = 2), and DPYD c.2864A > T heterozygous (n = 1). Two patients received 5-FU at a 50% reduced dose on days 29-32; one patient refused to receive 5-FU (continued with MMC and RT); one patient received only radiation therapy due to persistent pancytopenia despite the use of growth factors; two patients received an alternative regimen consisting of MMC 10 mg/m2 on day 29 with cisplatin (CDDP) 25 mg/m2/week plus RT; and two patients received cisplatin/MMC with RT from the beginning as they were prospectively detected to have TYMS abnormalities prior to dosing the chemotherapy. These patients tolerated treatment very well with only grade 2 toxicities. All the patients (4/4) on cisplatin/MMC achieved clinical complete response (cCR), while four patients (4/15) on 5-FU/MMC reached cCR at the first assessment. Radiological response showed complete response at the end of 24 weeks assessment. CONCLUSIONS Molecular testing for DPYD and TYMS genes can allow us to identify patients who are most likely to respond or face severe toxicity to 5-FU in a potentially curable cancer. Combining radiation with CDDP with MMC in patients with AC is feasible. A prospective study based on pharmacogenetic testing comparing MMC/cisplatin with MMC/5-FU is indicated in patients with AC.
Collapse
|
112
|
Slørdahl KS, Klotz D, Olsen JÅ, Skovlund E, Undseth C, Abildgaard HL, Brændengen M, Nesbakken A, Larsen SG, Hanekamp BA, Holmboe L, Tvedt R, Sveen A, Lothe RA, Malinen E, Kaasa S, Guren MG. Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors after chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:921-930. [PMID: 33966592 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1918763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare malignancy with rising incidence, associated with human papilloma virus (HPV). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the preferred treatment. The purpose was to investigate treatment failure, survival and prognostic factors after CRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective observational study from a large regional centre, 141 patients were included from 2013 to 2017, and 132 were eligible for analysis. The main inclusion criteria were SCCA, planned radiotherapy, and performance status (ECOG) ≤2. Patient characteristics, disease stage, treatment, and treatment response were prospectively registered. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and locoregional treatment failure after CRT were analysed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with Cox`s proportional hazards model. RESULTS Median follow-up was 54 (range 6-71) months. Eighteen patients (14%) had treatment failures after CRT; of these 10 (8%) had residual tumour, and 8 (6%) relapse as first failure. The first treatment failure was locoregional (11 patients), distant (5 patients), and both (2 patients). Salvage abdomino-perineal resection was performed in 10 patients, 2 had resections of metastases, and 3 both. DFS was 85% at 3 years and 78% at 5 years. OS was 93% at 3 years and 86% at 5 years. In analyses adjusted for age and gender, HPV negative tumours (HR 2.5, p = 0.024), N3 disease (HR 2.6, p = 0.024), and tumour size ≥4 cm (HR 2.4, p = 0.038) were negative prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION State-of-the-art chemoradiotherapy for SCCA resulted in excellent outcomes, and improved survival compared with previous national data, with <15% treatment failures and a 3-year DFS of >80%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathinka S. Slørdahl
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dagmar Klotz
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan-Åge Olsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eva Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Morten Brændengen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Gunnar Larsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bettina A. Hanekamp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Laila Holmboe
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Tvedt
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anita Sveen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild A. Lothe
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Grønlie Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Intensified Induction Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus-A Population-Based Experience from the Danish Anal Cancer Group. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133226. [PMID: 34203394 PMCID: PMC8267651 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The primary treatment modality for anal cancer is chemoradiotherapy, but patients with locally advanced disease (i.e., large tumors and/or involvement of regional lymph nodes) have a high risk of treatment failure. The use of chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy (induction chemotherapy) can potentially shrink the tumor and/or eradicate small cancer cells with metastatic potential, with a chance of a better outcome. With this paper, the authors present 20 years of nationwide experience with intensified induction chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer, which indicates a role for further investigation in the most advanced cases. Abstract Locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (LASCCA) has a poor prognosis with a high risk of treatment failure calling for intensified therapy. We present the long-term follow-up of a nationwide cohort of LASCCA treated with intensified induction chemotherapy (ICT). The study included patients with LASCCA (T3-4N0 or T1-4N+) treated with at least one cycle of ICT (cisplatin, ifosfamide, leucoverin, and 5-flourouracil) between 1998–2018. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records, and statistics were performed in STATA 16.1. In total, 166 patients with LASCCA were identified. Following ICT, 157 patients (95%) received primary curative treatment with either radiotherapy (70%), chemoradiotherapy (27%), or abdominal perineal resection (3%). The overall local tumor response rate after ICT was 76% with 20 (13%) achieving complete local tumor response. After the primary treatment, 123 patients (79%) obtained complete response, and 27 underwent salvage surgery due to persistent disease. The median follow-up time was 6 years, local and distant failure rates 22% and 13%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 70% and 67%, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 76% and 70%, respectively. Intensified ICT regimen could be a supplementary treatment option in the most advanced cases of LASCCA. Prospective randomized trials are needed to investigate this approach further.
Collapse
|
114
|
|
115
|
Shah NK, Qureshi MM, Dyer MA, Truong MT, Mak KS. Optimal Radiotherapy Dose in Anal Cancer: Trends in Prescription Dose and Association with Survival. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 52:229-236. [PMID: 32152823 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-020-00393-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Definitive chemoradiotherapy represents a standard of care treatment for localized anal cancer. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend radiotherapy (RT) doses of ≥ 45 Gy and escalation to 50.4-59 Gy for advanced disease. Per RTOG 0529, 50.4 Gy was prescribed for early-stage disease (cT1-2N0), and 54 Gy for locally advanced cancers (cT3-T4 and/or node positive). We assessed patterns of care and overall survival (OS) with respect to the RT dose. METHODS The National Cancer Database identified patients with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma from 2004 to 2015 treated with chemoradiotherapy. Patients were stratified by RT dose: 40-< 45, 45-< 50, 50-54, and > 54-60 Gy. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were computed using Cox regression modeling. RESULTS A total of 10,524 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 40.7 months. The most commonly prescribed RT dose was 54 Gy. On multivariate analysis, RT doses of 40-< 45 Gy were associated with worse OS vs. 50-54 Gy (HR 1.68 [1.40-2.03], P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in OS for patients who received 45-< 50 or > 54-60 Gy compared with 50-54 Gy. For early-stage disease, there was no significant association between RT dose and OS. For locally advanced disease, 45-< 54 Gy was associated with worse survival vs. 54 Gy (HR 1.18 [1.04-1.34], P = 0.009), but no significant difference was detected comparing > 54-60 Gy vs. 54 Gy (HR 1.08 [0.97-1.22], P = 0.166). CONCLUSIONS For patients with localized anal cancer, RT doses of ≥ 45 Gy were associated with improved OS. For locally advanced disease, 54 Gy but not > 54 Gy was associated with improved OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishant K Shah
- Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- University of Pennsylvania Radiation Oncology Residency Program, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Concourse Level, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Muhammad M Qureshi
- Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, 830 Harrison Ave, Moakley Building LL 237, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Michael A Dyer
- Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, 830 Harrison Ave, Moakley Building LL 237, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Minh Tam Truong
- Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, 830 Harrison Ave, Moakley Building LL 237, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Kimberley S Mak
- Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, 830 Harrison Ave, Moakley Building LL 237, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Choudhury A, Theophanous S, Lønne PI, Samuel R, Guren MG, Berbee M, Brown P, Lilley J, van Soest J, Dekker A, Gilbert A, Malinen E, Wee L, Appelt AL. Predicting outcomes in anal cancer patients using multi-centre data and distributed learning - A proof-of-concept study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:183-189. [PMID: 33753156 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Predicting outcomes is challenging in rare cancers. Single-institutional datasets are often small and multi-institutional data sharing is complex. Distributed learning allows machine learning models to use data from multiple institutions without exchanging individual patient-level data. We demonstrate this technique in a proof-of-concept study of anal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy across multiple European countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS atomCAT is a three-centre collaboration between Leeds Cancer Centre (UK), MAASTRO Clinic (The Netherlands) and Oslo University Hospital (Norway). We trained and validated a Cox proportional hazards regression model in a distributed fashion using data from 281 patients treated with radical, conformal chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer in three institutions. Our primary endpoint was overall survival. We selected disease stage, sex, age, primary tumour size, and planned radiotherapy dose (in EQD2) a priori as predictor variables. RESULTS The Cox regression model trained across all three centres found worse overall survival for high risk disease stage (HR = 2.02), male sex (HR = 3.06), older age (HR = 1.33 per 10 years), larger primary tumour volume (HR = 1.05 per 10 cm3) and lower radiotherapy dose (HR = 1.20 per 5 Gy). A mean concordance index of 0.72 was achieved during validation, with limited variation between centres (Leeds = 0.72, MAASTRO = 0.74, Oslo = 0.70). The global model performed well for risk stratification for two out of three centres. CONCLUSIONS Using distributed learning, we accessed and analysed one of the largest available multi-institutional cohorts of anal cancer patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques. This demonstrates the value of distributed learning in outcome modelling for rare cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananya Choudhury
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University & Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Stelios Theophanous
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Per-Ivar Lønne
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Robert Samuel
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Maaike Berbee
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University & Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Brown
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - John Lilley
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospitals, United Kingdom
| | - Johan van Soest
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University & Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Limburg, The Netherlands; Brightlands Institute for Smart Society (BISS), Faculty of Science & Engineering, Maastricht University, CR Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University & Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Leonard Wee
- MAASTRO (Dept of Radiotherapy), GROW School of Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University & Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Limburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Talwar G, Daniel R, McKechnie T, Levine O, Eskicioglu C. Radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy for stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1111-1122. [PMID: 33486535 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03846-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with stage I anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have been underrepresented in landmark trials showing superiority of chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy for definitive treatment. This review aims to elucidate whether definitive treatment with radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy is associated with differences in survival and treatment-related toxicity outcomes in patients with stage I anal SCC. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched as of November 2020 to identify studies comparing outcomes of radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for non-operative treatment of patients with stage I anal SCC. The primary outcomes were 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival. The secondary outcome was treatment-related toxicities. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed using an inverse-variance random-effects model. RESULTS From 2174 citations, 5 retrospective studies with 415 patients treated with radiotherapy and 3784 patients treated with chemoradiotherapy were included. Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy had an increased 5-year overall survival (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.10-1.26, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) but no significant difference in 5-year disease-free survival (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.92-1.11, p = 0.87, I2 = 0%). Treatment-related toxicities could not be meta-analyzed due to heterogeneity. Limited data from individual studies suggested an increased frequency of select toxicities with chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy may be an appropriate alternative to chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage I anal SCC who may be unable to tolerate chemotherapy-related toxicity; however, chemoradiotherapy remains the gold standard. Larger prospective studies comparing strategies for this select patient population are needed to clarify whether treatment can be de-escalated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Talwar
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan Daniel
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tyler McKechnie
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Oren Levine
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1988-2006. [PMID: 34073199 PMCID: PMC8161825 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The annual Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 was held in Morell, Prince Edward Island, 19-21 September 2019. Experts in medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgical oncology who are involved in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses multiple topics in the management of anal, colorectal, biliary tract, and gastric cancers, including: radiotherapy and systemic therapy for localized and advanced anal cancer; watch and wait strategy for the management of rectal cancer; role of testing for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency prior to commencement of fluoropyrimidine therapy; radiotherapy and systemic therapy in the adjuvant and unresectable settings for biliary tract cancer; and radiotherapy and systemic therapy in the perioperative setting for early-stage gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
119
|
Possiel J, Ammon HE, Guhlich M, Conradi LC, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Schirmer MA, Samel S, Mügge M, Rieken S, Leu M, Dröge LH. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Improves Outcomes in Definitive Radiochemotherapy for Anal Cancer Whilst Reducing Acute Toxicities and Increasing Treatment Compliance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112533. [PMID: 34064061 PMCID: PMC8196749 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care in definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal cancer. Only a limited number of studies have analyzed the clinical results with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy, the advanced form of IMRT). We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at our institution. We compared the outcomes of VMAT-treated and 3DCRT (3D conformal radiotherapy)-treated patients. VMAT reduced acute toxicities (i.e., primarily dermatitis and enteritis) to a great extent. Additionally, VMAT relevantly improved treatment compliance (i.e., less CRT interruptions/delays, shorter overall treatment time, and higher absolute 5-fluorouracil dose applied). Finally, we found improved cancer-specific survival and distant control in VMAT-treated patients. The present study underlines the great progress that has been achieved with IMRT/VMAT in the CRT of anal cancer. Our study is the first to demonstrate an improvement in treatment compliance and outcomes with VMAT. Future studies could address whether VMAT is advantageous when compared to conventional IMRT. Abstract Background: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the standard of care in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for anal cancer. Until now, only a limited number of studies have analyzed the results with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy). We conducted a retrospective study on patients treated at our institution. Patients and Methods: We included patients who received curative CRT for anal cancer. We compared VMAT-treated and 3DCRT (3D conformal radiotherapy)-treated patients. We analyzed toxicities (acute: CTCAE criteria; late: LENT/SOMA criteria), treatment compliance, overall survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), distant control (DC), and locoregional control. Results: A total of 149 patients (3DCRT: n = 87, VMAT: n = 62) were included. The median follow-up was longer in 3DCRT-treated patients (3DCRT: 61.3 months; VMAT: 39.1 months; p < 0.05). VMAT-treated patients had more G3 tumors (3DCRT: 12/87 (13.8%); VMAT: 18/62 (29.0%), p < 0.001). VMAT reduced acute toxicities ≥grade 3 (3DCRT: n = 48/87 (55.2%); VMAT: n = 11/62 (17.7%), p < 0.001). VMAT improved treatment compliance (less interruptions/delays) (3DCRT: 37/87, 42.5%; VMAT: 4/62, 6.5%; p < 0.001), provided a shorter median overall treatment time (3DCRT: 41 days; VMAT: 38 days; p = 0.02), and gave a higher median absolute 5-fluorouracil dose (3DCRT: 13,700 mg; VMAT: 14,400 mg; p = 0.001). Finally, we found improved CSS (p = 0.02; 3DCRT: 81.9% at 3 years; VMAT: 94.1% at 3 years) and DC (p = 0.01; 3DCRT: 89.4% at 3 years; VMAT: 100.0% at 3 years) with VMAT. Summary: Our study is the first to demonstrate improved treatment compliance and outcomes with VMAT for anal cancer. Previous studies have indicated that organs at risk sparing might be more improved with the use of VMAT vs. with conventional IMRT. Future studies should address whether these advantages lead to a further reduction in CRT-associated morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Possiel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Hanne Elisabeth Ammon
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Manuel Guhlich
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Lena-Christin Conradi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (L.-C.C.); (M.G.)
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (L.-C.C.); (M.G.)
| | - Hendrik Andreas Wolff
- University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany;
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Radiology Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Anton Schirmer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Stephan Samel
- Praxis für Koloproktologie und chirurgische Endoskopie, Waldweg 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (S.S.); (M.M.)
| | - Michael Mügge
- Praxis für Koloproktologie und chirurgische Endoskopie, Waldweg 1, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (S.S.); (M.M.)
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Martin Leu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
| | - Leif Hendrik Dröge
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany; (J.P.); (H.E.A.); (M.G.); (M.A.S.); (S.R.); (M.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-551-398-866
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Concurrent Chemoradiation in Anal Cancer Patients Delivered with Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT: Final Results of a Prospective Phase II Trial. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11050427. [PMID: 34069862 PMCID: PMC8157357 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11050427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the role of the selective avoidance of haematopoietically active pelvic bone marrow (BM), with a targeted intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. We designed a one-armed two-stage Simon’s design study to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing IMRT would improve by 20% the rate of G0–G2 (vs. G3–G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05; β = 0.20). A minimum of 21/39 (54%) with G0–G2 toxicity represented the threshold for the fulfilment of the criteria to define this approach as ‘promising’. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. From December 2017 to October 2020, we enrolled 39 patients. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 20% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 11% rate of ≥G3 thrombocytopenia. Overall, 11 out of 39 treated patients (28%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, in 28 patients (72%) G0–G2 HT events were observed, above the threshold set. Hence, 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in this clinical setting.
Collapse
|
121
|
Baloch N, Nordenvall C, Johansson H, Nygren J, Nilsson PJ. Perineal healing following salvage surgery for anal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:1102-1108. [PMID: 33336448 PMCID: PMC8246882 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
AIM Approximately 25% of anal cancer patients undergo abdominoperineal excision or more extensive surgery. Following surgery, a high perineal complication rate has been reported. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based multimodal interventional programme introduced to mitigate the risk of complications. This study aims to describe perineal healing in relation to ERAS compliance, type of resection and method of perineal reconstruction in patients with anal cancer after salvage surgery. METHOD This is a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing abdominal surgery for squamous cell anal cancer in Stockholm between January 2005 and December 2015. Data collection was from registers supplemented by chart review. All patients were followed until death or 1 year after surgery. The associations between ERAS compliance, patient and treatment characteristics and perineal wound healing were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 101 patients (67 women) were included, of whom 72 were ERAS compliant. Of patients alive, healing after surgery occurred in 61/98 and 84/89 at 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Perineal healing at 3 months was statistically significantly associated with younger age and type of perineal reconstruction (in favour of vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap). No associations were observed at 1 year but almost all wounds were healed. CONCLUSION Age and type of perineal reconstruction appear to be significantly associated with improved healing at 3 months whereas compliance to an ERAS protocol and type of resection do not. Nearly all patients had a fully healed perineal wound 1 year after surgery for anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naseer Baloch
- Department of Pelvic CancerDivision of ColoproctologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Caroline Nordenvall
- Department of Pelvic CancerDivision of ColoproctologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology‐PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Jonas Nygren
- Department of SurgeryErsta HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyds HospitalKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Pelvic CancerDivision of ColoproctologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
De-Escalation of Therapy for Patients with Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092099. [PMID: 33925282 PMCID: PMC8123637 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Management of early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) remains controversial. The current standard of care treatment of chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy can result in both acute and late toxicity. Alternative therapies, including radiation therapy alone or local excision, may be less toxic, but the role of these therapies in early-stage SCCA remains unclear. Additional options for reducing the intensity of therapy for early-stage SCCA include reduction of radiation dose, altering treatment volumes, modifying chemotherapy type and dosage, and using intensity-modulated radiation therapy to reduce the radiation dose to adjacent normal tissues. Multiple prospective studies are actively investigating the role of de-escalation of therapy in patients with early-stage SCCA. Abstract The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is increasing, particularly in the elderly, with increased mortality in this age group. While the current standard of care for localized SCCA remains chemoradiation (CRT), completion of this treatment can be challenging with risks for severe acute and late toxicity. It remains unclear if full course CRT is required for the management of early-stage SCCA or if de-escalation of treatment is possible without compromising patient outcomes. Alternative therapies include radiation therapy alone or local excision for appropriate patients. Modifying standard CRT may also reduce toxicity including the routine use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for treatment delivery, modification of treatment volumes, and selection and dosing of concurrent systemic therapy agents. Finally, we provide an overview of currently accruing prospective trials focused on defining the role of de-escalation of therapy in patients with early-stage SCCA.
Collapse
|
123
|
Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated (IMRT) Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Carcinoma (RAINSTORM): A Multicenter Study on Behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081902. [PMID: 33920873 PMCID: PMC8071256 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is the standard treatment in anal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was proved to reduce severe, acute and late toxicities. Moreover, IMRT techniques allow for the planning and delivery of a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), with a differential dose per fraction given to selected sub-regions during the same treatment session. This boost modality provides the chance to employ a dose-painted approach with a reduction in overall treatment time that could result in a potential clinical advantage. Since a large variability in dose prescription to the primary tumor and elective or involved lymph nodes can be found in available guidelines and clinical practice, a multicenter analysis was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and the impact of radiotherapy parameters on clinical outcomes for anal cancer patients treated with IMRT techniques within a national cohort. Abstract A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.
Collapse
|
124
|
Farias JPF, Rangel da Silva MHC, Jácome AA. Emerging and Experimental Agents for Anal Cancer: What is New? J Exp Pharmacol 2021; 13:433-440. [PMID: 33859504 PMCID: PMC8043794 DOI: 10.2147/jep.s262342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is an HPV-related malignancy with rising incidence in the past few decades in the US, characterized by high rates of complete response to chemoradiotherapy with curative intent. However, in a long-term follow-up, a meaningful subgroup of patients with locally advanced disease presents disease recurrence, which demands treatments with high morbidity and important impact in the quality of life. In metastatic or unresectable disease, palliative chemotherapy is the standard of care, but it is still associated with a dismal prognosis. Novel agents are urgently needed in the systemic therapy of SCCA. From a translational standpoint, there are many hurdles to overcome, since PI3KCA mutation is the most frequent genetic abnormality and actionable mutations are rarely found in SCCA, as well as it is characterized by low tumor mutational burden and low rates of high-frequency microsatellite instability. But the latest studies of immunotherapeutic approaches have produced promising findings and this therapeutic strategy is the major path being followed in the ongoing clinical trials. The latest advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA have provided the framework for the conception of new clinical trials. Therefore, carboplatin plus paclitaxel have become the backbone for novel agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), mainly anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, such as retifanlimab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab have been studied in Phase III trials with chemotherapy in first-line therapy. Likewise, ICIs have been evaluated in locally advanced and refractory disease. Novel technologies, such as bispecific antibodies, and immunotherapeutic approaches, such as vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapies, have also been tested in ongoing clinical trials. Immunotherapy may bring practice-changing advances in the systemic therapy of SCCA in the next few years and it might play a larger role in the therapeutic management of this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Paulo F Farias
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Oncoclínicas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Alexandre A Jácome
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Oncoclínicas, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
125
|
Siegel R, Werner RN, Koswig S, Gaskins M, Rödel C, Aigner F. Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:217-24. [PMID: 33531112 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of anal cancer diagnoses has been rising steadily, so that the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Almost all anal cancers are induced by persistent infection with human papillomaviruses. Hitherto the care of patients with anal cancer has been heterogeneous and little experience exists with the primary management of anal cancer. METHODS The guideline was developed in accordance with the requirements of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. In line with the GRADE approach, the certainty of the evidence was assessed on the outcome level following a systematic literature search. Interdisciplinary working groups were set up to compile suggestions for recommendations, which were discussed and agreed upon in a formal consensus conference. RESULTS Ninety-three recommendations and statements were developed. No high-quality evidence was available to support recommendations for or against the treatment of stage I anal cancer with local excision alone as an alternative to chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard in the treatment of stages II–III. Among other aspects regarding the timing and extent of response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy, the guideline panel recommended against obtaining a biopsy in the event of complete clinical response. Owing to lack of confidence in the available evidence, only open recommendations were given for treatment of stage IV. CONCLUSION This evidence-based clinical practice guideline provides a sound basis for optimizing the interdisciplinary, cross-sector care of anal cancer patients. Among other areas, gaps in research were identified with respect to the care of patients with early-stage or metastatic anal cancer. Approaches such as chemoradiotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia require further investigation. The role for immunotherapy in the management of metastasized anal cancer has also been insufficiently explored to date.
Collapse
|
126
|
Li J, Xu H, Zou J, Wang X, Li Z, Shen Y. Cisplatin/capecitabine with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:432-436. [PMID: 33556252 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1879250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mitomycin (MMC)/5-fluoroural (5-FU) with concurrent radiation is the standard treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) as an alternative with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in ASCC setting. METHODS We retrospectively screened all patients with stage I-IV ASCC from January 2010 to June 2019. The records of patients who received definitive chemoradiation with cisplatin/capecitabine (XP) and IMRT were collected and analyzed. RESULTS The first patient was treated with XP in 2017, so totally 11 patients were included in our study from January 2017 to June 2019. All patients have experienced clinical complete response (cCR). After a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 18-39 months), no patient had local recurrence or distant metastasis. Two-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) and two-year disease-free survival (DFS) were both 100%. The median overall survival (OS) has not reached. Grade 3 acute toxicities included leukopenia (1, 9.1%), neutropenia (2, 18.2%) and thrombocytopenia (2, 18.2%). No grade 4 acute adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION In our study, cisplatin/capecitabine combined with IMRT was safe in ASCC patients, with favorable efficacy as an alternative, and is expected to be explored in study with larger sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jielang Li
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Huanji Xu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Jiahuan Zou
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Zhiping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| | - Yali Shen
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Parzen JS, Vayntraub A, Squires B, Almahariq MF, Thompson AB, Robertson JM, Kabolizadeh P, Quinn TJ. A population-based analysis of chemoradiation versus radiation alone in the definitive treatment of patients with stage I-II squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:831-844. [PMID: 34012670 PMCID: PMC8107581 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of patients with stage I-II squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus is controversial. The current study evaluates the efficacy of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT) versus radiation therapy (RT) alone in the treatment of these patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. METHODS SEER 18 Custom Data registries were queried for patients with stage I-II SCC of the anus. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling were performed. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for indication bias. RESULTS A total of 4,288 patients with stage I-II disease were identified, of whom 3,982 (93%) underwent CRT and 306 (7%) underwent RT. Median follow-up was 42 months. Approximately 30.8% had T1 disease and 69.2% had T2-T3 disease. The IPTW-adjusted 5-year overall survival (OS) was 76.7%, with no significant differences between the CRT and RT groups (77% vs. 73.5%, P=0.33). On multivariate IPTW-adjusted analysis, the lack of association between CRT use and OS was upheld (HR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.65-1.08, P=0.2). On subgroup analyses, 5-year OS was 86% with CRT (n=1,216) and 84.2% with RT (n=103) (P=0.74) in stage I (T1N0) patients, while 5-year OS was 72.8% with CRT (n=2,766) and 66.4% with RT (n=203) (P=0.13) in stage II (T2-3N0) patients. CRT was associated with improved median OS in stage II patients (119 months vs. not reached, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS The current study suggests that omission of concurrent chemotherapy is not associated with inferior OS in patients with stage I SCC of the anus. However, combined chemoradiation was superior to radiation alone in patients with stage II disease. Prospective evidence is needed to optimize clinical decision-making in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S Parzen
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | - Bryan Squires
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | - Andrew B Thompson
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - John M Robertson
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | | | - Thomas J Quinn
- Beaumont Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Werner RN, Gaskins M, Avila Valle G, Budach V, Koswig S, Mosthaf FA, Raab HR, Rödel C, Nast A, Siegel R, Aigner F. State of the art treatment for stage I to III anal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:188-196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
129
|
Dee EC, Byrne JD, Wo JY. Evolution of the Role of Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1208. [PMID: 33801992 PMCID: PMC8001637 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior to the 1980s, the primary management of localized anal cancer was surgical resection. Dr. Norman Nigro and colleagues introduced neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy prior to abdominoperineal resection. Chemoradiotherapy 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C afforded patients complete pathologic response and obviated the need for upfront surgery. More recent studies have attempted to alter or exclude chemotherapy used in the Nigro regimen to mitigate toxicity, often with worse outcomes. Reductions in acute adverse effects have been associated with marked advancements in radiotherapy delivery using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guidance radiation delivery, resulting in increased tolerance to greater radiation doses. Ongoing trials are attempting to improve IMRT-based treatment of locally advanced disease with efforts to increase personalized treatment. Studies are also examining the role of newer treatment modalities such as proton therapy in treating anal cancer. Here we review the evolution of radiotherapy for anal cancer and describe recent advances. We also elaborate on radiotherapy's role in locally persistent or recurrent anal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James D. Byrne
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Blossom St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Huffman DL, Jayakrishnan TT, Vannatter BL, Monga DK, Finley GG, McCormick JT, Kirichenko AV, Wegner RE. Chemotherapy use in early stage anal canal squamous cell carcinoma and its impact on long-term overall survival ,,. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100347. [PMID: 33711636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 02/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. It is postulated that chemotherapy could be omitted for the earliest stages without worsening outcomes. METHODS We queried the NCDB from 2004-2016 for patients with cT1N0M0 SCCA treated non-operatively with radiation, with and without chemotherapy, and at least two months of follow-up. Of the 2,959 patients meeting eligibility, 92% received chemotherapy (n = 2722) and 8% (n = 237) did not. Most patients were white (n = 2676), female (n = 2019), had private insurance (n = 1507) and were treated in a comprehensive cancer center (n = 1389). Average age was 58.5 years. RESULTS Predictors of chemotherapy omission were age > 58 years (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49-0.90], P = 0.0087), higher comorbidity score (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.38-0.99], P = 0.0442), African American race (OR 0.57, 95% CI [0.36-0.90], P = 0.0156) and treatment at the start of the study period (OR 1 for years 2004-2006). HR for single-agent chemotherapy was 0.70 (95% CI [0.50-0.96], P = 0.0288) and 0.48 for multi-agent (95% CI [0.38-0.62], P <0.0001). Overall survival was 86% in those that received chemotherapy vs 65% in those who did not (P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, patients with early-stage squamous cell cancer of the anus who are treated with combination chemoradiation continue to demonstrate better overall survival than those who undergo radiotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna L Huffman
- Allegheny Health Network, Department of Internal Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
| | - Thejus T Jayakrishnan
- Allegheny Health Network, Department of Internal Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Brittany L Vannatter
- Allegheny Health Network, Department of Internal Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Dulabh K Monga
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Gene G Finley
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Medical Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - James T McCormick
- Allegheny Health Network, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Alexander V Kirichenko
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Maccabe TA, Parwaiz I, Longman RJ, Thomas MG, Messenger DE. Outcomes following local excision of early anal squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal and perianal margin. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:689-697. [PMID: 33140913 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is a paucity of data on outcomes from local excision (LE) of early anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCCs). This study aimed to assess survival outcomes according to tumour location, perianal (PAT) or anal canal (ACT), and to determine factors associated with R1 excision and outcomes according to T-category. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with early ASCC treated by LE from 2007 to 2019. Data were collected on baseline demographics, tumour location, staging, excision histology, adjuvant treatment, site and timing of recurrence. The main outcome measures were R1 resection, locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS Of 367 patients treated for ASCC, 39 (10.6%) patients with complete follow-up data underwent LE: 15 ACTs and 24 PATs. R1 resections were obtained in 27 patients (69.2%) and occurred more frequently in ACTs than PATs (93.3% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.006). Eighteen of 27 patients (66.7%) received adjuvant therapy (chemoradiotherapy [n = 11], radiotherapy alone [n = 7]) for R1 excision or re-excision, following which LRR developed in one of 10 (10.0%) patients in the ACT cohort and one of eight (12.5%) patients in the PAT cohort. There was no difference in 5-year LRR-free survival (82.0% vs. 70.1%, P = 0.252), disease-free survival (58.2% vs. 78.4%, P = 0.200) or overall survival (86.2% vs. 95.7%, P = 0.607) between the ACT and PAT cohorts. CONCLUSIONS LE is a feasible treatment option for early ASCCs of the perianal margin but not the anal canal. Acceptable long-term outcomes can still be achieved with adjuvant therapy in the presence of a positive margin. Larger prospective studies to assess LE as a treatment strategy, such as the ACT3 trial, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom A Maccabe
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Iram Parwaiz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Robert J Longman
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael G Thomas
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - David E Messenger
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Ghebre R, Berry-Lawhorn JM, D'Souza G. State of the Science: Screening, Surveillance, and Epidemiology of HPV-Related Malignancies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-12. [PMID: 33830827 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_325319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Oropharyngeal, cervical, vulvar, and anal cancers share a common risk factor of HPV infection. HPV vaccination is currently recommended at age 11 or 12 to prevent new HPV infections for all genders with catch-up vaccination recommened up to age 26. Despite the known effectiveness of HPV vaccination to prevent HPV-related cancer, there is continued low uptake in the United States; only 40% of eligible persons were vaccinated in 2018, though rates are 70% among teenagers. Current American Cancer Society cancer screening guidelines recommend cervical cancer screening, but do not have specific recommendations for screening for other HPV-related cancers. Oropharyngeal cancer precursors have yet to be identified, and there are currently no routine screening tests for oropharyngeal cancer recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society recommend cervical cancer screening for women at average risk up to age 65, and screening guidelines do not currently differ by HPV vaccination status. Primary HPV DNA testing was first approved for cervical cancer screening in 2016 and was shown to be superior for cervical cancer prevention. Vulvar and anal cancer precursors have been identified, but optimal screening remains unclear. Examination of the anal canal and perianus is best performed by trained clinicians using high-resolution anoscopy, and effectiveness of using high-resolution anoscopy to detect and treat anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to prevent cancer is actively being researched. Current multistep approaches to control HPV-related malignancies include HPV vaccination coupled with cervical cancer screening or surveillance for oropharyngeal, vulvar, and anal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahel Ghebre
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - J Michael Berry-Lawhorn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Anal Neoplasia Clinic, Research, and Education Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Gypsyamber D'Souza
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Jethwa KR, Day CN, Sandhyavenu H, Gonuguntla K, Harmsen WS, Breen WG, Routman DM, Garda AE, Hubbard JM, Halfdanarson TR, Neben-Wittich MA, Merrell KW, Hallemeier CL, Haddock MG. Intensity modulated radiotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: A 16-year single institution experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:17-23. [PMID: 33732911 PMCID: PMC7943964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To report long-term efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Materials and methods This was a retrospective review of patients with ASCC who received curative-intent IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy (98%) between 2003 and 2019. Overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported. Acute and late AEs were recorded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. Results 127 patients were included. The median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-69) and 79% of patients were female. 33% of patients had T3-4 disease and 68% had clinically involved pelvic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs).The median patient follow-up was 47 months (IQR: 28-89 months). The estimated 4-year OS, CFS, and PFS were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-89%), 77% (95% CI: 68%-86%), and 78% (95% CI: 70%-86%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidences of LR, LRR, and DM were 3% (95% CI: 1%-9%), 9% (95% CI: 5%-17%), and 10% (95% CI: 6%-18%), respectively. Overall treatment duration greater than 39 days was associated with an increased risk of LRR (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.4-19.5, p = 0.015). The most common grade 3+ acute AEs included hematologic (31%), gastrointestinal (GI) (17%), dermatologic (16%), and pain (15%). Grade 3+ late AEs included: GI (3%), genitourinary (GU) (2%), and pain (1%). Current smokers were more likely to experience grade 3+ acute dermatologic toxicity compared to former or never smokers (34% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions IMRT was associated with favorable toxicity rates and long-term efficacy. These data support the continued utilization of IMRT as the preferred treatment technique for patients with ASCC.
Collapse
Key Words
- 3DCRT, 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy
- 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil
- ACT II, United Kingdom Anal Cancer Trial II
- AE, adverse events
- ASCC, anal canal squamous cell carcinoma
- Anal cancer
- BED, biologically effective dose
- CFS, colostomy-free survival
- CI, confidence interval
- CRT, chemoradiotherapy
- CTCAE v 4.0, common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0
- CTV, clinical target volume
- DM, distant metastasis
- DP-IMRT, dose-painted intensity modulated radiotherapy
- DVH, dose-volume histogram
- G, grade
- GI, gastrointestinal
- GU, genitourinary
- HIV, human immunodeficiency virus
- HR, hazard ratio
- IMRT
- IMRT, intensity modulated radiotherapy
- IQR, interquartile range
- LN, lymph node
- LR, local recurrence
- LRR, locoregional recurrence
- MMC, mitomycin-C
- OS, overall survival
- PFS, progression-free survival
- PTV, planning target volume
- RT, radiotherapy
- RTOG, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Radiation
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Karthik Gonuguntla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Allison E Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Joleen M Hubbard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Kenneth W Merrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Michael G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Rimini M, Franco P, De Bari B, Zampino MG, Vagge S, Frassinetti GL, Arcadipane F, Bacigalupo A, Valgiusti M, Aloi D, Gervaso L, Corvò R, Bartolini G, Gerardi MA, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. The Prognostic Value of the New Combined Hemo-Eosinophil Inflammation Index (HEI Index): A Multicenter Analysis of Anal Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemo-Radiation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:671. [PMID: 33562397 PMCID: PMC7914854 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare tumor, and bio-humoral predictors of response to chemo-radiation (CT-RT) are lacking. We developed a prognostic score system based on laboratory inflammation parameters. We investigated the correlation between baseline clinical and laboratory variables and disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in anal SCC patients treated with CT-RT in five institutions. The bio-humoral parameters of significance were included in a new scoring system, which was tested with other significant variables in a Cox's proportional hazard model. A total of 308 patients was included. We devised a prognostic model by combining baseline hemoglobin level, SII, and eosinophil count: the Hemo-Eosinophils Inflammation (HEI) Index. We stratified patients according to the HEI index into low- and high-risk groups. Median DFS for low-risk patients was not reached, and it was found to be 79.5 months for high-risk cases (Hazard Ratio 3.22; 95% CI: 2.04-5.10; p < 0.0001). Following adjustment for clinical covariates found significant at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis confirmed the HEI index as an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. The HEI index was shown to be a prognostic parameter for DFS and OS in anal cancer patients treated with CT-RT. An external validation of the HEI index is mandatory for its use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Rimini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital Modena, 41000 Modena, Italy;
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Berardino De Bari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.D.B.); (D.A.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Maria Giulia Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20019 Milan, Italy; (M.G.Z.); (L.G.)
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16121 Genova, Italy; (S.V.); (A.B.)
| | - Giovanni Luca Frassinetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori ‘Dino Amadori’–IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (G.L.F.); (M.V.); (G.B.)
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Almalina Bacigalupo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16121 Genova, Italy; (S.V.); (A.B.)
| | - Martina Valgiusti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori ‘Dino Amadori’–IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (G.L.F.); (M.V.); (G.B.)
| | - Deborah Aloi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; (B.D.B.); (D.A.)
| | - Lorenzo Gervaso
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20019 Milan, Italy; (M.G.Z.); (L.G.)
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Health Science Department (DISSAL), University of Genova, 16121 Genova, Italy;
| | - Giulia Bartolini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori ‘Dino Amadori’–IRST, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (G.L.F.); (M.V.); (G.B.)
| | | | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019 Milan, Italy; (S.C.); (A.C.-G.)
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019 Milan, Italy; (S.C.); (A.C.-G.)
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Susko MS, Lazar AA, Wang CCJ, Van Loon K, Feng M, Hope TA, Behr S, Anwar M. Use of advanced PET-volume metrics predicts risk of local recurrence and overall survival in anal cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246535. [PMID: 33539412 PMCID: PMC7861457 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy with the primary treatment for localized disease being concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. Pre-treatment PET/CT is useful for target delineation, with minimal exploration of its use in prognostication. In the post-treatment setting there is growing evidence for advanced PET metrics in assessment of treatment response, and early identification of recurrence essential for successful salvage, however this data is limited to small series. Methods Patient with non-metastatic anal cancer from a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for receipt of pre- and post-treatment PET/CTs. PET data was co-registered with radiation therapy planning CT scans for precise longitudinal assessment of advanced PET metrics including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), for assessment with treatment outcomes. Treatment outcomes included local recurrence (LR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), as defined from the completed radiation therapy to the time of the event. Cox proportional hazard modeling with inverse probability weighting (IPW) using the propensity score based on age, BMI, T-stage, and radiation therapy dose were utilized for assessment of these metrics. Results From 2008 to 2017 there were 72 patients who had pre-treatment PET/CT, 61 (85%) had a single follow up PET/CT, and 35 (49%) had two follow up PET/CTs. The median clinical follow-up time was 25 months (IQR: 13–52) with a median imaging follow up time of 16 months (IQR: 7–29). On pre-treatment PET/CT higher MTV2.5 and TLG were significantly associated with higher risk of local recurrence (HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.06–1.16, p<0.001; and HR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.19, p<0.001), and worse PFS (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.13, p<0.001; and HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03–1.12, p = 0.003) and OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04–1.16, p = 0.001; and HR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04–1.20, p = 0.004). IPW-adjusted pre-treatment PET/CT showed higher MTV2.5 (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02–1.17, p = 0.012) and TLG (HR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.20, p = 0.048) were significantly associated with worse PFS, and post-treatment MTV2.5 was borderline significant (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.35, p = 0.052). Conclusion Advanced PET metrics, including higher MTV2.5 and TLG, in the pre-treatment and post-treatment setting are significantly associated with elevated rates of local recurrence, and worse PFS and OS. This adds to the growing body of literature that PET/CT for patient with ASCC should be considered for prognostication, and additionally is a useful tool for consideration of early salvage or clinical trial of adjuvant therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S. Susko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ann A. Lazar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Chia-Ching Jackie Wang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital–Medical Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Mary Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Tom A. Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Spencer Behr
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Mekhail Anwar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Kim S, Spehner L, Cabel L, Bidard FC, Borg C. [Squamous cell anal carcinoma. What's next ?]. Bull Cancer 2021; 108:80-89. [PMID: 33423780 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Despite its status as a rare disease, the incidence of the squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is surging, especially in its metastatic form. In addition, the prognosis of initially localized diseases has not substantially changed since the 1970s with a recurrence rate of between 25-40 % after the chemoradiotherapy. The updated data from 115 patients included in the Epitopes-HPV01 and Epitopes-HPV02 trials, confirm the modified regimen of DCF (mDCF) as the treatment of choice for patients with advanced SCCA given the rate of sustained remissions and complete molecular responses observed. The carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen may be considered as an option for patients with contraindication to cisplatin or 5-FU. In chemo-refractory patients, the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in monotherapy is limited and only brings benefit to 10-20 % of patients, and its use cannot be generalized in the absence of an association potentiating its effectiveness. In order to better understand the immunological parameters associated with advanced SCCA, an analysis of peripheral immune responses was carried out in the Epitopes-HPV01 and 02 trials. It demonstrated the key role of CD4 Th1 specific responses of telomerase and M-MDSC as main prognostic factors for the therapeutic efficacy of DCF. Numerous combination trials are currently underway or will soon begin in localized SCCA, as well as in the first and second-line in the advanced stage. Finally, the detection of circulating tumor DNA of HPV oncoprotein E6 and E7 (HPVtc), especially by the "digital droplet PCR" technique, is highly sensitive and specific, and can be used in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Kim
- University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Inserm, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT, Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, 25000 Besançon, France; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; Clinical Investigational Center, CIC-1431, 25000 Besançon, France; Oncology Multidisciplinary Group (GERCOR), 75011 Paris, France; French Federation of Digestive Cancerology (FFCD), 21000 Dijon, France.
| | - Laurie Spehner
- University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Inserm, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT, Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, 25000 Besançon, France; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
| | - Luc Cabel
- Curie Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, 75005 Paris, France
| | | | - Christophe Borg
- University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Inserm, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT, Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, 25000 Besançon, France; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; Clinical Investigational Center, CIC-1431, 25000 Besançon, France; Oncology Multidisciplinary Group (GERCOR), 75011 Paris, France; French Federation of Digestive Cancerology (FFCD), 21000 Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
MRI-Based Radiomics Input for Prediction of 2-Year Disease Recurrence in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13020193. [PMID: 33430396 PMCID: PMC7827348 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13020193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Exclusive chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinomas. Identifying novel prognostic factors could help to improve CRT outcomes, notably for locally advanced diseases where relapses still occur in around 35% of patients. In this study, we aim to assess the potential value of a pre-therapeutic MRI radiomic analysis added to standard clinical variables in order to build a logistic regression model predicting 2-year recurrence after CRT. In a population of 82 patients randomly divided in training (n = 54) and testing (n = 28) sets, after selection of optimal variables, a model using two radiomic (FirstOrder_Entropy and GLCM_JointEnergy) and two clinical (tumor size and CRT length) features was able to predict the 2-year recurrence with good performances in the testing set. Radiomic biomarkers provided valuable additional and independent information added to clinical data, and could help contribute to identify high risk patients amenable to treatment intensification with view of personalized medicine. Abstract Purpose: Chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinomas (ASCC). Despite excellent results for T1-2 stages, relapses still occur in around 35% of locally advanced tumors. Recent strategies focus on treatment intensification, but could benefit from a better patient selection. Our goal was to assess the prognostic value of pre-therapeutic MRI radiomics on 2-year disease control (DC). Methods: We retrospectively selected patients with non-metastatic ASCC treated at the CHU Bordeaux and in the French FFCD0904 multicentric trial. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted pre-therapeutic MRI delineated sequences. After random division between training and testing sets on a 2:1 ratio, univariate and multivariate analysis were performed on the training cohort to select optimal features. The correlation with 2-year DC was assessed using logistic regression models, with AUC and accuracy as performance gauges, and the prediction of disease-free survival using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: A total of 82 patients were randomized in the training (n = 54) and testing sets (n = 28). At 2 years, 24 patients (29%) presented relapse. In the training set, two clinical (tumor size and CRT length) and two radiomic features (FirstOrder_Entropy and GLCM_JointEnergy) were associated with disease control in univariate analysis and included in the model. The clinical model was outperformed by the mixed (clinical and radiomic) model in both the training (AUC 0.758 versus 0.825, accuracy of 75.9% versus 87%) and testing (AUC 0.714 versus 0.898, accuracy of 78.6% versus 85.7%) sets, which led to distinctive high and low risk of disease relapse groups (HR 8.60, p = 0.005). Conclusion: A mixed model with two clinical and two radiomic features was predictive of 2-year disease control after CRT and could contribute to identify high risk patients amenable to treatment intensification with view of personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
138
|
Feasibility and Outcome of Routine Use of Concurrent Chemoradiation in HIV-positive Patients With Squamous Cell Anal Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 43:701-708. [PMID: 32694298 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinical concerns about hematologic toxicities in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+ patients with squamous cell anal cancer (SCAC) may lead to de-escalation of treatment intensity. The objective of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes including toxicity following standard concurrent curative-intent chemoradiation for HIV+ and HIV- patients with SCAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Among 97 evaluable patients treated between 2009 and 2016 (median age 52.2 y), 43 (44.3%) were HIV+ and 54 (55.7%) HIV-. The majority of the radiation was delivered using intensity-modulated radiation therapy and chemotherapy consisting primarily (93%) of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Clinical outcomes assessed included toxicity, locoregional control (LRC), distant metastasis (DM), progression-free survival (PFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), overall survival (OS), and cause-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 45 months, HIV+ patients exhibited a trend toward reduced OS compared with HIV- patients (4 y OS 61.2% vs. 78.3%; HR 2.09; 95% CI, 0.97-4.52; P=0.055) on univariable analysis, but HIV status was not significant after adjusting for additional parameters on multivariable analysis. Toxicity rates, LRC, CFS, PFS, freedom from DM, and CSS were similar between the 2 cohorts. On multivariable analysis, tumor size >5 cm impacted all clinical outcomes (trend for LRC) except CFS. Radiation treatment extension beyond 7 days was found to negatively impact LRC and CSS. Male sex was associated with worse CFS. CONCLUSIONS Radiation therapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C chemotherapy is reasonably well-tolerated as curative treatment for HIV+ patients with SCAC, and no significant difference in outcomes was noted relative to HIV- patients.
Collapse
|
139
|
Swinton M, Choudhury A, Kiltie AE, Chung P, Billfalk-Kelly A, James N, Kamran SC, Efstathiou JA. Trimodal Therapy. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
140
|
Yucel S, Kadioglu H, Gural Z, Akgun Z, Saglam EK. Outcomes of patients with anal cancer treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2021; 17:51-55. [PMID: 33723132 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_774_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Aims To evaluate the results of chemoradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of anal canal cancer patients at three institutions that had advanced devices. Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for patients treated with 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin-based chemotherapy and IMRT or VMAT for anal cancer from 2011 to 2013. Complete response (CR) rates, colostomy-free survival (CFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were investigated. Toxicities were evaluated with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0. Results Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The majority of patients had T2 (53.3%) and N0 (40%) disease according to the staging system that was developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer. CR was observed in 14 patients (93%), and the median follow-up was 26 months (13-42 months). The 3-year CFS, DFS, and OS were 86%, 86%, and 88%, respectively. Acute Grade 3 toxicities were observed as 6% of hematological, 26% of gastrointestinal, and 26% of dermatological. Conclusion Early results confirm that IMRT or VMAT for anal cancer treatment reduces acute toxicities while maintaining high control rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serap Yucel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Kadioglu
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medical, Bezmialem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Gural
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zuleyha Akgun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Esra Kaytan Saglam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Bruyere D, Monnien F, Colpart P, Roncarati P, Vuitton L, Hendrick E, Lepinoy A, Luquain A, Pilard C, Lerho T, Molimard C, Maingon P, Arnould L, Bone-Lepinoy MC, Dusserre L, Martin L, Reynders C, Ancion M, Peiffert D, Leroux A, Hubert P, Delhorme JB, Ghnassia JP, Woronoff AS, Delvenne P, Prétet JL, Bosset JF, Peulen O, Mougin C, Valmary-Degano S, Herfs M. Treatment algorithm and prognostic factors for patients with stage I-III carcinoma of the anal canal: a 20-year multicenter study. Mod Pathol 2021; 34:116-130. [PMID: 32728225 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0637-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Despite a growing incidence in developed countries and a recent improved understanding of its pathogenesis, anal cancer management has not evolved over the past decades and drug combination used as first-line regimen still largely depends on clinician preferences. Aiming at paving the way for precision medicine, a large cohort of 372 HIV-negative patients diagnosed over a 20-year time period with locally advanced anal carcinoma was collected and carefully characterized at the clinical, demographic, histopathologic, immunologic, and virologic levels. Both the prognostic relevance of each clinicopathological parameter and the efficacy of different concurrent chemoradiation strategies were determined. Overall, the incidence of anal cancer peaked during the sixth decade (mean: 63.4) and females outnumbered males (ratio: 2.51). After completion of treatment, 95 (25.5%) patients experienced progression of persistent disease or local/distant recurrence and 102 (27.4%) died during the follow-up period (median: 53.8 months). Importantly, uni-multivariate analyses indicated that both negative HPV/p16ink4a status and aberrant p53 expression were far better predictors for reduced progression-free survival than traditional risk factors such as tumor size and nodal status. As for overall survival, the significant influences of age at diagnosis, p16ink4a status, cTNM classification as well as both CD3+ and CD4+ T-cell infiltrations within tumor microenvironment were highlighted. Cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy was superior to both radiotherapy alone and other concurrent chemoradiation therapies in the treatment of HPV-positive tumors. Regarding their HPV-uninfected counterparts, frequent relapses were observed, whatever the treatment regimen administered. Taken together, our findings reveal that current anal cancer management and treatment have reached their limits. A dualistic classification according to HPV/p53 status should be considered with implications for therapy personalization and optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Bruyere
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Franck Monnien
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Prudence Colpart
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Patrick Roncarati
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Lucine Vuitton
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.,EA3181, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LabEx LipSTIC ANR-11-LABX-0021, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Elodie Hendrick
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Alexandra Luquain
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Charlotte Pilard
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Thomas Lerho
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Chloé Molimard
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges-François Leclerc Center, 21000, Dijon, France.,Department of Radiation Oncology, La Pitié Salpêtrière University Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Arnould
- Department of Biology and Pathology of Tumors, Georges-François Leclerc Center, 21000, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Laurent Martin
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - Celia Reynders
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Marie Ancion
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Agnès Leroux
- Department of Pathology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Pascale Hubert
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Jean-Baptiste Delhorme
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67200, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Anne-Sophie Woronoff
- Doubs and Belfort Territory Cancer Registry, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Philippe Delvenne
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium.,Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Prétet
- EA3181, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LabEx LipSTIC ANR-11-LABX-0021, 25000, Besançon, France.,CNR Papillomavirus, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Jean-François Bosset
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Olivier Peulen
- Metastasis Research Laboratory, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium
| | - Christiane Mougin
- EA3181, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LabEx LipSTIC ANR-11-LABX-0021, 25000, Besançon, France.,CNR Papillomavirus, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France
| | - Séverine Valmary-Degano
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.,EA3181, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, LabEx LipSTIC ANR-11-LABX-0021, 25000, Besançon, France.,Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Grenoble-Alps, 38043, Grenoble cedex 9, France
| | - Michael Herfs
- Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Park IJ, Chang G. Survival and Operative Outcomes After Salvage Surgery for Recurrent or Persistent Anal Cancer. Ann Coloproctol 2020; 36:361-373. [PMID: 33486907 PMCID: PMC7837391 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.12.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a relatively rare cancer comprising less than 2.5% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. The standard treatment for anal SCC is primary chemoradiation therapy which can result in complete regression. After successful treatment, the 5-year survival is approximately 80%. However, up to 30% of patients experience recurrent persistent or recurrent disease. The role of surgery in the treatment of anal cancer, therefore, is limited to the management of recurrent or persistent disease with abdominoperineal resection and/or en bloc adjacent organ excision. Salvage surgery after irradiated anal cancer can be technically demanding in terms of acquisition of oncologically safe surgical margins and minimization of postoperative morbidity. In addition, 5-year survival outcomes after salvage resection have been reported to vary from 23% to 69%. Positive resection margins are generally regarded as the important risk factor associated with poor survival outcome. Perineal wound complications are the most common major postoperative morbidity. Because of the challenges of primary wound closure after salvage abdominoperineal resection, myocutaneous flap reconstruction has been performed to reduce the severity of perianal would complications. We, therefore, descriptively reviewed contemporary published evidence describing the treatment and outcomes after salvage surgery for persistent or recurrent anal SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In Ja Park
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul, Korea
| | - George Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
143
|
Silina L, Maksut F, Bernard-Pierrot I, Radvanyi F, Créhange G, Mégnin-Chanet F, Verrelle P. Review of Experimental Studies to Improve Radiotherapy Response in Bladder Cancer: Comments and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:E87. [PMID: 33396795 PMCID: PMC7795454 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer is among the top ten most common cancer types in the world. Around 25% of all cases are muscle-invasive bladder cancer, for which the gold standard treatment in the absence of metastasis is the cystectomy. In recent years, trimodality treatment associating maximal transurethral resection and radiotherapy combined with concurrent chemotherapy is increasingly used as an organ-preserving alternative. However, the use of this treatment is still limited by the lack of biomarkers predicting tumour response and by a lack of targeted radiosensitising drugs that can improve the therapeutic index, especially by limiting side effects such as bladder fibrosis. In order to improve the bladder-preserving treatment, experimental studies addressing these main issues ought to be considered (both in vitro and in vivo studies). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic reviews, we conducted a literature search in PubMed on experimental studies investigating how to improve bladder cancer radiotherapy with different radiosensitising agents using a comprehensive search string. We made comments on experimental model selection, experimental design and results, formulating the gaps of knowledge still existing: such as the lack of reliable predictive biomarkers of tumour response to chemoradiation according to the molecular tumour subtype and lack of efficient radiosensitising agents specifically targeting bladder tumour cells. We provided guidance to improve forthcoming studies, such as taking into account molecular characteristics of the preclinical models and highlighted the value of using patient-derived xenografts as well as syngeneic models. Finally, this review could be a useful tool to set up new radiation-based combined treatments with an improved therapeutic index that is needed for bladder preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Silina
- French League Against Cancer Team, CNRS UMR144, Curie Institute and PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France; (I.B.-P.); (F.R.)
- CNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France; (F.M.); (F.M.-C.)
| | - Fatlinda Maksut
- CNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France; (F.M.); (F.M.-C.)
| | - Isabelle Bernard-Pierrot
- French League Against Cancer Team, CNRS UMR144, Curie Institute and PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France; (I.B.-P.); (F.R.)
| | - François Radvanyi
- French League Against Cancer Team, CNRS UMR144, Curie Institute and PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France; (I.B.-P.); (F.R.)
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Radiation Oncology Department, Curie Institute, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Frédérique Mégnin-Chanet
- CNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France; (F.M.); (F.M.-C.)
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- CNRS UMR 9187, INSERM U1196, Curie Institute, PSL Research University and Paris-Saclay University, Rue H. Becquerel, 91405 Orsay, France; (F.M.); (F.M.-C.)
- Radiation Oncology Department, Curie Institute, 75005 Paris, France;
- Clermont Auvergne University, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Abstract
Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and 89-100% of anal cancers are caused by persistent infections with high-risk (HR) human papillomaviruses (HPV). In HIV-positive patients, anal HPV infection and AIN are very common and these patients have a significantly increased risk for anal cancer. However, a continuous increase in the incidence of anal cancer has also been observed in the general population in recent decades. AIN can clinically present in diverse manners. In HIV-positive patients AIN can be hidden in condylomas. Approximately 3-14% of high-grade AIN progress to anal cancer within 5 years. Therefore, screening examinations should be offered to patients with an increased risk for anal cancer. The treatment options for AIN are similar to those for condylomas. HIV-positive patients with controlled immune status and HIV-negative patients with anal cancer respond comparably well to combined radiochemotherapy. A German-language S3 guideline for anal cancer will be available in 2020. In HIV-positive patients over 26 years of age, HPV vaccination showed no effect in a controlled phase‑3 study. To prevent AIN and anal cancer in the future, HPV vaccination rates need to be increased in HPV-naïve girls and boys.
Collapse
|
145
|
Bogach J, Fenech D, Chu W, Ashamalla S, Ung Y, Taggar AS, Chan KKW, Earle CC, Wong CS. Salvage surgery for locally recurrent anal cancer after intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020; 26:100287. [PMID: 33360327 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chemoradiation (CRT) with intensity modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) has become the standard for anal cancer. In patients who fail this treatment modality, salvage surgery with abdominal perineal resection can result in long term cancer control. We aimed to evaluate a single centre's experience of salvage surgery for local recurrence since the introduction of IMRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent definitive CRT for anal carcinoma at a single tertiary referral center since IMRT became standard in 2009. Patients with recurrent or persistent disease after treatment who underwent salvage surgery were included. Details of CRT, salvage surgery and surgical complications, patterns of recurrence after surgery, and survival data were collected and described. RESULTS Between 2009-2018, 181 patients underwent definitive treatment using IMRT for anal carcinoma. Of 26 patients who had locoregional recurrent or persistent disease, 14 underwent salvage surgery. Nine had multi-visceral resection and 8 required autologous flap reconstruction. Twelve patients had resections with clear margins and 2 had microscopic positive margins. Twelve patients (86%) experienced post-operative complications, and eight (57%) had perineal wound complications. After salvage, four patients (29%) recurred locally. None of the 8 patients with rpT2 disease recurred. After salvage surgery, 5-year disease free survival was 68.4% and 5-year overall survival was 75%. CONCLUSION Following IMRT based chemoradiation, salvage surgery has high rates of surgical complications; however disease free and overall survival results are excellent particularly for small recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Bogach
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Darlene Fenech
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shady Ashamalla
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yee Ung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amandeep S Taggar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Craig C Earle
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - C Shun Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Gouvas N, Gourtsoyianni S, Kalogeridi MA, Sougklakos J, Vini L, Xynos E. Hellenic society of medical oncology (HESMO) guidelines for the management of anal cancer. Updates Surg 2020; 73:7-21. [PMID: 33231836 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00923-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Despite considerable improvement in the management of anal cancer, there is a great deal of variation in the outcomes among European countries, and in particular among different hospital centres in Greece and Cyprus. The aim was to elaborate a consensus on the multidisciplinary management of anal cancer, based on European guidelines (European Society of Medical Oncologists-ESMO), considering local special characteristics of our healthcare system. Following discussion and online communication among members of an executive team, a consensus was developed. Guidelines are proposed along with algorithms of diagnosis and treatment. The importance of centralisation, care by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) and adherence to guidelines are emphasised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Gouvas
- Colorectal Surgeon, Nicosia General Hospital, Medical School, Shacolas Educational Centre for Clinical Medicine, University of Cyprus, Palaios Dromos Lefkosias Lemesou No.215/6Aglantzia, 2029, Nicosia, Cyprus.
| | - Sophia Gourtsoyianni
- Abdominal Radiologist, "Aretaieion" Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - John Sougklakos
- Medical Oncologist, University Hospital of Heraklion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Louisa Vini
- Clinical Oncologist/Radiotherapist, "Iatriko" Hopsital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Xynos
- Colorectal Surgeon, Creta Inter-Clinic Hopsital, Heraklion, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
147
|
Bone Marrow-Sparing IMRT in Anal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemo-Radiation: Results of the First Phase of a Prospective Phase II Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113306. [PMID: 33182445 PMCID: PMC7696305 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hematological toxicity may be a consistent issue in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation, with a potentially detrimental effect on clinical outcomes and patient compliance to treatment. Chemotherapy is the most important trigger, since it induces myelosuppression, but radiation dose delivered to the hematopoietically active bone marrow (BM) also plays an important role. Active bone marrow can be identified using functional imaging with 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) and selectively spared during radiation delivery via intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). We investigated, within a prospective phase II trial, the potential effectiveness of targeted avoidance of active BM comprised within pelvic bones in reducing the acute hematologic toxicity profile of anal cancer patients undergoing concomitant chemo-radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. The results of the first step of the study fulfilled the criteria to define BM-sparing IMRT as “promising” and to continue with the second step of the phase II trial. Abstract Purpose: to investigate the role of selective avoidance of hematopoietically active BM within the pelvis, as defined with 18FDG-PET, employing a targeted IMRT approach, to reduce acute hematologic toxicity (HT) profile in anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiation. Methods: a one-armed two-stage Simon’s design was selected to test the hypothesis that BM-sparing approach would improve by 20% the rate of G0–G2 (vs. G3–G4) HT, from 42% of RTOG 0529 historical data to 62% (α = 0.05 and the β = 0.20). At the first stage, among 21 enrolled patients, at least 9 should report G0–G2 acute HT to further proceed with the trial. We employed 18FDG-PET to identify active BM within the pelvis. Acute HT was assessed via weekly blood counts and scored as per the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Effects version 4.0. Results: from December 2017 to October 2019, 21 patients were enrolled. Maximum observed acute HT comprised 9% rate of ≥G3 leukopenia and 5% rate of ≥G3 neutropenia and anemia. Overall, only 4 out of 21 treated patients (19%) experienced ≥G3 acute HT. Conversely, 17 patients (81%) experienced G0–G2 events, way above the threshold set by the trial design. Conclusion: 18FDG-PET-guided BM-sparing IMRT was able to reduce acute HT in anal cancer patients treated with concomitant chemo-radiation. These results prompted us to conclude the second part of this prospective phase II trial.
Collapse
|
148
|
Prognostic implications of advancing nodal stage in anal cancer: evaluating AJCC 8 staging changes through an NCDB analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:2099-2104. [PMID: 32691133 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03688-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the AJCC8, nodal staging for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) has been changed to a binary format (N0 or N+), and overall stage groups have been redefined. We evaluated the effect of AJCC8 nodal stage by T stage and hypothesized similar survival regardless of the extent of AJCC7-defined nodal involvement. METHODS The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify patients' SCCA. Overall survival (OS) for each T stage within the AJCC7 was compared with increasing nodal stage, as well as for the new AJCC8 overall stage groups and subsets. RESULTS There were 6738 patients analyzed. The 5-year OS by AJCC8 stage was I = 81%, IIA = 78%, IIB = 64%, IIIA = 69%, IIIB = 59%, IIIC = 57% (p < 0.0001). In AJCC8 IIIA (T1-2, N+), there was no difference in 5-year OS between T1N+ or T2N+ patients (70.3% vs 68.6%, p = 0.09). A significant survival difference was demonstrated between AJCC7 N1, N2, and N3 for patients with either T1 (p = 0.0047) or T2 (p = 0.0389) disease. In the AJCC 8 IIIC (T3-4, N+) group, there was no difference in 5-year OS between T3N+ and T4N+ (58% vs 55%, p = 0.81). There was no OS difference between AJCC7 N1-3 for either T3 (p = 0.19) or T4 (0.35) disease. CONCLUSION For earlier T stages, advancing nodal stage per AJCC7 retains prognostic implications for OS. Survival in AJCC8 stage IIIA is heterogeneous and is largely driven by burden of nodal disease in patients with T1-2 disease.
Collapse
|
149
|
Glynne-Jones R, Meadows HM, Lopes A, Muirhead R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Adams R. Impact of compliance to chemoradiation on long-term outcomes in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: results of a post hoc analysis from the randomised phase III ACT II trial. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1376-1385. [PMID: 32619648 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent chemoradiation is standard-of-care for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Poor compliance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy treatment interruptions and unplanned breaks may impact adversely on long-term outcomes. METHODS The ACT II trial recruited 940 patients with localised squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, and assigned patients to mitomycin (week 1) or cisplatin (weeks 1 and 5), with fluorouracil (weeks 1 and 5) and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 38 days). This post hoc analysis examined the association between baseline factors (age, gender, site, T stage and N stage), and compliance to treatment (radiotherapy and chemotherapy), and their effects on locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Compliance was categorised into groups. Radiotherapy: six groups according to total dose and overall treatment time (OTT). Chemotherapy: three groups (A = per-protocol; B = dose reduction or delay; C = omitted). RESULTS A total of 931/940 patients were assessable for radiotherapy and 936 for chemotherapy compliance. Baseline glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min and cisplatin were significantly associated with poor week 5 compliance to chemotherapy (P = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively). Omission of week 5 chemotherapy was associated with significantly worse locoregional failure-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.53 (1.33-4.82) P = 0.005]. Dose reductions/delays or omission of week 5 chemotherapy were associated with significantly worse PFS {HR: 1.56 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-2.06], P = 0.002 and HR: 2.39 (95% CI: 1.44-3.98), P = 0.001, respectively} and OS [HR: 1.92 (95% CI: 1.41-2.63), P < 0.001 and HR: 2.88 (95% CI: 1.63-5.08), P < 0.001, respectively]. Receiving the target radiotherapy dose in >42 days is associated with worse PFS and OS [HR: 1.72 (95% CI: 1.17-2.54), P =0.006]. CONCLUSION Poor compliance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with worse locoregional failure-free survival, PFS and OS. Treatment interruptions should be minimised, and OTT and total dose maintained. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER ISRCTN 26715889.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Glynne-Jones
- Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - H M Meadows
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | - A Lopes
- Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, UCL, London, UK
| | - R Muirhead
- Oxford Cancer & Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - R Adams
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Abstract
A 61-year-old woman with ongoing tobacco use was referred to a colorectal surgery clinic after a screening colonoscopy found irregular lesions at the dentate line with biopsies revealing a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. She reported scant bleeding and irregular bowel function, but no incontinence. She has a history of abnormal Papanicolaou tests, but has since undergone a hysterectomy and has no history of immunosuppressive treatment or HIV. She was taken for an examination under anesthesia that revealing a 2.5-cm mass in the anal canal and was biopsied. Pathological examination confirmed anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) with strongly positive p16 staining. A CT of her chest, abdomen, and pelvis did not reveal metastatic disease. She was referred to medical and radiation oncology for radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C). Subsequent office examination with anoscopy 3 months after treatment demonstrated an anterior scar without residual tumor.
Collapse
|