Standardizing terminology and definitions of medication adherence and persistence in research employing electronic databases

Accurate Medication Adherence Measurement Using Administrative Data for Frequently Hospitalized Patients

Background: Pharmacy administrative claims data remain an accessible and efficient source to measure medication adherence for frequently hospitalized patient populations that are systematically excluded from the landmark drug trials. Published pharmacotherapy studies use medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) to calculate medication adherence and usually fail to incorporate hospitalization and prescription overlap/gap from claims data. To make the cacophony of adherence measures clearer, this study created a refined hospital-adjusted algorithm to capture pharmacotherapy adherence among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods: The United States Renal Data System (USRDS) registry of ESRD was used to determine prescription-filling patterns of those receiving new prescriptions for oral P2Y12 inhibitors (P2Y12-I) between 2011 and 2015. P2Y12-I-naïve patients were followed until death, kidney transplantation, discontinuing medications, or loss to follow-up. After flagging/censoring key variables, the algorithm adjusted for hospital length of stay (LOS) and medication overlap. Hospital-adjusted medication adherence (HA-PDC) was calculated and compared with traditional MPR and PDC methods. Analyses were performed with SAS software. Results: Hospitalization occurred for 78% of the cohort (N = 46 514). The median LOS was 12 (interquartile range [IQR] = 2-34) days. MPR and PDC were 61% (IQR = 29%-94%) and 59% (IQR = 31%-93%), respectively. After applying adjustments for overlapping coverage days and hospital stays independently, HA-PDC adherence values changed in 41% and 52.7% of the cohort, respectively. When adjustments for overlap and hospital stay were made concurrently, HA-PDC adherence values changed in 68% of the cohort by 5.8% (HA-PDC median = 0.68, IQR = 0.31-0.93). HA-PDC declined over time (3M-6M-9M-12M). Nearly 48% of the cohort had a ≥30 days refill gap in the first 3 months, and this increased over time (P < .0001). Conclusions: Refill gaps should be investigated carefully to capture accurate pharmacotherapy adherence. HA-PDC measures increased adherence substantially when adjustments for hospital stay and medication refill overlaps are made. Furthermore, if hospitalizations were ignored for medications that are included in Medicare quality measures, such as Medicare STAR program, the apparent reduction in adherence might be associated with lower quality and health plan reimbursement.

Intensification of Diabetes Medications at Hospital Discharge and Clinical Outcomes in Older Adults in the Veterans Administration Health System

IMPORTANCE

Transient elevations of blood glucose levels are common in hospitalized older adults with diabetes and may lead clinicians to discharge patients with more intensive diabetes medications than they were using before hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate outcomes associated with intensification of outpatient diabetes medications at discharge.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study assessed patients 65 years and older with diabetes not taking insulin who were hospitalized in the Veterans Health Administration Health System between January 1, 2011, and September 28, 2016, for common medical conditions. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021.

EXPOSURE

Discharge with intensified diabetes medications, defined as filling a prescription at hospital discharge for a new or higher-dose medication than was being used before hospitalization. Propensity scores were used to construct a matched cohort of patients who did and did not receive diabetes medication intensifications.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Coprimary outcomes of severe hypoglycemia and severe hyperglycemia were assessed at 30 and 365 days using competing risk regressions. Secondary outcomes included all-cause readmissions, mortality, change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level, and persistent use of intensified medications at 1 year after discharge.

RESULTS

The propensity-matched cohort included 5296 older adults with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 73.7 [7.7] years; 5212 [98.4%] male; and 867 [16.4%] Black, 47 [0.9%] Hispanic, 4138 [78.1%] White), equally split between those who did and did not receive diabetes medication intensifications at hospital discharge. Within 30 days, patients who received medication intensifications had a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia (hazard ratio [HR], 2.17; 95% CI, 1.10-4.28), no difference in risk of severe hyperglycemia (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.33-3.08), and a lower risk of death (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.92). At 1 year, no differences were found in the risk of severe hypoglycemia events, severe hyperglycemia events, or death and no difference in change in HbA1c level was found among those who did vs did not receive intensifications (mean postdischarge HbA1c, 7.72% vs 7.70%; difference-in-differences, 0.02%; 95% CI, -0.12% to 0.16%). At 1 year, 48.0% (591 of 1231) of new oral diabetes medications and 38.5% (548 of 1423) of new insulin prescriptions filled at discharge were no longer being filled.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this national cohort study, among older adults hospitalized for common medical conditions, discharge with intensified diabetes medications was associated with an increased short-term risk of severe hypoglycemia events but was not associated with reduced severe hyperglycemia events or improve HbA1c control. These findings indicate that short-term hospitalization may not be an effective time to intervene in long-term diabetes management.

Real-world Evidence for Adherence and Persistence with Atorvastatin Therapy

Atorvastatin, which has been approved by regulatory agencies for primary- and secondary-prevention patients with dyslipidemia, has historically been the most commonly prescribed statin and is now widely available in generic formulations. Despite widespread statin usage, many patients fail to attain recommended (LDL-C) targets. While several factors impact the successful treatment of dyslipidemia, suboptimal patient adherence is a major limiting factor to medication effectiveness. In this narrative review we sought to investigate patient adherence and persistence with atorvastatin in a real-world setting and to identify barriers to LDL-C goal attainment and therapy outcomes beyond the realm of clinical trials. Moreover, in light of growing generic usage, we carried out targeted literature searches to investigate the impact of generic atorvastatin availability on patient adherence/persistence, and on lipid and efficacy outcomes, compared with branded formulations. Unsurprisingly, real-world data suggest that patient adherence/persistence to atorvastatin is suboptimal, but few studies have attempted to address factors impacting adherence. Data from studies comparing adherence/persistence in patients prescribed branded or generic atorvastatin are limited and show no clear evidence that initiation of a specific preparation of atorvastatin impacts adherence/persistence. Furthermore, results from studies comparing adherence/persistence of patients who switched from the branded to the generic drug are conflicting, although they do suggest that switching may negatively impact adherence over the long term. Additional real-world studies are clearly required to understand potential differences in adherence and persistence between patients initiating treatment with branded versus generic atorvastatin and, moreover, the factors that influence adherence. Targeted education initiatives and additional research are needed to understand and improve patient adherence in a real-world setting.

Associations of statin adherence and lipid targets with adverse outcomes in myocardial infarction survivors: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To examine associations between statin adherence and lipid target achievement in myocardial infarction (MI) survivors, and their associations with mortality and recurrent MIs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using linked clinical records within the National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) Data Safe Haven.

SETTING

Routine clinical practice in the NHS GGC area between January 2009 and July 2017.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients ≥18 years who experienced a non-fatal MI hospital admission (ICD10: I21, I22) between January 2009 and July 2014 (n=11 031), followed up from the date of MI admission until July 2017 or death, whichever occurred first.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Statin adherence was estimated using encashed prescriptions and lipid results from routine biochemistry data. Primary lipid and statin adherence targets were LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L and adherence ≥50%, and were related to all-cause death, deaths due to cardiovascular disease (CVD) (ICD10: I00-I99 as the underlying cause), and recurrent MI in unadjusted models and models adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation and year of MI.

RESULTS

Over 4.5 years follow-up, 76% achieved LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L, and 84.5% had average adherence ≥50%. Patients with adherence <50% had an increased risk of not meeting LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L, in adjusted models (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.31, p<0.0001). In univariable models, not meeting LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.39, p<0.0001) and CVD mortality (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.51, p=0.0013). Adherence <50% was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.74, p<0.0001) and CVD mortality (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.88, p<0.0001). Adjustment for confounders did not abrogate these associations. Neither exposure was associated with recurrent MIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-achievement of lipid and adherence targets are associated with increased risks of all-cause and CVD mortality. Further work is required to optimise their use to improve outcomes in clinical practice.

Effect of Dosing Interval on Compliance of Osteoporosis Patients on Bisphosphonate Therapy: Observational Study Using Nationwide Insurance Claims Data

Only a few studies are available on the effect of the dosing interval of bisphosphonate on drug compliance. We analyzed the data of patients who were newly prescribed bisphosphonate using a national insurance claims database. Drug compliance was assessed by calculating medication possession ratio (MPR) over a minimum of a 1-year follow-up. This analysis included 281,996 new bisphosphonate users with a mean age of 68.9 years (92% women). The patients were divided into daily, weekly, monthly, 3-monthly, and switch groups (who changed the drug to other dosing intervals). The average MPR was the highest in the switch group (66%), and the longer the dosing interval, the higher the compliance (3-monthly, 56% vs. daily, 37%). “Non-compliant” was defined as an MPR under 80%. Various factors which were possibly associated with “non-compliant” MPR were investigated using multiple regression analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that male patients were more likely to be non-compliant with pharmacotherapy than female patients, with as odds ratio of 1.389. Younger patients had a significantly lower likelihood of being non-compliant than older patients for age 60–69 vs. age 80+. Long dosing intervals were recommended to improve compliance and special attention was given to older and male patients.

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of Medication Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale-Revised in Hypertension

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cultural adaptation of Medication Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale-Revised is lacking in the Arabs population. This study tested the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Medication Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale-Revised.

METHODS

The study included 199 Omani hypertensive patients. The scale was translated into Arabic. Reliability and construct and convergent validity were examined.

RESULTS

Scale's reliability was α = .93. One factor was identified and explained about 57.5% of the variance. A new modified model with covariance suggested a better model fit. A significant relationship between the scale and Morisky medication adherence scale was found (r = .53, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Arabic version scale is reliable, valid, and could be applied in the clinical settings to improve medication adherence.

Strategies for measuring prescription medication switching with pharmacy claims data: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review will aim to compare strategies for measuring prescription medication switching with pharmacy claims data, with a focus on psychotropic vs non-psychotropic medications.

INTRODUCTION

Medication switching (ie, the replacement of one medication for another) is common and occurs due to several factors (such as adverse effects to a specific medication). In pharmacoepidemiology studies that use pharmacy claims data, it is important to identify and account for switches; however, due to data limitations and lack of a methodological standard, this can be challenging. The aim of this scoping review is to describe how studies have previously measured medication switching with pharmacy claims data in order to create a repository of common strategies and highlight areas for future research.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will include studies that have used pharmacy claims data to measure medication switching as their primary independent or dependent variable. Studies conducted at the individual level (ie, not ecological), published between January 1, 1980, and October 31, 2020, and investigating orally administered, non-anti-infective medications will be considered. No age, population, or context restrictions are specified as inclusion criteria.

METHODS

JBI methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews were used for this protocol. MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Central (Cochrane Library), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Google Scholar will be searched with the assistance of a health sciences research librarian. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. Strategies for measuring medication switching will be narratively described and summarized overall and by broad medication class.

Objective medication adherence and persistence in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is critical for the realization of pharmacotherapy benefits and reduced healthcare expenditure. Studies have shown up to 60% of people with Multiple sclerosis (MS) experience suboptimal medication adherence, which is associated with poorer health outcomes and subsequent discontinuation. The current systematic review reported on objectively measured adherence and discontinuation rates for self-administered oral and injectable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). OBJECTIVES: To identify whether, in people with MS, the introduction of oral DMTs has improved medication adherence when compared with injectable DMTs. The secondary aim was to report synthesized objectively measured medication adherence and persistence rates for both oral and injectable DMTs in MS across varying study durations. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted through PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO. Inclusion criteria were limited to English, peer-reviewed, objective, self-administered DMT articles, published between July 1993 to December 2019. Publications reporting combined intravenous and self-administered DMT data, or that did not account for DMT switching in discontinuation rates, were excluded. Data were synthesized into observation lengths ranging from less than 8 months to greater than 36 months. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were undertaken on both oral and injectable 12-month adherence and discontinuation data. RESULTS: In total, 61 articles were included; 46 articles examined adherence and 26 examined discontinuation. Twelve-month adherence ranged between 53.0% to 89.2% for oral (N = 7) and 47.0% to 77.4% for injectable DMTs (N = 7). Results from the meta-analysis and meta-regression show significantly higher pooled mean medication possession ratio (MPR) adherence for oral DMTs (91.0%) when compared to injectable DMTs (77.0%) over 12 months (β = -0.146; 95% CI: -0.263 to -0.029). Results indicate major asymmetry across studies (LFK index: -5.18), proposing the presence of significant publication bias. Mean discontinuation over 12 months was between 10.5% to 33.3% for oral (N = 7) and 15.2% to 50.8% for injectable DMTs (N = 10), with meta-analysis results indicating the presence of significant heterogeneity (I2 Injectable: 99.5%; I2 Oral: 93.1%) between studies included in each subgroup. However, no appreciable difference in mean discontinuation rates across groups (Injectable: 27%; 95% Cl: 19.0%-34.0%; Oral: 24%; 95% CI: 17.0%-31.0%) was found. CONCLUSIONS: Medication adherence for oral DMTs suggests a significant improvement compared to adherence for injectable DMTs. No significant difference in discontinuation rates between oral and injectable DMTs was found. Oral DMT adherence and persistence studies are limited, given their relatively recent introduction. Suboptimal medication adherence and discontinuation issues remain present for both oral and injectable DMTs. Future studies would benefit from improved consistency in methodology, such as comparable adherence and persistence definitions. DISCLOSURES: The authors did not receive any funding for this study. Mardan and Hussain have nothing to disclose. Grech reports grants from Merck Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. Allan reports grants received from Merck Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. Allan holds advisory board and consulting positions with Merck and advisory board positions for Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis, for which Monash Institute of Neurological Diseases receives consulting fees.

Comparison of measures of medication adherence from pharmacy dispensing and insurer claims data

OBJECTIVE

Medication nonadherence is linked to worsened clinical outcomes and increased costs. Existing system-level adherence interventions rely on insurer claims for patient identification and outcome measurement, yet suffer from incomplete capture and lags in data acquisition. Data from pharmacies regarding prescription filling, captured in retail dispensing, may be more efficient.

DATA SOURCES

Pharmacy fill and insurer claims data.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared adherence measured using pharmacy fill data to adherence using insurer claims data, expressed as proportion of days covered (PDC) over 12 months. Agreement was evaluated using correlation/validation metrics. We also explored the relationship between adherence in both sources and disease control using prediction modeling.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Large pragmatic trial of cardiometabolic disease in an integrated delivery network.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among 1113 patients, adherence was higher in pharmacy fill (mean = 50.0%) versus claims data (mean = 47.4%), although they had moderately high correlation (R = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.53-0.61) with most patients (86.9%) being similarly classified as adherent or nonadherent. Sensitivity and specificity of pharmacy fill versus claims data were high (0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.91 and 0.80, 95% CI: 0.75-0.85). Pharmacy fill-based PDC predicted better disease control slightly more than claims-based PDC, although the difference was nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy fill data may be an alternative to insurer claims for adherence measurement.

The use of medication adherence guidelines in medication taking behaviour research

Medication nonadherence continues to be a serious issue in a range of long-term medical conditions and has been studied extensively over the past few decades. However, despite the plethora of research studies on medication adherence, poor methodological rigour in many studies has contributed to limited generalisability of the positive findings, limited impact on patients' medication adherence, and inability to compare between studies. This paper focuses on current guidelines designed specifically for research on medication adherence. It discusses key elements to consider during study design, selection of adherence measurements, and reporting on medication adherence research, to ensure a higher quality of research in medication adherence. Overall, there appears to be variations in adherence terminology reported in the literature despite improvements in defining medication taking behaviour and the availability of taxonomies. In addition, limited guidance exists on how best to measure adherence. Recommendations are provided on appropriate adherence measures for the adherence behaviour being investigated, including careful consideration of adherence concepts, validity of adherence instruments, appropriate instrument selection, definition of nonadherence threshold, and how to report medication adherence. Improving adherence research requires greater clarity and standardisation of descriptions of nonadherence behaviour, increased methodological rigour in study designs, better selection of adherence measurements, and comprehensive reporting.

Cardiovascular Safety of Hydroxychloroquine in US Veterans With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) may prolong the QT interval, a risk factor for torsade de pointes, a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia. This study was undertaken to examine the cardiovascular safety of HCQ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We conducted an active comparator safety study of HCQ in a propensity score-matched cohort of 8,852 US veterans newly diagnosed as having RA between October 1, 2001 and December 31, 2017. Patients were started on HCQ (n = 4,426) or another nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD; n = 4,426) after RA diagnosis, up to December 31, 2018, and followed up for 12 months after therapy initiation, up to December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean ± SD age of 64 ± 12 years, 14% were women, and 28% were African American. The treatment groups were balanced with regard to 87 baseline characteristics. There were 3 long QT syndrome events (0.03%), 2 of which occurred in patients receiving HCQ. Of the 56 arrhythmia-related hospitalizations (0.63%), 30 occurred in patients in the HCQ group (hazard ratio [HR] associated with HCQ 1.16 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.68-1.95]). All-cause mortality occurred in 144 (3.25%) and 136 (3.07%) of the patients in the HCQ and non-HCQ groups, respectively (HR associated with HCQ 1.06 [95% CI, 0.84-1.34]). During the first 30 days of follow-up, there were no long QT syndrome events, 2 arrhythmia-related hospitalizations (none in the HCQ group), and 13 deaths (6 in the HCQ group).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the incidence of long QT syndrome and arrhythmia-related hospitalization is low in patients with RA during the first year after the initiation of HCQ or another nonbiologic DMARD. We found no evidence that HCQ therapy is associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events or death.

Treatment patterns following initiation of generic glatiramer acetate among patients with multiple sclerosis from two large real-world databases in the United States

INTRODUCTION

To better understand treatment patterns in US patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) initiating generic glatiramer acetate (GA), this study examined adherence, discontinuation and switching patterns from generic follow-on glatiramer acetate (FOGA) therapy in real-world patient cohorts.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses utilized data from two large US databases (administrative claims and linked electronic medical records). Eligible adult MS patients had ≥1 pharmacy claim for FOGA during the identification period; the first FOGA claim was the index date. All analyses were descriptive; proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated as a measure of adherence to FOGA during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

The first cohort consisted of 95 patients, with 93.6% having a branded GA claim for Copaxone during the baseline period. Half these patients (48.4%) had high adherence to FOGA therapy (PDC: 0.8-1.0). Fifty-five patients (57.9%) initially discontinued FOGA with a mean persistence of 112 days. Of those who discontinued, 7.3% had no subsequent disease-modifying therapy (DMT), 30.9% restarted FOGA and 61.8% did not restart FOGA. The second cohort consisted of 1957 patients, with 63.8% having a branded GA claim for Copaxone during the baseline period and 33.5% were treatment naïve. The majority of patients (61.9%) had high adherence to FOGA therapy. A total of 1597 patients (81.6%) initially discontinued FOGA with a mean persistence of 93 days. Of those who discontinued, 55.8% switched to another DMT, 16.7% restarted FOGA and 37.5% had no subsequent DMT.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to FOGA therapy was reasonably high across cohorts; however, most patients discontinued their initial FOGA within four months of the index date and most switches from FOGA were to branded GA products.

Survival benefit of coronary revascularization after myocardial perfusion SPECT: The role of ischemia

BACKGROUND

Survival benefit of revascularization over medical therapy (MT) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is uncertain. We evaluated the prognostic effects of revascularization in patients with SIHD undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI).

METHODS

Of 47,894 patients, 7973 had ischemia ≥ 5% of the left ventricle. Of these, 1837 underwent early revascularization (≤ 60 days after SPECT-MPI). The rest were MT subgroup. Follow-up period was 4.04 ± 1.86 years. Statin therapy intensity and adherence were assessed. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, death + non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and MACE [major adverse cardiac event = death + MI + late revascularization (> 60 days after SPECT-MPI)].

RESULTS

Among patients with moderate-severe ischemia (≥ 10%), death rate was lower in early revascularization compared to MT subgroup (1.42%/year vs 3.12%/year, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.90, P = .008). Death + MI and MACE rates were also lower, adjusted HR 0.69 (0.55-0.88, P = .003) and 0.80 (0.69-0.92, P = .003). Revascularization was beneficial in optimal statin therapy subgroup (death rate 1.04%/year vs 2.36%/year, adjusted HR 0.51 (0.30-0.86, P = .012). In mild ischemia (5%-9%), revascularization did not improve survival or MI-free survival, and was associated with higher MACE rate (8.86%/year vs 7.67%/year, adjusted HR 1.30 (1.12-1.52, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to MT, revascularization was associated with reduced risk of death, death + MI, and MACE in patients with moderate-severe ischemia, incremental over optimal statin therapy. In mild ischemia, revascularization was associated with higher risk of MACE, driven by late revascularization, with no impact on death and death + MI.

Smart About Meds (SAM): a pilot randomized controlled trial of a mobile application to improve medication adherence following hospital discharge

Objective

The objectives of this pilot study were (1) to assess the feasibility of a larger evaluation of Smart About Meds (SAM), a patient-centered medication management mobile application, and (2) to evaluate SAM’s potential to improve outcomes of interest, including adherence to medication changes made at hospital discharge and the occurrence of adverse events.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial among patients discharged from internal medicine units of an academic health center between June 2019 and March 2020. Block randomization was used to randomize patients to intervention (received access to SAM at discharge) or control (received usual care). Patients were followed for 30 days post-discharge, during which app use was recorded. Pharmacy claims data were used to measure adherence to medication changes made at discharge, and physician billing data were used to identify emergency department visits and hospital readmissions during follow-up.

Results

Forty-nine patients were eligible for inclusion in the study at hospital discharge (23 intervention, 26 control). In the 30 days of post-discharge, 15 (65.2%) intervention patients used the SAM app. During this period, intervention patients adhered to a larger proportion of medication changes (83.7%) than control patients (77.8%), including newly prescribed medications (72.7% vs 61.7%) and dose changes (90.9% vs 81.8%). A smaller proportion of intervention patients (8.7%) were readmitted to hospital during follow-up than control patients (15.4%).

Conclusion

The high uptake of SAM among intervention patients supports the feasibility of a larger trial. Results also suggest that SAM has the potential to enhance adherence to medication changes and reduce the risk of downstream adverse events. This hypothesis needs to be tested in a larger trial.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT04676165.

Impact of implementing electronic prior authorization on medication filling in an electronic health record system in a large healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

Medications frequently require prior authorization from payers before filling is authorized. Obtaining prior authorization can create delays in filling prescriptions and ultimately reduce patient adherence to medication. Electronic prior authorization (ePA), embedded in the electronic health record (EHR), could remove some barriers but has not been rigorously evaluated. We sought to evaluate the impact of implementing an ePA system on prescription filling.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ePA was implemented in 2 phases in September and November 2018 in a large US healthcare system. This staggered implementation enabled the later-implementing sites to be controls. Using EHR data from all prescriptions written and linked information on whether prescriptions were filled at pharmacies, we 1:1 matched ePA prescriptions with non-ePA prescriptions for the same insurance plan, medication, and site, before and after ePA implementation, to evaluate primary adherence, or the proportion of prescriptions filled within 30 days, using generalized estimating equations. We also conducted concurrent analyses across sites during the peri-implementation period (Sept-Oct 2018).

RESULTS

Of 74 546 eligible ePA prescriptions, 38 851 were matched with preimplementation controls. In total, 24 930 (64.2%) ePA prescriptions were filled compared with 26 731 (68.8%) control prescriptions (Adjusted Relative Risk [aRR]: 0.92, 95%CI: 0.91-0.93). Concurrent analyses revealed similar findings (64.7% for ePA vs 62.3% control prescriptions, aRR: 1.03, 95%CI: 0.98-1.09).

DISCUSSION

Challenges with implementation, such as misfiring and insurance fragmentation, could have undermined its effectiveness, providing implications for other health informatics interventions deployed in outpatient care.

CONCLUSION

Despite increasing interest in implementing ePA to improve prescription filling, adoption did not change medication adherence.

Improving statin treatment strategies to reduce LDL-cholesterol: factors associated with targets' attainment in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

This cross-sectional study aimed to identify actionable factors to improve LDL-cholesterol target achievement and overcome underuse of lipid-lowering treatments in high- or very-high-cardiovascular risk patients.

METHODS

We evaluated healthcare records of 934,332 subjects from North-Italy, including subjects with available lipid profile and being on statin treatments up to December 2018. A 6-month-period defined adherence with proportion-of-days-covered ≥ 80%. Treatment was classified as high-intensity-statin (HIS) + ezetimibe, HIS-alone, non-HIS (NHIS) + ezetimibe or NHIS alone.

RESULTS

We included 27,374 subjects without and 10,459 with diabetes. Among these, 30% and 36% were on secondary prevention, respectively. Adherence was high (78-100%) and increased with treatment intensity and in secondary prevention. Treatment intensity increased in secondary prevention, but only 42% were on HIS. 2019-guidelines LDL-cholesterol targets were achieved in few patients and more often among those with diabetes (7.4% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Patients in secondary prevention had mean LDL-cholesterol levels aligned slightly above 70 mg/dl (range between 68 and 73 mg/dl and between 73 and 85 mg/dl in patients with and without diabetes, respectively). Moreover, the differences in mean LDL-cholesterol levels observed across patients using treatments with well-stablished different LDL-lowering effect were null or much smaller than expected (HIS vs. NHIS from - 3 to - 11%, p < 0.001, HIS + ezetimibe vs. HIS-from - 4 to + 5% n.s.). These findings, given the observational design of the study, might suggest that a "treat to absolute LDL-cholesterol levels" approach (e.g., targeting LDLc of 70 mg/dl) was mainly used by physicians rather than an approach to also achieve the recommended 50% reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels. Our analyses suggested that female sex, younger age, higher HDL-c, and elevated triglycerides are those factors delaying prescription of statin treatments, both in patients with and without diabetes and in those on secondary prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients on statin treatment and high adherence, only a small proportion of patients achieved LDL-cholesterol targets. Late initiation of high-intensity treatments, particularly among those with misperceived low-risk (e.g., female subjects or those with high HDL-cholesterol), appears as pivotal factors needing to be modified to improve CVD prevention.

Association Between Patient-Clinician Relationships and Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications Among Black Adults: An Observational Study Design

Background We assessed the associations between patient-clinician relationships (communication and involvement in shared decision-making [SDM]) and adherence to antihypertensive medications. Methods and Results The 2010 to 2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data were analyzed. A retrospective cohort study design was used to create a cohort of prevalent and new users of antihypertensive medications. We defined constructs of patient-clinician communication and involvement in SDM from patient responses to the standard questionnaires about satisfaction and access to care during the first year of surveys. Verified self-reported medication refill information collected during the second year of surveys was used to calculate medication refill adherence; adherence was defined as medication refill adherence ≥80%. Survey-weighted multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to measure the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for the association between both patient-clinician constructs and adherence. Our analysis involved 2571 Black adult patients with hypertension (mean age of 58 years; SD, 14 years) who were either persistent (n=1788) or new users (n=783) of antihypertensive medications. Forty-five percent (n=1145) and 43% (n=1016) of the sample reported having high levels of communication and involvement in SDM, respectively. High, versus low, patient-clinician communication (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and involvement in SDM (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.61) were both associated with adherence to antihypertensives after adjusting for multiple covariates. These associations persisted among a subgroup of new users of antihypertensive medications. Conclusions Patient-clinician communication and involvement in SDM are important predictors of optimal adherence to antihypertensive medication and should be targeted for improving adherence among Black adults with hypertension.

Compared to commercially insured patients, Medicare advantage patients adopt newer diabetes drugs more slowly and adhere to them less

AIMS

To compare rates of use and adherence for newer versus older second-line diabetes drug classes in commercially insured, Medicare Advantage and dual-eligible (covered by both Medicare and Medicaid) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Longitudinal cohort study using insurance claims data from 1/1/2012 to 12/31/2016 to identify patients with a first prescription, after metformin, of a second-line diabetes drug (eg sulphonylurea, DPP-4 inhibitor, thiazolidinedione, SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist) and to estimate their adherence to that drug class. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine the association between insurance type and use of each drug class, and between insurance type and adherence to each drug class.

RESULTS

The study population included 96,663 patients. Trends in drug use differed by insurance type. For example, sulphonylurea use declined among the commercially insured (from 46% to 39%, p < .001) but not among Medicare Advantage or dual-eligible patients. Patterns of adherence also differed between insurance groups. For example, compared to commercial insurance, Medicare Advantage was associated with higher adherence to sulphonylurea (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.21-1.43)) but lower adherence to SGLT-2 inhibitors (OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.33-0.56)).

CONCLUSIONS

This study finds differences in utilization and adherence for diabetes drugs across insurance types. Older medications such as sulphonylureas appear to be more used and better adhered to among Medicare Advantage recipients, while the opposite is true for newer medication classes. These findings suggest a need to personalize selection of diabetes drugs according to insurance status, particularly when adherence needs optimization.

Impact of financial medication assistance on medication adherence: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of financial medication assistance (FMA), including patient assistance programs, coupons/copayment cards, vouchers, discount cards, and programs/pharmacy services that help patients apply for such programs, has increased. The impact of FMA on medication adherence and persistence has not been synthesized. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to review published studies evaluating the impact of FMA on the three phases of medication adherence (initiation [or primary adherence], implementation [or secondary adherence], and discontinuation) and persistence. Among these studies, the secondary objective was to report the impact of FMA on patient out-of-pocket costs and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE and Web of Science. RESULTS: Of 656 articles identified, eight studies met all inclusion criteria. Seven studies examined FMA for medications treating cardiovascular diseases, while one study assessed FMA for cancer medications. Among included studies, FMA had a positive impact on medication adherence or persistence, and most measured this impact over one year or less. Of the three phases of medication adherence, implementation (5 of 8) was most commonly reported, followed by discontinuation (3 of 8), and then initiation (1 of 8). Regarding implementation, users of FMA had a higher mean medication possession ratio (MPR) than nonusers, ranging from 7 to 18 percentage points higher. The percentage of patients who discontinued medication was 7 percentage points lower in users of FMA versus nonusers for cardiovascular disease states. In one cancer study, FMA had a larger impact on initiation than discontinuation, ie, compared to nonusers, users of FMA were less likely to abandon an initial prescription (risk ratio= 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-0.18), and this effect was larger than the decreased likelihood of discontinuing the medication (hazard ratio = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.88). In 3 of 8 studies reporting on medication persistence, FMA increased the odds of medication persistence for one year ranged from 11% to 47%, depending on the study. In addition to adherence, half of the studies reported on FMA impacts on patient out-of-pocket costs and 3 of 8 studies reported on clinical outcomes. Impacts on patient out-of-pocket costs were mixed; two studies reported that out-of-pocket costs were higher for users of a coupon or a voucher versus nonusers, one study reported the opposite, and one study reported null effects. Impacts on clinical outcomes were either positive or null. CONCLUSIONS: We found that FMA has positive impacts on all phases of medication adherence as well as medication persistence over one year. Future studies should assess whether FMA has differential impacts based on phase of medication adherence and report on its longer-term (ie, beyond one year) impacts on medication adherence. DISCLOSURES: This work was sponsored by a grant from Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). PhRMA had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Hung reports past employment by Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and CVS Health and a grant from PhRMA outside of the submitted work. Zullig reports research funding from Proteus Digital Health and the PhRMA Foundation. consulting fees from Novartis. Reed reports receiving research support from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Janssen Research & Development, Monteris, PhRMA Foundation, and TESARO and consulting fees from Sanofi/Regeneron, NovoNordisk, SVC Systems, and Minomic International, Inc. Bosworth reports research grants from the PhRMA Foundation, Proteus Digital Health, Otsuka, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Improved Patient Outcomes, Boehinger Ingelheim, NIH, and VA, as well as consulting fees from Sanofi, Novartis, Otsuka, Abbott, Xcenda, Preventric Diagnostics, and the Medicines Company. The other authors have nothing to report. This work was presented as a poster presentation at the ESPACOMP Annual Meeting in November 2020.

Characteristics of Treated Asthmatics Experiencing Exacerbations in a US Database: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Rationale

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) recommend a stepwise approach to asthma management, with the goals of maintaining asthma control and reducing exacerbations. Although asthma treatments reduce the frequency of exacerbations, they still occur. We aimed to characterize the treated United States of America (US) adult asthma population, including those experiencing exacerbations, in terms of socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU).

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort of asthma patients aged ≥18 years on 01 January 2014 with ≥1 ICD-9 asthma code (493.xx) enrolled in a US healthcare claims database during 2013–2014. Patients who had ≥2 asthma medication dispensings during 2013 (baseline), including ≥1 in the 90-day period before index date, were classified according to NHLBI step. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer diagnoses were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and HRU were described during baseline. Exacerbations and HRU were described during 2014 (follow-up period).

Results

In total, 72,156 patients were included; 10,590 (14.7%) had ≥1 exacerbation during follow-up. Approximately 44% of patients were classified as NHLBI Steps 1–2, 41% as Steps 3–4, and 11% as Steps 5–6. Exacerbation frequency increased with step (Steps 1, 2, and 3: 12–14%; Steps 4, 5, and 6: 16–26%). Compared with the overall population during baseline, patients with an exacerbation had similar demographics, but differences were observed for comorbid allergic rhinitis (46.4% vs 40.1%, respectively), blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL (45.5% vs 39.6%, respectively), and asthma-related healthcare encounters (62.9% vs 52.4%, respectively). Overall, asthma-related HRU during follow-up increased with NHLBI step.

Conclusion

Exacerbations were observed among patients classified at each NHLBI step and were more frequent with increasing step. Exacerbations and asthma-related HRU highlight the continued unmet need in the treated US asthma population.

Factors Associated With Adherence to Osteoporosis Medications Among Male Veterans

Risk factors for nonadherence to osteoporosis medication have been well described for cohorts of women with osteoporosis, but little is known about predictors or mediators of nonadherence in men. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national cohort of male veterans to explore factors associated with nonadherence to osteoporosis medications. We included veterans with a prescription for an oral bisphosphonate or calcitonin between 2000 and 2010. We identified demographic, comorbid, and fracture-related risk factors by their International Classification of Diseases-9 (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate their association with adherence. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) over 5 years, starting at the time of their first prescription during the study period and censoring at death or end of study period. Of 135,306 men identified with at least one prescription for an osteoporosis medication during the study period, 90,406 (67%) were nonadherent (MPR < 0.80). The median duration of therapy was 3.2 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.7-5.0). In the fully adjusted model, the odds of adherence were lower in those aged <65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.89), with no copay (OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.76-0.80), dementia (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.83-0.91), anxiety/depression (OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.90-0.95), tobacco use (OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.89-0.94), alcohol abuse (OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.89-0.94), rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97), and on androgen deprivation therapy (OR = 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.95). The odds of adherence were higher in whites (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.11-1.17), with a prior screening colonoscopy (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 1.09-1.14), on alendronate versus other agents (OR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.55-1.67), with a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.12-1.17), on glucocorticoids (OR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.02-1.14), and with recent fracture (OR = 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10). In conclusion, adherence to oral bisphosphonates/calcitonin is poor, with particular subgroups at greatest risk. These findings may help tailor approaches for supporting adherence in men prescribed osteoporosis medications. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

An introduction to network analysis for studies of medication use

BACKGROUND

Network Analysis (NA) is a method that has been used in various disciplines such as Social sciences and Ecology for decades. So far, NA has not been used extensively in studies of medication use. Only a handful of papers have used NA in Drug Prescription Networks (DPN). We provide an introduction to NA terminology alongside a guide to creating and extracting results from the medication networks.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce the readers to NA as a tool to study medication use by demonstrating how to apply different NA measures on 3 generated medication networks.

METHODS

We used the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD) to create a network that describes the co-medication in elderly persons in Norway on January 1, 2013. We used the Norwegian Electronic Prescription Support System (FEST) to create another network of severe drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Lastly, we created a network combining the two networks to show the actual use of drugs with severe DDIs. We used these networks to elucidate how to apply and interpret different network measures in medication networks.

RESULTS

Interactive network graphs are made available online, Stata and R syntaxes are provided. Various useful network measures for medication networks were applied such as network topological features, modularity analysis and centrality measures. Edge lists data used to generate the networks are openly available for readers in an open data repository to explore and use.

CONCLUSION

We believe that NA can be a useful tool in medication use studies. We have provided information and hopefully inspiration for other researchers to use NA in their own projects. While network analyses are useful for exploring and discovering structures in medication use studies, it also has limitations. It can be challenging to interpret and it is not suitable for hypothesis testing.

Association between hyperkalemia, RAASi non-adherence and outcomes in chronic kidney disease

Background

Hyperkalemia is relatively frequent in CKD patients treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors (RAASi).

Aim

The aim of the present study was to estimate the increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality due to sub-optimal adherence to RAASi in CKD patients with hyperkalemia.

Methods

An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted, based on administrative and laboratory databases of five Local Health Units. Adult patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of CKD, who were prescribed RAASi between January 2010 and December 2017, were included. We evaluated the appearance of documented episodes of hyperkalemia, RAASi therapy adherence and the effects of these two variables on cardiovascular events, death and dialysis inception for study patients.

Results

Of the 9241 selected patients, 4451 met all the criteria for study inclusion. Among them, 1071 had at least one documented episode of hyperkalemia, while 3380 did not. After propensity score matching based on several variables we obtained 2 groups of patients. The appearance of hyperkalemia caused treatment discontinuation in 21.8% of patients previously on RAASi therapy, and sub-optimal adherence (proportion of days covered  < 80%) in 33.6% of them. Non-adherence to RAASi therapy among hyperkalemia patients was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, confidence interval [CI] 1.02–2.08; p < 0.05). Moreover, in non-adherent hyperkalemia patients, the risk of death increased by 126% (HR 2.26, CI 1.62–3.15; p < 0.001) compared with adherent patients.

Conclusions

In a large cohort of CKD patients treated with RAASi, we observed that following hyperkalemia onset, non-adherence to RAASi medication can result in an increased risk of cardiovascular events and death.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-021-01070-6.

Feasibility of Simplification From a Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen to a Fixed-Ratio Formulation of Basal Insulin Plus a GLP-1RA or to Basal Insulin Plus an SGLT2 Inhibitor: BEYOND, a Randomized, Pragmatic Trial

OBJECTIVE

BEYOND trial evaluated the feasibility of either basal insulin plus glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) or basal insulin plus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) to replace a full basal-bolus insulin (BBI) regimen in participants with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to: 1) intensification of the BBI regimen (n = 101), 2) fixed ratio of basal insulin plus GLP-1RA (fixed-combo group; n = 102), and 3) combination of basal insulin plus SGLT2i (gliflo-combo group; n = 102). The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline in HbA_1c at 6 months.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar among the three groups (mean HbA_1c was 8.6% [70 mmol/mol]). At 6 months, patients experienced similar reduction in HbA_1c level (-0.6 ± 0.8, -0.6 ± 0.8, and -0.7 ± 0.9%, mean ± SD, respectively; noninferiority P < 0.001 vs. BBI), and the proportion of patients with HbA_1c ≤7.5% was also similar (34%, 28%, and 27%, respectively; P = 0.489). Total insulin dose increased in the BBI group (62 units/day) and decreased both in the fixed-combo and gliflo-combo groups (27 units/day and 21 units/day, respectively; P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with hypoglycemia was 17.8%, 7.8%, and 5.9%, respectively (P = 0.015). There were 12 dropouts in the fixed-combo group, 9 in the gliflo-combo group, and none in the BBI group.

CONCLUSIONS

BEYOND provides evidence that it is possible and safe to switch from a BBI regimen to either a once-daily fixed-combo injection or once-daily gliflozin added to basal insulin, with similar glucose control, fewer insulin doses, fewer injections daily, and less hypoglycemia.

Early use of erenumab in US real-world practice

Background:

Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) developed to block the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, is approved for the prevention of migraine in adults. This retrospective observational study sought to describe early real-world use of erenumab.

Methods:

This study used the Practice Fusion ambulatory Electronic Health Record database, which represents approximately 6% of ambulatory care among primary care and specialist practices in the United States. Among migraine patients initiating erenumab, demographics, migraine type, comorbidities, and prior treatments were assessed during the 12-month baseline period. Treatment patterns including changes in acute and preventive medications, switches to other CGRP mAbs (fremanezumab and galcanezumab), and for erenumab, changes in dose and adherence were examined among patients with 6 months of follow-up.

Results:

Of 3,336 patients identified (85.9% female; mean age = 49.1 years), approximately 40% had documentation of chronic migraine. Common comorbidities included non-migraine headache, anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Most patients (76.3%) initiated on the 70 mg dose of erenumab. Among 1,638 patients included in the treatment pattern analysis, 53.1% used acute medications and 55.7% used other non-specific preventive migraine medications during follow-up, reductions of 9.8% and 10.2%, respectively, over the same period of time before index. Switching to fremanezumab and galcanezumab were observed in 12.2% and 13.8% of patients, respectively. The mean proportion of days covered by erenumab at 6 months was 79%. Dosage of erenumab increased (from 70 mg to 140 mg) in 13.0% and decreased (from 140 mg to 70 mg) in 24.9% of patients.

Conclusion:

This early real-world study showed high adherence among erenumab users. This combined with observed reductions in previously used acute and preventive medications are suggestive of erenumab’s benefit.

Inappropriate Use of Oral Antithrombotic Combinations in an Outpatient Setting and Associated Risks: A French Nationwide Cohort Study

With the increase in prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, multimorbidity, and medical progress, oral antithrombotic (AT) combinations are increasingly prescribed. The aims of this study were to estimate the incidence of oral AT combinations, their appropriateness (defined as indications compliant with guidelines), and the related risk of major bleeding (i.e., leading to hospitalization) or death, among new users. We conducted a 5-year historical cohort study, using the French national healthcare database, including all individuals ≥ 45 years old with a first delivery of oral ATs between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017. The cumulative incidence of oral AT combinations was estimated with the Fine and Gray method, taking into account the competitive risk of death. We compared the cumulative incidence of major bleeding according to the type of oral AT treatment initiated at study entry (monotherapy or oral AT combinations). During the study period, 22,220 individuals were included (mean (SD) age 68 (12) years). The cumulative incidence of oral AT combinations at 5 years was 27.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 26.8–28.9). Overall, 64% of any oral AT combinations did not comply with guidelines. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding and death in the whole cohort at 5 years was 4.1% (95% CI 3.7–4.6) and 10.8% (95% CI 10.1–11.6), respectively. Risk of major bleeding increased among individuals with oral AT combinations versus oral AT monotherapy at study entry (subdistribution hazard ratio sHR: 2.16 (1.01–4.63)); with no difference in terms of death. The use of oral AT combinations among oral AT users is frequent, often inappropriately prescribed, and associated with an increased risk of major bleeding.

Methodological considerations for investigating oral anticoagulation persistence in atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Reports of long-term oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) reveal highly variable, and generally suboptimal estimates of medication persistence. The objective of this review is to summarize current literature and highlight important methodological considerations for interpreting persistence research and designing studies of persistence on OAC treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We summarize differences in study methodology, setting, timing, treatment, and other factors associated with reports of better or worse persistence. For example, prospective compared with retrospective study designs are associated with higher reported persistence. Similarly, patient factors such as permanent AF or high stroke risk, and treatment with non-vitamin K oral antagonists relative to vitamin K antagonists are associated with higher persistence. Persistence has also been reported to be higher in Europe compared with North America and higher when the treating physician is a general practitioner compared with a specialist. We propose a framework for assessing and designing persistence studies. This framework includes aspects of patient selection, reliability and validity of measures, persistence definitions, clinical utility of measurements, follow-up periods, and analytic approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in study design, patient selection, treatments, and factors such as the countries/regions where studies are conducted or the type of treating physician may help explain the variability in OAC persistence estimates. A framework is proposed to assess persistence studies. This may have utility to compare and interpret published studies as well as for planning of future studies.

Improving medication adherence in hypertensive patients: A scoping review

In recent years, interest in medication adherence has greatly increased. Adherence has been particularly well studied in the context of arterial hypertension treatment. Numerous interventions have addressed this issue, however, the effort to improve adherence has been often frustrating and frequently disorganized. The aim of present study was to perform a scoping review of medication adherence interventions in hypertensive patients, so that a clear overview was achieved. Moreover, an evidence-based categorization of interventions was developed. The review was performed according to the PRISMA-ScR statement. MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched, and studies published from database inception until August 17, 2020 were included. A total of 2994 non-duplicate studies were retrieved. After screening and eligibility phases, a total of 45 articles were included. Studies were analyzed regarding their design, participant characteristics and management of adherence strategies employed. Furthermore, medication adherence and blood pressure outcomes, as well as adherence measuring tools were evaluated. Each study's intervention was then categorized using a novel evidence-based system of categorization, derived from the conceptual clustering framework used in machine learning. This work is an important step in pushing for better informed and more efficient future research efforts, both by providing an overview of the research field and by creating a new, evidence-based intervention categorization tool. It also provides valuable information to clinicians about medication adherence to antihypertensive therapy.

Association of Treatment Intensity and Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Therapy with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among Post-MI Patients in Germany

Introduction

Patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) are at very high risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. This study evaluated the association of treatment intensity and adherence to lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among post-MI patients in Germany.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective cohort study using German health claims data (2010–2015). We included patients ≥ 18 years, with a history of MI and who started an LLT (statin and/or ezetimibe), between 2011 and 2013. The follow-up period started 1 year after the second LLT prescription and continued until MACE, all-cause death or December 31, 2015, whichever occurred first. Treatment intensity was classified based on expected low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction; adherence was measured by the proportion of days covered using prescription data. A combined adherence-adjusted intensity variable was created by multiplying intensity and adherence. We used Cox proportional hazards models to control for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index and other cardiovascular risk factors at baseline.

Results

A total of 14,944 patients were included. Mean age was 66.7 (SD = 13.0) years; 68.7% of patients were men. Each 10% increase in treatment intensity, adherence, or adherence-adjusted intensity was associated with a decrease in the risk of MACE of 17% (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.87), 5% (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.94–0.97), and 14% (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.83–0.90), respectively.

Conclusions

Higher treatment intensity and/or adherence of LLT was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE in post-MI patients. Strategies to tailor intensity to patient profiles and improve adherence could reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01697-8.

50 Years of Topical Retinoids for Acne: Evolution of Treatment

Since the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tretinoin in 1971, retinoids alone or combined with other agents have become the mainstay of acne treatment. Retinoids act through binding to retinoic acid receptors, altering expression levels of hundreds of cellular proteins affecting multiple pathways involved in acne pathogenesis. Retinoids have evolved from first-generation agents, such as tretinoin, through chemical modifications resulting in a second generation (etretinate and acitretin for psoriasis), a third generation (adapalene and tazarotene) and, most recently, a fourth (trifarotene). For all topical retinoids, local irritation has been associated with poor tolerability and suboptimal adherence. Efforts to improve tolerability have utilized novel delivery systems and/or novel agents. This qualitative literature review summarizes the evolution of the four topical single-agent retinoids available for the treatment of acne in the US today and their various formulations, presenting the rationale behind their development and data from key studies.

Metformin and cancer-specific survival among breast, colorectal, or endometrial cancer patients: A nationwide data linkage study

AIMS

Equivocal results of association between metformin and cancer-specific survival need more investigation. We tested the hypothesis that adherence to the drug had a lower cancer-specific mortality in a homogeneous population (i.e. regular users).

METHODS

The Australian Cancer database was linked to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data and the National Death Index. Adherence to metformin was calculated by proportion of days covered. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were used to estimate multivariable-adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of adherence to metformin and cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2013, three separate cohorts of 6717, 3121, and 1854 female patients were identified with newly diagnosed breast, colorectal, or endometrial cancer. The 1-year adherence was similar at baseline in three cohorts, on average 75%. Each 10% increase in 1-year adherence to metformin reduced cancer-specific mortality among women with breast cancer (adjusted HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97), colorectal cancer (adjusted HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96), or endometrial cancer (adjusted HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99). The inverse associations remained unchanged in most subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Among metformin users, adherence to this drug is inversely associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality. If confirmed, metformin could be considered as an adjuvant treatment.

Persistence With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the United States, 2012-2017

BACKGROUND

Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection if used adherently throughout periods of HIV risk. We estimated PrEP persistence among cohorts of persons with commercial or Medicaid insurance.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the IBM MarketScan Research Database to identify persons aged 18-64 years who initiated PrEP between 2012 and 2017. We assessed PrEP persistence by calculating the time period that each person continued filling PrEP prescriptions until there was a gap in prescription fills > 30 days. We used Kaplan-Meier time-to-event methods to estimate the proportion of PrEP users who persisted with PrEP at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation, and constructed Cox proportional hazards models to determine patient characteristics associated with nonpersistence.

RESULTS

We studied 11 807 commercially insured and 647 Medicaid insured persons with PrEP prescriptions. Commercially insured patients persisted for a median time of 13.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.3-14.1), compared to 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.1-7.6) among Medicaid patients. Additionally, female sex, younger age, residence in rural location, and black race were associated with shorter persistence. After adjusting for covariates, we found that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.56-2.11]) and younger age (18-24 years: HR, 2.38 [95% CI, 2.11-2.69]) predicted nonpersistence.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of commercially insured persons who initiated PrEP persisted with it for 12 months, compared to a third of those with Medicaid. A better understanding of reasons for nonpersistence is important to support persistent PrEP use and to develop interventions designed for the diverse needs of at-risk populations.

Association Between Digoxin Use and Cancer Incidence: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study With Competing Risk Analysis

Background: Previous studies neglected death as a critical competing risk while estimating the cancer risk for digoxin users. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the effectiveness of digoxin on cancer prevention by competing risk analysis. Methods: We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research database between 1998 and 2010. After one-to-one propensity score-matching from 36,160 patients with defined criteria, we enrolled 758 patients both in digoxin and β-blocker group for further analysis. Results: The results showed that the digoxin group had higher all-cause mortality than the β-blocker group in the 4- year (10.4 vs. 4.9%) and 8 years (13.6 vs. 7.0%) follow-up. The subdistribution HR of cancer incidence in the digoxin group compared to the β-blocker group was 1.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-3.01) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.01-2.15) in the 4 years and 8 years follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: The result of our study showed the usage of digoxin has no benefit in cancer prevention compared with β-blocker. The possibility of β-blocker as a new drug candidate for cancer prevention needs further clinical evaluation. The current study also emphasized the necessity of competing risk analysis applying to similar clinical researches.

Haemophilia A patients' medication adherence to prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa

INTRODUCTION

Lightening the injection burden is commonly believed to improve prophylaxis adherence. Efmoroctocog alfa (rFVIIIFc) is the first recombinant FVIII-Fc fusion protein available in France. This clotting factor with an extended half-life could thus improve medication adherence.

AIM

The study primarily aimed to assess the real-life impact on prophylaxis adherence of haemophilia A patients, when switching from a standard to an extended half-life FVIII.

METHODS

This study was an observational, monocentre, non-interventional study aiming at assessing haemophilia A patients' real-life adherence during the first-year post-rFVIIIFc prophylaxis initiation. Medication adherence was assessed using two methods: the medication possession ratio (MPR), which is based on the hospital pharmacy dispensing data, and self-reported VERITAS-Pro^® questionnaire. Patients on rFVIIIFc prophylaxis for at least 12 months, following a 12-month standard FVIII prophylaxis, were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

In 2019, 47 male patients were undergoing rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in our Hemophilia Center, among which 36 meeting the inclusion criteria. Switching from standard to extended half-life FVIII prophylaxis resulted in increased mean dosing, while the mean number of weekly prophylactic injections (2.6 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 0.3) decreased. Following rFVIIIFc initiation, a non-significant increase in median MPR occurred and the self-reported VERITAS-Pro^® questionnaire demonstrated improved adherence to rFVIIIFc prophylaxis. Comparing adherent and non-adherent patients revealed age as the only factor likely to impact adherence (p = .07).

CONCLUSION

Our patient cohort exhibited high adherence levels before and after FVIII switching, based on MPR and VERITAS-Pro^® questionnaire. The latter is likely a useful tool to quantity prophylaxis adherence from a patient's perspective in daily use.

Adherence and Associated Factors of Treatment Regimen in Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis Patients

Background: Adherence to tuberculosis (TB) drugs is one of the key aspects of global TB control, yet there is a lack of epidemiological evidence on the factors influencing adherence to TB drugs. Thus, this study aimed to explore the adherence and factors associated with adherence among TB patients in South Korea. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using a sampled national healthcare database from 2017 to 2018. Our study population included incident TB patients initiating quadruple or triple regimen who were available for follow-up for 180-days. Adherence was evaluated using the proportion of days covered (PDC): 1) adherent group: patients with PDC ≥80%; 2) non-adherent group: patients with PDC <80%. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to calculate the median time-to-discontinuation in the study population. We calculated the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess factors associated with adherence to TB drugs using logistic regression. Results: Of 987 patients, 558 (56.5%) were adherent and 429 (43.5%) were non-adherent, with the overall mean PDC of 68.87% (standard deviation, 33.37%). The median time-to-discontinuation was 113 days (interquartile range 96-136) in the study population. Patients initiating quadruple regimen were more likely to adhere in comparison to the triple regimen (aOR 4.14; 95% CI 2.78-6.17), while those aged ≥65 years (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.35-0.81), with a history of dementia (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.34-0.85), and with history of diabetes mellitus (aOR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.96) were less likely to adhere to the drug. Conclusion: Approximately 45% of TB patients were non-adherent to the drug, which is a major concern for the treatment outcome. We call for intensified attention from the authorities and healthcare providers to reinforce patients' adherence to the prescribed TB drugs.

Clinical impact and room for improvement of intensity and adherence to lipid lowering therapy: Five years of clinical follow-up from 164,565 post-myocardial infarction patients

BACKGROUND

In patients at risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) is affected by both intensity and adherence. Our study evaluated the association between LLT intensity (statin and/or ezetimibe) and adherence, and CV events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in France.

METHODS

Using the French national healthcare database (SNDS), we included patients with a history of MI, an initial LLT prescription in 2011-2013, and a second prescription within one year. LLT intensity was defined using the expected percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations between intensity and/or adherence, and the risk of major adverse CV event (MACE).

RESULTS

164,565 patients were included; mean (SD) age, 66·3 (13·8) years; 73·6% men. Following an MI, only half of patients were treated with high-intensity LLT and approximately 40% of those on LLT remained non-adherent during follow-up (mean (SD) follow-up, 2·6 (1·4) years). Each 10% increase in treatment intensity, adherence, or adherence-adjusted intensity was respectively associated with a 16% (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.84-0.85), 7% (HR 0.93, 95%CI 0.93-0.94), and 15% (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.84-0.86) decrease in the risk of MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with a history of MI, prescriptions of high-intensity LLT were limited and adherence to LLT was low. Higher intensity and/or adherence to statins was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE, highlighting the importance of compliance with clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

Uncontrolled asthma: a retrospective cohort study in Japanese patients newly prescribed with medium-/high-dose ICS/LABA

Many asthma patients remain uncontrolled despite guideline-based therapies. We examined real-life asthma control in Japanese patients prescribed with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/LABA). Patients (≥12 years) with ≥2 asthma diagnoses, newly initiated on medium-/high-dose ICS/LABA (Japanese asthma guidelines), from 01 April 2009 to 31 March 2015 were included, using Japan Medical Data Center Claims Database. Primary objective: proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma in the year following ICS/LABA initiation. Secondary objectives: predictors of uncontrolled asthma and healthcare resource utilization. In medium-dose (N = 24,937) and high-dose (N = 8661) ICS/LABA cohorts, 23% and 21% patients, respectively, were uncontrolled. Treatment step up and exacerbation were most common indicators of uncontrolled asthma. Predictors of uncontrolled asthma, analyzed by multivariable Cox model, included systemic corticosteroid use, exacerbation history, comorbidities, and being female. In both cohorts, healthcare resource utilization was higher in patients with uncontrolled asthma. Over 20% patients with persistent asthma who initiated medium- or high-dose ICS/LABA were uncontrolled, highlighting unmet need for novel therapies in these patients.

Chronic opioid use is associated with early biologic discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic opioid use is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease.

AIMS

To investigate an association between chronic opioid use and persistence with biologic agents in management of inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A total of 16 624 patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease and receiving a first-time biologic prescription from 2011 to 2016 were identified retrospectively from the Truven MarketScan Database. A cohort of 1768 patients were identified as chronic opioid users utilising outpatient prescription claims. Utilisation patterns of biologic therapies were assessed from inpatient administration and outpatient claims data, including persistence calculations. Information on healthcare utilisation and common comorbidities was also collected. A Cox regression model was constructed to assess the hazard of chronic opioid use on early discontinuation of biologic therapy controlling for disease severity.

RESULTS

A mean 1.5 different biologic agents were utilised by inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic opioid use (vs 1.37 in the comparator group; P < 0.0001). A lower proportion of the chronic opioid use cohort persisted on biologic therapies to the end of the study period (16.2% vs 33.5% P < 0.0001). Inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic opioid use utilised more healthcare resources and had a higher rate of comorbidities than the reference cohort. Patients with chronic opioid use were 23% more likely (hazard ratio 1.23; 95% CI [1.16-1.31]) to be non-persistent with biologic therapy while accounting for relevant markers of disease acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic opioid use is associated with increased hazard of biologic discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease. Symptoms of opioid withdrawal may mimic IBD flares thereby leading providers to inappropriately switch biologic therapies and compromise disease control.

Influential factors in adherence to the therapeutic regime in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

BACKGROUND

Medication non-adherence is a global problem and the most common cause of treatment failure. Researchers warn that only one in two patients with chronic conditions adhere to their medication. Therefore, the primary objective of the study was to assess influential factors in adherence to the therapeutic regime in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The secondary objective was to evaluate medication adherence in patients with hypertension (HT) and/or diabetes (DM) and compare the level of adherence among patients with either diabetes or hypertension.

METHODS

The study included 1303 patients divided into three groups according to the type of chronic condition. The Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) was used to assess the level of adherence with pharmacological recommendations.

RESULTS

A comparison of adherence between the groups demonstrated that the level of adherence was highest in patients with diabetes alone (17 ± 5.15) and was lowest in patients with co-existing HT and diabetes (19.9 ± 7.51). A single-factor linear regression model analysis showed that the presence of hypertension alone has a positive effect on adherence to medications, while the co-existence of diabetes and hypertension has a statistically significantly negative impact on medication adherence. The sociodemographic predictors of higher adherence included female gender (β = -0.06; p = 0.024), high school education (β = -0.16 and p = 0.001) and being unemployed (β = -0.08; p = 0.0100).

CONCLUSION

Patients with co-existing diabetes and HT taking antihypertensive and antidiabetic drugs have the lowest adherence rates, and the co-existence of two chronic conditions is a statistically significant independent determinant of decreased adherence. Variables confirmed in the multiple-factor model as having an independent impact on the level of adherence include the type of condition suffered, female gender, education and professional status. Practical implication. The primary objective is to undertake actions whose aim is to improve adherence in order to enhance patients' functioning, reduce the number of follow-up visits and the hospitalisation rate, and thus limit the economic consequences of treating disease complications.

Optimal cut-off points for adherence measure among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care clinics: a retrospective analysis

Background

Medication adherence measures are often dichotomized to classify patients into those with good or poor adherence using a cut-off value ⩾80%, but this cut-off may not be universal across diseases or medication classes. This study aimed to examine the cut-off value that optimally distinguish good and poor adherence by using the medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC) as adherence measures and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as outcome measure among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

Method

We used pharmacy dispensing data of 1461 eligible T2DM patients from public primary care clinics in Malaysia treated with oral antidiabetic drugs between January 2018 and May 2019. Adherence rates were calculated during the period preceding the HbA1c measurement. Adherence cut-off values for the following conditions were compared: adherence measure (MPR versus PDC), assessment period (90-day versus 180-day), and HbA1c target (⩽7.0% versus ⩽8.0%).

Results

The optimal adherence cut-offs for MPR and PDC in predicting HbA1c ⩽7.0% ranged between 86.1% and 98.3% across the two assessment periods. In predicting HbA1c ⩽8.0%, the optimal adherence cut-offs ranged from 86.1% to 92.8%. The cut-off value was notably higher with PDC as the adherence measure, shorter assessment period, and a stricter HbA1c target (⩽7.0%) as outcome.

Conclusion

We found that optimal adherence cut-off appeared to be slightly higher than the conventional value of 80%. The adherence thresholds may vary depending on the length of assessment period and outcome definition but a reasonably wise cut-off to distinguish good versus poor medication adherence to be clinically meaningful should be at 90%.

ADHD as a Potential Risk Factor in Poor Antiretroviral Adherence Rates in HIV: A Brief Narrative Review and Suggestions for Future Research

This was a narrative review of the literature pertaining to antiretroviral adherence rates in patients with HIV, with a focus on ADHD as a potential risk for poor adherence. A connection is drawn between the cognitive symptoms of ADHD and risk factors for poor treatment adherence in HIV. Parallel associations between ADHD and poor treatment adherence in patients with diabetes are also discussed. Finally, some of the challenges in measuring medication adherence in patients with HIV are summarized. Future research may assess whether patients with comorbid ADHD and HIV have lower rates of adherence than those with HIV alone. Samples will need to be large to manage other contributing factors such as age; in our clinic, patients with HIV referred for ADHD evaluations tend to be younger than patients with HIV referred for assessment of other neurocognitive conditions. This artifact confounds attempts to compare adherence rates in patients with both ADHD and HIV versus those without, as younger age is independently associated with poorer medication compliance. Future research should also include the development of strategies to help infectious disease clinicians to measure adherence as well as the development of cognitive and behavioral strategies for improving adherence rates in patients at risk for poor medication compliance.

Treatment prescription, adherence, and persistence after the first hospitalization for heart failure: A population-based retrospective study on 100785 patients

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates, in a real-world setting, to what extent the recommended therapies by international guidelines, are prescribed after a first hospitalization for heart failure (HF), and to analyse adherence and persistence, and the effect of treatment adherence on mortality and re-hospitalization.

METHODS

From the Lombardy healthcare administrative database, we analysed patients discharged after their incident HF, from 2000 to 2012. Adherence was defined as the proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80% adjusted for hospitalizations and persistence as the absence of discontinuation of therapy for >30 days. A logit model was used to determine the effect of patients' adherence on mortality and readmissions.

RESULTS

Of 100422 HF patients (52% males, age 75 ± 12 years), 86846 (87%) had a prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACE/ARBs), 64135 (64%) for beta-blockers (BB), and 36893 (37%) for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), as mono-, bi- or tri-therapy. In patients on monotherapy, PDC was 78 ± 22% for ACE/ARBs, 69 ± 29% for BB and 54 ± 29% for MRAs; in those on bi-therapy, PDC was 63 ± 31% for ACEI/ARBs+BB, 41 ± 29% for ACEI/ARBs+MRAs, and 40 ± 26% for MRAs+BB; for patients on tri-therapy, PDC was 42 ± 28%. Medication persistence was present in 47% of patients treated with ACEI/ARBs, in 35% of patients treated with BB and in 14% of patients treated with MRAs. Re-hospitalizations and in mortality were significantly reduced in adherent patients (p < 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased rate of non-adherence and non-persistence in incident HF. Non-adherence is associated with an increased risk of mortality and re-hospitalizations.

Medication adherence in multiple sclerosis as a potential model for other chronic diseases: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether better medication adherence in multiple sclerosis (MS) might be due to specialised disease-modifying drug (DMD) support programmes by: (1) establishing higher adherence in MS than in other chronic diseases and (2) determining if higher adherence is associated with patient-specific or treatment-specific factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with data from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2015.

SETTING

Population-based health administrative data from three Canadian provinces.

PARTICIPANTS

Individual cohorts were created using validated case definitions for MS, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease (PD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Subjects were included if they received ≥1 dispensation for a disease-related drug between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2014.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of subjects with optimal adherence (≥80%) measured by the medication possession ratio 1 year after the index date (first dispensation of disease-related drug).

RESULTS

126 478 subjects were included in the primary analysis (MS, n=6271; epilepsy, n=55 739; PD, n=21 304; RA, n=43 164). Subjects with epilepsy (adjusted OR, aOR 0.29; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.45), PD (aOR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63) or RA (aOR 0.26; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.35) were less likely to have optimal 1-year adherence compared with subjects with MS. Within the MS cohort, adherence was higher for DMD than for chronic-use non-MS medications, and no consistent patient-related predictors of adherence were observed across all four non-MS medication classes, including having optimal adherence to DMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with MS were significantly more likely to have optimal 1-year adherence than subjects with epilepsy, RA and PD, and optimal adherence appears related to treatment-specific factors rather than patient-related factors. This supports the hypothesis that higher adherence to the MS DMDs could be due to the specialised support programmes; these programmes may serve as a model for use in other chronic conditions.

Prevalence of Unmet Basic Needs and Association with Diabetes Control and Care Utilization Among Insured Persons with Diabetes

Unmet basic needs (eg, food insecurity, inadequate housing) are major barriers to diabetes self-management. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of unmet basic needs and examine the association with diabetes control and care utilization among insured persons with diabetes. A total of 4043 adult patients with diabetes were screened for unmet basic needs using Your Current Life Situation, a screener for unmet basic needs, during a clinical encounter or as an online survey, during the study period (January 1, 2016-August 31, 2017). Hemoglobin A1c and care utilization (outpatient, emergency department [ED], hospitalization, diabetes-related prescription refills) were extracted from the electronic health record 12 months prior to screening. The authors compared patients with unmet basic needs to those with no needs on poor diabetes control (ie, A1c ≥8%) and care utilization using multivariable regression models. Of the 4043 patients screened, 25% endorsed ≥1 unmet basic need. In adjusted analyses, the presence of unmet basic needs was associated with an increased likelihood of having an A1c ≥8% (OR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.47, 2.13), more outpatient visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.3; 1.2, 1.4), more ED visits (IRR = 2.3; 2.0, 2.6), more hospitalizations (IRR = 1.8; 1.5, 2.2), and more delays in refilling diabetes medication (IRR = 1.21; 1.13, 1.30). Findings indicate that unmet basic needs are highly prevalent, even among an insured patient population, and are associated with poor diabetes-related clinical outcomes and excess utilization. Future studies to determine best strategies to integrate this information into treatment planning are warranted.

Employing computational linguistics techniques to identify limited patient health literacy: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study

OBJECTIVE

To develop novel, scalable, and valid literacy profiles for identifying limited health literacy patients by harnessing natural language processing.

DATA SOURCE

With respect to the linguistic content, we analyzed 283 216 secure messages sent by 6941 diabetes patients to physicians within an integrated system's electronic portal. Sociodemographic, clinical, and utilization data were obtained via questionnaire and electronic health records.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study used natural language processing and machine learning to generate five unique "Literacy Profiles" by employing various sets of linguistic indices: Flesch-Kincaid (LP_FK); basic indices of writing complexity, including lexical diversity (LP_LD) and writing quality (LP_WQ); and advanced indices related to syntactic complexity, lexical sophistication, and diversity, modeled from self-reported (LP_SR), and expert-rated (LP_Exp) health literacy. We first determined the performance of each literacy profile relative to self-reported and expert-rated health literacy to discriminate between high and low health literacy and then assessed Literacy Profiles' relationships with known correlates of health literacy, such as patient sociodemographics and a range of health-related outcomes, including ratings of physician communication, medication adherence, diabetes control, comorbidities, and utilization.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

LP_SR and LP_Exp performed best in discriminating between high and low self-reported (C-statistics: 0.86 and 0.58, respectively) and expert-rated health literacy (C-statistics: 0.71 and 0.87, respectively) and were significantly associated with educational attainment, race/ethnicity, Consumer Assessment of Provider and Systems (CAHPS) scores, adherence, glycemia, comorbidities, and emergency department visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Since health literacy is a potentially remediable explanatory factor in health care disparities, the development of automated health literacy indicators represents a significant accomplishment with broad clinical and population health applications. Health systems could apply literacy profiles to efficiently determine whether quality of care and outcomes vary by patient health literacy; identify at-risk populations for targeting tailored health communications and self-management support interventions; and inform clinicians to promote improvements in individual-level care.

Depression and antecedent medication adherence in a cohort of new metformin users

AIMS

The association between depression and poor medication adherence is based on cross-sectional studies and cohort studies that measure adherence rates after depression status is determined. However, depressive symptoms occur well before diagnosis. This study examined adherence patterns in the year before a depressive episode.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study followed new metformin users identified in Alberta Health's administrative data between 2008 and 2018. Depressive episodes starting ≥1 year after metformin initiation were identified using a validated case definition. Controls were randomly assigned a pseudo depression date. Adherence to oral antihyperglycemic medications was estimated using proportion of days covered (PDC) and group-based trajectory models to explore the association between depression and poor adherence (PDC<0.8).

RESULTS

A depressive episode occurred in 17,418 (10.6%) of 165,056 new metformin users. Individuals with depression were more likely to have poor adherence compared to controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.21; 95% CI 1.17, 1.26). Five trajectories were identified: nearly perfect adherence (PDC >0.95 [34.8% of cohort]), discontinued (PDC=0 [18.3% of cohort], poor initial adherence (PDC 0.75) that declined either rapidly (9.2% of cohort) or gradually (30.1% of cohort), and poor initial adherence (PDC 0.26) that increased gradually (7.6% of cohort). Individuals with depression were more likely to be in one of the four trajectories of poor adherence compared to controls (adjusted odds ratio 1.24; 95% CI 1.19-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor medication adherence occurs in the year before a depressive episode; therefore, poor medication use patterns could be used as an early warning sign for depression.

PCSK9 inhibition in clinical practice: Treatment patterns and attainment of lipid goals in a large health maintenance organization

BACKGROUND

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) effectively reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), improving cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials when added to statin therapy.

OBJECTIVES

As real-world evidence is lacking, we aimed to evaluate treatment and adherence patterns using PCSK9i in clinical practice.

METHODS

We investigated 1600 patients initiating PCSK9i between January 2016 and December 2019 in a large health maintenance organization. Treatment discontinuation was defined as a gap ≥60 days between last days' supply of one prescription and the start of the next. Re-initiation rates as well as proportion of days covered (PDC) over 1-year period and attainment of lipid goals under PCSK9i, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Evolocumab 140 mg was initiated by 50.7%, alirocumab 75 mg by 29.5% and 150 mg by 19.8%. Cumulative discontinuation rates were 28.1% after 6-months and 49.9% after 3-years. Overall, 58% of the patients that discontinued therapy have re-initiated PCSK9i (31% after 3-months from discontinuation). Mean PDC over 1-year of therapy was 56% ± 29, with PDC ≥80% evident in 29%. Of those with established cardiovascular disease (n = 991), 55% achieved LDL-C<70 mg/dL and 38% LDL-C<55 mg/dL. Attainment rates were lower in patients with PDC<80%, baseline LDL-C>190 mg/dL and in those not treated with concurrent statin therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world practice of patients treated by PCSK9i, high proportion of early treatment discontinuation was evident, with non-negligible re-initiation rates but overall low medication coverage over time. This have contributed to sub-optimal attainment of LDL-C treatment goals, particularly observed in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, inadequate drug adherence, and those using PCSK9i as monotherapy.

1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

A Randomized Encouragement Trial to Increase Mail Order Pharmacy Use and Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Mail order pharmacy (MOP) use has been linked to improved medication adherence and health outcomes among patients with diabetes. However, no large-scale intervention studies have assessed the effect of encouraging MOP use on medication adherence.

OBJECTIVE

To assess an intervention to encourage MOP services to increase its use and medication adherence.

DESIGN

Randomized encouragement trial.

PATIENTS

63,012 diabetes patients from three health care systems: Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), Kaiser Permanente Hawaii (KPHI), and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (HPHC) who were poorly adherent to at least one class of cardiometabolic medications and had not used MOP in the prior 12 months.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to receive either usual care (control arm) or outreach encouraging MOP use consisting of a mailed letter, secure email message, and automated telephone call outlining the potential benefits of MOP use (intervention arm). HPHC intervention patients received the letter only.

MEASUREMENTS

We compared the percentages of patients that began using MOP and that became adherent to cardiometabolic medication classes during a 12-month follow-up period. We also conducted a race/ethnicity-stratified analysis.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 10.6% of intervention patients began using MOP vs. 9.3% of controls (p < 0.01); the percent of cardiometabolic medication delivered via mail was 42.1% vs. 39.8% (p < 0.01). Metformin adherence improved in the intervention arm relative to control at the two KP sites (52% vs. 49%, p < 0.01). Stratified analyses suggested a significant positive effect of the intervention in White (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.22) and Asian (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.45) patients.

CONCLUSION

This pragmatic trial showed that simple outreach to encourage MOP modestly increased its use and improved adherence measured by refills to a key class of diabetes medications in some settings. Given its minimal cost, clinicians and health systems should consider outreach interventions to actively promote MOP use among diabetes patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02621476.