A phase II study in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer using epirubicin and cisplatin in combination with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF)

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: slow but further progress

Gastric cancer remains a significant problem in terms of global health, and is the most common cancer in Korea. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for localized gastric cancer, but most cases present at an advanced stage. Randomized trials have demonstrated that chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer improves the quality of life and extends survival, by 4 approximately 6 months, compared with best supportive care alone. Single agents with a proven activity in a first-line setting include 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, mitomycin C, cisplatin, taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) and oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and TS-1). Based on the results from several large scale randomized trials, FP (5-FU/cisplatin) and ECF (epirubicin/cisplatin/5-FU) combinations are the most widely used regimen against advanced gastric cancer. Phase II studies of the FP and ECF combination reported a 40~51% response rate in previously untreated patients, and this regimen also produced a significantly higher response rate than the FAM (5-FU/doxorubicin/mitomycin) and FAMTX (5-FU/doxorubicin/methotrexate) regimens, respectively. However, significant treatment related-toxicities and discomfort were reported from ECF, which prevents this combination from becoming the standard treatment regimen. While no one combination chemotherapy regimen is accepted as the standard for advanced gastric cancer, FP is currently considered a suitable reference regimen worldwide. New agents, such as taxane, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, combined with old agents, such as cisplatin and 5-FU, are currently under evaluation to further improve treatment outcomes. Also, oral 5-FU prodrugs are replacing the cumbersome 5-FU long-term infusion due to its convenience and superior toxicity profile. However, the low complete response rate and short response duration are still the main obstacles in the chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Only large scale comparative clinical trials will give clues to improve the results of gastric cancer treatments.

Infusional 5-Fluorouracil and Mitomycin C: An Effective Regimen in the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as part of multi-drug chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has shown to be effective with low toxicity. The present analysis was carried out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 5-FU/FA in combination with 3-weekly mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 28 patients with AGC were analysed (first line n=23). They received weekly 24-h 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 preceded by 2-h FA 500 mg/m2 for 6 weeks followed by a two week rest period. Bolus MMC 10 mg/m2 was applied on days 1 and 22. Patient characteristics were: m/f 17/11; median age 67 years (43-79). The most common metastatic sites were liver and peritoneum (n=12, respectively).

RESULTS

A median of 3 and a total of 91 cycles were administered. Mean dose intensity in cycle I was: 5-FU 86%, MMC 87%. Responses were observed in 43%, no change was seen in 29% of the patients. Median overall survival was 9.7 months (10.7 months for patients treated first line). Non-haematological toxicities (NCI CTC grades 3 and 4) were observed in 2 patients, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia grades 3/4 were observed in 50 and 25% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusional 5-FU/FA plus MMC may safely be used in patients with AGC in the routine clinical setting. This regimen yields response rates and survival data comparable to platinum-based regimen.

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus oxaliplatin (L-OHP) as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a multicentre phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with AGC who had not received previous therapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. The median age was 62.5 years and the World Health Organization performance status was 0-1 in 29 patients; 13 (40.6%) patients had previous surgery and three (9.4%) had adjuvant chemotherapy. L-OHP (85 mg/m2 as a 2-h i.v. infusion) followed by CPT-11 (200 mg/m2 as a 30-min i.v. infusion) was given on day 1, in cycles of 21 days.

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 were evaluable for response. Complete response was achieved in one (3.1%) patient and a partial response was achieved in 15 (46.9%) [overall response rate = 50% (95% confidence interval 38.7-72.4%)]. Eight (25%) patients had stable disease, and eight (25%) had progressive disease. The median duration of response was 5 months and the median time to disease progression was 5.5 months. After a median follow-up period of 16 months, the median survival time was 8.5 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in six (18.6%) patients, febrile neutropenia in two (6.2%) and grade 3 anaemia in one (3.1%). Grade 3 diarrhoea was observed in two (6.2%) patients, grade 1 neurotoxicity in five (15.6%) and grade 3 asthenia in two (6.2%). There was no treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of CPT-11/L-OHP is an active regimen as front-line treatment in AGC with a favourable toxicity profile and deserves further evaluation in randomised studies.

Audit of postoperative chemoradiotherapy as adjuvant therapy for resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an Australian multicentre experience

BACKGROUND

Improved disease free and overall survivals were seen in curatively resected patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with the Intergroup 0116 (INT 0116) protocol of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to surgery alone. This protocol has not been widely adopted in Australian centres because of perceived risks of toxicity.

METHODS

We reviewed the case records from 45 consecutive patients treated between May 1998 and August 2003 with the INT 0116 protocol and variations at five Australian institutions. The median age was 61.5 years (range 38-79). Twenty-nine patients had gastric and 12 had gastroesophageal junction primaries. All patients had attempted curative resection, however, seven had involved microscopic margins (R1 resection). Thirty-five had regional node involvement and none had evidence of distant metastasis.

RESULTS

The overall National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0 grade 3 and grade 4 toxicity rates for all patients were 37.8% and 4.4%, respectively. There were no treatment related deaths. Gastrointestinal grade 3 toxicity was observed in 20% of patients, while haematologic grade 3 and 4 toxicity was observed in 17.8%. Toxicities experienced led to chemotherapy dose reductions in 22 patients and dose delay in 11 patients. Seven patients had a delay in radiotherapy and two did not proceed with radiotherapy. At a median follow up of 16 months (range 5-35) from surgery, 28 patients have relapsed (six with local recurrence alone) with 22 deaths occurring, all but one caused by cancer.

CONCLUSION

The INT 0116 protocol is a safe and feasible schedule in a multicentre setting with an acceptable rate of toxicity and is an appropriate adjuvant treatment option for high-risk resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

5-Fluorouracil as protracted continuous intravenous infusion can be added to full-dose docetaxel (Taxotere)-cisplatin in advanced gastric carcinoma: a phase I-II trial

BACKGROUND

A phase I-II multicenter trial was conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) according to tolerance and toxicity (primary objective), as well as to describe the clinical activity, in terms of response and survival (secondary objectives), of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in protracted continuous intravenous infusion (p.i.v.) with docetaxel and cisplatin for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, World Health Organization performance status < or =1, normal hematological and renal functions, adequate hepatic function and not pretreated for advanced disease by chemotherapy, received up to eight cycles of a combination of docetaxel on day 1, cisplatin on day 1 and 5-FU p.i.v. on days 1-14 (TCF) every 3 weeks, which was escalated up to the MTD, defined by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity in two patients in one dose level.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were accrued and treated (43 in the phase I part of the trial and nine additional at the recommended dose level). A median of five cycles/patient was given. The recommended dose of TCF was docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 5-FU p.i.v. 300 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14. Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia 79%, alopecia 46%, fatigue 23%, mucositis 10%, diarrhea 19%, nausea/vomiting 13%, neurological 4% and palmar-plantar 2%. Ten non-fatal febrile neutropenia episodes were recorded in eight patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. Among 41 patients with measurable disease (79%), we observed one complete and 20 partial responses for an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 51% (95% confidence interval 35-67%). Five patients (20%) had stable disease for > or =12 weeks (four cycles). The median overall survival was 9.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

5-FU p.i.v. at 300 mg/m(2)/day for 2 weeks out of three could be safely added to the docetaxel-cisplatin (TC) combination, but the dose of docetaxel had to be reduced to 75 mg/m(2) in a subsequent phase II trial. This drug regimen seems to be very active in advanced gastric cancer. Comparison with both TC and ECF in a randomized SAKK trial is ongoing.

A cost-benefit analysis of chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgery remains the mainstay of any curative treatment; however, those patients who are considered not amenable of curative resection generally receive chemotherapy, in order to obtain palliation of symptoms and improved survival. Many drugs have been tested in several combination regimens yielding higher response rates. In spite of the fact that chemotherapy has been extensively used in advanced gastrointestinal cancer, there are few studies that focus on its economic costs. The aim of this paper is to review the results of the main studies regarding the relationship between the cost of chemotherapy and its effectiveness in advanced gastric and gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) in metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer

Based on single agent activities and the additive or synergistic effects of three individual drugs in gastric cancer, we performed a phase II study of a new regimen combining epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) for unresectable gastric cancer. The patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer and no history of palliative chemotherapy were eligible for this trial. In total, 40 mg m⁻² epirubicin (reduced to 30 mg m⁻² due to high incidence of febrile neutropaenia; 75%) intravenously (i.v.) over 30 min, followed by 60 mg m⁻² docetaxel i.v. over 1 h, then 75 mg m⁻² cisplatin i.v. over 1 h was administered every 3 weeks. Between January 2002 and February 2003, 30 patients (epirubicin 40 mg m⁻², eight; 30 mg m⁻², 22) were enrolled. The median age was 52 years (range, 33–68). The patients received a median of four cycles (range, 1–8). One patient (3%) achieved a complete response, 13 (43%) showed partial responses, 13 (43%) had stable diseases and three (10%) progressed. The overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 28–66%), and the median duration of response was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.0–7.0). The median time to progression was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4–5.9), and the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5–12.4). Grade 4 neutropaenia were observed in 41%, and febrile neutropaenia in 32%, out of the patients receiving 30 mg m⁻² of epirubicin. Grade 3 nonhaematological toxicities included nausea, vomiting, anorexia and peripheral neuropathy. In conclusion, EDP is active in gastric cancer, with a manageable and predictable toxicity profile.

Phase II studies of BBR3464, a novel tri-nuclear platinum complex, in patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

BBR3464, a novel tri-nuclear platinum complex, forms long-range DNA adducts and is highly potent when compared with cisplatin in vitro. Preclinical studies demonstrated activity in cisplatin-resistant tumours and tumours with mutated p53 status. Phase I & II clinical studies gave preliminary indications of activity in melanoma, pancreatic, lung and ovarian cancers. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and confirm the toxicity of BBR3464 when given either as first- or second-line treatment for advanced disease in patients with gastric and gastro-oesphageal adenocarcinoma. Two multicentre, open label, Gehan design studies were conducted; one study used BBR3464 as first-line and the other as second-line treatment for metastatic or locally advanced disease. Nineteen first-line and 26 second-line patients were enrolled receiving a total of 74 and 53 infusions, respectively. Initially, seven patients in the second-line study received BBR3464 using the planned schedule of 1.1 mg/m2 every 4 weeks; however, 5 of these patients experienced dose-limiting grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia; subsequent patients in both studies were treated using the modified schedule of 0.9 mg/m2, every 21 days. In 1 of 17 evaluable, previously untreated patients, regression of multiple skin lesions was noted with stabilisation of lung metastases and maxillary sinus mass, lasting 155 days. In the first-line study, the median time to progression was 85 days [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 42, 127] (2.8 months) and in the second-line study, the median time to progression was 71 days [95% CI: 42, 109] and 38 days [95% CI: 32, 73] in the 1.1 and 0.9 mg/m2 dose level groups, respectively. Toxicity data were available for 45 patients. Neutropenia was the main toxicity seen (G3: 40%, G4: 40%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in six patients (15%) treated with 0.9 mg/m2 compared with five patients (71%) treated with 1.1 mg/m2 BBR3464. Other drug-related toxicities (G3/4) included: anaemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis and fatigue. Diarrhoea and nausea/ vomiting were adequately controlled by the use of loperamide and antiemetics, respectively. Recruitment to the second-line study was closed early due to the poor response rate (1/17 evaluable, 6%; 95% CI: 1%, 27%) and short time to progression noted in the first-line study. Further studies with BBR3464 in this tumour type are not recommended.

Chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer: population-based perceptions and practice patterns of medical oncologists

Although randomised trials in metastatic gastric cancer have shown a survival benefit from chemotherapy, a significant proportion of medical oncologists do not believe that it prolongs survival or improves quality of life, including those who routinely treat metastatic gastric cancer. There was wide variation in what was considered to be ‘standard therapy’ and a statistically significant difference between what medical oncologists consider ‘standard therapy’ and what they use in every day practice.

Combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and heptaplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Heptaplatin is a recently developed platinum derivative. This agent has been reported to have a response rate of 17% as a single agent, and tolerable toxicity in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and heptaplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Forty-seven chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced or recurred gastric cancer were recruited. 5-FU was administered over 120 hr by continuous intravenous infusion from day 1 to 5, at a daily dose of 1,000 mg/m2 and heptaplatin was administered over 1 hr by intravenous infusion on day 1 at 400 mg/m2, and this cycle was repeated every 4 weeks. The response rate was 21%, median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.2 months). Median overall survival was 6.2 months (95% CI, 4 to 8.4 months) and the 1-yr survival rate was 29% for all patients. The most frequent toxicity was proteinuria. Toxicities were generally mild and reversible. This study demonstrates that the combination of 5-FU/heptaplatin combination is less active but tolerated in patients with advance gastric cancer.

High curative resection rate with weekly cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgastrim in patients with locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of a weekly preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable gastric cancer. In all, 82 patients with an Eastern Oncology Cooperative Group PS <or=2 and normal cardiac function were enrolled onto the study. Surgical unresectability was confirmed in 52 patients (63%) at laparotomy, and in 30 (27%) cases by CT scan of the abdomen and endoscopic ultrasonography. Chemotherapy treatment was: cisplatin 40 mg x m(-2); 5-fluorouracil 500 mg x m(-2); epidoxorubicin 35 mg x m(-2); 6S-leucovorin 250 mg x m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g x m(-2) (PELF). One cycle consisted of 8 weekly treatments. Response to chemotherapy was observed in 40 of 82 patients (49%): six (7%) complete and 34 (41%) partial responses, and in four (5%) cases a complete pathological response was confirmed. Of the 40 responding patients, 37 (45%) had potentially curative surgery. Grade 3/4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in three and two patients. At a median follow-up of 48 months, 25 of the 37 resected patients (68%) were alive and 24 (65%) were disease free. The median and 4-year survival for the whole group was 17 months and 31%, respectively. The median survival was 12 months for inoperable patients and it was not reached in resected patients.

Combination chemotherapy in advanced gastrointestinal cancers: ex vivo sensitivity to gemcitabine and mitomycin C

Advanced or metastatic disease is common in both oesophagogastric and colorectal cancers, with poor 5-year survival despite palliative chemotherapy. We have investigated the sensitivity of gastrointestinal tumours to gemcitabine in combination with mitomycin C (GeM), using a modified ex vivo ATP-based tumour chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). Tumour material from 41 colorectal and 22 oesophagogastric cancers were assessed. The GeM combination showed variable but definite activity in most of the samples tested. The results show that GeM achieves >95% inhibition at concentrations within the range achievable clinically in 60% of colorectal tumours (21 out of 35) and 38% of oesophagogastric tumours (five out of 13) tested. We did not identify any significant difference in sensitivity using concurrent or sequential exposure of tumour-derived cells to these two drugs. The results from this study suggest that GeM may be a useful combination in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal malignancy.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted infusion of 5-FU (ECF) in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma usually presents late in the clinical course and has a poor prognosis. No effective systemic therapy is currently available. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the ECF regimen (epirubicin, cisplatin. and 24-h continuous infusion of 5-FU) in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

On day 1, epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) were administered i.v., repeated every 21 days. 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/day was given continuous i.v. via an ambulatory infusion pump throughout the treatment course. A total of 24 patients (15 men and nine women) with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between August 1996 and April 2002 were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Of the 20 evaluable patients, two had partial response (10%) and nine had stable disease (45%), including two minor response. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in six patients, while grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in five patients. There was no neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenic bleeding during any of the cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

ECF regimen is well-tolerated but is not an effective treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Newer clinical trials with combination drugs should be developed.

5-fluorouracil administered as a 48-hour semiintermittent infusion in combination with leucovorin, cisplatin and epirubicin: phase II study in advanced gastric cancer patients

The main objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and the antitumor activity of a chemotherapy regimen with a 48-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), cisplatin (CDDP), and epirubicin (EPIDX) administered every 3 weeks in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Thirty-three patients received CDDP 60 mg/m2 over 30 minutes followed by 1-LV 250 mg/m2 over 2 hours followed by EPIDX 60 mg/m2 over 5 minutes (bolus) and followed by 5-FU 3,800 mg/m2 as a 48-hour semiintermittent continuous infusion, with 67% of total daily dose administered between 4 pm and midnight. Four patients had a locally advanced disease and 29 had metastatic disease. A total of 171 cycles were administered. Most relevant toxicities were stomatitis (grade III in 2% of cycles and 12% of patients) and neutropenia (grade III-IV in 8% of cycles and 28% of patients) with 3 (9%) patients experiencing 1 episode of febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for response. In 3 patients (9.6%) a complete response and in 11 patients (35.4%) a partial response was observed, for an objective response rate of 45% (95% C.I. 27-64%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.9 and 9.8 months, respectively. In conclusion, this regimen is feasible in an outpatient setting with acceptable and manageable toxicities, and it is associated with promising antitumor activity, time to progression, and survival.

Phase II Trial of Biweekly Infusional Fluorouracil, Folinic Acid, and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the toxicity and activity of infusional fluorouracil (FU), folinic acid (FA), and oxaliplatin, administered every 2 weeks in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

Forty-one previously untreated patients with measurable adenocarcinoma of the stomach were eligible for the study. Patients received FU 2.6 g/m2 (24-hour continuous infusion), FA 500 mg/m2 (2-hour intravenous infusion), and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (2-hour intravenous infusion) every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression of disease was observed.

Results

All patients were assessable for toxicity and 37 of 41 patients were assessable for response. Patient characteristics were: sex (male, 28; female,13), median age 60 years (range, 20 to 77 years), and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Response was evaluated every 6 weeks. Of 37 assessable patients, one complete and 15 partial remissions were observed (overall response rate, 43%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (32%) and progressive disease in nine patients (24%). The median overall survival was 9.6 months. WHO grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia in two patients (4.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.4%). Other WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea in three patients (7.3%) and vomiting in two patients (4.9%). There were no cases of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy and no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Biweekly fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin is active and well-tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Response rates, time to progression, and overall survival were comparable to those achieved with other combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX6, with significantly less toxicity.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer using epirubicin/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (ECF) and alternative regimens before and after chemoradiation

Chemoradiation is now used more commonly for gastric cancer following publication of the US Intergroup trial results that demonstrate an advantage to adjuvant postoperative chemoradiotherapy. However, there remain concerns regarding the toxicity of this treatment, the optimal chemotherapy regimen and the optimal method of radiotherapy delivery. In this prospective study, we evaluated the toxicity and feasibility of an alternative chemoradiation regimen to that used in the Intergroup trial. A total of 26 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach were treated with 3D-conformal radiation therapy to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with concurrent continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The majority of patients received epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU (ECF) as the systemic component given before and after concurrent chemoradiation. The overall rates of observed grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 38 and 15%, respectively. GIT grade 3 toxicity was observed in 19% of patients, while haematologic grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in 23%. Our results suggest that this adjuvant regimen can be delivered safely and with acceptable toxicity. This regimen forms the basis of several new studies being developed for postoperative adjuvant therapy of gastric cancer.

Future prospects of personalized chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: results of a prospective randomized pilot study

In the present study, in order to evaluate the feasibility of personalized chemotherapy, a prospective randomized pilot study was performed in 30 advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients. As we have demonstrated previously, the expressions of mRNA from tumor biopsy samples for seven molecular markers, i.e., dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), glutathione S-transferase (GST)-pi, beta-tubulin (tub), O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), multiple drug-resistant protein (MRP)-1, NADPH/quinone oxidoreductase (NQO)-1, and cytochrome p450 (P450), were examined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis and therapy was recommended in a flow chart that depended on the level of expression of these predictive molecular markers. We chose 12 therapeutic plans, including best supportive care (BSC). We treated 15 patients according to the gene expression profiles, and the remaining 15 patients (controls) were treated without recommended regimens, and the therapy was continued after the expression profiles were checked. Interestingly, 11 of 26 lesions (42.3%) responded after treatment given according to gene expression analysis; however, no clinical response was detected in the control group. The prediction of the response, including resistance, was successful in 75.9% by the gene expression profiles. Moreover, the survival of the patients with the recommended treatment was better than that of patients without a recommended protocol. These results indicate that personalized treatment may be beneficial for gastric cancer chemotherapy and further randomized trials should be carried out in the future.

Phase I study of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I study was conducted to determine the recommended phase II doses, safety profile, and antitumour activity of a combination regimen of cisplatin, irinotecan, and epirubicin administered every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours. Cisplatin and epirubicin were given at fixed doses of 50 and 60 mg m(-2), respectively. The irinotecan dose was escalated at 10 mg m(-2) increments from a starting dose level of 70 mg m(-2). Epirubicin, irinotecan, and their metabolites were measured with HPLC methods. In all, 35 patients received 141 courses of treatment. Irinotecan dose was escalated in seven cohorts up to 130 mg m(-2), and then finally de-escalated to 110 mg m(-2). The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenic fever. Nonhaematologic toxicities included mild to moderate nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea and fatigue. Of 34 patients with evaluable disease, one patient had a complete response and nine patients had partial response, yielding an overall response rate of 29.4%. Pharmacokinetic parameters of epirubicin were not affected by the sequence of drug administration. However, the AUCs of irinotecan and its metabolites were increased significantly when irinotecan and epirubicin were administered concurrently. This combination regimen has promising broad antitumour activity, and will be further evaluated in phase II studies in multiple tumour types.

Cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) is more active than 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) and cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-FU (PELF) have both been reported to be superior to the combination 5-FU, doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) in advanced gastric carcinoma. On the basis of the presence and dose intensity of the included agents, we hypothesised that PELF would be superior to FAMTX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred patients with untreated advanced gastric carcinoma were randomised to receive PELF or FAMTX for a maximum of six cycles or until disease progression.

RESULTS

The complete response (CR) rates to PELF and FAMTX were, respectively, 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 6% to 20%] and 2% (95% CI 0% to 5%; P = 0.003), and the objective response rates [CR plus partial response (PR) rates] 39% (95% CI 29% to 49%) and 22% (95% CI 13% to 30%; P = 0.009), thus significantly favouring the PELF combination. The survival rates after 12 months (30.8% versus 22.4%) and 24 months (15.7% versus 9.5%) were also higher among patients receiving PELF, but these differences were not statistically significant. The toxicities were qualitatively different but quantitatively similar. Both regimens seem to be feasible provided that careful patient monitoring is assured.

CONCLUSIONS

PELF is significantly more active than FAMTX and deserves further research in the adjuvant setting.

Chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a review and updated meta-analysis

The five years survival rate for patients with gastric cancer is 15-25%. With the aim of improving survival, chemotherapy has been used in different adjuvant settings. Similarly, but with the aim of improving quality of life and prolonging life, chemotherapy has been used extensively in metastatic disease. In this review we have included studies of systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy given before, during or after operation and for advanced disease. A meta-analysis has been made on the 21 randomised studies that used adjuvant systemic chemotherapy postoperatively. A significant survival benefit for the patients treated postoperatively compared with controls was identified (odds ratio (OR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.96). When western and Asian studies were analysed separately we found no survival benefit for the treated patients in the western groups (OR 0.96 (95 CI 0.83 to 1.12)). Flaws in the conduct of several trials made it difficult to draw firm conclusions, including the exclusion of a small but clinically meaningful survival benefit. Preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown effects in some patients, but no significant benefit was found in the few randomised studies. The few studies that reported intraperitoneal therapy showed no detectable survival benefit either. In patients with advanced disease, four small randomised studies found significantly longer survival in the treated patients. The survival benefit is in the range of 3-9 months, and there were also improvements of the quality of life. Several drug combinations have been tested, however, with no confirmed superiority for a particular regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot be recommended as a routine because of the lack of confirmed beneficial effects. Some patients with advanced disease will have a clinically important benefit from palliative chemotherapy, so this can be recommended for patients who are otherwise in good health.

Heterogeneity of chemosensitivity of esophageal and gastric carcinoma

Esophageal and gastric cancer have a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy is rarely of long-term benefit. This may be related in part to heterogeneity of chemosensitivity and to constitutive resistance to individual cytotoxic drugs. This study aimed to demonstrate the degree of heterogeneity of chemosensitivity between tumors. We have examined the heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal and gastric cancer specimens (n=85) using an ex vivo ATP-based chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA). A variety of chemotherapeutic agents were tested. Sixty-four specimens were endoscopic biopsy samples; the remainder were from resection specimens. Cells were obtained from 62 specimens (73%). Eight assays were infected due to contamination/infection of the biopsy material, giving an evaluability rate of 87%. Analysis of the data showed considerable heterogeneity of chemosensitivity. The most active single agents identified by the assay were mitomycin C (56% sensitivity) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 42% sensitivity). Exposure of tumor cells to combinations of drugs showed ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-FU) and mitomycin C+5-FU to be moderately active regimens. Other experimental drug combinations showed greater activity. There is a marked heterogeneity of chemosensitivity in esophageal and gastric cancers. The degree of heterogeneity observed suggests that the ATP-TCA could be used to individualize chemotherapy by selecting agents for particular patients. This approach provides the rationale for a trial of ATP-TCA-directed therapy to determine whether individualization of chemotherapy might improve patient response and survival.

Status of treatment for advanced gastric carcinoma

Gastric cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Advanced gastric cancer is incurable. The most widely investigated single-agent chemotherapy is 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with partial response rates up to 20%. Pilot phase II studies investigating combinations of 5-FU, anthracyclines, mitomycin, methotrexate, and platinums achieved higher response rates; however, the response rates declined in subsequent larger trials. Furthermore, toxicity was substantially higher in confirmatory trials, emphasizing the need to develop well-tolerated regimens prior to multi-institutional testing. Although phase III studies of combination regimens have not achieved a clear worldwide standard, the regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion 5-FU achieved a survival benefit, possibly through the increased activity of infusional 5-FU combined with cisplatin. The taxanes, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, have recently shown important activity in gastric cancer. Patient accrual to a phase III trial comparing a docetaxel-based combination regimen with the regimen of cisplatin and 5-FU has completed accrual. Whether patients with adenocarcinomas of the proximal stomach and gastroesophageal junction will have the same response rates to these new agents as did patients with classical body and distal gastric cancers is unknown. It is anticipated that the development of these active new agents will ultimately improve survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Curative treatment of gastric cancer: towards a multidisciplinary approach?

Despite marked decreases in incidence over the last century, particularly in developed countries, gastric cancer is still the second-most common tumor worldwide. Surgery remains the gold standard for the cure of locoregional disease. However, in most countries, the diagnosis is made at an advanced stage, and the 5-year survival for surgically resectable disease stays far below 50%. The efficacy of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in addition to surgery has been actively studied over the last 30 years. Unfortunately, with few exceptions, most studies of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer have given deceiving results. The purpose of this review is to address the reasons for our failure to objectivate an improvement in the cure of gastric cancer with adjuvant treatment in most trials, and to consider potential solutions. The low efficacy of chemotherapy regimens available up to now may have hampered our progress. In addition, many previous studies suffered limitations of design or methodology (e.g. low accrual, inadequate disease stage selection, inadequate surgical treatment) that may have obscured a treatment effect. Furthermore, the reduced treatment tolerance of post-gastrectomy patients, perhaps due to their poor nutritional status, results in decreased or delayed adjuvant systemic therapy, with potential adverse consequences in its efficacy. Among potential solutions, the arrival of new drugs, taxanes and topoisomerase I inhibitors in particular, which have shown encouraging results in metastatic disease, may increase the impact of chemotherapy in a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Pre-treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy prior to surgery may also be advantageous, averting the problems associated with post-surgical treatment. Such an approach has been shown to be feasible in phase II studies, and is relatively well tolerated by patients. Several carefully designed randomized phase III trials are underway to answer this question.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2) (10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous infusion) every 14 days.

RESULTS

Patients (69% male, 31% female) had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease, and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver (61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression, and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients (oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen in this indication.

A multicentre phase II trial of primary chemotherapy with cisplatin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil followed by chemoradiation in patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus

BACKGROUND

We undertook a multicentre phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for localised adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma of the oesophagus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy comprised five 3-weekly cycles of cisplatin and protracted continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, with conformally planned radiotherapy commencing at the start of the fifth cycle.

RESULTS

The planned treatment programme was completed by 39 of 72 patients (54%), and a further 13% completed chemotherapy and proceeded to surgical oesophagectomy. Response rates to chemotherapy and to the entire treatment programme were 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34% to 60%] and 56% (CI 43% to 68%). The dysphagia score improved in 54% of patients. The median survival duration was 14.6 months with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 58.7% and 44.1%, respectively. Grade III/IV chemotherapy-related toxicity occurred in 38% of patients, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a feasible and active treatment regimen providing palliative benefits for patients with poor-prognosis localised oesophageal cancer.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of capecitabine in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine when used in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin (ECC) in patients with oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were also determined, and the effect of previous oesophago-gastric surgery or concurrent oesophago-gastric cancer on the absorption and metabolism of capecitabine was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma received up to six cycles of epirubicin (50 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly), cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v., 3-weekly) and capecitabine, the latter administered orally in an intermittent schedule (14 days treatment; 7-day rest period) at 3-weekly intervals. Patients were recruited into one of four escalating dose cohorts (500, 825, 1000 and 1250 mg/m(2) bd). Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level, with DLT assessed on the toxicity of the first cycle only. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic analyses was performed over the first 10 h of day 1 of cycle 1.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients, median age 63 years (range 32-76 years), ECOG performance status < or =2 with locally advanced (10) or metastatic (22) disease were recruited and were evaluable for toxicity. Two of five patients experienced DLT at 1250 mg/m(2) bd with grade II stomatitis (one patient) and grade III diarrhoea with febrile neutropenia (one patient). Cumulative toxicity for all cycles (n = 140) (worst grade per patient) includes grade IV oesophagitis (one patient), grade III diarrhoea (five), grade IV neutropenia with infection (seven), grade II stomatitis (four) and grade IV thrombocytopenia (one). Of 29 patients with evaluable disease, there was one complete response and six partial responses [24% response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 10% to 44%]], a median PFS of 22 weeks (95% CI 17-27 weeks) and median overall survival of 34 weeks (95% CI 19-49 weeks). Capecitabine was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with a t(max) of 1-2 h for capecitabine, DFCR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine) and DFUR (5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine). The C(max) and AUC(0-)( infinity ) for capecitabine, DFCR and DFUR were similar to those observed in previous monotherapy studies of capecitabine taken after food.

CONCLUSION

A dose of 1000 mg/m(2) bd of capecitabine is recommended for use on an intermittent schedule in combination with these doses and schedule of epirubicin and cisplatin. This regimen is tolerable and active in oesophago-gastric adenocarcinoma. A randomised phase III comparison with ECF is justified.

The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in squamous esophageal cancer: a prospective nonrandomized study of pulse and continuous-infusion regimens with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil

BACKGROUND

We evaluated cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil as preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous esophageal cancer and compared two different infusion regimens. The outcomes were also compared with those of our historical control patients treated by surgery alone.

METHODS

From 1991 to 1997, 83 consecutive esophageal cancer patients underwent surgical exploration after completion of two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy regimens, either in pulse or in continuous infusion cycles. Outcomes were compared with those of 76 historical control patients. Both groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and tumor stages. The resection rates, operative morbidity, mortality, and survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

Partial response was achieved in 50% of patients who received chemotherapy. There was no chemotherapy-related mortality. The resection, morbidity, and mortality rates and median survival between the surgery-alone group and the chemotherapy group were 71.1% vs. 82%, 51% vs. 55%, and 4% vs. 10.8%, 12.0 vs. 13.5 months, respectively (P >.05). There was also no statistically significant difference between the two regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil infusion, in pulse or continuous regimens, followed by surgery for squamous esophageal cancer patients had no added benefit in the overall survival.

A randomised trial comparing 5-FU with 5-FU plus cisplatin in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is moderately efficient as a treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but patient survival and quality of life has improved with this modality in some trials. In a previous phase II trial, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin (FUP) yielded a 26.5% response rate and a 29% survival rate at 1 year. The present study aimed to compare FUP with 5-FU alone, which was the control arm in former Mayo Clinic trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with untreated cytologically or histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were deemed measurable or evaluable. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of a control FU arm (5-FU 500 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days) and the investigational FUP arm (continuous 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 or day 2). In both arms, chemotherapy was repeated at day 29.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and seven patients from 18 centres were randomised: 103 in the FU arm and 104 in FUP arm. Treatment arms were balanced with respect to performance status grade 0-1 (83% versus 86%, respectively) and the presence of metastases (92% versus 89%, respectively). The median number of cycles administered was two in both arms (range 0-14). Five patients did not receive any chemotherapy and 45 received only one cycle. Toxicity (WHO grade 3-4) was lower with FU than with FUP (20% versus 48%, P <0.001), as was neutropenia (6% versus 23%), vomiting (4% versus 17%) and toxicity-related deaths (one versus four early in the trial). The response rate was low in both arms, but superior in the FUP arm: 12% versus 0% (intention-to-treat analysis, P <0.01). The survival rates at 6 months were 28% and 38% for the FU and FUP arms, respectively, and 1-year survival rates were 9% and 17% (log-rank test, P = 0.10). One-year progression-free survival was 0% with FU versus 10% with FUP (log-rank test, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced pancreatic carcinomas with a poor prognosis, FUP was superior to FU in terms of response and progression-free survival, but not in terms of overall survival. The low response rate is partly related to the number of patients who received only one cycle of chemotherapy. A more effective, better tolerated version of this FUP combination is needed.

Effective combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and/or erythropoietin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

A phase II trial was performed to determine the antitumour efficacy and tolerance of combined paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoetic growth factor support in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Forty-five patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer were entered in this trial. Treatment consisted of 2-weekly courses of paclitaxel 160 mg per m2 and cisplatin 60 mg per m2 both given on day 1. Depending on absolute neutrophil counts on the days of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration (1000-2000 per microl), a 5-day course of human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg x kg(-1) per day was given subcutaneously; in addition, if haemoglobin was <12.0 mg dl(-1), erythropoietin 10 000 IU was administered subcutaneously three times per week. The confirmed overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 44%, including five complete (11%) and 15 partial remissions (33%). Twelve patients had stable disease (27%), 11 (24%) progressed while on chemotherapy, and two patients were not evaluable. The median time to response was 3 months, the median time to progression 7.0 months, and the median survival time was 11.2 months with 12 patients currently alive. Haematologic toxicity was common, though WHO grade 4 neutropenia occurred in only five patients (11%). Apart from total alopecia in 16 patients (36%), severe non-haematologic adverse reactions included grade 3 peripheral neuropathy in six (13%) and anaphylaxis in two patients. In addition, there was one patient each who experienced grade 3 emesis, diarrhea, and infection, respectively. Our data suggest that the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without G-CSF and/or erythropoietin has promising therapeutic activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) With epirubicin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer

PURPOSE

We report the results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) (ECF) with the combination of mitomycin, cisplatin, and PVI 5-FU (MCF) in previously untreated patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred eighty patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized to receive either ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and PVI 5-FU 200 mg/m(2)/d) or MCF (mitomycin 7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, and PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m(2)/d) and analyzed for survival, response, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37% to 48%) with ECF and 44.1% (95% CI, 38% to 50%) with MCF (P =.692). Toxicity was tolerable, and there were only two toxic deaths. ECF resulted in more grade 3/4 neutropenia and grade 2 alopecia, but MCF caused more thrombocytopenia and plantar-palmar erythema. Median survival was 9.4 months with ECF and 8.7 months with MCF (P =.315); at 1 year, 40.2% (95% CI, 34% to 46%) of ECF and 32.7% (95% CI, 27% to 38%) of MCF patients were alive. Median failure-free survival was 7 months with both regimens. Global QOL scores were better with ECF at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms response, survival, and QOL benefits of ECF observed in a previous randomized study. The equivalent efficacy of MCF was demonstrated, but QOL was superior with ECF. ECF remains one of the reference treatments for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Association of color Doppler vascularity index and microvessel density with survival in patients with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical usefulness of microvessel density (MVD) and an in vivo angiogenesis parameter, color Doppler vascularity index (CDVI), in patients with gastric cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have reported a significant association between the degree of MVD-evaluated angiogenesis with the clinicopathologic factors and prognosis of patients with various solid tumors. All these studies were accomplished on tissue sections retrospectively obtained from surgical specimens. However, an in vivo method to assess tumor angiogenesis for human malignancies is highly desirable for diagnostic purpose, treatment planning, and follow-up. The CDVI is a new ultrasound parameter for evaluating in vivo angiogenesis, has a good correlation with status of lymph node metastasis in cervical carcinoma, and can predict distant metastasis and survival in colon cancer patients. Therefore, the CDVI may also be useful to assess in vivo angiogenesis in human gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled in this study, and microvessel density was evaluated by using immunohistochemical staining of surgical specimens with anti-CD-34 antibody. Tumors were sonographically visible in 31 patients. The CDVI of each tumor was determined using transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound. The CDVI was defined as the ratio of the number of the colored pixels within a tumor section to the number of total pixels in that specific tumor section, and was calculated by using Encomate software (Electronic Business Machine Co. Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan). Correlation between MVD, CDVI and clinicopathologic factors and patient survival was studied.

RESULTS

The MVD was significantly correlated with vascular invasion by multiple linear regression analysis. Although the survival of patients with high MVD (> 32) was significantly worse than those with low MVD (< 32) by univariate analysis, vascular invasion was an independent prognostic factor by Cox proportional hazard model. There was a linear correlation between CDVI and MVD (r =.495, P =.005). Moreover, in patients with a high CDVI (> 11%), the survival rate was significantly lower than that in those with low CDVI (< or = 11%, P =.005). None of the patients with high CDVI (> 11%) survived 2 years after curative resection. In addition to vascular invasion, the CDVI was another independent prognostic factor in the patients with stage III gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular invasion was an important prognostic indicator in gastric cancer. The high CDVI was a good preoperative indicator of early death in stage III gastric cancer patients. Thus, the CDVI may be helpful in selecting patients with gastric cancer for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or anti-angiogenic therapy.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and mitomycin C in advanced gastric cancer: a low cost effective regimen

Recently, we reported a highly active regimen in advanced gastric cancer including a weekly administration of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil with the support of filgrastim. In order to simplify the administration and to decrease the toxicity of these drugs, mainly epidoxorubicin-induced alopecia, we designed a regimen including an infusional 5-fluorouracil schedule according to the de Gramont regimen, cisplatin and mitomycin C replacing epidoxorubicin. Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were treated with cisplatin 50 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, every 2 weeks, 6S-stereoisomer-leucovorin 100 mg m(-2) i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) i.v. in a 22-h infusion, on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks, and mitomycin C 7 mg m(-2) i.v. bolus on day 2, every 6 weeks. Grades 3-4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria) consisted mainly of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Five patients had a complete response and 16 had a partial response for an overall response rate of 46.7% (95% confidence interval, 32.1-61.2%). The median survival was 11 months. The combination of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin according to de Gramont, and mitomycin C seems to be an active and safe regimen in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Because of its low cost it may be suggested for patients not enrolled into clinical trials.

A phase II study of epirubicin, cisplatin and raltitrexed combination chemotherapy (ECT) in patients with advanced oesophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and ralitrexed (Tomudex). ECT, in patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma. Efficacy was assessed primarily as response rate and secondarily in terms of toxicity, time to progression and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with histologically and/or cytologically proven unresectable (7) or metastatic (14) gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma, who had bi-dimensionally measurable disease, with ECOG performance status < or = 2. with adequate haematological, hepatic and renal function received first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin (50 mg/m2). cisplatin (60 mg/m2) and Tomudex (2.5 mg/m2), ECT, at three-weekly intervals. Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy, with a further three cycles if there was disease response or stabilisation.

RESULTS

ECT is an active regimen in the treatment of advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with an overall intention-to-treat response rate of 29% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 11%-52%). In addition, 4 (19%) patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 19 weeks (95% CI: 7-31 weeks). Median overall survival was 18 weeks (95% CI: 11-24 weeks). Seventeen patients failed to complete the six cycles of treatment due to disease progression (5). toxicity (3), non-toxic death (1 pulmonary embolism, 1 cardiac), severe allergy to epirubicin (1), patient decision (1) and five patients after the study was discontinued early due to toxicity. There were three toxic deaths: two due to sepsis complicating neutropaenia and one due to cardiorespiratory failure following drug induced enteritis. Nine patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropaenia, two patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nausea and vomiting and one patient had grade 4 diarrhoea.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and tomudex is active against advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma but the toxicity suggests that further evaluation in a randomised comparison to ECF is not appropriate.

Preoperative ECF chemotherapy in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion (ECF) has been reported to result in high clinical response rates in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma and is currently the 'gold standard' chemotherapy regimen for this tumour site. Despite this, its role as preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment is unproven and therefore remains under investigation. We report our experience using ECF (intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, with continuous infusion of 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction and stomach. Of the 23 patients treated (median age 54 years), 19 had potentially resectable disease, four were unresectable and seven had radiological evidence of lymph node involvement. A median of four cycles of ECF was delivered (range 1-6). Ten of 12 patients (83%) with dysphagia reported improvement of symptoms. Clinical disease progression occurred in six patients (26%) during chemotherapy. WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in six patients (26%): four haematological, one mucositis, one vomiting. Seventeen patients (74%) proceeded to surgery; 14 (61%) were resected and three were unresectable. There were two (12%) postoperative deaths from respiratory failure. Major pathological response was seen in three patients (13%): one pathological complete response, two microscopic residual disease. Two patients had Stage II (T2N(0-1)) disease and nine were Stage III (T(3-4)N(0-1)). None of the patients with initially unresectable disease was rendered resectable. After a median follow-up interval of 33 months (range 26-53), the overall median survival was 12 months and 2-year survival was 30%. All patients who were initially unresectable or had radiological evidence of lymph node involvement have died. Therefore, despite good symptomatic response rates, ECF chemotherapy given in the preoperative setting did not appear to improve the outcome of patients with unresectable or radiologically lymph node-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The role of ECF chemotherapy in resectable tumours is unclear and is currently under investigation in the randomized MRC Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) study.

A phase II study of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after the weekly PELF regimen in advanced gastric cancer. A report from the Italian group for the study of digestive tract cancer

In advanced gastric cancer, we investigated feasibility and activity of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel after an intensive weekly regimen consisting of cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, fluorouracil, leucovorin (PELF) plus filgrastim. Chemotherapy-naive patients with relapsed or metastatic gastric cancer received 8 weekly administrations of chemotherapy with cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg/m(2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m(2) and glutathione 1.5 g/m(2). On the other days filgrastim 5 microg kg(-1) was administered by subcutaneous injection. Subsequently, patients with partial response or stable disease received 3 cycles of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. 40 patients have been enrolled and they are evaluable for response and toxicity. After the PELF regimen, 3 patients achieved complete response, 13 patients showed partial response, 21 patients had stable disease and 3 patients progressed (40% response rate; 95% CI 25% to 55%). After docetaxel, 9 out 34 patients improved the outcome (26.5%); 7 patients with stable disease achieved partial response and 2 patients with partial response achieved complete response. The overall response rate in the 40 patients was 57.5% (95% CI, 42.5% to 72.5%). The PELF regimen did not cause any grade IV toxicity, the most frequent grade III acute side-effects were thrombocytopenia and vomiting which occurred in the 10% of 320 PELF cycles. Docetaxel caused grade III-IV neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in the 10% and the 19% of cycles respectively. Fatigue was a frequent side-effect during both PELF and docetaxel chemotherapy. The sequential application of docetaxel after PELF chemotherapy gained major objective responses with manageable toxicity. This strategy is worth of further investigation in the setting of palliative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The tegafur-based dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidines, UFT/leucovorin (ORZEL) and S-1: a review of their clinical development and therapeutic potential

Protracted intravenous regimens of fluorouracil (5-FU) may be superior and better tolerated than intravenous bolus dosing. An effective oral regimen would allow a protracted course of 5-FU without the need for central venous lines and the associated increase in complications. Approximately 85% of 5-FU is degraded by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD); inhibition of this enzyme pathway can increase the amount of circulating 5-FU. Two oral fluoropyrimidines commonly referred to as DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines, or DIFs, UFT plus leucovorin (LV) and S-1 are reviewed herein. These agents represent an approach to more convenient, less toxic 5-FU therapy. In two multicenter, randomized, phase III trials in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, UFT/LV produced equivalent activity compared with intravenous 5-FU/LV but with significantly less major toxicity. The predominant side effect of UFT, diarrhea, is generally self-limited and easily managed. Myelosuppression and hand-foot syndrome were rarely noted in the schedules used in these trials. S-1 has demonstrated promising activity in phase II trials conducted in patients with gastric, colorectal, breast, and head and neck cancers. Ongoing trials are defining the roles of these agents in a variety of malignancies.

Changes in P-glycoprotein expression in gastric carcinoma with respect to distant gastric mucosa may be influenced by p53

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of some chemotherapeutic agents used to treat gastric carcinoma patients may be impaired by the presence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the status of p53. A modulation of P-gp expression by p53 or other alterations during tumorigenesis have been reported. The authors analyzed P-gp expression in relation to p53 and histopathologic features in gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty-one resected gastric carcinomas and mucosa distant from the tumor were assessed for P-gp expression by immunohistochemistry with C494 and JSB-1 antibodies. p53 expression was also immunohistochemically assessed by DO7 antibody in tumor samples. P-gp and p53 expression were semiquantitatively analyzed according to the percentage of stained cells. Histologic type, grade, vessel invasion, and stage were also studied.

RESULTS

Moderate or high P-gp expression was detected in gastric carcinoma in 29 cases (71%) and in gastric mucosa remote from the tumor in 36 cases (88%). This reduction in P-gp expression was observed in 22% of the carcinomas, all but 1 being p53 immunonegative tumors. Thus, 8 (42%) of the p53 immunonegative carcinomas showed a loss of P-gp expression compared with their distant gastric mucosa. All p53 immunopositive carcinomas coexpressed P-gp. No correlation between P-gp expression and histologic type, grade, vessel invasion, or stage was found.

CONCLUSIONS

P-gp expression in gastric carcinomas is frequent and coexpression with p53 is found. The analysis of P-gp expression in carcinomas and distant mucosa show that it is not regulated by p53, but a loss of P-gp detected in some of these carcinomas is mainly associated with a lack of p53 protein accumulation.

Changes in P-glycoprotein expression in gastric carcinoma with respect to distant gastric mucosa may be influenced by p53

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of some chemotherapeutic agents used to treat gastric carcinoma patients may be impaired by the presence of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the status of p53. A modulation of P-gp expression by p53 or other alterations during tumorigenesis have been reported. The authors analyzed P-gp expression in relation to p53 and histopathologic features in gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty-one resected gastric carcinomas and mucosa distant from the tumor were assessed for P-gp expression by immunohistochemistry with C494 and JSB-1 antibodies. p53 expression was also immunohistochemically assessed by DO7 antibody in tumor samples. P-gp and p53 expression were semiquantitatively analyzed according to the percentage of stained cells. Histologic type, grade, vessel invasion, and stage were also studied.

RESULTS

Moderate or high P-gp expression was detected in gastric carcinoma in 29 cases (71%) and in gastric mucosa remote from the tumor in 36 cases (88%). This reduction in P-gp expression was observed in 22% of the carcinomas, all but 1 being p53 immunonegative tumors. Thus, 8 (42%) of the p53 immunonegative carcinomas showed a loss of P-gp expression compared with their distant gastric mucosa. All p53 immunopositive carcinomas coexpressed P-gp. No correlation between P-gp expression and histologic type, grade, vessel invasion, or stage was found.

CONCLUSIONS

P-gp expression in gastric carcinomas is frequent and coexpression with p53 is found. The analysis of P-gp expression in carcinomas and distant mucosa show that it is not regulated by p53, but a loss of P-gp detected in some of these carcinomas is mainly associated with a lack of p53 protein accumulation.

A dose-finding study of raltitrexed (tomudex) with cisplatin and epirubicin in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

The standard treatment for advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer in the UK is epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluoruracil by an indwelling central venous catheter (ECF), which has significant morbidity. Raltitrexed (tomudex), a specific inhibitor of thymidylate synthase with a long plasma terminal half-life (50-100 h) has activity in gastro-intestinal tract malignancy. To reduce the Hickman line-associated morbidity of ECF; we have conducted a dose-finding study of tomudex combined with epirubicin and cisplatin. Twenty-four patients (22 males, two female), median age 63 years (range 21-75), ECOG performance status < or =2 with histologically proven, unresectable or metastatic gastric (14 patients), gastro-oesophageal junction (nine patients) or oesophageal (one patient) adenocarcinoma received treatment with 3-weekly cisplatin 60 mg m(-2), epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) and tomudex at doses of 2 mg m(-2), 2.5 mg m(-2) or 3 mg m(-2) in successive cohorts. Six patients were treated per dose level with no intra-patient dose escalation. Dose escalation occurred after six patients had completed at least one cycle of chemotherapy at the previous dose level. After defining the maximum tolerated dose a further six patients were treated at the preceding dose level to assess toxicity at the proposed phase II dose. A total of 102 cycles (50% completed 6 cycles) were administered. The dose-limiting toxicities are neutropenia and diarrhoea occurring in 2/6 patients at the 3 mg m(-2) dose level. Of those patients evaluable for response, there were eight partial and one complete response (overall response rate 38%). The median survival was 9.9 months. ECT is an active regimen in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The recommended dose of tomudex for further study in combination with epirubicin and cisplatin is 2.5 mg m(-2).

Docetaxel (Taxotere)-cisplatin (TC): an effective drug combination in gastric carcinoma. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), and the European Institute of Oncology (EIO)

PURPOSE

A multi-centric trial was performed to explore the clinical activity, in terms of response and toxicity (primary objectives), duration of response and survival (secondary objectives), of docetaxel with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma, performance status < or = 1, normal hematological, hepatic and renal functions and not pretreated for advanced disease by chemotherapy received up to eight cycles of TC (docetaxel 85 mg/m2 dl, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 dl) q3w. Dose escalation to 100 mg/m2 was performed in five patients and was discontinued for excessive toxicity.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were accrued. A median of 5 cycles/patient was given. We observed 2 complete and 25 partial responses for an overall intent to treat response rate of 56% (95% CI: 41%-71%). Twelve patients had stable disease for > or = 9 weeks (3 cycles). The median time to progression and overall survival were 6.6 and 9 months, respectively. Grade > or = 3 toxicities were neutropenia 81%, anemia 32%, thrombocytopenia 4%, alopecia 36%, fatigue 9%, mucositis 9%, diarrhea 6%, nausea/vomiting 4%, neurologic 2%, and one anaphylaxis precluding treatment administration. We recorded nine episodes of non-fatal febrile neutropenia in eight patients, two of them with docetaxel at 100 mg/m2. There were no direct treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

TC is active in AGC with a high response rate in a multicentric trial. Despite its hematotoxicity, this regimen is well tolerated and can be recycled as originally planned in 78% of the cases. These results may serve as basis for further developments of docetaxel containing regimens in this disease.

Combined paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide for patients with previously untreated esophageal and gastroesophageal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (T), etoposide (E), and cisplatin (P) are each active in gastric carcinoma, either as single agents or as part of a multidrug regimen. To the authors' knowledge, the combination of these three agents in the treatment of patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal carcinoma has not been previously studied.

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the stomach, esophagus, or gastroesophageal (GE) junction received at least 2 cycles of TPE administered twice weekly for 3 weeks, with the cycle repeated every 28 days. Drug doses, administered over 3 hours on either Monday and Thursday or Tuesday and Friday, consisted of T 50 mg/m2/dose, P 15 mg/m2/dose, and E 40 mg/m2/dose. For patients with local disease only, subsequent therapy consisted of radiation with or without surgical resection.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with gastric (10) or gastroesophageal or GE junction (15) carcinoma were treated. Eighteen had locally advanced disease and 7 had liver metastases at presentation. Hematologic toxicity, namely, Grade 3 anemia and neutropenia, was experienced by all patients. The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range, 2-6). Three patients were not evaluable for response. All 22 evaluable patients responded; 3 were complete responders and 19 were partial responders. Eleven patients received radiation therapy with (6) or without (5) concomitant 5-fluorouracil, and 8 patients subsequently underwent surgical resection. Three of 8 patients had no tumor at surgery, 4 had minimal microscopic tumor at the primary site, and 3 had microscopic lymph node involvement. Twenty-three patients are alive, of whom 14 are without evidence of disease. Two patients with metastatic disease at presentation died at 9 and 29 months, respectively. The median survival was 12.5 months (range, 6 to 30+ months).

CONCLUSIONS

Multifractionated TPE chemotherapy is a highly active regimen in gastric and gastroesophageal carcinoma. It could be evaluated in Phase III trials against other active regimens for the treatment of patients with this disease. The introduction of 5-fluorouracil could also be an interesting direction to explore because of its primary role in the treatment of patients with gastric and esophageal carcinoma.

Long-term survival after epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil for gastric cancer: results of a randomized trial

We report the final results of a prospectively randomized study that compared the combination of epirubicin, cisplatin and protracted venous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) (ECF regimen) with the standard combination of 5-FU, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in previously untreated patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer. Between 1992 and 1995, 274 patients with adenocarcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma were randomized from eight oncology centres in the UK and analysed for response and survival. The overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval (CI), 37-55%) with ECF, and 21% (95% CI, 13-28%) with FAMTX (P = 0.00003). The median survival was 8.7 months with ECF and 6.1 months with FAMTX (P = 0.0005). The 2-year survival rates were 14% (95% CI, 8-20%) for the ECF arm, and 5% (95% CI, 2-10%) for the FAMTX arm (P = 0.03). Histologically complete surgical resection following chemotherapy was achieved in ten patients in the ECF arm (three pathological complete responses to chemotherapy) and three patients in the FAMTX arm (no pathological complete responses). The ECF regimen resulted in a response and survival advantage compared with FAMTX chemotherapy. The probability of long-term survival following surgical resection of residual disease is increased by this treatment. The high response rates seen with ECF support its use in the neoadjuvant setting.

Chemotherapy for operable gastric cancer: results of the Dutch randomised FAMTX trial. The Dutch Gastric Cancer Group (DGCG)

The aim of this trial was to investigate whether pre-operative chemotherapy leads to a 15% higher curative resectability rate in patients with operable gastric cancer. In this randomised trial, patients were allocated to receive either four courses of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and methotrexate (FAMTX) prior to surgery or to undergo surgery only. Patients younger than 75 years of age with a good physical and mental condition and a histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach without clinical or radiographic (computed tomography scan) evidence of distant metastases were eligible for this trial. Early gastric cancer or cardia carcinoma were excluded. The response to chemotherapy was evaluated after two and four courses. In case of progressive disease (PD) after two courses, patients were operated upon as soon as possible. Otherwise complete response (CR) partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), two more courses were scheduled. The standard surgical procedure was a limited lymphadenectomy (D1) with staging biopsy of the para-aortic lymph nodes. Between September 1993 and February 1996, 56 eligible and evaluable patients were entered: 27 were randomised to receive FAMTX before surgery and 29 to undergo surgery only. In the FAMTX + surgery treatment group, 15/27 (56%) had curative resections versus 18/29 (62%) in the surgery only arm. There was no difference in the frequency of TNM stages I + II in both treatment arms: 15/27 versus 15/29. Due to PD and/or toxicity, 12 patients (44%) could not complete the planned four courses of FAMTX. Response evaluation after chemotherapy was possible in 25 patients: 2 CR, 6 PR, 8 SD and 9 PD. The difference in curative resectability rate was 6.5% (95% confidence interval -32 to +19%) in favour of surgery only. Downstaging for stages I + II did not occur. PD was more often the reason for not completing the planned four courses than toxicity. More active regimens than FAMTX are required for future randomised trials.

Raltitrexed (Tomudex) in combination with platinum-based agents and/or anthracyclines: preliminary results of phase I clinical trials

Three ongoing, dose-escalation, phase I studies are evaluating the combination of raltitrexed with oxaliplatin or anthracyclines (with and without cisplatin). In study 1, patients with advanced solid tumours received 2.0-3.75 mg/m2 raltitrexed, followed 45 min later by 85-130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin (2-h infusion) every 3 weeks. In study 2, patients with advanced oesophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma received 2.0-3.0 mg/m2 raltitrexed with 50 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) epirubicin and 60 mg/m2 i.v. cisplatin every 3 weeks. In study 3, patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer received 2.5-3.5 mg/m2 raltitrexed followed by 30-60 mg/m2 i.v. doxorubicin every 3 weeks. In all studies, raltitrexed was given as a 15-min infusion. All the combinations evaluated were administered in convenient 3-weekly schedules and were generally well tolerated. Recommended doses for raltitrexed and oxaliplatin are the same in combination as for single-agent use, i.e. 3.0 mg/m2 raltitrexed and 130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. The recommended dose of raltitrexed in combination with cisplatin and epirubicin is 2.5 mg/m2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during co-administration of the full single-agent doses of raltitrexed and doxorubicin (3.0 mg/m2 and 60 mg/m2, respectively); dose escalation is continuing. Preliminary efficacy results were encouraging, particularly for the combination of raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in patients with mesothelioma and advanced colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from these phase I studies suggest that the combination of raltitrexed with platinum-based agents and/or anthracyclines may represent useful regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. Further studies are required to identify the most effective combinations of raltitrexed with both established and new anticancer agents.