Low-density lipoprotein particle number and risk for cardiovascular disease

Value of Low-Density Lipoprotein Particle Number and Size as Predictors of Coronary Artery Disease in Apparently Healthy Men and Women

OBJECTIVES

We assessed relations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle number (LDL-P) and LDL particle size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of future coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

Whereas LDL-C is an established risk factor for CAD, its discriminative power is limited. Measuring LDL-P and size may have stronger associations with CAD than LDL-C.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was performed in the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk study, which comprises 25,663 subjects. Cases (n = 1,003) were individuals who developed CAD during 6 year follow-up. Control subjects (n = 1,885) were matched for age, gender, and enrollment time. Odds ratios (ORs) for future CAD were calculated, and we also evaluated whether LDL-P could improve the Framingham risk score (FRS) to predict CAD.

RESULTS

In univariate analyses, LDL-P (OR 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 2.59) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.69) were more closely associated with CAD than LDL-C (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.18). The additional value of LDL-P was lost after adjustment for HDL-C and triglyceride levels. Whereas LDL size was inversely related to CAD (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.76), this relation was abolished upon adjustment for LDL-P. In a model adjusted for the FRS, LDL-P retained its association with CAD (p for trend 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large study of individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C, LDL-P was related to CAD on top of FRS as well as after adjusting for LDL-C. The additional value of LDL-P was comparable to non-HDL-C, and it was abolished after adjusting for triglycerides and HDL-C.

Lipoprotein particle analysis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Laboratory measurements of plasma lipids (principally cholesterol and triglycerides) and lipoprotein lipids (principally low-density lipoprotein [LDL] and low-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) are the cornerstone of the clinical assessment and management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. LDL particles, and to a lesser extent very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL] particles, cause atherosclerosis, whereas HDL particles prevent or reverse this process through reverse cholesterol transport. The overall risk for CVD depends on the balance between the "bad" LDL (and VLDL) and "good" HDL particles. Direct assessment of lipoprotein particle numbers us now possible through nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis.

Heterogeneity of low-density lipoprotein particle number in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of cardiovascular events even when treated to low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goals. The purpose of this study was to determine how many diabetic patients with low LDL cholesterol have correspondingly low numbers of LDL particles (LDL-P) and the extent to which those achieving target levels of LDL cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol might still harbor residual risk associated with increased LDL-P. Split-sample measurements of LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and nuclear magnetic resonance measured LDL-P were performed on plasma samples from 2,355 patients with type 2 diabetes seen in clinical practice and who had LDL cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl. Substantial heterogeneity of LDL-P was noted among patients with low or very low levels of LDL cholesterol. Of 1,484 patients with low LDL cholesterol (70 to 99 mg/dl), only 385 (25.9%) had low levels of LDL-P (<20th percentile of an ethnically diverse contemporary reference population), whereas 468 (31.6%) had LDL-P values >50th percentile (>1,300 nmol/L). Among the 871 patients with very low LDL cholesterol, i.e., <70 mg/dl, 349 (40.1%) had LDL-P levels >1,000 nmol/L (>20th percentile) and 91 (10.4%) had LDL-P levels >50th percentile. For patients with high triglyceride values (200 to 400 mg/dl), there was less discordance between LDL-P and non-HDL cholesterol than between LDL-P and LDL cholesterol. However, for those with triglyceride levels <200 mg/dl, LDL-P distributions were similarly wide for patients having achieved low or very low targets of LDL cholesterol or non-HDL cholesterol. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and LDL cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl are extremely heterogeneous with regard to LDL-P and, by inference, LDL-based cardiovascular risk.

Treatment of obesity with diet/exercise versus pioglitazone has distinct effects on lipoprotein particle size

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of diet/exercise induce weight loss versus pioglitazone on lipoprotein particle characteristics in non-diabetic, insulin resistant adults to determine whether the responses and potential mechanisms for improvement are similar between these two insulin sensitizing regimens.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-seven obese, insulin resistant volunteers were randomized to 19 weeks of either pioglitazone or diet/exercise treatment. Insulin sensitivity (Si) by IVGTT and lipoprotein subclass particle profiles by NMR was measured. Only diet/exercise lowered TG (-40+/-11 mg/dL), total (-29+/-4 mg/dL) and LDL cholesterol (-20+/-4 mg/dL; all p<0.01). Both diet/exercise and pioglitazone improved Si (p<0.05), decreased total LDL particles (-227+/-40 and -149+/-21 nmol/L, respectively, both p<0.001) and small LDL particles (-242+/-58 and -226+/-36, respectively, both p<0.001). Large LDL particle concentrations increased with both treatments. LDL particle subclasses changes correlated with changes in Si only in the diet/exercise group.

CONCLUSION

In obese, insulin resistant non-diabetic adults, pioglitazone improved LDL particle characteristics in a manner similar to diet/exercise without changing TG, diabetic control, total or LDL cholesterol. This effect could have implications for atherosclerotic risk.

Liver-specific inhibition of acyl-coenzyme a:cholesterol acyltransferase 2 with antisense oligonucleotides limits atherosclerosis development in apolipoprotein B100-only low-density lipoprotein receptor-/- mice

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of liver-specific inhibition of acyl-coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase 2 (ACAT2) on the development of hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in mice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Apolipoprotein B100-only low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-/- mice were given saline, a nontargeting control antisense oligonucleotide (ASO), or ASOs targeting ACAT2 biweekly for a period spanning 16 weeks. Mice treated with ACAT2 targeting ASOs had liver-specific reduction in ACAT2 mRNA, yet intestinal ACAT2 and cholesterol absorption was left undisturbed. ASO-mediated knockdown of ACAT2 resulted in reduction of total plasma cholesterol, increased levels of plasma triglyceride, and a shift in LDL cholesteryl ester (CE) fatty acid composition from mainly saturated and monounsaturated to polyunsaturated fatty acid enrichment. Furthermore, the liver-specific depletion of ACAT2 resulted in protection against diet-induced hypercholesterolemia and aortic CE deposition. This is the first demonstration that specific pharmacological inhibition of ACAT2, without affecting ACAT1, is atheroprotective.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic ACAT2 plays a critical role in driving the production of atherogenic lipoproteins, and therapeutic interventions, such as the ACAT2-specific ASOs used here, which reduce acyltransferase 2 (ACAT2) function in the liver without affecting ACAT1, may provide clinical benefit for cardiovascular disease prevention.

The Clinical Relevance of Low-Density-Lipoproteins Size Modulation by Statins

The predominance of small, dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; in fact, LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease. Several studies have also shown that the therapeutical modulation of LDL size is of great benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Hypolipidemic treatment is able to alter LDL subclass distribution and statins are currently the most widely used lipid-lowering agents. Statins are potent inhibitors of hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis and are the main drugs of choice for the treatment of elevated plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations. Statins potentially lower all LDL subclasses (e.g., large, medium and small particles); thus, their net effect on LDL subclasses or size is often only moderate. However, a strong variation has been noticed among the different agents: analyses of all published studies suggest a very limited role of pravastatin and simvastatin in modifying LDL size and their subclasses, while fluvastatin and atorvastatin seem to be much more effective agents. Finally, rosuvastatin, the latest statin molecule introduced in the market, seems to be promising in altering LDL subclasses towards less atherogenic particles.

Nutrition, lipids, and cardiovascular disease

The evolving epidemic of cardiovascular disease in many newly industrialized societies will bankrupt their health care systems and reduce the available resources for other health priorities. Therefore, the prevention of this epidemic, or at least slowing the increase, is of the highest priority. The development of coronary heart disease (CHD) is an example of a common source epidemic due to increased consumption of saturated fat and cholesterol, low intakes of polyunsaturated fat, and increasing obesity. Hypertension, cigarette smoking, and diabetes mellitus contribute to risk of disease. The prevention of atherosclerosis beginning in young adults is of paramount importance. Careful monitoring of the evolving epidemic of CHD, including noninvasive evaluation of atherosclerosis, is important. A high-risk approach is very successful but expensive.

Serum cardiovascular risk factors in obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients have increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The cardiovascular markers associated with OSA are currently not defined.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine whether OSA is associated with serum cardiac risk markers and to investigate the relationship between them.

METHODS

Sixty-two male patients were classified into two groups with respect to apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): group 1, sleep apnea (n = 30), with AHI > 5; and group 2 (n = 32), with AHI < 5. We compared cardiovascular risk factors in both groups with control subjects (n = 30) without OSA (AHI < 1). Serum cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein (a), C-reactive protein (CRP), and homocysteine were measured. Statistical significance was assessed with analysis of variance at p < 0.05. In correlation analysis, Pearson correlation was used.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglyceride, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a). All of the M-mode echocardiographic parameters were in the normal reference range. Serum homocysteine and CRP levels were significantly increased in group 1 compared to group 2 (p < 0.05). Serum CRP values were increased in both group 1 and group 2 when compared with control subjects (p < 0.05). Serum homocysteine values were higher in group 1 than in control subjects (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that OSA syndrome is associated not only with slight hyperhomocysteinemia but also with increased CRP concentrations. Increased plasma concentrations of homocysteine and CRP can be useful in clinical practice to be predictor of long-term prognosis for cardiovascular disease and the treatment of OSA.

Low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein particle subclasses predict coronary events and are favorably changed by gemfibrozil therapy in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial

BACKGROUND

Changes in conventional lipid risk factors with gemfibrozil treatment only partially explain the reductions in coronary heart disease (CHD) events experienced by men in the Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial (VA-HIT). We examined whether measurement of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particle subclasses provides additional information relative to CHD risk reduction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective nested case-control study of 364 men with a new CHD event (nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiac death) during a 5.1-year (median) follow-up and 697 age-matched controls. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used to quantify levels of LDL and HDL particle subclasses and mean particle sizes in plasma obtained at baseline and after 7 months of treatment with gemfibrozil or placebo. Odds ratios for a 1-SD increment of each lipoprotein variable were calculated with adjusted logistic regression models. Gemfibrozil treatment increased LDL size and lowered numbers of LDL particles (-5%) while raising numbers of HDL particles (10%) and small HDL subclass particles (21%). Concentrations of these LDL and HDL particles achieved with gemfibrozil were significant, independent predictors of new CHD events. For total LDL and HDL particles, odds ratios predicting CHD benefit were 1.28 (95% CI, 1.12 to 1.47) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.81), respectively. Mean LDL and HDL particle sizes were not associated with CHD events.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of gemfibrozil on NMR-measured LDL and HDL particle subclasses, which are not reflected by conventional lipoprotein cholesterol measures, help to explain the demonstrated benefit of this therapy in patients with low HDL cholesterol.

Apo B versus cholesterol in estimating cardiovascular risk and in guiding therapy: report of the thirty-person/ten-country panel

There is abundant evidence that the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease is directly related to plasma cholesterol levels. Accordingly, all of the national and transnational screening and therapeutic guidelines are based on total or LDL cholesterol. This presumes that cholesterol is the most important lipoprotein-related proatherogenic risk variable. On the contrary, risk appears to be more directly related to the number of circulating atherogenic particles that contact and enter the arterial wall than to the measured concentration of cholesterol in these lipoprotein fractions. Each of the atherogenic lipoprotein particles contains a single molecule of apolipoprotein (apo) B and therefore the concentration of apo B provides a direct measure of the number of circulating atherogenic lipoproteins. Evidence from fundamental, epidemiological and clinical trial studies indicates that apo B is superior to any of the cholesterol indices to recognize those at increased risk of vascular disease and to judge the adequacy of lipid-lowering therapy. On the basis of this evidence, we believe that apo B should be included in all guidelines as an indicator of cardiovascular risk. In addition, the present target adopted by the Canadian guideline groups of an apo B <90 mg dL(-1) in high-risk patients should be reassessed in the light of the new clinical trial results and a new ultra-low target of <80 mg dL(-1) be considered. The evidence also indicates that the apo B/apo A-I ratio is superior to any of the conventional cholesterol ratios in patients without symptomatic vascular disease or diabetes to evaluate the lipoprotein-related risk of vascular disease.

The effect of simvastatin on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in patients with type 2 diabetic dyslipidemia: a SILHOUETTE trial sub-study

OBJECTIVE

To determine if simvastatin effectively decreases the elevated levels of triglyceride (TG), TG-rich lipoproteins, and small, dense LDL particles, which are characteristic of diabetic dyslipidemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a prespecified analysis from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 6-week crossover trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and low HDL-C (< 40 mg/dL). Each patient was randomized to 1 of 6 possible treatment arms; each patient received simvastatin 80 mg, simvastatin 40 mg, and placebo over 3 periods. We used the validated vertical auto profile (VAP) method to directly assess TG-rich lipoproteins and LDL subclasses. We assessed the efficacy of simvastatin to improve the lipoprotein profile in adult men (71%) and women (29%) (n = 151) with stable type 2 diabetes (HbA1C < 9%), LDL-C > 100 mg/dL, HDL-C < 40 mg/dL, and fasting TG level > 150 and < 700 mg/dL (median = 273 mg/dL).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage change from baseline in IDL and VLDL (TG-rich lipoproteins), LDL subclasses, and additional lipoproteins at the end of each 6-week treatment interval; percentage of patients who reached NCEP ATP III non-HDL goal of < 130 mg/dL by the end of each 6-week period.

RESULTS

Both simvastatin 80 mg and 40 mg significantly reduced VLDL-C, VLDL3, and IDL, as well as the four LDL subclasses measured with VAP, compared with placebo. Simvastatin 80 mg, compared with simvastatin 40 mg, provided additional efficacy. With simvastatin 80 mg, 77.2% of patients not at their non-HDL-C goal of < 130 mg/dL at study baseline reached goal, compared with 65.7% following simvastatin 40 mg treatment, and 2.2% following placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with simvastatin effectively reduced the elevated levels of TG-rich lipoproteins and improved LDL composition in patients with type 2 diabetes. A large percentage of these patients attained the NCEP ATP III non-HDL-C goal of < 130 mg/dL, which demonstrates the improvement of the atherogenic profile in these patients.

Low-density lipoprotein size and cardiovascular risk assessment

A predominance of small, dense low-density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease and evidences suggests that both quality (particularly small, dense LDL) and quantity may increase cardiovascular risk. However, other authors have suggested that LDL size measurement does not add information beyond that obtained by measuring LDL concentration, triglyceride levels and HDL concentrations. Therefore, it remains debatable whether to measure LDL particle size in cardiovascular risk assessment and, if so, in which categories of patient. Therapeutic modulation of LDL particle size or number appears beneficial in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events, but no clear causal relationship has been shown, because of confounding factors, including lipid and non-lipid variables. Studies are needed to investigate the clinical significance of LDL size measurements in patients with coronary and non-coronary forms of atherosclerosis; in particular, to test whether LDL size is associated with even higher vascular risk, and whether LDL size modification may contribute to secondary prevention in such patients.

Altered lipoprotein subclass distribution and PAF-AH activity in subjects with generalized aggressive periodontitis

In this study, we examined whether the documented increase of plasma triglycerides in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis (GAgP) is associated with changes in lipoprotein subclass distribution and/or LDL-associated platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) activity. Lipoprotein subclasses were analyzed in whole plasma samples using nuclear magnetic resonance methods. Compared with subjects without periodontitis (NP subjects; n = 12), GAgP subjects (n = 12) had higher plasma levels of large, medium, and small VLDL (35.0 +/- 6.7 vs. 63.1 +/- 9.6 nmol/l; P = 0.025), higher levels of intermediate density lipoprotein (24.8 +/- 11.6 vs. 87.2 +/- 16.6 nmol/l; P = 0.006), lower levels of large LDL (448.3 +/- 48.5 vs. 315.8 +/- 59.4 nmol/l; P = 0.098), and higher levels of small LDL (488.2 +/- 104.2 vs. 946.7 +/- 151.6 nmol/l; P = 0.021). The average size of LDL from NP and GAgP subjects was 21.4 +/- 0.2 and 20.6 +/- 0.3 nm, respectively (P = 0.031). Compared with NP subjects, GAgP subjects had a greater number of circulating LDL particles (961.3 +/- 105.3 vs. 1,349.0 +/- 133.2 nmol/l; P = 0.032). Differences in the plasma levels of large, medium, and small HDL were not statistically significant. NP and GAgP subjects had similar plasma levels of total LDL-associated PAF-AH activity; however, LDL of GAgP subjects contained less PAF-AH activity per microgram of LDL protein (1,458.0 +/- 171.0 and 865.2 +/- 134 pmol/min/microg; P = 0.014). These results indicate that, in general, GAgP subjects have a more atherogenic lipoprotein profile and lower LDL-associated PAF-AH activity than NP subjects. These differences may help explain the increased risk of GAgP subjects for cardiovascular disease.

Effects of pioglitazone on lipoproteins, inflammatory markers, and adipokines in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the short-term effects of pioglitazone (PIO) on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and other metabolic parameters in nondiabetic patients with metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty nondiabetic adults with low HDL-C and MetSyn were randomized to PIO or matching placebo for 12 weeks. PIO increased HDL-C by 15% and 14% at 6 and 12 weeks, respectively, compared with placebo (P<0.001). Changes in HDL-C were correlated to changes in adiponectin (r=0.34; P=0.01) but not to changes in insulin resistance. PIO did not affect serum triglycerides or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations but reduced the number of small LDL particles by 18% (P<0.001). PIO reduced median C-reactive protein levels by 31% (P<0.001) and mean resistin levels by 10% (P=0.02) while increasing mean serum levels of adiponectin by 111% (P<0.001) compared with placebo. PIO did not affect weight and modestly decreased insulin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

In nondiabetic patients with low HDL-C and MetSyn, PIO significantly raised HDL-C and favorably affected lipoprotein particle size, markers of inflammation, and adipokines without changes in triglycerides, LDL-C, or weight. These results suggest that PIO has direct effects on HDL, which may contribute to its antiatherogenic effects.

Lipids for psychiatrists - an overview

Serum cholesterol is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides are positively related to cardiovascular disease, while HDL cholesterol has an inverse relationship. Measurement of lipids is essential in individuals with established cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes, and may also be carried out in healthy individuals as part of cardiovascular risk assessment. Lifestyle measures are important in cardiovascular disease prevention, but the mainstay of lipid lowering therapy is appropriate use of lipid lowering drugs. Total and LDL cholesterol are the primary targets for treatment, but consideration should also be given to raising HDL cholesterol and lowering triglycerides where appropriate. Statins are the most frequently used lipid lowering agents, but there is an important place for other drugs, including ezetimibe, fibrates and nicotinic acid.

Colesevelam HCl reduces LDL particle number and increases LDL size in hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Although LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the target of cholesterol-lowering therapy, high levels of LDL particle numbers better differentiate cardiovascular risk than LDL-C concentrations. Colesevelam HCl, a novel bile acid sequestrant, has also been shown to reduce mean LDL-C by 18% with the maximum dose. The effect of colesevelam HCl on LDL particle number and particle size has not been previously published. LDL particle number and particle size were measured by NMR spectroscopy.

METHODS

In this multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 149 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C > 160 mg/dL [4.14 mmol/L]; triglycerides < 300 mg/dL [3.39 mmol/L]) were randomized to colesevelam HCl (1.5-3.75 g/d) or placebo for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Colesevelam HCl reduced LDL particle number by 6.8% at a dosage of 3.0 g/d (P = 0.031), and 13.7% (P = 0.0002) at a dosage of 3.75 g/d. Baseline levels of triglycerides or LDL size did not influence changes in LDL particle number. Further, mean LDL particle size increased with colesevelam HCl 3.75 g/d (1.1% increase versus baseline, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia, treatment with colesevelam HCl at the recommended starting dose of 3.75 g/d lowered LDL particle number, and increased mean LDL particle size.