Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring: Current Status and New Developments

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is a reliable, convenient, and less costly alternative to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Recognition and use of HBPM have dramatically increased over the last 20 years and current guidelines make strong recommendations for the use of both HBPM and ABPM in patients with hypertension. The accuracy and reliability of home blood pressure (BP) measurements require use of a validated device and standardized procedures, and good patient information and training. Key HBPM parameters include morning BP, evening BP, and the morning-evening difference. In addition, newer semi-automatic HBPM devices can also measure nighttime BP at fixed intervals during sleep. Advances in technology mean that HBPM devices could provide additional relevant data (e.g., environmental conditions) or determine BP in response to a specific trigger (e.g., hypoxia, increased heart rate). The value of HBPM is highlighted by a growing body of evidence showing that home BP is an important predictor of target organ damage, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)- and stroke-related morbidity and mortality, and provides better prognostic information than office BP. In addition, use of HBPM to monitor antihypertensive therapy can help to optimize reductions in BP, improve BP control, and reduce target organ damage and cardiovascular risk. Overall, HBPM should play a central role in the management of patients with hypertension, with the goal of identifying increased risk and predicting the onset of CVD events, allowing proactive interventions to reduce risk and eliminate adverse outcomes.

Relationship Between Home Blood Pressure and the Onset Season of Cardiovascular Events: The J-HOP Study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure)

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) increases during winter. The risk that elevated home blood pressure (BP) poses for CVD events that occur in each of 4 seasons is unclear. We conducted a post hoc analysis using the dataset from a nationwide cohort, the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study, to assess the association between home BP and winter-onset CVD events.

METHODS

J-HOP participants who had cardiovascular risks conducted morning and evening home BP measurements for a 14-day period and were followed-up for the occurrence of CVD events.

RESULTS

We analyzed 4,258 participants (mean age 64.9 years; 47% male; 92% hypertensives) who were followed-up for an average of 6.2 ± 3.8 years (26,295 person-years). We divided the total of 269 CVD events (10.2/1,000 person-years) by the season of onset as follows: 82 in the winter and 187 in the other seasons (spring, summer, and autumn). In the Cox models adjusted for covariates and the season when home BPs were measured at baseline, morning home systolic BP (SBP) was associated with both winter-onset and other season-onset CVD events: hazard ratio (HR) for winter 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.42 per 10 mm Hg; HR for other seasons 1.11, 95% CI 1.00-1.23. Evening home SBP was associated with the other season-onset CVD events (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33 per 10 mm Hg), but not with the winter-onset CVD events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that compared with evening home BP, morning home BP might be a superior predictor of winter-onset CVD events.

Difference between morning and evening home blood pressure and cardiovascular events: the J-HOP Study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure)

Little is known about the relationship of the difference between morning and evening systolic blood pressure (BP) (MEdif) in home BP with cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. To assess this relationship, we used data from the nationwide practice-based J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home BP) study, which recruited 4258 cardiovascular risk participants (mean age 64.9 years; 46.8% men; 79.2% using antihypertensive medications) who underwent morning and evening home BP monitoring using a validated, automated device for 14 consecutive days. During a mean ± SD follow-up of 6.2 ± 3.8 years (26,295 person-years), 269 CVD events occurred. Adjusted Cox models suggested that higher MEdif (≥20 mmHg) was associated with higher CVD risks than was medium MEdif (0-20 mmHg) independent of the average morning and evening (MEave) home systolic BP (SBP) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.91). We also divided participants into four BP phenotype groups as follows: "both non-elevated" (MEdif < 20 mmHg and MEave SBP < 135 mmHg), "elevated-MEdif" (MEdif ≥ 20 mmHg and MEave SBP < 135 mmHg), "elevated-MEave" (MEdif < 20 mmHg and MEave SBP ≥ 135 mmHg), and "both elevated" (MEdif ≥ 20 mmHg and MEave SBP ≥ 135 mmHg). The cumulative incidence of CVD events was higher in patients with the "elevated-MEdif," "elevated-MEave," and "both elevated" phenotypes than in those with the "both non-elevated" phenotype. After adjusting for covariates, the "both elevated" phenotype was associated with higher CVD risk than the "both non-elevated" phenotype (adjusted HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.09-2.46). This is the first study demonstrating a direct correlation between CVD outcomes and the difference between morning and evening home SBP.

Impact of home blood pressure variability on cardiovascular outcome in patients with arterial stiffness: Results of the J-HOP study

This study sought to investigate whether the relation between increased blood pressure (BP) variability and increased arterial stiffness confers a risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. We analyzed 2648 patients from a practitioner‐based population (mean ± SD age 64.9 ± 11.4 years: 75.8% taking antihypertensive medication) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor who underwent home BP monitoring in the Japan Morning Surge‐Home Blood Pressure Study. The standard deviation (SD_SBP), coefficient of variation (CV_SBP), and average real variability (ARV_SBP) were assessed as indexes of day‐by‐day home systolic BP (SBP) variability. The authors assessed arterial stiffness by brachial‐ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and divided patients into lower (< 1800 cm/s, n = 1837) and higher (≥1800 cm/s, n = 811) baPWV groups. During a mean follow‐up of 4.4 years, 95 cardiovascular events occurred (8.1 per 1000 person‐years). In Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors including average home SBP, the highest quartiles of SD_SBP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23‐4.32), CV_SBP (HR, 2.89; 95%CI, 1.59‐5.26) and ARV_SBP (HR, 2.55; 95%CI, 1.37‐4.75) were predictive of CVD events compared to the other quartiles in the higher baPWV group. Moreover, 1SD increases in SD_SBP (HR, 1.44; 95%CI, 1.13‐1.82), CV_SBP (HR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.16‐1.90) and ARV_SBP (HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 1.09‐1.73) were also predictive of CVD events. These associations remained even after N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide was added to the models. However, these associations were not observed in the lower baPWV group. We conclude that arterial stiffness contributes to the association between home BP variability and CVD incidence.

Office, Central, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Predicting First Stroke in Older Adults: A Community-Based Cohort Study

[Figure: see text].

Impact of Relationship and Communication Variables on Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Advanced Cancer Caregivers

BACKGROUND

Cancer impacts both patients and their family caregivers. Evidence suggests that caregiving stress, including the strain of taking on a new role, can elevate the risk of numerous health conditions, including high blood pressure (BP). However, the caregiver's psychosocial experiences, including their interpersonal relationship with the patient, may buffer some of the negative physiological consequences of caregiving.

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of psychosocial contextual variables on caregiver ambulatory BP.

METHODS

Participants were 81 spouse-caregivers of patients with advanced gastrointestinal or thoracic cancer. For an entire day at home with the patient, caregivers wore an ambulatory BP monitor that took readings at random intervals. Immediately after each BP reading, caregivers reported on physical circumstances (e.g., posture, activity) and psychosocial experiences since the last BP measurement, including affect, caregiver and patient disclosure, and role perceptions (i.e., feeling more like a spouse vs. caregiver). Multilevel modeling was used to examine concurrent and lagged effects of psychosocial variables on systolic and diastolic BP, controlling for momentary posture, activity, negative affect, and time.

RESULTS

Feeling more like a caregiver (vs. spouse) was associated with lower systolic BP at the same time point. Patient disclosure to the caregiver since the previous BP reading was associated with higher diastolic BP. No lagged effects were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers' psychosocial experiences can have immediate physiological effects. Future research should examine possible cognitive and behavioral mechanisms of these effects, as well as longer-term effects of caregiver role perceptions and patient disclosure on caregiver psychological and physical health.

Nocturnal Hypertension and Heart Failure: Mechanisms, Evidence, and New Treatments

Heart failure (HF) is a common condition with an increasing prevalence. Despite a variety of evidence-based treatments for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, morbidity and mortality rates remain high. Furthermore, there are currently no treatments that have yet been shown to reduce complication and death rates in patients who have HF with preserved ejection fraction. Hypertension is a common comorbidity in patients with HF, contributing to disease development and prognosis. For example, hypertension is closely associated with the development of left ventricular hypertrophy, which an important precursor of HF. In particular, nighttime blood pressure (BP) appears to be an important, modifiable risk factor. Both nighttime BP and an abnormal circadian pattern of nighttime BP dipping have been shown to predict development of HF and the occurrence of cardiovascular events, independent of office BP. Key mechanisms for this association include sodium handling/salt sensitivity and increased sympathetic activation. These pathogenic mechanisms are targeted by several new treatment options, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and renal denervation. All of these could form part of antihypertensive strategies designed to control nighttime BP and contribute to the goal of achieving perfect 24-hour BP management. Nevertheless, additional research is needed to determine the effects of reducing nighttime BP and improving the circadian BP profile on the rate of HF, other cardiovascular events, and mortality.

Seasonal Variation in Masked Nocturnal Hypertension: The J-HOP Nocturnal Blood Pressure Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about seasonal variation in nighttime blood pressure (BP) measured by a home device. In this cross-sectional study, we sought to assess seasonal variation in nighttime home BP using data from the nationwide, practice-based Japan Morning Surge-Home BP (J-HOP) Nocturnal BP study.

METHODS

In this study, 2,544 outpatients (mean age 63 years; hypertensives 92%) with cardiovascular risks underwent morning, evening, and nighttime home BP measurements (measured at 2:00, 3:00, and 4:00 am) using validated, automatic, and oscillometric home BP devices.

RESULTS

Our analysis showed that nighttime home systolic BP (SBP) was higher in summer than in other seasons (summer, 123.3 ± 14.6 mmHg vs. spring, 120.7 ± 14.8 mmHg; autumn, 121.1 ± 14.8 mmHg; winter, 119.3 ± 14.0 mmHg; all P<0.05). Moreover, we assessed seasonal variation in the prevalence of elevated nighttime home SBP (≥120 mmHg) in patients with non-elevated daytime home SBP (average of morning and evening home SBP <135 mmHg; n = 1,565), i.e., masked nocturnal hypertension, which was highest in summer (summer, 45.6% vs. spring, 27.2%; autumn, 28.8%; winter, 24.9%; all P<0.05). Even in intensively controlled morning home SBP (<125 mmHg), the prevalence of masked nocturnal hypertension was higher in summer (summer, 27.4% vs. spring, 14.2%; autumn, 8.9%; winter, 9.0%; all P<0.05). The urine albumin-creatinine ratio in patients with masked nocturnal hypertension tended to be higher than that in patients with non-elevated both daytime and nighttime SBP throughout each season.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of masked nocturnal hypertension was higher in summer than other seasons and the difference proved to be clinically meaningful.

The Impact of Various Blood Pressure Measurements on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Hypertension is a potent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. High blood pressure (BP) correlates closely with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Although the gold standard remains office BP (auscultatory or automated), other methods (central or out-of-office) are gaining popularity as better predictors of CV events. In this review, we investigated the prognostic value of each method of BP measurement and explored their advantages and pitfalls. Unattended automated office BP is a novel technique of BP measurement with promising data. Ambulatory BP monitoring, and to a lesser extent, home BP measurements, seem to predict cardiovascular events and mortality outcomes better, while at the same time, they can help distinguish hypertensive phenotypes. Data on the association of central BP levels with cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, are conflicting. Future extensive cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate head-to-head the corresponding levels and results of each method of BP measurement, as well as to highlight disparities in their prognostic utility.

Impact of home telemonitoring and management support on blood pressure control in non-dialysis CKD: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is a common public health problem and a key modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Home blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring (HBPT) and management is associated with improved BP control, accelerated delivery of care and decision-making strategies that can reduce adverse outcomes associated with hypertension. The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol for a systematic review to assess the impact of HBPT interventions used for improving BP control and reducing CV and kidney outcomes in non-dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

We developed this protocol using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015. We will search empirical databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO and grey literature for studies conducted in non-dialysis CKD patients on interventions using HBPT and reporting outcomes related to BP control and other outcomes such as CV events and kidney disease progression. All studies meeting these criteria, in adults and published from inception until 2020 with no language barrier will be included.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval will not be required for this review as the data used will be extracted from already published studies with publicly accessible data. As this study will assess the impact of HBPT on BP control in non-dialysis CKD patients, evidence gathered through it will be disseminated using traditional approaches that includes open-access peer-reviewed publication, scientific presentations and a report. We will also disseminate our findings to appropriate government agencies.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020190705).

Circadian variations in blood pressure and their implications for the administration of antihypertensive drugs: is dosing in the evening better than in the morning?

: Blood pressure (BP) follows a circadian rhythm with a physiological decrease during the night. Studies have demonstrated that nocturnal BP as well as its dipping pattern during night-time have a significant prognostic importance for mortality and the occurrence of cardiovascular events. Therefore, hypertension management guidelines recommend to ascertain that patients treated for hypertension have well controlled BP values around the clock. To improve hypertension control during the night and eventually further reduce cardiovascular events, it has been proposed by some to prescribe at least one antihypertensive medication at bedtime. In this review, we have examined the data which could support the benefits of prescribing BP-lowering drugs at bedtime. Our conclusion is that there is no convincing evidence that the administration of BP-lowering drugs in the evening provides any significant advantage in terms of quality of BP control, prevention of target organ damage or reduction of cardiovascular events. Before changing practice for unproven benefits, it would be wise to wait for the results of the ongoing trials that are addressing this issue.

Resting Heart Rate as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Hypertensive Patients: An Update

A large body of evidence has shown that resting heart rate (RHR) holds important prognostic information in several clinical conditions. In the majority of the general population studies, a graded association between RHR and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular (CV) disease, ischemic heart disease, and stroke has been observed. These associations appeared even stronger and more consistent in hypertensive patients. Studies performed with 24-hour ambulatory recording have shown that an elevated nighttime heart rate may confer an additional risk on top of office RHR. The mechanisms by which tachycardia alone or in association with sympathetic overactivity induces CV damage are well understood. Fast RHR is a strong predictor of future hypertension, metabolic disturbances, obesity, and diabetes. Several experimental lines of research point to high RHR as a main risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, large artery stiffness, and CV disease. Elevated RHR is a common feature in patients with hypertension. Thus, there is a large segment of the hypertensive population that would benefit from a treatment able to decrease RHR. Improvement of unhealthy lifestyle should be the first goal in the management of the hypertensive patient with elevated RHR. Most clinical guidelines now recommend the use of combination therapies even in the initial treatment of hypertension. Although no results of clinical trials specifically designed to investigate the effect of RHR lowering in human beings without CV diseases are available, in hypertensive patients with high RHR a combination therapy including a cardiac slowing drug at optimized dose seems a sensible strategy. Tachycardia can be considered both as a marker of sympathetic overactivity and as a risk factor for cardiovascular events. In this sketch, the main cardiovascular and metabolic effects of increased sympathetic tone underlying high heart rate are shown. The link between tachycardia and cardiovascular events can be explained also by the direct hemodynamic action of heart rate on the arteries and the left ventricular (LV) wall.

Obstructive sleep apnea and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: current evidence and research gaps

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is a common condition characterized by intermittent collapse of the upper airway during sleep, resulting in partial (hypopnoeas) and total obstructions (apneas). These respiratory events observed in OSA may trigger multiple pathways involved in the blood pressure (BP) instability during the night and potentially influencing daytime BP as well (carry-over effects). This review provides an update about the impact of OSA and its treatments on 24-h BP control. Overall, there is growing evidence suggest that OSA is associated with higher frequency of nondipping BP pattern and nocturnal hypertension in a dose-dependent manner. The presence of nondiping BP (especially the reverse pattern) is independently associated with OSA regardless of sleep-related symptoms suggesting a potential tool for screening OSA in patients with clinical indication for performing ABPM. Beyond dipping BP, preliminary evidence associated OSA with white-coat effect and higher frequency of masked hypertension and BP variability than the control group (no OSA). Unfortunately, most of the evidence on the evidence addressing the impact of OSA treatment on BP was limited to office measurements. In the last years, data from observational and randomized studies pointed that CPAP is able to promote 24-h BP decrease especially in patients with resistant and refractory hypertension. A randomized trial suggests that CPAP is able to decrease the rate of masked hypertension as compared to no treatment in patients with severe OSA. Interestingly, nondipping BP is a good predictor of BP response to CPAP making ABPM an interesting tool for better OSA management.

Blood pressure monitoring in kidney transplantation: a systematic review on hypertension and target organ damage

BACKGROUND

Sparse studies show that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is superior to office BP (oBP) measurements to predict target organ damage and cardiovascular (CV) events in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We performed a systematic review aimed at determining the potential associations between BP recordings by different methods and renal and CV outcomes in this population.

METHODS

Major medical databases were searched for studies enrolling adult KTRs undergoing 24h ABPM compared to office or home BP measurements. Main outcomes were: associations between different BP recordings and renal and CV outcomes. Additionally, any association between the circadian BP pattern (dipping/non-dipping status) and outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (2078 participants) were reviewed. Amongst 12 studies collecting data on renal endpoints, ten studies found that BP assessed by ABPM was a stronger predictor of renal function decline, assessed by serum creatinine (SCr) and/or creatinine clearance (CrCl) or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), than traditional office measurements. Twelve studies analyzed the relation between different BP recordings and CV target organ damages and reported robust correlations between echocardiographic abnormalities [i.e. left ventricular mass index (LVM/LVMI)] and 24h ABPM, but not with office BPs. Furthermore, 24h ABPM correlated better than oBP with markers of vascular damage, such as carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), diffuse thickening, and endothelial dysfunction. Additionally, abnormal circadian BP pattern (non-dippers and reverse dippers) identified a group of kidney recipients at risk for kidney function loss and CV abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

In our systematic review, ABPM reflected target organ damage more closely than oBP in KTRs. Furthermore, altered circadian BP profile associated with renal and CV target organ damages.

Blood pressure variability and target organ damage regression in hypertension

The study by Triantafyllidi et al. supports the view that regression of subclinical cardiac damage requires an effective 24‐hour blood pressure (BP) control along with a reduction in BP variability and suggests that the assessment of BPV and its modifications during the course of therapy may be an useful approach in predicting the beneficial effects of treatment on cardiac structure. However, some aspects and limitations of this study require caution in drawing firm conclusions. So, further investigation is needed to determine if reduction of BPV is actually associated with a regression in cardiac and extracardiac organ damage to identify which which classes of antihypertensive drugs are most effective in reducing BPV, and to elucidate whether those treatments provide additional clinical benefit, independent of the conventional BP targets.

Simultaneous self‐monitoring comparison of a supine algorithm‐equipped wrist nocturnal home blood pressure monitoring device with an upper arm device

A nocturnal home blood pressure (BP) monitoring device that measures nighttime BP levels accurately with less sleep disturbance is needed for the 24‐h management of hypertension. Here we conducted the first comparison study of simultaneous self‐monitoring by both a supine position algorithm‐equipped wrist nocturnal home BP monitoring device, the HEM‐9601T (NightView; Omron Healthcare) with a similar upper arm device, the HEM‐9700T (Omron Healthcare) in 50 hypertensive patients (mean age 68.9 ± 11.3 years). Both devices were worn on the same non‐dominant arm during sleep over two nights. The patients self‐measured their nighttime BP by starting nocturnal measurement mode just before going to bed. In total, 694 paired measurements were obtained during two nights (7.2 ± 1.5 measurements per night), and the mean differences (±SD) in systolic BP between the devices was 0.2 ± 10.2 mmHg (p = .563), with good agreement. In the comparison of nighttime BP indices, the difference in average SBP at 2:00, 3:00, and 4:00 AM and the average SBP of 1‐h interval measurements was −0.5 ± 5.5 mmHg (p = .337), with good agreement. The HEM‐9601T substantially reduced sleep disturbance compared to the upper arm‐type device. The newly developed HEM‐9601T (NightView) can thus accurately measure BP during sleep without reducing the wearer's sleep quality.

Prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension according to 2018 European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Hypertension office blood pressure categories

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of isolated nocturnal hypertension (INH) and its relationships with office blood pressure (BP) categories defined by 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study in consecutive patients referred to perform an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosis or therapeutic purposes. Office BP measurements and ABPM were performed in the same visit. The cohort was divided according to office BP in optimal, normal, high-normal and hypertension. The prevalence and adjusted risk for combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension and INH were estimated for each category.

RESULTS

We evaluated 1344 individuals, 59.3% women (51 ± 14 years old) and 40.7% men (52 ± 15 years old). 61.5% of the individuals had nocturnal hypertension, 12.9% INH and 48.7% combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension. Prevalence of combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension increased through office BP categories (P < 0.001). Conversely, prevalence of INH was lower in individuals with hypertension than in normotensives (7.4 vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and similar between nonhypertensive office BP categories, 16.6, 15 and 19.4% for optimal, normal and high-normal BP, respectively (P < 0.399). In individuals with office BP values less than 140/90 mmHg, the prevalence of masked hypertension phenotypes were 8.6, 17.2 and 30.2% for daytime, INH and combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension, respectively. Adjusted risk for combined daytime and nocturnal hypertension increased significantly through office BP categories; conversely, the risk for INH was similar in all nonhypertensive office BP categories.

CONCLUSION

Nocturnal hypertension was the more prevalent phenotype of masked hypertension and more than one-third of the individuals with nocturnal hypertension had INH. The risk for INH was not related to nonhypertensive office BP categories.

Adding Home and/or Ambulatory Blood Pressure to Office Blood Pressure for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction

Home and 24-hour blood pressure (BP_Home and BP_24h) are believed to improve the prognostic value of office BP (BP_Office) alone, but the evidence has limitations such as that (1) these 3 BPs are characterized by multicollinearity and (2) the procedures adopted do not allow quantification of the prognostic advantage. One thousand eight hundred thirty-three individuals belonging to the PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni) were followed for 16 years. Prediction of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was determined via the goodness of fit of individual data (Cox model), the area underlying the receiving operator curves and the net reclassification improvement of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risk. Calculations were made for BP_Office alone and after addition of BP_Home, BP_24h, or both, limited to their residual portion which was found to be unexplained by, and thus independent on, BP_Office. With all methods addition of residual out-of-office systolic or diastolic BP to BP_Office significantly improved cardiovascular and all-cause mortality prediction. The improvement was more consistent when BP_Home rather than BP_24h was added to BP_Office and, compared with BP_Office plus BP_Home, no better prediction was found when addition was extended to BP_24h. With all additions, however, the improvement was quantitatively modest, which was the case also when data were separately analyzed in younger and older individuals or in dippers and nondippers. Thus, addition of out-of-office to BP_Office improves prediction of cardiovascular risk, even when data analysis avoids previous limitations. The improvement appears to be limited, however, which raises the question of the advantage to recommend their extended use in clinical practice.

Adherence to Single-Pill Versus Free-Equivalent Combination Therapy in Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Poor adherence to antihypertensive therapy is a major cause of poor blood pressure (BP) control in patients with hypertension. Regimen simplification may improve adherence and BP control. This systematic review assessed whether single-pill combination (SPC) therapy led to improved adherence, persistence, and better BP control compared with free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy in patients with hypertension. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 2020, in addition to manual searching of relevant congress abstracts from 2014 to 2020 for studies including adults with hypertension aged ≥18 years receiving SPC or FEC antihypertensive therapy measuring any of the following: adherence, persistence, and reductions in systolic BP and/or diastolic BP. Adherence and persistence were summarized in a narrative analysis; direct pair-wise meta-analysis was conducted to compare BP reductions with SPC therapy versus FEC therapy using fixed-effect and random-effects models. Following screening, 44 studies were included. The majority (18 of 23) of studies measuring adherence showed adherence was significantly improved in patients receiving SPCs versus FECs. Overall, 16 studies measured persistence, of which 14 showed that patients receiving SPCs had significantly improved persistence or were significantly less likely to discontinue therapy than patients receiving FECs. Systolic BP (mean difference, -3.99 [95% CI, -7.92 to -0.07]; P=0.05) and diastolic BP (-1.54 [95% CI, -2.67 to -0.41]; P=0.0076) were both significantly reduced with SPC therapy compared with FEC therapy at week 12. SPC therapy leads to improved adherence and persistence compared with FEC therapy and may lead to better BP control in patients with hypertension.

Assessment of salusin alpha and salusin beta levels in patients with newly diagnosed dipper and non-dipper hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The pathophysiology of non-dipper hypertension has not been clarified. The relationship between salusins with atherosclerosis and hypertension has gained attention in recent years. The aim of this paper is to investigate whether salusins are associated with circadian blood pressure, left ventricular mass index, and diastolic functions in newly diagnosed hypertensives.

METHODS

The study included 88 newly diagnosed hypertensive individuals. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiographic examinations were performed. The patients were assigned to dipper hypertension (n = 41) and non-dipper hypertension (n = 47) groups based on the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring results according to the presence of ≥ a 10% decrease in nighttime blood pressure values or not. Serum salusin α and β levels were determined by electrochemiluminescence immunological test method.

RESULTS

Compared to dipper hypertension, non-dipper hypertension group demonstrated lower salusin α levels (1818.71 ± 221.67 vs 1963 ± 200.75 pg/mL, p = .002), mitral E/A, septal E'/A' and higher salusin β levels (576.24 ± 68.15 vs 516.13 ± 90.7 pg/ml, p = .001) and left ventricular mass index. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed salusin-α (OR 0.474, 95% CI 0.262 to 0.986, p = .001), salusin-β (OR 2.550, 95% CI 2.123 to 2.991, p = .018), and left ventricular mass index (OR 2.620, 95% CI 2.124 to 2.860, p = .011) as independent predictors of non-dipper hypertension. As candidate markers to predict non-dipper hypertension, decreased salusin α, and increased salusin β levels may mediate crosstalk between sympathetic and parasympathetic systems and indicate poor cardiovascular prognosis in hypertension.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The current state and future of internet technology-based hypertension management in Japan

Internet-based information and communication technology is altering our lives. Although medicine is traditionally conservative, it can benefit in many ways from adopting new technology and styles of care. Hypertension is a prime condition for the practical application of digital health management because it is prevalent and undercontrolled, and its primary index, home blood pressure, can be effectively telemonitored. Compared to other conditions that require laboratory measures or the use of drugs with frequent side effects, hypertension can be managed without actual office visits with sufficiently low risk. In this review of hypertension in Japan, we discuss the current and somewhat fragmented state of internet technology and the components and processes necessary for smooth, integrated, and multidisciplinary care in the future. Although further clinical trials are required to show the safety and efficacy of information and communication technology-based care for hypertension, the deployment of telemonitoring and telemedicine in daily practice should be expedited to solve the hypertension paradox. Challenges remain relating to cost, data integration, the redesigning of team-based care, and the improvement of user experience, but information and communication technology-based hypertension management is sure to become pivotal in improving public health.

Validation of the Omron HBP-1320 for professional use according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 2013 protocol and the 2010 revision of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol

OBJECTIVE

Performance of the Omron HBP-1320, designed for professional use by adding several features to the home blood pressure (BP) measuring device, was validated using two different protocols, specifically the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 (ANSI/AAMI/ISO) and the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol, 2010 Revision (ESH IP2), as a separate study.

METHODS

Three trained medical technologists validated the performance of this device by comparing data obtained from the device with those obtained using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer throughout the study.

RESULTS

Mean differences in mercury readings for systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between the devices were 1.6 ± 5.8 and -0.4 ± 5.3 mmHg, respectively, according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol, and mean device-observer measurement differences were -0.4 ± 4.9 and -0.2 ± 4.2 mmHg, respectively, satisfying Part 1 of ESH IP2. Differences in SBP and DBP both satisfied Part 2 of ESH IP2. The number of absolute differences in the values obtained using the device and those obtained by the observers fulfilled the requirements of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol and ESH IP2.

CONCLUSION

Omron HBP-1320 met all requirements of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO protocol and ESH IP2.

Association of lower nighttime diastolic blood pressure and hypoxia with silent myocardial injury: The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study

Whether marked nocturnal blood pressure (BP) reduction is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still controversial. In addition, no report has yet discussed the relationship between lower nocturnal BP and CVD, involving modification by nighttime hypoxia. We evaluated 840 patients who had one or more cardiovascular risk factors by measuring their high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T (Hs‐cTnT), N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐pro BNP), and nighttime saturation levels and performing ambulatory BP monitoring. The lowest tertile in nighttime diastolic BP (DBP) (≤66 mmHg) had increased likelihood of the presence of ≥0.014 ng/ml of Hs‐cTnT compared with the second tertile (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–3.63), and the lowest tertile of minimum blood oxygen saturation (≤81%) had increased likelihood of the presence of ≥0.014 ng/ml of Hs‐cTnT compared with the third tertile (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.13–4.10). Additionally, the patients with both lowest tertile of nighttime DBP and minimum SpO2 showed increased likelihood of the presence of ≥0.014 ng/ml of Hs‐cTnT compared with those without this combination (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.40–6.16). On the other hand, these associations were not found in the presence of ≥125 pg/ml of NT‐pro BNP. In the clinical population, each of lower nocturnal DBP and nighttime hypoxia was associated with asymptomatic myocardial injury, which was represented as higher Hs‐cTnT, and coexisting lower nocturnal DBP and nighttime hypoxia had an additive effect on the risk of myocardial injury.

Exercise Reduces Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background Although exercise training reduces office blood pressure (BP), scarcer evidence is available on whether these benefits also apply to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), which is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality. The present study aims to assess the effects of exercise training on ABP in patients with hypertension based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results A systematic search of randomized controlled trials on the aforementioned topic was conducted in PubMed and Scopus (since inception to April 1, 2020). The mean difference between interventions (along with 95% CI) for systolic BP and diastolic BP was assessed using a random-effects model. Sub-analyses were performed attending to (1) whether participants were taking antihypertensive drugs and (2) exercise modalities. Fifteen studies (including 910 participants with hypertension) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions lasted 8 to 24 weeks (3-5 sessions/week). Exercise significantly reduced 24-hour (systolic BP, -5.4 mm Hg; [95% CI, -9.2 to -1.6]; diastolic BP, -3.0 mm Hg [-5.4 to -0.6]), daytime (systolic BP, -4.5 mm Hg [-6.6 to -2.3]; diastolic BP, -3.2 mm Hg [-4.8 to -1.5]), and nighttime ABP (systolic BP, -4.7 mm Hg [-8.4 to -1.0]; diastolic BP, -3.1 mm Hg [-5.3 to -0.9]). In separate analyses, exercise benefits on all ABP measures were significant for patients taking medication (all P<0.05) but not for untreated patients (although differences between medicated and non-medicated patients were not significant), and only aerobic exercise provided significant benefits (P<0.05). Conclusions Aerobic exercise is an effective coadjuvant treatment for reducing ABP in medicated patients with hypertension.

Supine blood pressure—A clinically relevant determinant of vascular target organ damage in hypertensive patients

Night‐time blood pressure (BP) is an important predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. Its assessment, however, remains challenging due to limited accessibility to ambulatory BP devices in many settings, costs, and other factors. We hypothesized that BP measured in a supine position during daytime may perform similarly to night‐time BP when modeling their association with vascular hypertension‐mediated organ damage (HMOD). Data from 165 hypertensive patients were used who as part of their routine clinic workup had a series of standardized BP measurements including seated attended office, seated and supine unattended office, and ambulatory BP monitoring. HMOD was determined by assessment of kidney function and pulse wave velocity. Correlation analysis was carried out, and univariate and multivariate models were fitted to assess the extent of shared variance between the BP modalities and their individual and shared contribution to HMOD variables. Of all standard non‐24‐hour systolic BP assessments, supine systolic BP shared the highest degree of variance with systolic night‐time BP. In univariate analysis, both systolic supine and night‐time BP were strong determinants of HMOD variables. In multivariate models, supine BP outperformed night‐time BP as the most significant determinant of HMOD. These findings indicate that supine BP may not only be a clinically useful surrogate for night‐time BP when ambulatory BP monitoring is not available, but also highlights the possibility that unattended supine BP may be more closely related to HMOD than other BP measurement modalities, a proposition that requires further investigations in prospective studies.

Progression of Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Variability Despite Best Medical Management

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Beat-to-beat variability in blood pressure (BP) is associated with recurrent stroke despite good control of hypertension. However, no study has identified rates of progression of beat-to-beat BP variability (BPV), its determinants, or which patient groups are particularly affected, limiting understanding of its potential as a treatment target. In consecutive patients one month after a transient ischaemic attack or nondisabling stroke (Oxford Vascular Study), continuous noninvasive BP was measured beat-to-beat over 5 minutes (Finometer). Arterial stiffness was measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Sphygmocor). Repeat assessments were performed at the 5-year follow-up visit and agreement determined by intraclass correlation coefficient. Rates of progression of systolic BPV (SBPV) and diastolic BPV (DBPV) and their determinants were estimated by mixed-effect linear models, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. One hundred eighty-eight of 310 surviving, eligible patients had repeat assessments after a median of 5.8 years. Pulse wave velocity was highly reproducible but SBPV and DBPV were not (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.71, 0.10, and 0.16, respectively), however, all 3 progressed significantly (pulse wave velocity, 2.39%, P<0.0001; SBPV, 8.36%, P<0.0001; DBPV, 9.7, P<0.0001). Rate of progression of pulse wave velocity, SBPV, and DBPV all increased significantly with age (P<0.0001), with an increasingly positive skew and were particularly associated with female sex (pulse wave velocity P=0.00035; SBPV P<0.0001; DBPV P<0.0001) and aortic mean SBP (SBPV P=0.037, DBPV P<0.0001). Beat-to-beat BP variability progresses significantly in high-risk patients, particularly in older individuals with elevated aortic systolic pressure. Beat-to-beat BPV and its progression represent potential new therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of combining traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of hypertension: compound Apocynum tablets combined with Nifedipine sustained-release tablets vs Nifedipine sustained-release tablets alone

Background

We evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) and to compare the cost-effectiveness of a combined treatment consisting of compound Apocynum tablets and Nifedipine sustained-release tablets with the cost-effectiveness of treatment with Nifedipine sustained-release tablets alone.

Methods

A Markov model was used to simulate the potential incremental cost-effectiveness per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to be gained from compound Apocynum tablets and Nifedipine sustained-release tablets compared with Nifedipine sustained-release tablets alone. Model parameter estimates were informed by previously published studies. The direct medical costs of outpatients with hypertension were estimated from the health care provider’s perspective. A 5% annual discount rate was applied to both costs and QALYs.

Results

TCMs combined with Nifedipine sustained-release tablets group generated a total 20-year cost of 11,517.94 RMB (US $1739.87), whereas Nifedipine sustained-release tablets alone group resulted in a 20-year cost of 7253.71 RMB (US $1095.73). TCMs combined with Nifedipine sustained-release tablets group resulted in a generation of 12.69 QALYs, whereas Nifedipine sustained-release tablets alone group resulted in 12.50. The incremental cost-utility ratio was 22,443.32 RMB (US $3390.23) per QALY. Considering the threshold of 1 GDP per capita in China in 2018 (US $9764.95), the combination of compound Apocynum tablets and Nifedipine sustained-release tablets was a cost-effective strategy. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed unchanged results over an acceptable range.

Conclusions

Combining Traditional Chinese Medicines with chemical medicines is more cost-effective strategy in the treatment of hypertension.

Validation of a wearable cuff-less wristwatch-type blood pressure monitoring device

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring is recommended to improve the management of hypertension. Here, we investigated the accuracy of BP estimated using a wearable cuff-less device, InBodyWATCH, compared with BP measured using a manual sphygmomanometer. Thirty-five adults were enrolled (age 57.1 ± 17.9 years). The BP was estimated using InBodyWATCH with an individualized estimation based on a neural network model. Three paired sets of BPs from the two devices were compared using correlation analysis and Bland–Altman plots (n = 105 paired BP readings). The correlations for both systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) between the two devices were high (r = 0.964 and 0.939, both P < 0.001). The mean difference was 2.2 ± 6.1 mmHg for SBP and −0.2 ± 4.2 mmHg for DBP; these were not significant (P = 0.472 for SBP and P = 0.880 for DBP). The proportions of estimated SBP/DBP obtained from the InBodyWATCH within ± 5 mmHg of manual SBP/DBP were 71.4%/83.8%; within ± 10 mmHg they were 86.7%/98.1%; and within ± 15 mmHg they were 97.1%/99.0%. The estimated BP from this wearable cuff-less device correlated highly with the manual BP and showed good accuracy, suggesting its potential to be used in ambulatory BP monitoring.

Characteristics of Individuals with Disagreement between Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements for the Diagnosis of Hypertension

Home and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements are recommended for the diagnosis of hypertension. However, the clinical characteristics of individuals showing a diagnostic disagreement between their home and ambulatory BP measurements are unclear. Of the 470 individuals who were not on antihypertensive drug treatment with a BP ≥140/90 mmHg at an outpatient clinic, 399 who had valid office, home, and ambulatory BP results were included. Hypertension was diagnosed based on an average home BP ≥135/85 mmHg and/or an average daytime ambulatory BP ≥135/85 mmHg. The participants were divided into three groups: Agree-NT (home and ambulatory BP normotension), Disagree (home BP normotension and ambulatory BP hypertension, or home BP normotension and ambulatory BP hypertension), and Agree-HT (home and ambulatory BP hypertension). Eighty-four individuals (21.1%) were classified as the Disagree group. The mean serum creatinine, triglycerides, and electrocardiogram voltage in the Disagree group were intermediate between those observed in the Agree-NT and the Agree-HT group. In the Disagree group, the mean levels of office and home diastolic BP, all of the components of ambulatory BP, the aortic systolic BP, and the BP variabilities were found to be intermediate between those of the Agree-NT and the Agree-HT groups. These results indicate that individuals showing a diagnostic disagreement between their home and ambulatory BP may have cardiovascular risks that are intermediate between those with sustained home and ambulatory normotension and hypertension.

[Cardiovascular preventive recommendations. PAPPS 2020 update]

The recommendations of the semFYC's Program for Preventive Activities and Health Promotion (PAPPS) for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are presented. The following sections are included: Epidemiological review, where the current morbidity and mortality of CVD in Spain and its evolution as well as the main risk factors are described; Cardiovascular (CV) risk tables and recommendations for the calculation of CV risk; Main risk factors such as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus, describing the method for their diagnosis, therapeutic objectives and recommendations for lifestyle measures and pharmacological treatment; Indications for antiplatelet therapy, and recommendations for screening of atrial fibrillation. The quality of testing and the strength of the recommendation are included in the main recommendations.

Influence of elevated sleep-time blood pressure on vascular risk and hypertension-mediated organ damage

We report the analysis of 252 hypertensive patients whose blood pressure (BP) was assessed by around-the-clock ambulatory BP monitoring compared to office BP measurement during a follow-up investigation of 8.7 y (SD: 2.43 y) that evaluated the added value of measuring sleep-time BP values. We found that 37.3% of the patients had mismatched diagnoses between the two techniques of BP assessment, with 11.5% of the patients showing white-coat hypertension and 25.8% masked hypertension. Only 12.3% of the diagnosed and treated patients presented normal BP values. Nocturnal (sleep-time) hypertension was present in 70.63%. The sleep-time systolic BP mean was found to be an independent vascular risk factor (F = 9.005, p < .001), indirectly measured through the 10-year risk of morbidity and mortality. Additionally, the elevated sleep-time systolic BP mean was a better marker of subclinical hypertension-mediated organ damage (ρ = 0.19, p < .01) than either the awake (ρ = 0.168, p < .01) or 24 (ρ = 0.184, p < .01) systolic BP means. In conclusion, the accuracy and sleep-time measurements provided by ambulatory BP make it particularly relevant in hypertension diagnosis and management. The use of the ambulatory BP measurement method could end up modifying current therapeutic targets, with sleep-time systolic BP mean becoming a main one, in order to optimize hypertension control and reduce hypertension-related organ pathology and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.

Blood pressure monitoring in sleep: time to wake up

Hypertension is a highly common condition with well-established adverse consequences. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has repeatedly been shown to better predict cardiovascular outcomes and mortality, compared to single office visit blood pressure. Non-dipping of sleep-time blood pressure is an independent marker for increased cardiovascular risk. We review blood pressure variability and the challenges of blood pressure monitoring during sleep. Although pathological sleep such as obstructive sleep apnea has been associated with non-dipping of sleep-time blood pressure, blood pressure is not routinely measured during sleep due to lack of unobtrusive blood pressure monitoring technology. Second, we review existing noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring technologies. Lastly, we propose including sleep-time blood pressure monitoring during sleep studies and including sleep studies in patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Lifestyle interventions for the prevention and treatment of hypertension

Hypertension affects approximately one third of the world's adult population and is a major cause of premature death despite considerable advances in pharmacological treatments. Growing evidence supports the use of lifestyle interventions for the prevention and adjuvant treatment of hypertension. In this Review, we provide a summary of the epidemiological research supporting the preventive and antihypertensive effects of major lifestyle interventions (regular physical exercise, body weight management and healthy dietary patterns), as well as other less traditional recommendations such as stress management and the promotion of adequate sleep patterns coupled with circadian entrainment. We also discuss the physiological mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of these lifestyle interventions on hypertension, which include not only the prevention of traditional risk factors (such as obesity and insulin resistance) and improvements in vascular health through an improved redox and inflammatory status, but also reduced sympathetic overactivation and non-traditional mechanisms such as increased secretion of myokines.

Oral Salt Loading Test is Associated With 24-Hour Blood Pressure and Organ Damage in Primary Aldosteronism Patients

Objective

In the present study, we investigated the most useful confirmatory test for reflecting the severity of primary aldosteronism (PA), by evaluating 24-hour blood pressure (BP), urine albumin, left ventricular mass (LVM), and intima media thickness (IMT).

Methods

This study included 113 patients (80 PA and 33 non-PA hypertensive patients) who were admitted to Oita University Hospital and evaluated using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). First, casual blood pressure (BP) and ABPM parameters were compared between PA and non-PA patients. Second, patients were divided into PA-positive and PA-negative groups based on confirmatory tests, including the saline infusion test (SIT), captopril challenge test (CCT), and oral salt loading test (OSLT), and casual BP and ABPM parameters were compared between the 2 groups. In addition, urine albumin excretion, LVM, and maximum IMT as markers of organ damage were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The ABPM parameters but not casual BP, were higher in PA patients than in non-PA patients. Nocturnal and 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) in OSLT-positive patients were significantly higher than in OSLT-negative patients. ABPM parameters in other confirmatory tests were not different between the PA-positive and PA-negative groups. Urine albumin excretion in OSLT-positive patients was significantly higher than in the OSLT-negative patients. However, in other confirmatory tests, organ damage markers were not different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

The OSLT is potentially useful not only for the diagnosis of PA but also for assessment of 24-hour SBP and organ damage, as indicated by urine albumin excretion.

Prognostic value of daytime and nighttime blood pressure in treated hypertensive patients according to age and sex

The authors assessed the prognostic value of daytime and nighttime blood pressure (BP) in adult (≤65 years) or old (> 65 years) women or men with treated hypertension. Cardiovascular outcomes were evaluated in 2264 patients. During the follow-up (mean 10 years), 523 cardiovascular events occurred. After adjustment for covariates, both daytime and nighttime systolic BP were always associated with outcomes, that is, hazard ratio (95% confidence interval per 10 mm Hg increment) 1.22 (1.04-1.43) and 1.20 (1.04-1.37), respectively, in adult women, 1.30 (1.18-1.43) and 1.21 (1.10-1.33), respectively, in adult men, 1.21 (1.10-1.33) and 1.18 (1.07-1.31), respectively, in old women, and 1.16 (1.01-1.33) and 1.28 (1.14-1.44), respectively, in old men. When daytime and nighttime systolic BP were further and mutually adjusted, daytime and nighttime BP had comparable prognostic value in adult and old women, daytime BP remained associated with outcomes in adult men (hazard ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.74 per 10 mm Hg increment), and nighttime BP remained associated with outcomes in old men (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.64 per 10 mm Hg increment). Daytime and nighttime systolic BP have similar prognostic impact in adult and old women with treated hypertension, whereas daytime BP is a stronger predictor of risk in adult men and nighttime BP is a stronger predictor of risk in old men.

Differences between home blood pressure and strictly measured office blood pressure and their determinants in Japanese men

Conventional office blood pressure (OBP) and home blood pressure (HBP) measurements are often inconsistent. The purpose of this research was (1) to test whether strictly measured OBP values with sufficient rest time before measurement (st-OBP) is comparable to HBP at the population level and (2) to ascertain whether there are particular determinants for the difference between HBP and st-OBP at the individual level. Data from a population-based group of 1056 men aged 40-79 years were analyzed. After a five-min rest, st-OBP was measured twice. HBP was measured after a 2-min rest every morning for seven consecutive days. To determine factors related to ΔSBP (HBP minus st-OBP measurements), multiple linear regression analyses and analyses of covariance were performed. While st-OBP and HBP were comparable (136.5 vs. 137.2 mmHg) at the population level, ΔSBP varied with a standard deviation of 13.5 mmHg. Smoking was associated with a larger ΔSBP regardless of antihypertensive usage, and BMI was associated with a larger ΔSBP in participants using antihypertensive drugs. The adjusted mean ΔSBP in the highest BMI tertile category was 4.6 mmHg in participants taking antihypertensive drugs. st-OBP and HBP measurements were comparable at the population level, although the distribution of ΔSBP was considerably broad. Smokers and obese men taking antihypertensive drugs had higher HBP than st-OBP, indicating that their blood pressure levels are at risk of being underestimated. Therefore, this group would benefit from the addition of HBP measurements.

Home blood pressure data visualization for the management of hypertension: designing for patient and physician information needs

Background

Nearly half of US adults with diagnosed hypertension have uncontrolled blood pressure. Clinical inertia may contribute, including patient-physician uncertainty about how variability in blood pressures impacts overall control. Better information display may support clinician-patient hypertension decision making through reduced cognitive load and improved situational awareness.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team employed iterative user-centered design to create a blood pressure visualization EHR prototype that included patient-generated blood pressure data. An attitude and behavior survey and 10 focus groups with patients (N = 16) and physicians (N = 24) guided iterative design and confirmation phases. Thematic analysis of qualitative data yielded insights into patient and physician needs for hypertension management.

Results

Most patients indicated measuring home blood pressure, only half share data with physicians. When receiving home blood pressure data, 88% of physicians indicated entering gestalt averages as text into clinical notes. Qualitative findings suggest that including a data visualization that included home blood pressures brought this valued data into physician workflow and decision-making processes. Data visualization helps both patients and physicians to have a fuller understanding of the blood pressure ‘story’ and ultimately promotes the activated engaged patient and prepared proactive physician central to the Chronic Care Model. Both patients and physicians expressed concerns about workflow for entering and using home blood pressure data for clinical care.

Conclusions

Our user-centered design process with physicians and patients produced a well-received blood pressure visualization prototype that includes home blood pressures and addresses patient-physician information needs. Next steps include evaluating a recent EHR visualization implementation, designing annotation functions aligned with users’ needs, and addressing additional stakeholders’ needs (nurses, care managers, caregivers). This significant innovation has potential to improve quality of care for hypertension through better patient-physician understanding of control and goals. It also has the potential to enable remote monitoring of patient blood pressure, a newly reimbursed activity, and is a strong addition to telehealth efforts.

Direct Comparison of Home Versus Ambulatory Defined Nocturnal Hypertension for Predicting Cardiovascular Events

The home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) method that measures blood pressure during sleep hours was reported to be comparable to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in measuring nighttime blood pressure and detecting nocturnal hypertension. The aim of this study was to directly compare the prognostic power of nocturnal hypertension detected by HBPM versus ABPM for predicting future cardiovascular events. We analyzed nighttime blood pressure (measured by HBPM and ABPM) data of 1005 participants who were included in the J-HOP study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure). During a follow-up period of 7.6±3.4 years, 80 cardiovascular disease events occurred. The majority (91.8%) of our study population were hypertensive, and 80.7% of participants were using antihypertensive medication. Nighttime home systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher compared to nighttime ambulatory SBP (123.0±14.6 versus 120.3±14.4 mm Hg, P <0.001). Nocturnal hypertension was defined as nighttime home or ambulatory SBP of ≥120 mm Hg. The number of participants with nocturnal hypertension defined by HBPM and ABPM was 564 (56.1%) and 469 (46.7%), respectively. Nocturnal hypertension defined by HBPM was associated with increased risk of future cardiovascular events: total cardiovascular events (coronary artery disease and stroke events; 1.78 [1.00–3.15]) and stroke (2.65 [1.14–6.20]), independent of office SBP. These results were absent with nocturnal hypertension defined by ABPM. This is the first comparison prospective study illustrating that uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension defined by HBPM (independent of office SBP) is a predictor of future cardiovascular events.

Nighttime blood pressure decline as a predictor of renal injury in patients with hypertension: a population-based cohort study

We explored whether the nighttime blood pressure (BP) decline predicts renal function decline in a population-based cohort with primary hypertension. We measured the baseline ambulatory BP and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in a cohort of 1,042 primary hypertensive patients. We repeated the GFR measurements and calculated the rate of GFR decline after a median follow-up of 5.8 years. The estimated GFR (eGFR) declined by -0.23 to -0.20 mL/min per year as the nighttime systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and mean BP decline rates increased by 1% (P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, the nighttime SBP, DBP, and mean BP were all related to a steeper rate of eGFR decline by -0.25 to -0.22 mL/min per 1% increase. The adjusted multivariable results indicated that the odds of an eGFR decline were reduced by 46% when the nighttime SBP decline rate increased by 1% (OR= 0.54, 95% CI: 0.46-0.62). The restricted cubic spline model indicated a non-linear dose-response relationship with the nighttime SBP, DBP, and mean BP. Nighttime BP may be an important biomarker of renal function injury in hypertensive patients.

Seasonal Variation of Home Blood Pressure and Its Association With Target Organ Damage: The J-HOP Study (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure)

Background

Although seasonal variation of home blood pressure (BP) has been reported to be higher in winter, seasonal difference in home BP (HBP) and its association with target organ damage (TOD) remains unclear.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study using the dataset from the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study to assess seasonal differences in HBP, prevalence of masked hypertension, and association of HBP with TOD. The J-HOP study is a nationwide, multicenter prospective study whose participants with cardiovascular risks underwent morning and evening HBP measurements for a 14-day period in 71 institutions throughout Japan. Urine albumin–creatinine ratio (UACR) and serum-B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were obtained at enrollment.

Results

Among 4,267 participants (mean age, 64.9 ± 10.9 years; 46.9% male; 91.4% hypertensives), 1,060, 979, 1,224, and 1,004 participants were enrolled in spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. Morning and evening home systolic/diastolic BP levels, and prevalence of masked hypertension (office BP <140/90 mm Hg and HBP ≥135/85 mm Hg) were significantly lower in summer than other seasons after adjustment for covariates. When we assessed the interaction between BP parameters and each season for an association with TOD, we found the association between morning home diastolic BP and each of UACR and BNP was stronger in winter than other seasons (both P for interaction <0.05).

Conclusions

In this study, we revealed that the prevalence of masked hypertension was higher in other seasons than in summer and found a notable association between morning home diastolic BP and TOD in winter.

American Versus European Hypertension Guidelines: The Case of White Coat Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The impact of the 2017 American College Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on reclassification of white coat hypertension (WCH) and white coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH) phenotypes has not been thoroughly investigated, so far. The aim of the present analysis was to compare the prevalence rates of WCH and WUCH according to either 2018 European Society Hypertension/European Society Cardiology and 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines.

METHODS

A large database of individual 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) recordings from untreated and treated hypertensive individuals with office BP ≥140 and/or 90 mm Hg was analyzed.

RESULTS

As many as 3,223 (39% men) out of 7,353 (47% men) fulfilled diagnostic criteria for WCH (n = 1,281) and WUCH (n = 1,942) according to the 2018 ESH/ESC guidelines (mean 24-hour BP <130/80 mm Hg), the prevalence rate being 17.4% and 26.4%, respectively. The corresponding figures according to the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines (mean 24-hour BP <125/75 mm Hg) were 15.6 and 9.4%, respectively. Thus, a total of 1,378 patients (42.7%) either defined as WCH and WUCH by ESH/ESC guidelines, were classifiable as untreated sustained and uncontrolled sustained hypertensives by ACC/AHA guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACC/AHA reclassification of patients with office BP ≥140/90 mm Hg leads to a marked decrease in the prevalence of WCH/WUCH. This may have relevant clinical implications because the prognostic significance of these phenotypes is often ignored in clinical practice and, consequently, contributes to the high burden of cardiovascular diseases worldwide.

Nocturnal blood pressure: the dark side of white-coat hypertension

AIM

The impact of defining white-coat hypertension (WCH) and white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WCUH) based on daytime and night-time thresholds of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), instead of 24-h mean value, is unclear. We aimed to reclassify BP status according to both diurnal and nocturnal thresholds in a large sample of hypertensive patients seen in a specialist center and previously classified as WCH and WCUH based on 24-h BP values.

METHODS

A data-base of 7353 individual 24-h ABP monitoring (ABPM) from untreated and treated hypertensive individuals with office BP at least 140 mmHg and/or 90 mmHg was analysed and a subset of 3223 patients characterized by mean 24-h BP less than 130/80 mmHg (i.e. WCH and WCUH) was included in the present analysis.

RESULTS

As many as 1281 patients were classified as WCH and 1942 as WCUH. Among them, elevated out-of-office BP according to night-time threshold (i.e. ≥120/70 mmHg) was found in about 30% of cases. In particular, prevalence rates of nocturnal hypertension were 26.9% in WCH and 31.8% in WCUH. Isolated daytime hypertension (i.e. ≥135/85 mmHg) was detected in an additional 4% of individuals.

CONCLUSION

Classification of WCH and WCUH based on mean 24-h BP thresholds does not allow to detect an adverse BP phenotype, such as nocturnal hypertension in a large fraction of untreated and treated patients.

Association of Daytime and Nighttime Blood Pressure With Cardiovascular Disease Events Among African American Individuals

Importance

Little is known regarding health outcomes associated with higher blood pressure (BP) levels measured outside the clinic among African American individuals.

Objective

To examine whether daytime and nighttime BP levels measured outside the clinic among African American individuals are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality independent of BP levels measured inside the clinic.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study analyzed data from 1034 African American participants in the Jackson Heart Study who completed ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline (September 26, 2000, to March 31, 2004). Mean daytime and nighttime BPs were calculated based on measurements taken while participants were awake and asleep, respectively. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2017, to April 30, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Cardiovascular disease events, including coronary heart disease and stroke, experienced through December 31, 2014, and all-cause mortality experienced through December 31, 2016, were adjudicated. The associations of daytime BP and nighttime BP, separately, with CVD events and all-cause mortality were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

A total of 1034 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [10.9] years; 337 [32.6%] male; and 583 [56.4%] taking antihypertensive medication) were included in the study. The mean daytime systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) was 129.4/77.6 mm Hg, and the mean nighttime SBP/DBP was 121.3/68.4 mm Hg. During follow-up (median [interquartile range], 12.5 [11.1-13.6] years for CVD and 14.8 [13.7-15.6] years for all-cause mortality), 113 CVD events and 194 deaths occurred. After multivariable adjustment, including in-clinic SBP and DBP, the hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD events for each SD higher level were 1.53 (95% CI, 1.24-1.88) for daytime SBP (per 13.5 mm Hg), 1.48 (95% CI, 1.22-1.80) for nighttime SBP (per 15.5 mm Hg), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.02-1.51) for daytime DBP (per 9.3 mm Hg), and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.06-1.59) for nighttime DBP (per 9.5 mm Hg). Nighttime SBP was associated with all-cause mortality (HR per 1-SD higher level, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.45), but no association was present for daytime SBP (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97-1.33) and daytime (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.81-1.10) and nighttime (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.90-1.24) DBP.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among African American individuals, higher daytime and nighttime SBPs were associated with an increased risk for CVD events and all-cause mortality independent of BP levels measured in the clinic. Measurement of daytime and nighttime BP using ambulatory monitoring during a 24-hour period may help identify African American individuals who have an increased cardiovascular disease risk.