The effects of GABA(B) agonists and gabapentin on mechanical hyperalgesia in models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain in the rat

Pregabalin reduces muscle and cutaneous hyperalgesia in two models of chronic muscle pain in rats

Pregabalin is used for treatment of neuropathic pain conditions. The present study evaluated effects of pregabalin in 2 rat models of muscle-induced hyperalgesia: Inflammatory and noninflammatory. Muscle hyperalgesia (withdrawal threshold to compression of the muscle) and cutaneous hyperalgesia of the paw (withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments) were measured before and after induction of hyperalgesia and after treatment with pregabalin (saline, 10 to 100 mg/kg i.p.). In the inflammatory model, 3% carrageenan injected into 1 gastrocnemius muscle decreased the mechanical withdrawal threshold of the paw bilaterally and the compression withdrawal threshold of the muscle ipsilaterally 2 weeks later. Pregabalin (10 to 100 mg/kg) increased the compression withdrawal threshold of the inflamed muscle when compared with vehicle controls. Pregabalin also increased the mechanical withdrawal threshold of the paw bilaterally, but only with 100 mg/kg. In the noninflammatory model, 2 unilateral injections of acidic saline into the gastrocnemius muscle produced bilateral cutaneous and muscle hyperalgesia 24 hours after the second injection. Pregabalin (10 to 100 mg/kg i.p.) significantly increased the compression withdrawal thresholds of the muscle and the mechanical withdrawal threshold of the paw bilaterally when compared with vehicle. However, pregabalin also has significant motor effects at the higher doses (60 to 100 mg/kg). Therefore, pregabalin reduces both muscle and cutaneous hyperalgesia that occurs after muscle insult in 2 animal models of muscle pain at doses that do not produce ataxia.

PERSPECTIVE

This study shows that pregabalin reduces both cutaneous and muscle hyperalgesia in inflammatory and noninflammatory models of muscle pain. Thus, pregabalin may be an effective treatment for people with chronic muscle pain.

Chemotherapy-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy: analgesic effects of gabapentin and effects on expression of the alpha-2-delta type-1 calcium channel subunit

Chemotherapeutics in the taxane and vinca-alkaloid classes sometimes produce a painful peripheral neuropathy for which there is no validated treatment. Experiments with rat models of paclitaxel- and vincristine-evoked pain suggest that these conditions may not respond to all of the analgesics that have efficacy in other models of painful peripheral neuropathy. We tested gabapentin as a potential analgesic for paclitaxel- and vincristine-evoked pain. We used a repeated dosing paradigm because there are precedents showing that repeated drug exposure may be necessary to demonstrate analgesia in neuropathic pain models. Gabapentin is believed to work via binding to voltage-gated calcium channels that contain the alpha-2-delta type-1 (alpha(2)delta-1) subunit, and the expression of this subunit is known to be increased in some painful peripheral neuropathy models. Thus we also examined whether the paclitaxel-evoked pain syndrome was accompanied by an alpha(2)delta-1 increase, and whether gabapentin had any effect on subunit expression. We found that the paclitaxel- and vincristine-evoked mechano-allodynia and mechano-hyperalgesia were significantly reduced by gabapentin, but only with repeated dosing. Paclitaxel-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy was associated with an increased expression of the alpha(2)delta-1 subunit in the spinal dorsal horn, but not in the dorsal root ganglia. The spinal cord increase was normalized by repeated gabapentin injections. Together, these findings suggest that repeated dosing with gabapentin may be beneficial in patients with chemotherapy-evoked painful peripheral neuropathy and that gabapentin's mechanisms of action may include normalization of the nerve injury-evoked increase in calcium channel alpha(2)delta-1 subunit expression.

Lacosamide: a review of preclinical properties

Lacosamide (LCM), (SPM 927, (R)-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropionamide, previously referred to as harkoseride or ADD 234037) is a member of a series of functionalized amino acids that were specifically synthesized as anticonvulsive drug candidates. LCM has demonstrated antiepileptic effectiveness in different rodent seizure models and antinociceptive potential in experimental animal models that reflect distinct types and symptoms of neuropathic as well as chronic inflammatory pain. Recent results suggest that LCM has a dual mode of action underlying its anticonvulsant and analgesic activity. It was found that LCM selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels without affecting fast inactivation. Furthermore, employing proteomic affinity-labeling techniques, collapsin-response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2 alias DRP-2) was identified as a binding partner. Follow-up experiments confirmed a functional interaction of LCM with CRMP-2 in vitro. LCM did not inhibit or induce a wide variety of cytochrome P450 enzymes at therapeutic concentrations. In safety pharmacology and toxicology studies conducted in mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs, LCM was well tolerated. Either none or only minor side effects were observed in safety studies involving the central nervous, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and renal systems and there is no indication of abuse liability. Repeated dose toxicity studies demonstrated that after either intravenous or oral administration of LCM the adverse events were reversible and consisted mostly of exaggerated pharmacodynamic effects on the CNS. No genotoxic or carcinogenic effects were observed in vivo, and LCM showed a favorable profile in reproductive and developmental animal studies. Currently, LCM is in a late stage of clinical development as an adjunctive treatment for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, and it is being assessed as monotherapy in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Further trials to identify LCM's potential in pain and for other indications have been initiated.

Pharmacology and mechanism of action of pregabalin: the calcium channel alpha2-delta (alpha2-delta) subunit as a target for antiepileptic drug discovery

Pregabalin (Lyrica) is a new antiepileptic drug that is active in animal seizure models. Pregabalin is approved in US and Europe for adjunctive therapy of partial seizures in adults, and also has been approved for the treatment of pain from diabetic neuropathy or post-herpetic neuralgia in adults. Recently, it has been approved for treatment of anxiety disorders in Europe. Pregabalin is structurally related to the antiepileptic drug gabapentin and the site of action of both drugs is similar, the alpha2-delta (alpha2-delta) protein, an auxiliary subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. Pregabalin subtly reduces the synaptic release of several neurotransmitters, apparently by binding to alpha2-delta subunits, and possibly accounting for its actions in vivo to reduce neuronal excitability and seizures. Several studies indicate that the pharmacology of pregabalin requires binding to alpha2-delta subunits, including structure-activity analyses of compounds binding to alpha2-delta subunits and pharmacology in mice deficient in binding at the alpha2-delta Type 1 protein. The preclinical findings to date are consistent with a mechanism that may entail reduction of abnormal neuronal excitability through reduced neurotransmitter release. This review addresses the preclinical pharmacology of pregabalin, and also the biology of the high affinity binding site, and presumed site of action.

Baclofen, an agonist at peripheral GABAB receptors, induces antinociception via activation of TEA-sensitive potassium channels

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Central anti-nociceptive actions of baclofen involve activation of K+ channels. Here we assessed what types of K+ channel might participate in the peripheral anti-nociception induced by baclofen.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Nociceptive thresholds to mechanical stimulation in rat paws treated with intraplantar prostaglandin E2.(PGE2) to induce hyperalgesia were measured 3 h after PGE2 injection. Other agents were also given by intraplantar injection.

KEY RESULTS

Baclofen elicited a dose-dependent (15 - 240 microg per paw) anti-nociceptive effect. An intermediate dose of baclofen (60 microg) did not produce antinociception in the contralateral paw, showing its peripheral site of action. The GABAB receptor antagonist saclofen (12.5 - 100 microg per paw) antagonized, in a dose-dependent manner, peripheral antinociception induced by baclofen (60 microg), suggesting a specific effect. This antinociceptive action of baclofen was unaffected by bicuculline, GABAA receptor antagonist (80 microg per paw), or by (1,2,5,6 tetrahydropyridin-4-yl) methylphosphinic acid, GABAC receptor antagonist (20 microg per paw). The peripheral antinociception induced by baclofen (60 microg) was reversed, in a dose-dependent manner, by the voltage-dependent K+ channel blockers tetraethylammonium (7.5 - 30 microg per paw) and 4-aminopyridine (2.5 - 10 microg per paw). The blockers of other K+ channels, glibenclamide (160 microg), tolbutamide (320 microg), charybdotoxin (2 microg), dequalinium (50 microg) and caesium (500 microg) had no effect.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This study provides evidence that the peripheral antinociceptive effect of the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen results from the activation of tetraethylammonium-sensitive K+ channels. Other K+ channels appear not to be involved.

α2δ and the mechanism of action of gabapentin in the treatment of pain

Gabapentin is a drug that has been widely used in the treatment of chronic pain states. Despite its widespread usage, it is only recently that light has been shed on the mechanism of action of this agent. In the current review, the authors document the pharmacological, biochemical and molecular information that has led to the identification of the alpha2delta1 auxilliary subunit of voltage gated calcium channels as the target for this drug's actions.

Development of baclofen tolerance in a rat model of chronic spasticity and rigidity

Systemic or spinal treatment with baclofen has been associated with the development of tolerance in patients with chronic spasticity. In the present study, we used a rat model of spinal ischemia-induced spasticity to characterize the development of baclofen tolerance after chronic intrathecal (i.t.) baclofen infusion. Following the induction of spinal ischemia and the development of behavioral spasticity, animals were implanted with i.t. catheters connected to osmotic pumps to continuously infuse baclofen (1.0 microg/0.5 microl/h). Hindleg peripheral muscle resistance (PMR) was measured periodically after initiation of chronic infusion and after bolus i.t. baclofen injection (1.0 microg). Peripheral muscle resistance was significantly decreased at the onset of baclofen infusion, however, after 5-7 days of infusion a progressive return of spasticity was noted, where baseline PMR values returned to preinfusion levels. At the same time, the efficacy of bolus i.t. baclofen treatment also decreased, where after 5 days of baclofen infusion 1.0 microg (i.t.) baclofen only reduced PMR by 10% (compared to 40-50% preinfusion). Baclofen efficacy progressively returned once continuous infusion was stopped. These data demonstrate that transient spinal ischemia leads to the development of spasticity which is sensitive to spinal baclofen. Chronic i.t. infusion leads to a progressive development of tolerance. This model offers potential to study tolerance mechanisms after spinal injury, and aid in drug discovery for use in baclofen-tolerant patients.

Molecular diversity, trafficking and subcellular localization of GABAB receptors

GABAB receptors are the G-protein coupled receptors for the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). While native studies predicted pharmacologically distinct GABAB receptor subtypes, molecular studies failed to identify the expected receptor varieties. Mouse genetic experiments therefore addressed whether the cloned receptors can account for the classical electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral GABAB responses or whether additional receptors exist. Among G-protein coupled receptors, GABAB receptors are unique in that they require 2 distinct subunits for functioning. This atypical receptor structure triggered a large body of work that investigated the regulation of receptor assembly and trafficking. With the availability of molecular tools, substantial progress was also made in the analysis of the receptor protein distribution in neuronal compartments. Here, we review recent studies that shed light on the molecular diversity, the subcellular distribution and the cell surface dynamics of GABAB receptors.

Pharmacological characterisation of place escape/avoidance behaviour in the rat chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain

RATIONALE

Classical pain tests performed in animals routinely measure evoked nociceptive behaviours. These almost exclusively reflect sensory processing of nociceptive transmission, although a recently described place escape/avoidance paradigm may be used to selectively assess affective pain processing.

OBJECTIVE

To establish if drugs with proven analgesic efficacy selectively attenuate sensory-discriminative or affective-motivational aspects of nociceptive processing.

METHODS

The mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine, the anti-epileptic gabapentin, the anti-depressant duloxetine, the 5HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT, the GABA(A) receptor agonist gaboxadol and the mixed cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 were tested after systemic administration in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain. For the place escape/avoidance paradigm, CCI rats had free access between the 'non-aversive' dark and 'aversive' light side of an enclosed chamber. Either the injured or non-injured hindpaw was routinely stimulated if the rat was in the dark or light area, respectively. Escape/avoidance behaviour was defined as a shift from the dark to the light area. Mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia were determined prior to and following escape/avoidance testing.

RESULTS

Morphine (3 and 6 mg/kg), gabapentin (50 and 100 mg/kg), duloxetine (10 and 30 mg/kg) and 8-OH-DPAT (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg) attenuated the time spent by CCI rats in the light area; gaboxadol (1 and 3 mg/kg) and WIN55,212-2 (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) were ineffective. Only gabapentin and 8-OH-DPAT attenuated mechanical nociceptive behaviours at non-sedative doses.

CONCLUSIONS

The place escape/avoidance paradigm may enable discrimination between selected drug classes on distinct components of sensory and affective pain processing in rats with neuropathic pain.

Therapeutic efficacy of prosaposin-derived peptide on different models of allodynia

We have previously demonstrated that the prosaposin-derived 14-mer peptide TX14(A) prevents structural and functional abnormalities associated with peripheral neuropathy in diabetic rats. Unusually, this neuroprotective peptide also exhibited acute anti-hyperalgesic properties in the same model, suggesting a dual action of TX14(A) that could allow therapeutic targeting of both degenerative neuropathy and neuropathic pain. In the present study, we have extended investigation of the anti-allodynic properties of TX14(A) to a range of models in which allodynia is induced using metabolic, physical, neurotoxic or chemical/inflammatory damage to the peripheral nerve. Single systemic doses of TX14(A) rapidly alleviated tactile allodynia in rats in which nerve injury was induced by diabetes, sciatic nerve hemiligation, systemic paclitaxel treatment or paw formalin injection. Further, TX14(A) pre-treatment prevented onset of allodynia in the paclitaxel and formalin injection models. These results indicate that TX14(A) has anti-allodynic properties in diverse models of neuropathic pain and support further exploration of its potential as a therapeutic agent for a wide range of peripheral neuropathies and neuropathic pain states.

Mechanisms of the antinociceptive action of gabapentin

Gabapentin, a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue anticonvulsant, is also an effective analgesic agent in neuropathic and inflammatory, but not acute, pain systemically and intrathecally. Other clinical indications such as anxiety, bipolar disorder, and hot flashes have also been proposed. Since gabapentin was developed, several hypotheses had been proposed for its action mechanisms. They include selectively activating the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptors consisting of GABA(B1a) and GABA(B2) subunits, selectively enhancing the NMDA current at GABAergic interneurons, or blocking AMPA-receptor-mediated transmission in the spinal cord, binding to the L-alpha-amino acid transporter, activating ATP-sensitive K(+) channels, activating hyperpolarization-activated cation channels, and modulating Ca(2+) current by selectively binding to the specific binding site of [(3)H]gabapentin, the alpha(2)delta subunit of voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels. Different mechanisms might be involved in different therapeutic actions of gabapentin. In this review, we summarized the recent progress in the findings proposed for the antinociceptive action mechanisms of gabapentin and suggest that the alpha(2)delta subunit of spinal N-type Ca(2+) channels is very likely the analgesic action target of gabapentin.

Adverse effects of gabapentin and lack of anti-allodynic efficacy of amitriptyline in the streptozotocin model of painful diabetic neuropathy

Amitriptyline and gabapentin are the primary treatments for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), and it is clear that they produce beneficial effects, but there are questions about these treatments that have not been adequately addressed. For example, although there is a growing consensus that the therapeutic effects of amitriptyline in pain patients are independent of its effects on mood, it is not clear that amitriptyline has specific and direct effects on pain. There is also a fairly broad consensus that gabapentin is safe and well tolerated, but the side-effect profile of gabapentin has not been adequately assessed in pain populations. The rat streptozotocin (STZ) model of PDN was used (a) to assess the effects of amitriptyline on objective, quantitative measures of tactile allodynia, a common type of pain in PDN patients, and (b) to assess the side effects of gabapentin using measures of motor/ambulatory and cognitive function. Amitriptyline did not attenuate STZ-induced mechanical allodynia, even after chronic administration of high doses. Gabapentin produced robust anti-allodynic effects but also produced deficits in tests of motor/ambulatory and cognitive functions. The present experiments suggest that the beneficial effects of amitriptyline in PDN may not be a result of anti-allodynic efficacy and that gabapentin produces robust anti-allodynic effects but may also produce significant motor and cognitive deficits even at or near the lowest effective doses. These findings challenge the consensus opinions about these primary treatments for PDN and suggest that their therapeutic and adverse effects should be explored further in pain patients.

Spinal-supraspinal serotonergic circuits regulating neuropathic pain and its treatment with gabapentin

Not all neuropathic pain patients gain relief from current therapies that include the anticonvulsant, gabapentin, thought to modulate calcium channel function. We report a neural circuit that is permissive for the effectiveness of gabapentin. Substance P-saporin (SP-SAP) was used to selectively ablate superficial dorsal horn neurons expressing the neurokinin-1 receptor for substance P. These neurons project to the brain as shown by retrograde labelling and engage descending brainstem serotonergic influences that enhance spinal excitability via a facilitatory action on 5HT(3) receptors. We show the integrity of this pathway following nerve injury contributes to the behavioural allodynia, neuronal plasticity of deep dorsal horn neurons and the injury-specific actions of gabapentin. Thus SP-SAP attenuated the tactile and cold hypersensitivity and abnormal neuronal coding (including spontaneous activity, expansion of receptive field size) seen after spinal nerve ligation. Furthermore the powerful actions of gabapentin after neuropathy were blocked by either ablation of NK-1 expressing neurones or 5HT(3) receptor antagonism using ondansetron. Remarkably, 5HT(3) receptor activation provided a state-dependency (independent of that produced by neuropathy) allowing GBP to powerfully inhibit in normal uninjured animals. This circuit is therefore a crucial determinant of the abnormal neuronal and behavioural manifestations of neuropathy and importantly, the efficacy of gabapentin. As this spino-bulbo-spinal circuit contacts areas of the brain implicated in the affective components of pain, this loop may represent a route by which emotions can influence the degree of pain in a patient, as well as the effectiveness of the drug treatment. These hypotheses are testable in patients.

The nitric oxide-cyclic GMP-protein kinase G-K+ channel pathway participates in the antiallodynic effect of spinal gabapentin

The possible participation of the nitric oxide (NO)-cyclic GMP-protein kinase G (PKG) pathway on gabapentin-induced spinal antiallodynic activity was assessed in spinal nerve injured rats. Intrathecal gabapentin, diazoxide or pinacidil reduced tactile allodynia in a dose-dependent manner. Pretreatment with NG-L-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, non-specific inhibitor of NO synthase NOS), 7-nitroindazole (neuronal NO synthase inhibitor), 1H-[1,2,4] -oxadiazolo [4,3-a] quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ, guanylyl cyclase inhibitor) or (9S, 10R, 12R)-2,3,9,10,11,12-hexahydro-10-methoxy-2,9-dimethyl-1-oxo-9,12-epoxy-1H-diindolo-[1,2,3-fg:3',2',1'-kl]pyrrolo[3,4-i][1,6]benzodiazocine-10-carboxylic acid methyl ester (KT-5823, specific PKG inhibitor), but not NG-D-nitro-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME) or okadaic acid (protein phosphatase 1 and 2 inhibitor) prevented gabapentin-induced antiallodynia. Pinacidil activity was not blocked by L-NAME, D-NAME, 7-nitroindazole, ODQ, KT-5823 or okadaic acid. Moreover, KT-5823, glibenclamide (ATP-sensitive K+ channel blocker), apamin and charybdotoxin (small- and large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel blockers, respectively), but not margatoxin (voltage-gated K+ channel blocker), L-NAME, 7-nitroindazole, ODQ or okadaic acid, reduced diazoxide-induced antiallodynia. Data suggest that gabapentin-induced spinal antiallodynia could be due to activation of the NO-cyclic GMP-PKG-K+ channel pathway.

Spinal nerve ligation does not alter the expression or function of GABA(B) receptors in spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia of the rat

Loss of GABA-mediated inhibition in the spinal cord is thought to mediate allodynia and spontaneous pain after nerve injury. Despite extensive investigation of GABA itself, relatively little is known about how nerve injury alters the receptors at which GABA acts. This study examined levels of GABA(B) receptor protein in the spinal cord dorsal horn, and in the L4 and L5 (lumbar designations) dorsal root ganglia one to 18 weeks after L5 spinal nerve ligation. Mechanical allodynia was maximal by 1 week and persisted at blunted levels for at least 18 weeks after injury. Spontaneous pain behaviors were evident for 6 weeks. Western blotting of dorsal horn detected two isoforms of the GABA(B(1)) subunit and a single GABA(B(2)) subunit. High levels of GABA(B(1a)) and low levels of GABA(B(1b)) protein were present in the dorsal root ganglia. However, GABA(B(2)) protein was not detected in the dorsal root ganglia, consistent with the proposed existence of an atypical receptor composed of GABA(B(1)) homodimers. The levels of GABA(B(1a)), GABA(B(1b)), and GABA(B(2)) protein in the ipsilateral dorsal horn were unchanged at any time after injury. Immunohistochemical staining also did not detect a change in GABA(B(1)) or GABA(B(2)) subunits in dorsal horn segments having a robust loss of isolectin B4 staining. The levels of GABA(B(1a)) protein were also unchanged in the L4 or L5 dorsal root ganglia at any time after spinal nerve ligation. Levels of GABA(B(2)) remained undetectable. Finally, baclofen-stimulated binding of guanosine-5'-(gamma-O-thio)triphosphate in dorsal horn did not differ between sham and ligated rats. Collectively, these results argue that a loss of GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition, particularly of central terminals of primary afferents, is unlikely to mediate the development or maintenance of allodynia or spontaneous pain behaviors after spinal nerve injury.

Differential distribution of voltage-gated calcium channel alpha-2 delta (alpha2delta) subunit mRNA-containing cells in the rat central nervous system and the dorsal root ganglia

Voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) play an essential role in controlling neurotransmitter release, neuronal excitability, and gene expression in the nervous system. The distribution of cells that contain mRNAs encoding the auxiliary alpha2delta-1, alpha2delta-2, and alpha2delta-3 subunits of the VGCCs in the central nervous system (CNS) and the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) was examined in rats by using in situ hybridization. Specific labeling of alpha2delta-1, alpha2delta-2, and alpha2delta-3 mRNAs appeared to be largely confined to neurons and was widely, although differentially, distributed in the brain, the spinal cord, and the DRG. Importantly, alpha2delta-2 mRNA was found to be expressed in interneurons in the cortex, the hippocampus, the striatum, and in regions that contain dense cholinergic neurons. Our results suggest that different alpha2delta subunits may exert distinctive functions in the CNS. The alpha2delta-1 subunit mRNA is localized in brain regions known to be involved in cortical processing, learning and memory, defensive behavior, neuroendocrine secretion, autonomic activation, primary sensory transmission, and general arousal. The alpha2delta-2 subunit mRNA is present in brain regions known to modulate the overall activities of the cortex, the hippocampus, and the thalamus. The alpha2delta-2 subunit is also found in brain regions known to be involved in olfaction, somatic motor control, fluid homeostasis, ingestive and defensive behaviors, neuroendocrine functions, and circadian rhythm. In addition to being localized in brain regions that express alpha2delta-1 and alpha2delta-2 subunit mRNAs, alpha2delta-3 subunit mRNA is highly expressed in regions involved in auditory information processing and somatic movement.

The Role of GABA in the Mediation and Perception of Pain

A great deal of effort has been expended in attempting to define the role of GABA in mediating the transmission and perception of pain. Pursuit of this question has been stimulated by the fact that GABAergic neurons are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system, including regions of the spinal cord dorsal horn known to be important for transmitting pain impulses to the brain. In addition, GABA neurons and receptors are found in supraspinal sites known to coordinate the perception and response to painful stimuli and this neurotransmitter system has been shown to regulate control of sensory information processing in the spinal cord. The discovery that GABA receptor agonists display antinociceptive properties in a variety of animal models of pain has provided an impetus for developing such agents for this purpose. It has been shown that GABA receptor agonists, as well as inhibitors of GABA uptake or metabolism, are clinically effective in treating this symptom. However, even with an enhanced understanding of the relationship between GABAergic transmission and pain, it has proven difficult to exploit these findings in designing novel analgesics that can be employed for the routine management of pain. Work in this area has revealed a host of reasons why GABAergic drugs have, to date, been of limited utility in the management of pain. Chief among these are the side effects associated with such agents, in particular sedation. These limitations are likely due to the simultaneous activation of GABA receptors throughout the neuraxis, most of which are not involved in the transmission or perception of pain. This makes it difficult to fully exploit the antinociceptive properties of GABAergic drugs before untoward effects intervene. The discovery of molecularly and pharmacologically distinct GABAA receptors may open the way to developing subtype selective agents that target those receptors most intimately involved in the transmission and perception of pain. The more limited repertoire of GABAB receptor subunits makes it more difficult to develop subtype selective agents for this site. Nonetheless, a GABAB agonist, CGP 35024, has been identified that induces antinociceptive responses at doses well below those that cause sedation (Patel et al., 2001). It has also been reported that, unlike baclofen, tolerance to antinociceptive responses is not observed with CGP 44532, a more potent GABAB receptor agonist (Enna et al., 1998). While the reasons for these differences in responses to members of the same class remain unknown, these findings suggest it may be possible to design a GABAB agonist with a superior clinical profile than existing agents. Besides the challenges associated with identifying subtype selective GABAA and GABAB receptor agonists, the development of GABA analgesics has been hindered by the fact that the responsiveness of these receptor systems appear to vary with the type and duration of pain being treated and the mode of drug administration. Further studies are necessary to more precisely define the types of pain most amenable to treatment with GABAergic drugs. Inasmuch as the antinociceptive responses to these agents in laboratory animals are mediated, at least in part, through activation or inhibition of other neurotransmitter and neuromodulator systems, it is conceivable that GABA agonists will be most efficacious as analgesics when administered in combination with other agents. The results of anatomical, biochemical, molecular, and pharmacological studies support the notion that generalized activation of GABA receptor systems dampens the response to painful stimuli. The data leave little doubt that, under certain circumstances, stimulation of neuroanatomically discreet GABA receptor sites could be of benefit in the management of pain. Continued research in this area is warranted given the limited choices, and clinical difficulties, associated with conventional analgesics.

Development and expression of neuropathic pain in CB1 knockout mice

Neuropathic pain is a clinical manifestation characterized by the presence of spontaneous pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia. Here, we have evaluated the involvement of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the development and expression of neuropathic pain. For this purpose, partial ligation of the sciatic nerve was performed in CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice and their wild-type littermates. The development of mechanical and thermal allodynia, and thermal hyperalgesia was evaluated by using the von Frey filaments, cold-plate and plantar tests, respectively. Pre-surgical tactile and thermal withdrawal thresholds were similar in both genotypes. In wild-type mice, sciatic nerve injury led to a neuropathic pain syndrome characterized by a marked and long-lasting reduction of the paw withdrawal thresholds to mechanical and thermal stimuli. These manifestations developed similarly in mice lacking CB1 cannabinoid receptors. We have also investigated the consequences of gabapentin administration in these animals. Gabapentin (50 mg/kg/day, i.p.) induced a similar suppression of mechanical and thermal allodynia in both wild-type and CB1 knockout mice. Mild differences between genotypes were observed concerning the effect of gabapentin in the expression of thermal hyperalgesia. Taken together, our results indicate that CB1 cannabinoid receptors are not critically implicated in the development of neuropathic pain nor in the anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic effects of gabapentin in this model.

Inhibition of nociceptive responses of spinal cord neurones during hypertension involves the spinal GABAergic system and a pain modulatory center located at the caudal ventrolateral medulla

The mechanisms of hypertension-induced hypoalgesia were studied in a model of hypertension induced by adenosine receptors blockade with the non-selective antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-sulfophenylxanthine (DPSPX) during 7 days. Based on the positive correlation between pain thresholds and noxious-evoked expression of the c-fos protooncogene in spinal cord neurones, we used this marker of nociceptive activation of spinal neurones to evaluate the involvement of the spinal GABAergic system and the caudal ventrolateral medulla (VLM), an important inhibitory component of the supraspinal endogenous pain modulatory system. In DPSPX-treated animals, a 20% increase in blood pressure was achieved along with a decrease in Fos expression in the superficial (laminae I-II) and deep (laminae III-VII) dorsal horn. In these animals, lower percentages of neurones labeled for GABAB receptors that expressed Fos were obtained in the superficial dorsal horn. Lesioning the VLMlat with quinolinic acid prevented the decrease in Fos expression at the spinal cord of DPSPX-hypertensive rats whereas in normotensive animals, no changes in Fos expression were detected. The present results support previous findings that hypertension is associated with a decrease of nociceptive activation of spinal cord neurones, through descending inhibition exerted by the VLMlat. This study further shows that during hypertension a decrease in the expression of GABAB receptors in nociceptive spinal neurones occurs, probably due to changes in the local GABAergic inhibitory system.

GABA(B) receptor function and subunit expression in the rat spinal cord as indicators of stress and the antinociceptive response to antidepressants

Experiments were undertaken to examine whether once daily i.p. administration of either of two antidepressants used for the treatment of neuropathic pain, amitriptyline (10 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (5 mg/kg), to rats for 7 days modifies GABA(B) receptor function and subunit expression in the lumbar spinal cord. The results indicate that, as previously reported for desipramine, both amitriptyline and fluoxetine increase the pain threshold to a thermal stimulus, the expression of GABA(B(1)) subunits, and baclofen-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding, a measure of GABA(B) receptor function. The effects of antidepressant administration on GABA(B(1b)) and GABA(B(2)) subunit expression in spinal cord are more variable than for GABA(B(1a)). It was also discovered that repeated daily exposure to a thermal stimulus or immobilization stress increases GABA(B(1a)) expression in the lumbar spinal cord, with no commensurate change in thermal pain threshold or GABA(B) receptor sensitivity. These results support a relationship between GABA(B) receptors and the action of antidepressants. The findings demonstrate that drug-induced increases in GABA(B) receptor function can occur independently of any change in GABA(B) receptor subunit expression and are consistent with the notion that GABA(B) receptor subunits have multiple functions, only one of which is dimerization to form GABA(B) receptors. The data also suggest that GABA(B) subunit gene expression may serve as a preclinical marker of antidepressant efficacy and of drug- or stress-induced modifications in central nervous system activity.

Amitriptyline prevents thermal hyperalgesia and modifications in rat spinal cord GABAB receptor expression and function in an animal model of neuropathic pain

Using an animal model of neuropathic pain, behavioral and biochemical experiments were performed to assess the effects of this condition on pain threshold and GABA(B) receptor sensitivity and subunit gene expression in the rat lumbar spinal cord. The results indicate that partial sciatic nerve ligation decreases thermal and mechanical pain withdrawal latencies, and increases baclofen-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and GABA(B) receptor subunit gene expression in the rat lumbar spinal cord, suggesting that neuropathic pain may be due, in part, to a deficiency in GABAergic transmission. The experiments also demonstrate that daily administration (10 mg/kg, i.p.) of amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant used for the treatment of neuropathic pain, for 1 week after surgery prevents the decline in thermal pain threshold, the increase in GABA(B2) gene expression, and development of increased GABA(B) receptor function in spinal cord resulting from nerve damage. These findings indicate that the efficacy of amitriptyline as a treatment for neuropathic pain may be related to an ability to maintain spinal cord GABA(B) receptor activity.

GABA(B) receptor modulators potentiate baclofen-induced depression of dopamine neuron activity in the rat ventral tegmental area

2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-(3-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-propyl)-phenol (CGP7930) is a recently reported positive allosteric modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(B) receptors. In this study, we assessed the ability of CGP7930 to modulate the baclofen-induced depression of dopamine (DA) neuron activity via the activation of GABA(B) receptors in the ventral tegmental area in rat midbrain slices. The selective GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen, depressed the spontaneous firing rate of DA neurons in a concentration-dependent manner (EC50 = 0.27 microM, n = 11). CGP7930 (30 microM) significantly (P < 0.05) shifted the baclofen concentration-response curve to the left (EC50 = 0.15 microM, n = 5). The effects of baclofen alone or baclofen coapplied with CGP7930 were fully blocked by 1 microM (2S)-3-[[(1S)-1-(3,4-dichloropheny)ethyl]amino-2-hydroxypropyl] (phenylmethyl) phosphinic acid (CGP55845), a potent and selective GABA(B) receptor antagonist. In similar experiments, N-[3,3-diphenylpropyl]-alpha-methylbenzylamine (fendiline) (30 or 50 microM), a compound shown to potentiate GABA(B) receptor-mediated cortical hyperpolarisation, also significantly enhanced the inhibitory effect of baclofen. It is therefore concluded that the recently reported GABA(B) receptor modulators, CGP7930 and fendiline, can enhance GABA(B) receptor-mediated depression of DA neuronal activity. This finding suggests a therapeutic potential for GABA(B) potentiators for the treatment of diseases associated with a hyperfunctional mesocorticolimbic system.

Ambroxol, a Nav1.8-preferring Na(+) channel blocker, effectively suppresses pain symptoms in animal models of chronic, neuropathic and inflammatory pain

Neuropathic pain affects many patients, and treatment today is far from being perfect. Nav1.8 Na(+) channels, which are expressed by small fibre sensory neurons, are promising targets for novel analgesics. Na(+) channel blockers used today, however, show only limited selectivity for this channel subtype, and can cause dose-limiting side effects. Recently, the secretolytic ambroxol was found to preferentially inhibit Nav1.8 channels. We used this compound as a tool to investigate whether a Nav1.8-preferring blocker can suppress symptoms of chronic, neuropathic and inflammatory pain in animal models. The drug was tested in the formalin paw model, two models of mononeuropathy, and a model of monoarthritis in rats. Ambroxol's effects were compared with those of gabapentin. Ambroxol at a dose of 1g/kg had to be administered to rats to achieve the plasma levels that are reached in clinical use (for the treatment of infant and acute respiratory distress syndrome). Ambroxol (1g/kg) was only weakly effective in models for acute pain, but effectively reduced pain symptoms in all other models; in some cases it completely reversed pain behaviour. In most cases the effects were more pronounced than those of gabapentin (at 100mg/kg). These data show that a Nav1.8-preferring Na(+) channel blocker can effectively suppress pain symptoms in a variety of models for chronic, neuropathic and inflammatory pain at plasma levels, which can be achieved in the clinic.

Effect of preemptive gabapentin on postoperative pain relief and morphine consumption following lumbar laminectomy and discectomy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Synergism between gabapentin and morphine in treating incisional pain has been demonstrated in animal experiments and clinical studies. The efficacy of gabapentin for treatment of perioperative pain remains controversial. This study was designed to detect the influence of gabapentin premedication on morphine consumption in the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy and discectomy. Either gabapentin 800 mg (in two equally divided doses) or placebo was given preoperatively to 60 adult patients undergoing elective lumbar laminectomy or discectomy in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Standard general anesthesia was given to all the patients. Morphine was administered via patient-controlled analgesia pump in the immediate postoperative period for first 8 hours. Pain at rest and on movement was assessed using a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) every 2 hours for the first 8 postoperative hours. There were no differences in demographics or surgical duration between the two groups. The amount of fentanyl administered in the intraoperative period was similar between the two groups. In the postoperative period, the VRS score for pain at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours was not significantly different between the two groups. Highest median VRS score was recorded at 0 hours postoperatively in both groups (VRS: rest = 6, movement = 8 in placebo group; rest = 6, movement = 8 in gabapentin group). Total morphine consumption and side effects were similar in the two groups. Gabapentin does not decrease the morphine requirement or morphine side effects in the immediate postoperative period following lumbar laminectomy and discectomy.

CHF3381, a novel antinociceptive agent, attenuates capsaicin-induced pain in rats

Here, we have examined the effect of the novel antinociceptive agent CHF3381 on the development of nocifensive behaviour as well as secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia induced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin in rats. Vehicle, CHF3381 or gabapentin were orally administered 1 h before capsaicin injection. The duration of nocifensive behaviour was measured during the first 5 min after capsaicin injection. Secondary mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia were measured at 5 and 15 min after capsaicin injection, respectively. CHF3381 produced a significant suppression of nocifensive behaviour and completely blocked the development of mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia at 100 and 200 mg/kg. Gabapentin weakly inhibited the development of nocifensive behaviour and mechanical allodynia. On the contrary, gabapentin (100 mg/kg) completely prevented the development of mechanical hyperalgesia. In conclusion, CHF3381 had full efficacy for all the capsaicin-induced pain parameters tested, suggesting that CHF3381 may have a therapeutic utility in the management of pain states involving central sensitisation.

The comparative evaluation of gabapentin and carbamazepine for pain management in Guillain-Barré syndrome patients in the intensive care unit

We evaluated the effects of gabapentin and carbamazepine for pain relief in 36 Guillain-Barré syndrome patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gabapentin 300 mg, carbamazepine 100 mg, or matching placebo 3 times a day for 7 days. Fentanyl 2 microg/kg was used as a supplementary analgesic on patient demand. The pain score was recorded by using a numeric pain rating scale of 0-10, and sedation was recorded with a Ramsay sedation scale of 1-6 before medications were given and then at 6-h intervals throughout the study period. Total daily fentanyl consumption was recorded each day for each patient. The results of the study demonstrated that patients in the gabapentin group had significantly lower (P < 0.05) median numeric pain rating scale scores (3.5, 2.5, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, and 2.0) compared with patients in the placebo group (6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, 6.0, and 6.0) and the carbamazepine group (6.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.0). There was no significant difference in fentanyl consumption between the gabapentin and carbamazepine groups on Day 1 (340.1 +/- 34.3 microg and 347.5 +/- 38.0 microg, respectively), but consumption was significantly less in these 2 groups compared with the placebo group (590.4 +/- 35.0 microg) (P < 0.05). For the rest of the study period, there was a significant difference in fentanyl consumption among all treatment groups, and it was minimal in the gabapentin group (P < 0.05). We conclude that gabapentin is more effective than carbamazepine for decreasing pain and fentanyl consumption.

Evidence that gabapentin reduces neuropathic pain by inhibiting the spinal release of glutamate

Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant that successfully treats many neuropathic pain syndromes, although the mechanism of its antihyperalgesic action remains elusive. This study aims to help delineate gabapentin's antihyperalgesic mechanisms. We assessed the effectiveness of gabapentin at decreasing mechanical and cold hypersensitivity induced in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Thus, we compared the effectiveness of pre- or post-treatment with systemic or intrathecal (i.t.) gabapentin at reducing the development and maintenance of the neuropathic pain symptoms. Gabapentin successfully decreased mechanical and cold hypersensitivity, both as a pretreatment and post-treatment. Furthermore, both i.t. and systemic administration of gabapentin were effective in reducing the behavioral hypersensitivity; however, the i.t. administration was superior to the systemic. We also examined gabapentin's effects at inhibiting hindpaw formalin-induced release of excitatory amino acids (EAAs) in the spinal cord dorsal horn (SCDH) both in naïve rats and in rats with neuropathic pain. We present the first evidence that gabapentin reduces the formalin-induced release of both glutamate and aspartate in SCDH. Furthermore, i.t. gabapentin reduces the enhanced noxious stimulus-induced spinal release of glutamate seen in neuropathic rats. These data suggest that gabapentin reduces neuropathic pain symptoms by inhibiting the release of glutamate in the SCDH.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations and biomarkers in the development of COX-2 inhibitors

The mechanism by which COX inhibitors exert their analgesic effect is well established. However, data show no direct correlation between drug concentrations in plasma and the analgesic or adverse effects in chronic inflammatory conditions. This represents a major problem in the development of COX inhibitors, since it is difficult to predict the appropriate dosing regimen for the treatment of chronic inflammatory pain, based upon information from pre-clinical studies and eventually early clinical studies. The factors that determine response in inflammatory pain must be understood in order to make predictions about the time course of the analgesic effect. In this review the determinants of drug response and their variability will be discussed: physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics (PK), pathophysiology and disease progression. From a mechanistic point of view, endogenous mediators of inflammation might be used as a biomarker for the analgesic effect and safety assessment. Such a biomarker can be an intermediate step between drug exposure and response. In addition, its concentration-effect relationship could be characterized by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling. Indeed, recent investigations have shown that COX-2 inhibition, as determined by modelling of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in the whole blood assay in vitro can be used as a marker to predict drug effects (analgesia) in humans. A model-derived parameter, IC80, (total and unbound) was found to correlate directly with the analgesic plasma concentration of different COX inhibitors varying in enzyme selectivity. These findings indicate that PGE2 and thromboxane B2 inhibition can be used to predict and select efficacious doses in humans.

Comparison of the Antinociceptive Profiles of Gabapentin and 3-Methylgabapentin in Rat Models of Acute and Persistent Pain: Implications for Mechanism of Action

The anticonvulsant gabapentin (GBP) has been shown effective for the treatment of neuropathic pain, although its mechanism of action remains unclear. A recent report has suggested that binding to the alpha(2)delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels contributes to its antinociceptive effect, based on the stereoselective efficacy of two analogs: (1S,3R)3-methylgabapentin (3-MeGBP) (IC(50) = 42 nM), which is effective in neuropathic pain models; and (1R,3R)3-MeGBP (IC(50) > 10,000 nM), which is ineffective (Field et al., 2000). The present study was designed to further examine the profiles of GBP and 3-MeGBP in rat models of acute and persistent pain. Systemic administration of GBP or (1S,3R)3-MeGBP inhibited tactile allodynia in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain, whereas (1R,3R)3-MeGBP was ineffective. The antiallodynic effect of GBP, but not (1S,3R)3-MeGBP, was blocked by i.t. injection of the GABA(B) receptor antagonist [3-[[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)methyl]amino]propyl](diethoxymethyl)phosphinic acid (CGP52432). Systemic GBP or (1S,3R)3-MeGBP also inhibited the second phase of formalin-evoked nociceptive behaviors, whereas (1R,3R)3-MeGBP was ineffective. However, both (1S,3R)3-MeGBP and (1R,3R)3-MeGBP, but not GBP, inhibited first phase behaviors. In the carrageenan model of inflammatory pain, systemic GBP or (1R,3R)3-MeGBP failed to inhibit thermal hyperalgesia, whereas (1S,3R)3-MeGBP had a significant, albeit transient, effect. Systemic (1S,3R)3-MeGBP, but not GBP or (1R,3R)3-MeGBP, also produced an antinociceptive effect in the warm water tail withdrawal test of acute pain. These data demonstrate that GBP and 3-MeGBP display different antinociceptive profiles, suggesting dissimilar mechanisms of antinociceptive action. Thus, the stereoselective efficacy of 3-MeGBP, presumably related to alpha(2)delta binding, likely does not completely account for the mechanism of action of GBP.

Redistribution of GABAB(1) protein and atypical GABAB responses in GABAB(2)-deficient mice

GABAB receptors mediate slow synaptic inhibition in the nervous system. In transfected cells, functional GABAB receptors are usually only observed after coexpression of GABAB(1) and GABAB(2) subunits, which established the concept of heteromerization for G-protein-coupled receptors. In the heteromeric receptor, GABAB(1) is responsible for binding of GABA, whereas GABAB(2) is necessary for surface trafficking and G-protein coupling. Consistent with these in vitro observations, the GABAB(1) subunit is also essential for all GABAB signaling in vivo. Mice lacking the GABAB(1) subunit do not exhibit detectable electrophysiological, biochemical, or behavioral responses to GABAB agonists. However, GABAB(1) exhibits a broader cellular expression pattern than GABAB(2), suggesting that GABAB(1) could be functional in the absence of GABAB(2). We now generated GABAB(2)-deficient mice to analyze whether GABAB(1) has the potential to signal without GABAB(2) in neurons. We show that GABAB(2)-/- mice suffer from spontaneous seizures, hyperalgesia, hyperlocomotor activity, and severe memory impairment, analogous to GABAB(1)-/- mice. This clearly demonstrates that the lack of heteromeric GABAB(1,2) receptors underlies these phenotypes. To our surprise and in contrast to GABAB(1)-/- mice, we still detect atypical electrophysiological GABAB responses in hippocampal slices of GABAB(2)-/- mice. Furthermore, in the absence of GABAB(2), the GABAB(1) protein relocates from distal neuronal sites to the soma and proximal dendrites. Our data suggest that association of GABAB(2) with GABAB(1) is essential for receptor localization in distal processes but is not absolutely necessary for signaling. It is therefore possible that functional GABAB receptors exist in neurons that naturally lack GABAB(2) subunits.

Synaptic modulation in pain pathways

All higher organisms possess a sensory system that allows them to detect potentially tissue-damaging (or noxious) stimuli. The proper functioning of this system is essential to protect their bodies from tissue damage. However, under pathological conditions after severe tissue injury and in inflammatory or neuropathic diseases, this system can become sensitized, and pain can then turn into a disease. Such exaggerated pain sensation (or hyperalgesia) can arise at different levels of integration. It can originate from an increased responsiveness of primary nociceptors, specialized nerve cells, which sense noxious stimuli, or from changes in the central processing of nociceptive input. Like other sensory input, nociceptive signals are relayed in the central nervous system by neurons, which communicate with each other mainly through chemical synapses. Changes in the excitability of these neurons or in the strength of their synaptic coupling provide the cellular basis for many forms of pathological pain. This review focuses on the synaptic processing of pain-related signals in the spinal cord dorsal horn, the first site of synaptic integration in the pain pathway. Particular emphasis is paid to synaptic processes underlying the generation of pathological pain evoked by inflammation or neuropathic diseases.

Molecular structure and physiological functions of GABA(B) receptors

GABA(B) receptors are broadly expressed in the nervous system and have been implicated in a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The cloning of the first GABA(B) receptor cDNAs in 1997 revived interest in these receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets. With the availability of molecular tools, rapid progress was made in our understanding of the GABA(B) system. This led to the surprising discovery that GABA(B) receptors need to assemble from distinct subunits to function and provided exciting new insights into the structure of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in general. As a consequence of this discovery, it is now widely accepted that GPCRs can exist as heterodimers. The cloning of GABA(B) receptors allowed some important questions in the field to be answered. It is now clear that molecular studies do not support the existence of pharmacologically distinct GABA(B) receptors, as predicted by work on native receptors. Advances were also made in clarifying the relationship between GABA(B) receptors and the receptors for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, an emerging drug of abuse. There are now the first indications linking GABA(B) receptor polymorphisms to epilepsy. Significantly, the cloning of GABA(B) receptors enabled identification of the first allosteric GABA(B) receptor compounds, which is expected to broaden the spectrum of therapeutic applications. Here we review current concepts on the molecular composition and function of GABA(B) receptors and discuss ongoing drug-discovery efforts.

The Analgesic Effects of Gabapentin in Monitored Anesthesia Care for Ear-Nose-Throat Surgery

We investigated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in rhinoplasty or endoscopic sinus surgery patients. Patients received either oral placebo or gabapentin 1200 mg 1 h before surgery. After standard premedication, 25 patients in each group received propofol, fentanyl, and local anesthesia at the operative site. Sedation was maintained by a continuous infusion of propofol adjusted according to the Ramsay scale. Sedation and pain scores were obtained at 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min during surgery and 30 min and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h after the procedure. Diclofenac 75 mg IM was administered as a rescue analgesic. Postoperative pain scores and intraoperative pain scores at 45 and 60 min were significantly lower in the gabapentin group. Fentanyl (122 +/- 40 microg versus 148 +/- 42 microg; P < 0.05) and diclofenac (33 +/- 53 mg versus 111 +/- 92 mg; P < 0.001) consumption was smaller and the time to first analgesic request (18 +/- 9 h versus 9 +/- 7 h; P < 0.001) was longer in the gabapentin group. A more frequent incidence of dizziness was found in the gabapentin (versus placebo) group (24% versus 4%, respectively). We conclude that gabapentin provided a significant analgesic benefit for intraoperative and postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing ambulatory rhinoplasty or endoscopic sinus surgery; however, dizziness may be a handicap for ambulatory use.

Gabapentin for the prevention of postoperative pain after vaginal hysterectomy

Gabapentin alleviates and/or prevents acute nociceptive and inflammatory pain both in animals and volunteers, especially when given before trauma. Gabapentin might also reduce postoperative pain. To test the hypothesis that gabapentin reduces the postoperative need for additional pain treatment (postoperative opioid sparing effect of gabapentin in humans), we gave 1200 mg of gabapentin or 15 mg of oxazepam (active placebo) 2.5 h prior to induction of anaesthesia to patients undergoing elective vaginal hysterectomy in an active placebo-controlled, double blind, randomised study. Gabapentin reduced the need for additional postoperative pain treatment (PCA boluses of 50 microg of fentanyl) by 40% during the first 20 postoperative hours. During the first 2 postoperative hours pain scores at rest and worst pain score (VAS 0-100 mm) were significantly higher in the active placebo group compared to the gabapentin-treated patients. Additionally, pretreatment with gabapentin reduced the degree of postoperative nausea and incidence of vomiting/retching possibly either due to the diminished need for postoperative pain treatment with opioids or because of an anti-emetic effect of gabapentin itself. No preoperative differences between the two groups were encountered with respect to the side effects of the premedication. However, 15 mg oxazepam was more effective in relieving preoperative anxiety than 1200 mg gabapentin.

Blockade of supraspinal 5-HT1A receptors potentiates the inhibitory effect of venlafaxine on wind-up activity in mononeuropathic rats

In mononeuropathic rats submitted to a C-fiber reflex responses paradigm, repeated administration (five successive injections every half-life) of 10 mg/kg, s.c. of venlafaxine, but not of 2.5 mg/kg, s.c., a mixed monoamine reuptake inhibitor with preferential inhibitory activity in 5-HT reuptake, induced a progressive reduction of spinal wind-up. Repeated co-administration of the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 i.c.v. (50 microg/injection) significantly increased the effect of venlafaxine s.c., indicating that venlafaxine-induced inhibition of spinal wind-up in mononeuropathic rats is potentiated by blockade of central 5-HT1A receptors.

Does gabapentin act as an agonist at native GABAB receptors?

Gabapentin, a novel anticonvulsant and analgesic, is a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue but was shown initially to have little affinity at GABA(A) or GABA(B) receptors. It was recently reported to be a selective agonist at GABA(B) receptors containing GABA(B1a)-GABA(B2) heterodimers, although several subsequent studies disproved that conclusion. In the present study, we examined whether gabapentin is an agonist at native GABA(B) receptors using a rat model of postoperative pain in vivo and periaqueductal gray (PAG) slices in vitro; PAG contains GABA(B) receptors, and their activation results in antinociception. An intrathecal injection of gabapentin or baclofen, a GABA(B) receptor agonist, induced antiallodynia in this postoperative pain model. Intrathecal injection of GABA(B) receptor antagonists CGP 35348 and CGP 55845 antagonized baclofen- but not gabapentin-induced antiallodynia. In ventrolateral PAG neurons, baclofen activated G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels in a manner blocked by CGP 35348 or CGP 55845. However, gabapentin displayed no effect on the membrane current. In neurons unaffected by gabapentin, baclofen activated GIRK channels through GABA(B) receptors. It is concluded that gabapentin is not an agonist at GABA(B) receptors that are functional in baclofen-induced antiallodynia in the postoperative pain model in vivo and in GIRK channel activation in ventrolateral PAG neurons in vitro.

Venlafaxine-induced depression of wind-up activity in mononeuropathic rats is potentiated by inhibition of brain 5-HT1A receptor expression in vivo

Antinociceptive effects of inhibiting 5-HT1A receptor expression by intracerebroventricular administration of an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide were studied in mononeuropathic rats. A 7-day period of treatment with the antisense produced: (i) reduction of mechanical hyperalgesia in the neuropathic hindlimb starting from day 5 of treatment, (ii) decrease of the hypothermic effect of 8-OH-DPAT challenge on day 6 of treatment, and (iii) potentiation of the inhibitory effect of velafaxine on spinal wind-up activity on day 7 of treatment. Results suggest a counteracting role of somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptors of raphe nuclei neurons in the antinociceptive efficacy of antidepressants with serotonergic spectrum in neuropathic pain.

Gabapentin: in postherpetic neuralgia

Gabapentin is a structural analogue of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) approved for use in adults with postherpetic neuralgia. Gabapentin does not bind to GABA(A) or GABA(B) receptors. Its mechanism of action in humans is unclear, but may involve binding to alpha2delta calcium channel subunits in animal models. Reductions in the mean daily pain score from baseline to week 7 or 8 of treatment (primary endpoint) were significantly greater with gabapentin 1800-3600 mg/day than placebo therapy in two well designed trials in patients with postherpetic neuralgia. The proportion of responders (patients showing a > or =50% reduction in mean daily pain score at endpoint versus baseline) was significantly greater with gabapentin than placebo. Daily sleep rating scores, the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (total pain scores), Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change and measures on the Short Form-36 Health Survey (including physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, vitality or mental health) improved to a significantly greater extent with gabapentin than placebo. Adverse events associated with gabapentin in patients with postherpetic neuralgia were usually mild to moderate in intensity, with dizziness, somnolence and peripheral oedema being commonly reported.

Comparative activity of the anti-convulsants oxcarbazepine, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and gabapentin in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat and guinea-pig

Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Oxcarbazepine is a recently introduced AED that is effective in treating epilepsy and has an improved side-effect profile compared to existing therapies. Here we have examined the effect of oxcarbazepine and other AEDs in a model of neuropathic pain in the rat and guinea-pig. Oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine (3-100 mg x kg(-1)) did not affect mechanical hyperalgesia or tactile allodynia induced by partial sciatic nerve ligation in the rat following oral administration. However, in the same model in the guinea-pig, both drugs produced up to 90% reversal of mechanical hyperalgesia with respective D(50) values of 10.7 and 0.8 mg x kg(-1). The active human metabolite of oxcarbazepine, monohydroxy derivative, was similarly active against mechanical hyperalgesia in the guinea-pig but not the rat. Lamotrigine (3-100 mg x kg(-1), p.o.) was effective against mechanical hyperlagesia in both species although it showed greater efficacy and potency in the guinea-pig (D(50) 4.7 mg x kg(-1)) compared to the rat (D(50) 27 mg kg(-1)). Lamotrigine produced slight inhibition of tactile allodynia in the rat only at the highest dose tested of 100 mg x kg(-1). Gabapentin was poorly active against mechanical hyperalgesia in both the rat and guinea-pig following a single oral administration (100 mg x kg(-1)), although upon repeated administration it produced up to 70 and 90% reversal in rat and guinea-pig, respectively. Gabapentin did however produce significant dose-related reversal of tactile allodynia in the rat following a single administration. These data show that oxcarbazepine and other AEDs are effective anti-hyperalgesic or anti-allodynic agents in an animal model of neuropathic pain, and provide further support for their use in the treatment of neuropathic pain in the clinic.

Inhibitory effects of spinal baclofen on spinal dorsal horn neurones in inflamed and neuropathic rats in vivo

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter, which modulates afferent transmission of nociceptive information at different levels of the central nervous system. Plasticity of spinal GABAergic systems may contribute to aberrant nociceptive responses associated with inflammatory and neuropathic pain states. Here potential changes in spinal GABA(B) receptor function in rats with peripheral inflammation and nerve injury, compared to control were investigated. Extracellular recordings of electrically evoked responses of spinal dorsal horn neurones were made in halothane anaesthetised rats. Effects of spinal administration of the GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen (0.1-10 microg/50 microL) on evoked responses of spinal neurones in control, hindpaw carrageenan inflamed, spinal nerve ligated and sham-operated rats were studied. In all groups of rats, spinal baclofen significantly reduced Abeta-, Adelta- and C-fibre evoked responses of spinal dorsal horn neurones in a dose related manner. Spinal pre-administration of the GABA(B) receptor antagonist, CGP-35348 (30 microg/50 microL) significantly blocked the inhibitory effects of baclofen on evoked neuronal responses in control rats. Estimated ED(50) values for each fibre type within experimental groups were calculated, a significant (P<0.05) difference between the values for Abeta-fibre-evoked and C-fibre mediated post-discharge responses of spinal dorsal horn neurones in spinal nerve ligated rats is reported. This finding may reflect decreased sensitivity of Abeta-fibre-evoked responses to baclofen, as well as an increased sensitivity of post-discharge responses to baclofen in spinal nerve ligated rats. Overall, we report that GABA(B)-receptor control of A- and C-fibre evoked responses of spinal neurones is not profoundly altered in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

Anti-allodynic and anti-oedematogenic properties of the extract and lignans from Phyllanthus amarus in models of persistent inflammatory and neuropathic pain

This study investigated the anti-allodynic and anti-oedematogenic effects of the hexanic extract, lignan-rich fraction and purified lignans from a plant used in the traditional medicine, Phyllanthus amarus, in the inflammatory and neuropathic models of nociception. The hexanic extract inhibited the allodynia and the oedema induced by the intraplantar injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). The inhibition observed was 76 +/- 7% (ipsilateral paw), 64 +/- 7% (contralateral paw), and 41 +/- 2% (oedema). Otherwise, the lignan-rich fraction or the pure lignans did not affect CFA-induced allodynia. Administered chronically, the lignan fraction reduced CFA-induced paw oedema (39 +/- 9%). When evaluated in the model of neuropathic pain caused by partial ligation of sciatic nerve, the hexanic extract inhibited the mechanical allodynia (77 +/- 7%), with a similar efficacy to the gabapentin (71 +/- 10%). The anti-allodynic effects of hexanic extract of P. amarus seem not to be associated with the impairment of motor co-ordination or with the development of tolerance. Finally, the treatment with hexanic extract inhibited the increase of myeloperoxidase activity, either following intraplantar injection of CFA or after sciatic nerve injury. It is concluded that, apart from its anti-inflammatory actions, which are probably linked to the presence of lignans, another as yet unidentified active principle(s) present in the hexanic extract of P. amarus produces pronounced anti-allodynia in two models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Considering that few drugs are currently available for the treatment of chronic pain, especially of the neuropathic type, the present results may have clinical relevance and open new possibilities for the development of new anti-allodynic drugs.

Muscimol prevents long-lasting potentiation of dorsal horn field potentials in rats with chronic constriction injury exhibiting decreased levels of the GABA transporter GAT-1

The inhibitory activity of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is considered critical in setting the conditions for synaptic plasticity, and many studies support an important role of GABA in the suppression of nociceptive transmission in the dorsal horn. Consequently, any injury-induced modification of the GABA action has the potential to critically modify spinal synaptic plasticity. We have previously reported that chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve was accompanied by long-lasting potentiation of superficial spinal dorsal horn field potentials following high-frequency tetanus. In this study we examined whether the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol would modify post-tetanic responses in rats with chronic constriction injury. In animals exhibiting maximal thermal hyperalgesia as one sign of neuropathic pain 7 days after loose ligation of the sciatic nerve, spinal application of muscimol (5, 10 or 20 microg) before the high-frequency (50 Hz) tetanus produced a long-lasting depression (rather than potentiation) of spinal dorsal horn field potentials. In separate but related Western immunoblot experiments, we also established that the chronic constriction injury was accompanied by significant decreases in the content of the GABA transporter GAT-1. These data demonstrated that GABA-A receptor agonists may effectively influence the expression of long-lasting synaptic plasticity in the spinal dorsal horn, and that an injury-induced loss in GABA transporter content may have contributed to a depletion of GABA from its terminals within the spinal dorsal horn. These data lent further support to the notion that the loss of GABA inhibition may have important consequences for the development of neuropathic pain.

Release of BDNF and GABA in the dorsal horn of neuropathic rats

Damage to peripheral nerves is associated with changes in excitability and/or phenotype of primary afferent neurons as well as increased neuronal excitability (central sensitization) and reduced inhibitory tone in the dorsal horn. For instance, in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is down-regulated in small cells whilst de novo expressed in large diameter cells. In the dorsal horn, GABA content is decreased. In this study, in a dorsal horn, 'with dorsal roots attached' preparation obtained from spinal nerve lesioned Wistar rats, stimulation of ipsilateral dorsal roots at either A fibre or A + C fibre strength did not evoke release of BDNF. In separate experiments, activity-induced release of GABA in the isolated dorsal horn of neuropathic rats was significantly reduced compared to release in sham operated rats. GABA release could be significantly restored following topical application of BDNF through the dorsal horn preparation. Finally, neuropathic rats developed thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity and thermal hyperalgesia was reduced by intrathecal injection of BDNF. We concluded that BDNF-induced release of GABA could be a mechanism to explain the antinociceptive action of intrathecal BDNF in neuropathic animals. Furthermore, reduced availability of sensory neuron-derived BDNF might contribute to the reduced GABAergic tone in the dorsal horn of neuropathic rats.

Antinociceptive activity of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist N-(2-Indanyl)-glycinamide hydrochloride (CHF3381) in experimental models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain

N-(2-Indanyl)-glycinamide hydrochloride (CHF3381) is a novel low-affinity, noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist. The current study compared the antinociceptive effects of CHF3381 with those of gabapentin and memantine in in vitro and in vivo models of pain. In isolated rat spinal cord, CHF3381 and memantine, but not gabapentin, produced similar inhibition of the wind-up phenomenon. CHF3381 suppressed the maintenance of carrageenan-induced thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in the rat with a minimum significantly effective dose (MED) of 30 mg/kg p.o. Memantine produced a partial reversal of both thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia (MED = 10 and 15 mg/kg i.p., respectively). Gabapentin reversed mechanical hyperalgesia (MED = 10 mg/kg s.c.), but did not affect thermal hyperalgesia. In the mouse formalin test, CHF3381 and memantine preferentially inhibited the late phase (MED = 30 and 20 mg/kg i.p., respectively); gabapentin inhibited only the late phase (MED = 30 mg/kg s.c.). Unlike morphine, CHF3381 chronic administration was not accompanied by the development of tolerance in the formalin test. Furthermore, morphine tolerance did not cross-generalize to CHF3381. In rats with a sciatic nerve injury, CHF3381 relieved both cold and mechanical allodynia (MED = 100 mg/kg p.o.). In contrast, memantine was inactive. Gabapentin blocked cold allodynia (MED = 30 mg/kg s.c.), but had marginal effects on mechanical allodynia. In diabetic neuropathy, CHF3381 reversed mechanical hyperalgesia (MED = 50 mg/kg p.o.). Memantine (15 mg/kg i.p.) produced an antinociceptive effect, whereas gabapentin (100 mg/kg p.o.) had no significant effect. Thus, CHF3381 may be useful for the therapy of peripheral painful neuropathies.

Allodynia and hyperalgesia in adjuvant-induced arthritic rats: time course of progression and efficacy of analgesics

The complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced arthritic rat model has extensively served as a laboratory model in the study of arthritic pain. However, the time courses of allodynia and hyperalgesia and the efficacies of different analgesics have not fully been analyzed in this model. Mechanical allodynia, thermal and joint hyperalgesia, and other disease development parameters (body weight, mobility, paw volume, and joint stiffness) were measured on postinoculation days (PIDs) 0 to 28 in rats. Acute analgesic efficacies of drugs were evaluated on PID 9 when degrees of allodynia, hyperalgesia, and joint stiffness in the ipsilateral paw reached almost the maximum, although those in the contralateral paw changed only slightly. In the ipsilateral paw, thermal hyperalgesia reached the maximum on PID 1, whereas mechanical allodynia and joint hyperalgesia progressively developed during the first 7 or 8 days, being tuned in to arthritis development. In the contralateral paw, thermal hyperalgesia never occurred, whereas mechanical allodynia and joint hyperalgesia developed after PID 11. Morphine and tramadol had full efficacies for all the pain parameters tested at sedation-inducing doses. Indomethacin and diclofenac significantly but partially improved thermal and joint hyperalgesia. Amitriptyline significantly reduced thermal and joint hyperalgesia only at sedation-inducing dose. Acetaminophen, carbamazepine, and gabapentin had, at the most, very small efficacies. In conclusion, the present study provided integrated information about the time course of pain and other disease development parameters in the CFA-induced arthritic rats, and clarified acute efficacies of different categories of analgesics for the allodynia and hyperalgesia.

A thymulin analogue peptide with powerful inhibitory effects on pain of neurogenic origin

The effects of a synthetic peptide analog of thymulin (PAT) were tested on nociceptive behavior in two animal models for peripheral mononeuropathy and in another two models for capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. Treatment with PAT (0.25-25 microg/rat, i.p.) produced significant reduction of the mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia in rats subjected to either chronic constriction injury (CCI) or spared nerve injury (SNI) models for mononeuropathy. Cold allodynia was moderately reduced in the CCI model. The inhibition of neuropathic manifestations peaked at 1-2 h post-treatment and disappeared in 3-4 h. Daily treatment with PAT, however, produced progressive attenuation of all neuropathic manifestations in the SNI model. On the other hand, pretreatment with similar doses of PAT produced dose-dependent reduction of the hyperalgesia induced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin (10 microg in 50 microl). The highest dose of PAT (50 microg) produced significant reduction of abdominal aversive behavior induced by i.p injection of capsaicin (20 microg in 100 microl). Compared with the effects of treatment with morphine or meloxicam (injected at single doses known to produce analgesia), PAT exerted equal or stronger inhibitory effects on neuropathic manifestations. The reported results suggest a possible direct action of PAT on afferent nerve fibers but its mechanisms remain to be determined.

The neurobiology and control of anxious states

Fear is an adaptive component of the acute "stress" response to potentially-dangerous (external and internal) stimuli which threaten to perturb homeostasis. However, when disproportional in intensity, chronic and/or irreversible, or not associated with any genuine risk, it may be symptomatic of a debilitating anxious state: for example, social phobia, panic attacks or generalized anxiety disorder. In view of the importance of guaranteeing an appropriate emotional response to aversive events, it is not surprising that a diversity of mechanisms are involved in the induction and inhibition of anxious states. Apart from conventional neurotransmitters, such as monoamines, gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) and glutamate, many other modulators have been implicated, including: adenosine, cannabinoids, numerous neuropeptides, hormones, neurotrophins, cytokines and several cellular mediators. Accordingly, though benzodiazepines (which reinforce transmission at GABA(A) receptors), serotonin (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonists and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors are currently the principle drugs employed in the management of anxiety disorders, there is considerable scope for the development of alternative therapies. In addition to cellular, anatomical and neurochemical strategies, behavioral models are indispensable for the characterization of anxious states and their modulation. Amongst diverse paradigms, conflict procedures--in which subjects experience opposing impulses of desire and fear--are of especial conceptual and therapeutic pertinence. For example, in the Vogel Conflict Test (VCT), the ability of drugs to release punishment-suppressed drinking behavior is evaluated. In reviewing the neurobiology of anxious states, the present article focuses in particular upon: the multifarious and complex roles of individual modulators, often as a function of the specific receptor type and neuronal substrate involved in their actions; novel targets for the management of anxiety disorders; the influence of neurotransmitters and other agents upon performance in the VCT; data acquired from complementary pharmacological and genetic strategies and, finally, several open questions likely to orientate future experimental- and clinical-research. In view of the recent proliferation of mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis, modulation and, potentially, treatment of anxiety disorders, this is an opportune moment to survey their functional and pathophysiological significance, and to assess their influence upon performance in the VCT and other models of potential anxiolytic properties.

Pharmacological sensitivity and gene expression analysis of the tibial nerve injury model of neuropathic pain

The tibial nerve injury model is a novel, surgically uncomplicated, rat model of neuropathic pain based on a unilateral transection (neurotomy) of the tibial branch of the sciatic nerve. The aim of the present study was to describe some behavioral and molecular features of the model, and to test its sensitivity to a number of drugs which are currently used for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The model was characterized by a pronounced mechanical allodynia which was present in all subjects and a less robust thermal hyperalgesia. Mechanical allodynia developed within 2 weeks post-surgery and was reliably present for at least 9 weeks. Neurotomized rats showed no autotomy and their body weight developed normally. Gene expression in ipsilateral L5 dorsal root ganglia, analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR), showed a pronounced up-regulation of galanin and vasointestinal peptide (VIP). This up-regulation developed rapidly (within 1 to 2 days following neurotomy) and remained present for at least 12 days. On the other hand, expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P mRNA was down-regulated 12 days following neurotomy. Mechanical allodynia was completely reversed by morphine [minimal effective dose (MED): 8 mg/kg, i.p.] and partially reversed by carbamazepine (MED: 64 mg/kg, i.p.), baclofen (MED: 3 mg/kg, i.p.) and amitriptyline (trend for efficacy at 32 mg/kg, i.p.), but not by gabapentin (50-100 mg/kg, i.p.). The finding that the tibial nerve injury model shows a robust and persistent mechanical allodynia which is sensitive to a number of established analgesics, as well as a gene expression profile which is compatible with that obtained in other models of neuropathic pain, further supports its validity as a reliable and surgically uncomplicated model for the study of neuropathic pain.