Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma

A case of cutaneous melanoma metastatic to the ciliary body and choroid with complete regression via systemic dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous melanoma is the leading cause of death from cutaneous malignancy and tends to metastasize lymphatically and hematogenously to the lung, liver, brain, and bone; it is a rare source of metastatic disease to the eye. Herein we provide a case report of cutaneous melanoma metastatic to the ciliary body and choroid involving clinical examination, slit lamp photography, and B-scan ultrasonography.

RESULT

A 55-year-old female with known metastatic cutaneous melanoma presented with pain, a large ciliochoroidal mass, visual decline, and diffuse intraocular inflammation. The examination and testing were consistent with intraocular metastasis from her primary cutaneous melanoma. Given the extent of intraocular disease, the patient elected for enucleation of the involved eye. The patient's intraocular disease demonstrated significant regression on combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab and surgery was subsequently deferred. The metastatic ciliochoroidal lesion ultimately regressed completely with systemic dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab immunotherapy may be effective in the treatment of aggressive intraocular metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Myocarditis in Patients Starting Combination Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Analysis of a Commercial Claims Database

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the clinical outcomes of several cancers but have also been associated with a greater risk of immune-related adverse effects, especially when combined. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of myocarditis in relation to the use of dual concurrent versus single immune checkpoint inhibitors therapies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cohort study was conducted using medical and pharmacy claims data (2011-2022) from a large US commercial insurer. Cox regression quantified the comparative risks of myocarditis or heart failure in patients with cancer receiving treatment with combination therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab) in comparison to taking a single immune checkpoint inhibitor only. Mean follow-up time in 53 018 patients was 226 days (interquartile range, 93-495 days). There were 148 cases of myocarditis (0.3%), 33 (0.7%) in patients on combination therapy, and 115 (0.2%) in patients on monotherapy. The risk of myocarditis per 1000 patients was 7.40 in the combination therapy group and 2.37 in the monotherapy group (risk ratio, 3.12 [95% CI, 2.12-4.60]). Using multivariable regression analysis, the hazard ratio for myocarditis in the combination therapy group was 2.38 (1.57-3.63). No difference in the risk of heart failure was found between combination and single therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of myocarditis compared with monotherapy, with most cases occurring in the first 6 months of therapy.

Oncolytic Viruses and Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma and Retinoblastoma: The Current Landscape and Novel Advances

Intraocular malignant tumors are rare; however, they can cause serious life-threatening complications. Uveal melanoma (UM) and retinoblastoma (RB) are the most common intraocular tumors in adults and children, respectively, and come with a great disease burden. For many years, several different treatment modalities for UM and RB have been proposed, with chemotherapy for RB cases and plaque radiation therapy for localized UM as first-line treatment options. Extraocular extension, recurrence, and metastasis constitute the major challenges of conventional treatments. To overcome these obstacles, immunotherapy, which encompasses different treatment options such as oncolytic viruses, antibody-mediated immune modulations, and targeted immunotherapy, has shown great potential as a novel therapeutic tool for cancer therapy. These anti-cancer treatment options provide numerous advantages such as selective cancer cell death and the promotion of an anti-tumor immune response, and they prove useful in preventing vision impairment due to macular and/or optic disc involvement. Numerous factors such as the vector choice, route of administration, dosing, and patient characteristics must be considered when engineering an oncolytic virus or other forms of immunotherapy vectors. This manuscript provides an in-depth review of the molecular design of oncolytic viruses (e.g., virus capsid proteins and encapsulation technologies, vectors for delivery, cell targeting) and immunotherapy. The most recent advances in preclinical- and clinical-phase studies are further summarized. The recent developments in virus-like drug conjugates (i.e., AU011), oncolytic viruses for metastatic UM, and targeted immunotherapies have shown great results in clinical trials for the future clinical application of these novel technologies in the treatment algorithm of certain intraocular tumors.

Final, 10-Year Outcomes with Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Previous results from this trial showed longer overall survival after treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab monotherapy than with ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. Given that patients with advanced melanoma are living longer than 7.5 years, longer-term data were needed to address new clinically relevant questions.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to one of the following regimens: nivolumab (1 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks; nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks plus placebo; or ipilimumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo. Treatment was continued until the occurrence of disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. Randomization was stratified according to BRAF mutation status, metastasis stage, and programmed death ligand 1 expression. Here, we report the final, 10-year results of this trial, including results for overall survival and melanoma-specific survival, as well as durability of response.

RESULTS

With a minimum follow-up of 10 years, median overall survival was 71.9 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 36.9 months with nivolumab, and 19.9 months with ipilimumab. The hazard ratio for death was 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.65) for nivolumab plus ipilimumab as compared with ipilimumab and was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76) for nivolumab as compared with ipilimumab. Median melanoma-specific survival was more than 120 months with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (not reached, with 37% of the patients alive at the end of the trial), 49.4 months with nivolumab, and 21.9 months with ipilimumab. Among patients who had been alive and progression-free at 3 years, 10-year melanoma-specific survival was 96% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 97% with nivolumab, and 88% with ipilimumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The final trial results showed a continued, ongoing survival benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and with nivolumab monotherapy, as compared with ipilimumab monotherapy, in patients with advanced melanoma. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 067 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01844505.).

Cancer immunotherapy in elderly patients: The concept of immune senescence challenged by clinical experience

Cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, has led to major improvements in the treatment of a wide range of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. However, age-mediated immune system modifications, known as immunosenescence, may preclude its efficacy in elderly patients. In this review, we assessed the efficacy of these different cancer immunotherapies in elderly patients compared to young patients to revisit the concept of immunosenescence from a therapeutic perspective.

Combined treatment of small cell lung cancer using radiotherapy and immunotherapy: Challenges and updates

Currently, chemotherapy remains the standard first- and second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Research concerning immunotherapy has brought about a remarkable development in the treatment pattern of SCLC. Atirizumab, duvalizumab, atezolizumab, and serplulimab can significantly improve the clinical outcomes of SCLC. Given the rapidly evolving concept that combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy can increase therapeutic effectiveness, clinicians are devoted to further improving local tumor control by integrating immunotherapy with radiotherapy. This paper reviews the research progress in this field to date and explores ways to further enhance the efficacy of this combination therapy. We first discussed that immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy can improve the abscopal effect, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates of SCLC patients. Then, the biomarkers related to the radiation immune microenvironment, such as programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and the immune function of patients were discussed. Next, we explored the occurrence and underlying mechanisms of immune resistance during radiotherapy implementation. Finally, we clarified that the emerging trend of low-dose radiotherapy help overcome the inhibitory signals that limit T-cell infiltration in the tumor matrix. In summary, considering the rapid development of this field, these combined therapy strategies may have unlimited potential to further improve the efficacy of radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy for patients.

Durvalumab and tremelimumab in patients with advanced rare cancer: a multi-centre, non-blinded, open-label phase II basket trial

Background

Dual inhibition of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been shown to be an effective treatment strategy in many cancers. We sought to determine the objective response rate of combination durvalumab (D) plus tremelimumab (TM) in parallel cohorts of patients with carefully selected rare cancer types in which these agents had not previously been evaluated in phase II trials and for which there was clinical or biological rationale for dual immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy to be active.

Methods

We designed a multi-centre, non-blinded, open-label phase II basket trial with each of the following 8 rare cancers considered a separate phase II trial: salivary carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) with tumour infiltrating lymphocytes and/or expressing PD-L1, mucosal melanoma, acral melanoma, osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCCO) or squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA). The primary objective was to evaluate the response rate of the combination of D and TM, and the secondary objectives were to evaluate the tolerability and safety of D and TM combination. Eligible patients had advanced, metastatic or recurrent, or unresectable cancer with no known life-prolonging treatment option, age ≥16 years, ECOG performance status 0 or 1. Patients received D (1500 mg IV) + TM (75 mg IV) on Day 1 q4 weeks for 4 cycles followed by D q4 weeks until disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02879162.

Findings

From December 14th, 2016, to August 14, 2019, 140 patients enrolled into seven cohorts. The rare melanoma cohorts were closed due to lack of accrual. Of the 140 patients enrolled, 138 were eligible, 138 were evaluable for toxicity and 128 (91%) were evaluable for response. Durable responses were noted in all cohorts except for osteosarcoma. The overall response rate for eligible patients was 16% (95% CI: 10-23%). The response rates in each cancer cohort were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma 15% (n = 3/20; 95% CI 3-38%), salivary carcinoma 20% (n = 4/20; 95% CI: 6-44%), CUP 17% (n = 3/18; 95% CI 4-41%), SCCA 10% (n = 2/20; 95% CI 12-32%) and CCCO 21% (n = 8/39; 95% CI 9-37%). Grade 3/4 adverse events were rare, where 4 patients experienced grade 4 related events and39 patients experienced grade 3 events.

Interpretation

Durvalumab + tremelimumab treatment resulted in meaningful responses in salivary carcinoma and CCCO and deserves further exploration in front-line studies.

Funding

AstraZeneca and Canadian Cancer Society.

Current Perspectives of Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common tumor and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It ranks fourth in the spectrum of malignant tumor incidence and second in the order of death from major malignant tumors in China. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a complex ecosystem containing non-tumor cells (mainly immune-related cells), and its immunotherapy can stimulate the recognition of specific tumor antigens, inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, and produce over-memory lymphocytes, which can prevent recurrence. So, immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasingly becoming a research hotspot in liver cancer treatment. With the intensive research in recent years, great progress has been made in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, pericyte therapy, vaccination, and antiviral therapy. In addition, the study found that the therapeutic effect of combination therapy was enhanced compared to monotherapy. This review summarizes the most prominent immunotherapies currently available for the clinical treatment of patients with HCC and the main opportunities and challenges facing HCC research.

Amelanotic melanoma: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management

Amelanotic melanoma (AM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma with little or no pigment on visual or histopathologic examination and accounts for approximately 2% of melanoma cases. This uncommon variant is often misdiagnosed or diagnosed in late stages due to its variable clinical presentation and lack of established criteria for clinical diagnosis. AM often presents nonspecifically as a pink to red macule, papule, or dermal nodule; therefore, dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy are extremely helpful tools in the diagnosis of AM. Histopathologically, there is an attenuation or complete absence of melanin granules, and immunohistochemistry for melanocytic markers, such as S100, Melan-A, and HMB-45, may be necessary for accurate diagnosis. Like other types of melanomas, the Breslow depth, presence or absence of ulceration, and mitotic rate are necessary for diagnosis, staging, and management. The standard of treatment for AM includes surgical excision with margins based on staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy, if indicated. We present the clinical and histopathologic features, special techniques, differential diagnosis, and current management of AM.

Overcoming Resistance Mechanisms to Melanoma Immunotherapy

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized treatment of advanced melanoma. While most patients derive survival benefit from established immunotherapies, notably monoclonal antibodies blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, a subset does not optimally respond due to the manifestation of innate or acquired resistance to these therapies. Combination regimens have proven efficacious relative to single-agent blockade, but also yield high-grade treatment toxicities that are often dose-limiting for patients. In this review, we discuss the significant strides made in the past half-decade toward expanding the melanoma immunotherapy treatment paradigm. These include newly approved therapies, adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, and studies in the clinical trials pipeline targeting alternative immune checkpoints and key immunoregulatory molecules. We then review how developments in molecular and functional diagnostics have furthered our understanding of the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms driving immunotherapy resistance, as well as highlight novel biomarkers for predicting treatment response. Throughout, we discuss potential approaches for targeting these resistance mechanisms in rational combination with established immunotherapies to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Disparities in utilization of novel cancer therapies in advanced stage III and IV melanoma and variance in outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Significant gains in advanced melanoma have been made through immunotherapy trials. Factors influencing equitable access and survival impact of these novel therapies are not well-defined.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis using National Cancer Database of patients with advanced stage III and IV melanoma from 2004 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the use of immunotherapy and Cox proportional hazard regression to evaluate overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

47,427 patients with increasing utilization of immunotherapy from 13.78% in 2004 to 65.88% by 2021. Inequitable adoption were impacted by age, sex, socioeconomic status/affordability, insurance types and residential educational/income level. Receiving immunotherapy was associated with a 44% improvement in OS (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.54-0.57) and receiving a clinical trial-based therapy was associated with a 37% improvement (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.53-0.75). Among patients who received immunotherapy or clinical trial-base therapy, there was 40% worse survival in non-Hispanic Black patients (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.16-1.69) compared to non-Hispanic Whites.

CONCLUSION

There are disparities in utilization of immunotherapy that is influenced by socioeconomic status. Race and ethnicity had a significant influence in differential impact on survival outcomes of immunotherapies highlighting the importance of increasing underrepresented population participation in trials that lead to novel therapies.

Long-term outcomes among patients who respond within the first year to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy: A pooled analysis in 935 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the predictive value of RECIST response within 3, 6, or 12 months on long-term survival, and explore differences between nivolumab+ipilimumab and nivolumab monotherapy, we analyzed pooled 5-year data of 935 responder and non-responder patients at various time points after treatment initiation in CheckMate 069, 066, and 067 studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naive advanced melanoma patients received nivolumab+ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy. To decrease immortal time bias, 3-, 6-, or 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) landmark analyses were performed. Association between characteristics and response was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Response rates at any time were 58 % (239/409) for nivolumab+ipilimumab and 44 % (230/526) for nivolumab monotherapy. In 12-month landmark analyses, 5-year OS rates for responders versus non-responders were 82 % versus 40 % with nivolumab+ipilimumab (HR=0.23 [95 % CI, 0.15-0.35]) and 76 % versus 32 % with nivolumab monotherapy (HR=0.22 [95 % CI, 0.16-0.31]). PFS rates were 83 % versus 32 % and 69 % versus 46 %, respectively. Similar strong associations between response at 3 and 6 months and 5-year OS and PFS were also observed with more than 70 % of the responses observed in the first 3 months. Response rates correlated with baseline LDH and PD-L1 status by multivariate analysis but the association between response and long-term survival was maintained in landmark analyses even among patients with high LDH and low PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

Clinical response evaluated in the first months of therapy is a strong predictor of long-term survival, even in patients with poor prognostic biomarkers.

Neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio and risk of disease progression in patients with nivolumab‑treated unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

Studies have associated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric cancer (GC). The present study aimed to examine the relationship between dynamic changes in NLR during treatment and disease progression in patients with unresectable or recurrent GC treated with nivolumab monotherapy as a third-line or later regimen. Patients treated with nivolumab as a third-line or later therapy for unresectable or recurrent GC at Gifu University Hospital (Gifu, Japan) from April 2017 to December 2021 were included. Pretreatment data and those obtained every 2 weeks after the treatment commenced were evaluated. The association between all NLR values and disease progression for each patient was evaluated using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model and restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves. The study included 44 patients (23 men and 21 women). The response and disease control rates were 6.8 and 27.3%, respectively. The median PFS and OS of all patients were 1.84 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-2.14] and 5.93 months (95% CI, 3.75-10.75), respectively. The risk for progressive disease (PD) increased with higher NLR (hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.3-3.87). The RCS curves also indicated that the higher the NLR, the higher the risk for PD, especially if the NLR value was <3.0. NLR during treatment could predict the risk of PD, suggesting that NLR could be integrated with tumor markers, computed tomographic images and other modalities to enable treatment selection without delay.

Efficient Predictor for Immunotherapy Efficacy: Detecting Pan-Clones Effector Tumor Antigen-Specific T Cells in Blood by Nanoparticles Loading Whole Tumor Antigens

Cancer involves tumor cells and tumor-specific immunity. The ability to accurately quantify tumor-specific immunity is limited. Most immunotherapies function by activating new effector tumor antigen-specific T cells (ETASTs) or reactivating the pre-existing ETASTs repertoire. Therefore, the amount of ETASTs can be used to characterize immunotherapy efficacy. Tumor antigens are highly heterogeneous and detecting most ETASTs is challenging. Therefore, nanoparticles loading whole-cell tumor antigens are used to activate and detect pan-clones ETASTs in the blood. The differences between ETASTs and other T cells are transformed into activated and non-activated states. By measuring markers of the activated status and cytotoxic function of ETASTs, it can distinguish ETASTs from other T cells. ETASTs in patients with lung cancer are higher than those in healthy individuals and those with benign pulmonary nodules. Therapeutic efficacy positively correlated with the number of ETASTs in the blood. ETATS levels increase only in the blood of patients who respond to immunotherapy. Single-cell sequencing studies validated these findings. This study provides a highly accurate, specific, non-invasive, and efficient biomarker for predicting immunotherapy efficacy in lung and other cancers. This method can also be applied to evaluate the efficacy of other treatments, such as radiotherapy, oncolytic viruses, and nanomedicine-based therapies.

Filamentous phages as tumour-targeting immunotherapeutic bionanofibres

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockers have advanced immunotherapy, but their lack of tumour homing capability represents a substantial challenge. Here we show that genetically engineered filamentous phages can be used as tumour-targeting immunotherapeutic agents that reduce the side effects caused by untargeted delivery of PD-L1 blockers. Specifically, we improved biopanning to discover a peptide binding the extracellular domain of PD-L1 and another targeting both melanoma tissues and cancer cells. The two peptides were genetically fused to the sidewall protein and tip protein of fd phages, respectively. The intravenously injected phages homed to tumours and bound PD-L1 on cancer cells, effectively blocking PD-1/PD-L1 recognition to trigger targeted immunotherapy without body weight loss, organ abnormalities and haematological aberrations. The phages, cost-effectively replicated by bacteria, are cancer-targeting immunotherapeutic nanofibres that can be flexibly designed to target different cancer types and immune checkpoints.

Predictors of survival in immunotherapy-based treatments in advanced melanoma: a meta-analysis

The introduction of immunotherapy-based strategies has significantly improved the prognosis for melanoma patients. Nevertheless, some patients still have dismal outcomes, emphasizing the significance of survival predictive indicators in immunotherapy-based approaches. We systematically searched randomized controlled clinical trials investigating dual immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy versus placebo or mono-immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone in advanced melanoma patients. R version 4.3.0. was employed to perform all analyses. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a total of 13,809 patients with advanced melanoma from 19 randomized clinical trials. Immunotherapy-based strategies (alone or in combination) could significantly lengthen the overall survival(OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with corresponding controls. Mono-immunotherapy improved RFS and OS in PD-L1 positive patients, in stage AJCC IIIC, and with 4 or more positive lymph nodes, compared with chemotherapy. Combined immunotherapy statistically improved RFS and OS in those aged < 65, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0, and LDH ≤ ULN at baseline compared with single treatment alone. Our findings indicated that certain clinicopathological and molecular features could assist in choosing appropriate melanoma patients for immune-based treatments.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic mucosal melanoma: 3-year survival update and multi-omics analysis

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has shown promising efficacy in advanced mucosal melanoma in the multi-centre phase II study. This report updates 3-year survival outcomes and multi-omics analysis to identify potential response biomarkers.

METHODS

Forty-three intention-to-treat (ITT) patients received intravenous administration of atezolizumab and bevacizumab every 3 weeks. Available samples underwent whole exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing and targeted bisulphite sequencing to assess correlations with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 40.3 months, the median overall survival (mOS) was 23.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1-34), and the 3-year OS rate was 28.7% (95% CI, 17.6%-46.8%). Patients with upper site melanoma exhibited longer progression-free survival (PFS), higher tumour neoantigen burden (TNB) and greater copy number variations (CNVs) burden compared to those with lower site melanoma. NRAS mutations were associated with enhanced angiogenesis, with five of six patients achieving partial response. Inflammatory cell infiltration, angiogenic status and activation of the SMAD2 and p38 MAPK pathways may be prognostic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

This 3-year updated analysis confirms the sustained efficacy of atezolizumab in combination of bevacizumab in patients with advanced mucosal melanoma. Inflammatory cell infiltration and angiogenic status were associated with therapeutic response. Furthermore, mucosal melanoma of upper site and NRAS mutation appear to be good predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor and anti-angiogenic combination treatment. Targeting SMAD2 and p38 MAPK pathways may further improve the outcome of mucosal melanoma.

KEY POINTS

3-year follow-up study confirmed the therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab Tumors in the upper site and NRAS mutations are more sensitive to treatment Inflammatory cell infiltration, angiogenic status, and activation of the SMAD2 and p38 MAPK pathways may be prognostic indicators.

Mapping the intellectual structure and landscape of colorectal cancer immunotherapy: A bibliometric analysis

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy, stands as an innovative therapeutic approach currently garnering substantial attention in cancer treatment. It has become a focal point of numerous studies, showcasing significant potential in treating malignancies, including lung cancer and melanoma. The objective of this research is to analyze publications regarding immunotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC), investigating their attributes and identifying the current areas of interest and cutting-edge advancements. We took into account the publications from 2002 to 2022 included in the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were conducted using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, R-bibliometrix, and Microsoft Excel. The quantity of publications associated with this domain has been steadily rising over the years, encompassing 3753 articles and 1498 reviews originating from 573 countries and regions, involving 19,166 institutions, 1011 journals, and 32,301 authors. In this field, China, the United States, and Italy are the main countries that come forward for publishing. The journal with the greatest impact factor is CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. Romain Cohen leads in the number of publications, while Le Dt stands out as the most influential author. The immune microenvironment and immune infiltration are emerging as key hotspots and future research directions in this domain. This research carries out an extensive bibliometric examination of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer, aiding researchers in understanding current focal points, investigating possible avenues for research, and recognizing forthcoming development trends.

A landscape of checkpoint blockade resistance in cancer: underlying mechanisms and current strategies to overcome resistance

The discovery of immune checkpoints and the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have achieved a durable response in advanced-stage cancer patients. However, there is still a high proportion of patients who do not benefit from ICI therapy due to a lack of response when first treated (primary resistance) or detection of disease progression months after objective response is observed (acquired resistance). Here, we review the current FDA-approved ICI for the treatment of certain solid malignancies, evaluate the contrasting responses to checkpoint blockade in different cancer types, explore the known mechanisms associated with checkpoint blockade resistance (CBR), and assess current strategies in the field that seek to overcome these mechanisms. In order to improve current therapies and develop new ones, the immunotherapy field still has an unmet need in identifying other molecules that act as immune checkpoints, and uncovering other mechanisms that promote CBR.

Hepatotoxicity in Cancer Immunotherapy: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Perspectives

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has positively impacted oncological treatments. Despite its effectiveness, immunotherapy is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, including the liver. Hepatotoxicity primarily manifests as immune-related hepatitis and, less frequently, cholangitis. Several risk factors, such as pre-existing autoimmune and liver diseases, the type of immunotherapy, and combination regimens, play a role in immune-related hepatotoxicity (irH), although reliable predictive markers or models are still lacking. The severity of irH ranges from mild to severe cases, up to, in rare instances, acute liver failure. Management strategies require regular monitoring for early diagnosis and interventions, encompassing strict monitoring for mild cases to the permanent suspension of immunotherapy for severe forms. Corticosteroids are the backbone of treatment in moderate and high-grade damage, alone or in combination with additional immunosuppressive drugs for resistant or refractory cases. Given the relatively low number of events and the lack of dedicated prospective studies, much uncertainty remains about the optimal management of irH, especially in the most severe cases. This review presents the main features of irH, focusing on injury patterns and mechanisms, and provides an overview of the management landscape, from standard care to the latest evidence.

Current trends in sensitizing immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

Insight of immune checkpoint inhibitor related myocarditis

As the understanding of immune-related mechanisms in the development and progression of cancer advances, immunotherapies, notably Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs), have become integral in comprehensive cancer treatment strategies. ICIs reactivate T-cell cytotoxicity against tumors by blocking immune suppressive signals on T cells, such as Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Antigen-4 (CTLA-4). Despite their beneficial effects, ICIs are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), manifesting as autoimmune side effects across various organ systems. A particularly alarming irAE is life-threatening myocarditis. This rare but severe side effect of ICIs leads to significant long-term cardiac complications, including arrhythmias and heart failure, and has been observed to have a mortality rate of up to 50% in affected patients. This greatly limits the clinical application of ICI-based immunotherapy. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the current knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of ICI-related myocarditis. We also discuss the utility of preclinical mouse models in understanding and addressing this critical challenge.

A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immunology-based therapies are emerging as an effective cancer treatment, using the body's immune system to target tumors. Immune checkpoints, which regulate immune responses to prevent tissue damage and autoimmunity, are often exploited by cancer cells to avoid destruction. The discovery of checkpoint proteins like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 was pivotal in developing cancer immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great success, with FDA-approved drugs like PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), PD-L1 inhibitors (Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab), alongside LAG-3 inhibitor Relatlimab. Research continues on new checkpoints like TIM-3, VISTA, B7-H3, BTLA, and TIGIT. Biomarkers like PDL-1 expression, tumor mutation burden, interferon-γ presence, microbiome composition, and extracellular matrix characteristics play a crucial role in predicting responses to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Despite their effectiveness, not all patients experience the same level of benefit, and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as rash or itching, colitis, diarrhea, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism may occur. Given the rapid advancements in this field and the variability in patient outcomes, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive review that consolidates the latest findings on immune checkpoint inhibitors, covering their clinical status, biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, strategies to overcome resistance, and associated adverse effects. This review aims to fill this gap by providing an analysis of the current clinical status of ICIs, emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of resistance, strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy, and assessment of adverse effects. This review is crucial to furthering our understanding of ICIs and optimizing their application in cancer therapy.

Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors in Melanoma

Malignant melanoma is one of the most important dermatological neoplasms. The high mortality rate associated with this skin disease is primarily due to the occurrence of metastases, while the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in its early stages has a favorable prognosis. Early detection is crucial because the success of treatment is directly related to the depth of cancerous growth. The family of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) plays a critical role in the initiation and progression of melanoma. Prominent MMPs, including MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-13, and MMP-14, have been shown to significantly contribute to the development of melanoma. The tumor microenvironment, particularly the extracellular matrix (ECM), has emerged as a critical factor in modulating cancer progression. This review focuses on the role of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in ECM degradation and the subsequent progression of melanoma, as well as their potential as therapeutic targets.

Clinical characteristics of patients requiring emergency hospitalization due to immune-related adverse events: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, offering hope for various malignancies by enhancing the immune response against tumors. However, ICIs are associated with unique immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which differ significantly from conventional chemotherapy-induced toxicities. These irAEs, which affect more than 70% of patients and often escalate to severe grades, present substantial clinical management challenges and frequently necessitate emergency hospitalization. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients requiring emergency hospitalization due to irAEs during ICI therapy to enhance understanding and improve management strategies.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients who received ICIs at Iwate Medical University Hospital between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, and required emergency hospitalization due to irAEs. Clinical data were extracted from the medical records, including patient demographics, presenting complaints, time from ICI initiation to hospitalization, irAE diagnoses, and treatment outcomes. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the associations between the chief complaints and irAE diagnoses.

RESULTS

Of 1009 ICI-treated patients, 96 required emergency hospitalization for irAEs. The cohort's mean age was 73 years, with 75.0% of patients being male. Among patients who required emergency hospitalization, a high proportion were undergoing treatment for lung cancer (41.7%). The median hospitalization duration was 87 days. The chief complaints included dyspnea (34.4%) and fatigue (34.4%), with gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders being the most frequent irAEs (35.4%). Significant correlations were observed between dyspnea and respiratory diseases (Rs = 0.66), skin diseases and disorders (Rs = 0.81), pain and musculoskeletal disorders (Rs = 0.59), and diarrhea and gastrointestinal disorders (Rs = 0.49). Corticosteroids were administered to 64.6% of the patients. Despite emergency interventions, 8.3% of patients succumbed to irAEs, while 33.3% resumed ICI therapy after hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency hospitalization due to irAEs is a considerable concern in ICI therapy, occurring in 9.5% of treated patients. The high incidence of severe irAEs within the first 3 months of treatment underscores the need for early and vigilant monitoring. This study highlights the importance of recognizing and promptly managing irAEs to improve patient outcomes. Future strategies should focus on developing comprehensive management frameworks and enhancing patient and caregiver education to recognize symptoms that warrant immediate medical attention.

From trials to practice: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma patients in Norway

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Norway has one of the highest rates of cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence and mortality globally. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for CM was introduced between 2014 and 2017 to improve treatment and patient prognosis, but knowledge about its clinical usage is limited. This study investigates patient's characteristics and treatment patterns in real-world practice compared to clinical trial results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All adult (≥18) CM patients treated with ICI therapy in Norway from 2014 to 2021 were included, utilizing high-coverage data from multiple national registries to describe patients' health, socioeconomic factors, and treatment management, stratified by first ICI therapy. We compared patient and tumour characteristics with findings from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Among 2,083 patients receiving ICI therapy, 975 (47%) received nivolumab as their first treatment in the metastatic setting. Patients on combination therapy were younger and had higher education and income levels compared to those on monotherapy. Overall, real-world patients were older and had a higher incidence of brain metastases than those in RCTs. Approximately, 1 in 5 patients would have been excluded from RCTs due to pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Targeted therapy was the most common secondary systemic treatment after first-line PD-1 inhibitors.

INTERPRETATION

This study details ICI therapy in Norway, highlighting differences between real-world ICI users and clinical trial participants, raising questions about the effectiveness of this treatment for patients not eligible for trials.

Specific SOX10 enhancer elements modulate phenotype plasticity and drug resistance in melanoma

Recent studies indicate that the development of drug resistance and increased invasiveness in melanoma is largely driven by transcriptional plasticity rather than canonical coding mutations. Understanding the mechanisms behind cell identity shifts in oncogenic transformation and cancer progression is crucial for advancing our understanding of melanoma and other aggressive cancers. While distinct melanoma phenotypic states have been well characterized, the processes and transcriptional controls that enable cells to shift between these states remain largely unknown. In this study, we initially leverage the well-established zebrafish melanoma model as a high-throughput system to dissect and analyze transcriptional control elements that are hijacked by melanoma. We identify key characteristics of these elements, making them translatable to human enhancer identification despite the lack of direct sequence conservation. Building on our identification of a zebrafish sox10 enhancer necessary for melanoma initiation, we extend these findings to human melanoma, identifying two human upstream enhancer elements that are critical for full SOX10 expression. Stable biallelic deletion of these enhancers using CRISPR-Cas9 induces a distinct phenotype shift across multiple human melanoma cell lines from a melanocytic phenotype towards an undifferentiated phenotype and is also characterized by an increase in drug resistance that mirrors clinical data including an upregulation of NTRK1, a tyrosine kinase, and potential therapeutic target. These results provide new insights into the transcriptional regulation of SOX10 in human melanoma and underscore the role of individual enhancer elements and potentially NTRK1 in driving melanoma phenotype plasticity and drug resistance. Our work lays the groundwork for future gene-based and combination kinase-inhibitor therapies targeting SOX10 regulation and NTRK1 as a potential avenue for enhancing the efficacy of current melanoma treatments.

Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells and HLA Expression as Potential Biomarkers Predicting Response to PD-1 Inhibitor Therapy in Stage IV Melanoma Patients

PD-1 inhibitors are known to be effective in melanoma; however, a considerable proportion of patients fail to respond to therapy, necessitating the identification of predictive markers. We examined the predictive value of tumor cell HLA class I and II expression and immune cell infiltration in melanoma patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pretreatment surgical samples from 40 stage IV melanoma patients were studied immunohistochemically for melanoma cell expression of HLA class I molecules (using four antibody clones with different specificities), HLA-II, and immune cell infiltration (using a panel of 10 markers). Among the responders, the ratio of patients showing melanoma cell HLA-II expression was higher compared to non-responders (p = 0.0158), and similar results were obtained in the case of two anti-HLA-I antibodies. A combined score of HLA-I/II expression also predicted treatment response (p = 0.0019). Intratumoral infiltration was stronger in the responders for most immune cell types. Progression-free survival showed an association with HLA-II expression, the combined HLA score, and the density of immune cells expressing CD134 and PD-1, while overall survival was significantly associated only with HLA class II expression. Our findings corroborate previous results indicating the importance of immune cell infiltration and tumor cell HLA-II expression in the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in a "real world" patient cohort and suggest the potential predictive role of HLA class I expression.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Glioblastoma IDHwt Treatment: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

A glioblastoma (GBM) is a primary brain tumor with significant unmet therapeutic needs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have marked therapeutic benefits in many different cancers but have yet to show benefit for most GBM patients in phase III trials.

METHODS

A systematic review querying ClinicalTrials.gov for prospective clinical trials investigating ICI in GBM between 1950 and July 2024 was performed. Search terms comprised 11 distinct ICIs. Data abstracted include clinical trial NCT numbers with study titles and status, enrollment information, interventions, and more. Clinical trial identifying information, interventions, and outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen clinical trials were identified; four were phase 3. Most involved PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade as monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care. The large, randomized trials included CHECKMATE 143, CHECKMATE 498, CHECKMATE 548, and NRG BN007. These showed no improvement in median overall survival or progression-free survival in unselected patients. Biomarker-directed analyses suggest that a subset of GBM patients may benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI for the treatment of GBM has not demonstrated clear evidence of efficacy thus far. This review serves as a quick reference of ICI trial results in GBM. Biomarker-driven patient selection and/or novel approaches to overcome resistance mechanisms remain areas of viable inquiry.

Re-exposition to ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive cutaneous malignancy. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with PD-(L)1 blockade has significantly improved treatment outcomes in metastatic disease. In patients with primary resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibition, a high overall response rate (ORR) of 50% to later-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab (IPI/NIVO) has been demonstrated. However, clinical data on patients with progression after an initial response to IPI/NIVO are still lacking.

Methods

Clinical data of three metastatic MCC patients who were re-exposed to IPI/NIVO after progression were retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Two of the three patients showed primary resistance to avelumab with progressive disease, while one patient showed complete response (according to RECIST V.1.1). All three patients received combined ICI with IPI/NIVO as subsequent therapy, resulting in an ORR of ∼ 67%. However, all three patients progressed during follow-up and were re-exposed to IPI/NIVO. With a follow-up period ranging from 6.5 to 37.1 months, no PFS event has been detected. ORR for IPI/NIVO re-exposition was equal to that of initial IPI/NIVO treatment.

Conclusion

In this retrospective follow-up analysis, we observed a response rate of 67% and long-lasting responses after re-exposition to combined ICI in metastatic MCC patients with progression after initial response or disease control upon their first IPI/NIVO treatment. An important observation from this small analysis is that primary resistance to PD-L1 inhibition may result in a better response to IPI/NIVO.

Adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac imaging findings in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

There is an urgent need to better understand the diverse presentations, risk factors, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated cardiovascular toxicity. There remains a lack of consensus surrounding cardiovascular screening, risk stratification, and clinical decision-making in patients receiving ICIs.

METHODS

We conducted a single center retrospective cohort study including 2165 cancer patients treated with ICIs between 2013 and 2020. The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events (ACE): a composite of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, arrhythmias, heart failure, valvular disease, pericardial disease, and myocarditis. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and the individual components of ACE. We additionally conducted an imaging substudy examining imaging characteristics from echocardiography (echo) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 44% (n = 962/2165) of patients experienced ACE. In a multivariable analysis, dual ICI therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.45), age (HR 1.01, CI 1.00-1.01), male sex (HR 1.18, CI 1.02-1.36), prior arrhythmia (HR 1.22, CI 1.03-1.43), lung cancer (HR 1.17, CI 1.01-1.37), and central nervous system (CNS) malignancy (HR 1.23, CI 1.02-1.47), were independently associated with increased ACE. ACE was independently associated with a 2.7-fold increased risk of mortality (P<0.001). Dual ICI therapy was also associated with a 2.0-fold increased risk of myo/pericarditis (P = 0.045), with myo/pericarditis being associated with a 2.9-fold increased risk of mortality (P<0.001). However, the cardiovascular risks of dual ICI therapy were offset by its mortality benefit, with dual ICI therapy being associated with a ~25% or 1.3-fold decrease in mortality. Of those with echo prior to ICI initiation, 26% (n = 115/442) had abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction or global longitudinal strain, and of those with echo after ICI initiation, 28% (n = 207/740) had abnormalities. Of those who had CMR imaging prior to ICI initiation, 43% (n = 9/21) already had left ventricular dysfunction, 50% (n = 10/20) had right ventricular dysfunction, 32% (n = 6/19) had left ventricular late gadolinium enhancement, and 9% (n = 1/11) had abnormal T2 imaging.

CONCLUSION

Dual ICI therapy, prior arrhythmia, older age, lung and CNS malignancies were independently associated with an increased risk of ACE, and dual ICI therapy was also independently associated with an increased risk of myo/pericarditis, highlighting the utmost importance of cardiovascular risk factor optimization in this particularly high-risk population. Fortunately, the occurrence of myo/pericarditis was relatively uncommon, and the overall cardiovascular risks of dual ICI therapy appeared to be offset by a significant mortality benefit. The use of multimodal cardiac imaging can be helpful in stratifying risk and guiding preventative cardiovascular management in patients receiving ICIs.

NK cell-based immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: An attractive therapeutic option for the next decade

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a major subtype of liver cancer, poses significant therapeutic challenges due to its late diagnosis and rapid progression. The evolving landscape of immunotherapy offers a beacon of hope, with natural killer (NK) cells emerging as pivotal players in combating HCC. NK cells are unique cytotoxic lymphocytes that are essential in the fight against infections and malignancies. Phenotypic and functional NK cell abnormalities have been shown in HCC patients, indicating their significance as a component of the innate immune system against cancer. This review elucidates the critical role of NK cells in combating HCC, focusing on their interaction with the tumor microenvironment, the development of NK cell-based therapies, and the innovative strategies to enhance their efficacy in the immunosuppressive milieu of HCC. The review delves into the various therapeutic strategies, including autologous and allogeneic NK cell therapies, genetic engineering to improve NK cell resilience and targeting, and the integration of NK cells with other immunotherapeutic approaches like checkpoint inhibitors and oncolytic virotherapy. By highlighting recent advancements and the ongoing challenges in the field, this review sets the stage for future research directions that could unlock the full potential of NK cell-based immunotherapy for HCC, offering a beacon of hope for patients battling this formidable cancer.

Siglec-G Suppresses CD8+ T Cells Responses through Metabolic Rewiring and Can be Targeted to Enhance Tumor Immunotherapy

CD8+ T cells play a critical role in cancer immune-surveillance and pathogen elimination. However, their effector function can be severely impaired by inhibitory receptors such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) and T cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (Tim-3). Here Siglec-G is identified as a coinhibitory receptor that limits CD8+ T cell function. Siglec-G is highly expressed on tumor-infiltrating T cells and is enriched in the exhausted T cell subset. Ablation of Siglec-G enhances the efficacy of adoptively transferred T cells and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in suppressing solid tumors growth. Mechanistically, sialoglycan ligands, such as CD24 on tumor cells, activate the Siglec-G-SHP2 axis in CD8+ T cells, impairing metabolic reprogramming from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis, which dampens cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation, expansion, and cytotoxicity. These findings discover a critical role for Siglec-G in inhibiting CD8+ T cell responses, suggesting its potential therapeutic effect in adoptive T cell therapy and tumor immunotherapy.

Updated survival outcome of regorafenib, ipilimumab, and nivolumab in refractory microsatellite stable non-liver metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase I nonrandomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Combination regorafenib, ipilimumab, and nivolumab (RIN) was evaluated in a phase 1 nonrandomized study (NCT04362839) of refractory microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer. Promising antitumor activity was previously reported in the non-liver metastatic (NLM) population. This updated analysis describes long-term survival outcomes in the NLM cohort and highlights durable remissions with potential cure following completion of RIN therapy.

METHODS

Between May 2020 and January 2022, 39 patients with refractory MSS metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled. Patients received RIN until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or completion at two years. The primary endpoint was recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) selection. Secondary endpoints were safety, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at the RP2D level.

RESULTS

22 patients with refractory non-liver metastatic MSS colorectal cancer were treated at the RP2D of RIN. ORR was 36.4 % (8/22 patients), and median PFS was 5.0 months (95 % CI: 3-9). After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 24.1 %, 24.1 %, and 19.3 % by RECIST. The median OS was 27.5 months (95 % CI: 14.0 to NE). At data cutoff, 6 patients had ongoing clinical benefit, including 3 responders who remain disease-free > 18 months after treatment completion.

CONCLUSION

With extended follow-up, RIN combination therapy demonstrated durable clinical benefit in a subset of patients with NLM MSS metastatic colorectal cancer, including potential cure in 3 responders who remain disease-free > 18 months after treatment completion.

Cerebral biomimetic nano-drug delivery systems: A frontier strategy for immunotherapy

Brain diseases are a significant threat to human health, especially in the elderly, and this problem is growing as the aging population increases. Efficient brain-targeted drug delivery has been the greatest challenge in treating brain disorders due to the unique immune environment of the brain, including the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Recently, cerebral biomimetic nano-drug delivery systems (CBNDSs) have provided a promising strategy for brain targeting by mimicking natural biological materials. Herein, this review explores the latest understanding of the immune microenvironment of the brain, emphasizing the immune mechanisms of the occurrence and progression of brain disease. Several brain targeting systems are summarized, including cell-based, exosome-based, protein-based, and microbe-based CBNDSs, and their immunological mechanisms are highlighted. Moreover, given the rise of immunotherapy, the latest applications of CBNDSs in immunotherapy are also discussed. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of CBNDSs and serves as a guideline for immunotherapy in treating brain diseases. In addition, it provides inspiration for the future of CBNDSs.

Different characteristics of the tumor immune microenvironment among subtypes of salivary gland cancer

AIM

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) for salivary gland cancer (SGC) have been investigated in clinical trials, details of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) remain unclear. This research aimed to elucidate the TIME of SGC and its relationship with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and to explore the rationale for the applicability of ICPi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected five pathological types, namely adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC); adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (ANOS); salivary duct carcinoma (SDC); and low/high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEClow/high). We investigated the TIME and TMB of each pathological type. TIME was evaluated by multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemistry. TMB was measured by next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

ACC and MEChigh showed the lowest and highest infiltration of immune effector and suppressor cells in both tumor and stroma. ANOS, SDC, and MEClow showed modest infiltration of immune effector cells in tumors. Correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between CD3+CD8+ T cells in tumor and TMB (r = 0.647). CD3+CD8+ T cells in tumors showed a positive correlation with programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in tumor cells (r = 0.513) and a weak positive correlation with CD3+CD4+Foxp3+ cells in tumors (r = 0.399). However, no correlation was observed between CD3+CD8+ T cells and CD204+ cells in tumors (r = -0.049).

CONCLUSION

The TIME of ACC was the so-called immune desert type, which may explain the mechanisms of the poor response to ICPi in previous clinical trials. On the other hand, MEChigh was the immune-inflamed type, and this may support the rationale of ICPi for this pathological subtype.

Local administration of immunotherapy for patients with skin cancer: A systematic review

Since the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 receptors, survival has improved significantly for patients with irresectable and metastatic skin cancer, including cutaneous squamous cell cancer and melanoma. However, systemic administration of these drugs is associated with immune related adverse events (irAEs), which can be severe, irreversible and even fatal. To reduce the risk of irAEs associated with systemic exposure to immunotherapeutic drugs, local administration of low doses could be considered. This systematic review provides an overview of early phase clinical trials with drugs that are currently under investigation for intratumoral administration in patients with melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer.

Echinacoside inhibits tumor immune evasion by downregulating inducible PD-L1 and reshaping tumor immune landscape in breast and colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Targeting PD-L1 has become a crucial approach in tumor immunotherapy. Echinacoside (ECH) is a natural compound known for its extensive biological activities, its impact on antitumor immunity remains uncertain.

PURPOSE

This work was designed to assess the effects of ECH on the PD-L1/PD-1-mediated tumor immune evasion and its underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

Flow cytometry and RT-qPCR were utilized to explore the influence of ECH on PD-L1 expression. Western blot was employed to examine the mechanism by which ECH might modulate PD-L1 expression. Flow cytometry was conducted to evaluate the influence of ECH therapy, or the synergistic effects of ECH combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) on tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in tumor-burden mice. Blood biochemistry tests were used to evaluate the safety of ECH treatment.

RESULTS

ECH downregulated both the protein and mRNA expression levels of IFN-γ-induced PD-L1 through JAK/STAT1/IRF1 signaling pathway. ECH treatment upregulated the infiltration of IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells and Ki-67+CD8+ T cells, lowered the frequency of TIM-3+PD-1+ T cells, promoted the infiltration of effector CD4+ T cells and total CD8+ T cells while suppressed the percentage of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Moreover, the combination of ECH and anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 therapy exhibited synergistic anti-tumor effects, reshaping TIME. Blood biochemistry tests unveiled that ECH did not show additional toxicity.

CONCLUSION

ECH upregulates the expression of inducible PD-L1 through the JAK/STAT1/IRF1 signaling pathway, enhances T cell function, and reshapes the tumor immune landscape into an anti-tumor phenotype. Importantly, ECH markedly enhances the efficacy of ICB treatment, indicating its potential application in anti-tumor therapy.

Onco-Primary Care of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Primary clinicians foster long-term relationships with patients and play key roles in the treatment journey for patients with cancer. Primary clinicians are important members of the multidisciplinary team and are central in coordinating and providing supportive care. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatments and metastatic disease requires an awareness of their long-term survival benefits and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Primary clinicians collaborate with the oncology care team to increase irAE awareness and identify institutional and individualized approaches to manage irAEs. IrAEs can develop at any time and present with a spectrum of symptoms, making them difficult to differentiate from other conditions. IrAE management relies on early recognition, close monitoring, and intervention with corticosteroids and/or dose interruption. Delayed irAEs underscore the importance of continued clinical vigilance following treatment, as primary clinicians are patients' most enduring point of contact. Primary clinicians have a critical role in supporting the care of patients with cancer and ensuring appropriate irAE recognition, monitoring, and intervention. Long-term continuity of care is critical for the immuno-oncology patient journey.

Role of gut microbiota in tumorigenesis and antitumoral therapies: an updated review

Gut microbiota plays a prominent role in regulation of host nutrientmetabolism, drug and xenobiotics metabolism, immunomodulation and defense against pathogens. It synthesizes numerous metabolites thatmaintain the homeostasis of host. Any disbalance in the normalmicrobiota of gut can lead to pathological conditions includinginflammation and tumorigenesis. In the past few decades, theimportance of gut microbiota and its implication in various diseases, including cancer has been a prime focus in the field of research. Itplays a dual role in tumorigenesis, where it can accelerate as wellas inhibit the process. Various evidences validate the effects of gutmicrobiota in development and progression of malignancies, wheremanipulation of gut microbiota by probiotics, prebiotics, dietarymodifications and faecal microbiota transfer play a significant role.In this review, we focus on the current understanding of theinterrelationship between gut microbiota, immune system and cancer,the mechanisms by which they play dual role in promotion andinhibition of tumorigenesis. We have also discussed the role ofcertain bacteria with probiotic characteristics which can be used tomodulate the outcome of the various anti-cancer therapies under theinfluence of the alteration in the composition of gut microbiota.Future research primarily focusing on the microbiota as a communitywhich affect and modulate the treatment for cancer would benoteworthy in the field of oncology. This necessitates acomprehensive knowledge of the roles of individual as well asconsortium of microbiota in relation to physiology and response ofthe host.

[Serious adverse effects with immunotherapies for the treatment of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma: Real-world evidence study]

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key component of standard anticancer systemic therapy. While their immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) have been widely described, there are few data on grade≥3 irAEs. The primary aim of our descriptive study was to evaluate their incidence and characteristics.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective, monocentric study was conducted. It included patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma who initiated ICI therapy between 2016-2021 and experienced at least one grade≥3 irAEs coded according to the MedDRA® system.

RESULTS

All cancer types and ICIs combined, the incidence of grade≥3 irAEs was estimated at 11.7% [9.6-13.9]. These were mainly hepatobiliary (22%), gastrointestinal (17%), musculoskeletal (16%) and respiratory (16%) disorders. They occurred on average 6.2±6.2 months after the start of treatment, resulting in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization in over 40 and 20% of cases, respectively. Resolution without sequelae was observed in 56% of cases, but four patients died.

DISCUSSION

This real-world study investigated three cancers and several ICIs, unlike previously published studies that focused on a single cancer and/or one ICI. It provides a better understanding of grade≥3 irAEs, most of which are reversible, which an aim to optimize patient care.

BioKGrapher: Initial evaluation of automated knowledge graph construction from biomedical literature

Background The growth of biomedical literature presents challenges in extracting and structuring knowledge. Knowledge Graphs (KGs) offer a solution by representing relationships between biomedical entities. However, manual construction of KGs is labor-intensive and time-consuming, highlighting the need for automated methods. This work introduces BioKGrapher, a tool for automatic KG construction using large-scale publication data, with a focus on biomedical concepts related to specific medical conditions. BioKGrapher allows researchers to construct KGs from PubMed IDs. Methods The BioKGrapher pipeline begins with Named Entity Recognition and Linking (NER+NEL) to extract and normalize biomedical concepts from PubMed, mapping them to the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS). Extracted concepts are weighted and re-ranked using Kullback-Leibler divergence and local frequency balancing. These concepts are then integrated into hierarchical KGs, with relationships formed using terminologies like SNOMED CT and NCIt. Downstream applications include multi-label document classification using Adapter-infused Transformer models. Results BioKGrapher effectively aligns generated concepts with clinical practice guidelines from the German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO), achievingF 1 -Scores of up to 0.6. In multi-label classification, Adapter-infused models using a BioKGrapher cancer-specific KG improved microF 1 -Scores by up to 0.89 percentage points over a non-specific KG and 2.16 points over base models across three BERT variants. The drug-disease extraction case study identified indications for Nivolumab and Rituximab. Conclusion BioKGrapher is a tool for automatic KG construction, aligning with the GGPO and enhancing downstream task performance. It offers a scalable solution for managing biomedical knowledge, with potential applications in literature recommendation, decision support, and drug repurposing.

T-cell immunotherapy for melanoma

This review explores T-cell immunotherapy for melanoma, highlighting immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-LAG-3), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and emerging therapies that engineer T cells with specific receptors or T-cell receptors, such as CAR-T and TCR cells, and RNA vaccines. We discuss the history of T-cell immunotherapy, mechanisms of action, and future directions for improving patient outcomes.

Prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes in advanced or metastatic melanoma patients treated with immunotherapy: Findings from the CheckMate-067 study

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that predict survival in cancer patients have yet to be realized as practical tools for clinicians to make better treatment decisions. To identify such PROs in adults with advanced melanoma treated with immunotherapy, this study used 7.5-year follow-up data from CheckMate-067, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus ipilimumab.

METHODS

PRO data assessed using the European Organization of Research for the Treatment of Cancer Core-30 and EQ-5D-3L at baseline and during subsequent visits after treatment initiation were pooled across treatment arms. Associations between baseline PRO or change from baseline (CFB) scores with survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], and melanoma-specific survival [MSS]) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models for PFS or OS and cause-specific hazard models for MSS.

RESULTS

Baseline and CFB scores for most PRO domains, especially for physical functioning, global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), fatigue, and EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), were prognostic of all survival outcomes. Achieving meaningful improvement/maintenance of baseline PRO scores at 12 weeks following treatment initiation predicted better survival outcomes than with meaningful worsening from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

PROs at baseline and during treatment, particularly for physical functioning, GHS/QoL, fatigue, and EQ-VAS, were prognostic of survival outcomes. This knowledge may accelerate development of prognostic tools to manage treatment in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma who undergo immunotherapy.

An overview of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities in bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is the tenth most prevalent malignancy worldwide, with a significant mortality burden. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common histological subtype, and treatment options are guided by whether the disease is muscle-invasive (MIBC) or non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC), with subsequent risk group stratification. The growing popularity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat MIBC and NMIBC as either monotherapy or combined with intravesical agents, may radically change the treatment paradigm of UC. Current treatments for NMBIC includes intravesical chemotherapy after trans-urethral resection of the bladder tumour, intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or radical cystectomy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is widely regarded as the first-line treatment for metastatic UC due to its beneficial response and survival rates when compared to alternative therapies. However, up to 70 % of metastatic UC patients are ineligible, and the prognosis of these patients remains poor, with a median survival of 13-16 months. For NMIBC and MIBC, ICIs provide a promising alternative for cisplatin-ineligible patients. In UC, ICIs including atezolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab, and pembrolizumab are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for monotherapy, and have demonstrated promising results, particularly in those who cannot receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and as a second-line treatment option for recurrent UC following platinum-based chemotherapy. It is important to consider that some patients may experience adverse events (AEs) with limited clinical benefit. Infusion-related reactions and immune-mediated AEs (imAEs) such as colitis, endocrinopathies, hepatitis, pneumonitis, interstitial lung disease, renal dysfunction, nephritis, cutaneous and neurological toxicities must be monitored for. Currently, there is no clear consensus on the role of a 'two-year stopping rule' in reducing the risk of imAEs, with further research on the optimal treatment duration of ICIs required. With increased ICI use, vigilance regarding their side effects is imperative. This review aims to provide an updated overview of ICI toxicities in bladder cancer, to assist clinicians in their therapeutic decision-making, with consideration of patient characteristics and the clinical context.

When to stop immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: the emulated target trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated their efficacy with a 7.5-year overall survival (OS) close to 50% for advanced stages. The design of clinical trials provides for treatment until progression or toxicity, or for a maximum duration of two years. Prolonged follow-up of responders after treatment cessation shows sustained response and a low risk of relapse in the months following cessation. To date, the optimal duration of anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma remains unestablished. The objective of this work was to evaluate the optimal duration of ICI administration.

Methods

We emulated target trials using the cloning, weighting and censoring approach. Each emulation trial aimed to compare the effect of discontinuing versus continuing ICIs at a specific timepoint, among patients still under treatment and with disease control at that time. Patients were from MelBase between 2015 and 2021.

Findings

435 participants in the MelBase cohort were eligible and were included in the 6-month discontinuation emulated trial. The results showed significantly lower OS when treatment was discontinued, than when treatment was prolonged for at least three months. The 48-month survival difference was 37.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.8-60.5), and the corresponding restricted mean survival time difference was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-12.7). Neither the 12-month nor the 18-month discontinuation emulated trials showed evidence of benefit of either discontinuing or continuing ICIs at either of these timepoints. The 24-month discontinuation emulated trial results were more in favor of discontinuing than continuing treatment at that time point, with an absolute 48-month survival rate that was 10.5% higher (95% CI 4.4-18.1).

Interpretation

These results suggest that a one-year course of immunotherapy is both necessary and sufficient for patients with advanced melanoma. Prolonged treatment beyond 2 years does not appear to be beneficial in terms of survival and could even be detrimental.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dhome, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sun Pharm, Regeneron, Sanofi, Nektar, Therapeutics and Oncyte.

Metabolic checkpoints in glioblastomas: targets for new therapies and non-invasive detection

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant tumor of the central nervous system that remains intractable despite advancements in current tumor treatment modalities, including immunotherapy. In recent years, metabolic checkpoints (aberrant metabolic pathways underlying the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment) have gained attention as promising therapeutic targets and sensitive biomarkers across various cancers. Here, we briefly review the existing understanding of tumor metabolic checkpoints and their implications in the biology and management of GBM. Additionally, we discuss techniques that could evaluate metabolic checkpoints of GBM non-invasively, thereby potentially facilitating neo-adjuvant treatment and dynamic surveillance.

Safety and Efficacy Analysis of Targeted and Immune Combination Therapy in Advanced Melanoma-A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The combinations of BRAF inhibitor-based targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors currently represent less common therapeutic approaches in advanced melanoma. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of currently available melanoma treatments by conducting a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Four databases were systematically searched for randomized clinical studies that included patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma receiving chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, or combinations thereof. The primary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), serious adverse events (SAE) of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, therapy discontinuation, progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). A total of 63 articles were eligible for our systematic review; 59 of them were included in the statistical analysis. A separate subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy outcomes, specifically in BRAF-positive patients. Triple combination therapy or triple therapy (inhibiting BRAF, MEK and PD1/PDL1 axis) showed significantly longer progression-free survival compared to BRAF + MEK combination therapies (HR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.9), but similar objective and complete response rates in BRAF-mutated melanoma. This safety analysis suggests that triple therapy is not inferior to combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF/MEK therapies in terms of serious adverse events and therapy discontinuation rates. However, monotherapies and BRAF/MEK combinations showed notable advantage over triple therapy in terms of treatment-related adverse events. Combination strategies including BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with ICI therapies are effective first-line options for advanced, BRAF-mutant melanoma; however, they are associated with more frequent side effects. Therefore, future RCTs are required to evaluate and identify high-risk subpopulations where triple therapy therapies should be considered.