Growth hormone receptor antagonists: discovery, development, and use in patients with acromegaly

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is an acquired disorder related to excessive production of growth hormone (GH) and characterized by progressive somatic disfigurement (mainly involving the face and extremities) and systemic manifestations. The prevalence is estimated at 1:140,000-250,000. It is most often diagnosed in middle-aged adults (average age 40 years, men and women equally affected). Due to insidious onset and slow progression, acromegaly is often diagnosed four to more than ten years after its onset. The main clinical features are broadened extremities (hands and feet), widened thickened and stubby fingers, and thickened soft tissue. The facial aspect is characteristic and includes a widened and thickened nose, prominent cheekbones, forehead bulges, thick lips and marked facial lines. The forehead and overlying skin is thickened, sometimes leading to frontal bossing. There is a tendency towards mandibular overgrowth with prognathism, maxillary widening, tooth separation and jaw malocclusion. The disease also has rheumatologic, cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic consequences which determine its prognosis. In the majority of cases, acromegaly is related to a pituitary adenoma, either purely GH-secreting (60%) or mixed. In very rare cases, acromegaly is due to ectopic secretion of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) responsible for pituitary hyperplasia. The clinical diagnosis is confirmed biochemically by an increased serum GH concentration following an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and by detection of increased levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). Assessment of tumor volume and extension is based on imaging studies. Echocardiography and sleep apnea testing are used to determine the clinical impact of acromegaly. Treatment is aimed at correcting (or preventing) tumor compression by excising the disease-causing lesion, and at reducing GH and IGF-I levels to normal values. Transsphenoidal surgery is often the first-line treatment. When surgery fails to correct GH/IGF-I hypersecretion, medical treatment with somatostatin analogs and/or radiotherapy can be used. The GH antagonist (pegvisomant) is used in patients that are resistant to somatostatin analogs. Adequate hormonal disease control is achieved in most cases, allowing a life expectancy similar to that of the general population. However, even if patients are cured or well-controlled, sequelae (joint pain, deformities and altered quality of life) often remain.

Pituitary disorders: an overview for the general physician

The pituitary gland is responsible for the production of the trophic hormones that control normal homeostasis. The hyper- or hypofunction of one or more of these may result in a distinct pathological clinical presentation, particularly in the presence of macroadenoma. Most pituitary disorders, however, present with non-specific signs and symptoms. This review gives an overview of pituitary disorders, their causes, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is caused by growth hormone hypersecretion, mostly from a pituitary adenoma, driving insulin-like growth factor 1 overproduction. Manifestations include skeletal and soft tissue growth and deformities; and cardiac, respiratory, neuromuscular, endocrine, and metabolic complications. Increased morbidity and mortality require early and tight disease control. Surgery is the treatment of choice for microadenomas and well-defined intrasellar macroadenomas. Complete resection of large and invasive macroadenomas rarely is achieved; hence, their low rate of disease remission. Pharmacologic treatments, including long-acting somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and growth hormone receptor antagonists, have assumed more importance in achieving biochemical and symptomatic disease control.

Rational design of competitive prolactin/growth hormone receptor antagonists

There is increasing evidence that prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) act as growth-promoters of breast tumors. Recent arguments have accumulated to suggest that when they are locally-produced within the mammary tissue, these hormones, acting by an autocrine-paracrine mechanism may have enhanced, or even specific functions compared to endocrine PRL and GH. Classical drugs blocking pituitary hormone production (dopamine and somatostatin analogs) are ineffective on extrapituitary expression of PRL/GH genes, therefore the undesirable effects of these locally-produced hormones remain a target of interest for alternative strategies. This has encouraged the development of competitive PRL and/or GH receptor antagonists, which involve engineered variants of natural receptor ligands (PRL or GH) aimed at blocking receptor activation rather than hormone production in peripheral tissues. This article overviews the rational design of this new class of molecules, their specific molecular features (receptor specificity, biological properties, etc.) and whenever available, the data that have been obtained in cell or animal models of breast cancer.

Disruption of growth hormone signaling retards prostate carcinogenesis in the Probasin/TAg rat

We asked whether down-regulation of GH signaling could block carcinogenesis in the Probasin/TAg rat, a model of aggressive prostate cancer. The Spontaneous Dwarf rat, which lacks GH due to a mutation (dr) in its GH gene, was crossed with the Probasin/TAg rat, which develops prostate carcinomas at 100% incidence by 15 wk of age. Progeny were heterozygous for the TAg oncogene and homozygous for either the wild-type GH gene (TAg/Gh(+/+)) or the dr mutation (TAg/Gh(dr/dr)). Prostate tumor incidence and burden were significantly reduced, and tumor latency was delayed in TAg/Gh(dr/dr) rats relative to TAg/Gh(+/+) controls. At 25 wk of age, loss of GH resulted in a 20 and 80% decrease in the area of microinvasive carcinoma in the dorsal and lateral lobes, respectively. By 52 wk of age, invasive prostate adenocarcinomas were observed in all TAg/Gh(+/+) rats, whereas the majority of TAg/Gh(dr/dr) did not develop invasive tumors. Suppression of carcinogenesis could not be attributed to alterations in prostate expression of TAg or androgen receptor or changes in serum testosterone levels. As carcinogenesis progressed in TAg/Gh(+/+) rats, prostate GHR mRNA and protein expression increased significantly, but prostate IGF-I receptor mRNA and protein levels dropped. Furthermore, serum IGF-I and prostate IGF-I levels did not change significantly over the course of carcinogenesis. These findings suggest that GH plays a dominant role in progression from latent to malignant prostate cancer driven by the powerful probasin/TAg fusion gene in rats and suggest that GH antagonists may be effective at treating human prostate cancer.

Activation of growth hormone receptors by growth hormone and growth hormone antagonist dimers: insights into receptor triggering

GH binds dimerized GH receptors (GHRs) to form a trimolecular complex and induces downstream signaling events. The mechanism by which GH binding converts the inactive predimerized GHR to its active signaling conformation is uncertain. GH has no axis of symmetry. Its interaction with GHR is mediated by two asymmetric binding sites on GH, each with distinct affinity. Site 1 is of high affinity and is thought to mediate the first binding step. Mutation of binding site 2 (as in the human GH mutant, G120R) disrupts the second binding but leaves site 1 binding intact. G120R is a GH antagonist; it binds only one GHR and thus fails to signal, and it prevents productive GHR binding by normal GH. We previously demonstrated that prolactin receptor signaling was achieved by a dimeric version of a prolactin antagonist. We now employ assays of cellular signaling and receptor conformational changes to examine whether GH molecules harboring two site 1 regions can trigger GHR activation. We used recombinantly produced GH-GH and G120R-G120R dimers in which monomers in tandem are connected by a short linker peptide. Rabbit GHR-expressing human fibrosarcoma cells (C14) were treated with GH, G120R, GH-GH, or G120R-G120R. As expected, GH and GH-GH, but not G120R, induced GHR disulfide linkage, as assessed by anti-GHR blotting of cell extracts resolved by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions. Disulfide linkage of GHRs reflects attainment of the active signaling conformation. Likewise, GH and GH-GH, but not G120R, caused Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) activation. Notably, G120R-G120R, despite its lack of an intact site 2 in either dimer partner, also promoted GHR disulfide linkage and JAK2 and STAT5 activation, albeit less potently than either GH or GH-GH. Time-course responses of the three agonists were similar in terms of JAK2 and STAT5 activation. Pretreatment of cells with our conformation-sensitive inhibitory monoclonal antibody, anti-GHR ext-mAb, prevented ligand-induced receptor activation for all three agonists. GHR was also rendered less immunoprecipitable by anti-GHR ext-mAb after treatment with these agonists. These results are important in that they indicate that a ligand with two intact binding sites 1 causes GHR to adopt similar conformational changes as does GH and thus triggers activation of JAK2 and downstream signaling. Furthermore, we infer that there is substantial flexibility in the GHR extracellular domain, such that it productively accommodates GH dimers that are much larger than GH.

Clinical pharmacodynamic effects of the growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant: implications for cancer therapy

PURPOSE

The present study evaluated and compared the efficacy of pegvisomant and octreotide in blocking the growth hormone (GH) axis in humans based on pharmacodynamic biomarkers associated with the GH axis. The study also evaluated the safety of pegvisomant given at high s.c. doses for 14 days.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eighty healthy subjects were enrolled in five cohorts: cohorts 1 to 3, s.c. pegvisomant at 40, 60, or 80 mg once dailyx14 days (n=18 per cohort); cohort 4, s.c. octreotide at 200 microg thrice dailyx14 days (n=18); and cohort 5, untreated control (n=8). Serial blood samples were collected to measure plasma concentrations of total insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I), free IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and GH in all subjects and serum pegvisomant concentrations in subjects of cohorts 1 to 3. All subjects receiving treatment were monitored for adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

After s.c. dosing of pegvisomant once daily for 14 days, the mean maximum suppression values of total IGF-I were 57%, 60%, and 62%, at 40, 60, and 80 mg dose levels, respectively. The maximum suppression was achieved approximately 7 days after the last dose and was sustained for approximately 21 days. Pegvisomant also led to a sustained reduction in free IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-II concentrations by up to 33%, 46%, and 35%, respectively, and an increase in GH levels. In comparison, octreotide resulted in a considerably weaker inhibition of total IGF-I and IGFBP-3 for a much shorter duration, and no inhibition of IGF-II. AEs in pegvisomant-treated subjects were generally either grade 1 or 2. The most frequent treatment-related AEs included injection site reactions, headache, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant at well-tolerated s.c. doses was considerably more efficacious than octreotide in suppressing the GH axis, resulting in substantial and sustained inhibition of circulating IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 concentrations. These results provide evidence in favor of further testing the hypothesis that pegvisomant, through blocking the GH receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways, could be effective in treating tumors that may be GH, IGF-I, and/or IGF-II dependent, such as breast and colorectal cancer.

Primer: molecular tools used for the understanding of endocrinology

Molecular techniques have had and are continuing to have a strong effect on clinical research and on diagnosis and screening of many endocrine disorders. To undertake research and interpret the results of others, it is important to know how and when to use molecular techniques such as Southern, northern and western blotting and the polymerase chain reaction. Knowledge of the human genome and how genes translate into proteins is required for a full understanding of the burgeoning fields of genomics and proteomics. Genetic manipulation of experimental species, which uses transgenic and gene-knockout technology, has led to important advances in determining the relationship between genes and their encoded proteins' function in the intact organism. This article describes these aspects of molecular biology, and gives specific examples of how they can be applied to clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

Role of the growth hormone (GH) receptor transmembrane domain in receptor predimerization and GH-induced activation

The GH receptor (GHR) mediates GH effects by activating the GHR-associated cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase, Janus kinase 2. Recent studies indicate that GHRs exist as dimers independently of GH binding. Some authors suggest that receptor predimerization is mediated by the transmembrane domain (TMD) and that GH binding initiates signaling by triggering changes in the orientation of the two GHRs within the dimer. In this study, we investigate the role of GHR TMD in GH-independent receptor dimerization and ligand-induced activation. We prepared a GHR mutant, GHR(LDLR), in which the TMD is replaced with the TMD of the human low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). The resultant chimera has a TMD two residues shorter than the native GHR TMD; thus, in addition to possessing a different TMD, the altered GHR(LDLR) TMD helical register may change positions of the GHR extracellular domain (ECD) and intracellular domain relative to the TMD when compared with the wild-type (WT) receptor. When each was coexpressed with an intracellular domain-truncated GHR mutant, GHR(1-274-Myc), both WT GHR and GHR(LDLR) were specifically coprecipitated with GHR(1-274-Myc), indicating that the GHR TMD was not required for GHR heterodimerization with GHR(1-274-Myc). We further examined the contribution of the so-called "dimerization interface," a GHR ECD region that is critical for GH-induced signaling, to receptor predimerization. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments with either WT GHR, a dimerization interface mutant (GHR-H150D), or a control mutant (GHR-T147D) with GHR(1-274-Myc) showed dramatically reduced coprecipitation of GHR-H150D with GHR(1-274-Myc) when compared with WT GHR or GHR-T147K. This result suggests that, in contrast to some recent models, the dimerization interface contributes to GHR predimerization. We also compared WT GHR with GHR(LDLR) and GHR(LDLRDelta4) (a chimera in which the LDLR TMD has an internal deletion of four residues) with regard to response to GH stimulation. Although the chimeras had similar GH dose responses and time courses for signaling as WT GHR, they were markedly less sensitive to inhibition of signaling by a conformation-sensitive GHR ECD monoclonal antibody. Further, the chimeras were much less sensitive to inducible metalloprotease cleavage than was WT GHR, implying that the ECD conformations of the chimera receptors differ from WT GHR. Collectively, our data indicate that the composition and/or length of the TMD affect some aspects of GHR function, but do not affect receptor predimerization or GH-induced GHR activation. Further, they suggest that the GHR ECD-TMD is more flexible than previously thought in terms of the ability to achieve the active conformation in response to GH.

Effects of growth hormone on glucose and fat metabolism in human subjects

This article focuses on in vivo data from tests performed in normal subjects and in patients who had abnormal growth hormone (GH) status. Experimental data in human subjects demonstrate that GH acutely inhibits glucose disposal in skeletal muscle. At the same time GH stimulates the turnover and oxidation of free fatty acid (FFA), and experimental evidence suggests a causal link between elevated FFA levels and insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. Observational data in GH-deficient adults do not indicate that GH replacement is associated with significant impairment of glucose tolerance, but it is recommended that overdosing be avoided and glycemic control be monitored.

In vivo evaluation of a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule growth hormone receptor antagonist

IGF-I is regarded as the most sensitive marker of growth hormone (GH) secretion in both GH deficient individuals and in individuals with excessive GH production. Studies on the effect of inhibitors of GH action in normal experimental animals are difficult to evaluate due to the complex relationship and feed back mechanisms of the GH/IGF-I system and the hypothalamo-pituitary axis. To circumvent the GH/IGF-I feedback mechanisms, we have used hypophysectomized (HX) rats treated with GH to assess the potential of a new low molecular weight compound, BVT-A ((N-[5-(aminosulfonyl)-2-methylphenyl]-5-bromo-2-furamide), to act as a GH receptor antagonist in vivo. GH treatment of HX rats induced serum IGF-I, body weight and hepatic mRNA levels of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS and the IGF-I and GH receptors. Co-treatment with BVT-A suppressed all the GH-induced effects. We conclude that the GH substituted HX rat is a useful model for studies on GH receptor antagonists, and for the first time, a small molecule GH receptor antagonist with in vivo activity has been revealed. This opens up for development of new drugs for diseases in which lowering of GH receptor activity would be beneficial.

Treatment with growth hormone receptor antagonist in acromegaly: effect on cardiac structure and performance

AIM

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of short-term (6 months) and long-term (18 months) treatment with pegvisomant on cardiac structure and performance in patients with acromegaly.

PATIENTS

Seventeen patients (nine women, eight men, 27-61 yr) with active acromegaly entered and 12 completed the long-term study. After a baseline evaluation, including measurement of hemodynamic, biochemical, and hormonal parameters, and a standard Doppler echocardiography, treatment with pegvisomant was started at the initial dose of 10 mg/d, increasing by 5 mg/d every 6 wk on the basis of IGF-I levels until normalization or the achievement of a maximal dose of 40 mg/d.

RESULTS

After short-term treatment, IGF-I levels were normalized in 10 of the 17 (59%) patients. Left ventricular mass index (LVMi) was significantly decreased without changes in diastolic and systolic performance. After long-term treatment, IGF-I levels were normalized in 10 of the 12 (83%) patients. Blood glucose and serum insulin levels were decreased compared with baseline. LVMi was further decreased compared with short-term treatment, so that the prevalence of left ventricle hypertrophy decreased from 50% at baseline to 17% after 18 months of treatment. Moreover, ejection fraction as well as early to late (atrial) peak velocity ratio (E/A) were significantly increased, whereas isovolumic relaxation time was significantly decreased compared with baseline, demonstrating an improvement of both diastolic and systolic function. A significant correlation was found between the change in IGF-I levels and that of left ventricular ejection fraction. In general, the prevalence of cardiac insufficiency was present in 13 of the 17 (76%) patients at baseline and in one (8%) patient after 18 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with the GH receptor antagonist improves acromegalic cardiomyopathy by decreasing cardiac hypertrophy and enhancing diastolic and systolic function, and consequently partially or completely reverting the cardiac insufficiency.

Membrane reinsertion of a myristoyl-peptidyl anchored extracellular domain growth hormone receptor

The actions of GH are mediated through a cell surface cytokine receptor. We previously demonstrated that naturally occurring truncated membrane bound GH receptors (GHRs) can block GH receptor signaling. We have now investigated whether recombinant extracellular GHR can be conjugated to a myristoylated-peptide (mp) tail and inserted into cell membranes to modulate GHR signaling. Recombinant human extracellular domain (1-241) GHR was expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and refolded from cell lysate. The free C-terminal cysteine was then reduced and conjugated to an activated preformed mp tail. The properties of the purified tailed GHR (GHR-mp) were then compared with those of the untailed purified GHR 1-241. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis and cell surface binding assays demonstrated that GHR-mp inserted into the cell surface membranes of CHO cells, whereas untailed GHR 1-241 showed no insertion. In a cell-based bioassay GHR-mp partially inhibited wild-type GHR signaling, whereas GHR 1-241 had no effect. Truncated extracellular domain GHR can, when specifically modified with a membrane-localizing mp unit, insert into cell surface membranes and modulate GHR signaling.

Gender, body weight, disease activity, and previous radiotherapy influence the response to pegvisomant

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

To effectively normalize IGF-I in patients with acromegaly, various covariates may affect dosing and plasma concentrations of pegvisomant. We assessed whether sex, age, weight, and previous radiotherapy influence dosing of pegvisomant in patients with active disease.

DESIGN

Data from 69 men and 49 women participating in multicenter, open-label trials of pegvisomant were retrospectively evaluated using multiple regression techniques. Sixty-nine subjects (39 men, 30 women) had undergone external beam pituitary radiotherapy. Serum IGF-I was at least 30% above age-related upper limit of normal in all patients at study entry. After a loading dose of pegvisomant (80 mg), patients were commenced on 10 mg/d. Pegvisomant dose was adjusted by 5 mg every eighth week until serum IGF-I was normalized.

RESULTS

At baseline, men had significantly higher mean serum IGF-I levels than women despite similar GH levels. After treatment with pegvisomant, IGF-I levels were similar in men and women. A significant correlation between baseline GH, IGF-I, body weight, and the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I was observed (all P < 0.001). Women required an average of 0.04 mg/kg more pegvisomant than men and a mean weight-corrected dose of 19.2 mg/d to normalize serum IGF-I [14.5 mg/d (men); P < 0.001]. Patients treated with radiotherapy required less pegvisomant to normalize serum IGF-I despite similar baseline GH/IGF-I levels (15.2 vs. 18.5 mg/d for no previous radiotherapy; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex, body weight, previous radiotherapy, and baseline GH/IGF-I influence the dose of pegvisomant required to normalize serum IGF-I in patients with active acromegaly.

Long-term effects of the combination of pegvisomant with somatostatin analogs (SSA) on glucose homeostasis in non-diabetic patients with active acromegaly partially resistant to SSA

Several recent studies have reported beneficial effects of pegvisomant monotherapy on glucose homeostasis for acromegalic patients resistant to somatostatin analogs (SSA). The aim of our longitudinal study was to test whether these beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis would also occur during combined pegvisomant + SSA treatment amongst partially SSA-resistant acromegalic patients. Ten non-diabetic, partially SSA-resistant acromegalic patients underwent a 12-month SSA+pegvisomant treatment after SSA-only therapy. Glucose homeostasis was evaluated at disease diagnosis, at the end of the SSA treatment and after 6 and 12 months of combined SSA+pegvisomant treatment. The addition of pegvisomant treatment was accompanied by a significant improvement in insulin and glycemic responses to the oral glucose tolerance test, without any significant changes in fasting plasma glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, homeostatic model assessment-derived insulin resistance index and homeostatic model assessment-derived beta-cell function. Moreover, the number of patients with glucose intolerance did not significantly change during the 12-month combined treatment, notwithstanding the significant decrease in serum IGF-1 values. Therefore, our findings suggest that the combined pegvisomant and SSA treatment may not be able to restore normal clinical and biochemical glycometabolic features occurring in acromegalic patients resistant to SSA, while a slight but significant improvement in some biochemical features may be expected.

Treatment of acromegaly with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in clinical practice: safety and efficacy evaluation from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

The GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant is a highly effective new treatment option in acromegaly. The German Pegvisomant Observational Study (GPOS) was started to monitor long-term safety and efficacy of pegvisomant as prescribed in clinical practice.

DESIGN

GPOS is an observational, multi-center, surveillance study, which comprises non-interventional data collection.

METHODS

Of the 229 patients included in the study, 90.4% had previous pituitary surgery, 43.2% were treated by radiation therapy, and 94.3% had previous medical therapy for acromegaly that had been discontinued mainly due to persistent IGF-I elevation or side effects. The intention-to-treat population included 177 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

RESULTS

IGF-I levels decreased from 1.75+/-0.91-fold the upper limit of normal at baseline to 1.05+/- 0.62 at the 6-month visit, 0.96+/-0.60 at the 12-month visit, and to 0.89+/-0.41-fold after 24 months (P<0.0001). Mean duration of pegvisomant therapy was 51.8+/-35.8 weeks (median=51.9 weeks). IGF-I was normalized in 64.4% at 6 months with a median dose of 15.0 mg/day, in 70.9% at 12 months, and in 76.3% at 24 months. Fasting glucose levels improved from 114.4+/-45.9 to 101.5+/- 42.8 mg/dl after 6 months (P<0.01) and to 100.6+/-33.2 mg/ml after 12 months (P<0.01). General physical condition measured by specific signs and symptoms score improved significantly. Adverse events occurring in >1% were injection site reactions in 7.4%, elevated liver enzymes (>3 times of normal) in 5.2% (3.1% spontaneously normalized during continued treatment), reported increase of pituitary tumor volume in 5.2% (which was verified in 3.1%), and headache in 1.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant is generally well tolerated with a safety profile similar to that reported in clinical trials and can effectively reduce IGF-I in patients with acromegaly refractory to conventional therapy.

Drug Insight: prolactin-receptor antagonists, a novel approach to treatment of unresolved systemic and local hyperprolactinemia?

Prolactin is a polypeptide hormone whose major biological actions are related to normal lactation and reproduction. Abnormally high prolactin levels, referred to as hyperprolactinemia, can result in various reproductive disorders. Currently, therapeutic management of hyperprolactinemia relies on dopamine agonists, since dopamine is the primary physiological suppressor of pituitary prolactin production. Epidemiologic studies have shown that prolactin levels in the high-normal range, as well as medications that interfere with dopamine action (e.g. certain antipsychotic drugs), might correlate with increased breast cancer risk. In addition to circulating prolactin, it is now well established that prolactin is also produced locally within various tissues, including breast and prostate. Increasing evidence, mainly from animal studies at present, suggests that excess locally produced prolactin may promote the growth of breast and prostate tumors via an autocrine or paracrine mechanism. These findings have renewed the interest in finding alternative strategies to suppress prolactin actions when dopamine agonists are ineffective. Our studies of the relationship between prolactin structure and function have resulted in the development of pure prolactin-receptor antagonists. These molecules prevent endogenous prolactin from exerting its actions via a competitive mechanism for receptor binding. In this review, we discuss the possible future therapeutic utility of this novel class of compounds.

GH receptor signaling in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in human subjects following exposure to an intravenous GH bolus

Growth hormone (GH) regulates muscle and fat metabolism, which impacts on body composition and insulin sensitivity, but the underlying GH signaling pathways have not been studied in vivo in humans. We investigated GH signaling in biopsies from muscle and abdominal fat obtained 30 (n = 3) or 60 (n = 3) min after an intravenous bolus of GH (0.5 mg) vs. saline in conjunction with serum sampling in six healthy males after an overnight fast. Expression of the following signal proteins were assayed by Western blotting: STAT5/p-STAT5, MAPK, and Akt/PKB. IRS-1-associated PI 3-kinase activity was measured by in vitro phosphorylation of PI. STAT5 DNA binding activity was assessed with EMSA, and the expression of IGF-I and SOCS mRNA was measured by real-time RT-PCR. GH induced a 52% increase in circulating FFA levels with peak values after 155 min (P = 0.03). Tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5 was detected in muscle and fat of all subjects after GH. Activation of MAPK was observed in several lysates but without GH dependency. Neither PKB/Akt nor PI 3-kinase activity was affected by GH. GH-induced STAT5 DNA binding and expression of IGF-I mRNA were detected in fat, whereas expression of SOCS-1 and -3 tended to increase after GH in muscle and fat, respectively. We conclude that 1) STAT5 is acutely activated in human muscle and fat after a GH bolus, but additional downstream GH signaling was significant only in fat; 2) the direct GH effects in muscle need further characterization; and 3) this human in vivo model may be used to study the mechanisms subserving the actions of GH on substrate metabolism and insulin sensitivity in muscle and fat.

Growth hormone hypothesis and development of diabetic nephropathy in Type 1 diabetes

In Type 1 diabetes, poor glycemic control is the key predictor for the development of microalbuminuria, an established early marker of overt nephropathy. However, the role of other pathways in the development of diabetic nephropathy may also be important. The growth hormone (GH) hypothesis suggests that the GH-insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 axis may play an important role in this disease process. In Type 1 diabetes, the characteristic pattern of GH hypersecretion and low circulating IGF-1 levels results from hepatic GH resistance owing to the lack of portal insulin. Clinical data indicate that high GH and low IGF-1 levels reduce insulin sensitivity and worsen glycemic control. Furthermore, despite hepatic GH resistance, GH receptors at the kidney remain intact. Experimental data show that excess GH stimulates renal GH receptors and, through paracrine IGF-1 production, results in pathophysiological changes consistent with diabetic nephropathy, namely nephromegaly, glomerular hyperfiltration and eventual proteinuria. These abnormalities are reversed by intervention to block or normalize the local effects of GH and IGF-1. Although such data in humans are limited, preliminary trials show that interventions to increase IGF-1 levels and reduce GH hypersecretion improve glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in the short term. However, their effects on early nephropathy and end points, such as the prevalence of end stage renal disease, have yet to be determined.

Growth hormone and its disorders

Growth hormone (GH) is synthesised and secreted by the somatotroph cells of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Its actions involve multiple organs and systems, affecting postnatal longitudinal growth as well as protein, lipid, and carbohydrate metabolism. GH hypersecretion results in gigantism or acromegaly, a condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality, while GH deficiency results in growth retardation in children and the GH deficiency syndrome in adults. This article, aimed at non-paediatric physicians, examines the clinical features, diagnosis, and current concepts in the management of these conditions.

Pegvisomant therapy for acromegaly

Despite traditional, multimodality therapy that consisted of surgery, radiotherapy and medical therapies, many patients with acromegaly could not be adequately treated. Pegvisomant is a novel growth hormone receptor antagonist that became available for the treatment of acromegaly in 2003. This drug is a growth hormone variant that has nine mutations to human growth hormone. These give it high affinity for the growth hormone receptor as well as disrupting growth hormone receptor dimerization, with the net effect being antagonism of growth hormone at its receptor. Traditional methods of therapy for acromegaly treat the disease by reducing pituitary tumor secretion of growth hormone and, thus, lowering serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels. Pegvisomant, by contrast, blocks the actions of circulating growth hormone excess, but does not lower serum growth hormone levels. Its efficacy, therefore, is assessed by monitoring serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels. In clinical trials, pegvisomant has been shown to effectively normalize insulin-like growth factor-I levels in up to 97% of patients and to improve acromegaly-related signs and symptoms, and morbidities such as insulin resistance. As the action of pegvisomant does not rely on the tumor's receptor profile, it can be effective even in patients resistant to somatostatin analog therapy. Individually tailored therapy guided by serum insulin-like growth factor-I normalization goals and improvement in clinical signs and symptoms should be undertaken while growth hormone deficiency should be avoided. Pegvisomant is very well tolerated, but liver transaminase levels need to be monitored during therapy. As pegvisomant does not shrink pituitary tumors, the underlying rate of tumor growth may continue on this therapy and periodic pituitary imaging needs to be conducted during therapy.

A liver specific gene that is expressed in growth hormone transgenic mice and in normal female mice as a function of age

Growth hormone (GH) acts on various organs to exert its growth and metabolic effects. GH induces transcription of a number of genes in different organs including liver. By performing subtractive hybridization analysis on liver cDNAs of GH transgenic and non-transgenic mice, differentially expressed cDNAs were obtained. This paper describes the isolation and characterization of a liver cDNA, termed cDNA #5, that contains 1897 bp and is predicted to encode a protein (P5) of 512 aa residues. P5 has five immunoglobulin related domains thus allowing it to be classified as a member of the immunoglobulin super family (IGSF). Also, P5 shows significant similarity to both rat and human alpha-1-B glycoprotein which is an acidic serum protein of unknown function. mRNA #5 was detected in the liver hepatocytes of male and female GH transgenic mice and in the liver of female, but not of male, non-transgenic mice. mRNA #5 was not present in dwarf mice including the Ames dwarf, those that express a GH antagonist and those with the GH receptor and binding protein gene disrupted. These findings suggest that induction of mRNA #5 in the liver requires a continuous pattern of GH secretion and an intact GH-GH receptor-signaling complex. mRNA #5 levels in female non-transgenic mice were observed to vary with age implying that gender-specific age-dependent factor(s) may be involved in the induction of mRNA #5. The appearance of mRNA #5 in post-hepatectomized liver that coincides with the proliferative phase of liver regeneration suggests that it may be involved in hepatocyte proliferation. Together these data suggest that expression of cDNA #5 is liver-specific, sexually dimorphic, age-dependent, and may be involved in hepatocyte hyperplasia and liver enlargement.

An unusual somatotropin and thyreotropin secreting pituitary adenoma efficiently controlled by Octreotide and Pegvisomant

We describe the first case of a 36 year-old male patient with a somatotropin and thyreotropin secreting pituitary adenoma, co-treated by a long-acting releasing somatostatin analog (Octreotide) and a GH receptor antagonist (Pegvisomant). The patient normalized his biological disease activity reflected by hormone levels but his tumor size remained unchanged as measured by MRI. The co-treatment was well tolerated and induced a synergic effect on IGF1 levels that allowed us to use low doses of both therapies.

Role of radiotherapy in the management of acromegaly

Active acromegaly can be treated effectively by transsphenoidal surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment in the form of somatostatin analogs and growth hormone receptor antagonists. Many patients will require a combination of treatment modalities to normalize growth hormone excess and associated increased mortality, and to improve comorbidity. Following postoperative radiotherapy, growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I levels gradually decrease and normalization of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I is achieved in 50% of patients after 5 years and 75% after 10 years. Disadvantages of radiotherapy include the long interval until hormone levels have sufficiently decreased and the high incidence of radiation-induced hypopituitarism. Radiotherapy was associated with increased mortality in some but not other studies. Limitations in the design and confounding factors, such as years spent with active disease and changing treatment strategies, make it impossible to draw conclusions on this topic. Gamma knife radiosurgery may combine faster decline of growth hormone excess with a lower incidence of hypopituitarism in eligible cases, but long-term results of this radiation technique are lacking. At present, patients will preferentially be treated by primary surgery and/or somatostatin analog treatment, followed, if necessary, by growth hormone receptor antagonist treatment, while radiotherapy is reserved for selected cases only. The indications for radiotherapy and radiosurgery need to be revisited in the near future, when longer follow-up results for medical treatment and radiosurgery have become available. This review summarizes the recent literature on efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy and radiosurgery in acromegaly and discusses the place of radiation treatment in the treatment algorithm of acromegaly.

Treatment strategies for acromegaly

Acromegaly is a chronic debilitating disorder caused by a growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenoma. Active acromegaly is associated with a two- to fourfold increased mortality risk, mainly from cardiovascular disease. Transsphenoidal surgery is considered as the treatment of choice because of the rapidity of cure and normalisation of survival. Secondary treatment modalities are radiotherapy and medical treatment, and are important because surgery in the best hands cures only approximately 60% in long-term studies. Medical treatment with slow-release formulations of somatostatin are now widely used, also as primary treatment, and appear to be safe and effective in 50-60% of the patients. However, no data on mortality risk with these drugs is available. Recently, a GH-receptor blocking agent, pegvisomant, was licensed for use in acromegaly and appears to normalise IGF-1 in almost all patients. This article examines the pathophysiology of acromegaly, currently used medicines and their safety and efficacy, and the new drugs that are in development.

Efficacy of 12-month treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term, high-dose somatostatin analog treatment: effect on IGF-I levels, tumor mass, hypertension and glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the efficacy of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term (> or = 24-month), high-dose treatment with octreotide-LAR (40 mg/month) or lanreotide (120 mg/month).

DESIGN

This was an open, prospective study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We studied 16 patients with acromegaly (nine women; aged 28-61 years). The main outcome measures were IGF-I levels, blood pressure, glucose tolerance and safety (liver function and tumor size). Pegvisomant was given at doses of 10-40 mg s.c. daily. Dose titration was performed every month by IGF-I assay.

RESULTS

Three patients spontaneously stopped pegvisomant treatment after 6-9 months because of poor compliance; from the measurement of serum pegvisomant, another patient was found not to inject herself properly. After 6 months, IGF-I levels decreased by 63 +/- 19% (767.8 +/- 152.9 vs 299.8 +/- 162.9 microg/l, P < 0.0001, t-test); serum IGF-I levels normalized in 57%. After 12 months, IGF-I levels normalized in nine (75%) patients and were reduced by over 50% in another three (25%). The mean tumor volume remained stable during the study (1198 +/- 1234 vs 1196 +/- 1351 mm(3), P = 0.37): it did not change ( +/- 25% vs basal) in nine patients, increased by 39.4% and 40.8% in two and decreased by 30.8-46.5% in four. The total/high-density lipoprotein (HDL):cholesterol ratio (from 4.4 +/- 1.0 to 3.7 +/- 0.6, P = 0.0012), glucose levels (from 5.6 +/- 1.2 to 4.4 +/- 1.4 mmol/l, P = 0.026), insulin levels (from 12.4 +/- 6.7 to 8.1 +/- 3.0 mUl/l, P = 0.0023) and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index (from 3.4 +/- 2.1 to 1.9 +/- 1.0, P = 0.0017) decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment for 12 months with pegvisomant normalized IGF-I levels, and improved cardiovascular risk parameters and insulin sensitivity in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term, high-dose treatment with somatostatin analogs. The tolerance of treatment was good.

Pegvisomant Treatment in a 4-Year-Old Girl with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Growth hormone (GH) excess in childhood is a rare disorder. Current treatment options such as somatostatin analogues, pituitary surgery or irradiation can have serious side effects. Recently, a GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant, was introduced for the treatment of adults with acromegaly. We wanted to investigate whether pegvisomant was effective in a child with octreotide-resistant GH excess.

CASE

A 4-year-old girl with neurofibromatosis type 1 and GH excess associated with optic glioma received pegvisomant injections (10 mg subcutaneously) with increasing intervals from daily to every 4th day.

RESULTS

IGF-I and IGFBP-3 decreased from +6.9 and 4.6 standard deviation scores (SDS), respectively, to within normal range. Height velocity dropped from 12.4 SDS to mean -0.7 SDS (range: -5.0 to 5.0) and height SDS decreased from +1.3 to +0.6 (target height: +0.2). Random non-fasting serum GH values were mean 5.0 mlU/l (range: 1.6-9.5). There was no change in fasting blood glucose (4.6-4.7 mmol/l) or glycosylated haemoglobin (5.5%) and no subjective or biochemical side effects. Repeated tests of thyroid, adrenal and gonadal function showed no alterations during the treatment period. Intracranial tumours remained unchanged in size and visual impairment did not deteriorate.

CONCLUSION

Pegvisomant normalized IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. Growth velocity was normalized after initial catch-down growth, and it remains to be seen whether this result can be maintained during long-term treatment.

Pathology of acromegaly

This review summarizes current knowledge on pituitary changes in patients with acromegaly. The histologic, immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study provided conclusive evidence that a marked diversity exists between the tumors which secrete growth hormone (GH) in excess, such as densely and sparsely granulated GH cell adenoma, the mixed GH prolactin cell adenoma and the mammosomatotrope adenoma. The latter two tumors produce GH and prolactin simultaneously. Densely granulated GH cell tumors may produce thyrotropin and alpha subunit as well. Somatotrope carcinomas are extremely rare. GH cell hyperplasia can also be associated with acromegaly in patients with extrapituitary GH-releasing hormone secreting tumors. The medical therapy of acromegaly is reviewed briefly, including long-acting somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant, a GH receptor blocker.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a slowly progressive disease characterized by 30% increase of mortality rate for cardiovascular disease, respiratory complications and malignancies. The estimated prevalence of the disease is 40 cases/1000000 population with 3-4 new cases/1000000 population per year. The biochemical diagnosis is based upon the demonstration of high circulating levels of GH and IGF-I. A random GH level lower than 0.4 microg/l and an IGF-I value in the age- and sex-matched normal range makes the diagnosis of acromegaly unlikely. In doubtful cases, the lack of GH suppressibility below 1 microg/l (0.3 microg/l according to recent reports) after an oral glucose load will confirm the diagnosis. A pituitary adenoma is demonstrated in most cases by CT scan or MRI. A negative X-ray finding or the presence of empty sella do not exclude the diagnosis. Cardiovascular complications (acromegalic cardiomyopathy and arterial hypertension) should be looked for and, if present, followed-up by echocardiography and 24h-electrocardiogram. Sleep apnoea, when clinically suspicious, should be confirmed by polisomnography. At the moment of diagnosis all patients should undergo colonscopy. Lipid profile should be obtained and glucose tolerance evaluated. Surgery, radiotherapy and medical treatment represent the therapeutic options for acromegaly. The outcome of transsphenoidal surgery is far better for microadenomas (80-90%) than for macroadenomas (less than 50%), which unluckily represent more than 70% of all GH-secreting pituitary tumours. Therefore, pituitary surgery is the first line treatment for microadenomas. Medical therapy is based on GH-lowering drugs (somatostatin receptor agonists and, in some cases, dopaminergic agents) and GH receptor antagonists (pegvisomant). The former are traditionally indicated after unsuccessful surgery and while awaiting the effectiveness of radiation therapy. However, GH-lowering drugs are also used as primary therapy when surgery is contraindicated or in the case of large GH-secreting macroadenomas which are not likely to be completely removed by surgery. These compounds may also be indicated in the preoperative management of some acromegalic patients in order to lower the risk of surgical and anaesthetic complications. For the moment pegvisomant is indicated for patients resistant to the GH-lowering drugs and there is no evidence for drug-induced enlargement of the pituitary tumour. In order to avoid this possibility, however, a combination of pegvisomant and GH-lowering compound can also be conceived. With pegvisomant, IGF-I plasma levels are the marker of therapeutic efficacy and normalize in 97% of patients. Radiotherapy is employed sparingly due to the number of side effects (80% of hypopituitarism). It is indicated after unsuccessful surgical and/or medical treatment and allows the control of hormonal secretion and tumour growth in approx. 40% and 100% of cases, respectively. Acromegaly is defined as controlled when, in the absence of clinical activity, IGF-I levels are in the age- and sex-matched normal range and GH is normally suppressible by the oral glucose load.

The role of the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor axis in tumor growth and progression: Lessons from animal models

Over the past two decades it has become widely appreciated that a relationship exists between the insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and cancer. Many cancers have been shown to overexpress the IGF-I receptor and produce the ligands (IGF-I or IGF-II) and some combinations of the six IGF-binding proteins. With the recent demonstration by epidemiological studies that an elevated serum IGF-I level is associated with an increased relative risk of developing a number of epithelial cancers, interest has been sparked in this area of research with the possibility of targeting the IGF-I receptor in cancer treatment protocols. This review highlights many of the most relevant studies in this exciting area of research, focusing in particular on lessons learned from animal models of cancer.

Feline Acromegaly: A Review of the Syndrome

Acromegaly is characterized by chronic excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion by the pituitary gland. Feline acromegaly is most commonly caused by a functional pituitary tumor. Definitive diagnosis can be difficult because of the gradual disease onset, subtle clinical signs, unavailability of relevant laboratory tests, and client financial investment. The most significant clinical finding of acromegaly is the presence of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus. Diagnosis is currently based upon brain imaging and measurement of serum GH and/or insulin-like growth factor-1 concentrations. Definitive treatment in cats is not well described, but radiation therapy appears promising.

Effects of medical therapy on pituitary tumors

Previously surgery and irradiation were the only available procedures to treat patients with pituitary tumors. During the last few decades, novel drugs such as dopamine agonists and long-acting somatostatin analogs were developed and, an alternative medical therapy emerged. This paper summarizes the effect of medical therapy on the morphologic features of pituitary tumors and illustrates the ultrastructural alterations on electron micrographs. Currently drugs can be used in the management of pituitary tumors secreting GH, PRL, and/or TSH in excess. No medical therapy is available so far for ACTH-, FSH-, LH-, or alpha-subunit-secreting tumors as well as non-hormone-secreting pituitary tumors. Dopamine agonists are effective in the management of PRL-secreting tumors; they cause marked reversible tumor shrinkage in the substantial majority of patients. Long-acting somatostatin analogs are useful in the management of GH- and TSH-secreting pituitary tumors; they lead to mild to moderate tumor shrinkage in approximately 50% of cases. In patients treated with these drugs reduction of elevated blood hormone levels and amelioration of clinical symptoms ensue. It should be emphasized that no permanent cure is obtained. Blood hormone levels increase and the clinical symptoms reappear after discontinuation of treatment. Recently GH receptor blockers (pegvisomant) were introduced in the treatment of GH-producing pituitary adenomas. To the authors' knowledge the effect of these drugs on the morphology of pituitary tumors has not been revealed so far.

Diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly

Acromegaly is an insidious disease that occurs, in the majority of cases, as a result of a pituitary adenoma that hypersecretes growth hormone (GH). The clinical consequences of acromegaly are a function of excess GH secretion and mass effect of the pituitary tumor. The involvement of multiple organ systems may lead to significant morbidity and mortality, prompting the need for rapid and accurate disease recognition and treatment. This brief review will describe current recommendations for management of this uncommon, but debilitating, endocrine disorder.

The effect of atorvastatin on serum lipoproteins in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is associated with long-term adverse effects on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Reducing growth hormone secretion improves well-being and symptoms, but may not significantly improve the lipoprotein profile. An additional approach to cardiovascular risk reduction in acromegaly may therefore be to target lipoprotein metabolism directly. In this study we investigated the effect of statin treatment.

DESIGN

Double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effects on circulating lipoproteins of atorvastatin 10 mg daily vs. placebo. Each treatment was given for 3 months in random order.

SUBJECTS

Eleven patients with acromegaly.

MEASUREMENTS

Lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, enzyme activity and calculated cardiovascular risk.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin treatment compared to placebo resulted in a significant decrease in serum cholesterol (5.85 +/- 1.04 mmol/l vs. 4.22 +/- 0.69 mmol/l; mean +/- SD; P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (2.95 +/- 1.07 mmol/l vs. 1.82 +/- 0.92 mmol/l; P < 0.001), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (0.31 (0.21-0.47) mmol vs. 0.23 (0.13-0.30) mmol/l median (interquartile range); P < 0.05), apolipoprotein B (111 +/- 28 mg/dl vs. 80 +/- 18 mg/dl; P < 0.001), and calculated coronary heart disease risk (6.8 (3.3-17.9) vs. 2.8 (1.5-5.7)% over next 10 years; P < 0.01). Serum triglyceride was 1.34 (1.06-1.71) mmol/l on placebo and 1.14 (0.88-1.48) mmol/l on atorvastatin (ns). HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1 and Lp(a) concentrations and cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin: cholesterol acyl transferase activities were also not significantly altered.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin treatment was safe, well tolerated and effective in improving the atherogenic lipoprotein profile in acromegaly.

Update on the medical management of pituitary adenomas

The medical treatment of pituitary adenomas has changed significantly over the past decade. Pharmacologic therapy for prolactinomas in the form of dopamine agonists has been available since the 1970s, and somatostatin analogues for treatment of growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas were introduced in the 1980s. However, the recent introduction of long-acting forms of these agents has markedly improved efficacy. Furthermore, long-acting somatostatin analogues also have utility in treating thyrotropin adenomas and a subset of adrenocorticotroph tumors. Limited clinical studies with long-acting dopamine agonists suggest that a subset of patients with GH, adrenocorticotroph, and gonadotropin/nonsecreting adenomas may also benefit from therapy with these agents. The introduction of a GH receptor antagonist in the 1990s has added to the pharmacologic armamentarium for treatment of acromegaly. In parallel with improved medical therapy, hormonal assays for assessing tumor activity have improved in sensitivity, necessitating new standards for treatment optimization. This article highlights some of these evolving new ideas and approaches to the pharmacologic management of pituitary adenomas.

Development and potential clinical uses of human prolactin receptor antagonists

There is a large body of literature showing that prolactin (PRL) exerts growth-promoting activities in breast cancer, and possibly in prostate cancer and prostate hyperplasia. In addition, increasing evidence argues for the involvement of locally produced (autocrine) PRL, perhaps even more than pituitary-secreted (endocrine) PRL, in tumor growth. Because dopamine analogs are unable to inhibit PRL production in extrapituitary sites, alternative strategies need investigation. To that end, several PRL receptor antagonists have been developed by introducing various mutations into its natural ligands. For all but one of these analogs, the mechanism of action involves a competition with endogenous PRL for receptor binding. Such compounds are thus candidates to counteract the undesired actions of PRL, not only in tumors, but also in dopamine-resistant prolactinomas. In this review, we describe the different versions of antagonists that have been developed, with emphasis on the controversies regarding their characterization, and the limits for their potential development as a drug. The most recently developed antagonist, Delta1-9-G129R-hPRL, is the only one that is totally devoid of residual agonistic activity, meaning it acts as pure antagonist. We discuss to what extent this new molecule could be considered as a lead compound for inhibiting the actions of human PRL in the above-mentioned diseases. We also speculate on the multiple questions that could be addressed with respect to the therapeutic use of PRL receptor antagonists in patients.

Pegvisomant: a novel pharmacotherapy for the treatment of acromegaly

Pegvisomant is a pegylated analogue of growth hormone (GH) that functions as a growth hormone receptor antagonist. Clinical trials of its use in acromegaly commenced in 1997; the drug was approved in the US in March 2003 and in Europe in November 2003. In the same year, it was made available on prescription in several European countries, with further launches due in 2004. Pegvisomant is capable of normalising serum insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations (the chief mediator of disease activity in acromegaly) in 97% of patients with active acromegaly, and therapy is associated with a significant improvement in the symptoms and signs of GH excess. Disease control is achievable with pegvisomant in patients who are wholly or partially resistant or do not tolerate somatostatin analogues; preliminary data suggest that the drug may be particularly suitable for patients with acromegaly and co-existent diabetes mellitus.

Mathematical modelling of prolactin-receptor interaction and the corollary for prolactin receptor gene expression in skin

A mathematical model of prolactin regulating its own receptors was developed, and compared with experimental data on a qualitative level. The model incorporates the kinetics of prolactin-receptor interactions and subsequent signalling by prolactin-receptor dimers to regulate the production of receptor mRNA and hence the receptor population. The model relates changes in plasma prolactin concentration to prolactin receptor (PRLR) gene expression, and can be used for predictive purposes. The cell signalling that leads to the activation of target genes, and the mechanisms for regulation of transcription, were treated empirically in the model. The model's parameters were adjusted so that model simulations agreed with experimentally observed responses to administration of prolactin in sheep. In particular, the model correctly predicts insensitivity of receptor mRNA regulation to a series of subcutaneous injections of prolactin, versus sensitivity to prolonged infusion of prolactin. In the latter case, response was an acute down-regulation followed by a prolonged up-regulation of mRNA, with the magnitude of the up-regulation increasing with the duration of infusion period. The model demonstrates the feasibility of predicting the in vivo response of prolactin target genes to external manipulation of plasma prolactin, and could provide a useful tool for identifying optimal prolactin treatments for desirable outcomes.

GH receptor antagonist: mechanism of action and clinical utility

This review focuses on the development of GH receptor antagonist as a novel agent for treatment of acromegaly, its mechanism of action and potential areas of use. A brief overview of acromegaly, its diagnosis and existing medical, surgical and radiotherapy options of treatment is necessary to justify the addition of yet another therapeutic modality to the already vast therapeutic armamentarium.

The role of growth hormone-receptor antagonism in relation to acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare but disabling condition associated with reduced life expectancy. It is caused almost invariably by a growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. Transsphenoidal surgery and/or radiotherapy are still considered to be the treatment of choice, but despite recent advances in both these forms of treatment, the overall surgical cure rate remains approximately 60%, and radiotherapy is characterised by delayed effect and a high incidence of hypopituitarism. Medical therapy in the form of dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues has traditionally been used as an adjunct to surgery and/or radiotherapy, but is increasingly being used as first line therapy in the treatment of acromegaly. Recently, a third form of medical therapy, the growth hormone receptor antagonist, pegvisomant, has been licensed for use in acromegaly. This article examines the design, properties, clinical efficacy and safety of pegvisomant.

Cortistatin-17 and -14 exert the same endocrine activities as somatostatin in humans

Cortistatin (CST) is a neuropeptide, which binds with high affinity all somatostatin (SS) receptor subtypes and shows high structural homology with SS itself. A receptor specific for CST only, i.e., not recognized by SS, has been recently described in agreement with data reporting that not all CST actions are shared by SS. Interestingly, CST but not SS also binds ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) in vitro, suggesting a potential interplay between CST and ghrelin system. The aim of this study was to investigate in humans the endocrine and metabolic activities of human CST-17 in comparison with rat CST-14 that has previously been shown to exert the same endocrine actions of SS in healthy volunteers. To this aim, in six healthy male volunteers (age [median, 3rd-97th centiles]: 28.5; 23.6-34.3 years; Body Mass Index: 23.5; 21.0-25.1 kg/m(2)), we studied the effects of human CST-17 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min), rat CST-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) on: (a) spontaneous GH, ACTH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels; (b) the GH responses to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min); (c) the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min). CST-17 inhibited (p < 0.01) basal GH secretion to the same extent of CST-14 and SS-14. Spontaneous PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion were not significantly modified by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. CST-17 as well as CST-14 and SS-14 also inhibited (p < 0.05) spontaneous insulin secretion to a similar extent. None of these peptides modified glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited to the same extent by CST-17 (p < 0.01), CST-14 (p < 0.01) and SS-14 (p < 0.05 ). The ghrelin-induced GH response was higher than that elicited by GHRH (p < 0.01) and inhibited by CST-17 (p < 0.05) as well as by CST-14 (p < 0.05) and SS-14 (p < 0.01). The PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to ghrelin were unaffected by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. On the other hand, the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on insulin levels was abolished by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14 (p < 0.05) that, in turn, did not modify the ghrelin-induced increase in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that human CST-17 and rat CST-14 exert the same endocrine activities of SS in humans. The endocrine actions of human and rat CST therefore are likely to reflect activation of classical SS receptors.

Free insulin-like growth factors -- measurements and relationships to growth hormone secretion and glucose homeostasis

IGF-I is a multipotent growth factor with important actions on normal tissue growth and regeneration. In addition, IGF-I has been suggested to have beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis due to its glucose lowering and insulin sensitizing actions. However, not all effects of IGF-I are considered to be favorable; thus, epidemiological studies suggest that IGF-I is also involved in the development of common cancers, atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes. The biological actions of IGF-I are modulated by at least six IGF-binding proteins, which bind approximately 99% of the circulating IGF-I pool. So far, most in vivo studies have used serum or plasma total (extractable IGF-I) as an estimate of the bioactivity of IGF-I in vivo. However, within the last decade, validated assays for measurement of free IGF-I have been described. This review aims to discuss the current assays for free IGF-I and their advances in relation to the traditional measurement of total IGF-I. The literature overview will focus on the role of circulating free versus total IGF-I in the feedback regulation of GH release, and the possible involvement of the circulating IGF-system in glucose homeostasis.

History and future of growth hormone research

The understanding of the mechanisms of growth hormone (GH) action has seen great accomplishments over the last two decades. These achievements include the cloning of a variety of GH and GH receptor (GHR) genes and cDNAs; solving of the three-dimensional structure of GH and the GH/GHR complex, and the discovery of GH antagonists. These GH antagonists have resulted in a new class of drugs with important clinical implications. Animal models in which the GH/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I axis has been perturbed also have resulted in many novel findings. We have now entered the era of genomics and proteomics. Genes and proteins that are up- or downregulated as a function of GH action (or lack thereof) will add to the repertoire of knowledge that will lead to a better understanding of the molecular basis of GH action.