Gilbert syndrome and the development of antiretroviral therapy-associated hyperbilirubinemia

[Applicability of pharmacogenetic studies in daily clinical practice]

In the last few years, research in pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics has identified distinct variants or markers that can help to define the benefits and risk of patients requiring antiretroviral treatment. The beneficial effect of the deletion 32 allele of the CCR5 coreceptor on the natural history of HIV infection and, to a certain extent, on treatment response is well known. The bases of immune reconstitution after initiation of antiretroviral therapy, although the subject of intense study, are probably multifactorial and polygenetic and consequently conclusions with clear applicability to clinical practice are currently lacking. Among the risks, no significant progress has been made in lipodystrophy. The origin of dyslipidemia associated with antiretroviral treatment and the excess cardiovascular risk conferred by some antiretroviral drugs is probably polygenetic and, at present, poorly defined. The genetic bases of efavirenz-induced neurological toxicity and of hyperbilirubinemia secondary to atazanavir are fairly well known, although their application in daily clinical practice has not been adequately assessed. Some aspects that help to understand the molecular bases of hypersensitivity reaction to nevirapine and of nevirapine-induced hepatotoxicity have been described but are not applicable in most cases and consequently further studies are required. Some data correlate tenofovir-induced renal toxicity with genetic variations in some transport proteins. The most significant advance for clinical practice is the correlation between the presence of the HLA-B*5701 allele and hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir. In particular, one clinical trial with a large number of patients from distinct ethnic groups found that the probability of not developing hypersensitivity reaction (immunologically confirmed) was 100% if the patient was HLA-B*5701-negative. These data suggest the need to implement this test in daily clinical practice.

[Toxicogenetics of antiretroviral treatment (II): neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, lactic acidosis, kidney damage, and other adverse effects of antiretroviral drugs]

Several pharmacogenetics studies have analyzed the influence of specific genetic polymorphisms on the toxicity of antiretroviral treatment. The present review describes some of the adverse effects of antiretroviral drugs in which a genetic predisposition may be involved: efavirenz-induced neurological toxicity, generally associated with the 516G>T polymorphism of liver enzyme cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6); hypersensitivity reactions to nevirapine, associated with specific alleles of major histocompatibility complex, mainly the HLA-DRB1*0101 allele, which, in combination with a high CD4 lymphocyte count, has been associated with systemic reactions and hepatitis in Caucasians, and the HLA-Cw8 allele, which is associated with hypersensitivity reactions in persons from the Italian island of Sardinia and from Japan; nevirapine-induced hepatotoxicity associated with the C>T polymorphism in position 3435T of the ABCB1 (MDR-1) gene codifying for glycoprotein P (lower risk); hyperbilirubinemia in patients exposed to atazanavir or indinavir carrying the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism; peripheral neuropathy with nucleoside analogues associated with haplogroup T of the mitochondrial genome (higher risk) and with the HFE C282Y genotype of the hemochromatosis gene (lower risk); the mutation in codon 964 (R964C) of the POLG gene that codifies the mitochondrial polymerase DNA gamma described in a Thai patient with lactic acidosis; the ABCC2 gene haplotypes associated with tenofovir-induced proximal tubulopathy, and the risk of pancreatitis in persons with mutations in the CFTR and SPINK-1 genes.

Minimal effects of ritonavir and efavirenz on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir

Raltegravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against HIV-1 (95% inhibitory concentration = 31 nM in 50% human serum). The possible effects of ritonavir and efavirenz on raltegravir pharmacokinetics were separately examined. Two clinical studies of healthy subjects were conducted: for ritonavir plus raltegravir, period 1, 400 mg raltegravir; period 2, 100 mg ritonavir every 12 h for 16 days with 400 mg raltegravir on day 14; for efavirenz plus raltegravir, period 1, 400 mg raltegravir; period 2, 600 mg efavirenz once daily for 14 days with 400 mg raltegravir on day 12. In the presence of ritonavir, raltegravir pharmacokinetics were weakly affected: the plasma concentration at 12 h (C(12 h)) geometric mean ratio (GMR) (90% confidence interval [CI]) was 0.99 (0.70, 1.40), area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) was 0.84 (0.70, 1.01), and maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)) was 0.76 (0.55, 1.04). In the presence of efavirenz, raltegravir pharmacokinetics were moderately to weakly reduced: C(12 h) GMR (90% CI) was 0.79 (0.49, 1.28); AUC(0-infinity) was 0.64 (0.52, 0.80); and C(max) was 0.64 (0.41, 0.98). There were no substantial differences in the time to maximum concentration of drug in plasma or the half-life. Plasma concentrations of raltegravir were not substantially affected by ritonavir. Though plasma concentrations of raltegravir were moderately to weakly reduced by efavirenz, the degree of this reduction was not clinically meaningful. No dose adjustment is required for raltegravir with coadministration with ritonavir or efavirenz.

Pharmacogenetics of Gilbert's syndrome

Gilbert's syndrome is characterized by mild unconjugated nonhemolytic hyperbilirubinemia, which does not lead to hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, chronic liver disease or liver failure. Almost 100 years after its clinical description, it was linked to a genetic variant of the human bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1), UGT1A1 (*)28, found in approximately 40% of Caucasoid individuals. Over 113 UGT1A1 variants have since been reported, leading to a continuous spectrum from mild hyperbilirubinemia to life-threatening jaundice. UGT1A variants are evolutionary diverse and occur in the context of haplotypes combining different variants within the promoter, the 5 exons, as well as introns of the UGT1A1 gene, and also in combination with other UGT1A genes expressed in the liver and the extrahepatic gastrointestinal tract. The variation of glucuronidation hidden behind Gilbert's syndrome impacts drug therapy, which includes the well-characterized examples of irinotecan and atazanavir. The prediction of unwanted drug reactions associated with Gilbert's syndrome will improve drug safety, therapeutic individualization and impact the drug-development process.

Switch from ritonavir-boosted to unboosted atazanavir guided by therapeutic drug monitoring

Plasma concentration of atazanavir (ATV) may be reduced when coadministered with tenofovir (TDF) or proton pump inhibitors. Boosting ATV exposure with ritonavir (r) may make it possible to overcome these drug interactions. However, jaundice and loss of the metabolic advantages of ATV are more frequent using ATV/r than ATV alone. Herein, we assessed whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could make it possible to identify the subset of patients in whom removal of ritonavir could be attempted without risk of suboptimal plasma ATV exposure and subsequent virological failure. A total of 56 patients with undetectable plasma HIV-RNA under a stable triple regimen containing ATV 300/100 mg qd were switched to ATV 400 mg qd. Plasma ATV concentrations were measured using a reliable high-performance liquid chromatography method. Median plasma ATV C(min) fell from 880 to 283 ng/ml (p = 0.03) after removal of ritonavir. While all patients on ATV/r showed ATV plasma concentrations within therapeutic values (IC(min) above 150 ng/ml) before switching, four patients (7%) fell below this threshold after switching to ATV 400 mg qd. However, only one of this group experienced virological failure at week 24 of follow-up. TDF was part of the antiretroviral regimen in all four cases. From a total of 29 (52%) patients on ATV/r showing grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia, only 7 (12%) remained on it upon switching to ATV 400 mg qd (p < 0.001). Patients with complete viral suppression under ATV/r 300/100 mg qd may benefit from switching to ATV 400 mg qd guided by TDM, which may make it possible to minimize adverse events without compromising antiviral efficacy in most cases.

Family 1 uridine-5'-diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGT1A): from Gilbert's syndrome to genetic organization and variability

The human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A gene locus is organized to generate enzymes, which share a carboxyterminal portion and are unique at their aminoterminal variable region. Expression is tissue-specific and overlapping substrate specificities include a broad spectrum of endogenous and xenobiotic compounds as well as many therapeutic drugs targeted for detoxification and elimination by glucuronidation. The absence of glucuronidation leads to fatal hyperbilirubinemia. A remarkable interindividual variability of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases is evidenced by over 100 identified genetic variants leading to alterations of catalytic activites or transcription levels. Variant alleles with lower carcinogen detoxification activity have been associated with cancer risk such as colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Genetic variants and haplotypes have been identified as risk factors for unwanted drug effects of the anticancer drug irinotecan and the antiviral proteinase inhibitor atazanavir. Glucuronidation and its variability are likely to represent an important factor for individualized drug therapy and risk prediction impacting the drug development and licensing processes.

Bilirubin in clinical practice: a review

Bilirubin is an endogenous compound that can be toxic under certain conditions but, on the other hand, mild unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia might protect against cardiovascular diseases and tumour development. Serum bilirubin levels are often enhanced under a variety of clinical conditions. These are discussed and the mechanisms are outlined.

Pharmacogenetics and the potential for the individualization of antiretroviral therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic associations highlighting differences in the response to HIV infection and treatment have significantly furthered our understanding of the pathogenesis, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiretroviral drug action and toxicities and HIV disease itself. This review focuses on the current knowledge of associations between polymorphisms and treatment outcomes in HIV with particular emphasis on clinically relevant relationships likely to lead to the individualization of antiretroviral therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Our understanding of the immunogenetic basis of drug toxicity has been furthered by human leucocyte antigen associations with hypersensitivities for the antiretroviral drugs abacavir and nevirapine. For abacavir in particular, the use of HLA-B*5701 as a screening test appears to be generalizable across racially diverse populations and has been supported by both observational, and blinded randomized controlled trials.

SUMMARY

Differences in HIV acquisition and progression as well as antiretroviral efficacy and toxicity will continue to provide the basis for research to define the genetic basis of such diversity. Despite the plethora of research in this area, numerous barriers exist to the successful operationalization of genetic testing to the clinic. HLA-B*5701 screening to prevent abacavir hypersensitivity is currently the most relevant to clinical practice and highlights that the promise of cost-effective testing can be facilitated by robust laboratory methodology and quality assurance programs that can be applied to diverse treatment settings.

Pharmacogenetics of Anti-HIV Drugs

Pharmacogenetics holds promise in HIV treatment because of the complexity and potential toxicity of multidrug therapies that are prescribed for long periods. Thus far, few candidate genes have been examined for a limited number of allelic variants, but a number of confirmed associations have already emerged. A change in paradigm emerges from the availability of the HapMap, the wealth of data on less-common genetic polymorphisms, and new genotyping technology. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on pharmacogenetic determinants of antiretroviral drug exposure, drug toxicity, as well as genetic markers associated with the rate of disease progression. It is expected that larger-scale comprehensive genome approaches will profoundly change the landscape of knowledge in the future.

Interaction between buprenorphine and atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir

Opioid addiction and HIV disease frequently co-occur. Adverse drug interactions have been reported between methadone and some HIV medications, but less is known about interactions between buprenorphine, an opioid partial agonist used to treat opioid dependence, and HIV therapeutics. This study examined drug interactions between buprenorphine and the protease inhibitors atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir. Opioid-dependent, buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained, HIV-negative volunteers (n=10 per protease inhibitor) participated in two 24-h sessions to determine pharmacokinetics of (1) buprenorphine and (2) buprenorphine and atazanavir (400mg daily) or atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100mg daily) following administration for 5 days. Objective opiate withdrawal scale scores and mini-mental state examination were determined prior to and following antiretroviral administration to examine pharmacodynamic effects. Pharmacokinetics of atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir were compared in subjects and matched, healthy controls (n=10 per protease inhibitor) to determine effects of buprenorphine. With atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir, respectively concentrations of buprenorphine (p<0.001, p<0.001), norbuprenorphine (p=0.026, p=0.006), buprenorphine glucuronide (p=0.002, p<0.001), and norbuprenorphine glucuronide (NS, p=0.037) increased. Buprenorphine treatment did not significantly alter atazanavir or ritonavir concentrations. Three buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained participants reported increased sedation with atazanavir/ritonavir. Atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir may increase buprenorphine and buprenorphine metabolite concentrations and might require a decreased buprenorphine dose.

Risk Factors for Acute Liver Enzyme Abnormalities in HIV-Hepatitis B Virus-Coinfected Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy

Background

Little is known about the prognostic factors of acute liver enzyme variations in HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients.

Objectives

To identify prognostic factors of acute liver enzyme abnormalities in HIV-HBV-coinfected patients with a focus on the putative role of antiretroviral drugs.

Design

Data from a 3-year, prospective, multicentre cohort study involving HIV-HBV patients were used.

Methods

A Markov model was used to identify prognostic factors of acute episodes of cytolysis and cholestasis in 300 HIV-HBV-coinfected patients. The effect of antiretroviral therapy was analysed according to the classes of drugs, duration of treatment and treatment modifications.

Results

The incidence rates of acute episodes of cytolysis and cholestasis were 13.4 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5–17.3) and 7.1 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 4.2–10.0), respectively (median follow up 34.1 months). Independent risk factors for cytolysis were a high level of HBV or HIV replication, as well as a low of CD4+ T-cell count. No antiretroviral drug was associated with cytolysis, whereas protease inhibitors seemed to be independently associated with cholestasis, along with treatment modifications and the duration of HIV infection.

Conclusion

Acute and reversible episodes of cytolysis or cholestasis were common and associated with virus- and host-related determinants. The choice of the optimal antiretroviral combination in HIV-HBV-coinfected patients must take into account the necessity of exerting an efficient control of HIV and HBV replication (associated with transient cytolysis) and the risk of inducing cholestasis (associated with the use of protease inhibitors and treatment modifications).

Drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury is a frequent cause of hepatic dysfunction. Reliably establishing whether the liver disease was caused by a drug requires the exclusion of other plausible causes and the search for a clinical drug signature. The drug signature consists of the pattern of liver test abnormality, the duration of latency to symptomatic presentation, the presence or absence of immune-mediated hypersensitivity and the response to drug withdrawal. Determination of causality also includes an evaluation of individual susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury. This susceptibility is governed by both genetic and environmental factors. Components of the drug signature in conjunction with certain risk factors have been incorporated into formal scoring systems that are predictive of the likelihood of drug-induced liver injury. The most validated scoring system is the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment method, which nonetheless retains certain imperfections. Mitigating the potential for drug-induced liver injury is achieved by the identification of toxicity signals during clinical trials and the monitoring of liver tests in clinical practice. There are three signals of liver toxicity in clinical trials: (i) a statistically significant doubling (or more) in the incidence of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation >3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN); (ii) any incidence of serum ALT elevation >8-10 x ULN; and (iii) any incidence of serum ALT elevation >3 x ULN accompanied by a serum bilirubin elevation >2 x ULN. Monitoring of liver tests in clinical practice has shown unconvincing efficacy, but where a benefit-risk analysis would favour continued therapy, monthly monitoring may have some benefit compared with no monitoring at all. With rare exception, treatment of drug-induced liver injury is principally supportive. Drug toxicity is the most common cause of acute liver failure, defined as a prolonged prothrombin time (international normalised ratio > or =1.5) and any degree of mental alteration occurring <26 weeks after the onset of illness in a patient without pre-existing cirrhosis. A patient who meets these criteria must be evaluated for liver transplantation. The pathogenesis of drug-induced liver injury can be examined on the basis of the two principal patterns of injury. The hepatocellular pattern is characterised by a predominant rise in the level of transaminases and results from the demise of hepatocytes by means of either apoptosis or necrosis. The cholestatic pattern is characterised by a predominant rise of the serum alkaline phosphatase level and usually results from injury to the bile ductular cells either directly by the drug or its metabolite, or indirectly by an adaptive immune response.

Lopinavir–Ritonavir Dramatically Affects the Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in HIV Patients With Kaposi’s Sarcoma

The coadministration of protease inhibitors with anticancer drugs in the management of human immunodeficiency virus-related malignancies can cause potential drug-drug interactions. The effect of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) on the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan (CPT11) has been investigated in seven patients with Kaposi's sarcoma. Coadministration of LPV/RTV reduces the clearance of CPT11 by 47% (11.3+/-3.5 vs 21.3+/-6.3 l/h/m(2), P=0.0008). This effect was associated with an 81% reduction (P=0.02) of the AUC (area under the curve) of the oxidized metabolite APC (7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic-acid)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin). The LPV/RTV treatment also inhibited the formation of SN38 glucuronide (SN38G), as shown by the 36% decrease in the SN38G/SN38 AUCs ratio (5.9+/-1.6 vs 9.2+/-2.6, P=0.002) consistent with UGT1A1 inhibition by LPV/RTV. This dual effect resulted in increased availability of CPT11 for SN38 conversion and reduced inactivation on SN38, leading to a 204% increase (P=0.0001) in SN38 AUC in the presence of LPV/RTV. The clinical consequences of these substantial pharmacokinetic changes should be investigated.

Monitoring liver safety in drug development: the GSK experience

To promptly identify and evaluate liver safety events, an evidence-based liver safety system was created for global Phase I-III clinical trials. The goals of this system included improving clinical trial subject safety, expanding information on liver safety events, and improving data quality across studies by establishing and communicating: Two different algorithms for liver stopping criteria were developed. The most stringent criteria were selected for healthy volunteers in Phase I studies, where no treatment benefit is anticipated and clinical safety data are limited. With an interest in assessing potential liver "tolerance" or adaptation with accruing safety information, slightly higher liver chemistry thresholds were set for Phase II-III studies. This paper will describe the importance of liver safety in drug development, laboratory tests used to monitor liver safety, the rationale for selected liver chemistry subject stopping criteria, and implementation of this safety system.

ADME pathway approach for pharmacogenetic studies of anti-HIV therapy

Pharmacogenetics holds promise in HIV treatment because of the complexity and potential toxicity of multidrug therapies that are prescribed for long periods. However, there has been limited success with the current approach where one or few candidate genes are examined for a limited number of allelic variants. A change in paradigm emerges from the availability of the HapMap, the wealth of data on less common genetic polymorphisms, and new genotyping technology. We present a comprehensive review of functional and putative functional variants in genes encoding absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) proteins relevant to HIV therapy. We propose an analytical array based on our review of the literature, web resources and use of bioinformatic analysis. We identified 126 genes with proven or potential role in HIV therapy. Variation in these genes can be characterized by 2428 SNPs (in Caucasians). On average, a gene is covered by 20 SNPs. This review compiles information for future analysis of the role of specific genes/variants in the exposure and response to antiretroviral therapy to generate a ranked list of new genetic variants for future studies.

Atazanavir: simplicity and convenience in different scenarios

HIV protease inhibitors (PI) have undergone the most significant evolution when considering the different families of antiretrovirals. Marketed in 2003, atazanavir (ATV) is the first azapeptide PI, and is considered a member of the second generation of PIs. Important characteristics make ATV different from other drugs in the same family of antiretrovirals. It is administered once daily, either as two capsules (200 mg) or boosted with ritonavir (100 mg) two capsules (150 mg) or one capsule (300 mg). No elevations in serum levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides have been observed with unboosted ATV. Although some increases in these levels are found with boosted ATV, these were lower when compared with other PIs. Elevation in unconjugated bilirubin levels, which is usually not dose limiting, is the most frequent adverse event. Naive patients receiving ATV boosted with ritonavir do not develop PI mutations at failure, whereas unboosted ATV in the same scenario induces the I50L mutation, which does not confer cross-resistance to other PIs. The best scenario for unboosted ATV is simplification. In PI treatment-experienced patients with PI mutations, susceptibility to ATV is usually reduced, so it should be administered with ritonavir. As with other PIs, careful attention must be given to pharmacokinetic drug interactions; the coadministration of certain commonly used drugs among HIV-infected patients, tenofovir and members of the proton pump inhibitor family, leads to significantly lower plasma levels of ATV.

Atazanavir/ritonavir: a valuable once-daily HIV protease inhibitor with little impact on lipid profile

Atazanavir is the first once-daily azapeptide HIV protease inhibitor that may offer simpler and safer protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy, as it has been associated with less hyperlipemia and diarrhea compared with the other drugs of the same class. The typical side effect of atazanavir is an asymptomatic increase in serum unconjugated bilirubin. Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has proved to be effective in treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals, and there is no evidence that it leads to the selection of mutations conferring cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. Its efficacy in patients harboring drug-resistant variants is not statistically different from that of the reference protease inhibitor, lopinavir/ritonavir. It has been approved by the US FDA for use in drug-experienced HIV-infected patients, although atazanavir/ritonavir-based regimens have now been included among those recommended by the International AIDS Society  – USA Panel and the Department of Health and Human Services Panel as initial treatment. The aim of this article is to describe the pharmacological characteristics of atazanavir/ritonavir, and the results of the main clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of this antiretroviral combination.

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, atazanavir, and ritonavir in a twice-daily boosted double-protease inhibitor regimen

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV), saquinavir (SQV), and ritonavir (RTV) in a boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI) therapy regimen without reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs). The study design was as follows. Patients with limited RTI options received a PI combination of 300/100 mg ATV/RTV once daily and 1,000 mg SQV twice daily (group 1; n=49) without RTI comedication. The results were compared to the plasma concentrations of PIs of patients taking either 300 mg ATV/100 mg RTV once daily plus RTIs (group 2; n=72) or patients taking 1,000 mg SQV/100 mg RTV plus RTIs (group 3; n=90). The study methods were as follows. Patients were given a 12/24-h pharmacokinetic assessment at steady state. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The minimum and maximum concentrations (Cmin and Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve under steady-state conditions (AUCss), elimination half-life, time of maximum concentration and lag time were subject to statistical analysis. The results show that patients treated with ATV/SQV/RTV exhibited significantly high SQV concentrations and moderate enhancement of the AUCss of ATV in comparison to those of patients of the control groups: for SQV in groups 1 and 3, the geometric mean (GM) of the AUCss was 22,794 versus 15,759 ng.h/ml (GM ratio [GMR]=1.45; P<0.05), the GM of the Cmax was 3,257 versus 2,331 ng/ml (GMR=1.40; P<0.05), and the GM of the Cmin was 438 versus 437 ng/ml (GMR=1.00); for ATV in groups 1 and 2, the GM of the AUCss was 39,154 versus 33,626 ng.h/ml (GMR=1.16), the GM of the Cmax was 3,488 versus 2,924 ng/ml (GMR=1.20), and the GM of the Cmin was 515 versus 428 ng/ml (GMR=1.21). RTV levels were comparable for all groups. A subgroup analysis detected only marginal differences in ATV plasma exposure if combined with tenofovir-disoproxilfumarate and without it. We conclude that our pharmacokinetic results support the use of a boosted double-PI regimen of ATV/SQV/RTV as a treatment option for patients who need antiretroviral therapy without RTIs.

Genetic factors influencing atazanavir plasma concentrations and the risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia

BACKGROUND

Hyperbilirubinemia is frequently seen in patients treated with atazanavir (ATV). Polymorphisms at the uridin-glucoronosyl-transferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) and multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1) genes may influence, respectively, bilirubin and ATV plasma concentrations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

HIV-infected individuals receiving ATV 300 mg daily plus ritonavir 100 mg daily at one clinic were examined. ATV plasma concentrations were measured at steady state. MDR1-3435C>T and UGT1A1 polymorphisms were examined in DNA extracted from blood mononuclear cells.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients (all Caucasian) were analysed. The median ATV plasma concentration was 465 ng/ml [interquartile range (IQR), 233-958]. MDR1-3435 genotypes were as follows: CC (32%), CT (47%) and TT (21%). CC patients showed higher ATV minimum concentration than those with CT/TT genotypes: 939 ng/ml (IQR, 492-1266) versus 376 ng/ml (IQR, 221-722) (P = 0.001). In multivariate analyses, having at least one T allele at MDR1-3435 was independently associated with lower ATV plasma concentrations (beta: -427 [95% confidence interval (CI), -633 to -223]; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with grade 3-4 hyperbilirubinemia varied with distinct UGT1A1 genotypes: 80% for 7/7, 29% for 6/7 and 18% for 6/6 (P = 0.012). In the multivariate analysis, having at least one 7 allele at UGT1A1 was independently associated with severe hyperbilirubinemia (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.29-6.78; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Polymorphisms at MDR1-3435 significantly influence ATV plasma concentrations, as does being Caucasian patients with CT/TT genotypes, having lower ATV levels, even using ritonavir boosting. On the other hand, although ATV plasma concentrations directly correlate with bilirubin levels, the risk of severe hyperbilirubinemia is further increased in the presence of the UGT1A1-TA7 allele.

Gilbert's disease and atazanavir: from phenotype to UDP-glucuronosyltransferase haplotype

Gilbert's disease leads to intermittent non-hemolytic hyperbilirubinemia by a reduction of hepatic bilirubin glucuronidation associated with the presence of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28 polymorphism. It is considered benign because it does not result in hepatocellular damage. However, pharmacogenetic analyses have linked UGT1A1*28 to drug toxicity and cancer predisposition. The protease inhibitor atazanavir (ATV) is an inhibitor of hepatic UGT activity leading to hyperbilirubinemia in individual patients. Whether this is linked specifically to UGT1A1*28 or to more complex variants influencing glucuronidation is unclear. One hundred and six ATV-treated patients were characterized and genotyped for UGT1A1*28, the UGT1A3 (-66C) and UGT1A7 (-57G) promoter variants, and UGT1A7(129K/131K). ATV treatment increased median bilirubin levels from 10 to 41 micromol/L (P = .001) with hyperbilirubinemia exceeding 43 micromol/L in 37%. Hyperbilirubinemia over 43 micromol/L was significantly associated not only with UGT1A1*28 but also with UGT1A3-66C, UGT1A7-57G, and UGT1A7(129K/131K), although these variants do not naturally occur in linkage dysequilibrium in blood donors. Homozygous combinations of UGT1A1*28 with the other variants increased from 7.4% (normal bilirubin to 42 micromol/L) to 41% to 46.1% (43 to >85 micromol/L), and 100% (>85 micromol/L). All six patients with hyperbilirubinemia greater than 85 micromol/L were homozygous for all four variants identifying a haplotype inherited on a single allele. In conclusion, the genetic variant associated with Gilbert's disease is identified as part of a haplotype of four UGT1A variants spanning three genes at the UGT1A gene locus. This haplotype predisposes to hyperbilirubinemia in ATV treatment and may have an additional role as a pharmacogenomic risk factor for drug therapy.

Pharmacogenetics of HIV therapy

Drug treatment in HIV disease is characterized by variable responses, in terms of both efficacy and toxicity. Both genetic and environmental factors are important determinants of this variability, although the relative contributions are unclear and likely to vary with different drugs. Many of the antiretrovirals are metabolized by polymorphically expressed enzymes (cytochrome P450, CYP450; glucuronyl transferase, GT) and/or transported by drug transporters (ABC and SLC families). Initial studies of antiretroviral efficacy have therefore focused on these genes. For example, it has recently been shown that a CYP2B6 genetic variant predicts higher plasma efavirenz exposure and possibly increased central nervous system toxicity. A large number of studies on ABCB1 genetics with antiretrovirals have also been undertaken; however, as in other therapeutic areas, the data have been contradictory, and currently, no firm conclusions can be reached on the effect of ABCB1 variability as a determinant of efficacy. Indeed, this highlights the need for validation of initial association studies in pharmacogenetic research. By contrast, the clearest association between genetic variants and response relates to the hypersensitivity reaction that occurs with abacavir. The identification that the major histocompatibility complex haplotype 57.1 acts as a strong genetic predisposing factor can be regarded as a prime example of how fundamental research can be translated into a pharmacogenetic test. Nevirapine hypersensitivity has also been related to an HLA gene (HLA-DRB1*0101) but the predictive value does not appear to be sufficient to implement in clinical practice. Much more work needs to be done to define the genetic factors determining response to antiretroviral agents. These studies need to be sufficiently powered and utilize a modern genotyping strategy. Most importantly, the phenotype needs to be carefully characterized. We also need to disseminate this information: a pivotal resource for this can be found at www.HIV-pharmacogenomics.org.

Management of antiretroviral drug toxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the emergence of very potent antiretroviral regimens, the major limitation to the success of treatment is now the tolerability of drugs, which can ultimately affect adherence. It is important, therefore, to review the current understanding on antiretroviral drug toxicity, and examine key recent data that can inform the successful avoidance or management of such toxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

A common theme of recent research has focussed on the genetic predisposition to important immediate side-effects, such as abacavir hypersensitivity, nevirapine hepatotoxicity, efavirenz neurotoxicity and hyperbilirubinemia with atazanavir. Long-term toxicities such as body-composition changes and hyperlipidemia have been more closely linked to thymidine analogues and certain protease inhibitors. The management of these toxicities has also been clarified by studies addressing switching antiretroviral drugs or specific treatments for metabolic syndromes.

SUMMARY

Recent data emphasize the need for the prevention of antiretroviral toxicity by the avoidance of some drugs in certain genetically predisposed populations or by the avoidance of entire classes if possible. In addition, recent studies emphasize the importance of ongoing research to determine the emergence of additional toxicities, as new drugs emerge and achieve widespread use.

Population pharmacokinetics of atazanavir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Atazanavir (ATV) is a new azapeptide protease inhibitor recently approved and currently used at a fixed dose of either 300 mg once per day (q.d.) in combination with 100 mg ritonavir (RTV) or 400 mg q.d. without boosting. ATV is highly bound to plasma proteins and extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Since ATV plasma levels are highly variable and seem to be correlated with both viral response and toxicity, dosage individualization based on plasma concentration monitoring might be indicated. This study aimed to assess the ATV pharmacokinetic profile in a target population of HIV patients, to characterize interpatient and intrapatient variability, and to identify covariates that might influence ATV disposition. A population analysis was performed with NONMEM with 574 plasma samples from a cohort of 214 randomly selected patients receiving ATV. A total of 346 randomly collected ATV plasma levels and 19 full concentration-time profiles at steady state were available. The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were an oral clearance (CL) of 12.9 liters/h (coefficient of variation [CV], 26%), a volume of distribution of 88.3 liters (CV, 29%), an absorption rate constant of 0.405 h(-1) (CV, 122%), and a lag time of 0.88 h. A relative bioavailability value was introduced to account for undercompliance due to infrequent follow-ups (0.81; CV, 45%). Among the covariates tested, only RTV significantly reduced CL by 46%, thereby increasing the ATV elimination half-life from 4.6 h to 8.8 h. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ATV were adequately described by a one-compartment population model. The concomitant use of RTV improved the pharmacokinetic profile. However, the remaining high interpatient variability suggests the possibility of an impact of unmeasured covariates, such as genetic traits or environmental influences. This population pharmacokinetic model, together with therapeutic drug monitoring and Bayesian dosage adaptation, can be helpful in the selection and adaptation of ATV doses.

The clinical implications of antiretroviral pharmacogenomics

Heterogeneity exists in the effectiveness and toxic effects of antiretroviral agents between individuals and populations. Although patient-related clinical variables such as age, sex and ethnic origin have been associated with drug response, inherited predispositions may have a significant effect on treatment outcome. The role of host and pathogen pharmacogenomics is gaining increasing interest in the field of both antiretrovirals in development, such as the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) inhibitors, and in established therapies where toxicity and efficacy may be predicted. Despite numerous studies available in the literature, the interpretation of the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcomes is often posed with many confounding variables, making clinical interpretations of these results difficult. This review summarizes the key findings in the growing knowledge between human genetics and response to antiretroviral drugs and how these findings may be effectively applied in a clinical context.

An Update on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Antiretroviral Drugs

There is an increasing uptake of TDM of antiretroviral drugs, particularly in Europe. There is consensus that current antiretroviral drugs meet most of the criteria of drugs that can be considered as candidates for a TDM strategy. This review examines the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for protease inibitors and non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, give an overview of the published randomised clinical trials and then summarises the scenarios for use of TDM. Finally the development of the inhibitory quotient (IQ) concept is discussed.