151
|
Visser JJ, Goergen SK, Klein S, Noguerol TM, Pickhardt PJ, Fayad LM, Omoumi P. The Value of Quantitative Musculoskeletal Imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2020; 24:460-474. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
AbstractMusculoskeletal imaging is mainly based on the subjective and qualitative analysis of imaging examinations. However, integration of quantitative assessment of imaging data could increase the value of imaging in both research and clinical practice. Some imaging modalities, such as perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion MRI, or T2 mapping, are intrinsically quantitative. But conventional morphological imaging can also be analyzed through the quantification of various parameters. The quantitative data retrieved from imaging examinations can serve as biomarkers and be used to support diagnosis, determine patient prognosis, or monitor therapy.We focus on the value, or clinical utility, of quantitative imaging in the musculoskeletal field. There is currently a trend to move from volume- to value-based payments. This review contains definitions and examines the role that quantitative imaging may play in the implementation of value-based health care. The influence of artificial intelligence on the value of quantitative musculoskeletal imaging is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob J. Visser
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stacy K. Goergen
- Department of Imaging, Monash Imaging, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefan Klein
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Perry J. Pickhardt
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Laura M. Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Patrick Omoumi
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
152
|
Bianchini L, Santinha J, Loução N, Figueiredo M, Botta F, Origgi D, Cremonesi M, Cassano E, Papanikolaou N, Lascialfari A. A multicenter study on radiomic features from T 2 -weighted images of a customized MR pelvic phantom setting the basis for robust radiomic models in clinics. Magn Reson Med 2020; 85:1713-1726. [PMID: 32970859 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from MR images and provide a workflow to identify robust features. METHODS T2 -weighted images of a pelvic phantom were acquired on three scanners of two manufacturers and two magnetic field strengths. The repeatability and reproducibility of features were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and the concordance correlation coefficient, respectively, and by the within-subject coefficient of variation, considering repeated acquisitions with and without phantom repositioning, and with different scanner and acquisition parameters. The features showing intraclass correlation coefficient or concordance correlation coefficient >0.9 were selected, and their dependence on shape information (Spearman's ρ > 0.8) analyzed. They were classified for their ability to distinguish textures, after shuffling voxel intensities of images. RESULTS From 944 two-dimensional features, 79.9% to 96.4% showed excellent repeatability in fixed position across all scanners. A much lower range (11.2% to 85.4%) was obtained after phantom repositioning. Three-dimensional extraction did not improve repeatability performance. Excellent reproducibility between scanners was observed in 4.6% to 15.6% of the features, at fixed imaging parameters. In addition, 82.4% to 94.9% of the features showed excellent agreement when extracted from images acquired with echo times 5 ms apart, but decreased with increasing echo-time intervals, and 90.7% of the features exhibited excellent reproducibility for changes in pulse repetition time. Of nonshape features, 2.0% was identified as providing only shape information. CONCLUSION We showed that radiomic features are affected by MRI protocols and propose a general workflow to identify repeatable, reproducible, and informative radiomic features to ensure robustness of clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Bianchini
- Department of Physics, Università degli Studi di Milano and INSTM RU, Milan, Italy
| | - João Santinha
- Computational Clinical Imaging Group, Center for the Unknown (CCU), Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.,Instituto de Telecomunicações, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Mário Figueiredo
- Instituto de Telecomunicações, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Francesca Botta
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Origgi
- Medical Physics Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Radiation Research Unit, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Papanikolaou
- Computational Clinical Imaging Group, Center for the Unknown (CCU), Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
153
|
Zhong J, Hu Y, Si L, Jia G, Xing Y, Zhang H, Yao W. A systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing radiomics quality score as a tool promoting clinical translation. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:1526-1535. [PMID: 32876837 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07221-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the methodological quality and risk of bias in radiomics studies investigating diagnosis, therapy response, and survival of patients with osteosarcoma. METHODS In this systematic review, literatures on radiomics in osteosarcoma were included and assessed for methodological quality through the radiomics quality score (RQS). The risk of bias and concern of application was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. A meta-analysis of studies focusing on predicting osteosarcoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed. RESULTS Twelve radiomics studies exploring osteosarcoma were identified, and five were included in meta-analysis. The RQS reached an average of 20.4% (6.92 of 36) with good inter-rater agreement (ICC 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-0.99). Four studies validated results with an internal dataset, none of which used external dataset; one study was prospectively designed, and another one shared part of the dataset. The risk of bias and concern of application were mainly related to index test aspect. The meta-analysis showed a diagnostic odds ratio of 43.68 (95%CI 13.5-141.31) for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with high heterogeneity and low methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS The overall scientific quality of included studies is insufficient; however, radiomics remains a promising technology for predicting treatment response, which might guide therapeutic decision-making and related to prognosis. Improvements in study design, validation, and open science needs to be made to demonstrate the generalizability of findings and to achieve clinical applications. Widespread application of RQS, pre-trained RQS scoring procedure, and modification of RQS in response to clinical needs are necessary. KEY POINTS • Limited radiomics studies were established in osteosarcoma with mean RQS of 20.4%, commonly due to unvalidated results, retrospective study design, and absence of open science. • Meta-analysis of radiomics studies predicting osteosarcoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed high diagnostic odds ratio 43.68, while high heterogeneity and low methodological quality were the main concerns. • A previously trained data extraction instrument allowed reaching moderate inter-rater agreement in RQS applications, while RQS still needs improvement to become a wide adaptive tool in reviews of radiomics studies, in routine self-check before manuscript submitting and in study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyu Zhong
- Department of Imaging, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 1111 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China
| | - Yangfan Hu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Liping Si
- Department of Imaging, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 1111 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China
| | - Geng Jia
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Yue Xing
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200233, China
| | - Huan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin 2nd Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| | - Weiwu Yao
- Department of Imaging, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 1111 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, 200050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Tozzi L, Fleming SL, Taylor ZD, Raterink CD, Williams LM. Test-retest reliability of the human functional connectome over consecutive days: identifying highly reliable portions and assessing the impact of methodological choices. Netw Neurosci 2020; 4:925-945. [PMID: 33615097 PMCID: PMC7888485 DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Countless studies have advanced our understanding of the human brain and its organization by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to derive network representations of human brain function. However, we do not know to what extent these "functional connectomes" are reliable over time. In a large public sample of healthy participants (N = 833) scanned on two consecutive days, we assessed the test-retest reliability of fMRI functional connectivity and the consequences on reliability of three common sources of variation in analysis workflows: atlas choice, global signal regression, and thresholding. By adopting the intraclass correlation coefficient as a metric, we demonstrate that only a small portion of the functional connectome is characterized by good (6-8%) to excellent (0.08-0.14%) reliability. Connectivity between prefrontal, parietal, and temporal areas is especially reliable, but also average connectivity within known networks has good reliability. In general, while unreliable edges are weak, reliable edges are not necessarily strong. Methodologically, reliability of edges varies between atlases, global signal regression decreases reliability for networks and most edges (but increases it for some), and thresholding based on connection strength reduces reliability. Focusing on the reliable portion of the connectome could help quantify brain trait-like features and investigate individual differences using functional neuroimaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Tozzi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Scott L. Fleming
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Zachary D. Taylor
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Cooper D. Raterink
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Leanne M. Williams
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
van Timmeren JE, Cester D, Tanadini-Lang S, Alkadhi H, Baessler B. Radiomics in medical imaging-"how-to" guide and critical reflection. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:91. [PMID: 32785796 PMCID: PMC7423816 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00887-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 735] [Impact Index Per Article: 147.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, which aims at enhancing the existing data available to clinicians by means of advanced mathematical analysis. Through mathematical extraction of the spatial distribution of signal intensities and pixel interrelationships, radiomics quantifies textural information by using analysis methods from the field of artificial intelligence. Various studies from different fields in imaging have been published so far, highlighting the potential of radiomics to enhance clinical decision-making. However, the field faces several important challenges, which are mainly caused by the various technical factors influencing the extracted radiomic features.The aim of the present review is twofold: first, we present the typical workflow of a radiomics analysis and deliver a practical "how-to" guide for a typical radiomics analysis. Second, we discuss the current limitations of radiomics, suggest potential improvements, and summarize relevant literature on the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janita E van Timmeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Cester
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hatem Alkadhi
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bettina Baessler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Goodkin O, Pemberton HG, Vos SB, Prados F, Das RK, Moggridge J, De Blasi B, Bartlett P, Williams E, Campion T, Haider L, Pearce K, Bargallό N, Sanchez E, Bisdas S, White M, Ourselin S, Winston GP, Duncan JS, Cardoso J, Thornton JS, Yousry TA, Barkhof F. Clinical evaluation of automated quantitative MRI reports for assessment of hippocampal sclerosis. Eur Radiol 2020; 31:34-44. [PMID: 32749588 PMCID: PMC7755617 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07075-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is a common cause of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroradiological practice relies on visual assessment, but quantification of HS imaging biomarkers-hippocampal volume loss and T2 elevation-could improve detection. We tested whether quantitative measures, contextualised with normative data, improve rater accuracy and confidence. METHODS Quantitative reports (QReports) were generated for 43 individuals with epilepsy (mean age ± SD 40.0 ± 14.8 years, 22 men; 15 histologically unilateral HS; 5 bilateral; 23 MR-negative). Normative data was generated from 111 healthy individuals (age 40.0 ± 12.8 years, 52 men). Nine raters with different experience (neuroradiologists, trainees, and image analysts) assessed subjects' imaging with and without QReports. Raters assigned imaging normal, right, left, or bilateral HS. Confidence was rated on a 5-point scale. RESULTS Correct designation (normal/abnormal) was high and showed further trend-level improvement with QReports, from 87.5 to 92.5% (p = 0.07, effect size d = 0.69). Largest magnitude improvement (84.5 to 93.8%) was for image analysts (d = 0.87). For bilateral HS, QReports significantly improved overall accuracy, from 74.4 to 91.1% (p = 0.042, d = 0.7). Agreement with the correct diagnosis (kappa) tended to increase from 0.74 ('fair') to 0.86 ('excellent') with the report (p = 0.06, d = 0.81). Confidence increased when correctly assessing scans with the QReport (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.945). CONCLUSIONS QReports of HS imaging biomarkers can improve rater accuracy and confidence, particularly in challenging bilateral cases. Improvements were seen across all raters, with large effect sizes, greatest for image analysts. These findings may have positive implications for clinical radiology services and justify further validation in larger groups. KEY POINTS • Quantification of imaging biomarkers for hippocampal sclerosis-volume loss and raised T2 signal-could improve clinical radiological detection in challenging cases. • Quantitative reports for individual patients, contextualised with normative reference data, improved diagnostic accuracy and confidence in a group of nine raters, in particular for bilateral HS cases. • We present a pre-use clinical validation of an automated imaging assessment tool to assist clinical radiology reporting of hippocampal sclerosis, which improves detection accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Goodkin
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK. .,Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Hugh G Pemberton
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK.,Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sjoerd B Vos
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK.,Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK
| | - Ferran Prados
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK.,Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ravi K Das
- Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - James Moggridge
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bianca De Blasi
- Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Philippa Bartlett
- Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elaine Williams
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Campion
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lukas Haider
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,NMR Research Unit, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kirsten Pearce
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nuria Bargallό
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and Magnetic Resonance Image Core Facility, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Sanchez
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sotirios Bisdas
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark White
- Digital Services, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, UK.,School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Gavin P Winston
- Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - John S Duncan
- Epilepsy Society MRI Unit, Chalfont St Peter, UK.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jorge Cardoso
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John S Thornton
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tarek A Yousry
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), University College London, London, UK.,Neuroradiological Academic Unit, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.,Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
CT Phantom Evaluation of 67,392 American College of Radiology Accreditation Examinations: Implications for Opportunistic Screening of Osteoporosis Using CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 216:447-452. [PMID: 32755177 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.22943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether systematic bias in attenuation measurements occurs among CT scanners made by four major manufacturers and the relevance of this bias regarding opportunistic screening for osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data on attenuation measurement accuracy were acquired using the American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom and were evaluated in a blinded fashion for four CT manufacturers (8500 accreditation submissions for manufacturer A; 18,575 for manufacturer B; 8278 for manufacturer C; and 32,039 for manufacturer D). The attenuation value for water, acrylic (surrogate for trabecular bone), and Teflon (surrogate for cortical bone; Chemours) materials for an adult abdominal CT technique (120 kV, 240 mA, standard reconstruction algorithm) was used in the analysis. Differences in attenuation value across all manufacturers were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a post hoc test for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS. The mean attenuation value for water ranged from -0.3 to 2.7 HU, with highly significant differences among all manufacturers (p < 0.001). For the trabecular bone surrogate, differences in attenuation values across all manufacturers were also highly significant (p < 0.001), with mean values of 120.9 (SD, 3.5), 124.6 (3.3), 126.9 (4.4), and 123.9 (3.4) HU for manufacturers A, B, C, and D, respectively. For the cortical bone surrogate, differences in attenuation values across all manufacturers were also highly significant (p < 0.001), with mean values of 939.0 (14.2), 874.3 (13.3), 897.6 (11.3), and 912.7 (13.4) HU for manufacturers A, B, C, and D, respectively. CONCLUSION. CT scanners made by different manufacturers show systematic offsets in attenuation measurement when compared with each other. Knowledge of these off-sets is useful for optimizing the accuracy of opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
158
|
Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Bolus Transit Quantification With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Across Multiple Scanners and Analysis Software Packages—A Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance Study. Invest Radiol 2020; 55:643-656. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
159
|
Leroi L, Gras V, Boulant N, Ripart M, Poirion E, Santin MD, Valabregue R, Mauconduit F, Hertz‐Pannier L, Le Bihan D, Rochefort L, Vignaud A. Simultaneous proton density, T
1
, T
2
, and flip‐angle mapping of the brain at 7 T using multiparametric 3D SSFP imaging and parallel‐transmission universal pulses. Magn Reson Med 2020; 84:3286-3299. [DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Revised: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Leroi
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Vincent Gras
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Nicolas Boulant
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Mathilde Ripart
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Emilie Poirion
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
- ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06 UMR S1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière Paris France
| | - Mathieu D. Santin
- ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06 UMR S1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière Paris France
- CENIR, ICM, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière Paris France
| | - Romain Valabregue
- ICM, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06 UMR S1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière Paris France
- CENIR, ICM, Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière Paris France
| | - Franck Mauconduit
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | | | - Denis Le Bihan
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| | - Ludovic Rochefort
- Aix‐Marseille University, CNRS, CRMBM (Center for Magnetic Resonance in Biology and Medicine‐UMR 7339) Marseille France
| | - Alexandre Vignaud
- Université Paris‐Saclay, CEA, CNRS, BAOBAB, NeuroSpin Gif‐sur‐Yvette France
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Panayides AS, Amini A, Filipovic ND, Sharma A, Tsaftaris SA, Young A, Foran D, Do N, Golemati S, Kurc T, Huang K, Nikita KS, Veasey BP, Zervakis M, Saltz JH, Pattichis CS. AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2020; 24:1837-1857. [PMID: 32609615 PMCID: PMC8580417 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2020.2991043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews state-of-the-art research solutions across the spectrum of medical imaging informatics, discusses clinical translation, and provides future directions for advancing clinical practice. More specifically, it summarizes advances in medical imaging acquisition technologies for different modalities, highlighting the necessity for efficient medical data management strategies in the context of AI in big healthcare data analytics. It then provides a synopsis of contemporary and emerging algorithmic methods for disease classification and organ/ tissue segmentation, focusing on AI and deep learning architectures that have already become the de facto approach. The clinical benefits of in-silico modelling advances linked with evolving 3D reconstruction and visualization applications are further documented. Concluding, integrative analytics approaches driven by associate research branches highlighted in this study promise to revolutionize imaging informatics as known today across the healthcare continuum for both radiology and digital pathology applications. The latter, is projected to enable informed, more accurate diagnosis, timely prognosis, and effective treatment planning, underpinning precision medicine.
Collapse
|
161
|
Pinkert MA, Cox BL, Dai B, Hall TJ, Eliceiri KW. 3-D-Printed Registration Phantom for Combined Ultrasound and Optical Imaging of Biological Tissues. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2020; 46:1808-1814. [PMID: 32340797 PMCID: PMC7293928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Efforts to develop quantitative ultrasound biomarkers would benefit from comparisons between ultrasound data and higher-resolution images of the tissue microstructure, such as from optical microscopy. However, only a few studies have used these methods for multiscale imaging because it is difficult to register low-resolution (>100 μm) ultrasound images to high-resolution microscopy images. To address this need, we have designed a 3-D-printed registration phantom that is made of a hard fluorescent resin, fits into a glass-bottom dish and can be used to calculate a coordinate system transform between ultrasound and optical microscopy. We report the phantom design, a registration protocol and an example registration using 18.5-MHz ultrasound and second harmonic generation microscopy. We evaluate the registration precision, achieving standard deviations smaller than the ultrasound resolution across all axes, and illustrate on a mouse mammary gland that this method yields results superior to those of manual landmark registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Pinkert
- Morgridge Institute for Research, 330 N Orchard St, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53715
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53706
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Medical Physics, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53705
| | - Benjamin L Cox
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53706
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Medical Physics, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53705
| | - Bing Dai
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53706
| | - Timothy J Hall
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Medical Physics, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53705
- Co-corresponding Author: Timothy J. Hall, , Phone: +1 608-265-9459
| | - Kevin W Eliceiri
- Morgridge Institute for Research, 330 N Orchard St, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53715
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Laboratory for Optical and Computational Instrumentation, 1675 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53706
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Medical Physics, 1111 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, United States of America, 53705
- University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Biomedical Engineering, 1550 Engineering Dr, Madison, WI 53706
- Co-corresponding Author: Kevin W. Eliceiri, , Phone: +1 608-263-6288
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Mahmutovic Persson I, Falk Håkansson H, Örbom A, Liu J, von Wachenfeldt K, Olsson LE. Imaging Biomarkers and Pathobiological Profiling in a Rat Model of Drug-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease Induced by Bleomycin. Front Physiol 2020; 11:584. [PMID: 32636756 PMCID: PMC7317035 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A large number of systemically administered drugs have the potential to cause drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DIILD). We aim to characterize a model of DIILD in the rat and develop imaging biomarkers (IBs) for detection and quantification of DIILD. In this study, Sprague-Dawley rats received one single dose of intratracheal (i.t.) bleomycin and were longitudinally imaged at day 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 post dosing, applying the imaging techniques magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was analyzed for total protein and inflammatory cells. Lungs were saved for further evaluation by gene analysis using quantitative-PCR and by histology. Lung sections were stained with Masson's-Trichrome staining and evaluated by modified Ashcroft score. Gene expression profiling of inflammatory and fibrotic markers was performed on lung tissue homogenates. Bleomycin induced significant increase in total protein concentration and total cell count in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), peaking at day 3 (p > 0.001) and day 7 (p > 0.001) compared to control, respectively. Lesions measured by MRI and PET signal in the lungs of bleomycin challenged rats were significantly increased during days 3-14, peaking at day 7. Two subgroups of animals were identified as low- and high-responders by their different change in total lung volume. Both groups showed signs of inflammation initially, while at later time points, the low-responder group recovered toward control, and the high-responder group showed sustained lung volume increase, and significant increase of lesion volume (p < 0.001) compared to control. Lastly, important inflammatory and pro-fibrotic markers were assessed from lung tissue, linking observed imaging pathological changes to gene expression patterns. In conclusion, bleomycin-induced lung injury is an adequate animal model for DIILD studies and for translational lung injury assessment by MRI and PET imaging. The scenario comprised disease responses, with different fractions of inflammation and fibrosis. Thereby, this study improved the understanding of imaging and biological biomarkers in DIILD and lung injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irma Mahmutovic Persson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Institution of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Örbom
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Lars E Olsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Institution of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,TRISTAN-IMI Consortium (Translational Imaging in Drug Safety Assessment-Innovative Medicines Initiative)
| |
Collapse
|
163
|
Fain SB, Lynch DA, Hatt C. Invited Commentary on "Quantitative CT Analysis of Diffuse Lung Disease". Radiographics 2020; 40:E1-E3. [PMID: 32125952 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean B Fain
- From the Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Rm 2488, Madison, WI 53705 (S.B.F); Department of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo (D.A.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Imbio, Minneapolis, Minn (C.H.)
| | - David A Lynch
- From the Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Rm 2488, Madison, WI 53705 (S.B.F); Department of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo (D.A.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Imbio, Minneapolis, Minn (C.H.)
| | - Charles Hatt
- From the Departments of Medical Physics and Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Rm 2488, Madison, WI 53705 (S.B.F); Department of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo (D.A.L.); and Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Imbio, Minneapolis, Minn (C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
164
|
Borga M, Ahlgren A, Romu T, Widholm P, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, West J. Reproducibility and repeatability of MRI‐based body composition analysis. Magn Reson Med 2020; 84:3146-3156. [DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Borga
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden
- Center for Medical Image science and Visualization Linköping University Linköping Sweden
- AMRA Medical AB Linköping Sweden
| | | | | | - Per Widholm
- Center for Medical Image science and Visualization Linköping University Linköping Sweden
- AMRA Medical AB Linköping Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science Linköping University Linköping Sweden
| | - Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard
- Center for Medical Image science and Visualization Linköping University Linköping Sweden
- AMRA Medical AB Linköping Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science Linköping University Linköping Sweden
| | - Janne West
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden
- Center for Medical Image science and Visualization Linköping University Linköping Sweden
- AMRA Medical AB Linköping Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
European Society of Radiology (ESR), Alberich-Bayarri A, Sourbron S, Golay X, deSouza N, Smits M, van der Lugt A, Boellard R. ESR Statement on the Validation of Imaging Biomarkers. Insights Imaging 2020; 11:76. [PMID: 32500316 PMCID: PMC7272524 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00872-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Medical imaging capable of generating imaging biomarkers, specifically radiology and nuclear medicine image acquisition and analysis processes, differs from frequently used comparators like blood or urine biomarkers. This difference arises from the sample acquisition methodology. While different analysis methodologies and equipment provide slightly different results in any analytical domain, unlike blood or urine analysis where the samples are obtained by simple extraction or excretion, in radiology the acquisition of the sample is heterogeneous by design, since complex equipment from different vendors is used. Therefore, with this additional degree of freedom in medical imaging, there is still risk of persistent heterogeneity of image quality through time, due to different technological implementations across vendors and protocols used in different centres. Quantitative imaging biomarkers have yet to demonstrate an impact on clinical practice due to this lack of comprehensive standardisation in terms of technical aspects of image acquisition, analysis algorithms, processes and clinical validation.The aim is establishing a standard methodology based on metrology for the validation of image acquisition and analysis methods used in the extraction of biomarkers and radiomics data. The appropriate implementation of the guidelines herein proposed by radiology departments, research institutes and industry will allow for a significant reduction in inter-vendor & inter-centre variability in imaging biomarkers and determine the measurement error obtained, enabling them to be used in imaging-based criteria for diagnosis, prognosis or treatment response, ultimately improving clinical workflows and patient care. The validation of developed analytical methods must be based on a technical performance validation and clinical validation.
Collapse
|
166
|
Soltysik DA. Optimizing data processing to improve the reproducibility of single-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Behav 2020; 10:e01617. [PMID: 32307927 PMCID: PMC7303387 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High reproducibility is critical for ensuring the confidence needed to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation maps for presurgical planning. METHODS In this study, the comparison of different motion correction methods, spatial smoothing methods, regression methods, and thresholding methods was performed to see whether specific data processing methods can be employed to improve the reproducibility of single-subject fMRI activation. Three test-retest metrics were used: the percent difference in activation volume (PDAV), the difference in the center of mass (DCM), and the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). RESULTS The PDAV was minimized when using little or no spatial smoothing and AMPLE thresholding. The DCM was minimized when using affine motion correction and little or no spatial smoothing. The DSC was improved when using affine motion correction and generous spatial smoothing. However, it is believed that the overlap metric may be unsuitable for testing fMRI reproducibility. CONCLUSION Processing methods to improve fMRI reproducibility were determined. Importantly, the processing methods needed to improve reproducibility were dependent on the fMRI activation metric of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Soltysik
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Medical Products and Tobacco, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Ursprung S, Beer L, Bruining A, Woitek R, Stewart GD, Gallagher FA, Sala E. Radiomics of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in renal cell carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:3558-3566. [PMID: 32060715 PMCID: PMC7248043 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06666-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To assess the methodological quality of radiomics studies investigating histological subtypes, therapy response, and survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and (2) to determine the risk of bias in these radiomics studies. METHODS In this systematic review, literature published since 2000 on radiomics in RCC was included and assessed for methodological quality using the Radiomics Quality Score. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool and a meta-analysis of radiomics studies focusing on differentiating between angiomyolipoma without visible fat and RCC was performed. RESULTS Fifty-seven studies investigating the use of radiomics in renal cancer were identified, including 4590 patients in total. The average Radiomics Quality Score was 3.41 (9.4% of total) with good inter-rater agreement (ICC 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Three studies validated results with an independent dataset, one used a publically available validation dataset. None of the studies shared the code, images, or regions of interest. The meta-analysis showed moderate heterogeneity among the included studies and an odds ratio of 6.24 (95% CI 4.27-9.12; p < 0.001) for the differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from RCC. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics algorithms show promise for answering clinical questions where subjective interpretation is challenging or not established. However, the generalizability of findings to prospective cohorts needs to be demonstrated in future trials for progression towards clinical translation. Improved sharing of methods including code and images could facilitate independent validation of radiomics signatures. KEY POINTS • Studies achieved an average Radiomics Quality Score of 10.8%. Common reasons for low Radiomics Quality Scores were unvalidated results, retrospective study design, absence of open science, and insufficient control for multiple comparisons. • A previous training phase allowed reaching almost perfect inter-rater agreement in the application of the Radiomics Quality Score. • Meta-analysis of radiomics studies distinguishing angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma show moderate diagnostic odds ratios of 6.24 and moderate methodological diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Ursprung
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lucian Beer
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Annemarie Bruining
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Grant D Stewart
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ferdia A Gallagher
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Marcadent S, Hofmeister J, Preti MG, Martin SP, Van De Ville D, Montet X. Generative Adversarial Networks Improve the Reproducibility and Discriminative Power of Radiomic Features. Radiol Artif Intell 2020; 2:e190035. [PMID: 33937823 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the contribution of a generative adversarial network (GAN) to improve intermanufacturer reproducibility of radiomic features (RFs). Materials and Methods The authors retrospectively developed a cycle-GAN to translate texture information from chest radiographs acquired using one manufacturer (Siemens) to chest radiographs acquired using another (Philips), producing fake chest radiographs with different textures. The authors prospectively evaluated the ability of this texture-translation cycle-GAN to reduce the intermanufacturer variability of RFs extracted from the lung parenchyma. This study assessed the cycle-GAN's ability to fool several machine learning (ML) classifiers tasked with recognizing the manufacturer on the basis of chest radiography inputs. The authors also evaluated the cycle-GAN's ability to mislead radiologists who were asked to perform the same recognition task. Finally, the authors tested whether the cycle-GAN had an impact on radiomic diagnostic accuracy for chest radiography in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Results RFs, extracted from chest radiographs after the cycle-GAN's texture translation (fake chest radiographs), showed decreased intermanufacturer RF variability. Using cycle-GAN-generated chest radiographs as inputs, ML classifiers categorized the fake chest radiographs as belonging to the target manufacturer rather than to a native one. Moreover, cycle-GAN fooled two experienced radiologists who identified fake chest radiographs as belonging to a target manufacturer class. Finally, reducing intermanufacturer RF variability with cycle-GAN improved the discriminative power of RFs for patients without CHF versus patients with CHF (from 55% to 73.5%, P < .001). Conclusion Both ML classifiers and radiologists had difficulty recognizing the chest radiographs' manufacturer. The cycle-GAN improved RF intermanufacturer reproducibility and discriminative power for identifying patients with CHF. This deep learning approach may help counteract the sensitivity of RFs to differences in acquisition.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020See also the commentary by Alderson in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Marcadent
- Service of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., S.P.M., X.M.); Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., M.G.P., S.P.M., D.V.D.V., X.M.); and Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (S.M., M.G.P., D.V.D.V.)
| | - Jeremy Hofmeister
- Service of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., S.P.M., X.M.); Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., M.G.P., S.P.M., D.V.D.V., X.M.); and Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (S.M., M.G.P., D.V.D.V.)
| | - Maria Giulia Preti
- Service of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., S.P.M., X.M.); Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., M.G.P., S.P.M., D.V.D.V., X.M.); and Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (S.M., M.G.P., D.V.D.V.)
| | - Steve P Martin
- Service of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., S.P.M., X.M.); Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., M.G.P., S.P.M., D.V.D.V., X.M.); and Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (S.M., M.G.P., D.V.D.V.)
| | - Dimitri Van De Ville
- Service of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., S.P.M., X.M.); Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., M.G.P., S.P.M., D.V.D.V., X.M.); and Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (S.M., M.G.P., D.V.D.V.)
| | - Xavier Montet
- Service of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., S.P.M., X.M.); Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (S.M., J.H., M.G.P., S.P.M., D.V.D.V., X.M.); and Institute of Bioengineering/Center for Neuroprosthetics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (S.M., M.G.P., D.V.D.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Captur G, Bhandari A, Brühl R, Ittermann B, Keenan KE, Yang Y, Eames RJ, Benedetti G, Torlasco C, Ricketts L, Boubertakh R, Fatih N, Greenwood JP, Paulis LEM, Lawton CB, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Lamb HJ, Steeds R, Leung SW, Berry C, Valentin S, Flett A, de Lange C, DeCobelli F, Viallon M, Croisille P, Higgins DM, Greiser A, Pang W, Hamilton-Craig C, Strugnell WE, Dresselaers T, Barison A, Dawson D, Taylor AJ, Mongeon FP, Plein S, Messroghli D, Al-Mallah M, Grieve SM, Lombardi M, Jang J, Salerno M, Chaturvedi N, Kellman P, Bluemke DA, Nezafat R, Gatehouse P, Moon JC, on behalf of the T1MES Consortium. T 1 mapping performance and measurement repeatability: results from the multi-national T 1 mapping standardization phantom program (T1MES). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020; 22:31. [PMID: 32375896 PMCID: PMC7204222 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00613-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The T1 Mapping and Extracellular volume (ECV) Standardization (T1MES) program explored T1 mapping quality assurance using a purpose-developed phantom with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Conformité Européenne (CE) regulatory clearance. We report T1 measurement repeatability across centers describing sequence, magnet, and vendor performance. METHODS Phantoms batch-manufactured in August 2015 underwent 2 years of structural imaging, B0 and B1, and "reference" slow T1 testing. Temperature dependency was evaluated by the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology and by the German Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt. Center-specific T1 mapping repeatability (maximum one scan per week to minimum one per quarter year) was assessed over mean 358 (maximum 1161) days on 34 1.5 T and 22 3 T magnets using multiple T1 mapping sequences. Image and temperature data were analyzed semi-automatically. Repeatability of serial T1 was evaluated in terms of coefficient of variation (CoV), and linear mixed models were constructed to study the interplay of some of the known sources of T1 variation. RESULTS Over 2 years, phantom gel integrity remained intact (no rips/tears), B0 and B1 homogenous, and "reference" T1 stable compared to baseline (% change at 1.5 T, 1.95 ± 1.39%; 3 T, 2.22 ± 1.44%). Per degrees Celsius, 1.5 T, T1 (MOLLI 5s(3s)3s) increased by 11.4 ms in long native blood tubes and decreased by 1.2 ms in short post-contrast myocardium tubes. Agreement of estimated T1 times with "reference" T1 was similar across Siemens and Philips CMR systems at both field strengths (adjusted R2 ranges for both field strengths, 0.99-1.00). Over 1 year, many 1.5 T and 3 T sequences/magnets were repeatable with mean CoVs < 1 and 2% respectively. Repeatability was narrower for 1.5 T over 3 T. Within T1MES repeatability for native T1 was narrow for several sequences, for example, at 1.5 T, Siemens MOLLI 5s(3s)3s prototype number 448B (mean CoV = 0.27%) and Philips modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) 3s(3s)5s (CoV 0.54%), and at 3 T, Philips MOLLI 3b(3s)5b (CoV 0.33%) and Siemens shortened MOLLI (ShMOLLI) prototype 780C (CoV 0.69%). After adjusting for temperature and field strength, it was found that the T1 mapping sequence and scanner software version (both P < 0.001 at 1.5 T and 3 T), and to a lesser extent the scanner model (P = 0.011, 1.5 T only), had the greatest influence on T1 across multiple centers. CONCLUSION The T1MES CE/FDA approved phantom is a robust quality assurance device. In a multi-center setting, T1 mapping had performance differences between field strengths, sequences, scanner software versions, and manufacturers. However, several specific combinations of field strength, sequence, and scanner are highly repeatable, and thus, have potential to provide standardized assessment of T1 times for clinical use, although temperature correction is required for native T1 tubes at least.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Captur
- UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
- UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7BH UK
- Cardiology Department, The Royal Free Hospital, Centre for Inherited Heart Muscle Conditions, Pond Street, Hampstead, London, NW3 2QG UK
| | - Abhiyan Bhandari
- UCL Medical School, University College London, Bloomsbury Campus, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Rüdiger Brühl
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestr. 2–12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Ittermann
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestr. 2–12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathryn E. Keenan
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder, MS 818.03, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO USA
| | - Ye Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016 Zhejiang People’s Republic of China
| | - Richard J. Eames
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Rd, London, SW7 2BB UK
| | - Giulia Benedetti
- Department of Radiology, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Camilla Torlasco
- University of Milan-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20100 Milan, Italy
| | - Lewis Ricketts
- UCL Medical School, University College London, Bloomsbury Campus, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Redha Boubertakh
- Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS UK
| | - Nasri Fatih
- UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
- UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7BH UK
| | - John P. Greenwood
- Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Center & Division of Biomedical Imaging, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Leonie E. M. Paulis
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Chris B. Lawton
- Bristol Heart Institute, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
| | - Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci
- Bristol Heart Institute, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
| | - Hildo J. Lamb
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Steeds
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK
| | - Steve W. Leung
- UK Albert B. Chandler Hospital - Pavilion G, Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
| | - Colin Berry
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, RC309 Level C3, Bhf Gcrc, Glasgow, Scotland G12 8TA UK
| | - Sinitsyn Valentin
- Department of Multidisciplinary Clinical Studies, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrew Flett
- University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD UK
| | - Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Magalie Viallon
- INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, University of Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, CREATIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Pierre Croisille
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - David M. Higgins
- Philips, Philips Centre, Unit 3, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, Surrey GU2 8XG UK
| | | | - Wenjie Pang
- Resonance Health, 278 Stirling Highway, Claremont, WA 6010 Australia
| | - Christian Hamilton-Craig
- The Prince Charles Hospital, Griffith University and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Wendy E. Strugnell
- The Prince Charles Hospital, Griffith University and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tom Dresselaers
- Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, UZ Belgium
| | | | - Dana Dawson
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD Scotland, UK
| | - Andrew J. Taylor
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - François-Pierre Mongeon
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger Street, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8 Canada
| | - Sven Plein
- Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Center & Division of Biomedical Imaging, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Messroghli
- Department of Internal Medicine – Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mouaz Al-Mallah
- King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center (KACC) (Riyadh), National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Stuart M. Grieve
- The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
| | - Massimo Lombardi
- I.R.C.C.S., Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, 2, 20097 San Donato Milanese, MI Italy
| | - Jihye Jang
- Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Cardiology East Campus, Room E/SH455, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Michael Salerno
- University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St, PO Box 800158, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
| | - Nish Chaturvedi
- UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7BH UK
| | - Peter Kellman
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1061 USA
| | - David A. Bluemke
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792-3252 USA
| | - Reza Nezafat
- Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Cardiology East Campus, Room E/SH455, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
| | - Peter Gatehouse
- CMRI Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP UK
| | - James C. Moon
- UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
- Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE UK
| | - on behalf of the T1MES Consortium
- UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
- UCL MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7BH UK
- Cardiology Department, The Royal Free Hospital, Centre for Inherited Heart Muscle Conditions, Pond Street, Hampstead, London, NW3 2QG UK
- UCL Medical School, University College London, Bloomsbury Campus, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestr. 2–12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
- National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Boulder, MS 818.03, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO USA
- Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016 Zhejiang People’s Republic of China
- Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Rd, London, SW7 2BB UK
- Department of Radiology, Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- University of Milan-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20100 Milan, Italy
- Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS UK
- Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Center & Division of Biomedical Imaging, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Bristol Heart Institute, National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Upper Maudlin St, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK
- UK Albert B. Chandler Hospital - Pavilion G, Gill Heart & Vascular Institute, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, RC309 Level C3, Bhf Gcrc, Glasgow, Scotland G12 8TA UK
- Department of Multidisciplinary Clinical Studies, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
- University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD UK
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
- INSA, CNRS UMR 5520, INSERM U1206, University of Lyon, UJM-Saint-Etienne, CREATIS, F-42023 Saint-Etienne, France
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France
- Philips, Philips Centre, Unit 3, Guildford Business Park, Guildford, Surrey GU2 8XG UK
- SiemensHealthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
- Resonance Health, 278 Stirling Highway, Claremont, WA 6010 Australia
- The Prince Charles Hospital, Griffith University and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, UZ Belgium
- Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD Scotland, UK
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger Street, Montreal, QC H1T 1C8 Canada
- Department of Internal Medicine – Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
- King Abdulaziz Cardiac Center (KACC) (Riyadh), National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
- I.R.C.C.S., Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, 2, 20097 San Donato Milanese, MI Italy
- Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Cardiology East Campus, Room E/SH455, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
- University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St, PO Box 800158, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1061 USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792-3252 USA
- CMRI Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London, SW3 6NP UK
- Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE UK
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Barendregt AM, Mazzoli V, van Gulik EC, Schonenberg-Meinema D, Nassar-Sheikh Rashid A, Nusman CM, Dolman KM, van den Berg JM, Kuijpers TW, Nederveen AJ, Maas M, Hemke R. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Diffusion-weighted MRI in the Assessment of Arthritis in the Knee. Radiology 2020; 295:373-380. [PMID: 32154774 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can depict the inflamed synovial membrane in arthritis. Purpose To study the diagnostic accuracy of DWI for the detection of arthritis compared with the clinical reference standard and to compare DWI to contrast material-enhanced MRI for the detection of synovial inflammation. Materials and Methods In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 45 participants with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or suspected of having JIA (seven boys, 38 girls; median age, 14 years [interquartile range, 12-16 years]) were included between December 2015 and December 2018. Study participants underwent pre- and postcontrast 3.0-T MRI of the knee with an additional DWI sequence. For the clinical reference standard, a multidisciplinary team determined the presence or absence of arthritis on the basis of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings (excluding DWI). Two data sets were scored by two radiologists blinded to all clinical data; data set 1 contained pre- and postcontrast sequences (contrast-enhanced MRI), and data set 2 contained precontrast and DWI sequences (DWI). Diagnostic accuracy was determined by comparing the scores of the DWI data set to those of the clinical reference standard. Second, DWI was compared with contrast-enhanced MRI regarding detection of synovial inflammation. Results Sensitivity for detection of arthritis for DWI was 93% (13 of the 14 participants with arthritis were correctly classified with DWI; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 64%, 100%) and specificity was 81% (25 of 31 participants without arthritis were correctly classified with DWI; 95% CI: 62%, 92%). Scores for synovial inflammation at DWI and contrast-enhanced MRI agreed in 37 of 45 participants (82%), resulting in a sensitivity of 92% (12 of 13 participants; 95% CI: 62%, 100%) and specificity of 78% (25 of 32 participants; 95% CI: 60%, 90%) with DWI when contrast-enhanced MRI was considered the reference standard. Conclusion Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was accurate in detecting arthritis in pediatric participants with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or suspected of having JIA and showed agreement with contrast-enhanced MRI. The results indicate that DWI could replace contrast-enhanced MRI for imaging of synovial inflammation in this patient group. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk M Barendregt
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Valentina Mazzoli
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - E Charlotte van Gulik
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Amara Nassar-Sheikh Rashid
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Charlotte M Nusman
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Koert M Dolman
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - J Merlijn van den Berg
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Taco W Kuijpers
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Aart J Nederveen
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Mario Maas
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| | - Robert Hemke
- From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., A.J.N., M.M., R.H.), Department of Pediatric Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease (A.M.B., E.C.v.G., D.S.M., A.N.S.a.R., J.M.v.d.B., T.W.K.), and Department of Pediatrics (C.M.N.), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Lucas Center for Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (V.M.); Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); and Department of Pediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Acceleration of 2D-MR fingerprinting by reducing the number of echoes with increased in-plane resolution: a volunteer study. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2020; 33:783-791. [PMID: 32248322 PMCID: PMC7669790 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-020-00842-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare the absolute values and repeatability of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) with 3000 and 1500 echoes/slice acquired in 41 s and 20 s (MRF3k and MRF1.5k, respectively). Materials and methods MRF3k and MRF1.5k scans based on fast imaging with steady precession (FISP) were conducted using a 3 T scanner. Inter-scan agreement and intra-scan repeatability were investigated in 41 and 28 subjects, respectively. Region-of-interest (ROI) analysis was conducted on T1 values of MRF3k by two raters, and their agreement was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Between MRF3k and MRF1.5k, differences in T1 and T2 values and inter-measurement correlation coefficients (CCs) were investigated. Intra-measurement repeatability was evaluated using coefficients of variation (CVs). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The ICCs of ROI measurements were 0.77–0.96. Differences were observed between the two MRF scans, but the CCs of the overall ROIs were 0.99 and 0.97 for the T1 and T2 values, respectively. The mean and median CVs of repeatability were equal to or less than 1.58% and 3.13% in each of the ROIs for T1 and T2, respectively; there were some significant differences between MRF3k and MRF1.5k, but they were small, measuring less than 1%. Discussion Both MRF3k and MRF1.5k had high repeatability, and a strong to very strong correlation was observed, with a trend toward slightly higher values in MRF1.5k. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10334-020-00842-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
172
|
Gong Q, Li Q, Gavrielides MA, Petrick N. Data transformations for statistical assessment of quantitative imaging biomarkers: Application to lung nodule volumetry. Stat Methods Med Res 2020; 29:2749-2763. [PMID: 32133924 DOI: 10.1177/0962280220908619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Variance stabilization is an important step in the statistical assessment of quantitative imaging biomarkers. The objective of this study is to compare the Log and the Box-Cox transformations for variance stabilization in the context of assessing the performance of a particular quantitative imaging biomarker, the estimation of lung nodule volume from computed tomography images. First, a model is developed to generate and characterize repeated measurements typically observed in computed tomography lung nodule volume estimation. Given this model, we derive the parameter of the Box-Cox transformation that stabilizes the variance of the measurements across lung nodule volumes. Second, simulated, phantom, and clinical datasets are used to compare the Log and the Box-Cox transformations. Two metrics are used for quantifying the stability of the measurements across the transformed lung nodule volumes: the coefficient of variation for the standard deviation and the repeatability coefficient. The results for simulated, phantom, and clinical datasets show that the Box-Cox transformation generally had better variance stabilization performance compared to the Log transformation for lung nodule volume estimates from computed tomography scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Gong
- US Food and Drug Administration, CDRH/OSEL/DIDSR, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Qin Li
- US Food and Drug Administration, CDRH/OSEL/DIDSR, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Nicholas Petrick
- US Food and Drug Administration, CDRH/OSEL/DIDSR, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Kinahan PE, Perlman ES, Sunderland JJ, Subramaniam R, Wollenweber SD, Turkington TG, Lodge MA, Boellaard R, Obuchowski NA, Wahl RL. The QIBA Profile for FDG PET/CT as an Imaging Biomarker Measuring Response to Cancer Therapy. Radiology 2020; 294:647-657. [PMID: 31909700 PMCID: PMC7053216 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019191882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) Profile for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging was created by QIBA to both characterize and reduce the variability of standardized uptake values (SUVs). The Profile provides two complementary claims on the precision of SUV measurements. First, tumor glycolytic activity as reflected by the maximum SUV (SUVmax) is measurable from FDG PET/CT with a within-subject coefficient of variation of 10%-12%. Second, a measured increase in SUVmax of 39% or more, or a decrease of 28% or more, indicates that a true change has occurred with 95% confidence. Two applicable use cases are clinical trials and following individual patients in clinical practice. Other components of the Profile address the protocols and conformance standards considered necessary to achieve the performance claim. The Profile is intended for use by a broad audience; applications can range from discovery science through clinical trials to clinical practice. The goal of this report is to provide a rationale and overview of the FDG PET/CT Profile claims as well as its context, and to outline future needs and potential developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul E. Kinahan
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Eric S. Perlman
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - John J. Sunderland
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Rathan Subramaniam
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Scott D. Wollenweber
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Timothy G. Turkington
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Martin A. Lodge
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Nancy A. Obuchowski
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| | - Richard L. Wahl
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE
Pacific St, RR215, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7117 (P.E.K.); Perlman Advisory
Group, LLC, Hillsdale, NY (E.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University of Iowa,
Iowa City, Iowa (J.J.S.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas
Southwestern, Dallas, Tex (R.S.); GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis (S.D.W.);
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (T.G.T.);
The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (M.A.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear
Medicine, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.B.); Quantitative Health Sciences,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (N.A.O.); and Mallinckrodt
Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo
(R.L.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Vail DM, LeBlanc AK, Jeraj R. Advanced Cancer Imaging Applied in the Comparative Setting. Front Oncol 2020; 10:84. [PMID: 32117739 PMCID: PMC7019008 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The potential for companion (pet) species with spontaneously arising tumors to act as surrogates for preclinical development of advanced cancer imaging technologies has become more apparent in the last decade. The utility of the companion model specifically centers around issues related to body size (including spatial target/normal anatomic characteristics), physical size and spatial distribution of metastasis, tumor heterogeneity, the presence of an intact syngeneic immune system and a syngeneic tumor microenvironment shaped by the natural evolution of the cancer. Companion species size allows the use of similar equipment, hardware setup, software, and scan protocols which provide the opportunity for standardization and harmonization of imaging operating procedures and quality assurance across imaging protocols, imaging hardware, and the imaged species. Murine models generally do not replicate the size and spatial distribution of human metastatic cancer and these factors strongly influence image resolution and dosimetry. The following review will discuss several aspects of comparative cancer imaging in more detail while providing several illustrative examples of investigational approaches performed or currently under exploration at our institutions. Topics addressed include a discussion on interested consortia; image quality assurance and harmonization; image-based biomarker development and validation; contrast agent and radionuclide tracer development; advanced imaging to assess and predict response to cytotoxic and immunomodulatory anticancer agents; imaging of the tumor microenvironment; development of novel theranostic approaches; cell trafficking assessment via non-invasive imaging; and intraoperative imaging to inform surgical oncology decision making. Taken in totality, these comparative opportunities predict that safety, diagnostic and efficacy data generated in companion species with naturally developing and progressing cancers would better recapitulate the human cancer condition than that of artificial models in small rodent systems and ultimately accelerate the integration of novel imaging technologies into clinical practice. It is our hope that the examples presented should serve to provide those involved in cancer investigations who are unfamiliar with available comparative methodologies an understanding of the potential utility of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Vail
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.,Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Amy K LeBlanc
- Comparative Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Robert Jeraj
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.,Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Abstract
CLINICAL ISSUE The reproducible and exhaustive extraction of information from radiological images is a central task in the practice of radiology. Dynamic developments in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are introducing new methods for this task. Radiomics is one such method and offers new opportunities and challenges for the future of radiology. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS Radiomics describes the quantitative evaluation, interpretation, and clinical assessment of imaging markers in radiological data. Components of a radiomics analysis are data acquisition, data preprocessing, data management, segmentation of regions of interest, computation and selection of imaging markers, as well as the development of a radiomics model used for diagnosis and prognosis. This article explains these components and aims at providing an introduction to the field of radiomics while highlighting existing limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS This article is based on a selective literature search with the PubMed search engine. ASSESSMENT Even though radiomics applications have yet to arrive in routine clinical practice, the quantification of radiological data in terms of radiomics is underway and will increase in the future. This holds the potential for lasting change in the discipline of radiology. Through the successful extraction and interpretation of all the information encoded in radiological images the next step in the direction of a more personalized, future-oriented form of medicine can be taken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob M Murray
- AG Computational Radiology, Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.,Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Georgios Kaissis
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, München, Deutschland
| | - Rickmer Braren
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, München, Deutschland
| | - Jens Kleesiek
- AG Computational Radiology, Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Erickson BJ, Cai J. Magician's Corner: 4. Image Segmentation with U-Net. Radiol Artif Intell 2020; 2:e190161. [PMID: 33937814 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2020190161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A popular deep learning framework (Keras) is applied to the problem of image segmentation using a U-Net.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Jason Cai
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| |
Collapse
|
177
|
Ljungberg E, Wood T, Solana AB, Kolind S, Williams SCR, Wiesinger F, Barker GJ. Silent T
1
mapping using the variable flip angle method with B
1
correction. Magn Reson Med 2020; 84:813-824. [DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emil Ljungberg
- Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
| | - Tobias Wood
- Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
| | | | - Shannon Kolind
- Department of Physics and Astronomy University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- Department of Radiology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
- Medicine (Neurology) University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
| | - Steven C. R. Williams
- Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
| | - Florian Wiesinger
- Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
- ASL Europe, General Electric Healthcare Munich Germany
| | - Gareth J. Barker
- Department of Neuroimaging Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Test-retest reproducibility of a deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm for the chest radiograph. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2346-2355. [PMID: 31900698 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06589-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform test-retest reproducibility analyses for deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm (DLAD) using two stationary chest radiographs (CRs) with short-term intervals, to analyze influential factors on test-retest variations, and to investigate the robustness of DLAD to simulated post-processing and positional changes. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with pulmonary nodules resected in 2017. Preoperative CRs without interval changes were used. Test-retest reproducibility was analyzed in terms of median differences of abnormality scores, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Factors associated with test-retest variation were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses. Shifts in classification between the two CRs were analyzed using pre-determined cutoffs. Radiograph post-processing (blurring and sharpening) and positional changes (translations in x- and y-axes, rotation, and shearing) were simulated and agreement of abnormality scores between the original and simulated CRs was investigated. RESULTS Our study analyzed 169 patients (median age, 65 years; 91 men). The median difference of abnormality scores was 1-2% and ICC ranged from 0.83 to 0.90. The 95% LoA was approximately ± 30%. Test-retest variation was negatively associated with solid portion size (β, - 0.50; p = 0.008) and good nodule conspicuity (β, - 0.94; p < 0.001). A small fraction (15/169) showed discordant classifications when the high-specificity cutoff (46%) was applied to the model outputs (p = 0.04). DLAD was robust to the simulated positional change (ICC, 0.984, 0.996), but relatively less robust to post-processing (ICC, 0.872, 0.968). CONCLUSIONS DLAD was robust to the test-retest variation. However, inconspicuous nodules may cause fluctuations of the model output and subsequent misclassifications. KEY POINTS • The deep learning-based automatic detection algorithm was robust to the test-retest variation of the chest radiographs in general. • The test-retest variation was negatively associated with solid portion size and good nodule conspicuity. • High-specificity cutoff (46%) resulted in discordant classifications of 8.9% (15/169; p = 0.04) between the test-retest radiographs.
Collapse
|
179
|
Booth TC, Williams M, Luis A, Cardoso J, Ashkan K, Shuaib H. Machine learning and glioma imaging biomarkers. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:20-32. [PMID: 31371027 PMCID: PMC6927796 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM To review how machine learning (ML) is applied to imaging biomarkers in neuro-oncology, in particular for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched for articles published before September 2018 using relevant search terms. The search strategy focused on articles applying ML to high-grade glioma biomarkers for treatment response monitoring, prognosis, and prediction. RESULTS Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically used throughout the patient pathway because routine structural imaging provides detailed anatomical and pathological information and advanced techniques provide additional physiological detail. Using carefully chosen image features, ML is frequently used to allow accurate classification in a variety of scenarios. Rather than being chosen by human selection, ML also enables image features to be identified by an algorithm. Much research is applied to determining molecular profiles, histological tumour grade, and prognosis using MRI images acquired at the time that patients first present with a brain tumour. Differentiating a treatment response from a post-treatment-related effect using imaging is clinically important and also an area of active study (described here in one of two Special Issue publications dedicated to the application of ML in glioma imaging). CONCLUSION Although pioneering, most of the evidence is of a low level, having been obtained retrospectively and in single centres. Studies applying ML to build neuro-oncology monitoring biomarker models have yet to show an overall advantage over those using traditional statistical methods. Development and validation of ML models applied to neuro-oncology require large, well-annotated datasets, and therefore multidisciplinary and multi-centre collaborations are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T C Booth
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK; Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK.
| | - M Williams
- Department of Neuro-oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Rd, London W6 8RF, UK
| | - A Luis
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK; Department of Radiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - J Cardoso
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - K Ashkan
- Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - H Shuaib
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy's & St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Kim HJ, Kim B, Yu HJ, Huh J, Lee JH, Lee SS, Kim KW, Kim JK. Reproducibility of hepatic MR elastography across field strengths, pulse sequences, scan intervals, and readers. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:107-115. [PMID: 31720766 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02312-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the reproducibility of hepatic MRE under various combinations of settings of field strength, pulse sequence, scan interval, and reader in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients. METHODS Adult NAFLD patients were prospectively enrolled for serial hepatic MRE with 1.5 T using 2D GRE sequence and 3.0 T using 2D SE-EPI sequence on the same day and after 2 weeks, resulting a total of four MRE examinations per patient. Three readers with various levels of background knowledge in MRE technique and liver anatomy measured liver stiffness after a training session. Linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, within-subject coefficient of variation, and reproducibility coefficient (RDC) were used to determine reproducibility of hepatic MRE measurement. RESULTS Twenty patients completed the MRE sessions. Liver stiffness through MRE showed pooled RDC of 26% (upper 95% CI 30.6%) and corresponding limits of agreement (LOA) within 0.55 kPa across field strengths, MRE sequences, and 2-week interscan interval in three readers. Small mean biases and narrow LOA were observed among readers (0.05-0.19 kPa ± 0.53). CONCLUSION The magnitude of change across combinations of scan parameters is within acceptable clinical range, rendering liver stiffness through MRE a reproducible quantitative imaging biomarker. A lower reproducibility was observed for measurements under different field strengths/MRE sequences at a longer (2 weeks) interscan interval. Operators should be trained to acquire region of interest consistently in repeat examinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.
| | - Hyun Jeong Yu
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea
| | - Jimi Huh
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea
| | - Jei Hee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea
| | - Seung Soo Lee
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jai Keun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Hospital, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
181
|
Goyal NP, Sawh MC, Ugalde-Nicalo P, Angeles JE, Proudfoot JA, Newton KP, Middleton MS, Sirlin CB, Schwimmer JB. Evaluation of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for Early-phase Clinical Trials of Steatohepatitis in Adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 70:99-105. [PMID: 31633654 PMCID: PMC8053386 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Early-phase pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) clinical trials are designed with noninvasive parameters to assess potential efficacy. Increasingly, these parameters include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and MR elastography (MRE)-derived shear stiffness as biomarkers of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, respectively. Understanding fluctuations in these measures is essential for calculating trial sample sizes, interpreting results, and planning clinical drug trials in children with NAFLD. Lack of such data in children constitutes a critical knowledge gap. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to assess whole-liver MRI-PDFF change in adolescents with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) over 12 weeks. METHODS Adolescents 12 to 19 years with biopsy-proven NASH undergoing standard-of-care treatment were enrolled. Baseline and week-12 assessments of anthropometrics, transaminases, MRI-PDFF, and MRE stiffness were obtained. RESULTS Fifteen adolescents were included (mean age 15.7 [SD 2.9] years). Hepatic MRI-PDFF was stable over 12 weeks (mean absolute change -0.8%, P = 0.24). Correlation between baseline and week-12 values of MRI-PDFF was high (ICC = 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-0.99). MRE stiffness was stable (mean percentage change 2.7%, P = 0.44); correlation between baseline and week-12 values was moderate (ICC = 0.47; 95% CI 0-0.79). Changes in weight, BMI, and aminotransferases were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION In adolescents with NASH, fluctuations in hepatic MRI-PDFF and MRE stiffness over 12 weeks of standard-of-care were small. These data on the natural fluctuations in quantitative imaging biomarkers can serve as a reference for interventional trials in pediatric NASH and inform the interpretation and planning of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi P. Goyal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Mary Catherine Sawh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Patricia Ugalde-Nicalo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Jorge E. Angeles
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - James A. Proudfoot
- Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California, San Diego
| | - Kimberly P. Newton
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Michael S. Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Claude B. Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Jeffrey B. Schwimmer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Hall-Craggs MA, Bray TJP, Ciurtin C, Bainbridge A. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Has Potential for Assessment of Spondyloarthritis: Arguments for its Study and Use. J Rheumatol 2019; 46:541-542. [PMID: 31043500 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Anne Hall-Craggs
- Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL) and Consultant Radiologist, UCL Hospitals (UCLH);
| | | | - Coziana Ciurtin
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, UCL
| | - Alan Bainbridge
- UCLH, and Centre for Medical Imaging, Division of Medicine, UCL
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
3D-printed biological cell phantom for testing 3D quantitative phase imaging systems. Sci Rep 2019; 9:18872. [PMID: 31827171 PMCID: PMC6906528 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55330-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
As the 3D quantitative phase imaging (QPI) methods mature, their further development calls for reliable tools and methods to characterize and compare their metrological parameters. We use refractive index engineering during two-photon laser photolithography to fabricate a life-scale phantom of a biological cell with internal structures that mimic optical and structural properties of mammalian cells. After verification with a number of reference techniques, the phantom is used to characterize the performance of a limited-angle holographic tomography microscope.
Collapse
|
184
|
Pollard JH, Raman C, Zakharia Y, Tracy CR, Nepple KG, Ginader T, Breheny P, Sunderland JJ. Quantitative Test-Retest Measurement of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC in Tumor and Normal Tissue. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:1145-1152. [PMID: 31806776 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The PET radiotracer 68Ga-PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen)-HBED-CC (N,N'-bis [2-hydroxy-5-(carboxyethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid) shows potential as an imaging biomarker for recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the repeatability of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC in a test-retest trial in subjects with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods: Subjects with metastatic prostate cancer underwent 2 PET/CT scans with 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC within 14 d (mean, 6 ± 4 d). Lesions in bone, nodes, prostate/bed, and visceral organs, as well as representative normal tissues (salivary glands and spleen), were segmented separately by 2 readers. Absolute and percentage differences in SUVmax and SUVmean were calculated for all test-retest regions. Repeatability was assessed using percentage difference, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), repeatability coefficient (RC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Eighteen subjects were evaluated, 16 of whom demonstrated local or metastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT. In total, 136 lesions were segmented in bone (n = 99), nodes (n = 27), prostate/bed (n = 7), and viscera (n = 3). The wCV for SUVmax was 11.7% for bone lesions and 13.7% for nodes. The RC was ±32.5% SUVmax for bone lesions and ±37.9% SUVmax for nodal lesions, meaning 95% of the normal variability between 2 measurements will be within these numbers, so larger differences are likely attributable to true biologic changes in tumor rather than normal physiologic or measurement variability. wCV in the salivary glands and spleen was 8.9% and 10.7% SUVmean, respectively. Conclusion: Repeatability measurements for PET/CT test-retests with 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC showed a wCV of 12%-14% SUVmax and an RC of ±33%-38% SUVmax in bone and nodal lesions. These estimates are an important aspect of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC as a quantitative imaging biomarker. These estimates are similar to those reported for 18F-FDG, suggesting that 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/CT may be useful in monitoring response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet H Pollard
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa .,Iowa City Veterans Healthcare Center, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Caleb Raman
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Chad R Tracy
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Kenneth G Nepple
- Department of Urology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Tim Ginader
- Biostatistics Core, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; and
| | - Patrick Breheny
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - John J Sunderland
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
185
|
Computer-aided diagnosis system for characterizing ISUP grade ≥ 2 prostate cancers at multiparametric MRI: A cross-vendor evaluation. Diagn Interv Imaging 2019; 100:801-811. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2019] [Revised: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
186
|
Park JA, Kang KJ, Ko IO, Lee KC, Choi BK, Katoch N, Kim JW, Kim HJ, Kwon OI, Woo EJ. In Vivo Measurement of Brain Tissue Response After Irradiation: Comparison of T2 Relaxation, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient, and Electrical Conductivity. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2019; 38:2779-2784. [PMID: 31034410 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2913766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) has been widely used as a powerful treatment tool to address cancerous tissues because of its ability to control cell growth. Its ionizing radiation damages the DNA of cancerous tissues, leading to cell death. Medical imaging, however, still has limitations regarding the reliability of its assessment of tissue response and in predicting the treatment effect because of its inability to provide contrast information on the gradual, minute tissue changes after RT. A recently developed magnetic resonance (MR)-based conductivity imaging method may provide direct, highly sensitive information on this tissue response because its contrast mechanism is based on the concentration and mobility of ions in intracellular and extracellular spaces. In this feasibility study, we applied T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and electrical conductivity imaging to mouse brain, thus, using the MR imaging to map the tissue response after radiation exposure. To evaluate the degree of response, we measured the T2 relaxation, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and electrical conductivity of brain tissues before and after irradiation. The conductivity images, which showed significantly higher sensitivity than other MR imaging methods, indicated that the contrast is distinguishable in different ways at different areas of the brain. Future studies will focus on verifying these results and the long-term evaluation of conductivity changes using various irradiation methods for clinical applications.
Collapse
|
187
|
Smith EE, Biessels GJ, De Guio F, de Leeuw FE, Duchesne S, Düring M, Frayne R, Ikram MA, Jouvent E, MacIntosh BJ, Thrippleton MJ, Vernooij MW, Adams H, Backes WH, Ballerini L, Black SE, Chen C, Corriveau R, DeCarli C, Greenberg SM, Gurol ME, Ingrisch M, Job D, Lam BY, Launer LJ, Linn J, McCreary CR, Mok VC, Pantoni L, Pike GB, Ramirez J, Reijmer YD, Romero JR, Ropele S, Rost NS, Sachdev PS, Scott CJ, Seshadri S, Sharma M, Sourbron S, Steketee RM, Swartz RH, van Oostenbrugge R, van Osch M, van Rooden S, Viswanathan A, Werring D, Dichgans M, Wardlaw JM. Harmonizing brain magnetic resonance imaging methods for vascular contributions to neurodegeneration. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2019; 11:191-204. [PMID: 30859119 PMCID: PMC6396326 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Many consequences of cerebrovascular disease are identifiable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but variation in methods limits multicenter studies and pooling of data. The European Union Joint Program on Neurodegenerative Diseases (EU JPND) funded the HARmoNizing Brain Imaging MEthodS for VaScular Contributions to Neurodegeneration (HARNESS) initiative, with a focus on cerebral small vessel disease. METHODS Surveys, teleconferences, and an in-person workshop were used to identify gaps in knowledge and to develop tools for harmonizing imaging and analysis. RESULTS A framework for neuroimaging biomarker development was developed based on validating repeatability and reproducibility, biological principles, and feasibility of implementation. The status of current MRI biomarkers was reviewed. A website was created at www.harness-neuroimaging.org with acquisition protocols, a software database, rating scales and case report forms, and a deidentified MRI repository. CONCLUSIONS The HARNESS initiative provides resources to reduce variability in measurement in MRI studies of cerebral small vessel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric E. Smith
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Geert Jan Biessels
- Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - François De Guio
- Department of Neurology, Lariboisière Hospital, University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Frank Erik de Leeuw
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Simon Duchesne
- CERVO Research Center, Quebec Mental Health Institute, Québec, Canada
- Radiology Department, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Marco Düring
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE, Munich), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Richard Frayne
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Seaman Family MR Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - M. Arfan Ikram
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eric Jouvent
- Department of Neurology, Lariboisière Hospital, University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Bradley J. MacIntosh
- Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Department of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael J. Thrippleton
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Meike W. Vernooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hieab Adams
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Walter H. Backes
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, School for Mental Health & Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucia Ballerini
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sandra E. Black
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Chen
- Memory Aging and Cognition Centre, Department of Pharmacology, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rod Corriveau
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Charles DeCarli
- Department of Neurology and Center for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Steven M. Greenberg
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Stroke Service and Memory Disorders Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M. Edip Gurol
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Stroke Service and Memory Disorders Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dominic Job
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Bonnie Y.K. Lam
- Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Centre for Prevention of Dementia, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Centre, Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Lenore J. Launer
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Linn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Cheryl R. McCreary
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Seaman Family MR Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vincent C.T. Mok
- Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Centre for Prevention of Dementia, Gerald Choa Neuroscience Centre, Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Leonardo Pantoni
- Luigi Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - G. Bruce Pike
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joel Ramirez
- Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Department of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yael D. Reijmer
- Department of Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jose Rafael Romero
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA, USA
| | - Stefan Ropele
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Natalia S. Rost
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Perminder S. Sachdev
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher J.M. Scott
- Heart and Stroke Foundation Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, Department of Medical Biophysics, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sudha Seshadri
- Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's & Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Mukul Sharma
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Neurology) McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Imaging Biomarkers Group, Department of Biomedical Imaging Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca M.E. Steketee
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard H. Swartz
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert van Oostenbrugge
- Department of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias van Osch
- C.J. Gorter Center for high field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sanneke van Rooden
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anand Viswanathan
- J. Philip Kistler Stroke Research Center, Stroke Service and Memory Disorders Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Werring
- University College London Queen Square institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Martin Dichgans
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE, Munich), Munich, Germany
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Joanna M. Wardlaw
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Edinburgh Imaging, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- UK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Bunevicius A, Schregel K, Sinkus R, Golby A, Patz S. REVIEW: MR elastography of brain tumors. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 25:102109. [PMID: 31809993 PMCID: PMC6909210 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
MR elastography allows non-invasive quantification of the shear modulus of tissue, i.e. tissue stiffness and viscosity, information that offers the potential to guide presurgical planning for brain tumor resection. Here, we review brain tumor MRE studies with particular attention to clinical applications. Studies that investigated MRE in patients with intracranial tumors, both malignant and benign as well as primary and metastatic, were queried from the Pubmed/Medline database in August 2018. Reported tumor and normal appearing white matter stiffness values were extracted and compared as a function of tumor histopathological diagnosis and MRE vibration frequencies. Because different studies used different elastography hardware, pulse sequences, reconstruction inversion algorithms, and different symmetry assumptions about the mechanical properties of tissue, effort was directed to ensure that similar quantities were used when making inter-study comparisons. In addition, because different methodologies and processing pipelines will necessarily bias the results, when pooling data from different studies, whenever possible, tumor values were compared with the same subject's contralateral normal appearing white matter to minimize any study-dependent bias. The literature search yielded 10 studies with a total of 184 primary and metastatic brain tumor patients. The group mean tumor stiffness, as measured with MRE, correlated with intra-operatively assessed stiffness of meningiomas and pituitary adenomas. Pooled data analysis showed significant overlap between shear modulus values across brain tumor types. When adjusting for the same patient normal appearing white matter shear modulus values, meningiomas were the stiffest tumor-type. MRE is increasingly being examined for potential in brain tumor imaging and might have value for surgical planning. However, significant overlap of shear modulus values between a number of different tumor types limits applicability of MRE for diagnostic purposes. Thus, further rigorous studies are needed to determine specific clinical applications of MRE for surgical planning, disease monitoring and molecular stratification of brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adomas Bunevicius
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Katharina Schregel
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Ralph Sinkus
- Inserm U1148, LVTS, University Paris Diderot, University Paris 13, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Golby
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Samuel Patz
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
189
|
Quantitative imaging biomarkers in nuclear medicine: from SUV to image mining studies. Highlights from annals of nuclear medicine 2018. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2737-2745. [PMID: 31690962 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04531-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Quantification in medical imaging is one of the main goals in research and clinical practice since it allows immediate understanding, objective communication, and comparison. Our aim was to summarize relevant investigations on quantification in nuclear medicine studies published in the volume 32 of Annals of Nuclear Medicine. METHODS In this article, we summarized the data of 14 selected papers from international research groups that were published between January and December 2018. This is a descriptive review with an inherently subjective selection of articles. RESULTS We discussed the role of parameters ranging from standardized uptake value to ratios, to flow within a region of interest, to volumetric parameters and to texture indices in different clinical scenarios in oncology, cardiology, and neurology. CONCLUSIONS In all the medical disciplines in which nuclear medicine examinations play a role, quantification is essential both in research and in clinical practice. Standardization and high-quality protocols are crucial for the success and reliability of imaging biomarkers.
Collapse
|
190
|
Kay FU, Canan A, Abbara S. Future Directions in Coronary CT Angiography: CT-Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque Vulnerability, and Quantitative Plaque Assessment. Korean Circ J 2019; 50:185-202. [PMID: 31960635 PMCID: PMC7043962 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a well-validated and noninvasive imaging modality for the assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). CCTA not only delineates the anatomy of the heart and coronary arteries in detail, but also allows for intra- and extraluminal imaging of coronary arteries. Emerging technologies have promoted new CCTA applications, resulting in a comprehensive assessment of coronary plaques and their clinical significance. The application of computational fluid dynamics to CCTA resulted in a robust tool for noninvasive assessment of coronary blood flow hemodynamics and determination of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Detailed evaluation of plaque morphology and identification of high-risk plaque features by CCTA have been confirmed as predictors of future outcomes, identifying patients at risk for ACSs. With quantitative coronary plaque assessment, the progression of the CAD or the response to therapy could be monitored by CCTA. The aim of this article is to review the future directions of emerging applications in CCTA, such as computed tomography (CT)-fractional flow reserve, imaging of vulnerable plaque features, and quantitative plaque imaging. We will also briefly discuss novel methods appearing in the coronary imaging scenario, such as machine learning, radiomics, and spectral CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arzu Canan
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Suhny Abbara
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Hormuth DA, Sorace AG, Virostko J, Abramson RG, Bhujwalla ZM, Enriquez-Navas P, Gillies R, Hazle JD, Mason RP, Quarles CC, Weis JA, Whisenant JG, Xu J, Yankeelov TE. Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:1377-1392. [PMID: 30925001 PMCID: PMC6766430 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The complexity of modern in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods in oncology has dramatically changed in the last 10 years. The field has long since moved passed its (unparalleled) ability to form images with exquisite soft-tissue contrast and morphology, allowing for the enhanced identification of primary tumors and metastatic disease. Currently, it is not uncommon to acquire images related to blood flow, cellularity, and macromolecular content in the clinical setting. The acquisition of images related to metabolism, hypoxia, pH, and tissue stiffness are also becoming common. All of these techniques have had some component of their invention, development, refinement, validation, and initial applications in the preclinical setting using in vivo animal models of cancer. In this review, we discuss the genesis of quantitative MRI methods that have been successfully translated from preclinical research and developed into clinical applications. These include methods that interrogate perfusion, diffusion, pH, hypoxia, macromolecular content, and tissue mechanical properties for improving detection, staging, and response monitoring of cancer. For each of these techniques, we summarize the 1) underlying biological mechanism(s); 2) preclinical applications; 3) available repeatability and reproducibility data; 4) clinical applications; and 5) limitations of the technique. We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned from translating MRI methods from the preclinical to clinical setting, and a presentation of four fundamental problems in cancer imaging that, if solved, would result in a profound improvement in the lives of oncology patients. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1377-1392.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Hormuth
- Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| | - Anna G. Sorace
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| | - John Virostko
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| | - Richard G. Abramson
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | | | - Pedro Enriquez-Navas
- Departments of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Cancer Physiology, The Moffitt Cancer Center
| | - Robert Gillies
- Departments of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Cancer Physiology, The Moffitt Cancer Center
| | - John D. Hazle
- Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ralph P. Mason
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Department of NeuroImaging Research, The Barrow Neurological Institute
| | - Jared A. Weis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering Wake Forest School of Medicine
| | | | - Junzhong Xu
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center,Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Diagnostic Medicine, The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin
| |
Collapse
|
192
|
Winfield JM, Wakefield JC, Dolling D, Hall M, Freeman S, Brenton JD, Lutchman-Singh K, Pace E, Priest AN, Quest RA, Taylor NJ, Gabra H, McKnight L, Collins DJ, Banerjee S, Hall E, deSouza NM. Diffusion-weighted MRI in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Response Marker. Radiology 2019; 293:374-383. [PMID: 31573402 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer results in a relapse rate of 75%. Early markers of response would enable optimization of management and improved outcome in both primary and recurrent disease. Purpose To assess the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), derived from diffusion-weighted MRI, as an indicator of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. Materials and Methods This prospective multicenter trial (from 2012-2016) recruited participants with stage III or IV ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer (newly diagnosed, cohort one; relapsed, cohort two) scheduled for platinum-based chemotherapy, with interval debulking surgery in cohort one. Cohort one underwent two baseline MRI examinations separated by 0-7 days to assess ADC repeatability; an additional MRI was performed after three treatment cycles. Cohort two underwent imaging at baseline and after one and three treatment cycles. ADC changes in responders and nonresponders were compared (Wilcoxon rank sum tests). PFS and overall survival were assessed by using a multivariable Cox model. Results A total of 125 participants (median age, 63.3 years [interquartile range, 57.0-70.7 years]; 125 women; cohort one, n = 47; cohort two, n = 78) were included. Baseline ADC (range, 77-258 × 10-5mm2s-1) was repeatable (upper and lower 95% limits of agreement of 12 × 10-5mm2s-1 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6 × 10-5mm2s-1 to 18 × 10-5mm2s-1] and -15 × 10-5mm2s-1 [95% CI: -21 × 10-5mm2s-1 to -9 × 10-5mm2s-1]). ADC increased in 47% of cohort two after one treatment cycle, and in 58% and 53% of cohorts one and two, respectively, after three cycles. Percentage change from baseline differed between responders and nonresponders after three cycles (16.6% vs 3.9%; P = .02 [biochemical response definition]; 19.0% vs 6.2%; P = .04 [radiologic definition]). ADC increase after one cycle was associated with longer PFS in cohort two (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.98; P = .03). ADC change was not indicative of overall survival for either cohort. Conclusion After three cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes are indicative of response. After one treatment cycle, increased ADC is indicative of improved progression-free survival in relapsed disease. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Winfield
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Jennifer C Wakefield
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - David Dolling
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Marcia Hall
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Susan Freeman
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - James D Brenton
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Kerryn Lutchman-Singh
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Erika Pace
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Andrew N Priest
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Rebecca A Quest
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - N Jane Taylor
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Hani Gabra
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Liam McKnight
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - David J Collins
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Susana Banerjee
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Emma Hall
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| | - Nandita M deSouza
- From the Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiation Therapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); MRI Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, England (J.M.W., J.C.W., E.P., D.J.C., N.M.d.S.); Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, England (D.D., E.H.); Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (M.H.); Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England (S.F., A.N.P.); Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (J.D.B.); Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (K.L.S.); Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England (R.A.Q.); Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, England (N.J.T.); Imperial College London Hammersmith Campus, London, England (H.G.); Clinical Discovery Unit, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, Astrazeneca, Cambridge, England (H.G.); Department of Radiology, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg Health Board, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, Wales (L.M.); and Gynaecology Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, England (S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
193
|
Jirapatnakul A, Reeves AP, Lewis S, Chen X, Ma T, Yip R, Chin X, Liu S, Perumalswami PV, Yankelevitz DF, Crane M, Branch AD, Henschke CI. Automated measurement of liver attenuation to identify moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis from chest CT scans. Eur J Radiol 2019; 122:108723. [PMID: 31778964 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Develop and validate an automated method for measuring liver attenuation in non-contrast low-dose chest CT (LDCT) scans and compare it to the standard manual method for identifying moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis (HS). METHOD The automated method identifies a region below the right lung within the liver and uses statistical sampling techniques to exclude non-liver parenchyma. The method was used to assess moderate-to-severe HS on two IRB-approved cohorts: 1) 24 patients with liver disease examined between 1/2013-1/2017 with non-contrast chest CT and abdominal MRI scans obtained within three months of liver biopsy, and 2) 319 lung screening participants with baseline LDCT performed between 8/2011-1/2017. Agreement between the manual and automated CT methods, the manual MRI method, and pathology for determining moderate-to-severe HS was assessed using Cohen's Kappa by applying a 40 HU threshold to the CT method and 17.4% fat fraction to MRI. Agreement between the manual and automated CT methods was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Variability was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA). RESULTS In the first cohort, the manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement (ICC = 0.97, κ = 1.00) with LoA of -7.6 to 4.7 HU. Both manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement with MRI (κ = 0.90) and substantial agreement with pathology (κ = 0.77). In the second cohort, the manual and automated CT methods had almost perfect agreement (ICC = 0.94, κ = 0.87). LoA were -10.6 to 5.2 HU. CONCLUSION Automated measurements of liver attenuation from LDCT scans can be used to identify moderate-to-severe HS on LDCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artit Jirapatnakul
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Anthony P Reeves
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, 392 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States
| | - Sara Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Xiangmeng Chen
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States; Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Huangpu West Ave No. 613, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, No. 18 Zicha Road, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China
| | - Teng Ma
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States; Department of Radiology, Jiangmen Central Hospital, No. 18 Zicha Road, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China
| | - Rowena Yip
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Xing Chin
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Shuang Liu
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, 392 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States
| | - Ponni V Perumalswami
- Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1123, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - David F Yankelevitz
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Michael Crane
- Department of Environmental Medicine & Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Andrea D Branch
- Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1123, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Claudia I Henschke
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, Box 1234, New York, NY 10029, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Emerging quantitative MR imaging biomarkers in inflammatory arthritides. Eur J Radiol 2019; 121:108707. [PMID: 31707169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) methods for imaging inflammation in connective tissues and the skeleton in inflammatory arthritis. This review is designed for a broad audience including radiologists, imaging technologists, rheumatologists and other healthcare professionals. METHODS We discuss the use of qMRI for imaging skeletal inflammation from both technical and clinical perspectives. We consider how qMRI can be targeted to specific aspects of the pathological process in synovium, cartilage, bone, tendons and entheses. Evidence for the various techniques from studies of both adults and children with inflammatory arthritis is reviewed and critically appraised. RESULTS qMRI has the potential to objectively identify, characterize and quantify inflammation of the connective tissues and skeleton in both adult and pediatric patients. Measurements of tissue properties derived using qMRI methods can serve as imaging biomarkers, which are potentially more reproducible and informative than conventional MRI methods. Several qMRI methods are nearing transition into clinical practice and may inform diagnosis and treatment decisions, with the potential to improve patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS qMRI enables specific assessment of inflammation in synovium, cartilage, bone, tendons and entheses, and can facilitate a more consistent, personalized approach to diagnosis, characterisation and monitoring of disease.
Collapse
|
195
|
Jafari R, Sheth S, Spincemaille P, Nguyen TD, Prince MR, Wen Y, Guo Y, Deh K, Liu Z, Margolis D, Brittenham GM, Kierans AS, Wang Y. Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:725-732. [PMID: 30637892 PMCID: PMC6929208 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate measurement of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is needed to guide iron-chelating therapy for patients with transfusional iron overload. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of automated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to measure the LIC. PURPOSE To develop a rapid, robust, and automated liver QSM for clinical practice. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION 13 healthy subjects and 22 patients. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES 1.5 T and 3 T/3D multiecho gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence. ASSESSMENT Data were acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with an out-of-phase echo spacing with respect to each other. All odd echoes that were in-phase (IP) were used to initialize the fat-water separation and field estimation (T2 *-IDEAL) before performing QSM. Liver QSM was generated through an automated pipeline without manual intervention. This IP echo-based initialization method was compared with an existing graph cuts initialization method (simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift, SPURS) in healthy subjects (n = 5). Reproducibility was assessed over four scanners at two field strengths from two manufacturers using healthy subjects (n = 8). Clinical feasibility was evaluated in patients (n = 22). STATISTICAL TESTS IP and SPURS initialization methods in both healthy subjects and patients were compared using paired t-test and linear regression analysis to assess processing time and region of interest (ROI) measurements. Reproducibility of QSM, R2 *, and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) among the four different scanners was assessed using linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS Liver QSM using the IP method was found to be ~5.5 times faster than SPURS (P < 0.05) in initializing T2 *-IDEAL with similar outputs. Liver QSM using the IP method were reproducibly generated in all four scanners (average coefficient of determination 0.95, average slope 0.90, average bias 0.002 ppm, 95% limits of agreement between -0.06 to 0.07 ppm, ICC 0.97). DATA CONCLUSION Use of IP echo-based initialization enables robust water/fat separation and field estimation for automated, rapid, and reproducible liver QSM for clinical applications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:725-732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin Jafari
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Sujit Sheth
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Pascal Spincemaille
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Thanh D. Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Martin R. Prince
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yan Wen
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yihao Guo
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kofi Deh
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Zhe Liu
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Margolis
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | | | - Andrea S. Kierans
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Yi Wang
- Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
196
|
Chen S, McFarlin BL, Meagher BT, Peters TA, Simpson DG, O'Brien WD, Han A. A Phantom-Based Assessment of Repeatability and Reproducibility of Transvaginal Quantitative Ultrasound. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS, FERROELECTRICS, AND FREQUENCY CONTROL 2019; 66:1413-1421. [PMID: 31217100 PMCID: PMC6774614 DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2019.2921925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
This article evaluated the repeatability and reproducibility (R&R) of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) biomarkers attenuation coefficient (AC) and backscatter coefficient (BSC) in transvaginal QUS reference phantoms for obstetric applications. Five phantoms were scanned by three sonographers according to the scanning protocol. Each sonographer scanned each phantom with four transvaginal transducers of the same model (MC9-4) and three probe cover types (latex cover, nonlatex cover, and no cover). The AC and BSC were estimated by using a reference phantom method. The R&R analysis was performed for the frequency-averaged AC and logBSC (= 10log10BSC) (5.4-5.8 MHz) by using three-factor random effects Analysis of Variance with interaction. The total R&R variabilities for AC and logBSC are small (AC: 0.042-0.065 dB/cm-MHz; logBSC: 0.50-0.68 dB), indicating high measurement precision. These values are small compared to the ranges of AC (0.28-0.99 dB/cm-MHz) and logBSC (-33.16 to -20.35 dB) of the five phantoms. The AC and logBSC biomarkers measured on transvaginal QUS phantoms using the reference phantom method are repeatable, and reproducible between sonographers, transducers, and probe covers.
Collapse
|
197
|
deSouza NM, Achten E, Alberich-Bayarri A, Bamberg F, Boellaard R, Clément O, Fournier L, Gallagher F, Golay X, Heussel CP, Jackson EF, Manniesing R, Mayerhofer ME, Neri E, O'Connor J, Oguz KK, Persson A, Smits M, van Beek EJR, Zech CJ. Validated imaging biomarkers as decision-making tools in clinical trials and routine practice: current status and recommendations from the EIBALL* subcommittee of the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 2019; 10:87. [PMID: 31468205 PMCID: PMC6715762 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0764-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 06/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Observer-driven pattern recognition is the standard for interpretation of medical images. To achieve global parity in interpretation, semi-quantitative scoring systems have been developed based on observer assessments; these are widely used in scoring coronary artery disease, the arthritides and neurological conditions and for indicating the likelihood of malignancy. However, in an era of machine learning and artificial intelligence, it is increasingly desirable that we extract quantitative biomarkers from medical images that inform on disease detection, characterisation, monitoring and assessment of response to treatment. Quantitation has the potential to provide objective decision-support tools in the management pathway of patients. Despite this, the quantitative potential of imaging remains under-exploited because of variability of the measurement, lack of harmonised systems for data acquisition and analysis, and crucially, a paucity of evidence on how such quantitation potentially affects clinical decision-making and patient outcome. This article reviews the current evidence for the use of semi-quantitative and quantitative biomarkers in clinical settings at various stages of the disease pathway including diagnosis, staging and prognosis, as well as predicting and detecting treatment response. It critically appraises current practice and sets out recommendations for using imaging objectively to drive patient management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandita M deSouza
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
| | | | | | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Claus Peter Heussel
- Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 156, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Edward F Jackson
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Rashindra Manniesing
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emanuele Neri
- Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - James O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (Ne-515), Erasmus MC, PO Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin J R van Beek
- Edinburgh Imaging, Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh Bioquarter, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Christoph J Zech
- University Hospital Basel, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
198
|
Goodkin O, Pemberton H, Vos SB, Prados F, Sudre CH, Moggridge J, Cardoso MJ, Ourselin S, Bisdas S, White M, Yousry T, Thornton J, Barkhof F. The quantitative neuroradiology initiative framework: application to dementia. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190365. [PMID: 31368776 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
There are numerous challenges to identifying, developing and implementing quantitative techniques for use in clinical radiology, suggesting the need for a common translational pathway. We developed the quantitative neuroradiology initiative (QNI), as a model framework for the technical and clinical validation necessary to embed automated segmentation and other image quantification software into the clinical neuroradiology workflow. We hypothesize that quantification will support reporters with clinically relevant measures contextualized with normative data, increase the precision of longitudinal comparisons, and generate more consistent reporting across levels of radiologists' experience. The QNI framework comprises the following steps: (1) establishing an area of clinical need and identifying the appropriate proven imaging biomarker(s) for the disease in question; (2) developing a method for automated analysis of these biomarkers, by designing an algorithm and compiling reference data; (3) communicating the results via an intuitive and accessible quantitative report; (4) technically and clinically validating the proposed tool pre-use; (5) integrating the developed analysis pipeline into the clinical reporting workflow; and (6) performing in-use evaluation. We will use current radiology practice in dementia as an example, where radiologists have established visual rating scales to describe the degree and pattern of atrophy they detect. These can be helpful, but are somewhat subjective and coarse classifiers, suffering from floor and ceiling limitations. Meanwhile, several imaging biomarkers relevant to dementia diagnosis and management have been proposed in the literature; some clinically approved radiology software tools exist but in general, these have not undergone rigorous clinical validation in high volume or in tertiary dementia centres. The QNI framework aims to address this need. Quantitative image analysis is developing apace within the research domain. Translating quantitative techniques into the clinical setting presents significant challenges, which must be addressed to meet the increasing demand for accurate, timely and impactful clinical imaging services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Goodkin
- 1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hugh Pemberton
- 1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,3Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sjoerd B Vos
- 1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,4Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,5Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ferran Prados
- 1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,6Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,7Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carole H Sudre
- 8School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London.,9Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London
| | - James Moggridge
- 2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,4Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Jorge Cardoso
- 8School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- 8School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London
| | - Sotirios Bisdas
- 2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,4Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark White
- 10Digital Services, University College London Hospital, London United Kingdom
| | - Tarek Yousry
- 2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,4Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Thornton
- 2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,4Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- 1Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,2Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,4Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,6Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,11Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
199
|
Weller A, Sharif B, Qarib MH, St Leger D, De Silva HS, Lingam RK. British Thyroid Association 2014 classification ultrasound scoring of thyroid nodules in predicting malignancy: Diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement. ULTRASOUND : JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH MEDICAL ULTRASOUND SOCIETY 2019; 28:4-13. [PMID: 32063989 DOI: 10.1177/1742271x19865001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To assess the inter-observer agreement amongst five observers of differing levels of expertise in applying the British Thyroid Association (2014) guidelines for ultrasound scoring of thyroid nodules (BTA-U score) in the management of thyroid cancer, and to assess the U-score diagnostic performance in predicting malignancy. Method A total of 73 consecutive patients were included over a two-year period (July 2012 to July 2014), after referral to a tertiary head and neck oncology centre for ultrasound plus fine needle aspiration and cytology. Our five observers retrospectively and independently reviewed static ultrasound images on PACS and scored the thyroid nodules according to BTA-U classification. The observers were blinded to each other's scoring, cytology and histology results. Either the Kappa-statistic or intra-class correlation was used to assess the level of inter-observer agreement, plus agreement between the radiological and cytological diagnoses. The diagnostic performance of U-scoring for predicting final histological diagnosis was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Results A Kappa-value of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.77) confirmed substantial inter-observer agreement amongst the five observers. All 17 histology confirmed malignant nodules were correctly classified as potentially malignant by all observers. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of BTA-U score in detecting and predicting malignancy were 100%, whereas the specificity and positive predictive values were 34% and 32%, respectively. Conclusions There is good inter-observer agreement in using the BTA-U score amongst different observers at differing levels of expertise. Adhering to BTA-U scoring can potentially achieve 100% sensitivity in selecting malignant nodules for sampling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Weller
- Department of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ban Sharif
- Department of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mohammad H Qarib
- Department of Radiology, Central Middlesex Hospital, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Dominic St Leger
- Department of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hakkini Sl De Silva
- Department of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ravi K Lingam
- Department of Radiology, Northwick Park & Central Middlesex Hospitals, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
200
|
Jang J, Ngo LH, Captur G, Moon JC, Nezafat R. Measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences over 20 months: A single center study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220190. [PMID: 31344078 PMCID: PMC6658153 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantifying reproducibility of native T1 and T2 mapping over a long period (> 1 year) is necessary to assess whether changes in T1 and T2 over repeated sessions in a longitudinal study are associated with variability due to underlying tissue composition or technical confounders. OBJECTIVES To carry out a single-center phantom study to 1) investigate measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 (STONE) and T2 mapping over 20 months, 2) quantify sources of variability, and 3) compare reproducibility and measurements against reference spin-echo measurements. METHODS MR imaging was performed on a 1.5 Tesla Philips Achieva scanner every 2-3 weeks over 20 months using the T1MES phantom. In each session, slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping was repeated 3 times for 5 slices, and maps were reconstructed using both 2-parameter and 3-parameter fit models. Reproducibility between sessions, and repeatability between repetitions and slices were evaluated using coefficients of variation (CV). Different sources of variability were quantified using variance decomposition analysis. The slice-interleaved measurement was compared to the spin-echo reference and MOLLI. RESULTS Slice-interleaved T1 had excellent reproducibility and repeatability with a CV < 2%. The main sources of T1 variability were temperature in 2-parameter maps, and slice in 3-parameter maps. Superior between-session reproducibility to the spin-echo T1 was shown in 2-parameter maps, and similar reproducibility in 3-parameter maps. Superior reproducibility to MOLLI T1 was also shown. Similar measurements to the spin-echo T1 were observed with linear regression slopes of 0.94-0.99, but slight underestimation. Slice-interleaved T2 showed good reproducibility and repeatability with a CV < 7%. The main source of T2 variability was slice location/orientation. Between-session reproducibility was lower than the spin-echo T2 reference and showed good measurement agreement with linear regression slopes of 0.78-1.06. CONCLUSIONS Slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences yield excellent long-term reproducibility over 20 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Jang
- Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Long H. Ngo
- Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Gabriella Captur
- Barts Heart Center, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Center, London, United Kingdom
- UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - James C. Moon
- Barts Heart Center, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, West Smithfield, London, United Kingdom
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Center, London, United Kingdom
- UCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Reza Nezafat
- Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|