101
|
Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:5096-5105. [PMID: 33409778 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07508-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic power of separately integrating on-site computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and static CT stress myocardial perfusion (CTP) with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in detecting patients with flow-limiting CAD. The flow-limiting stenosis was defined as obstructive (≥ 50%) stenosis by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with a corresponding perfusion deficit on stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/MPI). METHODS Forty-eight patients (74 vessels) were enrolled who underwent research-indicated combined CTA-CTP (320-row CT scanner, temporal resolution 137 ms) and SPECT/MPI prior to conventional coronary angiography. CT-FFR was computed on-site using resting CCTA data with dedicated workstation-based software. All five imaging modalities were analyzed in blinded independent core laboratories. Logistic regression and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) index were used to evaluate incremental differences in CT-FFR or CTP compared with CCTA alone. RESULTS The prevalence of obstructive CAD defined by combined ICA-SPECT/MPI was 40%. Per-vessel sensitivity and specificity were 95 and 42% for CCTA, 76 and 89% for CCTA + CTP, and 81 and 96% for CCTA + CT-FFR, respectively. The diagnostic performance of CCTA (AUC = 0.82) was improved by combining it with CT-FFR (AUC = 0.92, p = 0.01; IDI = 0.27, p < 0.001) or CTP (AUC = 0.90, p = 0.02; IDI = 0.18, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION On-site CT-FFR combined with CCTA provides an incremental diagnostic improvement over CCTA alone in identifying patients with flow-limiting CAD defined by ICA + SPECT/MPI, with a comparable diagnostic accuracy for integrated CTP and CCTA. KEY POINTS • Both on-site CT-FFR and CTP perform well with high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of flow-limiting stenosis. • Comparable diagnostic accuracy between CCTA + CT-FFR and CCTA + CTP is demonstrated to detect flow-limiting stenosis. • Integrated CT-FFR and CCTA derived from a single widened CCTA data acquisition can accurately and conveniently evaluate both coronary anatomy and physiology in the future management of patients with suspected CAD, without the need for additional vasodilator administration and contrast and radiation exposure.
Collapse
|
102
|
Singh V, Choi AD, Leipsic J, Aghayev A, Earls JP, Blanke P, Steigner M, Shaw Phd LJ, Di Carli MF, Villines TC, Blankstein R. Use of cardiac CT amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: North American perspective. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2021; 15:16-26. [PMID: 33248903 PMCID: PMC7661966 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected patient care deliver throughout the world, resulting in a greater emphasis on efficiently and safety. In this article, we discuss the experiences of several North American centers in utilizing cardiac CT during the pandemic. We also provide a case-based overview which highlights the advantages of cardiac CT in evaluating the following scenarios: (1) patients with possible myocardial injury versus myocardial infarction; (2) patients with acute chest pain; (3) patients with stable chest pain; (4) patients with possible intracardiac thrombus; (5) patients with valvular heart disease. For each scenario, we also provide an overview of various societies recommendations which have highlighted the use of cardiac CT during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope that the advantages of cardiac CT that have been realized during the pandemic can help promote wider adoption of this technique and improved coverage and payment by payors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasvi Singh
- Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew D Choi
- Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jonathon Leipsic
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ayaz Aghayev
- Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James P Earls
- Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Philipp Blanke
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael Steigner
- Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leslee J Shaw Phd
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcelo F Di Carli
- Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Todd C Villines
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Goldman LH, Lerer R, Shabrang C, Travin MI, Levsky JM. Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: Insights from a randomized controlled trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2020; 27:2306-2315. [PMID: 30788757 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01647-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of incidental findings from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on management has not been rigorously investigated. This study uses a control group to explore this relationship. METHODS Analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of acute chest pain patients admitted to telemetry was performed. Patients were randomized to undergo either CCTA (n = 200) or radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) (n = 200). Incidental findings were determined from imaging reports. Records were reviewed to determine subsequent management and imaging during and after hospitalization. Comparisons were performed using Fischer's exact tests. RESULTS 386 incidental findings were found among 187 CCTA studies. No extra-cardiac incidental findings were noted in the MPI arm, which served as an effective control group. There were significantly more non-coronary medical workups during admission in the CCTA group compared to the MPI group [20% (39) vs. 12% (23), P = 0.038]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more resting echocardiography during the inpatient workup compared to the MPI group [38% (75) vs. 18% (55), P = 0.042]. CCTA patients underwent significantly more non-contrast chest CT exams in the year following admission compared to MPI patients [14% (27) vs. 7% (13) P = 0.029]. CONCLUSIONS Incidental findings on inpatient CCTAs performed for chest pain have a significant impact on treatment and imaging during and following hospital admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren H Goldman
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
| | - Rikah Lerer
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
| | - Cyrus Shabrang
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
| | - Mark I Travin
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Levsky
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Beache GM, Mohammed TLH, Hurwitz Koweek LM, Ghoshhajra BB, Brown RKJ, Davis AM, Heitner J, Hsu JY, Johri AM, Khosa F, Kligerman SJ, Litmanovich D, Maroules CD, Meyersohn N, Tomaszewski CA, Villines TC, Wann S, Abbara S. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Nonspecific Chest Pain-Low Probability of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:S346-S354. [PMID: 33153548 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Patients with acute nonspecific chest pain and low probability for coronary disease remain an important clinical management dilemma. We focus on evidence for imaging, in an integrated decision-making setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garth M Beache
- University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky.
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrew M Davis
- The University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians
| | - John Heitner
- New York Presbyterian Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | - Joe Y Hsu
- Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amer M Johri
- Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; Canada, Cardiology expert
| | - Faisal Khosa
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Todd C Villines
- University of Virginia Health Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
| | - Samuel Wann
- Ascension Healthcare Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Nuclear cardiology expert
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Specialty Chair, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Seitun S, Clemente A, Maffei E, Toia P, La Grutta L, Cademartiri F. Prognostic value of cardiac CT. Radiol Med 2020; 125:1135-1147. [PMID: 33047297 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01285-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In the past decades, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has become a powerful tool in the management of coronary artery disease. The diagnostic and prognostic value of CCTA has been extensively demonstrated in both large observational studies and clinical trials among stable chest pain patients. The quantification of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a well-established predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic subjects. Besides CACS, the main strength of CCTA is the accurate assessment of the individual total atherosclerotic plaque burden, which holds important prognostic information. In addition, CCTA, by providing detailed information on coronary plaque morphology and composition with identification of specific high-risk plaque features, may further improve the risk stratification beyond the assessment of coronary stenosis. The development of new CCTA applications, such as stress myocardial CT perfusion and computational fluids dynamic applied to standard CCTA to derive CT-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) values have shown promising results to guide revascularization, potentially improving clinical outcomes in stable chest pain patients. In this review, starting from the role of CACS and moving beyond coronary stenosis, we evaluate the existing evidence of the prognostic effectiveness of the CCTA strategy in real-world clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Seitun
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Clemente
- Department of Radiology, CNR (National Council of Research)/Tuscany Region 'Gabriele Monasterio' Foundation (FTGM), Massa, Italy
| | - Erica Maffei
- Department of Radiology - Area Vasta 1 - ASUR Marche, Ospedale Civile "Santa Maria della Misericordia" di Urbino, Viale Federico Comandino, 70, 61029, Urbino, PU, Italy
| | - Patrizia Toia
- Department of Radiology, DIBIMED, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
106
|
Contrast medium administration with a body surface area protocol in step-and-shoot coronary computed tomography angiography with dual-source scanners. Sci Rep 2020; 10:16690. [PMID: 33028924 PMCID: PMC7541528 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-73915-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the feasibility and image quality of prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using a body surface area (BSA) protocol for contrast-medium (CM) administration on both second- and third-generation scanners (Flash and Force CT), without using heart rate control. One-hundred-and-eighty patients with suspected coronary heart disease undergoing CCTA were divided into groups A (BSA protocol for CM on Flash CT), B (body mass index (BMI)-matched patients; BMI protocol for CM on Flash CT), and C (BMI-matched patients; BSA protocol for CM on Force CT). Patient characteristics, quantitative and qualitative measures, and radiation dose were compared between groups A and B, and A and C. Of the 180 patients, 99 were male (median age, 62 years). Average BSA in groups A, B, and C was 1.80 ± 0.17 m2, 1.74 ± 0.16 m2, and 1.64 ± 0.17 m2, respectively, with groups A and C differing significantly (P < 0.001). Contrast volume (50.50 ± 8.57 mL vs. 45.00 ± 6.18 mL) and injection rate (3.90 ± 0.44 mL/s vs. 3.63 ± 0.22 mL/s) differed significantly between groups A and C (P < 0.001). Groups A and C (both: all CT values > 250 HU, average scores > 4) achieved slightly lower diagnostic image quality than group B. The BSA protocol for CM administration was feasible in both Flash and Force CT, and therefore may be valuable in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
107
|
Marano R, Rovere G, Savino G, Flammia FC, Carafa MRP, Steri L, Merlino B, Natale L. CCTA in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Radiol Med 2020; 125:1102-1113. [PMID: 32964325 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01283-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The world of cardiac imaging is proposing to physicians an ever-increasing spectrum of options and tools with the disadvantages of patients presently submitted to multiple, sequential, time-consuming, and costly diagnostic procedures and tests, sometimes with contradicting results. In the last two decades, the CCTA has evolved into a valuable diagnostic test in today's patient care, changing the official existing guidelines and clinical practice with a pivotal role to exclude significant CAD, in the referral of patients to the Cath-Lab, in the follow-up after coronary revascularization, and finally in the cardiovascular risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Marano
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Rovere
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Savino
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ciriaco Flammia
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rachele Pia Carafa
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Steri
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Biagio Merlino
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Natale
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Linde JJ, Kelbæk H, Hansen TF, Sigvardsen PE, Torp-Pedersen C, Bech J, Heitmann M, Nielsen OW, Høfsten D, Kühl JT, Raymond IE, Kristiansen OP, Svendsen IH, Vall-Lamora MHD, Kragelund C, de Knegt M, Hove JD, Jørgensen T, Fornitz GG, Steffensen R, Jurlander B, Abdulla J, Lyngbæk S, Elming H, Therkelsen SK, Jørgensen E, Kløvgaard L, Bang LE, Hansen PR, Helqvist S, Galatius S, Pedersen F, Abildgaard U, Clemmensen P, Saunamäki K, Holmvang L, Engstrøm T, Gislason G, Køber LV, Kofoed KF. Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75:453-463. [PMID: 32029126 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), coronary pathology may range from structurally normal vessels to severe coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to test if coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) may be used to exclude coronary artery stenosis ≥50% in patients with NSTEACS. METHODS The VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes) trial (NCT02061891) evaluated the outcome of patients with confirmed NSTEACS randomized 1:1 to very early (within 12 h) or standard (48 to 72 h) invasive coronary angiography (ICA). As an observational component of the trial, a clinically blinded coronary CTA was conducted prior to ICA in both groups. The primary endpoint was the ability of coronary CTA to rule out coronary artery stenosis (≥50% stenosis) in the entire population, expressed as the negative predictive value (NPV), using ICA as the reference standard. RESULTS Coronary CTA was conducted in 1,023 patients-very early, 2.5 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.8 to 4.2 h), n = 583; and standard, 59.9 h (IQR: 38.9 to 86.7 h); n = 440 after the diagnosis of NSTEACS was made. A coronary stenosis ≥50% was found by coronary CTA in 68.9% and by ICA in 67.4% of the patients. Per-patient NPV of coronary CTA was 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.8% to 94.1%) and the positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were 87.9% (95% CI: 85.3% to 90.1%), 96.5% (95% CI: 94.9% to 97.8%) and 72.4% (95% CI: 67.2% to 77.1%), respectively. NPV was not influenced by patient characteristics or clinical risk profile and was similar in the very early and the standard strategy group. CONCLUSIONS Coronary CTA has a high diagnostic accuracy to rule out clinically significant coronary artery disease in patients with NSTEACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper J Linde
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henning Kelbæk
- Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Slagelse & Holbæk, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Thomas F Hansen
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per E Sigvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Torp-Pedersen
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Bech
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete Heitmann
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Olav W Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dan Høfsten
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørgen T Kühl
- Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Slagelse & Holbæk, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Ilan E Raymond
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole P Kristiansen
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ida H Svendsen
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria H D Vall-Lamora
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Kragelund
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martina de Knegt
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens D Hove
- Department of Cardiology, Hvidovre and Amager Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tem Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiology, Hvidovre and Amager Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte G Fornitz
- Department of Cardiology, Hvidovre and Amager Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rolf Steffensen
- Department of Cardiology, Hillerød Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgit Jurlander
- Department of Cardiology, Hillerød Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jawdat Abdulla
- Department of Cardiology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stig Lyngbæk
- Department of Cardiology, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanne Elming
- Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Slagelse & Holbæk, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Susette K Therkelsen
- Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Slagelse & Holbæk, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Erik Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Kløvgaard
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lia Evi Bang
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Riis Hansen
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steffen Helqvist
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Galatius
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frants Pedersen
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Abildgaard
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Clemmensen
- Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kari Saunamäki
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Holmvang
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Engstrøm
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunnar Gislason
- Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars V Køber
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus F Kofoed
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Asher A, Wragg A, Davies C. Review: FFRCT Changing the Face of Cardiac CT. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12410-020-09548-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
110
|
Adamson PD, Newby DE. Non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2020; 40:2444-2454. [PMID: 30388261 PMCID: PMC6669405 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries is an enterprise in rapid development. From the research perspective, there is great demand for in vivo techniques that can reliably identify features of high-risk plaque that may offer insight into pathophysiological processes and act as surrogate indicators of response to therapeutic intervention. Meanwhile, there is clear clinical need for greater accuracy in diagnosis and prognostic stratification. Fortunately, ongoing technological improvements and emerging data from randomized clinical trials are helping make these elusive goals a reality. This review provides an update on the current status of non-invasive coronary imaging with computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography with a focus on current clinical applications and future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip D Adamson
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Room SU 305, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Cres, Edinburgh, UK.,Christchurch Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - David E Newby
- BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Room SU 305, Chancellor's Building, 49 Little France Cres, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
111
|
Abdelrahman KM, Chen MY, Dey AK, Virmani R, Finn AV, Khamis RY, Choi AD, Min JK, Williams MC, Buckler AJ, Taylor CA, Rogers C, Samady H, Antoniades C, Shaw LJ, Budoff MJ, Hoffmann U, Blankstein R, Narula J, Mehta NN. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography From Clinical Uses to Emerging Technologies: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76:1226-1243. [PMID: 32883417 PMCID: PMC7480405 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has seen a paradigm shift in the last decade. Evidence increasingly supports the clinical utility of CCTA across various stages of CAD, from the detection of early subclinical disease to the assessment of acute chest pain. Additionally, CCTA can be used to noninvasively quantify plaque burden and identify high-risk plaque, aiding in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This is especially important in the evaluation of CAD in immune-driven conditions with increased cardiovascular disease prevalence. Emerging applications of CCTA based on hemodynamic indices and plaque characterization may provide personalized risk assessment, affect disease detection, and further guide therapy. This review provides an update on the evidence, clinical applications, and emerging technologies surrounding CCTA as highlighted at the 2019 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute CCTA Summit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled M Abdelrahman
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Marcus Y Chen
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Amit K Dey
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Renu Virmani
- Department of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Aloke V Finn
- Department of Pathology, CVPath Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Ramzi Y Khamis
- Vascular Sciences Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew D Choi
- Division of Cardiology and Department of Radiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - James K Min
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Michelle C Williams
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Edinburgh Imaging, Queen's Medical Research Institute University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Habib Samady
- Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Charalambos Antoniades
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Leslee J Shaw
- Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Matthew J Budoff
- Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Udo Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Departments of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division) and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jagat Narula
- Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Cardiovascular Health Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Heart, New York, New York
| | - Nehal N Mehta
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Gibbs J, deFilippi C, Peacock F, Mahler S, Nowak R, Christenson R, Apple F, Jacobsen G, McCord J. The utility of risk scores when evaluating for acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am Heart J 2020; 227:1-8. [PMID: 32634671 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Risk scores including the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score; History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk Factors, and Troponin (HEART) score; and Simplified Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (sEDACS) have been used to evaluate patients with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarct (AMI). This study assessed prognostic utility of cardiac risk stratification scores when augmented with a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I assay (hs-cTnI). METHODS This study enrolled 2,505 suspected AMI patients at 29 hospitals in the United States from April 2015 to April 2016. Blood samples were tested for hs-cTnI on the Atellica IM TnIH Assay (Siemens Healthineers). Patients were considered low risk for death/AMI with a TIMI score = 0, HEART ≤3, sEDACS ≤15, and hs-cTnI <45 ng/L (99th percentile) at time 0 and 2-3 hours. RESULTS There were 2,336 patients included after exclusions for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or incomplete data. At 30 days, 283 patients (12.1%) had been diagnosed with AMI, and there were 24 (1.0%) deaths and 213 (9.1%) revascularizations. Of 298 patients with death or AMI, 258 (86.6%) had elevated hs-cTnI. The HEART score and sEDACS identified 34.5% and 36.6% of patients as low risk, respectively. This was significantly more than the 12.1% identified by the TIMI score (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS The TIMI, HEART, and sEDACS scores all identify low-risk patients when combined with hs-cTnI measurements. The HEART score and sEDACS identified more low-risk patients compared to the TIMI score. These patients could be considered for discharge from the emergency department without further testing.
Collapse
|
113
|
Cardoso R, Dudum R, Ferraro RA, Bittencourt M, Blankstein R, Blaha MJ, Nasir K, Rajagopalan S, Michos ED, Blumenthal RS, Cainzos-Achirica M. Cardiac Computed Tomography for Personalized Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:e011365. [DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.120.011365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus are increasing in the United States and worldwide. The individual-level risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events in primary prevention populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus is highly heterogeneous. Accurate risk stratification in this group is paramount to optimize the use of preventive therapies. Herein, we review the use of the coronary artery calcium score as a decision aid in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus without clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to guide the use of preventive pharmacotherapies, such as aspirin, lipid-lowering mediations, and cardiometabolic agents. The magnitude of expected risk reduction for each of these therapies must be weighed against its cost and potential adverse events. Coronary artery calcium has the potential to improve risk stratification in select individuals beyond clinical and laboratory risk factors, thus providing a more granular assessment of the expected net benefit with each therapy. In patients with diabetes mellitus and stable chest pain, coronary computed tomography angiography increases the sensitivity for coronary artery disease diagnoses compared with functional studies because of the detection of nonobstructive atherosclerosis. Most importantly, this anatomic approach may improve cardiovascular outcomes by increasing the use of evidence-based preventive therapies informed by plaque burden. We therefore provide an updated discussion of the pivotal role of coronary computed tomography angiography in the workup of stable chest pain in patients with diabetes mellitus in the context of recent landmark trials, such as PROMISE trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), SCOT-HEART trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart), and ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches). Finally, we also outline the current role of coronary computed tomography angiography in acute chest pain presentations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhanderson Cardoso
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (R.C., R.B.)
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
| | - Ramzi Dudum
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (R.D.)
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
| | - Richard A. Ferraro
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
| | - Marcio Bittencourt
- Center for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil (M.B.)
| | - Ron Blankstein
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (R.C., R.B.)
| | - Michael J. Blaha
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
| | - Khurram Nasir
- Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX (K.N., M.C.-A.)
- Center for Outcomes Research, The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX (K.N., M.C.-A.)
| | - Sanjay Rajagopalan
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (S.R.)
| | - Erin D. Michos
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
| | - Roger S. Blumenthal
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
| | - Miguel Cainzos-Achirica
- Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (R.C., R.D., R.A.F., M.J.B., E.D.M., R.S.B., M.C.-A.)
- Division of Cardiovascular Prevention and Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX (K.N., M.C.-A.)
- Center for Outcomes Research, The Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX (K.N., M.C.-A.)
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Peper J, Suchá D, Swaans M, Leiner T. Functional cardiac CT-Going beyond Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease with Cine CT, CT-FFR, CT Perfusion and Machine Learning. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200349. [PMID: 32783626 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to provide an overview of different functional cardiac CT techniques which can be used to supplement assessment of the coronary arteries to establish the significance of coronary artery stenoses. We focus on cine-CT, CT-FFR, CT-myocardial perfusion and how developments in machine learning can supplement these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce Peper
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Koekoekslaan 1, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dominika Suchá
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Swaans
- Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital Koekoekslaan 1, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Leiner
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
An Updated Healthcare System-Wide Clinical Pathway for Managing Patients With Chest Pain and Acute Coronary Syndromes. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2020; 18:167-175. [PMID: 31725507 DOI: 10.1097/hpc.0000000000000189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Clinical pathways reinforce best practices and help healthcare institutions standardize care delivery. The NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center has used such a pathway for the management of patients with chest pain and acute coronary syndromes for almost 2 decades. A multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders serially updates the algorithm according to new data and recently published guidelines. Herein, we present the 2019 version of the clinical pathway. We explain the rationale for changes to the algorithm and describe our experience expanding the pathway to all the 8 affiliated institutions within the NewYork Presbyterian healthcare system.
Collapse
|
116
|
Webb JL, Streitz M, Hyams J, April M, Oliver JJ. HEART Score of Four for Age and Risk Factors: A Case Series. Cureus 2020; 12:e9576. [PMID: 32913692 PMCID: PMC7474560 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Chest pain is a frequent chief complaint in the ED. Identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and establishing proper disposition for further risk assessment for major adverse cardiac events are paramount. The HEART Score is a key decision-making tool used to determine patient risk and disposition. One scenario with a potential drawback of the HEART Score is found in patients with a score of four based solely on age and risk factors. The HEART Score categorizes a score of three or less as low risk, and patients with scores above this threshold are typically admitted. We present six cases of chest pain presenting to a military emergency department with a score of four based solely on age and risk factors. They represent every such case found in a previously created database used to validate the HEART Score. We followed each case forward one year in electronic medical records to identify major adverse cardiac events. With the exception of one case that was placed on hospice for non-cardiac reasons and subsequently lost to follow up, there were no adverse events. There is a rising concern for increasing hospital admission rates, overuse of resources, and cost. We highlight that this subset of HEART Score patients requires a more nuanced risk stratification in the ED. It may be worth the time and effort to risk stratify this subset with coronary computed tomography angiography. This additional effort may help reduce admission at such a patient's current and future presentations to the ED for chest pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Webb
- Emergency Department, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, USA
| | - Matthew Streitz
- Emergency Department, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, USA
| | - Jessica Hyams
- Emergency Department, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, USA
| | - Michael April
- Emergency Department, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, USA
| | - Joshua J Oliver
- Emergency Department, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Kicska G, Litmanovich DE, Ordovas KG, Young PM, Dennie C, Truong QA, Abbara S, Kirsch J. Statement from the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging on imaging strategies to reduce the scarcity of healthcare resources during the COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 36:1387-1393. [PMID: 32474676 PMCID: PMC7261212 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-01861-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is an evolving global pandemic that is predicted to strain healthcare resources at multiple locations throughout North America and the World. As of April 6, 2020, the apex of infection rates is predicted to occur within 1 to 5 weeks at various locations. Widespread reports of personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, and healthcare worker exposure to disease have become commonplace. To mitigate this crisis, we are suggesting imaging strategies that aim to use the least PPE, require the smallest number of potential staff exposures, and streamlines utilization of imaging. They are broadly organized by (1) substituting a noninvasive diagnostic test in place of a semi-invasive or invasive diagnostic tests, and (2) consolidating diagnostic imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Kicska
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Diana E. Litmanovich
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Karen G. Ordovas
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Phillip M. Young
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - Carole Dennie
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Quynh A. Truong
- Department of Radiology and Division of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA
| | - Jacobo Kirsch
- Department of Imaging, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL USA
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Grandhi GR, Batlle JC, Maroules CD, Janowitz W, Peña CS, Ziffer JA, Macedo R, Nasir K, Cury RC. Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2020; 15:129-136. [PMID: 32807703 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.06.195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A combined approach of myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) with coronary CT angiography (CTA) was shown to have better diagnostic accuracy than coronary CTA alone. However, data on cost benefits and length of stay when compared to other perfusion imaging modalities has not been evaluated. Therefore, we aim to perform a feasibility study to assess direct costs and length of stay of a combined stress CTP/CTA and use SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) as a benchmark, among chest pain patients at intermediate-risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS This is a prospective two-arm clinical trial (NCT02538861) with 43 patients enrolled in stress CTP/CTA arm (General Electric Revolution CT) and 102 in SPECT-MPI arm. Mean age of the study population was 65 ± 12 years; 56% were men. We used multivariable linear regression analysis to compare length of stay and direct costs between the two modalities. RESULTS Overall, 9 out of the 43 patients (21%) with CTP/CTA testing had an abnormal test. Of these 9 patients, 7 patients underwent invasive coronary angiography and 6 patients were found to have obstructive coronary artery disease. Normal CTP/CTA test was found in 34 patients (79%), who were discharged home and all patients were free of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The mean length of stay was significantly shorter by 28% (mean difference: 14.7 h; 95% CI: 0.7, 21) among stress CTP/CTA (20 h [IQR: 16, 37]) compared to SPECT-MPI (30 h [IQR: 19, 44.5]). Mean direct costs were significantly lower by 44% (mean difference: $1535; 95% CI: 987, 2082) among stress CTA/CTP ($1750 [IQR: 1474, 2114] compared to SPECT-MPI ($2837 [IQR: 2491, 3554]). CONCLUSION Combined stress CTP/CTA is a feasible strategy for evaluation of chest pain patients presenting to ED at intermediate-risk for ACS and has the potential to lead to shorter length of stay and lower direct costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gowtham R Grandhi
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Juan C Batlle
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Warren Janowitz
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Constantino S Peña
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jack A Ziffer
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Robson Macedo
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Khurram Nasir
- Division of Cardiovascular Prevention & Wellness, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ricardo C Cury
- Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Impact of Education-based HEART Score Pathway on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Utilization and Yield in the Emergency Department. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2020; 19:200-205. [PMID: 32701592 DOI: 10.1097/hpc.0000000000000234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a growing consensus to reduce unnecessary testing among low-risk chest pain patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of implementing an education-based HEART score pathway in the emergency department on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) utilization and yield. METHODS A retrospective before and after intervention study was conducted at a single site. Adult emergency department patients undergoing CCTA for suspected acute coronary syndrome were included. Primary outcomes were CCTA utilization and yield. Utilization was defined as the percentage of patients evaluated with CCTA and yield was calculated as the percentage of patients with a diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease, defined as ≥50% stenosis in any one coronary artery due to atherosclerosis. RESULTS 1540 patients undergoing CCTAs were included. CCTA utilization before and after were 2.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-2.3] and 2.0% (95% CI 1.9-2.2), respectively; mean difference 0.1% (95% CI -0.1 to 0.3; P = 0.21). The mean age was 53 years (SD = 11) and females were 52%. Of 1477 patients included in CCTA yield analysis, patients diagnosed with obstructive coronary artery disease before and after were 15.0% (95% CI 12.6-17.7) and 16.2% (95% CI 13.6-19.1), respectively; mean difference 1.2% (95% CI -2.6 to 5.1; P = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant change in the CCTA utilization or yield after the implementation of an education-based HEART pathway in a large academic center. Our findings suggest adopting a more comprehensive approach for deploying such evidence-based protocols to increase institutional compliance.
Collapse
|
120
|
Martin SS, Mastrodicasa D, van Assen M, De Cecco CN, Bayer RR, Tesche C, Varga-Szemes A, Fischer AM, Jacobs BE, Sahbaee P, Griffith LP, Matuskowitz AJ, Vogl TJ, Schoepf UJ. Value of Machine Learning-based Coronary CT Fractional Flow Reserve Applied to Triple-Rule-Out CT Angiography in Acute Chest Pain. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020; 2:e190137. [PMID: 33778579 DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the additional value of noninvasive artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR), derived from triple-rule-out coronary CT angiography for acute chest pain (ACP) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Materials and Methods AI-based CT FFR from triple-rule-out CT angiography data sets was retrospectively obtained in 159 of 271 eligible patients (102 men; mean age, 57.0 years ± 9.7 [standard deviation]) presenting to the ED with ACP. The agreement between CT FFR (≤ 0.80) and stenosis at triple-rule-out CT angiography (≥ 50%), as well as downstream cardiac diagnostic testing, was investigated. Furthermore, the predictive value of CT FFR for coronary revascularization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was assessed over a 1-year follow-up period. Results CT FFR and triple-rule-out CT angiography demonstrated agreement in severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in 52% (82 of 159) of all cases. CT FFR of 0.80 and less served as a better predictor for coronary revascularization and MACE than stenosis of 50% and greater at triple-rule-out CT angiography (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.4, 8.2 vs odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.9, 5.3) (P < .01). In the subgroup of patients with additional noninvasive cardiac testing (94 of 159), there was higher agreement as to the presence or absence of significant disease with CT FFR (55%) than with coronary triple-rule-out CT angiography (47%) (P = .23). Conclusion CT FFR derived from triple-rule-out CT angiography was a better predictor for coronary revascularization and MACE and showed better agreement with additional diagnostic testing than triple-rule-out CT angiography. Therefore, CT FFR may improve the specificity in identifying patients with ACP with significant CAD in the ED setting and reduce unnecessary downstream testing.© RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Ihdayhid and Ben Zekry in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon S Martin
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Domenico Mastrodicasa
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Marly van Assen
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Carlo N De Cecco
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Richard R Bayer
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Christian Tesche
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Akos Varga-Szemes
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Andreas M Fischer
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Brian E Jacobs
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Pooyan Sahbaee
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - L Parkwood Griffith
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Andrew J Matuskowitz
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - Thomas J Vogl
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| | - U Joseph Schoepf
- Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Ashley River Tower, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425-2260 (S.S.M., D.M., M.v.A., C.N.D.C., R.R.B., C.T., A.V.S., A.M.F., B.E.J., L.P.G., U.J.S.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (S.S.M., T.J.V.); Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Stanford, Calif (D.M.); Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (C.N.D.C.); Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (R.R.B.); Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Munich-Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Department of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (C.T.); Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, Pa (P.S.); and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC (A.J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
121
|
Kargoli F, Levsky J, Bulcha N, Mustehsan MH, Brown-Manhertz D, Furlani A, Polanco D, Mizrachi S, Makkiya M, Golive A, Haramati L, Taub C, Garcia MJ. Comparison Between Anatomical and Functional Imaging Modalities for Evaluation of Chest Pain in the Emergency Department. Am J Cardiol 2020; 125:1809-1814. [PMID: 32345475 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department (ED) frequently employs a noninvasive strategy, including coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress echocardiography (SE), or myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). We sought to report the real-world experience of utilizing CCTA compared with SE and MPI at an urban hospital ED. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutively enrolled patients presenting with chest pain who had normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), negative initial troponin-T, at least intermediate risk based on modified Diamond-Forrester criteria, and who underwent CCTA, SE, or MPI based on their individual test eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was ED discharge time. Secondary outcomes included test utilization and 30-days rehospitalization rates. The 2,143 patients who were included (mean age was 56 ± 12 years; 55% women) utilization rate (test performed/eligible) was lower for CCTA (n = 354/1,329) and MPI (n = 530/1,435) compared with SE (n = 1,259/1,650), p <0.001. Mean ED discharge times for both CCTA and SE were 12.5 ± 7.4 versus 16 ± 7.3 hours for MPI (p <0.0001). Patients with SE and CCTA were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (29%, 25%, vs 52% for MPI). There was a 1% cardiac-related 30-days rehospitalization rate in the CCTA group versus 1% in SE and 3% in the MPI group (p <0.01). In conclusion, CCTA and SE were associated with faster ED discharge and lower frequency of diagnostic coronary angiography. Notwithstanding its clinical utility, CCTA was underutilized at our large urban ED setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faraj Kargoli
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
| | - Jeffrey Levsky
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Nurilign Bulcha
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Mohammad Hashim Mustehsan
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Durline Brown-Manhertz
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Andrea Furlani
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Dalvert Polanco
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Sarah Mizrachi
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Mohammed Makkiya
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Anjani Golive
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Linda Haramati
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Cynthia Taub
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Mario J Garcia
- Department of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Ngam PI, Ong CC, Chai P, Wong SS, Liang CR, Teo LLS. Computed tomography coronary angiography - past, present and future. Singapore Med J 2020; 61:109-115. [PMID: 32488269 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is a robust and reliable non-invasive alternative imaging modality to invasive coronary angiography, which is the reference standard in evaluating the degree of coronary artery stenosis. CTCA has high negative predictive value and can confidently exclude significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in low to intermediate risk patients. Over the years, substantial effort has been made to reduce the radiation dose and increase the cost efficiency of CTCA. In this review, we present the evolution of computed tomography scanners in the context of coronary artery imaging as well as its clinical applications and limitations. We also highlight the future directions of CTCA as a one-stop non-invasive imaging modality for anatomic and functional assessment of CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Ing Ngam
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ching Ching Ong
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ping Chai
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siong Sung Wong
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chong Ri Liang
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Lynette Li San Teo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
123
|
Candemir S, White RD, Demirer M, Gupta V, Bigelow MT, Prevedello LM, Erdal BS. Automated coronary artery atherosclerosis detection and weakly supervised localization on coronary CT angiography with a deep 3-dimensional convolutional neural network. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2020; 83:101721. [PMID: 32470854 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
We propose a fully automated algorithm based on a deep learning framework enabling screening of a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examination for confident detection of the presence or absence of coronary artery atherosclerosis. The system starts with extracting the coronary arteries and their branches from CCTA datasets and representing them with multi-planar reformatted volumes; pre-processing and augmentation techniques are then applied to increase the robustness and generalization ability of the system. A 3-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) is utilized to model pathological changes (e.g., atherosclerotic plaques) in coronary vessels. The system learns the discriminatory features between vessels with and without atherosclerosis. The discriminative features at the final convolutional layer are visualized with a saliency map approach to provide visual clues related to atherosclerosis likelihood and location. We have evaluated the system on a reference dataset representing 247 patients with atherosclerosis and 246 patients free of atherosclerosis. With five fold cross-validation, an Accuracy = 90.9%, Positive Predictive Value = 58.8%, Sensitivity = 68.9%, Specificity of 93.6%, and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) = 96.1% are achieved at the artery/branch level with threshold 0.5. The average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.91. The system indicates a high NPV, which may be potentially useful for assisting interpreting physicians in excluding coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute chest pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sema Candemir
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States.
| | - Richard D White
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States
| | - Mutlu Demirer
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States
| | - Vikash Gupta
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States
| | - Matthew T Bigelow
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States
| | - Luciano M Prevedello
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States
| | - Barbaros S Erdal
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging of the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States
| |
Collapse
|
124
|
Initial Imaging-Guided Strategy Versus Routine Care in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 74:2466-2477. [PMID: 31727284 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels often routinely undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), but many do not have obstructive coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVES This study investigated whether cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) or computed tomographic angiography (CTA) may serve as a safe gatekeeper for ICA. METHODS This randomized controlled trial (NCT01559467) in 207 patients (age 64 years; 62% male patients) with acute chest pain, elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels (>14 ng/l), and inconclusive electrocardiogram compared a CMR- or CTA-first strategy with a control strategy of routine clinical care. Follow-up ICA was recommended when initial CMR or CTA suggested myocardial ischemia, infarction, or obstructive coronary artery disease (≥70% stenosis). Primary efficacy and secondary safety endpoints were referral to ICA during hospitalization and 1-year outcomes (major adverse cardiac events and complications), respectively. RESULTS The CMR- and CTA-first strategies reduced ICA compared with routine clinical care (87% [p = 0.001], 66% [p < 0.001], and 100%, respectively), with similar outcome (hazard ratio: CMR vs. routine, 0.78 [95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 1.61]; CTA vs. routine, 0.66 [95% confidence interval: 0.31 to 1.42]; and CMR vs. CTA, 1.19 [95% confidence interval: 0.53 to 2.66]). Obstructive coronary artery disease after ICA was found in 61% of patients in the routine clinical care arm, in 69% in the CMR-first arm (p = 0.308 vs. routine), and in 85% in the CTA-first arm (p = 0.006 vs. routine). In the non-CMR and non-CTA arms, follow-up CMR and CTA were performed in 67% and 13% of patients and led to a new diagnosis in 33% and 3%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A novel strategy of implementing CMR or CTA first in the diagnostic process in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is a safe gatekeeper for ICA.
Collapse
|
125
|
Bautz B, Schneider JI. High-Risk Chief Complaints I: Chest Pain-The Big Three (an Update). Emerg Med Clin North Am 2020; 38:453-498. [PMID: 32336336 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Nontraumatic chest pain is a frequent concern of emergency department patients, with causes that range from benign to immediately life threatening. Identifying those patients who require immediate/urgent intervention remains challenging and is a high-risk area for emergency medicine physicians where incorrect or delayed diagnosis may lead to significant morbidity and mortality. This article focuses on the 3 most prevalent diagnoses associated with adverse outcomes in patients presenting with nontraumatic chest pain, acute coronary syndrome, thoracic aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. Important aspects of clinical evaluation, diagnostic testing, treatment, and disposition and other less common causes of lethal chest pain are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Bautz
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 1 Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Jeffrey I Schneider
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 1 Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA 02118, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging 2020; 35:198-203. [PMID: 32032251 DOI: 10.1097/rti.0000000000000474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of invasive and noninvasive tests and compare cost in patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department (ED) who underwent either triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography (TRO-CTA) or standard of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of 2156 ED patients who presented with acute chest pain with a negative initial troponin and electrocardiogram for myocardial injury. Patient cohorts matched by patient characteristics who had undergone TRO-CTA as a primary imaging test (n=1139) or standard of care without initial CTA imaging (n=1017) were included in the study. ED visits, utilization of tests, and costs during the initial episode of hospital care were compared. RESULTS No significant differences in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, or aortic dissection were observed. Median ED waiting time (4.5 vs. 7.0 h, P<0.001), median total length of hospital stay (5.0 vs. 32.0 h, P<0.001), hospital admission rate (12.6% vs. 54.2%, P<0.001), and ED return rate to our hospital within 30 days (3.5% vs. 14.6%, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the TRO-CTA group. Moreover, reduced rates of additional testing and invasive coronary angiography (4.9% vs. 22.7%, P<0.001), and ultimately lower total cost per patient (11,783$ vs. 19,073$, P<0.001) were observed in the TRO-CTA group. CONCLUSIONS TRO-CTA as an initial imaging test in ED patients presenting with acute chest pain was associated with shorter ED and hospital length of stay, fewer return visits within 30 days, and ultimately lower ED and hospitalization costs.
Collapse
|
127
|
Batlle JC, Kirsch J, Bolen MA, Bandettini WP, Brown RKJ, Francois CJ, Galizia MS, Hanneman K, Inacio JR, Johnson TV, Khosa F, Krishnamurthy R, Rajiah P, Singh SP, Tomaszewski CA, Villines TC, Wann S, Young PM, Zimmerman SL, Abbara S. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chest Pain-Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:S55-S69. [PMID: 32370978 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits and inpatient evaluation, with particular concern for acute coronary syndrome as an etiology, since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Although history-based, electrocardiographic, and laboratory evaluations have shown promise in identifying coronary artery disease, early accurate diagnosis is paramount and there is an important role for imaging examinations to determine the presence and extent of anatomic coronary abnormality and ischemic physiology, to guide management with regard to optimal medical therapy or revascularization, and ultimately to thereby improve patient outcomes. A summary of the various methods for initial imaging evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome is outlined in this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Batlle
- Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute and Baptist Health of South Florida, Miami, Florida.
| | - Jacobo Kirsch
- Panel Chair, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida
| | | | - W Patricia Bandettini
- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
| | | | | | | | - Kate Hanneman
- Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joao R Inacio
- The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas V Johnson
- Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina; Cardiology Expert
| | - Faisal Khosa
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Todd C Villines
- University of Virginia Health Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
| | - Samuel Wann
- Ascension Healthcare Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Nuclear Cardiology Expert
| | | | | | - Suhny Abbara
- Specialty Chair, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
128
|
Affiliation(s)
- Galit Aviram
- From the Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (G.A.), and Department of Cardiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel (A.W.)
| | - Arik Wolak
- From the Department of Radiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (G.A.), and Department of Cardiology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jesselson Integrated Heart Center, Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel (A.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Nieman K. The feasibility, findings and future of CT-FFR in the emergency ward. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2020; 14:287-288. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
130
|
Canan A, Ranganath P, Goerne H, Abbara S, Landeras L, Rajiah P. CAD-RADS: Pushing the Limits. Radiographics 2020; 40:629-652. [PMID: 32281902 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Coronary CT angiography is now established as the first-line diagnostic imaging test to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD) in the population at low to intermediate risk. Wide variability exists in both the reporting of coronary CT angiography and the interpretation of these reports by referring physicians. The CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) is sponsored by multiple societies and is a collaborative effort to provide standard classification of CAD, which is then integrated into patient clinical care. The main goals of the CAD-RADS are to decrease variability among readers; enhance communication between interpreting and referring clinicians, allowing collaborative determination of the best course of patient care; and generate consistent data for auditing, data mining, quality improvement, research, and education. There are several scenarios in which the CAD-RADS guidelines are ambiguous or do not provide definite recommendations for further management of CAD. The authors discuss the CAD-RADS categories and modifiers, highlight a variety of complex or ambiguous scenarios, and provide recommendations for managing these scenarios. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Aviram and Wolak.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Canan
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.C., P. Ranganath, H.G., S.A., P. Rajiah); Imaging and Diagnosis Center, Guadalajara, Mexico (H.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (L.L.)
| | - Praveen Ranganath
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.C., P. Ranganath, H.G., S.A., P. Rajiah); Imaging and Diagnosis Center, Guadalajara, Mexico (H.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (L.L.)
| | - Harold Goerne
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.C., P. Ranganath, H.G., S.A., P. Rajiah); Imaging and Diagnosis Center, Guadalajara, Mexico (H.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (L.L.)
| | - Suhny Abbara
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.C., P. Ranganath, H.G., S.A., P. Rajiah); Imaging and Diagnosis Center, Guadalajara, Mexico (H.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (L.L.)
| | - Luis Landeras
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.C., P. Ranganath, H.G., S.A., P. Rajiah); Imaging and Diagnosis Center, Guadalajara, Mexico (H.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (L.L.)
| | - Prabhakar Rajiah
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.C., P. Ranganath, H.G., S.A., P. Rajiah); Imaging and Diagnosis Center, Guadalajara, Mexico (H.G.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (L.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
131
|
Gupta V, Demirer M, Bigelow M, Little KJ, Candemir S, Prevedello LM, White RD, O'Donnell TP, Wels M, Erdal BS. Performance of a Deep Neural Network Algorithm Based on a Small Medical Image Dataset: Incremental Impact of 3D-to-2D Reformation Combined with Novel Data Augmentation, Photometric Conversion, or Transfer Learning. J Digit Imaging 2020; 33:431-438. [PMID: 31625028 PMCID: PMC7165215 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00267-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Collecting and curating large medical-image datasets for deep neural network (DNN) algorithm development is typically difficult and resource-intensive. While transfer learning (TL) decreases reliance on large data collections, current TL implementations are tailored to two-dimensional (2D) datasets, limiting applicability to volumetric imaging (e.g., computed tomography). Targeting performance enhancement of a DNN algorithm based on a small image dataset, we assessed incremental impact of 3D-to-2D projection methods, one supporting novel data augmentation (DA); photometric grayscale-to-color conversion (GCC); and/or TL on training of an algorithm from a small coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) dataset (200 examinations, 50% with atherosclerosis and 50% atherosclerosis-free) producing 245 diseased and 1127 normal coronary arteries/branches. Volumetric CCTA data was converted to a 2D format creating both an Aggregate Projection View (APV) and a Mosaic Projection View (MPV), supporting DA per vessel; both grayscale and color-mapped versions of each view were also obtained. Training was performed both without and with TL, and algorithm performance of all permutations was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. Without TL, APV performance was 0.74 and 0.87 on grayscale and color images, respectively, compared to 0.90 and 0.87 for MPV. With TL, APV performance was 0.78 and 0.88 on grayscale and color images, respectively, compared with 0.93 and 0.91 for MPV. In conclusion, TL enhances performance of a DNN algorithm from a small volumetric dataset after proposed 3D-to-2D reformatting, but additive gain is achieved with application of either GCC to APV or the proposed novel MPV technique for DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikash Gupta
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Mutlu Demirer
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Matthew Bigelow
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Kevin J Little
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Sema Candemir
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Luciano M Prevedello
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Richard D White
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | | | | | - Barbaros S Erdal
- Laboratory for Augmented Intelligence in Imaging-Division of Medical Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, 395 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Meier D, Skalidis I, De Bruyne B, Qanadli SD, Rotzinger D, Eeckhout E, Collet C, Muller O, Fournier S. Ability of FFR-CT to detect the absence of hemodynamically significant lesions in patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS admitted in the emergency department with chest pain, study design and rationale. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2020; 27:100496. [PMID: 32181323 PMCID: PMC7063126 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the era of High-sensitive troponin (hs-Tn), up to 50% of patients with a mild increase of hs-Tn will finally have a normal invasive coronary angiogram. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR-CT) has never been used as a non-invasive tool for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation (NSTE-ACS). AIMS The study aims to determine the role of coronary CT angiography and FFR-CT in the setting of high-risk NSTE-ACS. METHODOLOGY We will conduct a prospective trial, enrolling 250 patients admitted with high-risk NSTE-ACS who will rapidly undergo a coronary CT angiography and then a coronary angiography with FFR measurements. Results of coronary CT, FFR-CT and coronary angiography (± FFR) will be compared. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE In conclusion, non-invasive identification of patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS who could avoid coronary angiography would reduce procedure related risks and medical costs.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACS, Acute coronary syndrome
- AE, Adverse Event
- Acute coronary syndrome
- CMRI, Cardiac Magnetic resonance imaging
- CT, Computed tomography
- Coronary computed tomography
- ECG, Electrocardiogram
- ED, Emergency department
- FFR, Fractional Flow Reserve
- FFR-CT
- FFR-CT, FFR derived from coronary CT
- Fractional Flow Reserve
- Hs-Tn, High-sensitive troponins
- MACE, Major adverse cardiac events
- MI, Myocardial infraction
- NSTE-ACS, Acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation
- NSTEMI, Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- PCI, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- URL, Upper Range Limit
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Meier
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ioannis Skalidis
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bernard De Bruyne
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Salah Dine Qanadli
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Rotzinger
- Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Eric Eeckhout
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Olivier Muller
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stephane Fournier
- Department of Cardiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
133
|
Achenbach S. Coronary CT Angiography: Moving Up on the Risk Scale. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75:464-466. [PMID: 32029127 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Achenbach
- Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
134
|
Siddiqui WJ, Rawala MS, Abid W, Zain M, Sadaf MI, Abbasi D, Alvarez C, Mansoor F, Hasni SF, Aggarwal S. Is Physiologic Stress Test with Imaging Comparable to Anatomic Examination of Coronary Arteries by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Investigate Coronary Artery Disease? - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2020; 12:e6941. [PMID: 32190493 PMCID: PMC7067363 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive diagnostic modality that remains underutilized compared to functional stress testing (ST) for investigating coronary artery disease (CAD). Several patients are misdiagnosed with noncardiac chest pain (CP) that eventually die from a cardiovascular event in subsequent years. We compared CCTA to ST to investigate CP. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from January 1, 2007 to July 1, 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CCTA to ST in patients who presented with acute or stable CP. We used Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program] Version 5.3 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) for review and analysis. Results We included 16 RCTs enrolling 21,210 patients; there were more patients with hyperlipidemia and older patients in the ST arm compared to the CCTA arm. There was no difference in mortality: 103 in the CCTA arm vs. 110 in the ST arm (risk ratio [RR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-1.21, P = .58, and I2 = 0%). A significant reduction was seen in myocardial infarctions (MIs) after CCTA compared to ST: 115 vs. 156 (RR = 0.71, CI = 0.56-0.91, P < .006, I2=0%). On subgroup analysis, the CCTA arm had fewer MIs vs. the ST with imaging subgroup (RR = 0.70, CI = 0.54-0.89, P = .004, I2 = 0%) and stable CP subgroup (RR = 0.66, CI = 0.50-0.88, P = .004, I2 = 0%). The CCTA arm showed significantly higher invasive coronary angiograms and revascularizations and significantly reduced follow-up testing and recurrent hospital visits. A trend towards increased unstable anginas was seen in the CCTA arm. Conclusions Our analysis showed a significant reduction in downstream MIs, hospital visits, and follow-up testing when CCTA is used to investigate CAD with no difference in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqas J Siddiqui
- Cardiology/Nephrology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - Waqas Abid
- Interventional Radiology, Christiana Hospital, Newark, USA
| | - Muhammad Zain
- Internal Medicine, Sheikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, PAK
| | | | - Danish Abbasi
- Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, USA
| | | | | | - Syed Farhan Hasni
- Heart Failure and Transplant, Albert Einstein Hospital, Philadelphia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
135
|
Daghem M, Newby DE. Detecting unstable plaques in humans using cardiac CT: Can it guide treatments? Br J Pharmacol 2020; 178:2204-2217. [PMID: 31596945 DOI: 10.1111/bph.14896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in imaging technology have driven the rapid expansion in the use of CT in the assessment of coronary atherosclerotic plaque. Based on a rapidly growing evidence base, current guidelines recommend coronary CT angiography as the first-line diagnostic test for patients presenting with stable chest pain. There is a growing need to refine current methods for diagnosis and risk stratification to improve the individualisation of preventative therapies. Imaging assessments of high-risk plaque with CT can be used to differentiate stable from unstable patterns of coronary atherosclerosis and potentially to improve patient risk stratification. This review will focus on coronary imaging with CT with a specific focus on the detection of coronary atherosclerosis, high-risk plaque features, and the implications for patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa Daghem
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David E Newby
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Honigberg MC, Lander BS, Baliyan V, Jones-O'Connor M, Healy EW, Scholtz JE, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra BB, Natarajan P. Preventive Management of Nonobstructive CAD After Coronary CT Angiography in the Emergency Department. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13:437-448. [PMID: 31326481 PMCID: PMC6954346 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess medical management of patients found to have nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) performed in the emergency department (ED). BACKGROUND Contemporary recognition and management of nonobstructive CAD discovered on CCTA performed in the ED is unknown. METHODS Patients undergoing CCTA in the authors' hospital's ED between November 2013 and March 2018 who also received primary care within the authors' health system were studied. All patients with nonobstructive CAD, defined as 1% to 49% maximum luminal stenosis on CCTA, were included, along with a control group without CAD in a 1 case:1 control fashion. Ten-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk prior to CCTA was estimated using the Pooled Cohort Equations. Management changes were recorded until 6 months after CCTA. Multivariate logistic regression tested the association between CCTA result and follow-up statin prescription, adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors and baseline statin use. RESULTS The cohort included 510 patients with nonobstructive CAD and 510 controls. Prevalence of statin prescription increased from 38.8% to 56.1% among patients with nonobstructive CAD (p < 0.001) and 18.0% to 20.4% among controls (p = 0.01), representing a 7.1-fold relative difference (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.4 to 23.0; p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. However, 30.0% of patients with nonobstructive CAD and ≥20% 10-year ASCVD risk were not prescribed a statin at the end of follow-up. Cardiologist evaluation was independently associated with statin prescription after adjustment for ASCVD risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 4.4; 95% CI: 2.4 to 8.5; p < 0.001). A Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System class 1 to 2 result was associated with lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12.1 mg/dl at mean 1.9-year follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Incidental subclinical atherosclerosis on CCTA performed in the ED increases the likelihood of statin prescription, but opportunities to improve allocation of indicated preventive therapies remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Honigberg
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bradley S Lander
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vinit Baliyan
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maeve Jones-O'Connor
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emma W Healy
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jan-Erik Scholtz
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - John T Nagurney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Udo Hoffmann
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian B Ghoshhajra
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pradeep Natarajan
- Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Cardiovascular Research Center and Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Monica MP, Merkely B, Szilveszter B, Drobni ZD, Maurovich-Horvat P. Computed Tomographic Angiography for Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Chest Pain - The Triple Rule-out Concept in the Emergency Department. Curr Med Imaging 2020; 16:98-110. [PMID: 32003310 DOI: 10.2174/1573405614666180604095120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute chest pain is one of the most common reasons for Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospital admissions. As this could represent the first symptom of a lifethreatening condition, urgent identification of the etiology of chest pain is of utmost importance in emergency settings. Such high-risk conditions that can present with acute chest pain in the ED include Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Pulmonary Embolisms (PE) and Acute Aortic Syndromes (AAS). DISCUSSION The concept of Triple Rule-out Computed Tomographic Angiography (TRO-CTA) for patients presenting with acute chest pain in the ED is based on the use of coronary computed tomographic angiography as a single imaging technique, able to diagnose or exclude three lifethreatening conditions in one single step: ACS, AAS and PE. TRO-CTA protocols have been proved to be efficient in the ED for diagnosis or exclusion of life-threatening conditions and for differentiation between various etiologies of chest pain, and application of the TRO-CTA protocol in the ED for acute chest pain of uncertain etiology has been shown to improve the further clinical evaluation and outcomes of these patients. CONCLUSION This review aims to summarize the main indications and techniques used in TRO protocols in EDs, and the role of TRO-CTA protocols in risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marton-Popovici Monica
- Department of Internal Medicine and Critical Care, Swedish Medical Center, Edmonds, Washington, United States
| | - Béla Merkely
- MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bálint Szilveszter
- MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsófia Dora Drobni
- MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pál Maurovich-Horvat
- MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
138
|
Stepinska J, Lettino M, Ahrens I, Bueno H, Garcia-Castrillo L, Khoury A, Lancellotti P, Mueller C, Muenzel T, Oleksiak A, Petrino R, Guimenez MR, Zahger D, Vrints CJ, Halvorsen S, de Maria E, Lip GY, Rossini R, Claeys M, Huber K. Diagnosis and risk stratification of chest pain patients in the emergency department: focus on acute coronary syndromes. A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2020; 9:76-89. [PMID: 31958018 DOI: 10.1177/2048872619885346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This paper provides an update on the European Society of Cardiology task force report on the management of chest pain. Its main purpose is to provide an update on the decision algorithms and diagnostic pathways to be used in the emergency department for the assessment and triage of patients with chest pain symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janina Stepinska
- Department of Intensive Cardiac Therapy, Institute of Cardiology, Poland
| | | | - Ingo Ahrens
- Department of Cardiology and Medical Intensive Care, Augustinerinnen Hospital, Germany
| | - Hector Bueno
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain and Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Spain
| | | | - Abdo Khoury
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Clinical Investigation Center, University Hospital of Besançon, France
| | | | - Christian Mueller
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Muenzel
- Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Zentrum für Kardiologie, Germany
| | - Anna Oleksiak
- Department of Intensive Cardiac Therapy, Institute of Cardiology, Poland
| | | | | | - Doron Zahger
- Department of Cardiology, Soroka University Medical Center, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
139
|
Goehler A, Mayrhofer T, Pursnani A, Ferencik M, Lumish HS, Barth C, Karády J, Chow B, Truong QA, Udelson JE, Fleg JL, Nagurney JT, Gazelle GS, Hoffmann U. Long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with suspicion for acute coronary syndrome. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2020; 14:44-54. [PMID: 31303580 PMCID: PMC6930365 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials have shown favorable clinical outcomes for coronary CT angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Our goal was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of coronary CTA as compared to alternative management strategies for ACP patients over lifetime. METHODS Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare cost-effectiveness of competitive strategies for ACP patients: 1) coronary CTA, 2) standard of care (SOC), 3) AHA/ACC Guidelines, and 4) expedited emergency department (ED) discharge protocol with outpatient testing. ROMICAT-II trial was used to populate the model with low to intermediate risk of ACS patient data, whereas diagnostic test-, treatment effect-, morbidity/mortality-, quality of life- and cost data were obtained from the literature. We predicted test utilization, costs, 1-, 3-, 10-year and over lifetime cardiovascular morbidity/mortality for each strategy. We determined quality adjusted life years (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Observed outcomes in ROMICAT-II were used to validate the short-term model. RESULTS Estimated short-term outcomes accurately reflected observed outcomes in ROMICAT-II as coronary CTA was associated with higher costs ($4,490 vs. $2,513-$4,144) and revascularization rates (5.2% vs. 2.6%-3.7%) compared to alternative strategies. Over lifetime, coronary CTA dominated SOC and ACC/AHA Guidelines and was cost-effective compared to expedited ED protocol ($49,428/QALY). This was driven by lower cardiovascular mortality (coronary CTA vs. expedited discharge: 3-year: 1.04% vs. 1.10-1.17; 10-year: 5.06% vs. 5.21-5.36%; respectively). CONCLUSION Coronary CTA in patients with suspected ACS renders affordable long-term health benefits as compared to alternative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Goehler
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Mayrhofer
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; School of Business Studies, Stralsund University of Applied Sciences, Stralsund, Germany
| | - Amit Pursnani
- Cardiology Division, Evanston Hospital, Walgreen Building 3rd Floor, 2650, Ridge Ave, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Maros Ferencik
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, 3180, SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR, USA
| | - Heidi S Lumish
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cordula Barth
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Júlia Karády
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA; MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Benjamin Chow
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quynh A Truong
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - James E Udelson
- Division of Cardiology, Tufts New England Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jerome L Fleg
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John T Nagurney
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - G Scott Gazelle
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Management and Policy, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Udo Hoffmann
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Busse A, Cantré D, Beller E, Streckenbach F, Öner A, Ince H, Weber MA, Meinel FG. Cardiac CT: why, when, and how : Update 2019. Radiologe 2019; 59:1-9. [PMID: 31062037 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-019-0530-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to review established and emerging techniques of cardiac computed tomography (CT) and their clinical applications with a special emphasis on new techniques, recent trials, and guidelines. TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS Cardiac CT has made great strides in recent years to become an ever more robust and safe imaging technique. The improvements in spatial and temporal resolution are equally important as the substantial reduction in radiation exposure, which has been achieved through prospective ECG-triggering, low tube voltage scanning, tube current modulation, and iterative reconstruction techniques. CT-derived fractional flow reserve and CT myocardial perfusion imaging are novel, investigational techniques to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis. ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING INDICATIONS In asymptomatic patients at risk for coronary artery disease, CT coronary artery calcium scoring is useful to assess cardiovascular risk and guide the intensity of risk factor modification. Coronary CT angiography is an excellent noninvasive test to rule out obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with stable chest pain. In acute chest pain with normal ECG and normal cardiac enzymes, cardiac CT can safely rule out acute coronary syndrome although its benefit and role in this indication remains controversial. Cardiac CT is the established standard for planning transcatheter aortic valve implantation and-increasingly-minimally invasive mitral valve procedures. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Our review makes practical recommendations on when and how to perform cardiac CT and provides templates for structured reporting of cardiac CT examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Busse
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, Neuro- and Pediatric Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Daniel Cantré
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, Neuro- and Pediatric Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Ebba Beller
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, Neuro- and Pediatric Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Felix Streckenbach
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, Neuro- and Pediatric Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Alper Öner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hüseyin Ince
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Marc-André Weber
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, Neuro- and Pediatric Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Felix G Meinel
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional, Neuro- and Pediatric Radiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
141
|
Kay FU, Canan A, Abbara S. Future Directions in Coronary CT Angiography: CT-Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque Vulnerability, and Quantitative Plaque Assessment. Korean Circ J 2019; 50:185-202. [PMID: 31960635 PMCID: PMC7043962 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a well-validated and noninvasive imaging modality for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). CCTA not only delineates the anatomy of the heart and coronary arteries in detail, but also allows for intra- and extraluminal imaging of coronary arteries. Emerging technologies have promoted new CCTA applications, resulting in a comprehensive assessment of coronary plaques and their clinical significance. The application of computational fluid dynamics to CCTA resulted in a robust tool for noninvasive assessment of coronary blood flow hemodynamics and determination of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Detailed evaluation of plaque morphology and identification of high-risk plaque features by CCTA have been confirmed as predictors of future outcomes, identifying patients at risk for ACSs. With quantitative coronary plaque assessment, the progression of the CAD or the response to therapy could be monitored by CCTA. The aim of this article is to review the future directions of emerging applications in CCTA, such as computed tomography (CT)-fractional flow reserve, imaging of vulnerable plaque features, and quantitative plaque imaging. We will also briefly discuss novel methods appearing in the coronary imaging scenario, such as machine learning, radiomics, and spectral CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arzu Canan
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Mushtaq S, Conte E, Melotti E, Andreini D. Coronary CT Angiography in Challenging Patients: High Heart Rate and Atrial Fibrillation. A Review. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:1544-1549. [PMID: 30745172 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Despite several strategies have been developed by different vendors to improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography performed at high heart rate (HR) and HR variability, as in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), some concerns and small clinical experience characterize these subsets of challenging patients. However, patients with AF have been reported to have higher risk of cardiovascular events and noninvasive evaluation of suspected coronary artery disease in this setting may be of extreme clinical interest. The goal of this review is to provide to the reader an overview on the use of cardiac CT in patients with AF and high HR and to outline the technological improvements recently introduced in the clinical field that may enable to definitively overcome the limitations of cardiac CT in this challenging scenario.
Collapse
|
143
|
Arslan M, Schaap J, Rood PP, Nieman K, Budde RP, Attrach M, Dubois EA, Dedic A. HEART score improves efficiency of coronary computed tomography angiography in patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2019; 9:23-29. [PMID: 31647305 PMCID: PMC7008554 DOI: 10.1177/2048872619882424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Aims: Coronary computed tomography angiography is increasingly employed in the emergency department for suspected acute coronary syndrome patients. The HEART score has been proposed for initial risk stratification in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value and efficiency of the HEART score before coronary computed tomography angiography. Methods and results: We included patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department. Based on the HEART score, patients were stratified as low-risk (HEART≤3), intermediate-risk (HEART4–6) and high-risk (HEART≥7). We assessed coronary computed tomography angiography for the presence of significant coronary artery disease (>50% stenosis). The primary outcome, the level of major adverse cardiac events, was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularisation within 30 days. The study population consisted of 340 patients (mean age: 55.6±10.1 years, 44.7% women), major adverse cardiac events occurred in 45 (13.2%) patients. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events in patients stratified as low-risk (35.0%), intermediate-risk (56.8%) and high-risk (8.2%) was 3.4%, 12.4% and 60.7%, respectively. All four low-risk patients with major adverse cardiac events had a HEART score of three. An algorithm where coronary computed tomography angiography is reserved for patients with HEART 3–6 resulted in a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 84.1%, negative predictive value of 99.6% and positive predictive value of 48.4%, while reducing the need for coronary computed tomography angiography by 22% (n=75). Conclusion: The predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography for 30-day major adverse cardiac events in suspected acute coronary syndrome patients is good, and reserving coronary computed tomography angiography for HEART score 3–6 patients reduces the number of needed coronary computed tomography angiograms without affecting diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murat Arslan
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Schaap
- Department of Cardiology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, The Netherlands
| | - Pleunie Pm Rood
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Nieman
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Ricardo Pj Budde
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed Attrach
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Eric A Dubois
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| | - Admir Dedic
- Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
144
|
Williams MC, Newby DE, Nicol ED. Coronary atherosclerosis imaging by CT to improve clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2019; 13:281-287. [PMID: 30952611 PMCID: PMC6928571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Coronary artery disease remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality world-wide. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) has excellent diagnostic accuracy and the identification and stratification of coronary artery disease is associated with improved prognosis in multiple studies. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that in patients with stable coronary artery disease, CCTA is associated with improved diagnosis, changes in investigations, changes in medical treatment and appropriate selection for revascularization. Importantly this diagnostic approach reduces the long-term risk of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction. The identification of adverse plaques on CCTA is known to be associated with an increased risk of acute coronary syndrome, but does not appear to be predictive of long-term outcomes independent of coronary artery calcium burden. Future research will involve the assessment of outcomes after CCTA in patients with acute chest pain and asymptomatic patients. In addition, more advanced quantification of plaque subtypes, vascular inflammation and coronary flow dynamics may identify further patients at increased risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle C Williams
- University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - David E Newby
- University of Edinburgh/British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Edinburgh, UK; Edinburgh Imaging Facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Edward D Nicol
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust Departments of Cardiology and Radiology, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
145
|
Taron J, Foldyna B, Eslami P, Hoffmann U, Nikolaou K, Bamberg F. Cardiac Computed Tomography - More Than Coronary Arteries? A Clinical Update. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2019; 191:817-826. [PMID: 31250415 PMCID: PMC6839890 DOI: 10.1055/a-0924-5883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid improvement of scanner and postprocessing technology as well as the introduction of minimally invasive procedures requiring preoperative imaging have led to the broad utilization of cardiac computed tomography (CT) beyond coronary CT angiography (CTA). METHOD This review article presents an overview of recent literature on cardiac CT. The goal is to summarize the current guidelines on performing cardiac CT and to list established as well as emerging techniques with a special focus on extracoronary applications. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION Most recent guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT include the evaluation of coronary artery disease, cardiac morphology, intra- and extracardiac structures, and functional and structural assessment of the myocardium under certain conditions. Besides coronary CTA, novel applications such as the calculation of a CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), assessment of myocardial function and perfusion imaging, as well as pre-interventional planning in valvular heart disease or prior pulmonary vein ablation in atrial fibrillation are becoming increasingly important. Especially these extracoronary applications are of growing interest in the field of cardiac CT and are expected to be gradually implemented in the daily clinical routine. KEY POINTS · Coronary artery imaging remains the main indication for cardiac CT. · Novel computational fluid dynamics allow the calculation of a CT-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. · Cardiac CT delivers information on left ventricular volume as well as myocardial function and perfusion. · CT is the cardinal element for pre-interventional planning in transcatheter valve implantation and pulmonary vein isolation. CITATION FORMAT · Taron J, Foldyna B, Eslami P et al. Cardiac Computed Tomography - More Than Coronary Arteries? A Clinical Update. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 817 - 826.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Taron
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General-Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University-Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Borek Foldyna
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General-Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Parastou Eslami
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General-Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Udo Hoffmann
- Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Massachusetts General-Hospital – Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | - Konstantin Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University-Hospital Tübingen, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
146
|
Bittner DO, Mayrhofer T, Puchner SB, Lu MT, Maurovich-Horvat P, Ghemigian K, Kitslaar PH, Broersen A, Bamberg F, Truong QA, Schlett CL, Hoffmann U, Ferencik M. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Specific Definitions of High-Risk Plaque Features Improve Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2019; 11:e007657. [PMID: 30354493 DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.118.007657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Background High-risk plaque (HRP) features as detected by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) predict acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We sought to determine whether coronary CTA-specific definitions of HRP improve discrimination of patients with ACS as compared with definitions from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Methods and Results In patients with suspected ACS, randomized to coronary CTA in the ROMICAT II (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction/Ischemia Using Computer Assisted Tomography II) trial, we retrospectively performed semiautomated quantitative analysis of HRP (including remodeling index, plaque burden as derived by plaque area, low computed tomography attenuation plaque volume) and degree of luminal stenosis and analyzed the performance of traditional IVUS thresholds to detect ACS. Furthermore, we derived CTA-specific thresholds in patients with ACS to detect culprit lesions and applied those to all patients to calculate the discriminatory ability to detect ACS in comparison to IVUS thresholds. Of 472 patients, 255 patients (56±7.8 years; 63% men) had coronary plaque. In 32 patients (6.8%) with ACS, culprit plaques (n=35) differed from nonculprit plaques (n=172) with significantly greater values for all HRP features except minimal luminal area (significantly lower; all P<0.01). IVUS definitions showed good performance while minimal luminal area (odds ratio: 6.82; P=0.014) and plaque burden (odds ratio: 5.71; P=0.008) were independently associated with ACS but not remodeling index (odds ratio: 0.78; P=0.673). Optimized CTA-specific thresholds for plaque burden (area under the curve: 0.832 versus 0.676) and degree of stenosis (area under the curve: 0.826 versus 0.721) showed significantly higher diagnostic performance for ACS as compared with IVUS-based thresholds (all P<0.05) with borderline significance for minimal luminal area (area under the curve: 0.817 versus 0.742; P=0.066). Conclusions CTA-specific definitions of HRP features may improve the discrimination of patients with ACS as compared with IVUS-based definitions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01084239.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel O Bittner
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston. Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Germany (D.O.B.)
| | - Thomas Mayrhofer
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,School of Business Studies, Stralsund University of Applied Sciences, Germany (T.M.)
| | - Stefan B Puchner
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Austria (S.B.P.)
| | - Michael T Lu
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.)
| | - Pal Maurovich-Horvat
- MTA-SE Lendület Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary (P.M.-H.)
| | - Khristine Ghemigian
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.)
| | - Pieter H Kitslaar
- Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands (P.H.K., A.B.).,Medis Medical Imaging Systems B.V, Leiden, the Netherlands (P.H.K.)
| | - Alexander Broersen
- Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands (P.H.K., A.B.)
| | | | - Quynh A Truong
- Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imaging, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College (Q.A.T.)
| | | | - Udo Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.)
| | - Maros Ferencik
- Department of Radiology (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Cardiac MR PET CT Program (D.O.B., T.M., S.B.P., M.T.L., K.G., U.H., M.F.).,Department of Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Germany (F.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Bhattacharya PT, Golamari RR, Vunnam S, Moparthi S, Venkatappa N, Dollard DJ, Missri J, Yang W, Kimmel SE. Predictive risk stratification using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and initial troponin) and TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) scores in non-high risk chest pain patients: An African American urban community based hospital study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16370. [PMID: 31393346 PMCID: PMC6708799 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Validated risk scoring systems in African American (AA) population are under studied. We utilized history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and initial troponin (HEART) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) scores to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in non-high cardiovascular (CV) risk predominantly AA patient population.A retrospective emergency department (ED) charts review of 1266 chest pain patients where HEART and TIMI scores were calculated for each patient. Logistic regression model was computed to predict 6-week and 1-year MACE and 90-day cardiac readmission. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was constructed to differentiate between clinical strategies in non-high CV risk patients.Of the 817 patients included, 500 patients had low HEART score vs. 317 patients who had moderate HEART score. Six hundred sixty-three patients had low TIMI score vs. 154 patients had high TIMI score. The univariate logistic regression model shows odds ratio of predicting 6-week MACE using HEART score was 3.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-6.76, P = .004) with increase in risk category from low to moderate vs. 2.07 (95% CI 1.18-3.63, P = .011) using TIMI score with increase in risk category from low to high and c-statistic of 0.86 vs. 0.79, respectively. DCA showed net benefit of using HEART score is equally predictive of 6-week MACE when compared to TIMI.In non-high CV risk AA patients, HEART score is better predictive tool for 6-week MACE when compared to TIMI score. Furthermore, patients presenting to ED with chest pain, the optimal strategy for a 2% to 4% miss rate threshold probability should be to discharge these patients from the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka T. Bhattacharya
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Reshma R. Golamari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Drexel University College of Medicine
| | - Sandhya Vunnam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Drexel University College of Medicine
| | - Smitha Moparthi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Drexel University College of Medicine
| | - Neethi Venkatappa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Drexel University College of Medicine
| | - Denis J. Dollard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy Catholic Medical Center, Drexel University College of Medicine
| | - Jose Missri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Wei Yang
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen E. Kimmel
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
148
|
Schoepf IC, Buechel RR, Kovari H, Hammoud DA, Tarr PE. Subclinical Atherosclerosis Imaging in People Living with HIV. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E1125. [PMID: 31362391 PMCID: PMC6723163 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8081125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In many, but not all studies, people living with HIV (PLWH) have an increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) events compared to the general population. This has generated considerable interest in the early, non-invasive detection of asymptomatic (subclinical) atherosclerosis in PLWH. Ultrasound studies assessing carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) have tended to show a somewhat greater thickness in HIV+ compared to HIV-, likely due to an increased prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in PLWH. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) determination by non-contrast computed tomography (CT) seems promising to predict CV events but is limited to the detection of calcified plaque. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) detects calcified and non-calcified plaque and predicts CAD better than either CAC or CIMT. A normal CCTA predicts survival free of CV events over a very long time-span. Research imaging techniques, including black-blood magnetic resonance imaging of the vessel wall and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the assessment of arterial inflammation have provided insights into the prevalence of HIV-vasculopathy and associated risk factors, but their clinical applicability remains limited. Therefore, CCTA currently appears as the most promising cardiac imaging modality in PLWH for the evaluation of suspected CAD, particularly in patients <50 years, in whom most atherosclerotic coronary lesions are non-calcified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella C Schoepf
- University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, University of Basel, 4101 Bruderholz, Switzerland
| | - Ronny R Buechel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Helen Kovari
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dima A Hammoud
- Center for Infectious Disease Imaging, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Philip E Tarr
- University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, University of Basel, 4101 Bruderholz, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
149
|
Patiño-Jaramillo NG, Medina H. Coronary angiotomography in the emergency department. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CARDIOLOGÍA 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rccar.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
150
|
Twerenbold R, Costabel JP, Nestelberger T, Campos R, Wussler D, Arbucci R, Cortes M, Boeddinghaus J, Baumgartner B, Nickel CH, Bingisser R, Badertscher P, Puelacher C, du Fay de Lavallaz J, Wildi K, Rubini Giménez M, Walter J, Meier M, Hafner B, Lopez Ayala P, Lohrmann J, Troester V, Koechlin L, Zimmermann T, Gualandro DM, Reichlin T, Lambardi F, Resi S, Alves de Lima A, Trivi M, Mueller C. Outcome of Applying the ESC 0/1-hour Algorithm in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74:483-494. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|