The analgesic activity of morphine-6-glucuronide

The panorama of opioid-related cognitive dysfunction in patients with cancer: a critical literature appraisal

BACKGROUND

Opioids have an essential role in the management of pain in cancer patients, particularly those with advanced disease. Cognitive dysfunction is a recognized complication of opioid use. However, misconceptions and controversy surround the nature and prevalence of its occurrence. A projected increase in the aging cancer population highlights the need for a better understanding of this phenomenon.

METHODS

A critical appraisal of the literature evidence in relation to the pattern, pathophysiology, assessment, impact, and management of cognitive dysfunction due to opioid use in cancer pain management is given.

RESULTS

Studies in cancer patients with less advanced disease reveal subtle evidence of cognitive impairment, largely related to initial dosing or dose increases. In advanced cancer, opioid-induced cognitive dysfunction usually occurs in the form of delirium, a multifactorial syndrome. The presence of both cognitive impairment and delirium frequently is misdiagnosed or missed. Potential risk factors include neuropathic and incidental pain, opioid tolerance, somatization of psychologic distress, and a history of drug or alcohol abuse. Elevation of opioid metabolites with renal impairment may contribute to cognitive dysfunction. Recognition of opioid-related cognitive dysfunction is improved by objective screening. Successful management requires either dose reduction or a change of opioid, in addition to addressing other reversible precipitants such as dehydration or volume depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid-related cognitive dysfunction tends to be subtle in the earlier stages of cancer, whereas delirium, a more florid form with behavioral disturbance is likely to be present in the advanced cancer population. In patients with advanced disease, an optimal management approach requires careful clinical assessment, identification of risk factors, objective monitoring of cognition, maintenance of adequate hydration, and either dose reduction or switching to a different opioid.

Pain, sedation and morphine metabolism in cancer patients during long-term treatment with sustained-release morphine

BACKGROUND

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) are the two most important metabolites of morphine. Both are pharmacologically active, however, with different effects. M-6-G has been demonstrated capable of inducing anti-nociception and sedation, and M-3-G may induce behavioural excitation and possibly antagonise anti-nociception. Their impact on pharmacodynamics in patients in long-term treatment with oral morphine remains to be settled.

METHODS

Forty-two cancer patients treated with oral sustained-release (SR) morphine were assessed for pain, sedation and other side effects related to morphine treatment. Blood samples were analysed for morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (M) (r = 0.535, P < 0.001), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.868, P < 0.001) and plasma M-3-G (r = 0.865, P < 0.001). There was no relationship between plasma morphine, M-6-G, M-6-G/M and pain and sedation scores. Seventy-nine percent of the patients suffered from dryness of the mouth, which was the most frequent side effect observed. Patients in this group had higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect.

CONCLUSION

The plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites, M-3-G and M-6-G, are significantly correlated to the daily dose of SR morphine. Although M-6-G has analgesic properties, no associations were found between pain and plasma morphine and morphine metabolites. This may be due to the multitudinous factors affecting the dose-effect relationship. Patients with dryness of the mouth had higher concentrations of morphine and M-6-G than patients without this side effect.

Morphine-6-glucuronide: an analgesic of the future?

Morphine-6-beta-glucuronide (M6G) is an opioid agonist that plays a role in the clinical effects of morphine. Although M6G probably crosses the blood-brain barrier with difficulty, during long term morphine administration it may reach sufficiently high CNS concentrations to exert clinically relevant opioid effects. As a consequence of its almost exclusive renal elimination, M6G may accumulate in the body of patients with impaired renal function and cause severe opioid adverse effects with insidious onset and long persistence. Its profile of receptor affinities, however, gives reason to speculate that M6G may exhibit analgesic effects while causing fewer adverse effects than morphine. This is supported by reports of the good tolerability of intrathecal and intravenous injections of M6G in humans with intact renal function. M6G may thus be contemplated as an analgesic for short term postoperative analgesia, especially for intrathecal analgesic therapy. In addition, its possibly higher potency than morphine makes M6G a candidate opioid for local or peripheral analgesic therapy. However, current knowledge is too incomplete to finally judge the clinical usefulness of M6G. The next topics for clinical research on M6G should include: (i) a comparison of the potencies of M6G and morphine to cause wanted and unwanted clinical effects; (ii) development of a predictive population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of M6G with calculation of the transfer half-life between plasma and effect site; and (iii) identification of cofactors influencing the action of M6G that can serve as predictors for the clinical outcome of morphine/M6G therapy in an individual including the pharmacogenetics of M6G.

[New Level III opioids of the World Health Organization]

PURPOSE

The new opioids and the new galenic forms, now available in France, require an update in practitioners' knowledge. The purpose of the present study is to help those prescribing select the appropriate opioid and its galenic form for pain relief.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Presentation of pharmacological properties of opioids (mechanisms, pharmacokinetics and pharmacovigilance). Presentation of indications, modes of prescription and use of main opioids for pain (especially cancer pain). Examples for calculating required drug dosage depending on the clinical situation and the route of administration. Symptomatic treatments of the main undesirable side effects of the opioids, and actions to be taken in the event of accidental overdose.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Oral morphine is the treatment first recommended for nociceptive pain insufficiently relieved by WHO level I and II analgesics. The new immediate-release galenic forms allow morphine titration and the treatment of breakthrough pain. Transmucosal fentanyl, soon available in France, is recommended for breakthrough pain in patients already under opioid treatment: it gives more rapid relied starting after only 5 minutes and it only acts for a short time. Transdermal fentanyl is indicated for stable cancer pain. It is particularly suitable when oral and injectable morphine routes are not available, or for patients with severe constipation. Hydromorphone is the first opioid recommended in France for severe cancer pain when morphine resistance exists or uncontrolled side effects are present (opioid rotation). The new opioids and the new galenic forms widen the range of therapeutic possibilities. Their use is well codified for cancer pain and must still undergo clinical trials for chronic non-cancer pain. When correctly indicated, opioid selection provides a considerable advance in pain management.

The polymorphism A118G of the human mu-opioid receptor gene decreases the pupil constrictory effect of morphine-6-glucuronide but not that of morphine

Large individual differences in the clinical response to morphine therapy have been known for a long time by clinicians. The recent advances in genomic research encourage the search for pharmacogenetic causes of that variability. As a measure of central opioid effects, pupil diameters were assessed every 20 min for 18 h after administration of morphine or its active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) in a two-way crossover study. The opioid effects were compared between six subjects with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) A118G in the mu-opioid receptor gene (five heterozygous, one homozygous) and six control subjects. Non-parametric pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling was employed to identify the influence of the A118G SNP on the concentration-response relationship of M6G and morphine, which was described by a sigmoid Emax model. As a measure of potency, the EC50 of the pupil constrictory effects of M6G was 714 +/- 197 nmol/l in wild-type and 1475 +/- 424 nmol/l in heterozygous carriers of the A118G SNP. In the homozygous carrier of the SNP, it had an EC50 of 3140 nmol/l. In addition, the dose-response relationship was flatter in the A118G carriers than in control subjects (shape factor of the sigmoid Emax model: gamma = 3.3 +/- 1.2, 1.7 +/- 0.5 and 1.6 for wild-type, heterozygous and the homozygous A118G carriers, respectively). In contrast, the concentration-response relationship of morphine was not affected by this specific SNP. The A118G SNP in the mu-receptor gene significantly reduces the potency of M6G in humans.

Limited phase I study of morphine-3-glucuronide

The toxicity of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) has been investigated in an open, uncontrolled, single-blinded, single dose study over a limited range of doses. Three cohorts each of three healthy volunteers received 7.5, 15, and 30 mg/70 kg intravenous (IV) M3G. Blood sampling was undertaken for the following 24 h. Subjective toxicity was recorded on visual analogue scales and plasma M3G concentrations measured by a specific HPLC assay. Virtually no effects and no change in cardiovascular or respiratory parameters were seen. The pharmacokinetics fitted a two-compartment model. The mean elimination half-life (+/- S.D.) of M3G was 1.66 (+/- 0.47) h. Mean AUC standardized to a dose of 1 mg/70 kg was 228 (+/- 62) etamolL(-1) x h. Mean M3G clearance was 169 (+/- 48) mLmin(-1) and the mean volume of distribution was 23.1 (+/- 4.8) liters. At the doses investigated there were no clear neuroexcitatory effects, no opioid effects, and the pharmacokinetics were very similar to those of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G).

Analysis of urinary metabolites of tea catechins by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Tea has been proposed to have beneficial health effects which have been attributed to the polyphenolic compounds known as catechins. The bioavailability and biotransformation of these compounds, however, are not clearly understood. In this study, we used liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS) to determine urinary glucuronidated and sulfated tea catechins and their metabolites (including methylated and ring-fission metabolites) based on the detection of deprotonated molecular ions and aglycone fragment ions. The compound resolution was achieved both chromatographically and mass spectroscopically. After green tea administration, the major conjugates appeared in human, mouse, and rat urine samples were identified as monoglucuronides and monosulfates of (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC) and (-)-epicatechin. We also found O-methyl-EGC-O-glucuronides and -O-sulfates and O-methyl-epicatechin-O-sulfates in human urine. (-)-5-(3',4',5'-Trihydroxyphenyl)-gamma-valerolactone (M4) and (-)-5-(3',4'-dihydroxyphenyl)-gamma-valerolactone (M6), the ring-fission metabolites of EGC and (-)-epicatechin, respectively, were also predominantly in monoglucuronide and monosulfate forms in the urine. In comparison to rats, the urinary metabolite profiles of tea catechins in mice resemble more closely to those in humans. This is the first report describing direct simultaneous analysis of multiple tea catechin conjugates in urine samples. This method will allow more thorough investigations of the biotransformation of tea polyphenols.

Morphine-6 beta-glucuronide induces potent immunomodulation

The effect of morphine administration on immune parameters is well documented. However, there exists a limited knowledge of the effect of morphine's metabolites on immune status. The present study examines the immunomodulatory effects of the morphine metabolite, morphine-6 beta-glucuronide (M6G), in the rat and provides further evaluation of the antinociceptive effects of M6G. Animals were administered phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or M6G in doses of 1.0, 3.16, or 10.0 mg/kg (subcutaneous (s.c.)) or 0.1, 0.316, or 1.0 microgram (intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.)). Animals were tested for antinociception in the warm water tail-withdrawal procedure. In a separate set of animals, assessments of splenic natural killer cell activity, lymphocyte proliferative responses to mitogenic stimulation, and production of interferon-gamma were made 1 h following the s.c. or i.c.v. administration of M6G. The results show that M6G induced potent antinociception that was evident for at least 120 min following administration. M6G also produced decreases in natural killer cell activity, lymphocyte proliferation, and interferon-gamma production 1 h following both routes of administration. The difference in potency between immune alterations induced by subcutaneous vs. intracerebroventricular administration suggest central mediation of the immunomodulatory properties of M6G. Thus, M6G produces significant antinociception and immunomodulation in the rat. These findings demonstrate potent immunomodulatory properties of a metabolite of morphine, 1M6G.

The pharmacological basis of contemporary pain management

Pain management has become an increasingly well researched area in medicine over recent years, and there have been advances in a number of areas. While opioids remain an integral part of pain-management strategies, there is now an emphasis on the use of adjuvant drugs, such as paracetamol and anti-inflammatory agents, which through physiological or pharmacological synergism, both enhance pain control and reduce opioid use. The management of neuropathic pain continues to be a challenge. Anti-epileptics and antidepressants, together with clonidine and ketamine, provide the foundations for treatment. Another area of interest has been the widespread use of patient-controlled analgesia and the administration of some drugs, especially opioids, by means other than traditional oral and parenteral routes. The number of new drugs that have reached the stage of clinical trials has been small, yet they offer exciting possibilities. The epibatidine analogue ABT-594 and zinconitide both offer novel approaches to the management of neuropathic pain states, while selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and nitroaspirins may see advances in the management of nociceptive pain states.

Bedside perspectives on the use of opioids: transferring results of clinical research into practice

1. Transference of research findings to clinical practice has been a challenge for those managing chronic pain. Generally, pain is not well controlled in hospitals and steps need to be taken to make pain control more effective. 2. Clinical trials of opioids have shown that pain can be controlled in the great majority of patients. Apart from the use of the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder, a 'pain diagnosis' should be made and a comprehensive view of pain needs to be considered by the clinician. This would include pain and other physical symptoms, psychological issues and social and spiritual stresses. 3. Respiratory depression and tolerance for opioids are often seen as negative aspects of opioids and, therefore, may lead to inadequate control of pain. The evidence cited suggests that, in the long-term treatment of cancer pain, respiratory depression almost never occurs. The only situation that warrants caution is when an anaesthetic block or similar procedure relieves pain treated by opioids, when that patient has been receiving large doses of opioids. Long-term studies with opioids show that tolerance may occur, but is not a clinical problem and should not impair their use in adequate doses to relieve the patient's pain. 4. The active morphine metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) do need to be considered when administering morphine. There seems to be considerable interindividual variation in the production and elimination of metabolites. In cases of renal failure or in the elderly, the ratios of M3G and M6G to morphine accumulate exponentially, making opioid toxicity more likely. Even different routes of administration seem to be associated with different ratios of metabolites. A knowledge of these sources of pharmacokinetic variability may lead to more effective use of the opioids in clinical practice.

Lack of crosstolerance between morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide as revealed by locomotor activity

Morphine-6beta-glucuronide is a major metabolite of morphine. We wanted to examine whether the effects related to opiate CNS stimulation could be mediated by different receptors for morphine and M6G by studying the development of crosstolerance between these two drugs. The effect studied was locomotor activity in C57BL/6JBom mice. We observed a dose-dependent development of tolerance to daily injections of morphine, with 20 micromol/kg giving the most rapid development of tolerance, apparent already on the second day of treatment. This was also observed for the same dose of M6G. Crosstolerance to M6G was measured both after 1 day pretreatment and 7 days pretreatment with morphine 20 micromol/kg, while the crosstolerance to morphine was tested only after 1 day pretreatment with M6G (20 micromol/kg). Lack of crosstolerance towards M6G after 1 day of morphine pretreatment was observed, whereas crosstolerance to M6G was observed after 7 days of exposure to morphine pretreatment. Crosstolerance after M6G pretreatment to morphine was observed. It was concluded that the main part of the effect caused by M6G was mediated through a specific M6G receptor.

Morphine-related metabolites differentially activate adenylyl cyclase isozymes after acute and chronic administration

Morphine-3- and morphine-6-glucuronide are morphine's major metabolites. As morphine-6-glucuronide produces stronger analgesia than morphine, we investigated the effects of acute and chronic morphine glucuronides on adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity. Using COS-7 cells cotransfected with representatives of the nine cloned AC isozymes, we show that AC-I and V are inhibited by acute morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide, and undergo superactivation upon chronic exposure, while AC-II is stimulated by acute and inhibited by chronic treatment. Morphine-3-glucuronide had no effect. The weak opiate agonists codeine and dihydrocodeine are also addictive. These opiates, in contrast to their 3-O-demethylated metabolites morphine and dihydromorphine (formed by cytochrome P450 2D6), demonstrated neither acute inhibition nor chronic-induced superactivation. These results suggest that metabolites of morphine (morphine-6-glucuronide) and codeine/dihydrocodeine (morphine/dihydromorphine) may contribute to the development of opiate addiction.

The pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine glucuronide metabolites after subcutaneous bolus injection and subcutaneous infusion of morphine

AIMS

To investigate the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) in healthy volunteers after the administration of morphine by subcutaneous bolus injection (s.c.b.) and subcutaneous infusion (s.c. i.) over 4 h, and to compare the results with the intravenous bolus (i.v.) administration of morphine.

METHODS

Six healthy volunteers each received 5 mg morphine sulphate by i.v., s.c.b. and short s.c.i. over 4 h, on three separate occasions, in random order, each separated by at least 1 week. Plasma samples were assayed for morphine, M6G and M3G.

RESULTS

After i.v. morphine, the concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G and their pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those we have observed previously, in other healthy volunteers (when standardized to nmol l- 1, for a 10 mg dose to a 70 kg subject). After s.c.b. morphine, similar results were obtained except that the median tmax values for morphine and M3G were significantly longer than after i.v. morphine (P< 0.001 and P< 0.05, respectively), with a trend to a longer tmax for M6G (P = 0. 09). The appearance half-lives after s.c.b. morphine for M6G and M3G were also significantly longer than after i.v. morphine (P = 0.03 and P< 0.05, respectively). Comparison of log-transformed AUC values indicated that i.v. and s.c.b. administration of morphine were bioequivalent with respect to morphine, M6G and M3G. In comparison with i.v. morphine, morphine by s.c.i. was associated with significantly longer median tmax values for morphine (P< 0.001), M6G (P< 0.001) and M3G (P< 0.05), and the mean standardized Cmax values significantly lower than after both i.v. and s.c.b. morphine (morphine P< 0.001, M6G P< 0.001 and M3G P< 0.01 for each comparison). Comparison of log-transformed AUC values after i.v. and s.c.i. morphine indicated that the two routes were not bioequivalent for morphine (log-transformed AUC ratio 0.78, 90% CI 0.66-0.93), M6G (0.72, 90% CI 0.63-0.82), or M3G (0.65, 90% CI 0.54-0.78). A small stability study indicated no evidence of adsorptive losses from morphine infused over 4 h using the infusion devices from the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Although bioequivalence was demonstrated between the s. c.b. and i.v. routes of morphine administration, the bioavailabilities of morphine, M6G and M3G after s.c.i. were significantly lower than after i.v. administration. However, despite this, the study demonstrates that the subcutaneous route is an effective method for the parenteral administration of morphine.

Open questions on bioequivalence: some problems and some solutions

This paper focuses on some specific situations where bioequivalence requires careful attention and tailored protocols in order to overcome intrinsic difficulties either marginally covered or fully neglected by operating guidelines. Some problems congregate with serious difficulties, namely high variability, very poorly absorbed drugs and endogenous substances with their own baseline. With endogenous substances, the dilemma faced is whether to subtract baseline from post-dose values in assessing bioequivalence. Either approach has intrinsic problems and is somewhat puzzling. In an attempt to resolve other existing problems, the most appropriate approach should be selected on a case-by-case basis, ensuring that the adopted procedure does not conflict with operating guidelines and scientific literature on the matter. Problematic cases include the management of trials with a predominant active metabolite, the absence of a reliable analytical bioassay, the availability of various strengths of the same drug on the market, a wide acceptability titre range, the management of studies on topical drugs that are devoid of systemic activity, the management of drugs that cannot be given for ethical reasons to healthy subjects or that may cause adverse events, especially when a steady state design is required. The parallel group study design appears to be more appropriate than the cross-over or the individual bioequivalence design in assessing drugs with a long half-life. Some pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis-related issues are also discussed such as the sequence/period interaction sometimes encountered in these trials, which, in the absence of the carry-over effect, does not bias the bioequivalence results and the need to process data with non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis.

Elevated concentrations of morphine 6-beta-D-glucuronide in brain extracellular fluid despite low blood-brain barrier permeability

1 This study was done to find out how morphine 6-beta-D-glucuronide (M6G) induces more potent central analgesia than morphine, despite its poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. The brain uptake and disposition of these compounds were investigated in plasma and in various brain compartments: extracellular fluid (ECF), intracellular space (ICS) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). 2 Morphine or M6G was given to rats at 10 mg kg(-1) s.c. Transcortical microdialysis was used to assess their distributions in the brain ECF. Conventional tissue homogenization was used to determine the distribution in the cortex and whole brain. These two procedures were combined to estimate drug distribution in the brain ICS. The blood and CSF pharmacokinetics were also determined. 3 Plasma concentration data for M6G were much higher than those of morphine, with Cmax and AUC 4-5 times more higher, Tmax shorter, and VZf-1 (volume of distribution) and CL f(-1) (clearance) 4-6 times lower. The concentrations of the compounds in various brain compartments also differed: AUC values for M6G were lower than those of morphine in tissue and CSF and higher in brain ECF. AUC values in brain show that morphine levels were four times higher in ICS than in ECF, whereas M6G levels were 125 higher in ECF than in ICS. 4 Morphine entered brain cells, whereas M6G was almost exclusively extracellular. This high extracellular concentration, coupled with extremely slow diffusion into the CSF, indicates that M6G was predominantly trapped in the extracellular fluid and therefore durably available to bind at opioid receptors.

Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients: is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine?

Eighteen patients suffering from chronic pain due to cancer completed a balanced, double-blind, double-dummy, two period cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, after administration of morphine given as controlled-release (CR) tablets (every 12 h) and immediate-release (IR) tablets (every 6 h). The same total daily dose of morphine was given in both study periods. Patients received both test formulations for 4 days and on the final day of each period, peripheral venous blood samples for analysis of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide were obtained. Pain intensity, sedation, and continuous reaction time (CRT) were assessed. No significant differences could be demonstrated in AUC/dose, Cmin, Cmax or fluctuation index values between the two treatments (IR and CR tablets) for either morphine or its metabolites. Tmax for morphine and its metabolites occurred significantly later after administration of CR tablets than after administration of IR tablets. There were no significant differences between the IR and the CR formulation with respect to analgesia and side effects, and there was no difference in the patients' overall impression of the two treatments. More important, there was no difference between the Tmax and the time to peak sedation after administration of IR tablets (P = 0.63). However, due to the relatively small number of patients and the variability in the data, the statistical power of the test was only 0.074. The risk of a type II error is 0.926. These data demonstrate the PK and PD similarities and differences between CR and IR morphine. They suggest that there may be a relationship between Tmax (determined by absorption rate) and sedation, but further evaluation of this potential relationship is needed.

Population pharmacokinetics of oral morphine and its glucuronides in children receiving morphine as immediate-release liquid or sustained-release tablets for cancer pain

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) in children with cancer receiving morphine as immediate-release morphine liquid or sustained-release tablets. (2) To determine differences with age within the group and from adults. (3) To explore relationships between plasma concentration and pain measurements.

STUDY DESIGN

Blood samples were collected and plasma analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical and fluorescence detection. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were derived with the program P-PHARM.

RESULTS

Forty children with a median age of 11.4 years (range 1.7 to 18.7 years) received a median dose of 1.4 mg/kg/d (range 0.4 to 24.6 mg/kg/d). A median of 4 blood samples per child was collected. Plasma clearance of morphine was 23.1 mL/min per kg body weight. The volume of distribution was 5.2 L/kg. Molar ratios of M3G/morphine, M6G/morphine, and M3G/M6G were 21.1, 4.7, and 4.2, respectively. Children <11 years had significantly higher clearance and larger volume of distribution for morphine and its glucuronides than older children and adults. Regression analysis indicated average plasma morphine concentration equal to dose (mg/kg/d) x 8.6 (95% confidence interval 7.4 to 9.9). Significant pain was present in 30% of the children. Higher pain scores were recorded in children with average morphine concentrations <12 ng/mL (P <.01 MW).

CONCLUSION

Age differences in morphine pharmacokinetics exist within children and compared with adults. The study supports a starting dose of 1.5 to 2. 0 mg/kg/d to provide plasma morphine concentrations >12 ng/mL in children with cancer pain unrelieved by mild to moderate strength analgesia.

Morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of children

AIMS

To measure morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of children following a single intravenous dose of morphine.

METHODS

Twenty-nine paired samples of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma were collected from children with leukaemia undergoing therapeutic lumbar puncture. An intravenous dose of morphine was administered at selected intervals before the procedure. Concentrations of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were measured in each sample. Morphine was measured using a specific radioimmunoassay (r.i.a.) and M6G was measured using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

The ELISA for measuring M6G was highly sensitive. The intra-and interassay variations were less than 15%. Using a two-compartment model for plasma morphine, the area under the curve to infinity (AUC, 7143 ng ml-1 min), volume of distribution (3.6 l kg-1 ) and elimination half-life (88 min) were comparable with those reported in adults. Clearance (35 ml min-1 ) was higher than that in adults. Morphine-6-glucuronide was readily synthesized by the children in this study. The elimination half-life (321 min) and AUC (35507 ng ml-1 min) of plasma M6G were much greater than those of morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensive metabolism of morphine to M6G in children with cancer has been demonstrated. These data provide further evidence to support the importance of M6G accumulation after multiple doses. There was no evidence that morphine passed more easily into the CSF of children than adults.

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Functions and transcriptional regulation of PAH-inducible human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases

Functions and regulation of selected human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7, UGT2B15) are summarized. Evidence for at least two PAH-inducible UGTs (UGT1A6 and UGT1A9) is presented, which, however, are also constitutively expressed in a tissue- and cell-specific manner. These isoforms have recently been characterized to conjugate planar and bulky phenols, respectively. Using a selective RT-PCR method, UGT1A6 expression was detected in a variety of tissues (liver, kidney, lung, intestine, and pharyngeal mucosa). PAH-inducible UGTs may cooperate in the metabolism of phenolic metabolites of benzo(a)pyrene. Studies with stably expressed isoforms suggest that UGT1A9 is responsible for the formation of benzo(a)pyrene-3.6-diphenol diglucuronide, the major biliary metabolite of benzo(a)pyrene.

Immunoaffinity extraction of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide from blood of heroin victims for simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic determination

The development of an immunoaffinity-based extraction method for the determination of morphine and its glucuronides in human blood is described. For the preparation of an immunoadsorber, specific antisera (polyclonal, host: rabbit) against morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were coupled to 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole-activated tris-acrylgel and used for immunoaffinity extraction of morphine and its glucuronides from coronary blood. The resulting extracts were analysed by HPLC with native fluorescence detection. The mean recoveries from spiked blood samples were 71%, 76% and 88% for morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, respectively. The limit of detection was 3 ng/g blood and the limit of quantitation was 10 ng/g blood for all three analytes. The results of the analysis of coronary blood samples from 23 fatalities due to heroin are presented.

The influence of the route of administration: a comparative study at steady state of oral sustained release morphine and morphine sulfate suppositories

Steady state pharmacokinetics of morphine (M), morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were investigated in 6 patients with intractable cancer pain administered orally with MST (Mundipharma, Limburg, Germany) and, subsequently, rectally with MSR to make a judgment whether orally administered morphine can be replaced by rectally administered morphine. The parent drug and glucuronide metabolites were measured simultaneously using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and native fluorescence detection. The mean morphine area under the curve (AUC) value (0-8 h) was smaller (434.3 +/- 170.2 nmolL(-1)h) in the oral administration than in the rectal administration (574.8 +/- 285.0 nmolL(-1)h) (p < 0.05). The rectal administration resulted in less production of M3G and M6G. There were no significant differences in the mean steady state concentrations (C(ss)) of morphine, M3G, and M6G between the oral and rectal administrations (p > 0.05). The median AUC ratio--M3G/M and M6G/M, 12.58 and 1.85--following MSR rectal administration was smaller than following MST oral administration in 6 patients (19.97 and 2.59; p < 0.05), whereas the median AUC ratio M3G/M6G in the rectal dosing was 6.24 (range 5.2-7.6) was almost the same as the median ratio M3G/M6G in the oral dosing was 6.49 (range 5.8-8.5; p > 0.1). Four of the 6 patients had a greater Cmax of M3G and M6G after oral administration than after rectal administration. The same 4 had lower fluctuation rates for morphine, M3G (p < 0.05), and M6G (p < 0.05) after rectal administration. Therefore, during chronic morphine treatment, it still seems difficult to decide whether oral administration can be replaced by rectal administration.

The role of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in the determination of heroin and related opioids in biological fluids

The opioid most commonly sold in the illicit market is heroin. This substance, classified as an analgesic narcotic drug, has an extremely short half-life, and it is rapidly metabolized to 6-monoacetyl-morphine and further to morphine. Morphine is principally metabolized by conjugation to morphine-3 and morphine-6 glucuronides. Morphine itself is a potent analgesic that is frequently used in the pharmacological intervention of cancer pain. The toxicological and clinical evaluation of heroin and morphine have stimulated pharmacokinetic studies in human and animal models. Although a number of methods exist to determine opiates and their metabolites, liquid chromatography (LC) appears to be the technique that can separate without any pretreatment the lipophilic and the hydrophilic analytes of the complete metabolic profile of heroin and/or morphine. Moreover, mass spectrometry (MS) used as a detector for liquid chromatography is unique, because it offers universality and selectivity. Furthermore, efforts have been made to develop LC/MS interfaces that could overcome the previous problem of poor sensitivity. For this reason, in recent years LC combined with MS has been applied to the analysis of opiates--parent drugs and metabolites--in biological fluids. This article reviews the existing literature on the determination, using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, of opiate metabolites found in different biological matrices after the administration of the parent compounds.

Rapid, highly sensitive method for the determination of morphine and its metabolites in body fluids by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

A rapid, highly sensitive method for the determination of morphine and its metabolites morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and normorphine has been developed using high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry, with the deuterated analogues as internal standards. The analytes were extracted automatically using end-capped C2 solid-phase extraction cartridges. Baseline separation of morphine, M3G and M6G was achieved on a LiChrospher 100 RP-18 end-capped analytical column (125x3 mm I.D., 5 microm particle size) with water-acetonitrile-tetrahydrofuran-formic acid (100:1:1:0.1, v/v) as the mobile phase. Morphine and normorphine coeluate and were separated mass spectrometrically. The mass spectrometer was operated in the selected-ion monitoring mode using m/z 272 for normorphine, m/z 286 for morphine, m/z 462 for morphine-6-glucuronide. Due to an interfering peak, M3G was measured by tandem mass spectrometry in the daughter-ion mode. The limits of quantitation achieved with this method were 1.3 pmol/ml for morphine, 1.5 pmol/ml for normorphine, 1.0 pmol/ml for M6G and 5.4 pmol/ml for M3G in serum or cerebrospinal fluid. The limits of quantitation achieved in urine were 10 pmol/ml for morphine, 20 pmol/ml for normorphine and M6G and 50 pmol/ml for M3G using a sample size of 100 microl. The method described was successfully applied to the determination of morphine and its metabolites in human serum, cerebrospinal fluid and urine in pharmacokinetic and drug interaction studies.

[Conventional techniques for analgesia: opioids and non-opioids. Indications, adverse effects and monitoring]

Morphine dosage must be carefully adapted in patients with renal failure or severe liver failure. The i.v. route is used for morphine titration in the post anaesthesia care unit (PACU), or for analgesia in children. Systematic (not on demand) intramuscular or subcutaneous morphine must be administered at intervals not longer than 4 hours. Dosage is best determined after i.v. titration in the PACU. Codeine, administered orally, is metabolised into morphine. Codeine has almost no effect in 7% of Caucasians and at least 15% of Asians. Nalbuphine, which has a sedative effect and a short half-life, is mainly used in children. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is used orally or rectally, most often in combination with codeine. Paracetamol dosage is 60-90 mg.kg-1.d-1, including a 20 mg (orally), or 40 mg (rectally) loading dose. Its therapeutic ratio is low, with a potential hepatic toxicity. Dosage must be lowered in alcoholics or in patients under isoniazide therapy. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are powerful antinociceptive agents. Their use must be restricted to the first 5 postoperative days. Their major contraindications are kidney failure, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, coagulation disorders, allergy. They also have a marked morphine sparing effect and reduce therefore the respiratory depression induced by morphine.

Pharmacokinetics of morphine-6-glucuronide and its formation from morphine after intravenous administration

BACKGROUND

Morphine-6-beta-glucuronide is a primary morphine metabolite with potent opioid action. However, its low and slow brain permeability eventually prevents its central opioid effects after short-term intravenous administration. Research is needed to establish whether morphine-6-beta-glucuronide qualifies as an analgesic; this study provides the pharmacokinetic bases for such studies.

METHODS

Plasma concentration-time data of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide and morphine obtained from 20 healthy volunteers after short-term intravenous administration of either morphine-6-beta-glucuronide or morphine were described by a biexponential disposition curve. Disposition parameters of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide and morphine were estimated by nonlinear regression, and basic pharmacokinetic parameters (clearance, volume of distribution at steady state, and mean disposition residence time) were derived. A new model of metabolite kinetics was applied, and the disposition parameters of morphine and morphine-6-beta-glucuronide were then used to fit the plasma concentration-time profile of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide formed from morphine. Thereby the fraction of morphine metabolized to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide and the mean transit time of morphine across the site of metabolism were estimated.

RESULTS

The extent and time course of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide formation from morphine could be well described by a parametric model, with a fraction of morphine metabolized to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide of 7.55% +/- 1.24% and a mean metabolic transit time for morphine to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide of 0.28 +/- 0.21 hour. The underlying disposition of morphine and morphine-6-beta-glucuronide was characterized by clearance (morphine clearance, 32.7 +/- 6 ml.min-1.kg-1, morphine-6-beta-glucuronide clearance, 2.2 +/- 0.4 ml.min-1.kg-1), volume of distribution at steady state (morphine, 1.8 +/- 0.3 L.hr-1; morphine-6-beta-glucuronide, 0.12 +/- 0.02 L.hr-1), and mean disposition residence time (morphine, 1.8 +/- 0.4 hours; morphine-6-beta-glucuronide, 1.7 +/- 0.4 hours).

CONCLUSIONS

The time course of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide formation kinetics was analyzed with use of the information on the disposition kinetics of both morphine and preformed morphine-6-beta-glucuronide, which was obtained by separate data fits. The transformation of morphine to morphine-6-beta-glucuronide could be described by two parameters characterizing the extent and delay of metabolite formation. The results of this study will serve as pharmacokinetic bases of future investigations of morphine-6-beta-glucuronide in human beings.

Simultaneous determination of codeine and its seven metabolites in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and electrochemical detection

A sensitive and selective high-performance liquid chromatography method has been developed for the measurement of codeine and its seven metabolites, norcodeine, morphine, normorphine, codeine-6-glucuronide, morphine-6-glucuronide, morphine-3-glucuronide and norcodeine glucuronide, in plasma and urine. The compounds were recovered from plasma and urine using solid-phase extraction with C18 cartridges and separated on a reversed-phase C8 column with a mobile phase consisting of 77% buffer (5 mM sodium phosphate monobasic and 0.70 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate, pH 2.35) and 23% acetonitrile. Codeine, norcodeine, codeine-6-glucuronide, norcodeine glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide were detected by ultraviolet detection at 214 nm, with a detection limit of 0.02 nmol/ml for each compound in plasma. Morphine-6-glucuronide, normorphine and morphine were monitored by electrochemical detection at 350 mV, with a detection limit of 0.003 nmol/ml for each compound in plasma. The assay showed good reproducibility and accuracy using external standardization. The recovery and inter-day variation for all compounds in plasma samples were 63.40-77.90% and 3.49-16.77% (R.S.D.) and while in urine were 64.98-90.13% and 2.93-9.96% (R.S.D.), respectively.

Determination of morphine in urine by solid-phase immunoextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

The analysis of morphine in biological fluids is of vital interest in monitoring opiate abuse and in drug abuse research. Although methods for analysis of morphine and its metabolites are well established, studies are still being carried out to improve sample preparation procedures as well as detection levels of morphine in biological samples. In this study, morphine-specific immunosorbents were developed to concentrate morphine prior to HPLC analysis. Urine (0.1 ml) was diluted 10-fold with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS), loaded onto a solid-phase immunoextraction column and washed with 15 ml PBS followed by elution with 2 ml of elution buffer (40% ethanol in PBS, pH 4). The eluted fraction was analysed for morphine by HPLC-electrochemical detection using a cyanopropyl (CN) analytical column with 25% acetonitrile in phosphate buffer-sodium lauryl sulphate, pH 2.4 as the mobile phase. Duration of the extraction procedure was approximately 40 min. Calibration graphs were linear from 100 ng ml-1 to 500 ng ml-1 in urine. The inter-assay R.S.D. was < 10% and the recovery of morphine from urine was > 98%. Immunocolumns demonstrated remarkably high specificity towards morphine showing minimal binding with other opiate metabolites such as codeine, normorphine, norcodeine, morphine-3-glucuronide, morphine-6-glucuronide.

High-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry analysis of morphine and morphine metabolites and its application to a pharmacokinetic study in male Sprague-Dawley rats

A high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) assay was developed for the analyses of morphine, morphine glucuronides and normorphine in plasma samples from rats. The analytes were extracted by using C2 solid-phase extraction cartridges. The extraction recoveries were 100% for morphine, 84% for morphine-3-glucuronide, 64% for morphine-6-glucuronide and 88% for normorphine. Both intra- and inter-assay variabilities were below 11%. Using a plasma sample size of 100 microliters, the limits of detection were 13 nmol l-1 (3.8 ng ml-1) for morphine, 12 nmol l-1 (5.5 ng ml-1) for morphine-3-glucuronide, 26 nmol l-1 (12 ng ml-1) for morphine-6-glucuronide and 18 nmol l-1 (5.0 ng ml-1) for normorphine, at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. The present assay was applied to a pharmacokinetic study in rats after intraperitoneal administration of morphine.

A pharmacodynamic study of morphine and its glucuronide metabolites after single morphine dosing in cancer patients with pain

Eleven morphine naïve patients with cancer-related pain were given a single dose of either intravenous morphine (n = 5) or oral morphine (n = 6). Blood sampling was performed over a 24-hr period and serial pain assessments were made using a categorical scale. Plasma samples were analyzed for morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G), morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G), and normorphine using high-performance liquid chromatography. In neither the intravenous nor oral group was there a correlation between analgesia duration and the half-lives of morphine and M-6-G. There was no correlation between the time to peak analgesia and time to peak concentration for morphine or M-6-G. There was no significant difference in absolute concentrations of M-6-G or M-3-6 nor in the ratio of M-3-G to M-6-G at peak analgesia versus relapse.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of illicit drug use and treatment of illicit drug users

Many clinicians are confronted by the use of illicit drugs on a daily basis. The unsanctioned use of opioids, psychostimulants, benzodiazepines, alcohol and nicotine is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Multiple factors have inhibited the scientific study of these agents including prohibition, public denial and lack of commercial interests. In dealing with problems related to these drugs, clinicians need a scientific understanding of their pharmacology, quantifiable effects and potential adverse effects. Illicit drug users select drugs with particular pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic properties. Generally, rapid absorption, rapid entry into the central nervous system, high bioavailability, short half-life, small volume of distribution and high free drug clearance are pharmacokinetic characteristics which predict a high potential for harmful use because these factors increase positive reinforcement. Drug users adapt the method and route of drug administration to optimise the delivery of the drug to the brain while attempting to maximise the bioavailability of the drug. Inhalation and smoking are the routes of administration which allow the most rapid delivery of drug to the brain, while intravenous injection maximises the bioavailability of an administered drug. Each route of administration results in attendant complications related to mucosal damage, carcinogenesis and risk of infection. Negative reinforcement or withdrawal is a major drive to recurrent use. Many illicit drugs have pharmacological features that promote dependence, including long half-life, low free drug clearance and sufficient drug exposure to allow development of tolerance. The preventive or reductive pharmacotherapeutics of illicit drug use makes use of several subsets of agents: those which act on the same receptor or system as the illicit drug (such as methadone), those which produce an adverse reaction on consumption of the illicit drug (such as disulfiram) and those which symptomatically attenuate illicit drug withdrawal symptoms (such as clonidine). Many new agents are being trialled as potential preventive or reductive agents. It is important to consider pharmacotherapy as only one potential part of the treatment of illicit drug users. The complications of illicit drug use present many therapeutic challenges. As with all patients consuming multiple drugs, illicit drug users are prone to developing drug interactions. The most common interactions seen in practice are pharmacodynamic in nature, most often due to the additive effects of different drugs on the central nervous system. However, alcohol, cocaine, disulfiram, methadone and tricyclic antidepressants may be involved in important pharmacokinetic interactions. Of these the effect of long term alcohol consumption in increasing the hepatotoxicity of paracetamol and of cytochrome P450 3A microsomal enzyme stimulating drugs in diminishing the efficacy of methadone are the most commonly encountered.

Plasma morphine and glucuronide (M3G and M6G) concentrations in hospice inpatients

Plasma morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) concentrations were quantified by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 36 hospice inpatients receiving morphine orally or subcutaneously. The data were analyzed in relation to dose, serum creatinine, serum gamma glutamyl transferase, and presence or absence of opioid-induced adverse effects. There were significant associations (P < 0.05) between plasma morphine, M3G (subcutaneous route only), and M6G concentrations and dose for both routes of administration. The mean dose-corrected plasma morphine concentration for the subcutaneous group was three times that of the oral group, confirming present oral to subcutaneous dose conversion practices. Nineteen patients experienced symptoms attributed to morphine: nausea and vomiting in ten and acute delirium in nine. Serum creatinine was elevated in patients with adverse effects (P = 0.031), as were the dose-corrected plasma M3G (P = 0.029) and M6G (P = 0.043) concentrations. All seven patients with serum creatinine concentrations above the normal range had symptoms attributed to opioid-induced adverse effects. Plasma M3G, M6G, and dose-corrected plasma M3G and M6G concentrations were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in these patients than in those with normal serum creatinine concentrations. The data indicate that accumulation of M3G and M6G may be a causal or aggravating factor in the nausea and vomiting and cognitive function profile of palliative and terminal care patients with significant renal function impairment.

Intravenous versus intraperitoneal morphine before surgery to provide postoperative pain relief

BACKGROUND

Opioid receptors have been demonstrated on peripheral afferent nerves throughout the body. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of morphine with regard to pain, postoperative morphine requirement, and recovery after major abdominal surgery, and to describe the pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal morphine in humans.

METHODS

In a double-blind manner, 30 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were randomized to either 50 mg of morphine intravenously (i.v.) or 50 mg of morphine intraperitoneally (i.p.) before operation. Pain was measured on a visual analogue scale and morphine requirements were registered for 3 days. Recovery was measured as time to oral intake of food, time to flatulence and days in hospital. Plasma morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide concentrations were determined during the first 4 h after morphine administration.

RESULTS

During the first postoperative hours there was less pain at rest (P = 0.02) and on coughing (P = 0.004) in the intravenous group. The requirement of additional morphine (P = 0.016) was lower in the intravenous group during the first postoperative day. No major differences in recovery were seen. The plasma concentrations of morphine measured as area under the curve (AUC) during the first 4 h were similar, but the intravenous group showed significantly higher concentrations of the active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide, (P = 0.016), indicating a difference in pharmacokinetics after intraperitoneal compared to intravenous administration of morphine.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal administration of 50 mg of morphine before major abdominal surgery is less efficient in reducing pain and postoperative morphine requirements than the same amount of morphine given intravenously.

Role of morphine glucuronide metabolites in morphine dependence in the rat

Concentrations of morphine and its 3- and 6-glucuronide metabolites (M3G and M6G) in plasma, brain, and urine of rats exposed to morphine for either 24 or 48 h were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. In another group of morphine-treated rats, the intensity of naloxone-precipitated withdrawal behaviours was monitored at 24 and 48 h. The behavioural effects of M3G in opiate-naive and opiate-dependent rats were also investigated. Morphine was present in plasma, urine, and brain at 24 and 48 h, whereas M3G was detected in plasma and urine only. M6G was not present in detectable quantities in either plasma, urine, or brain. Although plasma concentrations of M3G were similar in both time groups, rats treated for 48 h had significantly larger quantities of M3G in their urine than did the other treatment groups. The incidence of withdrawal behaviour was significantly higher in animals exposed to morphine for 48 h than in those with only 24 h of exposure, M3G had no behavioural effects in the opiate-naive rats and did not precipitate an opiate-abstinence syndrome in morphine-dependent rats. From these results, it was concluded that although M3G is the major product formed by morphine breakdown in rats, it is unlikely that it is involved in the development of morphine dependence in this species.

Strychnine-like multifocal myoclonus and seizures in extremely high-dose opioid administration: treatment strategies

While occasional myoclonic jerks are prevalent in cancer patients receiving opioids, severe myoclonic jerks and seizures due to opioids are uncommon. In this retrospective case series, we describe five cancer patients with refractory cancer pain and severe neuroexcitatory toxicity associated with extremely high-dose opioid therapy to characterize better the syndrome, its treatment, and its outcome. Two patients died following seizures, but three patients recovered following prompt treatment with parenteral midazolam infusions and rotation to alternative opioids. Possible mechanisms and treatment options for this potentially lethal clinical syndrome are reviewed. The authors conclude that severe multifocal myoclonus and seizures associated with extremely high-dose opioid therapy are life-threatening, and respond to parenteral midazolam infusion, rotation to alternative opioids, and aggressive supportive care.

The role of beta-glucuronidase in drug disposition and drug targeting in humans

Glucuronides of drugs often accumulate during long term therapy. The hydrolysis of glucuronides can be catalysed by beta-glucuronidase, an enzyme expressed in many tissues and body fluids in humans. The possible contribution of beta-glucuronidase to drug disposition in humans has not been assessed in a systematic manner, but this enzyme may be able to release, locally or systemically, the active or inactive parent compound from drug glucuronides, thereby modifying the disposition and action of these drugs. Based on the information available on the localisation, expression and variability of beta-glucuronidase, the concept of beta-glucuronidase-mediated drug metabolism is outlined in this article using examples from the literature. Since some issues surrounding the beta-glucuronidase-mediated deconjugation of drug glucuronides still need to be clarified in humans, additional data from animal models supporting this concept have been included. Moreover, as beta-glucuronidase has already been proven to be useful in tumour specific bioactivation of glucuronide prodrugs of anticancer agents, we also focus on anticancer prodrug approaches utilising beta-glucuronidase. This review summarises the role of beta-glucuronidase in drug disposition and drug targeting in humans.

Morphine metabolites

Morphine is a potent opioid analgesic widely used for the treatment of acute pain and for long-term treatment of severe pain. Morphine is a member of the morphinan-framed alkaloids, which are present in the poppy plant. The drug is soluble in water, but its solubility in lipids is poor. In man, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) are the major metabolites of morphine. The metabolism of morphine occurs not only in the liver, but may also take place in the brain and the kidneys. The glucuronides are mainly eliminated via bile and urine. Glucuronides as a rule are considered as highly polar metabolites unable to cross the blood-brain barrier. Although morphine glucuronidation has been demonstrated in human brain tissue, the capacity is very low compared to that of the liver, indicating that the M3G and M6G concentrations observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after systemic administration reflect hepatic metabolism of morphine and that the morphine glucuronides, despite their high polarity, can penetrate into the brain. Like morphine, M6G has been shown to be relatively more selective for mu-receptors than for delta- and kappa-receptors while M3G does not appear to compete for opioid receptor binding. The analgesic properties of M6G were recognised in the early 1970s and more recent work suggests that M6G might significantly contribute to the opioid analgesia after administration of morphine. The analgesic potency of M6G after intracerebroventricular (ICV) or intrathecal (IT) administration in rats is from 45-800 timer greater than that of morphine, depending on the animal species and the experimental antinociceptive test used. Furthermore, the development of a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay for the quantitative determination of morphine, M6G and M3G has revealed that M6G and M3G were present in abundance after chronic oral morphine administration and that the area under the plasma concentration-time curve exceeded that of morphine. M3G has been found to antagonise morphine and M6G induced analgesia and ventilatory depression in the rat, which has led to the hypothesis that M3G may influence the development of morphine tolerance. M3G exhibits no analgesic effect after ICV or IT administration. Some studies do, however, indicate that M3G may cause non-opioid mediated hyperalgesia/allodynia and convulsions after IT administration in rats. These observations led to the hypothesis that M3G might be responsible for side-effects, hyperalgesia/allodynia and myoclonus seen after high-dose morphine treatment.

Principles of drug administration in renal insufficiency

Normal renal function is important for the excretion and metabolism of many drugs. Renal diseases which affect glomerular blood flow and filtration, tubular secretion, reabsorption and renal parenchymal mass alter drug clearances and lead to the need for alterations in dosage regimens to optimise therapeutic outcome and minimise the risk of toxicity. Renal disease is increasing and the cost of care has risen progressively over the past decade. Part of these costs is related to inappropriate drug therapy and excessive drug use. Although there are a variety of methods for evaluating the various aspects of renal function, the most practical and commonly used clinical measure of renal function is estimated creatinine clearance (CLCR) as a marker for glomerular filtration. This is useful since alterations in drug clearance are proportional to alterations in CLCR, and this relationship is used as the basis for changing doses and dosage intervals for drugs which are largely renally excreted. Two populations, neonates and the elderly, are at risk of inappropriate drug dosage due to physiological changes in renal function. Estimated CLCR may not be the best method of evaluating renal function in these patients, and dosage regimens should be carefully considered. Renal insufficiency and concurrent drug therapy used in these populations can either increase or decrease drug absorption, depending on the particular agent. Drug distribution may be altered in renal insufficiency due to pH-dependent protein binding and reduced protein (primarily albumin) levels. Interestingly, renal disease may affect hepatic as well as renal drug metabolism; the exact mechanisms for these changes are not well understood. The most important quantitative pharmacokinetic change is excretion. Glomerular filtration and tubular process may both be affected but not to the same extent, and the type of renal disease may differentially affect filtration and excretion. Drug removal by dialysis is dependent on a number of factors, including the characteristics of a particular drug and the type of dialysis and equipment used. Therapeutic outcomes may be evaluated using end-points such as plasma concentrations, patient outcomes such as reduction in fever or negative cultures, and system-wide changes such as drug-use or laboratory-use patterns.

Concentrations of morphine and morphine metabolites in CSF and plasma during continuous subcutaneous morphine administration in cancer pain patients

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) steady-state concentrations (Css) of morphine (M) and the main metabolites morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 21 cancer patients treated with chronic subcutaneous morphine infusion. There was a moderate, but statistically significant correlation between the daily dose of morphine and the concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF. A poorer correlation to concentrations were seen in plasma. The mean +/- SEM CSF/plasma morphine concentration ratio was 0.36 +/- 0.07. In plasma and CSF, the mean steady state concentration of M3G but not M6G substantially exceeded that of morphine where the mean CSF M/M3G/M6G ratio was 1:15:0.5 (molar basis), and the mean plasma ratio was M/M3G/M6G 1:31:3 (molar basis). The mean M3G and M6G concentrations in CSF were approximately 8 and 10% of those found in plasma, but there was a wide interindividual variation. Plasma concentrations of both morphine glucuronides were positively correlated to serum creatinine. Neither pain intensity, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), nor side effects showed any relationship to the CSF M3G concentrations, M3G/M or the M3G/M6G ratios. We conclude that during steady state subcutaneous administration of morphine, there is a large interindividual variation in plasma morphine with poor relationship to the daily administered dose. In CSF this correlation was more evident. Plasma and CSF concentrations of M3G and CSF concentrations of M6G correlated with administered morphine dose. There was an accumulation of both morphine glucuronides in patients with elevated serum creatinine. Measurements of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF did not show any overt relationship to analgesia or side effects.

A pharmacokinetic study of sublingual aerosolized morphine in healthy volunteers

A pharmacokinetic study was undertaken to compare the pharmacokinetics of morphine after an intravenous dose with the pharmacokinetics after a sublingual dose administered from an aerosol. Plasma levels of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were measured in five normal volunteers after morphine administration by the intravenous route and from a novel sublingual pressurized aerosol formulation. The mean (+/- s.d.) bioavailability of the sublingual aerosol morphine was 19.7 +/- 6.7%. The morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine and the morphine-6-glucuronide/morphine ratios were 5.1 +/- 1.6 and 1.2 +/- 0.4, respectively, for the intravenous route and 28.3 +/- 11.3 and 5.2 +/- 1.4, respectively, for the sublingual route. The combined total areas under the plots of systemic concentration against time (AUC) for the metabolites after the two routes was not significantly different. When compared with published data for oral administration the results demonstrate that the sublingual aerosol morphine might provide an alternative to conventional methods of morphine delivery, and has similar pharmacokinetics to a sublingual morphine tablet. It has no particular pharmacokinetic advantages over oral morphine, except a potential for a faster onset of analgesia. Bioavailability, maximum plasma concentration, Cpmax, and the time at which the maximum plasma concentration is reached, Tmax, are equivalent to those for orally administered morphine.

Pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly. Do they contribute to drug abuse and dependence?

The elderly frequently use psychoactive drugs including alcohol (ethanol), benzodiazepines and opioid analgesics, which have a propensity to cause abuse and dependence. Theoretically, the changes in pharmacokinetics of these agents in the elderly may modify their abuse and dependence potential. In the elderly, blood alcohol concentrations following an oral dose are higher, alcohol withdrawal syndrome follows a more severe and protracted clinical course and requires treatment with higher doses of chlordiazepoxide than needed for younger adults. However, there is no direct evidence that supports an increased direct abuse and dependence potential of alcohol because of its altered kinetics in the elderly. In the case of oxidatively metabolised benzodiazepine, both age-related pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic changes may increase their clinical effects in the elderly. The hypothesis that benzodiazepines have an increased abuse and dependence potential in the elderly has not been tested. Many of the benzodiazepines (e.g. alprazolam, triazolam and midazolam) are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A subfamily. The pharmacokinetics of these agents may be modified by inhibition of CYP3A due to concurrently administered medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Unfortunately, data on the direct measures of abuse and dependence potential of benzodiazepines are not available in the elderly. Thus, a conclusive statement on the contribution of age-related pharmacokinetic changes to benzodiazepine abuse and dependence cannot be made at the present time. The clinical effects of codeine do not appear to change with age. Codeine is O-demethylated to its active metabolite morphine by the genetically polymorphic CYP2D6 isozyme. The activity of this isozyme is unaltered by age, gender or smoking habits; however, it is subject to potent inhibition by some of the frequently used medications in the elderly, such as the antidepressants paroxetine and fluoxetine. This may result in an impairment in O-demethylation of codeine to morphine and may lead to a decrease in the abuse and dependence potential of codeine. Conversely, those with a very rapid CYP2D6 catalytic activity may have an increased potential for codeine abuse and dependence. The clinical significance of age-related pharmacokinetic changes should be evaluated within the context of clinical practice. Most physicians are inclined to prescribe lower doses to the elderly, which may offset the potential impact of altered pharmacokinetics on the abuse and dependence potential of psychoactive agents. In summary, the available data are not sufficient for a definitive conclusion on whether the pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly translate to an increase in the abuse and dependence potential of alcohol, benzodiazepines or opioids. In particular, the data on age-associated changes in direct measures of abuse potential of these agents are missing. Future comparative systemic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies assessing pertinent outcome measures on abuse and dependence potential of commonly used psychoactive drugs are required to resolve the ongoing controversy on risk factors for drug abuse and dependence in the elderly.

A comparison of intrathecal morphine-6-glucuronide and intrathecal morphine sulfate as analgesics for total hip replacement

Postoperative analgesia was assessed after intrathecal administration of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) 100 micrograms and 125 micrograms in 75 patients undergoing total hip replacement. Analgesia was excellent and was similar to that obtained after intrathecal administration of morphine sulfate 500 micrograms. Visual analog pain scores recorded postoperatively were low (median = 0) and were similar in all three groups. However, at 6 and 10 h after operation significantly more patients in the M6G 125 group recorded pain as 0 compared with patients in the morphine group (P < 0.04, P < 0.01) and significantly more patients in the M6G 100 group recorded pain as 0 at 24 h after operation compared with patients in the morphine group (P < 0.04). Postoperative meperidine consumption using a patient-controlled system was also similar in each of the three treatment groups. Nausea and emesis occurred frequently in all groups; morphine (nausea 88%, vomiting 76%), M6G 100 micrograms (nausea 76%, vomiting 64%), and M6G 125 micrograms (nausea 88%, vomiting 60%). Respiratory depression occurred in two and three patients, respectively, in the M6G 100-microgram and 125-microgram groups but did not occur in any patient who received morphine sulfate. The lack of statistical significance in the difference in incidence of respiratory depression between the groups may represent a type II error. However, the risk of late respiratory depression developing after administration of any intrathecal opioid necessitates careful postoperative observation of patients. As M6G is a potent intrathecal analgesic further investigation of this drug using small doses may be useful.