Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape

Kidney Transplants From Donors on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Prior to Death Are Associated With Better Long-Term Renal Function Compared to Donors After Circulatory Death

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) allows expansion of the donor pool. We report on 11 years of Italian experience by comparing the outcome of grafts from DCD and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) prior to death donation (EPD), a new donor category. We studied 58 kidney recipients from DCD or EPD and collected donor/recipient clinical characteristics. Primary non function (PNF) and delayed graft function (DGF) rates, dialysis need, hospitalization duration, and patient and graft survival rates were compared. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was measured throughout the follow-up. Better clinical outcomes were achieved with EPD than with DCD despite similar graft and patient survival rates The total warm ischemia time (WIT) was longer in the DCD group than in the EPD group. Pure WIT was the highest in the class II group. The DGF rate was higher in the DCD group than in the EPD group. PNF rate was similar in the groups. Dialysis need was the greatest and hospitalization the longest in the class II DCD group. eGFR was lower in the class II DCD group than in the EPD group. Our results indicate good clinical outcomes of kidney transplants from DCD despite the long “no-touch period” and show that ECMO in the procurement phase improves graft outcome, suggesting EPD as a source for pool expansion.

Donation after circulatory death donors in lung transplantation

Transplantation of any organ into a recipient requires a donor. Lung transplant has a long history of an inadequate number of suitable donors to meet demand, leading to deaths on the waiting list annually since national data was collected, and strict listing criteria. Before the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), passed in 1980, legally defined brain death in the U.S., all donors for lung transplant came from sudden death victims [uncontrolled Donation after Circulatory Death donors (uDCDs)] in the recipient’s hospital emergency department. After passage of the UDDA, uDCDs were abandoned to Donation after Brain Death donors (DBDs)—perhaps prematurely. Compared to livers and kidneys, many DBDs have lungs that are unsuitable for transplant, due to aspiration pneumonia, neurogenic pulmonary edema, trauma, and the effects of brain death on lung function. Another group of donors has become available—patients with a devastating irrecoverable brain injury that do not meet criteria for brain death. If a decision is made by next-of-kin (NOK) to withdraw life support and allow death to occur by asphyxiation, with NOK consent, these individuals can have organs recovered if death occurs relatively quickly after cessation of mechanical ventilation and maintenance of their airway. These are known as controlled Donation after Circulatory Death donors (cDCDs). For a variety of reasons, in the U.S., lungs are recovered from cDCDs at a much lower rate than kidneys and livers. Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) in the last decade has had a modest impact on increasing the number of lungs for transplant from DBDs, but may have had a larger impact on lungs from cDCDs, and may be indispensable for safe transplantation of lungs from uDCDs. In the next decade, DCDs may have a substantial impact on the number of lung transplants performed in the U.S. and around the world.

Live donor kidney transplantation. Situation analysis and roadmap

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spainhave adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.

From Haphazard to a Sustainable Normothermic Regional Perfusion Service: A Blueprint for the Introduction of Novel Perfusion Technologies

Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) has shown encouraging clinical results. However, translation from an experimental to routine procedure poses several challenges. Herein we describe a model that led to the implementation of NRP into standard clinical practice in our centre following an iterative process of refinement incorporating training, staffing and operative techniques. Using this approach we achieved a four-fold increase in trained surgical staff and a 6-fold increase in competent senior organ preservation practitioners in 12 months, covering 93% of the retrieval calls. We now routinely provide NRP throughout the UK and attended 186 NRP retrievals from which 225 kidneys, 26 pancreases and 61 livers have been transplanted, including 5 that were initially declined by all UK transplant centres. The 61 DCD(NRP) liver transplants undertaken exhibited no primary non-function or ischaemic cholangiopathy with up to 8 years of follow-up. This approach also enabled successful implementation of ex situ normothermic liver perfusion which together with NRP contributed 37.5% of liver transplant activity in 2021. Perfusion technologies (in situ and ex situ) are now supported by a team of Advanced Perfusion and Organ Preservation Specialists. The introduction of novel perfusion technologies into routine clinical practice presents significant challenges but can be greatly facilitated by developing a specific role of Advanced Perfusion and Organ Preservation Specialist supported by a robust education, training and recruitment programme.

Potential of Donation After Unexpected Circulatory Death Programs Defined by Their Demographic Characteristics

Background.

Donation after unexpected circulatory death (uDCD) donors are often suggested to increase the number of donor organs. In 2014, a uDCD protocol was implemented in three transplant centers in the Netherlands which unfortunately did not result in additional transplantations. This study was initiated to identify demographic factors influencing the potential success of uDCD programs.

Methods.

Dutch resuscitation databases covering various demographic regions were analyzed for potential donors. The databases were compared with the uDCD implementation project and successful uDCD programs in Spain, France, and Russia.

Results.

The resuscitation databases showed that 61% of all resuscitated patients were transferred to an emergency department. Age selection reduced this uDCD potential to 46% with only patients aged 18–65 years deemed eligible. Of these patients, 27% died in the emergency department. The urban region of Amsterdam showed the largest potential in absolute numbers (52 patients/y). Comparison with the uDCD implementation project showed large similarities in the percentage of potential donors; however, in absolute numbers, it showed a much smaller potential. Calculation of the potential per million persons and the extrapolation of the potential based on the international experience revealed the largest potential in urban regions.

Conclusions.

Implementation of a uDCD program should not only be based on the number of potential donors calculated from resuscitation databases. They show promising potential uDCD percentages for large rural regions and small urban regions; however, actual numbers per hospital are low, leading to insufficient exposure rates. It is, therefore, recommendable to limit uDCD programs to large urban regions.

The economic impact of machine perfusion technology in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Several clinical studies have demonstrated the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of machine perfusion in liver transplantation, although its economic outcomes are still underexplored. This review aimed to examine the costs related to machine perfusion and its associated outcomes.

METHODS

Expert opinion of several groups representing different machine perfusion modalities. Critical analysis of the published literature reporting the economic outcomes of the most used techniques of machine perfusion in liver transplantation (normothermic and hypothermic ex situ machine perfusion and in situ normothermic regional perfusion).

RESULTS

Machine perfusion costs include disposable components of the perfusion device, perfusate components, personnel and facility fees, and depreciation of the perfusion device or device lease fee. The limited current literature suggests that although this upfront cost varies between perfusion modalities, its use is highly likely to be cost-effective. Optimization of the donor liver utilization rate, local conditions of transplant programs (long waiting list times and higher MELD scores), a decreased rate of complications, changes in logistics, and length of hospital stay are potential cost savings points that must highlight the expected benefits of this intervention. An additional unaccounted factor is that machine perfusion optimizing donor organ utilization allows patients to be transplanted earlier, avoiding clinical deterioration while on the waiting list and the costs associated with hospital admissions and other required procedures.

CONCLUSION

So far, the clinical benefits have guided machine perfusion implementation in liver transplantation. Albeit there is data suggesting the economic benefit of the technique, further investigation of its costs to healthcare systems and society and associated outcomes is needed.

[Organ donation-Not only a responsibility of intensive care medicine]

Im Jahr 2019 starben in Deutschland 756 Menschen, während sie auf der Warteliste für ein Spenderorgan standen. Sowohl im Eurotransplant-Verbund als auch weltweit gehört Deutschland mit 10,8 Organspendern/Mio. Einwohner im Jahr 2019 zur Schlussgruppe. Sämtliche politischen Versuche, die Spenderzahlen zu steigern, scheinen bislang ohne Effekt geblieben zu sein. Darüber hinaus hat die durch das „severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2“ (SARS-CoV-2) ausgelöste Pandemie zum weiteren Rückgang der Spenderzahlen geführt. Der Intensivmedizinerin kommt im Prozess der Erkennung möglicher Spender sowie als erste Ansprechpartnerin für die Angehörigen eine zentrale Rolle zu. Jedoch existieren nicht nur in den gesellschaftlichen und medialen Diskussionen um das Thema Organspende viele Unklarheiten, sondern auch bei den intensivmedizinisch tätigen Ärzten. Viele Annahmen und Hypothesen, die mit den niedrigen Spenderzahlen in einen Zusammenhang gebracht werden, lassen sich wissenschaftlich jedoch nicht belegen und sollen in diesem Beitrag diskutiert werden.

Novel Organ Perfusion and Preservation Strategies in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death in Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney and pancreatic transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death donors are vulnerable to ischemia-reperfusion injuries. In this context of transplant shortage, there is a need to optimize the function of these transplants and to develop novel perfusion and preservation strategies in controlled donation after circulatory death in kidney and pancreatic transplants.

IN SITU PERFUSION AND PRESERVATION STRATEGIES

In situ regional normothermic perfusion improves the outcome of kidney transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death and provides equivalent results for the kidney from brain-dead donors. In situ regional normothermic perfusion is under investigation for pancreatic transplants.

EX SITU PERFUSION AND PRESERVATION STRATEGIES

Perfusion on hypothermic machine perfusion is highly recommended for the kidney from controlled donation after cardiac death. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion machine decreases the rate of graft rejection and graft failure in kidney transplantation. Ex situ normothermic perfusion is an easy way to assess renal function. In the future, kidney transplants could benefit from drug therapy during ex situ normothermic perfusion. In pancreas transplantation, hypothermic machine perfusion and ex situ normothermic perfusion present encouraging results in preclinical studies.

Similar Results in Liver Transplantation From Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Donors With Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Donation After Brain Death Donors: A Case-Matched Single-Center Study

Although good results have been reported with the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) liver transplantation (LT), there is a lack of evidence to demonstrate similar results to donation after brain death (DBD). We present a single-center retrospective case-matched (1:2) study including 100 NRP cDCD LTs and 200 DBD LTs and a median follow-up of 36 months. Matching was done according to donor age, recipient Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and cold ischemia time. The following perioperative results were similar in both groups: alanine transaminase peaks of 909 U/L in the DBD group and 836 U/L in the cDCD group and early allograft disfunction percentages of 21% and 19.2%, respectively. The 1-year and 3-year overall graft survival for cDCD was 99% and 93%, respectively, versus 92% and 87%, respectively, for DBD (P = 0.04). Of note, no cases of primary nonfunction or ischemic-type biliary lesion were observed among the cDCD grafts. Our results confirm that NRP cDCD LT meets the same outcomes as those obtained with DBD LT and provides evidence to support the idea that cDCD donors per se should no longer be considered as "marginal donors" when recovered with NRP.

A retrievable, dual-chamber stent protects against warm ischemia of donor organs in a model of donation after circulatory death

BACKGROUND

Ischemic injury during the agonal period of donation after circulatory death donors remains a significant barrier to increasing abdominal transplants. A major obstacle has been the inability to improve visceral perfusion, while at the same time respecting the ethics of the organ donor. A retrievable dual-chamber stentgraft could potentially isolate the organ perfusion from systemic hypotension and hypoxia, without increasing cardiac work or committing the donor.

METHODS

Retrievable dumbbell-shaped stents were laser welded from nitinol wire and covered with polytetrafluoroethylene. Yorkshire pigs were assigned to either agonal control or dumbbell-shaped dual-chamber stentgraft. A central lumen maintained aortic flow, while an outer visceral chamber was perfused with oxygenated blood. A 1-hour agonal phase of hypoxia and hypotension was simulated. Stents were removed by simple sheath advancement. Cardiac monitoring, labs, and visceral flow were recorded followed by recovery of the animal to a goal of 48 hours.

RESULTS

Cardiac stress did not increase during stent deployment. Visceral pO2 and flow were dramatically improved in stented animal relative to control animals. Five of 7 control animals were killed after renal failure complications, whereas all stent animals survived. Histology confirmed increased ischemic changes among control kidneys compared to stented animals.

CONCLUSION

A dual-chamber stent improved outcomes after a simulated agonal phase. The stent did not increase cardiac work, thus respecting a key ethical consideration. The ability of a dual-chamber stent to prevent ischemia during organ recovery may become a powerful tool to address the critical donor organ shortage.

Role of normothermic perfusion with ECMO in donation after controlled cardiac death in Spain

Spain has become one of the most active countries in donation after controlled cardiac death, using normothermic abdominal perfusion with ECMO in more than 50% of all donors - a situation contributed to by the creation of mobile teams to support hospitals lacking this technology. The donation process must be respectful of the wishes and values of the patients and their relatives, especially if there is pre mortem manipulation, and the absence of cerebral perfusion should be guaranteed. The liver is the most benefited organ by reducing biliary complications as well as the loss of grafts. In renal transplantation, the technique could contribute to reduce the incidence of delayed graft function. In addition, the procedure is compatible with surgical rapid recovery in hypothermia when there is also lung donation. The future lies in the consolidation of cardiac donation by extending normothermic perfusion to the thoracic cavity.

Impact of the duration of normothermic regional perfusion on the results of liver transplant from controlled circulatory death donors: A retrospective, multicentric study

In France, the program of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) was established with routine use of in situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). There is currently no consensus on its optimal duration. The purpose was to assess the impact of NRP duration on liver graft function and biliary outcomes. One-hundred and fifty-six liver recipients from NRP-cDCD donors from six French centers between 2015 and 2019 were included. Primary endpoint was graft function assessed by early allograft dysfunction (EAD, according to Olthoff's criteria) and MEAF (model for early allograft function) score. Overall, three (1.9%) patients had primary non-function, 30 (19.2%) patients experienced EAD, and MEAF score was 7.3 (±1.7). Mean NRP duration was 179 (±43) min. There was no impact of NRP duration on EAD (170±44 min in patients with EAD vs. 181±42 min in patients without, P = .286). There was no significant association between NRP duration and MEAF score (P = .347). NRP duration did neither impact on overall biliary complications nor on non-anastomotic biliary strictures (overall rates of 16.7% and 3.9%, respectively). In conclusion, duration of NRP in cDCD donors does not seem to impact liver graft function and biliary outcomes after liver transplantation. A 1 to 4-h perfusion represents an optimal time window.

Improved short-term outcomes of kidney transplants in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death with the use of normothermic regional perfusion

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) allows the in situ perfusion of organs with oxygenated blood in donation after the circulatory determination of death (DCDD). We aimed at evaluating the impact of NRP on the short-term outcomes of kidney transplants in controlled DCDD (cDCDD). This is a multicenter, nationwide, retrospective study comparing cDCDD kidneys obtained with NRP versus the standard rapid recovery (RR) technique. During 2012-2018, 2302 cDCDD adult kidney transplants were performed in Spain using NRP (n = 865) or RR (n = 1437). The study groups differed in donor and recipient age, warm, and cold ischemic time and use of ex situ machine perfusion. Transplants in the NRP group were more frequently performed in high-volume centers (≥90 transplants/year). Through matching by propensity score, two cohorts with a total of 770 patients were obtained. After the matching, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of primary nonfunction (p = .261) and mortality at 1 year (p =  .111). However, the RR of kidneys was associated with a significantly increased odds of delayed graft function (OR 1.97 [95% CI 1.43-2.72]; p < .001) and 1-year graft loss (OR 1.77 [95% CI 1.01-3.17]; p = .034). In conclusion, compared with RR, NRP appears to improve the short-term outcomes of cDCDD kidney transplants.

Advances in Kidney Preservation Techniques and Their Application in Clinical Practice

The use of cold preservation solutions to rapidly flush and cool the kidney followed by static cold storage in ice has been the standard kidney preservation technique for the last 50 y. Nonetheless, changing donor demographics that include organs from extended criteria donors and donation after circulatory death donors have led to the adoption of more diverse techniques of preservation. Comparison of hypothermic machine perfusion and static cold storage techniques for deceased donor kidneys has long been debated and is still contested by some. The recent modification of hypothermic machine perfusion techniques with the addition of oxygen or perfusion at subnormothermic or near-normothermic temperatures are promising strategies that are emerging in clinical practice. In addition, the use of normothermic regional perfusion to resuscitate abdominal organs of donation after circulatory death donors in situ before cold flushing is also increasingly being utilized. This review provides a synopsis of the different types of preservation techniques including their mechanistic effects and the outcome of their application in clinical practice for different types of donor kidney.

Additional Normothermic Machine Perfusion Versus Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Suboptimal Donor Kidney Transplantation: Protocol of a Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial

Introduction:

Ageing of the general population has led to an increase in the use of suboptimal kidneys from expanded criteria donation after brain death (ECD-DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. However, these kidneys have inferior graft outcomes and lower rates of immediate function. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) may improve outcomes of these suboptimal donor kidneys. Previous non-randomized studies have shown the safety of this technique and suggested its efficacy in improving the proportion of immediate functioning kidneys compared to static cold storage (SCS). However, its additional value to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), which has already been proved superior to SCS, has not yet been established.

Methods and analysis:

This single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial aims to assess immediate kidney function after 120 minutes additional, end-ischemic NMP compared to HMP alone. Immediate kidney function is defined as no dialysis treatment in the first week after transplant. Eighty recipients on dialysis at the time of transplant who receive an ECD-DBD or DCD kidney graft are eligible for inclusion. In the NMP group, the donor kidney is taken of HMP upon arrival in the recipient hospital and thereafter put on NMP for 120 minutes at 37 degrees Celsius followed by transplantation. In the control group, donor kidneys stay on HMP until transplantation. The primary outcome is immediate kidney function.

Ethics and dissemination:

The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Erasmus Medical Center (2020-0366). Results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals.

Registration:

registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04882254).

Highlights:

Nighttime Kidney Transplant From Donor With Controlled Cardiac Death: Greater Functionality at the Cost of More Complications?

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation surgery from controlled cardiac death donor (Maastricht III) is frequently performed at night, without taking into account the accumulated fatigue that the surgical team may experience. The objective of the study is to assess whether surgical complications and the functionality of the graft in the short and long term are affected by the time of day in which kidney transplantation from controlled cardiac death donors is performed.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was carried out. Patient were classified according to the start of surgery, daytime hours (8:00 AM to 7:59 PM), and nighttime hours (8:00 PM to 7:59 AM). Baseline and intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and parameters related to graft functionality were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients were included: 37 patients had kidney transplantations performed during the daytime (48.05%), and 40 patients had kidney transplantations performed at nighttime (51.95%). No statistically significant differences were found between the baseline characteristics of both groups except for sex (55.0% men in daytime vs 78.4% men in nighttime, P = .03) and time on pretransplant dialysis (33.1 months in daytime vs 13.8 months in nighttime, P = .008). The incidence of surgical complications and the functionality of the graft was similar in both groups; however, the surgical time was shorter in night transplants (163.2 minutes in daytime vs 136.5 minutes at nighttime, P = .0006) CONCLUSION: The performance of kidney transplants at night is not associated, either in the short or long term, with an increase in surgical complications or conditions leading to the deterioration in the functionality of the graft.

Deciphering transplant outcomes of expanded kidney allografts donated after controlled circulatory death in the current transplant era. A call for caution

Outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT) after controlled circulatory death (cDCD) with highly expanded criteria donors (ECD) and recipients have not been thoroughly evaluated. We analyzed in a multicenter cohort of 1161 consecutive KT, granular baseline donor and recipient factors predicting transplant outcomes, selected by bootstrapping and Cox proportional hazards, and were validated in a contemporaneous European KT cohort (n = 1585). 74.3% were DBD and 25.7% cDCD-KT. ECD-KT showed the poorest graft survival rates, irrespective of cDCD or DBD (log-rank < 0.001). Besides standard ECD classification, dialysis vintage, older age, and previous cardiovascular recipient events together with low class-II-HLA match, long cold ischemia time and combining a diabetic donor with a cDCD predicted graft loss (C-Index 0.715, 95% CI 0.675-0.755). External validation showed good prediction accuracy (C-Index 0.697, 95%CI 0.643-0.741). Recipient older age, male gender, dialysis vintage, previous cardiovascular events, and receiving a cDCD independently predicted patient death. Benefit/risk assessment of undergoing KT was compared with concurrent waitlisted candidates, and despite the fact that undergoing KT outperformed remaining waitlisted, remarkably high mortality rates were predicted if KT was undertaken under the worst risk-prediction model. Strategies to increase the donor pool, including cDCD transplants with highly expanded donor and recipient candidates, should be performed with caution.

Effect of delayed graft function on longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors in the United Kingdom: A national cohort study

Kidneys from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are utilized variably worldwide, in part due to high rates of delayed graft function (DGF) and putative associations with adverse longer-term outcomes. We aimed to determine whether the presence of DGF and its duration were associated with poor longer-term outcomes after kidney transplantation from DCD donors. Using the UK transplant registry, we identified 4714 kidney-only transplants from controlled DCD donors to adult recipients between 2006 and 2016; 2832 recipients (60·1%) had immediate graft function and 1882 (39·9%) had DGF. Of the 1847 recipients with DGF duration recorded, 926 (50·1%) had DGF < 7 days, 576 (31·2%) had DGF 7-14 days, and 345 (18·7%) had DGF >14 days. After risk adjustment, the presence of DGF was not associated with inferior long-term graft or patient survivals. However, DGF duration of >14 days was associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft failure (hazard ratio 1·7, p = ·001) and recipient death (hazard ratio 1·8, p < ·001) compared to grafts with immediate function. This study suggests that shorter periods of DGF have no adverse influence on graft or patient survival after DCD donor kidney transplantation and that DGF >14 days is a novel early biomarker for significantly worse longer-term outcomes.

A systematic review and meta-analyses of regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death solid organ transplantation

In donation after circulatory death (DCD), (thoraco)abdominal regional perfusion (RP) restores circulation to a region of the body following death declaration. We systematically reviewed outcomes of solid organ transplantation after RP by searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. Eighty-eight articles reporting on outcomes of liver, kidney, pancreas, heart, and lung transplants or donor/organ utilization were identified. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible. Methodological quality was assessed using National Institutes of Health (NIH)-scoring tools. Case reports (13/88), case series (44/88), retrospective cohort studies (35/88), retrospective matched cohort studies (5/88), and case-control studies (2/88) were identified, with overall fair quality. As blood viscosity and rheology change below 20 °C, studies were grouped as hypothermic (HRP, ≤20 °C) or normothermic (NRP, >20 °C) regional perfusion. Data demonstrate that RP is a safe alternative to in situ cold preservation (ISP) in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. The scarce HRP data are from before 2005. NRP appears to reduce post-transplant complications, especially biliary complications in controlled DCD livers, compared with ISP. Comparisons for kidney and pancreas with ISP are needed but there is no evidence that NRP is detrimental. Additional data on NRP in thoracic organs are needed. Whether RP increases donor or organ utilization needs further research.

Comparison of in situ preservation techniques for kidneys from donors after circulatory death: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Several techniques have been developed to reduce the warm ischaemic injury of donation after circulatory death (DCD) organs before procurement. There are scarce data about the in situ preservation techniques for kidney graft outcomes. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the best in situ preservation method for kidney graft outcomes from organs obtained from controlled and uncontrolled DCD.

Methods

A systematic review of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, LILACS and Cochrane databases was conducted. Studies that compare two or more in situ preservation techniques were identified and included. Only studies which provided enough data to calculate odds ratio were eligible for meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020179598.

Results

The search strategy yielded 7,121 studies. Ultimately, 14 retrospective studies were included. Because of heterogeneity, the included studies provided weak evidence that normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is the best in situ preservation technique in terms of delayed graft function (DGF) rates. Regarding primary nonfunction (PNF), we carried out a meta-analysis of 10 studies with a pooled OR of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.40-1.71), for the NRP. In regard to DGF, pooled OR for NRP was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.25-0.54).

Conclusions

NRP in the DCD donor could improve kidney graft function and be considered the in situ preservation technique of choice for abdominal organs.

Graft utilization after normothermic regional perfusion in controlled donation after circulatory death-a single-center perspective from France

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a promising procurement strategy. However, a detailed analysis of graft utilization rates is lacking. This retrospective study included all cDCD donors proposed to a single center for NRP procurement of at least one abdominal organ from 2015 to 2020. Utilization rates were defined as the proportion of transplanted grafts from proposed donors in which withdrawal of life sustaining therapies (WLST) was initiated. In total, 125 cDCD donors underwent WLST with transplantation of at least one graft from 109 (87%) donors. In a total of 14 (11%) procedures NRP failure led to graft discard. Utilization rates for kidney and liver grafts were 83% and 59%, respectively. In 44% of the discarded livers, the reason was poor graft quality based on functional donor warm ischemia >45 min, macroscopic aspect, high-transaminases release, or pathological biopsy. In this study, abdominal NRP in cDCD lead to transplantation of at least one graft in the majority of cases. While the utilization rate for kidneys was high, nearly half of the liver grafts were discarded. Cannulation training, novel graft viability markers, and ex-vivo liver graft perfusion may allow to increase graft utilization.

Early Allograft Dysfunction and Complications in DCD Liver Transplantation: Expert Consensus Statements From the International Liver Transplantation Society

Livers for transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors are relatively more prone to early and ongoing alterations in graft function that might ultimately lead to graft loss and even patient death. In consideration of this fact, this working group of the International Liver Transplantation Society has performed a critical evaluation of the medical literature to create a set of statements regarding the assessment of early allograft function/dysfunction and complications arising in the setting of donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.

Unassisted Return of Spontaneous Circulation Following Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy During Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death in a Child

OBJECTIVES

To describe the unassisted return of spontaneous circulation following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a child.

DESIGN

Case report based on clinical observation and medical record review.

SETTING

Community Children's Hospital.

PATIENT

Two-year old child.

INTERVENTIONS

Following hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, the child was taken to the operating room for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment during controlled donation after circulatory determination of death.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In addition to direct observation by experienced pediatric critical care providers, the child was monitored with electrocardiography, pulse oximetry, and invasive blood pressure via femoral arterial catheter in addition to direct observation by experienced pediatric critical care providers. Unassisted return of spontaneous circulation occurred greater than 2 minutes following circulatory arrest and was accompanied by return of respiration.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide the first report of unassisted return of spontaneous circulation following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a child. In our case, return of spontaneous circulation occurred in the setting of controlled donation after circulatory determination of death and was accompanied by return of respiration. Return of spontaneous circulation greater than 2 minutes following circulatory arrest in our patient indicates that 2 minutes of observation is insufficient to ensure that cessation of circulation is permanent after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a child.

Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion (HOPE) Reduces Early Allograft Injury and Improves Post-Transplant Outcomes in Extended Criteria Donation (ECD) Liver Transplantation from Donation After Brain Death (DBD): Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (HOPE ECD-DBD)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate peak serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and postoperative clinical outcomes after hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) versus static cold storage (SCS) in extended criteria donation (ECD) liver transplantation (LT) from donation after brain death (DBD).

BACKGROUND

HOPE might improve outcomes in LT, particularly in high-risk settings such as ECD organs after DBD, but this hypothesis has not yet been tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT).

METHODS

Between 09/2017-09/2020 46 patients undergoing ECD-DBD LT from four centers were randomly assigned to HOPE (n=23) or SCS (n=23). Peak-ALT levels within seven days following LT constituted the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification (CD), Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)), length of intensive care- (ICU) and hospital-stay, and incidence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD).

RESULTS

Demographics were equally distributed between both groups (donor age: 72 [IQR:59-78] years, recipient age: 62 [IQR:55-65] years, labMELD: 15 [IQR:9-25], 38 male and 8 female recipients). HOPE resulted in a 47% decrease in serum peak ALT (418 [IQR: 221-828] vs. 796 [IQR:477-1195] IU/L, p=0.030), a significant reduction in 90-day complications (44% vs. 74% CD grade ≥3, p=0.036; 32 [IQR:12-56] vs. 52 [IQR:35-98] CCI, p=0.021), and shorter ICU- and hospital-stays (5 [IQR:4-8] vs. 8 [IQR:5-18] days, p=0.045; 20 [IQR:16-27] vs. 36 [IQR:23-62] days, p=0.002) compared to SCS. A trend towards reduced EAD was observed for HOPE (17% vs. 35%; p=0.314).

CONCLUSION

This multicenter RCT demonstrates that HOPE, in comparison to SCS, significantly reduces early allograft injury and improves post-transplant outcomes in ECD-DBD liver transplantation.

Regulations and Procurement Surgery in DCD Liver Transplantation: Expert Consensus Guidance From the International Liver Transplantation Society

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors are an increasingly more common source of livers for transplantation in many parts of the world. Events that occur during DCD liver recovery have a significant impact on the success of subsequent transplantation. This working group of the International Liver Transplantation Society evaluated current evidence as well as combined experience and created this guidance on DCD liver procurement. Best practices for the recovery and transplantation of livers arising through DCD after euthanasia and organ procurement with super-rapid cold preservation and recovery as well as postmortem normothermic regional perfusion are described, as are the use of adjuncts during DCD liver procurement.

Kidney Transplants in Controlled Donation Following Circulatory Death, or Maastricht Type III Donors, With Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion, Optimizing Functional Outcomes

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Warm ischemia time and ischemia-reperfusion damage result in higher rates of delayed graft function and primary nonfunction in kidney transplants (KTs) from controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD). This study aimed to assess early and late kidney function and patient and graft survival of KT from cDCD preserved with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and to compare with KT from brain death donors (DBDs) and cDCD preserved with rapid recovery (RR).

Methods.

Patients who received a KT at our institution from 2012 to 2018 were included, with a minimum follow-up period of 1 y. They were categorized by donor type and conditioning methods: DBD, cDCD with NRP, and cDCD with RR. Early and late graft function, along with patient and graft survival were analyzed in all groups.

Results.

A total of 182 KT recipients were included in the study (98 DBD and 84 cDCD). Out of the cDCDs, 24 kidneys were recovered with the use of NRP and 62 with RR; 22 of the 24 kidneys were ultimately transplanted. The cDCD using NRP group showed lower rates of delayed graft function compared with the cDCD with RR group (36.3% versus 46.7%, P = 0.01). Also, primary nonfunction rates were lower in the cDCD using NRP group (4.5% versus 6.4% cDCD-RR and 10.2% DBD). Patient survival rates were >90% in all groups. No differences were found in graft survival rates at 1 y.

Conclusions.

The use of abdominal NRP improves early function recovery of KT from cDCD, making their outcomes comparable with those of DBD.

Live donor kidney transplantation. Situation analysis and roadmap

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spain have adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.

Implementation of donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation can safely enlarge the donor pool: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidney transplantation has been introduced to address organ shortage. However, DCD kidneys are not accepted worldwide due to concerns about inferior quality. To investigate whether these concerns are justified, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate DCD graft outcomes compared to donation after brain death (DBD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched from database inception until September 2020. Exclusion criteria were studies reporting on pediatric/dual kidney transplants, multi-organ transplants or studies including normothermic perfusion techniques. The primary outcome was graft survival. Secondary outcomes were primary non-function (PNF), delayed graft function (DGF), 3-months biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), 1-year estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), patient survival, and urologic complications. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis was performed in case of high between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fifty-one studies were included, comprising 73,454 DCD and 518,229 DBD recipients. One-year graft loss was increased in DCD recipients (death-censored: risk ratio (RR) 1.10 (95%-confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.16), all-cause: RR 1.13 (95%-CI 1.08-1.19)). Ten-year graft loss was similar to DBD (death-censored: RR 1.02 (95%-CI 0.92-1.13), all-cause: RR 1.03 (95%-CI 0.94-1.13)). DCD recipients had an increased risk of PNF (RR 1.43 (95%-CI 1.26-1.62)), DGF (RR 2.02 (95%-CI 1.88-2.16)), and 1-year mortality (RR 1.10 (95%-CI 1.01-1.21)). No differences were observed for 3-months BPAR, ureter stenosis/leakage, 1-year eGFR and 10-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

Long-term DCD kidney transplant outcomes are similar to DBD despite a higher risk of PNF, DGF, and a 13% increased risk of graft loss in the first year after transplantation. These results should encourage implementation of DCD programs.

Renal Delivery of Pharmacologic Agents During Machine Perfusion to Prevent Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury: From Murine Model to Clinical Trials

Donor organ shortage still remains a serious obstacle for the access of wait-list patients to kidney transplantation, the best treatment for End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD). To expand the number of transplants, the use of lower quality organs from older ECD or DCD donors has become an established routine but at the price of increased incidence of Primary Non-Function, Delay Graft Function and lower-long term graft survival. In the last years, several improvements have been made in the field of renal transplantation from surgical procedure to preservation strategies. To improve renal outcomes, research has focused on development of innovative and dynamic preservation techniques, in order to assess graft function and promote regeneration by pharmacological intervention before transplantation. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge of these new preservation strategies by machine perfusions and pharmacological interventions at different timing possibilities: in the organ donor, ex-vivo during perfusion machine reconditioning or after implementation in the recipient. We will report therapies as anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory agents, senolytics agents, complement inhibitors, HDL, siRNA and H2S supplementation. Renal delivery of pharmacologic agents during preservation state provides a window of opportunity to treat the organ in an isolated manner and a crucial route of administration. Even if few studies have been reported of transplantation after ex-vivo drugs administration, targeting the biological pathway associated to kidney failure (i.e. oxidative stress, complement system, fibrosis) might be a promising therapeutic strategy to improve the quality of various donor organs and expand organ availability.

Optimal donation of kidney transplants after controlled circulatory death

Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is used for "extended criteria" donors with poorer kidney transplant outcomes. The French cDCD program started in 2015 and is characterized by normothermic regional perfusion, hypothermic machine perfusion, and short cold ischemia time. We compared the outcomes of kidney transplantation from cDCD and brain-dead (DBD) donors, matching cDCD and DBD kidney transplants by propensity scoring for donor and recipient characteristics. The matching process retained 442 of 499 cDCD and 809 of 6185 DBD transplantations. The DGF rate was 20% in cDCD recipients compared with 28% in DBD recipients (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.82). When DBD transplants were ranked by cold ischemia time and machine perfusion use and compared with cDCD transplants, the aRR of DGF was higher for DBD transplants without machine perfusion, regardless of the cold ischemia time (aRR with cold ischemia time <18 h, 1.57; 95% CI 1.20-2.03, vs aRR with cold ischemia time ≥18 h, 1.79; 95% CI 1.31-2.44). The 1-year graft survival rate was similar in both groups. Early outcome was better for kidney transplants from cDCD than from matched DBD transplants with this French protocol.

Organ donation after controlled circulatory death (Maastricht classification III) following the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in Korea: a suggested guideline

The “Act on hospice and palliative care and decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life” was enacted in February 2018 in Korea. Therefore, we suggest a Korean guideline for organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) category III after the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). Implementation of WLST includes stopping ventilation, extubation, discontinuation of inotropics and vasoconstrictors, cessation of continuous renal replacement therapy, and cessation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Medical staff involved in organ procurement or transplantation surgery cannot participate in the WLST process. Following cardiac arrest, 5 minutes of “no touch time” should pass, after which circulatory death can be declared. The procurement team can enter the room after the declaration of death. The final procurement decision is made after the surgeon visually checks the organ condition. DCD category III activation in Korea will help increase organ donation and reduce the demand-supply mismatch of organ transplantation.

Donation after circulatory death is associated with increased fibrosis on 1-year post-transplant kidney allograft surveillance biopsy

AIM

The use of kidneys donated after circulatory death (DCD) provides an invaluable expansion of the organ supply for transplantation. Here, we investigated the effect of DCD on fibrotic changes on 1 1-year post 1-transplant surveillance kidney allograft biopsy.

METHODS

Recipients of a deceased donor kidney transplant between 2013 and 2017 at a single institution, who survived 1 year and underwent surveillance biopsy, were included in the analysis (n = 333: 87 DCD kidneys, 246 kidneys donated after brain death [DBD]). Banff scores for interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were summed as IFTA and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

DCD and DBD groups were comparable for baseline characteristics. Delayed graft function was 39% in DCD versus 19% in DBD, P = .0002. Patient and graft survival were comparable for DCD and DBD cohorts. IFTA scores were higher in DCD compared to DBD (2.43±..13 vs. 2.01±..08, P = .0054). On multivariate analysis, the odds of IFTA > 2 in the DCD group was 2.5× higher (95%CI: 1.354.63) than in the DBD group. Within the DCD group, kidneys with IFTA > 2 had inferior 5-year graft survival (P = .037).

CONCLUSION

Compared to DBD kidneys, DCD kidneys developed a greater degree of fibrotic changes on 1-year post-transplant surveillance biopsy, which affected graft longevity within the DCD cohort.

Ethical considerations in the use of pre-mortem interventions to support deceased organ donation: A scoping review

AIM

Pre-mortem interventions (PMIs) are performed on patients before the determination of death in order to preserve or enhance the possibility of organ donation. These interventions can be ethically controversial, and we thus undertook a scoping review of the ethical issues surrounding diverse PMIs.

METHODS

Using modified scoping review methods, we executed a search strategy created by an information specialist. Screening and iterative coding of each article was done by two researchers using qualitative thematic analysis, and narrative summaries of coded themes were presented.

RESULTS

We identified and screened 5365 references and coded 196 peer-reviewed publications. The most frequently cited issues were related to possible harms to the patient who is a potential donor, and legitimacy of consent. The most controversial issue was that PMIs may place patients at risk for physical harm, yet benefit is accrued mainly to recipients. Some authors argued that lack of direct medical benefit to the still living patient precluded valid consent from surrogate decision makers (SDMs), while many stated that some medical risk could be approved by SDMs if it aligns with non-medical benefits valued by the patient.

CONCLUSION

PMIs require consensus that benefit includes concepts beyond medical benefit to the patient who is a potential donor. Informed consent must be confirmed for each PMI and not assumed to be part of general consent for donation. Risk must be proportionate to the potential benefit and newly proposed interventions should be reviewed carefully for medical efficacy and potential risks.

Consensus statement on normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death: report from the European Society for Organ Transplantation's Transplant Learning Journey

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a safe alternative to in situ cooling and rapid procurement. An increasing number of countries and centres are performing NRP, a technically and logistically challenging procedure. This consensus document provides evidence-based recommendations on the use of NRP in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. It also offers minimal ethical, logistical and technical requirements that form the foundation of a safe and effective NRP programme. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by a panel of European experts of Workstream 04 of the Transplantation Learning Journey project, which is part of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

First Organ Donation after Circulatory Death Following Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatment in Korea: a Case Report

In February 2018, the Withdrawal of the Life-sustaining Treatment (WLST) Decision Act was legalized in Korea. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) after WLST was classified as DCD category III. We report the first case of successful organ donation after WLST in Korea. A 52-year-old male who experienced cerebral hemorrhage was a potential brain-dead donor with donation consent. During the first brain death examination, Babinski reflex was present, which disappeared two days later. Then, electroencephalography was performed five times at intervals of 2 to 3 days, according to the recommendation of a neurologist. The patient was transferred to the OR at 19:30 July 3, 2020. At 20:00, an intensive care unit specialist performed extubation and discontinued vasopressors. Oxygen saturation fell to < 70% in 1 minute, which signaled the beginning of functional warm ischemia. At 20:15, asystole was confirmed; after 5 minutes of "no-touch time," circulatory death was declared. Organ procurement surgery was initiated, with surgeons performing the recipient surgery ready in the adjacent OR. Through the first successful DCD case, we expected that DCD will be actively implemented in Korea, saving the lives of patient waiting for transplantation and resolving the imbalance between organ receipt and donation.

Current status and further potential of lung donation after circulatory death

Chronic organ shortage remains the most limiting factor in lung transplantation. To overcome this shortage, a minority of centers have started with efforts to reintroduce donation after circulatory death (DCD). This review aims to evaluate the experimental background, the current international clinical experience, and the further potential and challenges of the different DCD categories. Successful strategies have been implemented to reduce the problems of warm ischemic time, thrombosis after circulatory arrest, and difficulties in organ assessment, which come with DCD donation. From the currently reported results, controlled-DCD lungs are an effective and safe method with good mid-term and even long-term survival outcomes comparable to donation after brain death (DBD). Primary graft dysfunction and onset of chronic allograft dysfunction seem also comparable. Thus, controlled-DCD lungs should be ceased to be treated as marginal and instead be promoted as an equivalent alternative to DBD. A wide implementation of controlled-DCD-lung donation would significantly decrease the mortality on the waiting list. Therefore, further efforts in establishment of legislation and logistics are crucial. With regard to uncontrolled DCD, more data are needed analyzing long-term outcomes. To help with the detailed assessment and improvement of uncontrolled or otherwise questionable grafts after retrieval, ex-vivo lung perfusion is promising.

Spanish experience with heart transplants from controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion and cold storage

Heart transplantation from controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) may help to increase the availability of hearts for transplantation. During 2020, four heart transplants were performed at three different Spanish hospitals based on the use of thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) followed by cold storage (CS). All donors were young adults <45 years. The functional warms ischemic time ranged from 8 to 16 minutes. In all cases, the heart recovered sinus rhythm within 1 minute of TA-NRP. TA-NRP was weaned off or decreased <1L within 25 minutes. No recipient required mechanical support after transplantation and all were immediately extubated and discharged home (median hospital stay: 21 days) with an excellent outcome. Four livers, eight kidneys, and two pancreata were also recovered and transplanted. All abdominal grafts recipients experienced an excellent outcome. The use of TA-NRP makes heart transplantation feasible and allows assessing heart function before organ procurement without any negative impact on the preservation of abdominal organs. The use of TA-NRP in cDCDD heart donors in conjunction with cold storage following retrieval can eliminate the need to use ex situ machine perfusion devices, making cDCDD heart transplantation economically possible in other countries.

Expanding controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death: statement from an international collaborative

A decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment (WLST) is derived by a conclusion that further treatment will not enable a patient to survive or will not produce a functional outcome with acceptable quality of life that the patient and the treating team regard as beneficial. Although many hospitalized patients die under such circumstances, controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) programs have been developed only in a reduced number of countries. This International Collaborative Statement aims at expanding cDCDD in the world to help countries progress towards self-sufficiency in transplantation and offer more patients the opportunity of organ donation. The Statement addresses three fundamental aspects of the cDCDD pathway. First, it describes the process of determining a prognosis that justifies the WLST, a decision that should be prior to and independent of any consideration of organ donation and in which transplant professionals must not participate. Second, the Statement establishes the permanent cessation of circulation to the brain as the standard to determine death by circulatory criteria. Death may be declared after an elapsed observation period of 5 min without circulation to the brain, which confirms that the absence of circulation to the brain is permanent. Finally, the Statement highlights the value of perfusion repair for increasing the success of cDCDD organ transplantation. cDCDD protocols may utilize either in situ or ex situ perfusion consistent with the practice of each country. Methods to accomplish the in situ normothermic reperfusion of organs must preclude the restoration of brain perfusion to not invalidate the determination of death.

Organ donation and transplantation: a multi-stakeholder call to action

Although overall donation and transplantation activity is higher in Europe than on other continents, differences between European countries in almost every aspect of transplantation activity (for example, in the number of transplantations, the number of people with a functioning graft, in rates of living versus deceased donation, and in the use of expanded criteria donors) suggest that there is ample room for improvement. Herein we review the policy and clinical measures that should be considered to increase access to transplantation and improve post-transplantation outcomes. This Roadmap, generated by a group of major European stakeholders collaborating within a Thematic Network, presents an outline of the challenges to increasing transplantation rates and proposes 12 key areas along with specific measures that should be considered to promote transplantation. This framework can be adopted by countries and institutions that are interested in advancing transplantation, both within and outside the European Union. Within this framework, a priority ranking of initiatives is suggested that could serve as the basis for a new European Union Action Plan on Organ Donation and Transplantation.

Transplantation of a heart donated after circulatory death via thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion and results from the first Spanish case

BACKGROUND

Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has emerged as one of the main strategies for increasing the organ donor pool. Because of the ischemic injury that follows the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, hearts from cDCD donors have not been considered for transplantation until recently. The ex-situ perfusion of hearts directly procured from cDCD donors has been used to allow the continuous perfusion of the organ and the assessment of myocardial viability prior to transplantation. Based on our experience with abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in cDCD, we designed a protocol to recover and validate hearts from cDCD donors using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion without the utilization of an ex-situ device.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the first case of a cDCD heart transplant performed with this approach in Spain. The donor was a 43-year-old asthmatic female diagnosed with severe hypoxic encephalopathy. She was considered a potential cDCD donor and a suitable candidate for multiorgan procurement including the heart via thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion. The heart recipient was a 60-year-old male diagnosed with amyloid cardiomyopathy. Cold ischemia time was 55 min. The surgery was uneventful.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report, the first of its kind in Spain, supports the feasibility of evaluating and successfully transplanting cDCD hearts without the need for ex-situ perfusion based on the use of thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion opening the way for multiorgan donation in cDCD.

Abdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

BACKGROUND

Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) for donation after circulatory death is an emerging organ preservation technique that might lead to increased organ utilization per donor by facilitating viability testing, improving transplant outcome by early reversal of ischemia, and decreasing the risk of unintentional surgical damage. The aim of the current review is to evaluate the recent literature on the added value of aNRP when compared to local standard perfusion technique.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for systematic reviews was used, and relevant literature databases were searched. Primary outcomes were organ utilization rate and patient and graft survival after 1 year. Secondary outcomes included delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, serum creatinine, and biliary complications.

RESULTS

A total of 24 articles were included in this review. The technique is unanimously reported to be feasible and safe, but the available studies are characterized by considerable heterogeneity and bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Uniform reported outcome measures are needed to draw more definitive conclusions on transplant outcomes and organ utilization. A randomized controlled trial comparing aNRP with standard procurement technique in donation after circulatory death donors would be needed to show the added value of the procedure and determine its place among modern preservation techniques.

Online education about end-of-life care and the donation process after brain death and circulatory death. Can we influence perception and attitudes in critical care doctors? A prospective study

Impact of training on end-of-life care (EOLC) and the deceased donation process in critical care physicians' perceptions and attitudes was analysed. A survey on attitudes and perceptions of deceased donation as part of the EOLC process was delivered to 535 physicians working in critical care before and after completion of a online training programme (2015-17). After training, more participants agreed that nursing staff should be involved in the end-of-life decision process (P < 0.001) and that relatives should not be responsible for medical decisions (P < 0.001). Postcourse, more participants considered 'withdrawal/withholding' as similar actions (P < 0.001); deemed appropriate the use of pre-emptive sedation in all patients undergoing life support treatment adequacy (LSTA; P < 0.001); and were favourable to approaching family about donation upon LSTA agreement, as well as admitting them in the intensive care unit (P < 0.001) to allow the possibility of donation. Education increased the number of participants prone to initiate measures to preserve the organs for donation before the declaration of death in patients undergoing LSTA (P < 0.001). Training increased number of positive terms selected by participants to describe donation after brain and circulatory death. Training programmes may be useful to improve physicians' perception and attitude about including donation as part of the patient's EOLC.

DCD donations and outcomes of heart transplantation: the Australian experience

Purpose

There is increasing clinical utilization of hearts from the donation after circulatory death (DCD) pathway with the aim of expanding the donor pool and mitigating the ever-present discrepancy between the inadequate availability of good quality donor hearts and the rising number of patients with end-stage heart failure.

Methods

This article reviews the rationale, practice, logistical factors, and 5-year experience of DCD heart transplantation at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney.

Findings

Between July 2014 and July 2019, 69 DCD donor retrievals were undertaken resulting in 49 hearts being instrumented on an ex situ normothermic cardiac perfusion device. Seventeen (35%) of these hearts were declined and the remaining 32 (65%) were used for orthotopic DCD heart transplantation. At 5 years of follow-up, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 96%, 94%, and 94% for DCD hearts compared with 89%, 83%, and 82% respectively for donation after brain death (DBD) hearts (n.s). The immediate post-implant requirement for temporary extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for delayed graft function was 31% with no difference in rejection rates when compared with the contemporaneous cohort of patients transplanted with standard criteria DBD hearts.

Summary

DCD heart transplantation has become routine and incorporated into standard clinical practice by a handful of pioneering clinical transplant centres. The Australian experience demonstrates that excellent medium-term outcomes are achievable from the use of DCD hearts. These outcomes are consistent across the other centres and consequently favour a more rapid and wider uptake of heart transplantation using DCD donor hearts, which would otherwise be discarded.