Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy

Factors Associated With New Persistent Opioid Usage After Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

Opioid dependence, misuse, and abuse in the United States continue to rise. Prior studies indicate an important risk factor for persistent opioid use includes elective surgical procedures, though the probability following thoracic procedures remains unknown. We analyzed the incidence and factors associated with new persistent opioid use after lung resection.

METHODS

We evaluated data from opioid-naïve cancer patients undergoing lung resection between 2010 and 2014 using insurance claims from the Truven Health MarketScan Databases. New persistent opioid usage was defined as continued opioid prescription fills between 90 and 180 days following surgery. Variables with a p value less than 0.10 by univariate analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression performed for risk adjustment. Multivariable results were each reported with odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 3,026 patients (44.8% men, 55.2% women) were identified as opioid-naïve undergoing lung resection. Mean age was 64 ± 11 years and mean postoperative length of stay was 5.2 ± 3.3 days. A total of 6.5% underwent neoadjuvant therapy, while 21.7% underwent adjuvant therapy. Among opioid-naïve patients, 14% continued to fill opioid prescriptions following lung resection. Multivariable analysis showed that age less than or equal to 64 years (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.59; p = 0.028), male sex (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.73; p = 0.002), postoperative length of stay (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.65; p = 0.016), thoracotomy (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.02; p < 0.001), and adjuvant therapy (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.75 to 2.75; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for persistent opioid usage.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest risk factors for persistent opioid use (14%) following lung resection were adjuvant therapy and thoracotomy. Future studies should focus on reducing excess prescribing, perioperative patient education, and safe opioid disposal.

Comparison of lymph node dissection and lymph node sampling for non-small cell lung cancers by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Background

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been increasingly used in the treatment of lung cancers. But it is still unclear whether mediastinal lymph node dissection (LND) under VATS is safe and feasible. The aim of this study is to figure out whether LND by VATS is safe and feasible.

Methods

Consecutive patients with primary resectable lung cancers referred for lobectomy and LND or sampling by VATS between January 2012 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative results were collected for statistical analysis.

Results

Seven-hundred and seventy-three VATS lobectomy patients were included in this study, 494 received LND and 279 received lymph node sampling (LNS). There were more male patients, higher pathological T and N stage in the LND group than in the LNS group. Multivariate analysis suggested that clinical N stage higher than cN0 category and LND were independent risk factors for finding pN2 diseases in all lung cancers, while higher than cN0 category, solid or micropapillary component, and LND were independently related to finding pN2 stage in adenocarcinomas. Propensity-score matching rendered 279 pairs of patients with no significant difference in age, gender, co-morbidity, tumor location, or T stage. Although the LND group had longer operation time (128 vs. 114 minutes, P<0.001), higher amount of postoperative drainage (920 vs. 720 mL, P<0.001), longer postoperative hospital stay (6 vs. 4 days, P<0.001) than the LNS group, no difference was observed in overall morbidity or mortality between the two groups.

Conclusions

LND by VATS has acceptable perioperative results but can provide more accurate nodal staging compared with LNS. LND by VATS is safe, feasible, and should be recommended in patients with tumors in clinical N stages higher cN0 category or with more invasive histology.

Nodal upstaging evaluation in NSCLC patients treated by robotic lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Open pulmonary resection is considered the gold standard treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in the last decades, the use of minimal-invasive techniques has given promising results. Survival in lung cancer, after surgery, depends on the number of pathological nodes (pN), thus lymph nodal upstaging can be considered a surrogate for surgical quality of the procedure. Several studies have demonstrated a lower rate of upstaging in video-assisted thoracic surgery than in open surgery, suggesting an approach-related difference in lymphadenectomy. Features of robotic technique could consent a lymph nodal dissection similar to open surgery. The aim of the study is to compare nodal upstaging between thoracotomy and robotic approaches to evaluate the oncologic radicality.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2016, 212 consecutive cN0 NSCLC patients underwent lobectomy and lymphadenectomy (N1 + N2 stations) by either thoracotomy (Open Group) or robotic surgery (Robotic Group).

RESULTS

Lobectomy and lymphadenectomy were performed in 106 cN0-cN1 NSCLC patients by robotic surgery and in 106 cN0-cN1 NSCLC patients by open surgery. A mean of 14.42 ± 6.99 lymph nodes was removed in the Robotic Group (RG) and a mean of 14.32 ± 7.34 nodes in the Open Group (OG). Nodal upstaging was observed in 22 (20.75%) RG patients and in 19 OG (17.92%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic lobectomy for clinical N0-N1 NSCLC appears to be equivalent to thoracotomy in terms of efficacy of lymph node dissection and nodal upstaging. Given that the nodal upstaging is a surrogate of quality of surgery, we can consider robotic lobectomy an appropriate procedure which ensures similar result to the open approach.

Circulating tumor cells in the pulmonary vein increase significantly after lobectomy: A prospective observational study

Background

It has been reported that there are more circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the pulmonary vein (PV) than in the peripheral blood; however, it is unclear whether the CTC count changes in the PV after resection of a lung lobe.

Methods

Thirty‐three lung cancer patients were recruited for the study, including 17 who underwent lobectomy via video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 16 via open thoracotomy. Sixty‐six blood specimens were sampled from the PV before the PV was interrupted and after lobectomy. The CTCs were quantified using the oHSV1‐hTERT‐GFP method.

Results

Before PV interruption, the CTC (pre‐CTC) detection rate was 79.0% (26/33), the mean number of CTCs was 3.36 (median 2, range: 0–18), and there was no significant relationship between the pre‐CTC count and clinical factors, such as histologic findings and pathological T stage (P > 0.05). After lobectomy, the CTC (post‐CTC) detection rate was 100% (33/33), the average number of CTCs was 14.88 (median 11, range: 1–69), and the post‐CTC count was significantly higher in patients in whom the PV was interrupted prior to the pulmonary artery (PA) than in patients in whom the PA was interrupted before the PV (P = 0.016). Overall, the CTC count was significantly higher following surgery (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Post‐CTC counts were significantly higher than pre‐CTC counts, suggesting that surgical manipulation may potentially dislodge tumor cells into the PV. Interrupting the PV prior to the PA during lobectomy may prevent partial CTC entry into the circulation.

Patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

Background

Paravertebral block has been proven to be an efficient method to provide post-thoracotomy pain management. This study aimed to compare patient-controlled paravertebral analgesia (PCPA) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) in terms of analgesic efficiency, respiratory function, and adverse effects after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Patients and methods

The prospective randomized trial study was carried out on 60 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy (randomly allocated 30 patients in each group). In the PCPA group, an initial dose of 0.3 mL/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 µg/mL was administered, followed by a 3 mL/h continuous infusion with patient-controlled analgesia (2 mL bolus, 10-minute lockout interval, 25 mL/4 h limit). In the IVPCA group with morphine 1 mg/mL solution, an infusion device was programmed to deliver a 1.0 mL demand bolus with no basal infusion rate, with a 10-minute lockout interval and a maximum of 20 mL/4 h period. Postoperative pain was assessed by visual analog scale at rest and on coughing. Arterial blood gas and spirometry were monitored and recorded for the first 3 postoperative days. Side effects to include were also recorded.

Results

The PCPA group had statistically significant lower pain scores (P<0.0001) at rest at all times. Lower pain scores on coughing were statistically significant in PCPA group in the first 4 hours. Postoperative spirometry showed that both the groups had comparable recovery trajectories for their pulmonary function. Arterial blood gas analysis showed pH and PaCO₂ were in a normal range in both the groups. The incidence of headache was higher in the IVPCA group (13.3% vs 0%; P=0.038).

Conclusion

PCPA effectively managed pain after VATS lobectomy, with lower pain scores, similar respiratory function, and fewer side effects than standard IVPCA treatment.

Disparities in the Treatment and Outcome of Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the 21st Century

BACKGROUND

African American (AA) individuals are less likely to receive treatment and more likely to die from cancer compared with Caucasian (C) individuals. Recent advancements in surgery and radiation have improved outcomes in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (ESNSCLC). We studied racial disparities in ESNSCLC in the past decade.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to retrieve data of 62,312 ESNSCLC patients age 60 years and older diagnosed between 2004 and 2012. Patients were divided into racial cohorts: C, AA, American Indian (AI), Asian/Pacific Islander (API), or unknown. Demographics characteristics, therapy, and survival were compared using χ² test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

AA and AI individuals were less likely to receive surgery than typical ESNSCLC patients (55.9% and 57.6% vs. 66.7%; P < .0001). Two-year overall survival (OS) for C individuals was 70%, for AA 65%, AI 60%, and API 76% (P < .0001). Two-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) for C individuals was 79%, AA 76%, AI 73%, and API 84% (P < .0001). Median CSS for AI and AA individuals was less than that of typical ESNSCLC patients (49 and 80 months vs. 107 months; P < .0001). This difference disappeared in multivariate analysis, accounted by sex, age, treatment, histology, and T stage (all P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Despite treatment advancements in the past decade, AA and AI individuals continue to have worse OS and CSS from ESNSCLC. This might be because of the association with more adverse risk factors, including older age, squamous histology, male sex, T2 stage, and tendency to forgo treatment.

Uniportal Lung Cancer Surgery: State of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has generated much attention in recent years, but questions remain regarding the adequacy of evidence to support its use in lung cancer surgery. This review aims to explore what the currently published literature suggests the role of the uniportal approach may be and to critically appraise that literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the Ovid Medline database to identify articles related to uniportal VATS. Articles were selected for review on the basis of ability to provide original clinical data on the role of uniportal VATS for lung cancer surgery.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed that only some publications on uniportal VATS provided original clinical data. Twenty-two articles were selected for review, including 9 case series and 13 comparative studies. No concerns about the safety of the uniportal VATS were noted. Some but not all comparative studies provided data suggesting that uniportal VATS may hold advantages over multiportal VATS in some simple clinical outcomes (such as reduced lengths of stay and postoperative pain). However, the quantity and quality of evidence thus far are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

It remains premature to declare superiority for uniportal VATS in lung cancer surgery. A higher level of evidence is needed, especially in investigating objective benefits and treatment efficacy of the single-incision approach.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: The first Indian report

INTRODUCTION

The fear of pleural adhesions and densely stuck lymph nodes in India, a country where tuberculosis is endemic, is one major factor keeping our surgeons away from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. In this paper, we aim to report our experience with performing VATS lobectomy in 102 cases using a standardised three-port anterior approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2012 and September 2016, we performed 102 VATS lobectomies. Sixty patients (58.8%) were males and 42 females (41.2%), with a mean age of 42.02 years. Diagnoses were as follows: benign disease (72), lung cancer (27) and pulmonary metastases (3). Among the cases with primary lung cancer, twenty out of 27 (74%) were adenocarcinoma and 7 cases of squamous carcinoma (25.92%). All patients underwent lobectomy by a standardised three-port anterior approach.

RESULTS

The overall conversion rate was 8.82% (n = 9). We observed no postoperative complications in 82 (80.4%) patients. The average blood loss was 211.37 ml. Mean operative time was 173 min. Median length of hospital stay was 5 with median chest tube duration of 4.9 days. There was no in hospital or 30-day mortality. The most common complication was prolonged air leak.

CONCLUSION

From this first Indian series, it is clear that VATS lobectomy is feasible in both benign and malignant cases. It also shows that the fear of adhesions is unwarranted and properly selected benign cases can also undergo VATS lobectomy safely.

Thoracoscopic lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection as a standard surgery for T1-2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (>300 surgeries experience)

Background

A lot of clinics worldwide in recent years recommend the use of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the early stages of lung cancer claiming that this technique helps reduce the number of postoperative complications, shortens the period of social rehabilitation of patients, without significantly affecting the long-term results of treatment. In this study we evaluate immediate and long-term results of surgical treatment of patients with early stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS) with mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Materials and methods

Since 2008 317 patients with T1-2N0M0 NSCLC over 20 (median age was 65.3 ± 2.5) years underwent VATS with mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Total number of men was 186 (58.7%), women - 131 (41.3%). Histologically verified adenocarcinoma was in 278 (87, 7%), Squamous cell carcinoma in 39 (12.3%). A group of patients who underwent thoracotomy lobectomy (n = 189) was taken to compare immediate and long-term results. Median age in this group was 66.5 ± 1.7. Total number of men was 115, women - 74. Histologically verified adenocarcinoma was in 154 (82.4%), Squamous cell carcinoma in 35 (17.6%).

Results

Conversion to thoracotomy during VATS was in 14.3% of surgeries. There was no postoperative mortality in VATS group, whereas in open surgeries this happened in 2.6%. The 3 and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 94.0% and 94.0% in the VATS group respectively, 83.0% and 78.0% in the thoracotomy group for clinical stage T1N0M0 NSCLC (p = 0.04554).

Conclusion

Considering the results of our research and the literature review we made sure that VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection is an alternative procedure to open approaches: it is much safer, reduce the frequency of post-operative complications and the rehabilitation period. We believe that complete VATS lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection must be taken as a standard in surgical treatment of patients with early stages of non-small cell lung cancer.

Impact of the introduction of thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Background

The present study evaluated the impact of the introduction of thoracoscopic lung lobectomy (TL) for non-small cell lung cancer at our institution.

Methods

This study retrospectively compared surgical and oncological outcomes in the period before and after the introduction of TL for non-small cell lung cancer. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed with respect to baseline patient variables and tumor characteristics.

Results

Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent lung lobectomy in the period before (BI group, n=261) and after (AI group, n=261) the introduction of TL. The proportion of TLs at our institution increased from 1.3% in the BI group to 93% in the AI group. The AI group experienced a longer duration of surgery, lesser intraoperative blood loss, and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (POHS). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. The median follow-up period was 50 months in both groups. No significant differences were observed between the BI and AI groups with respect to 5-year overall survival (OS) (76.1% and 71.7%, respectively; P=0.1973) and disease-free survival (DFS) (67.6% and 66.1%, respectively; P=0.4071). On multivariate analysis, pathological N1-2 status was an independent predictor of survival. AI group and TL showed no independent association with survival.

Conclusions

The introduction of TL represented a positive change at our institution owing to decreased invasiveness and oncological equivalence of the surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

Risk factors of cough in non-small cell lung cancer patients after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Background

Cough is a common respiratory complication in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after surgery. Previous studies have proposed a number of risk factors for postoperative cough; however, these studies are mainly based on traditional thoracotomies and tend to lack adequate objective assessment methods. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors of cough in NSCLC patients after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin Chinese (LCQ-MC) to evaluate postoperative cough.

Methods

A total of 198 NSCLC patients were enrolled. Overall, 91 patients (46.0%) developed cough after VATS, and 73 patients remained cough after 1 month. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors of postoperative cough.

Results

The independent factors of postoperative cough included female sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.399, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.260-4.565, P=0.008], duration of anesthesia (over 164 minutes; OR 2.810, 95% CI: 1.368-5.771, P=0.005), resection of the lower paratracheal nodes (OR 3.697, 95% CI: 1.439-9.499, P=0.007), and resection of the subcarinal nodes (OR 4.175, 95% CI: 1.203-14.495, P=0.024). The follow-up LCQ-MC total score after 1 month (18.00±1.80) was significantly higher than the postoperative total score (16.35±2.26; P=0.004).

Conclusions

Female sex, duration of anesthesia over 164 minutes, lower paratracheal node resection and subcarinal node resection were independent risk factors related to cough in NSCLC patients after VATS. In addition, the LCQ-MC performed satisfactorily in describing the longitudinal changes in cough symptoms.

Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Pulmonary Segmentectomy

Objective

Pulmonary segmentectomy using robotic assistance is often perceived as being more expensive than segmentectomy using video-assisted thoracic surgery. The robotic technique allows for meticulous dissection during segmentectomy, potentially leading to fewer parenchymal injuries, fewer air leaks, and shorter length of stay. This study compared pulmonary segmentectomy costs using video-assisted thoracic surgery versus robotic with manual staplers versus robotic with robotic staplers.

Methods

Retrospective analyses were performed evaluating our early experience with robotic pulmonary segmentectomy for 30 months compared with the video-assisted thoracic surgery approach. All 50 anatomical segmentectomies performed since introduction of robotic technique in the practice were included. Twenty-eight procedures were robotic-assisted and 22 were video-assisted thoracic surgery. Procedure-specific evaluation of direct costs was performed, including cost of robotic instruments, staplers, and average length of stay in the hospital.

Results

The mean ± SD age was 70 ± 10 years (range = 43–91 years). There were 12 males in the robotic group and eight in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group ( P = 0.642). The mean age was 69 years in the robotic group and 71 years in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group ( P = 0.367). The median length of stay was 2 (2–4) days in the robotic group (range = 1–9) and 4 (2–5) days in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group (range = 1–20, P = 0.089). The cost of robotic segmentectomy with manual staplers was less than that with robotic staplers. Both robotic techniques cost less than video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Conclusions

In this small series, cost and outcomes in our early experience with robotic-assisted segmentectomy were comparable with our video-assisted thoracic surgery approach with trends toward shorter length of stay and fewer complications. Larger series are needed to validate these results.

The Role of an Array of Routine Clinical Variables to the Occurrence and Severity of Postoperative Pneumonia in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background and purpose:

Data of an array of preoperative/intraoperative clinical variables may carry significant information for predicting the probability of postoperative pneumonia or chest infection in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We aimed to investigate the association between those variables and the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia (POP) as well as the severity of POP, based on routine laboratory tests, basic characteristics, and perioperative variables during the in-hospital period.

Methods:

A consecutive series of NSCLC patients undergoing lung cancer lobectomy at our department from January 2014 and December 2015 was used as the target patient group and stratified into 2 groups: pneumonia (POP) and non-pneumonia (N-POP), according to occurrence of pneumonia after lobectomy in 30 days. The POP was classified into 5 severity grades, based on the Clavien-Dindo complication classification system.

Results:

Regarding binary logistic regression analysis for risk factors of POP, the following were found to be the independent risk factors of the occurrence of POP: postoperative predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [ppoFEV1%; odds ratio (OR): 0.996, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.993–0.999; P = 0.021]; Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score &gt;3 (OR: 2.694, 95% CI: 1.462–4.965; P = 0.001); American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)score &gt;3 (OR: 2.066, 95% CI: 1.060–4.029; P = 0.033); postoperative predicted diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung (ppoDlco%; OR: 0.458, 95% CI: 0.090–0.809; P = 0.014); and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; OR: 2.171, 95% CI: 1.721–2.737; P &lt; 0.001). With regard to risk factors analysis of pneumonia severity via ordinal polytomous logistic regression, the following were the independent risk factors: early stage (OR: 0.626, 95% CI: 0.422–0.929, P = 0.020); CCI score &gt;3 (OR: 1.914, 95% CI: 1.058–3.459, P = 0.032); ppoDlco% (OR: 0.638, 95% CI: 0.445–0.914, P = 0.014); and NLR (OR: 1.218, 95% CI: 1.031–1.436, P = 0.020).

Conclusion:

Among an array of clinical variables in the hospital, major risk factors for POP following LC surgery were ppoFEV1%, ppoDlco%, NLR, ASA score &gt;3, and CCI score&gt;3; meanwhile, ppoDlco%, CCI score&gt;3, NLR, and early tumor stage were the key predictors of POP severity.

Video-assisted thoracic surgery is an optimal alternative to conventional thoracotomy for reoperations for ipsilateral pulmonary lesions

BACKGROUND

Ipsilateral pulmonary reoperation is empirically considered a contraindication of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) because of intrapleural adhesion and the destruction of anatomical structures caused by previous surgery. The purpose of this study was to present our experience of the use of VATS for ipsilateral reoperations.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent VATS reoperation or re-thoracotomy between January 2006 and March 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Data were compared to assess the feasibility and safety of VATS for ipsilateral reoperations.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 64 patients, including 36 patients who underwent attempted ipsilateral VATS reoperations (VATS group) and 28 who underwent conventional re-thoracotomy as a control with clinicopathological characteristics similar to those in the VATS group. Intrapleural severe adhesions were detected in 28 (77.8%) and 22 (78.6%) patients in the VATS and re-thoracotomy groups, respectively (P = 0.906), and their dissection required a longer period in the VATS group (P = 0.014). VATS reoperations were converted to re-thoracotomy or video-assisted mini re-thoracotomy in three patients because of bleeding or difficulty in dissecting hilar structures. There were no significant differences in resection methods, time to reoperation, intraoperative blood loss, or drainage time between the two groups. However, patients in the VATS group had a shorter hospital stay (P < 0.01) and fewer complications (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

VATS is an optimal alternative to re-thoracotomy for ipsilateral pulmonary lesions, regardless of intrapleural adhesions and the destruction of anatomical structures caused by former operations in selected patients.

[Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Experts Consensus on the Management of Ground-Glass Nodules Suspected as Lung Adenocarcinoma (Version 1)]

随着胸部计算机断层扫描（computed tomography, CT）检查，尤其是低剂量薄层CT筛查项目在中国的广泛开展，越来越多的无症状肺部磨玻璃结节（ground-glass nodules, GGNs）被发现。虽然国内及国际上已发布了一系列针对肺部GGNs的指南，但是这些指南的撰写者多来自呼吸、肿瘤及影像专业，可能缺乏对现代微创胸外科的充分认识，造成外科手术在肺部GGNs诊治中的作用不明确，甚至被低估；而且，肺部肿瘤相关的各学科对于早期肺癌，尤其是浸润前病变的处理也缺乏统一规范。因此，基于国内外现有文献及上海市肺科医院多年积累的经验，上海市肺科医院撰写了此诊疗共识。本共识推荐对于疑似肺腺癌的GGNs进行多学科评估，依据诊断，选择合理的处置方式。对于疑似原位腺癌，推荐进行胸部薄层CT随访，或在特定情况下进行不超过肺段切除的限制性肺切除；对于疑似微浸润腺癌，推荐进行限制性肺切除或肺叶切除；对于疑似浸润性腺癌，建议依据病灶是否含有磨玻璃成分、位置、大小、个数及患者躯体情况选择合理的手术方式；而肺多发结节的处理原则推荐为主病灶优先，兼顾次要病灶，综合选择治疗方案。

[Clinical Value of Four-hole Unilateral Dissecting Lobectomy and Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Early Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic lobectomy combined with mediastinal lymph node dissection has been considered as one of the standard surgical procedures for early lung cancer. After 20 years of development, thoracoscopic lobectomy has reached a consensus on reliability and minimally invasive. At present, thoracoscopic lobectomy has a variety of incisions, which gradually evolve into four holes based on three holes, and two or one hole as the operative approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of four-hole unilateral dissecting lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of anatomical lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy under four-hole completely video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (C-VATS) in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

The patients undergoing lobectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy for NSCLC were identified in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yangzhou First People's Hospital, Yangzhou University from March 2015 to July 2016. Preoperative clinical diagnosis of peripheral-type early NSCLC. The patients were randomly divided into four-hole monophasic group (experimental group) and three-hole group (control group) according to the number of hospitalization before surgery. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the 39 cases assign in experimental group and 34 cases in the control group, including 36 males and 37 females; aged 38 to 84 years. The mean operation time, average blood loss, lymph node dissection group, average drainage, average extubation time and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The two groups of patients were successfully completed surgery, no death after surgery. Mean bleeding in the two groups, the number of lymph node dissection group, the average postoperative drainage, the average time of extubation, postoperative complications, with no significant difference. The average operation time of the four-hole unidirectional group was shorter than that of the three-hole group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy of a four-hole one-way operation under VATS are satisfactory. The operation is smooth during operation, which shortens the course of operation and deserves the clinical promotion.
.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with chest wall resection

Lung cancer presents with chest wall invasion in 5-8% of patients, which imparts some treatment challenges. Surgical resection is currently the standard of care, and there are some controversies regarding the best approach. Published series and case reports confirm the safety and feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in highly complex surgical cases including lobectomy with chest wall resection of locally advanced lung cancer. In this article, we present the clinical indications of locally advanced lung cancer that infiltrates the chest wall, the modalities for and importance of accurately staging lung cancers with chest wall invasion, and the technical aspects of accomplishing a safe and oncologically sound extended resection through VATS.

Ribcage kinematics during exercise justifies thoracoscopic versus postero-lateral thoracotomy lobectomy prompt recovery

OBJECTIVES

The video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach is encouraged over postero-lateral thoracotomy (PLT) for lobectomy in lung cancer. We compare the ribcage kinematics during exercise before and after both procedures, assuming that VATS, being minimally invasive, could better preserve ribcage expansion.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients undergoing lobectomy by means of VATS (n = 20) or PLT (n = 11) were compared presurgery, after chest drainage removal (T1) and 2 months post-surgery (T2) during quiet breathing and incremental exercise. Spirometry, chest pain, ventilatory pattern and expansions of the ribcage (ΔVRC) and abdomen were measured. Furthermore, the expansion of the ribcage and abdomen in the operated (ΔVRC-OP and ΔVAB-OP, respectively) and non-operated (ΔVRC-NO and ΔVAB-NO, respectively) sides was also considered.

RESULTS

At T1, in both groups, spirometry worsened and chest pain increased, being higher after PLT. Tidal volume (VT) decreased after PLT because the ribcage expanded less due to reduced ΔVRC-OP. Contrary to this, in VATS, there were no changes in VT and ΔVRC, although ΔVRC-OP was lower, because ΔVRC-NO increased at high level of exercise. At T2, ΔVRC-OP was completely restored after VATS. At high levels of exercise following PLT, although patients still showed reduced ΔVRC and ΔVRC-OP, VT was restored owing to increased ΔVAB-NO.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate VATS to have a reduced impact on ribcage kinematics while PLT induced restriction more markedly during exercise and still present 2 months after surgery. Patients adopt 2 different compensatory mechanisms, by shifting the expansion toward the contralateral ribcage after VATS and toward the abdomen after PLT. Our study justifies thoracoscopic lobectomy prompt recovery.

Clinical trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02910453).

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung, spine and oligometastatic disease: current evidence and future directions

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) also referred to as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), is a technique which has emerged over the past two decades due to improvements in radiation technology. Unlike conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) which traditionally delivers radiation in small doses [approximately 2 Gray (Gy) per fraction] over several weeks, SBRT, typically delivered in one to eight fractions, is a technique whereby potentially ablative doses of radiotherapy (usually 7.5-20 Gy per fraction) can be delivered with steeper dose gradients and sub millimetre precision, minimising risk to surrounding normal tissues. The potential benefits of excellent tumor control with low toxicity has led to the increasing use of SBRT in a number of clinical situations. Due to compelling evidence, SBRT is now the treatment of choice for medically inoperable patients with peripherally located stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Controversy remains however as to its efficacy and safety for central or ultra-central lung tumors. The evidence base supporting the use of SBRT as a novel treatment for spinal metastases and oligometastases is rapidly expanding but challenges remain in these difficult patient populations. In an era where targeted therapy and improved systemic treatments for stage IV cancer have resulted in increased disease-free survival, and our knowledge of the oligometastatic state is ever expanding, using SBRT to treat metastatic disease and gain durable local control is increasingly desirable. Several randomized trials are currently underway and are sure to provide valuable information on the benefit and utility of SBRT across many tumor sites including early-stage NSCLC, spinal metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recognizing the evolving role of SBRT in clinical practice, this paper provides a critical review of recent developments in each of these areas particularly highlighting the challenges facing clinicians and discusses potential areas for future research.

Lung decortication in phase III pleural empyema by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-results of a learning curve study

Background

Pleural empyema (PE) is a devastating disease with a high morbidity and mortality. According to the American Thoracic Society it is graduated into three phases and surgery is indicated in intermediate phase II and organized phase III. In the latter, open decortication of the lung via thoracotomy is the gold standard whereas the evidence for feasibility and safety of a minimally-invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic approach is still poor.

Methods

Retrospective single-center analysis of patients undergoing surgery for phase III PE from 02/2011 to 03/2015 [n=138, including n=130 VATS approach (n=3 of them with bilateral disease) and n=8 open approach]. The learning curve was assessed by grouping those 127 patients with unilateral disease who underwent a video-assisted thoracoscopic approach into two groups: VATS-1 (03/2011 to 06/2012, n=43) and VATS-2 (06/2012 to 03/2015, n=84).

Results

ASA-scores (P=0.0279) and rate of pre-operative drainage therapy (P=0.0534) were higher in VATS-2 patients. Operating times were longer in VATS-1 (P=0.0308), intra-operative complication as well as conversion to open surgery rates did both not differ. Rates of post-operative vasoconstrictive therapy (P=0.0191) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (P=0.0560) were both higher in VATS-2, however, post-operative length of stay (LOS) at intensive care unit, overall post-operative LOS and post-operative complication rate were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is feasible for evacuation and decortication in late phase III PE. A learning curve of approximately 40 cases is sufficient to gain procedure-specific surgical skills and thus reduce the operating times sufficiently.

Assessment of competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: A Danish nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy has previously been established on the basis of numbers of procedures performed, but this approach does not ensure competence. Specific assessment tools, such as the newly developed video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy assessment tool, allow for structured and objective assessment of competence. Our aim was to provide validity evidence for the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy assessment tool.

METHODS

Video recordings of 60 video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies performed by 18 thoracic surgeons were rated using the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy assessment tool. All 4 centers of thoracic surgery in Denmark participated in the study. Two video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery experts rated the videos. They were blinded to surgeon and center.

RESULTS

The total internal consistency reliability Cronbach's alpha was 0.93. Inter-rater reliability between the 2 raters was Pearson's r = 0.71 (P < .001). The mean video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy assessment tool scores for the 10 procedures performed by beginners were 22.1 (standard deviation [SD], 8.6) for the 28 procedures performed by the intermediate surgeons, 31.2 (SD, 4.4), and for the 20 procedures performed by experts 35.9 (SD, 2.9) (P < .001). Bonferroni post hoc tests showed that experts were significantly better than intermediates (P < .008) and beginners (P < .001). Intermediates' mean scores were significantly better than beginners (P < .001). The pass/fail standard calculated using the contrasting group's method was 31 points. One of the beginners passed, and 2 experts failed the test.

CONCLUSIONS

Validity evidence was provided for a newly developed assessment tool for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy assessment tool) in a clinical setting. The discriminatory ability among expert surgeons, intermediate surgeons, and beginners proved highly significant. The video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy assessment tool could be an important aid in the future training and certification of thoracic surgeons.

Oncologic Equivalence of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy: The Scientific and Practical Arguments

BACKGROUND

Despite the slow adoption of minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL), it is now a preferred approach for early lung cancer. Nevertheless, ongoing concerns about MIL oncologic effectiveness has led to calls for prospective, randomized trials.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of on-line databases, collected readings, and other scholarly experiences of the experienced authors were used to construct this review. All available reports that contained long-term survival comparisons for open versus MIL were tabulated.

RESULTS

The preponderance of limited randomized and numerous large propensity-matched database analyses indicate equivalent or improved long-term MIL survival for early-stage disease. MIL lymph node dissection quality has been challenged; however, this was attributed to MIL avoidance of central tumors in early reports. Although technical inadequacies for MIL should be amplified for advanced cancer resections, early reports show no such concern. In fact, for special populations such as older, frail patients, evidence is much stronger that MIL confers a survival advantage.

CONCLUSIONS

MIL is an oncologically equivalent operation with substantially less morbidity, especially in frail populations. It is reasonable to suggest that MIL should be the technique of choice, even a quality indicator, for lobectomy.

Recent advances in the management of lung cancer

Historically, the prognosis for individuals diagnosed with lung cancer has been bleak. However, the past 10 years have seen important advances in treatment and diagnosis which have translated into the first improvements seen in lung cancer survival. This review highlights the major advances in treatments with curative intent, systemic targeted therapies, palliative care and early diagnosis in lung cancer. We discuss the pivotal research that underpins these new technologies/strategies and their current position in clinical practice.

A novel assessment tool for evaluating competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Specific assessment tools can accelerate trainees' learning through structured feedback and ensure that trainees attain the knowledge and skills required to practice as competent, independent surgeons (competency-based surgical education). The objective was to develop an assessment tool for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy by achieving consensus within an international group of VATS experts.

METHOD

The Delphi method was used as a structured process for collecting and distilling knowledge from a group of internationally recognized VATS experts. Opinions were obtained in an iterative process involving answering repeated rounds of questionnaires. Responses to one round were summarized and integrated into the next round of questionnaires until consensus was reached.

RESULTS

Thirty-one VATS experts were included and four Delphi rounds were conducted. The response rate for each round were 68.9% (31/45), 100% (31/31), 96.8% (30/31), and 93.3% (28/30) for the final round where consensus was reached. The first Delphi round contained 44 items and the final VATS lobectomy Assessment Tool (VATSAT) comprised eight items with rating anchors: (1) localization of tumor and other pathological tissue, (2) dissection of the hilum and veins, (3) dissection of the arteries, (4) dissection of the bronchus, (5) dissection of lymph nodes, (6) retrieval of lobe in bag, (7) respect for tissue and structures, and (8) technical skills in general.

CONCLUSION

A novel and dedicated assessment tool for VATS lobectomy was developed based on VATS experts' consensus. The VATSAT can support the learning of VATS lobectomy by providing structured feedback and help supervisors make the important decision of when trainees have acquired VATS lobectomy competencies for independent performance.

Robotic-Assisted Lobectomies in the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RobATS) lobectomy is becoming more common for the treatment of lung cancer. As with any relatively new technology, there is the assumption that greater experience leads to greater proficiency. The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes of patients undergoing RobATS lobectomy as hospitals gain experience, and to describe outcomes after conversion to open procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to analyze robotic lobectomies for lung cancer from 2010 to 2014. Individual hospitals were categorized by the year they began reporting robotic lobectomies to the NCDB. Primary outcomes were perioperative morbidity and mortality and rate of conversion to open lobectomy.

RESULTS

There were 7,645 robotic lobectomies identified from 465 hospitals. The overall conversion rate was 9.2% (n = 702). A propensity-matched analysis showed no significant difference between experienced and inexperienced hospitals with respect to 30-day mortality (1.07% vs 2.03%, p = 0.092) or 90-day mortality (2.35% vs 3.63%, p = 0.104). Conversion to open was a predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.54, CI 1.56 to 4.14) and 90-day mortality (OR 2.68, CI 1.83 to 3.91). Patients who underwent conversion had higher 90-day mortality compared with patients not undergoing conversion, in years of experience: 2 (p = 0.043), 3 (p = 0.002), and 4 (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality after RobATS lobectomy at experienced hospitals is not significantly different than at inexperienced hospitals. Though conversion rates decrease with experience, patients who undergo conversion have higher mortality than those who do not, particularly in hospitals with more experience. This suggests that a deliberate effort to increase experience with and improve patient selection for RobATS lobectomies may ameliorate the conversions and their attendant sequelae.

Thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for lung metastases of colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis using propensity score adjustment†

OBJECTIVES

Thoracoscopic surgery for lung metastasectomy remains controversial. The study aimed at determining the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgery for lung metastasectomy.

METHODS

This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study that included 1047 patients who underwent lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer between 1999 and 2014. Prognostic factors of overall survival were compared between the thoracoscopic and open thoracotomy groups using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. The propensity score, calculated using the preoperative covariates, included the era of lung surgery as a covariate. A stepwise backward elimination method, with a probability level of 0.15, was used to select the most powerful sets of outcome predictors. The difference between the radiological tumour number and the resected tumour number (delta_num) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The c -statistics and the P -value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow Chi-square of the propensity score model were 0.7149 and 0.1579, respectively. After adjusting for the propensity score, the thoracoscopy group had a better survival rate than the open group (stratified log-rank test: P  = 0.0353). After adjusting for the propensity score, the most powerful predictive model for overall survival was that which combined thoracoscopy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.468, 95% CI: 0.262-0.838, P  = 0.011] and anatomical resection (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.134-1.953, P  = 0.004). Before adjusting for the propensity score, the delta_num was significantly greater in the open group than in the thoracoscopy group (thoracoscopy: 0.06, open: 0.33, P  = 0.001); however, after adjustment, there was no difference in the delta_num (thoracoscopy: 0.04, open: 0.19, P  = 0.114).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic metastasectomy showed better overall survival than the open approach in this analysis. The thoracoscopic approach may be an acceptable option for resection of pulmonary metastases in terms of tumour identification and survival outcome in the current era.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is debate regarding the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or surgery for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis compared the clinical efficacy of SABR and lobectomy in stage I NSCLC patients.

METHODS

An online search identified eight eligible articles (including 2 trials and 7 cohort studies) for inclusion. The odds ratio (OR) was used as a summary statistic. Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were selected to calculate ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Fixed-effects or random-effects models were conducted according to study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between SABR and lobectomy in terms of one-year OS or CSS. Significant benefits of surgery were observed in three-year OS (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.55-2.86), three-year CSS (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.05-3.57), three-year RFS (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12-2.36), and five-year OS (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.71-3.36). In addition, lobectomy demonstrated a beneficial trend in one-year RFS, five-year RFS, and CSS.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses of current evidence suggested that lobectomy provides better long-term survival outcomes for stage I NSCLC patients.

Enhanced Recovery in Thoracic Surgery: A Review

The main goal of enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery is to minimize stress response, reduce postoperative pulmonary complications, and improve patient outcome, which will in addition decrease hospital stay and reduce hospital costs. As minimally invasive technique, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery represents an important element of enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. Anesthetic management during preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative period is essential for the enhanced recovery. In the era of enhanced recovery protocols, non-intubated thoracoscopic procedures present a step forward. This article focuses on the key elements of the enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. Having reviewed recent literature, the authors highlight potential procedures and techniques that might be incorporated into the program.

First experiences and complications in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at a thoracic surgery center

Background

This study aims to report the difficulties and complications we experienced in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies performed at our thoracic surgery center.

Methods

A total of 76 patients (54 males, 22 females; mean age 48.3 years; range 9 to 83 years) who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy between January 2012 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patient characteristics such as additional diseases or tuberculosis history, stage for malignant diseases, surgical characteristics such as port properties and amount of bleeding, postoperative characteristics such as amount, time and duration of drainage, air leakage, and discharge time, morbidity and mortality rates, and their causes were evaluated.

Results

Of the patients, 35 were evaluated due to benign pulmonary diseases and 41 due to malignant pulmonary diseases. Postoperative prolonged air leakage developed in 14 patients. Of these patients, one was administered thoracotomy and primary repair, three were administered pleurodesis, and three were administered secondary pleurocan catheter, while the air leakage ended spontaneously in seven patients. Due to bleeding, one patient was treated with revision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery on the same day postoperatively. One patient developed chylothorax and one patient developed pneumonia, which caused respiratory failure.

Conclusion

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy is a safe thoracic procedure, which is used for both oncologic and non-oncologic diseases of the lung. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be performed by all thoracic surgeons experienced in open thoracic surgery. Thanks to the gained experiences, the rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy may improve in all centers.

Physiopathology aspects of anatomical video-assisted thoracic surgery resections: current status and prospects of development

Pulmonary lobectomy remains the gold standard therapy for early-stage lung cancer. With the spread of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), surgeons began using this approach also to perform lobectomies, becoming progressively widespread worldwide. However some early-stage lung cancer patients are of questionable eligibility for open lobectomy being considered at high-risk to develop postoperative complications due to compromised pulmonary function or cardiopulmonary reserve. Herein we evaluate pathophysiology of VATS, focusing on: the correlation between the traditional predictors of outcome and overall complications, the current status of different VATS approaches and the role of VATS segmentectomy in high-risk patients, unable to tolerate lobectomy for their compromised cardiopulmonary reserve.

[Video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in myasthenia gravis. New approach]

AIM

To present possibility and technical aspects of anesthetic management during video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article describes the proposed modified anesthetic method that is suitable for video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis. Nine patients with myasthenia underwent VATS-thymectomy. Anesthesia was performed with artificial airway and auxiliary ventilation without muscle relaxants administration.

Evaluation of surgical approaches to anatomical segmentectomies: the transition to minimal invasive surgery improves hospital outcomes

Background

We aim to evaluate the transition process from open to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomical segmentectomies in a regional thoracic surgical unit.

Methods

In a retrospective study from January 2013 to December 2015, we identified all anatomical segmentectomies performed in our unit. Pre, peri and postoperative data were compared between the three years (2013, 2014 and 2015) and according to operative approach. Thoracotomy after VATS intraoperative biopsy was considered a conversion for the purposes of the study.

Results

A total of 86 consecutive cases [56 females and 30 males, median age 70 years (range, 43 to 83 years); median FEV1 of 78% predicted (range, 41% to 126%)] were included. There was a significant change in the surgical approach with time. Fifty-two cases underwent VATS (73% via single-port) and 34 open surgeries, including nine conversions. There were no postoperative deaths in the VATS group and one in the open group. Operative outcomes were similar over time with no haemorrhagic events, equivalent R1 resection and nodal stations explored in all lymph node positive patients. In node negative cases however, open surgery was associated with more extensive mediastinal exploration. Patients in 2015 had a shorter hospital stay in comparison to those in previous years [median 4 days (range, 1-15 days) vs. median 6 days (range, 3-27 days), P=0.01]. There were no differences in the incidence of complications or readmissions to hospital over time.

Conclusions

The transition over a short period of time from open to single-port VATS segmentectomy has allowed us to significantly reduce postoperative hospital stay without compromising operative or postoperative outcomes.

Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. With the implementation of lung cancer screening, the number and proportion of patients diagnosed with early-stage disease are anticipated to increase. Surgery is currently the standard of care for patients with operable stage I NSCLC. However, promising outcomes with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with inoperable disease has led to interest in directly comparing SBRT and surgery in operable patients. Unfortunately, early randomized trials comparing surgery and SBRT closed early because of poor accrual. In this article, the nuances of surgery and SBRT for early-stage NSCLC are reviewed. Furthermore, retrospective and prospective analyses of SBRT in early-stage NSCLC are discussed, and active randomized trials comparing these 2 approaches are described. Cancer 2018;124:667-78. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage primary lung cancer, is an active breath coordinator necessary? An audit from a tertiary cancer care center

CONTEXT

The hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment modality for early-stage nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

AIMS

An audit SBRT in primary lung cancer treated in our center with and without an active breath coordinator (ABC) was undertaken to evaluate its impact on target volumes and clinical outcomes.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was an observational study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine patients with lung carcinoma were treated from January 2014 to August 2016. Five patients were simulated using ABC and four patients with free breathing. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated using Monaco treatment planning software. Three patients were treated with a dose of 54 Gy in three fractions and six patients with a dose of 48 Gy in four fractions.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival.

RESULTS

The mean planning target volumes (PTV) in ABC and free breathing groups were 42.19cc and 60.17cc, respectively. The mean volume of lung receiving 20, 10, and 5 Gy (V20, V10and V5) in ABC group were 5.37cc, 10.49cc, and 18.45cc whereas in free breathing 6.63cc, 12.74cc, and 20.64cc, respectively. At a median follow-up of 18 months, there were three local recurrences. No significant toxicity occurred in our series.

CONCLUSION

Our initial results show that SBRT is well tolerated with good local control. Although the PTV volume and irradiated normal lung volume was higher in this group compared to ABC group, this did not translate to any added clinical toxicity.

Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Safety and short-term efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for early-stage non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated by observational studies previously. However, these outcomes have never been verified by a large randomized controlled trial (RCT). The aim of our RCT was to confirm that VATS is not inferior or even superior to open operation for early-stage NSCLC in terms of short-term and oncologic efficacy.

METHODS

The trial was undertaken at five tertiary hospitals. Patients aged between 18 and 75 years with clinically early-stage NSCLC were randomly assigned to the VATS and axillary thoracotomy groups. Lobectomy plus mediastinal lymph node dissection was standard surgical intervention. Because patients continue to be followed up for oncologic outcome, the short-term perioperative outcomes would be reported here.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2014, 508 patients were recruited and 425 were eligible for analyses (215 VATS and 210 axillary thoracotomy). Eight VATS procedures were converted to open operation intraoperatively (3.72%). Median operation time with VATS was significantly less than axillary thoracotomy (150 versus 166 minutes, p = 0.009). In addition, VATS was associated with less intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.001). There was no difference for postoperative pleural drainage, length of hospitalization, and rates of morbidity and mortality. Cancer residual margins were found in 1 patient with VATS and 5 with axillary thoracotomy (p = 0.128). The yield of lymph nodes from either surgical approach was similar (p = 0.389).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that VATS lobectomy is safe and reliable to treat NSCLCs, and it may be superior to axillary thoracotomy for operation time and intraoperative blood loss. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01102517.

Midterm outcomes of single port thoracoscopic surgery for major pulmonary resection

INTRODUCTION

Single-port thoracoscopic surgery has widened the current minimally invasive surgical techniques toward more less invasive procedures in terms of reducing the number of incisions. However, the current status of oncologic outcome with this technique is not well known for lung cancer surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes in early stage lung cancer for impact of the survival outcomes with our experience of conversion to a single-port approach from the conventional three-port approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective data of patients who underwent thoracoscopic major lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2006 and June 2015 were analyzed. Patients' characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathologic result, and postoperative follow-up data of thoracoscopic surgery were reviewed and surgical outcomes were compared between conventional three-port (n = 168), two-port (n = 68), and single-port thoracoscopic surgery (n = 203).

RESULTS

Of the 203 single-port thoracoscopic surgeries, we performed 167 single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissections. During the learning period of each thoracoscopic approach, the mean operation time for single-port thoracoscopic surgery (189±62 min) was not significantly different from those of two-port (175±46 min) and three-port (195±75 min) thoracoscopic lobectomy (p = 0.165). Perioperative outcomes including drain indwelling time (p <0.001), complication (p = 0.185) and conversion event (p = 0.911) were not worsened during learning period with two-port. Midterm survival (p = 0.753) and recurrence free survival (p = 0.656) of single port thoracoscopic lobectomy showed acceptable results compared with two- and three-port approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-port thoracoscopic surgery is safe and a feasible option for major lung resection in lung malignancy and this approach following experiences of two-port approach may yield similar oncologic results to those of conventional multi-port approach during thoracoscopic lobectomy.