Phase III, randomized, double-blind study of epoetin alfa compared with placebo in anemic patients receiving chemotherapy

Analysis and interpretation of results based on patient-reported outcomes

This article is part of a series of manuscripts dealing with the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into clinical trials. The issues dealt with in this manuscript concern the common pitfalls to avoid in statistical analysis and interpretation of PROs. Specifically, the questions addressed by this manuscript involve the analysis pitfalls with PRO data in clinical trials and how can they be avoided (e.g.,missing data, multiplicity, null results etc.). The manuscript provides key literature for existing resources and proposes new guidelines.

Stimulating erythropoiesis in inflammatory bowel disease associated anemia

Anemia is a frequent complication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and is associated with decreased quality of life and increased rate of hospitalization. The primary therapeutic targets of IBD-associated anemia are iron deficiency and anemia of chronic disease. An important prognostic parameter of the success or failure of therapy is the outcome of the underlying disease. Iron deficiency should be appropriately managed with iron supplementation. However, the use of oral iron therapy is limited by several problems, the most important being gastrointestinal side effects leading occasionally to disease relapse and poor iron absorption. Intravenous iron preparations are more reliable, with iron sucrose demonstrating the best efficacy and tolerability. Treatment with erythropoietin or darbepoetin has been proven to be effective in patients with anemia, who fail to respond to intravenous iron. Patients with ongoing inflammation have anemia of chronic disease and may require combination therapy comprising of intravenous iron sucrose and erythropoietin. After initiating treatment, careful monitoring of hemoglobin levels and iron parameters is needed in order to avoid recurrence of anemia. In conclusion, anemia in the setting of IBD should be aggressively diagnosed, investigated, and treated. Future studies should define the optimal dose and schedule of intravenous iron supplementation and appropriate erythropoietin therapy in these patients.

Possible links between behavioral and physiological indices of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion in advanced cancer

GOALS

In this theoretical paper, we present the Edmonton Fatigue Framework (EFF), a new framework for the study of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion in advanced cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Fatigue Adaptation Model (FAM), the starting point for the EFF, was drawn from a literature review pertaining to fatigue in depression, chronic fatigue syndrome, cancer, shift workers, and athletes published in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PubMed, PsychINFO, SPORTdiscus, and CancerLit between 1995 and 2004, and from seven qualitative studies conducted by our group. The EFF, an elaboration of the FAM, was constructed after an expansion of our literature review to 2006 and team discussion. The EFF provides new insights into possible links between behavioral and physiological indices of tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion as they occur in both ill and non-ill states. In this paper, however, we consider only possible links in advanced cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that stressors associated with advanced cancer and its supportive treatment trigger declines in four systems -- cognitive function, sleep quality, nutrition, and muscle endurance -- and that these declines reduce one's ability to adapt. While these systems each likely has its own effect on adaptation, we propose that the most important and serious effects arise from interactions among declines in cognitive function, sleep quality, nutrition, and muscle endurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions for fatigue have been limited by a lack of understanding about its etiology. Hypotheses arising from the EFF; suggest a new direction for further study that focuses on interactions among cognitive function, sleep quality, nutrition, and muscle endurance.

Selective modulation of the erythropoietic and tissue-protective effects of erythropoietin: time to reach the full therapeutic potential of erythropoietin

Erythropoietin (EPO) has been used clinically both as an erythropoietic stimulating agent in the treatment of anemia and as a tissue-protective agent in diverse clinical settings including stroke, multiple sclerosis, acute myocardial infarction and others. However, use of EPO or EPO-analogues leads to simultaneous targeting of both the erythropoietic and tissue-protective properties of EPO, and this strategy has been associated with several problems. Specifically, the benefit of correction of cancer-related anemia can be offset by the tissue-protective effects of EPO, which may lead to stimulation of cancer cell proliferation. Conversely, the benefit of tissue-protection in patients with stroke or myocardial infarction can be offset by adverse effects associated with the erythropoietic effects of EPO such as elevation of red blood cell mass, hypertension and prothrombotic phenomena. The finding that the erythropoietic and tissue-protective properties of EPO are conferred via two distinct receptor systems raises the interesting possibility of discovering novel drugs that selectively stimulate either the erythropoietic or the tissue-protective activities of EPO. This article reviews the current status of the clinical use of EPO and EPO-analogues in the treatment of cancer-related anemia and for tissue protection, outlines the distinct molecular biology of the tissue-protective and erythropoietic effects of EPO and discusses strategies of selective targeting of these activities with the goal of exploiting the full therapeutic potential of EPO.

A randomized trial comparing immediate versus delayed treatment of anemia with once-weekly epoetin alfa in patients with non-small cell lung cancer scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the safety/efficacy of once-weekly (QW) epoetin alfa measured by quality of life (QOL), hemoglobin (Hb), transfusion incidence, tumor response, and survival in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients with Hb > or = 11 to < 15 g/dl scheduled for at least 8 weeks of first-line chemotherapy were randomized to subcutaneously receive 40,000 U of epoetin alfa QW at chemotherapy initiation (immediate) or no epoetin alfa unless Hb decreased to < or = 10 g/dl (delayed). The primary efficacy variable was change in QOL for immediate versus delayed intervention. Target accrual was 320 patients.

RESULTS

The study was terminated early because of slow accrual; of 216 patients enrolled, 211 were evaluable for efficacy. Hb was maintained in the immediate group, but it decreased in the delayed group (12.9 versus 11.6 g/dl final values, respectively). Numerically, fewer immediate patients required transfusions versus delayed patients. Mean QOL scores, modestly declining in both groups from baseline to final measurement, were not significantly different between groups. Tumor response and median overall survival were similar between groups. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated, with a similar thrombovascular event rate between groups.

CONCLUSION

Epoetin alfa in subcutaneous doses of 40,000 U QW, given immediately at chemotherapy initiation for advanced NSCLC, was well tolerated, and it effectively maintained Hb, leading to a reduced transfusion incidence versus delayed epoetin alfa. Overall QOL scores were higher than typical in this population, decreasing slightly during treatment in both groups. Overall survival was similar between groups, with no evidence of a negative effect by early epoetin alfa intervention.

Correlation between variation in quality of life and change in hemoglobin level after treatment with epoetin alfa 40,000 IU administered once-weekly

INTRODUCTION

Anemia is frequently associated with cancer due to the disease itself and antineoplastic treatments. This open-label, uncontrolled, multi-center study evaluated the effects of once-weekly (qw) epoetin alfa 40,000 IU on hemoglobin (Hb) levels and quality of life (QoL) in anemic patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 522 patients with Hb level < or =12 g/dL received epoetin alfa 40,000 IU qw subcutaneously for 9-20 weeks to reach and maintain Hb range of 12-14 g/dL. QoL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An [anemia sub-scale]) and Cancer Linear Analogue Scale (CLAS) at study entry, after two chemotherapy cycles, and at study end.

RESULTS

Mean baseline Hb was 10.43 g/dL. Hb increases (g/dL) from baseline after 4, 8, 12 weeks and at study end were 1.07, 1.77, 1.92 and 1.71 g/dL, respectively. Response rates (Hb increase > or =1 and > or =2 g/dL during trial) were 81% and 61%, respectively. Mean increases in the FACT-An score from baseline (mean 55.4) were 3.1 after two chemotherapy cycles and 3.3 at study end; mean increases in the CLAS score from baseline (58.4 mm) were 5.9 mm after two chemotherapy cycles and 6.5 mm at study end.

DISCUSSION

The greatest QoL increase was recorded when patients approached Hb level of 12 g/dL, independent of the baseline Hb level. Hb changes from baseline to trial end were related to corresponding changes in the FACT-An score. A positive correlation was also observed in patients with progressive disease. Adverse events were essentially those associated with chemotherapy. Incidence of thrombovascular events (6.7%) did not differ from the expected standard treatment in cancer patients. Epoetin alfa 40,000 IU qw increased Hb levels and improved or preserved QoL.

Therapeutic use of erythropoietin in dermatooncology

Erythropoietin has been successfully used in Europe since 1997 in the treatment of anemia induced by chemotherapy of solid tumors. There is only limited experience with regard to its use when treating dermatologic tumors such as metastatic melanoma. We review here current guidelines on the use of erythropoietin in cancer patients and report on our own melanoma patients treated with erythropoietin for chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythropoietin in non-small-cell lung cancer with disease-related anemia

PURPOSE

Previous trials have suggested a quality-of-life (QOL) improvement for anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoietin, but few used QOL as the primary outcome. We designed a trial to investigate the effects of epoetin alfa therapy on the QOL of anemic patients with advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. The proposed sample size was 300 patients. Eligible patients were required to have NSCLC unsuitable for curative therapy and baseline hemoglobin (Hgb) levels less than 121 g/L. Patients were assigned to 12 weekly injections of subcutaneous epoetin alpha or placebo, targeting Hgb levels between 120 and 140 g/L. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scores between baseline and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Reports of thrombotic events in other epoetin trials prompted an unplanned safety analysis after 70 patients had been randomly assigned (33 to the active arm and 37 to the placebo arm). This revealed a significant difference in the median survival in favor of the patients on the placebo arm of the trial (63 v 129 days; hazard ratio, 1.84; P = .04). The Steering Committee closed the trial. Patient numbers compromised the interpretation of the QOL analysis, but a positive Hgb response was noted with epoetin alfa treatment.

CONCLUSION

An unplanned safety analysis suggested decreased overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with epoetin alfa. Although infrequent, other similar reports highlight the need for ongoing trials evaluating erythropoietin receptor agonists to ensure that overall survival is monitored closely.

Erythropoietic therapy for the treatment of anemia in patients with cancer: a valuable clinical and economic option

BACKGROUND

Healthcare organizations must evaluate the cost effectiveness of the alternative therapies that are available to treat anemia and improve quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer, that is, erythropoietic protein therapy and blood transfusion.

METHODS

Pharmacoeconomic studies that evaluated the cost of not treating anemia or treating with transfusion or erythropoietic protein therapy were reviewed and compared. Studies of individual erythropoietic proteins (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta or darbepoetin alfa) were also assessed. As no prospective trials have compared the erythropoietic proteins, retrospective studies and the results of separate trials were analyzed. The database searched for this review was PubMed (open date to August 2006). Recent conference abstracts were also searched (2003-July 2006).

RESULTS

There is a high cost associated with anemia in cancer patients. Treatment of anemia is likely to lead to increased hemoglobin (Hb) levels and improved QoL as principal outcomes. Therefore, in assessing erythropoietic protein versus transfusion, it is more appropriate to use Hb or QoL as endpoint rather than quality adjusted life year. Studies with the former approach showed that erythropoietic protein therapy is more cost effective than transfusion. Also, its cost effectiveness should be improved with the use of evidence-based guidelines for patient selection and more tailored utilization. Increasing evidence suggests there might be differences among the erythropoietic proteins in terms of response rate, speed of response, and need for dose escalation.

CONCLUSION

Significant costs are incurred when anemia in cancer is not treated. Erythropoietic protein therapy is more cost effective than blood transfusion for the treatment of cancer-related anemia. Transfusion should be reserved for patients with poor responses to erythropoietic protein or for the emergency setting, when rapid improvement in Hb is required.

Preclinical studies of erythropoietin receptor expression in tumour cells: Impact on clinical use of erythropoietic proteins to correct cancer-related anaemia

In vitro and animal model studies have shown erythropoietin receptor (Epo-R) mRNA and/or protein may be present in a range of human tumours and cancer cell lines, and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been reported to have tumour cell growth-modulating effects. Following a review of the literature, we conclude that considerations must be made when interpreting data from the preclinical studies. First, supraphysiological doses of ESAs were usually used. Second, there are no well validated, commercially available antibodies for identifying the presence and functionality of Epo-R at the protein level, either intracellularly or on the cell surface. Data from previous studies that used antibodies only for Epo-R detection must therefore be interpreted with caution. Together with diverging results in the literature, these methodological limitations indicate that findings from preclinical studies must not be over-translated in terms of their clinical relevance to patients with cancer.

Guidelines and Recommendations for the Management of Anaemia in Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies

Patients with lymphoid malignancies frequently require repetitive and intensive anticancer treatments to induce and maintain disease remission. Anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] <12 g/dL) is a common and debilitating problem associated with both the malignancy itself and its treatment burden. Anaemia negatively impacts on all aspects of patient quality of life (QOL) and treatment outcomes and survival, particularly in this disease setting. Widely acknowledged goals of anaemia treatment include Hb correction to approximately 12 g/dL, reduction in transfusion requirements and optimisation of patient QOL. Since the introduction of recombinant human erythropoietic therapy, transfusion (once the only anaemia treatment option available) is now primarily reserved for non-responders or those with severe or life-threatening anaemia. Data from randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, and large, non-randomised, open-label, community-based studies, along with almost 15 years of practical experience, support the assertion that epoetin alfa administered at a dosage of 150-300 U/kg three times weekly or 40,000-60,000U once weekly, both of which are US FDA-approved dose administration schedules, can effectively and safely achieve anaemia treatment goals for the majority of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Data and practical experience collected over the last 5 years on another erythropoietic agent with a slightly longer half-life but lower binding affinity, darbepoetin alfa, show that this agent when administered according to the FDA-approved dose administration schedules (2.25-4.5 microg/kg once weekly or 500microg once every 3 weeks) or according to a commonly-administered dose in clinical practice (3.0-5.0 microg/kg once every 2 weeks) can also effectively and safely correct anaemia, reduce transfusion requirements and improve QOL in many patients with lymphoid malignancies. One comparative head-to-head trial suggested that epoetin alfa might be superior to darbepoetin alfa in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with respect to timing and magnitude of Hb correction, although further study is necessary, especially concerning optimal dose administration. Alternative dose administration schedules, such as epoetin alfa 80,000U every 2 weeks from initiation or 80,000U every 3 weeks following initiation with once weekly administration and darbepoetin alfa 4.5 microg/kg every 3 weeks following initiation with once weekly administration, are being actively investigated with the goal of increased flexibility for patients and healthcare providers. The treatment of anaemia in patients with lymphoid malignancies is an important part of overall disease management, as evidenced by continuous investigation of existing erythropoietic agents and new agents. Although treatment guidelines issued by organisations such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Hematology (ASH)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) suggest intervention with erythropoietic therapy when Hb falls below 10-11 g/dL or based on clinical symptoms, data suggest that anaemia is vastly under-recognised and under-treated. Clearly, an update on the definition, identification and optimal management of anaemia in patients with lymphoid malignancies is warranted.

Effectiveness versus convenience: patient preferences for an erythropoietic agent to treat cancer-related anemia

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient preferences across two attributes--effectiveness and convenience--in the selection of an erythropoietic agent to treat chemotherapy-related anemia.

METHODS

During 2004, 500 adults with solid tumors and anemia were recruited through 50 oncologists' offices across the USA. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires, divided into two parts. The first, completed by the provider, captured clinical information and providers' perceptions of patient preferences. The second, completed by the patient, recorded knowledge, experiences, and preferences regarding anemia and its treatments. Patient preferences, the relative importance of effectiveness (time to noticeable relief of fatigue) and convenience (number of provider visits required in an 8-week period), were measured using a choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis. Each attribute was assessed at three levels (4, 6, or 8 weeks/visits).

RESULTS

467 providers (93%) and 438 patients (88%) completed the preference sections. When choosing a medication to treat anemia, 77% of providers viewed effectiveness as more important to patients than convenience. Similarly, patients had a greater preference for effectiveness than convenience. Relative preference weights were significantly higher for 4- versus 6-week effectiveness (0.61 vs. 0.09, p < 0.001) and 6- versus 8-week effectiveness (0.09 vs. -0.70, p = 0.004). Overall, time to effectiveness was twice as important to patients as the number of visits.

LIMITATIONS

Only two attributes were included in the CBC, which did not control for bias from respondent characteristics or experiences.

CONCLUSION

When evaluating an erythropoietic agent to treat chemotherapy-related anemia, both providers and patients view effectiveness as more important than convenience.

Once-weekly epoetin beta (30,000IU) in anemic patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy

Anemia occurs frequently in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy and has a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Erythropoietic proteins effectively increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels, reduce transfusion requirements and improve QoL in anemic patients with a range of malignancies. This prospective, observational study evaluated epoetin beta 30,000 IU once weekly in patients with lung cancer in a real-life, clinical-practice setting. Forty patients (72.5% with NSCLC and 27.5% with SCLC) were treated with epoetin beta during any cycle of chemotherapy when Hb decreased to <12 g/dL. Hb levels were assessed at regular intervals and transfusion needs were monitored throughout the study. In total, 72.5% of patients required epoetin treatment by the second cycle of chemotherapy. Epoetin beta treatment duration ranged from 1 to >9 (median 4) weeks. Mean (+/-S.D.) baseline Hb was 10.4+/-1.2 g/dL. Epoetin beta was associated with a rapid increase in Hb levels, with a mean increase of 1.3 g/dL by week 4. Most patients (95%) remained transfusion-free throughout the study. Epoetin beta was well tolerated. This early intervention strategy with epoetin beta 30,000 IU once weekly is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for anemia in patients with lung cancer.

EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update

Anaemia is frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer, and may have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QoL). We previously conducted a systematic literature review (1996-2003) to produce evidence-based guidelines on the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer.[Bokemeyer C, Aapro MS, Courdi A, et al. EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:2201-2216.] We report here an update to these guidelines, including literature published through to November 2005. The results of this updated systematic literature review have enabled us to refine our guidelines based on the full body of data currently available. Level I evidence exists for a positive impact of erythropoietic proteins on haemoglobin (Hb) levels when administered to patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease, when used to prevent cancer anaemia, and in patients undergoing cancer surgery. The addition of further Level I studies confirms our recommendation that in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, treatment with erythropoietic proteins should be initiated at a Hb level of 9-11 g/dL based on anaemia-related symptoms rather than a fixed Hb concentration. Early intervention with erythropoietic proteins may be considered in asymptomatic anaemic patients with Hb levels 11.9 g/dL provided that individual factors like intensity and expected duration of chemotherapy are considered. Patients whose Hb level is below 9 g/dL should primarily be evaluated for need of transfusions potentially followed by the application of erythropoietic proteins. We do not recommend the prophylactic use of erythropoietic proteins to prevent anaemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy who have normal Hb levels at the start of treatment, as the literature has not shown a benefit with this approach. The addition of further supporting studies confirms our recommendation that the target Hb concentration following treatment with erythropoietic proteins should be 12-13 g/dL. Once this level is achieved, maintenance doses should be titrated individually. There is Level I evidence that dosing of erythropoietic proteins less frequently than three times per week is efficacious when used to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia or prevent cancer anaemia, with studies supporting the use of epoetin alfa and epoetin beta weekly and darbepoetin alfa given every week or every 3 weeks. We do not recommend the use of higher than standard initial doses of erythropoietic proteins with the aim of producing higher haematological responses, due to the limited body of evidence available. There is Level I evidence that, within reasonable limits of body weight, fixed doses of erythropoietic proteins can be used to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia. This analysis confirms that there are no baseline predictive factors of response to erythropoietic proteins that can be routinely used in clinical practice if functional iron deficiency or vitamin deficiency is ruled out; a low serum erythropoietin (EPO) level (only in haematological malignancies) appears to be the only predictive factor to be verified in Level I studies. Further studies are needed to investigate the value of hepcidin, c-reactive protein, and other measures as predictive factors. In these updated guidelines, we explored a new question of whether oral or intravenous iron supplementation increases the response rate to erythropoietic proteins. We found no evidence of increased response with the addition of oral iron supplementation, but there is Level II evidence of improved response to erythropoietic proteins with the addition of intravenous iron. However, the doses and schedules for intravenous iron supplementation are not yet well defined, and further studies in this area are warranted. The two major goals of erythropoietic protein therapy are prevention or elimination of transfusions and improvement of QoL. The total body of evidence shows that red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements are reduced following treatment with erythropoietic proteins. This analysis also confirms that QoL is significantly improved in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia and in those with anaemia of chronic disease following erythropoietic protein therapy, with more robust evidence now available that QoL was improved in studies investigating early intervention in cases of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced anaemia. There is only indirect evidence that patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia or anaemia of chronic disease initially classified as non-responders to standard doses proceed to respond to treatment following a dose increase. None of the studies addressed the question in a prospective, randomised fashion, and so the Taskforce does not recommend dose escalation as a general approach in all patients who are not responding. There is still insufficient data to determine the effect on survival following treatment with erythropoietic proteins in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Our analysis of survival endpoints in studies involving patients receiving radio(chemo)therapy found that most studies were inconclusive, with no clear link between the use of erythropoietic proteins and survival. Likewise, we found no clear link between erythropoietic therapy and other endpoints such as local tumour control, time to progression, and progression-free survival. There is no evidence that pure red cell aplasia occurs in cancer patients following treatment with erythropoietic proteins, and the fear of this condition developing should not lead to erythropoietic proteins being withheld in patients with cancer. There is Level I evidence that the risk of thromboembolic events and hypertension are slightly elevated in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia receiving erythropoietic proteins. Additional trials are warranted, especially to define the optimal doses and schedules of intravenous iron supplementation during erythropoietic therapy. While our review did not address cost benefit evaluations in detail, the consensus is that studies taking into account all real determinants of cost and benefit need to be performed prospectively.

Analyzing the "correct" endpoint

The choice of QOL endpoints for a study should be based on which score will most likely change if the treatment is favorable. How the QOL change is calculated should be based on the expected amount of missing data, how many time points data will be collected, and whether extreme outliers in the scores impact results. The study should have sufficient power to detect a meaningful difference between arms (typically 10 points on a 0-100 point scale) in the chosen QOL endpoint. At the conclusion of a study, several secondary endpoints can be analyzed which can provide additional information and confirm primary endpoint results.

Clinical benefits and risks associated with epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) are indicated for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Evidence-based guidelines and systematic reviews of the management of CIA do not yet include all currently approved ESPs or all of the clinically relevant benefits and risks of ESPs.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this work were to provide up-to-date assessments of the clinical efficacy and effectiveness (ie, transfusions and quality-of-life [QoL] benefits) and safety (ie, risk of venous thromboembolism [VTE] and all-cause or treatment-associated death) of epoetin-alfa, epoetin-beta, and darbepoetin-alfa for the treatment of CIA in cancer patients with hemoglobin<11 g/dL. We also considered the impact of differences in study design, patients, and treatments on the results.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify and analyze English-language studies (controlled trials and prospective uncontrolled studies with >or=300 patients) published between 1980 and July 2005. The databases searched were MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Relevant abstracts from the last 2 annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and European Society for Medical Oncology were also included. Studies were selected, using predefined eligibility criteria. Two reviewers had to agree on all included and excluded studies, and on all data extracted from each accepted study before they were entered into a relational database. Meta-analyses were performed to quantify benefit and risk outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 40 studies including 21,378 patients were eligible for analysis. Each ESP was found to have efficacy relative to standard care or placebo. The odds ratio (OR) for transfusions in studies of epoetin versus controls was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.35-0.55) and of darbepoetin versus controls was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.55). Patients receiving ESPs experienced a significant improvement in QoL; the mean difference in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue score for ESPs versus controls was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.10-0.36; P=0.001). The frequency of VTE and death was not significantly different between ESPs and control (VTE OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.81-2.47]; all-cause mortality OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.69-1.44]).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of key clinical benefits and risks of epoetin and darbepoetin in the treatment of CIA found no clinically relevant differences between these drugs.

Early Intervention with epoetin alfa during platinum-based chemotherapy: an analysis of quality-of-life results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial compared with population normative data

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa on quality of life (QOL) in patients with solid tumors and mild-to-moderate anemia receiving platinum-based chemotherapy relative to population norms.

METHODS

In the original study, patients (n = 316) with hemoglobin (Hb) levels < or =12.1 g/dl were randomized 2:1 to receive either epoetin alfa at a dose of 10,000 U thrice weekly s.c. or best supportive care (BSC) to compare the effects on transfusion use, hematologic response, and QOL (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia [FACT-An]and Cancer Linear Analogue Scale [CLAS]). The QOL data from this previously reported trial were reanalyzed here relative to population norms.

RESULTS

Mean baseline QOL scores were similar between groups. At study completion, mean CLAS, FACT-An, FACT-An Anemia subscale, and FACT-An Fatigue subscale scores were significantly higher for patients given epoetin alfa than for those treated with BSC. Compared with population norms, both groups had impaired QOL at baseline. Differences in mean QOL change scores from baseline to study end for epoetin alfa versus BSC were 3.17 points for the FACT-General Total, 9.90 for the FACT-An Fatigue subscale, and 7.30 for the FACT-An Anemia subscale. This was equivalent to corrections in QOL deficits attributable to epoetin alfa of 97.3%, 40.7%, and 38.0% for the FACT-General Total, FACT-An Fatigue, and FACT-An Anemia subscale scores, respectively, versus BSC. A somewhat greater QOL benefit was observed for the FACT-An Fatigue and FACT-An Anemia subscales in the subset of patients with baseline Hb levels >10.5 g/dl.

CONCLUSION

Patients in this study had impaired QOL compared with population norms. Early treatment with epoetin alfa to correct anemia improved QOL in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful way, and improvements were greater in patients with baseline Hb levels >10.5 g/dl.

Early intervention with epoetin alfa during platinum-based chemotherapy: an analysis of the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial based on initial hemoglobin level

OBJECTIVE

This analysis of the results of a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the effects of epoetin alfa (EPO) therapy on transfusion requirements, hemoglobin (Hb), and quality of life (QOL) in patients with cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy was conducted to evaluate the effect of initial Hb level on study outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with Hb levels < or =12.1 g/dl were randomized 2:1 to receive EPO, 10,000 U three times weekly s.c. or best supportive care (BSC) until 4 weeks after their last chemotherapy cycle. For this analysis, patients were stratified by baseline Hb level (< or =9.7 g/dl, >9.7 g/dl to < or =10.5 g/dl, >10.5 g/dl to < or =11.3 g/dl, and >11.3 g/dl to < or =12.1 g/dl), and study results were reanalyzed.

RESULTS

Significantly fewer EPO patients than BSC patients with initial Hb levels >9.7 g/dl to < or =12.1 g/dl required transfusions. EPO maintained Hb levels throughout the study for patients with Hb levels >11.3 g/dl to < or =12.1 g/dl, compared with a decrease with BSC. For patients with baseline Hb levels >10.5 g/dl, for whom the mean changes from baseline to last assessment were measured by the Cancer Linear Analogue Scale assessments of energy and overall QOL as well as by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Fatigue and FACT-An Anemia subscale, QOL scores were significantly greater with EPO than with BSC. QOL declined in patients receiving BSC, and the mean decreases in QOL scores were greater for BSC patients with baseline Hb levels >10.5 g/dl, compared with the overall BSC group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy and with baseline Hb levels >10.5 g/dl, early intervention with EPO reduces transfusions, maintains Hb level, and maintains or improves QOL. This study supports the positive effects of early intervention when analyzed according to initial Hb value.

Clinical validity of the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia Scale

GOALS OF WORK

The purpose of this study was to reveal the clinical validity of the Japanese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scale (FACT-An) in relation to hemoglobin level. We also analyzed patients' scores for the related FACT-General scale (FACT-G), the FACT Anemia subscale, and the FACT Trial Outcome Index-Anemia scale (FACT TOI-An) to determine which was the most sensitive to anemia measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Throughout Japan, we recruited 227 patients (mean+/-SD, 59+/-12.1 years old) diagnosed with a variety of cancers. We correlated the severity of anemia, as measured by hemoglobin levels, to scores on the FACT-An and on the other scales at baseline and at 3 months.

MAIN RESULTS

The questionnaire completion rate was more than 98% at both time points. The FACT-An had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient >0.8). FACT-An scores were significantly and positively correlated with hemoglobin levels both at baseline (r=0.24; 95% CI=0.12 to 0.36; n=225) and at 3 months (r=0.24; 95% CI=0.10 to 0.36; n=204). FACT-G, FACT Anemia subscale, and FACT TOI-An scores also successfully discriminated between patients with lower (Hb <11.0 g/dl) and higher (Hb > or =11.0 g/dl) hemoglobin levels. Moreover, the changes of these FACT scores over 3-months could discriminate changes in hemoglobin level.

CONCLUSION

The Japanese version of the FACT-An has higher clinical validity and can be used to appropriately assess health-related quality of life among Japanese cancer patients with anemia.

Once-weekly epoetin-beta improves hemoglobin levels in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: A randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study

OBJECTIVE

To determine a recommended dose of once-weekly epoetin-beta administration for anemic cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial.

METHODS

A total of 86 patients with malignant lymphoma or lung cancer who received chemotherapy containing platinum, taxanes or anthracyclines were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into groups that received three dose levels of epoetin-beta (9000, 18,000 or 36,000 IU) administered subcutaneously once a week for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in hemoglobin, while the secondary endpoints were quality of life (QOL) assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire and transfusion requirements.

RESULTS

Among the 69 patients (per protocol set population) assessable for efficacy, hemoglobin level change in the 36,000 IU group was significantly greater than that in the 9000 IU group (1.75 +/- 2.15 versus 0.04 +/- 1.98 g/dl; P = 0.009), and a significant dose-response relationship was observed for the change in hemoglobin level (P = 0.003). Although changes in FACT-An Total Fatigue subscale (Fatigue subscale) scores were similar for the three dosage groups, there was a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.435, P < 0.001) between the change in hemoglobin levels and the change in Fatigue subscale scores. The proportion of transfused patients was significantly smaller in the 36 000 IU group compared with that in the 9000 IU group (P = 0.022, not adjusted for pre-study transfusions). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the three dosage groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-weekly epoetin-beta 36,000 IU for 12 weeks was well tolerated and significantly increased hemoglobin levels in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Quality of Life, Hematologic End Points, and Safety of Weekly Epoetin Alfa in Children With Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of once-weekly epoetin alfa (EPO) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), hemoglobin (Hb), transfusions, and tolerability in children with cancer.

Methods

Anemic patients 5 years to 18 years of age receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies, excluding brain tumors, received intravenous EPO 600 units/kg to 900 units/kg or placebo once-weekly for 16 weeks. Patients and parents completed the pediatric health-related quality-of-life generic scales (GS) and cancer-specific scales (CS).

Results

One hundred eleven patients received EPO and 111 patients received placebo. Mean final values for GS total score (P = .763 among patients; P = .219 among parents) and CS domain scores (P ≥ .238; P ≥ .081, respectively) were not significantly different between treatment groups. EPO-treated patients had greater increases in Hb overall (P = .002) and were more likely to be transfusion free after 4 weeks (38.7% v 22.5%; P = .010). Change in Hb was correlated with change in PedsQL-GCS total score in the EPO group (r = 0.242; P = .018), but was not in the placebo group (r = 0.086; P = .430). Adverse events were comparable between treatment groups.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the tolerability and hematologic benefits of once-weekly EPO in children with cancer. No significant difference in HRQOL was detected between treatment groups, but a significant positive correlation was observed between Hb changes and HRQOL changes in the EPO group. Additional studies are warranted to assess HRQOL when anemia is managed optimally in children with cancer.

Cancer-related anemia and recombinant human erythropoietin--an updated overview

For cancer patients, anemia can be a debilitating problem that negatively influences their overall quality of life and worsens their prognosis. The condition is caused either by the cancer itself or by cytotoxic treatment. Anemia is the primary indication for transfusion of red blood cells, but the development of recombinant human erythropoietins (epoetins) provides an alternative to red blood cell transfusions. Treatment with epoetins has been shown to reduce transfusion rates and increase hemoglobin response. There is some evidence that epoetins improve quality of life. It remains unclear, however, whether erythropoietin affects tumor growth and survival, and this area requires further investigation. Data from clinical trials suggest that erythropoietin increases the risk of thromboembolic complications. In the management of anemic patients, physicians should follow closely the dosing recommendations in products' package inserts or the ASCO/American Society of Hematology guidelines. Treatment of patients beyond the correction of anemia, however, has to be regarded as experimental and is potentially harmful, so should only be conducted in clinical trials.

Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Anaemia associated with cancer and cancer therapy is an important clinical factor in the treatment of malignant diseases. Therapeutic alternatives are recombinant human erythropoietin (Epo), darbepoetin (Darbepo) and red blood cell transfusions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effects of Epo or Darbepo to either prevent or treat anaemia in cancer patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE and other data bases. Searches were done for the periods 01/1985 to 12/2001 for the first review and 1/2002 to 04/2005 for the update. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials on managing anaemia in cancer patients that compared the use of Epo/Darbepo (plus transfusion if needed) with observation until red blood cell transfusion was required.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Several reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This update of the systematic review included a total of 57 trials with 9,353 patients. Of these, 27 trials with 3,287 adults were also included in the first Cochrane Review. Thirty trials with 6,066 patients were added during the update process. Use of Epo/Darbepo significantly reduced the relative risk of red blood cell transfusions (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.68, 42 trials, n = 6,510). On average participants in the Epo/Darbepo group received one unit of blood less than the control group (WMD -1.05; 95% CI -1.32 to -0.78, 14 trials, n = 2,353). For participants with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL haematological response was observed more often in participants receiving Epo/Darbepo (RR 3.43; 95% CI 3.07 to 3.84, 22 trials, n = 4,307). There was suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve Quality of Life (QoL). The relative risk for thrombo embolic complications was increased in patients receiving Epo/Darbepo compared to controls (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.06; 35 trials, n = 6,769). Uncertainties remain whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response (fixed effect RR 1.12; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.23, 13 trials, n = 2,833; random effects: RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26) or overall survival (unadjusted and adjusted data: HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.18; 42 trials, n = 8,167).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent evidence that administration of Epo/Darbepo reduces the relative risk for blood transfusions and the number of units transfused in cancer patients. For patients with baseline haemoglobin below 12 g/dL (mild anaemia) there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo improves haematological response. There is suggestive evidence that Epo/Darbepo may improve QoL. However, there is strong evidence that Epo/Darbepo increases the relative risk for thrombo embolic complications. Whether and how Epo/Darbepo effects tumour response and overall survival remains uncertain.

Randomized, open-label comparison of epoetin alfa extended dosing (80 000 U Q2W) vs weekly dosing (40 000 U QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa (EPO) 80 000 U every 2 weeks (Q2W) to the FDA-approved regimen of 40 000 U weekly (QW) in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 310 patients with nonmyeloid malignancy and baseline hemoglobin (Hb) <or= 11 g/dL who were scheduled to receive chemotherapy for a minimum of 12 weeks were randomized to EPO Q2W or QW for up to 12 weeks, with dose modification to maintain Hb at approximately 12 g/dL. Efficacy analyses used the per-protocol population (patients who completed the study with a value for Hb change) for the primary endpoint only and the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population (patients who received study drug and had at least one postbaseline Hb value) for the primary and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Analysis of the primary endpoint revealed that the mean change in Hb from baseline to study end was comparable between the Q2W and QW groups in the per-protocol population (1.6 g/dL vs 1.8 g/dL, respectively; treatment difference, -0.2 g/dL; one-sided 95% confidence interval [-0.56, -]); similar results were observed in the mITT population. Among patients on study at Day 29, 9.6% (13/135) and 11.1% (14/126) of patients in the Q2W and QW groups, respectively, received a transfusion between Day 29 and the end of the study (p = 0.709). Dose withholds (21% vs 42%, p < 0.001) and dose reductions (41% vs 59%, p = 0.003) were less common for Q2W than QW. Safety profiles were similar between groups; clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events occurred in 8% of patients in each group. The open-label dosing and the patient attrition rate did not appear to influence overall study results.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended dosing (80 000 U Q2W) and once-weekly dosing (40 000 U QW) of EPO provided comparable safety and efficacy for chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia: the 20030125 Study Group Trial

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced anemia is widely treated in the United States with darbepoetin alfa (DA) or epoetin alfa (EA). This noninferiority study systematically compares efficacy and safety of DA and EA using common doses and schedules used in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients had a diagnosis of nonmyeloid malignancy with > or = 8 weeks of planned chemotherapy, age >or = 18 years, and anemia (hemoglobin < or = 11 g/dL). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to DA 200 microg every two weeks (Q2W) or EA 40,000 units every week (QW) for up to 16 weeks with identical dose adjustment rules. Efficacy was assessed by the incidence of RBC transfusion (Kaplan-Meier estimate). The definition of noninferiority was that the upper 95% CI limit of the observed difference in RBC transfusions between groups was less than 11.5%; this noninferiority margin was based on the treatment effect observed in placebo-controlled EA studies.

RESULTS

Of 1,220 patients randomly assigned, 1,209 received > or = one dose of the study drug. Common tumor types were lung (26%), breast (21%), and gastrointestinal (18%). Transfusion incidence from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase (the primary end point) was 21% in the DA group and 16% in the EA group; noninferiority was concluded because the upper 95% CI limit of the difference between groups (10.8%) was below the prespecified noninferiority margin. Sensitivity analyses using alternate statistical methods and analysis sets yielded similar results. Hemoglobin, quality of life, and safety end points further support equivalency of the erythropoietic therapies.

CONCLUSION

This large, phase III study demonstrates comparable efficacy of DA Q2W and EA QW. Less frequent dosing offers potential benefits for patients, caregivers and health care providers.

Epoetin alfa increases hemoglobin levels and improves quality of life in anemic geriatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

GOAL

To evaluate epoetin alfa (EPO) treatment of anemia in geriatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, a retrospective subgroup analysis was conducted of anemic cancer patients > or =65 years of age from three 16-week community-based studies of thrice-weekly (TIW) or once-weekly (QW) EPO for chemotherapy-related anemia (CRA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses were conducted on the overall geriatric population (> or =65 years) and by age subgroup (65-74, 75-84, and > or =85 years), and compared with younger patients (<65 years) for each individual study and for pooled data.

MAIN RESULTS

Some 3,634 geriatric patients were compared with 3,467 younger patients. From baseline to final measurement, EPO therapy significantly increased Hb by 2.0 g/dl in patients > or =65 years and 1.9 g/dl in patients <65 years (P<0.0001) and reduced transfusion utilization in both groups (P<0.006). Both age groups also had significant improvements in quality of life (QOL), measured by the 100-mm Linear Analog Assessment Scale (LASA). In younger patients, mean LASA changes were significantly greater than those in geriatric patients (P<0.05); however, QOL improvements in both age groups were clinically meaningful. There were no significant differences across geriatric age subgroups or between TIW and QW regimens for Hb change or QOL improvement. Overall hematopoietic response rate to EPO was 65.4% for patients > or =65 years and 64.7% for patients <65 years. Predictors of greater hematopoietic response (based on a pooled analysis) included lower body weight, baseline Hb, and baseline serum erythropoietin levels; better tumor response; and history of EPO dose reduction and longer time on study.

CONCLUSIONS

Anemic geriatric patients receiving EPO for CRA responded comparably to younger patients <65 years and should be treated similarly.

Recombinant human erythropoietins and cancer patients: updated meta-analysis of 57 studies including 9353 patients

This is an updated systematic review of 57 trials and 9353 cancer patients from articles, abstracts, and reports published between January 1, 1985, and April 30, 2005, on the effects of epoetin alfa and beta (i.e., epoetin) and darbepoetin alfa (i.e., darbepoetin). We included randomized controlled trials comparing epoetin or darbepoetin plus red blood cell transfusion with red blood cell transfusion alone for prophylaxis or treatment of anemia in cancer patients with or without concurrent antineoplastic therapy. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and conference proceedings were searched. Effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with fixed-effects models. Treatment with epoetin or darbepoetin statistically significantly reduced the risk for red blood cell transfusions (relative risk [RR] = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.68; 42 trials and 6510 patients) and improved hematologic response (RR = 3.43, 95% CI = 3.07 to 3.84; 22 trials and 4307 patients). Treatment with epoetin or darbepoetin increased the risk of thrombo-embolic events (RR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.35 to 2.06; 35 trials and 6769 patients). Uncertainties remain as to whether and how epoetin or darbepoetin affects overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.18; 42 trials and 8167 patients). Caution is advised when using epoetin or darbepoetin in combination with thrombogenic chemotherapeutic agents or for cancer patients who are at high risk for thrombo-embolic events.

Epoetin alfa in platinum-treated ovarian cancer patients: results of a multinational, multicentre, randomised trial

This multicentre, open-label, controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of epoetin alfa treatment on haematologic and quality of life (QOL) parameters in 182 anaemic (Hb⩽12 g dl⁻¹) ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum chemotherapy. Patients were randomised 2 : 1 to receive epoetin alfa 10 000–20 000 IU three times weekly plus best standard treatment (BST) or BST only. Main study end points were changes from baseline in haemoglobin (Hb) level, transfusion requirements, and QOL. For the epoetin alfa group, mean Hb increased by 1.8 g dl⁻¹ by weeks 4–6 and was significantly increased from baseline through study end (P<0.001). The mean change in Hb from baseline was significantly (P<0.001) greater for epoetin alfa than BST patients at all postbaseline evaluations. Significantly fewer epoetin alfa than BST patients required transfusion(s) after the first 4 weeks of treatment (7.9 vs 30.5%; P<0.001). Also, significant (P⩽0.04) differences favouring the epoetin alfa group over the BST group were found for all three median CLAS scores (Energy Level, Ability to Do Daily Activities, Overall QOL) and the median average CLAS score during chemotherapy. These findings support use of epoetin alfa to increase Hb levels, reduce transfusion use, and improve QOL in anaemic ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum chemotherapy.

Phase III study of two different dosing schedules of erythropoietin in anemic patients with cancer

PURPOSE

To compare maintenance epoetin alfa administered once every 3 weeks with continued weekly epoetin alfa for patients with cancer-associated anemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned at enrollment to receive three weekly doses of epoetin alfa 40,000 U subcutaneously (SC), followed by either standard weekly epoetin alfa (40K arm) or 120,000 U of epoetin alfa (120K arm) SC every 3 weeks for 18 additional weeks.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-five patients were enrolled. One hundred eighty-three patients were assigned to the 40K arm, and 182 were assigned to the 120K arm. There was no difference in the proportion of patients requiring transfusions during the study (23% in 40K arm and 18% in 120K arm, P = .22) or specifically during the maintenance phase (13% in 40K arm v 15% in 120K arm, P = .58). Patients randomly assigned to the 40K arm were more likely to have a > or = 2 or > or = 3 g/dL hemoglobin (Hb) increment, were more likely to have a drug dose held because of high Hb, and had higher mean end-of-study Hb levels. Toxicities, including thromboembolism, and overall survival were similar. Patients in the 40K arm had a higher global quality of life (QOL) at baseline for unclear reasons, whereas patients in the 120K arm had a greater global QOL improvement during the study, so end-of-study QOL was equivalent.

CONCLUSION

After three weekly doses of epoetin alfa 40,000 U, a dose of 120,000 U can be administered safely once every 3 weeks without increasing transfusion needs or sacrificing QOL. The Hb increment is somewhat greater with continued weekly epoetin alfa. Lack of blinding as a result of different treatment schedules may have confounded results.

Randomized comparison of epoetin alfa (40,000 U weekly) and darbepoetin alfa (200 microg every 2 weeks) in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

This is the first randomized, open-label, multicenter trial designed and powered to directly compare the hemoglobin (Hb) response to epoetin alfa (EPO), 40,000 U once weekly (QW), with that to darbepoetin alfa (DARB), 200 microg every 2 weeks (Q2W), in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy (CT). Transfusion requirements, quality of life (QOL), and safety also were evaluated. Adults with solid tumors scheduled to receive CT for > or =12 weeks and with baseline Hb < or =11 g/dl were randomized to receive either EPO 40,000 U QW (n = 178) or DARB 200 microg Q2W (n = 180) s.c. for up to 16 weeks. Doses were increased for nonresponders (Hb increase <1 g/dl) after 4 (EPO) or 6 (DARB) weeks, as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and were reduced for a rapid rise in Hb (>1.3 g/dl [EPO] or >1.0 g/dl [DARB] within any 2-week period) or for an Hb level >13 g/dl. The proportion of patients achieving a > or =1-g/dl Hb rise by week 5, the primary end point, was significantly higher with EPO (47.0%) than with DARB (32.5%), and EPO-treated patients achieved a > or =1-g/dl Hb increase significantly earlier than those receiving DARB (median, 35 days versus 46 days). The mean increase in Hb from baseline was significantly higher at weeks 5, 9, 13, and the end of the study with EPO than with DARB. The number of units transfused per patient was significantly lower for the EPO group than for the DARB group. The proportions of patients requiring transfusions, mean QOL improvements, and tolerability profiles were similar in the two groups.

Recombinant epoetins do not stimulate tumor growth in erythropoietin receptor–positive breast carcinoma models

We investigated the significance of erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) expression following treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO; epoetin alpha) and the effect of recombinant epoetins (epoetin alpha, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin alpha) alone or in combination with anticancer therapy on tumor growth in two well-established preclinical models of breast carcinoma (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines). Expression and localization of EPOR under hypoxic and normoxic conditions in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were evaluated by immunoblotting, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry. EPOR binding was evaluated using [125I]rHuEPO. Proliferation, migration, and signaling in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells following treatment with rHuEPO were evaluated. Tumor growth was assessed following administration of recombinant epoetins alone and in combination with paclitaxel (anticancer therapy) in orthotopically implanted MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast carcinoma xenograft models in athymic mice. EPOR expression was detected in both tumor cell lines. EPOR localization was found to be exclusively cytosolic and no specific [125I]rHuEPO binding was observed. There was no stimulated migration, proliferation, or activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and AKT following rHuEPO treatment. In mice, treatment with recombinant epoetins alone and in combination with paclitaxel resulted in equivalent tumor burdens compared with vehicle-treated controls. Results from our study suggest that although EPOR expression was observed in two well-established breast carcinoma cell lines, it was localized to a cytosolic distribution and did not transduce a signaling cascade in tumors that leads to tumor growth. The addition of recombinant epoetins to paclitaxel did not affect the outcome of paclitaxel therapy in breast carcinoma xenograft models. These results show that recombinant epoetins do not evoke a physiologic response on EPOR-bearing tumor cells as assessed by numerous variables, including growth, migration, and cytotoxic challenge in preclinical in vivo tumor models.

Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia

BACKGROUND

In the United States, darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) is often used to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia using weekly or every-2-week administration schedules. In Europe, darbepoetin alfa is used either weekly or in every-3-week dosing. The every-3-week schedule can be synchronized with many chemotherapy regimens, resulting in fewer visits and reducing burden to patients, but the safety and efficacy of this regimen have not been clear.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled phase 3 trial was performed in 110 European centers. Eligible patients (age > or = 18 years) were anemic (hemoglobin level < 11 g/dL), had a nonmyeloid malignancy, and were to receive at least 12 weeks of chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to darbepoetin alfa treatment every 3 weeks (500-microg dose) or weekly (2.25-microg/kg) for 15 weeks. We compared red blood cell transfusion incidence among the two arms from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase using a noninferiority study design. Noninferiority was determined if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in blood transfusions between groups, calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods, did not exceed 12.5%, a margin based on previous placebo-controlled studies.

RESULTS

A total of 705 patients were randomly assigned, and 672 remained in the study at week 5. Fewer patients in the every-3-week arm than in the weekly arm received blood transfusions from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase (unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates = 23% versus 30%, difference = -6.8%; 95% CI = -13.6 to 0.1). Percentages of patients achieving the target hemoglobin level (> or = 11 g/dL, consistent with evidence-based practice guidelines) were 84% (every 3 weeks) and 77% (weekly). The frequency of cardiovascular/thromboembolic adverse events was 8% in both groups, and safety was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia can safely and effectively be treated with 500 microg of darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks.

Anemia profiles in patients with lung cancer: What have we learned from the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS)?

The often-aggressive therapy, including platinum-based regimens, required to treat lung cancer patients results in a significant risk for anemia in this population. Results of the recent European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS) showed that, at enrollment, 37.6% (753/2002) of lung cancer patients were anemic; rates by cancer treatment were 50.0% on concomitant chemotherapy/radiotherapy, 39.0% on chemotherapy, 31.7% on radiotherapy, 38.6% on combination treatment, and 30.7%, on no treatment. At enrollment, of 605 patients receiving platinum therapy, 50.1% were anemic versus 30.6% of 1252 receiving nonplatinum regimens. During ECAS, 83.3% of lung cancer patients who received chemotherapy were anemic at some time, with the prevalence of anemia in platinum-treated patients increasing progressively from 23.5% at Cycle 1 to 77.3% at Cycle 6 (corresponding values for nonplatinum-treated patients, 32.9% and 57.7%). However, only 47% of anemic patients received anemia treatment, which, when provided, often was not initiated until hemoglobin (Hb) levels were relatively low (initiation Hb: epoetin, 9.1 g/dL; transfusion, 8.5 g/dL). Logistical analysis of ECAS data identified treatment with platinum, female sex, and initial Hb level as risk factors for anemia in lung cancer patients. Given the potential adverse consequences of anemia in lung cancer patients, including diminished quality of life (QOL), it is advisable that treatment patterns for anemia management, especially in regard to anemia monitoring and Hb level used to initiate treatment, be reviewed and optimized, with the goal of optimizing overall patient care. Also, anemia risk factors should be considered, which may help clinicians identify lung cancer patients particularly at risk for this problem, allowing the planning and initiation of appropriate treatment for effective and timely anemia management, thus preserving patient QOL.

Anaemia management strategies: optimising treatment using epoetin beta (NeoRecormon)

Anaemia has a detrimental impact on quality of life and it is important that this condition is recognised and treated in patients with cancer. Epoetin beta is an effective and well-tolerated treatment of anaemia in patients with a wide range of solid and haematological malignancies. A study in patients with lymphoid malignancies confirms that epoetin beta is equally effective at the same overall weekly dose (30,000 IU weekly) when given once-weekly or three-times weekly. This once-weekly regimen has also proved effective in patients with solid tumours. Once-weekly treatment is more convenient for the patient, potentially improving compliance and is associated with reduced hospital administration costs. The majority of patients with cancer will respond to epoetin therapy with an increase in haemoglobin levels. However, it is of value to identify those patients who are likely to respond, so that cost-effectiveness can be improved. Despite much research into potential predictive factors, follow-up studies are required and clinical judgement remains key to managing the anaemia of cancer. In addition, studies suggest that intravenous iron supplementation can improve response to epoetin therapy in patients with functional iron deficiency. Epoetin beta offers an effective, safe and convenient therapy for the management of anaemia in patients with cancer. Ongoing studies are expected to lead to a greater understanding of the optimal use of epoetins in cancer-related anaemia.

Management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents: doubts, certainties, and concerns

The management of cancer-related anemia with erythropoietic agents presents many unresolved issues. We reviewed the literature relating to epoetin alfa (Eprex)/Epypo); Ortho Biotech/Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe, United Kingdom, http://www.orthobiotech.co.uk; Procrit); Ortho Biotech Products, L.P., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.orthobiotech.com), epoetin beta (NeoRecormon); Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland, http://www.roche.com), and darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp); Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, http://www.amgen.com) highlighting the results of published clinical trials, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Studies were identified through MEDLINE and the bibliographies of relevant articles. Epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, and darbepoetin alfa have differing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. They are all effective at reducing transfusion requirements and improving health-related quality-of-life parameters, irrespective of tumor response. A direct comparison between epoetin alfa and darbe poetin alfa is based on limited evidence, which does not allow definitive conclusions about relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness. No predictive factors for response to erythropoietic agents have been validated in prospective trials. The most consistent adverse events are thrombotic and may occur irrespective of an increase in hemoglobin. Recent research indicates that the erythropoietin receptor is expressed in several cancer cell lines, raising the concern of possible stimulation of tumor cell growth by these drugs. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of erythropoietins, particularly compared with transfusion therapy, have been challenging to conduct and analyze and have generated ambiguous results. The use of erythropoietins needs to be optimized in terms of cost-effectiveness, and issues surrounding safety need to be clarified. A stronger methodology for clinical studies and the design of new, randomized, clinical trials is a major priority.

Evaluating erythropoietic agents for the treatment of anaemia in the oncology setting

Anaemia is a common complication of cancer and its treatment. It is also associated with substantial impairment of patient quality of life (QOL). Erythropoietic agents are primary treatment options for cancer-related anaemia (CRA). This review summarises evidence supporting clinical use of the approved erythropoietic agents (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa). A MEDLINE((R)) search from January 2000 to September 2004 using the search terms "epoetin alfa," "epoetin beta," "darbepoetin alfa," "erythropoietin," and "anaemia" was conducted to identify studies evaluating erythropoietic agents in the treatment of CRA. Recent presentations at professional meetings were also included. Erythropoietic agents increase haemoglobin levels, decrease transfusion requirements, and improve QOL in patients with CRA. However, variations in study design, patient populations, dose titration schedules, and outcome measures among available studies make data comparisons between clinical trials difficult. Head-to-head trials are comparing erythropoietic agents in a randomised setting; other trials are evaluating optimal dosage schedules. Clinically relevant differences among approved erythropoietic agents have not been determined in direct comparative trials; however, epoetin alfa appears to be at least as effective as darbepoetin alfa in treatment of CRA.

Palliative care in patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With improvements in systemic therapy, central nervous system metastases have increased in incidence in patients with cancer. Patients with brain metastases from solid tumors often have a dismal prognosis, and supportive measures are often critical in improving patient outcome. They include treatments against vasogenic edema, seizures, symptomatic venous thrombosis, and pain, and the management of iatrogenic side effects. This article reviews all the supportive care measures in patients with brain metastases, with the exception of tumor-specific chemotherapy treatments that are also used in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, improvement has been made in the management of the following complications of brain metastases: epilepsy and antiepileptic drug side effects, thromboembolic complications, fatigue and cognitive disorder of mixed (tumoral and/or iatrogenic) origin, pain, hematological side effects of chemotherapy, and steroids complications.

SUMMARY

Patients with brain metastases are particularly prone to develop severe side effects, increased fatigue, and cognitive deteriorations following apparently minor changes in symptomatic treatments. Palliative management of brain metastasis requires a multidisciplinary approach, and it is important to avoid any treatment that is useless or harmful or has a poor toxicity/efficacy ratio.

Retrospective observational study of patients with chemotherapy-related anemia receiving erythropoietic agents

OBJECTIVE

Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-related anemia (CRA) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. This study examined dosing and hematologic outcomes with these agents in community oncology clinics.

METHODS

Medical charts were abstracted retrospectively for 1005 patients (527 EPO, 478 DARB) with CRA (hemoglobin [Hb] < or = 11 g/dL) who received EPO or DARB at 10 U.S. oncology clinics between January 2002 and March 2003.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included dose and frequency of erythropoietic therapy, change in Hb at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after initiation of therapy, and transfusion of packed red blood cells.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally similar between groups. Most EPO-treated patients received EPO once weekly, but 25% received EPO every 2-3 weeks, with 40,000 U the predominant dose. DARB was usually given every 1-2 weeks in doses ranging from 200-400 mcg/injection. Mean treatment duration was relatively short (< 8 weeks) in both groups, with a similar number of Hb determinations and similar incidence of red blood transfusion between groups. Hb increased from baseline in the EPO and DARB groups at 4 weeks (0.99 vs. 0.69 g/dL, p = 0.003), 8 weeks (1.39 vs. 1.06 g/dL, p = 0.011), and 12 weeks (1.43 vs. 1.11 g/dL, p = 0.055). Early Hb response (> or = 1 g/dL increase by 4 weeks) was more common with EPO than DARB (48% vs. 38%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

EPO was superior to DARB for early hematologic outcomes in patients with CRA in community oncology clinics. Retrospective data collection and relative inexperience with DARB at the time of the study may limit the generalization of these results. Randomized, controlled trials comparing EPO and DARB are warranted.

Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of nonrenal anemia

Recombinant human erythropoietins (rhEPO) reliably increase hemoglobin levels in cancer patients experiencing chemotherapy-associated anemia. However, in patients with "anemia of cancer" not being treated with chemotherapy, rhEPO appears less effective. Recently, two studies have been broadly discussed which have raised concern on the concomitant use of erythropoietin and chemo- or radiation therapy in cancer patients. In addition, use of rhEPO is generally not considered cost-effective. Thus, the application of rhEPO should be limited to indications with proven clinical benefit. This review will provide an overview of the state of the art use of rhEPO in anemic patients and will discuss future developments.