Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy

PPAR Agonists and Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes

Peroxisome proliferators activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors that play important roles in lipid and glucose homeostasis. To the extent that PPAR agonists improve diabetic dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance, these agents have been considered to reduce cardiovascular risk. However, data from murine models suggests that PPAR agonists also have independent anti-atherosclerotic actions, including the suppression of vascular inflammation, oxidative stress, and activation of the renin angiotensin system. Many of these potentially anti-atherosclerotic effects are thought to be mediated by transrepression of nuclear factor-kB, STAT, and activator protein-1 dependent pathways. In recent clinical trials, PPARalpha agonists have been shown to be effective in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events, while their cardiovascular benefit in patients with established cardiovascular disease remains equivocal. However, the use of PPARgamma agonists, and more recently dual PPARalpha/gamma coagonists, has been associated with an excess in cardiovascular events, possibly reflecting unrecognised fluid retention with potent agonists of the PPARgamma receptor. Newer pan agonists, which retain their anti-atherosclerotic activity without weight gain, may provide one solution to this problem. However, the complex biologic effects of the PPARs may mean that only vascular targeted agents or pure transrepressors will realise the goal of preventing atherosclerotic vascular disease.

Rosiglitazone reduces liver fat and insulin requirements and improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring high insulin doses

BACKGROUND

Liver fat is an important determinant of insulin requirements during insulin therapy. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonists reduce liver fat. We therefore hypothesized that type 2 diabetic patients using exceptionally high doses of insulin might respond well to addition of a PPARgamma agonist.

METHODS

We determined the effect of the PPARgamma agonist rosiglitazone on liver fat and directly measured hepatic insulin sensitivity in 14 patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 51 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 36.7 +/- 1.1 kg/m2), who were poorly controlled (glycosylated hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c) 8.9 +/- 0.4%) despite using high doses of insulin (218 +/- 22 IU/d) in combination with metformin. Liver fat content (1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy), hepatic insulin sensitivity [6 h hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (insulin 0.3 mU/kg.min) combined with [3-3H]glucose], body composition (magnetic resonance imaging), substrate oxidation rates (indirect calorimetry), clinical parameters, and liver enzymes were measured before and after rosiglitazone treatment (8 mg/d) for 8 months.

RESULTS

During rosiglitazone, HbA(1c) decreased from 8.9 +/- 0.4% to 7.8 +/- 0.3% (P = 0.007) and insulin requirements from 218 +/- 22 to 129 +/- 20 IU/d (P = 0.002). Liver fat content decreased by 46 +/- 9% from 20 +/- 3% to 11 +/- 3% (P = 0.0002). Hepatic insulin sensitivity, measured from the percent suppression of endogenous glucose production by insulin, increased from -40 +/- 7% to -89 +/- 12% (P = 0.001). The percent change in liver fat correlated with the percent decrease in HbA 1c (r = 0.53, P = 0.06), insulin dose (r = 0.66, P = 0.014), and suppression of endogenous glucose production (r = 0.76, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that rosiglitazone may be particularly effective in type 2 diabetic patients who are poorly controlled despite using high insulin doses. The mechanism is likely to involve reduced liver fat and enhanced hepatic insulin sensitivity.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors--from active regulators of macrophage biology to pharmacological targets in the treatment of cardiovascular disease

Altered macrophage functions contribute to the pathogenesis of many infectious, immunological and inflammatory disease processes. Pharmacological modulation of macrophage activities therefore represents an important strategy for the prevention and treatment of inflammation-related diseases, such as atherosclerosis. This review focuses on recent advances on the role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor transcription factor family in the modulation of lipid homeostasis and the inflammatory response in macrophages and the potential participation of these actions in the modulation of metabolic and cardiovascular disease.

Novel combination treatment of type 2 diabetes DPP-4 inhibition + metformin

Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) as a novel therapy for type 2 diabetes is based on prevention of the inactivation process of bioactive peptides, the most important in the context of treatment of diabetes of which is glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Most clinical experience with DPP-4 inhibition is based on vildagliptin (GalvusR, Novartis) and sitagliptin (JanuviaR, Merck). These compounds improve glycemic control both in monotherapy and in combination with other oral hyperglycemic agents. Both have also been shown to efficiently improve glycemic control when added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with inadequate glycemic control. Under that condition, they reduce HbA1C levels by 0.65%-1.1% (baseline HbA1C 7.2-8.7%) in studies up to 52 weeks of duration in combination versus continuous therapy with metformin alone. Sitagliptin has also been examined in initial combination therapy with metformin have; HbA1 was reduced by this combination by 2.1% (baseline HbA1C 8.8%) after 24 weeks of treatment. Both fasting and prandial glucose are reduced by DPP-4 inhibition in combination with metformin in association with improvement of insulin secretion and insulin resistance and increase in concentrations of active GLP-1. The combination of DPP-4 inhibition and metformin has been shown to be highly tolerable with very low risk of hypoglycemia. Hence, DPP-4 inhibition in combination with metformin is an efficient, safe and tolerable combination therapy for type 2 diabetes.

Combination treatment in the management of type 2 diabetes: focus on vildagliptin and metformin as a single tablet

Vildagliptin is a potent and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4), orally active, that improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) primarily by enhancing pancreatic (alpha and beta) islet function. Thus vildagliptin has been shown both to improve insulin secretion and to suppress the inappropriate glucagon secretion seen in patients with T2DM. Vildagliptin reduces HbA(1c) when given as monotherapy, without weight gain and with minimal hypoglycemia, or in combination with the most commonly prescribed classes of oral hypoglycemic drugs: metformin, a sulfonylurea, a thiazolidinedione, or insulin. Metformin, with a different mode of action not addressing beta-cell dysfunction, has been used for about 50 years and still represents the universal first line therapy of all guidelines. However, given the multiple pathophysiological abnormalities in T2DM and the progressive nature of the disease, intensification of therapy with combinations is typically required over time. Recent guidelines imply that patients will require pharmacologic combinations much earlier to attain and sustain the increasingly stringent glycemic targets, with careful drug selection to avoid unwanted adverse events, especially hypoglycemia. The combination of metformin and vildagliptin offers advantages when compared to currently used combinations with additive efficacy and complimentary mechanisms of action, since it does not increase the risk of hypoglycemia and does not promote weight gain. Therefore, by specifically combining these agents in a single tablet, there is considerable potential to achieve better blood glucose control and to improve compliance to therapy.

Should We Use PPAR Agonists to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk?

Trials of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists have shown mixed results for cardiovascular prevention. Fibrates are PPAR-alpha agonists that act primarily to improve dyslipidemia. Based on low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL and HDL) effects, gemfibrozil may be of greater cardiovascular benefit than expected, fenofibrate performed about as expected, and bezafibrate performed worse than expected. Increases in both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular serious adverse events have been observed with some fibrates. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are PPAR-gamma agonists used to improve impaired glucose metabolism but also influence lipids. Pioglitazone reduces atherosclerotic events in diabetic subjects, but has no net cardiovascular benefit due to increased congestive heart failure risk. Rosiglitazone may increase the risk of atherosclerotic events, and has a net harmful effect on the cardiovascular system when congestive heart failure is included. The primary benefit of TZDs appears to be the prevention of diabetic microvascular complications. Dual PPAR-alpha/gamma agonists have had unacceptable adverse effects but more selective agents are in development. PPAR-delta and pan-agonists are also in development. It will be imperative to prove that future PPAR agonists not only prevent atherosclerotic events but also result in a net reduction on total cardiovascular events without significant noncardiovascular adverse effects with long-term use.

Why insulin sensitizers but not secretagogues should be retained when initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes

The stringent targets set for HbA(1c) levels in type 2 diabetes are currently achieved by fewer than half the patients in the United States. Failure to manage hyperglycaemia in the early stages of disease results in progressive loss of beta-cell function, which ultimately necessitates the initiation of insulin therapy. At this point, choices have to be made on whether to continue oral anti-diabetic drug therapy and, if so, with which agent(s). Historically, sulfonylureas have been the mainstay of oral anti-diabetic drug therapy; however, their long-term efficacy in patients with depleted beta-cell capacity is doubtful, and other classes of oral anti-diabetic drugs, notably the insulin sensitizers, may prove more reliable. These agents (metformin and thiazolidinediones) appear to provide various benefits over and above sustained glycaemic control, which may variably include reduced loss of beta-cell function as well as improvements to cardiovascular risk factors, morbidity, and mortality. Metformin also limits weight gain associated with insulin therapy. This manuscript presents the case that when insulin therapy is initiated it should be tailored to individual needs through combination with one or more insulin sensitizers rather than a secretagogue.

Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular outcomes

Diabetes mellitus is associated with a number of serious microvascular and macrovascular complications that have a devastating effect on quality of life and impose a heavy burden on healthcare systems. In order to decrease the risk of diabetes-related complications, individuals with diabetes should normally receive intensive and effective treatment for all metabolic disturbances, including hyperglycaemia. Thiazolidinediones are an important part of this therapeutic armamentarium, but are currently the subject of intense scrutiny following the publication of a meta-analysis reporting increased cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone. Based on available data, the FDA has concluded that the use of rosiglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes may be associated with a greater risk of myocardial ischaemic events than placebo, metformin or sulphonylureas and have added label warnings to the prescribing information until the results of long-term cardiovascular outcome trials become available. To date, increased cardiovascular risk has not been reported with pioglitazone and indeed there is evidence suggestive of cardiovascular protection. Thiazolidinediones are effective glucose-lowering agents, complementing existing treatment approaches and thus have a continuing role to play in the management of diabetes.

Thiazolidinediones as anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic agents

In the last few years, there has been increasing focus on the impact of interventions on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia often co-exist with a cluster of risk factors for coronary artery disease, but the underlying mechanisms leading to the development of such vascular complications are complex. The over-production of free radicals in patients suffering from diabetes results in a state of oxidative stress, which leads to endothelial dysfunction and a greater risk of atherosclerosis. Moreover, inflammatory factors which play a critical role in atherothrombosis and plaque rupture are often found to be at elevated levels in this patient population. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are now routinely used to manage glucose levels, and have been suggested to influence other cardiovascular risk factors and therefore the pathways leading to macrovascular events. Consequently, recent studies have investigated the anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic properties of TZDs. The data available up to the present time, in the context of the emerging cardiovascular outcome profiles of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, will be discussed here.

Protection of pancreatic beta-cells: is it feasible?

Hyperglycemia, which is the biochemical hallmark of type 2 diabetes, mainly results from insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. However, the latter is crucial in the development of the disease because diabetes cannot occur without an impairment of insulin secretion. Beta-cell failure is also responsible for progressive loss of metabolic control in type 2 diabetic patients and the eventual need for insulin treatment. An impairment of beta-cell function can be detected in several ways and can be observed already in pre-diabetic individuals. Histopathology studies documented that beta-cell volume is reduced in pre-diabetes and, to a greater extent, in type 2 diabetes mainly because the apoptotic rate of beta-cells is increased whereas neogenesis is intact. All anti-diabetic agents can improve, directly or indirectly, beta-cell function. However, only PPAR-gamma agonists and incretin-mimetic agents seem to have favorable effects on beta-cell morphology and volume. Many trials showed that type 2 diabetes can be prevented but few of them directly addressed the issue of beta-cell protection by the intervention used in the study. It is reasonable to conclude that in these trials diabetes prevention, which was based on the use of lifestyle changes (diet and/or exercise) or different drugs (tolbutamide, acarbose, metformin, glitazones, bezafibrate, orlistat, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers or pravastatin), depended also, or mainly, on a protection of the beta-cells but in most studies data on insulin secretion are not available or are insufficient to draw firm conclusions. The mechanisms of beta-cell protection in these trials, if any, remain unknown. They could be various and likely included reduced glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, insulin resistance, inflammation, oxidant stress and/or apoptosis, an amelioration of islet blood flow and/or favorable changes in cation balance within the islets. Contrasting the decline and the eventual failure of beta-cells is crucial in preventing type 2 diabetes as well as in changing the natural history of the disease, when it occurs. The protection can be achieved in several ways but any strategy should include a change in lifestyle in order to generate a healthier islet milieu. Among anti-diabetic drugs, PPAR-gamma agonists and incretin-mimetic agents are the most promising in the protection. Among other drugs, inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system might play a significant role. The increased worldwide diffusion of type 2 diabetes and the progressive loss of metabolic control in affected patients are clear demonstrations that the strategies to protect the beta-cells implemented so far, if any, were largely inadequate. Anti-diabetic agents targeting the intimate mechanisms of beta-cell damage might change the scenario in the near future.

Pioglitazone and sulfonylureas: effectively treating type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is characterised by a gradual decline in glycaemic control and progression from oral glucose-lowering monotherapy to combination therapy and exogenous insulin therapy. Functional decline of the insulin-secreting beta-cells is largely responsible for the deterioration in glycaemic control. Preservation of beta-cell functionality, in addition to maintaining glycaemic control and reducing insulin resistance, is now regarded as a key target for long-term management strategies. Early, aggressive intervention with combination therapy is emerging as a valid approach to optimise long-term outcomes and combining agents with differing modes of action and secondary effect profiles should prove valuable. Sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones exert their glucose-lowering effect through differing mechanisms of action - the sulfonylureas by stimulating insulin secretion, whereas the thiazolidinediones are insulin sensitisers. Both agents offer excellent improvements in glycaemic control when given as monotherapy or in combination. The thiazolidinediones protect beta-cell structural and functional integrity and functionality and complement the sulfonylureas by inducing and maintaining improvements in insulin resistance, the abnormal lipid profile associated with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, there is a strong rationale to support the addition of thiazolidinediones to sulfonylureas as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes. This combination may be particularly effective in the early stages of the disease when beta-cell function is at its highest, allowing maximal benefit to be obtained from the insulin secretion-promoting abilities of the sulfonylureas and the beta-cell-protective effects of the thiazolidinediones.

Update on type 2 diabetes mellitus: understanding changes in the diabetes treatment paradigm

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is increasingly prevalent in the United States and responsible for the bulk of diabetes-related healthcare costs, has not been adequately managed over the long term with the most commonly prescribed oral hypoglycaemic medications. Although there is evidence that successful management of type 2 diabetes must address both beta-cell deficiency and insulin resistance, most oral agents now prescribed do not prevent the progressive loss of beta-cell function that has traditionally continued during treatment. Increasingly aggressive management guidelines have led to the recommendation that metformin therapy be initiated along with lifestyle modification at the time of diagnosis. It seems unlikely, however, that this strategy will impede the progression of beta-cell dysfunction. Treatment paradigms are emerging that combine routinely used drug categories with newer agents based on the incretin pathway to achieve long-term glycaemic control. The current review discusses the clinical implications of these newer therapeutic alternatives, which enhance insulin secretion through glucose-dependent and physiologic mechanisms.

Does rosiglitazone increase cardiovascular outcomes?

Rosiglitazone is commonly used in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes. However, the cardiovascular outcomes with rosiglitazone have only been evaluated recently. Firstly, they were evaluated by meta-analysis. A total of 42 short-term trials, not designed to determine cardiovascular outcomes, were included in the meta-analysis. There were 72 myocardial infarctions in the control group of 12283 subjects (0.59%) and 86 in the rosiglitazone group of 15560 subjects (0.55%). This gave an odds ratio of 1.43 and a p-value of 0.03. As a consequence of this meta-analysis, the safety of this widely used medicine in subjects with Type 2 diabetes is being questioned. Interim analysis of the long-term RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of glycaemia in Diabetes) trial, which was designed to determine cardiovascular outcomes, showed that these occurred in 9.1% of control subjects and 9.8% of the rosiglitazone subjects, and these values were not significantly different. Both the meta-analysis and the interim analysis of RECORD have many limitations. In conclusion, it seems that it is possible that rosiglitazone may have a small harmful effect on cardiovascular outcomes. As the effect (if any) is small, this should not be cause for alarm, but rather for further review of how rosiglitazone should be used and for a larger trial to determine the unequivocal effect of rosiglitazone on cardiovascular outcomes.

PPAR-gamma regulates osteoclastogenesis in mice

Osteoclasts are bone-resorbing cells derived from hematopoietic precursors of the monocyte-macrophage lineage. Regulation of osteoclast function is central to the understanding of bone diseases such as osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and osteopetrosis. Although peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) has been shown to inhibit osteoblast differentiation, its role, if any, in osteoclasts is unknown. This is a clinically crucial question because PPAR-gamma agonists, "such as thiazolidinediones-" a class of insulin-sensitizing drugs, have been reported to cause a higher rate of fractures in human patients. Here we have uncovered a pro-osteoclastogenic effect of PPAR-gamma by using a Tie2Cre/flox mouse model in which PPAR-gamma is deleted in osteoclasts but not in osteoblasts. These mice develop osteopetrosis characterized by increased bone mass, reduced medullary cavity space and extramedullary hematopoiesis in the spleen. These defects are the result of impaired osteoclast differentiation and compromised receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand signaling and can be rescued by bone marrow transplantation. Moreover, ligand activation of PPAR-gamma by rosiglitazone exacerbates osteoclast differentiation in a receptor-dependent manner. Our examination of the underlying mechanisms suggested that PPAR-gamma functions as a direct regulator of c-fos expression, an essential mediator of osteoclastogenesis. Therefore, PPAR-gamma and its ligands have a previously unrecognized role in promoting osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption.

Diabetes mellitus, bone mineral density, and fracture risk

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent research on type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, bone mineral density, and fractures and to identify high-priority research areas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent meta-analyses and cohort studies confirm that type 1 and 2 diabetes are associated with higher fracture risk. These findings are not completely explained by lower bone mineral density in type 1 diabetes or the higher bone mineral density in type 2 diabetes. Studies provide new information on fracture risk for middle-aged diabetic adults, type 1 diabetic men, type 2 diabetic black women, and multiple sites. Recent case-control studies adjusted for key risk factors, and lower bone mineral density in type 1 diabetic adults remained significant at multiple sites. Prospective studies suggest an increased bone mineral density loss for type 2 diabetic white women and with thiazolidinedione use. Longitudinal cohort studies found that subclinical and clinical alterations in peripheral nerve, vascular, and kidney function were associated with lower bone mineral density, higher bone mineral density loss, or higher fracture rates in type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic older adults.

SUMMARY

Prospective studies of risk factors for diabetic bone loss are needed. A greater elucidation of fracture etiology in diabetes has implications for preventive measures.

New onset diabetes mellitus after solid organ transplantation

This article presents an overview of the literature on the current diagnostic criteria for new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) and discusses suggested risk factors for the development of NODAT, its potential pathogenic mechanisms, and its impact on post-transplant outcomes after solid organ transplantation. Suggested guidelines for early identification and management of NODAT are also discussed.

Vascular disease in paediatric type 2 diabetes: the state of the art

Type 2 diabetes is an emerging problem in the paediatric population. Paediatricians and paediatric endocrinologists are struggling with how to best assess, predict and treat cardiovascular risk factors in these patients. There is a notable lack of consensus in how to proceed, even among experts in the field. There are very limited data from quality trials in established paediatric type 2 diabetes. We address the available information regarding traditional and non-traditional indices of cardiovascular risk, including examination findings, biochemical markers and non-invasive imaging modalities. We discuss the utility and pitfalls of applying knowledge gained in adult medicine to the paediatric population. Potential treatment strategies are reviewed, including the currently available pharmaceutical options, with the acknowledgement that there are few drugs formally approved in the paediatric population.

Pharmaco-economic issues for diabetes therapy

A systematic review was undertaken to analyse pharmaco-economic issues in diabetes, with evidence selected on the basis of relevance and immediacy. Pharmaco-economics in diabetes primarily relates to making choices about antidiabetic pharmaceuticals, and this is being influenced by global trends. Trends include increasing numbers of patients with diabetes, with increasing costs of caring for people with diabetes, and an ever-present focus on the costs of pharmaceuticals which are predicted to increase as the pace of development of new medications parallels the increasing incidence of the condition. These developments have influenced the demand for health care in diabetes in the last decade, and will continue to determine this in the coming decade. Recent national experiences are cited to illustrate current issues and to focus specifically upon the challenges facing a raft of new diabetes treatment options now hitting the marketplace, although supported by fewer completed long-term trials. It can be anticipated that these newer agents will be appraised for their cost-effectiveness or value for money. Economic analyses for some of the new technologies are summarized; in general, the peer-reviewed publications using well-accepted and validated models have reported that these technologies are cost-effective. Endorsement of any technology in a national setting is not awarded simply because the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) falls below the threshold regarded as value for money. In most national observations the reviewers expressed concerns about assumptions used in economic modelling which resulted in the ICERs being deemed optimistic at best, generally highly uncertain, and resulting in the cost-effectiveness appearing better than it really would be in clinical practice. This has often led to the authorities concluding that the price advantage of new technologies over comparators could not be justified, essentially leading to restrictions in use compared to their licence. In general, a paucity of robust evidence on longer-term outcome data together with a lack of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data collected in a reliable manner in appropriate patients and amenable to utility (and hence quality adjusted life year or QALY) estimation have resulted in problems for these new drugs at the so-called fourth (cost-effectiveness) hurdle. In the light of these findings, the implications for generating credible fit-for-purpose cost-effectiveness analyses of new technologies in diabetes are discussed. Throughout this chapter, the interested reader is referred to a number of excellent review articles for further details.

Glycaemic responsiveness to long-term insulin plus sulphonylurea therapy as assessed by sulphonylurea withdrawal

AIMS

To assess the effect of sulphonylurea (SU) in patients with Type 2 diabetes undergoing long-term combination therapy with insulin, by withdrawal of SU, and to identify clinically useful markers of long-term response.

METHODS

We studied 25 patients, aged 59-83 years, mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) 7.0 +/- 0.6%, who had been treated with SU for 16 years (7-24 years) in combination with insulin for 10 years (6-15 years). After basal measurements, SU was withdrawn. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and C-peptide were then monitored every 2-3 days during the following 2 weeks. If FPG increased > 40% or P-glucose exceeded 20 mmol/l, SU was restarted. If neither criterion was met, a clinical follow-up visit with measurement of HbA(1c) was scheduled within 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were restarted on SU because of worsening glycaemic control, eight within the first 4 weeks and the remaining 12 at the follow-up visit as their HbA(1c) had increased by 1.1% (range 0.4-2.0%). All these patients were defined as 'SU responders'. The increase in FPG during the initial 2 weeks correlated positively with duration of diabetes (P < 0.01) and duration of SU treatment (P < 0.001). The 'SU responders' had higher levels of basal fasting C-peptide (0.84 +/- 0.44 vs. 0.41 +/- 0.15 nmol/l, P < 0.05), but the variation was wide and none of the measured variables identified 'SU responders'.

CONCLUSIONS

In 80% of this group of patients, glycaemic control deteriorated after SU withdrawal despite long duration of SU treatment.

PPAR agonists: multimodal drugs for the treatment of type-2 diabetes

Patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are considered to be at particularly high risk for cardiovascular disease. Over the last decade, the members of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subfamily of nuclear receptors have emerged as valuable pharmacological targets whose activation can normalize metabolic dysfunctions and reduce some cardiovascular risk factors associated with T2DM. PPARalpha agonists, such as the fibrates, can correct dyslipidemia. PPARgamma agonists, such as the thiazolidinediones, act as insulin sensitizers and improve insulin resistance in patients with T2DM. Because of restricted potency and certain side-effects of PPAR agonists, as well as the increasingly epidemic incidence of T2DM, there is a real need for the development of selective PPAR agonists with improved clinical efficacy. This chapter focuses on the PPAR agonists currently used in the clinic, as well as on the discovery and development of the next generation of PPAR agonists.

The replication of beta cells in normal physiology, in disease and for therapy

Replication of beta cells is an important source of beta-cell expansion in early childhood. The recent linkage of type 2 diabetes with several transcription factors involved in cell cycle regulation implies that growth of the beta-cell mass in early childhood might be an important determinant of risk for type 2 diabetes. Under some circumstances, including obesity and pregnancy, the beta-cell mass is adaptively increased in adult humans. The mechanisms by which this adaptive growth occurs and the relative contributions of beta-cell replication or of mechanisms independent of beta-cell replication are unknown. Also, although there is interest in the potential for beta-cell regeneration as a therapeutic approach in both type 1 and 2 diabetes, little is yet known about the potential sources of new beta cells in adult humans. In common with other cell types, replicating beta cells have an increased vulnerability to apoptosis, which is likely to limit the therapeutic value of inducing beta-cell replication in the proapoptotic environment of type 1 and 2 diabetes unless applied in conjunction with a strategy to suppress increased apoptosis.

[Treatment of type 2 diabetes: revision of current therapeutical options and priorities]

The paradigm of type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment is based in an adequate meal plan and the regular practice of physical exercise. The benefits of these measures are of evident as it is the perseverance in their compliance. In the daily practice, this reality favours the early implementation of a pharmacological therapy that, in the opinion of different experts, would be simultaneous to the introduction of life style changes. In the last years, new drugs have been developed. On the one hand, there are agents with beneficial effects not only on blood glucose control but also on the components of metabolic syndrome. Other drugs, according to different experts, have doubtful therapeutical contribution. The appearance of new drugs to treat obesity, associated with diabetes or not, extends other possibilities of choice to take into account. The great variety of options makes the decision of the adequate therapy more difficult. In the last decade, many therapeutic guidelines have been developed, with convergences and divergences that may mislead the inexpert practitioners. In this review we propose some practical advise in diet and exercise, and an evaluation of the different drugs and rules of intervention proposed in the different therapeutic guidelines. The ultimate goal is to facilitate and direct type 2 diabetes management.

DPP-4 Inhibitors and Combined Treatment in Type 2 Diabetes: Re-evaluation of Clinical Success and Safety

The incretin system has proven to be a new source of glucose-lowering drugs. Glucon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are the incretins which are degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). GLP-1 is the major relevant incretin in type 2 diabetes, GIP has little stimulatory capacity. Oral inhibitors of DPP-4 increase GLP-1 levels and this leads to lower glucose levels caused by increased insulin secretion and decreased glucagon levels. There are currently two oral drugs registered with the European Medicinal Evaluation Agency: sitagliptin and vidagliptin. Both compounds have shown similar effects to date. A main issue is to establish the value of this new class of drugs in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. In this article, results from randomized studies on the efficacy of the new drugs are discussed: 1. comparison with placebo to establish long-term efficacy, 2. comparison with placebo when added to the regimen in patients failing on another oral glucose-lowering drug and 3. comparison in a head-to-head trial with other conventional drugs. Also, the combination with insulin is a promising new avenue. Both efficacy and safety (regarding hypoglycemia, body weight changes and changes in lipid levels) are major components in the decision of the optimal pharmacological treatment, which is discussed in this article. Finally, the advantages, disadvantages and risks of the new anti-diabetic compounds are highlighted, which are applicable to other classes of diabetes drugs.

Anti-inflammatory actions of PPAR ligands: new insights on cellular and molecular mechanisms

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARalpha, -gamma, and -beta/delta) are nuclear receptors with distinct patterns of expression in many cell types both within and outside the immune system. PPAR ligands have anti-inflammatory activity in a variety of mouse models for acute and chronic inflammation. In macrophages, PPARgamma ligands repress expression of a subset of Toll-like receptor (TLR) target genes by a molecular mechanism termed ligand-dependent transrepression. In chronic inflammation, ligand-bound PPARalpha represses production of IFNgamma and IL-17 by CD4(+) T cells, and PPARgamma ligands modulate dendritic cell function to elicit the development of anergic CD4(+) T cells. PPAR ligands also repress expression of cell adhesion molecules on endothelial cells and the secretion of chemokines by epithelial and other cells, decreasing the recruitment of leukocytes to the site of inflammation. The anti-inflammatory activity of PPAR ligands in mouse models suggests their possible use for treating human inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Measuring biomarkers to assess the therapeutic effects of PPAR agonists?

The metabolic syndrome is defined as a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors with insulin resistance, including dyslipidemia, coagulation disturbances and hypertension. Activators of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) modulate several of the metabolic risk factors predisposing to atherosclerosis. Fibrates are hypolipidemic drugs acting through activation of PPARα, whereas glitazones are insulin sensitizers activating PPARγ. In addition, these drugs exert pleiotropic anti-inflammatory actions. In this review, we will focus on the effects of fibrates and glitazones on biomarker modulation and their usefulness in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Lessons that can be learned from patients with diabetogenic mutations in mitochondrial DNA: implications for common type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the role of mitochondria in the development of type 2 diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some mutations in mitochondrial DNA are diabetogenic due to a gradual decline in insulin secretion by the pancreas. These mutations also result in abnormalities in lipid metabolism. A similar situation is seen in patients treated with nucleoside analogues as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy to suppress human immunodeficiency virus infection. These drugs induce a 30-50% reduction in mitochondrial DNA copy number in multiple tissues. Treated individuals develop a redistribution of body fat with concomitant development of markers of the metabolic syndrome and an elevated risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Studies have also shown the presence of reduced mitochondrial activity in muscle and adipose tissue in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

SUMMARY

These observations suggest a pathogenic model for obesity-associated type 2 diabetes, in which mitochondrial activity in peripheral adipocytes is essential to keep triacylglycerol stored within these cells. Mitochondria protect the organism against fatty acid-induced insulin resistance and lipotoxicity to the pancreas. In adipocytes, mitochondria may remove fatty acids through uncoupled beta oxidation, whereas in muscle fatty acids, removal is largely driven by adenosine diphosphate production through physical activity.

Influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone mineral density response to bisphosphonates in late postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates are effective agents for postmenopausal osteoporosis, but their efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is not known. The investigators evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) response to alendronate in women with concurrent late postmenopausal osteoporosis and type 2 DM. In a retrospective, matched case-control study, 26 late postmenopausal osteoporotic women with type 2 DM (age, 67.6+/-7.3 y; type 2 DM duration, 12.8+/-6.8 y; duration of menopause, 10.9+/-7.4 y; time on alendronate: 4.8+/-2.3 y; body mass index [BMI], 31.4+/-6.3 kg/m2) were matched with 26 controls according to age, BMI, duration of menopause, and alendronate treatment received. All subjects were given alendronate 10 mg/d or 70 mg/wk, along with sufficient vitamin D (>or=400 IU) and calcium (>or=1 g/d) intake, for 4.8 y. Response to alendronate therapy was determined by assessment of mean percent change in BMD of total hip, femoral neck, forearm, and lateral spine. The presence of type 2 DM resulted in no difference in spinal BMD response to alendronate therapy. In contrast, BMD in the total hip (mean percent change in BMD, -5.6% vs +1.4%; P=.096), femoral neck (-8.1% vs +1.1%; P=.015), and forearm (-3.6% vs +12.7%; P=.013) fell progressively from baseline in subjects with type 2 DM who were taking alendronate for 4.8 y, compared with controls. Elderly, postmenopausal, osteoporotic obese women with type 2 DM are resistant to long-term bisphosphonates, especially in regions of the hip, femoral neck, and forearm compared with the spine. The efficacy of bone resorption inhibitors in patients with type 2 DM, especially in comparison with anabolic agents, should be considered in additional studies.

Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Adding insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus is customary when glycemic control is suboptimal, though evidence supporting specific insulin regimens is limited.

METHODS

In an open-label, controlled, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 708 patients with a suboptimal glycated hemoglobin level (7.0 to 10.0%) who were receiving maximally tolerated doses of metformin and sulfonylurea to receive biphasic insulin aspart twice daily, prandial insulin aspart three times daily, or basal insulin detemir once daily (twice if required). Outcome measures at 1 year were the mean glycated hemoglobin level, the proportion of patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or less, the rate of hypoglycemia, and weight gain.

RESULTS

At 1 year, mean glycated hemoglobin levels were similar in the biphasic group (7.3%) and the prandial group (7.2%) (P=0.08) but higher in the basal group (7.6%, P<0.001 for both comparisons). The respective proportions of patients with a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or less were 17.0%, 23.9%, and 8.1%; respective mean numbers of hypoglycemic events per patient per year were 5.7, 12.0, and 2.3; and respective mean weight gains were 4.7 kg, 5.7 kg, and 1.9 kg. Rates of adverse events were similar among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single analogue-insulin formulation added to metformin and sulfonylurea resulted in a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or less in a minority of patients at 1 year. The addition of biphasic or prandial insulin aspart reduced levels more than the addition of basal insulin detemir but was associated with greater risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN51125379 [controlled-trials.com].).

Effects of thiazolidinediones on bone loss and fracture

OBJECTIVE

To examine the evidence regarding the effects of thiazolidinediones on bone loss and fracture.

DATA SOURCES

Published studies assessing the effects of thiazolidinediones on bone and/or fracture risk in humans were selected for review. A MEDLINE (1950-April 2007) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-April 2007) search was performed. Search terms included thiazolidinediones, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, troglitazone, bone, bone mineral density, fracture, and osteoporosis.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The literature search retrieved 5 English-language studies evaluating the effects of thiazolidinediones on bone in humans. These consisted of 2 small, uncontrolled studies using troglitazone; 1 prospective, randomized controlled study and 1 retrospective cohort study using rosiglitazone; and a post hoc analysis of an observational cohort study in subjects taking various thiazolidinediones. All of the studies assessed markers of bone metabolism and/or bone mineral density (BMD). No studies were identified that addressed rate of fractures in subjects taking thiazolidinediones.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The first troglitazone study demonstrated a decrease in levels of bone formation markers (10%; p < 0.05) and resorption markers (12%; p < 0.01), and authors determined that troglitazone produces a protective effect on bone through decreased bone turnover. The second troglitazone study did not demonstrate a significant change in BMD or levels of bone turnover markers. The 2 rosiglitazone studies demonstrated decreases in BMD of 1.19-1.9% with rosiglitazone use (p < 0.05). The post hoc analysis with various thiazolidinediones indicated a 2.5-fold greater decrease in BMD in women reporting thiazolidinedione use.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have assessed the effects of thiazolidinediones on bone in humans. Studies available suggest that treatment with thiazolidinediones, primarily rosiglitazone, contributes to bone loss. The effect appears to be most prominent in postmenopausal women. More studies are needed to better understand the effects of thiazolidinediones on bone and fracture rates.