Effect of Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Carboplatin on Survival in Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Association of Genetic Testing Results with Mortality Among Women with Breast Cancer or Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer and ovarian cancer patients increasingly undergo germline genetic testing. However, little is known about cancer-specific mortality among carriers of a pathogenic variant (PV) in BRCA1/2 or other genes in a population-based setting.

METHODS

Georgia and California Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry records were linked to clinical genetic testing results. Women were included who had stages I-IV breast cancer or ovarian cancer diagnosed in 2013-2017; received chemotherapy; and linked to genetic testing results. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of genetic results with cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

22,495 breast and 4,320 ovarian cancer patients were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 41 months. PVs were present in 12.7% of breast cancer patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive, HER2-negative cancer, 9.8% with HER2-positive cancer, 16.8% with triple-negative breast cancer and 17.2% with ovarian cancer. Among triple-negative breast cancer patients, cancer-specific mortality was lower with BRCA1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.69) and BRCA2 PVs (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41-0.89), and equivalent with PVs in other genes (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.37-1.13), versus non-carriers. Among ovarian cancer patients, cancer-specific mortality was lower with PVs in BRCA2 (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.25-0.49) and genes other than BRCA1/2 (HR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.32-0.69). No PV was associated with higher cancer-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Among breast cancer and ovarian cancer patients treated with chemotherapy in the community, BRCA1/2 and other gene PV carriers had equivalent or lower short-term cancer-specific mortality than non-carriers. These results may reassure newly diagnosed patients and longer follow-up is ongoing.

Estrogen receptor-low breast cancer: Biology chaos and treatment paradox

Hormone receptor testing mainly serves the purpose of guiding treatment choices for breast cancer patients. Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancers show significant response to endocrine therapy. However, the methods to define ER status and eligibility for treatment remain controversial. Despite recent guidelines considering staining ≥1% of tumor nuclei by immunohistology as ER‐positive, it has raised concerns on the benefit of endocrine therapy for tumors with ER 1%‐10% expression, termed “ER‐low positive”. This subgroup accounts for 3% to 9% of all patients and is likely to have unique molecular features, and therefore distinct therapeutic response to endocrine therapy compared with ER‐high positive tumors. The latest guidelines did not provide detailed descriptions for those patients, resulting in inconsistent treatment strategies. Consequently, we aimed to resolve this dilemma comprehensively. This review discusses molecular traits and recent ER‐low positive breast cancer innovations, highlighting molecular‐targeted treatment rather than traditional unified endocrine therapy for future basic and clinical research.

EVA1A Plays an Important Role by Regulating Autophagy in Physiological and Pathological Processes

Eva-1 homolog A (EVA1A) is regarded as TMEM166 (transmembrane protein 166) or FAM176A (family with sequence similarity 176) and a lysosome and endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein involved in regulating autophagy and apoptosis. EVA1A regulates embryonic neurogenesis, cardiac remodeling, islet alpha-cell functions, acute liver failure, and hepatitis B virus replication. However, the related mechanisms are not fully clear. Autophagy is a process in which cells transfer pathogens, abnormal proteins and organelles to lysosomes for degradation. It plays an important role in various physiological and pathological processes, including cancer, aging, neurodegeneration, infection, heart disease, development, cell differentiation and nutritional starvation. Recently, there are many studies on the important role of EVA1A in many physiological and pathological processes by regulating autophagy. However, the related molecular mechanisms need further study. Therefore, we summarize the above-mentioned researches about the role of EVA1A in physiological and pathological processes through regulating autophagy in order to provide theoretical basis for future researches.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer is still the most common cancer worldwide. But the way breast cancer is viewed has changed drastically since its molecular hallmarks were extensively characterised, now including immunohistochemical markers (eg, ER, PR, HER2 [ERBB2], and proliferation marker protein Ki-67 [MKI67]), genomic markers (eg, BRCA1, BRCA2, and PIK3CA), and immunomarkers (eg, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1). New biomarker combinations are the basis for increasingly complex diagnostic algorithms. Neoadjuvant combination therapy, often including targeted agents, is a standard of care (especially in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer), and the basis for de-escalation of surgery in the breast and axilla and for risk-adapted post-neoadjuvant strategies. Radiotherapy remains an important cornerstone of breast cancer therapy, but de-escalation schemes have become the standard of care. ER-positive tumours are treated with 5-10 years of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, based on an individual risk assessment. For metastatic breast cancer, standard therapy options include targeted approaches such as CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, and anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy, depending on tumour type and molecular profile. This range of treatment options reflects the complexity of breast cancer therapy today.

Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-Oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Consensus and Recommendations for the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background: The management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is challenging with several controversies and unmet needs. During the 12th Breast-Gynaecological & Immuno-oncology International Cancer Conference (BGICC) Egypt, 2020, a panel of 35 breast cancer experts from 13 countries voted on consensus guidelines for the clinical management of TNBC. The consensus was subsequently updated based on the most recent data evolved lately. Methods: A consensus conference approach adapted from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) was utilized. The panellists voted anonymously on each question, and a consensus was achieved when ≥75% of voters selected an answer. The final consensus was later circulated to the panellists for critical revision of important intellectual content. Results and conclusion: These recommendations represent the available clinical evidence and expert opinion when evidence is scarce. The percentage of the consensus votes, levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are presented for each statement. The consensus covered all the aspects of TNBC management starting from defining TNBC to the management of metastatic disease and highlighted the rapidly evolving landscape in this field. Consensus was reached in 70% of the statements (35/50). In addition, areas of warranted research were identified to guide future prospective clinical trials.

Cyclophosphamide-free Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Protection in Young Women with Breast Cancer: a Randomized Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced premature menopause leads to some consequences, including infertility. We initiated this randomized phase 3 trial to determine whether a cyclophosphamide-free adjuvant chemotherapy regimen would increase the likelihood of menses resumption and improve survival outcomes.

METHODS

Young women with operable ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer after definitive surgery were randomized to receive adjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel (EC-wP) or epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel (EP-wP). All patients received at least 5-year adjuvant endocrine therapy after chemotherapy. Two coprimary endpoints were the rate of menstrual resumption at 12 months after chemotherapy and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01026116). All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Between Jan 2011 and Dec 2016, 521 patients (median age = 34 years; interquartile range = 31-38 years) were enrolled, with 261 in the EC-wP group and 260 in the EP-wP group. The rate of menstrual resumption at 12 months after chemotherapy was 48.3% in EC-wP (95% confidence interval [CI] = 42.2% to 54.3%) and 63.1% in EP-wP (95% CI = 57.2% to 68.9%), with an absolute difference of 14.8% (95% CI = 6.37% to 23.2%, P < 0.001). The post-hoc exploratory analysis by patient-reported outcome questionnaires indicated that pregnancy might occur in fewer women in the EC-wP group than in the EP-wP group. At a median follow-up of 62 months, the 5-year DFS was 78.3% (95% CI = 72.2% to 83.3%) in EC-wP and 84.7% (95% CI = 79.3% to 88.8%) in EP-wP (stratified log-rank P = 0.07). The safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of relevant drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The cyclophosphamide-free chemotherapy regimen might be associated with a higher probability of menses resumption.

Emerging Therapeutics for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 10-15% of all breast cancers and it is associated with a poor prognosis. However, recent new effective treatment strategies have improved its outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the emerging therapeutics for TNBC, describing both previously approved therapies that are currently being repurposed, as well as new target therapies that may improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging therapies are forthcoming in TNBC's treatment landscape, including new post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies, PARP inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Combination of different therapies such as AKT/PI3K/mTOR-inhibitors, other immunotherapeutic agents, CDK-inhibitors, antiandrogens, antiangiogenics, and histone deacetylase inhibitors is under clinical investigation. The treatment landscape for TNBC is gradually evolving towards a more personalized approach with promising expectations.

Concordance index: Surrogacy of progression-free survival for overall survival

In oncology clinical trials, the primary endpoint is often time to an event of clinical interest, e.g., time to disease progression or time to death. As a result, progression-free survival (PFS: the time from initiation of treatment till disease progression or death whichever occurs first) and overall survival (OS: the time from initiation of treatment till death) are the focus of statistical analysis in comparison of two treatment arms. It is often argued that PFS may serve as a surrogate endpoint for OS, while the validity of such surrogacy is still under debates in different types of cancer. In practice, one may observe a significant difference in PFS but no significant difference in OS; or vice versa. We provide a concordance index (C-index) to measure the degree of concordance between PFS and OS, and elaborate on the PFS vs OS discrepancies using the C-index using simulation studies and real trial analysis.

Disseminated cancer cells in breast cancer: Mechanism of dissemination and dormancy and emerging insights on therapeutic opportunities

Metastatic spread in breast cancer patients is the major driver of cancer-related deaths. A unique subset of cells disseminated from pre-invasive or primary tumor lesions are recognized as the main seeds for metastatic outgrowth. Disseminated cancer cells (DCCs) can migrate to distant organs and settle in a dormant state for a prolonged period until they emerge to overt metastases. Understanding the biology of breast cancer cells dissemination, dormancy and reactivation to form overt metastases has become an important focus. In this review, we discuss the recent advancements of molecular pathways involving breast cancer cell dissemination, role of chemokine-chemokine receptor networks in DCCs migration, DCCs phenotypic heterogeneity and unique genes signatures in tumor dormancy, microenvironmental regulation and specific niches that favors DCCs homing and dormancy. In addition, we also discuss recent findings relating to the role of immune response on DCC dissemination and dormancy. With recent advances in the field of immunotherapy/targeted therapy and its beneficial effects in cancer treatment, this review will focus on their impact on DCCs, reversal of stemness, tumor dormancy and metastatic relapse.

The mitotic checkpoint is a targetable vulnerability of carboplatin-resistant triple negative breast cancers

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype, lacking effective therapy. Many TNBCs show remarkable response to carboplatin-based chemotherapy, but often develop resistance over time. With increasing use of carboplatin in the clinic, there is a pressing need to identify vulnerabilities of carboplatin-resistant tumors. In this study, we generated carboplatin-resistant TNBC MDA-MB-468 cell line and patient derived TNBC xenograft models. Mass spectrometry-based proteome profiling demonstrated that carboplatin resistance in TNBC is linked to drastic metabolism rewiring and upregulation of anti-oxidative response that supports cell replication by maintaining low levels of DNA damage in the presence of carboplatin. Carboplatin-resistant cells also exhibited dysregulation of the mitotic checkpoint. A kinome shRNA screen revealed that carboplatin-resistant cells are vulnerable to the depletion of the mitotic checkpoint regulators, whereas the checkpoint kinases CHEK1 and WEE1 are indispensable for the survival of carboplatin-resistant cells in the presence of carboplatin. We confirmed that pharmacological inhibition of CHEK1 by prexasertib in the presence of carboplatin is well tolerated by mice and suppresses the growth of carboplatin-resistant TNBC xenografts. Thus, abrogation of the mitotic checkpoint by CHEK1 inhibition re-sensitizes carboplatin-resistant TNBCs to carboplatin and represents a potential strategy for the treatment of carboplatin-resistant TNBCs.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options.

RESULTS

A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With Chemotherapy

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15% to 20% of all invasive breast carcinomas and is defined by the lack of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Although TNBC is characterized by high rates of disease recurrence and worse survival, it is significantly more sensitive to chemotherapy as compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Accordingly, despite great efforts in the genomic characterization of TNBC, chemotherapy still represents the cornerstone of treatment. For the majority of patients with early-stage TNBC, sequential anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents the standard therapeutic approach, with pathological complete response that strongly correlates with long-term survival outcomes. However, some issues about the optimal neoadjuvant regimen, as well as the effective role of chemotherapy in patients with residual disease after NACT, are still debated. Herein, we will review the current evidences that guide the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage TNBC. Furthermore, we will discuss current controversies, including the incorporation of platinum compounds to the neoadjuvant backbone and the optimal treatment for patients with residual disease after NACT. Lastly, we will outline potential future directions that can guide treatment escalation and de-escalation, as well as the development of new therapies. In our view, the application of multi-omics technologies, liquid biopsy assays, and machine learning algorithms are strongly warranted to pave the way toward personalized anticancer treatment for early-stage TNBC.