151
|
Ashack KA, Kuritza V, Visconti MJ, Ashack L. Dermatologic Sequelae Associated with Radiation Therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol 2020; 21:541-555. [PMID: 32410134 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-020-00519-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a mainstay for the treatment of primary malignancies and metastatic disease and is associated with several dermatological adverse events that are underreported in the literature. The objective of this paper was to review the literature regarding cutaneous manifestations associated with radiation therapy in order to promote awareness of the cutaneous radiation therapy-associated adverse effects. This extensive literature review was performed using the Pubmed and Embase databases. Studies were reviewed for relevance and critical evidence pertaining to cutaneous manifestations of radiation therapy. The most commonly reported cutaneous sequelae associated with radiation therapy include radiation dermatitis, non-melanoma skin cancer, radiation-associated angiosarcoma, morphea, bullous pemphigoid, lymphangioma circumscriptum, and pseudosclerodermatous panniculitis. For many of these conditions, only case reports or case series exist and there is an absence of large-scale cohort studies. Despite these limitations, this review describes the wide range of dermatological adverse events associated with radiation therapy.
Collapse
|
152
|
Denlinger CS, Sanft T, Moslehi JJ, Overholser L, Armenian S, Baker KS, Broderick G, Demark-Wahnefried W, Friedman DL, Goldman M, Henry NL, Hill-Kayser C, Hudson M, Khakpour N, Koura D, McDonough AL, Melisko M, Mooney K, Moore HCF, Moryl N, O'Connor T, Paskett ED, Patel C, Peterson L, Pirl W, Rodriguez MA, Ruddy KJ, Shockney L, Smith S, Syrjala KL, Tevaarwerk A, Zee P, McMillian NR, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Survivorship, Version 2.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1016-1023. [PMID: 32755975 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship provide screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for consequences of adult-onset cancer and its treatment, with the goal of helping healthcare professionals who work with survivors, including those in primary care. The guidelines also provide recommendations to help clinicians promote physical activity, weight management, and proper immunizations in survivors and facilitate care coordination to ensure that all of the survivors' needs are addressed. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize additions and changes made to the guidelines in 2020 regarding cardiovascular disease risk assessment and screening for subsequent primary malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tara Sanft
- Yale Cancer Center/Smilow Cancer Hospital
| | | | | | | | - K Scott Baker
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Mindy Goldman
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Melissa Hudson
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Kathi Mooney
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | - Halle C F Moore
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | - Lindsay Peterson
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | - Lillie Shockney
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | - Karen L Syrjala
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | - Phyllis Zee
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
153
|
Thorsness SL, Freites-Martinez A, Marchetti MA, Navarrete-Dechent C, Lacouture ME, Tonorezos ES. Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Childhood and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Previously Treated With Radiotherapy. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 17:237-243. [PMID: 30865918 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy (RT) is a risk factor for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), specifically basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), but whether features, histology, or recurrence of NMSC after RT resemble those observed in the general population is unknown. METHODS A retrospective review (1994-2017) was performed within the Adult Long-Term Follow-Up Program and Dermatology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Demographics, clinical features, histology, treatment, and recurrence were collected for this patient cohort that was under close medical surveillance. Pathology images were reviewed when available. RESULTS A total of 946 survivors (mean age, 40 years [SD, 13]) were assessed for NMSC. The mean age at first cancer diagnosis was 16 years (range, 0-40 years [11]), and the most common diagnosis was Hodgkin lymphoma (34%; n=318). In 63 survivors, 281 primary in-field lesions occurred, of which 273 (97%) were BCC and 8 (3%) were SCC. Mean intervals from time of RT to BCC and SCC diagnosis were 24 years (range, 2-44 years) and 32 years (range, 14-46 years), respectively. The most common clinical presentation of BCC was macule (47%; n=67), and the most common histologic subtypes were superficial for BCC (48%; n=131) and in situ for SCC (55%; n=5). Mohs surgery predominated therapeutically (42%; n=117), the mean duration of follow-up after treatment was 6 years (range, 12 days-23 years), and the 5-year recurrence rate was 1% (n=1). CONCLUSIONS Most NMSCs arising in sites of prior RT were of low-risk subtypes. Recurrence was similar to that observed in the general population. Current guidelines recommend surgical intervention for tumors arising in sites of prior RT because they are considered to be at high risk for recurrence. These findings suggest that an expanded role for less aggressive therapy may be appropriate, but further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Azael Freites-Martinez
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael A Marchetti
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cristian Navarrete-Dechent
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Department of Dermatology, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; and
| | - Mario E Lacouture
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emily S Tonorezos
- Adult Long-Term Follow-Up Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and.,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Alemany M, Velasco R, Simó M, Bruna J. Late effects of cancer treatment: consequences for long-term brain cancer survivors. Neurooncol Pract 2020; 8:18-30. [PMID: 33664966 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Late adverse effects of cancer treatments represent a significant source of morbidity and also financial hardship among brain tumor patients. These effects can be produced by direct neurologic damage of the tumor and its removal, and/or by complementary treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, either alone or combined. Notably, young adults are the critical population that faces major consequences because the early onset of the disease may affect their development and socioeconomic status. The spectrum of these late adverse effects is large and involves multiple domains. In this review we classify the main long-term adverse effects into 4 sections: CNS complications, peripheral nervous system complications, secondary neoplasms, and Economic impact. In addition, CNS main complications are divided into nonfocal and focal symptoms. Owing to all the secondary effects mentioned, it is essential for physicians to have a high level of clinical suspicion to prevent and provide early intervention to minimize their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montse Alemany
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-ICO L'Hospitalet (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roser Velasco
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-ICO L'Hospitalet (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Simó
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-ICO L'Hospitalet (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Bruna
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-ICO L'Hospitalet (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Subsequent neoplasms in childhood cancer survivors. Cancer Epidemiol 2020; 68:101779. [PMID: 32682319 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to characterize subsequent neoplasm (SN) (malignant (SMN), benign (BSNs), and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)) treated previously for a childhood solid malignant tumor at the Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Motol University Hospital, Prague. METHOD We evaluated a cohort of 4059 childhood cancer survivors treated between 1975 and 2018. RESULTS From 4059 survivors, 170 (4.3 %) developed at least one SMN - 193 SMNs in 170 survivors, 21 of them (0.5 % of all survivors) had two or more SMNs and 34 of them (0.8 %) had one SMN and one or more BSNs. Mortality for an SMN was 38.2 % i.e. 1.6 % of all survivors. The most frequent SMNs were thyroid carcinoma (37, 19.2 %), tumors of the central nervous system (25, 13.0 %), soft tissue sarcoma (23, 11.9 %), breast carcinoma (19, 9.8 %), and leukemia (11, 5.7 %). Genetic syndromes were present in 25 patients with SMNs (14.7 %) and in 16 patients with only BSNs (13.4 %). SMNs usually developed in second decade or later after finishing of therapy. We observed some not well known risk factors of SNs e.g. spinal irradiation or131-I metaiodobenzylguanidine radiotherapy in 2 cases of secondary thyroid cancer, cyclophosphamide therapy in all 8 cases of secondary urinary bladder sarcoma or 4 from 7 SNMSC developed SMN. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed data from previous studies of SNs and observed some not so well known risk factors. Our results and the literature show that the incidence of SMNs is 3-10 % of survivors and is associated with high mortality.
Collapse
|
156
|
Grewal M, Spielman DB, Overdevest JB, Otten M, Bruce J, Gudis DA. Current Management of Craniopharyngiomas. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00267-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
157
|
Sørensen GV, Winther JF, de Fine Licht S, Andersen KK, Holmqvist AS, Madanat-Harjuoja L, Tryggvadottir L, Bautz A, Lash TL, Hasle H. Long-Term Risk of Hospitalization Among Five-Year Survivors of Childhood Leukemia in the Nordic Countries. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:943-951. [PMID: 30753563 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djz016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse effects from childhood leukemia treatment may persist or present years after cure from cancer. We provide a comprehensive evaluation of subsequent hospitalization in five-year survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS In the Adult Life after Childhood Cancer in Scandinavia Study, we identified 4003 five-year survivors diagnosed with childhood leukemia 1970-2008 in Denmark, Sweden, Iceland, and Finland. Survivors and 129 828 population comparisons were followed for first-time nonpsychiatric hospitalizations for 120 disease categories in the hospital registries. Standardized hospitalization rate ratios and absolute excess rates were calculated. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Survivors of ALL (n = 3391), AML (n = 389), and CML (n = 92) had an increased overall hospitalization rate compared with population comparisons. The rate ratio for any hospitalization was 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.83 to 2.07) in ALL, 3.09 (95% CI = 2.53 to 3.65) in AML, and 4.51 (95% CI = 3.03 to 6.00) in CML survivors and remained increased even 20 years from leukemia diagnosis. Corresponding absolute excess rates per 1000 person-years were 28.48 (95% CI = 24.96 to 32.00), 62.75 (95% CI = 46.00 to 79.50), and 105.31 (95% CI = 60.90 to 149.72). CONCLUSION Leukemia survivors have an increased rate of hospitalization for medical conditions. We provide novel insight into the relative and absolute rate of hospitalization for 120 disease categories in survivors of ALL, AML, and CML, which are likely to be informative for both survivors and healthcare providers.
Collapse
|
158
|
Modern Radiotherapy for Pediatric Brain Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061533. [PMID: 32545204 PMCID: PMC7352417 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death in children with tumors of the central nervous system, the most commonly encountered solid malignancies in this population. Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of managing brain tumors, with excellent long-term survival overall. The tumor histology will dictate the volume of tissue requiring treatment and the dose. However, radiation in developing children can yield functional deficits and/or cosmetic defects and carries a risk of second tumors. In particular, children receiving RT are at risk for neurocognitive effects, neuroendocrine dysfunction, hearing loss, vascular anomalies and events, and psychosocial dysfunction. The risk of these late effects is directly correlated with the volume of tissue irradiated and dose delivered and is inversely correlated with age. To limit the risk of developing these late effects, improved conformity of radiation to the target volume has come from adopting a volumetric planning process. Radiation beam characteristics have also evolved to achieve this end, as exemplified through development of intensity modulated photons and the use of protons. Understanding dose limits of critical at-risk structures for different RT modalities is evolving. In this review, we discuss the physical basis of the most common RT modalities used to treat pediatric brain tumors (intensity modulated radiation therapy and proton therapy), the RT planning process, survival outcomes for several common pediatric malignant brain tumor histologies, RT-associated toxicities, and steps taken to mitigate the risk of acute and late effects from treatment.
Collapse
|
159
|
Teepen JC, Kok JL, Kremer LC, Tissing WJE, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Loonen JJ, Bresters D, van der Pal HJ, Versluys B, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Nijsten T, Hauptmann M, Hollema N, Dolsma WV, van Leeuwen FE, Ronckers CM. Long-Term Risk of Skin Cancer Among Childhood Cancer Survivors: A DCOG-LATER Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:845-853. [PMID: 30802904 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin cancer is common after radiotherapy among childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). We studied risks and risk factors for subsequent skin cancers, with emphasis on radiation dose, exposed skin surface area, and chemotherapeutic agents. METHODS The DCOG-LATER cohort study includes 5-year Dutch CCSs diagnosed 1963-2001. Subsequent skin cancers were identified from record linkages with the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Dutch Pathology Registry. Incidence rates were compared with general population rates. Multivariable Cox regression models were used, applying a novel method of case-control sampling enabling use of tumor location in cohort analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Among 5843 CCSs, 259 developed 1061 basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 29.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 26.3 to 33.6; excess absolute risk per 10 000 person-years (EAR) = 24.6), 20 had melanoma (SIR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.4 to 3.5; EAR = 1.1), and 10 had squamous cell carcinoma (SIR = 7.5, 95% CI = 3.6 to 13.8; EAR = 0.8). Cumulative incidence of BCC 40 years after childhood cancer was 19.1% (95% CI = 16.6 to 21.8%) after radiotherapy vs 0.6% expected based on general population rates. After a first BCC, 46.7% had more BCCs later. BCC risk was associated with any radiotherapy to the skin compartment of interest (hazard ratio [HR] = 14.32, 95% CI = 10.10 to 20.29) and with estimated percentage in-field skin surface area (26-75%: HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.24 to 3.20; 76-100%: HR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.33 to 3.53, vs 1-25% exposed; Ptrend among exposed = .002), but not with prescribed radiation dose and likelihood of sun-exposed skin-area. Of all chemotherapy groups examined, only vinca alkaloids increased BCC risk (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.04 to 2.27). CONCLUSION CCSs have a strongly, 30-fold increased BCC risk. BCC risk appears to increase with increasing skin surface area exposed. This knowledge underscores the need for awareness by survivors and their health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jop C Teepen
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Judith L Kok
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Wim J E Tissing
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | | | - Dorine Bresters
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | | | | | - Tamar Nijsten
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Nynke Hollema
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Wil V Dolsma
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
160
|
Attia SM, Al-Khalifa MK, Al-Hamamah MA, Alotaibi MR, Attia MSM, Ahmad SF, Ansari MA, Nadeem A, Bakheet SA. Vorinostat is genotoxic and epigenotoxic in the mouse bone marrow cells at the human equivalent doses. Toxicology 2020; 441:152507. [PMID: 32512035 DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2020.152507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Vorinostat was approved as the first histone deacetylase inhibitor for the management of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. However, it's in vivo genetic and epigenetic effects on non-cancerous cells remain poorly understood. As genetic and epigenetic changes play a critical role in the pathogenesis of carcinogenesis, we investigated whether vorinostat induces genetic and epigenetic alterations in mouse bone marrow cells. Bone marrow cells were isolated 24 h following the last oral administration of vorinostat at the doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day for five days (approximately equal to the recommended human doses). The cells were then used to assess clastogenicity and aneugenicity by the micronucleus test complemented by fluorescence in situ hybridization assay; DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA strand breaks, and DNA methylation by the modified comet assay; apoptosis by annexin V/PI staining analysis and the occurrence of the hypodiploid DNA content; and DNA damage/repair gene expression by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Array. The expression of the mRNA transcripts were also confirmed by real-time PCR and western blot analysis. Vorinostat caused structural chromosomal damage, numerical chromosomal abnormalities, DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA strand breaks, DNA hypomethylation, and programed cell death in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the expression of numerous genes implicated in DNA damage/repair were altered after vorinostat treatment. Accordingly, the genetic/epigenetic mechanism(s) of action of vorinostat may play a role in its carcinogenicity and support the continued study and development of new compounds with lower toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabry M Attia
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Mohamed K Al-Khalifa
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed A Al-Hamamah
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Moureq R Alotaibi
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamed S M Attia
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sheikh F Ahmad
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mushtaq A Ansari
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Nadeem
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh A Bakheet
- College of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
161
|
Xiang M, Chang DT, Pollom EL. Second cancer risk after primary cancer treatment with three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam radiation therapy. Cancer 2020; 126:3560-3568. [PMID: 32426866 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The comparative risks of a second cancer diagnosis are uncertain after primary cancer treatment with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT). METHODS Pediatric and adult patients with a first cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2015 who received 3DCRT, IMRT, or PBRT were identified in the National Cancer Database from 9 tumor types: head and neck, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, lymphoma, lung, prostate, breast, bone/soft tissue, and brain/central nervous system. The diagnosis of second cancer was modeled using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, follow-up duration, radiotherapy (RT) dose, chemotherapy, sociodemographic variables, and other factors. Propensity score matching also was used to balance baseline characteristics. RESULTS In total, 450,373 patients were identified (33.5% received 3DCRT, 65.2% received IMRT, and 1.3% received PBRT) with median follow-up of 5.1 years after RT completion and a cumulative follow-up period of 2.54 million person-years. Overall, the incidence of second cancer diagnosis was 1.55 per 100 patient-years. In a comparison between IMRT versus 3DCRT, there was no overall difference in the risk of second cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02; P = .75). By comparison, PBRT had an overall lower risk of second cancer versus IMRT (adjusted OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.26-0.36; P < .0001). Results within each tumor type generally were consistent in the pooled analyses and also were maintained in propensity score-matched analyses. CONCLUSIONS The risk of a second cancer diagnosis was similar after IMRT versus 3DCRT, whereas PBRT was associated with a lower risk of second cancer risk. Future work is warranted to determine the cost-effectiveness of PBRT and to identify the population best suited for this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Xiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.,Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.,Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Shaheen N, Jan MRU, Riaz S, Khan MS. Late Morbidity among Survivors of Childhood Cancers; Experience at Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital. JOURNAL OF CANCER & ALLIED SPECIALTIES 2020; 6:e351. [PMID: 37197606 PMCID: PMC10166322 DOI: 10.37029/jcas.v6i2.351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Long-term survivors of childhood malignancies are at increased risk of experiencing treatment-related morbidities. Survival into late adulthood in these children provides ample time for the acquisition of long-term sequelae. This study aimed to determine the late adverse effects among long-term survivors of childhood cancer from a low-income country perspective. Materials and Methods Data were retrospectively collected from review of charts of patients aged under 18 years at the time of their primary diagnosis between 1 January, 1995, and 31 December, 2008, and who survived for at least 5 years after completion of their treatment. Analysed data included demographics, cancer type, treatment modality, types of chemotherapy agents administered and specific late morbidities including frequency of azoospermia, oligospermia, endocrine abnormalities, hearing and pulmonary function impairment and cardiac dysfunction among the long-term survivors of cancer. Results The total number of patients was 300 with a mean age of 18 ± 2 years. The male to female ratio was 2.7:1. Median follow-up duration was 18 years (range: 5-25 years). Seventy-seven percent of patients were from Punjab, 20% were from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 3% were from other provinces. Fifty percent had a diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma, 17% had acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, 13% had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 10% had germ cell tumours and 10% had other tumours. Fifty-seven percent received chemotherapy, 23% had chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 15% had chemotherapy and surgery, 3% had chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy and 2% had only surgery. Notable long-term documented sequelae were; azoospermia/oligospermia in 64%, endocrine abnormalities in 25% with hypothyroidism in 13.5% and follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone abnormalities in 11.5%, ototoxicity in 6.5%, impaired pulmonary function tests in 4.6%, cardiotoxicity in 2.4% and second malignancies (acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndrome) in 1%. Conclusion Childhood cancer survivors are at increased risk of adverse treatment-related sequelae and a long-term follow-up plan should be in place in centres where they receive treatment for their primary disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Najma Shaheen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Mir Rooh Ullah Jan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Shazia Riaz
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Saghir Khan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Nguyen TH, Makena MR, Yavvari S, Kaur M, Pham T, Urias E, Panapitiya N, Al-Rahawan MM. Sarcoma as Second Cancer in a Childhood Cancer Survivor: Case Report, Large Population Analysis and Literature Review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56050224. [PMID: 32392854 PMCID: PMC7279476 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56050224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The majority of pediatric patients are cured of their primary cancer with current advanced developments in pediatric cancer therapy. However, survivors often experience long-term complications from therapies for primary cancer. The delayed mortality rate has been decreasing with the effort to reduce the therapeutic exposure of patients with pediatric cancers. Our study investigates the incidence of sarcoma as second cancer in pediatric cancer survivors. We present a 9-year-old male who survived embryonal hepatoblastoma diagnosed at 22 months of age. At 4.5 years of age, he presented with a non-metastatic primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) of the left submandibular area. He has no evidence of recurrence of either cancer for 51 months after finishing all chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify the current rate of second sarcomas in pediatric cancer survivors. Our literature review and large population analysis emphasize the impact of sarcoma as a second malignancy and provide help to physicians caring for pediatric cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thinh H. Nguyen
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA; (T.H.N.); (M.K.); (T.P.); (E.U.); (N.P.)
| | - Monish Ram Makena
- Department of Physiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
| | - Siddhartha Yavvari
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, Usual;
| | - Maninder Kaur
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA; (T.H.N.); (M.K.); (T.P.); (E.U.); (N.P.)
| | - Teresia Pham
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA; (T.H.N.); (M.K.); (T.P.); (E.U.); (N.P.)
| | - Eduardo Urias
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA; (T.H.N.); (M.K.); (T.P.); (E.U.); (N.P.)
| | - Narendra Panapitiya
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA; (T.H.N.); (M.K.); (T.P.); (E.U.); (N.P.)
| | - Mohamad M. Al-Rahawan
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA; (T.H.N.); (M.K.); (T.P.); (E.U.); (N.P.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Miles MA, Harris MA, Hawkins CJ. Proteasome inhibitors trigger mutations via activation of caspases and CAD, but mutagenesis provoked by the HDAC inhibitors vorinostat and romidepsin is caspase/CAD-independent. Apoptosis 2020; 24:404-413. [PMID: 30997620 DOI: 10.1007/s10495-019-01543-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Genotoxic anti-cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy can contribute to an increase in second malignancies in cancer survivors due to their oncogenic effects on non-cancerous cells. Inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins or the proteasome differ from chemotherapy in that they eliminate cancer cells by regulating gene expression or cellular protein equilibrium, respectively. As members of these drug classes have been approved for clinical use in recent times, we investigated whether these two drug classes exhibit similar mutagenic capabilities as chemotherapy. The HDAC inhibitors vorinostat/SAHA and romidepsin/FK288 were found to induce DNA damage, and mis-repair of this damage manifested into mutations in clonogenically viable surviving cells. DNA damage and mutations were also detected in cells treated with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Exposure to both drug classes stimulated caspase activation consistent with apoptotic cell death. Inhibition of caspases protected cells from bortezomib-induced acute (but not clonogenic) death and mutagenesis, implying caspases were required for the mutagenic action of bortezomib. This was also observed for second generation proteasome inhibitors. Cells deficient in caspase-activated DNase (CAD) also failed to acquire DNA damage or mutations following treatment with bortezomib. Surprisingly, vorinostat and romidepsin maintained an equivalent level of killing and mutagenic ability regardless of caspase or CAD activity. Our findings indicate that both drug classes harbour mutagenic potential in vitro. If recapitulated in vivo, the mutagenicity of these agents may influence the treatment of cancer patients who are more susceptible to oncogenic mutations due to dysfunctional DNA repair pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Miles
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
| | - Michael A Harris
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia
| | - Christine J Hawkins
- Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, La Trobe Institute for Molecular Science, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
Kok JL, Teepen JC, van Leeuwen FE, Tissing WJE, Neggers SJCMM, van der Pal HJ, Loonen JJ, Bresters D, Versluys B, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Aleman BMP, Daniels LA, Haasbeek CJA, Hoeben B, Janssens GO, Maduro JH, Oldenburger F, van Rij C, Tersteeg RJHA, Hauptmann M, Kremer LCM, Ronckers CM. Risk of benign meningioma after childhood cancer in the DCOG-LATER cohort: contributions of radiation dose, exposed cranial volume, and age. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:392-403. [PMID: 30099534 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric cranial radiotherapy (CrRT) markedly increases risk of meningiomas. We studied meningioma risk factors with emphasis on independent and joint effects of CrRT dose, exposed cranial volume, exposure age, and chemotherapy. METHODS The Dutch Cancer Oncology Group-Long-Term Effects after Childhood Cancer (DCOG-LATER) cohort includes 5-year childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) whose cancers were diagnosed in 1963-2001. Histologically confirmed benign meningiomas were identified from the population-based Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA; 1990-2015). We calculated cumulative meningioma incidence and used multivariable Cox regression and linear excess relative risk (ERR) modeling. RESULTS Among 5843 CCSs (median follow-up: 23.3 y, range: 5.0-52.2 y), 97 developed a benign meningioma, including 80 after full- and 14 after partial-volume CrRT. Compared with CrRT doses of 1-19 Gy, no CrRT was associated with a low meningioma risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.15), while increased risks were observed for CrRT doses of 20-39 Gy (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.83-3.33) and 40+ Gy (HR = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.30-6.08). CCSs whose cancers were diagnosed before age 5 versus 10-17 years showed significantly increased risks (HR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.39-4.07). In this dose-adjusted model, volume was not significantly associated with increased risk (HR full vs partial = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.86-3.22). Overall, the ERR/Gy was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.03-unknown). Dose effects did not vary significantly according to exposure age or CrRT volume. Cumulative incidence after any CrRT was 12.4% (95% CI: 9.8%-15.2%) 40 years after primary cancer diagnosis. Among chemotherapy agents (including methotrexate and cisplatin), only carboplatin (HR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.62-7.78) appeared associated with meningioma risk. However, we saw no carboplatin dose-response and all 9 exposed cases had high-dose CrRT. CONCLUSION After CrRT 1 in 8 survivors developed late meningioma by age 40 years, associated with radiation dose and exposure age, relevant for future treatment protocols and awareness among survivors and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith L Kok
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, University of Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology and Medicine section Endocrinology, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jacqueline J Loonen
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Dorine Bresters
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien A Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Haasbeek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca Hoeben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen/University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Foppe Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline van Rij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robbert J H A Tersteeg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Greenzang KA, Al-Sayegh H, Ma C, Najafzadeh M, Wittenberg E, Mack JW. Parental Considerations Regarding Cure and Late Effects for Children With Cancer. Pediatrics 2020; 145:peds.2019-3552. [PMID: 32284427 PMCID: PMC7193979 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-3552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 80% of children with cancer become long-term survivors, yet most survivors experience late effects of treatment. Little is known about how parents and physicians consider late-effects risks against a potential survival benefit when making treatment decisions. METHODS We used a discrete choice experiment to assess the importance of late effects on treatment decision-making and acceptable trade-offs between late-effects risks and survival benefit. We surveyed 95 parents of children with cancer and 41 physicians at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center to assess preferences for 5 late effects of treatment: neurocognitive impairment, infertility, cardiac toxicity, second malignancies, and impaired growth and development. RESULTS Each late effect had a statistically significant association with treatment choice, as did survival benefit (P < .001). Avoidance of severe cognitive impairment was the most important treatment consideration to parents and physicians. Parents also valued cure and decreased risk of second malignancies; physician decision-making was driven by avoidance of second malignancies and infertility. Both parents and physicians accepted a high risk of infertility (parents, a 137% increased risk; physicians, an 80% increased risk) in exchange for a 10% greater chance of cure. CONCLUSIONS Avoidance of severe neurocognitive impairment was the predominant driver of parent and physician treatment preferences, even over an increased chance of cure. This highlights the importance of exploring parental late-effects priorities when discussing treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie A. Greenzang
- Division of Population Sciences and,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston
Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hasan Al-Sayegh
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston
Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mehdi Najafzadeh
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and
Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts;
and
| | - Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan
School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer W. Mack
- Division of Population Sciences and,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute, Boston, Massachusetts;,Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston
Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Kenborg L, Winther JF, Linnet KM, Krøyer A, Albieri V, Holmqvist AS, Tryggvadottir L, Madanat-Harjuoja LM, Stovall M, Hasle H, Olsen JH. Neurologic disorders in 4858 survivors of central nervous system tumors in childhood-an Adult Life after Childhood Cancer in Scandinavia (ALiCCS) study. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:125-136. [PMID: 29850875 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A comprehensive overview of neurologic complications among survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in childhood is lacking. We aimed to investigate the risk for these disorders in a large, population-based study with outcome measures from nationwide hospital registries. Methods We identified 4858 five-year survivors with diagnoses of CNS tumor in childhood in Denmark, Iceland, Finland, and Sweden in 1943-2007, and 166658 matched population comparison subjects. Inpatient discharge diagnoses of neurologic disorders were used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs). Results A neurologic disorder was verified in 1309 survivors, while 92.4 were expected, yielding an overall RR of 14.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13.3-15.1) and an AER of 20 hospitalizations per 1000 persons per year. The risks remained increased more than 20 years after diagnosis (RR: 6.3, 95% CI: 5.6-7.2; AER: 11, 9-12). The most frequent diagnoses were epilepsy (affecting 14.1% of all survivors) followed by hydrocephalus (9.5%) and paralytic syndromes (4.2%), with RRs of 28.7 (95% CI: 26.0-31.6), 243 (95% CI: 190-311), and 40.3 (95% CI: 33.1-49.2), respectively. Of these outcomes, 30%-40% were diagnosed prior to or synchronously with the CNS tumor. The survivors had highly increased RRs for infectious diseases of the CNS, disorders of cranial nerves, and degenerative diseases of the nervous system. Conclusions Survivors of childhood CNS tumors are at markedly increased risk for neurologic disorders throughout their lives. Health care professionals must be aware of survivors who might benefit from preventive interventions and intensive follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Kenborg
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Falck Winther
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Anja Krøyer
- Childhood Cancer Research Group, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vanna Albieri
- Unit of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna Sällfors Holmqvist
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Laufey Tryggvadottir
- The Icelandic Cancer Registry, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Marilyn Stovall
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, Houston, USA
| | - Henrik Hasle
- Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jørgen H Olsen
- Research Management and Administration, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
168
|
|
169
|
Horn SR, Stoltzfus KC, Mackley HB, Lehrer EJ, Zhou S, Dandekar SC, Fox EJ, Rizk EB, Trifiletti DM, Rao PM, Zaorsky NG. Long-term causes of death among pediatric patients with cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:3102-3113. [PMID: 32298481 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to characterize the risk of death (1) from the primary cancer vs competing cause of death; and (2) from various causes of death vs the general poplation. The relative risk of death after a pediatric cancer diagnosis versus the general population and the risk of death from a primary cancer diagnosis versus competing causes of death. METHODS This retrospective, population-based study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1980-2015) and included patients aged 0 to 19 years at the time of diagnosis. Observed deaths were calculated; the risk of death versus the general population was assessed with standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Competing risk models for the cause of death were performed. RESULTS There were 58,356 patients who were diagnosed, and the mortality rate was 22.8%. To assess causes of death, 6996 patients who died during the study period were included (45,580 total person-years at risk): 5128 (73%) died of their primary cancer, and 1868 (27%) died of a competing cause. Among all patients, the rate of death from the index cancer was higher than the rate of death from another cause within the first 5 years after diagnosis. The risk of death from a nonprimary cancer began to supersede the rate of death from the primary cancer 10 years after diagnosis for patients with germ cell tumors, lymphomas, and sarcomas. SMRs for the primary cancer were highest within the first 5 years after diagnosis for all cancers (SMRs, 100-50,000; P < .0001). The risk of death from competing causes (heart disease, suicide, and sepsis) was elevated (SMR, >100; P < .001). The risk of dying of heart disease was high, especially for patients with astrocytomas (SMR, 47.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.87-76.59) and neuroblastomas (SMR, 98.59; 95% CI, 47.28-181.32). The risk of dying of suicide was high in most patients, particularly for those with osteosarcomas (SMR, 111.40; 95% CI, 2.82-620.69), Hodgkin lymphomas (SMR, 62.35; 95% CI, 34.89-102.83), and gonadal germ cell tumors (SMR, 28.97; 95% CI, 12.51-57.09). CONCLUSIONS The cause of death for patients with gonadal germ cell tumors, lymphomas, and sarcomas is more commonly a secondary cancer or noncancerous cause than the primary disease; their risk of death from competing causes (heart disease, suicide, and sepsis) rises throughout life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha R Horn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Kelsey C Stoltzfus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Heath B Mackley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Smita C Dandekar
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Edward J Fox
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Elias B Rizk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Pooja M Rao
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Method to quickly and accurately calculate absorbed dose from therapeutic and stray photon exposures throughout the entire body in individual patients. Med Phys 2020; 47:2254-2266. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
|
171
|
Armenian SH, Gibson CJ, Rockne RC, Ness KK. Premature Aging in Young Cancer Survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:226-232. [PMID: 30715446 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in early detection, treatment, and supportive care have resulted in an estimated 16 million cancer survivors who are alive in the United States today. Outcomes have notably improved for children with cancer as well as young adults with hematologic malignancies due, in part, to the intensification of cancer treatment, including the use of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Emerging evidence suggests that these cancer survivors are at risk for premature aging, manifesting as early onset of chronic health conditions and a higher risk of mortality compared with the general population. Although the pathophysiology of premature aging in these survivors has not been fully elucidated, emerging concepts in aging research could help shed light on this phenomenon. Longitudinal studies are needed to better characterize aging in these survivors, setting the stage for much-needed interventions to halt the trajectory of accelerated aging. These efforts will be enhanced through collaborations between translational researchers, clinical oncologists, primary care providers, geriatricians, patient caretakers, and other stakeholders committed to improving the lives of the growing population of survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kirsten K Ness
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Good ML, Malekzadeh P, Kriley IR, Shah NN, Kleiner DE, Calvo K, Hernandez JM, Davis JL. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as a rare secondary malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13653. [PMID: 31944498 PMCID: PMC8453586 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Secondary malignancies are a significant cause of non-relapse mortality in patients who undergo allogeneic HCT. However, secondary liver cancer is rare, and ICC following HCT has never been reported in the literature. Secondary solid cancers typically have a long latency period, and cholangiocarcinoma is classically a malignancy occurring in older individuals. Here, we report the first case of secondary ICC, which presented just 3 years after HCT in a young adult with a history of childhood ALL. A 26-year-old male with history of precursor B-cell ALL presented with asymptomatic elevated liver function tests 3 years after HCT. Laboratories were indicative of biliary obstruction. ERCP showed focal biliary stricturing of the common and left hepatic ducts. MRCP revealed left intrahepatic duct dilatation, suggestive of intrahepatic obstructing mass. Additional workup lead to a clinical diagnosis of ICC. The patient underwent left hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection and portal lymphadenectomy. Surgical pathology was consistent with moderately differentiated cholangiocarcinoma. Our case illustrates a rare SMN following HCT for ALL. It is the first case report of ICC occurring as a secondary cancer in this patient population. Although cholangiocarcinoma is characteristically diagnosed in the older population, it must remain on the differential for biliary obstruction in post-HCT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan L. Good
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA,Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Parisa Malekzadeh
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA,Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Isaac R. Kriley
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nirali N. Shah
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David E. Kleiner
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katherine Calvo
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan M. Hernandez
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jeremy L. Davis
- Surgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Inoue T, Kokubo T, Daino K, Yanagihara H, Watanabe F, Tsuruoka C, Amasaki Y, Morioka T, Homma‐Takeda S, Kobayashi T, Hino O, Shimada Y, Kakinuma S. Interstitial chromosomal deletion of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 locus is a signature for radiation-associated renal tumors in Eker rats. Cancer Sci 2020; 111:840-848. [PMID: 31925975 PMCID: PMC7060461 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Ionizing radiation can damage DNA and, therefore, is a risk factor for cancer. Eker rats, which carry a heterozygous germline mutation in the tumor-suppressor gene tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (Tsc2), are susceptible to radiation-induced renal carcinogenesis. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in Tsc2 inactivation are unclear. We subjected Fischer 344 × Eker (Long Evans Tsc2+/- ) F1 hybrid rats to gamma-irradiation (2 Gy) at gestational day 19 (GD19) or postnatal day 5 (PND5) and investigated the patterns of genomic alterations in the Tsc2 allele of renal tumors that developed at 1 year after irradiation (N = 24 tumors for GD19, N = 10 for PND5), in comparison with spontaneously developed tumors (N = 8 tumors). Gamma-irradiation significantly increased the multiplicity of renal tumors. The frequency of LOH at the chromosome 10q12 region, including the Tsc2 locus, was 38%, 29% and 60% in renal carcinomas developed from the nonirradiated, GD19 and PND5 groups, respectively. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed that the LOH patterns on chromosome 10 in renal carcinomas were classified into chromosomal missegregation, mitotic recombination and chromosomal deletion types. LOH of the interstitial chromosomal deletion type was observed only in radiation-associated carcinomas. Sequence analysis for the wild-type Tsc2 allele in the LOH-negative carcinomas identified deletions (nonirradiated: 26%; GD19: 21%) and base-substitution mutations (GD19: 4%). Reduced expression of Tsc2 was also observed in the majority of the LOH-negative carcinomas. Our results suggest that interstitial chromosomal deletion is a characteristic mutagenic event caused by ionizing radiation, and it may contribute to the assessment of radiation-induced cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
- Department of RadiologyJuntendo University Urayasu HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Toshiaki Kokubo
- Laboratory Animal and Genome Sciences SectionNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Kazuhiro Daino
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Hiromi Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Fumiko Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Chizuru Tsuruoka
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Yoshiko Amasaki
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Takamitsu Morioka
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Shino Homma‐Takeda
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences for Radiation DamagesNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| | - Toshiyuki Kobayashi
- Department of Pathology and OncologyFaculty of MedicineJuntendo UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Okio Hino
- Department of Pathology and OncologyFaculty of MedicineJuntendo UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Yoshiya Shimada
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
- Present address:
Institute for Environmental SciencesAomoriJapan
| | - Shizuko Kakinuma
- Department of Radiation Effects ResearchNational Institute of Radiological SciencesNational Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and TechnologyChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Kok JL, Teepen JC, van der Pal HJ, van Leeuwen FE, Tissing WJE, Neggers SJCMM, Loonen JJ, Louwerens M, Versluys B, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Jaspers MMW, van Santen HM, van der Heiden-van der Loo M, Janssens GO, Maduro JH, Bruggink AH, Jongmans MC, Kremer LCM, Ronckers CM. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Histologically Confirmed Solid Benign Tumors Among Long-term Survivors of Childhood Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020; 5:671-680. [PMID: 30920605 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Importance Survivors of childhood cancer (CCSs) face risk of developing subsequent tumors. Solid benign tumors may be cancer precursors; benign tumors and cancers may share etiologic factors. However, comprehensive data on the risk for solid benign tumors are lacking. Objective To quantify the incidence of and treatment-related risk factors for histologically confirmed solid nonskin benign tumors among CCSs. Design, Setting, and Participants This record linkage study involves the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group-Long-Term Effects After Childhood Cancer (DCOG-LATER) cohort of 6165 individuals diagnosed with childhood cancer at younger than 18 years from January 1, 1963, through December 31, 2001, in 7 Dutch pediatric centers and who survived at least 5 years after the diagnosis. Study groups eligible for record linkage from 1990 onward included 5843 CCSs (94.8%) and 883 siblings. Benign tumors were identified from the population-based Dutch histopathology and cytopathology registry (PALGA). Follow-up was completed on May 1, 2015. Data were analyzed from January 1, 1990, through May 1, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures Cumulative incidence of any subsequent benign tumor for cohort strata and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models (hazard ratios [HRs]) were used to evaluate potential risk factors for 8 major benign tumor subtypes. Results Of the 5843 eligible CCSs (55.9% male), 542 (9.3%) developed a histologically confirmed subsequent benign tumor after a median follow-up of 22.7 years (range, 5.0-52.2 years). Among women, abdominopelvic radiotherapy inferred dose-dependent increased risks for uterine leiomyoma (n = 43) for doses of less than 20 Gy (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.5-7.0), 20 to less than 30 Gy (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.4), and at least 30 Gy (HR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.4-12.4) compared with no abdominopelvic radiotherapy (P = .002 for trend). High-dose radiotherapy to the trunk was not associated with breast fibroadenoma (n = 45). Of 23 osseous and/or chondromatous neoplasms, 16 occurred among leukemia survivors, including 11 after total body irradiation (HR, 37.4; 95% CI, 14.8-94.7). Nerve sheath tumors (n = 55) were associated with radiotherapy (HR at 31 years of age, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5) and a crude indicator of neurofibromatosis type 1 or 2 status (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.3-13.7). Subsequent risk for benign tumors was higher than the risks for subsequent nonskin solid malignant neoplasms and for benign tumors among siblings. Conclusions and Relevance This record linkage study uses a unique resource for valid and complete outcome assessment and shows that CCSs have an approximately 2-fold risk of developing subsequent benign tumors compared with siblings. Site-specific new findings, including for uterine leiomyoma, osteochondroma, and nervous system tumors, are important to enable early diagnosis; this information will be the first step for future surveillance guidelines that include some benign tumors in CCSs and will provide leads for in-depth etiologic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith L Kok
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim J E Tissing
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, University of Groningen/Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology and Medicine section Endocrinology, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline J Loonen
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marloes Louwerens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Birgitta Versluys
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/ University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Sophia Children's Hospital/Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique M W Jaspers
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke M van Santen
- Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Geert O Janssens
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen/ University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Annette H Bruggink
- Foundation PALGA (Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology), Houten, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn C Jongmans
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
175
|
Subsequent primary neoplasms among bone sarcoma survivors; increased risks remain after 30 years of follow-up and in the latest treatment era, a nationwide population-based study. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:1242-1249. [PMID: 32066914 PMCID: PMC7156510 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0748-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term risks and time trends of subsequent primary neoplasms (SPNs) among Ewing (ES) and osteosarcoma (OS) survivors are not fully understood. METHODS We performed a nationwide study of all ES and OS patients identified in the Swedish Cancer Registry from 1958 to 2015 with up to 58 years of follow-up. The risk of SPN was compared with that of the general population using standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs). RESULTS One hundred and fifteen SPNs were diagnosed among 1779 patients with ES or OS, yielding an overall SIR of 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.9-2.7). The risk remained significantly increased in the latest treatment era (SIR2000-2015 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5). The highest absolute excess risks (AER) was due to breast cancer (AER 15.2/10,000 person-years; 95% CI, 5.0-29.8) followed by female genital malignancies (AER 9.5/10,000 person-years; 95% CI, 2.4-21.5). The excess breast cancer risk among ES survivors was noted also after 30 years of follow-up with 127 extra breast cancers/10,000 person-years (95% CI, 6.6-419). CONCLUSIONS Breast- and female genital malignancies contribute most to the excess risk of SPN among ES and OS survivors. Importantly, excess risks did not decline over calendar time or long-term follow-up.
Collapse
|
176
|
Ultrasound is superior to palpation for thyroid cancer detection in high-risk childhood cancer and BMT survivors. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5117-5124. [PMID: 32043175 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05340-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Thyroid cancer is a common subsequent malignant neoplasm in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Patients who received radiotherapy (RT) to the head, neck, upper thorax, or total body irradiation (TBI) are considered to be at risk for subsequent thyroid cancer. Current Children's Oncology Group screening guidelines recommend annual neck palpation. Our objective was to determine if ultrasound (US) is more sensitive and specific than palpation to detect thyroid cancer in high-risk CCS and bone marrow transplant (BMT) survivors. METHODS Electronic medical records of patients followed in a longitudinal survivorship clinic from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2017 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included history of RT to the head, neck, upper thorax, or TBI for primary therapy or preparation for BMT prior to the age of 20 years. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-five patients had documented palpation and 144 (64%) also had US evaluation. Mean radiation dose was 28.6 Gy. Sixteen of 225 patients (7.1%) developed a subsequent thyroid cancer at a mean of 9.7 years from the completion of RT. Sensitivity of US was 100% compared with 12.5% for palpation. US demonstrated higher accuracy, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 versus 0.56 for palpation (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Routine screening with US was more sensitive than palpation for detection of subsequent thyroid cancer after high-risk RT in CCS and BMT survivors. Screening US may lead to earlier detection of thyroid cancer in this population. Earlier diagnosis has the potential to decrease operative complexity, and earlier definitive therapy reduces the likelihood of metastatic disease.
Collapse
|
177
|
Schonfeld SJ, Howell RM, Smith SA, Neglia JP, Turcotte LM, Arnold MA, Inskip PD, Oeffinger KC, Moskowitz CS, Henderson TO, Leisenring WM, Gibson TM, de González AB, Sampson JN, Chanock SJ, Tucker MA, Bhatia S, Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Morton LM. Comparison of Radiation Dose Reconstruction Methods to Investigate Late Adverse Effects of Radiotherapy for Childhood Cancer: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Radiat Res 2020; 193:95-106. [PMID: 31794291 PMCID: PMC7063664 DOI: 10.1667/rr15308.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Quantification of radiation dose to normal tissue during radiotherapy is critical for assessing risk for radiotherapy-related late effects, including subsequent neoplasms (SNs). Case-control studies of SNs typically reconstruct absorbed radiation dose to the specific SN location using individual treatment parameters. A simplified method estimates the maximum prescribed target dose to the body region in which the SN arises. We compared doses and risk estimates from these methods using data from case-control studies of subsequent brain tumors (64 cases, 244 controls) and breast cancer (94 cases, 358 controls) nested within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (≥5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed 1970-1986). The weighted kappa statistic [95% confidence interval (CI)] evaluating agreement between categorical (>0-9.9/10-19.9/20-29.9/≥30 Gy) body-region and tumor location-specific doses was 0.95 (0.91-0.98) for brain and 0.76 (0.69-0.82) for breast. The body-region and location-specific doses were assigned to the same dose category for a smaller proportion of patients treated with fields delivering a heterogeneous dose across the tissue of interest (e.g., partial brain field = 57.1%; mantle field = 61.3%) than patients treated with fields delivering a more homogeneous dose (e.g., whole brain field = 100%). Excess odds ratios per Gy (95% CI) from conditional logistic regression were 1.25 (0.33-6.33) and 1.20 (0.31-6.14) for brain tumors and 0.21 (0.05-0.77) and 0.10 (0.02-0.44) for breast cancer, using location-specific and body-region doses, respectively. We observed that body-region doses can approximate location-specific doses when the tissue of interest is clearly in the radiation field or outside the treated body region. Agreement is lower when there is greater ambiguity of SN location relative to the treatment field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J. Schonfeld
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Rebecca M. Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan A. Smith
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph P. Neglia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Lucie M. Turcotte
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael A. Arnold
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
- Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Peter D. Inskip
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Chaya S. Moskowitz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Wendy M. Leisenring
- Clinical and Public Health Science Divisions, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Todd M. Gibson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | - Joshua N. Sampson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Stephen J. Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Margaret A. Tucker
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Leslie L. Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Gregory T. Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Lindsay M. Morton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Wilson CL, Wang Z, Liu Q, Ehrhardt MJ, Mostafavi R, Easton J, Mulder H, Hedges DJ, Wang S, Rusch M, Edmonson M, Levy S, Lanctot JQ, Currie K, Lear M, Patel A, Sapkota Y, Brooke RJ, Moon W, Chang TC, Chen W, Kesserwan CA, Wu G, Nichols KE, Hudson MM, Zhang J, Robison LL, Yasui Y. Estimated number of adult survivors of childhood cancer in United States with cancer-predisposing germline variants. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020; 67:e28047. [PMID: 31736278 PMCID: PMC7065721 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate the absolute number of adult survivors of childhood cancer in the U.S. population who carry a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a cancer predisposition gene. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we estimated the number of childhood cancer survivors on December 31, 2016 for each childhood cancer diagnosis, multiplied this by the proportion of carriers of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE) study, and projected the resulting number onto the U.S. RESULTS Based on genome sequence data, 11.8% of 2450 SJLIFE participants carry a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in one of 156 cancer predisposition genes. Given this information, we estimate that 21 800 adult survivors of childhood cancer in the United States carry a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in one of these genes. The highest estimated absolute number of variant carriers are among survivors of central nervous system tumors (n = 4300), particularly astrocytoma (n = 1800) and other gliomas (n = 1700), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 4300), and retinoblastoma (n = 3500). The most frequently mutated genes are RB1 (n = 3000), NF1 (n = 2300), and BRCA2 (n = 800). CONCLUSION Given the increasing number of childhood cancer survivors in the United States, clinicians should counsel survivors regarding their potential genetic risk, consider referral for genetic counseling and testing, and, as appropriate, implement syndrome-specific cancer surveillance or risk-reducing measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen L. Wilson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Zhaoming Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee,Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Qi Liu
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew J. Ehrhardt
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee,Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Roya Mostafavi
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - John Easton
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Heather Mulder
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Dale J. Hedges
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Shuoguo Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee,Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Michael Rusch
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Michael Edmonson
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Shawn Levy
- Genomics Service Laboratory, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama
| | - Jennifer Q. Lanctot
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kelsey Currie
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Matthew Lear
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Aman Patel
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Yadav Sapkota
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Russell J. Brooke
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Wonjong Moon
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Ti-Cheng Chang
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Wenan Chen
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Chimene A. Kesserwan
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Gang Wu
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kim E. Nichols
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Melissa M. Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee,Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Jinghui Zhang
- Departments of Computational Biology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Leslie L. Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Biswas A, Kashyap L, Bakhshi S. Radiation-Associated Glioblastoma after Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in a Patient of ALL: Review of Literature and Report of a Rare Case. Pediatr Neurosurg 2020; 55:409-417. [PMID: 33271550 DOI: 10.1159/000511996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The cumulative incidence of radiation-induced second malignancy is 1-2% per decade after radiotherapy (RT). Radiation-induced malignant glioma (RIMG) is a rare complication of cranial RT. CASE PRESENTATION We herein describe a case of left frontal glioblastoma arising 5 years after prophylactic cranial irradiation (12.6 Gy/7 fractions/1.5 weeks) as a part of INCTR-02-04 protocol in a 3-year-old boy with B-cell ALL. He underwent gross total excision (GTE) of the tumour followed by post-operative intensity modulated RT (59.4 Gy/33 fractions/6.5 weeks) and concurrent and adjuvant (3 cycles) temozolomide. Thereafter, he had rapid disease progression, which entailed re-excision of the recurrent tumour. Subsequently, there was widespread subependymal and leptomeningeal spread of tumour, leading to death 10.5 months after the initial diagnosis. CONCLUSION RIMG is an aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis, and in spite of multimodality management, it exhibits relentless progression, occasionally characterized by subependymal and leptomeningeal dissemination, leading to eventual death within a year of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahitagni Biswas
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India,
| | - Lakhan Kashyap
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Jamilson Araújo Pereira B, Nogueira de Almeida A, Henrique Pires de Aguiar P, Silva Paiva W, Jacobsen Teixeira M, Kazue Nagahashi Marie S. Comprehensive analysis of meningioma in the first two decades of life: A systematic review. Neurochirurgie 2019; 66:36-40. [PMID: 31809786 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 10/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the relationship between meningioma histological subtype and tumor site in under-20 year-olds. METHODS A review of the literature on meningioma during the first 2 decades of life was carried out through a Medline search up to February 2019. To evaluate the adult population, a cross-sectional study was conducted on patients operated on between 2000 and 2014 in a single institution. Exclusion criteria comprised: series reports and papers that lacked detailed description of clinical findings, neuroimaging confirmation of tumor location, and/or at least 5 years' follow-up. RESULTS One hundred and seven manuscripts were included, for 365 under-20 year-old patients: 200 male, and 164 female. Histopathology found 197 cases (53.9%) of WHO grade I meningioma, with predominance of meningothelial (41.1%) and transitional (30.9%) subtypes; 123 (33.7%) grade II, and 45 (12.3%) grade III. For 65 (18.25%) of the 356 cases, recurrence was documented, with only 24 deaths (6.7%). CONCLUSION Meningioma in this population presented 2 differences compared to the adult population: male predominance, and high incidence of atypical meningioma. Surgery was the primary treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy is controversial in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jamilson Araújo Pereira
- Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Departmento de Neurologia, Laboratório de biologia cellular e molecular LIM15, Escola de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - A Nogueira de Almeida
- Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Divisão de Neurocirurgia Funcional IPQ. Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - W Silva Paiva
- Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - M Jacobsen Teixeira
- Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - S Kazue Nagahashi Marie
- Departamento de Neurologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Kelada L, Wakefield CE, Heathcote LC, Jaaniste T, Signorelli C, Fardell JE, Donoghoe M, McCarthy MC, Gabriel M, Cohn RJ. Perceived cancer-related pain and fatigue, information needs, and fear of cancer recurrence among adult survivors of childhood cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:2270-2278. [PMID: 31257099 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain and fatigue are under-researched late effects of childhood cancer and its treatment, and may be interpreted by survivors as indicating cancer recurrence. Moreover, unmet information needs for managing pain and fatigue may be related to fear of cancer recurrence. We investigated the complex relationships between perceived cancer-related pain and fatigue, unmet information needs for managing pain and fatigue, and fear of cancer recurrence. METHODS We surveyed 404 adult survivors of any form of childhood cancer (M = 16.82 years since treatment completion). RESULTS Many survivors reported perceived cancer-related pain (28.7%) and fatigue (40.3%), and anticipated future pain (19.3%) and fatigue (26.2%). These symptomologies were all related to unmet information needs for managing pain (18.8%) and fatigue (32.2%; all p's<.001). Survivors reporting unmet information needs for managing pain (B = .48, 95% CI = 0.19-0.76, p = .001) and fatigue (B = .32, 95% CI = 0.06-0.52, p = .015) reported higher fear of cancer recurrence than survivors reporting no information needs. CONCLUSION Survivors often have unmet information needs for managing pain and fatigue, and these unmet needs are related to fear of cancer recurrence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Long-term follow-up clinics should assess pain and fatigue. Information provision about pain and fatigue may be an important tool to help manage fear of cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Kelada
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Australia.
| | - C E Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Australia
| | - L C Heathcote
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Palo Alto, USA
| | - T Jaaniste
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Department of Pain & Palliative Care, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Australia
| | - C Signorelli
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Australia
| | - J E Fardell
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Australia
| | - M Donoghoe
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
| | - M C McCarthy
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Gabriel
- Cancer Centre for Children, The Children's Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - R J Cohn
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia; Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Adverse late effects of pediatric brain tumors can be numerous and complex and potentially alter the life trajectories of survivors in a multitude of ways. We review these inter-related late effects that compromise neurocognitive function, general health, social and psychological adjustment, and overall adaptive and vocational outcomes, and threaten to undermine the ability of survivors to transition independently into adulthood and effectively manage their care. Intervention/prevention strategies and advances in treatment that may reduce such late effects are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS Studies of neuropsychological late effects have revealed specific deficits in core cognitive functions of attention, working memory and processing speed, with many survivors demonstrating decline in working memory and processing speed over time, irrespective of tumor type or treatment. This in turn affects the ongoing development of higher order neurocognitive skills. Research also highlights the increasing burden of health-related, neuropsychological and psychosocial late effects into adulthood and impact across life outcomes. SUMMARY Pediatric brain tumor survivors require coordinated interdisciplinary care, ongoing evaluation and management of late effects, and timely interventions focused on mitigating the impact of late effects. The transition to adulthood can be especially vulnerable and addressing barriers to care is of paramount importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celiane Rey-Casserly
- Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tanya Diver
- Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Youlden DR, Baade PD, Green AC, Valery PC, Moore AS, Aitken JF. Second primary cancers in people who had cancer as children: an Australian Childhood Cancer Registry population-based study. Med J Aust 2019; 212:121-125. [PMID: 31743457 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the incidence of second primary cancers in people diagnosed with cancer during childhood. DESIGN, SETTING Retrospective, population-based study; analysis of Australian Childhood Cancer Registry data. PARTICIPANTS People alive at least two months after being diagnosed before the age of 15 years with a primary cancer, 1983-2013, followed until 31 December 2015 (2-33 years' follow-up). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Risks of second primary cancer compared with the general population, expressed as standardised incidence ratios (SIRs). RESULTS Among 18 230 people diagnosed with cancer during childhood, 388 (2%) were later diagnosed with second primary cancers; the estimated 30-year cumulative incidence of second cancers was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.8-5.0%). The risk of a new primary cancer was five times as high as for the general population (SIR, 5.13; 95% CI, 4.65-5.67). Relative risk of a second primary cancer was greatest for people who had childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (SIR, 19.9; 95% CI, 14.4-27.6). Relative risk was particularly high for children who had undergone both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (SIR, 9.80; 95% CI, 8.35-11.5). Relative risk peaked during the 5 years following the first diagnosis (2 to less than 5 years: SIR, 10.3; 95% CI, 8.20-13.0), but was still significant at 20-33 years (SIR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.02-3.30). The most frequent second primary cancers were thyroid carcinomas (65 of 388, 17%) and acute myeloid leukaemias (57, 15%). CONCLUSIONS Survivors of childhood cancer remain at increased risk of a second primary cancer well into adulthood. As the late effects of cancer treatment probably contribute to this risk, treatments need to be refined and their toxicity reduced, without reducing their benefit for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danny R Youlden
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD
| | - Peter D Baade
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD.,Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Adèle C Green
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD.,Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew S Moore
- University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, QLD.,Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD.,Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Brisbane, QLD.,University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Wadhwa A, Chen Y, Bhatia S, Landier W. Providing health care for patients with childhood cancer and survivors: A survey of pediatric primary care providers. Cancer 2019; 125:3864-3872. [PMID: 31287565 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess self-reported comfort levels of pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) in providing acute medical care to patients with childhood cancer who currently were receiving therapy (on-therapy patients) and health maintenance care to childhood cancer survivors, independently and in conjunction with pediatric oncologists, along with confidence levels regarding knowledge about immunizations for survivors. All levels were measured using 7-point Likert scales. METHODS A cross-sectional, 23-item survey mailed to practicing PCPs affiliated with a tertiary children's hospital was analyzed. RESULTS The response rate was 64.4% (259 of 402 eligible PCPs). The mean PCP comfort level was higher when collaborating with a pediatric oncologist to provide acute medical care for on-therapy patients and health maintenance care for childhood cancer survivors (mean ratings of 6.0 ± 1.5 and 6.4 ± 1.3, respectively) compared with independently providing such care (mean ratings of 4.6 ± 1.8 and 5.0 ± 1.7, respectively; P < .0001). Only approximately 30% of PCPs were confident in their knowledge regarding immunizations for survivors. Certain factors were found to be associated with PCP comfort in providing care in conjunction with a pediatric oncologist. For acute care, these factors were rural location compared with urban location (odds ratio [OR], 5.0; 95% CI, 1.9-13.1 [P = .03]) and having cared for ≥6 on-therapy patients within the past year versus none (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.9-7.5 [P = .0001]). For survivor health maintenance care, practice location <50 miles from pediatric oncology specialty care versus ≥50 miles was the only factor found to be associated with PCP comfort (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.1 [P = .009]). CONCLUSIONS The findings of the current study underscore the need for collaboration between pediatric oncologists and PCPs when caring for children with cancer across the spectrum of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Wadhwa
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Institute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Yanjun Chen
- Institute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Institute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Wendy Landier
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Institute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Turcotte LM, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Henderson TO, Gibson TM, Leisenring W, Arnold MA, Howell RM, Green DM, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Neglia JP. Chemotherapy and Risk of Subsequent Malignant Neoplasms in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Cohort. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3310-3319. [PMID: 31622130 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Therapeutic radiation in childhood cancer has decreased over time with a concomitant increase in chemotherapy. Limited data exist on chemotherapy-associated subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS SMNs occurring > 5 years from diagnosis, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers, were evaluated in survivors diagnosed when they were < 21 years old, from 1970 to 1999 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (median age at diagnosis, 7.0 years; median age at last follow-up, 31.8 years). Thirty-year SMN cumulative incidence and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were estimated by treatment: chemotherapy-only (n = 7,448), chemotherapy plus radiation (n = 10,485), radiation only (n = 2,063), or neither (n = 2,158). Multivariable models were used to assess chemotherapy-associated SMN risk, including dose-response relationships. RESULTS Of 1,498 SMNs among 1,344 survivors, 229 occurred among 206 survivors treated with chemotherapy only. Thirty-year SMN cumulative incidence was 3.9%, 9.0%, 10.8%, and 3.4% for the chemotherapy-only, chemotherapy plus radiation, radiation-only, or neither-treatment groups, respectively. Chemotherapy-only survivors had a 2.8-fold increased SMN risk compared with the general population (95% CI, 2.5 to 3.2), with SIRs increased for subsequent leukemia/lymphoma (1.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.7), breast cancer (4.6; 95% CI, 3.5 to 6.0), soft-tissue sarcoma (3.4; 95% CI, 1.9 to 5.7), thyroid cancer (3.8; 95% CI, 2.7 to 5.1), and melanoma (2.3; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.5). SMN rate was associated with > 750 mg/m2 platinum (relative rate [RR] 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.5), and a dose response was observed between alkylating agents and SMN rate (RR, 1.2/5,000 mg/m2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3). A linear dose response was also demonstrated between anthracyclines and breast cancer rate (RR, 1.3/100 mg/m2; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6). CONCLUSION Childhood cancer survivors treated with chemotherapy only, particularly higher cumulative doses of platinum and alkylating agents, face increased SMN risk. Linear dose responses were seen between alkylating agents and SMN rates and between anthracyclines and breast cancer rates. Limiting cumulative doses and consideration of alternate chemotherapies may reduce SMN risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Qi Liu
- University of Alberta School of Public Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
186
|
Sanford NN, Lam MB, Butler SS, Ahn C, Beg MS, Aizer AA, Mahal BA. Self-reported Reasons and Patterns of Noninsurance Among Cancer Survivors Before and After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act, 2000-2017. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5:e191973. [PMID: 31091534 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Cancer survivors experience difficulties in maintaining health care coverage, but the reasons and risk factors for lack of insurance are poorly defined. Objective To assess self-reported reasons for not having insurance and demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with uninsured status among cancer survivors, before and after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014. Design, Setting, and Participants This survey study analyzes National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2017. Included were adult participants (age, 18-64 years) reporting a cancer diagnosis; however, those with a diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer were excluded. Exposures Insurance status. Main Outcomes and Measures Multivariable logistic regression was used to define the association between demographic and socioeconomic variables and odds of being uninsured. The prevalence of the most common self-reported reasons for not having insurance (cost, unemployment, employment-related reason, family-related reason) were estimated, with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for each of the reasons defined by multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 17 806 survey participants, the mean (SD) age was 50.9 (10.8) years, and 6121 (34.4%) were men. A total of 1842 participants (10.3%) reported not having health insurance. Individuals surveyed in 2000 to 2013 had higher odds of not having insurance than those surveyed in 2014 to 2017 (10.6% vs 6.2%; aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.49-2.08). Variables associated with higher odds of uninsured status included younger age (14.2% for age younger than mean vs 6.5% for age older than mean; aOR, 1.84; 95%, CI, 1.62-2.10), annual family income below the poverty threshold (21.4% vs 8.0%; aOR, 1.97; 95%, CI, 1.69-2.30), Hispanic ethnicity (18.8% vs 9.0%; aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.51-2.33), noncitizen status (24.3% vs 9.2%; aOR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.69-3.34), and current smoking (18.6% vs. 6.7%; aOR, 2.65; 95% CI, 2.32-3.02). Before the ACA, increasing interval from cancer diagnosis was associated with not having insurance (12.3% for ≥6 years vs 8.9% for 0-5 years; aOR, 1.47; 95% CI 1.26-1.70) as was black race (13.9% for black patients vs 10.4% for nonblack patients; AOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.04-1.61), but after the ACA, they no longer were (6.8% for ≥6 years vs 5.6% for 0-5 years; aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.82-1.54; and 6.9% for black patients vs 6.2% for nonblack patients; aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.46-1.43). The most commonly cited reason for not having insurance was cost, followed by unemployment, both of which decreased after ACA implementation (cost, 49.6% vs 37.6%, aOR [pre-ACA vs post-ACA], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.85; unemployment, 37.1% vs 28.5%; aOR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.87). Conclusions and Relevance The proportion of uninsured cancer survivors decreased after implementation of the ACA, but certain subgroups remained at greater risk of being uninsured. Cost was identified as the primary barrier to obtaining insurance, although more than half of cancer survivors reported other barriers to coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Miranda B Lam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Santino S Butler
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chul Ahn
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Muhammad S Beg
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brandon A Mahal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute McGraw/Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
187
|
Moke DJ, Hamilton AS, Chehab L, Deapen D, Freyer DR. Obesity and Risk for Second Malignant Neoplasms in Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Case-Control Study Utilizing the California Cancer Registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1612-1620. [PMID: 31337641 PMCID: PMC6774883 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-0466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is a known modifiable risk factor associated with adverse outcomes in children with cancer. We sought to determine whether obesity during childhood cancer treatment increases risk for second malignant neoplasms (SMN). METHODS In this case-control study, cases (with SMN) and controls (with a single-primary cancer) were selected from the California Cancer Registry who had primary cancer diagnosed <21 years treated at Children's Hospital Los Angeles between 1988 and 2014. Controls were matched 3:1 to cases at the registry level by clinical factors. Medical records were abstracted for cancer treatment exposures, cancer predisposition syndrome, body mass index (BMI), BMI Z-score, and BMI category at diagnosis and end of therapy (EOT). RESULTS A total of 59 cases and 130 controls were included. Median age at primary cancer diagnosis was 6 years, 64.5% were male, median time from primary cancer to SMN was 7.5 years, and 31.7% were obese or overweight. In matched multivariable analyses, there were elevated but nonsignificant associations between SMN and higher BMI Z-score at diagnosis [OR 1.27 (0.99-1.63)] and higher BMI categories at diagnosis [adjusted OR (aOR) overweight, 1.25 (0.55-2.52); aOR obese, 2.51 (1.00-6.29)]. There was a significantly increased risk for SMN among patients who were obese at both diagnosis and EOT [aOR, 4.44 (1.37-14.34)]. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that obesity during childhood cancer treatment may be associated with increased risk for SMNs, particularly among those obese throughout therapy. IMPACT Additional studies to confirm these findings and to develop interventions have the potential to impact SMN development in children with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana J Moke
- Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leena Chehab
- Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Dennis Deapen
- Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - David R Freyer
- Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Seibold P, Auvinen A, Averbeck D, Bourguignon M, Hartikainen JM, Hoeschen C, Laurent O, Noël G, Sabatier L, Salomaa S, Blettner M. Clinical and epidemiological observations on individual radiation sensitivity and susceptibility. Int J Radiat Biol 2019; 96:324-339. [PMID: 31539290 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1665209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To summarize existing knowledge and to understand individual response to radiation exposure, the MELODI Association together with CONCERT European Joint Programme has organized a workshop in March 2018 on radiation sensitivity and susceptibility.Methods: The workshop reviewed the current evidence on this matter, to inform the MELODI Strategic Research Agenda (SRA), to determine social and scientific needs and to come up with recommendations for suitable and feasible future research initiatives to be taken for the benefit of an improved medical diagnosis and treatment as well as for radiation protection.Results: The present paper gives an overview of the current evidence in this field, including potential effect modifiers such as age, gender, genetic profile, and health status of the exposed population, based on clinical and epidemiological observations.Conclusion: The authors conclude with the following recommendations for the way forward in radiation research: (a) there is need for large (prospective) cohort studies; (b) build upon existing radiation research cohorts; (c) use data from well-defined cohorts with good exposure assessment and biological material already collected; (d) focus on study quality with standardized data collection and reporting; (e) improve statistical analysis; (f) cooperation between radiobiology and epidemiology; and (g) take consequences of radiosensitivity and radiosusceptibility into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Seibold
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anssi Auvinen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.,STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Dietrich Averbeck
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), DRF, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Michel Bourguignon
- Department of Biophysics, Université Paris Saclay (UVSQ), Versailles, France
| | - Jaana M Hartikainen
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Christoph Hoeschen
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Olivier Laurent
- Laboratoire d'épidémiologie des Rayonnements Ionisants, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, PSE-SANTE/SESANE/LEPID, BP17, 92260, Fontenay aux Roses, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Département Universitaire de Radiothérapie, Centre Paul-Strauss, Unicancer, Strasbourg cedex, France
| | - Laure Sabatier
- Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), DRF, Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Sisko Salomaa
- Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Nipp RD, Shui AM, Perez GK, Kirchhoff AC, Peppercorn JM, Moy B, Kuhlthau K, Park ER. Patterns in Health Care Access and Affordability Among Cancer Survivors During Implementation of the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Oncol 2019; 4:791-797. [PMID: 29596618 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Importance Cancer survivors face ongoing health issues and need access to affordable health care, yet studies examining health care access and affordability in this population are lacking. Objectives To evaluate health care access and affordability in a national sample of cancer survivors compared with adults without cancer and to evaluate temporal trends during implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Design, Setting, and Participants We used data from the National Health Interview Survey from 2010 through 2016 to conduct a population-based study of 30 364 participants aged 18 years or older. We grouped participants as cancer survivors (n = 15 182) and those with no reported history of cancer, whom we refer to as control respondents (n = 15 182), matched on age. We excluded individuals reporting a cancer diagnosis prior to age 18 years and those with nonmelanoma skin cancers. Main Outcomes and Measures We compared issues with health care access (eg, delayed or forgone care) and affordability (eg, unable to afford medications or health care services) between cancer survivors and control respondents. We also explored trends over time in the proportion of cancer survivors reporting these difficulties. Results Of the 30 364 participants, 18 356 (57.4%) were women. The mean (SD) age was 63.5 (23.5) years. Cancer survivors were more likely to be insured (14 412 [94.8%] vs 13 978 [92.2%], P < .001) and to have government-sponsored insurance (7266 [44.3%] vs 6513 [38.8%], P < .001) compared with control respondents. In multivariable models, cancer survivors were more likely than control respondents to report delayed care (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.16-1.63), forgone medical care (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.45-2.12), and/or inability to afford medications (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.46-2.14) and health care services (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68) (P < .001 for all). From 2010 to 2016, the proportion of survivors reporting delayed medical care decreased each year (B = 0.47; P = .047), and the proportion of those needing and not getting medical care also decreased each year (B = 0.35; P = .04). In addition, the proportion of cancer survivors who reported being unable to afford prescription medication decreased each year (B=0.66; P = .004) and the proportion of those unable to afford at least 1 of 6 services decreased each year (B = 0.51; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance Despite higher rates of insurance coverage, cancer survivors reported greater difficulties accessing and affording health care compared with adults without cancer. Importantly, the proportion of survivors reporting these issues continued a downward trend throughout our observation period in the years following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Our findings suggest incremental improvement in health care access and affordability after recent health care reform and provide an important benchmark as additional changes are likely to occur in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Nipp
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - Amy M Shui
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Giselle K Perez
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Jeffrey M Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| | - Karen Kuhlthau
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Elyse R Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
190
|
Bhatia S, Chen Y, Wong FL, Hageman L, Smith K, Korf B, Cannon A, Leidy DJ, Paz A, Andress JE, Friedman GK, Metrock K, Neglia JP, Arnold M, Turcotte LM, de Blank P, Leisenring W, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Clapp DW, Shannon K, Nakamura JL, Fisher MJ. Subsequent Neoplasms After a Primary Tumor in Individuals With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3050-3058. [PMID: 31532722 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Fundamental gaps in knowledge regarding the risk of subsequent neoplasms (SNs) in children with pathogenic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) variants exposed to radiation and/or alkylator chemotherapy have limited the use of these agents. METHODS We addressed these gaps by determining the SN risk in 167 NF1-affected versus 1,541 non-NF1-affected 5-year childhood cancer survivors from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and 176 nonoverlapping NF1-affected individuals with primary tumors from University of Alabama at Birmingham and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia exposed to radiation and/or chemotherapy. Proportional subdistribution hazards multivariable regression analysis was used to examine risk factors, adjusting for type and age at primary tumor diagnosis and therapeutic exposures. RESULTS In the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort, the 20-year cumulative incidence of SNs in NF1 childhood cancer survivors was 7.3%, compared with 2.9% in the non-NF1 childhood cancer survivors (P = .003), yielding a 2.4-fold higher risk of SN (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.3; P = .005) in the NF1-affected individuals. In the University of Alabama at Birmingham and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia cohort, among NF1-affected individuals with a primary tumor, the risk of SNs was 2.8-fold higher in patients with irradiated NF1 (95% CI, 1.3 to 6.0; P = .009). In contrast, the risk of SNs was not significantly elevated after exposure to alkylating agents (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.3 to 3.0; P = .9). CONCLUSION Children with NF1 who develop a primary tumor are at increased risk of SN when compared with non-NF1 childhood cancer survivors. Among NF1-affected children with a primary tumor, therapeutic radiation, but not alkylating agents, confer an increased risk of SNs. These findings can inform evidence-based clinical management of primary tumors in NF1-affected children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Bhatia
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Yanjun Chen
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | - Bruce Korf
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - Daniel J Leidy
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Alejandro Paz
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Shannon
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
191
|
Geller AC, Emmons KM. The Time Has Come to Enhance Skin Cancer Screening for Adult Childhood Cancer Survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:760-761. [PMID: 30802912 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alan C Geller
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Karen M Emmons
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Scholz-Kreisel P, Kaatsch P, Spix C, Schmidberger H, Marron M, Grabow D, Becker C, Blettner M. Second Malignancies Following Childhood Cancer Treatment in Germany From 1980 to 2014. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2019; 115:385-392. [PMID: 29960606 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of improvements in cancer treatment, more than 80% of all children with cancer now survive at least five years from the time of diagnosis. As a result, late sequelae of cancer and its treatment have become more common, particularly second malignancies. We studied the current incidence of second malignancies among childhood cancer survivors in Germany. METHODS This study is based on the cohort of the German Childhood Cancer Registry (Deutsches Kinderkrebsregister, DKKR). Persons given the diagnosis of a first malignancy at any time in the years 1980-2014 who were no more than 14 years old at the time of diagnosis and survived at least six months thereafter were included in the study. Cumulative incidences and hazard ratios were calculated, and comparisons with the general population were made with the aid of standardized incidence ratios (SIR). RESULTS Among the 47 650 survivors included in the study, there were 1262 cases of second malignancies. After a follow-up interval of up to 35 years, the cumulative incidence of second malignancies was 8.27% (95% confidence interval [7.51; 9.03]). Second malignancies were more common in female patients (hazard ratio 1.29, [1.16; 1.44]) and in those who had had a systemic cancer as their initial malignancy (hazard ratio 1.22 [1.09; 1.36]). The SIR compared to the general population for the period 1955-2014 was 7.08 [6.42; 7.9] for female patients and 5.83 [5.27; 6.42] for male patients. CONCLUSION The cumulative incidence of second malignancies is 5.4% at 25 years and 8.3% at 35 years; these figures may be slight underestimates. The DKKR is an epidemiologic registry containing no data about treatment, so the effect of treatment on the risk of second malignancies could not be studied. The acquisition and evaluation of treatment data for the overall cohort is currently one of the main tasks for research on the late sequelae of childhood cancer. This may enable conclusions to be drawn about whether treatment strategies that have been introduced to lessen the risk of a second malignancy actually have the desired effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scholz-Kreisel
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI) at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz German Childhood Cancer Registry at the Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI) at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz; Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz; Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie (BIPS), Bremen
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
193
|
Hanaford AR, Alt J, Rais R, Wang SZ, Kaur H, Thorek DLJ, Eberhart CG, Slusher BS, Martin AM, Raabe EH. Orally bioavailable glutamine antagonist prodrug JHU-083 penetrates mouse brain and suppresses the growth of MYC-driven medulloblastoma. Transl Oncol 2019; 12:1314-1322. [PMID: 31340195 PMCID: PMC6657308 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A subset of poor-prognosis medulloblastoma has genomic amplification of MYC. MYC regulates glutamine metabolism in multiple cellular contexts. We modified the glutamine analog 6-diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine (DON) to mask its carboxylate and amine functionalities, creating a prodrug termed JHU-083 with increased oral bioavailability. We hypothesized that this prodrug would kill MYC-expressing medulloblastoma. JHU-083 treatment caused decreased growth and increased apoptosis in human MYC-expressing medulloblastoma cell lines. We generated a mouse MYC-driven medulloblastoma model by transforming C57BL/6 mouse cerebellar stem and progenitor cells. When implanted into the brains of C57BL/6 mice, these cells formed large cell/anaplastic tumors that resembled aggressive medulloblastoma. A cell line derived from this model was sensitive to JHU-083 in vitro. Oral administration of JHU-038 led to the accumulation of micromolar concentrations of DON in the mouse brain. JHU-083 treatment significantly increased the survival of immune-competent animals bearing orthotopic tumors formed by the mouse cerebellar stem cell model as well as immune-deficient animals bearing orthotopic tumors formed by a human MYC-amplified medulloblastoma cell line. These data provide pre-clinical justification for the ongoing development and testing of orally bioavailable DON prodrugs for use in medulloblastoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison R Hanaford
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jesse Alt
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Rana Rais
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Sabrina Z Wang
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Harpreet Kaur
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Daniel L J Thorek
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Charles G Eberhart
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Barbara S Slusher
- Johns Hopkins Drug Discovery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Allison M Martin
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
| | - Eric H Raabe
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287.
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Ueda T, Migita M, Itabashi T, Tanabe Y, Uchimura R, Gocho Y, Yamanishi M, Kobayashi F, Yoshino M, Fujita A, Yamanishi S, Kaizu K, Hayakawa J, Asano T, Maeda M, Itoh Y. Therapy-related Secondary Malignancy After Treatment of Childhood Malignancy: Cases from a Single Center. J NIPPON MED SCH 2019; 86:207-214. [DOI: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2018_86-401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mio Yoshino
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School
| | - Atsushi Fujita
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital
| | | | | | | | - Takeshi Asano
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital
| | - Miho Maeda
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
195
|
Teng A, Nelson DW, Dehal A, Chang SC, Fischer T, Steele SR, Goldfarb M. Colon cancer as a subsequent malignant neoplasm in young adults. Cancer 2019; 125:3749-3754. [PMID: 31290995 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of colon cancer (CC) is rising in younger adults and can occur de novo or in patients previously treated for another cancer. To the authors' knowledge, the impact on survival of CC occurring as a subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) has not been described for younger patients, which the authors anticipate to be lower with SMNs than that of primary CC. METHODS Patients aged <50 years with CC in the 2004 through 2014 National Cancer Data Base were identified. Patients were stratified by primary or subsequent occurrence. The impact of SMN status on overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS Of 41,915 patients, 2852 (6.8%) had colon SMNs. More patients with colon SMNs were aged 40 to 49 years compared with patients with primary CC (83% vs 77%; P < .001). Patients with colon SMNs presented with earlier clinical and pathological T, N, and M classifications (all P < .001). Colon SMNs more commonly occurred in the right colon, whereas primary CC was found to have a higher prevalence in the sigmoid colon (P < .001). Patients with colon SMNs more frequently underwent total colectomy (17% vs 5%; P < .001), but received less chemotherapy (53% vs 65%; P < .001). When adjusted for demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics, SMN status was associated with a 23% decreased OS compared with primary CC (95% CI, 1.14-1.31; P < .001). Chemotherapy offered a 33% improvement in OS (95% CI, 0.56-0.8; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Colon SMNs in younger patients present at an earlier stage and are treated more aggressively surgically compared with primary CCs. Patients with SMNs of the colon have decreased survival, although chemotherapy offers a survival advantage. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether these disparities are due to the effects of cancer treatment or differences in tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle Teng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Daniel W Nelson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Ahmed Dehal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Shu-Ching Chang
- Medical Data Research Center, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, Oregon
| | - Trevan Fischer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Melanie Goldfarb
- Department of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute at Providence St. John's Health Center, Santa Monica, California
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Athiyaman H, Mayilvaganan A, Chougule A, Joan M, Kumar HS. Estimation of radiation-induced second cancer risk associated with the institutional field matching craniospinal irradiation technique: A comparative treatment planning study. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2019; 24:409-420. [PMID: 31333335 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To estimate and compare the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of radiation-induced second cancer (SC) in pediatric medulloblastoma patients planned with institutional 3D conformal field matching method, gap junction method and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). Background The epidemiological studies on childhood cancer survivors reported that long-term cancer survivors who received radiotherapy are at a significantly increased risk for the development of SC. Hence, the increased concern to predict the SC risk for long-term survivors. Materials and methods In addition to institutional field matching planning method, IMRT and gap junction methods were created for ten pediatric medulloblastoma patients. The risk estimates were made based on the site-specific cancer risk coefficient provided by the BEIR VII committee according to the organ equivalent dose for various critical organs. Also, plans were compared for target volume dose distribution and dose received by critical organs. Results When compared to the gap junction method, the IMRT and institutional field matching method were superior in normal tissue sparing and dose conformity. However, highly significant volume of low dose associated with IMRT was the main concern for the SC risk. The accumulated LAR for all the critical organs with 3D conformal gap junction and IMRT method was 23-25% while for the 3D conformal field matching method it was 21%. Conclusion The LAR associated with the institutional field matching technique was substantially lower. As this method is highly robust and easy to set up, it can be a better choice of a craniospinal irradiation technique where 3DCRT is the only choice of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemalatha Athiyaman
- Department of Radiological Physics, SP Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India
| | | | - Arun Chougule
- Department of Radiological Physics, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Mary Joan
- Department of Radiological Physics, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
197
|
Allodji RS, Hawkins MM, Bright CJ, Fidler-Benaoudia MM, Winter DL, Alessi D, Fresneau B, Journy N, Morsellino V, Bárdi E, Bautz A, Byrne J, Feijen ELA, Teepen JC, Vu-Bezin G, Rubino C, Garwicz S, Grabow D, Gudmundsdottir T, Guha J, Hau EM, Jankovic M, Kaatsch P, Kaiser M, Linge H, Muraca M, Llanas D, Veres C, Øfstaas H, Diallo I, Mansouri I, Ronckers CM, Skinner R, Terenziani M, Wesenberg F, Wiebe T, Sacerdote C, Jakab Z, Haupt R, Lähteenmäki P, Zaletel LZ, Kuehni CE, Winther JF, Michel G, Kremer LCM, Hjorth L, Haddy N, de Vathaire F, Reulen RC. Risk of subsequent primary leukaemias among 69,460 five-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed from 1940 to 2008 in Europe: A cohort study within PanCareSurFup. Eur J Cancer 2019; 117:71-83. [PMID: 31260818 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of childhood cancers are at risk of developing subsequent primary leukaemias (SPLs), but the long-term risks beyond 20 years of treatment are still unclear. We investigated the risk of SPLs in five-year childhood cancer survivors using a large-scale pan-European (PanCareSurFup) cohort and evaluated variations in the risk by cancer and demographic factors. METHODS This largest-ever assembled cohort comprises 69,460 five-year childhood cancer survivors from 12 European countries. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) were calculated. RESULTS One hundred fifteen survivors developed an SPL including 86 myeloid leukaemias (subsequent primary myeloid leukaemias [SPMLs]), 17 lymphoid leukaemias and 12 other types of leukaemias; of these SPLs, 31 (27%) occurred beyond 20 years from the first childhood cancer diagnosis. Compared with the general population, childhood cancer survivors had a fourfold increased risk (SIR = 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1 to 4.5) of developing leukaemia, and eight leukaemias per 100,000 person-years (AER = 7.5, 95% CI: 6.0 to 9.2) occurred in excess of that expected. The risks remained significantly elevated beyond 20 years from the first primary malignancy (SIR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.4). Overall, the risk ratio for SPML (SIR = 5.8, 95% CI: 4.6 to 7.1) was higher than that for other SPLs. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that beyond 20 years after childhood cancer diagnosis, survivors experience an increased risk for SPLs compared with that expected from the general population. Our findings highlight the need for awareness by survivors and their healthcare providers for potential risk related to SPL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigue S Allodji
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi (EPAC), University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 P.O. Box 2009, Cotonou, Benin.
| | - Mike M Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chloe J Bright
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Miranda M Fidler-Benaoudia
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - David L Winter
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Daniela Alessi
- Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Italy
| | - Brice Fresneau
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Neige Journy
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Vera Morsellino
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Edit Bárdi
- St Anna Kinderspital Wien, Austria; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Andrea Bautz
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Childhood Cancer Research Group, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Elizabeth Lieke Am Feijen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jop C Teepen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Giao Vu-Bezin
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Carole Rubino
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Stanislaw Garwicz
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Desiree Grabow
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR), Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thorgerdur Gudmundsdottir
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria; Children's Hospital, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Joyeeta Guha
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eva-Maria Hau
- Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland; Department of Paediatrics, University Children's Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Momcilo Jankovic
- Foundation MBBM, Hemato-Oncology Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 38, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Peter Kaatsch
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR), Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Melanie Kaiser
- German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR), Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Helena Linge
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Monica Muraca
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Damien Llanas
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Veres
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Hilde Øfstaas
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Solid Tumors in Children, Norway
| | - Ibrahima Diallo
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Imene Mansouri
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, And Northern Institute of Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Monica Terenziani
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Finn Wesenberg
- Norwegian Cancer Registry and Dept. of Pediatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Wiebe
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Carlotta Sacerdote
- Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Italy
| | - Zsuzsanna Jakab
- Hungarian Childhood Cancer Registry, 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Riccardo Haupt
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Päivi Lähteenmäki
- Turku University and Turku University Hospital, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Claudia E Kuehni
- Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland; Department of Paediatrics, University Children's Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jeanette F Winther
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Childhood Cancer Research Group, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gisela Michel
- Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, PO Box 4466, 6002, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Leontien C M Kremer
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Lars Hjorth
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nadia Haddy
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- Cancer and Radiation Team, Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, INSERM U1018, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Raoul C Reulen
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, Robert Aitken Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Brown AL, Arroyo VM, Agrusa JE, Scheurer ME, Gramatges MM, Lupo PJ. Survival disparities for second primary malignancies diagnosed among childhood cancer survivors: A population-based assessment. Cancer 2019; 125:3623-3630. [PMID: 31251393 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Curative therapy places childhood cancer survivors at increased risk for second primary malignancies (SPMs). However, there have been few population-based attempts to characterize differences between outcomes of SPMs in childhood cancer survivors and outcomes of first primary malignancies (FPMs). METHODS Clinical and demographic information about childhood cancer survivors who developed SPMs and individuals with comparable FPMs was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with Cox proportional hazards models comparing the overall survival (OS) of individuals with and without a history of childhood cancer. OS was evaluated both overall and for specific cancers diagnosed in 50 or more childhood cancer survivors. Models accounted for potential confounders, including sex, race, age, treatment decade, histology, and disease stage. RESULTS Compared with individuals with FPMs (n = 1,332,203), childhood cancer survivors (n = 1409) with an SPM experienced poorer OS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.72-2.02) after the study had accounted for cancer type, age, sex, race, and decade of diagnosis. A history of childhood cancer remained a poor prognostic factor for all specific cancers evaluated, including breast cancer (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.63-2.62), thyroid cancer (HR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.08-6.19), acute myeloid leukemia (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.87-3.05), brain cancer (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.72-2.55), melanoma (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.55-4.27), bone cancer (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.37-2.57), and soft-tissue sarcoma (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.78-3.33). CONCLUSIONS Compared with individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis, survivors of childhood cancer with an SPM experienced inferior outcomes. Survival disparities were observed for the most frequent SPMs diagnosed in childhood cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin L Brown
- Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Vidal M Arroyo
- Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer E Agrusa
- Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Scheurer
- Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - M Monica Gramatges
- Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Philip J Lupo
- Hematology-Oncology Section, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Reynolds K, Spavor M, Brandelli Y, Kwok C, Li Y, Disciglio M, Carlson LE, Schulte F, Anderson R, Grundy P, Giese-Davis J. A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:547-557. [PMID: 31250352 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00774-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Few studies have compared follow-up-care models for adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCCs), though choice of model could impact medical test adherence, and health-related quality of life (QOL). This study compared two follow-up-care models, cancer-center-based versus community-based, for ASCCs in Alberta, Canada, to determine which model would demonstrate greater ASCC adherence to guideline-recommended medical screening tests for late effects, QOL, physical symptoms, and adherence to yearly follow-up. METHODS ASCC discharged to a community model (over 15 years) and those with comparable birth years (1973-1993) currently followed in a cancer center model were recruited via direct contact or multimedia campaign. Chart review identified chemotherapeutic and radiation exposures, and required medical late effect screening tests. ASCCs also completed questionnaires assessing QOL, physical symptoms, and follow-up behavior. RESULTS One hundred fifty-six survivors participated (community (n = 86); cancer center (n = 70)). Primary analysis indicated that cancer center ASCCs guideline-recommended total test adherence percentage (Mdn = 85.4%) was significantly higher than the community model (Mdn = 29.2%, U = 3996.50, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in QOL for cancer center ASCCs (M = 83.85, SD = 20.55 versus M = 77.50, SD = 23.94; t (154) = 1.77, p = 0.078) compared to community-based ASCCs. Cancer center-based ASCCs endorsed from 0.4-7.1% fewer physical symptom clusters, and higher adherence to follow-up behavior in comparisons using effect sizes without p values. CONCLUSION This study highlights the cancer center model's superiority for adherence to exposure-based medical late effect screening guidelines, cancer-specific follow-up behaviors, and the reporting of fewer physical complaints in ASCCs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS ASCCs followed in a cancer center model likely benefit from earlier late-effects detection and opportunities for early intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Reynolds
- Long Term Survivor's Clinic, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - M Spavor
- Northern Alberta Childhood Cancer Survivor Program, 4E2, Stollery Children's Hospital, 8440 112th Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
| | - Y Brandelli
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - C Kwok
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Y Li
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychosocial Resources, Alberta Health Services Cancer Care-Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2S 3C1, Canada
| | - M Disciglio
- Northern Alberta Childhood Cancer Survivor Program, 4E2, Stollery Children's Hospital, 8440 112th Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - L E Carlson
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychosocial Resources, Alberta Health Services Cancer Care-Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2S 3C1, Canada
| | - F Schulte
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Medical Science, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - R Anderson
- Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada
| | - P Grundy
- Northern Alberta Childhood Cancer Survivor Program, 4E2, Stollery Children's Hospital, 8440 112th Street, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405 87th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - J Giese-Davis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Psychosocial Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Health Services, Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychosocial Resources, Alberta Health Services Cancer Care-Holy Cross Site, 2202 2nd Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2S 3C1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Kirchhoff AC, Mann K, Warner EL, Kaddas HK, Fair D, Fluchel M, Knackstedt ED, Kepka D. HPV vaccination knowledge, intentions, and practices among caregivers of childhood cancer survivors. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15:1767-1775. [PMID: 31116634 PMCID: PMC6746484 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1619407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The HPV vaccine is an important vaccine for childhood cancer survivors because of their risks of second cancers, yet few survivors receive it. We examined HPV vaccine knowledge among caregivers of childhood cancer survivors, whether their child had received the vaccine, and their intentions to vaccinate. Eligible participants were caregivers (mostly parents) whose child finished cancer treatment at Primary Children’s Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah 3 to 36 months prior to the start of the study (N = 145). Additional analyses were done among caregivers whose child was age-eligible for the HPV vaccine (ages 11 and up; N = 61). We ran descriptive statistics and fit multivariable generalized linear models to identify factors associated with intention to vaccinate and HPV vaccination uptake. Among caregivers whose child had not yet gotten the HPV vaccine, approximately 30% stated they were not likely to get the vaccine for their child and the most commonly cited reason was not enough information (25.2%). Provider discussion about vaccines and side effects (relative risk (RR) = 1.85, 95% CI 1.16–2.94), along with recommendations regarding vaccines after cancer treatment (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.06–1.72), led to greater caregiver intention to get the HPV vaccine for their child with cancer. Approximately 40% of age-eligible survivors had gotten at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. Our findings demonstrate a need for oncology-focused interventions to educate families of childhood cancer survivors about the importance of the HPV vaccine after cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne C Kirchhoff
- a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.,b Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Karely Mann
- b Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Echo L Warner
- b Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.,c College of Nursing, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Heydon K Kaddas
- b Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Douglas Fair
- a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.,d Primary Children's Hospital , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Mark Fluchel
- a Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.,d Primary Children's Hospital , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Elizabeth D Knackstedt
- e Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| | - Deanna Kepka
- b Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.,c College of Nursing, University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA
| |
Collapse
|