Human papillomavirus genotype as a predictor of persistence and development of high-grade lesions in women with minor cervical abnormalities

Uneven distribution of HPV 16 E6 prototype and variant (L83V) oncoprotein in cervical neoplastic lesions

A previous Swedish study revealed that both prototype and variant HPV16 E6 oncoprotein, occur in about equal numbers in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HCIN), whereas variant HPV16 predominates in invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. Most of the malignant HPV16 variants contain a common mutation, L83V, in the E6 oncoprotein. In the present investigation, 28 HPV16 positive, invasive cervical adenocarcinomas were collected from a total number of 131 adenocarcinomas. These HPV16-positive cases were evaluated with analysis of the E6 gene, using a recently described PCR-SSCP method for identification of the specific mutation (L83V) in the E6 gene. The results obtained were correlated to findings in 103 preinvasive, HCIN, and 31 invasive cervical squamous carcinomas also infected with HPV16. The HPV16 E6 variant L83V was present in 40% of the HCIN lesions, in 54% of the invasive adenocarcinomas, in comparison to 81% of the invasive squamous carcinomas. The difference between HCIN and squamous carcinomas was statistically significant, P < 0.001, whereas the difference between HCIN and invasive adenocarcinomas was not statistically significant, P = 0.604. Prototype HPV16 and its E6 variant L83V are both prevalent in preinvasive and invasive cervical lesions in Swedish women. However, the obvious predominance of HPV16 variant in squamous carcinomas was not seen in adenocarcinomas. A single amino-acid shift in the HPV16 E6 gene appears to result in a different transforming potential in squamous and glandular cervical lesions.

Variants of the long control region of human papillomavirus type 16

Expression of the human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 and E7 oncogenes is regulated on the transcriptional level by specific protein-binding sites contained in the viral long control region (LCR). Sequence changes within the LCR region may have an impact on the transcription of viral oncogenes, possibly resulting in differences in the oncogenic potential of the virus. The present study was designed to determine the sequence variability of the LCR of HPV 16 and to assess whether certain LCR variants do correlate with the clinical outcome of the disease of the uterine cervix. The entire LCR segment of HPV 16 was analysed from 37 cervical biopsy specimens derived from 28 women included in the Kuopio long-term prospective follow-up study. The LCR sequence was identical with the reference sequence in six HPV 16 isolates. Overall, 14 different HPV 16 LCR variants were identified. One of the variants showed sequence variation typical of the Asian-American variant lineage of HPV 16, and all the other variants appeared to belong to the European variant group. The European variants exhibited low genetic diversity, and only five of these LCR variants contained nucleotide changes involving known or proposed binding sites for transcription factors. The variants with changes at nucleotide positions 7193 and 7521 was the most prevalent, accounting for almost 37% of infections. This variant (7193; 7521) has been previously demonstrated to have similar transcriptional activity compared with the reference isolate by Veress and colleagues J Gen Virol 1999, 80, 1035-1043. The reference isolate, variant (7193; 7521) and variants with changes within transcription factor binding sites accounted for most of the infections, and no significant differences were found in the comparison of the distribution of these different LCR isolates in cases where the disease showed progression to severe cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or carcinoma in situ (CIS). Notably, both the reference isolate and variant (7193; 7521) were also closely associated with infections showing more aggressive behaviour. According to the present findings, in European HPV 16 isolates, intratype genetic variation of the LCR region does not seem to be commonly responsible for differences in the pathogenicity of the virus and thereby for a risk of progressive infections.

Viral load of human papilloma virus 16 as a determinant for development of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Infection with certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV), which is common among young women, increases the risk of cervical cancer. However, less than 1% of young women positive for oncogenic types of HPV develop cervical cancer. We investigated whether the amount of HPV DNA is a useful predictor of progression to cervical carcinoma in situ.

METHODS

We estimated the amount of HPV 16 DNA by a PCR that uses the 5'-exonuclease (Taqman) method, in 478 women with cervical carcinoma in situ and 608 individually matched controls. To adjust for differences in the amount of genomic DNA between samples, we estimated the amount of a nuclear gene (beta-actin). We studied multiple smears (total 3835 archived samples) from each woman, taken over periods of up to 26 years, that covered normal cytology to development of cervical cancer.

FINDINGS

The risk of cervical carcinoma in situ increased with the amount of HPV 16 DNA. Analysis of the first smear from each woman, collected a mean of 7.8 years before cancer diagnosis, showed that women with the 20% highest amount of HPV 16 DNA were at a 60-fold higher risk of developing cervical carcinoma in situ than women negative for HPV 16. The first smear samples were classified as normal by squamous-cell cytology.

INTERPRETATION

Analysis of the amount of HPV DNA can predict cancer risk at a stage when current screening methods are uninformative. Testing for the amount of HPV 16 DNA during gynaecological health checks might strikingly improve our ability to distinguish between infections that have a high or low risk of progressing into cervical cancer.

Cervical lesions are associated with human papillomavirus type 16 intratypic variants that have high transcriptional activity and increased usage of common mammalian codons

Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) is a major cause of cervical neoplasia, but only a minority of HPV-16 infections result in cancer. Whether particular HPV-16 variants are associated with cervical disease has not yet been clearly established. An investigation of whether cervical neoplasia is associated with infection with HPV-16 intratypic variants was undertaken by using RFLP analyses in a study of 100 HPV-16 DNA-positive women with or without neoplasia. RFLP variant 2 was positively associated [odds ratio (OR)=2.57] and variant 5 was negatively associated with disease (OR=0.2). Variant 1, which resembles the reference isolate of HPV-16, was found at a similar prevalence among those with and without neoplasia. Variants 1 and 2 were also more likely to be associated with detectable viral mRNA than variant 5 (respectively P=0.03 and P=0.00). When HPV-16 E5 ORFs in 50 clones from 36 clinical samples were sequenced, 19 variant HPV-16 E5 DNA sequences were identified. Twelve of these DNA sequences encoded variant E5 amino acid sequences, 10 of which were novel. Whilst the associations between HPV-16 E5 RFLP variants and neoplasia could not be attributed to differences in amino acid sequences, correlation was observed in codon usage. DNA sequences of RFLP variant 2 (associated with greatest OR for neoplasia) had a significantly greater usage of common mammalian codons compared with RFLP pattern 1 variants.

Association between high-risk HPV types, HLA DRB1* and DQB1* alleles and cervical cancer in British women

Cervical scrapes from 116 British women referred with cervical cancer were tested for the presence of high oncogenic risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes (HPV(hr)). Ninety-four per cent of the scrapes had one or more of these virus types and 66% were HPV16-positive. HPV18 was more frequent in adenocarcinoma. No evidence was found for an increased cancer risk associated with the HPV16 E6 350G variant. The HLA DRB1* and DQB1* alleles in these women and in 155 women with normal cytology and negative for HPV(hr) DNA were compared. DQB1*0301 alone (2P = 0.02) and in combination with DRB1*0401 (2P = 0.02) was found to be associated with cervical cancer. This was more marked in cancers positive for HPV types other than HPV16. In contrast, DRB1*1501 alone and in combination with DQB1*0602 was not significantly elevated in cancers overall, but did show some excess in HPV16-positive cancers (2P = 0.05), associated with HPV16-positive cervical cancers. Taking all cancers together, a marginally significant protective effect was found for DQB1*0501 (2P = 0.03) but no protective effect could be seen for DRB1*1301.

Analysis of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 variants in relation to p53 codon 72 polymorphism genotypes in cervical carcinogenesis

This study aimed to assess the role of specific human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) variants, in combination with p53 codon 72 polymorphism genotypes, in cervical carcinogenesis. An initial sequence analysis of HPV-16 long control, E6 and E7 regions of 53 well-defined cervical samples containing HPV-16 revealed that a T to G transition at nucleotide position 350 within the E6 open reading frame was the most common variation, the frequency of which seemed to decrease with increasing severity of the lesion. Therefore, a total of 246 cervical samples of residents of The Netherlands was specifically analysed for HPV-16 350G/T variants and/or p53 codon 72 genotypes. These comprised HPV-negative normal cervical scrapes (n=40), normal cervical scrapes containing HPV-16 (n=46), scrapes containing HPV-16 from women with abnormal cervical cytology participating in a non-intervention follow-up study without (n=38) and with (n=51) a histologically proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III lesion at the end of the study, and cervical squamous cell carcinomas (n=71). Neither specific HPV-16 350G/T variants nor specific p53 genotypes were associated with a higher risk of developing CIN III or cervical cancer. However, HPV-16 350T variants were significantly over-represented in p53 Arg homozygous women with cervical cancer. This suggests that, in p53 Arg/Arg women, infection with HPV-16 350T variants confers a higher risk of cervical cancer.

Human papillomavirus type 16 E6 variants in cervical carcinoma: relationship to host genetic factors and clinical parameters

Infection with human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) confers a high risk for the development of cervical neoplasia. Variants of this virus may interact differentially with host genetic factors, possibly altering the disease course. Thus, HPV-16 E6 variants may differ in their ability to degrade p53 whereas the polymorphic p53 alleles may provide more or less susceptible substrates for the viral oncogene product. Also, E6 variants may differ in immunogenicity by generating different peptides for presentation by polymorphic HLA molecules to specific T cells. This study examines HPV-16 E6 sequence variation in cervical carcinomas from the UK and its relationship to polymorphism of HLA and p53 and to clinical parameters. Sequence analysis of the HPV-16 E6 ORF from 77 tumour biopsies detected the viral prototype sequence in 38% of cases. The most common variation detected was a T to G transition at base pair 350, resulting in an amino acid change from a leucine to a valine. Overall, the frequencies of 350T and 350G sequences were similar (49. 4% and 50.6% respectively). Other mutations of lower frequencies were detected together with and independently of 350G. HPV-16 E6 sequence variation at base pair 350 did not correlate with HLA genotype or clinical outcome. There was no difference in the distribution of p53 proline and arginine alleles between HPV-16-positive cervical carcinoma patients and local controls, and no influence on clinical outcome; however, there was a trend for an increased frequency of p53 arginine homozygotes among the 350T carcinoma patients.

Comparison of variant-specific hybridization and single-strand conformational polymorphism methods for detection of mixed human papillomavirus type 16 variant infections

PCR-based variant-specific hybridization (VSH) and single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analyses were compared for their capacities to detect mixed human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) variant infections within clinical specimens. The SSCP assay used in this comparison targets a 682-bp fragment that spans nucleotides 7445 to 222 within the HPV-16 genome. This fragment includes portions of the HPV-16 long control region and the E6 open reading frame and identifies three categories of SSCP patterns: those identical to the patterns of prototype HPV-16 (P), those identical to the patterns of Caski-derived HPV-16 (C), or those that are different from the P and C HPV-16 patterns and that are therefore classified as belonging to novel (N) HPV-16 variants. VSH targets the entire HPV-16 E6-coding region (nucleotides 56 to 640) and distinguishes previously described variant nucleotides at positions 109, 131, 132, 143, 145, 178, 286, 289, 350, 403, and 532. Clinical samples used in VSH and SSCP analyses were subjected to multiple independent amplification reactions. The resultant amplicons were cloned, and 14 to 78 clones per clinical specimen were evaluated by VSH. VSH detected an HPV-16 variant that represented at least 20% of the amplified HPV-16 variant population. In contrast, SSCP analysis detected HPV-16 variants that represented 36% of the amplified HPV-16 population. Comparison studies were conducted with mixed HPV-16 variant laboratory constructs. Again, VSH had a higher sensitivity than SSCP analysis in detecting mixed HPV-16 variant infections in these constructed amplicon targets. Accurate detection of HPV-16 variants may enhance our understanding of the natural history of HPV-16 infections.

HPV testing in primary screening of older women

Certain types of the human papilloma virus (HPV) are well established as the primary cause of cervical cancer. Several studies have shown that HPV testing can improve the detection rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), but these have been carried out primarily in younger women. In this study we evaluated the role of HPV testing as an adjunct to cytology in women aged 35 or over. An additional aim was to evaluate commercially available kits for HPV testing. A total of 2988 eligible women aged 34 or more attending for a routine smear in 40 general practitioner practices received HPV testing in addition to routine cytology, after having given written informed consent. Samples were assayed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and two versions of the Hybrid Capture test for HPV, and women were invited for colposcopy if there was any cytological abnormality (including borderline smears) or the PCR test was positive. Any apparent abnormality was biopsied and loop-excision was performed as necessary. CIN was judged by histology; 42 women had high-grade CIN, of which six were cytology negative (86% sensitivity for borderline or worse) and three had a borderline smear (79% sensitivity for mild dyskaryosis or worse). The positive predictive value of a borderline smear was only 3.1%. Eleven high-grade lesions were negative by the PCR HPV test (sensitivity 74%). The first generation Hybrid Capture II test had a similar sensitivity but an unacceptably high false positive rate (18.3%), while the newer Hybrid Capture II microtitre kit had a 95% sensitivity and a 2.3% positivity rate in normal women when used at a 2 pg ml(-1) cut-off (positive predictive value 27%). Cytology performed very well in this older cohort of women. The newer Hybrid Capture II microtitre test may be a useful adjunct, especially if the results reported here are reproducible in other studies. A combined screening test offers the possibility of greater protection and/or longer screening intervals, which could reduce the overall cost of the screening programme.

HPV typing and HPV16 E6-sequence variations in synchronous lesions of cervical squamous-cell carcinoma from Swedish patients

We microdissected 15 specimens of invasive cervical cancer co-existing with some of its precursors. Out of 15 cases, 10 carried HPV16, 2 HPV31, 1 HPV18 and 2 were HPV-negative. We found 3 HPV16 E6 variants among the 10 cases; one was A --> G in nt 131 (one case) and a second was A --> G in nt 276. The third, T;--> G in nt 350, was common, and was found in 5 of the 10 patients infected by HPV16. The type of HPV and the E6 variant were identical in all lesions within the same patient. Viral DNA present in normal epithelium was identical in type and E6 variant to HPV in the same patient's lesions. Multiple samples from invasive cancers with HPV were consistently positive. The data suggest that the originally infecting HPV, including its variant type in the E6 gene, persists unaltered in the whole series of CIN that precedes invasive cancer. Our data are compatible with an essential role of HPV manifested by persistence of the viral genome during the entire natural life history of cervical cancer. We did not confirm previous data on the specific association of invasive cancer with an HPV E6 variant (G at nt 350 rather than T). The discrepancy may depend on the relatively few cases investigated or selection of a special sub-set with progression from CIN to invasive cancer already manifest.

Uniform distribution of HPV 16 E6 and E7 variants in patients with normal histology, cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer

High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV), particularly HPV 16, are associated with invasive cervical cancer (ICC), and persistent high-risk HPV infection is considered to be a marker for progressive cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN). However, most high-risk, HPV-infected, pre-cancerous lesions will not progress to invasion. Several reports suggest that specific HPV 16 E6 and/or E7 sequence variations may be associated with a high risk for progression. No data from German patients have so far been reported. Therefore, we analyzed intra-type variations of these oncogenes in women with normal histology or CIN 1 (< or = CIN 1), CIN 2/3 or ICC. Cervical scrapes from 75 patients with normal histology or CIN and biopsies from 37 ICC patients all positive for HPV 16 were analyzed. The open reading frames of oncogenes HPV 16 E6 and E7 were amplified by nested PCR followed by primer cycle sequencing. From each cervical scrape, 2 independent PCR amplicons were generated and sequenced from both orientations. The prototype sequence of HPV 16 E6 and E7 was identified in 33% and 87% of < or = CIN 1, in 62% and 69% of CIN 2/3 and in 43% and 86% of ICC, respectively (not significant). Of all variants identified, the E6 variant 350G (L83V) and the E7 variant 822G were most frequently detected irrespective of histology and showed prevalence rates of 27% to 43% and 7% to 20%, respectively. No statistically significant differences in the prevalence of the E6 or E7 prototype sequences, any variants or multivariants in German women with < or = CIN 1, CIN 2/3 or ICC were found.

Genetic susceptibility to HPV infection and cervical cancer

Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) is one of the leading causes of death in developing countries. Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the major risk factor to develop malignant lesions in the cervix. Polymorphisms of the MHC and p53 genes seem to influence the outcome of HPV infection and progression to SCCC, although controversial data have been reported. MHC are highly polymorphic genes that encode molecules involved in antigen presentation, playing a key role in immune regulation, while p53 is a tumor suppressor gene that regulates cell proliferation. The HPV E6 protein from high-risk types binds p53 and mediates its degradation by the ubiquitin pathway. The role of these polymorphisms in genetic susceptibility to HPV infection and to SCCC remains under investigation.

Nonisotopic detection and typing of human papillomavirus DNA in genital samples by the line blot assay. The Canadian Women's HIV study group

The line blot assay, a gene amplification method that combines PCR with nonisotopic detection of amplified DNA, was evaluated for its ability to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in genital specimens. Processed samples were amplified with biotin-labeled primers for HPV detection (primers MY09, MY11, and HMB01) and for beta-globin detection (primers PC03 and PC04). Amplified DNA products were hybridized by a reverse blot method with oligonucleotide probe mixtures fixed on a strip that allowed the identification of 27 HPV genotypes. The line blot assay was compared to a standard consensus PCR test in which HPV amplicons were detected with radiolabeled probes in a dot blot assay. Two hundred fifty-five cervicovaginal lavage specimens and cervical scrapings were tested in parallel by both PCR tests. The line blot assay consistently detected 25 copies of HPV type 18 per run. The overall positivity for the DNA of HPV types detectable by both methods was 37.7% (96 of 255 samples) by the line blot assay, whereas it was 43. 5% (111 of 255 samples) by the standard consensus PCR assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the line blot assay reached 84.7% (94 of 111 samples) and 98.6% (142 of 144 samples), respectively. The agreement for HPV typing between the two PCR assays reached 83.9% (214 of 255 samples). Of the 37 samples with discrepant results, 33 (89%) were resolved by avoiding coamplification of beta-globin and modifying the amplification parameters. With these modifications, the line blot assay compared favorably to an assay that used radiolabeled probes. Its convenience allows the faster analysis of samples for large-scale epidemiological studies. Also, the increased probe spectrum in this single hybridization assay permits more complete type discrimination.

HPV 16 infection and progression of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: analysis of HLA polymorphism and HPV 16 E6 sequence variants

High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection plays an important role in cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN), but HPV infection alone is not sufficient for progression to cervical cancer. Several lines of evidence suggest that cellular immune surveillance is important in the control of HPV infection and the development of CIN. The presentation to T cells of target viral peptides in the context of HLA molecules is influenced by the genetic polymorphisms of both HPV and HLA and thereby influences the host immune response and clinical outcome of HPV infection. HLA class I and II polymorphism in susceptibility for HPV 16 infection, development and progression of CIN was analyzed in a group of 118 patients participating in a prospective study of women with initial abnormal cytology. Patients were stratified according to HPV status and course of the disease. HLA-B*44 frequency was increased in the small group of patients with a lesion that showed clinical progression during follow-up [OR = 9.0 (4.6-17.5), p = 0.007]. HLA-DRB1*07 frequency was increased among HPV 16-positive patients compared with patients who were negative for all HPV types [OR = 5.9 (3.0-11.3), p = 0.02]. Our results are consistent with the immunogenetic factors associated with disease progression being different from those associated with susceptibility to HPV 16 infection. Sequencing of the HPV 16 E6 and E7 open reading frames of a subset of these patients (n = 40) showed the frequency of HPV 16 variants to be similar to other studies. However, there was no significant correlation between variant incidence and disease progression or viral persistence and no significant correlation with any HLA allele. It appears that multiple HLA types can influence HPV 16-associated cervical dysplasia but the role of HPV 16 variants in disease progression and susceptibility in relation to HLA polymorphism remains unclear.

Virological and biological characteristics of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I with marked koilocytotic atypia

The aim of this study was to evaluate virologic and biological significance of marked koilocytotic atypia observed in some cases of grade I cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN I). Thirty-one CIN I cervical biopsy specimens with marked koilocytotic atypia, defined by the presence of meganuclei in the superficial epithelial layers, were compared to 37 CIN I biopsy specimens with usual koilocytes for (1) the human papillomavirus (HPV) type and signal pattern as detected by nonisotopic in situ hybridization (ISH); (2) the proliferation index assessed by Ki 67 immunostaining and (3) the p53 labeling pattern. Interobserver agreement for meganuclei was excellent (k = 0.9). Twenty-five out of 68 biopsies (37%) were positive by ISH for the 6 of 11 HPV probe, 30 (44%) for the 16-18 probe, and 7 (10%) for the 31/33 HPV probe, 6 (9%) were negative for ISH. The presence of meganuclei was strongly related to high and intermediate risk HPV type (P = 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of meganuclei for the detection of high or intermediate risk HPV in CINI were 73 and 87%, respectively. Loss of p53 immunostaining in the lower third of the epithelium was also related to the presence of meganuclei (P < .05), but the MIB-1 index and ISH labeling pattern were not. In conclusion, marked koilocytotic atypia in CIN I is a reliable and sensitive marker for infection by high or intermediate-risk HPV, and might be a guide to therapy.

Human papillomavirus infection with particular reference to genital disease

HPV is the commonest sexually transmitted viral infection in the United Kingdom and as such poses a major public health problem. In addition to the potential physical morbidity associated with genital warts, abnormal cervical cytology, and anogenital dysplasia and neoplasia, the associated psychological morbidity should not be forgotten. Although our knowledge of viral function and disease pathogenesis has advanced appreciably in recent years, we are still some way from developing an in vitro method of viral propagation. Vaccination against HPV infection will hopefully be achieved within the next 10 years, but a prevention and treatment strategy which is appropriate for both developed and developing nations must be our major long term goal.

A longitudinal study of human papillomavirus carriage in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected women

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the relationship of human immunodeficiency virus serostatus to carriage of oncogenic human papillomavirus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 268 human immunodeficiency virus-infected and 265 human immunodeficiency virus-uninfected women were seen every 6 months, at which time they had laboratory tests performed including a CD4 count. Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. Statistical methods included Kaplan-Meier and Cox's proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The prevalence at baseline of any human papillomavirus type was 73% and 43% among human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive and seronegative women, respectively (p < 0.0001) and of oncogenic types was 32.5% and 17.0% (p < 0.001). The prevalence of oncogenic human papillomavirus was higher in women with CD4 counts <200 mm3 (p < 0.001). The rate of detection of new oncogenic human papillomavirus per 100 patient years of follow-up in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women was almost three times higher than among human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative women (p < 0.01). The rate of loss of an oncogenic human papillomavirus was higher in the human immunodeficiency virus-seronegative women but the difference was not significant. The relative risk of a human immunodeficiency virus-infected woman who did not initially have a specific type of oncogenic human papillomavirus having one detected during follow-up was 6.6 times greater than among human immunodeficiency virus-negative women (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women are more likely to have newly detectable oncogenic types of human papillomavirus at follow-up and to show persistent carriage of oncogenic types of human papillomavirus types. Among human immunodeficiency virus-infected women, those with higher CD4 counts were more likely to have a newly detected oncogenic human papillomavirus during follow-up.

Human papillomavirus detection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the second-generation hybrid capture microplate test, comparing two different cervical specimen collection methods

BACKGROUND

The second generation Hybrid Capture microplate-based human papillomavirus (HPV) test (HC II) was examined to determine its sensitivity for identification of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) by two different cervical specimen collection methods.

OBJECTIVES

A cohort of 115 women with a mean age of 34.6 years (SD 9.1), referred to colposcopy with a history of abnormal cytology, was studied to compare HPV prevalence and viral load in low grade CIN vs. high grade CIN.

STUDY DESIGN

Prior to the application of acetic acid, cervical specimens were obtained by either method 1 or 2, as follows: method 1: A cotton-tipped swab was applied to the ectocervix and endocervix for a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. Next, a special cone-shaped cervical brush was applied to the endocervix, the ectocervix, and to the posterior vaginal vault and suspended in 1.0 ml of transport medium for HPV testing. Method 2: a Pap smear was taken with a cyto standard cylindrical cytology brush from the endocervix, and ectocervix, and the remaining cells were suspended in 3 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for HPV testing. Next, a Dacron-tipped swab was used to take a specimen from the ectocervix and posterior fornix and suspended in the same PBS solution.

Aetiology, pathogenesis, and pathology of cervical neoplasia

Early epidemiological studies of cervical neoplasia suggested a causal relation with sexual activity and human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have emerged as prime suspects as venerally transmitted carcinogens. HPVs fall into two broad camps: low risk types, associated with cervical condylomas and CIN 1; and high risk types (mostly 16 and 18), found in 50-80% of CIN 2 and CIN 3 lesions, and 90% of cancers. This association with cancer is very strong, with odds ratios of > 15 (often much higher) in case-control studies that are methodologically sound. An infrequently detected third group of intermediate risk type HPVs is associated with all grades of CIN and occasionally with cancers. HPVs have also been detected in a wide range of asymptomatic controls, indicating that other events are required for development of neoplasia such as viral persistence and/or altered expression of viral genes, often following integration of the viral genome. This leaves the two major viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, directly coupled to viral enhancers and promoters, allowing their continued expression after integration. High risk HPV E7 proteins bind and inactivate the Rb protein, whereas E6 proteins bind p53 and direct its rapid degradation. A range of putative cofactors has been implicated in progression: HLA type, immunosuppression, sex steroid hormones, and smoking; most of these cofactors appear to influence progression to CIN 3. The natural history includes progression to CIN 3 in 10% of CIN 1 and 20% of CIN 2 cases, whereas at least 12% of CIN 3 cases progress to invasive carcinoma. Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) often coexists with squamous CIN, and the premalignant potential of high grade CGIN is not in doubt, but the natural history of low grade CGIN remains uncertain. A high proportion of CGIN lesions and adenocarcinomas are HPV positive, and HPV18 has been implicated more in glandular than in squamous lesions. A strong clinical case for the application of HPV typing of cells recovered from cervical scrapes can be made; however, a rigorous cost-benefit analysis of introducing HPV typing into the cervical screening programme is required. Prophylactic and therapeutic HPV vaccines are under development. This article reviews the aetiology, pathogenesis, and pathology of cervical neoplasia, emphasising the role of HPVs.

Analysis of E2 amino acid variants of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 and their associations with lesion grade and HLA DR/DQ type

Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV 18 E2 amino acid variants and host HLA DR/DQ haplotypes have been identified by direct nucleic acid sequencing from cervical scrapes. HPV16 E2 variants co-segregate with a nucleotide variant at nt350 (in E6), which previously has been associated with persistent infections. Both HPV16 and HPV18 E2 variants occur relatively more frequently in individuals with HLA DR/DQ haplotypes 0401/0301 and 1101/0301 but are not related to lesion grade.

The future of HPV testing in clinical laboratories and applied virology research

BACKGROUND

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are now considered etiologic agents of cancer of the uterine cervix. Adjunctive diagnostic procedures for the detection of HPV infection could increase the sensitivity of primary and secondary screening of cervical cancer. HPV testing could also improve the specificity of screening programs resulting in avoidance of overtreatment and saving of costs for confirmatory procedures.

OBJECTIVES

To review the rationale of HPV testing in genital diseases and the potential applications of HPV DNA detection methods for clinical and epidemiological purposes.

RESULTS

Progression of HPV infection is associated with the persistence of HPV infection, involvement of high-risk HPV types, high HPV viral load in specimens, integration of viral DNA and possibly the presence of cofactors. The design of HPV diagnostic tests will need to take into account these parameters of disease progression. HPV DNA detection techniques based on signal-amplification are standardized, commercially available and detect several high-risk HPV types. They increase the sensitivity of screening for high-grade and low-grade lesions. Although they may yield false-negative results in the presence of significant HPV-related disease, new test formats could resolve this weakness. Amplification techniques are ideal instruments for epidemiologic purposes since they minimize misclassification of HPV infection status and allow for the detection of low viral burden infections. They are currently not readily applicable to diagnostic laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS

Before recommending HPV testing, prospective trials of untreated LSIL with HPV testing as well as the determination of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of novel HPV tests, need to be completed.

Human papillomavirus type 16 sequence variation in cervical cancers: a worldwide perspective

We examined intratype human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) sequence variation in tumor samples that were collected and analyzed in an international study of invasive cervical cancer. The collection included tumors from 22 countries in five continents. Using our recently developed E6 and L1 PCR-based hybridization systems to distinguish HPV-16 variant lineages, we analyzed material from tumors previously found to contain HPV-16 DNA. Of 408 specimens analyzed in the E6 hybridization assay, 376 (92.2%) belonged to previously reported HPV-16 variant lineages. The remaining 32 specimens (7.8%) harbored HPV-16 variants with novel hybridization patterns, novel nucleotide changes, or both. Nucleotide sequences (1,203 bp) were determined for the E6, the MY09/11 region of L1, and the long control region of each novel variant and representative specimens from each hybridization pattern observed. Based on E6 hybridization patterns, most of the variants from European and North American samples were phylogenetically classified as European prototype (E) while samples from Africa contained primarily African 1 (Af1) or African 2 (Af2) variants. The majority of Asian (As) variants were observed in Southeast Asia, and almost all Asian American (AA) variants were from Central and South America or Spain. A single North American 1 (NA1) variant was detected in a tumor from Argentina. Nucleotide changes previously shown to covary between the MY09/11 region of L1 and the E6 coding region were examined in a subset of 249 specimens. We observed 22 combined E6-L1 hybridization patterns, of which 11 (in 21 samples) were novel. No unanticipated nucleotide covariation was observed between the E class and the AA-Af1-Af2-NA1 classes, suggesting the absence or rarity of genomic recombination between HPV-16 lineages. This extensive description of HPV-16 variants forms a basis for further examining the relationship between intratype variation and basic functional differences in biological activities. HPV-16 variants may prove important for the determination of the risk of cervical neoplasia and for the design of HPV-16 vaccine strategies.