101
|
Sinaiko AD, Barnett ML, Gaye M, Soriano M, Mulvey T, Hochberg E. Association of Peer Comparison Emails With Electronic Health Record Documentation of Cancer Stage by Oncologists. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2015935. [PMID: 33021649 PMCID: PMC7539129 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Systematically capturing cancer stage is essential for any serious effort by health systems to monitor outcomes and quality of care in oncology. However, oncologists do not routinely record cancer stage in machine-readable structured fields in electronic health records (EHRs). OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a peer comparison email intervention that communicates an oncologist's performance on documenting cancer stage relative to that of peer physicians was associated with increased likelihood that stage was documented in the EHR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This 12-month, randomized quality improvement pilot study aimed to increase oncologist staging documentation in the EHR. The pilot study was performed at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center from October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019. Participants included 56 oncologists across 3 practice sites who treated patients in the ambulatory setting and focused on diseases that use standardized staging systems. Data were analyzed from July 2, 2019, to March 5, 2020. INTERVENTIONS Peer comparison intervention with as many as 3 emails to oncologists during 6 months that displayed the oncologist's staging documentation rate relative to all oncologists in the study sample. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was patient-level documentation of cancer stage, defined as the likelihood that a patient's stage of disease was documented in the EHR after the patient's first (eg, index) ambulatory visit during the pilot period. RESULTS Among the 56 oncologists participating (32 men [57%]), receipt of emails with peer comparison data was associated with increased likelihood of documentation of cancer stage using the structured field in the EHR (23.2% vs 13.0% of patient index visits). In adjusted analyses, this difference represented an increase of 9.0 (95% CI, 4.4-13.5) percentage points (P = .002) in the probability that a patient's cancer stage was documented, a relative increase of 69% compared with oncologists who did not receive peer comparison emails. The association increased with each email that was sent, ranging from a nonsignificant 4.0 (95% CI, -0.8 to 8.8) percentage points (P = .09) after the first email to a statistically significant 11.2 (95% CI, 4.9-17.4) percentage points (P = .003) after the third email . The association was concentrated among an oncologist's new patients (increase of 11.8 [95% CI, 6.2-17.4] percentage points; P = .001) compared with established patients (increase of 1.6 [95% CI, -2.9 to 6.1] percentage points; P = .44) and persisted for 7 months after the email communications stopped. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In a quality improvement pilot trial, peer comparison emails were associated with a substantial increase in oncologist use of the structured field in the EHR to document stage of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna D. Sinaiko
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael L. Barnett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marema Gaye
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Therese Mulvey
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ephraim Hochberg
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Heider AK, Mang H. Effects of Monetary Incentives in Physician Groups: A Systematic Review of Reviews. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2020; 18:655-667. [PMID: 32207083 PMCID: PMC7519000 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00572-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reimbursement systems that contribute to the cooperation and integration of providers have become increasingly important within the healthcare sector. Reimbursement systems not only serve as payment mechanisms but also provide control and incentive functions. Thus, the design of reimbursement systems is extremely important. OBJECTIVES The aims of this systematic review were to describe and gain a better understanding of the effects of monetary incentives in the setting of physician groups. METHODS In January 2020, we searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, and ISI Web of Science databases as well as the gray literature and authors' personal collections. RESULTS We included 21 reviews containing seven different incentive schemes/initiatives. The study settings and outcome measures varied considerably, as did the results within the incentive schemes and initiatives. However, we found positive effects on process quality for two types of incentives: pay-for-performance and accountable care organizations. The main limitations of this review were the variations in study settings and outcome measures of the studies included. CONCLUSIONS Monetary incentives in healthcare are often implemented as a control measure and are supposed to increase quality of care and reduce costs. The heterogeneity of the study results indicates that this is not always successful. The results reveal a need for research into the effects of monetary incentives in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann-Kathrin Heider
- Faculty of Medicine, Master Program Medical Process Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Harald Mang
- Master Program Medical Process Management, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Necyk C, Johnson JA, Minhas-Sandhu J, Tsuyuki RT, Eurich DT. Evaluation of comprehensive annual care plans by pharmacists in Alberta for patients with complex conditions. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2020; 60:1029-1036.e1. [PMID: 32962900 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize the population of patients who received a pharmacist-billed comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) in Alberta and to evaluate any changes in health care use for such patients, including physician visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS We used administrative data from Alberta Health to identify all individuals in Alberta who received a pharmacist CACP between July 1, 2012, and March 31, 2015. Two control patients were identified for each CACP patient, matched on age, sex, provider, date of service, and qualifying conditions. Controlled interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate changes in physician visits, all-cause and ambulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC)-related hospitalizations, and ED visits in the 12 months before and after the CACP index date. RESULTS Between July 1, 2012, and March 31, 2015, 188,640 pharmacy CACPs were billed in Alberta. Of these, 137,178 CACP patients were matched to 241,658 control patients. Those who received a CACP were associated with an overall decrease in all-cause hospitalizations, ACSC-related ED visits, and physician visits (181, 144, and 1206 events per 10,000 people, respectively, P < 0.05) compared with controls. However, among those who received a CACP, all-cause ED visits and ACSC-related hospitalizations increased by 40.1 and 8 visits per 10,000, respectively (P < 0.05), compared with controls. CONCLUSION The uptake of the pharmacy CACP remuneration model has been substantial since 2012. Overall, the CACP philosophy of a single yearly assessment has demonstrated limited impact on major health care use.
Collapse
|
104
|
Yasaitis L, Gupta A, Newcomb C, Kim E, Newcomer L, Bekelman J. An Insurer's Program To Incentivize Generic Oncology Drugs Did Not Alter Treatment Patterns Or Spending On Care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 38:812-819. [PMID: 31059365 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The high and rising costs of anticancer drugs have received national attention. The prices of brand-name anticancer drugs often dwarf those of established generic drugs with similar efficacy. In 2007-16 UnitedHealthcare sought to encourage the use of several common low-cost generic anticancer drugs by offering providers a voluntary incentivized fee schedule with substantially higher generic drug payments (and profit margins), thereby increasing financial equivalence for providers in the choice between generic and brand-name drugs and regimens. We evaluated how this voluntary payment intervention affected treatment patterns and health care spending among enrollees with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer. We found that the incentivized fee schedule had neither significant nor meaningful effects on the use of incentivized generic drugs or on spending. Practices that adopted the incentivized fee schedule already had higher rates of generic anticancer drug use before switching, which demonstrates selection bias in take-up. Our study provides cautionary evidence of the limitations of voluntary payment reform initiatives in meaningfully affecting health care practice and spending.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Yasaitis
- Laura Yasaitis is a fellow of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation at the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, in Philadelphia
| | - Atul Gupta
- Atul Gupta is an assistant professor in the Department of Health Care Management at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Craig Newcomb
- Craig Newcomb is a biostatistician in the Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Era Kim
- Era Kim is an analyst at UnitedHealthcare and the Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, in Rochester
| | - Lee Newcomer
- Lee Newcomer is a consultant at Lee N. Newcomer Consulting, in Wayzata, Minnesota
| | - Justin Bekelman
- Justin Bekelman ( ) is an associate professor and director of the Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation at the Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Martins M, Portela MC, Noronha MFD. [Health services research: historical, conceptual, and empirical highlights]. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2020; 36:e00006720. [PMID: 32901661 DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00006720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mônica Martins
- Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
106
|
Anselmi L, Borghi J, Brown GW, Fichera E, Hanson K, Kadungure A, Kovacs R, Kristensen SR, Singh NS, Sutton M. Pay for Performance: A Reflection on How a Global Perspective Could Enhance Policy and Research. Int J Health Policy Manag 2020; 9:365-369. [PMID: 32610713 PMCID: PMC7557422 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the provision of financial incentives to healthcare providers based on pre-specified performance targets. P4P has been used as a policy tool to improve healthcare provision globally. However, researchers tend to cluster into those working on high or low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with still limited knowledge exchange, potentially constraining opportunities for learning from across income settings. We reflect here on some commonalities and differences in the design of P4P schemes, research questions, methods and data across income settings. We highlight how a global perspective on knowledge synthesis could lead to innovations and further knowledge advancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Anselmi
- Health, Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care and Health Service Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Josephine Borghi
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Garrett Wallace Brown
- School of Politics and International Studies (POLIS), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Kara Hanson
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Roxanne Kovacs
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Søren Rud Kristensen
- Centre for Health Policy, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Neha S Singh
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health, Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care and Health Service Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Ellegård LM. Effects of pay-for-performance on prescription of hypertension drugs among public and private primary care providers in Sweden. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT 2020; 20:215-228. [PMID: 31960248 PMCID: PMC7426314 DOI: 10.1007/s10754-020-09278-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
This study exploits policy reforms in Swedish primary care to examine the effect of pay-for-performance (P4P) on compliance with hypertension drug guidelines among public and private health care providers. Using provider-level outcome data for 2005-2013 from the Swedish Prescription Register, providers in regions using P4P were compared to providers in other regions in a difference-in-differences analysis. The results indicate that P4P improved guideline compliance regarding prescription of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. The effect was mainly driven by private providers, suggesting that policy makers should take ownership into account when designing incentives for health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Maria Ellegård
- Department of Economics, Lund University, P.O. Box 7082, 220 07, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Whose experience is it anyway? Toward a constructive engagement of tensions in patient-centered health care. JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1108/josm-04-2020-0095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeHealthcare delivery faces increasing pressure to move from a provider-centered approach to become more consumer-driven and patient-centered. However, many of the actions taken by clinicians, patients and organizations fail to achieve that aim. This paper aims to take a paradox-based perspective to explore five specific tensions that emerge from this shift and provides implications for patient experience research and practice.Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses a conceptual approach that synthesizes literature in health services and administration, organizational behavior, services marketing and management and service operations to illuminate five patient experience tensions and explore mitigation strategies.FindingsThe paper makes three key contributions. First, it identifies five tensions that result from the shift to more patient-centered care: patient focus vs employee focus, provider incentives vs provider motivations, care customization vs standardization, patient workload vs organizational workload and service recovery vs organizational risk. Second, it highlights multiple theories that provide insight into the existence of the tensions and how they may be navigated. Third, specific organizational practices that engage the tensions and associated examples of leading organizations are identified. Relevant measures for research and practice are also suggested.Originality/valueThe authors develop a novel analysis of five persistent tensions facing healthcare organizations as a result of a shift to a more consumer-driven, patient-centered approach to care. The authors detail each tension, discuss an existing theory from organizational behavior or services marketing that helps make sense of the tension, suggest potential solutions for managing or resolving the tension and provide representative case illustrations and useful measures.
Collapse
|
109
|
Eriksson T, Tropp H, Wiréhn AB, Levin LÅ. A pain relieving reimbursement program? Effects of a value-based reimbursement program on patient reported outcome measures. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:805. [PMID: 32847579 PMCID: PMC7450562 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05578-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Value-based reimbursement programs have become increasingly common. However, little is known about the effect of such programs on patient reported outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the effect of introducing a value-based reimbursement program on patient reported outcome measures and to explore whether a selection bias towards less complicated patients occurred. Methods This is a retrospective observational study with a before and after design based on the introduction of a value-based reimbursement program in Region Stockholm, Sweden. We analyzed patient level data from inpatient and outpatient care of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during 2006–2015. Patient reported outcome measures used was Global Assessment, EQ-5D-3L and Oswestry Disability Index. The case-mix of surgically treated patients was analyzed using medical and socioeconomic factors. Results The value-based reimbursement program did not have any effect on targeted or non-targeted patient reported outcome measures. Moreover, the share of surgically treated patients with risk factors such as having comorbidities and being born outside of Europe increased after the introduction. Hence, the value-based reimbursement program did not encourage discrimination against sicker patients. However, the income was higher among patients surgically treated after the introduction of the value-based reimbursement. This indicates that a value-based reimbursement program may contribute to increased inequalities in access to healthcare. Conclusions The value-based reimbursement program did not have any effect on patient reported outcome measures. Our study contributes to the understanding of the effects of a value-based reimbursement program on patient reported outcome measures and to what extent cherry-picking arises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thérèse Eriksson
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Centre for Medical Technology Assessment (CMT), Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Hans Tropp
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ann-Britt Wiréhn
- Research and Development Unit in Region Östergötland and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lars-Åke Levin
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences (HMV), Centre for Medical Technology Assessment (CMT), Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
Epstein DS, Barton C, Mazza D, Woode ME, Mortimer D. Patient chosen gap payments in primary care: Predictions of patient acceptability, uptake and willingness to pay from a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med 2020; 263:113284. [PMID: 32818851 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Compulsory co-payments limit access and may compromise quality in primary care. Patient Chosen Gap Payments (PCGPs) allow patients to specify a (voluntary) out-of-pocket contribution, creating an incentive for patient-centred care without the need for complex outcomes-based funding formulae. It is not yet known if widespread use of PCGP services is consistent with consumer preferences. We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in a sample of the adult Australian general population (n = 1457) during April 2019 to simulate patient choice between alternative primary care services and describe preferences for PCGP services. Participants also completed a supplementary valuation task in which participants reported their intended PCGP contribution for PCGP services. Finally, we conducted policy-simulations to predict market shares when PCGP clinics operate alongside the two existing models of primary care funding in Australia. Results suggest that patients prefer shorter wait time, longer consults, lower compulsory copayments, services with higher patient satisfaction ratings, choice of doctor and $0 suggested voluntary contribution for PCGP services. Policy-simulations suggest that high-quality PCGP services could obtain market share of up to 39% and voluntary contributions of up to $25.36 per service (95%CI: $10.24, $40.47), potentially adding $1.48 billion AUD in revenues and funding for primary care at no cost to government. Low-quality PCGP services are unlikely to capture significant market share and PCGP contributions were lowest for low-quality PCGP services ($12.12, 95%CI: $2.09, $26.34). Further field testing is recommended where (i) patients make consequential choices (e.g. real payments for simulated services), and (ii) dynamic effects on quality of care and utilisation can be observed; particularly in vulnerable populations. We conclude that PCGP services aligned with patient preferences could capture significant market share and substantially increase revenue to general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Epstein
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Australia.
| | - C Barton
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Australia
| | - D Mazza
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Australia
| | - M E Woode
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Australia
| | - D Mortimer
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Pandya A, Soeteman DI, Gupta A, Kamel H, Mushlin AI, Rosenthal MB. Can Pay-for Performance Incentive Levels be Determined Using a Cost-Effectiveness Framework? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2020; 13:e006492. [PMID: 32615799 PMCID: PMC7375940 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.120.006492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare payers in the United States are increasingly tying provider payments to quality and value using pay-for-performance policies. Cost-effectiveness analysis quantifies value in healthcare but is not currently used to design or prioritize pay-for-performance strategies or metrics. Acute ischemic stroke care provides a useful application to demonstrate how simulation modeling can be used to determine cost-effective levels of financial incentives used in pay-for-performance policies and associated challenges with this approach. METHODS AND RESULTS Our framework requires a simulation model that can estimate quality-adjusted life years and costs resulting from improvements in a quality metric. A monetary level of incentives can then be back-calculated using the lifetime discounted quality-adjusted life year (which includes effectiveness of quality improvement) and cost (which includes incentive payments and cost offsets from quality improvements) outputs from the model. We applied this framework to an acute ischemic stroke microsimulation model to calculate the difference in population-level net monetary benefit (willingness-to-pay of $50 000 to $150 000/quality-adjusted life year) accrued under current Medicare policy (stroke payment not adjusted for performance) compared with various hypothetical pay-for-performance policies. Performance measurement was based on time-to-thrombolytic treatment with tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator). Compared with current payment, equivalent population-level net monetary benefit was achieved in pay-for-performance policies with 10-minute door-to-needle time reductions (5057 more acute ischemic stroke cases/y in the 0-3-hour window) incentivized by increasing tPA payment by as much as 18% to 44% depending on willingness-to-pay for health. CONCLUSIONS Cost-effectiveness modeling can be used to determine the upper bound of financial incentives used in pay-for-performance policies, although currently, this approach is limited due to data requirements and modeling assumptions. For tPA payments in acute ischemic stroke, our model-based results suggest financial incentives leading to a 10-minute decrease in door-to-needle time should be implemented but not exceed 18% to 44% of current tPA payment. In general, the optimal level of financial incentives will depend on willingness-to-pay for health and other modeling assumptions around parameter uncertainty and the relationship between quality improvements and long-run quality-adjusted life expectancy and costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Pandya
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Djøra I. Soeteman
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Hooman Kamel
- Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alvin I. Mushlin
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith B. Rosenthal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Turner JS, Broom KD, Johnston KJ, Howard SW, Freeman SL, Englund T. Volatility and Persistence of Value-Based Purchasing Adjustments: A Challenge to Integrating Population Health and Community Benefit Into Business Operations. Front Public Health 2020; 8:165. [PMID: 32582599 PMCID: PMC7296160 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
With the passage of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010, Medicare's Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) began a transition to value-based purchasing (VBP) that rewards or penalizes hospitals based on patient satisfaction, clinical processes of care, outcomes, and efficiency metrics. However, hospital-level volatility vs. persistence in value-based payments year-over-year could result in unpredictable cash flows that negatively influence investment behavior, drive underinvestment in community benefit/population health management initiatives, and make management of the factors that drive the VBP adjustment more challenging. To evaluate the volatility and persistence of hospital VBP adjustments, the sample includes VBP adjustments and the associated domain scores for the 2,547 hospitals that participated in the program from 2013 to 2016. The sample includes urban (74%), teaching (29.1%), system affiliated (46.5%), and not-for-profit (63.6%) facilities. Volatility was measured using basic descriptive statistics, relative risk ratios, and a fixed effect, autoregressive, dynamic panel model that robust-clustered the standard errors. There is substantial change in a given facility's total VBP score with an average standard deviation of 10.74 (on a 100-point scale) that is driven by significant volatility in all metrics but particularly by efficiency and outcomes metrics. Relative risk ratios have dropped substantially over the life of the program, and there is low persistence of VBP scores from one period to the next. Findings indicate that if hospitals receive a positive adjustment in 1 year, they are almost as likely to receive a negative adjustment as a positive adjustment the following year. Furthermore, using a fixed-effect dynamic panel model that controls for autocorrelation, we find that only 13.5% of a facility's prior year IPPS adjustment (positive or negative) carries forward to the next year. The low persistence makes investment in population health management and community benefit more challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason S Turner
- Department of Health Services Management, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Kevin D Broom
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Kenton J Johnston
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Steven W Howard
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States
| | - Susan L Freeman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
113
|
The effect of 'paying for performance' on the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional observational study. BJGP Open 2020; 4:bjgpopen20X101021. [PMID: 32238389 PMCID: PMC7330226 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The ‘cycle of care’ (COC) pay for performance (PFP) programme, introduced in 2015, has resourced Irish GPs to provide structured care to PCRS eligible patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Aim To investigate the effect of COC on management processes. Design &setting Cross-sectional observational study undertaken with two points of comparison (2014 and 2017) in participating practices (Republic of Ireland general practices), with comparator data from the United Kingdom National Diabetes Audit (UKNDA) 2015–2016. Method Invitations to participate were sent to practices using a discussion forum for Health One clinical software. Participating practices provided data on the processes of care in the management of patients with T2DM. Data on PCRS eligible patients was extracted from the electronic medical record system of participating practices using secure customised software. Descriptive analysis, using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 25), was performed. Results Of 250 practices invited, 41 practices participated (16.4%), yielding data from 3146 patients. There were substantial improvements in the rates of recording of glycosylated haemoglobin ([HbA1c] 53.1%–98.3%), total cholesterol ([TC] 59.2%–98.8%), urinary albumin:creatinine ratio ([ACR] 9.9%–42.3%), blood pressure ([BP] 61.4%–98.2%), and body-mass index ([BMI] 39.8%–97.4%) from 2014 to 2017. For the first time, rates of retinopathy screening (76.3%), foot review (64.9%), and influenza immunisation (69.9%) were recorded. Comparison of 2017 data with UKNDA 2015–2016 was broadly similar. Conclusion The COC demonstrated much improved rates of recording of clinical and biochemical parameters, and improved achievement of targets in TC and BP, but not HbA1c. Results demonstrate substantial improvements in the processes and quality of care in the management of patients with T2DM.
Collapse
|
114
|
Sieleunou I, De Allegri M, Roland Enok Bonong P, Ouédraogo S, Ridde V. Does performance-based financing curb stock-outs of essential medicines? Results from a randomised controlled trial in Cameroon. Trop Med Int Health 2020; 25:944-961. [PMID: 32446280 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2011, the government of Cameroon launched its performance-based financing (PBF) scheme. Our study examined the effects of the PBF intervention on the availability of essential medicines (EM). METHODS Randomised control trial whereby PBF and three distinct comparison groups were randomised in a total of 205 health facilities across three regions. Baseline data were collected between March and May 2012 and endline data 36 months later. We defined availability of multiple EM groups by assessing stock-outs for at least one day over the 30 days prior to the survey date and estimated changes attributable to PBF using a series of difference-in-difference regression models, adjusted for relevant facility-level covariates. Data were analysed stratified by region and area to assess effect heterogeneity. RESULTS Our estimates suggest that PBF intervention had no effect on the stock-outs of antenatal care drugs (P = 0.160), vaccines (P = 0.396), integrated management of childhood illness drugs (P = 0.681) and labour and delivery drugs (P = 0.589). However, the intervention was associated with a significant reduction of 34% in stock-outs of family planning medicines (P = 0.028). We observed effect heterogeneity across regions and areas, with significant decreases in stock-outs of family planning products in North-West region (P = 0.065) and in rural areas (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS The PBF intervention in Cameroon had limited effects on the reduction of EMs stock-outs. These poor results were likely the consequence of partial implementation failure, ranging from disruption and discontinuation of services to limited facility autonomy in managing decision-making and considerable delay in performance payment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isidore Sieleunou
- University of Montreal Public Health Research Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.,School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Research for Development International, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Manuela De Allegri
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Samiratou Ouédraogo
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Valéry Ridde
- School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,French Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, Universités Paris Sorbonne Cités, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Wettstein DJ, Boes S. The impact of reimbursement negotiations on cost and availability of new pharmaceuticals: evidence from an online experiment. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2020; 10:13. [PMID: 32440753 PMCID: PMC7243324 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-020-00267-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The necessity to measure and reward "value for money" of new pharmaceuticals has become central in health policy debates, as much as the requirement to assess the "willingness to pay" for an additional, quality-adjusted life year (QALY). There is a clear need to understand the capacity of "value-based" pricing policies to impact societal goals, like timely access to new treatments, sustainable health budgets, or incentivizing research to improve patient outcomes. Not only the pricing mechanics, but also the process of value assessment and price negotiation are subject to reform demands. This study assesses the impact of a negotiation situation for life-extending pharmaceuticals on societal outcomes. Of interest were general effects of the bargaining behaviour, as well as differences caused by the assigned role and the magnitude of prices. METHODS We ran an online experiment (n = 404) on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). Participants were randomly assigned into four treatment groups for a reimbursement negotiation between two roles (health minister, pharma representative) in two price framings. Payoff to players consisted of a fixed salary and a potential bonus, depending on their preferences, their price offer and the counter offer of a randomly paired negotiation partner. Success had real social consequences on other MTurk users (premium payers, investors) and via donations to a patient association. RESULTS Margins between reservation prices and price offers increased throughout the game. Yet, 47% of players reduced at least once and 15% always their bonus probability to zero in favour of an agreement. 61% of simulated negotiation pairs could have reached an agreement, based on their preferences. 63% of these were successful, leaving 61% of patients with no access to the new treatment. The group with "real world" prices had lower prices and less agreements than the unconverted payoff group. The successful markets redistributed 20% of total assets from premium payers to investors over five innovation cycles. CONCLUSIONS The negotiation situation for pharmaceutical reimbursement has notable impact on societal outcomes. Further research should evaluate policies that align preferences and increase negotiation success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik J Wettstein
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, P.O. Box 4466, CH-6002, Lucerne, Switzerland.
| | - Stefan Boes
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, P.O. Box 4466, CH-6002, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
116
|
Khalife J, Ammar W, Emmelin M, El-Jardali F, Ekman B. Hospital performance and payment: impact of integrating pay-for-performance on healthcare effectiveness in Lebanon. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5:95. [PMID: 33437874 PMCID: PMC7780336 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15810.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In 2014 the Lebanese Ministry of Public Health integrated pay-for-performance into setting hospital reimbursement tiers, to provide hospitalization service coverage for the majority of the Lebanese population. This policy was intended to improve effectiveness by decreasing unnecessary hospitalizations, and improve fairness by including risk-adjustment in setting hospital performance scores. Methods: We applied a systematic approach to assess the impact of the new policy on hospital performance. The main impact measure was a national casemix index, calculated across 2011-2016 using medical discharge and surgical procedure codes. A single-group interrupted time series analysis model with Newey ordinary least squares regression was estimated, including adjustment for seasonality, and stratified by case type. Code-level analysis was used to attribute and explain changes in casemix index due to specific diagnoses and procedures. Results: Our final model included 1,353,025 cases across 146 hospitals with a post-intervention lag-time of two months and seasonality adjustment. Among medical cases the intervention resulted in a positive casemix index trend of 0.11% per month (coefficient 0.002, CI 0.001-0.003), and a level increase of 2.25% (coefficient 0.022, CI 0.005-0.039). Trend changes were attributed to decreased cases of diarrhea and gastroenteritis, abdominal and pelvic pain, essential hypertension and fever of unknown origin. A shift from medium to short-stay cases for specific diagnoses was also detected. Level changes were attributed to improved coding practices, particularly for breast cancer, leukemia and chemotherapy. No impact on surgical casemix index was found. Conclusions: The 2014 policy resulted in increased healthcare effectiveness, by increasing the casemix index of hospitals contracted by the Ministry. This increase was mainly attributed to decreased unnecessary hospitalizations and was accompanied by improved medical discharge coding practices. Integration of pay-for-performance within a healthcare system may contribute to improving effectiveness. Effective hospital regulation can be achieved through systematic collection and analysis of routine data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade Khalife
- Faculty of Medicine at Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Walid Ammar
- Ministry of Public Health, Beirut, Lebanon
- Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maria Emmelin
- Faculty of Medicine at Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bjorn Ekman
- Faculty of Medicine at Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Navathe AS, Volpp KG, Bond AM, Linn KA, Caldarella KL, Troxel AB, Zhu J, Yang L, Matloubieh SE, Drye EE, Bernheim SM, Oshima Lee E, Mugiishi M, Endo KT, Yoshimoto J, Emanuel EJ. Assessing The Effectiveness Of Peer Comparisons As A Way To Improve Health Care Quality. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:852-861. [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amol S. Navathe
- Amol S. Navathe is a core investigator at the Corporal Michael J. Cresencz Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center; and an assistant professor in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, and a senior fellow at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, all in Philadelphia
| | - Kevin G. Volpp
- Kevin G. Volpp is a professor of medicine in the Department of Medicine at the Perelman School of Medicine and of health care management at the Wharton School, vice chair for health policy in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and director of the Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, all at the University of Pennsylvania, and a staff physician at the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center
| | - Amelia M. Bond
- Amelia M. Bond is an assistant professor of health care policy and research at Weill Cornell Medical College, in New York City
| | - Kristin A. Linn
- Kristin A. Linn is an assistant professor of biostatistics in the Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Kristen L. Caldarella
- Kristen L. Caldarella is a project manager in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Andrea B. Troxel
- Andrea B. Troxel is director of the Division of Biostatistics, New York University School of Medicine, in New York City
| | - Jingsan Zhu
- Jingsan Zhu is associate director of data analytics in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Lin Yang
- Lin Yang is a programmer analyst in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Shireen E. Matloubieh
- Shireen E. Matloubieh is a research coordinator in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth E. Drye
- Elizabeth E. Drye is a research scientist in the Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, in New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susannah M. Bernheim
- Susannah M. Bernheim is director of quality measurement at the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation at Yale–New Haven Hospital and an assistant clinical professor in the Department of Internal Medicine at Yale University School of Medicine
| | - Emily Oshima Lee
- Emily Oshima Lee is assistant vice president of health strategy at the Hawaii Medical Services Association (HMSA), in Honolulu
| | | | - Kimberly Takata Endo
- Kimberly Takata Endo is a health strategist in the Department of Payment Transformation, HMSA
| | - Justin Yoshimoto
- Justin Yoshimoto is a health strategist in the Department of Payment Transformation, HMSA
| | - Ezekiel J. Emanuel
- Ezekiel J. Emanuel is the Diane V. S. Levy and Robert M. Levy University Professor, chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and vice provost for global initiatives, all at the University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Kovacs RJ, Powell-Jackson T, Kristensen SR, Singh N, Borghi J. How are pay-for-performance schemes in healthcare designed in low- and middle-income countries? Typology and systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:291. [PMID: 32264888 PMCID: PMC7137308 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05075-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pay for performance (P4P) schemes provide financial incentives to health workers or facilities based on the achievement of pre-specified performance targets and have been widely implemented in health systems across low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The growing evidence base on P4P highlights that (i) there is substantial variation in the effect of P4P schemes on outcomes and (ii) there appears to be heterogeneity in incentive design. Even though scheme design is likely a key determinant of scheme effectiveness, we currently lack systematic evidence on how P4P schemes are designed in LMICs. METHODS We develop a typology to classify the design of P4P schemes in LMICs, which highlights different design features that are a priori likely to affect the behaviour of incentivised actors. We then use results from a systematic literature review to classify and describe the design of P4P schemes that have been evaluated in LMICs. To capture academic publications, Medline, Embase, and EconLit databases were searched. To include relevant grey literature, Google Scholar, Emerald Insight, and websites of the World Bank, WHO, Cordaid, Norad, DfID, USAID and PEPFAR were searched. RESULTS We identify 41 different P4P schemes implemented in 29 LMICs. We find that there is substantial heterogeneity in the design of P4P schemes in LMICs and pinpoint precisely how scheme design varies across settings. Our results also highlight that incentive design is not adequately being reported on in the literature - with many studies failing to report key design features. CONCLUSIONS We encourage authors to make a greater effort to report information on P4P scheme design in the future and suggest using the typology laid out in this paper as a starting point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne J Kovacs
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.
| | - Timothy Powell-Jackson
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Søren R Kristensen
- Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Global Health Innovation, London, UK
| | - Neha Singh
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Josephine Borghi
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Moro Visconti R, Morea D. Healthcare Digitalization and Pay-For-Performance Incentives in Smart Hospital Project Financing. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E2318. [PMID: 32235517 PMCID: PMC7177756 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17072318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to explore the impact of healthcare digitalization on smart hospital project financing (PF) fostered by pay-for-performance (P4P) incentives. Digital platforms are a technology-enabled business model that facilitates exchanges between interacting agents. They represent a bridging link among disconnected nodes, improving the scalable value of networks. Application to healthcare public-private partnerships (PPPs) is significant due to the consistency of digital platforms with health issues and the complexity of the stakeholder's interaction. In infrastructural PPPs, public and private players cooperate, usually following PF patterns. This relationship is complemented by digitized supply chains and is increasingly patient-centric. This paper reviews the literature, analyzes some supply chain bottlenecks, addresses solutions concerning the networking effects of platforms to improve PPP interactions, and investigates the cost-benefit analysis of digital health with an empirical case. Whereas diagnostic or infrastructural technology is an expensive investment with long-term payback, leapfrogging digital applications reduce contingent costs. "Digital" savings can be shared by key stakeholders with P4P schemes, incentivizing value co-creation patterns. Efficient sharing may apply network theory to a comprehensive PPP ecosystem where stakeholding nodes are digitally connected. This innovative approach improves stakeholder relationships, which are re-engineered around digital platforms that enhance patient-centered satisfaction and sustainability. Digital technologies are useful even for infectious disease surveillance, like that of the coronavirus pandemic, for supporting massive healthcare intervention, decongesting hospitals, and providing timely big data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Moro Visconti
- Department of Business Management, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Via Ludovico Necchi, 7, 20123 Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Morea
- Faculty of Economics, Universitas Mercatorum, Piazza Mattei, 10, 00186 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Jan CF, Lee MC, Chiu CM, Huang CK, Hwang SJ, Chang CJ, Chiu TY. Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:60. [PMID: 32228473 PMCID: PMC7106702 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01118-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background The National Health Insurance Administration of Taiwan has introduced several pay-for-performance programs to improve the quality of healthcare. This study aimed to provide government with evidence-based research findings to help primary care physicians to actively engage in pay-for-performance programs. Methods We conducted a questionnaire survey among family physicians with age-stratified sampling from September 2016 to December 2017. The structured questionnaire consisted of items including the basic demographics of the surveyee and their awareness of and attitudes toward the strengths and/or weaknesses of the pay-for-performance programs, as well as their subjective norms, and the willingness to participate in the pay-for-performance programs. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to compare the differences between family physicians who participate in the pay-for-performance programs versus those who did not. Results A total of 543 family physicians completed the questionnaire. Among family physicians who participated in the pay-for-performance programs, more had joined the Family Practice Integrated Care Project [Odds ratio (OR): 2.70; 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.78 ~ 4.09], had a greater awareness of pay-for-performance programs (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.50 ~ 3.83), and a less negative attitude to pay-for-performance programs (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31 ~ 0.80) after adjusting for age and gender. The major reasons for family physicians who decided to join the pay-for-performance programs included believing the programs help enhance the quality of healthcare (80.8%) and recognizing the benefit of saving health expenditure (63.4%). The causes of unwillingness to join in a pay-for-performance program among non-participants were increased load of administrative works (79.6%) and inadequate understanding of the contents of the pay-for-performance programs (62.9%). Conclusions To better motivate family physicians into P4P participation, hosting effective training programs, developing a more transparent formula for assessing financial risk, providing sufficient budget for healthcare quality improvement, and designing a reasonable profit-sharing plan to promote collaboration between different levels of medical institutions are all imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chyi-Feng Jan
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.7, Chung-Shan South Road, 10002, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Meng-Chih Lee
- Department of Family Medicine, Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan, Taiwan.,Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) Association of Family Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Ming Chiu
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yunlin Branch, Taipei, Yunlin, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuo Huang
- Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) Association of Family Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Keelung Medical Association, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Shinn-Jang Hwang
- Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) Association of Family Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Che-Jui Chang
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.7, Chung-Shan South Road, 10002, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Yuan Chiu
- Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No.7, Chung-Shan South Road, 10002, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Chinese Taipei (Taiwan) Association of Family Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Puyat JH, Kazanjian A. Physician Incentives and Sex/Gender Differences in Depression Care: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Health Equity 2020; 4:23-30. [PMID: 32219194 PMCID: PMC7097697 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2019.0034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Physician incentives have been shown to reduce socioeconomic disparities in health care. The impact on sex/gender inequalities, however, has rarely been investigated. Using population-based data, this study investigated sex/gender differences in depression care and the impact of physician incentives. Methods: Deidentified health data from physician claims, hospitals, vital statistics, prescription database, and insurance plan registries in British Columbia, Canada, were examined, retrospectively. Individuals with depression were identified and their use of mental health services was tracked for 12 months following initial diagnosis. The following indicators were assessed: (1) counseling/psychotherapy (CP), (2) minimally adequate counseling/psychotherapy (MACP), (3) antidepressant therapy (AT), and (4) minimally adequate antidepressant therapy (MAAT). Sex/gender differences in these indicators before (January 2005–December 2007) and after (January 2008–December 2012) the introduction of physician incentives were estimated using interrupted time series analysis. Results: Preintervention, the percentage of individuals with depression who received CP was higher among males (CP: 58.4%, MACP: 13.6%) than females (CP: 57.1%, MACP: 10.9%). In contrast, the percentage who received AT was higher among females (AT: 57.7%, MAAT: 47.4%) than males (AT: 53.6%, MAAT: 41.9%). These statistically significant sex/gender differences remain unchanged postintervention. Conclusions: Sex/gender differences in depression care persist despite the introduction of physician incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Puyat
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Arminee Kazanjian
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Gruß I, Pihlstrom DJ, Kaplan CD, Yosuf N, Fellows JL, Guerrero EG, Polk DE. Stakeholder Assessment of Evidence-Based Guideline Dissemination and Implementation in a Dental Group Practice. JDR Clin Trans Res 2020; 6:87-95. [PMID: 32040925 DOI: 10.1177/2380084420903999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This evaluation captures the perspectives of multiple stakeholders within a salaried dental care delivery organization (dentists, dental assistants, dental hygienists, and dental management) on the implementation of a pit-and-fissure sealant guideline in the Kaiser Permanente Dental Program. Also assessed is the role of formal processes and structures in providing a framework for guideline implementation. METHODS We collected qualitative data through field observations, stakeholder interviews (n = 6), and focus groups (30 participants in 5 focus groups). Field observation notes captured summaries of conversations and other activities. Interviews and focus groups were recorded and transcribed. We analyzed transcripts and field notes using a template analysis with NVivo 12 software to identify themes related to the existing implementation process of clinical guidelines and stakeholder perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of this process. RESULTS Stakeholders perceived 2 main barriers for achieving implementation of the pit-and-fissure sealant guideline: 1) shortcomings in the implementation infrastructure resulting in lack of clarity about the roles and responsibilities in the guideline implementation process and lack of effective mechanisms to disseminate guideline content and 2) resource constraints, such as limited human, space, and material resources. Perceived opportunities for the dissemination and implementation of guidelines included recognition of the importance of guidelines in dental practice and well-functioning workflows within dental specialties. CONCLUSION Our research points to the importance of developing and maintaining an infrastructure to ensure standardized, predictable mechanisms for implementation of guidelines and thereby promoting practice change. While addressing resource constraints may not be possible in all circumstances, an important step for improving guideline implementation-wherever feasible-would be the development of a robust implementation infrastructure that captures and delineates roles and responsibilities of different clinical actors in the guideline implementation process. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT The results of this study can be used by health care leadership and administrators to understand possible reasons for a lack of guideline implementation and provide suggestions for establishing sustainable infrastructure to promote the adoption of clinical guidelines in salaried dental clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Gruß
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - C D Kaplan
- University of Southern California Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - N Yosuf
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - J L Fellows
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR, USA
| | - E G Guerrero
- I-Lead Institute-Research to End Healthcare Disparities Corp, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - D E Polk
- University of Pittsburgh, Pitt Dental Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Paul E, Brown GW, Ensor T, Ooms G, van de Pas R, Ridde V. We shouldn’t count chickens before they hatch: results-based financing and the challenges of cost-effectiveness analysis. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2019.1707774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Paul
- Ecole de santé publique, Université libre de BruxellesUniversité libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Tax Institute, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Tim Ensor
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gorik Ooms
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Remco van de Pas
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Valéry Ridde
- CEPED (IRD-Université Paris Descartes), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Wiles LK, de Wet C, Dalton C, Murphy E, Harris MF, Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Arnolda G, Ting HP, Braithwaite J. The quality of preventive care for pre-school aged children in Australian general practice. BMC Med 2019; 17:218. [PMID: 31805928 PMCID: PMC6896286 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Variable and poor care quality are important causes of preventable patient harm. Many patients receive less than recommended care, but the extent of the problem remains largely unknown. The CareTrack Kids (CTK) research programme sought to address this evidence gap by developing a set of indicators to measure the quality of care for common paediatric conditions. In this study, we focus on one clinical area, 'preventive care' for pre-school aged children. Our objectives were two-fold: (i) develop and validate preventive care quality indicators and (ii) apply them in general medical practice to measure adherence. METHODS Clinical experts (n = 6) developed indicator questions (IQs) from clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations using a multi-stage modified Delphi process, which were pilot tested in general practice. The medical records of Australian children (n = 976) from general practices (n = 80) in Queensland, New South Wales and South Australia identified as having a consultation for one of 17 CTK conditions of interest were retrospectively reviewed by trained paediatric nurses. Statistical analyses were performed to estimate percentage compliance and its 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS IQs (n = 43) and eight care 'bundles' were developed and validated. Care was delivered in line with the IQs in 43.3% of eligible healthcare encounters (95% CI 30.5-56.7). The bundles of care with the highest compliance were 'immunisation' (80.1%, 95% CI 65.7-90.4), 'anthropometric measurements' (52.7%, 95% CI 35.6-69.4) and 'nutrition assessments' (38.5%, 95% CI 24.3-54.3), and lowest for 'visual assessment' (17.9%, 95% CI 8.2-31.9), 'musculoskeletal examinations' (24.4%, 95% CI 13.1-39.1) and 'cardiovascular examinations' (30.9%, 95% CI 12.3-55.5). CONCLUSIONS This study is the first known attempt to develop specific preventive care quality indicators and measure their delivery to Australian children in general practice. Our findings that preventive care is not reliably delivered to all Australian children and that there is substantial variation in adherence with the IQs provide a starting point for clinicians, researchers and policy makers when considering how the gap between recommended and actual care may be narrowed. The findings may also help inform the development of specific improvement interventions, incentives and national standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise K Wiles
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Carl de Wet
- Healthcare Improvement Unit, Clinical Excellence Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Elisabeth Murphy
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark F Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Charlotte J Molloy
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute (UniSA CRI), School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hsuen P Ting
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
125
|
Banerjee S, McCormick D, Paasche-Orlow MK, Lin MY, Hanchate AD. Association between degree of exposure to the Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program and 30-day mortality: experience from the first four years of Medicare's pay-for-performance program. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:921. [PMID: 31791322 PMCID: PMC6889655 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4562-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Hospital Value Based Purchasing Program (HVBP) in the United States, announced in 2010 and implemented since 2013 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), introduced payment penalties and bonuses based on hospital performance on patient 30-day mortality and other indicators. Evidence on the impact of this program is limited and reliant on the choice of program-exempt hospitals as controls. As program-exempt hospitals may have systematic differences with program-participating hospitals, in this study we used an alternative approach wherein program-participating hospitals are stratified by their financial exposure to penalty, and examined changes in hospital performance on 30-day mortality between hospitals with high vs. low financial exposure to penalty. Methods Our study examined all hospitals reimbursed through the Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) – which include most community and tertiary acute care hospitals – from 2009 to 2016. A hospital’s financial exposure to HVBP penalties was measured by the share of its annual aggregate inpatient days provided to Medicare patients (“Medicare bed share”). The main outcome measures were annual hospital-level 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) and pneumonia patients. Using difference-in-differences models we estimated the change in the outcomes in high vs. low Medicare bed share hospitals following HVBP. Results In the study cohort of 1902 US hospitals, average Medicare bed share was 61 and 41% in high (n = 540) and low (n = 1362) Medicare bed share hospitals, respectively. High Medicare bed share hospitals were more likely to have smaller bed size and less likely to be teaching hospitals, but ownership type was similar among both Medicare bed share groups.. Among low Medicare bed share (control) hospitals, baseline (pre-HVBP) 30-day mortality was 16.0% (AMI), 10.9% (HF) and 11.4% (pneumonia). In both high and low Medicare bed share hospitals 30-day mortality experienced a secular decrease for AMI, increase for HF and pneumonia; differences in the pre-post change between the two hospital groups were small (< 0.12%) and not significant across all three conditions. Conclusions HVBP was not associated with a meaningful change in 30-day mortality across hospitals with differential exposure to the program penalty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souvik Banerjee
- Disparities Research Unit and The Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Danny McCormick
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.,Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michael K Paasche-Orlow
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave #2092, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Meng-Yun Lin
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave #2092, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Amresh D Hanchate
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Ave #2092, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. .,VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Parkinson B, Meacock R, Sutton M, Fichera E, Mills N, Shorter GW, Treweek S, Harman NL, Brown RCH, Gillies K, Bower P. Designing and using incentives to support recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review and a checklist for design. Trials 2019; 20:624. [PMID: 31706324 PMCID: PMC6842495 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3710-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment and retention of participants are both critical for the success of trials, yet both remain significant problems. The use of incentives to target participants and trial staff has been proposed as one solution. The effects of incentives are complex and depend upon how they are designed, but these complexities are often overlooked. In this paper, we used a scoping review to ‘map’ the literature, with two aims: to develop a checklist on the design and use of incentives to support recruitment and retention in trials; and to identify key research topics for the future. Methods The scoping review drew on the existing economic theory of incentives and a structured review of the literature on the use of incentives in three healthcare settings: trials, pay for performance, and health behaviour change. We identified the design issues that need to be considered when introducing an incentive scheme to improve recruitment and retention in trials. We then reviewed both the theoretical and empirical evidence relating to each of these design issues. We synthesised the findings into a checklist to guide the design of interventions using incentives. Results The issues to consider when designing an incentive system were summarised into an eight-question checklist. The checklist covers: the current incentives and barriers operating in the system; who the incentive should be directed towards; what the incentive should be linked to; the form of incentive; the incentive size; the structure of the incentive system; the timing and frequency of incentive payouts; and the potential unintended consequences. We concluded the section on each design aspect by highlighting the gaps in the current evidence base. Conclusions Our findings highlight how complex the design of incentive systems can be, and how crucial each design choice is to overall effectiveness. The most appropriate design choice will differ according to context, and we have aimed to provide context-specific advice. Whilst all design issues warrant further research, evidence is most needed on incentives directed at recruiters, optimal incentive size, and testing of different incentive structures, particularly exploring repeat arrangements with recruiters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Parkinson
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rachel Meacock
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matt Sutton
- Health Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Nicola Mills
- MRC ConDuCT-II Hub, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gillian W Shorter
- Institute of Mental Health Sciences, School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nicola L Harman
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Katie Gillies
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
127
|
Bond AM, Volpp KG, Emanuel EJ, Caldarella K, Hodlofski A, Sacks L, Patel P, Sokol K, Vittore S, Calgano D, Nelson C, Weng K, Troxel A, Navathe A. Real-time Feedback in Pay-for-Performance: Does More Information Lead to Improvement? J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:1737-1743. [PMID: 31041590 PMCID: PMC6712150 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05004-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Revised: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been used expansively to improve quality of care delivered by physicians. However, to what extent P4P works through the provision of information versus financial incentives is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To determine whether an increase in information feedback without changes to financial incentives resulted in improved physician performance within an existing P4P program. INTERVENTION/EXPOSURE Implementation of a new registry enabling real-time feedback to physicians on quality measure performance. DESIGN Observational, predictive piecewise model at the physician-measure level to examine whether registry introduction associated with performance changes. We used detailed physician quality measure data 3 years prior to registry implementation (2010-2012) and 2 years after implementation (2014-2015). We also linked physician-level data including age, gender, and board certification; group-level data including registry click rates; and patient panel data including chronic conditions. PARTICIPANTS Four hundred thirty-four physicians continuously affiliated with Advocate from 2010 to 2015. MAIN MEASURES Physician performance on ten quality metrics. KEY RESULTS We found no consistent pattern of improvement associated with the availability of real-time information across ten measures. Relative to predicted performance without the registry, average performance increased for two measures (childhood immunization status-rotavirus (p < 0.001) and diabetes care-medical attention for nephropathy (p = 0.024)) and decreased for three measures (childhood immunization status-influenza (p < 0.001) and diabetes care-HbA1c testing (p < 0.001) and poor HbA1c control (p < 0.001)). Results were consistent for subgroup analysis on those most able to improve, i.e., physicians in the bottom tertile of performance prior to registry introduction. Physicians who improved most were in groups that accessed the registry more than those who improved least (8.0 vs 10.0 times per week, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS More frequent provision of information, provided in real-time, was insufficient to improve physician performance in an existing P4P program with high baseline performance. Results suggest that electronic registries may not themselves drive performance improvement. Future work should consider testing information feedback enhancements with financial incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia M Bond
- Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Kevin G Volpp
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ezekiel J Emanuel
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kristen Caldarella
- Division of Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Lee Sacks
- Advocate Health System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Kara Sokol
- Advocate Health System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Weng
- Advocate Health System, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Andrea Troxel
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amol Navathe
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Erlangga D, Suhrcke M, Ali S, Bloor K. The impact of public health insurance on health care utilisation, financial protection and health status in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219731. [PMID: 31461458 PMCID: PMC6713352 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expanding public health insurance seeks to attain several desirable objectives, including increasing access to healthcare services, reducing the risk of catastrophic healthcare expenditures, and improving health outcomes. The extent to which these objectives are met in a real-world policy context remains an empirical question of increasing research and policy interest in recent years. METHODS We reviewed systematically empirical studies published from July 2010 to September 2016 using Medline, Embase, Econlit, CINAHL Plus via EBSCO, and Web of Science and grey literature databases. No language restrictions were applied. Our focus was on both randomised and observational studies, particularly those including explicitly attempts to tackle selection bias in estimating the treatment effect of health insurance. The main outcomes are: (1) utilisation of health services, (2) financial protection for the target population, and (3) changes in health status. FINDINGS 8755 abstracts and 118 full-text articles were assessed. Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria including six randomised studies, reflecting a substantial increase in the quantity and quality of research output compared to the time period before 2010. Overall, health insurance schemes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been found to improve access to health care as measured by increased utilisation of health care facilities (32 out of 40 studies). There also appeared to be a favourable effect on financial protection (26 out of 46 studies), although several studies indicated otherwise. There is moderate evidence that health insurance schemes improve the health of the insured (9 out of 12 studies). INTERPRETATION Increased health insurance coverage generally appears to increase access to health care facilities, improve financial protection and improve health status, although findings are not totally consistent. Understanding the drivers of differences in the outcomes of insurance reforms is critical to inform future implementations of publicly funded health insurance to achieve the broader goal of universal health coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darius Erlangga
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Suhrcke
- Centre of Health Economics, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom
- Luxembourg Institute of Socio-economic Research (LISER), Luxembourg
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karen Bloor
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Erdek MA. Pay-for-Performance Reimbursement for Clinicians: Common Sense or a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? PAIN MEDICINE 2019; 19:2106-2108. [PMID: 30321393 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pny168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Erdek
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Cantu R. Physical Therapists' Ethical Dilemmas in Treatment, Coding, and Billing for Rehabilitation Services in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Mixed-Method Pilot Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 20:1458-1461. [PMID: 31378703 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reimbursement in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) is driven by the number of minutes a patient receives rehabilitation. Physical therapists' (PTs) clinical decisions in evaluation and appropriate treatment of patients drive the dosing of rehabilitation services. Many times these 2 dynamics clash. The purpose of this study was to determine how PTs in SNFs viewed their ethical work environment, what primary issues drove their views, and what potential solutions were identified for the issues. DESIGN This was a mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS An organizational ethics survey along with 2 open-ended questions were sent to a random sample of 1200 PTs in the state of Georgia; 340 surveys were returned, and the respondents were categorized into 9 typical PT work settings. Twenty eight participants (8.2%) reported they worked in SNFs. MEASURES The Ethics Environment Questionnaire was the quantitative measurement tool used for the study. In addition, 2 open-ended questions were asked regarding ethical concerns and possible solutions to those concerns. RESULTS Of the 9 workplace settings, therapists working in SNFs had the lowest perceptions of ethical work environment. They were also the only group that scored below the survey cut-off point for positive ethical work environment. Their primary concerns were overutilization issues, productivity standards, and billing and coding issues. The 2 primary themes regarding solutions were allowing PTs to be autonomous in their decision making and decreasing productivity standards. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS The current Medicare reimbursement system rewards quantity of rehabilitation over quality. PTs are trained to deliver quality care that is dosed appropriately, and this may conflict with organizational objectives. The primary implication in this study is that clinicians and administrators should engage more in open, honest dialogue on how to share responsibility and balance organizational goals with clinical ethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Cantu
- Department of Physical Therapy, Brenau University Ivester College of Health Sciences, Gainesville, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Wang Y, Ding Y, Park E, Hunte G. Do Financial Incentives Change Length-of-stay Performance in Emergency Departments? A Retrospective Study of the Pay-for-performance Program in Metro Vancouver. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:856-866. [PMID: 31317606 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs have been implemented in various forms to reduce emergency department (ED) patient length of stay (LOS). This retrospective study investigated to what extent the timing of patient disposition in Metro Vancouver EDs was influenced by a LOS-based P4P program. METHODS We analyzed ED visit records of four major hospitals in Metro Vancouver, Canada. For each ED, we individually tested whether LOS was distributed discontinuously at the LOS target before and after the P4P program was terminated. For the P4P effective period, we examined whether patients discharged just prior to the LOS target had a higher 7-day return-and-admission (RA) rate-the probability that a patient, after being discharged home, returned to any ED within 7 days and was admitted to an inpatient unit-than patients discharged just after the target. RESULTS Prior to the termination of the P4P program, in all four EDs, the LOS density of admitted patients was discontinuous and had a significant drop at the P4P 10-hours admission LOS target; a similar phenomenon was observed among discharged patients at the 4-hours discharge LOS target, but only in the two lower-volume EDs. Furthermore, in a lower-volume ED, patients who were discharged right before the 4-hours P4P LOS target had a higher 7-day RA rate than patients discharged right after the LOS target. After the termination of the discharge incentive, the discontinuity at the discharge LOS target became less evident, but patients were still more frequently admitted just before 10 hours in three of the four EDs as the local health authority continued to support the admission incentive scheme after the government terminated the P4P program. CONCLUSIONS The LOS-based financial incentive scheme appears to have influenced the timing of ED patient dispositions. The results suggest mixed consequences of the P4P program-it can reduce access block for admitted patients but may also lead to discharges associated with return visits and admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuren Wang
- College of Systems Engineering National University of Defense Technology Changsha China
| | - Yichuan Ding
- Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Eric Park
- Faculty of Business and Economics The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong
| | - Garth Hunte
- Department of Emergency Medicine St. Paul's Hospital University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Details matter: Physician responses to multiple payments for the same activity. Soc Sci Med 2019; 235:112343. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
133
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pay-for-Performance (P4P) is a payment model that rewards health care providers for meeting pre-defined targets for quality indicators or efficacy parameters to increase the quality or efficacy of care. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to assess the impact of P4P for in-hospital delivered health care on the quality of care, resource use and equity. Our objective was not only to answer the question whether P4P works in general (simple perspective) but to provide a comprehensive and detailed overview of P4P with a focus on analyzing the intervention components, the context factors and their interrelation (more complex perspective). SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two trial registers on 27 June 2018. In addition, we searched conference proceedings, gray literature and web pages of relevant health care institutions, contacted experts in the field, conducted cited reference searches and performed cross-checks of included references and systematic reviews on the same topic. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized trials, cluster randomized trials, non-randomized clustered trials, controlled before-after studies, interrupted time series and repeated measures studies that analyzed hospitals, hospital units or groups of hospitals and that compared any kind of P4P to a basic payment scheme (e.g. capitation) without P4P. Studies had to analyze at least one of the following outcomes to be eligible: patient outcomes; quality of care; utilization, coverage or access; resource use, costs and cost shifting; healthcare provider outcomes; equity; adverse effects or harms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened all citations for inclusion, extracted study data and assessed risk of bias for each included study. Study characteristics were extracted by one reviewer and verified by a second.We did not perform meta-analysis because the included studies were too heterogenous regarding hospital characteristics, the design of the P4P programs and study design. Instead we present a structured narrative synthesis considering the complexity as well as the context/setting of the intervention. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach and present the results narratively in 'Summary of findings' tables. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 studies (20 CBA, 7 ITS) on six different P4P programs. Studies analyzed between 10 and 4267 centers. All P4P programs targeted acute or emergency physical conditions and compared a capitation-based payment scheme without P4P to the same capitation-based payment scheme combined with a P4P add-on. Two P4P program used rewards or penalties; one used first rewards and than penalties; two used penalties only and one used rewards only. Four P4P programs were established and evaluated in the USA, one in England and one in France.Most studies showed no difference or a very small effect in favor of the P4P program. The impact of each P4P program was as follows.Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration Program: It is uncertain whether this program, which used rewards for some hospitals and penalties for others, has an impact on mortality, adverse clinical events, quality of care, equity or resource use as the certainty of the evidence was very low.Value-Based Purchasing Program: It is uncertain whether this program, which used rewards for some hospitals and penalties for others, has an impact on mortality, adverse clinical events or quality of care as the certainty of the evidence was very low. Equity and resource use outcomes were not reported in the studies, which evaluated this program.Non-payment for Hospital-Acquired Conditions Program: It is uncertain whether this penalty-based program has an impact on adverse clinical events as the certainty of the evidence was very low. Mortality, quality of care, equity and resource use outcomes were not reported in the studies, which evaluated this program.Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: None of the studies that examined this penalty-based program reported mortality, adverse clinical events, quality of care (process quality score), equity or resource use outcomes.Advancing Quality Program: It is uncertain whether this reward-/penalty-based program has an impact on mortality as the certainty of the evidence was very low. Adverse clinical events, quality of care, equity and resource use outcomes were not reported in any study.Financial Incentive to Quality Improvement Program: It is uncertain whether this reward-based program has an impact on quality of care, as the certainty of the evidence was very low. Mortality, adverse clinical events, equity and resource use outcomes were not reported in any study.Subgroup analysis (analysis of modifying design and context factors)Analysis of P4P design factors provides some hints that non-payments compared to additional payments and payments for quality attainment (e.g. falling below specified mortality threshold) compared to quality improvement (e.g. reduction of mortality by specified percent points within one year) may have a stronger impact on performance. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS It is uncertain whether P4P, compared to capitation-based payments without P4P for hospitals, has an impact on patient outcomes, quality of care, equity or resource use as the certainty of the evidence was very low (or we found no studies on the outcome) for all P4P programs. The effects on patient outcomes of P4P in hospitals were at most small, regardless of design factors and context/setting. It seems that with additional payments only small short-term but non-sustainable effects can be achieved. Non-payments seem to be slightly more effective than bonuses and payments for quality attainment seem to be slightly more effective than payments for quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Mathes
- University Witten/HerdeckeInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM) ‐ Department for Evidence‐based Health Services ResearchOstmerheimer Str. 200 (House 38)CologneGermany51109
| | - Dawid Pieper
- University Witten/HerdeckeInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM) ‐ Department for Evidence‐based Health Services ResearchOstmerheimer Str. 200 (House 38)CologneGermany51109
| | - Johannes Morche
- Federal Joint CommitteeMedical Consultancy DepartmentWegelystraße 8BerlinGermany
| | - Stephanie Polus
- University Witten/HerdeckeInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM) ‐ Department for Evidence‐based Health Services ResearchOstmerheimer Str. 200 (House 38)CologneGermany51109
| | - Thomas Jaschinski
- University Witten/HerdeckeInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM) ‐ Department for Evidence‐based Health Services ResearchOstmerheimer Str. 200 (House 38)CologneGermany51109
| | - Michaela Eikermann
- Medical advisory service of social health insurance (MDS)Department of Evidence‐based medicineTheodor‐Althoff‐Straße 47EssenNorth Rhine WestphaliaGermany51109
| | | |
Collapse
|
134
|
Sankaran R, Sukul D, Nuliyalu U, Gulseren B, Engler TA, Arntson E, Zlotnick H, Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2019; 366:l4109. [PMID: 31270062 PMCID: PMC6607204 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING 3238 acute care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged from acute care hospitals between 23 July 2014 and 30 November 2016 and eligible for at least one targeted hospital acquired condition (n=15 470 334). INTERVENTION Hospital receipt of a penalty in the first year of the HACRP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episode level count of targeted hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes, 30 day readmissions, and 30 day mortality. RESULTS Of 724 hospitals penalized under the HACRP in fiscal year 2015, 708 were represented in the study. Mean counts of hospital acquired conditions were 2.72 per 1000 episodes for penalized hospitals and 2.06 per 1000 episodes for non-penalized hospitals; 30 day readmissions were 14.4% and 14.0%, respectively, and 30 day mortality was 9.0% for both hospital groups. Penalized hospitals were more likely to be large, teaching institutions, and have a greater share of patients with low socioeconomic status than non-penalized hospitals. HACRP penalties were associated with a non-significant change of -0.16 hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes (95% confidence interval -0.53 to 0.20), -0.36 percentage points in 30 day readmission (-1.06 to 0.33), and -0.04 percentage points in 30 day mortality (-0.59 to 0.52). No clear patterns of clinical improvement were observed across hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Penalization was not associated with significant changes in rates of hospital acquired conditions, 30 day readmission, or 30 day mortality, and does not appear to drive meaningful clinical improvements. By disproportionately penalizing hospitals caring for more disadvantaged patients, the HACRP could exacerbate inequities in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshun Sankaran
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Devraj Sukul
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ushapoorna Nuliyalu
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Baris Gulseren
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Tedi A Engler
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Emily Arntson
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hanna Zlotnick
- University of Michigan Gerald R Ford School of Public Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Justin B Dimick
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew M Ryan
- University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
135
|
Cattel D, Eijkenaar F. Value-Based Provider Payment Initiatives Combining Global Payments With Explicit Quality Incentives: A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev 2019; 77:511-537. [PMID: 31216945 PMCID: PMC7536531 DOI: 10.1177/1077558719856775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
An essential element in the pursuit of value-based health care is provider payment reform. This article aims to identify and analyze payment initiatives comprising a specific manifestation of value-based payment reform that can be expected to contribute to value in a broad sense: (a) global base payments combined with (b) explicit quality incentives. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, consulting four scientific bibliographic databases, reference lists, the Internet, and experts. We included and compared 18 initiatives described in 111 articles/documents on key design features and impact on value. The initiatives are heterogeneous regarding the operationalization of the two payment components and associated design features. Main commonalities between initiatives are a strong emphasis on primary care, the use of "virtual" spending targets, and the application of risk adjustment and other risk-mitigating measures. Evaluated initiatives generally show promising results in terms of lower spending growth with equal or improved quality.
Collapse
|
136
|
Garabedian LF, Ross-Degnan D, Wharam JF. Provider Perspectives on Quality Payment Programs Targeting Diabetes in Primary Care Settings. Popul Health Manag 2019; 22:248-254. [PMID: 30204544 PMCID: PMC6555171 DOI: 10.1089/pop.2018.0093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Public and private insurers increasingly use quality payment programs as a tool to improve quality of care in primary care settings. However, little is known about primary care providers' perspectives on whether and how quality payment programs improve diabetes quality of care. In this qualitative study, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 23 providers from March to June 2015. Transcripts were analyzed to identify key themes using the immersion-crystallization method. Almost all of the providers believed that insurers play a meaningful role in improving quality of care for diabetes patients. Most thought that insurers' efforts are more effective when channeled through providers and delivery systems rather than directed at patients. Providers generally believed that quality payment programs have had a positive impact on quality of diabetes care, although provider views were not evidence based. Providers in practices in which quality payment programs were believed to have had a positive impact stated that the programs provided financial incentives and resources for improved population health management systems and additional staff. Conversely, most providers did not believe that quality payment programs have had any impact via direct financial incentives to individual physicians. A few providers were skeptical about the impact of quality payment programs and noted negative consequences that they had observed. Providers recommended strategies to improve quality payment programs (eg, refine quality measures, provide regular feedback on quality and costs) and additional strategies that insurers could consider to address provider- and patient-level barriers to high-quality diabetes care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura F. Garabedian
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dennis Ross-Degnan
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James F. Wharam
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Mendes SR, Martins RC, Mambrini JVM, Matta-Machado ATG, Mattos GCM, Gallagher JE, Abreu MHNG. Using Item Response Theory to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of questions in a Brazilian programme and the performance of dental teams in primary care. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217249. [PMID: 31150438 PMCID: PMC6544346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives First, to assess the psychometric properties of key questions included in a public sector evaluation of primary dental care in Brazil; and second, to evaluate the performance of dental teams in relation to these items. Methods Secondary analysis of a national primary care dataset monitoring quality and access to dental care. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with representatives of dental teams participating in the ‘National Programme for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care’. Twenty-three mandatory questions about the dentists’ reported delivery of dental procedures were included in the analysis. Item Response Theory (IRT) modelling was applied to measure the psychometric properties of the instrument—level of difficulty and discrimination parameter of each item—and then to estimate dental team performance scores based on these parameters. Based on IRT, possible scores ranged from -4 to +4. Results Three of the 23 mandatory items were removed due to poor internal consistency, resulting in a scale of 20 items for assessing dental team performance. The results showed variation in procedures delivered by the dental teams; whilst more than a half of the procedures were executed by at least 80% of the dental teams, those relating to dentures (partial/total) and frenectomy (lingual/labial) were performed by less than 30%. Amongst the 20 items included in the model, those related to partial/total dentures and oral cancer follow-up presented higher levels of difficulty and were less frequently provided. The items relating to the treatment of deciduous teeth and access to the dental pulp of permanent teeth had the highest discrimination parameters and, consequently, greater weight in the performance’s score estimation; therefore, dental teams that did not perform these items had the lowest performance scores. In the present study, dental team performance scores ranged from -3.66 to +1.87 with a mean/median of -0.06/+0.01. Conclusion The findings suggest that whilst the items within the instrument demonstrated some potential to discriminate between poor and very poor teams, they were ineffective in discriminating between poor and good teams. Whilst Brazilian dental teams perform many mandatory procedures, variation in the nature of their delivery of care requires further investigation to enhance service provision to the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suellen R. Mendes
- Graduate Program in Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Renata C. Martins
- Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | | | - Antônio Thomaz G. Matta-Machado
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Grazielle C. M. Mattos
- Kings College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer E. Gallagher
- Kings College London, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mauro H. N. G. Abreu
- Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Baathe F, Rosta J, Bringedal B, Rø KI. How do doctors experience the interactions among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care? A qualitative study in a Norwegian hospital. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026971. [PMID: 31129585 PMCID: PMC6537988 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Doctors increasingly experience high levels of burnout and loss of engagement. To address this, there is a need to better understand doctors' work situation. This study explores how doctors experience the interactions among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care. DESIGN An exploratory qualitative study design with semistructured individual interviews was chosen. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed by a transdisciplinary research group. SETTING The study focused on a surgical department of a mid-sized hospital in Norway. PARTICIPANTS Seven doctors were interviewed. A purposeful sampling was used with gender and seniority as selection criteria. Three senior doctors (two female, one male) and four in training (three male, one female) were interviewed. RESULTS We found that in order to provide quality care to the patients, individual doctors described 'stretching themselves', that is, handling the tensions between quantity and quality, to overcome organisational shortcomings. Experiencing a workplace emphasis on production numbers and budget concerns led to feelings of estrangement among the doctors. Participants reported a shift from serving as trustworthy, autonomous professionals to becoming production workers, where professional identity was threatened. They felt less aligned with workplace values, in addition to experiencing limited management recognition for quality of patient care. Management initiatives to include doctors in development of organisational policies, processes and systems were sparse. CONCLUSION The interviewed doctors described their struggle to balance the inherent tension among professional fulfilment, organisational factors and quality of patient care in their everyday work. They communicated how 'stretching themselves', to overcome organisational shortcomings, is no longer a feasible strategy without compromising both professional fulfilment and quality of patient care. Managers need to ensure that doctors are involved when developing organisational policies, processes and systems. This is likely to be beneficial for both professional fulfilment and quality of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Baathe
- LEFO – Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Stress Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Judith Rosta
- LEFO – Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway
| | - Berit Bringedal
- LEFO – Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karin Isaksson Rø
- LEFO – Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession, Oslo, Norway
- Dept. of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, MedicalFaculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
139
|
Donohue JM, Barry CL, Stuart EA, Greenfield SF, Song Z, Chernew ME, Huskamp HA. Effects of Global Payment and Accountable Care on Medication Treatment for Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders. J Addict Med 2019; 12:11-18. [PMID: 29189295 PMCID: PMC5786473 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC) implemented in 2009 by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) is intended to improve quality and control costs by putting providers at risk for total medical spending and tying payment to performance on specified quality measures. We examined the AQC's early effects on use of and spending on medication treatment (MT) for addiction among individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and opioid use disorders (OUDs), conditions not subject to any performance measurement in the AQC. METHODS Using data from 2006 to 2011, we use difference-in-difference estimation of the effect of the AQC on MT using a comparison group of enrollees in BCBSMA whose providers did not participate in the AQC. We compared AQC and non-AQC enrollees with AUDs (n = 37,113 person-years) and/or OUDs (n = 12,727 person-years) on any use of MT, number of prescriptions filled, and MT spending adjusting for demographic and health status characteristics. RESULTS There was no difference in MT use among AQC enrollees with OUD (38.7%) relative to the comparison group (39.1%) (adjusted difference = -0.4%, 95% confidence interval -3.8% to 3.0%, P = 0.82). Likewise, there was no difference in MT use for AUD between the AQC (6.3%) and comparison group (6.5%) (P = 0.64). Similarly, we detected no differences in number of prescriptions or spending. CONCLUSIONS Despite incentives for improved integration and quality of care under a global payment contract, the initial 3 years of the AQC showed no impact on MT use for AUD or OUD among privately insured enrollees with behavioral health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Zirui Song
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
140
|
Binyaruka P, Robberstad B, Torsvik G, Borghi J. Does payment for performance increase performance inequalities across health providers? A case study of Tanzania. Health Policy Plan 2019; 33:1026-1036. [PMID: 30380062 PMCID: PMC6263023 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czy084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of payment-for-performance (P4P) schemes in the health sector has been documented, but there has been little attention to the distributional effects of P4P across health facilities. We examined the distribution of P4P payouts over time and assessed whether increased service coverage due to P4P differed across facilities in Tanzania. We used two service outcomes that improved due to P4P [facility-based deliveries and provision of antimalarials during antenatal care (ANC)], to also assess whether incentive design matters for performance inequalities. We used data from 150 facilities from intervention and comparison areas in January 2012 and 13 months later. Our primary data were gathered through facility survey and household survey, while data on performance payouts were obtained from the programme administrator. Descriptive inequality measures were used to examine the distribution of payouts across facility subgroups. Difference-in-differences regression analyses were used to identify P4P differential effects on the two service coverage outcomes across facility subgroups. We found that performance payouts were initially higher among higher-level facilities (hospitals and health centres) compared with dispensaries, among facilities with more medical commodities and among facilities serving wealthier populations, but these inequalities declined over time. P4P had greater effects on coverage of institutional deliveries among facilities with low baseline performance, serving middle wealth populations and located in rural areas. P4P effects on antimalarials provision during ANC was similar across facilities. Performance inequalities were influenced by the design of incentives and a range of facility characteristics; however, the nature of the service being targeted is also likely to have affected provider response. Further research is needed to examine in more detail the effects of incentive design on outcomes and researchers should be encouraged to report on design aspects in their evaluations of P4P and systematically monitor and report subgroup effects across providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Binyaruka
- Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Health System, Impact Evaluation, and Policy, Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.,Department of Global Health and Development, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bjarne Robberstad
- Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gaute Torsvik
- Department of Global Health and Development, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Josephine Borghi
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Vlaanderen FP, Tanke MA, Bloem BR, Faber MJ, Eijkenaar F, Schut FT, Jeurissen PPT. Design and effects of outcome-based payment models in healthcare: a systematic review. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2019; 20:217-232. [PMID: 29974285 PMCID: PMC6438941 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-018-0989-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcome-based payment models (OBPMs) might solve the shortcomings of fee-for-service or diagnostic-related group (DRG) models using financial incentives based on outcome indicators of the provided care. This review provides an analysis of the characteristics and effectiveness of OBPMs, to determine which models lead to favourable effects. METHODS We first developed a definition for OBPMs. Next, we searched four data sources to identify the models: (1) scientific literature databases; (2) websites of relevant governmental and scientific agencies; (3) the reference lists of included articles; (4) experts in the field. We only selected studies that examined the impact of the payment model on quality and/or costs. A narrative evidence synthesis was used to link specific design features to effects on quality of care or healthcare costs. RESULTS We included 88 articles, describing 12 OBPMs. We identified two groups of models based on differences in design features: narrow OBPMs (financial incentives based on quality indicators) and broad OBPMs (combination of global budgets, risk sharing, and financial incentives based on quality indicators). Most (5 out of 9) of the narrow OBPMs showed positive effects on quality; the others had mixed (2) or negative (2) effects. The effects of narrow OBPMs on healthcare utilization or costs, however, were unfavourable (3) or unknown (6). All broad OBPMs (3) showed positive effects on quality of care, while reducing healthcare cost growth. DISCUSSION Although strong empirical evidence on the effects of OBPMs on healthcare quality, utilization, and costs is limited, our findings suggest that broad OBPMs may be preferred over narrow OBPMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F P Vlaanderen
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - M A Tanke
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - B R Bloem
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M J Faber
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - F Eijkenaar
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F T Schut
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P P T Jeurissen
- Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Celsus Academy for Sustainable Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Damberg CL, Silverman M, Burgette L, Vaiana ME, Ridgely MS. Are value-based incentives driving behavior change to improve value? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE 2019; 25:e26-e32. [PMID: 30763040 PMCID: PMC8502100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To understand physician organization (PO) responses to financial incentives for quality and total cost of care among POs that were exposed to a statewide multipayer value-based payment (VBP) program, and to identify challenges that POs face in advancing the goals of VBP. STUDY DESIGN Semistructured qualitative interviews and survey. METHODS We drew a stratified random sample of 40 multispecialty California POs (25% of the POs that were eligible for incentives). In-person interviews were conducted with physician leaders and a survey was administered on actions being taken to reduce costs and redesign care and to discuss the challenges to improving value. We performed a thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify common actions taken and challenges to reducing costs. RESULTS VBP helps to promote care delivery transformation among POs, although efforts varied across organizations. Investments are occurring primarily in strategies to control hospital costs and redesign primary care, particularly for chronically ill patients; specialty care redesign is largely absent. Physician payment incentives for value remain small relative to total compensation, with continued emphasis on productivity. Challenges cited include the lack of a single enterprisewide electronic health records platform for information exchange, limited ability to influence specialists who were not exclusive to the organization, lack of payer cost and utilization data to manage costs, inability to recoup care redesign investments given the small size of VBP incentives, and lack of physician cost awareness. CONCLUSIONS Transformation could be advanced by strengthening financial incentives for value; engaging specialists in care redesign and delivering value; enhancing partnerships among POs, hospitals, and payers to align quality and cost actions; strengthening information exchange across providers; and applying other strategies to influence physician behavior.
Collapse
|
143
|
Navathe AS, Volpp KG, Caldarella KL, Bond A, Troxel AB, Zhu J, Matloubieh S, Lyon Z, Mishra A, Sacks L, Nelson C, Patel P, Shea J, Calcagno D, Vittore S, Sokol K, Weng K, McDowald N, Crawford P, Small D, Emanuel EJ. Effect of Financial Bonus Size, Loss Aversion, and Increased Social Pressure on Physician Pay-for-Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Cohort Study. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e187950. [PMID: 30735234 PMCID: PMC6484616 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Despite limited effectiveness of pay-for-performance (P4P), payers continue to expand P4P nationally. Objective To test whether increasing bonus size or adding the behavioral economic principles of increased social pressure (ISP) or loss aversion (LA) improves the effectiveness of P4P. Design, Setting, and Participants Parallel studies conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2016, consisted of a randomized clinical trial with patients cluster-randomized by practice site to an active control group (larger bonus size [LBS] only) or to groups with 1 of 2 behavioral economic interventions added and a cohort study comparing changes in outcomes among patients of physicians receiving an LBS with outcomes in propensity-matched physicians not receiving an LBS. A total of 8118 patients attributed to 66 physicians with 1 of 5 chronic conditions were treated at Advocate HealthCare, an integrated health system in Illinois. Data were analyzed using intention to treat and multiple imputation from February 1, 2017, through May 31, 2018. Interventions Physician participants received an LBS increased by a mean of $3355 per physician (LBS-only group); prefunded incentives to elicit LA and an LBS; or increasing proportion of a P4P bonus determined by group performance from 30% to 50% (ISP) and an LBS. Main Outcomes and Measures The proportion of 20 evidence-based quality measures achieved at the patient level. Results A total of 86 physicians were eligible for the randomized trial. Of these, 32 were excluded because they did not have unique attributed patients. Fifty-four physicians were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups, and 33 physicians (54.5% male; mean [SD] age, 57 [10] years) and 3747 patients (63.6% female; mean [SD] age, 64 [18] years) were included in the final analysis. Nine physicians and 864 patients were randomized to the LBS-only group, 13 physicians and 1496 patients to the LBS plus ISP group, and 11 physicians and 1387 patients to the LBS plus LA group. Physician characteristics did not differ significantly by arm, such as mean (SD) physician age ranging from 56 (9) to 59 (9) years, and sex (6 [46.2%] to 6 [66.7%] male). No differences were found between the LBS-only and the intervention groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for LBS plus LA vs LBS-only, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65-1.15; P = .31]; aOR for LBS plus ISP vs LBS-only, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.64-1.42; P = .81]; and aOR for LBS plus ISP vs LBS plus LA, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.61; P = .62]). Increased bonus size was associated with a greater increase in evidence-based care relative to the comparison group (risk-standardized absolute difference-in-differences, 3.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.9-4.5 percentage points; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Increased bonus size was associated with significantly improved quality of care relative to a comparison group. Adding ISP and opportunities for LA did not improve quality. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02634879.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol S. Navathe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Kevin G. Volpp
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Kristen L. Caldarella
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Amelia Bond
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Health Care Management, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Andrea B. Troxel
- Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Jingsan Zhu
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Shireen Matloubieh
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Zoe Lyon
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Akriti Mishra
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Lee Sacks
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Carrie Nelson
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Pankaj Patel
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Judy Shea
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Don Calcagno
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | | | - Kara Sokol
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Kevin Weng
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | | | - Paul Crawford
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Health Care Management, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ezekiel J. Emanuel
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Warsi S, Elsey H, Boeckmann M, Noor M, Khan A, Barua D, Nasreen S, Huque S, Huque R, Khanal S, Shrestha P, Newell J, Dogar O, Siddiqi K. Using behaviour change theory to train health workers on tobacco cessation support for tuberculosis patients: a mixed-methods study in Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:71. [PMID: 30683087 PMCID: PMC6347762 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3909-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately impacted by interacting epidemics of tuberculosis (TB) and tobacco consumption. Research indicates behavioural support delivered by health workers effectively promotes tobacco cessation. There is, however, a paucity of training to support LMIC health workers deliver effective tobacco cessation behavioural support. The TB and Tobacco Consortium undertook research in South Asia to understand factors affecting TB health workers’ delivery of tobacco cessation behavioural support, and subsequently developed a training package for LMICs. Methods Using the “capability, opportunity, and motivation as determinants of behaviour” (COM-B) framework to understand any issues facing health worker delivery of behaviour support, we analysed 25 semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion with TB health workers, facility in-charges, and national tuberculosis control programme (NTP) staff members in each country. Results were integrated with findings of an adapted COM-B questionnaire on health worker confidence in tobacco cessation support delivery, administered to 36 TB health workers. Based on findings, we designed a guide and training programme on tobacco cessation support for health workers. Results Qualitative results highlighted gaps in the majority of health workers’ knowledge on tobacco cessation and TB and tobacco interaction, inadequate training on patient communication, insufficient resources and staff support, and NTPs’ non-prioritization of tobacco cessation in all three countries. Questionnaire results reiterated the knowledge deficits and low confidence in patient communication. Participants suggested strengthening knowledge, skills, and competence through training and professional incentives. Based on findings, we developed an interactive two-day training and TB health worker guide adaptable for LMICs, focusing on evidence of best practice on TB and tobacco cessation support, communication, and rapport building with patients. Conclusions TB health workers are essential in addressing the dual burden of TB and tobacco faced by many LMICs. Factors affecting their delivery of tobacco cessation support can be identified using the COM-B framework, and include issues such as individuals’ knowledge and skills, as well as structural barriers like professional support through monitoring and supervision. While structural changes are needed to tackle the latter, we have developed an adaptable and engaging health worker training package to address the former that can be delivered in routine TB care. Trial registration ISRCTN43811467. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-3909-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Warsi
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Helen Elsey
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| | - Melanie Boeckmann
- Institute of General Practice, Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Maryam Noor
- The Initiative, Orange Grove Farm, Banigala, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Amina Khan
- The Initiative, Orange Grove Farm, Banigala, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Deepa Barua
- ARK Foundation, House B130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1206, Bangladesh
| | - Shammi Nasreen
- ARK Foundation, House B130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1206, Bangladesh
| | - Samina Huque
- ARK Foundation, House B130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1206, Bangladesh
| | - Rumana Huque
- ARK Foundation, House B130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka, 1206, Bangladesh
| | - Sudeepa Khanal
- HERD International, P O Box Number: 24144, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Prabin Shrestha
- HERD International, P O Box Number: 24144, Thapathali 11, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - James Newell
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Level 10 Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Omara Dogar
- The Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Kamran Siddiqi
- The Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
145
|
Ellegård LM, Glenngård AH. Limited Consequences of a Transition From Activity-Based Financing to Budgeting: Four Reasons Why According to Swedish Hospital Managers. INQUIRY : A JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION AND FINANCING 2019; 56:46958019838367. [PMID: 30983464 PMCID: PMC6466459 DOI: 10.1177/0046958019838367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Activity-based financing (ABF) and global budgeting are two common reimbursement models in hospital care that embody different incentives for cost containment and quality. The purpose of this study was to explore and describe perceptions from the provider perspective about how and why replacing variable ABF by global budgets affects daily operations and provided services. The study setting is a large Swedish county council that went from traditional budgeting to an ABF system and then back again in the period 2005-2012. Based on semistructured interviews with midlevel managers and analysis of administrative data, we conclude that the transition back from ABF to budgeting has had limited consequences and suggest 4 reasons why: (1) Midlevel managers dampen effects of changes in the external control; (2) the actual design of the different reimbursement models differed from the textbook design; (3) the purchasing body's use of other management controls did not change; (4) incentives bypassing the purchasing body's controls dampened the consequences. The study highlights the challenges associated with improvement strategies that rely exclusively on budget system changes within traditional tax-funded and politically managed health care systems.
Collapse
|
146
|
Weigel TF, Hanisch E, Hanisch A, Buia A, Müller LP, Messias J, Hessler C. Power of Judgment: The Significance of Kant's Philosophy for the Medical System Today. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2019; 76:4-8. [PMID: 30111517 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2018] [Revised: 06/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The ways of thinking in the manufacturing sciences are increasingly determining the rationality within medicine as a practical or action-based science. This "technological paradigm" infiltrates the field of medicine with the promise of increasing efficiency while simultaneously improving quality at various points in the system. Simple linear causal relationships generally need to be taken into account when manufacturing products. Even complex manufacturing processes can be broken down into the smallest units and, therefore, also be automated. The situation in complex systems such as the human body, however, is completely different. In order for doctors to be able to carry out their actions within this complex system, medicine as a science provides the physician with rules on the means that should be used to decide which remedy should be used, when and how. This judgment of which remedy should be used, when and how, what is known as the indication, is a central medical moment. This requires a power of judgment sharpened by experience. The indication, in turn, essentially determines the course of a disease and thus the quality of the treatment or the quality of result so often referred to these days.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T F Weigel
- Department of General- and Visceral Surgery, Heilig-Geist-Hospital, Bingen, Germany.
| | - E Hanisch
- Department of Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Klinik, Langen, Germany
| | - A Hanisch
- KfW Development Bank, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Buia
- Department of Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Asklepios Klinik, Langen, Germany
| | - L P Müller
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J Messias
- Department of General- and Visceral Surgery, Heilig-Geist-Hospital, Bingen, Germany
| | - C Hessler
- Department of General- and Visceral Surgery, Heilig-Geist-Hospital, Bingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Major concerns remain around pay-for-performance programs in Canada. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2019; 152:54-55. [DOI: 10.1177/1715163518816666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
148
|
Lewis CC, Boyd M, Puspitasari A, Navarro E, Howard J, Kassab H, Hoffman M, Scott K, Lyon A, Douglas S, Simon G, Kroenke K. Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 76:324-335. [PMID: 30566197 PMCID: PMC6584602 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 251] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Measurement-based care (MBC) is the systematic evaluation of patient symptoms before or during an encounter to inform behavioral health treatment. Despite MBC's demonstrated ability to enhance usual care by expediting improvements and rapidly detecting patients whose health would otherwise deteriorate, it is underused, with typically less than 20% of behavioral health practitioners integrating it into their practice. This narrative review addresses definitional issues, offers a concrete and evaluable operationalization of MBC fidelity, and summarizes the evidence base and utility of MBC. It also synthesizes the extant literature's characterization of barriers to and strategies for supporting MBC implementation, sustainment, and scale-up. OBSERVATIONS Barriers to implementing MBC occur at multiple levels: patient (eg, concerns about confidentiality breach), practitioner (eg, beliefs that measures are no better than clinical judgment), organization (eg, no resources for training), and system (eg, competing requirements). Implementation science-the study of methods to integrate evidence-based practices such as MBC into routine care-offers strategies to address barriers. These strategies include using measurement feedback systems, leveraging local champions, forming learning collaboratives, training leadership, improving expert consultation with clinical staff, and generating incentives. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This narrative review, informed by implementation science, offers a 10-point research agenda to improve the integration of MBC into clinical practice: (1) harmonize terminology and specify MBC's core components; (2) develop criterion standard methods for monitoring fidelity and reporting quality of implementation; (3) develop algorithms for MBC to guide psychotherapy; (4) test putative mechanisms of change, particularly for psychotherapy; (5) develop brief and psychometrically strong measures for use in combination; (6) assess the critical timing of administration needed to optimize patient outcomes; (7) streamline measurement feedback systems to include only key ingredients and enhance electronic health record interoperability; (8) identify discrete strategies to support implementation; (9) make evidence-based policy decisions; and (10) align reimbursement structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara C. Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,
Seattle
| | - Meredith Boyd
- Department of Psychology, UCLA (University of California, Los
Angeles)
| | - Ajeng Puspitasari
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
Minnesota
| | - Elena Navarro
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,
Seattle
| | - Jacqueline Howard
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University,
Bloomington
| | | | - Mira Hoffman
- Department of Psychology, West Virginia University,
Morgantown
| | - Kelli Scott
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode
Island
| | - Aaron Lyon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of
Washington, Seattle
| | - Susan Douglas
- Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations, Peabody
College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Greg Simon
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute,
Seattle
| | | |
Collapse
|
149
|
Affiliation(s)
- M Ruth Lavergne
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Allen T, Whittaker W, Kontopantelis E, Sutton M. Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e811-e818. [PMID: 30397016 PMCID: PMC6255225 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x699797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Quality and Outcomes Framework has generated reputational as well as financial rewards for general practices because the number of quality points a practice receives is publicly reported. These rewards vary across diseases and practices, and over time. AIM To determine the relative effects on performance of the financial and reputational rewards resulting from a pay-for-performance programme. DESIGN AND SETTING Observational study of the published performance on 42 indicators of 8929 practices in England between 2004 and 2013. METHOD The authors calculated the revenue offered (financial reward, measured in £100s) and the points offered (reputational reward) per additional patient treated for each indicator for each practice in each year. Fixed-effects multivariable regression models were used to estimate whether the percentage of eligible patients treated responded to changes in these financial and reputational rewards. RESULTS Both the offered financial rewards and reputational rewards had small but statistically significant associations with practice performance. The effect of the financial reward on performance decreased from 0.797 percentage points per £100 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.614 to 0.979) in 2004, to 0.092 (95% CI = 0.045 to 0.138) in 2013. The effect of the reputational reward increased from -0.121 percentage points per quality point (95% CI = -0.220 to -0.022) in 2004, to 0.209 (95% CI = 0.147 to 0.271) in 2013. CONCLUSION In the short term, general practices were more sensitive to revenue than reputational rewards. In the long term, general practices appeared to divert their focus towards the reputational reward, once benchmarks of performance became established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Matt Sutton
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester
| |
Collapse
|