Structural underpinnings of oestrogen receptor mutations in endocrine therapy resistance

Overcoming Endocrine Resistance in Breast Cancer

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype. Treatment of ER+ breast cancer comprises interventions that suppress estrogen production and/or target the ER directly (overall labeled as endocrine therapy). While endocrine therapy has considerably reduced recurrence and mortality from breast cancer, de novo and acquired resistance to this treatment remains a major challenge. An increasing number of mechanisms of endocrine resistance have been reported, including somatic alterations, epigenetic changes, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review recent advances in delineating mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapies and potential strategies to overcome such resistance.

Suppression of breast cancer metastasis and extension of survival by a new antiestrogen in a preclinical model driven by mutant estrogen receptors

PURPOSE

Many human breast tumors become resistant to endocrine therapies and recur due to estrogen receptor (ERα) mutations that convey constitutive activity and a more aggressive phenotype. Here, we examined the effectiveness of a novel adamantyl antiestrogen, K-07, in suppressing the growth of breast cancer metastases containing the two most frequent ER-activating mutations, Y537S and D538G, and in extending survival in a preclinical metastatic cancer model.

METHODS

MCF7 breast cancer cells expressing luciferase and Y537S or D538G ER were injected into NOD-SCID-gamma female mice, and animals were treated orally with the antiestrogen K-07 or control vehicle. Comparisons were also made with the antiestrogen Fulvestrant. The development of metastases was monitored by in vivo bioluminescence imaging with phenotypic characterization of the metastases in liver and lung by immunohistochemical and biochemical analyses.

RESULTS

These breast cancer cells established metastases in liver and lung, and K-07 treatment reduced the metastatic burden. Mice treated with K-07 also survived much longer. By day 70, only 28% of vehicle-treated mice with mutant ER metastases were alive, whereas all K-07-treated D538G and Y537S mice were still alive. K-07 also markedly reduced the level of metastatic cell ER and the expression of ER-regulated genes.

CONCLUSION

The antiestrogen K-07 can reduce in vivo metastasis of breast cancers and extend host survival in this preclinical model driven by constitutively active mutant ERs, suggesting that this compound may be suitable for further translational examination of its efficacy in suppression of metastasis in breast cancers containing constitutively active mutant ERs.

Recent progress in selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) for the treatment of breast cancer

Selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) are a novel class of compounds capable of reducing the ERα protein level and blocking ER activity. Therefore, SERDs are considered as a significant therapeutic approach to treat ER+ breast cancer in both early stage and more advanced drug-resistant cases. After the FDA approval of a steroidal drug, fulvestrant, as a SERD for the treatment of breast cancer in patients who have progressed on antihormonal agents, several molecules with diverse chemical structures have been rapidly developed, studied and evaluated for selective estrogen receptor downregulation activity. Here we compile the promising SERDs reported in recent years and discuss the chemical structure and pharmacological profile of the most potent compound of the considered series. Because of the availability of only a limited number of effective drugs for the treatment of breast cancer, the quest for a potent SERD with respectable activity and bioavailability is still ongoing. The goal of this article is to make available to the reader an overview of the current progress in SERDs and provide clues for the future discovery and development of novel pharmacological potent SERDs for the treatment of breast cancer.

A new class of 1,3,5-triazine-based selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs): Lead optimization, molecular docking and dynamic simulation

Selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that acts as not only ER antagonist, but also ER degrader, would be useful for the treatment for drug-resistance ER+ breast cancer. However, most of currently available SERD candidates involve very limited molecular scaffolds and are still in clinical trials. In this study, we introduced a 1,3,5-triazine ring into a homobibenzyl motif extracted from amounts of ER ligands and synthesized sixteen SERDs bearing acrylic acid or acrylic amide side chains that possess both ERα antagonism and degradation properties. And all compounds were screened for their anti-proliferative activity against ER+ MCF-7 and Ishikawa cell lines. Among them, compound XHA1614 displayed potent growth inhibition activity against MCF-7 and Ishikawa cells with IC₅₀ values of 3.15 μM and 3.11 μM, respectively. Moreover, XHA1614 could dramatically degrade ER level at 1 nM in a Western blotting assay and afforded an outstanding antagonistic activity via suppressing the expression of progesterone receptor messenger RNA in MCF-7 cells in a RT-PCR assay. Further molecular docking and dynamic simulation on properly selected derivative furnished insights into its binding profile within ERα. Our findings suggest that the 1,3,5-triazine core was a feasible alternative to currently reported SERD scaffold, and provide information that will be useful for further development of promising SERDs candidates for breast cancer therapies.

Towards accurate high-throughput ligand affinity prediction by exploiting structural ensembles, docking metrics and ligand similarity

MOTIVATION

Nowadays, virtual screening (VS) plays a major role in the process of drug development. Nonetheless, an accurate estimation of binding affinities, which is crucial at all stages, is not trivial and may require target-specific fine-tuning. Furthermore, drug design also requires improved predictions for putative secondary targets among which is Estrogen Receptor alpha (ERα).

RESULTS

VS based on combinations of Structure-Based VS (SBVS) and Ligand-Based VS (LBVS) is gaining momentum to improve VS performances. In this study, we propose an integrated approach using ligand docking on multiple structural ensembles to reflect receptor flexibility. Then, we investigate the impact of the two different types of features (structure-based and ligand molecular descriptors) on affinity predictions using a random forest algorithm. We find that ligand-based features have lower predictive power (rP = 0.69, R2 = 0.47) than structure-based features (rP = 0.78, R2 = 0.60). Their combination maintains high accuracy (rP = 0.73, R2 = 0.50) on the internal test set, but it shows superior robustness on external datasets. Further improvement and extending the training dataset to include xenobiotics, leads to a novel high-throughput affinity prediction method for ERα ligands (rP = 0.85, R2 = 0.71). The presented prediction tool is provided to the community as a dedicated satellite of the @TOME server in which one can upload a ligand dataset in mol2 format and get ligand docked and affinity predicted.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION

http://edmon.cbs.cnrs.fr.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Suppression of FOXM1 activities and breast cancer growth in vitro and in vivo by a new class of compounds

The transcription factor FOXM1 is upregulated and overexpressed in aggressive, therapy-resistant forms of hormone receptor-positive and triple negative breast cancers, and is associated with less good patient survival. FOXM1 signaling is also a key driver in many other cancers. Here, we identify a new class of compounds effective in suppressing FOXM1 activity in breast cancers, and displaying good potency for antitumor efficacy. The compounds bind directly to FOXM1 and alter its proteolytic sensitivity, reduce the cellular level of FOXM1 protein by a proteasome- dependent process, and suppress breast cancer cell proliferation and cell cycle progression and increase apoptosis. RNA-seq and gene set enrichment analyses indicate that the compounds decrease expression of FOXM1-regulated genes and suppress gene ontologies under FOXM1 regulation. Several compounds have favorable pharmacokinetic properties and show good tumor suppression in preclinical breast tumor models. These compounds may be suitable for further clinical evaluation in targeting aggressive breast cancers driven by FOXM1.

The Emerging Role of ESR1 Mutations in Luminal Breast Cancer as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker of Response to Endocrine Therapy

Mutations in the hotspot ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER) gene ESR1 have recently been recognized as mechanisms of endocrine resistance in endocrine receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Accumulating data suggest these mutations develop under the selective pressure of endocrine treatments, and are infrequent in untreated ER-positive breast cancers. In vitro studies show that these mutations confer ligand-independent activity, resistance to estrogen deprivation, and relative resistance to tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Post-hoc retrospective and prospective analyses of ESR1 mutations in patients with MBC have consistently found that these mutations are markers of poor prognosis and predict resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs). These results warrant further investigation and prospective validation in dedicated studies. Moreover, studies are ongoing to clarify the activity of novel drugs in the context of metastatic endocrine resistant luminal breast cancer harboring ESR1 mutations. In this review, we summarize the pre-clinical and clinical findings defining the characteristics of ESR1 mutant breast cancer, and highlight the potential clinical developments in this field.

Discovery of 6-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-5-[4-[(3S)-1-(3-fluoropropyl)pyrrolidin-3-yl]oxyphenyl]-8,9-dihydro-7H-benzo[7]annulene-2-carboxylic acid (SAR439859), a Potent and Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) for the Treatment of Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer

More than 75% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) positive (ER+), and resistance to current hormone therapies occurs in one-third of ER+ patients. Tumor resistance is still ERα-dependent, but mutations usually confer constitutive activation to the hormone receptor, rendering ERα modulator drugs such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors ineffective. Fulvestrant is a potent selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), which degrades the ERα receptor in drug-resistant tumors and has been approved for the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer following antiestrogen therapy. However, fulvestrant shows poor pharmacokinetic properties in human, low solubility, weak permeation, and high metabolism, limiting its administration to inconvenient intramuscular injections. This Drug Annotation describes the identification and optimization of a new series of potent orally available SERDs, which led to the discovery of 6-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-[4-[(3S)-1-(3-fluoropropyl)pyrrolidin-3-yl]oxyphenyl]-8,9-dihydro-7H-benzo[7]annulene-2-carboxylic acid (43d), showing promising antitumor activity in breast cancer mice xenograft models and whose properties warranted clinical evaluation.

Androgen Receptor Is a Non-canonical Inhibitor of Wild-Type and Mutant Estrogen Receptors in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers

Sustained treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer with ER-targeting drugs results in ER mutations and refractory unresponsive cancers. Androgen receptor (AR), which is expressed in 80%-95% of ER-positive breast cancers, could serve as an alternate therapeutic target. Although AR agonists were used in the past to treat breast cancer, their use is currently infrequent due to virilizing side effects. Discovery of tissue-selective AR modulators (SARMs) has renewed interest in using AR agonists to treat breast cancer. Using translational models, we show that AR agonist and SARM, but not antagonist, inhibit the proliferation and growth of ER-positive breast cancer cells, patient-derived tissues, and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Ligand-activated AR inhibits wild-type and mutant ER activity by reprogramming the ER and FOXA1 cistrome and rendering tumor growth inhibition. These findings suggest that ligand-activated AR may function as a non-canonical inhibitor of ER and that AR agonists may offer a safe and effective treatment for ER-positive breast cancer.

Region-specific glucocorticoid receptor promoter methylation has both positive and negative prognostic value in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1, GR) is frequently downregulated in breast tumors, and evidence suggests it acts as a tumor suppressor in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We previously found that methylation of the GR promoter CpG island represses gene expression and occurs in ER+ breast tumors. In this study, the prognostic and predictive value of GR methylation was examined in ER+ patients from the CCTG MA.12 clinical trial of tamoxifen versus placebo in women with early breast cancer.

METHODS

We developed a targeted multiplex bisulfite next-generation sequencing assay to detect methylation at multiple GR promoter regions in DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. Following validation in a small cohort of breast tumors, ER+ FFPE tumor samples from MA.12 (n = 208) were tested. Survival analyses evaluated the impact of GR promoter methylation on patient overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

An analysis of TCGA data found that GR methylation is prevalent in ER+ tumors and is associated with decreased gene expression and analysis of public microarray data (KM Plotter) linked decreased GR expression to a poor outcome. In MA.12, two GR promoter regions (U and C) each had prognostic value, but with opposite effects on the outcome. U methylation was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.79, P = 0.041) whereas C methylation was associated with better OS (HR = 0.40, P = 0.040) and DFS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.037). The classification of patients based on the methylation status of the two regions was prognostic for OS (P = 0.006) and DFS (P = 0.041) and revealed a group of patients (U methylated, C unmethylated) with very poor outcomes. Placebo-treated patients in this high-risk group had worse OS (HR = 2.86, P = 0.002) and DFS (HR = 2.09, P = 0.014) compared to the rest of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Region-specific GR promoter methylation was an independent prognostic marker for patient survival and identified a subset of patients with poor prognosis, particularly without tamoxifen treatment. These findings provide a foundation for future studies into GR methylation as a promising prognostic biomarker in ER+ breast cancer.

Rational approaches of drug design for the development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), implicated in breast cancer

Drug discovery and development have gained momentum due to the rational drug design by engaging computational tools and bioinformatics methodologies. Bioisosteric replacements and hybrid molecular approaches are the other inventive processes, used by medicinal chemists for the desired modifications of leads for clinical drug candidates. SERMs, ought to produce inhibitory activity in breast, uterus and agonist activity in other tissues, are beneficial for estrogen-like actions. ER subtypes α and β are hormone dependent modulators of intracellular signaling and gene expression, and development of ER selective ligands could be an effective approach for treatment of breast cancer. This report has critically investigated the possible designing considerations of SERMs, their in silico interactions, and potent pharmacophore generation approaches viz. indole, restricted benzothiophene [3, 2-b] indole, carborane, xanthendione, combretastatin A-4, organometallic heterocycles, OBHS-SAHA hybrids, benzopyranones, tetrahydroisoquinolines, Dig G derivatives and their specifications in drug design and development, to rationally improve the understanding in drug discovery. This also includes various strategies for the development of dual inhibitors for the management of antiestrogenic resistance.

Estrogen-independent molecular actions of mutant estrogen receptor 1 in endometrial cancer

Estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations have been identified in hormone therapy-resistant breast cancer and primary endometrial cancer. Analyses in breast cancer suggest that mutant ESR1 exhibits estrogen-independent activity. In endometrial cancer, ESR1 mutations are associated with worse outcomes and less obesity, however, experimental investigation of these mutations has not been performed. Using a unique CRISPR/Cas9 strategy, we introduced the D538G mutation, a common endometrial cancer mutation that alters the ligand binding domain of ESR1, while epitope tagging the endogenous locus. We discovered estrogen-independent mutant ESR1 genomic binding that is significantly altered from wild-type ESR1. The D538G mutation impacted expression, including a large set of nonestrogen-regulated genes, and chromatin accessibility, with most affected loci bound by mutant ESR1. Mutant ESR1 is distinct from constitutive ESR1 activity because mutant-specific changes are not recapitulated with prolonged estrogen exposure. Overall, the D538G mutant ESR1 confers estrogen-independent activity while causing additional regulatory changes in endometrial cancer cells that are distinct from breast cancer cells.

Therapeutic Ligands Antagonize Estrogen Receptor Function by Impairing Its Mobility

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancers frequently remain dependent on ER signaling even after acquiring resistance to endocrine agents, prompting the development of optimized ER antagonists. Fulvestrant is unique among approved ER therapeutics due to its capacity for full ER antagonism, thought to be achieved through ER degradation. The clinical potential of fulvestrant is limited by poor physicochemical features, spurring attempts to generate ER degraders with improved drug-like properties. We show that optimization of ER degradation does not guarantee full ER antagonism in breast cancer cells; ER "degraders" exhibit a spectrum of transcriptional activities and anti-proliferative potential. Mechanistically, we find that fulvestrant-like antagonists suppress ER transcriptional activity not by ER elimination, but by markedly slowing the intra-nuclear mobility of ER. Increased ER turnover occurs as a consequence of ER immobilization. These findings provide proof-of-concept that small molecule perturbation of transcription factor mobility may enable therapeutic targeting of this challenging target class.

Glucocorticoid receptor modulation decreases ER-positive breast cancer cell proliferation and suppresses wild-type and mutant ER chromatin association

Background

Non-ER nuclear receptor activity can alter estrogen receptor (ER) chromatin association and resultant ER-mediated transcription. Consistent with GR modulation of ER activity, high tumor glucocorticoid receptor (GR) expression correlates with improved relapse-free survival in ER+ breast cancer (BC) patients.

Methods

In vitro cell proliferation assays were used to assess ER-mediated BC cell proliferation following GR modulation. ER chromatin association following ER/GR co-liganding was measured using global ChIP sequencing and directed ChIP analysis of proliferative gene enhancers.

Results

We found that GR liganding with either a pure agonist or a selective GR modulator (SGRM) slowed estradiol (E2)-mediated proliferation in ER+ BC models. SGRMs that antagonized transcription of GR-unique genes both promoted GR chromatin association and inhibited ER chromatin localization at common DNA enhancer sites. Gene expression analysis revealed that ER and GR co-activation decreased proliferative gene activation (compared to ER activation alone), specifically reducing CCND1, CDK2, and CDK6 gene expression. We also found that ligand-dependent GR occupancy of common ER-bound enhancer regions suppressed both wild-type and mutant ER chromatin association and decreased corresponding gene expression. In vivo, treatment with structurally diverse SGRMs also reduced MCF-7 Y537S ER-expressing BC xenograft growth.

Conclusion

These studies demonstrate that liganded GR can suppress ER chromatin occupancy at shared ER-regulated enhancers, including CCND1 (Cyclin D1), regardless of whether the ligand is a classic GR agonist or antagonist. Resulting GR-mediated suppression of ER+ BC proliferative gene expression and cell division suggests that SGRMs could decrease ER-driven gene expression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1164-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ESR1 mutations: a new biomarker in breast cancer

Introduction: In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy. Areas covered: Here, we review currently available data on ESR1 mutations, regarding their functional impact, prevalence at different stages (and according to the material used: tissue-based analysis vs. liquid biopsy), prognostic impact and predictive value of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Possible strategies to overcome this resistance by using selective estrogen receptor downregulators (such as fulvestrant) are also discussed. Expert opinion: ESR1 mutation detection will probably become a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the future, used in clinical practice for hormone-receptor breast cancer, especially in the metastatic setting. In the future, we should expect to assess ESR1 mutations, using liquid biopsy (by digital-PCR or next-generation sequencing), in the same way as other prognostic or predictive biomarkers, such as EGFR mutations in lung cancer, and possibly even have targeted-therapies against these mutations.

Estrogen Receptor Covalent Antagonists: The Best Is Yet to Come

The development of tamoxifen and subsequent estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) antagonists represents a tremendous therapeutic breakthrough in the treatment of breast cancer. Despite the ability of ERα antagonists to increase survival rates, resistance to these therapies is an all-too-common occurrence. The majority of resistant tumors, including those with hotspot mutations in the ligand-binding domain of ERα, remain dependent on ERα signaling, indicating that either a more potent or novel class of antagonist could have clinical benefit. With this thought in mind, we developed a novel ERα antagonist that exhibits enhanced potency due to its ability to covalently target a unique cysteine in ER. This review describes the design of this antagonist, H3B-5942, and discusses opportunities for future improvements, which could reduce the risk of escape mutations to this therapeutic modality.

Next-Generation ERα Inhibitors for Endocrine-Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer

One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. Because estrogen receptor-α (ERα) is expressed in ~70% of patients, therapeutic intervention by ERα-targeted endocrine therapies remains the leading strategy to prevent progression and/or metastasis in the adjuvant setting. However, the efficacy of these therapies will be diminished by the development of acquired resistance after prolonged treatment regimens. In preclinical models of endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancers that retain ERα expression, antiestrogens with improved efficacy and potency can overcome resistance to shrink tumors and prevent metastasis. In particular, selective ER degraders or downregulators, which both antagonize ERα actions and induce its degradation, have demonstrated substantial antitumor efficacy in this setting. In the present review, we have discussed the mechanisms of acquired endocrine resistance in luminal breast cancers and the strategies used by next-generation endocrine therapies to antagonize ERα.

18F-Fluoroestradiol PET Imaging of Activating Estrogen Receptor-α Mutations in Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of estrogen receptor-α gene (ESR1) mutations at the tyrosine (Y) 537 amino acid residue within the ligand binding domain on ¹⁸F-fluoroestradiol (¹⁸F-FES) binding and in vivo tumor uptake compared with wild-type (WT)-estrogen receptor α (ER). Methods: ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were used to generate stable cell lines that express WT-ER, Y537S, or Y537C mutant ER. Receptor expression and localization were confirmed by Western blot and immunofluorescence, respectively. ER transcriptional function was measured using an estrogen response element-luciferase reporter gene assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of ER-regulated endogenous target genes. Saturation binding and competition assays were performed to determine equilibrium dissociation constant (K_d) and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values. ¹⁸F-FES uptake was measured in tumor xenografts grown in female athymic nude mice by small-animal PET/CT imaging and tissue biodistribution using 5.55 MBq (150 μCi) of ¹⁸F-FES. A 10-fold-lower injected dose of 0.555 MBq (15 μCi) of ¹⁸F-FES was also used for tissue biodistribution. Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA. Results: Y537S and Y537C mutations resulted in increased ER transcriptional activity in the absence of estrogen compared with WT-ER (11.48 ± 2.42 fold; P = 0.0002, and 5.89 ± 0.94 fold; P = 0.04, respectively). Constitutive ER activation of two target genes (PGR and TFF1) in the absence of estrogen was also observed in Y537S- and Y537C-ER cells compared with WT-ER. K_d values for ¹⁸F-FES were 0.98 ± 0.54 nM for Y537S-ER (P = 0.27) and 0.24 ± 0.03 nM for Y537C-ER (P = 0.95) compared with 0.07 ± 0.03 nM for WT-ER. IC50 values were 0.22 ± 0.09 nM for Y537S-ER (P = 0.97), 0.18 ± 0.09 nM for Y537C-ER (P = 0.99), and 0.19 ± 0.11 nM for WT-ER. Tumor xenografts expressing Y537S-ER (mean percentage injected dose per gram, 1.45 ± 0.06; P = 0.77) and Y537C-ER (2.09 ± 0.20; P = 0.21) had similar ¹⁸F-FES uptake compared with WT-ER (1.68 ± 0.12). Comparable ¹⁸F-FES uptake between Y537S-, Y537C-, and WT-ER xenografts was also observed using a 10-fold-lower injected dose with the tissue biodistribution assay. Conclusion: Since tumoral uptake of ¹⁸F-FES is not significantly impacted by Y537S-ER or Y537C-ER mutations, the potential diagnostic utility of ¹⁸F-FES PET imaging is expected to be equally valid for patients with or without these activating ESR1 mutations.

Estrogen Signaling in Endometrial Cancer: a Key Oncogenic Pathway with Several Open Questions

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological cancer in the developed world, and it is one of the few cancer types that is becoming more prevalent and leading to more deaths in the USA each year. The majority of endometrial tumors are considered to be hormonally driven, where estrogen signaling through estrogen receptor α (ER) acts as an oncogenic signal. The major risk factors and some treatment options for endometrial cancer patients emphasize a key role for estrogen signaling in the disease. Despite the strong connections between estrogen signaling and endometrial cancer, important molecular aspects of ER function remain poorly understood; however, progress is being made in our understanding of estrogen signaling in endometrial cancer. Here, we discuss the evidence for the importance of estrogen signaling in endometrial cancer, details of the endometrial cancer-specific actions of ER, and open questions surrounding estrogen signaling in endometrial cancer.

Inhibition of histone methyltransferase DOT1L silences ERα gene and blocks proliferation of antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells

Breast cancer (BC) resistance to endocrine therapy results from constitutively active or aberrant estrogen receptor α (ERα) signaling, and ways to block ERα pathway in these tumors are sought after. We identified the H3K79 methyltransferase DOT1L as a novel cofactor of ERα in BC cell chromatin, where the two proteins colocalize to regulate estrogen target gene transcription. DOT1L blockade reduces proliferation of hormone-responsive BC cells in vivo and in vitro, consequent to cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death, with widespread effects on ER-dependent gene transcription, including ERα and FOXA1 gene silencing. Antiestrogen-resistant BC cells respond to DOT1L inhibition also in mouse xenografts, with reduction in ERα levels, H3K79 methylation, and tumor growth. These results indicate that DOT1L is an exploitable epigenetic target for treatment of endocrine therapy-resistant ERα-positive BCs.

miR-190 enhances endocrine therapy sensitivity by regulating SOX9 expression in breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide, and approximately 70% of breast cancers are hormone receptor-positive and express estrogen receptor-α (ERα) or/and progesterone receptor. Therapies targeting ERα have been successfully used in patients with ERα⁺ breast cancer. However, intrinsic or acquired resistance to anti-estrogen therapy presents a major challenge. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway regulates various processes that are important for cancer progression, and emerging evidences have shown a close interaction between Wnt/β-catenin and ERα signaling. miR-190 is also involved in ER signaling and our previous study indicated that miR-190 suppresses breast cancer metastasis.

Methods

The effect of miR-190 on breast cancer anti-estrogen sensitivity was investigated both in vitro and in vivo. The protein expression levels and localization were analyzed by western blotting and immunofluorescence, respectively. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and dual-luciferase reporter assays were used to validate the regulation of the zinc-finger E-box binding homeobox 1/ ERα-miR-190-SRY-related high mobility group box 9 (ZEB1/ERα-miR-190-SOX9) axis.

Results

miR-190 increased the anti-estrogen sensitivity of breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. miR-190 inhibited Wnt/β-catenin signaling by targeting SOX9, and its expression inversely correlated with that of SOX9 in breast cancer samples. Furthermore, ERα and ZEB1 competitively regulated miR-190 expression.

Conclusions

Our data uncover the ZEB1/ERα-miR-190-SOX9 axis and suggest a mechanism by which the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway is involved in breast cancer anti-estrogen therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13046-019-1039-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Strategies to degrade estrogen receptor α in primary and ESR1 mutant-expressing metastatic breast cancer

With the advent of omic technologies, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying estrogen receptor α (ERα)-expressing breast cancer (BC) progression has grown exponentially. Nevertheless, the most widely used therapy for inhibiting this disease is endocrine therapy (ET) (i.e., aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen - Tam, faslodex/fulvestrant - FUL). However, in a considerable number of cases, prolonged patient treatment with ET generates the development of resistant tumor cells and, consequently, tumor relapse, which manifests as metastatic disease that is extremely difficult to manage, especially because such metastatic BCs (MBCs) often express ERα mutations (e.g., Y537S, D538G) that confer pronounced growth advantages to tumor cells. Interestingly, ET continues to be the therapy of choice for this neoplasia, which underscores the need to identify novel drugs that could work in primary and MBCs. In this study, we review the approaches that have been undertaken to discover these new anti-ERα compounds, especially considering those focused on evaluating ERα degradation. A literature analysis demonstrated that current strategies for discovering new anti-BC drugs are focusing on the identification either of novel ERα inhibitors, of compounds that inhibit ERα-related pathways or of drugs that influence ERα-unrelated cellular pathways. Several lines of evidence suggest that all of these molecules alter the ERα content and block the proliferation of both primary and MBCs. In turn, we propose to rationalize all these discoveries into the definition of e.m.eral.d.s (i.e., selective modulators of ERα levels and degradation) as a novel supercategory of anti-ERα drugs that function both as modulators of ERα levels and inhibitors of BC cell proliferation.

Non-canonical Estrogen Signaling in Endocrine Resistance

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer related deaths in women worldwide. The disease is extremely heterogenous. A large percentage of the breast cancers are dependent on estrogen signaling and hence respond to endocrine therapies which essentially block the estrogen signaling. However, many of these tumors emerge as endocrine resistant tumors. Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the emergence of endocrine resistance, which include mutations in the estrogen receptors, cross-talk with other signaling pathways, cancer stem cells etc. This review is focused on the role of non-canonical estrogen receptor signaling in endocrine resistance. Most of the therapeutics which are used currently are targeting the major receptor of estrogen namely ER-α. Last two decades has witnessed the discovery of alternate forms of ER-α, as well as other receptors for estrogen such as ERRgamma, GPER-1 as well as ER-β, which are activated not only by estrogen, but also by the therapeutic agents such as tamoxifen that are routinely used in treatment of breast cancer. However, when the alternate receptors are activated, they result in activation of membrane signaling which subsequently activates pathways such as MAPK and GPCR leading to cell-proliferation. This renders the anticipated anti-estrogenic effects of tamoxifen less effective or ineffective. Future research in this area has to focus on the alternate mechanisms and develop a combinatorial strategy, which can complement the existing therapeutics to get better outcome of endocrine therapies.

Redrawing the Lines: The Next Generation of Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Although not considered curative in nature, new therapeutic advances in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have substantially improved patient outcomes. This article discusses the state-of-the-art and emerging therapeutic options for management of MBC. BC systemic therapy targets multiple key pathways, including estrogen receptor signaling, HER2 signaling, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling. Other therapeutic strategies include targeting DNA repair, inhibiting immune checkpoints, and developing antibody-drug conjugates. Although surgery historically was reserved for palliation of symptomatic, large, or ulcerating masses, some data suggest a possibly expanding role for more aggressive locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy. As technology develops, biomarker-specific, line-agnostic, and receptor-agnostic treatment strategies will redraw the current lines of MBC care. However, tumor heterogeneity remains a challenge. To effectively reshape our approach to MBC, careful consideration of the patient perspective, the costs and value of novel treatments, and accessibility (especially in developing countries) is paramount.

Antagonists for Constitutively Active Mutant Estrogen Receptors: Insights into the Roles of Antiestrogen-Core and Side-Chain

A major risk for patients having estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancer is the recurrence of drug-resistant metastases after initial successful treatment with endocrine therapies. Recent studies have implicated a number of activating mutations in the ligand-binding domain of ERα that stabilize the agonist conformation as a prominent mechanism for this acquired resistance. There are several critical gaps in our knowledge regarding the specific pharmacophore requirements of an antagonist that could effectively inhibit all or most of the different mutant ERs. To address this, we screened various chemotypes for blocking mutant ER-mediated transcriptional signaling and identified RU58668 as a model compound that contains structural elements that support potent ligand-induced inhibition of mutant ERs. We designed and synthesized a focused library of novel antagonists and probed how small and large perturbations in different ligand structural regions influenced inhibitory activity on individual mutant ERs in breast cancer cells. Effective inhibition derives from both nonpolar and moderately polar motifs in a multifunctional side chain of the antagonists, with the nature of the ligand core making important contributions by increasing the potency of ligands possessing similar types of side chains. Some of our new antagonists potently blocked the transcriptional activity of the three most common mutant ERs (L536R, Y537S, D538G) and inhibited mutant ER-mediated cell proliferation. Supported by our molecular modeling, these studies provide new insights into the role of specific components, involving both the ligand core and multifunctional side chain, in suppressing wild-type and mutant ER-mediated transcription and breast cancer cell proliferation.

Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: molecular mechanisms and future goals

Introduction

The majority of breast cancers (BCs) are characterized by the expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα+). ERα acts as ligand-dependent transcription factor for genes associated with cell survival, proliferation, and tumor growth. Thus, blocking the estrogen agonist effect on ERα is the main strategy in the treatment of ERα+ BCs. However, despite the development of targeted anti-estrogen therapies for ER+ BC, around 30–50% of early breast cancer patients will relapse. Acquired resistance to endocrine therapy is a great challenge in ER+ BC patient treatment.

Discussion

Anti-estrogen resistance is a consequence of molecular changes, which allow for tumor growth irrespective of estrogen presence. Those changes may be associated with ERα modifications either at the genetic, regulatory or protein level. Additionally, the activation of alternate growth pathways and/or cell survival mechanisms can lead to estrogen-independence and endocrine resistance.

Conclusion

This comprehensive review summarizes molecular mechanisms associated with resistance to anti-estrogen therapy, focusing on genetic alterations, stress responses, cell survival mechanisms, and cell reprogramming.

Identification of an Orally Bioavailable Chromene-Based Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD) That Demonstrates Robust Activity in a Model of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer

About 75% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α) positive, and women typically initially respond well to antihormonal therapies such as tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors, but resistance often emerges. Fulvestrant is a steroid-based, selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that both antagonizes and degrades ER-α and shows some activity in patients who have progressed on antihormonal agents. However, fulvestrant must be administered by intramuscular injections that limit its efficacy. We describe the optimization of ER-α degradation efficacy of a chromene series of ER modulators resulting in highly potent and efficacious SERDs such as 14n. When examined in a xenograft model of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, 14n (ER-α degradation efficacy = 91%) demonstrated robust activity, while, despite superior oral exposure, 15g (ER-α degradation efficacy = 82%) was essentially inactive. This result suggests that optimizing ER-α degradation efficacy in the MCF-7 cell line leads to compounds with robust effects in models of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer derived from an MCF-7 background.

Derivative of Stevioside; CPUK02; Restores ESR1 Gene Methylation in MDA-MB 231

Background:

CPUK02 (15-Oxosteviol benzyl ester) is a new ent-kaurenoid derivative of stevioside and exhibits strong anti-cancer activity. Nowadays, the pattern of epigenetic in cancer has been topic of many studies and DNA methylation targeting represents a relevant strategy for cancer treatment. Since, no study conducted to this mechanism, we attempt to evaluate whether CPUK02 induce its anti-cancer effects via alteration the level of mRNA DNMT3B, DNMT3A expression and ESR1 methylation pattern in breast cancer cells line.

Methods:

MCF-7 (ER +) and MDA-MB231 (ER-) cell lines were treated for 24, 48 hours with 1 µM CPUK02 and 5-AZA-CdR (DNA methyltransferase inhibitor). Quantitative expression of DNMT3B and DNMT3A genes and ESR1 promoter methylation was assessed by Real-Time PCR and MS-PCR, respectively.

Results:

CPUK02 restored ESR1 promoter unmethylated allele in MDA-MB 231 cells. Also treatment with CPUK02 decreased the expression of both DNMT3A and DNMT3B genes like 5-AZA. The expression of DNMT genes were diminished by half compared with control cells.

Conclusions:

These results showed that CPUK02 has an anticancer effect on MDA-MB 231 cells which this effect can be done through several pathways.

Tamoxifen Resistance Trumped and Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders Arrive

Predictive tests, to refine the estrogen receptor assay, for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with tamoxifen and oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERD) are required. A splice variant of the corepressor NCOR2, BQ2313636.1 predicts tamoxifen resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen and AZ9496, the first oral SERD, completes phase I studies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3480-2. ©2018 AACRSee related articles by Gong et al., p. 3681 and Hamilton et al., p. 3510.

Successful Targeted Therapies for Breast Cancer: the Worcester Foundation and Future Opportunities in Women's Health

The signing of the National Cancer Act in 1971 was designed to take laboratory discoveries rapidly from the bench to the bedside. A "war on cancer" had been declared. Combination cytotoxic chemotherapy was predicted to cure all cancers, based on the stunning success in treating childhood leukemia. Breast cancer treatments were primitive; radical mastectomy and radiation were standard of care for disease that had not spread. Ablative endocrine surgery (oophorectomy, hypophysectomy, and adrenalectomy) was a palliative last option for metastatic breast cancer. However, only 30% responded, surviving for only 1 or 2 years: every patient soon died. The discovery of the estrogen receptor (ER) and translation to breast cancer treatment triggered a revolution in women's health. Two important but interconnected events occurred in 1972 at the Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology (WFEB) that would exploit the breast tumor ER as the first target to save lives and prevent breast cancer development. Two new groups of medicines-selective ER modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs)-would continue the momentum of research at the WFEB to improve women's health. Here, we recount the important progress made in women's health based on knowledge of the endocrinology of breast cancer. We propose future opportunities in SERM therapeutics to "refresh" the current standards of care for breast cancer treatment. The opportunity is based on emerging knowledge about acquired resistance to long-term adjuvant AI therapy used to treat breast cancer.