Coronary side-effect potential of current and prospective antimigraine drugs

Functional characterization of contractions to tegaserod in human isolated proximal and distal coronary arteries

Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) receptor agonist, has been used to treat idiopathic constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel disease. It has recently been suggested that tegaserod has an affinity for 5-HT(1B) receptors, which mediate vasoconstriction. As some patients have experienced cardiac ischemia during treatment with tegaserod, we assessed contractions to tegaserod in healthy and diseased human isolated coronary arteries and compared the results with those obtained using sumatriptan, an established 5-HT(1B) receptor agonist. Proximal and distal human coronary arteries were divided into sets of healthy and diseased tissues based on functional endothelial responses. Concentration-response curves to tegaserod and sumatriptan were constructed to assess their contractile potential. Tegaserod's antagonist properties at 5-HT(1B) receptors were studied by constructing concentration-response curves to sumatriptan in the absence or presence of tegaserod (1 microM). Sumatriptan induced concentration-dependent contractions, which were greater in distal than in proximal coronary artery segments. In the proximal segments, tegaserod induced contractions only at concentrations of 10 microM or higher, while in distal segments contractions were generally absent. Tegaserod did not antagonize sumatriptan-induced contractions. There was no difference between the results obtained in healthy and diseased coronary arteries. In conclusion, tegaserod induced contractions in human proximal coronary arteries at concentrations 1000 times higher than C(max) (6 mg bid). Hence, tegaserod does not exhibit a relevant vasoconstrictor potential in the human coronary artery. Further, tegaserod did not behave as an antagonist at 5-HT(1B) receptors. Additional studies may be warranted to investigate the use of 5-HT(4) agonists in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

History of Methysergide in Migraine

Harold Wolff's theory of vasodilation in migraine is well-known. Less known is his search for a perivascular factor that would damage local tissues and increase pain sensitivity during migraine attacks. Serotonin was found to be among the candidate agents to be included. In the same period, serotonin was isolated (1948) and, because of its actions, an anti-serotonin drug was needed. Methysergide was synthesized from lysergic acid (LSD) by adding a methyl group and a butanolamid group. This resulted in a compound with selectivity and high potency as a serotonin (5-HT) inhibitor. Based on the possible involvement of serotonin in migraine attacks, it was introduced in 1959 by Sicuteri as a preventive drug for migraine. The clinical effect was often excellent, but 5 years later it was found to cause retroperitoneal fibrosis after chronic intake. Consequently, the use of the drug in migraine declined considerably, but it was still used as a 5-HT antagonist in experimental studies. In 1974 Saxena showed that methysergide had a selective vasoconstrictor effect in the carotid bed and in 1984 he found an atypical receptor. This finding provided an incentive for the development of sumatriptan. Bredberg et al. showed that methysergide is probably a prodrug for its active metabolite methylergometrine. Whereas methysergide is ‘a clean drug’, methylergometrine is ‘a relatively dirty drug’ with additional dopaminergic activity. The mechanism for the preventive effect of methysergide (methylergometrine) in migraine remains elusive. We describe the rise, fall and subsequent use as a third-choice drug of the first effective migraine prophylactic, methysergide.

Current and prospective pharmacological targets in relation to antimigraine action

Migraine is a recurrent incapacitating neurovascular disorder characterized by unilateral and throbbing headaches associated with photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting. Current specific drugs used in the acute treatment of migraine interact with vascular receptors, a fact that has raised concerns about their cardiovascular safety. In the past, alpha-adrenoceptor agonists (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, isometheptene) were used. The last two decades have witnessed the advent of 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (sumatriptan and second-generation triptans), which have a well-established efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Moreover, current prophylactic treatments of migraine include 5-HT(2) receptor antagonists, Ca(2+) channel blockers, and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Despite the progress in migraine research and in view of its complex etiology, this disease still remains underdiagnosed, and available therapies are underused. In this review, we have discussed pharmacological targets in migraine, with special emphasis on compounds acting on 5-HT (5-HT(1-7)), adrenergic (alpha(1), alpha(2,) and beta), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP(1) and CGRP(2)), adenosine (A(1), A(2), and A(3)), glutamate (NMDA, AMPA, kainate, and metabotropic), dopamine, endothelin, and female hormone (estrogen and progesterone) receptors. In addition, we have considered some other targets, including gamma-aminobutyric acid, angiotensin, bradykinin, histamine, and ionotropic receptors, in relation to antimigraine therapy. Finally, the cardiovascular safety of current and prospective antimigraine therapies is touched upon.

Intrapulmonary and intravenous administrations of dihydroergotamine mesylate have similar cardiovascular effects in the conscious dog

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The effects of intrapulmonary artery (i.p.a.) administration of dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) were evaluated.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Conscious beagle dogs (n=4) were given DHE via the i.p.a. or i.v. route as two 0.014 mg kg(-1) doses and a 0.14 mg kg(-1) dose given 60 min apart. A recovery period of > or =45 h occurred before crossover to the alternative route. Physiological parameters were monitored by telemetry or direct measurement, and venous blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessments.

KEY RESULTS

No meaningful differences between i.v. and i.p.a. treatments were observed for heart rate, systemic pressures and vascular pressures. Aortic resistance increased 8, 27 and 70%, respectively, following three doses of i.v. DHE compared with 11, 37 and 57%, respectively, with i.p.a. DHE. Carotid artery resistance increased 22, 40 and 87%, respectively, following three doses of i.v. DHE, compared with 17, 45 and 67%, respectively, following i.p.a. DHE. Increases in coronary artery resistance were of similar magnitude following i.v. and i.p.a. DHE administration. Increases in left ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures were seen following all doses of i.v. and i.p.a. DHE. Changes following DHE 0.014 mg kg(-1) were minimal and not clinically significant. With DHE 0.14 mg kg(-1) by either route, emesis was the most common adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

DHE has comparable effects delivered via simulated deep inhalation (i.p.a.) or i.v. administration. The risk of cardiovascular complications is unlikely to be greater following inhalation of DHE.

The primary headaches: genetics, epigenetics and a behavioural genetic model

The primary headaches, migraine with (MA) and without aura (MO) and cluster headache, all carry a substantial genetic liability. Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), an autosomal dominant mendelian disorder classified as a subtype of MA, is due to mutations in genes encoding neural channel subunits. MA/MO are considered multifactorial genetic disorders, and FHM has been proposed as a model for migraine aetiology. However, a review of the genetic studies suggests that the FHM genes are not involved in the typical migraines and that FHM should be considered as a syndromic migraine rather than a subtype of MA. Adopting the concept of syndromic migraine could be useful in understanding migraine pathogenesis. We hypothesise that epigenetic mechanisms play an important role in headache pathogenesis. A behavioural model is proposed, whereby the primary headaches are construed as behaviours, not symptoms, evolutionarily conserved for their adaptive value and engendered out of a genetic repertoire by a network of pattern generators present in the brain and signalling homeostatic imbalance. This behavioural model could be incorporated into migraine genetic research.

Pharmacogenetics of migraine: genetic variants and their potential role in migraine therapy

Migraine is a paroxysmal neurological disorder affecting up to 6% of males and 18% of females in the general population, and has been demonstrated to have a strong, but complex, genetic component. Genetic investigation of migraine provides hope that new targets for medications and individual specific therapy will be developed. The identification of polymorphisms or genetic biomarkers for disease susceptibility and treatment should aid in providing a better understanding of migraine pathology and, consequently, more appropriate and efficient treatment for migraineurs. In this review, we will discuss results investigating genetic biomarkers for migraine and their potential role in future therapy planning.

Treatment of migraine attacks based on the interaction with the trigemino-cerebrovascular system

Primary headaches such as migraine are among the most prevalent neurological disorders, affecting up to one-fifth of the adult population. The scientific work in the last decade has unraveled much of the pathophysiological background of migraine, which is now considered to be a neurovascular disorder. It has been discovered that the trigemino-cerebrovascular system plays a key role in migraine headache pathophysiology by releasing the potent vasodilator calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). This neuropeptide is released in parallel with the pain and its concentration correlates well with the intensity of the headache. The development of drugs of the triptan class has provided relief for the acute attacks but at the cost of, mainly cardiovascular, side effects. Thus, the intention to improve treatment led to the development of small CGRP receptor antagonists such as olcegepant (BIBN4096BS) and MK-0974 that alleviate the acute migraine attack without acute side events. The purpose of this review is to give a short overview of the pathological background of migraine headache and to illustrate the mechanisms behind the actions of triptans and the promising CGRP receptor blockers.

Sumatriptan for prevention of acute mountain sickness: randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of sumatriptan prophylaxis on acute mountain sickness (AMS) and altitude headache development within 24 hours of ascent, we designed a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Tochal Mountain Hotel at an altitude of 3,500 meters above sea level during October 2006 to November 2006. A total of 102 Iranian adults were assigned to receive either sumatriptan succinate (50mg) or placebo within 1 hour of ascent. AMS incidence was measured by Lake Louise AMS score > or = 3 with headache and one other symptom. Secondary outcome measures included severity of syndrome (Lake Louise scores > or = 5), incidence of headache, and severity of headache.

RESULTS

Based on intention-to-treat analysis, AMS was more prevalent in placebo group (n = 23 [45.1%]) than sumatriptan group (n = 12 [23.5%]; p = 0.02). Headache also had a greater rate for placebo users (placebo vs sumatriptan group: 29 [56.9%] vs 17 [33.3%]; p = 0.02). No association was detected between sumatriptan prophylaxis and AMS or altitude headache severity.

DISCUSSION

Sumatriptan prophylaxis is effective to prevent AMS development. Furthermore, our findings confirm cerebral vasodilative and edematous mechanisms of AMS progression, whereas sumatriptan is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine(1) receptor subtype agonist and a selective cerebral vasoconstrictor as a result (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN87201238/).

Characterization of the human basilar artery contractile response to 5-HT and triptans

To study the contractile responses of the human basilar artery to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), sumatriptan, zolmitriptan and naratriptan, and to characterize the 5-HT receptor subtypes involved on those responses, human basilar artery rings were prepared for isometric contraction, protein isolation and Western blotting analysis. Concentration-response (CR) curves were made for all agonists in the absence or in the presence of selective antagonists at 5-HT1B (cyanopindolol), 5-HT1D (BRL 15,572) and 5-HT2 (ketanserin) receptors. We also used anti-5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor antibodies to search for the expression of protein of these receptor subtypes. From the CR curves, the relative intrinsic activity and potency of these agonists were determined. The ranking order for the intrinsic activity was 5-HT > or = sumatriptan > zolmitriptan > or = naratriptan, whereas that for the potency was zolmitriptan > or = 5-HT > or = sumatriptan > naratriptan. Our results also show that the human basilar artery seems to have a mixed population of 5-HT1B/1D receptors mediating the contractile response to triptans, which is also suggested by the expression of both receptor subtypes. There is also a population of 5-HT2 receptors for which the antimigraine drugs used have no apparent affinity. From this study, one can conclude that the second generation triptans have lower contractile capacity than sumatriptan, suggesting that they have a better cerebrovascular safety profile.

The phe-124-Cys and A-161T variants of the human 5-HT1B receptor gene are not major determinants of the clinical response to sumatriptan

BACKGROUND

The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist sumatriptan is highly effective in the treatment of migraine. However, some patients do not respond to sumatriptan or experience recurrence of the headache after initial relief. In addition, some patients report chest symptoms after the use of sumatriptan.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether 2 genetic variants (F124C changing a phenylalanine for a cysteine and polymorphism A/T at nucleotide position -161 in the 5' regulatory region) of the 5-HT(1B) receptor play a major role in the therapeutic response to sumatriptan. The 5-HT(1B) receptor most likely mediates the therapeutic action and coronary side effects of sumatriptan, and both F124C and A-161T have relevant functional consequences on either the affinity of sumatriptan to bind to the 5-HT(1B) receptor or on receptor expression level itself, respectively.

METHOD

Genomic DNA of a relatively small but very well-characterized set of migraine patients with consistently good response to sumatriptan (n = 14), with no response (n = 12), with recurrence of the headache (n = 12), with chest symptoms (n = 13), and patients without chest symptoms (n = 27) was available for the genetic analyses and screened for the F124C variant and the A-161T polymorphism in the human 5-HT(1B) receptor gene.

RESULTS

F124C was not detected in any of the patients studied. In addition, we did not observe drastic changes in allele frequencies of the A-161T polymorphism that might hint to a causal relation with the therapeutic effect of sumatriptan.

CONCLUSION

We have not obtained any evidence that variants F124C and A-161T of the 5-HT(1B) receptor are major determinants in the clinical response to sumatriptan.

A61603-induced contractions of the porcine meningeal artery are mediated by alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors

It has recently been shown that A61603 (N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-naphthalen-1-yl]methane sulphonamide), a potent alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor agonist, decreased carotid artery conductance in anaesthetized pigs by a novel non-adrenergic mechanism. In this study, we set out to pharmacologically characterize A61603-induced contractions of the porcine isolated meningeal artery. While the maximum contractile responses of the artery were similar, A61603 (E(max): 183 +/- 23% of 100 mM KCl; pEC(50): 7.25 +/- 0.18) was more potent than noradrenaline (E(max): 156 +/- 16%; pEC(50): 5.75 +/- 0.17) or phenylephrine (E(max): 163 +/- 20%; pEC(50): 5.63 +/- 0.02). Prazosin (pA(2): 9.36 +/- 0.23) and, to a lesser extent, rauwolscine (pK(b): 6.36 +/- 0.38) and yohimbine (pK(b): 7.30 +/- 0.15) antagonised the contractions to A61603. The 5-HT(1B) (GR127935; N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl) phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)[1,1-biphenyl]-4-carboxamide) and 5-HT(2) (ritanserin) receptor antagonists failed to affect the responses to A61603, but methiothepin, which, in addition, has a high affinity for alpha-adrenoceptors, proved an effective antagonist. The A61603-induced responses were suppressed by the cAMP stimulator forskolin, but not by the protein kinase C inhibitor chelerythrine. Our results suggest that the contraction of porcine isolated meningeal artery by A61603 is mediated via mainly alpha(1)-(probably alpha(1A)) and, to a lesser extent, alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, involving the adenylyl cyclase, but not the diacylglycerol pathway.

Rat carotid artery responses to alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists and 5-HT after ovariectomy and hormone replacement

OBJECTIVE

To compare the contractile responses to alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists and 5-HT in the rat carotid artery after ovariectomy and subsequent hormone replacement with 17beta-estradiol, progesterone, or the combination of 17beta-estradiol and progesterone.

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of migraine is higher in women than in men, and changes in 17beta-estradiol levels seem to affect the frequency of attacks in female migraineurs. However, the underlying mechanisms are not yet completely understood.

METHODS

After 1 week of acclimatization (Day 0), female Sprague-Dawley rats were either sham-operated or bilateral ovariectomized. One week later (Day 7), the ovariectomized rats were subcutaneously implanted with a pellet releasing over a 21-day period either placebo, 0.25 mg 17beta-estradiol, 50 mg progesterone, or the combination of the 2 hormones. Blood samples were collected on Days 0, 7, and 21 to measure plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine. On days 25 to 28, the animals were killed to isolate carotid artery and mount its segments in Mulvany myographs. Cumulative concentration response curves to alpha-adrenergic receptor agonists and 5-HT were constructed in the absence or presence of suitable antagonists.

RESULTS

The potency of norepinephrine in ovariectomized rats was significantly reduced in animals treated with progesterone as compared to those with placebo. In placebo-treated ovariectomized animals there was a noticeable response mediated by alpha2-adrenoceptors, in contrast to that in sham-operated or ovariectomized rats treated with 17beta-estradiol and progesterone, either alone or in combination. The plasma levels of norepinephrine and epinephrine were not significantly affected by either ovariectomy or the subsequent hormone replacement. The potency of 5-HT was significantly reduced in animals having circulating sex hormones as compared to that in placebo-treated ovariectomized animals.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results indicate that circulating progesterone and/or 17beta-estradiol may reduce the contraction of the rat carotid artery in response to norepinephrine and 5-HT. This effect of female sex hormones might be one of the factors through which these hormones aggravate migraine in women.

Sumatriptan provokes coronary artery spasm in patients with variant angina: Possible involvement of serotonin 1B receptor

BACKGROUND

Serotonin (5HT) can induce coronary artery spasm (CAS) in patients with variant angina (VA). We have previously reported that 5HT(1B) and 5HT(2A) receptors gene were expressed in human coronary arterial smooth muscle cells and that isolated coronary artery from a patient with VA showed the supersensitivity to sumatriptan (SMT), a 5HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist. The aim of the present study was to determine whether SMT can provoke CAS directly or indirectly through platelet aggregation in patients with VA.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of intracoronary infusion of graded concentrations of SMT on coronary arteries in 9 patients, including 5 documented VA and 4 participants with atypical chest pain as control.

RESULTS

SMT provoked CAS in all patients with VA. SMT could not induce CAS in control. SMT (10(-4) M) caused significant contractions (%diameter of baseline; median [interquartile range], 0 [0-18.4]% in VA, as compared with control (proximal segments; 92.6 [77.9-118.9]%, p<0.05 vs. VA, distal segments; 92.9 [65.3-158.5]%, p<0.01 vs. VA). In control, minor dilation occurred at SMT concentration up to 10(-5) M. SMT could induce in vitro platelet aggregation neither in healthy subjects nor in patients with VA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that activation of 5HT(1B) receptor by SMT can induce CAS directly in patients with VA without platelet activation. This is the first report directly demonstrating the effect of 5HT(1B) receptor activation on human coronary arteries in vivo.

Interactions of metoclopramide and ergotamine with human 5-HT(3A) receptors and human 5-HT reuptake carriers

The actions of metoclopramide and ergotamine, drugs which are used as a combined migraine medication, on human (h)5-HT3A receptors and 5-HT reuptake carriers, stably expressed in HEK-293 cells, were studied with patch-clamp- and ([3H]5-HT)-uptake techniques. At clinical concentrations, metoclopramide inhibited peak and integrated currents through h5-HT3A receptors concentration-dependently (IC50 = 0.064 and 0.076 microM, respectively) when it was applied in equilibrium (60 s before and during 5-HT (30 microM) exposure). The onset and offset time constants of metoclopramide action were 1.3 and 2.1 s, respectively. The potency of metoclopramide when exclusively applied during the agonist pulse decreased more than 200-fold (IC50 = 19.0 microM, peak current suppression). Metoclopramide (0.10 microM) did not alter the EC50 of 5-HT-induced peak currents. In contrast to the lack of competitive interaction between metoclopramide and 5-HT in this functional assay, metoclopramide inhibited specific [3H]GR65630 binding to human h5-HT3A receptors in a surmountable manner. This seeming discrepancy between functional studies and radioligand binding experiments may be accounted for by (1) the slow kinetics of inhibition of peak currents by metoclopramide compared with the fast onset and offset kinetics of 5-HT-induced currents and (2) the low efficacy of metoclopramide in inhibiting radioligand binding (e.g. only 20% binding inhibition compared to 79% peak current suppression by 200 nM metoclopramide). At low concentrations (1-10 nM), ergotamine had no effect on 5-HT (30 microM)-induced peak currents. Above clinical concentrations, ergotamine (>3 microM) inhibited them. When both drugs were applied together (0.10 microM metoclopramide +0.001 to 0.01 microM ergotamine), an inhibition of both, peak and integrated current responses was observed. Neither metoclopramide (< or =30 microM) nor ergotamine (< or =30 microM) had an effect on the 5-HT reuptake carrier as they did not alter the citalopram-sensitive [3H]5-HT uptake.

Effects of current and prospective antimigraine drugs on the porcine isolated meningeal artery

Vasoconstriction to agonists at serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptors and alpha-adrenoceptors, as well as vasodilatation induced by alpha-CGRP, have been well described in the porcine carotid circulation in vivo. The present study sets out to investigate the effects of current and prospective antimigraine drugs on porcine meningeal artery segments in vitro. Sumatriptan, ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, isometheptene and clonidine failed to contract the meningeal artery, but 5-HT, noradrenaline and phenylephrine induced concentration-dependent contractions. The contractions to 5-HT were competitively antagonized by the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist ketanserin, whilst those to noradrenaline were antagonized by alpha(1)-(prazosin), alpha(2)-(rauwolscine and yohimbine) and alpha(2C/2B)-(OPC-28326) adrenoceptor antagonists. Whilst dobutamine and salbutamol were ineffective, alpha-CGRP produced concentration-dependent relaxations that were antagonized by the CGRP(1) receptor antagonist olcegepant. In agreement with their lack of contractile effect, sumatriptan and ergotamine failed to influence forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in the porcine meningeal artery; in contrast, both compounds decreased forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in the human isolated saphenous vein, where they induced contractions. Finally, using RT-PCR, we could demonstrate the presence of mRNAs encoding for several 5-HT receptors (5-HT(1B), 5-HT(1D), 5-HT(1F), 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(7)) and adrenoceptors (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), alpha(1D), alpha(2A), alpha(2B), alpha(2C), beta(1) and beta(2)), as well as that for the calcitonin receptor like receptor, a component of the CGRP(1) receptor. These results suggest that: (i) the porcine meningeal artery may not be involved in the vasoconstriction of the carotid vascular bed elicited by antimigraine drugs in anaesthetized pigs, and (ii) the mismatch between the presence of receptor mRNA and the lack of response to sumatriptan, dobutamine and salbutamol implies that mRNAs for the 5-HT(1B) receptor and beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors are probably unstable, or that their density is too low for being translated as receptor protein in sufficient quantities.

Rizatriptan in the treatment of migraine

Migraine is a common, disabling disorder associated with considerable personal and societal burden. Current guidelines recommend triptans for the acute treatment of migraine unlikely to respond to less effective therapies. Rizatriptan is a second-generation triptan available in tablet or orally disintegrating tablet (wafer) formulations that offers several advantages over other members of its class. Rizatriptan is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and achieves maximum plasma concentrations more quickly than other triptans, providing rapid pain relief. Clinical trials have shown that rizatriptan is at least as effective or superior to other oral migraine-specific agents in the acute treatment of migraine, and has more consistent long-term efficacy across multiple migraine attacks. Rizatriptan has a favorable tolerability profile, and patients have reported greater satisfaction and a preference for rizatriptan over other migraine-specific agents. Improvements in quality of life reported with rizatriptan are consistent with its favorable efficacy and tolerability profiles. Notably, multi-attribute decision models that combine clinical data with patient- and physician-reported treatment preferences have identified rizatriptan as one of three triptans closest to a hypothetical "ideal". The efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine have thus been well established.

5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in the human cardiovascular system

The human cardiovascular system is exposed to plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), usually released from platelets. 5-HT can produce harmful acute and chronic effects. The acute cardiac effects of 5-HT consist of tachycardia (preceded on occasion by a brief reflex bradycardia), increased atrial contractility and production of atrial arrhythmias. Acute inotropic, lusitropic and arrhythmic effects of 5-HT on human ventricle become conspicuous after inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity. Human cardiostimulation is mediated through 5-HT4 receptors. Atrial and ventricular PDE3 activity exerts a protective role against potentially harmful cardiostimulation. Chronic exposure to high levels of 5-HT (from metastatic carcinoid tumours), the anorectic drug fenfluramine and its metabolites, as well as the ecstasy drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its metabolite 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) are associated with proliferative disease and thickening of cardiac valves, mediated through 5-HT2B receptors. 5-HT2B receptors have an obligatory physiological role in murine cardiac embryology but whether this happens in humans requires research. Congenital heart block (CHB) is, on occasion, associated with autoantibodies against 5-HT4 receptors. Acute vascular constriction by 5-HT is usually shared by 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors, except in intracranial arteries which constrict only through 5-HT1B receptors. Both 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors can mediate coronary artery spasm but only 5-HT1B receptors appear involved in coronary spasm of patients treated with triptans or with Prinzmetal angina. 5-HT2A receptors constrict the portal venous system including oesophageal collaterals in cirrhosis. Chronic exposure to 5-HT can contribute to pulmonary hypertension through activation of constrictor 5-HT1B receptors and proliferative 5-HT2B receptors, and possibly through direct intracellular effects.

Post-marketing experience with an opioid nasal spray for migraine: lessons for the future

In 1992 a nasal spray formulation of butorphanol, an opioid medication intended for pain relief, was marketed in the USA on an unscheduled basis. Only a few years later, amid widespread reports of abuse and dependence, primarily in migraine patients, its manufacturer voluntarily requested the Food and Drug Administration to reschedule the drug as a Schedule IV narcotic. The events surrounding this episode are reviewed, and four problem areas that might have contributed are identified: (i) inadequate review of previous experience with other formulations of butorphanol; (ii) failure to consider the impact of disease state and drug formulation on the risk of adverse events; (iii) the limited scope of clinical trials prior to approval; and (iv) aggressive marketing efforts. The implications of these lessons for future drug development and post-marketing surveillance in the migraine field are considered.

Characterisation of CGRP receptors in the human isolated middle meningeal artery

Although the understanding of migraine pathophysiology is still incomplete, there seems to be little doubt that dilatation of cranial blood vessels, including meningeal arteries, is involved in the headache phase of migraine. Since calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been implicated in this vasodilatation, the present study set out to compare the relaxant effects of the endogenous ligand h-alphaCGRP, and [ethylamide-Cys(2,7)]h-alphaCGRP ([Cys(Et)(2,7)]h-alphaCGRP), a CGRP(2) receptor agonist, on human isolated middle meningeal artery segments, precontracted with KCl. Classical Schild plot analysis was used to characterise the receptor population in this artery using BIBN4096BS and h-alphaCGRP(8-37) as antagonists. h-alphaCGRP relaxed arterial segments more potently than [Cys(Et)(2,7)]h-alphaCGRP (pEC(50): 8.51+/-0.16 and 7.48+/-0.24, respectively), while the maximal responses to these agonists were not significantly different. BIBN4096BS equipotently blocked the relaxations induced by both agonists with a pA(2) of approximately 10 and with a Schild plot slope not significantly different from unity. h-alphaCGRP(8-37) also antagonised the response to h-alphaCGRP with a pA(2) of 6.46+/-0.16 and a Schild plot slope not different from unity. Furthermore, the results obtained from RT-PCR studies confirmed the presence of all the essential components required for a functional CGRP(1) receptor in these arteries. Considering the high antagonist potency of BIBN4096BS, coupled to the lower agonist potency of [Cys (Et)(2,7)]h-alphaCGRP, it is reasonable to suggest a predominant role of CGRP(1) receptors in the human middle meningeal artery. This view is reinforced by Schild plot analysis, which revealed a slope of unity in all experiments, giving further evidence for a homogeneous CGRP receptor population in this vascular preparation.

Triptan-induced contractile (5-HT1B receptor) responses in human cerebral and coronary arteries: relationship to clinical effect

Triptans are agonists at 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D (where 5-HT is 5-hydroxytryptamine; serotonin) receptors and cause vasoconstriction of isolated blood vessels. The aim of the present study was to determine vasoconstrictor potency (EC50) of triptans in human coronary and cerebral arteries and to examine whether there was any relationship with the maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax; nM) of the drugs achieved following oral administration of clinically relevant doses to man using values reported in the literature. We also examined the expression of 5-HT1B receptors in atherosclerotic and normal coronary arteries. The vasocontractile responses to sumatriptan, rizatriptan or eletriptan were characterized by in vitro pharmacology. The ratio of Cmax/EC50 was calculated. 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors were visualized by immunohistochemical techniques in coronary arteries. Sumatriptan, rizatriptan and eletriptan were powerful vasoconstrictors in cerebral artery. The rank order of agonist potency was eletriptan=rizatriptan=sumatriptan. In the coronary artery, the triptans were weaker vasoconstrictors. The rank order of potency was similar. In cerebral artery the ratio of Cmax/EC50 was not significantly different from unity, indicating a relationship between these two parameters. In general for the coronary artery, the ratios were significantly less than unity, indicating no direct relationship. Immunohistochemistry showed expression of 5-HT1B receptors in the medial layer, but did not reveal any obvious difference in 5-HT1B receptor expression between normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries. The results support the notion that triptans are selective vasoconstrictors of cerebral arteries over coronary arteries and that there is a relationship between vasoconstrictor potency in cerebral arteries and clinically relevant plasma levels.

Triptans induce vasoconstriction of human arteries and veins from the thoracic wall

A common side effect of migraine treatment with triptans is chest symptoms. The origin of these symptoms is not known. The aim of the present study was to examine the vasocontractile effect of triptans in human arteries and veins from the thoracic wall and in coronary artery bypass grafts. In vitro pharmacology experiments showed that the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) type 1B and 1D receptor agonists, eletriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan, induced vasoconstriction in the thoracic blood vessels from 38% to 57% of the patients. 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) and sumatriptan elicited a vasoconstriction that was antagonized by the 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289, whereas the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL115572 had no effect. 5-HT induced a contraction that was inhibited by the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist ketanserin. 5-HT2A, 5-HT1B, and 5-HT1D receptor mRNA levels were detected by real-time PCR in all blood vessels studied. In conclusion, triptans induce vasoconstriction in arteries and veins from the thoracic wall, most likely by activation of 5-HT1B receptors. This response could be observed in only 38% to 57% of the patients, which may provide an explanation for why a similar number of patients experience chest symptoms as a side effect of migraine treatment with triptans.

Multiple attack study on the available triptans in Italy versus placebo

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the five triptans that are commercially available in Italy (zolmitriptan 2.5 mg, rizatriptan 10 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, almotriptan 12.5 mg and eletriptan 40 mg). The study was conducted in single-blind versus placebo and its duration was 18 months. At the Headache Centre of the 'Agostino Gemelli' Hospital in Rome we selected 42 patients, suffering from headache with and without aura (International Headache Society Committee on Headache Classification, 1988 Cephalalgia 8:1-96), whose headache frequency ranged between 1- and 4-monthly crises. For a total of 25 crises, for every five consecutive crises, a different triptan was taken. The end-points of the study were as follows: response at 2 h, 'pain free' at 2 h and 'sustained pain free' (at 24 h). The intra-patient consistency and the tolerability were also evaluated. Thirty patients completed the study and the statistical analysis was only applied to these patients. No substantial difference in terms of the efficacy of the triptans was noted; all triptans were well tolerated. These results suggest the possibility of testing different triptans in the same patient in order to identify the ideal drug for every patient.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide and its role in migraine pathophysiology

Migraine is a common neurological disorder that is associated with an increase in plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) levels. CGRP, a neuropeptide released from activated trigeminal sensory nerves, dilates intracranial blood vessels and transmits vascular nociception. Therefore, it is propounded that: (i) CGRP may have an important role in migraine pathophysiology, and (ii) inhibition of trigeminal CGRP release or CGRP-induced cranial vasodilatation may abort migraine. In this regard, triptans ameliorate migraine headache primarily by constricting the dilated cranial blood vessels and by inhibiting the trigeminal CGRP release. In order to explore the potential role of CGRP in migraine pathophysiology, the advent of a selective CGRP receptor antagonist was obligatory. The introduction of di-peptide CGRP receptor antagonists, namely BIBN4096BS (1-piperidinecarboxamide, N-[2-[[5-amino-1-[[4-(4-pyridinyl)-1-piperazinyl]carbonyl] pentyl] amino]-1-[(3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxyphenyl) methyl]-2-oxoethyl]-4-(1,4-dihydro-2-oxo-3(2H)-quinazolinyl)-, [R-(R*,S*)]-), is a breakthrough in CGRP receptor pharmacology and can be used as a tool to investigate the role of CGRP in migraine headaches. Preclinical investigations in established migraine models that are predictive of antimigraine activity have shown that BIBN4096BS is a potent CGRP receptor antagonist and that it has antimigraine potential. Indeed, a recently published clinical study has reported that BIBN409BS is effective in treating acute migraine attacks without significant side effects. The present review will discuss mainly the potential role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and the various treatment modalities that are currently available to target this neuropeptide.

Evaluating the safety and tolerability profile of acute treatments for migraine

Among the medications that have been used as acute treatments for migraine are nonspecific agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics (either single or combination), and narcotics, as well as migraine-specific medications, including ergot alkaloids and triptans (5-hydroxytryptamine 1B/1D agonists). All of these drugs have side effects that vary in type and severity. Side effects of nonspecific medications, including gastrointestinal (GI) and renal effects with NSAIDs and cognitive effects and the potential for abuse with narcotics and butalbital-containing medications, have been documented over time, as these medications have been used for various indications. Side effects of the migraine-specific medications include GI and vascular symptoms with the ergots; for the triptans, they include chest and neurologic symptoms. Although adverse events are reported fairly frequently in patients receiving triptans, they are usually mild, and few patients discontinue therapy because of them. The most serious adverse events are cardiovascular. Because of potential vasoconstrictor effects--mild and transient increases in blood pressure and mild and transient effects on coronary artery tone--triptans as a class are contraindicated in patients with established or clinically suspected cardiovascular disease, specifically ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension. Other adverse events, including the potential for drug-drug interactions, are less common. Therefore, consideration should be given to the tolerability and safety of medications before their use as abortive medications for the treatment of migraine headache.

Rizatriptan: a new 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist for the treatment of migraine

Rizatriptan (MAXALT MK-0462) is a new 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine. The marketed 10 mg and 5 mg oral doses are rapidly and consistently effective in relieving headache pain with associated migraine symptoms, and in enabling patients to return to their normal activities of daily living. Rizatriptan 10 mg is more effective than rizatriptan 5 mg. Compared to oral sumatriptan, the established agent in this class, rizatriptan has a shorter Tmax and greater bioavailability. In comparative clinical trials, the probability of having pain relief sooner was higher for rizatriptan 10 mg than for sumatriptan 100 mg or 50 mg. Over the 2 h after dosing, rizatriptan 10 mg was also superior to sumatriptan 100 mg and 50 mg on a range of other outcome measures. Both doses of rizatriptan are well-tolerated. The most common side-effects are dizziness, drowsiness, and asthenia/fatigue, which are short-lasting and of mild or moderate severity. In summary, rizatriptan is an effective and well-tolerated acute treatment for migraine, which may offer some advantages over oral sumatriptan.

Naratriptan: a review

Even though naratriptan and sumatriptan are both 5-HT1B/5-HT1D receptor agonists, the biological and pharmacokinetic profile of naratriptan differs significantly from that of sumatriptan. With a plasma half-life of 6 h, very high oral bioavailability of 63-74% and higher lipophilicity than sumatriptan, naratriptan exhibits a distinct clinical therapeutic profile. The similar tolerability to placebo, prolonged efficacy for 24 h or more and very low headache recurrence rate make naratriptan an attractive option in the treatment of acute migraine.

Assessment of anti-migraine potential of a novel alpha-adrenoceptor agonist S19014: effects on porcine carotid and regional haemodynamics and human coronary artery

Taking into account the drawbacks associated with the use of triptans, attempts are being made to explore other avenues for the treatment of migraine. Recently, it has been shown that both alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors mediate the constriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses, which has effectively served as an experimental model predictive of anti-migraine activity. The present study investigated the effects of a novel alpha-adrenoceptor agonist S19014 (spiro[(1,3-diazacyclopent-1-ene)-5 : 2'-(4',5'-dimethylindane)] fumarate) on carotid and systemic haemodynamics in anaesthetized pigs, and on human isolated coronary arteries. Increasing doses of S19014 (1-30 micro g/kg, i.v.) produced a dose-dependent initial short-lasting vasopressor response and a decrease of total carotid blood flow and conductance. The carotid blood flow and conductance changes were exclusively due to constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses (capillary blood flow increased) and were accompanied by an increase in arterio-jugular venous oxygen saturation difference. Whereas prazosin (100 micro g/kg, i.v.) was ineffective, rauwolscine (300 micro g/kg, i.v.) attenuated the responses to S19014. The compound did not much affect the distribution of cardiac output to peripheral organs when compared with the vehicle group. Furthermore, S19014 only slightly contracted the human isolated coronary artery and its contractions, contrary to those of sumatriptan, were not increased in blood vessels pre-contracted with U46619. These results suggest that (i) the systemic and carotid vascular effects of S19014 are mainly mediated by alpha2-adrenoceptors, and (ii) S19014 could be effective in the treatment of migraine with an improved cardiovascular tolerance.

Preclinical neuropharmacology of naratriptan

The basic CNS neuropharmacology of naratriptan is reviewed here. Naratriptan is a second-generation triptan antimigraine drug, developed at a time when CNS activity was thought not to be relevant to its therapeutic effect in migraine. It was, however, developed to be a more lipid-soluble, more readily absorbed and less readily metabolized variant on preexisting triptans and these variations conferred on it a higher CNS profile. Naratriptan is a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with a highly selective action on migraine pain and nausea, without significant effect on other pain or even other trigeminal pain. Probable sites of therapeutic action of naratriptan include any or all of: the cranial vasculature; the peripheral terminations of trigeminovascular sensory nerves; the first-order synapses of the trigeminovascular sensory system; the descending pain control system; and the nuclei of the thalamus. Naratriptan may prevent painful dilatation of intracranial vessels or reverse such painful dilatation. Naratriptan can prevent the release of sensory peptides and inhibit painful neurogenic vasodilatation of intracranial blood vessels. At the first order synapse of the trigeminal sensory system, naratriptan can selectively suppress neurotransmission from sensory fibers from dural and vascular tissue, while sparing transmission from other trigeminal fibers, probably through inhibition of neuropeptide transmitter release. In the periaqueductal gray matter and in the nucleus raphe magnus, naratriptan selectively activates inhibitory neurons which project to the trigeminal nucleus and spinal cord and which exert inhibitory influences on trigeminovascular sensory input. Naratriptan has also a therapeutic effect on the nausea of migraine, possibly exerting its action at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarius via the same mechanisms by which it inhibits trigeminovascular nociceptive input. The incidence of naratriptan-induced adverse effects in the CNS is low and it is not an analgesic for pain other than that of vascular headache. In patients receiving selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) naratriptan may cause serotonin syndrome-like behavioral side effects. The mechanism of action involved in the production of behavioral and other CNS side effects of naratriptan is unknown.

Severe vascular events in migraine patients

OBJECTIVE

To estimate rates of vascular events in relation to dispensing of triptans and ergot alkaloids among migraineurs, and to compare these rates with those of nonmigraineurs.

CONTEXT

It has been speculated that the use of triptans or ergot alkaloid drugs might increase risk of ischemic events through vasoconstriction.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of 130,411 migraineurs and 130,411 age-, sex-, and health plan-matched nonmigraineurs who were members of UnitedHealthcare during 1995 through 1999. The data source for this study was Ingenix's research database containing pharmacy and medical claims for UnitedHealthcare members, and the National Death Index.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and mortality.

RESULTS

Migraineurs and nonmigraineurs had identical rates of myocardial infarction: 1.4 per 1000 person-years. Migraineurs were 67% more likely to suffer a stroke than nonmigraineurs (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.13), and had higher rates of unstable angina and transient ischemic attacks. There was no increase in risk of myocardial infarction with current (adjusted RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.11) or recent (adjusted RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.71-1.87) triptan use. Neither current (adjusted RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64-1.26) nor recent (adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.46-1.55) triptan use was associated with risk of stroke. Current users of ergot alkaloids were somewhat more likely to have a stroke than other migraineurs (adjusted RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.93-2.41), but there was no dose-response relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of triptans is not associated with increased risk of any ischemic events, including myocardial infarction and stroke, or mortality. Consistent with previous studies, migraineurs in general have an elevated risk of stroke, but not myocardial infarction, compared with nonmigraineurs.

Tegaserod-induced myocardial infarction: case report and hypothesis

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT])1 receptor agonists, such as those used for treating migraine, can cause coronary artery contraction, coronary spasm, and even myocardial infarction. Tegaserod maleate is a relatively new 5-HT4 receptor agonist with moderate affinity for the 5-HT1 receptor. Currently, it is approved only for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in women who have constipation as the primary symptom. However, it is also being administered as a promotility agent in patients with gastroparesis. Since tegaserod has affinity for the 5-HT1 receptor, it is plausible that tegaserod could cause the same types of cardiovascular adverse events seen with agents prescribed for management of migraine. We report the first case of a man who experienced a myocardial infarction after receiving only two 6-mg doses of tegaserod; we also provide a hypothesis regarding this event. When considering prescribing a drug with 5-HT1 receptor agonist activity, clinicians should review the patient's medical history specifically for the presence of underlying cardiovascular risk factors.

Frovatriptan succinate, a 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist for migraine

Frovatriptan succinate is one of the most recent serotonin receptor agonists to receive FDA, approved labelling for use in the acute management of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mechanism of action of frovatriptan is thought to be similar to that of a serotonin agonist. However, frovatriptan has distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacologic properties, chiefly, a high affinity for serotonin receptors 1B and 1D and a long elimination half-life; frovatriptan was shown to be more selective for cerebral than coronary arteries, a property which makes frovatriptan more favourable in patients at risk of coronary artery disease. Additionally, frovatriptan has a half-life of approximately 25 h, substantially longer than that of any other agent within its class. This property makes frovatriptan suitable for patients who typically suffer migraines of long duration and/or those who suffer migraine recurrence. The efficacy of frovatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine was demonstrated in five double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. At 2h, headache response rates for frovatriptan 2.5 mg ranged from 38 to 40% compared to 22-35% for placebo. Headache recurrence for frovatriptan 2.5 mg at 24h ranged from 9 to 14% compared with 18% in placebo subjects. Frovatriptan has no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with drugs used for migraine prophylaxis or with commonly prescribed medications. Adverse effects of frovatriptan including dizziness, paresthesia, dry mouth, fatigue and flushing were generally mild and well tolerated. Given the fact that patient response to serotonin agonists is individualised, and selecting an effective agent may involve trial and error, frovatriptan is a welcome alternative in the acute management of migraine.

Reduction in the therapeutic intensity of abortive migraine drug use during ACE inhibition therapy--a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Since a few case reports have demonstrated some beneficial effects of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in migraine prevention, we were interested in studying the impact of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (Ang II) on the consumption of specific abortive migraine drugs and, therefore, indirectly on the frequency of migraine attacks.

METHODS

Data from a large prescription database involving 95 patients initiating a specific abortive migraine drug (ergotamine or a triptan) and subsequently treated with either an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor antagonist (index group: ACE/Ang II) or diuretic (reference group) were analysed. The effects of ACE/Ang II inhibition as well as diuretic therapy on reducing the frequency of migraine attacks were assessed by measuring the mean consumption of abortive migraine drug use, in DDDs per month ('therapeutic intensity'), before, during and after ACE/Ang II or diuretic therapy. A 'therapeutic fluctuation intensity estimate' of abortive migraine drug use for all patients was likewise calculated.

RESULTS

On an individual level, the therapeutic intensity (TI) fluctuation estimate, 'during' relative to 'before' ACE diuretic therapy, was significantly larger for the ACE/Ang II group (62% reduction) than for the diuretic group (24% reduction) (p = 0.02). For patients who continued abortive migraine drug use during and after ACE/Ang II or diuretic therapy, a significantly larger reduction in this estimate was observed during ACE/Ang II inhibition (68.9%) compared to during diuretic therapy (10.5% increase) (p = 0.004). The TI fluctuation estimate, after relative to 'during', had increased by 50.3% after ACE/Ang II inhibition and had reduced by 22.2% after diuretic treatment (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

A clear reduction in the TI of abortive migraine drug use during the use of ACE inhibitors as compared to diuretic treatment was observed. Our findings may indirectly support a positive effect of ACE/Ang II inhibition on the frequency and severity of migraine attacks, as observed in other studies and reports.

Consensus Statement: Cardiovascular Safety Profile of Triptans (5-HT1B/1D Agonists) in the Acute Treatment of Migraine

BACKGROUND

Health care providers frequently cite concerns about cardiovascular safety of the triptans as a barrier to their use. In 2002, the American Headache Society convened the Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel to evaluate the evidence on triptan-associated cardiovascular risk and to formulate consensus recommendations for making informed decisions for their use in patients with migraine.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the evidence reviewed by the Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel and their recommendations for the use of triptans in clinical practice.

PARTICIPANTS

The Triptan Cardiovascular Safety Expert Panel was composed of a multidisciplinary group of experts in neurology, primary care, cardiology, pharmacology, women's health, and epidemiology.

EVIDENCE AND CONSENSUS PROCESS

An exhaustive search of the relevant published literature was reviewed by each panel member in preparation for an open roundtable meeting. Pertinent issues (eg, cardiovascular pharmacology of triptans, epidemiology of cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk assessment, migraine) were presented as a prelude to group discussion and formulation of consensus conclusions and recommendations. Follow-up meetings were held by telephone.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Most of the data on triptans are derived from patients without known coronary artery disease. (2) Chest symptoms occurring during use of triptans are generally nonserious and are not explained by ischemia. (3) The incidence of serious cardiovascular events with triptans in both clinical trials and clinical practice appears to be extremely low. (4) The cardiovascular risk-benefit profile of triptans favors their use in the absence of contraindications.

Triptan use preceding life-threatening arrhythmias in charcot-marie-tooth: a case report and review of the literature

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) identifies a rare group of inherited disorders of the peripheral nervous system that share clinical features of sensory and motor defects, but rarely affect cardiac function. The few references that relate CMT to cardiac pathology of any sort are so rare that their finding was considered either fortuitous or suggestive of an erroneous diagnosis. The 5-HT1B/1D agonists or triptan drug class was introduced to the clinical practice arena in the early 1990s, and since then several cardiac adverse events have been associated with its use. The authors report the case of a 41-year-old white woman with CMT who had been recently prescribed sumatriptan and who presented with sudden loss of consciousness associated with ventricular fibrillation. These findings have been reported in the literature, but the association of triptan-induced arrhythmias and degenerative neuropathies remains to be established. The authors propose, through this case report and review, that the relative rarity of CMT coupled with the lack of further investigation of their association with conduction abnormalities might have set the stage for underestimation of the potentially synergistic effect with triptans in their capacity to generate life-threatening arrhythmias.

3-(2-Pyrrolidin-1-ylethyl)-5-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole derivatives as high affinity human 5-HT1B/1D ligands

A series of 3-(2-pyrrolidin-1-ylethyl)-5-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole derivatives (2) has been prepared using parallel synthesis techniques, and their structure-activity relationships studied. High affinity human 5-HT(1B/1D) (h5-HT(1B/1D)) ligands have been identified.

5-Hydroxytryptamine1B receptor-mediated contraction of rabbit saphenous vein and basilar artery: role of vascular endothelium

This study characterizes the sumatriptan-sensitive [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1B/1D)] receptor in rabbit saphenous vein and basilar artery. (S)-(-)-1-[2-[4-(4-Methoxy-phenyl)-piperazin-1-yl]-ethyl]isochroman-6-carboxylic acid methylamide (PNU-109291), a 5-HT(1D) subtype-selective agonist (human K(i) = 2.5 +/- 0.07 nM), did not contract either tissue, whereas o-methoxyphenylpiperazide derivative 4F (MPPA-4F), a 5-HT(1B) subtype-selective antagonist (human K(i) = 4.6 +/- 0.6 nM) potently inhibited sumatriptan-induced contraction in the saphenous vein and basilar artery. These results suggested that sumatriptan-induced contraction was mediated via the 5-HT(1B) receptor in these blood vessels. 5-HT(1B) receptor-mediated contraction was then compared in endothelium-intact and denuded vessels to evaluate the role of the endothelium in regulating sumatriptan-induced contractility in these tissues. The presence of an intact endothelium inhibited 5-HT(1B)-induced contraction in both tissues. Endothelial denudation or nitric-oxide synthase inhibition with N(omega) nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (100 microM) increased the efficacy and potency of sumatriptan in the saphenous vein and basilar artery. Surprisingly, in endothelial-denuded vascular tissues, L-NAME (100 microM) also significantly increased the maximal 5-HT(1B) receptor-induced contraction in both tissues, with no effect on potency of sumatriptan. The effect of L-NAME after endothelial denudation may reflect the presence of a low density of residual endothelial cells as estimated by CD31 antibody staining combined with the modulating effect of nitric oxide released from nonendothelial cells in vascular tissue. Endothelial modulation was specific to 5-HT(1B) receptors because removal of the endothelium did not significantly alter contraction to norepinephrine, histamine, prostaglandin, or potassium chloride in the saphenous vein or basilar artery.

( R )-3-( N -Methylpyrrolidin-2-ylmethyl)-5-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole derivatives as high affinity h5-HT 1B/1D ligands

A series of (R)-3-(N-methylpyrrolidin-2-ylmethyl)-5-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)-1H-indole derivatives (2) have been prepared using parallel synthesis, and their structure-activity relationship studied. High affinity human 5-HT(1B/1D) (h5-HT(1B/1D)) ligands have been identified.

Possible role of alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes in acute migraine therapy

Even though the underlying mechanisms for the pathophysiology of migraine attacks are not completely understood, little doubt exists that the headache phase is explained by dilatation of cranial, extracerebral blood vessels. In this context, experimental models predictive for anti-migraine activity have shown that both triptans and ergot alkaloids, which abort migraine headache, produce vasoconstriction within the carotid circulation of different species. In contrast to the well-established role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT1B receptors in the common carotid vascular bed, the role of alpha-adrenoceptors and their subtypes has been examined only relatively recently. Using experimental animal models and alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists (phenylephrine and BHT933, respectively) and antagonists (prazosin and rauwolscine, respectively), it was shown that activation of either receptor produces a cranioselective vasoconstriction. Subsequently, investigations employing relatively selective antagonists at alpha1- (alpha1A, alpha1B, alpha1D) and alpha2- (alpha2A, alpha2B, alpha2C) adrenoceptor subtypes revealed that specific receptors mediate the carotid haemodynamic responses in these animals. From these observations, together with the potential limited role of alpha1B- and alpha2C-adrenoceptors in the regulation of systemic haemodynamic responses, it is suggested that selective agonists at these receptors may provide a promising novel avenue for the development of acute anti-migraine drugs.

Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications

The triptans represent a relatively new class of compounds effective in the treatment of migraine. The safety and tolerability of these drugs have been extensively investigated since the first triptan (sumatriptan) became commercially available. A report on a very large population of patients tested during clinical trials and in postmarketing studies, confirms that these drugs are safe and well tolerated when correctly used. Adverse events are frequently reported, but are usually mild and only a few patients discontinue therapy because of them. These adverse events include, in particular, the so-called 'triptan symptoms' (tingling, sensation of warmth, etc.). The exact mechanism of chest symptoms reported by 20% of patients with migraine treated with triptans remains unclear, but are exceptionally related to a cardiac mechanism. CNS adverse events (i.e. somnolence) are also reported, but it is a matter of debate whether they are related to the pharmacological properties (i.e. lipophilicity) of the drug or are symptoms of the disease itself. The potential risk for drug overuse must be taken into account when the triptans are given to patients with a high frequency of migraine attacks. Clinical interaction of triptans with other drugs metabolised in the liver may theoretically influence the incidence of adverse events, but there is little evidence to support this assumption. There is no evidence of a teratogenic risk of triptans in pregnant women taking these drugs.

Safety profile of the triptans

The triptans are 5-HT(1B/1D) agonists used as migraine and cluster-specific agents. Seven are in commercial use worldwide; in order of release these are sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan, frovatriptan and eletriptan. Sumatriptan has been in clinical use since 1991, and although postmarketing studies have stimulated much debate of triptan strengths and weaknesses, their overall safety profile appears excellent. The most serious adverse events are cardiovascular, due to coronary artery narrowing as a consequence of coronary artery 5-HT(1B) receptor activity. Triptans are contraindicated in patients with vascular disease. Other events are even more rare, and include the potential for drug-drug interactions, based on metabolic elimination pathways. Serotonin syndrome has been a concern, but one large prospective study failed to document a single case, and reports are sporadic and not clearly causative.

Migraine preventive medication reduces resource utilization

OBJECTIVE

To determine if long-term resource utilization is reduced by adding a preventive medication to a migraine management regimen that already includes acute medication.

BACKGROUND

In 2000, new evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of migraine were released by the US Headache Consortium and the American Academy of Neurology. Although these guidelines emphasize the role of preventive medication in achieving significant clinical improvement, little yet is known concerning the impact of such management on medical and pharmaceutical resources. Methods.-Resource utilization information in a large claims database was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Adding a preventive medication to migraine management reduced the use of other migraine medications, as well as visits to physician offices and emergency departments. In addition, both acute and preventive medications were associated with lower utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans.

CONCLUSION

Migraine preventive drug therapy is effective in reducing resource consumption when added to therapy consisting only of an acute medication.

Amplification of sumatriptan-induced contraction in rabbit saphenous vein but not in basilar artery

The modulation of serotonin (5-HT(1B/1D)) receptor-induced vascular contractility by histamine and U-46619 was compared in the rabbit basilar artery and saphenous vein. In the saphenous vein, histamine (5 x 10(-7) M) significantly increased the potency (from pEC(50) of 6.0 to 6.8) and efficacy (from 52.3% to 88.2%) of sumatriptan. Likewise, U-46619 (5 x 10(-9) M) also increased the potency (from pEC(50) of 5.9 to 6.6) and efficacy (from 51.8% to 92.1%) of sumatriptan in the saphenous vein. In contrast, equieffective concentrations of histamine (10(-7) M) and U-46619 (3 x 10(-9) M) failed to amplify contraction to sumatriptan in the basilar artery. Contraction to sumatriptan was inhibited by nitrendipine (10(-7) M) in the basilar artery but not in the saphenous vein, suggesting that different contractile signaling mechanisms are operating in these tissues. Furthermore, U-46619- and thrombin-induced contractility in the basilar artery were also not amplified by histamine, suggesting that lack of amplification of contraction in the basilar artery was not restricted to sumatriptan but was rather a characteristic of this cerebral vessel. These data suggest that in the in vivo plasma milieu sumatriptan will more markedly contract the peripheral saphenous vein than the basilar artery, a cerebral blood vessel.

Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine: history, pharmacology, and efficacy

Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine share structural similarities with the adrenergic, dopaminergic, and serotonergic neurotransmitters. As a result, they have wide-ranging effects on the physiologic processes that they mediate. Ergotamine and dihydroergotamine are highly potent at the 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D antimigraine receptors and, as a consequence, the plasma concentrations that are necessary to produce the appropriate therapeutic and physiologic effects are very low. The broad spectrum of activity at other monoamine receptors is responsible for their side effect profile (dysphoria, nausea, emesis, unnecessary vascular effects). Both ergotamine and dihydroergotamine have sustained vasoconstrictor actions. In acute migraine treatment, their mechanisms of action involve constricting the pain-producing intracranial extracerebral blood vessels at the 5-HT1B receptors and inhibiting the trigeminal neurotransmission at the peripheral and central 5-HT1D receptors. The scientific evidence for efficacy is stronger for dihydroergotamine than for ergotamine. Their wide use is based on long-term experience.