101
|
Sancho JM, García O, Mercadal S, Pomares H, Fernández-Alvarez R, González-Barca E, Tapia G, González-García E, Moreno M, Domingo-Domènech E, Sorigué M, Navarro JT, Motlló C, Fernández-de-Sevilla A, Feliu E, Ribera JM. The long term follow-up of early stage follicular lymphoma treated with radiotherapy, chemotherapy or combined modality treatment. Leuk Res 2015; 39:853-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Revised: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
102
|
Casulo C, Byrtek M, Dawson KL, Zhou X, Farber CM, Flowers CR, Hainsworth JD, Maurer MJ, Cerhan JR, Link BK, Zelenetz AD, Friedberg JW. Early Relapse of Follicular Lymphoma After Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone Defines Patients at High Risk for Death: An Analysis From the National LymphoCare Study. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2516-22. [PMID: 26124482 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.7534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 587] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Twenty percent of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) experience progression of disease (POD) within 2 years of initial chemoimmunotherapy. We analyzed data from the National LymphoCare Study to identify whether prognostic FL factors are associated with early POD and whether patients with early POD are at high risk for death. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 588 patients with stage 2 to 4 FL received first-line rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Two groups were defined: patients with early POD 2 years or less after diagnosis and those without POD within 2 years, the reference group. An independent validation set, 147 patients with FL who received first-line R-CHOP, was analyzed for reproducibility. RESULTS Of 588 patients, 19% (n = 110) had early POD, 71% (n = 420) were in the reference group, 8% (n = 46) were lost to follow-up, and 2% (n = 12) died without POD less than 2 years after diagnosis. Five-year overall survival was lower in the early-POD group than in the reference group (50% v 90%). This trend was maintained after we adjusted for FL International Prognostic Index (hazard ratio, 6.44; 95% CI, 4.33 to 9.58). Results were similar for the validation set (FL International Prognostic Index-adjusted hazard ratio, 19.8). CONCLUSION In patients with FL who received first-line R-CHOP, POD within 2 years after diagnosis was associated with poor outcomes and should be further validated as a standard end point of chemoimmunotherapy trials of untreated FL. This high-risk FL population warrants further study in directed prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Casulo
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Michelle Byrtek
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Keith L Dawson
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Xiaolei Zhou
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Charles M Farber
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Christopher R Flowers
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - John D Hainsworth
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Matthew J Maurer
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - James R Cerhan
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Brian K Link
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Andrew D Zelenetz
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Jonathan W Friedberg
- Carla Casulo and Jonathan W. Friedberg, University of Rochester, Rochester; Jonathan W. Friedberg, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michelle Byrtek and Keith L. Dawson, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; Xiaolei Zhou, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; Charles M. Farber, Carol G. Simon Cancer Center, Morristown, NJ; Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; John D. Hainsworth, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Matthew J. Maurer and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Brian K. Link, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Outcomes of transformed follicular lymphoma in the modern era: a report from the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS). Blood 2015; 126:851-7. [PMID: 26105149 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2015] [Accepted: 06/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
We assessed the incidence, prognostic features, and outcomes associated with transformation of follicular lymphoma (FL) among 2652 evaluable patients prospectively enrolled in the National LymphoCare Study. At a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 379/2652 (14.3%) patients transformed following the initial FL diagnosis, including 147 pathologically confirmed and 232 clinically suspected cases. Eastern Cancer Oncology Group performance status >1, extranodal sites >1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and B symptoms at diagnosis were associated with transformation risk. Relative to observation, patients initiating treatment at diagnosis had a reduced risk of transformation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.75). The risk of transformation was similar in patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone compared with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (adjusted HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.62-1.42). Maintenance rituximab was associated with reduced transformation risk (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.97). Five-year survival from diagnosis was significantly worse for patients with vs without transformation (75%, 95% CI, 70-79 vs 85%, 95% CI, 83-86). The median overall survival post-transformation was 5 years. Forty-seven patients with evidence of transformation at the time of diagnosis shared similar prognostic factors and survival rates to those without transformation. Improved outcomes for transformation in the modern era are suggested by this observational study. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00097565.
Collapse
|
104
|
Vargo JA, Gill BS, Balasubramani GK, Beriwal S. What is the optimal management of early-stage low-grade follicular lymphoma in the modern era? Cancer 2015; 121:3325-34. [PMID: 26042364 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2015] [Revised: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 04/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite international practice guidelines endorsing radiotherapy (RT) as the preferred initial therapy, treatment approaches vary for patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma. The authors engaged the National Cancer Data Base to analyze patterns of care and survival outcomes for patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma in the era of modern therapy. METHODS A National Cancer Data Base retrospective cohort study was conducted of 35,961 patients with lymph node and extranodal, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I to II, WHO grade 1 to 2 follicular lymphoma who were diagnosed between 1998 and 2012. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify sociodemographic, treatment, and tumor characteristics that were predictive of overall survival (OS) and treatment use. Propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards ratios for survival in patients treated for follicular lymphoma were used. RESULTS Of the 35,961 patients with follicular lymphoma included in the current study, 63% had stage I disease, 79% were without extranodal disease, and 61% were aged >60 years. RT use decreased from 37% in 1999 to 24% in 2012 (P<.0001), with corresponding significant increases in observation and single-agent chemotherapy. Patients who received RT had 5-year and 10-year OS rates of 86% and 68%, respectively, compared with 74% and 54%, respectively, for those who did not receive RT (P<.0001). On multivariable survival analysis, including a propensity score to account for potential uncaptured confounding variables due to a lack of randomization, upfront RT remained independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio of death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.63 [P<.0001]). CONCLUSIONS RT is an increasingly underused treatment approach in the era of modern therapy for patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma. The use of RT appears to improve OS and should remain standard practice as encouraged by clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Beant S Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Goundappa K Balasubramani
- Department of Epidemiology, Epidemiology Data Center, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Chihara D, Nastoupil LJ, Williams JN, Lee P, Koff JL, Flowers CR. New insights into the epidemiology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and implications for therapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2015; 15:531-44. [PMID: 25864967 PMCID: PMC4698971 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1023712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) comprises numerous biologically and clinically heterogeneous subtypes, with limited data examining the risk factors for these distinct disease entities. Many limitations exist when studying lymphoma epidemiology; therefore, until recently, little was known regarding the etiology of NHL subtypes. This review highlights the results of recent pooled analyses examining the risk factors for NHL subtypes. We outline the heterogeneity and commonality among the risk factors for NHL subtypes, with proposed subtype-specific as well as shared etiologic mechanisms. In addition, we describe how the study of lymphoma epidemiology may translate into prevention or therapeutic targeting as we continue to explore the complexities of lifestyle and genetic factors that impact lymphomagenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dai Chihara
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Loretta J. Nastoupil
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jessica N. Williams
- Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Paul Lee
- Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jean L. Koff
- Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
106
|
Prica A, Chan K, Cheung M. Frontline rituximab monotherapy induction versus a watch and wait approach for asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer 2015; 121:2637-45. [PMID: 25877511 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A watch and wait (WW) strategy is the standard of care for patients with asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. Recent data have demonstrated an improvement in the time to progression with rituximab induction (RI) with or without rituximab maintenance (RM) in comparison with a WW strategy wait in such patients. It remains unclear whether this is a cost-effective strategy. METHODS A Markov decision analysis model was developed to compare the clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of RI (4 weekly doses) plus RM (12 doses every 2 months), RI (4 weekly doses), and a WW strategy for patients newly diagnosed with low-burden, asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma over a lifetime horizon. Baseline probabilities and utilities were derived from a systematic review of published studies, and they were evaluated on a 6-month cycle. A Canadian public health payer's perspective was adopted, and costs were presented in 2012 Canadian dollars. RESULTS RI was the cheapest strategy. It was less costly at $59,953 versus $67,489 for the RM arm and $75,895 for the WW arm. It was also associated with a slightly lower quality-adjusted life expectancy at 6.16 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus 6.28 QALYs for the RM strategy but was superior to WW (5.71 QALYs). In sensitivity analyses of key variables, this effectiveness was sensitive to the probability of first and second progression in the RI arm, and this indicated relatively neutral effectiveness between the 2 rituximab arms. CONCLUSIONS RI without maintenance for asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma is the preferred strategy: it minimizes costs per patient over a lifetime horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anca Prica
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelvin Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Matthew Cheung
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Nabhan C, Byrtek M, Rai A, Dawson K, Zhou X, Link BK, Friedberg JW, Zelenetz AD, Maurer MJ, Cerhan JR, Flowers CR. Disease characteristics, treatment patterns, prognosis, outcomes and lymphoma-related mortality in elderly follicular lymphoma in the United States. Br J Haematol 2015; 170:85-95. [PMID: 25851937 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Data from the National LymphoCare Study (a prospective, multicentre registry that enrolled follicular lymphoma (FL) patients from 2004 to 2007) were used to determine disease characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes and prognosis for elderly FL (eFL) patients. Of 2650 FL patients, 209 (8%) were aged >80 years; these eFL patients more commonly had grade 3 disease, less frequently received chemoimmunotherapy and anthracyclines, and had lower response rates when compared to younger patients. With a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 5-year overall survival (OS) for eFL patients was 59%; 38% of deaths were lymphoma-related. No treatment produced superior OS among eFL patients. In multivariate Cox models, anaemia, B-symptoms and male sex predicted worse OS (P < 0.01); a prognostic index of these factors (0, 1 or ≥ 2 present) predicted OS [hazard ratio (95% CI): ≥ 2 vs. 0, 4.72 (2.38-9.33); 1 vs. 0, 2.63 (1.39-4.98)], with a higher concordance index (0.63) versus the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (0.55). The index was validated in an independent cohort. In the largest prospective US-based eFL cohort, no optimal therapy was identified and nearly 40% of deaths were lymphoma-related, representing baseline outcomes in the modern era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chadi Nabhan
- Department of Medicine Section of Hematology and Oncology, The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Xiaolei Zhou
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
108
|
Kelly JL, Salles G, Goldman B, Fisher RI, Brice P, Press O, Casasnovas O, Maloney DG, Soubeyran P, Rimsza L, Haioun C, Xerri L, LeBlanc M, Tilly H, Friedberg JW. Low Serum Vitamin D Levels Are Associated With Inferior Survival in Follicular Lymphoma: A Prospective Evaluation in SWOG and LYSA Studies. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1482-90. [PMID: 25823738 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.57.5092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent literature reports a potential association between high vitamin D and improved lymphoma prognosis. We evaluated the impact of pretreatment vitamin D on follicular lymphoma (FL) outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS SWOG participants were previously untreated patients with FL enrolled onto SWOG clinical trials (S9800, S9911, or S0016) involving CHOP chemotherapy plus an anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab or iodine-131 tositumomab) between 1998 and 2008. Participants included in our second independent cohort were also previously untreated patients with FL enrolled onto the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) PRIMA trial of rituximab plus chemotherapy (randomly assigned to rituximab maintenance v observation) between 2004 and 2007. Using the gold-standard liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, 25-hydroxyvitamin D was measured in stored baseline serum samples. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS After a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the adjusted PFS and overall survival hazard ratios for the SWOG cohort were 1.97 (95% CI, 1.10 to 3.53) and 4.16 (95% CI, 1.66 to 10.44), respectively, for those who were vitamin D deficient (< 20 ng/mL; 15% of cohort). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the adjusted PFS and overall survival hazard ratios for the LYSA cohort were 1.50 (95% CI, 0.93 to 2.42) and 1.92 (95% CI, 0.72 to 5.13), respectively, for those who were vitamin D deficient (< 10 ng/mL; 25% of cohort). CONCLUSION Although statistical significance was not reached in the LYSA cohort, the consistent estimates of association between low vitamin D levels and FL outcomes in two independent cohorts suggests that serum vitamin D might be the first potentially modifiable factor to be associated with FL survival. Further investigation is needed to determine the effects of vitamin D supplementation in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Kelly
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Gilles Salles
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Bryan Goldman
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Richard I Fisher
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Pauline Brice
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Oliver Press
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Olivier Casasnovas
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - David G Maloney
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Pierre Soubeyran
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Lisa Rimsza
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Corinne Haioun
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Luc Xerri
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Hervé Tilly
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
| | - Jonathan W Friedberg
- Jennifer L. Kelly and Jonathan W. Friedberg, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Gilles Salles, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Benite; Pauline Brice, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris; Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon; Pierre Soubeyran, Institut Bergonié and Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux; Corinne Haioun, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil; Luc Xerri, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; Hervé Tilly, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Bryan Goldman, Oliver Press, and Michael LeBlanc, SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Richard I. Fisher, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; and Lisa Rimsza, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Trends in quality of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma care: is it getting better? Ann Hematol 2015; 94:1195-203. [PMID: 25772630 PMCID: PMC4432098 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-015-2340-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2014] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
This study outlines trends in quality of delivered non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) care in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2011 and to what extend this was influenced by the national Visible Care program, which aimed at increasing transparency by providing insight into the quality of healthcare. We analyzed data collected from medical records in two observational studies, combined into 20 validated quality indicators (QIs) of which 6 were included in the national program. A random sample of 771 patients, diagnosed with NHL in 26 Dutch hospitals, was examined. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess differences in quality of NHL care and to provide insight into the effect of the national program. We reported improved adherence to only 3 out of 6 QIs involved in the national program and none of the other 14 validated QIs. Improvement was shown for performance of all recommended staging techniques (from 26 to 43 %), assessment of International Prognostic Index (from 21 to 43 %), and multidisciplinary discussion of patients (from 23 to 41 %). We found limited improvement in quality of NHL care between 2007 and 2011; improvement potential (<80 % adherence) was still present for 13 QIs. The national program seems to have a small positive effect, but has not influenced all 20 indicators which represent the most important, measurable parts in quality of NHL care. These results illustrate the need for tailored implementation and quality improvement initiatives.
Collapse
|
110
|
Cannon AC, Loberiza FR. Review of Antibody-Based Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Patterns of Use. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2015; 15:129-38. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Revised: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
111
|
El-Galaly TC, Bilgrau AE, de Nully Brown P, Mylam KJ, Ahmad SA, Pedersen LM, Gang AO, Bentzen HH, Juul MB, Bergmann OJ, Pedersen RS, Nielsen BJ, Johnsen HE, Dybkaer K, Bøgsted M, Hutchings M. A population-based study of prognosis in advanced stage follicular lymphoma managed by watch and wait. Br J Haematol 2015; 169:435-44. [DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2014] [Accepted: 12/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly
- Department of Haematology; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine; Aalborg University; Aalborg Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Centre; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
| | - Anders E. Bilgrau
- Department of Haematology; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
- Department of Mathematical Sciences; Aalborg University; Aalborg Denmark
| | - Peter de Nully Brown
- Department of Haematology; Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Karen J. Mylam
- Department of Haematology; Odense University Hospital; Odense Denmark
| | - Syed A. Ahmad
- Department of Haematology; Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| | | | - Anne O. Gang
- Department of Haematology; Copenhagen University Hospital; Herlev Denmark
| | - Hans H. Bentzen
- Department of Haematology; Aarhus University Hospital; Aarhus Denmark
| | - Maja B. Juul
- Department of Haematology; Vejle Hospital; Vejle Denmark
| | | | | | - Berit J. Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine; Aalborg University; Aalborg Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
| | - Hans E. Johnsen
- Department of Haematology; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine; Aalborg University; Aalborg Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Centre; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
| | - Karen Dybkaer
- Department of Haematology; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine; Aalborg University; Aalborg Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Centre; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
| | - Martin Bøgsted
- Department of Haematology; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine; Aalborg University; Aalborg Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Centre; Aalborg University Hospital; Aalborg Denmark
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Haematology; Rigshospitalet; Copenhagen University Hospital; Copenhagen Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Wudhikarn K, Smith BJ, Button AM, Habermann TM, Thompson CA, Rosenstein LJ, Syrbu SI, Weiner GJ, Cerhan JR, Link BK. Relationships between chemotherapy, chemotherapy dose intensity and outcomes of follicular lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era: a report from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource. Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 56:2365-72. [PMID: 25530345 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.994206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The optimal treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) is not established. Rituximab's value potentially dilutes the impact of chemotherapy on FL. We reviewed 337 cases of FL treated initially with rituximab as monotherapy or with chemotherapy at the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic from 2002 to 2009, investigating the association between chemotherapy delivery of cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin and survival. With median follow-up duration of 52.7 months, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the two groups, with a trend toward better EFS in the R-chemotherapy cohort (hazard ratio [HR]=1.24, p=0.28). In the R-chemotherapy group, increased total dose delivery and delivered dose intensity of doxorubicin were associated with improved EFS only in patients who did not receive R-maintenance (HR=0.81; p=0.02 and HR=0.94; p=0.04). Cyclophosphamide delivery was not associated with EFS. Thus, in the immunochemotherapy era, chemotherapy delivery strategy requires re-evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kitsada Wudhikarn
- a Department of Medicine , College of Medicine, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA
| | - Brian J Smith
- b Department of Biostatistics , College of Public Health, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.,c Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center , Iowa City , IA , USA
| | - Anna M Button
- b Department of Biostatistics , College of Public Health, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.,c Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center , Iowa City , IA , USA
| | | | | | - Lori J Rosenstein
- a Department of Medicine , College of Medicine, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.,c Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center , Iowa City , IA , USA
| | - Sergei I Syrbu
- e Department of Pathology , College of Medicine, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA
| | - George J Weiner
- a Department of Medicine , College of Medicine, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.,c Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center , Iowa City , IA , USA
| | - James R Cerhan
- f Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Brian K Link
- a Department of Medicine , College of Medicine, University of Iowa , Iowa City , IA , USA.,c Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center , Iowa City , IA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
Kritharis A, Sharma J, Evens AM. Current therapeutic strategies and new treatment paradigms for follicular lymphoma. Cancer Treat Res 2015; 165:197-226. [PMID: 25655611 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13150-4_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that remains an incurable disease for most patients. It is responsive to a variety of different treatments, however it follows a pattern of relapsing and remitting disease. Traditional therapeutic options for patients with untreated FL include expectant observation for asymptomatic and low tumor burden and multiagent cytotoxic chemotherapy for symptomatic and/or high tumor burden. Biologics have become an integral part of therapy with agents that target B lymphocytes, including monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies and radiolabeled anti-CD20 antibodies. Treatment response to cytotoxic and biologic therapy is high initially; however, with subsequent treatments, response rate and remission duration typically decline and cumulative toxicities increase. The identification of novel targeted agents, use of stem cell transplantation, and new treatment combinations provide the opportunity to enhance patient outcomes. In this review, we critically examine standard treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory FL and discuss established and emerging novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Kritharis
- Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Rossi G, Marcheselli L, Dondi A, Bottelli C, Tucci A, Luminari S, Arcaini L, Merli M, Pulsoni A, Boccomini C, Puccini B, Micheletti M, Martinelli G, Rossi A, Zilioli VR, Bozzoli V, Balzarotti M, Bolis S, Cabras MG, Federico M. The use of anthracycline at first-line compared to alkylating agents or nucleoside analogs improves the outcome of salvage treatments after relapse in follicular lymphoma The REFOLL study by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Am J Hematol 2015; 90:56-61. [PMID: 25327841 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Revised: 10/10/2014] [Accepted: 10/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients experience multiple remissions and relapses and commonly receive multiple treatment lines. A crucial question is whether anthracyclines should be used at first-line or whether they would be better "reserved" for relapse and whether FL outcome can be optimized by definite sequences of treatments. Randomized trials can be hardly designed to address this question. In this retrospective multi-institutional study, time-to-next-treatment after first relapse was analyzed in 510 patients who had received either alkylating agents- or anthracycline- or nucleoside analogs-based chemotherapy with/without rituximab at first-line and different second-line therapies. After a median of 42 months, median time-to-next-treatment after relapse was 41 months (CI95%:34-47 months). After adjustment for covariates, first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy with/without rituximab was associated with better time-to-next-treatment after any salvage than alkylating agents-based chemotherapy with/without rituximab or nucleoside analogs-based chemotherapy with/without rituximab (HR:0.74, P = 0.027). The addition of rituximab to first-line chemotherapy had no significant impact (HR:1.22, P = 0.140). Autologs stem cell transplantation performed better than any other salvage treatment (HR:0.53, P < 0.001). First-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy significantly improved time-to-next-treatment even in patients receiving salvage autologs stem cell transplantation (P = 0.041). This study supports the concept that in FL previous treatments significantly impact on the outcome of subsequent therapies. The outcome of second-line treatments, either with salvage chemoimmunotherapy or with autologs stem cell transplantation, was better when an anthracycline-containing regimen was used at first-line.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luigi Marcheselli
- Department of Diagnostic; Clinical; and Public Health Medicine; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena Italy
| | - Alessandra Dondi
- Department of Diagnostic; Clinical; and Public Health Medicine; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena Italy
| | | | | | - Stefano Luminari
- Department of Diagnostic; Clinical; and Public Health Medicine; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena Italy
| | - Luca Arcaini
- Department of Hematology Oncology; Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo; University of Pavia; Pavia Italy
| | - Michele Merli
- Hematology Division; Department of Internal Medicine; Circolo e Fondazione Macchi; Varese Italy
| | | | - Carola Boccomini
- Department of Hematology; Città della Salute e della Scienza; Torino Italy
| | - Benedetta Puccini
- Department of Hematology; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi; Firenze Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Rossi
- Department of Hematology; Ospedali Riuniti; Bergamo Italy
| | | | - Valentina Bozzoli
- Department of Hematology; University Cattolica Sacro Cuore; Roma Italy
| | | | - Silvia Bolis
- Hematology Unit; Ospedale San Gerardo; Monza Italy
| | | | - Massimo Federico
- Department of Diagnostic; Clinical; and Public Health Medicine; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena Italy
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
Nowakowski GS, Ansell SM. Therapeutic targeting of microenvironment in follicular lymphoma. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2014; 2014:169-173. [PMID: 25696851 DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Immune and nonimmune microenvironmental factors play a critical role in the progression, transformation, and resistance to therapy in follicular lymphoma (FL). A recent increase in our understanding of the role of microenvironment in FL biology has led to the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the nonimmune and immune microenvironment. These include immunomodulatory drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immnunoconjugates, and small-molecule inhibitors with an impact on the microenvironment in addition to direct antitumor activity. These agents are now at different stages of clinical development, ranging from early clinical trials in relapsed disease to phase 3 studies in the upfront setting, including combinations with other agents such as monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. It is important to recognize that, although the current upfront therapy of FL is associated with favorable outcomes in the majority of patients, a significant proportion experience early disease progression and develop treatment resistance and transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Although the development of "chemo-free" combinations using drugs targeting the microenvironment offers a promising approach to minimize toxicity, the identification of patients at risk of relapse and the use of biomarkers allowing the personalization of therapy will likely play a major role in the development of maintenance strategies. Against this landscape of currently available therapy options, this chapter discusses the clinical status of therapies targeting the microenvironment in FL.
Collapse
|
116
|
Al-Hamadani M, Go RS. Stage redistribution and survival among Medicare beneficiaries before and after the approval of positron emission tomography scan for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:1544-6. [DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.966709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
117
|
Nastoupil LJ, Sinha R, Byrtek M, Ziemiecki R, Taylor M, Friedberg JW, Koff JL, Link BK, Cerhan JR, Dawson KL, Flowers CR. Comparison of the effectiveness of frontline chemoimmunotherapy regimens for follicular lymphoma used in the United States. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:1295-302. [PMID: 25263322 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.953144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of frontline rituximab-chemotherapy regimens in clinical practice, we examined outcomes for patients with low-grade, stage III/IV follicular lymphoma receiving rituximab (R) with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP), R with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) or R with a fludarabine-based regimen (R-Flu) as frontline therapy. In total, 611 patients meeting these criteria were identified in the National LymphoCare Study: 47% receiving R-CHOP (n = 287), 31% receiving R-CVP (n = 187) and 22% receiving R-Flu (n = 137). Overall response rates were high (R-CVP 87%, R-CHOP 93%, R-Flu 94%; p = 0.017). Median follow-up was 7.4 years. R-CVP was associated with lower 5-year overall survival (R-CVP 76%, R-CHOP 86%, R-Flu 86%; p = 0.021) and progression-free survival (R-CVP 49%, R-CHOP 58%, R-Flu 64%; p = 0.029). There were no significant differences in survival in Cox models adjusted for baseline clinical factors, practice region/setting and post-treatment R maintenance/observation.
Collapse
|
118
|
Aguiar-Bujanda D, Blanco-Sánchez MJ, Jiménez-Gallego P, Mori-De Santiago M, Hernández-Sosa M, Galván-Ruíz S, Hernández-Sarmiento S, Saura-Grau S, Bohn-Sarmiento U. Therapeutic approaches in patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma. Future Oncol 2014; 10:1967-80. [DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT The prognosis of follicular lymphoma (FL) has significantly improved over the last decade, particularly following the introduction of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, which has challenged the old concept of FL as an incurable disease. However, the decision whether to start treatment in a patient with advanced FL or adopt a watch-and-wait policy remains a subject of controversy. Furthermore, the optimal first-line treatment for FL remains a clinical challenge owing to the numerous different therapeutic options available. In this review, the authors focus on the initial management of patients with newly diagnosed FL, consider the different treatment options for every stage, paying special consideration to the therapeutic approaches for each clinical scenario, and discuss future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Aguiar-Bujanda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - María Jesús Blanco-Sánchez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Pedro Jiménez-Gallego
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Marta Mori-De Santiago
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - María Hernández-Sosa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Saray Galván-Ruíz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Samuel Hernández-Sarmiento
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Salvador Saura-Grau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Uriel Bohn-Sarmiento
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrin, C/Barranco de la Ballena s/n, 35010, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Wudhikarn K, Link BK. Comparative effectiveness research in follicular lymphoma: current and future perspectives and challenges. J Comp Eff Res 2014; 3:95-107. [PMID: 24345259 DOI: 10.2217/cer.13.86] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in northern America. FL is an incurable disease with relapsing-remitting courses requiring serial intermittent treatments. Duration of remission will often become progressively shorter and most patients will die from refractory disease or transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Given the incurable nature of FL, current goals of treatment are focused on improving symptoms and survival by a variety of available treatment options, while considering potential adverse events. Although randomized controlled trials are universally perceived as the gold standard of clinical research, randomized controlled trials are not always practical and have several limitations. Therapeutic and diagnostic options of FLs are expanding faster than randomized controlled trials can test them, so employing comparative effectiveness research on other research designs are needed to efficiently improve global FL care. Implementing comparative effectiveness research with judicious use of appropriate research designs will hopefully fill current knowledge gaps and provide insights for FL managements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kitsada Wudhikarn
- Division of Blood & Marrow Transplant, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
120
|
Friedberg JW. End of rituximab maintenance for low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3093-5. [PMID: 25154826 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.57.8328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
121
|
Kahl BS, Hong F, Williams ME, Gascoyne RD, Wagner LI, Krauss JC, Habermann TM, Swinnen LJ, Schuster SJ, Peterson CG, Sborov MD, Martin SE, Weiss M, Ehmann WC, Horning SJ. Rituximab extended schedule or re-treatment trial for low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma: eastern cooperative oncology group protocol e4402. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3096-102. [PMID: 25154829 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.56.5853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL), maintenance rituximab (MR) has been shown to improve progression-free survival when compared with observation. It is not known whether MR provides superior long-term disease control compared with re-treatment rituximab (RR) administered on an as-needed basis. E4402 (RESORT) was a randomized clinical trial designed to compare MR against RR. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with previously untreated low-tumor burden FL received four doses of rituximab, and responding patients were randomly assigned to either RR or MR. Patients receiving RR were eligible for re-treatment at each disease progression until treatment failure. Patients assigned to MR received a single dose of rituximab every 3 months until treatment failure. The primary end point was time to treatment failure. Secondary end points included time to first cytotoxic therapy, toxicity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). RESULTS A total of 289 patients were randomly assigned to RR or MR. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the estimated median time to treatment failure was 3.9 years for patients receiving RR and 4.3 years for those receiving MR (P = .54). Three-year freedom from cytotoxic therapy was 84% for those receiving RR and 95% for those receiving MR (P = .03). The median number of rituximab doses was four patients receiving RR and 18 for those receiving MR. There was no difference in HRQOL. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were infrequent in both arms. CONCLUSION In low-tumor burden FL, a re-treatment strategy uses less rituximab while providing disease control comparable to that achieved with a maintenance strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brad S Kahl
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA.
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael E Williams
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Randy D Gascoyne
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - John C Krauss
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas M Habermann
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Lode J Swinnen
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Stephen J Schuster
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Christopher G Peterson
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark D Sborov
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - S Eric Martin
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Matthias Weiss
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - W Christopher Ehmann
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Sandra J Horning
- Brad S. Kahl, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Christopher G. Peterson, Aspirus Regional Cancer Center, Wausau; Matthias Weiss, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI; Fangxin Hong, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Michael E. Williams, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Randy D. Gascoyne, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Lynne I. Wagner, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; John C. Krauss, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester; Mark D. Sborov, Fairview-Southdale Hospital, St Louis Park, MN; Lode J. Swinnen, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Stephen J. Schuster, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; W. Christopher Ehmann, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA; S. Eric Martin, Christiana Care Community Clinical Oncology Program and Helen F. Graham Cancer Network, Newark, DE; and Sandra J. Horning, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
McQuillan AD, Macdonald WBG, Turner JH. Phase II study of first-line (131)I-rituximab radioimmunotherapy in follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma and prognostic (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:1271-7. [PMID: 25065701 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.949260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
First-line (131)I-anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) achieves durable remission with low toxicity. The phase II INITIAL study comprised 68 patients with follicular NHL followed up to 7 years (median 4 years) after outpatient (131)I-rituximab radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in conjunction with rituximab, followed by maintenance therapy for 1 year. Baseline and 3-month (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) imaging, analyzed according to Deauville criteria, was used to evaluate response and predict prognosis. The overall response rate at 3 months was 99%, with 88% achieving Deauville category 1-3. These satisfactory responders did not reach median time-to-next-treatment, versus a median of 29 months for a category 4-5 response (p < 0.0001). Grade IV hematological toxicity (9%) was self-limited without clinical sequelae. (131)I-rituximab radioimmunotherapy in newly diagnosed, advanced stage, symptomatic follicular NHL is an effective, practical and affordable alternative to existing conventional chemotherapies, with lower toxicity and durable remissions. Response assessment at 3 months by (18)F-FDG PET Deauville five-point scale permits prognostic stratification.
Collapse
|
123
|
Olszewski AJ, Shafqat H, Ali S. Disparate survival outcomes after front-line chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with follicular, nodal marginal zone and small lymphocytic lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:942-50. [PMID: 24956144 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.936013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data (1996-2010), we compared survival and toxicity outcomes in 6993 patients older than 65 years with follicular (FL), nodal marginal zone (NMZL) and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) receiving front-line therapy with rituximab (R), RCHOP (R, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone), RCVP (R, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) or R-fludarabine-containing regimens within 3 years from diagnosis. We demonstrated significant heterogeneity by histology after various regimens in multivariable survival models. Compared with RCHOP, overall survival was inferior with fludarabine-based regimens in FL (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, p = 0.0001) and NMZL (HR 1.88, p = 0.0018). Conversely, in SLL outcomes were similar with any regimen. In NMZL and SLL, survival was not significantly different after single-agent R compared with multi-agent combinations. Choice of front-line chemotherapy may thus impact survival in older patients with indolent lymphomas, and heterogeneity by histology should be accounted for in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J Olszewski
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island , Pawtucket, RI , USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
124
|
Mounier M, Bossard N, Belot A, Remontet L, Iwaz J, Dandoit M, Girard-Boulanger S, Herry A, Woronoff AS, Casasnovas RO, Maynadié M, Giorgi R. Trends in excess mortality in follicular lymphoma at a population level. Eur J Haematol 2014; 94:120-9. [PMID: 24952984 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the 1990s and since the development of humanised monoclonal antibodies in 1998, the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma has undergone profound changes. Follicular lymphoma (FL) was the first to benefit from this treatment, and several clinical trials have shown a significant improvement in overall survival, but little information is available at a population level. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to estimate changes in FL-specific mortality at a population level, with an appropriate methodology. METHODS Two French retrospective population-based studies on FL were conducted, one from 1995 to 2004, in 1477 patients, and one from 1995 to 2010, in 451 patients. Trends in excess mortality rates (EMRs) according to age, sex, Ann Arbor stage and year of diagnosis were evaluated using the flexible model of Remontet et al. RESULTS Trends in the EMR differed according to age at diagnosis and was higher in advanced stage (III, IV) in patients older than 65 yr. The EMR decreased linearly from 1995 to 2010. This decrease was more marked for advanced stages. CONCLUSION FL-specific mortality decreased over the years of diagnosis, and the difference according to the lymphoma stage diminished in more recent years. However, progress in the management of FL was not able to erase age-related differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgane Mounier
- Registre des Hémopathies Malignes de Côte d'Or, EA 4184, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
125
|
Mohite SS, Nastoupil LJ. Rituximab in follicular lymphoma: the first chapter of the new era? Int J Hematol Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.2217/ijh.14.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Follicular lymphoma is the most common indolent B-cell lymphoma. Although there is no current standard of care adopted for all patients, clinical outcomes for patients with follicular lymphoma have significantly improved over the past few decades, which can be largely attributed to the incorporation of immunotherapy. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody to the CD20 antigen, has been widely adopted in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas, resulting from improvements in remission duration and overall survival. We provide an evidence-based discussion of the clinical success and incorporation of immunotherapy, rituximab in the treatment of follicular lymphoma, the prototypical indolent B-cell lymphoma. This shift in the treatment paradigm has opened the door to novel, nonchemotherapy approaches in the treatment of patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satyajit S Mohite
- University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Loretta J Nastoupil
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
126
|
Travers K, Sallum RH, Burns MD, Barr CE, Beattie MS, Pashos CL, Luce BR. Characteristics and temporal trends in patient registries: focus on the life sciences industry, 1981-2012. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014; 24:389-98. [PMID: 25079108 PMCID: PMC4407929 DOI: 10.1002/pds.3643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2013] [Revised: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient registries are used to monitor safety, examine real-world effectiveness, and may potentially contribute to comparative effectiveness research. To our knowledge, life sciences industry (LSI)-sponsored registries have not been systematically categorized. This study represents a first step toward understanding such registries over time. METHODS Studies described as registries were identified in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Characteristics from these registry records were abstracted and analyzed. RESULTS Of 1202 registries identified, approximately 47% reported LSI sponsorship. These 562 LSI registries varied in focus: medical devices (n = 193, 34%), specific drugs (n = 173, 31%), procedures (n = 29, 5%), or particular diseases (n = 139, 25%). Thirty-three registries (<6%) evaluated pregnancy outcomes. The most common therapeutic area was cardiovascular (n = 234, 42%); others included endocrinology, immunology, oncology, musculoskeletal disorders, and neurology. The two most often measured outcomes were clinical effectiveness and safety, each of which appeared in 363/562 (65%) of LSI registries. Other outcomes included real-world clinical practice patterns (n = 122, 22%), patient-reported outcomes (n = 106, 19%), disease epidemiology/natural history (n = 69, 12%), and economic outcomes (n = 30, 5%). The number of LSI registries and their geographic diversity has increased over time. CONCLUSIONS The LSI registries represent a substantial proportion of all patient registries documented in ClinicalTrials.gov. These prospective studies are growing in number and encompass diverse therapeutic areas and geographic regions. Most registries measure multiple outcomes and capture real-world data that may be unavailable through other study designs. This classification of LSI registries documents their use for studying heterogeneity of diseases, examining treatment patterns, measuring patient-reported outcomes, examining economic outcomes, and performing comparative effectiveness research.
Collapse
|
127
|
Nastoupil LJ, Sinha R, Byrtek M, Zhou X, Taylor MD, Friedberg JW, Link BK, Cerhan JR, Dawson K, Flowers CR. The use and effectiveness of rituximab maintenance in patients with follicular lymphoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 in the United States. Cancer 2014; 120:1830-7. [PMID: 24668580 PMCID: PMC4265986 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2013] [Revised: 12/20/2013] [Accepted: 01/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors examined the "real-world" effectiveness of rituximab (R) maintenance therapy (R-maintenance) compared with observation after R-based induction therapy in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) in the United States. METHODS The National LymphoCare Study is a prospective, multicenter, observational study that enrolled > 2700 untreated patients with FL diagnosed from 2004 to 2007 at 265 sites in the United States. Among these, patients who achieved at least stable disease after R-based induction therapy were eligible for the current analysis. Patients who initiated R-maintenance within 215 days of completing induction therapy were categorized as the R-maintenance group, and those who did not initiate therapy during this period were categorized as the observation group. The objective of the current study was to determine the effect of R-maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 1439 patients completed R-based induction therapy, 1186 of whom met all inclusion criteria (541 patients received R-maintenance and 645 patients were observed). Characteristics that were found to be predictive of receiving R-maintenance were histology grade (1/2), Ann Arbor stage of disease (III/IV), geographic region (region other than the West), and practice setting (community practice). With a median follow-up of 5.7 years, R-maintenance was associated with superior PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.56-0.84 [P = .0003]) and TTNT (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84 [P = .0007]). No significant difference in OS was observed (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.14 [P = .23]). CONCLUSIONS R-maintenance in patients with FL and at least stable disease after R-based induction therapy provided significantly longer PFS and TTNT in comparison with observation, but no significant difference in OS was observed with 5-years of follow-up. This comparative effectiveness study aligns with the results of randomized trials suggesting that similar outcomes occur with R-maintenance in FL with the treatment variations observed in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loretta J Nastoupil
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
128
|
Vaidyanathan G, Czuczman MS. Follicular lymphoma grade 3: review and updates. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2014; 14:431-5. [PMID: 25066038 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2014.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2014] [Accepted: 04/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma (FL), Grade 3, is recognized as a distinct entity in the World Health Organization classification of lymphoma. It is further classified into Grade 3a and Grade 3b depending on the Bernard cell counting system and percentage of centroblasts. Grade 3 has molecular and genetic characteristics that distinguish it from other grades of FL. There is confusion and misunderstanding about the natural history and clinical course of Grade 3a and 3b because some studies indicate them as having indolent behavior and others describe more aggressive biology. The purpose of this article is to understand the concept of Grade 3 FL, especially the fundamental differences between Grade 3a and Grade 3b FL. Grade 3 FL is still an evolving subclass in FL and the practicing physician should understand the aggressive nature of Grade 3b, which typically requires timely attention, compared with Grade 3a. Grade 3a FL has more indolent characteristics but can possibly progress to Grade 3b and/or transform to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at a future time. Nevertheless, large prospective studies are missing for an optimal evidence-based management approach for patients with Grade 3 FL at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gayatri Vaidyanathan
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma/Myeloma Section, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY
| | - Myron S Czuczman
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma/Myeloma Section, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
129
|
Abstract
Radiation is established as one of the most powerful, highly effective treatments for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Unfortunately, in recent years the medical oncology community has improperly underutilized radiotherapy (RT) in the management of NHL. Replacing RT with longer chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy may not necessarily be a good alternative approach and may lead to suboptimal outcome and more toxicity, particularly in patients with localized disease. Some misconceptions regarding the use of RT emanated from the ways RT has been utilized in the past-as a single therapy and in high doses and large fields. Major developments in imaging technology, radiation planning concepts, and RT precision and delivery have been revolutionized RT for NHL over the past two decades. Modern proper administration should result with very minimal acute or late side effects. Some of the controversial issues of the use of RT borrowed from Hodgkin lymphoma, such as risk of secondary tumors, are irrelevant to patients with NHL but cause unnecessary patient and physician scare. Many lymphoma types are notoriously sensitive to RT, especially the indolent types. When localized, like in most marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) and almost a third of follicular lymphomas (FL), RT is potentially curative, even with low dose and small volumes. In more aggressive lymphomas, RT often is an effective consolidation after chemotherapy in complete or even incomplete responders. It also is an important component of salvage and palliation. In older patients, RT is particularly valuable, because chemotherapy tolerance and salvage options may be limited. The International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) developed and published modern guidelines for using RT in NHL, including FL. The guidelines emphasize the new concept of RT field: involved site radiotherapy (ISRT). These modern ILROG principles and several relevant studies that looked into the proper integration of RT in the management of NHL patients are the focus of this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Yahalom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
130
|
Mamessier E, Broussais-Guillaumot F, Chetaille B, Bouabdallah R, Xerri L, Jaffe ES, Nadel B. Nature and importance of follicular lymphoma precursors. Haematologica 2014; 99:802-10. [PMID: 24790058 PMCID: PMC4008113 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.085548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
It is now widely recognized that cancer development is a protracted process requiring the stepwise acquisition of multiple oncogenic events. In humans, this process can take decades, if not a lifetime, blurring the notion of 'healthy' individuals. Follicular lymphoma exemplifies this multistep pathway of oncogenesis. In recent years, variants of follicular lymphoma have been recognized that appear to represent clonal B-cell expansions at an early stage of follicular lymphoma lymphomagenesis. These include follicular lymphoma in situ, duodenal follicular lymphoma, partial involvement by follicular lymphoma, and in the blood circulating follicular lymphoma-like B cells. Recent genetic studies have identified similarities and differences between the early lesions and overt follicular lymphoma, providing important information for understanding their biological evolution. The data indicate that there is already genomic instability at these early stages, even in instances with a low risk for clinical progression. The overexpression of BCL2 in t(14;18)-positive B cells puts them at risk for subsequent genetic aberrations when they re-enter the germinal center and are exposed to the influences of activation-induced cytidine deaminase and somatic hypermutations. The emerging data provide a rationale for clinical management and, in the future, may identify genetic risk factors that warrant early therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
|
131
|
Loberiza FR, Cannon AC, Cannon AJ, Bierman PJ. Insights on practice variations in the management of lymphoma and leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 55:2449-56. [DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.881480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto R. Loberiza
- Section of Oncology/Hematology, Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Andrew C. Cannon
- Section of Oncology/Hematology, Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Anthony J. Cannon
- Section of Oncology/Hematology, Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Philip J. Bierman
- Section of Oncology/Hematology, Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
132
|
Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study. Blood 2014; 123:2944-52. [PMID: 24591201 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-531327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 452] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This randomized, noninferiority (NI), global, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) vs a standard rituximab-chemotherapy regimen (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CHOP] or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CVP]) for treatment-naive patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or mantle cell lymphoma. Investigators preassigned the standard treatment regimen they considered most appropriate for each patient; patients were randomized to receive BR (n = 224) or standard therapy (R-CHOP/R-CVP, n = 223) for 6 cycles; 2 additional cycles were permitted at investigator discretion. Response was assessed by a blinded independent review committee. BR was noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP, as assessed by the primary end point of complete response rate (31% vs 25%, respectively; P = .0225 for NI [0.88 margin]). The overall response rates for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP were 97% and 91%, respectively (P = .0102). Incidences of vomiting and drug-hypersensitivity reactions were significantly higher in patients treated with BR (P < .05), and incidences of peripheral neuropathy/paresthesia and alopecia were significantly higher in patients treated with standard-therapy regimens (P < .05). These data indicate BR is noninferior to standard therapy with regard to clinical response with an acceptable safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00877006.
Collapse
|
133
|
Halwani AS, Link BK. Chemotherapy and antibody combinations for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 11:443-55. [DOI: 10.1586/era.11.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
134
|
Sarkozy C, Salles G. Treatment approaches to asymptomatic follicular lymphoma. Expert Rev Hematol 2013; 6:747-58. [PMID: 24219551 DOI: 10.1586/17474086.2013.860355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Follicular lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease in which some patients present an indolent evolution for decades and others, a rather aggressive form of the disease requiring immediate therapy. While immunochemotherapy has emerged as a standard of care for symptomatic patients, treatment of the asymptomatic population remains controversial. Since the disease is still considered incurable, delayed initiation of therapy is an acceptable option. However, four single injections of rituximab can result in an acceptable clinical response and can improve the duration of the interval without cytotoxic therapy. With recent therapeutic approaches that enable substantial improvements in life expectancy for follicular lymphoma patients, limiting short- or long-term treatment toxicities appears as a new concern in the asymptomatic population. Based on these options, the challenge is to preserve patient quality of life and prolong survival: from the patient's perspective, his/her opinion is therefore of significant importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémentine Sarkozy
- Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud (CHLS), Pierre Bénite, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
135
|
Zinzani PL, Pellegrini C, Broccoli A, Casadei B, Argnani L, Pileri S. Fludarabine-mitoxantrone-rituximab regimen in untreated intermediate/high-risk follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: experience on 142 patients. Am J Hematol 2013; 88:E273-6. [PMID: 23843267 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.23540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Revised: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 07/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
There is no international consensus on front-line optimal chemotherapy regimen for advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, or a clear definition of cure for this disease. Aim of this study was to test the degree of effectiveness and the safety of the regimen containing fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in a subset of poor prognosis FL patients with particular focus on the long-term disease-free survival. A retrospective study was conducted on 142 intermediate/high-risk FL patients treated in first-line with fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab regimen. Responses, safety, and survival were evaluated. The prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) was also investigated in a 56-patients subset. Overall response rate was 95.5% including 88% of complete responses. With a median follow-up of 48 months, 18% of patients had disease relapse, yielding an estimated 12-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 72%. All cases showed the lymphoma recurrence within 40 months: after this timing the DFS curve presented a plateau. Overall survival was 73% at 12 years. Post-treatment PET positivity remains a highly significant predictor of disease progression. The observed high rate of complete responses following the use of fludarabine, mitoxantrone-based regimen in combination with rituximab seems to be the first step to improve DFS. Our study could be the starting point to consider DFS as a potential alternative endpoint of future clinical trials on FL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pier Luigi Zinzani
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli,”; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Cinzia Pellegrini
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli,”; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Alessandro Broccoli
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli,”; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Beatrice Casadei
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli,”; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Lisa Argnani
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli,”; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| | - Stefano Pileri
- Institute of Hematology “L. e A. Seràgnoli,”; University of Bologna; Bologna Italy
| |
Collapse
|
136
|
Link BK, Maurer MJ, Nowakowski GS, Ansell SM, Macon WR, Syrbu SI, Slager SL, Thompson CA, Inwards DJ, Johnston PB, Colgan JP, Witzig TE, Habermann TM, Cerhan JR. Rates and outcomes of follicular lymphoma transformation in the immunochemotherapy era: a report from the University of Iowa/MayoClinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:3272-8. [PMID: 23897955 PMCID: PMC3757293 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.48.3990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study sought to characterize transformation incidence and outcome for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in a prospective observational series begun after diffusion of rituximab use. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed FL were prospectively enrolled onto the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource from 2002 to 2009. Patients were actively followed for re-treatment, clinical or pathologic transformation, and death. Risk of transformation was analyzed via time to transformation by using death as a competing risk. RESULTS In all, there were 631 patients with newly diagnosed grade 1 to 3a FL who had a median age at enrollment of 60 years. At a median follow-up of 60 months (range, 11 to 110 months), 79 patients had died, and 60 patients developed transformed lymphoma, of which 51 were biopsy proven. The overall transformation rate at 5 years was 10.7%, with an estimated rate of 2% per year. Increased lactate dehydrogenase was associated with increased risk of transformation. Transformation rate at 5 years was highest in patients who were initially observed and lowest in patients who initially received rituximab monotherapy (14.4% v 3.2%; P = .021). Median overall survival following transformation was 50 months and was superior in patients with transformation greater than 18 months after FL diagnosis compared with patients with earlier transformation (5-year overall survival, 66% v 22%; P < .001). CONCLUSION Follicular transformation rates in the immunochemotherapy era are similar to risk of death without transformation and may be lower than reported in older series. Post-transformation prognosis is substantially better than described in older series. Initial management strategies may influence the risk of transformation.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/immunology
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/metabolism
- Lymphoma, Follicular/drug therapy
- Lymphoma, Follicular/mortality
- Lymphoma, Follicular/pathology
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Molecular Epidemiology
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Prognosis
- Prospective Studies
- Risk Factors
- Rituximab
- Survival Rate
- Young Adult
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K. Link
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthew J. Maurer
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Grzegorz S. Nowakowski
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Stephen M. Ansell
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - William R. Macon
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Sergei I. Syrbu
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Susan L. Slager
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Carrie A. Thompson
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - David J. Inwards
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Patrick B. Johnston
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph P. Colgan
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Thomas E. Witzig
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - Thomas M. Habermann
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| | - James R. Cerhan
- Brian K. Link, Sergei I. Syrbu, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; and Matthew J. Maurer, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Stephen M. Ansell, William R. Macon, Susan L. Slager, Carrie A. Thompson, David J. Inwards, Patrick B. Johnston, Joseph P. Colgan, Thomas E. Witzig, Thomas M. Habermann, and James R. Cerhan, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Martin P, Byrtek M, Dawson K, Ziemiecki R, Friedberg JW, Cerhan JR, Flowers CR, Link BK. Patterns of delivery of chemoimmunotherapy to patients with follicular lymphoma in the United States: results of the National LymphoCare Study. Cancer 2013; 119:4129-36. [PMID: 24006156 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2013] [Revised: 06/29/2013] [Accepted: 08/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug choice and delivered dose of treatment potentially influence outcome in patients treated for follicular lymphoma (FL). Historically, observational studies have evaluated drug choice. The National LymphoCare Study (NLCS) is a prospective, observational study of patients with FL who were enrolled at academic and community practice sites in the United States between 2004 and 2007. In the current study, the authors report on measures of delivered dose and its impact on outcomes for the most common first-line regimens. METHODS All evaluable patients with FL who were treated with initial rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP); rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP); or rituximab plus a fludarabine-containing regimen (R-Flu) were included. Associations between baseline factors, choice of treatment, number of cycles received, completion of therapy, and patient outcomes were assessed. RESULTS A total of 646 patients received R-CHOP, 297 received R-CVP, and 222 received R-Flu. Characteristics were similar between the 3 groups with the following exceptions. Patients receiving R-CHOP were more often found to have grade 3 FL and patients receiving R-CVP were older and had higher Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores. The majority of patients (80%) received ≥ 5 cycles of treatment. Toxicity, but not disease progression, was commonly cited as the reason for the early discontinuation of treatment (51% vs 6%). Time to retreatment was shorter for patients receiving ≤ 4 cycles, regardless of the treatment regimen used. The number of cycles was associated with overall survival, progression-free survival, and lymphoma-related mortality for patients receiving R-CVP. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with FL receiving chemoimmunotherapy in the NLCS completed ≥ 5 cycles of treatment. Strategies to improve dose delivery appear unlikely to impact outcomes, except possibly in patients receiving R-CVP. Although early treatment discontinuation appears to be associated with survival, this analysis does not implicate causality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Martin
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
138
|
Brugger W, Ghielmini M. Bendamustine in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a practice guide for patient management. Oncologist 2013; 18:954-64. [PMID: 23900001 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients with advanced indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), the recently reported results of the German StiL NHL-1 2003 and the international BRIGHT phase III trials showed that, as first-line treatment, the combination of bendamustine and rituximab is at least as effective as rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone or rituximab/cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone, possibly with a better therapeutic index. Bendamustine is therefore increasingly used in clinical practice. Because bendamustine has been used for many years in Germany and in Switzerland, our institutions have had extensive experience with bendamustine, both as a single agent and in combination with rituximab. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the most important clinical data from phase II/III trials with bendamustine in patients with indolent NHL and MCL, both in the relapsed/refractory setting and in the first-line setting. In addition, this review provides practical advice on how to optimally manage bendamustine therapy in patients with NHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfram Brugger
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Schwarzwald-Baar Clinic, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
139
|
Stienen JJC, Hermens RPMG, Wennekes L, van de Schans SAM, Dekker HM, Blijlevens NMA, van der Maazen RWM, Adang EMM, van Krieken JHJM, Ottevanger PB. Improvement of hospital care for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (PEARL study). Implement Sci 2013; 8:77. [PMID: 23837833 PMCID: PMC3711783 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-77] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2013] [Accepted: 07/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Malignant lymphomas constitute a diverse group of cancers of lymphocytes. One well-known disease is Hodgkin’s lymphoma; the others are classified as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). NHLs are the most common hematologic neoplasms in adults worldwide, and in 2012 over 170,000 new cases were estimated in the United States and Europe. In previous studies, several practice gaps in hospital care for patients with NHL have been identified. To decrease this variation in care, the present study aims to perform a problem analysis in which barriers to and facilitators for optimal NHL care will be identified and, based on these findings, to develop (tailored) improvement strategies. Subsequently, we will assess the effectiveness, feasibility and costs of the improvement strategies. Methods/design Barriers and facilitators will be explored using the literature, using interviews and questionnaires among physicians involved in NHL care, and patients diagnosed with NHL. The results will be used to develop a tailored improvement strategy. A cluster randomized controlled trial involving 19 Dutch hospitals will be conducted. Hospitals will be randomized to receive either an improvement strategy tailored to the barriers and facilitators found or, a standard strategy of audit and feedback. The effects of both strategies will be evaluated using previously developed quality indicators. Adherence to the indicators will be measured before and after the intervention period based on medical records from newly diagnosed NHL patients. To study the feasibility of both strategies, a process evaluation will be additionally performed. Data about exposure to the different elements of the strategies will be collected using questionnaires. Economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective will compare the two implementation strategies, where the costs of the implementation strategy and changes in healthcare consumption will be assessed. Discussion The presence of variation in the use of diagnostic tests, treatment, and follow-up between different physicians in different hospitals in the Netherlands is important for patients. To reduce the existing variation in care, implementation of tailored interventions to improve NHL care is necessary. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov as the PEARL study, registration number NCT01562509.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jozette J C Stienen
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare IQ healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
140
|
Itchaki G, Gafter-Gvili A, Lahav M, Vidal L, Raanani P, Shpilberg O, Paul M. Anthracycline-containing regimens for treatment of follicular lymphoma in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD008909. [PMID: 23832787 PMCID: PMC11290704 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008909.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anthracycline-containing regimens (ACR) are the most prevalent regimens in the management of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). However, there is no proof that they are superior to non-anthracycline-containing regimens (non-ACR). OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of ACRs to other chemotherapy regimens, in the treatment of FL. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2013), smaller databases, relevant conference proceedings (2004 to 2012) and the National Medical Library (April 2013). SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ACR with non-ACR for adult patients with FL. We excluded trials in which immunotherapy, radiotherapy alone or stem-cell transplantation were used in one arm alone. Our primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included disease control, as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) or remission duration (RD). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors assessed the quality of trials and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We analyzed trials separately according to resemblance of the chemotherapeutic regimens in study arms, other than the addition of anthracyclines ('same' versus 'different' chemotherapy). Hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and pooled using the fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS Eight RCTs, conducted between 1974 and 2011, and involving 2636 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All trials included therapy-naive patients. Rituximab was used in one trial only. Follow-up was between three and five years in most trials (range three to 18 years). All trials were published in peer-reviewed journals.Five trials compared similar chemotherapeutic regimens, except for the anthracycline. In three studies reporting overall survival specifically in FL patients, there was no statistically significant difference between ACR and non-ACR arms (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.29; I(2) = 0%). ACR significantly improved disease control (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.81; four trials). Progression or relapse at three years were reduced (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.85). Anthracyclines did not significantly increase rates of complete response (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.18) or overall response (RR 1.06; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12), but heterogeneity was substantial.Overall, ACR were more often associated with cytopenias, but not with serious infections or death related to chemotherapy. Cardiotoxicity, albeit rare, was associated with anthracycline use (RR 4.55; 95% CI 0.92 to 22.49; four trials).Three trials added anthracycline to one arm of two different regimens. None showed benefit to ACR regarding OS, yet there was a trend in favor of anthracyclines for disease control. Results were heterogeneous.We judged the overall quality of these trials as moderate as all are unblinded, some are outdated and are not uniform in outcome definitions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The use of anthracyclines in patients with FL has no demonstrable benefit on overall survival, although it may have been mitigated by the more intense regimens given in the control arms of three of five trials. ACR improved disease control, as measured by PFS and RD with an increased risk for side effects, notably cardiotoxicity. The current evidence on the added value of ACR in the management of FL is limited. Further studies involving immunotherapy during induction and maintenance may change conclusion.
Collapse
Key Words
- adult
- humans
- anthracyclines
- anthracyclines/therapeutic use
- antibiotics, antineoplastic
- antibiotics, antineoplastic/therapeutic use
- antibodies, monoclonal, murine‐derived
- antibodies, monoclonal, murine‐derived/therapeutic use
- antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols
- antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols/therapeutic use
- induction chemotherapy
- induction chemotherapy/methods
- lymphoma, follicular
- lymphoma, follicular/drug therapy
- lymphoma, follicular/mortality
- lymphoma, follicular/pathology
- maintenance chemotherapy
- maintenance chemotherapy/methods
- randomized controlled trials as topic
- rituximab
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilad Itchaki
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. .
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
141
|
Xavier AC, Armeson KE, Hill EG, Costa LJ. Risk and outcome of non-Hodgkin lymphoma among classical Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Cancer 2013; 119:3385-92. [PMID: 23797978 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2013] [Revised: 04/21/2013] [Accepted: 05/01/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are at an increased risk of developing secondary non-Hodgkin lymphomas (sNHLs). To the authors' knowledge, the outcome of patients with sNHL compared with their de novo counterparts (dnNHL) is unknown. METHODS Data from 26,826 cases of HL from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program that were diagnosed between 1992 and 2009 were used to obtain the risk of further development of different subtypes of sNHL. The survival of patients with sNHL was compared with that of matched patients with dnNHL. RESULTS The estimated cumulative incidence of sNHL was 2.50% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.10-2.89) at 15 years from the diagnosis of cHL. The standardized incidence ratio was 10.5 (95% CI, 8.9-12.4) for aggressive B-cell NHL, 4.0 (95% CI, 3.1-5.1) for indolent B-cell NHL, and 14.6 (95% CI, 10.3-20.1) for T-cell NHL. Patients with indolent B-cell sNHL had a worse overall survival compared with their dnNHL counterparts (hazards ratio [HR] of death, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.7). Survival was not significantly different between patients with sNHL and those with dnNHL with regard to aggressive B-cell NHL (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-2.7) or T-cell NHL (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-1.8). CONCLUSIONS The risk of developing sNHL after cHL is substantial. Although patients with indolent B-cell sNHL have inferior survival, patients with aggressive B-cell sNHL and T-cell sNHL have survival comparable to that of their de novo counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C Xavier
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
142
|
Improvements in observed and relative survival in follicular grade 1-2 lymphoma during 4 decades: the Stanford University experience. Blood 2013; 122:981-7. [PMID: 23777769 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-491514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 199] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies report an improvement in overall survival (OS) of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Previously untreated patients with grade 1 to 2 FL treated at Stanford University from 1960-2003 were identified. Four eras were considered: era 1, pre-anthracycline (1960-1975, n = 180); era 2, anthracycline (1976-1986, n = 426); era 3, aggressive chemotherapy/purine analogs (1987-1996, n = 471); and era 4, rituximab (1997-2003, n = 257). Clinical characteristics, patterns of care, and survival were assessed. Observed OS was compared with the expected OS calculated from Berkeley Mortality Database life tables derived from population matched by gender and age at the time of diagnosis. The median OS was 13.6 years. Age, gender, and stage did not differ across the eras. Although primary treatment varied, event-free survival after the first treatment did not differ between eras (P = .17). Median OS improved from 11 years in eras 1 and 2 to 18.4 years in era 3 and has not yet been reached for era 4 (P < .001), with no suggestion of a plateau in any era. These improvements in OS exceeded improvements in survival in the general population during the same period. Several factors, including better supportive care and effective therapies for relapsed disease, are likely responsible for this improvement.
Collapse
|
143
|
Wahlin BE, Sundström C, Sander B, Christensson B, Jeppsson-Ahlberg Å, Hjalmarsson E, Holte H, Østenstad B, Brown PD, Smeland EB, Kimby E. Higher World Health Organization grades of follicular lymphoma correlate with better outcome in two Nordic Lymphoma Group trials of rituximab without chemotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 55:288-95. [PMID: 23662992 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.802778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Abstract A common treatment for follicular lymphoma is rituximab monotherapy. To identify patients for whom this regimen is adequate as first-line therapy, we applied the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for grading follicular lymphoma in a prospective central pathology review of the biopsies of previously untreated patients in two randomized trials of rituximab without chemotherapy. In the first trial (n₁ = 53), higher WHO grades correlated with longer time to next treatment, independently of clinical prognostic factors (p = 0.030); the finding was replicated in the second trial (n₂ = 221; p = 0.019). Higher grades were associated with better treatment responses (p = 0.018). Furthermore, also grades externally confirmed by independent local pathologists correlated with time to next treatment (p = 0.048). Flow cytometry in a separate patient series showed that the intensity of CD20 increased with the malignant cell size (p < 0.00005). In conclusion, WHO grade 1 follicular lymphoma correlates with inferior outcome after rituximab monotherapy. WHO grading might provide a clinically useful tool for personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Engelbrekt Wahlin
- Department of Medicine at Huddinge, Division of Hematology, Karolinska Institutet and The Hematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
144
|
Haematological cancer: Indolent lymphoma--why not to sprint at the start of a marathon. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013; 10:251-2. [PMID: 23591322 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
145
|
Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G, Banat GA, von Grünhagen U, Losem C, Kofahl-Krause D, Heil G, Welslau M, Balser C, Kaiser U, Weidmann E, Dürk H, Ballo H, Stauch M, Roller F, Barth J, Hoelzer D, Hinke A, Brugger W. Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2013; 381:1203-10. [PMID: 23433739 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1044] [Impact Index Per Article: 94.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rituximab plus chemotherapy, most often CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), is the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced indolent lymphoma, and for elderly patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. Bendamustine plus rituximab is effective for relapsed or refractory disease. We compared bendamustine plus rituximab with CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas. METHODS We did a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial at 81 centres in Germany between Sept 1, 2003, and Aug 31, 2008. Patients aged 18 years or older with a WHO performance status of 2 or less were eligible if they had newly diagnosed stage III or IV indolent or mantle-cell lymphoma. Patients were stratified by histological lymphoma subtype, then randomly assigned according to a prespecified randomisation list to receive either intravenous bendamustine (90 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of a 4-week cycle) or CHOP (cycles every 3 weeks of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2), and vincristine 1.4 mg/m(2) on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/day for 5 days) for a maximum of six cycles. Patients in both groups received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. Analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00991211, and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices of Germany, BfArM 4021335. FINDINGS 274 patients were assigned to bendamustine plus rituximab (261 assessed) and 275 to R-CHOP (253 assessed). At median follow-up of 45 months (IQR 25-57), median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the bendamustine plus rituximab group than in the R-CHOP group (69.5 months [26.1 to not yet reached] vs 31.2 months [15.2-65.7]; hazard ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.74; p<0.0001). Bendamustine plus rituximab was better tolerated than R-CHOP, with lower rates of alopecia (0 patients vs 245 (100%) of 245 patients who recieved ≥3 cycles; p<0.0001), haematological toxicity (77 [30%] vs 173 [68%]; p<0.0001), infections (96 [37%] vs 127 [50%]); p=0.0025), peripheral neuropathy (18 [7%] vs 73 [29%]; p<0.0001), and stomatitis (16 [6%] vs 47 [19%]; p<0.0001). Erythematous skin reactions were more common in patients in the bendamustine plus rituximab group than in those in the R-CHOP group (42 [16%] vs 23 [9%]; p=0.024). INTERPRETATION In patients with previously untreated indolent lymphoma, bendamustine plus rituximab can be considered as a preferred first-line treatment approach to R-CHOP because of increased progression-free survival and fewer toxic effects. FUNDING Roche Pharma AG, Ribosepharm/Mundipharma GmbH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias J Rummel
- Medizinische Klinik IV, Hospital of the Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
146
|
|
147
|
Has single-agent rituximab replaced watch-and-wait for a patient with asymptomatic low-grade follicular lymphoma? Cancer J 2013; 18:390-5. [PMID: 23006942 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0b013e31826aed4f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
To date, no overall survival benefit has been proven from the immediate treatment of patients with asymptomatic follicular lymphoma (FL) compared with expectant management. Watchful waiting therefore became the standard of care, with patients closely monitored for symptoms or critical progression, necessitating commencement of active therapy. With this approach, patients could avoid the adverse effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, at least for a while. However, with the advent of rituximab-containing regimens, the standard of care for FL patients requiring treatment has been rewritten. Upfront rituximab monotherapy can produce impressive response rates with low associated toxicity, and a recent randomized trial has shown a significant delay in the need for other treatment, with possible improvements in quality of life. Even without the longer-term survival data, this has reignited the debate over initial management in FL.
Collapse
|
148
|
Federico M, Luminari S, Dondi A, Tucci A, Vitolo U, Rigacci L, Di Raimondo F, Carella AM, Pulsoni A, Merli F, Arcaini L, Angrilli F, Stelitano C, Gaidano G, Dell'olio M, Marcheselli L, Franco V, Galimberti S, Sacchi S, Brugiatelli M. R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: results of the FOLL05 trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:1506-13. [PMID: 23530110 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.0866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although rituximab (R) is commonly used for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) requiring treatment, the optimal associated chemotherapy regimen has yet to be clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial among adult patients with previously untreated stages II to IV FL to compare efficacy of eight doses of R associated with eight cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) or six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or six cycles of fludarabine and mitoxantrone (FM). The principal end point of the study was time to treatment failure (TTF). RESULTS There were 534 patients enrolled onto the study. Overall response rates were 88%, 93%, and 91% for R-CVP, R-CHOP, and R-FM, respectively (P=.247). After a median follow-up of 34 months, 3-year TTFs were 46%, 62%, and 59% for the respective treatment groups (R-CHOP v R-CVP, P=.003; R-FM v R-CVP, P=.006; R-FM v R-CHOP, P=.763). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 52%, 68%, and 63% (overall P=.011), respectively, and 3-year overall survival was 95% for the whole series. R-FM resulted in higher rates of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (64%) compared with R-CVP (28%) and R-CHOP (50%; P< .001). Overall, 23 second malignancies were registered during follow-up: four in R-CVP, five in R-CHOP, and 14 in R-FM. CONCLUSION In this study, R-CHOP and R-FM were superior to R-CVP in terms of 3-year TTF and PFS. In addition, R-CHOP had a better risk-benefit ratio compared with R-FM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Federico
- Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Centro Oncologico Modenese, Clinica e di Sanità Pubblica, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
149
|
Abou-Nassar KE, Vanderplas A, Friedberg JW, Abel GA, Niland J, Rodriguez MA, Czuczman MS, Millenson M, Crosby A, Gordon LI, Zelenetz AD, Kaminski M, Lacasce AS. Patterns of use of 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography for initial staging of grade 1–2 follicular lymphoma and its impact on initial treatment strategy in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Outcomes database. Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 54:2155-62. [DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2013.770151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
150
|
Nooka AK, Nabhan C, Zhou X, Taylor MD, Byrtek M, Miller TP, Friedberg JW, Zelenetz AD, Link BK, Cerhan JR, Dillon H, Sinha R, Shenoy PJ, Levy D, Dawson K, Hirata JH, Flowers CR. Examination of the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) in the National LymphoCare study (NLCS): a prospective US patient cohort treated predominantly in community practices. Ann Oncol 2013; 24:441-448. [PMID: 23041589 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because follicular lymphoma (FL) patients have heterogeneous outcomes, the FL international prognostic index (FLIPI) was developed to risk-stratify patients and to predict survival. However, limited data exist regarding the role of FLIPI in the era of routine first-line rituximab (R) and R-chemotherapy regimens and in the setting of community oncology practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated the outcome data from the National LymphoCare Study (NLCS), a prospective, observational cohort study, which collects data on patients with FL in the United States (US) community practices. RESULTS Among 1068 male and 1124 female patients with FLIPI data, most were treated in US community practices (79%); 35% were FLIPI good risk, 30% intermediate risk, and 35% poor risk. FLIPI risk groups were significant predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients who undergo watchful waiting (WW), and those who receive non-R-containing regimens, R-alone, and R-chemotherapy combinations. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of contemporary practice with routine R use, stratifying patients into good, intermediate, and poor FLIPI risk groups predicts distinct outcomes in terms of OS and PFS. FLIPI remains an important prognostic index in the R era and should be used in clinical practices to support discussions about prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K Nooka
- Winship Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University-School of Medicine, Atlanta.
| | - C Nabhan
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Advocate Lutheran General Hospital and Oncology Specialists, Park Ridge
| | - X Zhou
- RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park
| | | | | | - T P Miller
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - J W Friedberg
- Department of Medicine, James P. Wilmont Cancer Center, Rochester
| | - A D Zelenetz
- Department of Medicine, Lymphoma Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - B K Link
- Oncology and Bone & Marrow Transplantation, Division of Hematology, University of Iowa, Iowa City
| | - J R Cerhan
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic-College of Medicine, Rochester
| | - H Dillon
- The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, White Plains, USA
| | - R Sinha
- Winship Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University-School of Medicine, Atlanta
| | - P J Shenoy
- Winship Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University-School of Medicine, Atlanta
| | - D Levy
- Genentech, South San Francisco
| | | | | | - C R Flowers
- Winship Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Emory University-School of Medicine, Atlanta
| |
Collapse
|