Quality of life in the intergroup exemestane study: a randomized trial of exemestane versus continued tamoxifen after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer

Summary of aromatase inhibitor clinical trials in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Five years of adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen was considered the gold-standard treatment for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer for many years. Data from a core group of clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have challenged this perception. These studies were designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of AIs in the following clinical settings: 1) as initial adjuvant therapy (the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial, Breast International Group Trial 1-98), 2) in a "switched setting" after 2 to 3 years of treatment with tamoxifen (Arimidex-Nolvadex 95, the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group 8 [ABCSG 8] trial, the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole study, the Intergroup Exemestane Study), and 3) in extended settings (National Cancer Institute of Canada Trial MA.17, ABCSG 6a, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project 33). The efficacy data from these studies suggested that AIs have added substantial benefit in terms of disease outcome. AIs were tolerated well, and patients who received them experienced fewer thrombolic events and less endometrial cancer, hot flashes, night sweats, and vaginal bleeding compared with patients who receive tamoxifen. However, patients who received tamoxifen had less skeletal events and accelerated bone resorption compared with women who received AIs. AIs should be considered when planning a patient's endocrine therapy, taking into account the differences in tolerability and end-organ effects of the classes of endocrine therapy. Outstanding issues to optimize AI therapy include identifying the optimal duration, agent, and patients for these therapies.

Major depression after breast cancer: a review of epidemiology and treatment

OBJECTIVE

While many breast cancer patients experience "normal" distress, there is a subset who experience clinically significant depression. We examined the current knowledge about the prevalence, impact and treatment of major depression in women with breast cancer.

METHOD

We reviewed the evidence for the prevalence of depression in women with breast cancer from the last 20 years and summarized the medical literature on the pharmacology and psychotherapy of depression in this population.

RESULTS

Despite evidence that depression significantly impacts quality of life in breast cancer patients, few studies focus on the epidemiology and treatment of major depression. Treatment studies have focused on distress and mixed depressive states, with resulting lack of replicable studies showing treatment efficacy. Potential biological and psychosocial determinants of major depression following breast cancer are discussed in a proposed model. The need for further research on the epidemiology and treatment of major depression in this population is proposed.

CONCLUSION

Major depression is a frequent but underrecognized and undertreated condition among breast cancer patients, which causes amplification of physical symptoms, increased functional impairment and poor treatment adherence. More research on the epidemiology and treatment of major depression in this population is needed.

Premature ovarian failure and its consequences: vasomotor symptoms, sexuality, and fertility

Premature ovarian failure is a common consequence of systemic treatment for premenopausal breast cancer. Vasomotor symptoms and sexual dysfunction occur frequently in women who have an abrupt menopause from chemotherapy or ovarian suppression. However, current fertility may be impaired even in women who are menstruating after chemotherapy, and survivors are at high risk for permanent ovarian failure at a young age. Hot flashes can be managed with venlaxafine, gabapentin, or-potentially-stress management. Providing advice on treating vaginal dryness and brief sexual counseling can often alleviate sexual dysfunction. Options for fertility preservation remain limited but are improving rapidly. Distress about interrupted childbearing has a long-term impact on the quality of life.

Aromatase inhibitors and musculoskeletal symptoms

AIMS

Recent evidence shows aromatase inhibitors (AIs) to be of benefit over tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting. It is also apparent that musculoskeletal symptoms associated with AIs may be a significant problem in the clinical setting. The aim of this article is to review the data on AIs with respect to musculoskeletal symptoms in the adjuvant setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review on the literature relating to AIs in the adjuvant setting and musculoskeletal symptoms.

RESULTS

Results of phase III trials show lower incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms than reported in the clinical setting.

DISCUSSION

AIs offer a significant advantage over tamoxifen. More research is required to ascertain the cause and to define the spectrum of musculoskeletal symptoms reported in women taking AIs. Decision of appropriate treatment should be made jointly between clinician and patient after full discussion of the risks and benefits.

Quality of life and adjuvant systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy reduce the risk of recurrence and death due to breast cancer, but often at considerable cost to the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients. The short-term effects of chemotherapy on HRQL are well known and are accepted by most patients for modest gains in survival. The long-term effects of chemotherapy-induced menopause and hormonal therapy on HRQL are poorly recognized. Vasomotor symptoms and altered sexual function are common, distressing and inadequately treated. HRQL information is helpful in describing likely effects of adjuvant treatment, facilitating informed decision-making, identifying health problems to guide research into potential solutions, guiding treatment strategies for interventions with equivalent survival and guiding resource allocation. New technologies will make HRQL information increasingly available for individual patient care.

The what, why and how of aromatase inhibitors: hormonal agents for treatment and prevention of breast cancer

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole have largely replaced tamoxifen as the preferred treatment for hormone receptor - positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Approximately 185,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer are diagnosed yearly, and at least half of these women are both postmenopausal and eligible for adjuvant therapy with AIs. In addition, AIs are currently being tested as primary prevention therapy in large randomised trials involving tens of thousands of women at increased risk for breast cancer. Given the volume of use, internists will increasingly see postmenopausal women who are taking or considering treatment with AIs. Physicians need to be able to: (i) briefly discuss the pros and cons of using a selective estrogen receptor modulator such as tamoxifen or raloxifene vs. an AI for risk reduction and (ii) recognise and manage AI-associated adverse events. The primary purpose of this review is to help internists with these two tasks.

Aromatase inhibitors: past, present and future in breast cancer therapy

Estrogen has been implicated in promoting breast cancer in a majority of women. Endocrine therapy controlling estrogen production has been the guiding principle in treating breast cancer for more than a century. A greater understanding of this disease at a molecular level has led to the development of molecules that inhibit estrogen production by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme, that is the primary source of estrogen in postmenopausal women. This review examines the evolution of aromatase inhibitor (AI) based therapies over the past three decades. The third generation aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane), which have been found to be extremely specific and effective in an adjuvant/neoadjuvant/extended adjuvant setting are discussed from a biochemical and clinical perspective. A comprehensive discussion of the past, present, and future of aromatase inhibitors is conducted in this review.

Comparison of Menopausal Symptoms During the First Year of Adjuvant Therapy With Either Exemestane or Tamoxifen in Early Breast Cancer: Report of a Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicenter Trial Substudy

Purpose

Hormonal breast cancer treatment increases menopausal symptoms in women. This study investigated differences between the symptoms associated with either adjuvant tamoxifen or exemestane.

Patients and Methods

Ten common symptoms were assessed by self-report questionnaire administered to 1,614 consecutive patients at baseline and every 3 months during the first year of a double-blind, randomized trial of postmenopausal women with early hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. Symptoms were categorized as none, mild, moderate, or severe. A hot flash score was calculated at each time point. Symptoms were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance. Each time period was tested repeatedly against the baseline; an overall P value was assigned for each reported symptom.

Results

Compliance was excellent, with 7,286 questionnaires analyzed. Baseline symptom prevalence ranged from 2% (vaginal bleeding) to 60% to 70% (bone/muscle aches and low energy). There were no significant differences in vaginal bleeding, mood alteration, or low energy. Patients receiving tamoxifen had significantly more vaginal discharge (P < .0001). Exemestane patients reported more bone/muscle aches (P < .0001), vaginal dryness (P = .0004), and difficulty sleeping (P = .03). In both groups, the hot flash score peaked at 3 months and decreased thereafter. At 12 months, patients receiving tamoxifen had a significantly higher mean hot flash score (P = .03), with daily hot flashes increasing from baseline by 33% compared with a 7% increase from baseline with exemestane.

Conclusion

At 12 months, exemestane was associated with fewer hot flashes and less vaginal discharge than tamoxifen, but with more vaginal dryness, bone/muscle aches, and difficulty sleeping. Symptoms were common in both groups.

Tamoxifen in breast cancer: not so easy to write off

For the past 30 years, tamoxifen has saved millions of lives throughout the world. The same has been proven in randomized trials and metaanalyses. Recent trials have shown clinical superiority of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen in terms of disease free survival and reduction in complications. However, because of the unique mechanism of tamoxifen, intrinsic advantages and low cost, this wonderdrug may still be a reasonable choice for hormonal therapy in breast cancer.

Safety of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane are replacing tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in most postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Although AIs have demonstrated superior efficacy and better overall safety compared with tamoxifen in randomized controlled trials, they may not provide the cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen, and bone loss may be a concern with their long-term adjuvant use. Patients require regular bone mineral density monitoring, and prophylactic bisphosphonates are being evaluated to determine whether they may protect long-term bone health. AIs decrease the risks of thromboembolic and cerebrovascular events compared with tamoxifen, and the overall rate of cardiovascular events in patients treated with AIs is within the range seen in age-matched, non-breast-cancer populations. AIs are also associated with a lower incidence of endometrial cancer and fewer vaginal bleeding/discharge events than tamoxifen. Compared with tamoxifen, the incidence of hot flashes is lower with anastrozole and letrozole but may be higher with exemestane. Generally, adverse events with AIs are predictable and manageable, whereas tamoxifen may be associated with life-threatening events in a minority of patients. Overall, the benefits of AIs over tamoxifen are achieved without compromising overall quality of life.

Recognition and management of treatment-related side effects for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy

In postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer, the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) to suppress estrogen is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with tamoxifen therapy. Women receiving such endocrine therapy may experience treatment-related side effects that negatively affect health-related quality of life (QoL) and adherence to therapy. In published clinical trials and in clinical practice, adverse events (AEs) constitute the main reason for nonadherence to endocrine treatment. Serious AEs are sometimes resolved by switching to a different agent, whereas other side effects can often be managed to allow patients to remain on therapy without sacrificing QoL. Across all adjuvant endocrine trials, regardless of the treatment received, vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes are the most common side effects. Other frequently reported side effects, such as vaginal discharge, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and arthralgia, vary in prevalence between tamoxifen and AIs. Here we provide an overview of reported AEs of adjuvant endocrine therapy, focusing on those that are amenable to pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic management without treatment discontinuation. Also highlighted are specific management strategies that may improve patient QoL and thereby optimize adherence to therapy, which in turn might improve patient outcomes.

Treatment strategies that effectively reduce early recurrence risk in postmenopausal women with endocrine-sensitive breast cancer: AIs upfront vs. switching

Several large, well-controlled clinical trials have now established that the aromatase inhibitors (AIs), including letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, are more effective than tamoxifen when used as adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Yet, it is an open question as to how these drugs should be best integrated into the adjuvant treatment regimen. Both letrozole and anastrozole have shown efficacy over tamoxifen when used as initial adjuvant therapy (initiated just following surgery for breast cancer), while exemestane and anastrozole have been used as switching adjuvant therapy, i.e., following 2-3 years of initial adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, with proven efficacy over continued tamoxifen. Studies demonstrate that recurrence risk peaks in the early period after surgery, and that distant metastases in particular, accounting for most of the early recurrences, have worse survival rates when compared with other types of recurrences. Treatments that reduce recurrences, especially distant metastases, in this early period are therefore likely to improve overall survival (OS) and reduce mortality from breast cancer. In this review, we discuss early recurrence risk among postmenopausal women with successfully treated early breast cancer, the efficacy of the different AIs in reducing early recurrences and distant metastases when incorporated into adjuvant therapy, and the evidence for increased OS when AIs are used as initial or switch adjuvant therapy.

Clinical management of adverse events in adjuvant therapy for hormone-responsive early breast cancer

Systemic adjuvant therapy has proven highly effective at reducing recurrences and deaths in patients who have received primary therapy for early breast cancer. However, as with all treatments, adjuvant therapy can cause unwanted side effects, and effective management of these events is essential to ensure that patients comply with, and continue, treatment. Adjuvant endocrine therapy is not associated with the more severe, acute toxicities of chemotherapy, and can therefore be taken for many years. At present, the standard duration of postoperative adjuvant endocrine therapy is 5 years. Prevention and treatment of adverse events associated with long-term endocrine therapy is particularly important in the adjuvant setting, where patients are clinically cancer free. In this situation, the efficacy benefits are not, therefore, obvious to the patient, but side effects may have a negative impact on daily life. Tamoxifen has been the gold standard endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer for many years, and the long-term side effects of this agent are well documented. In recent years, the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have begun to displace tamoxifen as the adjuvant therapy of choice, owing to greater efficacy and good tolerability. Predictably, the AIs and tamoxifen have partially overlapping side-effect profiles. Both therapies are associated with typical symptoms of estrogen deprivation; however, tamoxifen also has estrogenic activity in some tissues, which can cause either detrimental (genital tract) or beneficial (bone, cardiovascular system, lipids) effects that are not associated with AI use. To reduce treatment discontinuations, it is important that patients are made aware of the possible side effects of adjuvant therapy and the management strategies available to them, prior to starting therapy. The role of physical, alternative and pharmaceutical therapies in the management of adverse events associated with endocrine therapy has been investigated, and strategies are now available to alleviate symptoms and enable patients to benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy without a significant adverse impact on quality of life.

Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer

Endocrine therapy is a mainstay for the many women who develop in situ or invasive steroid receptor-positive breast cancer. The use of tamoxifen has reduced mortality in such women. Recently estrogen deprivation strategies have come under scrutiny. Here the use of aromatase inhibitors for treatment of postmenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer in the metastatic, adjuvant, and preoperative settings is reviewed.

Application of aromatase inhibitors in endocrine responsive breast cancers

Aromatase (estrogen synthetase) inhibitors (AIs) have been incorporated into adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer in post-menopausal women and their role in pre-menopausal is being investigated. Several questions regarding AIs remain unanswered: optimal sequence with tamoxifen; optimal duration and the best agent in the class. The benefits of extending therapy beyond 5 years has been established by the MA17 trial and many follow-on trials are exploring prolonged therapy. Several strategies to overcome de novo and acquired resistance are being explored. Improving on the "total estrogen blockade" by adding fulvestrant is one example; blocking collaborating cell signaling pathways is another. Candidate targets for this include the erbB2, IGF1R and the mTOR cell survival pathway. Identification of both host (pharmacogenomic) and tumor (genomic) signatures as prognostic and predictive factors will help to select patients for appropriate therapies in the future and reduce the number needed to treat to benefit a few.

Quality of life issues in relation to the aromatase inhibitor

Maturing data from aromatase inhibitor (AI) trials reveal benefits to many women who might otherwise have relapsed and died from breast cancer. In advanced disease the case for the use of AIs is well established but in the adjuvant and chemoprevention settings some worries about long-term safety remain. Large numbers of women may already be cured by surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy making further adjuvant treatment unnecessary. In chemoprevention the ratio of risks to putative benefits remains very unclear, so results from major trials are needed to clarify. When making decisions about treatment women need information about: the available options, likely therapeutic gains, predicted side-effects and convenience of treatment. Adherence is then dependent on the actual burden experienced and impact on QoL. Healthcare professionals often underestimate non-life-threatening but QoL-threatening side-effects, making treatments appear more favorable and acceptable during discussion about therapeutic options. It was hoped that AIs would enhance efficacy without producing unacceptable side-effects that diminish QoL and reduce adherence. Recently published results from the QoL sub-protocols of ATAC, IES and MA-17, looking at anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole, respectively, provide useful indications about the QoL associated with AIs. More information gained from longer-term patient follow-up and preference studies are needed to help clinicians making treatment recommendations and to assist development of ameliorative interventions needed to accompany the most efficacious therapies.

Adjuvant endocrine treatment of early breast cancer

Endocrine therapy plays a pivotal role in the early treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Although evidence suggests that chemotherapy may work partly through ovarian ablation in young women who have ER-positive tumors, combined chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are generally advocated. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibition has become the new "gold standard" of treatment. More research is needed to define optimal regimens (aromatase inhibitor monotherapy versus tamoxifen sequential application), optimal duration of therapy and potential advantages of particular compounds. The optimal use of estrogen suppression (ovarian ablation with or without aromatase inhibition) and tamoxifen (administered sequentially or in concert with ovarian ablation) in premenopausal women has yet to be defined.

Is HRT justified for symptom management in women at higher risk of developing breast cancer?

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the most efficacious intervention for the treatment of estrogen-deficiency symptoms. Prescriptions for HRT have fallen over the last 3 years due to anxiety provoked about breast cancer risk and recurrence that has been generated by recent clinical trials. In women at population risk of breast cancer, these trials have not shown risks greater than estimates from clinical trial evidence that predated them. For women at increased breast cancer risk due to a family history or high-risk benign breast conditions, clinical trial data are limited but suggest a lack of an additive effect of HRT on risk. In symptomatic breast cancer survivors, observational data suggest no increase in recurrence but these data are open to bias. Interim analyses of large, randomized trials have shown contradictory outcomes and, as a result, three large HRT randomized trials have now been closed. The randomized LIBERATE trial evaluating tibolone in breast cancer survivors is fully recruited and continuing. The current clinical climate is 'HRT adverse' but, due to a lack of effective alternatives for symptom relief, women at higher breast cancer risk and breast cancer survivors are still requesting information about HRT. In this situation, discussion of the current clinical uncertainty surrounding the use of HRT must be undertaken to ensure that women are adequately informed.

Endocrine symptom assessment in women with breast cancer: what a simple “yes” means

GOALS OF WORK

To investigate the self-reported symptoms related to endocrine therapy in women with early or advanced breast cancer and the impact of these symptoms on quality of life (QL) indicators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Symptom occurrence was assessed by the Checklist for Patients on Endocrine Therapy (C-PET) and symptom intensity was assessed by linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) indicators. Patients also responded to global LASA indicators for physical well-being, mood, coping effort and treatment burden. Associations between symptoms and these indicators were analysed by linear regression models.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 373 women, the distribution of symptom intensity showed considerable variation in patients reporting a symptom as present. Even though patients recorded a symptom as absent, some patients reported having experienced that symptom when responding to symptom intensity, as seen for decreased sex drive, tiredness and vaginal dryness. Six of 13 symptoms and lower age had a detrimental impact on the global indicators, particularly tiredness and irritability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' experience of endocrine symptoms needs to be considered both in patient care and research, when interpreting the association between symptoms and QL.

Breast Cancer Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy

Adjuvant endocrine therapy with the selective estrogen receptor modulator, tamoxifen, has significantly improved mortality from early-stage breast cancer for both pre- and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recent large clinical trials have demonstrated a clear and consistent benefit for the incorporation of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy within adjuvant endocrine regimens for postmenopausal women. The AIs, which are associated with myalgias, arthralgias, and a reduction in bone mineral density, are generally well tolerated and have lower risks of endometrial carcinoma and thromboembolic events than tamoxifen. Data are awaited from ongoing trials to better define the optimal sequencing strategy, duration, and AI agent. Attempts to further optimize adjuvant endocrine therapy by identifying predictive biomarkers of response, as well as by developing strategies to overcome endocrine resistance are underway. In premenopausal women AI monotherapy is currently contraindicated and tamoxifen remains the standard of care. The role of ovarian function suppression in addition to tamoxifen or combined with AI therapy is being explored. The hope is that continued advances in endocrine therapy will translate into improved survival among both pre- and postmenopausal women with receptor-positive breast cancer.

Advances in hormonal therapy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe recent developments in hormonal therapy for breast cancer, focusing on SERMs and AIs.

DATA SOURCES

Published journal articles and texts, research reports and monographs, government publications, and professional organization guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Research continues to identify the effectiveness of hormonal therapy in breast cancer, including adjuvant treatment in early and advanced stages as well as a chemopreventive measure. The individual drug profile must be evaluated for safety and efficacy, and the impact on QOL must be considered.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

It is imperative that oncology nurses understand the physiology, application, risks, and benefits of hormonal therapies.

Aromatase inhibitor-associated arthralgia syndrome

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are widely used as an adjuvant endocrine treatment in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Clinical trials have assessed 5 years of AI therapy, either as an alternative to tamoxifen for primary adjuvant therapy of breast cancer, or after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. Treatment of 2-3 years' duration after 2-3 years of tamoxifen has also been studied. AI therapy brings side effects related to estrogen deprivation, and this side effect profile differs in clinically relevant ways from that seen with tamoxifen. In particular, the selective estrogen receptor modulatory effects of tamoxifen contribute to menopausal symptoms, vaginal discharge, and the rare but worrisome risks of thromboembolism and uterine carcinoma. By contrast, the low levels of estrogen achieved with aromatase inhibition contribute to menopausal symptoms, vaginal dryness and sexual dysfunction, and accelerated bone demineralization with risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. Clinical experience also suggests that AI therapy is associated with a novel musculoskeletal side effect consisting of an arthralgia syndrome. The actual incidence of AI-associated arthralgias or musculoskeletal symptoms is not known, though such symptoms are quite prevalent and appear more commonly with AI use than with tamoxifen. Arthralgias can be a reason for discontinuation of AI treatment. The possible mechanisms of AI-associated arthralgia are unclear. Estrogen deficiency causes bone loss, which in turn contributes to arthralgia. Less well-studied functions of estrogen include regulating immune cells and cytokines involved in bone remodeling, and modulating pain sensitivity at the level of the central nervous system. Arthralgia and arthritis have seldom been rigorously differentiated in clinical trials of AIs. Assessment of inflammatory and rheumatologic markers, as well as detailed evaluation of patient symptoms using appropriate quality-of-life instruments, may be warranted in order to understand both the symptoms and the etiology of the arthralgia syndrome. Treatment options for arthralgia (primarily non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) are currently inadequate, but areas of active research include high-dose vitamin D and new-targeted therapies to inhibit bone loss.

Survival and safety of exemestane versus tamoxifen after 2-3 years' tamoxifen treatment (Intergroup Exemestane Study): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Early improvements in disease-free survival have been noted when an aromatase inhibitor is given either instead of or sequentially after tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with oestrogen-receptor-positive early breast cancer. However, little information exists on the long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors after treatment, and whether these early improvements lead to real gains in survival.

METHODS

4724 postmenopausal patients with unilateral invasive, oestrogen-receptor-positive or oestrogen-receptor-unknown breast cancer who were disease-free on 2-3 years of tamoxifen, were randomly assigned to switch to exemestane (n=2352) or to continue tamoxifen (n=2372) for the remainder of a 5-year endocrine treatment period. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival; overall survival was a secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were intention-to-treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN11883920.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 55.7 months (range 0-89.7), 809 events contributing to the analysis of disease-free survival had been reported (354 exemestane, 455 tamoxifen); unadjusted hazard ratio 0.76 (95% CI 0.66-0.88, p=0.0001) in favour of exemestane, absolute benefit 3.3% (95% CI 1.6-4.9) by end of treatment (ie, 2.5 years after randomisation). 222 deaths occurred in the exemestane group compared with 261 deaths in the tamoxifen group; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.85 (95% CI 0.71-1.02, p=0.08), 0.83 (0.69-1.00, p=0.05) when 122 patients with oestrogen-receptor-negative disease were excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that early improvements in disease-free survival noted in patients who switch to exemestane after 2-3 years on tamoxifen persist after treatment, and translate into a modest improvement in overall survival.

Quality of life for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the seventh most common cause of deaths from cancer in women. Recent annual worldwide figures reflect 204,000 new cases of ovarian cancer and 125,000 deaths. Treatment of advanced ovarian cancer involves a combination of surgery and chemotherapy, both of which may impact a woman's physical, social, and emotional well-being. A woman's quality of life (QOL) is affected by disease site, and treatment-specific and patient-specific factors, but other common QOL issues include changes in physical functioning owing to side effects of treatment, psychological distress caused by fear and anxiety of recurrence, sexual dysfunction associated with anatomic and physiologic changes of treatment, and for younger women, loss of childbearing potential. As new diagnostic and treatment strategies for gynecologic malignancies are developed, research efforts should include QOL consequences. Further studies are needed to develop strategies for identifying women at risk for serious QOL disruption so that effective interventions to assist these women can be designed.

Place actuelle des inhibiteurs de l'aromatase dans le traitement adjuvant des cancers du sein

Adjuvant hormone therapy is indicated only in patients whose tumors express estrogen or progesterone receptors. Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are indicated only in postmenopausal patients. AI are significantly more effective than tamoxifen in terms of disease-free survival and distant recurrence-free survival; these advantages will probably result in a significant overall survival benefit after sufficient follow-up. This benefit justifies the use of AI in all postmenopausal patients in the absence of contraindications and after complete explanations of the benefit/risk ratio and potential side effects of this treatment. The benefit of AI over tamoxifen may be particularly pronounced for tumors overexpressing HER-2 and perhaps for ER+PR- tumors. Replacement of tamoxifen by AI or first-line treatment with AI is advised in patients with such tumors. Extended adjuvant treatment with AI for 5 years significantly increases survival among patients already treated with tamoxifen for 5 years; it also provides a significant overall survival benefit to patients with positive axillary nodes and should be used in this group. AI may cause several generally mild side effects, including insomnia, arthralgia, bone loss, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia and loss of libido. Tamoxifen may be appropriate for well-informed patients with these side effects, especially those with RE+ RP+ tumors and a low risk of thromboembolic or endometrial complications. The effects of AI on memory and cognition should also be investigated thoroughly before its long-term use, especially in the elderly.

Impact on quality of life of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

Late toxicities of adjuvant chemotherapy and side effects of endocrine therapy may cause long-term quality-of-life impairments for some individuals who have been treated for breast cancer. Chemotherapy has been associated with durable effects on cognitive function and fatigue and with the induction of menopause. Endocrine therapies can increase menopausal and sexual symptoms and can contribute to weight gain. Overall, however, quality of life is good for the majority of breast cancer survivors who have received adjuvant systemic therapy. Behavioral interventions that target fatigue and sleep disturbance may further enhance quality of life.

A review of distress and its management in couples facing end-of-life cancer

The aim of this review paper is to (1) provide an overview of the impact of cancer on the couple, (2) to identify potential outcomes for couple's interventions targeted specifically when one spouse is facing end of life, (3) to review and critique the empirical literature on psychosocial interventions for couple's facing end of life to date, and (4) to provide direction for research in this area. Based on our review, we found that there is clear evidence of significant distress arising from the impact of terminal illness on the marital relationship, which can result in greater suffering in the last months and weeks of life. Currently, there is a very small body of evidence on the effectiveness of couple interventions for those where one is in palliative care. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the impact of couple therapy adapted for couples facing the end of life, and to guide in providing information on the number of sessions and format required for this population. Outcomes, such as more effective communication, reduction in the experience of hopelessness, uncertainty, isolation, depression, anxiety, and more adaptive coping strategies should be considered.

Initial versus sequential adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy: a review of the current data

OBJECTIVE

One of the principle unresolved questions in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer is whether it is more beneficial for women to receive aromatase inhibitor (AI) monotherapy or start with tamoxifen and then switch to AI therapy. This review will compare the current available efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness data for AIs in the initial adjuvant and switch adjuvant settings.

METHODS

A search of the Medline database from 1976 through 2006 was performed for the following terms: breast cancer, adjuvant, aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen, sequential, switching. A search for relevant abstracts from the EBCC, ECCO, ASCO, and SABCS conferences was also performed.

RESULTS

In the upfront adjuvant setting, anastrozole and letrozole have both demonstrated a significant disease-free survival (DFS) benefit over tamoxifen. Upfront therapy with a nonsteroidal AI appears to be most critical for patients at risk of an early relapse, illustrated by the finding that upfront letrozole provided a significant early DFS advantage over tamoxifen only in patients with node-positive disease (hazard ratio = 0.71, p < 0.001). With respect to safety, both strategies have similar adverse event profiles. From an economic perspective, AIs, whether used upfront or sequentially, are considered cost-effective compared with tamoxifen due to the cost savings associated with a reduction in the breast cancer event rate. From the efficacy standpoint, modeling studies have produced inconsistent results and do not produce definitive data.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in patient populations, definitions of end points, and prior tamoxifen usage between the trials discussed necessitates a careful interpretation but may provide insights in the treatment decision-making process. The BIG 1-98 trial was designed to compare letrozole monotherapy versus a letrozole-to-tamoxifen or reverse-sequence approach and should provide insights to the question of optimal therapy. Until results are available, for higher-risk patients (i.e., those with positive lymph nodes), initiation of treatment with a non-steroidal AI may be beneficial to avoid tamoxifen-associated early relapses that occur in the first 2 years after diagnosis.

Safety of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy

The long-term effects of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) on lipids and bone and cardiovascular and gynecological health are of particular interest to clinicians. The safety data of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane are limited to trials with follow-up periods of 5 years or less, and much of the data arise from comparisons with tamoxifen, a drug that has both estrogen agonist and antagonist effects. With the lack of extensive long-term data, indirect comparisons between the safety profiles of the AIs provide some insights. Although results from these indirect comparisons should be interpreted cautiously, they may assist physicians in the decision-making process. Thus far, AIs confer an increased risk of bone loss and osteoporosis and fractures, while the effects on lipid profiles and cardiovascular health seem to indicate only that AIs lack the cardioprotective and lipid-lowering effects of tamoxifen. Some data also are available from comparisons with placebo, a more appropriate comparator to investigate the tolerability and safety of a specific drug. In the MA.17 trial, patients receiving letrozole experienced similar rates of cardiovascular ischemic events and hypercholesterolemia compared with those on placebo. The significant clinical benefits of AIs compared with tamoxifen have been achieved without worsening quality of life.

Incidence and management of side effects associated with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are effective and generally well-tolerated as adjuvant therapy. These AIs are now being introduced for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, questions remain about their long-term safety. This paper summarizes the adverse events reported in third-generation AI trials and comments on the appropriate management of these drug-induced adverse events in patients.

METHODS

Papers relating to anastrozole, exemestane, and letrozole were identified through Medline searches, and proceedings of recent oncology meetings were also reviewed to capture relevant emerging data.

RESULTS

The most commonly reported adverse events associated with adjuvant AI therapy include hot flushes and musculoskeletal complaints/arthralgia. The incidence of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events is significantly lower with an AI than with tamoxifen. However, there is a small but significant increase in the risk of osteoporosis and fractures with AI therapy. A potential negative effect on the cardiovascular system, specifically on lipid metabolism, has not been conclusively demonstrated. No significant differences in overall quality of life were observed in studies comparing AIs with tamoxifen or placebo.

CONCLUSION

AIs alone and sequenced after tamoxifen are an appropriate option for adjuvant endocrine therapy for most postmenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancer. The incidence of some side effects such as endometrial cancer, stroke, or pulmonary embolism associated with tamoxifen is decreased. Monitoring and management of bone loss associated with AI treatment are essential and are being addressed in ongoing trials. Further studies with longer follow-up are required to clarify the effects of AIs on lipid metabolism and cardiovascular health.

Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy in Peri‐ and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

Tamoxifen has been the mainstay of endocrine treatment for early-stage breast cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women for many years. Since 2001, the results of several large, randomized, clinical trials have provided evidence that aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy, either upfront or in sequence after tamoxifen, improves disease-free survival and, in certain patients, overall survival for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Thus far, with relatively short-term follow-up, AIs have been generally safe and well tolerated among the population of patients treated in these adjuvant trials. However, important side effects such as musculoskeletal and bone-related problems, including the risk for osteoporosis and fractures, remain of concern and warrant continued monitoring and follow-up. Several questions regarding the appropriate AI to use and the timing of AI therapy remain unresolved, and ongoing studies will help address these issues. Caution is warranted in the use of AIs in perimenopausal women, including those that develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, and clinical evidence supports the role for AI use in postmenopausal women only. Areas of active investigation include the mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and AIs and clinical strategies to overcome this resistance.

Quality of life of postmenopausal women in the ATAC ("Arimidex", tamoxifen, alone or in combination) trial after completion of 5 years' adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer

The impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important consideration in the adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer. Here we report mature HRQoL outcomes from the ATAC trial, comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen as primary adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with localized breast cancer. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire plus endocrine subscale (ES) at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Baseline characteristics in the HRQoL sub-protocol were well balanced between the anastrozole (n = 335) and tamoxifen (n = 347) groups in the primary analysis population. As with previously published results at 2 years, there was no statistically significant difference in the Trial Outcome Index of the FACT-B, the primary endpoint of the study, between treatments at 5 years. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in ES total scores. Consistent with the 2-year analysis, there were differences between treatment groups in patient-reported side effects: diarrhea (anastrozole 3.1% vs. tamoxifen 1.3%), vaginal dryness (18.5% vs. 9.1%), diminished libido (34.0% vs. 26.1%), and dyspareunia (17.3% vs. 8.1%) were significantly more frequent with anastrozole compared to tamoxifen. Dizziness (3.1% vs. 5.4%) and vaginal discharge (1.2% vs. 5.2%) were significantly less frequent with anastrozole compared to tamoxifen. In this, the first report of HRQoL over 5 years of initial adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor, we conclude that anastrozole and tamoxifen had similar impacts on HRQoL, which was maintained or slightly improved during the treatment period for both groups.

Magnifying endoscopic observation of the gastric mucosa, particularly in patients with atrophic gastritis

The gastric mucosal surface was observed using the magnifying fibergastroscope (FGS-ML), and the fine gastric mucosal patterns, which were even smaller than one unit of gastric area, were examined at a magnification of about 30. For simplicification, we classified these patterns by magnifying endoscopy in the following ways; FP, FIP, FSP, SP and MP, modifying Yoshii's classification under the dissecting microscope. The FIP, which was found to have round and long elliptical gastric pits, is a new addition to our endoscopic classification. The relationship between the FIP and the intermediate zone was evaluated by superficial and histological studies of surgical and biopsy specimens. The width of the band of FIP seems to be related to the severity of atrophic gastritis. Also, the transformation of FP to FIP was assessed by comparing specimens taken from the resected and residual parts of the stomach, respectively. Moreover, it appears that severe gastritis occurs in the gastric mucosa which shows a FIP. Therefore, we consider that the FIP indicates the position of the atrophic border.