The direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement: the EXPRESS study

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, an alternative for anticoagulant treatment during the puerperium and lactation

OBJECTIVE

To determine the excretion of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI), ximelagatran, and its active form, melagatran, in human milk, and to thus evaluate the potential exposure of breastfed infants to melagatran.

DESIGN

An open, single dose, single centre study.

SETTING

Department of Antenatal Care, Primary Health Care South Bohuslän and Institute for the Health of Women and Children, Göteborg University, Sweden.

SAMPLE

Seven healthy Caucasian breastfeeding women who were at least two months postpartum were studied.

METHODS

The concentrations of ximelagatran, its two intermediates, and melagatran were determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, with the limit of quantification of 2 nmol L(-1) for human milk and 10 nmol L(-1) for plasma concentrations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Concentrations of ximelagatran, its intermediates and melagatran were measured in breast milk over 72 hours, and in plasma over 12 hours, after a single oral 36 mg dose of ximelagatran.

RESULTS

Neither ximelagatran nor its intermediates were detected in human breast milk. Only trace amounts of melagatran were detected. The mean cumulative amount of melagatran excreted into breast milk over the 72-hour period after dosing with oral ximelagatran was 0.00091% of the administered dose of ximelagatran. Ximelagatran was well tolerated, with no clinically relevant changes in laboratory variables or vital signs.

CONCLUSIONS

Trace levels of melagatran are excreted in human breast milk following administration of the oral DTI ximelagatran. The exposure of breastfed infants to melagatran appears to be low and is therefore unlikely to be of clinical concern.

Dose-response study of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (ART-123) in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (ART-123) is composed of the active, extracellular, domain of thrombomodulin. ART-123 binds to thrombin and this complex converts protein C into the natural anticoagulant activated protein C. This study was performed to identify an effective and safe dose of ART-123 for prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective, unilateral total hip replacement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An open-label, sequential, dose-ranging study was performed in which 312 patients received either 0.3 mg kg(-1) or 0.45 mg kg(-1) of ART-123, subcutaneously, 2-4 h after surgery (day 1). Those who received 0.3 mg kg(-1) were given a second dose of 0.3 mg kg(-1) on day 6, and the first 29 of these patients also used intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Those who received 0.45 mg kg(-1) were not given a second dose. Primary efficacy outcome was all deep vein thrombosis on mandatory bilateral venography performed on day 9 +/- 2 and symptomatic venous thromboembolism up to day 11. Primary safety outcome was major bleeding up to day 11. Among patients who did not use intermittent pneumatic compression, venous thromboembolism occurred in 3.4% of 116 evaluable patients in the 0.3 mg kg(-1) group and 0.9% of 111 patients in the 0.45 mg kg(-1) group. Major bleeding occurred in 1.4% of 139 patients in the 0.3 mg kg(-1) group and 6.3% of 144 patients in the 0.45 mg kg(-1) group.

CONCLUSION

ART-123 is a highly effective antithrombotic agent that should be directly compared with current methods of prophylaxis in patients who have major orthopedic surgery.

New anticoagulants: beyond heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin

The limitations of traditional anticoagulants, heparin and warfarin, have prompted the development of new anticoagulant drugs for prevention and treatment of both venous and arterial thromboembolism. After a brief review of thrombogenesis and its regulation, this paper focuses on new anticoagulant agents in more advanced stages of clinical testing.

A single-centre prospective study of clinical and haemostatic risk factors for venous thromboembolism following lower limb arthroplasty

Previous studies report conflicting results concerning the potential significance of thrombophilic genotypes in postarthroplasty venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study assessed thrombophilic genotypes, haemostatic and clinical variables as independent risk factors for VTE postarthroplasty. A total number of 569 patients undergoing elective lower limb arthroplasty at a single centre were prospectively studied. All patients were interviewed and had blood samples collected preoperatively. Bilateral lower limb ultrasonography was performed at day 7 +/- 2 postoperatively in all patients (ventilation/perfusion lung scanning in symptomatic patients only). The incidence of inhospital postoperative VTE was 26%. In univariate analysis - increased age, knee arthroplasty, recent surgery, general anaesthesia, shorter operation time, non-receipt of blood transfusion and differences in surgical practice (including use of pneumatic calf compression, surgical drains and postoperative bandaging techniques) were significantly associated with VTE. Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations were not significant risk factors for VTE, and of all haemostatic variables tested, only median activated partial thromboplastin time showed significant difference between VTE and non-VTE patients (34 s vs. 33 s). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that increased age, knee arthroplasty and individual surgeon's routine practices were the only significant independent risks for VTE; hence routine preoperative blood screening for a potential hypercoaguable state is not indicated in this surgical setting.

Deep vein thrombosis

Deep vein thrombosis and its sequelae pulmonary embolism and post-thrombotic syndrome are some of the most common disorders. A thrombus either arises spontaneously or is caused by clinical conditions including surgery, trauma, or prolonged bed rest. In these instances, prophylaxis with low-dose anticoagulation is effective. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis relies on imaging techniques such as ultrasonography or venography. Only about 25% of symptomatic patients have a thrombus. Thus, clinical risk assessment and D-dimer measurement are used to rule out deep vein thrombosis. Thrombus progression and embolisation can be prevented by low-molecular-weight heparin followed by vitamin K antagonists. Use of these antagonists for 3-6 months is sufficient for many patients. Those with antithrombin deficiency, the lupus anticoagulant, homozygous or combined defects, or with previous deep vein thrombosis can benefit from indefinite anticoagulation. In cancer patients, low-molecular-weight heparin is more effective than and is at least as safe as vitamin K antagonists. Women seem to have a lower thrombosis risk than men, but pregnancy or use of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy represent important risk factors.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of surgical procedures. The risk for VTE in surgical patients is determined by the combination of individual predisposing factors and the specific type of surgery. Prophylaxis with mechanical and pharmacological methods has been shown to be effective and safe in most types of surgery and should be routinely implemented. For patients undergoing general, gynecologic, vascular, and major urologic surgery, low-dose unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are the options of choice. For low-risk urologic surgery, early postoperative mobilization of patients is the only intervention warranted. For higher-risk patients, including those undergoing elective hip or knee replacement and surgery for hip fracture, vitamin K antagonists, LMWH, or fondaparinux are recommended. For patients undergoing neurosurgery, graduated elastic stockings are effective and safe and may be combined with LMWH to further reduce the risk of VTE. The role of prophylaxis is less defined in patients undergoing elective spine surgery, as well as laparoscopic and arthroscopic surgery. A number of issues related to prophylaxis of VTE after surgery deserve further clarification, including the role of screening for asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, the best timing for initiation of pharmacological prophylaxis, and the optimal duration of prophylaxis in high-risk patients.

Novel uses for current and future direct thrombin inhibitors: focus on ximelagatran and bivalirudin

Ximelagatran and bivalirudin are direct thrombin inhibitors that have been studied for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis and have potential advantages over the traditional indirect thrombin inhibitors (i.e., warfarin, unfractionated heparin and low molecular-weight heparin). They are both reversible inhibitors of thrombin and block both circulating and fibrin-bound thrombin. Ximelagatran and bivalirudin possess favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles including wider therapeutic indices, faster onsets of action and less interpatient variability compared to indirect thrombin inhibitors. Ximelagatran has shown favourable clinical trial results in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and atrial fibrillation. Similarly, bivalirudin has shown positive results in patients with acute coronary syndromes, however, further investigation is needed. Ximelagatran and bivalirudin have shown promising results in the management of thrombosis and the results of future studies confirming their use for the aforementioned indications are anticipated.

Rehabilitation of orthopedic and rheumatologic disorders. 3. Total hip arthroplasty rehabilitation

This self-directed learning module highlights a clinical vignette of a female patient who had a total hip arthroplasty. The module addresses the medical management and rehabilitation interventions necessary to direct the postacute care needs of this patient. It is part of the study guide on rehabilitation of the joint replacement patient in the Self-Directed Physiatric Education Program for practitioners and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation. This chapter emphasizes planning for discharge from the acute care hospital, postacute care medical complications, and rehabilitation program elements germane to the patient with hip joint replacement.

OVERALL ARTICLE OBJECTIVE

To summarize the postacute care planning, medical complications, and rehabilitation needs of the patient with hip joint replacement.

New blood thinner offers first potential alternative in 50 years: ximelagatran

Traditional anticoagulants employed in the treatment of thrombosis include the injectable heparins and oral warfarin. Though effective, these traditional agents are fraught with limitations in their ease of use in the clinical setting. Warfarin, for example, has many pharmacokinetic properties and food-and-drug interactions that result in unpredictable patient response and the need for expensive and time-consuming monitoring of coagulation status. Ximelagatran is a novel, promising, orally active, direct thrombin inhibitor currently in development that, for the first time in 50 years, offers a potential alternative to the mainstay oral agent "warfarin." Advantages of ximelagatran over warfarin include predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a broad therapeutic window, no routine anticoagulant monitoring, no clinically significant drug interactions, and fixed-dose administration. Ximelagatran has been evaluated for thromboprophylaxis following orthopedic surgery, acute treatment and secondary prevention of venous thrombosis, stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, and acute coronary syndromes. Results of clinical trials suggest that ximelagatran is equally or more efficacious than warfarin and/or low-molecular-weight heparin therapy without increasing rates of minor or major bleeding. Although postmarketing surveillance will provide the final test of this drug, the future looks promising for addition of a new anticoagulant with the potential to provide excellent efficacy, predictable response, and reduced adverse effects. Pending regulatory approval, ximelagatran may help overcome barriers to appropriate anticoagulant therapy, thereby decreasing morbidity and mortality associated with thrombotic diseases.

No Influence of Food on the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics or Tolerability of the 24mg and 36mg Oral Tablet Formulations of Ximelagatran

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential effects of food on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability/safety of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease that is rapidly bioconverted to its active form, melagatran.

DESIGN AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS

In two open-label, randomised, crossover studies, healthy male and female volunteers received oral ximelagatran as a single 24mg tablet (study 1, n = 30) or a single 36mg tablet (study 2, n = 50). Potential effects of food on the pharmacodynamics (activated partial thromboplastin time; APTT) of the 36mg tablet were also investigated in study 2.

RESULTS

For the 24mg tablet, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) and least-squares mean estimates for the ratio of the tablet with food to the tablet without food fell within the predefined bounds demonstrating no effect on area under the melagatran concentration-time curve (AUC ratio = 0.94 [90% CI 0.90, 0.99]) or maximum plasma concentration (C(max) ratio = 0.88 [90% CI 0.82, 0.95]). The same result was observed for the 36mg tablet (AUC ratio = 1.07 [90% CI 1.03, 1.12]; C(max) ratio = 1.05 [90% CI 0.98, 1.12]). Melagatran AUC normalised for differences in bodyweight was comparable between women and men administered the 24mg or 36mg tablet without food. In addition, food did not clinically significantly alter the melagatran-induced prolongation of the APTT of the 36mg tablet. Ximelagatran was well tolerated with or without food.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics (AUC, C(max)), pharmacodynamics (APTT) and tolerability of melagatran after administration of oral ximelagatran tablets were not affected by food.

Hepatic Findings in Long-Term Clinical Trials of Ximelagatran

OBJECTIVE

In clinical trials, the efficacy and safety of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran have been evaluated in the prevention or treatment of thromboembolic conditions known to have high morbidity and mortality. In these studies, raised aminotransferase levels were observed during long-term use (>35 days). The aim of this analysis is to review the data regarding these hepatic findings in the long-term trials of ximelagatran.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The prospective analysis included 6948 patients randomised to ximelagatran and 6230 patients randomised to comparator (warfarin, low-molecular weight heparin followed by warfarin or placebo). Of these, 6931 patients received ximelagatran for a mean of 357 days and 6216 patients received comparator for a mean of 389 days. An algorithm was developed for frequent testing of hepatic enzyme levels. A panel of four hepatologists analysed all cases of potential concern with regard to causal relation to ximelagatran treatment using an established evaluation tool (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method [RUCAM]).

RESULTS

An elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level of >3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) was found in 7.9% of patients in the ximelagatran group versus 1.2% in the comparator group. The increase in ALT level occurred 1-6 months after initiation of therapy and data were available to confirm recovery of the ALT level to <2 x ULN in 96% of patients, whether they continued to receive ximelagatran or not. There was some variability in the incidence of ALT level elevation between indications, those with simultaneous acute illnesses (acute myocardial infarction or venous thromboembolism) having higher incidences. Combined elevations of ALT level of >3 x ULN and total bilirubin level of >2 x ULN (within 1 month of the ALT elevation), regardless of aetiology, were infrequent, occurring in 37 patients (0.5%) treated with ximelagatran, of whom one sustained a severe hepatic illness that appeared to be resolving when the patient died from a gastrointestinal haemorrhage. No death was observed directly related to hepatic failure caused by ximelagatran.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ximelagatran has been associated with mainly asymptomatic elevation of ALT levels in a mean of 7.9% of patients in the long-term clinical trial programme and nearly all of the cases occurred within the first 6 months of therapy. Rare symptomatic cases have been observed. An algorithm has been developed for testing ALT to ensure appropriate management of patients with elevated ALT levels. Regular ALT testing should allow the clinical benefits of ximelagatran to reach the widest population of patients while minimising the risk of hepatic adverse effects.

A new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate, compared with enoxaparin for prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip or knee replacement: the BISTRO II randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor undergoing evaluation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

In a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study, 1973 patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement were randomized to 6-10 days of oral dabigatran etexilate (50, 150 mg twice daily, 300 mg once daily, 225 mg twice daily), starting 1-4 h after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily) starting 12 h prior to surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of VTE (detected by bilateral venography or symptomatic events) during treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 1949 treated patients, 1464 (75%) patients were evaluable for the efficacy analysis. VTE occurred in 28.5%, 17.4%, 16.6%, 13.1% and 24% of patients assigned to dabigatran etexilate 50, 150 mg twice daily, 300 mg once daily, 225 mg twice daily and enoxaparin, respectively. A significant dose-dependent decrease in VTE occurred with increasing doses of dabigatran etexilate (P < 0.0001). Compared with enoxaparin, VTE was significantly lower in patients receiving 150 mg twice daily [odds ratio (OR) 0.65, P = 0.04], 300 mg once daily (OR 0.61, P = 0.02) and 225 mg twice daily (OR 0.47, P = 0.0007). Compared with enoxaparin, major bleeding was significantly lower with 50 mg twice daily (0.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.047) but elevated with higher doses, nearly reaching statistical significance with the 300 mg once-daily dose (4.7%, P = 0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral administration of dabigatran etexilate, commenced early in the postoperative period, was effective and safe across a range of doses. Further optimization of the efficacy/safety balance will be addressed in future studies.

Current Issues in Anticoagulation

Anticoagulation therapy with unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins and oral vitamin K antagonists is currently the mainstay of treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders (such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation). Although these therapies have proven benefits, they also have important limitations that result in their underuse in routine clinical practice. Consequently, many patients identified by guidelines as requiring anticoagulant therapy receive no or inadequate treatment. Heparins require parenteral administration and pose the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Vitamin K antagonists have a narrow separation of antithrombotic and haemorrhagic effects and numerous food and drug-drug interactions, and require frequent coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment to ensure effective antithrombotic protection while minimizing the risk of bleeding complications. In response to these limitations, several new anticoagulants have recently been developed, including selective factor Xa inhibitors such as fondaparinux and ximelagatran, the first oral agent in the new class of direct thrombin inhibitors and the first new oral anticoagulant for almost 60 years. Ximelagatran possesses many of the properties of an ideal agent for anticoagulation therapy. With its oral formulation, consistent and predictable pharmacological profile and no coagulation monitoring, ximelagatran has the potential to increase the use and duration of anticoagulation treatment in thromboembolic disorders and to reduce the burden associated with long-term management.

Ximelagatran in Orthopaedic Surgery

Ximelagatran represents the first new oral anticoagulant since the introduction of warfarin almost 60 years ago, and has been evaluated for the treatment and prevention of a range of venous and arterial thromboembolic disorders. The MElagatran THRomboprophylaxis in Orthopaedic surgery (METHRO) and EXpanded PRophylaxis Evaluation Surgery Study (EXPRESS) studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (s.c.) melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing total hip replacement or total knee replacement. In METHRO II, immediate pre-operative-initiated s.c. melagatran followed by post-operative ximelagatran dose-dependently reduced VTE, with the highest dose (melagatran 3 mg/ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily) associated with a significantly reduced incidence of VTE compared with the low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) dalteparin (15.1 vs. 28.2%; p < 0.0001). In METHRO III, the efficacy of s.c. melagatran 3 mg/ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily initiated post-operatively (4-12 h after surgery) was comparable to that of the LMWH enoxaparin initiated 12 h before surgery (total VTE incidence, 31.0 and 27.3%, respectively). Rates of severe bleeding were also comparable between treatments (melagatran/ximelagatran = 1.4%; enoxaparin = 1.7%). Treatment with melagatran/ximelagatran was significantly more effective when initiated earlier (4-8 h) rather than later (8-12 h) after surgery (total VTE incidence, 27.5 vs. 35.4%; p = 0.0034). Based on the results of METHRO II and III, the EXPRESS study evaluated the efficacy and bleeding profile of s.c. melagatran 2 mg immediately before surgery, followed by s.c. melagatran 3 mg on the evening of the day of surgery and then ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily. This regimen was significantly more effective than enoxaparin (total VTE incidence, 20.3 vs. 26.6%; p < 0.0004). Excessive bleeding (as judged by the investigator) was more frequent with melagatran/ximelagatran, but rates of fatal bleeding, critical-site bleeding and bleeding requiring re-operation did not differ between the groups. Taken together, the METHRO and EXPRESS studies demonstrate that melagatran/ximelagatran has comparable or superior efficacy to LMWHs in the prevention of VTE in orthopaedic surgery patients, and that the timing and dose of melagatran is important in optimizing the balance of efficacy and bleeding risk.

Clinical potential of oral direct thrombin inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism

Current antithrombotic therapies are associated with various practical limitations and risks that restrict their utility in the management of venous thromboembolism. The coagulation factor, thrombin, has been the focus of extensive investigation as a pharmacological target in efforts to improve the management of venous thromboembolism. Hirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban are direct thrombin inhibitors that have been launched for limited indications as anticoagulants. Their usefulness for long-term prophylaxis is limited by a requirement for parenteral administration, restricted licensing and bleeding/tolerability profile. Ximelagatran--which, after oral administration, is rapidly converted to its active form, melagatran--is the first oral direct thrombin inhibitor and the first new oral anticoagulant to become available in 60 years. Clinical studies have shown that melagatran/ximelagatran, without coagulation monitoring, is effective and well tolerated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip replacement and knee replacement surgery. Ximelagatran is also effective in the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism and long-term secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism, the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and in the prevention of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction. Oral direct thrombin inhibitors have a promising role in the management of venous thromboembolism and other associated medical conditions.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This article discusses the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following. We recommend against the use of aspirin alone as thromboprophylaxis for any patient group (Grade 1A). For moderate-risk general surgery patients, we recommend prophylaxis with low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH) (5,000 U bid) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) [< or = 3,400 U once daily] (both Grade 1A). For higher risk general surgery patients, we recommend thromboprophylaxis with LDUH (5,000 U tid) or LMWH (> 3,400 U daily) [both Grade 1A]. For high-risk general surgery patients with multiple risk factors, we recommend combining pharmacologic methods (LDUH three times daily or LMWH, > 3,400 U daily) with the use of graduated compression stockings and/or intermittent pneumatic compression devices (Grade 1C+). We recommend that thromboprophylaxis be used in all patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery (Grade 1A) or major, open urologic procedures, and we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH two times or three times daily (Grade 1A). For patients undergoing elective total hip or knee arthroplasty, we recommend one of the following three anticoagulant agents: LMWH, fondaparinux, or adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [international normalized ratio (INR) target, 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0] (all Grade 1A). For patients undergoing hip fracture surgery (HFS), we recommend the routine use of fondaparinux (Grade 1A), LMWH (Grade 1C+), VKA (target INR, 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 2B], or LDUH (Grade 1B). We recommend that patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty, or HFS receive thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days (Grade 1A). We recommend that all trauma patients with at least one risk factor for VTE receive thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1A). In acutely ill medical patients who have been admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure or severe respiratory disease, or who are confined to bed and have one or more additional risk factors, we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH (Grade 1A) or LMWH (Grade 1A). We recommend, on admission to the intensive care unit, all patients be assessed for their risk of VTE. Accordingly, most patients should receive thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1A).

The direct thrombin inhibitor melagatran/ximelagatran

Melagatran is a synthetic, small-peptide direct thrombin inhibitor with anticoagulant activity. Ximelagatran, an oral prodrug, undergoes rapid enzymatic conversion to melagatran. Melagatran has rapid onset of action, fixed twice-daily dosing, stable absorption, apparent low potential for medication interactions, and no requirement for monitoring drug levels or dose adjustment. There is no specific antidote, but the drug has a short plasma elimination half-life (about 4 hours). In clinical studies, melagatran/ximelagatran is not inferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, to heparin-warfarin for acute treatment and extended secondary prevention of deep vein thrombosis, and superior to warfarin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery. Major bleeding with melagatran/ximelagatran occurred at rates similar to those in patients treated with warfarin. 6%-12% of patients taking ximelagatran develop asymptomatic elevated liver enzyme levels (predominantly alanine aminotransferase) after 1-6 months of therapy; this usually resolves with cessation of therapy. Less than 1% of patients develop abnormal liver function while taking ximelagatran; this rarely persists or develops into clinical illness.

Will oral antithrombin agents replace warfarin?

The new oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran is at least equivalent to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation, and seems to be a promising adjunct to aspirin after acute coronary syndrome

Ximelagatran: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To present the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), and to review available comparative clinical trial data evaluating its efficacy and safety relative to other antithrombotic agents in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases (1995-August 2004), supplemented by a manual search of article bibliographies, conference abstracts, and data on file from the manufacturer, was conducted. Key search terms were ximelagatran, melagatran, H376/95, and direct thrombin inhibitors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from available clinical trials, including study design, patient demographics, dosing regimens, anticoagulant comparators, methods for evaluating effectiveness, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, was extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ximelagatran is an orally administered DTI under development for use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), long-term prevention of a second VTE event, stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation, prevention of VTE after orthopedic procedures, and recurrent ischemic events after acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ximelagatran, in twice-daily doses of 24 or 36 mg, is an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins or warfarin in thromboprophylaxis following orthopedic knee replacement, atrial fibrillation, or initial treatment of VTE. Improved outcomes versus placebo were seen in the long-term prevention of VTE in patients who completed an initial 6 months of treatment. Liver-related effects need further clarification.

Bleeding profiles of anticoagulants, including the novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran: definitions, incidence and management

Ximelagatran is a novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI) that is currently in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events in a wide range of patient populations and indications. The clinical development of novel anticoagulant therapies requires that treatments be assessed according to both their clinical benefit (reduction of risk of thromboembolic events) and safety profile (primarily bleeding). Definition and assessment of bleeding severity is thus an important factor in clinical trial design. Lack of consistency in bleeding definitions used in different clinical trial programmes makes comparison of bleeding event data difficult. Standard bleeding definitions would be required to make fair comparisons between clinical trials possible. The definitions of bleeding events used in clinical trials of ximelagatran are broadly consistent with those used in many other major trials. Results of phase II and III trials comparing ximelagatran with currently available anticoagulant therapies demonstrate that ximelagatran can be used with fixed dosing with no coagulation monitoring, dose titration, or dose adjustment, without compromising efficacy or safety. The incidences of major bleeding events in clinical trials of ximelagatran have been low and similar to those with other anticoagulant drugs. Adequate treatment in case of emergency situations such as serious bleeding should include cessation of treatment and maintenance of adequate diuresis.

Ximelagatran, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in major elective orthopaedic surgery. Efficacy, safety and anaesthetic considerations

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran shows great promise for prevention of venous thromboembolic events following major elective orthopaedic surgery. Its consistent and predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across a wide range of patient populations allow administration with fixed dosing and with no coagulation monitoring. In orthopaedic surgery clinical trials, ximelagatran was effective and well tolerated compared with standard therapy, with dose and timing relative to surgery important factors in determining its optimal profile. In European trials, an initial 3-mg postoperative dose of subcutaneous melagatran, the active form of ximelagatran, followed by oral ximelagatran 24 mg twice daily achieved similar efficacy and safety to enoxaparin. Although the risk of spinal haematoma following neuraxial anaesthesia is rare, it is increased by the concomitant use of anticoagulants. In orthopaedic surgery trials with ximelagatran to date, complications such as spinal haematoma have not been reported. The pharmacokinetic profile of ximelagatran suggests that concurrent use with neuraxial anaesthesia should require no further precautions than those currently necessary with low-molecular-weight heparin.

New approaches to anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are a potential alternative to vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, for anticoagulant therapy. The oral DTI at the most advanced stage of clinical development is ximelagatran, which is rapidly absorbed and bioconverted to the active form melagatran. Oral ximelagatran has been evaluated in randomized, controlled trials for several indications, including stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, two pivotal phase III trials demonstrated that fixed-dose oral ximelagatran, 36 mg twice daily without coagulation monitoring, prevents stroke and systemic embolic events in patients with nonvalvular AF as effectively as well-controlled, adjusted-dose warfarin. Oral ximelagatran was generally well tolerated and caused less total (major plus minor) bleeding than warfarin. In a minority of ximelagatran-treated patients, elevated serum alanine aminotransferase levels were reported, but were typically not associated with specific symptoms, and returned toward the pretreatment baseline whether treatment was continued or discontinued. In AF, oral ximelagatran promises a better benefit to risk ratio than warfarin.

Challenges in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in the elderly

Aging itself is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and the prevalence in the elderly of additional risk factors (e.g. cancer, orthopedic surgery, immobility) increase its intrinsic risk. Many in the medical community are reluctant to prescribe anticoagulation (for primary and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism) to their geriatric patients for the fear that bleeding complications may outweigh the benefits. A thorough analysis of the data support the concept that the under-use of heparin in primary prevention in the elderly is more related to medical beliefs than to facts. The risk of bleeding due to oral anticoagulants (secondary prevention) is greatly reduced by keeping the International Normalized Ratio (INR) values within therapeutic ranges and carefully avoiding conditions/drugs that may interfere with such treatment. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran has been studied for primary (hip and knee replacement surgery) and for secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, and for acute venous thromboembolism treatment. The selective factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux has been approved for primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hip and knee replacement surgery and in hip fracture surgery. Studies on the latter drugs, where most of the patients were > 65 years of age, further show that the fear of bleeding complications due to anticoagulation in the elderly is largely unjustified.

New anticoagulants

Anticoagulants are pivotal agents for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Limitations of existing anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonist and heparins, have led to the development of newer anticoagulant therapies. These anticoagulants have been designed to target specific coagulation enzymes or steps in the coagulation pathway. New anticoagulants that are under evaluation in clinical trials include: (1) inhibitors of the factor VIIa/tissue factor pathway; (2) factor Xa inhibitors, both indirect and direct; (3) activated protein C and soluble thrombomodulin; and (4) direct thrombin inhibitors. Although most of these are parenteral agents, several of the direct inhibitors of factor Xa and thrombin are orally active. Clinical development of these therapies often starts with studies in the prevention of venous thrombosis before evaluation for other indications, such as prevention of cardioembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation or prosthetic heart valves. At present, the greatest clinical need is for an oral anticoagulant to replace warfarin for long-term prevention and treatment of patients with venous and arterial thrombosis. Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is the first of a series of promising new agents that might fulfill this need. Large phase 3 trials evaluating ximelagatran for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation have been completed.

Thrombophilia and New Anticoagulant Drugs

Venous thromboembolism, which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is the result of an imbalance among procoagulant, anticoagulant and profibrinolytic processes. This imbalance reflects a complex interplay between genetic and environmental or acquired risk factors. Genetic thrombophilic defects influence the risk of a first episode of thrombosis. How these defects influence the risk of recurrence in patients whose first episode of venous thromboembolism was unprovoked is less certain. Thus, when anticoagulants are stopped, patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism have a risk of recurrence of at least 7% to 10% per year, even in the absence of an underlying thrombophilic defect. Consequently, there is a trend toward longer durations of anticoagulation therapy for these patients, which is problematic given the limitation of existing anticoagulants. This chapter provides an overview of the thrombophilic defects and how they influence the risk of venous thromboembolism. The chapter also details advances in anticoagulant therapy, focusing on new inhibitors of factor Xa and thrombin.

In Section I, Dr. Saskia Middeldorp describes the various thrombophilic defects and reviews their relative importance in the pathogenesis of a first episode of venous thromboembolism. She then discusses the influence of these defects on the risk of recurrent thrombotic events in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism and in those whose thrombosis occurred in association with a known risk factor, such as surgery.

In Section II, Dr. William Geerts reviews the pharmacology of new parenteral and oral factor Xa inhibitors and describes the results of the Phase II and III clinical trials with these agents. He then provides perspective on the potential advantages and drawbacks of these drugs for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

In Section III, Dr. John Heit focuses on direct thrombin inhibitors. He discusses their mechanism of action and compares and contrasts their pharmacological profiles prior to describing the results of Phase II and III clinical trials. Dr. Heit then provides perspective on the potential advantages and limitations of these drugs relative to existing anticoagulants.

Pharmacokinetics, Preliminary Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Melagatran and Oral Ximelagatran

OBJECTIVE

The oral direct thrombin inhibitor (oral DTI) ximelagatran and its active form, melagatran, which can be administered subcutaneously, were investigated for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study in patients (n = 90) undergoing general abdominal and/or pelvic surgery, 8-day and 35-day treatment regimens of postoperatively initiated sub-cutaneous (sc) melagatran (3mg twice daily) followed by oral ximelagatran (24mg twice daily) were compared with standard-duration sc dalteparin (5000IU) initiated preoperatively. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy (number of patients with distal and/or proximal deep vein thrombosis [DVT] verified by bilateral venography on the final day of treatment) and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of melagatran were well described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption after administration of both sc melagatran and oral ximelagatran. Bioavailability of melagatran was 21% after the first oral dose of ximelagatran and was virtually unchanged throughout the study. Activated partial thromboplastin time increased in a non-linear manner with plasma melagatran concentration. The overall rate of DVT was 11.4% (8/70), with events distributed evenly between treatment groups. Bleeding volumes during surgery tended to be higher in the dalteparin group than in the melagatran/ximelagatran groups. Blood transfusion volumes and numbers of patients transfused were similar in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Good bioavailability of melagatran was achieved following oral administration of ximelagatran. Postoperative sc melagatran followed by oral ximelagatran appeared to be well tolerated, and the efficacy of standard-length or prolonged prophylaxis with sc melagatran and oral ximelagatran may be comparable to that of dalteparin initiated preoperatively.

The inhibitory effect of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran, compared with enoxaparin and r-hirudin on ex vivo thrombin generation in human plasma

INTRODUCTION

The effect of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) ximelagatran (Exanta, AstraZeneca) on the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) of activated plasma was investigated ex vivo using a thrombin generation assay and compared with recombinant (r)-hirudin and enoxaparin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

120 healthy male volunteers were randomized to one of six treatment groups (n=20 in each): oral ximelagatran (15, 30, or 60 mg), intravenous r-hirudin (0.4 mg/kg bolus, 0.15 mg/kg/h infusion for 2 h, followed by 0.075 mg/kg/h infusion for 2 h), subcutaneous enoxaparin (100 IU/kg), or control (tap water administered orally). Venous blood was collected predose and at 2, 4, and 10 h postdosing. Thrombin generation was triggered by the addition of tissue factor to platelet-poor plasma, and the ETP and time to peak thrombin generation were measured.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A significant and dose-dependent reduction in ETP was observed 2 and 4 h after the administration of ximelagatran 30 mg (70.3% of predose, 95% confidence intervals 63.0-78.5, P<0.0001 at 2 h) and 60 mg (49.8%, 43.2-57.4, P<0.0001 at 2 h), r-hirudin (19.5%, 10.1-37.6, P<0.0001 at 2 h), and enoxaparin (34.2%, 21.4-54.7, P<0.0001 at 2 h). Ximelagatran (30 mg, 3.79 min, 3.52-4.08 at 2 h), r-hirudin (6.23 min, 4.93-7.86 at 2 h), and enoxaparin (4.68 min, 3.30-6.64 at 2 h) also delayed the lag phase before the thrombin generation burst compared to placebo (2.92 min, 2.71-3.25 at 2 h). The oral DTI ximelagatran, in its active form melagatran, is a potent thrombin inhibitor that efficiently decreases ETP and delays the generation of thrombin in plasma in this ex vivo model.

Clinical Experience with Ximelagatran in Orthopaedic Surgery

Patients who undergo orthopaedic surgery are at substantially increased risk for venous thromboembolic events. These include proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis, with the former more likely to lead to pulmonary embolism and fatal complications. Anticoagulants are routinely used for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement surgery. Although current treatments offer effective prophylaxis, they have disadvantages. Warfarin is limited by the requirement for coagulation monitoring to ensure effective and safe use. Similarly, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have disadvantages, including the need for parenteral administration. This article brings together data from clinical trials of the novel oral direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee replacement. The ximelagatran clinical trial programme in orthopaedic surgery has focused primarily on five large multicentre studies in Europe (the Melagatran Thromboprophylaxis in Orthopaedic surgery II and III and Expanded Prophylaxis Evaluation Surgery Study studies) and in the United States (the Exanta Used to Lessen Thrombosis A and B studies), which enrolled more than 8000 patients. In addition, the USA clinical trial programme included three other trials that investigated ximelagatran in orthopaedic surgery; two of these studies focused on prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement, and one study investigated prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement. These studies compared ximelagatran with the LMWHs dalteparin and enoxaparin and with warfarin, and were designed to reflect regional differences in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and to build on findings from previous studies. Generally, ximelagatran has been shown to possess comparable or greater efficacy relative to comparators. The timing and dose of ximelagatran have been shown to be important determinants of its efficacy and safety. As ximelagatran can be given in fixed oral dosing without coagulation monitoring, it is an attractive choice for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in major elective orthopaedic surgery.