1
|
Roy S, Ye T, Ertefaie A, Vo TT, Flory J, Hennessy S, Small D. Group sequential testing under instrumented difference-in-differences approach. Stat Med 2023; 42:3838-3859. [PMID: 37345519 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Unmeasured confounding is a major obstacle to reliable causal inference based on observational studies. Instrumented difference-in-differences (iDiD), a novel idea connecting instrumental variable and standard DiD, ameliorates the above issue by explicitly leveraging exogenous randomness in an exposure trend. In this article, we utilize the above idea of iDiD, and propose a novel group sequential testing method that provides valid inference even in the presence of unmeasured confounders. At each time point, we estimate the average or conditional average treatment effect under iDiD setting using the data accumulated up to that time point, and test the significance of the treatment effect. We derive the joint distribution of the test statistics under the null using the asymptotic properties of M-estimation, and the group sequential boundaries are obtained using theα $$ \alpha $$ -spending functions. The performance of our proposed approach is evaluated on both synthetic data and Clinformatics Data Mart Database (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN) to examine the association between rofecoxib and acute myocardial infarction, and our method detects significant adverse effect of rofecoxib much earlier than the time when it was finally withdrawn from the market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samrat Roy
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ting Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ashkan Ertefaie
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Tat-Thang Vo
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Flory
- Department of Subspecialty Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sean Hennessy
- Division of Epidemiology, DBEI, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaufman EJ, Keele LJ, Wirtalla CJ, Rosen CB, Roberts SE, Mavroudis CL, Reilly PM, Holena DN, McHugh MD, Small D, Kelz RR. Operative and Nonoperative Outcomes of Emergency General Surgery Conditions: An Observational Study Using a Novel Instrumental Variable. Ann Surg 2023; 278:72-78. [PMID: 35786573 PMCID: PMC9810765 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of operative versus nonoperative management of emergency general surgery conditions on short-term and long-term outcomes. BACKGROUND Many emergency general surgery conditions can be managed either operatively or nonoperatively, but high-quality evidence to guide management decisions is scarce. METHODS We included 507,677 Medicare patients treated for an emergency general surgery condition between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018. Operative management was compared with nonoperative management using a preference-based instrumental variable analysis and near-far matching to minimize selection bias and unmeasured confounding. Outcomes were mortality, complications, and readmissions. RESULTS For hepatopancreaticobiliary conditions, operative management was associated with lower risk of mortality at 30 days [-2.6% (95% confidence interval: -4.0, -1.3)], 90 days [-4.7% (-6.50, -2.8)], and 180 days [-6.4% (-8.5, -4.2)]. Among 56,582 intestinal obstruction patients, operative management was associated with a higher risk of inpatient mortality [2.8% (0.7, 4.9)] but no significant difference thereafter. For upper gastrointestinal conditions, operative management was associated with a 9.7% higher risk of in-hospital mortality (6.4, 13.1), which increased over time. There was a 6.9% higher risk of inpatient mortality (3.6, 10.2) with operative management for colorectal conditions, which increased over time. For general abdominal conditions, operative management was associated with 12.2% increased risk of inpatient mortality (8.7, 15.8). This effect was attenuated at 30 days [8.5% (3.8, 13.2)] and nonsignificant thereafter. CONCLUSIONS The effect of operative emergency general surgery management varied across conditions and over time. For colorectal and upper gastrointestinal conditions, outcomes are superior with nonoperative management, whereas surgery is favored for patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary conditions. For obstructions and general abdominal conditions, results were equivalent overall. These findings may support patients, clinicians, and families making these challenging decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elinore J. Kaufman
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Luke J. Keele
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Christopher J. Wirtalla
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Claire B. Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Sanford E. Roberts
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Catherine L. Mavroudis
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Patrick M. Reilly
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Daniel N. Holena
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew D. McHugh
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences and Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, The University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, The University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li M, Small D, Ye T, Lin Y, Webster D. Examining a Hypothesized Causal Chain for the Effects of the 2007 Repeal of the Permit-to-Purchase Licensing Law in Missouri: Homicide Guns Recovered in State and within a Year of Purchase. J Urban Health 2023:10.1007/s11524-023-00739-6. [PMID: 37249820 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-023-00739-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Firearm-related deaths are a leading cause of death in the USA. Webster et al. (2014) found an association between Missouri's repeal of a permit-to-purchase handgun licensing law and an increase in firearm-related homicides. The evidence for causality of this association would be strengthened by finding that the increase occurred through the hypothesized mechanism of increasing the ease with which those with violent intent could obtain guns. This study examines two measures: (1) proportion of guns recovered and purchased in-state and (2) time between firearm purchase and recovery by police following criminal use. The repeal was associated from 2008 to 2019 with a 0.05 increase in the proportion own-state gun trace (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval: 0.08,0.13) and a 0.10 increase in the proportion of guns recovered prior to 1 year after purchase (p = 0.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.20, 1.90). Our study provides supportive evidence for the repeal increasing firearm-related homicides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Li
- Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ting Ye
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yuzhou Lin
- Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Webster
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lin Y, Tebulo A, Small D, Seydel K, Taylor T, Zhang B. Using Malarial Retinopathy to Improve the Diagnosis of Pediatric Cerebral Malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2023; 108:69-75. [PMID: 36509055 PMCID: PMC9833082 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In malaria endemic areas, a high proportion of children have detectable parasitemia but show no clinical symptoms. When comatose from a cause other than malaria, this group confounds the cerebral malaria (CM) definition, making accurate diagnosis challenging. One important biomarker of CM is malarial retinopathy, a set of specific features visible in the ocular fundus. In this study, we quantified the contribution of malarial retinopathy in discriminating malaria-caused coma from non-malaria-caused coma. We estimated that 10% of our study cohort of N = 1,192 patients who met the WHO clinical definition of CM in Malawi had non-malarial coma based on a Gaussian mixture model using the parasite protein Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein-2. A classification based on platelets, white blood cells, and retinopathy significantly improved the discriminative power of a previously established model including only platelets plus white blood cells (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.89 versus 0.75, P value < 0.001). We conclude that malarial retinopathy is highly predictive of malaria-caused versus non-malaria-caused coma and recommend that an ocular funduscopic examination to determine malarial retinopathy status be included in the assessment of parasitemic comatose African children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhou Lin
- Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Tebulo
- Blantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karl Seydel
- Blantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
- Department of Osteopathic Medical Specialties, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Terrie Taylor
- Blantyre Malaria Project, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
- Department of Osteopathic Medical Specialties, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Bo Zhang
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Westling T, Downes KJ, Small D. Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation Under a Likelihood Ratio Order. Stat Sin 2023. [DOI: 10.5705/ss.202020.0207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
6
|
Mitra N, Roy J, Small D. The Future of Causal Inference. Am J Epidemiol 2022; 191:1671-1676. [PMID: 35762132 PMCID: PMC9991894 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The past several decades have seen exponential growth in causal inference approaches and their applications. In this commentary, we provide our top-10 list of emerging and exciting areas of research in causal inference. These include methods for high-dimensional data and precision medicine, causal machine learning, causal discovery, and others. These methods are not meant to be an exhaustive list; instead, we hope that this list will serve as a springboard for stimulating the development of new research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandita Mitra
- Correspondence to Dr. Nandita Mitra, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA (e-mail: )
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang H, Elchebly M, Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Papadakis A, Pepe C, Cohen V, Small D, Spatz A. EP11.03-001 Loss of SUSD2 Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma Correlates with Solid Pattern, Higher Histological Grading and Higher Ki-67 Cycling Index. J Thorac Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.07.914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
8
|
Parikh RB, Zhang Y, Small D, Chivers C, Evans CN, Regli SB, Braun J, Hanson CW, Bekelman JE, Gabriel PE, Kumar P, O'Connor N, Shulman LN, Schuchter LM, Patel MS, Manz C. Long-term effect of machine learning–triggered behavioral nudges on serious illness communication and end-of-life outcomes among patients with cancer: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
109 Background: Early serious illness conversations (SICs) between oncology clinicians and patients are associated with improved mood, quality of life, and quality of end-of-life (EOL) care. Yet, most patients with cancer die without a documented SIC. We report on pre-specified 40-week SIC and EOL outcomes from a stepped-wedge randomized clinical trial (NCT03984773) testing the impact of clinician-directed behavioral nudges to prompt SICs among patients with cancer at high risk of mortality based on a machine learning algorithm. Methods: Our sample consisted of patients with cancer receiving care at one of 9 tertiary or community-based medical oncology clinics between June 2019 and April 2020. We identified high-risk patients using a prospectively validated electronic health record machine learning algorithm to predict 6-month mortality. The intervention consisted of: (1) Weekly emails comparing individual oncologists’ SIC rate relative to peers; (2) Weekly lists of forthcoming encounters with high-risk patients; and (3) Opt-out text messages to prompt SICs before high-risk patient encounters. Clinics were randomized in stepped-wedge fashion to receive the intervention in 4-week intervals through week 16, when all clinics received the intervention. Patients were followed through week 40. The primary outcome was SIC rates for all and high-risk patients. EOL outcomes among decedents were based on ASCO/NQF guidelines and included death in the hospital, intensive care unit admission within 30 days of death, receipt of systemic therapy within 14 days of death, hospice enrollment prior to death, and hospice length of stay. Intention-to-treat analyses were adjusted for clinic and wedge fixed effects and clustered at the oncologist-level. Results: The sample consisted of 20,506 patients and 41,021 encounters. 1,324 (6.5%) patients died by the end of follow-up. Among high-risk patients, the unadjusted SIC rate was 3.4% (59/1754) in the control period and 13.5% (510/3765) in the intervention period and remained >12% throughout follow-up. In adjusted analyses, the intervention was associated with an increase in SICs (adjusted odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 1.53-2.87, p<0.001) and a decrease in systemic therapy at the end of life, relative to control (6.8% [72/1066]) vs 9.3% [24/258], adjusted odds ratio 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.63, p=0.002). There were no differences between control and intervention patients in hospice enrollment or length of stay, inpatient death, or EOL ICU utilization. Conclusions: In this randomized trial, a machine learning-based behavioral intervention led to a sustained increase in serious illness communication and reduction in EOL systemic therapy among outpatients with cancer. Machine learning and behavioral nudges can lead to long-lasting improvements in cancer care delivery. Clinical trial information: NCT03984773.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dylan Small
- The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justin E. Bekelman
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kohn R, Vachani A, Small D, Stephens-Shields AJ, Sheu D, Madden VL, Bayes BA, Chowdhury M, Friday S, Kim J, Gould MK, Ismail MH, Creekmur B, Facktor MA, Collins C, Blessing KK, Neslund-Dudas CM, Simoff MJ, Alleman ER, Epstein LH, Horst MA, Scott ME, Volpp KG, Halpern SD, Hart JL. Comparing Smoking Cessation Interventions among Underserved Patients Referred for Lung Cancer Screening: A Pragmatic Trial Protocol. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2022; 19:303-314. [PMID: 34384042 PMCID: PMC8867367 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202104-499sd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Smoking burdens are greatest among underserved patients. Lung cancer screening (LCS) reduces mortality among individuals at risk for smoking-associated lung cancer. Although LCS programs must offer smoking cessation support, the interventions that best promote cessation among underserved patients in this setting are unknown. This stakeholder-engaged, pragmatic randomized clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of four interventions promoting smoking cessation among underserved patients referred for LCS. By using an additive study design, all four arms provide standard "ask-advise-refer" care. Arm 2 adds free or subsidized pharmacologic cessation aids, arm 3 adds financial incentives up to $600 for cessation, and arm 4 adds a mobile device-delivered episodic future thinking tool to promote attention to long-term health goals. We hypothesize that smoking abstinence rates will be higher with the addition of each intervention when compared with arm 1. We will enroll 3,200 adults with LCS orders at four U.S. health systems. Eligible patients include those who smoke at least one cigarette daily and self-identify as a member of an underserved group (i.e., is Black or Latinx, is a rural resident, completed a high school education or less, and/or has a household income <200% of the federal poverty line). The primary outcome is biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence sustained through 6 months. Secondary outcomes include abstinence sustained through 12 months, other smoking-related clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes. This pragmatic randomized clinical trial will identify the most effective smoking cessation strategies that LCS programs can implement to reduce smoking burdens affecting underserved populations. Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04798664). Date of registration: March 12, 2021. Date of trial launch: May 17, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Kohn
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
| | | | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jannie Kim
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
| | - Michael K. Gould
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California
| | | | - Beth Creekmur
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, California
| | | | | | - Kristina K. Blessing
- Investigator Initiated Research Operations, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Michael J. Simoff
- Henry Ford Cancer Institute, and
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Leonard H. Epstein
- Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael A. Horst
- Lancaster General Health Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael E. Scott
- The Center for Black Health and Equity, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Kevin G. Volpp
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Scott D. Halpern
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joanna L. Hart
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center
- Department of Medicine
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kasymjanova G, Anwar A, Sakr L, Cohen V, Small D, Wang H, Sultanem K, Pepe C, Friedmann J, Agulnik J. P31.01 Impact of COVID-19 on Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Retrospective Chart Review. J Thorac Oncol 2021. [PMCID: PMC8523125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
11
|
Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Papadakis A, Small D, Sakr L, Pepe C, Wang H, Cohen V. P24.11 Cell-Free Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Utility in Detection and Monitoring EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.08.376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
12
|
Navathe A, Liao J, Delgado K, Yan S, Isenberg W, Landa H, Bond B, Rareshide C, Small D, Pepe R, Refai F, Lei V, Volpp K, Patel M. Effect of Peer Comparison Feedback, Individual Audit Feedback or Both to Clinicians on Opioid Prescribing in Acute Care Settings: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. Health Serv Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amol Navathe
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Joshua Liao
- Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle WA USA
| | - Kit Delgado
- University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Sherry Yan
- Sutter Health Walnut Creek California USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Dylan Small
- The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Rebecca Pepe
- University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | | | - Victor Lei
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Kevin Volpp
- Department of MediPerelman School of Medicine and the Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Mitesh Patel
- University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kerlin MP, Small D, Fuchs BD, Mikkelsen ME, Wang W, Tran T, Scott S, Belk A, Silvestri JA, Klaiman T, Halpern SD, Beidas RS. Implementing nudges to promote utilization of low tidal volume ventilation (INPUT): a stepped-wedge, hybrid type III trial of strategies to improve evidence-based mechanical ventilation management. Implement Sci 2021; 16:78. [PMID: 34376233 PMCID: PMC8353429 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01147-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Behavioral economic insights have yielded strategies to overcome implementation barriers. For example, default strategies and accountable justification strategies have improved adherence to best practices in clinical settings. Embedding such strategies in the electronic health record (EHR) holds promise for simple and scalable approaches to facilitating implementation. A proven-effective but under-utilized treatment for patients who undergo mechanical ventilation involves prescribing low tidal volumes, which protects the lungs from injury. We will evaluate EHR-based implementation strategies grounded in behavioral economic theory to improve evidence-based management of mechanical ventilation. Methods The Implementing Nudges to Promote Utilization of low Tidal volume ventilation (INPUT) study is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, hybrid type III effectiveness implementation trial of three strategies to improve adherence to low tidal volume ventilation. The strategies target clinicians who enter electronic orders and respiratory therapists who manage the mechanical ventilator, two key stakeholder groups. INPUT has five study arms: usual care, a default strategy within the mechanical ventilation order, an accountable justification strategy within the mechanical ventilation order, and each of the order strategies combined with an accountable justification strategy within flowsheet documentation. We will create six matched pairs of twelve intensive care units (ICUs) in five hospitals in one large health system to balance patient volume and baseline adherence to low tidal volume ventilation. We will randomly assign ICUs within each matched pair to one of the order panels, and each pair to one of six wedges, which will determine date of adoption of the order panel strategy. All ICUs will adopt the flowsheet documentation strategy 6 months afterwards. The primary outcome will be fidelity to low tidal volume ventilation. The secondary effectiveness outcomes will include in-hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, and occurrence of potential adverse events. Discussion This stepped-wedge, hybrid type III trial will provide evidence regarding the role of EHR-based behavioral economic strategies to improve adherence to evidence-based practices among patients who undergo mechanical ventilation in ICUs, thereby advancing the field of implementation science, as well as testing the effectiveness of low tidal volume ventilation among broad patient populations. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04663802. Registered 11 December 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meeta Prasad Kerlin
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Dylan Small
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Barry D Fuchs
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark E Mikkelsen
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Teresa Tran
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stefania Scott
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aerielle Belk
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jasmine A Silvestri
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tamar Klaiman
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Scott D Halpern
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Allergy Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rinad S Beidas
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics (CHIBE), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (PISCE@LDI), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heng S, Small D. Sharpening the Rosenbaum Sensitivity Bounds to Address Concerns About Interactions Between Observed and Unobserved Covariates. Stat Sin 2021. [DOI: 10.5705/ss.202020.0395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
15
|
Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Pepe C, Hurry M, Walton RN, Sakr L, Cohen V, Lecavalier M, Small D. Understanding clinical practice and survival outcomes in patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in a single centre in Quebec. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e459-e466. [PMID: 33173385 PMCID: PMC7606053 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Methods A retrospective cohort study considered patients 18 or more years of age diagnosed between January 2007 and May 2018 with unresectable stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) who received combined chemoradiation (crt). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method to determine median overall (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (cis). Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors prognostic for survival, including age, sex, smoking status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ecog ps), histology, treatment type, tumour size, and nodal status. Results Of 226 patients diagnosed with unresectable stage iii disease, 134 (59%) received combined crt. Mean age was 63 years; most patients were white, were current smokers, had an ecog ps of 0 or 1, and had nonsquamous histology. Median pfs was 7.03 months (95% ci: 5.6 months to 8.5 months), and os for the cohort was 18.7 months (95% ci: 12.4 months to 24.8 months). Of those patients, 78% would have been eligible for durvalumab consolidation therapy. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant os benefit (p = 0.010) for concurrent crt (ccrt) compared with sequential crt (scrt). Disease-specific survival remained significantly better in the ccrt group (p = 0.004). No difference in pfs was found between the ccrt and scrt groups. In addition, tumour size and nodal involvement were significant discriminating factors for survival (p < 0.05). In this patient cohort, 64% of patients progressed and received subsequent therapy. Based on multivariate analysis, tumour size and nodal station were the only factors predictive of survival in patients with unresectable stage iii nsclc treated with crt. Conclusions Combined crt has been the standard treatment for unresectable stage iii nsclc. In our study, a trend of better survival was seen for ccrt compared with scrt. Factors predictive of survival in patients with stage iii disease treated with crt were tumour size and nodal station. Most patients with stage iii disease would potentially be eligible for durvalumab maintenance therapy based on the eligibility criteria from the pacific trial. The use and effectiveness of novel treatments will have to be further studied in our real-world patient population and similar populations elsewhere.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Agulnik
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - G Kasymjanova
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - C Pepe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - M Hurry
- AstraZeneca Canada, Mississauga, ON
| | | | - L Sakr
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - V Cohen
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - M Lecavalier
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - D Small
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Baiocchi M, Cheng J, Small D. Correction. Stat Med 2020; 39:2693. [DOI: 10.1002/sim.8567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Baiocchi
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA
| | - Jing Cheng
- Division of Oral Epidemiology and Dental Public Health University of California, San Francisco School of Dentistry San Francisco CA USA
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Roy J, Small D. Editorial: Special Issue on “Causal Inference”. Stat Sci 2020. [DOI: 10.1214/20-sts800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
18
|
Manz C, Parikh RB, Evans CN, Chivers C, Regli SB, Changolkar S, Bekelman JE, Small D, Rareshide CA, O'Connor N, Schuchter LM, Shulman LN, Patel MS. Effect of integrating machine learning mortality estimates with behavioral nudges to increase serious illness conversions among patients with cancer: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.12002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
12002 Background: Most patients with cancer die without a documented serious illness conversation (SIC) about prognosis and goals. Interventions that increase SICs between oncology clinicians and patients may improve goal-concordant care and end-of-life outcomes. Methods: In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (NCT03984773), we tested the effect of an intervention delivering machine learning-based mortality estimates with behavioral nudges to oncologists to increase SICs among patients with cancer. The clinician-focused intervention consisted of 1) weekly emails providing individual SIC performance feedback (number of SICs in the past month) and peer comparisons; 2) a list of patients scheduled for the next week with a ≥10% predicted risk of 6 month mortality by a validated machine learning prognostic algorithm, and 3) automated opt-out text prompts on the patient’s appointment day to consider an SIC. Eight medical oncology clinics were randomized to receive the intervention in a stepped-wedge fashion every four weeks for a total of 16 weeks. Medical oncology clinicians were included if they were trained to use the SIC Guide (Ariadne Labs, Boston MA). Patients were included if they had an outpatient encounter with an eligible clinician between June 17 and November 1, 2019. The primary outcome was the percent of patient encounters with a documented SIC. Intention to treat analyses adjusted for clinic and wedge fixed effects and clustered at the oncologist level. Results: The sample consisted of 78 clinicians and 14,607 patients. The mean age of patients was 61.7 years, 55.7% were female, 70.4% were white, and 19.6% were black. The percent of patient encounters with an SIC was 1.2% (106/8536) during the pre-intervention period and 4.0% (401/10,152) during the intervention period. In intention to treat adjusted analyses, the intervention led to a significant increase in SICs (adjusted odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.5 to 5.4, P value < 0.0001). Conclusions: An intervention consisting of machine learning mortality estimates and behavioral nudges to oncology clinicians increased SICs by three-fold over 16 weeks, a significant difference.This is one of the first studies evaluating a machine learning-based behavioral intervention to improve serious illness communication in oncology. Secondary analyses (completed April 2020) will clarify whether this intervention leads to a sustained increase in SIC rates and improves goal-concordant care and end-of-life outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03984773 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Manz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Justin E. Bekelman
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Dylan Small
- The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Nina O'Connor
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Manz CR, Parikh RB, Evans CN, Chivers C, Regli SH, Bekelman JE, Small D, Rareshide CAL, O'Connor N, Schuchter LM, Shulman LN, Patel MS. Integrating machine-generated mortality estimates and behavioral nudges to promote serious illness conversations for cancer patients: Design and methods for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 90:105951. [PMID: 31982648 PMCID: PMC7910008 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with cancer often receive care that is not aligned with their personal values and goals. Serious illness conversations (SICs) between clinicians and patients can help increase a patient's understanding of their prognosis, goals and values. METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this study, we describe the design of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the impact of an intervention that employs machine learning-based prognostic algorithms and behavioral nudges to prompt oncologists to have SICs with patients at high risk of short-term mortality. Data are collected on documented SICs, documented advance care planning discussions, and end-of-life care utilization (emergency room and inpatient admissions, chemotherapy and hospice utilization) for patients of all enrolled clinicians. CONCLUSION This trial represents a novel application of machine-generated mortality predictions combined with behavioral nudges in the routine care of outpatients with cancer. Findings from the trial may inform strategies to encourage early serious illness conversations and the application of mortality risk predictions in clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03984773.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Manz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Ravi B Parikh
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Chalanda N Evans
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Corey Chivers
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Susan H Regli
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Dylan Small
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Nina O'Connor
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Lynn M Schuchter
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Lawrence N Shulman
- Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Mitesh S Patel
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Penn Center for Cancer Care Innovation, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Greysen HM, Reale C, Mercede A, Patel MS, Small D, Snider C, Rareshide C, Halpern SD, Greysen SR. Mobility and outcomes for validated evidence - Incentive trial (MOVE IT): Randomized clinical trial study protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 89:105911. [PMID: 31838257 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Catherine Reale
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ashley Mercede
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mitesh S Patel
- Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania Health System, Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dylan Small
- University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher Snider
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Charles Rareshide
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Scott D Halpern
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - S Ryan Greysen
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Navathe AS, Emanuel EJ, Venkataramani AS, Huang Q, Gupta A, Dinh CT, Shan EZ, Small D, Coe NB, Wang E, Ma X, Zhu J, Cousins DS, Liao JM. Spending And Quality After Three Years Of Medicare’s Voluntary Bundled Payment For Joint Replacement Surgery. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:58-66. [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amol S. Navathe
- Amol S. Navathe is a core investigator at the Corporal Michael J. Cresencz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, in Philadelphia, and an assistant professor in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, and a senior fellow at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, both at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Ezekiel J. Emanuel
- Ezekiel J. Emanuel is the Diane V. S. Levy and Robert M. Levy University Professor, chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and vice provost for global initiatives, all at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Atheendar S. Venkataramani
- Atheendar S. Venkataramani is an assistant professor of medical ethics and of health policy at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Qian Huang
- Qian Huang is a statistical analyst in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Atul Gupta
- Atul Gupta is an assistant professor in the Department of Health Care Management, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Claire T. Dinh
- Claire T. Dinh is a medical student at Harvard Medical School, in Boston, Massachusetts. She was a research coordinator in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, when this work was completed
| | - Eric Z. Shan
- Eric Z. Shan is a research assistant in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Dylan Small
- Dylan Small is a professor in the Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Norma B. Coe
- Norma B. Coe is an associate professor in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Erkuan Wang
- Erkuan Wang is a data analyst in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Xinshuo Ma
- Xinshuo Ma is a data analyst in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Jingsan Zhu
- Jingsan Zhu is associate director of data analytics in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Deborah S. Cousins
- Deborah S. Cousins is a project manager in the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua M. Liao
- Joshua M. Liao is medical director of payment strategy, director of the Value and Systems Science Lab, and an assistant professor in the Department of Medicine, all at the University of Washington, in Seattle, and an adjunct senior fellow at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fortunato M, Harrison J, Oon AL, Small D, Hilbert V, Rareshide C, Patel M. Remotely Monitored Gamification and Social Incentives to Improve Glycemic Control Among Adults With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (iDiabetes): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2019; 8:e14180. [PMID: 31746765 PMCID: PMC6893558 DOI: 10.2196/14180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Type 2 diabetes is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Lifestyle modifications including increasing physical activity and losing weight have been demonstrated to improve glycemic control. However, most patients struggle to make these changes. Many stakeholders are interested in using gamification and social incentives to increase engagement in healthy behaviors. However, these approaches often do not appropriately leverage insights from behavioral economics that could be used to address predictable barriers to behavior change. Objective This study aimed to describe the protocol for the Influencing DIabetics to Adapt Behaviors related to Exercise and weighT by Enhancing Social incentives (iDiabetes) trial, which aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of gamification interventions that leverage insights from behavioral economics to enhance supportive, competitive, or collaborative social incentives to improve glycemic control, promote weight loss, and increase physical activity among overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods We are conducting a one-year four-arm randomized controlled trial of 361 overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes and a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level ≥8.0. Wireless weight scales and wearable devices are provided to remotely monitor weight and physical activity and transmit data to the study team. Patients are recruited by email, following which they establish a baseline measure of weight, daily step count, HbA1c level, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and then repeat these measures at 6 and 12 months. The control arm receives no other interventions. Patients randomized to one of the three intervention arms are entered into a game designed using insights from behavioral economics to enhance supportive, competitive, or collaborative social incentives. To examine predictors of strong or poor performance, participants completed validated questionnaires on a range of areas including their personality, risk preferences, and social network. Results Enrollment of 361 patients was completed in January 2019. Results are expected in 2020. Conclusions The iDiabetes trial represents a scalable model to remotely monitor the daily health behaviors of adults with type 2 diabetes. Results from this trial will help provide insights into how to improve management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02961192; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02961192 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/14180
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fortunato
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Joseph Harrison
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ai Leen Oon
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Dylan Small
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Victoria Hilbert
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Charles Rareshide
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mitesh Patel
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Penn Medicine Nudge Unit, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Crescenz Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang H, Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Wang A, Jiménez P, Cohen V, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Fiset PO, Auger M, Camilleri-Broet S, Alam El Din M, Chong G, van Kempen L, Spatz A. Cytology cell blocks are suitable for immunohistochemical testing for PD-L1 in lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:1417-1422. [PMID: 29659668 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing is usually carried out on tissue blocks from core needle biopsy or surgical resections. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of using cytology cell blocks for PD-L1 IHC assay. Methods A total of 1419 consecutive cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including 371 cytology cell blocks, 809 small biopsies, and 239 surgical specimens, were included in the study. The cytology cell blocks were prepared with formalin only, methanol/alcohol only or both. PD-L1 expression was examined by staining with Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit. A Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) was categorized as <1%, 1%-49% and ≥50% tumor cells. A total of 100 viable tumor cells were required for adequacy. Results Of the cytology cell blocks, 92% of the specimens had an adequate number of tumor cells, not significantly different from small biopsies. The rate of TPS ≥50% differed between sample types and was observed in 42% of cytology cell blocks versus 36% of small biopsies (P = 0.04), and 29% of surgical resections (P = 0.001). The fixative methods did not affect the immunostaining, with overall PD-L1 high expression (TPS ≥50%) rates of 42% in formalin-fixed specimens versus 40% in specimens with combined fixation by methanol/alcohol and formalin (NS). The PD-L1 high expression rate was not associated with EGFR, ALK or KRAS molecular alterations. Higher stage (IV) was associated with higher PD-L1 TPS (P= 0.001). Conclusion Our results show that when the TPS ≥50% is used as the end point, PD-L1 IHC performs well with cytology cell blocks. Cell blocks should be considered as a valuable resource for PD-L1 testing in advanced NSCLC. The clinical significance of higher PD-L1 IHC scores in cytology specimens needs to be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wang
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
| | - J Agulnik
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - G Kasymjanova
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - A Wang
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - P Jiménez
- National University of AsunciœFaculty of Medical Sciences, Dr. Montero, 658. AsunciœParaguay
| | - V Cohen
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - D Small
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - C Pepe
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - L Sakr
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - P O Fiset
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - M Auger
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - S Camilleri-Broet
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - M Alam El Din
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - G Chong
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - L van Kempen
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - A Spatz
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular genetics, OPTILAB-McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Chong G, Wang H, Papadakis A, Spatz A, Cohen V. P1.01-52 Cell-Free Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Utility in Detection of Original Sensitizing and Resistant EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). J Thorac Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
25
|
Kasymjanova G, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Cohen V, Lecavalier M, Wang H, Spatz A, Hurry M, Walton R, Agulnik J. MA16.09 Clinical Practice and Outcomes in Patients with Stage III Unresectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Canceran Academic Centre, Canada. J Thorac Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
26
|
Papadakis A, Kasymjanova G, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Chong G, Wang H, Spatz A, Agulnik J, Cohen V. P1.01-99 EGFR-Wild Type Patients Responding to TKI: Revisiting Pathology with Newer Technology. J Thorac Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
27
|
Wang H, Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Fiset PO, Camilleri-Broet S, Redpath M, Cohen V, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Spatz A. Erratum to "The metastatic site does not influence PD-L1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma" [Lung Cancer 132 (June) (2019) 36-38]. Lung Cancer 2019; 136:161. [PMID: 31455511 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Wang
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - J Agulnik
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - G Kasymjanova
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - P O Fiset
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - S Camilleri-Broet
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - M Redpath
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - V Cohen
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D Small
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - C Pepe
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - L Sakr
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - A Spatz
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wang H, Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Fiset PO, Camilleri-Broet S, Redpath M, Cohen V, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Spatz A. The metastatic site does not influence PD-L1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer 2019; 132:36-38. [PMID: 31097091 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing with Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% and ≥1% is required to be eligible for first- and second-line Pembrolizumab treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respectively. Stage IV NSCLC often presents with metastasis to multiple distant sites which are easily accessible for biopsy. Knowing whether PD-L1 IHC TPS can be indifferently measured from different metastatic site is therefore an important clinical question. In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 expression in NSCLC from varied distant metastatic sites. METHODS A total of 580 NSCLC specimens of distant metastases were retrieved for study, including 35 paired samples from two different metastatic sites. The metastatic sites included brain, bone, remote lymph nodes, serous membranes (pleura, pericardium and peritoneum), extra-thoracic solid organs and skin/soft tissues. The samples were cytology cell blocks, small biopsies or surgical resections. IHC was performed using Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. A total of 100 viable tumor cells was required for adequacy. TPS ≥ 50% and 1-49% were defined as high and low PD-L1 expression respectively. RESULTS PD-L1 TPS scores were not significantly different across a range of distant metastatic sites nor between metastases in paired samples. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the PD-L1 TPS scoring is similar across different metastatic sites and any site biopsied will yield necessary information for guiding clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wang
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - J Agulnik
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - G Kasymjanova
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - P O Fiset
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - S Camilleri-Broet
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - M Redpath
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - V Cohen
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D Small
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - C Pepe
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - L Sakr
- Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - A Spatz
- Divisions of Pathology & Molecular Genetics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Medicine & Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Small D, Seydel K. Malaria Modeling to Evaluate Treatment for Severe Disease. J Infect Dis 2019; 219:1176-1177. [DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Karl Seydel
- Department of Osteopathic Medical Specialties, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Keele
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Dylan Small
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Navathe AS, Volpp KG, Caldarella KL, Bond A, Troxel AB, Zhu J, Matloubieh S, Lyon Z, Mishra A, Sacks L, Nelson C, Patel P, Shea J, Calcagno D, Vittore S, Sokol K, Weng K, McDowald N, Crawford P, Small D, Emanuel EJ. Effect of Financial Bonus Size, Loss Aversion, and Increased Social Pressure on Physician Pay-for-Performance: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Cohort Study. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e187950. [PMID: 30735234 PMCID: PMC6484616 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Despite limited effectiveness of pay-for-performance (P4P), payers continue to expand P4P nationally. Objective To test whether increasing bonus size or adding the behavioral economic principles of increased social pressure (ISP) or loss aversion (LA) improves the effectiveness of P4P. Design, Setting, and Participants Parallel studies conducted from January 1 to December 31, 2016, consisted of a randomized clinical trial with patients cluster-randomized by practice site to an active control group (larger bonus size [LBS] only) or to groups with 1 of 2 behavioral economic interventions added and a cohort study comparing changes in outcomes among patients of physicians receiving an LBS with outcomes in propensity-matched physicians not receiving an LBS. A total of 8118 patients attributed to 66 physicians with 1 of 5 chronic conditions were treated at Advocate HealthCare, an integrated health system in Illinois. Data were analyzed using intention to treat and multiple imputation from February 1, 2017, through May 31, 2018. Interventions Physician participants received an LBS increased by a mean of $3355 per physician (LBS-only group); prefunded incentives to elicit LA and an LBS; or increasing proportion of a P4P bonus determined by group performance from 30% to 50% (ISP) and an LBS. Main Outcomes and Measures The proportion of 20 evidence-based quality measures achieved at the patient level. Results A total of 86 physicians were eligible for the randomized trial. Of these, 32 were excluded because they did not have unique attributed patients. Fifty-four physicians were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups, and 33 physicians (54.5% male; mean [SD] age, 57 [10] years) and 3747 patients (63.6% female; mean [SD] age, 64 [18] years) were included in the final analysis. Nine physicians and 864 patients were randomized to the LBS-only group, 13 physicians and 1496 patients to the LBS plus ISP group, and 11 physicians and 1387 patients to the LBS plus LA group. Physician characteristics did not differ significantly by arm, such as mean (SD) physician age ranging from 56 (9) to 59 (9) years, and sex (6 [46.2%] to 6 [66.7%] male). No differences were found between the LBS-only and the intervention groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for LBS plus LA vs LBS-only, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.65-1.15; P = .31]; aOR for LBS plus ISP vs LBS-only, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.64-1.42; P = .81]; and aOR for LBS plus ISP vs LBS plus LA, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.75-1.61; P = .62]). Increased bonus size was associated with a greater increase in evidence-based care relative to the comparison group (risk-standardized absolute difference-in-differences, 3.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.9-4.5 percentage points; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Increased bonus size was associated with significantly improved quality of care relative to a comparison group. Adding ISP and opportunities for LA did not improve quality. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02634879.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol S. Navathe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Kevin G. Volpp
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Kristen L. Caldarella
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Amelia Bond
- Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Health Care Management, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Andrea B. Troxel
- Department of Population Health, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Jingsan Zhu
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Shireen Matloubieh
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Zoe Lyon
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Akriti Mishra
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Lee Sacks
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Carrie Nelson
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Pankaj Patel
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Judy Shea
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Don Calcagno
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | | | - Kara Sokol
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Kevin Weng
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | | | - Paul Crawford
- Advocate Physician Partners, Downers Grove, Illinois
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Health Care Management, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ezekiel J. Emanuel
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kasymjanova G, Jagoe RT, Pepe C, Sakr L, Cohen V, Small D, Muanza TM, Agulnik JS. Does the presence of emphysema increase the risk of radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 25:e610-e614. [PMID: 30607130 DOI: 10.3747/co.25.4093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Radiotherapy (rt) plays an important role in the treatment of lung cancer. One of the most common comorbidities in patients with lung cancer is pulmonary emphysema. The literature offers conflicting data about whether emphysema increases the occurrence and severity of radiation pneumonitis (rp). As a result, whether high doses of rt (with curative intent) should be avoided in patients with emphysema is still unclear. Objective We measured the documented incidence of rp in patients with and without emphysema who received curative radiation treatment. Methods This retrospective cohort study considered patients in the lung cancer clinical database of the Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre. Data from the database has been used previously for research studies, including a recent publication about emphysema grading, based on the percentage of lung occupied by emphysema on computed tomography (ct) imaging. Results Using previously published methods, chest ct imaging for 498 patients with lung cancer was scored for the presence of emphysema. The analysis considered 114 patients who received at least 30 Gy radiation. Of those 114 patients, 64 (56%) had emphysema, with approximately 23% having severe or very severe disease. The incidence of rp was 34.4% in patients with emphysema (n = 22) and 32.0% in patients with no emphysema (n = 16, p = 0.48). No difference in the incidence of rp was evident between patients with various grades of emphysema (p = 0.96). Similarly, no difference in the incidence of rp was evident between the two treatment protocols-that is, definitive rt 17 (37%) and combined chemotherapy-rt 21 (31%, p = 0.5). Conclusions In our cohort, the presence of emphysema on chest ct imaging was not associated with an increased risk of rp. That finding suggests that patients with lung cancer and emphysema should be offered rt when clinically indicated. However, further prospective studies will be needed for confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kasymjanova
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - R T Jagoe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - C Pepe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - L Sakr
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - V Cohen
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - D Small
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - T M Muanza
- Radiation Oncology, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - J S Agulnik
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sharma S, Guttmann D, Small D, Rareshide C, Kurtzman G, Jones J, Shabason J, Alonso-Basanta M, Lustig R, Maity A, Metz J, Lowitz S, Cohen M, Anderson N, Finlay J, Gabriel P, Patel M, Bekelman J. Effect of Introducing a Default Order Option on Unnecessary Daily Image Guidance During Palliative Radiation Therapy: A Cluster Randomized Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
34
|
Guo K, Kasymjanova G, Wang H, Sakr L, Small D, Cohen V, Pepe C, Spatz A, Agulnik J. P1.04-16 Comparison of Clinical Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced NSCLC with High PD-L1 Expression Tested on Cytology Versus Biopsy Samples. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
35
|
Wang H, Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Fiset P, Camilleri-Broët S, Redpath M, Small D, Cohen V, Spatz A. P2.09-07 Does Metastatic Site Matter for PD-L1 Testing in Stage IV NSCLC? J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.1304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
36
|
|
37
|
Wan F, Small D, Mitra N. A general approach to evaluating the bias of 2-stage instrumental variable estimators. Stat Med 2018; 37:1997-2015. [PMID: 29572890 DOI: 10.1002/sim.7636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 01/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Unmeasured confounding is a common concern when researchers attempt to estimate a treatment effect using observational data or randomized studies with nonperfect compliance. To address this concern, instrumental variable methods, such as 2-stage predictor substitution (2SPS) and 2-stage residual inclusion (2SRI), have been widely adopted. In many clinical studies of binary and survival outcomes, 2SRI has been accepted as the method of choice over 2SPS, but a compelling theoretical rationale has not been postulated. We evaluate the bias and consistency in estimating the conditional treatment effect for both 2SPS and 2SRI when the outcome is binary, count, or time to event. We demonstrate analytically that the bias in 2SPS and 2SRI estimators can be reframed to mirror the problem of omitted variables in nonlinear models and that there is a direct relationship with the collapsibility of effect measures. In contrast to conclusions made by previous studies (Terza et al, 2008), we demonstrate that the consistency of 2SRI estimators only holds under the following conditions: (1) when the null hypothesis is true; (2) when the outcome model is collapsible; or (3) when estimating the nonnull causal effect from Cox or logistic regression models, the strong and unrealistic assumption that the effect of the unmeasured covariates on the treatment is proportional to their effect on the outcome needs to hold. We propose a novel dissimilarity metric to provide an intuitive explanation of the bias of 2SRI estimators in noncollapsible models and demonstrate that with increasing dissimilarity between the effects of the unmeasured covariates on the treatment versus outcome, the bias of 2SRI increases in magnitude.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Wan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wong CA, Miller VA, Murphy K, Small D, Ford CA, Willi SM, Feingold J, Morris A, Ha YP, Zhu J, Wang W, Patel MS. Effect of Financial Incentives on Glucose Monitoring Adherence and Glycemic Control Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171:1176-1183. [PMID: 29059263 PMCID: PMC6583649 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Glycemic control often deteriorates during adolescence and the transition to young adulthood for patients with type 1 diabetes. The inability to manage type 1 diabetes effectively during these years is associated with poor glycemic control and complications from diabetes in adult life. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of daily financial incentives on glucose monitoring adherence and glycemic control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Behavioral Economic Incentives to Improve Glycemic Control Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes (BE IN CONTROL) study was an investigator-blinded, 6-month, 2-arm randomized clinical trial conducted between January 22 and November 2, 2016, with 3-month intervention and follow-up periods. Ninety participants (aged 14-20) with suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] >8.0%) were recruited from the Diabetes Center for Children at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. INTERVENTIONS All participants were given daily blood glucose monitoring goals of 4 or more checks per day with 1 or more level within the goal range (70-180 mg/dL) collected with a wireless glucometer. The 3-month intervention consisted of a $60 monthly incentive in a virtual account, from which $2 was subtracted for every day of nonadherence to the monitoring goals. During a 3-month follow-up period, the intervention was discontinued. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was change in HbA1c levels at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included adherence to glucose monitoring and change in HbA1c levels at 6 months. All analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS Of the 181 participants screened, 90 (52 [57.8%] girls) were randomized to the intervention (n = 45) or control (n = 45) arms. The mean (SD) age was 16.3 (1.9) years. The intervention group had significantly greater adherence to glucose monitoring goals in the incentive period (50.0% vs 18.9%; adjusted difference, 27.2%; 95% CI, 9.5% to 45.0%; P = .003) but not in the follow-up period (15.3% vs 8.7%; adjusted difference, 3.9%; 95% CI, -2.0% to 9.9%; P = .20). The change in HbA1c levels from baseline did not differ significantly between groups at 3 months (adjusted difference, -0.08%; 95% CI, -0.69% to 0.54%; P = .80) or 6 months (adjusted difference, 0.03%; 95% CI, -0.55% to 0.60%; P = .93). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes, daily financial incentives improved glucose monitoring adherence during the incentive period but did not significantly improve glycemic control. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02568501.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene A. Wong
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Victoria A. Miller
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Kathryn Murphy
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia
| | - Dylan Small
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Carol A. Ford
- Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Steven M. Willi
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jordyn Feingold
- medical student, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Alexander Morris
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Yoonhee P. Ha
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Jingsan Zhu
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Wenli Wang
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Mitesh S. Patel
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,Department of Medicine, Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wang H, Rijk A, Aguirre M, Wang A, Wang K, Dastani Z, Agulnik J, Cohen V, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Kasymjanova G, Van Kempen L, Spatz A. P3.02-055 Detecting ALK, ROS1 and RET Gene Translocations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with the NanoString Platform. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
40
|
Wang H, Spatz A, Aguirre M, Agulnik J, Cohen V, Small D, Pepe C, Sakr L, Kasymjanova G, Wang A, Owen S, Tsao M, Kempen L. PUB079 Detection of the EGFR P.(T790M) Mutation by Different Methods: A Small Comparison Case Study. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Wang H, Agulnik J, Kasymjanova G, Wang A, Cohen V, Pepe C, Small D, Sakr L, Fiset P, Auger M, Camilleri-Broet S, Ei Din MA, Spatz A. P2.02-040 Cytology Cell Block Is Suitable for Immunohistochemical Testing for PD-L1 in Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
42
|
Kasymjanova G, Small D, Cohen V, Jagoe RT, Batist G, Sateren W, Ernst P, Pepe C, Sakr L, Agulnik J. Lung cancer care trajectory at a Canadian centre: an evaluation of how wait times affect clinical outcomes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 24:302-309. [PMID: 29089797 DOI: 10.3747/co.24.3611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer continues to be one of the most common cancers in Canada, with approximately 28,400 new cases diagnosed each year. Although timely care can contribute substantially to quality of life for patients, it remains unclear whether it also improves patient outcomes. In this work, we used a set of quality indicators that aim to describe the quality of care in lung cancer patients. We assessed adherence with existing guidelines for timeliness of lung cancer care and concordance with existing standards of treatment, and we examined the association between timeliness of care and lung cancer survival. METHODS Patients with lung cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Pulmonary Division Lung Cancer Registry at our centre. RESULTS We demonstrated that the interdisciplinary pulmonary oncology service successfully treated most of its patients within the recommended wait times. However, there is still work to be done to decrease variation in wait time. Our results demonstrate a significant association between wait time and survival, supporting the need for clinicians to optimize the patient care trajectory. INTERPRETATION It would be helpful for Canadian clinicians treating patients with lung cancer to have wait time guidelines for all treatment modalities, together with standard definitions for all time intervals. Any reductions in wait times should be balanced against the need for thorough investigation before initiating treatment. We believe that our unique model of care leads to an acceleration of diagnostic steps. Avoiding any delay associated with referral to a medical oncologist for treatment could be an acceptable strategy with respect to reducing wait time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kasymjanova
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - D Small
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - V Cohen
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - R T Jagoe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - G Batist
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | | | - P Ernst
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - C Pepe
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - L Sakr
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - J Agulnik
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Segal Cancer Centre, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Rossy Cancer Network, and McGill University, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hasegawa R, Small D. Sensitivity analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis. Biometrics 2017; 73:1424-1432. [PMID: 28346822 DOI: 10.1111/biom.12688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
In matched observational studies where treatment assignment is not randomized, sensitivity analysis helps investigators determine how sensitive their estimated treatment effect is to some unmeasured confounder. The standard approach calibrates the sensitivity analysis according to the worst case bias in a pair. This approach will result in a conservative sensitivity analysis if the worst case bias does not hold in every pair. In this paper, we show that for binary data, the standard approach can be calibrated in terms of the average bias in a pair rather than worst case bias. When the worst case bias and average bias differ, the average bias interpretation results in a less conservative sensitivity analysis and more power. In many studies, the average case calibration may also carry a more natural interpretation than the worst case calibration and may also allow researchers to incorporate additional data to establish an empirical basis with which to calibrate a sensitivity analysis. We illustrate this with a study of the effects of cellphone use on the incidence of automobile accidents. Finally, we extend the average case calibration to the sensitivity analysis of confidence intervals for attributable effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raiden Hasegawa
- Statistics Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 400 Jon M. Huntsman Hall, 3730 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6340, U.S.A
| | - Dylan Small
- Statistics Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 400 Jon M. Huntsman Hall, 3730 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6340, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wu M, Hamaker M, Li L, Small D, Duffield AS. DOCK2 interacts with FLT3 and modulates the survival of FLT3-expressing leukemia cells. Leukemia 2016; 31:688-696. [PMID: 27748370 PMCID: PMC5332301 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2015] [Revised: 08/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) gene is the most commonly mutated gene in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and patients carrying internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations have a poor prognosis. Long-term inhibition of FLT3 activity in these patients has been elusive. To provide a more complete understanding of FLT3 biology, a mass spectroscopy-based screen was performed to search for FLT3-interacting proteins. The screen identified dedicator of cytokinesis 2 (DOCK2), which is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho GTPases, and its expression is limited to hematolymphoid cells. We show that DOCK2 is expressed in leukemia cell lines and primary AML samples, and DOCK2 co-immunoprecipitates with wild-type FLT3 and FLT3/ITD. Knock-down (KD) of DOCK2 by shRNA selectively reduced cell proliferation and colony formation in leukemia cell lines with increased FLT3 activity, and greatly sensitized these cells to cytarabine treatment, alone and in combination with FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. DOCK2 KD in a FLT3/ITD-positive leukemia cell line also significantly prolonged survival in a mouse xenograft model. These findings suggest that DOCK2 is a potential therapeutic target for novel AML treatments, as this protein regulates the survival of leukemia cells with elevated FLT3 activity and sensitizes FLT3/ITD leukemic cells to conventional anti-leukemic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Wu
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - M Hamaker
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - L Li
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - D Small
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - A S Duffield
- Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhang T, Rodrigues G, Louie A, Dar A, Dingle B, Sanatani M, Small D, Yaremko B, Younus J, Vincent M. Phase 1 Study of Cisplatin/Docetaxel Chemotherapy With Concurrent Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.1754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
46
|
Luo X, Gee S, Sohal V, Small D. A point-process response model for spike trains from single neurons in neural circuits under optogenetic stimulation. Stat Med 2016; 35:455-74. [PMID: 26411923 PMCID: PMC4713323 DOI: 10.1002/sim.6742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2014] [Accepted: 09/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Optogenetics is a new tool to study neuronal circuits that have been genetically modified to allow stimulation by flashes of light. We study recordings from single neurons within neural circuits under optogenetic stimulation. The data from these experiments present a statistical challenge of modeling a high-frequency point process (neuronal spikes) while the input is another high-frequency point process (light flashes). We further develop a generalized linear model approach to model the relationships between two point processes, employing additive point-process response functions. The resulting model, point-process responses for optogenetics (PRO), provides explicit nonlinear transformations to link the input point process with the output one. Such response functions may provide important and interpretable scientific insights into the properties of the biophysical process that governs neural spiking in response to optogenetic stimulation. We validate and compare the PRO model using a real dataset and simulations, and our model yields a superior area-under-the-curve value as high as 93% for predicting every future spike. For our experiment on the recurrent layer V circuit in the prefrontal cortex, the PRO model provides evidence that neurons integrate their inputs in a sophisticated manner. Another use of the model is that it enables understanding how neural circuits are altered under various disease conditions and/or experimental conditions by comparing the PRO parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X. Luo
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA
| | - S. Gee
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - V. Sohal
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - D. Small
- Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ma K, Cohen V, Kasymjanova G, Small D, Novac K, Peterson J, Levit A, Agulnik J. An exploratory comparative analysis of tyrosine kinase inhibitors or docetaxel in second-line treatment of EGFR wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective real-world practice review at a single tertiary care centre. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 22:e157-63. [PMID: 26089726 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc), especially in patients with wild-type EGFR, remains limited. Recently, erlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) targeting EGFR mutation, was approved as second-line treatment in EGFR wild-type nsclc. Despite evidence of better overall survival (os) with chemotherapy than with tki in second-line treatment, data on the use of tki in the real-life clinical setting remain limited. The present practice review of tki use for second- and third-line treatment in EGFR wild-type nsclc also compares clinical outcomes for tki and single-agent docetaxel as second-line treatment. METHODS Our retrospective cohort study included patients with EGFR wild-type nsclc treated at the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, QC) between 2003 and 2013. Patients received a tki (erlotinib or gefitinib) in the second and third line or docetaxel in the second line. For each group, we determined os, disease control rate, progression-free survival (pfs), and event-free survival (efs). RESULTS The tki group included 145 patients, with 92 receiving second-line treatment. In the control group, 53 patients received docetaxel as second-line therapy. In the tki group, os was 6.0 months; pfs, 2.7 months; and efs, 3.0 months. Comparing second-line treatments, os was 5.3 and 5.0 months respectively (p = 0.88), pfs was 2.5 and 1.8 months respectively (p = 0.041), and efs was 3.0 and 1.7 months respectively (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS In our study cohort, second-line therapy for EGFR wild-type nsclc with tki (compared with docetaxel) was associated with statistically better pfs and efs and noninferior os. Those findings raise the question of whether efs should also be considered when choosing second-line treatment in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Ma
- Division of Hematology Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | - V Cohen
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - G Kasymjanova
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - D Small
- Peter Brojde Lung Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC
| | - K Novac
- McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | | | - A Levit
- McGill University, Montreal, QC
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wan F, Small D, Bekelman JE, Mitra N. Bias in estimating the causal hazard ratio when using two-stage instrumental variable methods. Stat Med 2015; 34:2235-65. [PMID: 25800789 DOI: 10.1002/sim.6470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 12/05/2014] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Two-stage instrumental variable methods are commonly used to estimate the causal effects of treatments on survival in the presence of measured and unmeasured confounding. Two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) has been the method of choice over two-stage predictor substitution (2SPS) in clinical studies. We directly compare the bias in the causal hazard ratio estimated by these two methods. Under a principal stratification framework, we derive a closed-form solution for asymptotic bias of the causal hazard ratio among compliers for both the 2SPS and 2SRI methods when survival time follows the Weibull distribution with random censoring. When there is no unmeasured confounding and no always takers, our analytic results show that 2SRI is generally asymptotically unbiased, but 2SPS is not. However, when there is substantial unmeasured confounding, 2SPS performs better than 2SRI with respect to bias under certain scenarios. We use extensive simulation studies to confirm the analytic results from our closed-form solutions. We apply these two methods to prostate cancer treatment data from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare and compare these 2SRI and 2SPS estimates with results from two published randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Wan
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
| | - Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kalbasi A, Li J, Berman AT, Swisher-McClure S, Smaldone MC, Small D, Mitra N, Bekelman JE. Impact of dose-escalated radiation on overall survival in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.7_suppl.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
28 Background: Infive publishedRCTs, dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer resulted in improved biochemical and local control. However, the question of whether dose escalation improves overall survival (OS) remains unanswered. We examined OS among men with non-metastatic prostate cancer undergoing EBRT in the modern era. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted non-randomized comparative effectiveness studies of dose-escalated versus standard-dose EBRT in men diagnosed from 2004-2006 in three analytic cohorts defined by NCCN risk category: low- (N=12,848), intermediate- (N=14,966) or high-risk (N=14,587) prostate cancer. We categorized patients in each risk cohort into 2 treatment groups: standard-dose (68.4 Gy to <75.6 Gy) or dose-escalated (≥75.6 Gy to 90 Gy) EBRT. The primary outcome was time to death from any cause, measured from diagnosis to NCDB date of death or end of follow-up (December 31, 2011). We compared OS between treatment groups in the three analytic cohorts using Cox proportional hazard models. Inverse probability weighted propensity score methods were used to balance differences between treatment groups in age, race, year of diagnosis, AJCC T- and N-stage, PSA, Gleason score, androgen deprivation therapy, IMRT use, comorbid disease, income, insurance, urban/rural location, facility type and facility volume. In secondary analyses, we evaluated dose response for survival by categorizing dose in approximately 2 Gy increments. Results: Median follow up for survivors was between 73 and 74 months in all three risk cohorts. Dose-escalated EBRT was associated with improved survival in the intermediate-risk (adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77 and 0.85, p<0.0001) and high-risk groups (aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.81 and 0.89, p<0.0001), but not the low-risk group (aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92-1.06, p=0.803). For every incremental ~2Gy increase in dose, there was a 9% (95% CI 6% – 11%, p<0.0001) and 7% (95% CI 3% - 10%, p=0.004) reduction in the hazard of death for intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Conclusions: Dose-escalated EBRT is associated with improved survival in men with intermediate- and high-risk, but not low-risk, prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusha Kalbasi
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jiaqi Li
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail T. Berman
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Dylan Small
- The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Justin E. Bekelman
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Small
- Department of Statistics; The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia, PA U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|