Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial

Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT

Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) accurately identifies nodal metastasis of early breast cancer, but it is not clear whether further nodal dissection affects survival.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on survival of patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis of breast cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial, a phase 3 noninferiority trial conducted at 115 sites and enrolling patients from May 1999 to December 2004. Patients were women with clinical T1-T2 invasive breast cancer, no palpable adenopathy, and 1 to 2 SLNs containing metastases identified by frozen section, touch preparation, or hematoxylin-eosin staining on permanent section. Targeted enrollment was 1900 women with final analysis after 500 deaths, but the trial closed early because mortality rate was lower than expected.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent lumpectomy and tangential whole-breast irradiation. Those with SLN metastases identified by SLND were randomized to undergo ALND or no further axillary treatment. Those randomized to ALND underwent dissection of 10 or more nodes. Systemic therapy was at the discretion of the treating physician.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival was the primary end point, with a noninferiority margin of a 1-sided hazard ratio of less than 1.3 indicating that SLND alone is noninferior to ALND. Disease-free survival was a secondary end point.

RESULTS

Clinical and tumor characteristics were similar between 445 patients randomized to ALND and 446 randomized to SLND alone. However, the median number of nodes removed was 17 with ALND and 2 with SLND alone. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years (last follow-up, March 4, 2010), 5-year overall survival was 91.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.1%-94.5%) with ALND and 92.5% (95% CI, 90.0%-95.1%) with SLND alone; 5-year disease-free survival was 82.2% (95% CI, 78.3%-86.3%) with ALND and 83.9% (95% CI, 80.2%-87.9%) with SLND alone. The hazard ratio for treatment-related overall survival was 0.79 (90% CI, 0.56-1.11) without adjustment and 0.87 (90% CI, 0.62-1.23) after adjusting for age and adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with limited SLN metastatic breast cancer treated with breast conservation and systemic therapy, the use of SLND alone compared with ALND did not result in inferior survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003855.

[Surgery for invasive breast cancer]

As most solid tumors, surgery is often the first step of the multidisciplinary management for breast cancers. Although mastectomy and axillar lymphadenectomy still have indications, conservative treatment and sentinel node detection are commonly used. Thanks to induction chemotherapy and oncoplastic techniques, surgery is conservative in most cases, even for important tumors without overall survival prejudice. There is no consensus about resection margins status but a limit of 2 to 3 mm seems to be reasonable while oncoplastic surgery allows large resection and good cosmetic outcomes. In this overview, we present the state of the art for breast cancer surgery including conservative and radical treatments, axillar lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node detection, margins status, oncoplastic techniques.

Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has eliminated the need for axillary dissection (ALND) in patients whose sentinel node (SN) is tumor-free. However, completion ALND for patients with tumor-involved SNs remains the standard to achieve locoregional control. Few studies have examined the outcome of patients who do not undergo ALND for positive SNs. We now report local and regional recurrence information from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial.

METHODS

American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 was a prospective trial examining survival of patients with SN metastases detected by standard H and E, who were randomized to undergo ALND after SLND versus SLND alone without specific axillary treatment. Locoregional recurrence was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 446 patients randomized to SLND alone and 445 to SLND + ALND. Patients in the 2 groups were similar with respect to age, Bloom-Richardson score, estrogen receptor status, use of adjuvant systemic therapy, tumor type, T stage, and tumor size. Patients randomized to SLND + ALND had a median of 17 axillary nodes removed compared with a median of only 2 SN removed with SLND alone (P < 0.001). ALND also removed more positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001). At a median follow-up time of 6.3 years, there were no statistically significant differences in local recurrence (P = 0.11) or regional recurrence (P = 0.45) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the potential for residual axillary disease after SLND, SLND without ALND can offer excellent regional control and may be reasonable management for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant systemic therapy.

Race and ethnicity and breast cancer outcomes in an underinsured population

BACKGROUND

The disparity in breast cancer mortality between African American women and non-Hispanic white women has been the subject of increased scrutiny. Few studies have addressed these differences in the setting of equal access to health care. We compared the breast cancer outcomes of underinsured African American and non-Hispanic white patients who were treated at a single institution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of medical records for breast cancer patients who were treated at Wishard Memorial Hospital from January 1, 1997, to February 28, 2006. A total of 574 patients (259 non-Hispanic whites and 315 African Americans) were evaluated. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for competing risks was performed. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Sociodemographic characteristics were similar in the two groups, and both racial groups were equally unlikely to have undergone screening mammography during the 2 years before diagnosis. Most (84%) of the patients were underinsured. The median time from diagnosis to operation, receipt of adequate surgery, and use of all types of adjuvant therapy were similar in the two groups. Median follow-up was 80.3 months for non-Hispanic whites and 77.9 months for African Americans. After accounting for the effect of comorbidities, African American race was statistically significantly associated with breast cancer-specific mortality (African Americans vs non-Hispanic whites: 26.0% vs 17.5%, P = .028; hazard ratio [HR] of death = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 2.55). Adjustment for age at diagnosis, clinical stage, and hormone receptor status attenuated the effect, and the effect of race on breast cancer-specific survival was no longer statistically significant (HR of death from breast cancer = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.89 to 2.30). After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, the hazard ratio for race was further attenuated (HR = 1.26; 95% CI = 0.79 to 2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In this underinsured population, African American patients had poorer breast cancer-specific survival than non-Hispanic white patients. After adjustment for clinical and sociodemographic factors, the effect of race on survival was no longer statistically significant.

Variation in 'standard care' for breast cancer across Europe: a EUROCARE-3 high resolution study

On a population-based sample of 13,500 European breast cancer patients mostly diagnosed in 1996-1998 and archived by 26 cancer registries, we used logistic regression to estimate odds of conservative surgery plus radiotherapy (BCS+RT) versus other surgery, in T1N0M0 cases by country, adjusted for age and tumour size. We also examined: BCS+RT in relation to total national expenditure on health (TNEH); chemotherapy use in N+ patients; tamoxifen use in oestrogen-positive patients; and whether 10 nodes were examined in lymphadenectomies. Stage, diagnostic examinations and treatments were obtained from clinical records. T1N0M0 cases were 33.0% of the total. 55.0% of T1N0M0 received BCS+RT, range 9.0% (Estonia) to 78.0% (France). Compared to France, odds of BCS+RT were lower in all other countries, even after adjusting for covariates. Women of 70-99 years had 67% lower odds of BCS+RT than women of 15-39 years. BCS+RT was 20% in low TNEH, 58% in medium TNEH, and 64% in high TNEH countries. Chemotherapy was given to 63.0% of N+ and 90.7% of premenopausal N+ (15-49 years), with marked variation by country, mainly in post-menopause (50-99 years). Hormonal therapy was given to 55.5% of oestrogen-positive cases, 44.6% at 15-49 years and 58.8% at 50-99 years; with marked variation across countries especially in premenopause. The variation in breast cancer care across Europe prior to the development of European guidelines was striking; older women received BCS+RT much less than younger women; and adherence to 'standard care' varied even among countries with medium/high TNEH, suggesting sub-optimal resource allocation.

The half century of clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast And Bowel Project

The supplanting of radical mastectomy by simple mastectomy and then by lumpectomy plus radiation, the use of adjuvant therapy to alter the natural course of breast and colorectal cancer, the use of tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer, and the dramatic improvement in survival demonstrated with the use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive breast cancer are all the direct results of research that has been carried out over the past 50 years by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). This National Cancer Institute-supported clinical cooperative trials group based in Pittsburgh, PA, currently has 200 member institutions and 700 satellite centers located throughout the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico, and Ireland. The NSABP's mandate is to conduct large randomized phase III trials to evaluate therapies designed to improve the treatment and prevention of breast and colorectal cancer. Over the past half century, the NSABP has entered more than 150,000 patients and participants into clinical studies that have changed the treatment of colorectal cancer and have revolutionized the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Sentinel Node Mapping for Breast Cancer: The Operative Experience of a Breast Surgeon in a Rural Community

Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become an accepted procedure for staging the axilla in early stage breast cancer. Our objectives were to review our practice of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in breast cancer, to determine the impact of frozen section (FS) analysis of the SLN on patient management, and to compare our results to national data. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of our patients with breast cancer who underwent SLN mapping with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) between 1999 and 2006. During this period, 478 patients were treated for breast cancer, with 227 patients undergoing SLN mapping. The SLN was identified in 201 patients, with a positive SLN found in 52 patients (25.9%). There was a discrepancy between the intraoperative analysis (FS/touch prep) and final pathology in 20 patients (11.3%). Nineteen of those patients had a negative FS with positive final pathology. Six of these patients underwent completion ALND. One patient had a false-positive FS with a negative ALND. No axillary recurrences were observed. Eight patients (3.5%) developed postoperative complications. Our practice has been to use intraoperative evaluation of the SLN to reduce the number of patients requiring a secondary ALND. In our study, six patients returned to the operating room for a completion ALND. Our complication rate and axillary recurrence rates were similar to national data.

Sentinel node positive breast cancer patients who do not undergo axillary dissection: are they different?

BACKGROUND

Little data address outcome in patients with sentinel lymph node (SN) metastases without completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND). This study was designed to assess locoregional recurrence in patients with positive SNs who did not undergo CALND.

METHODS

An IRB-approved, retrospective chart review was conducted on breast cancer patients with a positive SN. Follow-up information on outcomes was obtained via mailed questionnaires and chart review. Comparative analyses were performed between patients who did and did not undergo CALND after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy.

RESULTS

From November 1998 to June 2004, 625 breast cancer patients had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. One-hundred and eighteen patients with < or = 0.2 mm nodal metastases (N0i+) were excluded from the study. Of the remaining 507 patients, 421 underwent CALND and 86 did not. In comparison to patients who had CALND, patients who did not undergo CALND had smaller primary tumors (2 vs 2.6 cm, P = .0007) and were more likely to have a single positive sentinel node (92% vs 77%, P = .002). The metastasis size of the sentinel node was smaller compared to patients who underwent axillary dissection (1.7 vs 6.4 mm, P < .0001). Mean predicted probability of nonsentinel node metastasis in patients who did not undergo CALND was 20% compared to 47% in patients who did (P < .0001). During a median follow-up of 30 months, there were no axillary recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm that patients who have a positive sentinel node biopsy and do not undergo CALND have a lower risk profile for axillary disease. In this lower risk subset, axillary treatment may not be necessary.

The incidence of arm edema in women with breast cancer randomized on the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project study B-04 to radical mastectomy versus total mastectomy and radiotherapy versus total mastectomy alone

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and factors associated with the development of arm edema in women who participated in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) study B-04.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1971 and 1974, the NSABP protocol B-04 randomized 1,665 eligible patients with resectable breast cancer to either (1) the Halstead-type radical mastectomy; (2) total mastectomy and radiotherapy to the chest wall, axilla, supraclavicular region, and internal mammary nodes if by clinical examination axillary nodes were involved by tumor; and (3) for patients with a clinically uninvolved axilla, a third arm, total mastectomy alone. Measurements of the ipsilateral and contralateral arm circumferences were to be performed every 3 months.

RESULTS

There was at least one recorded measurement of arm circumferences for 1,457 patients (87.5% of eligible patients). There were 674 women (46.3%) who experienced arm edema at some point during the period of follow-up until February 1976. For radical mastectomy patients, total mastectomy and radiotherapy patients, and total mastectomy patients alone, arm edema was recorded at least once in 58.1%, 38.2%, and 39.1% of patients, respectively (p<.001) and at last recorded measurement in 30.7%, 14.8%, and 15.5%, respectively (p=or<.001). Increasing body mass index (BMI) also showed a statistically significant correlation with arm edema at any time (p=.001) and at last assessment (p=.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo mastectomy, including those whose treatment plans do not include axillary dissection or postoperative radiotherapy, suffer an appreciable incidence of arm edema.

Review of breast cancer clinical trials conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) is a clinical trials cooperative group funded by the National Cancer Institute that has been responsible for the majority of prospective, randomized studies that have defined standards of breast cancer care in the United States during the past 4 decades. This article summarizes the design of and findings from a selection of their landmark studies. Results from their many successfully completed trials have been reported as subset analyses, pooled analyses, and retrospective studies. This article focuses on presenting the study designs, aims, and primary endpoint results of these studies.

Indications for mediastinoscopy and comparison of lymph node dissections in candidates for lung cancer surgery

A prospective phase II study of indications for surgery, using video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) to detect mediastinal lymph node metastasis was conducted in patients with resectable primary lung cancer of clinical stages I-IIIA. According to the indication criteria for VAM, Group A patients had primary tumor resection and lymph node sampling without VAM. Patients without detected metastasis by VAM underwent thoracotomy and systematic lymph node dissection (Group B). Cases with mediastinal lymph node involvement confirmed by VAM were treated with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (Group D) or by thoracotomy (Group C) with extended dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes via median sternotomy. Of the 359 eligible patients, 209 underwent VAM (Group V) and 150 had thoracotomy without VAM (Group A). Of the VAM patients, 158 were negative for mediastinal involvement and underwent thoracotomy (Group B). Fifty-one patients had metastases and were given chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. After two courses of chemotherapy, 22 patients with partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) but reduced tumor markers received surgery with mediastinal lymph node dissection (Group C). The 2- and 5-year survival rates were 93.0 and 88.5% for Group A, and 89.5 and 61.5% for Group B, while the 2-year rate in Group C was 60.3%. In stage IA patients, Group A 2- and 5-year survival rates were 98.6 and 95.1%, the respective Group B rates being 96.3 and 89.9%. The more favorable Group A outcomes indicated both successful selection by these criteria of patients not requiring mediastinal examination, and the superfluity of complete lymph node dissection in early stage cancer.

Ten-year follow-up results of a randomised controlled study comparing level-I vs level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer

The most appropriate level of axillary dissection for breast cancer remains unclear. The present randomised study compared the treatment results of level-I vs level-III dissection in T1/2/3 and N0/1a/1b (1987 UICC classification) breast cancer without distant metastasis. Between 1995 and 1997, 522 patients were enrolled, and 514 were eligible. They were stratified into breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, and then further stratified into level-III dissection (group-A, n=258) or level-I dissection (group-B, n=256). All patients were given oral 5-fluorouracil at 200 mg day-1 and tamoxifen at 20 mg day-1, daily for 2 years. Group-A resulted in a significantly longer operation time (77.0 vs 60.5 min, P<0.0001) and significantly larger blood loss (62.1 vs 48.1 ml, P<0.0001) than group-B, but in no significant differences in the frequencies of arm oedema and shoulder disturbance. Group-A resulted in a significantly larger number of dissected nodes than group-B (18.7 vs 14.8, P<0.0001), but in no differences in the number of involved nodes (1.54 vs 1.44). There were no significant differences in the 10-year overall and disease-free survival rates: 89.6 and 76.6% for group-A vs 87.8 and 74.1% for group-B, respectively. In conclusion, level-III dissection resulted in a longer operation time and greater blood loss than level-I, but did not improve the survival rate. Level-III dissection is not a recommended surgery for T1-3/N0-1b breast cancer.

The Landmark Surgical Trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project

In this paper we provide a summary of several of the completed and ongoing surgical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, one of the cancer cooperative trials groups supported by the US National Cancer Institute.

Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography in breast cancer

PURPOSE

In this study, we used quantitative decision tree modeling to assess the cost-effectiveness of a positron emission tomography (PET)-based management scenario for breast cancer in Canada.

PROCEDURES

Two patient management scenarios were compared (with and without PET). A metaanalysis of studies for the accuracy of PET in staging breast cancer was conducted. Life expectancies were calculated. Management costs were determined from previous cost-effective analyses, management costs from our institutions, and recently published Canadian cost estimates of various procedures.

RESULTS

A cost savings of $695 per person is expected for the PET strategy, with an increase in life expectancy (7.4 days), when compared with the non-PET strategy. This cost savings remained in favor of the PET strategy when subjected to a sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a PET management strategy for the staging of breast cancer is expected to remain economically viable in Canada under various economic conditions.

Cutaneous melanoma: therapeutic lymph node and elective lymph node dissections, lymphatic mapping, and sentinel lymph node biopsy

Early clinical observation in cancer patients suggested that tumors spread in a methodical, stepwise fashion from the primary site, to the regional lymphatics, and only then to distant locations. Based on these observations, the regional lymphatics were believed to be mechanical barriers, at least temporarily preventing the widespread dissemination of tumor. Despite evidence now available disputing its validity, this barrier theory has guided the surgical management of the regional lymphatics in cancer patients for more than a century, influencing the use of such surgical modalities as therapeutic lymph node dissection, elective lymph node dissection, and most recently lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy. No published randomized controlled trial exists that demonstrates improved overall patient survival for cancer of any type, including melanoma, after surgical excision of regional lymphatics. This article will review the biology of lymphatics as it relates to regional tumor metastasis, and based on available information, offer practical recommendations for the clinical dermatologist and their patients who have cutaneous melanoma.

Lower axillary dissection in breast cancer surgery may be candidate for cases with early breast cancer

Lower axillary lymph node dissection (lower parts of both the level I and II elements below the second intracostobrachial nerve) and level I and II lymph node dissection were performed on breast cancer patients (n = 54), and the results with the two methods were compared in terms of the status of detected lymph node metastases. For Stage I, N0 cases, the results for pathological classification lymph node metastases (pN) were in agreement between the two dissection methods. And, the occurrence of operated arm swelling wasn't recognized when a side effect was examined with the case (n = 28) that only lower axillary dissection was carried out in case of an operation for breast cancer. Accordingly, it was surmised that lower axillary dissection provides accurate pN information for Stage I, N0 cases. These results indicate that lower axillary dissection has the potential to become an effective, standard surgical procedure for breast cancer patients whose preoperative disease stage is Stage I.

Obesity and lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

With increasing sentinel lymph node experience, patient subsets associated with lower success rates are being identified. Obesity may be one such subset.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of breast cancer patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy from March 1997 to September 2002. Factors examined included demographics, body mass index (BMI), breast size, tumor characteristics, lymphoscintigraphy drainage, and success of mapping. Chi-square and exact P values were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four breast cancer patients had sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sixty-seven patients were normal weight (BMI <25.1); 56 patients were overweight (BMI 25.1 to 29.9); and 51 patients were obese (BMI >29.9). Failure to identify a sentinel lymph node and the false negative rate were not statistically different (P = 0.7783 and P = 0.9290, respectively) among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity has no significant effect on sentinel node identification rate or false negative rate.

Sentinel node in the era of neoadjuvant therapy and locally advanced breast cancer

The most important determinant of prognosis for patients with breast cancer is the status of the axillary lymph nodes. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been performed for over a century to stage the cancer, achieve regional control, and perhaps improve survival. In accordance with tradition, ALND has been performed on all patients with the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. In the early 1990s, this dogma was challenged because of the significant morbidity associated with ALND (paresthesia, extremity lymphedema) and the fact that greater than 50% of all breast cancers are node negative. A less morbid but highly accurate staging procedure, lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) was introduced. Currently, the de facto standard of care in breast cancer is to perform LM and SNB in patients with small tumors and clinically negative axilla. While numerous methodological issues are being raised, the utility of LM and SNB identification continues to expand. In the current review we assess the application of this technique to locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. What role does SNB play in locally advanced disease? Is LM and SNB accurate for patients with advanced disease? What influence do axillary metastases have on further treatment? What is the role of SNB in the planning for neoadjuvant patients? The skillful management of patients with breast cancer lies in the delicate balance between maximizing the efficacy of treatment and minimizing its morbidity and failure.

The management of regional lymph nodes in cancer

Early clinical observation in cancer patients suggested that tumours spread in a methodical, stepwise fashion from the primary site to the regional lymphatics, and only then to distant locations. Based on these observations, the regional lymphatics were believed to be mechanical barriers preventing the widespread dissemination of tumour. Despite evidence now available disputing its validity, this barrier theory has guided the surgical management of the regional lymphatics for more than a century, influencing the use of such surgical modalities as therapeutic lymph node dissection, elective lymph node dissection and most recently sentinel lymph node biopsy. No published randomized controlled trial exists that demonstrates improved overall survival for patients with cancer of any type undergoing surgery of the regional lymphatics. We believe the presence of tumour in the regional lymphatics indicates the presence of systemic disease, and therapeutic interventions should be directed accordingly.

The incidence of lung carcinoma after surgery for breast carcinoma with and without postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In the current study, the authors compared the incidence of subsequent primary lung carcinoma in patients with breast carcinoma who received radiotherapy as part of their treatment and in those patients who did not. The patients were participants in two large National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) breast carcinoma trials, B-04 and B-06, which prospectively randomized women to either undergo surgery alone or to undergo surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

The NSABP trial B-04 (1971-1974) randomized patients to undergo radical mastectomy versus total (simple) mastectomy and radiotherapy to the chest wall, axilla, and supraclavicular and internal mammary lymph node areas. For patients with a clinically uninvolved axilla, there was a third randomization arm: total mastectomy without radiotherapy. The B-06 trial (1976-1984) randomized patients between those undergoing total mastectomy versus lumpectomy versus those undergoing lumpectomy and breast irradiation, with all patients undergoing an axillary lymph node dissection. The records of all patients who developed a recurrence in the lung or a new primary lung tumor were reviewed to determine the incidence and laterality of confirmed and probable primary lung carcinoma.

RESULTS

For the 1665 evaluable patients on the NSABP B-04 trial (mean follow-up of 21.4 years), there was a total of 23 subsequent confirmed and probable ipsilateral or contralateral primary lung carcinomas. In those patients who had received comprehensive postmastectomy radiotherapy, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of these new primary tumors (P = 0.029). With regard to the development of confirmed new primary ipsilateral lung carcinoma alone, the incidence was statistically significantly increased (P = 0.013) in those patients who had received radiotherapy as part of their treatment, and when confirmed and probable ipsilateral lung carcinomas were analyzed, there was a strong trend toward a statistically significant increase in those patients who had received radiotherapy (P = 0.066). For the 1850 evaluable patients on the NSABP trial B-06 (mean follow-up of 19.0 years), there was a total of 30 second primary lung carcinomas but no increase in either ipsilateral or contralateral primary tumors of the lung in those patients who had received radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive postmastectomy irradiation of the chest wall and regional lymphatic node areas, with consequent exposure of a greater volume of lung to higher doses as administered in the NSABP B-04 trial compared with postlumpectomy breast irradiation in the NSABP B-06 trial, was associated with an increased incidence of subsequent primary lung tumors, both ipsilateral and contralateral.

Axilla surgery severely affects quality of life: results of a 5-year prospective study in breast cancer patients

No long-term prospective study has investigated arm morbidity and patient quality of life. It is unclear to what extent breast cancer patients suffer from arm problems, how long such problems affect their lives, and whether quality of life improves as arm problems abate. This prospective cohort study aims to provide data on the clinical factors associated with arm dysfunction, to estimate its prevalence and to relate arm morbidity to quality of life. The Munich Cancer Registry records clinical details of all cancer patients in and around Munich. Quality of life information was provided directly by breast cancer patients (n = 990) over 5 years. Arm morbidity, including movement limitations, swelling and lymph drainage, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were assessed. Up to 5 years after diagnosis, 38% of patients were still experiencing arm problems (swelling and limited movement). Consistently over the 5 years, quality of life was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for patients with arm difficulties. For those whose arm problems dissipated, quality of life significantly improved (p < 0.01). A logistic regression analysis showed that extent of axilla surgery (p < 0.003), comorbidity (CVD and diabetes) (p < 0.003), employment (p < 0.01), younger age (p < 0.02), and operating clinic (p < 0.05) significantly contributed to arm problems. Axilla surgery should be re-evaluated since arm morbidity has such a profound effect on patient quality of life.

Will we need lymph node dissection at all in the future?

Traditionally in the treatment of primary breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) plays an important role. However, a substantial and increasing percentage of patients appear to have no nodal involvement and have been subjected to ALND unnecessarily. The first reason to perform an ALND is axillary nodal staging. After reviewing the literature, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients an adequately conducted lymphatic mapping by sentinel node procedure is equal to ALND for this purpose. The second reason to perform an ALND is to establish the extent of nodal involvement, which might have an impact on adjuvant treatment recommendations. However, there is no evidence available that patients with extensive nodal involvement (= 4 positive nodes) benefit more from adjuvant systemic treatment (either standard or high dose) in terms of reduction of odds of recurrence and mortality compared to patients with limited nodal involvement and optimally administered so-called standard adjuvant treatment. The third reason to perform an ALND is to ensure axillary tumor control. Reviewing the different treatment options, it can be concluded that in clinically node-negative patients axillary control after axillary radiotherapy appears to be similar to axillary control after ALND. In clinically overt axillary involvement, ALND (with or without adjuvant radiotherapy) may result in an improved regional control. In the near future, ALND will not be the standard of care but will be reserved for those patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement. In microscopic disease, radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

MR-axillography oriented surgical sampling for assessment of nodal status in the selection of patients with breast cancer for axillary lymph nodes dissection

BACKGROUND

We have reported that magnetic resonance axillography (MR-axillography) is the best method for assessing lymph node size and representing the relation of the lymph node to normal anatomy.

METHODS

The four largest nodes on MR-axillography were sampled in 62 consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing axillary clearance. Axillary clearance yielded a mean of 17.0 (range 5-28) nodes.

RESULTS

A method of preliminary sampling of four nodes in the axilla oriented by MR-axillography was assessed in all cases, 22 of whom were histologically node positive. Based on the sampled nodes, lymph node metastases were detected in 20 of 22 (91%) of the node-positive patients. Based on the sampled nodes, of the 19 patients with macrometastatic nodes, lymph node metastases were detected in all 19 (100%), but only in 1 of the 3 (33%) patients with only one micrometastatic node.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience indicates that sampling the four largest nodes by MR-axillography orientation accurately identifies patients with macrometaststic nodes. This result may be comparable to that of surgical sampling performed by the most skilled surgeons.

Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation

BACKGROUND

In women with breast cancer, the role of radical mastectomy, as compared with less extensive surgery, has been a matter of debate. We report 25-year findings of a randomized trial initiated in 1971 to determine whether less extensive surgery with or without radiation therapy was as effective as the Halsted radical mastectomy.

METHODS

A total of 1079 women with clinically negative axillary nodes underwent radical mastectomy, total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation, or total mastectomy plus axillary dissection only if their nodes became positive. A total of 586 women with clinically positive axillary nodes either underwent radical mastectomy or underwent total mastectomy without axillary dissection but with postoperative irradiation. Kaplan-Meier and cumulative-incidence estimates of outcome were obtained.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed among the three groups of women with negative nodes or between the two groups of women with positive nodes with respect to disease-free survival, relapse-free survival, distant-disease-free survival, or overall survival. Among women with negative nodes, the hazard ratio for death among those who were treated with total mastectomy and radiation as compared with those who underwent radical mastectomy was 1.08 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.28; P=0.38), and the hazard ratio for death among those who had total mastectomy without radiation as compared with those who underwent radical mastectomy was 1.03 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.23; P=0.72). Among women with positive nodes, the hazard ratio for death among those who underwent total mastectomy and radiation as compared with those who underwent radical mastectomy was 1.06 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.27; P=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings validate earlier results showing no advantage from radical mastectomy. Although differences of a few percentage points cannot be excluded, the findings fail to show a significant survival advantage from removing occult positive nodes at the time of initial surgery or from radiation therapy.

Postoperative radiotherapy following mastectomy for high-risk breast cancer. A randomised trial

Grade III, node-positive breast cancer carries a high risk of loco-regional relapse after simple mastectomy. A randomised trial was conducted to assess whether this would be significantly reduced by postoperative radiotherapy. Between 1985 and 1991, 76 patients who had undergone a simple mastectomy and axillary sampling, and whose tumours had been found to be grade III and node-positive, were randomised to receive postoperative radiotherapy to the chest wall and axilla or no further loco-regional treatment. Radiotherapy was delivered with 8 MV X-rays to the axilla and supraclavicular fossa and with 8 MeV electrons to the chest wall, to a dose of 45 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. All patients have been followed-up until death, or for a minimum of 10 years. All loco-regional recurrences occurred within the first 4 years after mastectomy. There were 26 such events in the 40 patients randomised to the 'watch' policy (65%), as opposed to 9 out of 36 (25%) who received radiotherapy (P<0.01). Ten-year survival was 39% in the radiotherapy arm as opposed to 25% in the no radiotherapy arm. Recruitment to the trial was closed in 1991, when a preliminary safety analysis revealed the size of the effect of radiotherapy, and from then on all node-positive patients with grade III tumours have routinely been given this treatment. Further follow-up has confirmed this finding, as borne out by these 10-year results, which shows that radiotherapy has a significant impact on reducing loco-regional recurrence in patients at high risk after mastectomy. There is an apparent survival benefit although, because of the small numbers in this trial, this has not reached statistical significance.

A mathematical model of axillary lymph node involvement considering lymph node size in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical sampling for assessing axillary status has not been considered as a well defined surgical procedure. We have reported that MRI is a good instrument for assessing lymph node size and identifying lymph node position. We also developed a mathematical model that takes into consideration the size of axillary lymph nodes, and retrospectively determined the number and size of the axillary lymph nodes that need to be sampled from level I-II to achieve a greater than 90% probability of metastasis detection after surgical sampling, with the future aim of using MR-axillography to assess lymph node size.

METHODS

One thousand nine hundred and thirty four lymph nodes from 102 level I-II dissections performed on T1 and T2 breast cancer patients with nodal metastases were examined histologically and the greatest long-axis dimension on histologic slides was measured.

RESULTS

This model permitted determination of the cutoff level necessary for an expected probability of detection of metastasis of over 90%. The cutoff level, regardless of tumor size, is a maximum of 6 nodes removed from level I-II in which the greatest long-axis measurement is greater than or equal to 6 mm. The cutoff level in patients with macrometastatic nodes is a maximum of 3 or 4 nodes in which the long-axis dimensions are greater than or equal to 9 or 7 mm, respectively, removed from level I-II.

CONCLUSIONS

This model showed that surgical sampling on the basis of lymph node size might have good potential to detect lymph nodes metastases.

Treatment of the axilla in early breast cancer: past, present and future

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of the axilla in early breast cancer is controversial. The present study reviews the pattern and predictors of regional recurrence (RR) and prognosis after RR in patients with early breast cancer treated by conservative surgery and radiotherapy (CS + RT). Implications of the results on current practice and future directions are explored.

METHODS

Between 1979 and 1994, 1158 patients with stage I or II breast cancer were treated with CS + RT at Westmead Hospital. Two groups of patients were compared: 782 patients who underwent axillary dissection (axillary surgery group) and 229 patients who received radiotherapy (axillary RT group) as the only axillary treatment. At least 10 lymph nodes were dissected in 82% of the axillary surgery group. Of the women in the RT group, 90% received RT to the axilla and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) only and 10% also received RT to the internal mammary chain (IMC).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up period of 79 months for the axillary surgery group and 111 months for the axillary RT group, 27 patients developed a RR (2.8% and 2.2%, respectively). Seven patients (0.9%) in the axillary surgery group and three patients (1.3%) in the axillary RT group developed a RR in the axilla (P, not significant). Of the patients with SCF recurrences, 14 (1.8%) were in the axillary surgery group and one (0.4%) in the axillary RT group (P, not significant). One patient in the axillary surgery group developed concurrent axillary and SCF recurrences, while a patient in the axillary RT group developed an IMC recurrence. Twenty (74%) of the 27 patients with a RR developed a concurrent or subsequent distant relapse (30% and 44%, respectively). In the pathologically node-positive patients, the axillary recurrence rate was higher in those who had less than five nodes removed (17%) than those who had 10 or more nodes removed (0%; P = 0.01). The SCF recurrence rate was higher in patients with four or more positive axillary nodes (9.5%) than in those with 0-3 positive nodes (1.5%; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Adequate treatment of the axilla by surgery or RT alone is associated with a low rate of RR. The incidence of distant relapse was substantial in patients who developed a RR, which gives emphasis to the importance of optimizing local-regional control.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy in women with breast cancer metastatic to one to three axillary lymph nodes

The influence of postmastectomy radiotherapy on survival has long been debated. Early randomized trials established a clear role for adjuvant postmastectomy chest wall radiotherapy (PMCWRT) in reducing locoregional recurrence (LRR), and PMCWRT became standard therapy for patients at high risk of LRR: those with T3 or T4 tumors and four or more involved lymph nodes. However, without effective systemic therapy, distant metastases limited any effect of improved local control on overall outcome, and radiotherapy showed no benefit in survival. In fact, early meta-analyses showed a negative impact of radiotherapy on survival. As data and techniques matured, a favorable influence of PMCWRT on breast cancer-specific mortality emerged but was offset by a radiotherapy-related increase in vascular mortality. Improvements in radiotherapy delivery to increase efficacy and reduce toxicity, restriction of PMCWRT to patients at intermediate or high risk of LRR after mastectomy, and improved distant control of disease with systemic therapy are expected to bring the greatest likelihood of a survival advantage from locoregional control. Three randomized trials with sufficient follow-up meet these criteria. All demonstrate significant improvement in overall survival with PMCWRT. However, the trials were not designed to specifically address the benefit of PMCWRT in patients at intermediate risk of LRR (those with T1 or T2 tumors and one to three involved lymph nodes). These findings have been discussed in a host of publications and conferences in light of historical negative results. This review focuses on the recent data on PMCWRT in patients with one to three involved nodes.

Biology and surgical management of breast cancer

The surgical treatment of breast cancer has been a source of controversy. The controversy arises from the differences in physicians' philosophies regarding the biology of breast carcinoma. Traditionally, surgeons have emphasized the potential therapeutic value of regional lymph node dissection, maintaining that adequate loco-regional treatment is of prime concern in patients with localized tumors. On the other hand, medical oncologists have always stressed the systemic nature of cancer. However, breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease with an enormous range of different biologic characteristics, and new information is continually becoming available on the natural history of breast cancer. Therefore, we should seek a more rational theory based on the clinical evidence which can explain the biologic characteristics of breast cancer. We have proposed a new spectrum hypothesis as follows: (a)tumor cells traverse lymphatics to lymph nodes by direct extension, and there is an orderly pattern in the early stage of lymph node metastases; (b)regional lymph nodes are able to trap tumor cells but are ineffective or incomplete barriers to tumor cell spread; (c)regional lymph nodes have biologic importance, and a positive lymph node is an indicator of a host-tumor relationship that correlates with the subsequent appearance of distant disease; (d)lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination occur not serially, but in a parallel fashion; (e)many palpable invasive breast cancers are a systemic disease, but non-invasive or minimally invasive breast cancers are likely to be a local disease; (f)early detection and treatment of in-breast cancer improves survival, but variations in regional therapy are unlikely to have a major influence on survival.

Axillary Lymph Node Status of T1 Primary Breast Cancer in a Diverse Population

The utility of level I and II axillary lymph node dissection in women with primary tumors less than 1 cm in diameter has recently received extensive evaluation. Numerous patients undergo axillary lymph node dissection ultimately to discover no pathological involvement. This study investigates the lymph node status in T1 primary breast adenocarcinoma in our diverse patient population. A retrospective evaluation of patients treated at the Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans and the Tulane University Medical Center with breast adenocarcinoma less than or equal to 2 cm was performed. Demographic data and pathological reports were reviewed to obtain breast lesion size and lymph node status. One hundred sixteen patients were found to have T1 lesions. Ethnic distribution was African American 66 per cent; Caucasians 30 per cent; Hispanic 2 per cent; and Asian 3 per cent. Whereas no patients with T1a lesions had positive lymph nodes, 11 per cent of patients with T1b lesions and 36 per cent of patients with T1c lesions had positive lymph nodes. However, in our patient population no patients with tumors less than 1.0 cm. in diameter had positive lymph nodes. Although this may be due to our relatively small sample size axillary lymph node dissection may be unnecessary in this select patient population. For patients with lesions 1.0 cm and greater an axillary lymph node dissection seems to add necessary information for correct treatment in a small percentage of patients. The use of lymphatic mapping with sentinel axillary lymph node biopsy may reduce the number of unnecessary axillary dissections in early breast cancer.

Presentation, management and outcome of axillary recurrence from breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival is unclear. Limited axillary surgery has been proposed but may increase regional recurrence rates. Optimal management for axillary recurrence is poorly understood.

METHODS

Axillary recurrences were initial treatment failure sites in 44 of 4,255 breast cancer patients (1%) seen at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1982 to 1992.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (48%) had early stage disease (0, I, II) at diagnosis. With 70.8 months median follow-up, complete control of axillary recurrence was achieved in 31 patients (71%). Distant metastases developed in 50% and were more likely with uncontrolled axillary recurrences. Failure to receive multimodality therapy and failure to undergo surgery for the recurrence correlated with resistant axillary disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary recurrence from breast cancer is uncommon but may follow any stage of disease. One half of affected patients develop distant metastases. Durable disease control is best achieved with multimodality therapy including a surgery component.

Lumpectomy with tamoxifen as primary treatment for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Appropriate therapy for women over 70 years of age with breast cancer is currently a highly debated topic. The aim of this study was to determine whether a subset of patients could be identified in which lumpectomy alone, followed by tamoxifen, would offer adequate local, regional, and long-term control of disease.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 171 women over the age of 70 with stage I or II breast carcinomas treated by the senior authors from 1984 to 1998 was undertaken. One hundred and thirty-five patients who received conventional treatment were compared with 43 patients who received lumpectomy alone followed by tamoxifen. Differences in patient and tumor characteristics and in disease outcome and complications between the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients treated with lumpectomy and tamoxifen were significantly older (80 versus 76 years) and had significantly smaller tumors (1.4 versus 1.8 cm) than the conventionally treated patients. No significant differences were noted in comorbidities, clinical tumor size, histology, margin status, tumor differentiation, and hormone receptor status. There were no local or regional recurrences and only 1 distant recurrence (2%) in the lumpectomy with tamoxifen patients. In the conventionally treated group, 4 patients (3%) recurred locally, none regionally, and 18 patients (13%) recurred distantly.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that lumpectomy alone followed by tamoxifen results in an acceptable disease outcome in a subset of elderly women with breast cancer. This subset is defined by older patients with small, hormone receptor positive tumors.

What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Three important events in the history of breast cancer treatment occurred between 1983 and 1995: a large clinical trial, first lady Nancy Reagan's choice of mastectomy and the publishing of an NIH consensus statement.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of these events on use of breast conserving surgery (BCS).

RESEARCH DESIGN

Data from the cohort study of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) Program from 1983 to 1995 were divided into four periods: Baseline, Trial, Celebrity, and Consensus.

SUBJECTS

Of the women, 169,466 diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in nine SEER areas.

MEASURES

Monthly percentages of BCS.

RESULTS

A linear regression model generated a separate intercept and slope term for four time periods, adjusting for demographic characteristics of breast cancer patients. For the Baseline, Celebrity and Consensus Periods, slopes indicated an increasing use of BCS which varied between 0.24% and 0.28% per month. Slopes for these three periods were not statistically different (p = 0.120). In contrast, there was no change in use of BCS during the trial period (p = 0.247). We tested the magnitude of discontinuity between periods. At the beginning of the trial, celebrity and consensus periods, there were increases in BCS of 5.54% (p < 0.001), -3.55% (p < 0.001), and 2.37% (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BCS was substantially affected by the reports of a clinical trial of BCS and by celebrity action. These effects were abrupt but transient. The NIH consensus statement stimulated a small change in use of BCS and may be an important intervention for maintaining the increasing trend in use of BCS since the 1990s.

Breast cancer patients treated without axillary surgery: clinical implications and biologic analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of breast carcinoma (T1-2N0) surgery without axillary dissection on axillary and distant relapses, and to evaluate the usefulness of a panel of pathobiologic parameters determined from the primary tumor, independent of axillary nodal status, in planning adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective nonrandomized pilot study, 401 breast cancer patients who underwent breast surgery without axillary dissection were accrued from January 1986 to June 1994. At surgery, all patients were clinically node-negative and lacked evidence of distant metastases after clinical or radiologic examination. A precise 4-month clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed to detect axillary or distant metastases. Patients with clinical evidence of axillary nodal relapse were considered for surgery as salvage treatment. Biologic characteristics of primary carcinomas were investigated by immunohistochemistry, and four pathologic and biologic parameters (size, grading, laminin receptor, and c-erbB-2 receptor) were analyzed to determine a prognostic score.

RESULTS

The 5-year follow-up of these patients revealed a low rate of nodal relapses (6.7%), particularly for T1a and T1b patients (2% and 1.7%, respectively), whereas T1c and T2 patients showed a 10% and 18% relapse rate, respectively. Surgery was a safe and feasible salvage treatment without technical problems in all 19 cases of progressive disease at the axillary level. The low rate of distant metastases in T1a and T1b groups (<6%) increased to 15% in T1c and 34% in T2 patients. Analyzing the primary tumor with respect to the panel of pathologic and biologic parameters was predictive of metastatic spread and therefore can replace nodal status information for planning adjuvant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle-term follow-up shows that the rate of axillary relapse in this patient population is lower than expected, suggesting that only a minimal number of microembolic nodal metastases become clinically evident. Avoidance of axillary dissection has a negligible effect on the outcome of T1 patients, particularly in T1a and T1b tumors with no palpable nodes, because the rate of axillary node relapse is very low for both. In T1 breast carcinoma, postsurgical therapy should be considered on the basis of biologic characteristics rather than nodal involvement. The authors' prognostic score based on the primary tumor identified patients who required postsurgical treatment, providing a practical alternative to axillary status for deciding on adjuvant treatment. Conversely, in the T2 group, the high rate of salvage surgery for axillary relapses, which is expected in tumors larger than 2.5 cm or 3.0 cm, represents a limit for avoiding axillary dissection. Preoperative evaluation of axillary nodes for modification of surgical dissection in this subgroup would be more useful more than in T1 breast cancer because of the high risk. Complete dissection is feasible without technical problems if precise follow-up detects progressive axillary disease.