Increased urinary excretion of LTE4 after exercise and attenuation of exercise-induced bronchospasm by montelukast, a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist

Montelukast in 2- to 5-year-old children with asthma

Pediatric dose selection for montelukast in 2-5-year-old children was based on a pharmacokinetic approach that was also used in previously selecting a once-daily 5-mg chewable tablet for asthmatic children 6-14 years of age. A 4-mg chewable tablet administered once daily was determined to be the correct dose and was subsequently found to be safe and effective in asthmatic children 2-5 years of age.

Elevating dietary salt exacerbates hyperpnea-induced airway obstruction in guinea pigs

Previous studies have indicated that increased dietary salt consumption worsens postexercise pulmonary function in humans with exercise-induced asthma (EIA). It has been suggested that EIA and hyperpnea-induced airway obstruction (HIAO) in guinea pigs (an animal model of EIA) are mediated by similar mechanisms. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether altering dietary salt consumption also exacerbated HIAO in guinea pigs. Furthermore, the potential pathway of action of dietary salt was investigated by blocking leukotriene (LT) production during HIAO in guinea pigs. Thirty-two male Hartley strain guinea pigs were split into two groups. One group (n = 16) of animals ingested a normal-salt diet (NSD) for 2 wk; the other group (n = 16) ingested a high-salt diet (HSD) for 2 wk. Thereafter, animals were anesthetized, cannulated, tracheotomized, and mechanically ventilated during a baseline period and during two dry gas hyperpnea challenges. After the first challenge, the animals were administered either saline or nordihydroguaiaretic acid, a LT inhibitor. Bladder urine was analyzed for electrolyte concentrations and urinary LTE(4). The HSD elicited higher airway inspiratory pressures (Ptr) than the NSD (P < 0.001) postchallenge. However, after infusion of the LT inhibitor and a second hyperpnea challenge, HIAO was blocked in both diet groups (P < 0.001). Nonetheless, the HSD group continued to demonstrate slightly higher Ptr than the NSD group (P < 0.05). Urinary LTE(4) excretion significantly increased in the HSD group compared with the NSD group within treatment groups. This study has demonstrated that dietary salt loading exacerbated the development of HIAO in guinea pigs and that LT release was involved in HIAO and may be moderated by changes in dietary salt loading.

Choices of therapy for exercise-induced asthma in children

Cough and wheezing interferes with sport and other forms of physical activity in half of asthmatic children. Airway obstruction can be induced by a standard exercise test in over 70% of children with asthma. A beta-adrenergic agonist or cromone taken by inhalation beforehand will usually inhibit bronchoconstriction provoked by a free running exercise test. The duration of protective effect with salbutamol, terbutaline and cromones is less than 4 h. The long acting beta-adrenergic agonists formoterol and salmeterol give protection against exercise-induced airway obstruction for up to 12 h, which implies that treatment given in the morning will offer protection from the effects of physical activity throughout the day. However, the duration of protective effect after a morning dose declines if these compounds are given regularly. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRAs) also provide good protection against exercise-induced asthma. Regular administration of LRAs is not associated with tolerance and loss of protective effect. The oral route makes for unobtrusive administration and this may help adherence to prescribed regimens.

The anti-inflammatory effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs and their use in asthma

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways. Anti-inflammatory drug therapy, primarily using corticosteroids, is now considered the first-line treatment in the management of all grades of asthma severity. Although corticosteroids are believed to be the most potent anti-inflammatory agents available, they do not suppress all inflammatory mediators involved in the asthmatic response. Leukotrienes, which are lipid mediators generated from the metabolism of arachidonic acid, play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma. They produce bronchospasm, increase bronchial hyperresponsiveness, mucus production, and mucosal edema, and enhance airway smooth muscle cell proliferation and eosinophil recruitment into the airways, and their synthesis or release is unaffected by corticosteroid administration. The use of leukotriene synthesis inhibitors or leukotriene receptor antagonists as anti-inflammatory therapies in asthma has therefore been investigated. Beneficial effects of leukotriene-modifying drugs have been demonstrated in the management of all grades of asthma severity, and there is evidence that certain patient groups (such as those with exercise-induced asthma or aspirin-induced asthma) may be particularly suitable for such therapy.

Efficacy of antileukotriene agents in asthma management

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews information on the role of three antileukotrienes (anti-LTs), montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton, in the management of asthma. After reading this article, readers should have an understanding of the efficacy of anti-LTs in specific patient populations.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant and appropriately controlled clinical studies on the efficacy of anti-LTs were used. Only literature in the English language was reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Material was taken from peer-reviewed journals and published abstracts.

RESULTS

The efficacy of anti-LTs has been established in numerous randomized, controlled, multicenter trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate disease. These agents reduce asthma symptoms, beta2-agonist use, and asthma exacerbations, in addition to improving pulmonary function. The anti-LTs are also effective when added to low-dose or high-dose corticosteroid regimens in symptomatic asthma patients. They have proven efficacy in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma, and they appear able to reduce nasal congestion in asthma patients with concomitant upper airway symptoms. Some anti-LTs have been shown to be effective in pediatric asthma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In reviewing available clinical results as well as real-world experience in managing asthma patients, the Antileukotriene Working Group concludes that anti-LTs may be used in patients with mild persistent asthma as well as in combination with other asthma medications at all levels of disease severity for long-term maintenance of asthma control.

The role of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the literature on the role of antileukotrienes (anti-LTs), specifically montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton, in the treatment of asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant and appropriate controlled clinical studies were used. Only literature in the English language was reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Material was taken from academic/scholarly journals, appropriate reviews, and published abstracts.

RESULTS

In guidelines established by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a stepwise approach to asthma management is recommended, with recommendations varying depending on degree of disease severity. The anti-LTs, the newest class of drugs for the treatment of asthma, play a circumscribed role in the guidelines as they were only recently available when the latest guidelines were published. Subsequently, however, extensive clinical experience with the anti-LTs has been amassed. Multiple clinical studies have demonstrated that the anti-LTs improve pulmonary function and quality of life, and reduce asthma symptoms, asthma exacerbations, and use of beta2-agonists and oral steroids. The anti-LTs may be particularly useful in asthma patients with aspirin sensitivity or concomitant allergic rhinitis, as well as in pediatric patients. These agents have additive effects with inhaled corticosteroids and may permit a reduction in inhaled corticosteroid dosages.

CONCLUSIONS

The anti-LTs have several features that are likey to promote adherence to treatment and are generally well tolerated. The available clinical data suggest that anti-LTs should be considered as a therapeutic option or as additive therapy in patients with mild to severe asthma.

Comparison of montelukast versus budesonide in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

Previous studies in which leukotriene-receptor antagonist and corticosteroids were used have suggested a possible role for these anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, but no direct comparisons have been made.

OBJECTIVE

A crossover study was undertaken to compare the ability of both montelukast and budesonide to protect patients from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients (median age, 17 years; range, 8 to 36 years), who had clinical exercise-induced bronchoconstriction for 1 year and decreased FEV1 of at least 20% after exercise on two occasions, were enrolled in this study. To compare the therapies in each patient, we administered, consecutively, 10 mg of montelukast once daily at bedtime for 3 days and, later, 400 microg of budesonide twice daily for 15 days, or vice versa, with a 15-day intervening washout period during which no patient received treatment. Exercise challenges were performed at baseline (no therapy) and after each treatment. The percentage of FEV1 declines at 2, 7, and 12 minutes after exercise and the area under the curve (summarizing the extent and modification of FEV1 decreases relative to time) were measured and compared.

RESULTS

Both budesonide and montelukast significantly reduced the decrease in FEV1 (area under the curve) after exercise with respect to the baseline condition of no therapy (P = 0.0001). Overall, budesonide offered better protection (area under the curve) than did montelukast (P = 0.01), particularly in the short-term evaluation (2 minutes after exercise; P = 0.003); however, considerable individual variations in the responses to both budesonide and montelukast were observed. The degree of protection against decreases in FEV1 ranged from 0% to almost 100% for both treatments. In 16 of 20 patients, budesonide therapy offered better protection than did montelukast, and in the other 4 patients, montelukast showed better protection than did budesonide. No side effects of either montelukast or budesonide were detected during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with budesonide or montelukast prevents exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Because substantial variation in the response may be present among patients, both drugs should be tested in each patient before long-term therapy is chosen.

Montelukast dose selection in children ages 2 to 5 years: comparison of population pharmacokinetics between children and adults

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of asthma in patients age 6 years and older. The purpose of this open, one-period, multicenter population pharmacokinetic study was to identify a chewable tablet (CT) dose of montelukast for administration to children ages 2 to 5 years with asthma, yielding a single-dose pharmacokinetic profile (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) comparable to that of the 10 mg film-coated tablet (FCT) dose in adults. Because patient numbers were small and the volume of blood that could be collected from individual 2- to 5-year-old patients was limited, a population pharmacokinetic approach was used to estimate population AUC (AUCpop). The 4 mg CT dose of montelukast was well tolerated and yielded an AUCpop (2721 ng.h/mL) similar to that of the adult AUCpop (2595 ng.h/mL) observed after a 10 mg FCT dose. These results support the selection of a 4 mg once-daily CT dose of montelukast for future efficacy and safety studies in children ages 2 to 5 years with asthma.

Leukotrienes as mediators of asthma

This review describes the aspects of leukotriene (LT) pharmacology and biology that are relevant to their important role in asthma. The biosynthesis and metabolism, including transcellular metabolism, of LTB4 and the cysteinyl-LTs (i.e. LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4) are described, and their transport is briefly outlined. The existence, distribution and pharmacological characterization of the receptors (BLT, CysLT1, CysLT2), as well as the transduction mechanisms triggered, are discussed in detail. We also describe their effects on airway smooth muscle tone, hyperresponsiveness and proliferation, on vascular tone and permeability, on mucus secretion, on neural fibers and inflammatory cell functions. Finally, the evidence supporting their role as asthma mediators is reviewed, including the effects of anti LT drugs (both biosynthesis inhibitors and receptor antagonists) in experimental and clinical asthma.

Antileukotrienes in asthma: present situation

Leukotrienes are key mediators in asthma. Over the last 5 years, several antileukotrienes, including three receptor antagonists (montelukast, pranlukast and zafirlukast) and one 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (zileuton), have been marketed and, to date, this class of drugs is being used widely. Still, their definite place in the asthma treatment algorithm is not yet established. These novel drugs have not yet all been evaluated in the same depth, but they have all been shown to possess anti-inflammatory properties and to be effective in chronic asthma treatment. Zafirlukast and montelukast are particularly efficacious in exercise-induced asthma and zileuton appears valuable for treating aspirin-intolerant asthmatics. Clinical comparisons to other anti-asthma drugs are still sparse. The corticosteroid-sparing effect of antileukotrienes is fairly well established except for zileuton, even though this drug has been evaluated most thoroughly in terms of its anti-inflammatory effects. Montelukast is the antileukotriene most extensively evaluated in children and zafirlukast has recently been approved for use in children in the USA, although not yet in Europe. Therapeutic regimes are quite variable depending on the drug, but all of the antileukotrienes marketed to date are taken orally; hence, compliance is usually greater than that with inhaled medication. Response to antileukotrienes appears to depend on the individual patients' characteristics, in particular on genetic polymorphisms related to leukotriene metabolism. All drugs of this class are well tolerated and only in the case of zileuton is there potential for hepatic adverse effects. The diagnosis of Churg-Strauss syndrome made among patients taking antileukotrienes seems to be more related to the withdrawal of corticosteroids than to the antileukotrienes themselves.

Leukotriene modifiers in pediatric asthma management

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) are mediators released in asthma and virus-induced wheezing. Corticosteroids appear to have little or no effect on this release in vivo. Cys-LTs are both direct bronchoconstrictors and proinflammatory substances that mediate several steps in the pathophysiology of chronic asthma, including inflammatory cell recruitment, vascular leakage, and possibly airway remodeling. Blocking studies show that Cys-LTs are pivotal mediators in the pathophysiology of asthma. Cys-LTs are key components in the early and late allergic airway response and also contribute to bronchial obstruction after exercise and hyperventilation of cold, dry air in asthmatics. LT modifiers reduce airway eosinophil numbers and exhaled nitric oxide levels. Together these findings support an important role for the Cys-LTs in the asthma airway inflammation. Cys-LT receptor antagonists (Cys-LTRA) are generally well-tolerated. Phase III randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCT) show that LT modifiers are moderately effective, apparently with a particular between-patient variability in their clinical response. The clinical effects of LT modifiers are additive to those of beta-agonists and corticosteroids. The onset of action of LT modifiers is within 1 to several days, and not rapid enough to make them useful as rescue treatment. Although LT modifiers possess some antiinflammatory activity, they cannot substitute for corticosteroids for inflammation control. LT modifiers are alternatives to long-acting beta-agonists as complementary treatment to inhaled corticosteroids in pediatric asthma management because they provide bronchodilation and bronchoprotection without development of tolerance, and complement the antiinflammatory activity unchecked by steroids. In addition, the Cys-LTRA montelukast has been shown to ameliorate asthmatic symptoms and provide bronchoprotection in asthmatic preschool children from 2 years of age, which is of particular importance in this difficult-to-manage group of asthmatics. Given their efficacy, antiinflammatory activity, oral administration, and safety, LT modifiers will play an important role in the treatment of asthmatic children.

Expression of the cysteinyl leukotriene 1 receptor in normal human lung and peripheral blood leukocytes

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) are important mediators of human asthma. Pharmacologic and clinical studies show that the CysLTs exert most of their bronchoconstrictive and proinflammatory effects through activation of a putative, 7-transmembrane domain, G-protein-coupled receptor, the CysLT1 receptor. The initial molecular characterization of the CysLT1 receptor showed by in situ hybridization, the presence of CysLT1 receptor messenger RNA (mRNA) in human lung smooth-muscle cells and lung macrophages. We confirmed the results of these in situ hybridization analyses for the CysLT1 receptor, and produced the first immunohistochemical characterization of the CysLT1 receptor protein in human lung. The identification of the CysLT1 receptor in the lung is consistent with the antibronchoconstrictive and antiinflammatory actions of CysLT1 receptor antagonists. We also report the expression of CysLT1 receptor mRNA and protein in most peripheral blood eosinophils and pregranulocytic CD34+ cells, and in subsets of monocytes and B lymphocytes.

Leukotriene receptor antagonist therapy

Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) are a new class of drugs for asthma treatment, available in tablet form. Their unique mechanism of action results in a combination of both bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects. While their optimal place in asthma management is still under review, LTRA represent an important advance in asthma pharmacotherapy.

Eicosanoid and muscarinic receptor blockade abolishes hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction (HIB) results from the combined effects of prostanoid and leukotriene metabolism. A bronchoscope was used in anesthetized dogs to record peripheral airway resistance and HIB before and after combined treatment with inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (indomethacin) and 5-lipoxygenase (MK-0591). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cells and mediators from hyperventilated and control airways were also measured. Pretreatment with MK-0591 and indomethacin significantly attenuated, but did not abolish, HIB. However, addition of atropine nearly eliminated the residual response. Blockade of eicosanoid metabolism markedly reduced the concentrations of eicosanoids recovered in BALF after hyperventilation. Positive correlations between posthyperventilation BALF prostanoid and epithelial cell concentrations are suggestive of mucosal injury-induced mediator production and release. We conclude that HIB is prevented in the presence of eicosanoid and muscarinic-receptor blockade and that both classes of eicosanoids contribute similarly to the development of HIB.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction does not cause eosinophilic airway inflammation or airway hyperresponsiveness in subjects with asthma

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (LT) C(4), D(4), and E(4) may partially mediate eosinophilic airway inflammation in patients with asthma. High- intensity exercise by patients with asthma can result in exercise- induced bronchoconstriction, partly due to leukotriene production, but it is still debated whether this causes airway inflammation. Ten subjects completed a randomized, controlled study to examine the effects of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction on airway inflammatory cells. Subjects completed exercise challenge and methacholine challenge in random order separated by 1 wk. Spirometry was measured for 2 h after challenges, and airway responsiveness was measured the day before and 24 h after each challenge. Blood and sputum samples were obtained before, and 2, 4, 7, and 24 h after each challenge for measurement of inflammatory cells. Nine of the subjects inhaled allergen at least 3 wk before or 1 wk after the study. Sputum samples were collected before, 7 h, and 24 h after challenge. The maximum percentage fall in FEV(1) was 21.3 +/- 1.5% after exercise, 29.9 +/- 1.5% after methacholine, and 28.9+/-2.7% after allergen. Exercise had no effect on airway responsiveness or inflammatory cells measured in blood or sputum, unlike allergen inhalation, which resulted in significant airway hyperresponsiveness and increases in sputum eosinophils (p < 0.05). This study demonstrates that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction does not cause eosinophilic airway inflammation in subjects with asthma who develop airway inflammation with the same degree of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction. We conclude that exercise-induced bronchoconstriction does not cause airway inflammation or airway hyperresponsiveness.

Antileukotriene drugs in childhood asthma: what is their place in therapy?

Leukotriene antagonists are a new class of anti-inflammatory drugs which have shown clinical efficacy in the management of asthma. However, their role in paediatric asthma is still unclear. In essence, while there are theoretical reasons as to why leukotriene antagonists would be of use in the management of childhood asthma, there is little clinical data on their use in this patient group. Studies with leukotriene antagonists to date have been performed in children with chronic 'undertreated' asthma which, under current recommendations, should be treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Furthermore, the magnitude of effect of leukotriene antagonists on lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second of less than 5% better than placebo) and daily symptoms (0.23 puffs per day of B2 agonist less than placebo), while reaching statistical significance, is unlikely to be of clinical significance in children with chronic undertreated asthma. There is, however, good evidence for leukotriene antagonist use in exercise induced asthma in children. We conclude that although leukotriene antagonists may play an important role in the management of childhood asthma in the future, particularly as corticosteroid sparing agents and in exercise induced asthma, clinical data in paediatric asthma is poor.

Montelukast adult (10-mg film-coated tablet) and pediatric (5-mg chewable tablet) dose selections

Montelukast is a selective leukotriene receptor antagonist that has been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic asthma. It is approved in more than 70 countries for patients 6 years of age and older. For adults (> or = 15 years of age), a 10-mg film-coated tablet (FCT) is available, and for children (aged 6 to 14 years), a 5-mg chewable tablet (CT) is available. The adult montelukast dose (10-mg FCT) was selected on the basis of classic dose-ranging studies as the lowest dose that produces maximal improvement in both measures of airway function and patient-reported outcomes in chronic asthma and in the attenuation of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The strategy used for the pediatric dose selection for montelukast was based on the determination of a CT dose that would provide an overall systemic exposure to montelukast in children similar to that in adults who receive a 10-mg FCT dose. Because montelukast was to be given chronically for the treatment of asthma, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve was considered to be the pharmacokinetic measurement that best represented systemic exposure to the drug. A 5-mg CT yielded a comparable single-dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve profile to that of the adult 10-mg FCT dose and, therefore, was selected as the pediatric dose for children aged 6 to 14 years with asthma. Subsequently, 2 studies of efficacy and tolerability validated the choice of the 5-mg CT dose.

Exercise-induced asthma: is it the right diagnosis in elite athletes?

Exercise-induced asthma, as recognized in asthmatic subjects, is an exaggerated airway response to airway dehydration in the presence of inflammatory cells and their mediators. The airway narrowing is primarily caused by contraction of bronchial smooth muscle. The milder airway narrowing documented in response to exercise in elite athletes and otherwise healthy subjects may simply be the result of the physiologic responses and pathologic changes in airway cells arising from dehydration injury. These changes, which include excessive mucus production and airway edema, would serve both to cause cough and to amplify the narrowing effects of normal bronchial smooth muscle contraction, resulting in symptoms. These changes are more likely to occur in healthy subjects who exercise intensely for long periods of time breathing cold air, dry air, or both. Under these conditions, the ability to humidify inspired air may be overwhelmed, causing significant dehydration of the airway mucosa and an increase in osmolarity, even in small airways. In addition to dehydration injury, airway narrowing to pharmacologic and physical agents may occur as a result of injury caused by large volumes of air containing irritant gases, particulate matter, or allergens being inspired during exercise. As a result, the airways may become inflamed, and the airway smooth muscle may become more sensitive. These events could result in the same exaggerated airway response to dehydration, as documented in asthmatic subjects.

Comparative effects of long-acting beta2-agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor on exercise-induced asthma

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) is a common problem that can be controlled with long-acting beta-agonists and leukotriene-modifying compounds. There is, however, limited information on the comparative effectiveness of the two classes of drugs, as well as the relative potencies of the antileukotriene agents.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to provide data on the above issues.

METHODS

We performed a random-order, blinded, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial in 10 patients with EIA. Each subject received standard single doses of salmeterol, montelukast, zafirlukast, zileuton, and placebo on separate days. The participants performed 4 minutes of cycle ergometry while breathing frigid air 1, 4, 8, and 12 hours after administration of the test agents. The primary endpoint was the extent of the decrement in the FEV(1) 10 minutes after exertion.

RESULTS

With placebo, symptomatic airway narrowing developed at all times (mean +/- SE decrease in FEV(1) ranged between 21% +/- 5% and 26% +/- 5%). Salmeterol acted quickly and significantly blunted the obstructive response for 12 hours (DeltaFEV(1) first hour: 8% +/- 3%; DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 8% +/- 3%; P <.0001 vs placebo and P =.72 vs time). The leukotriene-modifying agents produced effects within 1 hour of ingestion. Like salmeterol, montelukast and zafirlukast also offered long-lasting protection, and there were no significant differences between them (montelukast DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 9% +/- 4%; zafirlukast DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 11% +/- 2%; P =.75) or the beta(2)-agonist (montelukast vs salmeterol: P =.72; zafirlukast vs salmeterol: P =.48). Zileuton provided equivalent prophylaxis for the first 4 hours (DeltaFEV(1) fourth hour: 11% +/- 2%); however, by 8 hours, it was less efficacious than all of the other active compounds, and by 12 hours it did not differ from placebo (DeltaFEV(1) twelfth hour: 19% +/- 4%; P =.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Single doses of the currently available leukotriene receptor antagonists provide prompt effective and persistent defense against EIA that equals that seen with a long-acting beta(2)-agonist. The synthesis inhibitor zileuton affords a comparable magnitude of prophylaxis but has a considerably shorter duration of action.

Role of leukotrienes in asthma pathophysiology

Inflammation is an essential component of asthma pathophysiology. While beta(2)-agonists are often used for short-term relief of acute bronchospasm, anti-inflammatory agents are required for the long-term management of chronic inflammation in this disease. Corticosteroids have emerged as the first-line anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma management. However, in some patients, especially children, the high doses of corticosteroids that may be required to control features of hyperresponsiveness, including exercise-induced asthma, raise safety concerns. Thus, there is a need for complementary anti-inflammatory, steroid-sparing agents in asthma therapy. Several inflammatory mediators have been targeted in an attempt to thwart this inflammatory process, but so far with little success. The cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT), LTC(4), LTD(4), and LTE(4), have been shown to be essential mediators in asthma, making them obvious targets for therapy. These cysteinyl leukotrienes, previously known as the slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis (SRS-A), mediate many of the features of asthma, including bronchial constriction, bronchial hyperreactivity, edema, and eosinophilia. Data show that selective cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists (CysLTRAs) effectively reverse these pathologic changes. Corticosteroids do not inhibit the production of CysLTs in vivo, suggesting that CysLTRAs and corticosteroids affect different targets. The bronchodilator properties of CysLTRAs seem to be additive to those of beta(2)-agonists and corticosteroids. These data suggest that CysLTs are important therapeutic targets in the management of inflammation in asthma.

Current treatment of asthma--focus on leukotrienes

Since their identification in 1979, the cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) have been shown to be prominent in many inflammatory conditions, including asthma, allergic rhinitis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, cystic fibrosis and inflammatory bowel disease. They are potent pro-inflammatory agents, as well as causing bronchoconstriction, and undoubtedly have a role in asthma. The cysLTs are products of arachidonic acid metabolism and have been shown to have effects via a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor (CysLTR1) on vascular permeability, mucus production, chemotaxis and bronchial smooth muscle. Their detection in certain body fluids in allergic, aspirin-sensitive and exercise-induced asthma is well documented and potential roles in pathogenesis, proposed. The development of agents affecting production or action offers an exciting new approach to the treatment of asthma. Two approaches to antileukotriene therapy have been developed: blocking their production by inhibiting the action of 5-lipoxygenase enzyme or blocking the CysLTR1. Both approaches have been tried in studies in asthma and overall the results are encouraging, with a decrease in both daytime and nocturnal symptoms, a decrease in additional beta 2 agonist usage and improvement in lung function. The changes, however, are small in some studies. This may be a reflection of disease severity in the study subjects, but of note is a heterogeneity of response to these treatments that may be genetically determined. Antileukotriene therapy has been shown to have an effect in specific types of asthma where the role of cysLTs seems well established--aspirin-sensitive/intolerant asthma and exercise-induced asthma. Longer term studies are needed in other areas such as severe asthma and chronic persistent asthma in both children and adults to provide evidence for the appropriate placement of antileukotriene treatment in current asthma guidelines, in comparison with other established treatments.

Montelukast or salmeterol combined with an inhaled steroid in adult asthma: design and rationale of a randomized, double-blind comparative study (the IMPACT Investigation of Montelukast as a Partner Agent for Complementary Therapy-trial)

Asthma patients who continue to experience symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. Leukotrienes play a key role in asthma pathophysiology, and since pro-inflammatory leukotrienes are poorly suppressed by corticosteroids it seems rational to add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) when a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids does not provide sufficient disease control. Long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatment represents an alternative to LTRAs and both treatment modalities have been shown to provide additional disease control when added to corticosteroid treatment. To compare the relative clinical benefits of adding either a LTRA or a LABA to asthma patients inadequately controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 48-week study will be initiated at approximately 120 centres throughout Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific region in early 2000. The study will compare the oral LTRA montelukast with the inhaled LABA salmeterol, each administered on a background of inhaled fluticasone, on asthma attacks, quality of life, lung function, eosinophil levels, healthcare utilization, and safety, in approximately 1200 adult asthmatic patients. The requirements for study enrollment include a history of asthma, FEV1 or PEFR values between 50% and 90% of the predicted value together with > or = 12% improvement in FEV1 after beta-agonist administration, a minimum pre-determined level of asthma symptoms and daily beta-agonist medication. The study will include a 4-week run-in period, during which patients previously taking inhaled corticosteroids are switched to open-label fluticasone (200 microg daily), followed by a 48-week double-blind, treatment period in which patients continuing to experience abnormal pulmonary function and daytime symptoms are randomized to receive montelukast (10 mg once daily) and salmeterol placebo, or inhaled salmeterol (100 microg daily) and montelukast placebo. All patients will continue with inhaled fluticasone (200 microg daily). During the study, asthma attacks, overnight asthma symptoms, and morning peak expiratory flow rate will be assessed using patient diary cards; quality of life will also be assessed using an asthma-specific quality-of life questionnaire. The results of this study are expected to provide physicians with important clinical evidence to help them make a rational and logical treatment choice for asthmatic patients experiencing breakthrough symptoms on inhaled corticosteroids.

The role of mast cells and basophils in inflammation

Mast cells are positioned in the asthmatic airways so that they are able to respond to the inhaled environment. During active disease, the cells are primed to secrete an array of preformed and newly generated inflammatory mediators including histamine, neutral proteases and heparin sulphate, prostaglandins and cysteinyl leukotrienes as well as an array of cytokines and chemokines that are involved in leucocyte recruitment and activation. These cells are a potent source of mediators in both allergen- and exercise-induced asthma and possibly in asthma provoked by other stimuli such as adenosine and inhaled air pollutants. The important role played by mast cells in maintaining airway dysfunction in asthma is underpinned by the efficacy of mediator inhibitors, such as those interfering with the release or action of the leukotrienes, agents that inhibit mast cell activation such as sodium cromoglycate and the recently studied E-20 humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and removes IgE. The recent discovery of novel inhibitory pathways involving inhibitory motifs (ITIMS) on critical cell surface signalling molecules has opened up new possibilities for preventing mast cell activation. Future research will focus on more effective ways for inhibiting the mast cell's contribution to asthma and understanding what role this unique cell has in the pathogenesis of airway wall remodelling.

Montelukast: a review of its therapeutic potential in persistent asthma

Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist used to treat persistent asthma in patients aged > or = 6 years. The drug has a rapid onset of action. Improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta2-agonist usage are apparent within 1 day of initiating montelukast treatment in adults and adolescents (aged > or = 15 years treated with 10 mg/day) or children (aged 6 to 14 years treated with 5 mg/day) with persistent asthma as shown in clinical trials. In two 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies in adults and adolescents aged > or = 15 years with persistent asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 50 to 85% predicted] there was significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvement in FEV1, symptom scores, peak expiratory flow (PEF), as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts and health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with montelukast 10 mg/day than in recipients of placebo. Improvements were significantly greater in patients treated with inhaled beclomethasone 400 microg/day than in recipients of montelukast 10 mg/day in 1 of these studies. Nonetheless, 42% of montelukast recipients experienced > or = 11% improvement in FEV1, the median improvement in this parameter in beclomethasone-treated patients. In an 8-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, study in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma (FEV1 50 to 85% predicted), montelukast 5 mg/day produced significantly greater improvements in FEV1, clinic PEF, as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts, asthma exacerbations and QOL scores than placebo. The combination of montelukast 10 mg/day plus inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily provided significantly better asthma control than inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily in adults with poorly controlled asthma (mean FEV1 = 72% predicted) despite 4 weeks treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. Patients receiving the combination experienced significant improvements in FEV1 and morning PEF, significant reductions in daytime symptom scores, as-needed beta2 agonist usage and night-time awakenings with asthma, and had significantly lower peripheral blood eosinophil counts after 16 weeks in this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Among adults (FEV1 > or = 70%) treated with montelukast 10 mg/day for 12 weeks, inhaled corticosteroid dosages were titrated downward by 47% (vs 30% in placebo recipients), 40% of patients were tapered off of inhaled corticosteroids (vs 29%), and significantly fewer patients (16 vs 30%) experienced failed corticosteroid rescues in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. During clinical studies, the frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated adults, adolescents and children was similar to that in placebo recipients. In conclusion, montelukast is well tolerated and effective in adults and children aged > or = 6 years with persistent asthma including those with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and/or aspirin sensitivity. Furthermore, montelukast has glucocorticoid sparing properties. Hence, montelukast, as monotherapy in patients with mild persistent asthma, or as an adjunct to inhaled corticosteroids is useful across a broad spectrum of patients with persistent asthma.

Oral montelukast compared with inhaled salmeterol to prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. A randomized, double-blind trial. Exercise Study Group

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, an oral, once-daily leukotriene receptor antagonist, provides protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of 8 weeks of therapy with salmeterol aerosol or montelukast on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in adults with asthma.

DESIGN

8-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

17 asthma treatment centers in the United States.

PATIENTS

191 adults with asthma who had documented exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

INTERVENTION

Qualified patients were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with montelukast (10 mg once in the evening) or salmeterol (50 microg [2 puffs] twice daily).

MEASUREMENTS

Changes in pre-exercise and postexercise challenge values; percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1; the area above the FEV1-time curve; and time to recovery of FEV1 at days 1 to 3, week 4, and week 8 of treatment.

RESULTS

By day 3, similar and statistically significant reductions in maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 were seen with both therapies. Sustained improvement occurred in the montelukast group at weeks 4 and 8; at these time points, the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol decreased significantly. At week 8, the percentage inhibition in the maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 was 57.2% in the montelukast group and 33.0% in the salmeterol group (P = 0.002). By week 8, 67% of patients receiving montelukast and 46% of patients receiving salmeterol had a maximal percentage decrease in FEV1 of less than 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchoprotective effect of montelukast was maintained throughout 8 weeks of study. In contrast, significant loss of bronchoprotection at weeks 4 and 8 was seen with salmeterol. Long-term administration of montelukast provided consistent inhibition of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction at the end of the 8-week dosing interval without tolerance.

Montelukast. No current use for asthma

Montelukast (Singulair), an antiasthma drug belonging to the leukotriene antagonist family, has two indications: as adjunctive treatment for mild-to-moderate chronic asthma when regular inhaled steroid therapy and short-acting inhaled beta2 stimulants "on demand" are inadequate; and in prevention of effort-induced asthma. The clinical file on montelukast contains no methodologically acceptable comparisons with reference treatments. Several placebo-controlled trials have shown the efficacy of montelukast, with improvement in clinical scores and respiratory function tests in those with chronic asthma and prevention of effort-induced asthma. For chronic asthma, montelukast has not been compared with oral or inhaled long-acting beta2 stimulants or with sustained-release theophylline in patients inadequately controlled by steroid therapy. For effort-induced asthma, only two trials have compared montelukast with salmeterol. On the basis of preliminary results, the authors of both studies concluded that montelukast was superior. Clinical trials showed no clear difference in the frequency of side effects in patients taking montelukast and patients taking placebo. Montelukast, however, might be associated with Churg-Strauss syndrome in rare cases. Montelukast is expensive.

Pharmacotherapy of asthma in children, with special reference to leukotriene receptor antagonists

Asthma in adults is generally recognized as a chronic inflammatory airway disease, although this association is less well established in childhood asthma. Thus, recent asthma guidelines have emphasized that asthma treatment should be directed toward the underlying inflammatory aspects of the disease. The prevalence of asthma and resultant hospitalizations and deaths have increased or remained stable over the past 10 years in the United States. In part, this appears to be caused by shortcomings of available antiasthma therapeutic agents. Because these trends are particularly troublesome in children and young adults, there is a need for effective anti-inflammatory therapies that are safe and tolerable. The leukotrienes are a family of lipid mediators that appear to play an important role in the symptomology and pathogenesis of asthma. The results of clinical trials in adults with asthma demonstrated that antileukotriene drugs such as zafirlukast, montelukast, and zileuton improve pulmonary function, decrease asthma symptoms, and decrease the concomitant use of other antiasthma drugs. Most antileukotriene agents are orally bioavailable and well tolerated, offering the potential for improved patient compliance. Montelukast and zafirlukast have received approval for use in pediatric asthma patients, and approval of zafirlukast in this patient population is pending.

Induced sputum eicosanoid concentrations in asthma

Further definition of the role of leukotrienes (LT) and prostaglandins (PG) in asthma would be helped by a noninvasive method for assessing airway production. The supernatant from sputum induced with hypertonic saline and dispersed using dithiotrietol has been successfully used to measure other molecular markers of airway inflammation and might be a useful method. We have measured induced sputum supernatant LTC(4)/D(4)/E(4) concentrations using enzyme immunoassay and PGE(2), PGD(2), TXB(2), and PGF(2alpha) using gas chromatography-negative ion chemical ionization-mass spectroscopy in 10 normal subjects and in 26 subjects with asthma of variable severity. Sputum cysteinyl-leukotrienes concentrations were significantly greater in subjects with asthma (median, 9.5 ng/ml) than in normal control subjects (6.4 ng/ml; p < 0.02) and greater in subjects with persistent asthma requiring inhaled corticosteroids (median, 11.4 ng/ml) or studied within 48 h of an acute severe exacerbation of asthma (13 ng/ml) than in subjects with episodic asthma treated with inhaled beta(2)-agonists only (7.2 ng/ml). There were no significant differences in the concentrations of other eicosanoids between groups, although there was a negative correlation between the percentage sputum eosinophil count and sputum PGE(2) concentration (r = -0.48; p < 0.01) in subjects with asthma. We conclude that induced sputum contains high concentrations of eicosanoids and that sputum LTC(4)/D(4)/E(4) concentrations are significantly greater in subjects with asthma than in normal subjects. The inverse relationship between eosinophilic airway inflammation and sputum PGE(2) concentration would be consistent, with the latter having an anti-inflammatory role.

Mucosal injury and eicosanoid kinetics during hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of canine peripheral airways was performed at various times after hyperventilation, and BAL fluid (BALF) cell and mediator data were used to evaluate two hypotheses: 1) hyperventilation-induced mucosal injury stimulates mediator production, and 2) mucosal damage is correlated with the magnitude of hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction. We found that epithelial cells increased in BALF immediately after a 2- and a 5-min dry air challenge (DAC). Prostaglandins D(2) and F(2alpha) and thromboxane B(2) were unchanged immediately after a 2-min DAC but were significantly increased after a 5-min DAC. Leukotriene C(4), D(4), and E(4) did not increase until 5 min after DAC. Hyperventilation with warm moist air did not alter BALF cells or mediators and caused less airway obstruction that occurred earlier than DAC. BALF epithelial cells were correlated with mediator release, and mediator release and epithelial cells were correlated with hyperventilation-induced bronchoconstriction. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that hyperventilation-induced mucosal damage initiates peripheral airway constriction via the release of biochemical mediators.

Asthma therapy with agents preventing leukotriene synthesis or action

Elucidation of the biochemistry of leukotriene production and the pharmacology of its actions has led to the development of a number of therapeutic agents shown to be of value in the treatment of asthma. These agents either prevent the synthesis of the leukotrienes, by preventing the action of the 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein or the catalytic action of the 5-lipoxygenase, or by inhibiting the action of leukotrienes at the CysLT1 receptor. Numerous clinical trials in exercise-induced asthma, allergen-induced asthma, aspirin-induced asthma, and spontaneously occurring asthmatic episodes have indicated that these agents are safe and effective asthma treatments.

The effect of Cys LT1 receptor blockade on airway responses to allergen

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a potent experimental leukotriene receptor antagonist, MK-571, on airway responses to inhaled allergen.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

SETTING

Clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Eight male volunteers with allergic asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

An intravenous loading dose was followed by an 8-hour infusion of MK-571 or placebo, with a 7- to 14-day washout between treatments. Allergen challenge was performed after the loading dose and a histamine challenge was performed before and 24 hours after allergen.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second was measured serially. MK-571 provided about 50% protection during maximum early and late responses compared with placebo (p=0.005), but airway obstruction persisted 8-24 hours after allergen on both treatment days. Airway responsiveness to histamine was not significantly attenuated at 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

Blocking Cys LT1 receptors for 8 hours attenuated the early and late responses but did not interrupt the cascade of events leading to subsequent allergen-induced airway obstruction and hyperreactivity.

Montelukast versus salmeterol in patients with asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Montelukast/Salmeterol Exercise Study Group

BACKGROUND

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, and salmeterol, a long-acting beta(2)-receptor agonist, each have demonstrated benefits in the treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in short-term studies. Direct comparisons between these agents in long-term studies are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare montelukast and salmeterol in the long-term treatment of EIB.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-seven patients with mild asthma and a postexercise fall in FEV(1) of at least 18% were randomized (double-blind) to receive montelukast 10 mg once daily or salmeterol 50 microg twice daily for 8 weeks. Exercise challenge was repeated at day 3, week 4, and week 8 after randomization near the end of the dosing interval for both drugs. The primary efficacy endpoint was the maximal percent fall in postexercise FEV(1) at week 8.

RESULTS

Montelukast was effective in treating EIB without inducing tolerance and provided superior (P </=.001) protection than salmeterol at weeks 4 and 8, with comparable protection at day 3. The frequency of respiratory clinical adverse events (P =.046) and discontinuations because of clinical adverse events (P =.052) were less with montelukast.

CONCLUSION

The effect of montelukast was greater than that of salmeterol in the chronic treatment of EIB over a period of 8 weeks in patients with mild asthma as demonstrated by effect size, maintenance of effect, and fewer respiratory clinical adverse events during the study period. Montelukast may be a better alternative to salmeterol as a controller agent for the chronic treatment of EIB.

Montelukast dose selection in 6- to 14-year-olds: comparison of single-dose pharmacokinetics in children and adults

Montelukast, an oral leukotriene-receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults. A once-daily 10 mg dose (film-coated tablet) was selected as the optimal adult dose based on dose-ranging studies. Asthma is a similar disease and is treated with the same medications in children and adults. These observations suggested that a dose of montelukast in children providing overall drug exposure (i.e., montelukast plasma concentrations) similar to that of the 10 mg film-coated tablet dose in adults would be efficacious, well tolerated, and obviate the need for separate dose-ranging studies in children. Therefore, the dose of montelukast for 6- to 14-year-old children was selected by identifying the chewable tablet dose of montelukast yielding a single-dose area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) comparable to that achieved with the adult 10 mg film-coated tablet dose. Based on this approach, which included dose normalization of data from several pediatric pharmacokinetic studies, a 5 mg chewable tablet dose of montelukast was selected for use in clinical efficacy studies in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

Experimental models in asthma

Histamine is an important mediator released from activated mast cells in acute bronchoconstriction provoked by allergen, exercise, hypertonic stimuli and inhaled adenosine. Histamine may also contribute to the allergen-induced late asthmatic response probably following the recruitment and activation of basophils. H1-receptor antagonists partially attenuate these responses but greater inhibition when these drugs are combined with cysteinyl LT1-receptor antagonists indicative of an interaction between mast cell-derived mediators. The combination of two or more selective mediator antagonists in the treatment of allergic disorders such as asthma offers a new therapeutic approach worthy of careful appraisal.

Leukotrienes, leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors in asthma: an update. Part II: clinical studies with leukotriene receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors in asthma

The demonstration that leukotrienes, mainly cysteinyl leukotrienes, have biological properties relevant to the pathogenesis of asthma has stimulated the development of many therapeutic compounds to block these deleterious effects. Two main classes of leukotriene modulators have been developed: CysLT1 receptor antagonists and leukotriene synthesis inhibitors. This article reviews the pharmacodynamics, the effects on baseline airway function, the protective effects in airway challenges as well as the results in chronic asthma of the different leukotriene modulators. In addition, the complementary anti-inflammatory effect of leukotriene modulators to that of corticosteroids and H1-histamine receptor antagonists is reviewed. Finally, a concise overview of the clinical responsiveness to this new class of drug, the safety and the drug interactions as well as the place in the strategies of treatment for asthmatic patients of the leukotriene modulators is also provided.

Asthma and leukotrienes: antileukotrienes as novel anti-asthmatic drugs

Antileukotriene drugs inhibit the formation or action of leukotrienes, which are potent lipid mediators generated from arachidonic acid in lung tissue and inflammatory cells. The leukotrienes were discovered in basic studies of arachidonic acid metabolism in leucocytes 20 years ago and were found to display a number of biological activities which may contribute to airway obstruction. Clinical studies with antileukotriene drugs have indeed demonstrated that leukotrienes are significant mediators of airway obstruction evoked by many common trigger factors in asthma. Moreover, treatment trials have established that this new class of drugs has beneficial anti-asthmatic properties, and several antileukotrienes have recently been introduced as new therapy of asthma. This communication presents an overview of the biosynthesis of leukotrienes, their biological effects and clinical effects of antileukotrienes in the treatment of asthama.

Drug treatment of asthma in the 1990s: achievements and new strategies

Asthma is an inflammatory condition of the airways. First-line therapy involves the use of inhaled corticosteroids as anti-inflammatory agents to control the underlying process. Bronchodilators are used for symptom relief. Short-acting beta-agonists provide rapid relief of bronchoconstriction, whereas long-acting beta-agonists control the symptoms and reduce the frequency of exacerbations when combined with inhaled corticosteroids. Anticholinergic bronchodilators have a minor role in acute exacerbations and in patients troubled by adverse effects from beta-agonists. Theophylline has a bronchodilator action in asthma, but its role as an anti-inflammatory agent needs to be examined further. Because of their toxicity, corticosteroid-sparing agents have a limited role, being restricted to patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. New selective phosphodiesterase IV inhibitors show both anti-inflammatory and bronchodilator characteristics with fewer adverse effects. Other new approaches to the control of inflammation come from the antileukotriene drugs, which improve pulmonary function in patients with chronic asthma. The antileukotrienes have shown promising results, especially in the treatment of asthma caused by aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), exercise and cold air. Other new therapies being studied include anti-immunoglobulin E, antitryptase and anti-CD4 agents. These newer possibilities suggest that the range of available treatment options will expand significantly over the next decade.

Leukotriene modifiers as novel therapeutics in asthma

After years of research, the components of slow-reacting substance of anaphylaxis have been identified as the cysteinyl leukotrienes C4, D4, and E4. Leukotrienes are now known to be important mediators of chronic asthma. Leukotrienes cause bronchoconstriction, oedema, and mucus secretion in models of asthma and are produced in excess quantities in asthmatic patients. Leukotriene receptor antagonists and biosynthesis inhibitors have been produced to improve the signs and symptoms of asthma. These agents block laboratory challenges simulating chronic asthma such as exercise, allergen, and aspirin challenge. They also are effective in studies of chronic asthma in a wide variety of patient types demonstrating that leukotrienes are indeed important mediators of asthma. Over the next several years the appropriate place in asthma therapy for these new agents will be defined.

Montelukast once daily inhibits exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, multicenter, 2-period crossover study. Children (n = 27) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) > or =70% of the predicted value and a fall in FEV1 > or =20% after exercise on 2 occasions. Patients received montelukast (5-mg chewable tablet) or placebo once daily in the evening for 2 days in crossover fashion (at least 4 days between treatment periods). Standardized exercise challenges were performed 20 to 24 hours after the last dose in each period. End points included area above the postexercise percent fall in FEV1 versus time curve (AAC0-60 min), maximum percent fall in FEV1 from pre-exercise baseline, and time to recovery of FEV1 to within 5% of pre-exercise baseline.

RESULTS

Montelukast significantly reduced AAC0-60 min (265 vs 590% x min for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05; approximately 59% protection relative to placebo) and the maximum percent fall (18% vs 26% for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P < or = .05). Montelukast treatment resulted in a shorter time to recovery (18 vs 28 minutes for montelukast and placebo, respectively, P = .079).

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast attenuates EIB at the end of the dosing interval in 6- to 14-year-old children with asthma.

Montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, for the treatment of mild asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

Patients with mild asthma frequently have only exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, a symptom of inadequate control of asthma. We evaluated the ability of montelukast, a leukotriene-receptor antagonist, to protect such patients against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 110 patients (age, 15 to 45 years) with mild asthma and a decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of at least 20 percent after exercise on two occasions during a placebo run-in period to receive 10 mg of montelukast (54 patients) or placebo (56 patients) once daily at bedtime for 12 weeks in a double-blind study. Treatment was followed by a two-week, single-blind washout period during which all patients received placebo. Exercise challenges were performed at base line; 20 to 24 hours after dosing at weeks 4, 8, and 12; and at the end of the washout period. The primary end point was the area under the curve for FEV1 (expressed as the percent change from base-line values) in the first 60 minutes after exercise. This measure summarized the extent and duration of bronchoconstriction after exercise.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, montelukast therapy offered significantly greater protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction than placebo therapy (expressed as the percentage of inhibition of the end points), as evidenced by the improvement in the area under the FEV1 curve (degree of inhibition, 47.4 percent; P=0.002). Montelukast therapy was also associated with a significant improvement in the maximal decrease in FEV1 after exercise (P=0.003) and the time from the maximal decrease in FEV1 to the return of lung function to within 5 percent of pre-exercise values (P=0.04). The differences between groups in the various measures of lung function were similar at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; there was no evidence of rebound worsening of lung function in the montelukast group after the washout period. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients in the montelukast group were more likely to rate their asthma control as better and less likely to require rescue therapy with a beta-agonist during or after exercise challenge. The rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with placebo, once-daily treatment with montelukast provided significant protection against exercise-induced asthma over a 12-week period. Tolerance to the medication and rebound worsening of lung function after discontinuation of treatment were not seen.

The role and contribution of leukotrienes in asthma

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Reading this article will reinforce the reader's knowledge of the biochemistry and pharmacology of leukotrienes (LTs), including the enzymes and cells involved in their synthesis, the receptors that mediate their biologic effects, and the evidence that cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLT) may play an important role in asthma. The 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein antagonists, and CysLT receptor antagonists are three classes of LTs modulators now in clinical use. The effects of these agents in clinical models of asthma induced by allergens, exercise, and aspirin and in multicenter asthma trials are reviewed.

DATA SOURCES

Key papers published in peer-reviewed journals.

STUDY SELECTION

Key papers published in peer-reviewed journals.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacology of these new medications and experience in clinical trials suggest that they may play a therapeutic role in the treatment of asthma.