A randomized, vehicle-controlled trial of tacrolimus ointment for treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatric Tacrolimus Study Group

[New horizons in the treatment of atopic dermatitis]

Nearly fifty years after their introduction, corticoids continue to be one of the main pillars of dermatological therapy in general and in atopic dermatitis in particular. However, their use is limited by local and systemic adverse effects.There is enormous demand for anti-inflammatory agents not belonging to the corticoid group that would be useful in the different inflammatory dermatoses.In the last few years the therapeutic arsenal for atopic dermatitis has increased with two distinct groups of drugs: topical immunomodulators and leukotriene inhibitors. Both groups of drugs are new and new compounds belonging to these types of drugs will probably appear in the next few years.Among the alternatives to corticoids are the immunomodulators and the most promising of these are macrolide antibiotics. Tacrolimus (FK 506) and pimecrolimus (ASM 981) belong to this group of substances with a high capacity to inhibit T lymphocyte activation. Although they also act on other cells playing a role in atopic dermatitis (mastocytes, Langerhans' cells, B lymphocytes) their action on T lymphocytes seems to be the most important. In T lymphocytes, these drugs act by inhibiting the action of calmodulin, a vital enzyme in the activation chain of these cells that ends in the production of interleukin 2 and other proinflammatory cytokines.The accumulated evidence of the various publications seems to indicate that tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment of atopic dermatitis in patients aged 2 years or more. The drug was approved for clinical use 3 years ago in Japan and more than 1 year ago in the United States. The number of randomized clinical trials comparing this drug with placebo or various corticoids demonstrate that its action is overwhelming. Its anti-inflammatory action is similar to that of high-potency topical corticoids. Two doses daily are required and the drug has been tested in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Published data from more than 10,000 patients guarantee its safety. The most frequent short-term adverse effect is a burning sensation in the site of application lasting a few minutes.Pimecrolimus has not yet been commercialized in any country and is currently undergoing phase III clinical investigations. It has been tested in three clinical trials in patients aged more than 3 months old with mild-moderate atopic dermatitis. Its safety profile is good and similar to that of tacrolimus.The number and quality of the data provided by studies of treatment with leukotriene inhibitors (zafirlukast, montelukast and zileuton) is much lower but these substances seem to warrant further investigation. Only five small series undergoing treatment with these products have been published.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Vehicle-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment for patients with atopic dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with 0.1% hydrocortisone-17-butyrate ointment, a midpotent to potent topical corticosteroid, in the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Patients applied ointment twice daily to all affected areas for 3 weeks in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI) mean area under the curve as a percentage of baseline.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy patients were randomized and received treatment. Discontinuations included 22 of 193 patients from the 0.03% tacrolimus group, 22 of 191 patients from the 0.1% tacrolimus group, and 17 of 186 patients from the hydrocortisone butyrate group. The median mEASI mean area under the curve as a percentage of baseline was 47.0%, 36.5%, and 36.1% for patients who received 0.03% tacrolimus, 0.1% tacrolimus, and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between 0.1% tacrolimus and 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate; however, the lower improvement in mEASI for 0.03% tacrolimus was statistically significant when compared with 0.1% tacrolimus (P <.001) or hydrocortisone butyrate (P =.002). Skin burning and pruritus at the application site showed a higher incidence in the tacrolimus treatment groups than in the hydrocortisone butyrate group (P <.05). Laboratory parameters showed no treatment differences and no marked changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment was similar to that of 0.1% hydrocortisone butyrate ointment and was lower for 0.03% tacrolimus ointment. No serious safety concerns were identified.

Tacrolimus: a review of its use for the management of dermatoses

The newly developed immunomodulator tacrolimus (FK506) is the first of a new class of agents that have enormous potential to change the way that dermatoses are treated and managed. Tacrolimus has been found to be active in a topical formulation with the latter exerting its effects by acting on the signal transduction pathways inside T cells and inhibiting gene transcription. The result is decreased responsiveness of T cells to antigens. Percutaneous absorption of tacrolimus is higher in diseased skin as opposed to healthy skin and, therefore, the drug will be taken in at progressively lower quantities as lesions heal. There is limited systemic absorption of tacrolimus over the course of therapy. The most extensive experience with tacrolimus has been in treating atopic dermatitis. In numerous trials, tacrolimus ointment 0.03-0.3% has shown to be effective in reducing the symptoms and severity of atopic dermatitis in adults and the paediatric population. Furthermore, there have been no significant toxic effects associated with topical therapy with tacrolimus. The most common complaint is that of local irritation after applying the ointment. This is generally transient and the patient is able to continue with therapy. The other dermatoses where tacrolimus has been used include contact dermatitis, psoriasis and pyoderma gangrenosum.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Vehicle-controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment with 1% hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children 2 to 15 years of age with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Treatment was twice daily to affected areas for 3 weeks in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary endpoint was the modified eczema area and severity index (mEASI) mean area under the curve (mAUC) as a percentage of baseline.

RESULTS

Five hundred sixty patients were randomized and received at least one application of ointment. Discontinuations included 21 of 189 patients from the 0.03% tacrolimus group, 13 of 186 patients from the 0.1% tacrolimus group, and 20 of 185 patients from the hydrocortisone acetate group. The median mEASI mAUC as a percentage of baseline showed 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus to be significantly more effective than 1% hydrocortisone acetate (P <.001) and 0.1% tacrolimus to be more effective than 0.03% tacrolimus (P =.006). The mEASI mAUC as a percentage of baseline was 44.8%, 39.8%, and 64.0% for patients who received 0.03% tacrolimus, 0.1% tacrolimus, and 1% hydrocortisone acetate, respectively. Transient skin burning was the only adverse event to show a higher incidence in the tacrolimus treatment groups than in the hydrocortisone acetate group (P <.05). Laboratory parameters showed no treatment differences and no marked changes over time.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus, 0.03% and 0.1%, was significantly more effective than 1% hydrocortisone acetate and 0.1% tacrolimus was more effective than 0.03% tacrolimus in the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in children. No safety concerns were identified.

Tacrolimus clinical studies for atopic dermatitis and other conditions

The first topical immunomodulator approved for human use, tacrolimus ointment (Protopic, Fujisawa, Healthcare, Inc, Deerfield, IL), has been shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of children (aged 2 years and older) and adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). Clinical trials conducted worldwide have involved 12,000 patients, with safety and efficacy data available for up to 3 years of treatment. In addition to its beneficial effects in the management of AD, topical tacrolimus has also been reported to be of benefit in other immunologically mediated skin diseases including: hand dermatitis, contact dermatitis, eyelid dermatitis, erosive lichen planus, steroid-induced rosacea, pyoderma gangrenosum, and graft-versus-host disease. This article reviews the clinical experience of topical tacrolimus in the treatment of AD and other skin conditions.

Safety of the new macrolide immunomodulators

With the wide acceptance of cyclosporine in the treatment of skin disease, there has been an effort to find new immunomodulating agents with superior safety profiles for use in dermatology. Among the most promising of the classes are the new macrolide immunomodulators, including tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. Of these, only tocrolimus has had widespread use for nondermatologic indications, primarily solid organ transplantation. Both of these agents have been studied for inflammatory diseases of the skin. In this article, we review the systemic and topical toxicities of these macrolide immunomodulators.

Topical tacrolimus and cyclosporin A differentially inhibit early and late effector phases of cutaneous delayed-type and immunoglobulin E hypersensitivity

Systemic and topical administration routes of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A (CsA) were compared in effects on early and late phases of elicited T-cell-mediated contact sensitivity (CS), and effects on early and late phases of cutaneous immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody-mediated hypersensitivity responses in mice. Thus, both CS and IgE responses in the skin have an early mast-cell-dependent phase, and also a late inflammatory phase. We measured the effects of both immunosuppressants on both phases of the respective T cell versus IgE responses. Systemic administration of both agents completely suppressed CS and IgE late-phase responses, but failed to affect either early phase. In contrast, when topical CsA was used, low doses abolished the early phase of IgE responses, but even high doses did not inhibit the early phase of CS. Conversely, topical tacrolimus inhibited the early phase of CS more potently than the early phase of cutaneous IgE hypersensitivity responses. Thus, topical treatment was needed to inhibit the early phases and the two agents acted differentially, suggesting differing susceptibility of the early phases, that are probably due to different signalling mechanisms. These studies underscore the potential value of topical administration of these powerful immunosuppressive agents in the treatment of allergic diseases that exhibit features of early-phase mast-cell-dependent inflammation, and late inflammation due to mast cells or to T cells, such as atopic dermatitis or asthma, since the early phase is predominantly susceptible to topical application, while the last phase of both IgE and T-cell inflammation responds to systemic treatment with both agents.

Azathioprine for atopic dermatitis

For adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical treatment, the choices of second-line therapy are limited. Furthermore, there are concerns about the long-term safety of treatments such as cyclosporin. Limited open studies suggest that azathioprine may be effective, although controlled trial data is lacking. Nevertheless, many UK dermatologists use azathioprine to treat patients with severe AD, despite the potential risk of serious toxicity. Azathioprine myelotoxicity and drug efficacy are now known to be related to the activity of a key enzyme in azathioprine metabolism, thiopurinemethyltransferase (TPMT). Recently, the facility for TPMT measurement has become more widely available, providing the possibility to optimize the therapeutic effect of azathioprine, yet minimise the risk of toxicity. We review the evidence concerning the use of azathioprine for AD, and have identified 128 cases in eight open studies, including our own prospective trial. Improvement in the majority was noted in seven studies, although objective measures of disease activity were used in only one trial. Measurements of TPMT activity were performed in the two most recent studies only. These data underscore the requirement for a prospective randomised controlled trial, and highlight the need to further investigate the role of TPMT measurement in azathioprine usage.

Topical tacrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy of topical tacrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD).

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE (1966-October 2000), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-October 2000), and ScienceDirect (1994-October 2000) were performed using the key search terms tacrolimus, FK506, and atopic dermatitis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Since patients with AD have defects in cell-mediated immunity, the immunosuppressant properties of the macrolides (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) may prove to be beneficial in the treatment of AD. Topical tacrolimus has been frequently studied in the treatment of AD because it was found to have better skin penetration and higher potentency than topically applied cyclosporine. Studies evaluating the use of topical tacrolimus are presented and provide evidence that topical tacrolimus is effective in the treatment of AD with no evidence thus far of systemic adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a fair amount of documentation of the efficacy and safety of topical tacrolimus. Further trials are needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy and its efficacy and safety in children less than seven years of age.

Tacrolimus in dermatologic disorders

OBJECTIVE

To review the data surrounding the use of tacrolimus for skin disorders.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were obtained through a MEDLINE search of English-language literature (1990-May 2000); references of the retrieved publications were further reviewed for relevant literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Orginal studies in humans regarding the use of tacrolimus for skin disorders were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

The major outcomes extracted from the literature involved patient response to therapy and adverse effects.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Tacrolimus offers an additional therapeutic approach to the treatment of immunologically based skin disorders. led trials and case reports indicates topical tacrolimus is a safe and effective alternative treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis. Case reports document efficacy in recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum, mucosal lichen planus, and ichthyosis linearis trolled trials and case reports indicate oral tacrolimus is effective in recalcitrant plaque psoriasis. Case reports document efficacy in recalcitrant pyoderma gangrenosum and leukocytclastic vascultis. The clinical utility of oral tacrolimus in skin disorders is limited due to potentially severe adverse effects such as infections, hypertension, hyperglcemia hyperkalemia, nephrotoxicity neurotoxicity, and increased risk of neoplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the available data indicate short-term (3 wk to 3 mo) topical tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment alternative for inflammatory skin disorders. Further study is needed to evaluate long-term safety and efficacy and to determine the best dosage regimen. Although oral tacrolimus has demonstrated efficacy in inflammatory skin disorders, the potenial for serious adverse effects limits its utility to third-line therapy for patients who are resistant to, or intolerant of, conventional therapies.

Topical tacrolimus (FK506) leads to profound phenotypic and functional alterations of epidermal antigen-presenting dendritic cells in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease in which antigen-presenting epidermal dendritic cells (DCs), ie, Langerhans cells and the so-called inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells (IDECs) expressing the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcepsilonRI) may play a significant pathophysiologic role. Therapeutic efficacy of the immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506) in AD has been demonstrated in clinical trials, but little is known of its mode of action.

OBJECTIVE

The present study focused on the effects of topical tacrolimus treatment on epidermal CD1a+/FcepsilonRI+ DC populations in lesional AD.

METHODS

Immunohistological analysis, epidermal DC phenotyping, and functional studies were performed on skin biopsy specimens from treated and untreated lesional skin of 10 patients with AD participating in a clinical trial with tacrolimus.

RESULTS

Untreated lesional skin was characterized by a high proportion of CD1a+ cells, which was largely due to a high proportion of IDECs strongly expressing FcepsilonRI. Epidermal DCs isolated from untreated lesional skin exhibited high stimulatory activity toward autologous T cells, which was strongly reduced while clinical improvement was seen during application of tacrolimus. Concomitantly, a decreased FcepsilonRI expression was observed in both Langerhans cells and IDECs. Finally, topical tacrolimus led to a progressive decrease in the IDEC population within the pool of CD1a+ epidermal DCs and also to a decrease in their CD36 expression, which is indicative of lower local inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Epidermal CD1a+ DCs may represent a target for topical tacrolimus in the treatment of AD.

Human epidermal Langerhans' cells are targets for the immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506)

BACKGROUND

The immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506) has been shown to inhibit allergic contact dermatitis in animal models as well as in human beings. More recently, successful treatment of atopic dermatitis with an ointment containing tacrolimus has been reported.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the effects of this compound on epidermal Langerhans' cells (LCs), which are known to play an important pathophysiologic role in inflammatory skin diseases.

METHODS

The expression of the intracellular FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) was monitored on freshly isolated and cultured epidermal LCs. Phenotyping and functional exploration of LCs treated with different concentrations of tacrolimus and beta-methasone valerate (betaMv) were performed.

RESULTS

FKBP12 is expressed in freshly isolated LCs but is lost while they are maturating into mature dendritic cells. Tacrolimus inhibited the expression of IL-2R (CD25) and of the costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7.1) and CD40. Expression of MHC class I and II was also affected, whereas CD86 (B7.2) expression was not altered. In contrast, betaMv strongly increased the expression of CD25. Paradoxically, while decreasing CD40 and MHC class I expression, betaMv significantly increased the expression of MHC class II, CD80, and CD86 on cultured LCs but impaired their allostimulatory activity. Tacrolimus was about 100 times more potent than betaMv at inhibiting LC stimulatory function.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus can exert immunopharmacologic alterations on LCs, which may account, at least in part, for the therapeutic effect of this compound in eczematous skin diseases.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: part I, efficacy

A total of 632 adults with atopic dermatitis applied tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) or vehicle twice daily for up to 12 weeks in two randomized, double-blind studies. This report focuses on the efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in these studies. The mean percent body surface area (%BSA) affected at baseline was 45%, and 56% of patients had severe atopic dermatitis. Evaluations included a physician's global evaluation of clinical response, %BSA affected, individual signs of atopic dermatitis, the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, and the patient's assessment of pruritus. A 90% or greater improvement from baseline in disease status was observed for 6.6%, 27.5%, and 36.8% of patients in the vehicle, 0.03% tacrolimus ointment, and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment groups, respectively (P<.001), and 50% or better improvement was observed for 19.8%, 61.6%, and 72.7% of patients, respectively. Tacrolimus ointment-treated patients showed significantly greater improvement than vehicle-treated patients for all efficacy parameters evaluated, including the %BSA affected, the total score and individual scores for signs of atopic dermatitis, the patient's assessment of pruritus, and EASI score. The 0.1% concentration was more effective than the 0.03% concentration, particularly in patients with severe disease and/or extensive BSA involvement at baseline and in African Americans. Tacrolimus ointment is an effective therapy for the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis on all skin regions including the head and neck.

Cellular and immunologic mechanisms in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is frequently associated with respiratory allergies. Atopic dermatitis develops as a result of a complex interrelationship of environmental, immunologic, genetic, and pharmacologic factors. Efforts to understand the relative contributions of these factors have led to research seeking to identify the relevant effector cells and mediators involved in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. These factors include the pattern of local cytokine release, the differentiation of helper T cells, multiple roles of IgE, skin-directed cell responses, infectious agents, and superantigens. This article reviews these cellular and immunologic mechanisms underlying atopic dermatitis and discusses how an understanding of their role in the inflammatory process may lead to improved treatments for atopic dermatitis.

Cyclosporine and tacrolimus in dermatology

Immune modulators are being used with increasing frequency in dermatology. This article reviews two such agents, cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Discussion emphasizes the pharmacology, side effects, and uses of these two drugs in dermatologic disorders.

Nonclinical and early clinical development of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Tacrolimus ointment, formulated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, is the first in a class of topical immunomodulators. Its mechanism of action is based on calcineurin inhibition, which results in suppression of antigen-specific T-cell activation and inhibition of inflammatory cytokine release. Animal and human studies have shown that topically applied tacrolimus is minimally absorbed into the systemic circulation, the fraction that is absorbed is extensively distributed, and tacrolimus does not accumulate in tissues following repeated topical application. In addition, tacrolimus ointment is not inherently irritating, sensitizing, phototoxic, or photoallergenic when applied to intact skin. Unlike some topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment does not cause a decrease in collagen synthesis or skin thickness, nor does it produce skin abnormalities or depigmentation. In animal studies, repeated daily application of tacrolimus ointment up to 1 year is associated with dermal findings similar to those following vehicle application (mild to moderate dermal irritation and microscopic findings of acanthosis, hyperkeratosis, and superficial inflammation). In a 52-week study with Yucatan micropigs, no noteworthy macroscopic or microscopic changes (either dermal or systemic) related to the application of tacrolimus ointment (0.03% to 0.3% concentrations) were observed. Tacrolimus ointment was shown to be safe and effective in phase 2 and early phase 3 studies. Significant improvements in atopic dermatitis were observed in the majority of patients treated with tacrolimus ointment. The most common adverse events associated with its use were a transient burning sensation and pruritus at the site of application. Blood tacrolimus concentrations were below the limit of quantitation in most patients.

A 12-week study of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients

The safety and efficacy of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis were evaluated in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study of 351 children 2 to 15 years of age with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The mean age of patients was 6.1 years. A total of 61.5% of patients had severe atopic dermatitis at baseline. The mean percentage of body surface area affected was 47.7%, and 83.5% of patients were affected on the head and/or neck. Significantly more patients (P<.001) achieved clinical improvement of 90% or better with 0.03% or 0.1% tacrolimus ointment compared with vehicle. Significant improvements in the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis, percent body surface area affected, and the patient's assessment of pruritus were also observed early in treatment and were maintained throughout the study. Adverse events with a statistically significantly greater incidence in the 0.03% tacrolimus ointment treatment group compared with vehicle were limited to the sensation of skin burning, pruritus, varicella, and vesiculobullous rash ("blisters"). Varicella and vesiculobullous rash occurred at a low incidence (<5%). No adverse event occurred at a statistically higher incidence in the 0.1% tacrolimus ointment-treated group compared with vehicle. Tacrolimus ointment was equally safe for younger (2-6 years) and older (7-15 years) children. Both tacrolimus ointment concentrations (0.03% and 0.1%) were safe and significantly more effective than vehicle for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children.

Tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adult patients: part II, safety

In two randomized, double-blind, multicenter studies, a total of 631 adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis applied tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) or vehicle twice daily for up to 12 weeks. The mean percent body surface area (%BSA) affected at baseline was 45%, and 56% of patients had severe atopic dermatitis. As previously reported, these studies showed that tacrolimus ointment was superior to vehicle for all efficacy parameters measured. This report focuses on the safety of tacrolimus ointment in these studies. The most common adverse events were the sensation of skin burning, pruritus, flu-like symptoms, skin erythema, and headache. Skin burning and pruritus were more common among patients with severe or extensive disease; these events were usually brief and were resolved during the first few days of treatment. Common adverse events with a significantly higher incidence in one or both of the tacrolimus ointment groups than in the vehicle group included skin burning, flu-like symptoms, and headache. More patients in the vehicle group discontinued the study because of an adverse event than in either of the tacrolimus ointment groups. There were no notable or consistent changes in any laboratory variables. Tacrolimus was not detected in 80% of blood samples collected. Measurable concentrations of tacrolimus were transitory and were not associated with adverse events. Tacrolimus ointment is a safe therapy for the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis on the face, neck, or other body regions.

Long-term safety and efficacy of tacrolimus ointment for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children

Tacrolimus ointment is a nonsteroidal topical immunomodulator that was formulated specifically for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. A total of 255 children, 2 to 15 years of age, with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis applied 0.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily for up to 12 months to assess long-term safety and efficacy. Patients on average were treated with tacrolimus ointment for 279 days or 87% of study days. Substantial improvements in the signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis, percent body surface area affected, and the patient's or parent's assessment of pruritus were observed during the first week of treatment and were maintained throughout the study. Transient skin burning and itching were the most common drug application site adverse events. Occurrence of these symptoms decreased after the first few days of treatment. There was no increased incidence of infections or other significant adverse events. Effectiveness of tacrolimus was maintained with prolonged daily use. Tacrolimus ointment (0.1%) is safe and effective for long-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in children.

Allergen immunotherapy: novel approaches in the management of allergic diseases and asthma

Currently available pharmacotherapies for allergic diseases and asthma, which are serious public health problems, are aimed primarily at neutralizing effector molecules and inflammatory mediators such as histamine and leukotrienes or at inhibiting the function of inflammatory cells such as eosinophils and Th2 lymphocytes. While this approach is effective in controlling symptoms, these therapies have a limited capacity to alter the natural course of allergic diseases and asthma, and discontinuation of medications results in the redevelopment of symptoms on reexposure to the offending allergens. In contrast, immune-based allergen immunotherapies modify and correct the underlying pathological immune responses in allergy and asthma in an antigen-specific manner. These immunotherapies replicate the regulatory processes that occur in nonallergic individuals and allow patients to tolerate exposure to allergens. Current and future methodologies for immunotherapy involve immunization with allergen, modified allergen, peptides of allergen, cDNA of allergen, with adjuvants, including immunostimulatory DNA sequences, cytokines, and bacterial products such as Listeria monocytogenes. This form of therapy can provide a long-lasting cure for allergic diseases without the need for continuous therapeutic intervention and without causing generalized immunosuppression or immune augmentation.

Effect of allergist intervention on patient-centered and societal outcomes: allergists as leaders, innovators, and educators

Atopic disorders, which afflict millions of Americans and hundreds of millions worldwide, are at epidemic levels with concomitant increases in morbidity and mortality. Environmental and lifestyle changes over the past three to five decades are proposed causes for this pandemic and as such present major burdens to reverse. The scope of allergy practice bridges directly on this challenge. Allergy as a specialty is a major leader in developing effective strategies to confront this epidemic. Allergists have made major contributions to the understanding of the risk factors, immunology, pathophysiology, immunomodulation, and prevention of atopic and immunologic disorders. Allergist epidemiologists and clinicians have helped develop and implement national and international guidelines in the recognition, management, and prevention of asthma and rhinitis. Allergist clinical researchers are active in (1) outcomes research that demonstrates convincingly the value of allergy as a specialty in asthma, allergic rhinitis, anaphylaxis, drug and food allergy, and other atopic disorders, (2) National Institutes of Health clinical trials that will form the basis for the future treatment of asthma and allergic disease, and (3) pharmaceutical trials that evaluate new, effective, and safe medication to treat atopic disease. Allergist educators, comprising academic and practicing allergists, supported by allied health professionals, national associations, and affiliated lay organizations, provide comprehensive education to fellows, residents, colleague physicians, media, the public, and patients. Documentation of the value of allergists in improving patient-centered and societal outcomes in their core domain, allergy, is the appropriate final topic contribution in the important series "New millennium: The conquest of allergy."

New approaches to topical therapy

Despite the rapid and proven efficacy of topical corticosteroids, side-effects can limit their clinical usefulness. Topically active macrolide immunosuppressants such as ascomycin and tacrolimus appear to provide comparable therapeutic potency without significant local or adverse effects. Data from ongoing studies will be crucial in determining the safety of these agents in the long term, and also their place within the current therapeutic armamentarium available for patients with atopic dermatitis. Enzyme inhibitors of PLA(2) and PDE 4 currently in the very early stages of clinical development also show potential promise as additional alternative strategies to topical treatment and may perhaps act as steroid sparing agents. Having been in the therapeutic doldrums for years, topical management of atopic dermatitis is likely to show great changes in the very near future.

Topical therapies and medications in the pediatric patient

Topical medications and therapies are necessary for the proper management of skin diseases in children; however, physicians must be aware of the differences in percutaneous absorption and the risks for toxicity from topical medications, which are often unique to infants and children. Topical therapy must be individualized, and success often depends on proper vehicle selection, ease of application, and cost to patients and their families. Although many commercially available topical therapies are not FDA approved for use in children, recently enacted legislation has served to stimulate much-needed drug research in pediatric patients. New therapies on the horizon, such as tacrolimus, may prove to be equally efficacious and less toxic.

Atopic dermatitis: new insights and opportunities for therapeutic intervention

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that frequently predates the development of allergic rhinitis or asthma. It is an important skin condition with significant costs and morbidity to patients and their families; the disease affects more than 10% of children. Recent studies have demonstrated the complex interrelationship of genetic, environmental, skin barrier, pharmacologic, psychologic, and immunologic factors that contribute to the development and severity of AD. The current review will examine the cellular and molecular mechanisms that contribute to AD as well as the immunologic triggers involved in its pathogenesis. These insights provide new opportunities for therapeutic intervention in this common skin condition.

Topical tacrolimus in dermatology

Tacrolimus and cyclosporin A are potent immunosuppressants that are used systemically to treat several inflammatory skin conditions successfully. They differ in their structure and tacrolimus is 10-100 times more potent than cyclosporin A. They have similar side-effects. They have been used topically in various clinical studies. Topical cyclosporin A is largely ineffective whereas topical tacrolimus is effective in treating atopic dermatitis. Topical tacrolimus has not been studied sufficiently in treating psoriasis although it has been used successfully in allergic contact dermatitis, erosive mucosal lichen planus and pyoderma gangrenosum.

Applications of tacrolimus for the treatment of skin disorders

During the last decades, systemic and topical glucocorticosteroids assumed a dominant role in immunosuppressive therapy in dermatology. However, their administration is limited because of numerous adverse effects. Consequently, there is a large need for alternative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapeutics with a superior risk/benefit ratio. In recent years, a new class of anti-inflammatories, the macrolide lactones, has attracted special interest. During the last decade, a member of this class, tacrolimus, proved to be a powerful suppressor of the immune system. Introduced into clinical practice to prevent allograft rejection, it is now routinely used in organ transplantation. Recently, several placebo-controlled multicenter studies showed the therapeutic efficiency of systemic and topical tacrolimus in common inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis and atopic eczema.Short-term tacrolimus ointment therapy disclosed significant efficacy vs. placebo and a safety profile with only few local side effects in patients with atopic eczema. Further clinical trials including greater extent of exposure (experienced by children), and comparison between tacrolimus ointment and glucocorticosteroids are being conducted and the results will show whether this drug opens a new era in the treatment of inflammatory skin disorders. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the pharmacokinetic properties, adverse effects and therapeutic indications of tacrolimus in dermatology.

Treatment of severe atopic dermatitis by topical immune modulation using dinitrochlorobenzene

We present the results of a small uncontrolled pilot trial which suggest that contact sensitization to dinitrochlorobenzene and repeated weekly applications significantly improve the clinical status of severe atopic dermatitis in adults. Although no changes were noted in circulating levels of either lymphocyte subset populations or the serum cytokines assayed in this trial, our observations may be due to topical immune modulation by dinitrochlorobenzene. Larger controlled studies of dinitrochlorobenzene treatment in atopic dermatitis are warranted.

Novel immunomodulators for topical skin disease therapy

The use of topical corticosteroids has revolutionised the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. However, problems including pharmacological resistance, as well as the side effect profile of potent topical corticosteroids, has prompted studies to investigate into other topical non-corticosteroidal agents in inflammatory skin diseases. This review outlines the major types of inflammatory skin diseases and discusses emerging therapies based on topical immunosuppressive macrolide antibiotics. In particular, tacrolimus and ascomycin derivatives have been shown to be effective for treating atopic dermatitis with a surprising lack of side effects. It is expected that these agents will play an important role in future dermatological therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests the importance of lipid-derived mediators of inflammation (eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor) in cutaneous inflammatory diseases. The role of these mediators in skin inflammation is also addressed in this review. Though there appears to be a large amount of redundancy in the activities of these lipid mediators, this family of agents could potentially serve as targets for anti-inflammatory therapy. Inasmuch as the phospholipase A(2) family of enzymes serve to synthesise both eicosanoids and platelet-activating factor, inhibition at this step could have important therapeutic benefits in designing therapy for inflammatory skin diseases.

Managing pediatric atopic dermatitis

Although atopic dermatitis is a very common inflammatory skin condition in children and results in many pediatric healthcare visits, its exact cause is unknown. No single laboratory test can reliably diagnose atopic dermatitis, but a relatively simple set of diagnostic criteria was recently validated for use by practicing physicians. Because existing remedies for atopic dermatitis do not cure the disorder, a program of disease control and management should be pursued. Patients and their caregivers should be advised that current therapies are primarily preventive and palliative. However, a comprehensive plan that includes routine general skin care, medical management of symptoms, identification and avoidance of aggravating factors (including psychological factors), and attention to quality-of-life issues can reduce the occurrence of skin flares. Successful treatment of acute flare-ups can be achieved with appropriate use of topical corticosteroids, but occasionally children afflicted with severe atopic dermatitis require more intensive therapies (e.g., ultraviolet light exposure systemic corticosteroids, and cyclosporine) that need close physician monitoring. Physicians must remain mindful of the psychological and quality-of-life burdens imposed on children with atopic dermatitis and their families and tailor treatments to the needs of each individual patient.

Old, new, and emerging therapies for atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is the most common skin condition in children under the age of 11 years. The chronic, cyclical, pruritic course of AD exacts a huge financial and emotional toll on its sufferers. Confusion about appropriate skin care and the role of allergic factors further complicates management. Although diligent moisturization and judicious use of topical steroids remain the therapeutic standard, new, effective local and systemic agents are now available, and several promising nonsteroidal products may be available soon.

Atopic diseases and upper respiratory infections

This article reviews information on the topics of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, and upper respiratory infections. The asthma section includes a review of inhaled steroids and their potential side effects. New findings on the pathogenesis, triggers, and therapies of atopic dermatitis and new insights into food hypersensitivity reactions are presented. Recent publications in the areas of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and upper respiratory infections are also reviewed.

Biochemical and immunologic mechanisms in atopic dermatitis: new targets for emerging therapies

The immunologic and pharmacophysiologic features of atopic dermatitis have stimulated research seeking to identify relevant effector cells and mediators that characterize chronic skin inflammation. The theory that unifies the various abnormalities associated with atopic dermatitis suggests that hematopoietic cells carrying abnormal genetic expressions of atopy cause clinical disease once they infiltrate the skin and mucosa. The proposed underlying mechanism may be either abnormalities in cyclic nucleotide regulation of marrow-derived cells or allergenic overstimulation that causes secondary abnormalities. The primacy of one mechanism over the other remains unresolved, but this does not obviate their value in identifying two novel therapeutic targets: phosphodiesterase inhibition and immune-intervention alternatives to corticosteroids. New type IV phosphodiesterase inhibitors are proving promising in topical formulations, as are inhibitors of calcineurin, such as FK506 and SDZ ASM 981, an ascomycin macrolactam derivative that in early clinical research appears to offer the potency of a corticosteroid without its adverse side effects. The promising clinical trial profiles of these new topical agents may result in alternative therapies providing potent anti-inflammatory activity without the adverse effects that limit corticosteroid use.