Effect of metoprolol on myocardial function and energetics in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

beta-Blockers in congestive heart failure

Recent advances in the understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying congestive heart failure (CHF) have focused on the role of neurohormonal activation. Chronic adrenergic overstimulation is directly toxic to myocardial cells, impairs function, causes peripheral vasoconstriction and may induce programmed cell death via apoptosis. beta-Adrenergic blockade can interrupt this pathological process. Accumulating evidence now points to a clear role for beta-blocking agents in the management of heart failure, reducing both the morbidity and mortality associated with CHF. This report will review the recent clinical trials supporting the use of beta-blockers in CHF, briefly highlight some practical considerations in the use of these drugs in patients with CHF and discuss several areas of controversy in which further study is needed.

Beta-blockers and amiodarone for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death

Sudden cardiac death remains a major public health care problem, generally occurring in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Beta-blockers, already of proven benefit for patients after myocardial infarction, have recently been shown to improve functional status and mortality outcomes in patients with heart failure. Amiodarone, a potent antiarrhythmic drug, was recently studied in a number of randomized clinical trials involving patients with heart failure and patients after myocardial infarction. Routine use of amiodarone cannot be recommended in these patient groups, but serious adverse outcomes were not observed. When antiarrhythmic drug therapy is required, amiodarone is the drug of choice for patients with structural heart disease.

Beta-blockade in heart failure: a comparison of carvedilol with metoprolol

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to compare the long-term clinical efficacy of treatment with metoprolol versus carvedilol in patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Beta-adrenergic blockade is of proven value in chronic heart failure. Metoprolol, a selective beta-blocker, is widely used, but recent trials suggest carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with alpha-1-receptor antagonist activity and antioxidant activities, is also effective. It is uncertain, however, if these additional properties of carvedilol provide further clinical benefit compared with metoprolol.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind control trial, 51 patients with chronic heart failure and mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of 26% +/- 1.8% were randomly assigned treatment with metoprolol 50 mg twice daily or carvedilol 25 mg twice daily in addition to standard therapy after a four-week dose titration period for a total of 12 weeks. Response was assessed by a quality of life questionnaire, New York Heart Association class, exercise capacity (6-min walk test), radionucleotide ventriculography for LV ejection fraction, two-dimensional echocardiography measurement of LV dimensions and diastolic filling and 24-h electrocardiograph monitoring to assess heart rate variability.

RESULTS

Both carvedilol and metoprolol produced highly significant improvement in symptoms (p < 0.001), exercise capacity (p < 0.05) and LV ejection fraction (p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences between the two drugs. Carvedilol had a significantly greater effect on sitting and standing blood pressure, LV end-diastolic dimension and normalized the mitral E wave deceleration time.

CONCLUSIONS

Both metoprolol and carvedilol were equally effective in improving symptoms, quality of life, exercise capacity and LV ejection fraction, although carvedilol lowers blood pressure more than metoprolol.

Prevention of suboptimal beta-blocker treatment in patients with myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To review the published data and clinical guidelines on the use of beta-blockers in myocardial infarctions (MIs) and contrast that with actual clinical practice.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1970-June 1999) was performed to identify all relevant articles. References from these articles were also evaluated for review if deemed important.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Intravenous and oral beta-blockers have been proven to improve outcomes in patients with MIs in numerous clinical trials. In current clinical practice, only 15% of MI patients receive intravenous beta-blockers and long-term beta-blocker therapy is used in <40% of patients without contraindications. However, they could be safely administered to 40% and 70% of these patients, respectively. Furthermore, most of these patients are receiving doses far below those found beneficial in clinical trials. Many of the real and perceived contraindications to beta-blockers are reviewed to allow the practitioner to identify patients who are incorrectly excluded from beta-blocker therapy. Also discussed are special clinical situations in which the benefits observed during clinical trials may not apply.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers are valuable drugs in the treatment of peri- and post-MI. In clinical practice, most patients are not treated or are inadequately treated with beta-blockers. Pharmacists should ensure that such patients actually have an absolute contraindication or unusual situation where therapy is not firmly indicated. Patients without absolute contraindications warrant titration to specific target doses or a target heart rate of 55-60 beats/min.

Effects of beta-adrenergic blocking therapy on left ventricular diastolic relaxation properties in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The hemodynamic mechanism for the improvement in left ventricle (LV) end-diastolic pressure in cardiomyopathy patients treated with beta-adrenergic blocking agents is controversial. We hypothesized that the salutary effect of this kind of therapy on LV end-diastolic pressure would be indicative of an improvement in late, passive diastolic relaxation properties.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 14 cardiomyopathy patients in normal sinus rhythm with no arteriographic evidence of coronary artery disease and an LV ejection fraction of </=40% by radionuclide angiography both before and after 6 months of metoprolol therapy with simultaneous micromanometry and biplane cineventriculography. Four comparable patients who were not treated with metoprolol were studied in a similar fashion and served as control subjects. In those receiving metoprolol, LV end-diastolic pressure decreased (P=0.001). The isovolumic relaxation index, tau(ln), shortened (P=0.03). In a similar fashion, the LV chamber stiffness constant, kappa, decreased (P=0.02), LV volume elastance improved (P=0.04), and the myocardial stiffness constant, kappa(e), decreased (P=0.02). A multiple regression analysis revealed that the decrease in LV end-diastolic pressure was indicative of significant improvements in tau(ln) and kappa(e) with the relationship: LV end-diastolic pressure=-4.73+0.27 tau(ln)+0.54 kappa(e) (r=0.81, P<0.0001). These LV diastolic relaxation properties did not change or worsened in the control cardiomyopathy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the decrease in LV end-diastolic pressure in cardiomyopathy patients treated with metoprolol is an indicator of improvement in LV diastolic properties resulting from more complete myocardial relaxation.

Short-term and long-term hemodynamic and clinical effects of metoprolol alone and combined with amlodipine in patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Initiation of beta-blocker therapy is often limited by worsening congestive heart failure, which may manifest as worsening hemodynamics. Deleterious hemodynamic effects might be mitigated with the vasodilation of combined calcium channel/beta-blocker therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective, randomized study assessed the safety and efficacy of metoprolol alone or combined with amlodipine on hemodynamic parameters at baseline, 2 hours after the first dose of study medication, and after 12 weeks of therapy in patients receiving background triple therapy for mild to severe heart failure. Functional, exercise, and hormonal status were assessed at baseline and end of study. Twenty-nine patients (mean age 50 +/- 12.1 years) were enrolled; 21 completed 12 weeks of treatment. Mean ejection fraction at baseline was 13.4% +/- 5.7%; 79% of patients had heart failure classified as New York Heart Association class III, and 66% had heart failure of idiopathic origin. Heart rate and blood pressure did not change with short-term therapy in either group. The first dose of both regimens produced significant increases in systemic vascular resistance and significant decreases in cardiac output and index and stroke volume and stroke work indexes; combination therapy acutely yielded small but statistically significant increases in pulmonary artery, pulmonary capillary wedge, and right atrial pressures. Long-term therapy with both regimens produced significant decreases in heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and significant increases in cardiac output and index and stroke volume and stroke work indexes. Combination therapy produced significant long-term decreases in blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no further measurable benefit with the addition of amlodipine to metoprolol compared with the effects of metoprolol alone. Therapy with metoprolol alone and the combination of metoprolol and amlodipine was well tolerated in patients with mild to severe heart failure, as evidenced by a lack of adverse effects on hemodynamic parameters over the short term and clinical and hemodynamic improvement with long-term treatment.

Effects of propranolol treatment on left ventricular function and intracellular calcium regulation in rats with postinfarction heart failure

1. Chronic treatment with beta-adrenergic blocking agents can improve survival in patients with heart failure. The mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects and whether these effects are generalizable to ischaemic heart failure are unresolved. 2. We performed echocardiographic-Doppler examinations in rats (n=28) 1 and 6 weeks after myocardial infarction (MI) or sham surgery. Rats were randomized to no treatment or propranolol (500 mg/l in drinking water) after the first echocardiogram. Isometric contractions and intracellular Ca transients were recorded simultaneously in noninfarcted left ventricular (LV) papillary muscles. 3. Untreated MI rats had significant LV dilatation (10.6+/-0.4* vs 8.9+/(-0.3) mm, MI vs control), impaired systolic function (fractional shortening=11+/-2* vs 38+/-2%), and a restrictive LV diastolic filling pattern. MI rats receiving propranolol had similar LV chamber sizes (10.6+/(-0.5) mm) and systolic function (13+/(-2%). The propranolol treated animals had higher LV end-diastolic pressures (27+/-2* vs 20+/(-3 mmHg) and a more restricted LV diastolic filling pattern (increased ratio of early to late filling velocities and more rapid E wave deceleration rate). Contractility of papillary muscles from untreated MI rats was depressed (1.6+/(-0.3) vs 2.4+/(0.5 g mm(-2). In addition, Ca transients were prolonged and the inotropic response to isoproterenol was blunted. Propranolol treatment did not improve force development (1.6+/(-0.3 g mm(-2) or the duration of Ca transients during isoproterenol stimulation. 4. Chronic propranolol treatment in rats with postinfarction heart failure did not improve LV remodeling or systolic function. LV diastolic pressures and filling patterns were worsened by propranolol. Treatment also did not produce appreciable improvement in contractility, intracellular Ca regulation or beta-adrenergic responsiveness in the noninfarcted myocardium.

Medical and surgical therapy for cardiac remodeling

Ventricular remodeling refers to changes in ventricular geometry, volume, mass, and myocellular structure in response to myocardial injury or alteration in loading conditions. Although initially adaptive as a consequence of the initial damage to the myocardium, progressive ventricular remodeling is ultimately a maladaptive process that is associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Treatment with an aim to halt or reverse remodeling with mainly two classes of medications, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenergic blockers, has been shown to improve the long-term outcome. The role of pharmacologic and surgical therapy in remodeling is evolving and may have an important impact on the development of new directions of therapy for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and hypertension.

Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular mass, chamber geometry, and mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure

We and others have previously shown that carvedilol improves left ventricular (LV) function and symptoms in chronic heart failure. This improvement in LV function has also been shown to be associated with an improvement in survival. This study evaluates the effect of carvedilol on LV mass, geometry, and degree of mitral regurgitation (MR). In 59 patients with symptomatic heart failure and LV ejection fraction <0.35, previously randomized to either treatment with carvedilol or placebo, we evaluated LV mass, geometry, and degree of MR over the time period of carvedilol treatment. LV mass decreased as early as 4 months into the treatment protocol and continued to decrease over a period of 1 year. LV geometry, defined by the length/diameter ratio, and severity of MR also improved with 4 months of therapy. Thus, compared with placebo treatment, carvedilol decreases LV mass while improving cardiac geometry and decreasing MR in patients with chronic heart failure. These changes occur in association with an improvement in LV systolic function. This process begins by 4 months of treatment and continues for 12 months.

Long-term beta-blocker therapy improves autonomic nervous regulation in advanced congestive heart failure: a longitudinal heart rate variability study

BACKGROUND

beta-Blocker therapy is believed to modulate the detrimental effect of overcompensating neurohormonal activation in chronic heart failure. However, clinical doubts remain, particularly the physiologic sympathovagal balance.

METHODS

To respond to clinical concern about worsening autonomic nervous perturbation in beta-blocker therapy of advanced congestive heart failure, 15 consecutive patients were longitudinally studied to elucidate the evolution of cardiac function versus 24-hour heart rate variability (HRV) before and after 1, 3, and 6 to 9 months of atenolol-combined therapy.

RESULTS

Two patients died prematurely within 1 month. All 13 surviving patients showed improvement in New York Heart Association functional class, with decrease in left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions and increase in fraction shortening and ejection fraction by echocardiography after at least 3 months of atenolol use. The retarded therapeutic effect was accompanied by a general rise of total, very low, low-, and high-frequency components (9.0 +/- 0.5, 8.8 +/- 0.5, 6.2 +/- 0.6, and 6.1 +/- 0.5 vs 10.9 +/- 0.3, 10.7 +/- 0.4, 8.6 +/- 0.3, and 7.8 +/- 0.3; all P <.02) of daily HRV. This implied recovery of parasympathetic and baroreceptor function. Return of sympathovagal interaction was further supported by the suppression of Cheyne-Stokes type HRV as detected by Wigner-Ville distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term beta-blocker therapy for advanced congestive heart failure upwardly regulates the autonomic nervous interaction in synchrony with the evolution of cardiac function performance.

Beta-blocker treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure in children: a multi-institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Dilated cardiomyopathy is the primary indication for heart transplantation in children beyond infancy. Although beta-blockers improve symptoms, ejection fraction, and survival in adults with congestive heart failure, little is known of their effects in children.

METHODS

This study reviews our pediatric experience with the beta-blocker, metoprolol, at 3 institutions. We gave metoprolol to 15 children, age 8.6 +/- 1.3 years (range 2.5 to 15 years), with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 9), anthracycline cardiomyopathy (n = 3), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy cardiomyopathy, postmyocarditis cardiomyopathy, and post-surgical cardiomyopathy (n = 1 each). All had been treated with conventional medications (digoxin, diuretics, and ACE inhibitors) for 22.5 +/- 9 months before starting metoprolol. Metoprolol was started at 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/ dose given twice daily and slowly increased over a period of weeks to a dose of 1.1 +/- 0.1 mg/kg/day (range 0.5 to 2.3 mg/kg/day).

RESULTS

Between the time point of stabilization on conventional medications and the initiation of metoprolol therapy, there was no significant change in fractional shortening (13.1 +/- 1.2% vs 15.0 +/- 1.2%) or ejection fraction (25.6 +/- 2.1% vs 27.0 +/- 3.4%). However, after metoprolol therapy for 23.2 +/- 7 months, there was a significant increase in fractional shortening(23.3 +/- 2.6%) and ejection fraction (41.1 +/- 4.3%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Metoprolol improves ventricular function in some children with dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure. Further study is warranted to better define which children may benefit most from beta-blocker therapy and which beta-blockers are most efficacious.

Beta blocker treatment in heart failure

The sympathetic nervous system occupies a prominent role in heart failure both as a marker of severity of disease and also as an important factor in its progression. Beta blocker therapy, once thought heretical in heart failure, has consistently improved cardiac function and slowed progression of disease. Large clinical trials of mild to moderate heart failure show improved survival as well as reduction in hospitalization. Beta blockers now have stronger data in heart failure than converting enzyme inhibitors, and should be considered standard therapy in mild-moderate heart failure. Ongoing trials are addressing beta blocker therapy in advanced heart failure and comparisons between agents.

Augmentation of the cardiac natriuretic peptides by beta-receptor antagonism: evidence from a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

The present retrospective analysis of data derived from a population-based study examined the relationship between intake of beta-receptor antagonists and plasma concentrations of the cardiac natriuretic peptides and their second messenger.

BACKGROUND

Beta-receptor antagonists are widely used for treatment of cardiovascular disease. In addition to direct effects on heart rate and cardiac contractility, recent evidence suggests that beta-receptor antagonists may also modulate the cross talk between the sympathetic nervous system and the cardiac natriuretic peptide system.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and their second messenger cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) were assessed in addition to anthropometric, hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters in a population-based sample (n = 672), of which 80 subjects used beta-receptor antagonists.

RESULTS

Compared to subjects without medication, subjects receiving beta-receptor antagonists were characterized by substantially elevated ANP, BNP and cGMP plasma concentrations (plus 32%, 89% and 18%, respectively, p < 0.01 each). Analysis of subgroups revealed that this effect was highly consistent and present even in the absence of hypertension, left atrial enlargement, left ventricular hypertrophy or left ventricular dysfunction. The most prominent increase was observed in a subgroup with increased left ventricular mass index. By multivariate analysis, a statistically significant and independent association between beta-receptor antagonism and ANP, BNP and cGMP concentrations was confirmed. Such an association could not be demonstrated for other antihypertensive agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or diuretics.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-receptor antagonists appear to augment plasma ANP, BNP and cGMP concentrations. The current observation suggests an important contribution of the cardiac natriuretic peptide system to the therapeutic mechanism of beta-receptor antagonists.

The role of third-generation beta-blocking agents in chronic heart failure

Third-generation beta-blocking agents developed for the hypertension market are proving useful in the treatment of chronic heart failure (HF). These compounds share the ancillary property of vasodilation, which improves acute tolerability by unloading the failing left ventricle at a time when beta-adrenergic withdrawal produces myocardial depression. In the case of carvedilol and bucindolol, this allows for the administration of nonselective beta blockade. Because of blockade of both beta 1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors as well as other properties, these compounds possess a more comprehensive antiadrenergic profile than second-generation, beta 1-selective compounds. For this and potentially other reasons, third-generation beta-blocking agents have theoretical efficacy advantages that have yet to be demonstrated in large-scale trials. Ongoing trials with either second- or third-generation compounds and one trial directly comparing a compound from each class will provide the answer as to whether third-generation compounds have an advantage in the treatment of chronic HF.

Medical therapy of chronic heart failure. Role of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers

Heart failure has long been considered to have a progressive downhill course leading inexorably to an early demise. This course often occurs silently, in the absence of any obvious cardiac insults. The reason for this is a combination of cell loss, myocyte dysfunction, impaired energetics, and pathologic remodeling of the chamber. Improved clinical outcome should result from strategies that reduce the biologic signals responsible for myocyte growth, dysfunction, and loss and chamber remodeling. Clinicians should no longer attempt to treat chronic heart failure with pharmacologic growth and remodeling process. In time, it may be possible for the clinician to view the treatment of heart failure largely as a matter of improving the biologic function of the myocardium.

Effects of chronic application of propranolol on beta-adrenergic signal transduction in heart ventricles from myopathic BIO TO2 and control hamsters

1. In human congestive heart failure beta-adrenoceptor antagonists improve exercise tolerance and cardiac contractility. These beneficial effects are thought to reflect an up-regulation of cardiac beta-adrenoceptors, involving mainly the beta1-subtype. In the present study we evaluated the functional contribution of beta-adrenoceptor subtypes to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase in an animal model of dilated cardiomyopathy, and compared the effects of treatment with propranolol on cardiac beta-adrenergic signal transduction in myopathic and control hamsters. 2. Cardiomyopathic BIO TO2 hamsters and BIO F1B controls aged 270 days were used. In the treatment study, hamsters received drinking water with or without propranolol 40 mg kg(-1) d(-1) for 4 weeks prior to sacrifice. Density and subtype distribution of beta-adrenoceptors were determined in radioligand binding studies. Functional contributions of beta-adrenoceptors were evaluated by subtype-selective stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. Cardiac G-protein content was determined by immunoblotting. 3. Compared to BIO F1B controls, myopathic hamsters showed increases in cardiac total beta- and beta2-adrenoceptor density, G(s alpha) and G(i alpha) content. In BIO TO2 ventricles, beta1-adrenoceptors were almost completely uncoupled from adenylyl cyclase stimulation despite an unchanged density. Treatment of hamsters with propranolol resulted in increased density of beta1-adrenoceptors in both strains, but had no effect on their functional efficacy. Moreover, beta2-adrenergic stimulation of adenylyl cyclase was even reduced in propranolol-treated animals, which could not be explained by changes in cardiac G-protein content. 4. Cardiomyopathic BIO TO2 hamsters showed functional uncoupling of cardiac beta1-adrenoceptors, which could not be normalized by propranolol and, therefore, is unlikely to be solely due to agonist-dependent desensitization. The paradoxical reduction in beta2-adrenergic efficiency in propranolol-treated myopathic and control hamsters deserves further investigation.

Clinical effects of beta-adrenergic blockade in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trials

BACKGROUND

beta-Blockers have improved symptoms and reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in studies of patients with heart failure, but it is unclear which end points are most sensitive to the therapeutic effects of these drugs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We combined the results of all 18 published double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials of beta-blockers in heart failure. From this combined database of 3023 patients, we evaluated the strength of evidence supporting an effect of treatment on left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, hospitalizations for heart failure, and death. beta-Blockers exerted their most persuasive effects on ejection fraction and on the combined risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure. beta-Blockade increased the ejection fraction by 29% (P<10(-9)) and reduced the combined risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure by 37% (P<0.001). Both effects remained significant even if >90% of the trials were eliminated from the analysis or if a large number of trials with a neutral result were added to the analysis. In contrast, the effect of beta-blockade on NYHA functional class was of borderline significance (P=0.04) and disappeared with the addition or removal of only 1 moderate-size study. Although beta -blockade reduced all-cause mortality by 32% (P=0.003), this effect was only moderately robust and varied according to the type of ss-blocker tested, ie, the reduction of mortality risk was greater for nonselective beta-blockers than for beta1-selective agents (49% versus 18%, P=0.049). However, selective and nonselective beta-blockers did not differ in their effects on other measures of clinical efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses indicate that there is persuasive evidence supporting a favorable effect of beta-blockade on ejection fraction and the combined risk of death and hospitalization for heart failure. In contrast, the effect of these drugs on other end points requires additional study.

Early reduction in plasma norepinephrine during beta-blocking therapy with metoprolol in chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

The possible role exerted by modulation of sympathetic outflow in the clinical effects of beta-blockade in chronic heart failure was tested during short- and long-term treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Oral metoprolol (30-150 mg/day) was added to conventional therapy in 14 patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <0.45, and New York Heart Association class II or III. Norepinephrine plasma levels, which are an index of sympathetic activation, decreased by 27.57 +/- 18.03% after 1 month (P < .005), but returned to pretreatment levels after 6 months. LVEF increased by 7.7 +/- 6.0 ejection fraction units after 6 months (P < .005 vs baseline and P < .05 vs 1 month). Long-term beta-blockade resulted in nonsignificant improvements in functional class, symptom score, and oxygen consumption at peak exercise. After 1 month, the reduction in plasma norepinephrine levels and the changes in LVEF were inversely correlated (P < .01). No other correlation emerged during short- or long-term treatment.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the reduction in plasma norepinephrine levels during short-term beta-blockade was not proportional to the clinical benefits and may have been attributed to the direct inhibition of sympathetic outflow. The early reduction in circulating norepinephrine levels may decrease cardiac performance through withdrawal of sympathetic support when the favorable effects of beta-blockade have not had time to occur. The role that sympathetic modulation may exert in the long-term clinical benefits of metoprolol deserves further investigation.

Growth hormone: a new therapy for heart failure?

There is now little doubt that growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) play a role in cardiac development and in cardiovascular physiology in adult life. Congenital lack of GH is associated with defective cardiac growth, ventricular wall thinning, and impaired systolic function. These abnormalities limit exercise capacity and contribute to the poor quality of life in patients with GH deficiency. In addition, studies with in vitro muscle preparations have shown that IGF-1 affects myocardial contractility by a direct mechanism. These findings suggested that GH would benefit patients affected by heart failure. Indeed, GH and/or IGF-1 have proven beneficial in various models of experimental heart failure. Tested in patients with classes II-IV heart failure, they improved cardiac performance and clinical status. These effects were associated with improved myocardial energetics and de-activation of the neurohormonal system. Because of the uncontrolled nature of the studies and the small number of cases examined, conclusions as to the effectiveness of GH and IGF-1 must await the results from larger trials.

Risk of non-fatal cardiac failure and ischaemic heart disease with long acting beta 2 agonists

BACKGROUND

The long term safety of beta agonists, particularly in patients with heart disease, has not been fully established.

METHODS

This study accessed the results of three cohort studies involving: 12,294 patients receiving at least one prescription for nedocromil between November 1986 and September 1988; 15,407 patients prescribed salmeterol between December 1990 and May 1991; and 8098 patients prescribed bambuterol between February 1993 and December 1995. Details of all dispensed prescriptions for these drugs prescribed by general practitioners in England soon after their launch were provided in confidence by the Prescription Pricing Authority. Questionnaires were sent to the prescriber asking for details of events occurring after the first prescription (prescription event monitoring). Rates and relative risks of non-fatal cardiac failure and ischaemic heart disease were calculated, comparing bambuterol and salmeterol with the reference drug nedocromil.

RESULTS

The age and sex adjusted relative risk of non-fatal cardiac failure associated with bambuterol was 3.41 (95% confidence limits (CL) 1.99 to 5.86) when compared with nedocromil. When salmeterol was compared with nedocromil the adjusted relative risk of non-fatal cardiac failure was 1.10 (95% CL 0.63 to 1.91). The adjusted relative risk of non-fatal ischaemic heart disease was 1.23 (95% CL 0.73 to 2.08) and 1.07 (95% CL 0.69 to 1.66) for bambuterol and salmeterol, compared with nedocromil, respectively. However, in the first month of exposure the adjusted relative risk of non-fatal ischaemic heart disease was 3.95 (95% CL 1.38 to 11.31) when bambuterol was compared with nedocromil.

CONCLUSIONS

Caution should be exercised when prescribing long acting oral beta agonists to patients at risk of cardiac failure. More definitive evidence would come from prospective randomised trials.

Beta-adrenergic blockade in chronic heart failure: principles, progress, and practice

Prolonged activation of the sympathetic nervous system in patients with impaired ventricular function exerts adverse effects on the heart and circulation by a variety of mechanisms that are triggered by the interaction of norepinephrine and epinephrine with alpha1-, beta1-, and beta2-adrenergic receptors. Drugs that interfere with the actions of the sympathetic nervous system on alpha- and beta-receptors might be expected to antagonize these deleterious effects. beta1-receptor blockers have been shown to prevent and reverse many of the structural and functional changes that occur during the progression of heart failure, and beta2- and alpha1-receptor blockade seems to enhance the ability of beta1-blockers to prevent the toxic effects of catecholamines. In a large number of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, long-term treatment of patients with chronic heart failure with beta-adrenergic blockers improves cardiac function, ameliorates symptoms, and reduces the risk of death and hospitalization. The nature and consistency of these benefits have led an increasing number of physicians to conclude that most patients with heart failure should be considered candidates for long-term treatment with these drugs. Analysis of these clinical trials has also raised the possibility that beta-blockers might differ from each other. Specifically, might agents that block alpha1-, betal-, and beta2-receptors be more effective and better tolerated that agents that act selectively on the beta1-receptor? This hypothesis is now being evaluated in a large-scale, long-term, international trial.

Beta-receptor blockade decreases carnitine palmitoyl transferase I activity in dogs with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological inhibition of carnitine palmitoyl transferase I (CPT-I), the enzyme controlling the rate of fatty acid transport into the mitochondria, prevents the contractile dysfunction, myosin isozyme shift and deterioration in sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ handling that occurs in rat models of left ventricular hypertrophy. In this study we examine whether the improved cardiac function with beta blockade therapy in heart failure is associated with an alteration in CPT-I activity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined dogs with coronary microembolism-induced heart failure treated for 12 weeks with metoprolol (25 mg twice daily). Myocardial activities of CPT-I, medium-chain acyl co-enzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD, a beta-oxidation enzyme), citrate synthase, and triglyceride content were measured. The progressive decrease in cardiac function was prevented by treatment with metoprolol, as reflected by an improved ejection fraction over 12 weeks in the metoprolol group (from 35% to 40%) compared to the untreated heart failure dogs (decrease from 36% to 26%). Dogs treated with metoprolol had a marked decrease in CPT-I activity (0.46 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.02 micromol min(-1) g(-1) wet weight; P < .02) along with an increase in triglyceride concentration compared to untreated heart failure dogs (3.9 +/- 0.3 v 4.9 +/- 0.2 micromol/g wet weight, respectively; P < .003). By contrast, MCAD and citrate synthase activities did not change.

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol induced a decrease in CPT-I activity and an increase in triglyceride content. These results suggest that the improved function observed with beta blockers in heart failure could be due, in part, to a decrease in CPT-I activity and less fatty acid oxidation by the heart.

Innovations in the pharmacologic management of heart failure

Improved understanding of the pathophysiologic course of heart failure has led to many advances in pharmacologic therapy. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors represent the first effort at targeting neurohormonal activation in chronic heart failure. More recently, beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists have been shown effective in blocking chronic sympathetic nervous system activation. The roles of digoxin and the newer, vasoselective calcium channel blockers in heart failure have been better defined. Other agents targeting the neurohormonal system are under investigation. These include angiotensin-receptor antagonists, aldosterone inhibitors, and endothelin antagonists. Experience with phosphodiesterase inhibitors and adrenergic agents has confirmed the importance of neurohormonal activation in progression of heart failure. Despite angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, diuretic, and digoxin therapy, mortality in heart failure remains high. Careful manipulation of the neurohormonal response to heart failure holds promise for altering the course of the disease.

Combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy for treatment of refractory class IV heart failure

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the effects of combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy in patients with severe heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe, class IV heart failure who receive standard medical therapy exhibit a 1-year mortality rate >50%. Moreover, such patients generally do not tolerate beta-blockade, a promising new therapy for chronic heart failure. Positive inotropes, including phosphodiesterase inhibitors, are associated with increased mortality when administered over the long term in these patients. The addition of a beta-blocker to positive inotropic therapy might attenuate this adverse effect, although long-term oral inotropic therapy might serve as a bridge to beta-blockade.

METHODS

Thirty patients with severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 17.2+/-1.2%, cardiac index 1.6+/-0.1 liter/min per m2) were treated with the combination of oral enoximone (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and oral metoprolol at two institutions. Enoximone was given at a dose of < or = 1 mg/kg body weight three times a day. After clinical stabilization, metoprolol was initiated at 6.25 mg twice a day and slowly titrated up to a target dose of 100 to 200 mg/day.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of the patients tolerated enoximone, whereas 80% tolerated the addition of metoprolol. The mean duration of combination therapy was 9.4+/-1.8 months. The mean length of follow-up was 20.9+/-3.9 months. Of the 23 patients receiving the combination therapy, 48% were weaned off enoximone over the long term. The LVEF increased significantly, from 17.7+/-1.6% to 27.6+/-3.4% (p=0.01), whereas the New York Heart Association functional class improved from 4+/-0 to 2.8+/-0.1 (p=0.0001). The number of hospital admissions tended to decrease during therapy (p=0.06). The estimated probability of survival at 1 year was 81+/-9%. Heart transplantation was performed successfully in nine patients (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with a positive inotrope and a beta-blocker appears to be useful in the treatment of severe, class IV heart failure. It may be used as a palliative measure when transplantation is not an option or as a bridge to heart transplantation. Further study of this form of combined therapy is warranted.

A review of why and how we may use beta-blockers in congestive heart failure

The history of the use of beta-blockers for congestive heart failure, beginning with the innovative seminal study by the Swedish group in 1975 to studies in 1995, is reviewed and shows that almost all trials favored the use of beta-blockers. They tended to demonstrate an increase in ejection fraction, a decrease in left ventricular mass, and in some studies, even a decrease in mortality. Even after the introduction of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, additional improvement in function and mortality was observed. Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy derived more benefit from beta-blockers than did patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Least likely to benefit were patients treated for <2 months, patients with alcoholic cardiomyopathy, and those with marked intercellular fibrosis. Although the starting dose of metoprolol, the most common beta-blocker used, may have to be as low as 2.5 mg/d, mortality analysis failed to show a decrease in sudden death unless the dose was raised to about 300 mg/d, a dose at which beta-selectivity is generally not expected to be present. The non-beta-specific bucindolol or carvedilol may ultimately be preferred to metoprolol because they are better tolerated initially due to a slight vasodilatation effect. Initial studies with carvedilol showed remarkable promise in reducing mortality. However, these agents cannot yet be said to have been studied adequately.

Restoring function in failing hearts: the effects of beta blockers

Until recently, clinical management of congestive heart failure was purely palliative. The drugs used in patients with failing hearts--digoxin, vasodilators, and positive inotropic agents--improved contractility, reversed hemodynamic abnormalities, and enhanced functional status, but they failed to confer a survival benefit. Indeed, the use of inotropic agents often resulted in excess mortality--a paradox explained in part by the pharmacological properties of these agents, which increase production of cAMP, the intracellular messenger for the beta-adrenergic system. The short-term pharmacological benefits of these drugs may be offset by deleterious long-term biological effects on the heart muscle itself. The use of beta-blockers in heart failure is counterintuitive, given that their initial pharmacological effect is to reduce heart rate and contractility in a faltering heart, thus producing an effect diametrically opposed to that of inotropic agents. However, it is becoming more clear that beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure not only improves left ventricular function, but may actually reverse pathological remodeling in the heart. Accumulating clinical evidence indicates that these beneficial changes are the result of secondary biological changes in the myocardium rather than a response to the pharmacological effects of the drugs themselves. Mounting evidence suggest that these agents may prolong survival in patients with heart failure, and ongoing clinical trials may soon confirm these preliminary findings.

Free fatty acid kinetics and oxidation in congestive heart failure

To characterize fuel utilization of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), we measured serum free fatty acid (FFA), counterregulatory hormone concentrations, whole body substrate oxidation rates (indirect calorimetry), and the turnover and oxidation rates of FFA ([1-(14)C]-palmitate infusion) in 7 patients with CHF and in 7 cardiac patients without CHF after an overnight fast. Plasma glucose and serum insulin concentrations were comparable, whereas serum FFA, blood ketone body, and fasting blood lactate (p <0.05 for all) concentrations were significantly increased in patients with CHF compared to those without CHF. Fasting plasma norepinephrine (p <0.05), serum cortisol (p <0.01), and growth hormone (p <0.01) concentrations were also higher in patients with CHF than in those without CHF. Rates of energy expenditure at rest (62 +/- 2 vs 56 +/- 1 J x kg(-1) x min(-1), p <0.05), FFA turnover (6.5 +/- 0.5 vs 5.0 +/- 0.4 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1), p <0.05), and oxidation (2.0 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.1 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)], p <0.05) were significantly higher in patients with CHF than in control subjects. In univariate analysis, the left ventricular ejection fraction was inversely correlated and the plasma norepinephrine concentration positively correlated with both energy expenditure at rest, FFA turnover, and the FFA oxidation rate. In multivariate analysis, the plasma norepinephrine concentration was the most significant predictor of increased FFA oxidation rate. We conclude that release of FFAs to the circulation and their subsequent oxidation are increased in patients with severe CHF after an overnight fast. These changes might reflect stress hormone-induced lipolysis and accompanying stimulation of serum FFA oxidation via mass action.

Mechanism of action of beta-blocking agents in heart failure

Antiadrenergic treatment is currently an emerging and very promising approach to the treatment of chronic heart failure. Although the adrenergic nervous system can be pharmacologically inhibited at multiple levels, it is the use of receptor-blocking agents that has generated the most interest and provided the most data for the "proof of concept" of this approach. In part because antiadrenergic treatment of chronic heart failure has developed in an atmosphere in which it was initially considered to be contraindicated (i.e., before Phase III clinical trials could be initiated), a large body of hypothesis-driven basic and clinical investigation was required to define the overall rationale and demonstrate feasibility. This article will review these data and propose a single primary mechanism of action to explain most of the clinical benefits of these agents.

Clinical studies on beta blockers and heart failure preceding the MERIT-HF Trial. Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure

With greater understanding of the impact of neuroendocrine stimulation on the adverse outcomes of heart failure, especially lethal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death, focus has returned to the potential benefits of beta-adrenergic blockade. In patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, particularly those prone to life-threatening arrhythmias, beta-blocker therapy has been associated with a lower incidence of arrhythmias and improved survival. Even in the absence of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, beta blockade has improved cardiac function and LV contractility in nonischemic heart failure, leading to a decrease in LV end-diastolic pressure and improved clinical status. Both the Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (MDC) trial and the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS) found beta blockade to be associated with decreased mortality rates in patients with nonischemic heart failure. Of the 3 large randomized mortality trials now under way, the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) is specifically designed to investigate the effects of beta blockade on total mortality when used as an adjunct to ACE inhibition in patients with ischemic or nonischemic heart failure. Unresolved issues to be addressed include whether: (1) beta-blocker therapy in heart failure can improve survival and/or reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death; (2) beta blockade is equally effective in ischemic and nonischemic heart failure; (3) any specific beta blocker may be better tolerated initially and cause fewer adverse effects; and (4) all beta blockers result in improved exercise tolerance and quality of life.

Efficacy of beta blockers in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy

Despite the well-documented benefits of beta blockade in a variety of cardiovascular conditions, the value of beta blockade in congestive heart failure (CHF) is still in question. The concept of neurohormonal blockade in heart failure has, however, brought beta blockade into focus. There is experimental evidence for the value of blocking sympathetic activation in CHF, and increased sympathetic activation may be an etiologic factor for development of CHF. Clinical studies have shown that long-term beta blockade improves both systolic and diastolic function. The effects on exercise tolerance and quality of life seem to differ between beta1-selective and nonselective beta blockers in favor of the beta1-selective blockers. To date, results of all trials reveal a consistent pattern of decreased cardiovascular morbidity. In one trial of metoprolol, fewer heart transplantations were required; such a reduction may have a great impact on healthcare costs associated with heart failure. Improved long-term survival found by one study must be confirmed in additional trials: 3 such survival trials (with metoprolol, bisoprolol, and bucindolol) are now in progress.

Rationale, design, and organization of the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). The International Steering Committee

Metoprolol is a cardioselective beta blocker that has been shown to improve left ventricular function and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) and also to decrease the number of hospitalizations due to CHF. However, the effects of metoprolol on mortality in patients with CHF have yet to be determined. Accordingly, the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) has been designed to investigate the effect of once-daily dosing of metoprolol succinate controlled release/extended release (CR/XL) when added to standard therapy in patients with CHF. A total of 3,200 patients will be recruited for this international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled survival study. The 2 primary objectives of MERIT-HF are to determine the effect of metoprolol CR/XL on (1) total mortality and (2) the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations (time to first event). Eligible patients are 40-80 years old, with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< or =0.40) and symptoms of CHF (New York Heart Association functional classes II-IV). After a 2-week placebo run-in period, an optimal allocation procedure will be used to randomize patients in a 1:1 ratio to metoprolol CR/XL or matching placebo. After an initial titration phase starting with 12.5 mg or 25 mg once daily (depending on functional class), the target dose will be 200 mg in all patients who tolerate this dose. The mean follow-up is estimated to be 2.4 years. The study data will be analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. An Independent Safety Committee will monitor the safety aspects of the trial, and an Independent Endpoint Committee will classify all endpoints.

Current status of diuretics, beta-blockers, alpha-blockers, and alpha-beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension

The article describes the current status of four main antihypertensives. Diuretics are making a bit of a comeback after seeing their popularity wane during the 1980s. beta-blockers also saw a bit of a popularity decrease in the 1980s due to some adverse side effects which the author feels were somewhat exaggerated. alpha-blockers have yet to be particularly successful in the treatment of hypertension, due to adverse side effects. alpha-beta-blockers appear to hold significant promise in the further treatment of hypertension.

Long-term carvedilol therapy increases parasympathetic nervous system activity in chronic congestive heart failure

To determine the effect of beta blockade on parasympathetic nervous system activity, we assessed RR variability during 24-hour Holter monitoring in 10 patients with congestive heart failure before and after 3 to 4 months of treatment with the beta blocker carvedilol. High-frequency power increased from 26 to 64 ms2, root-mean-square of successive differences in RR interval increased from 14.3 to 23.7 ms2, and percentage of absolute differences >50 ms between successive normal RR intervals increased from 0.8% to 4.7%, all p <0.01, indicating a substantial increase in parasympathetic modulation of RR intervals.

Effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockade on beta-adrenergic signal transduction in cardiomyopathic hamster (BIO 8262) hearts

In myopathic BIO 8262-hamsters beta1-adrenergic stimulation of cardiac adenylyl cyclase has been found to be markedly reduced compared to that of healthy controls. In order to test the hypothesis that the functional uncoupling of beta1-adrenoceptors in diseased hamster hearts is due to agonist-dependent desensitization, we investigated the effects of prolonged treatment with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on cardiac beta-adrenergic signaling. Groups of hamsters aged 240 days received either drinking water, or drinking water containing metoprolol (10 or 100 mg/kg/day) or propranolol (4 or 40 mg/kg/day). After 4 weeks' treatment animals were killed and heart ventricles were prepared for determination of beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor densities and their functional contribution to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. Markers of myocardial hypertrophy, i.e. absolute and relative ventricular weight and 5-nucleotidase activity, were not affected by the different treatment regimens. Neither absolute densities nor relative proportions of beta-adrenoceptor subtypes differed between untreated and treated hamster groups. Metoprolol had no effects on the functional efficacy of beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptors. Hamsters treated with high dose propranolol showed unchanged beta1-adrenoceptor function but reduced beta2-adrenergic stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. The findings of the present study demonstrate that the disturbed coupling of cardiac beta1-adrenoceptors to adenylyl cyclase cannot be reversed by in vivo treatment with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and, therefore, is unlikely to be due to agonist-dependent desensitization.

Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the current evidence for an effect of beta-blockade treatment on mortality in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).

BACKGROUND

Although numerous small studies have suggested a benefit with beta-blocker therapy in patients with heart failure, a clear survival benefit has not been demonstrated. A recent combined analysis of several studies with the alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking agent carvedilol demonstrated a significant survival advantage; however, the total number of events was small. Furthermore, it is unclear if previous studies with other beta-blockers are consistent with this finding.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials of beta-blockade treatment in patients with CHF from January 1975 through February 1997 were identified using a MEDLINE search and a review of reports from scientific meetings. Studies were included if mortality was reported during 3 or more months of follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 35 reports, 17 of which met the inclusion criteria. These studies included 3,039 patients with follow-up ranging from 3 months to 2 years. Beta-blockade was associated with a trend toward mortality reduction in 13 studies. When all 17 reports were combined, beta-blockade significantly reduced all-cause mortality (random effect odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54 to 0.88). A trend toward greater treatment effect was noted for nonsudden cardiac death (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83) compared with sudden cardiac death (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.2). Similar reductions in mortality were observed for patients with ischemic (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.98) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.99). The survival benefit was greater for trials of the drug carvedilol (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.81) than for noncarvedilol drugs (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12); however, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled evidence suggests that beta-blockade reduces all-cause mortality in patients with CHF. Additional trials are required to determine whether carvedilol differs in its effect from other agents.

Beta-blocker use in systolic heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy

Statistics regarding long-term survival for patients with heart failure are discouraging today. Converting enzyme inhibitors have produced a modest effect on mortality. beta-Blockers may be the next addition to standard therapy for heart failure because they generate consistent improvements in hemodynamic factors, symptom scores, and submaximal exercise tolerance in randomized, controlled clinical trials. They augment ejection fraction, reduce heart volume, and consistently lower neurohormonal activation as reflected by plasma norepinephrine levels. Trials with carvedilol and bisoprolol suggest an effect on mortality similar to that with converting enzyme inhibitor trials. Future studies, especially the beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial (BEST), with mortality as the main end point should elucidate the degree of effect on mortality further.

Beta-adrenergic blocking agents in the treatment of congestive heart failure: mechanisms and clinical results

Congestive heart failure is a major public health problem in Western countries. Despite current treatment including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, mortality and morbidity remain high. The sympathetic nervous system is markedly activated in heart failure, and inhibition of this system with the beta-adrenergic blocking agents may provide further benefit. Several clinical trials involving over 3,000 patients have shown that beta-blocker therapy improves left ventricular function in patients with heart failure. However, the effects of such therapy on symptoms and exercise tolerance have been variable. Recent reports have suggested that survival is improved with the beta-blocker carvedilol. Large-scale, long-term clinical trials are required to confirm these findings and to clearly define the role of this promising therapy for patients with heart failure.

Carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with mild symptoms of heart failure. US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure due to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n = 366) who had mildly symptomatic heart failure with an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 0.35, had minimal functional impairment (defined as the ability to walk 450 to 550 m on a 6-minute walk test), and were receiving optimal standard therapy, including ACE inhibitors, were randomized double-blind to carvedilol (n = 232) or placebo (n = 134) and followed up for 12 months. The primary end point was clinical progression, defined as death due to heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, or a sustained increase in heart failure medications. Clinical progression of heart failure occurred in 21% of placebo patients and 11% of carvedilol patients, reflecting a 48% (P = .008) reduction in the primary end point of heart failure progression (relative risk, 0.52; CI, 0.32 to 0.85). This effect of carvedilol was not influenced by sex, age, race, cause of heart failure, or baseline LVEF. Carvedilol also significantly improved several secondary end points, including LVEF, heart failure score, NYHA functional class, and the physician and patient global assessments. Carvedilol reduced all-cause mortality but had no effects on the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure scale, the distance walked in 9 minutes on a self-powered treadmill, or cardiothoracic index. The drug was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol, when added to standard therapy, including an ACE inhibitor, reduces clinical progression in patients who are only mildly symptomatic with well-compensated heart failure.

Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators

BACKGROUND

We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial designed to establish the efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a "third-generation" beta -blocking agent with vasodilator properties, in chronic heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three hundred forty-five subjects with mild to moderate, stable chronic heart failure were randomized to receive treatment with placebo, 6.25 mg BID carvedilol (low-dose group), 12.5 mg BID carvedilol (medium-dose group), or 25 mg BID carvedilol (high-dose group). After a 2- to 4-week up-titration period, subjects remained on study medication for a period of 6 months. The primary efficacy parameter was submaximal exercise measured by two different techniques, the 6-minute corridor walk test and the 9-minute self-powered treadmill test. Carvedilol had no detectable effect on submaximal exercise as measured by either technique. However, carvedilol was associated with dose-related improvements in LV function (by 5, 6, and 8 ejection fraction [EF] units in the low-, medium-, and high-dose carvedilol groups, respectively, compared with 2 EF units with placebo, P < .001 for linear dose response) and survival (respective crude mortality rates of 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.1% with increasing doses of carvedilol compared with 15.5% in the placebo group, P < .001). When the three carvedilol groups were combined, the all-cause actuarial mortality risk was lowered by 73% in carvedilol-treated subjects (P < .001). Carvedilol also lowered the hospitalization rate (by 58% to 64%, P = .01) and was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with mild to moderate heart failure from systolic dysfunction, carvedilol produced dose-related improvements in LV function and dose-related reductions in mortality and hospitalization rate.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of carvedilol in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The PRECISE Trial. Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Carvedilol on Symptoms and Exercise

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol has improved the symptomatic status of patients with moderate to severe heart failure in single-center studies, but its clinical effects have not been evaluated in large, multicenter trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 278 patients with moderate to severe heart failure (6-minute walk distance, 150 to 450 m) and a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.35 at 31 centers. After an open-label, run-in period, each patient was randomly assigned (double-blind) to either placebo (n = 145) or carvedilol (n = 133; target dose, 25 to 50 mg BID) for 6 months, while background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor remained constant. Compared with placebo, patients in the carvedilol group had a greater frequency of symptomatic improvement and lower risk of clinical deterioration, as evaluated by changes in the NYHA functional class (P = .014) or by a global assessment of progress judged either by the patient (P = .002) or by the physician (P < .001). In addition, treatment with carvedilol was associated with a significant increase in ejection fraction (P < .001) and a significant decrease in the combined risk of morbidity and mortality (P = .029). In contrast, carvedilol therapy had little effect on indirect measures of patient benefit, including changes in exercise tolerance or quality-of-life scores. The effects of the drug were similar in patients with ischemic heart disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy as the cause of heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that, in addition to its favorable effects on survival, carvedilol produces important clinical benefits in patients with moderate to severe heart failure treated with digoxin, diuretics, and an ACE inhibitor.

Comparative hemodynamic, left ventricular functional, and antiadrenergic effects of chronic treatment with metoprolol versus carvedilol in the failing heart

BACKGROUND

The basic pharmacology of the third-generation beta-blocking agent carvedilol differs considerably from second-generation compounds such as metoprolol. Moreover, carvedilol may produce different, ie, more favorable, clinical effects in chronic heart failure. For these reasons, we compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on adrenergic activity, receptor expression, degree of clinical beta-blockade, hemodynamics, and left ventricular function in patients with mild or moderate chronic heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol were compared in two concurrent placebo-controlled trials with carvedilol or metoprolol that had common substudies focused on adrenergic, hemodynamic, and left ventricular functional measurements. All subjects in the substudies had chronic heart failure resulting from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Carvedilol at 50 to 100 mg/d produced reductions in exercise heart rate that were similar to metoprolol at 125 to 150 mg/d, indicating comparable degrees of beta-blockade. Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol was associated with greater improvement in New York Heart Association functional class. Although there were no significant differences in hemodynamic effects between the carvedilol and metoprolol active-treatment groups, carvedilol tended to produce relatively greater improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume, and stroke work compared with changes in the respective placebo groups. Carvedilol selectively lowered coronary sinus norepinephrine levels, an index of cardiac adrenergic activity, whereas metoprolol did not lower coronary sinus norepinephrine and actually increased central venous norepinephrine levels. Finally, metoprolol was associated with an increase in cardiac beta-receptor density, whereas carvedilol did not change cardiac beta-receptor expression.

CONCLUSIONS

The third-generation beta-blocking agent carvedilol has substantially different effects on left ventricular function, hemodynamics, adrenergic activity, and beta-receptor expression than dose the second-generation compound metoprolol. Some or all of these differences may explain the apparent differences in clinical results between the two compounds.

Medical therapy can improve the biological properties of the chronically failing heart. A new era in the treatment of heart failure

Myocardial failure has been considered to be an irreversible and progressive process characterized by ventricular enlargement, chamber geometric alterations, and diminished pump performance. However, more recent evidence has suggested that certain types of medical therapy may lead to retardation and even reversal of the cardiomyopathic process. In the failing heart, long-term neurohormonal/autocrine-paracrine activation results in abnormalities in myocyte growth, energy production and utilization, calcium flux, and receptor regulation that produce a progressively dysfunctional, mechanically inefficient heart. Interventions such as ACE inhibition and beta-blockade result in a reduction in the harmful long-term consequences of neurohormonal/autocrine-paracrine effects and retard the progression of left ventricular dysfunction or ventricular remodeling. Furthermore, in subjects with idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy, antiadrenergic therapy with beta-blocking agents appears to be able to partially reverse systolic dysfunction and ventricular remodeling. Although the precise mechanisms underlying this latter effect have not yet been elucidated, the general mechanism appears to be via improvement in the biological function of the cardiac myocyte. Such an improvement in the intrinsic defect(s) responsible for myocardial failure will likely translate into important clinical benefits.